TO ee each babi Rae a4,
ne Pe WCRI ~ ca
em ) we hehe Doi Se la eh eet portal ny
er a2 f Chey efoedth~h a beeing Oded ap es
Ne ee ed a kt
Sp TBM line tenn Pe ash fan Do fail Han ihr fin ¥P the Ge cathe GYDA Ses PD gO te whi tt
eoesmart
Nee A eas ee
Oe Math ; atnihthot x
Se eater 2
; aioe eee, : sy
eisacuatedinant ties
tat te 5
ay
rt ee ee ee ee ee ee Pmt, me ek lees
ie —_——. — 2. ..-_3 Rare ae ee ee 2 a Leer ee ge eed = Kata ba sibs ans 2 ae
a 2 VS = ‘S ar NESS ie ie = se
) W. SX > oO ‘ th My , O's 2 | 5 \
ME 2 2 $G4G 2 a
- 2 = 2 Uy = 2 ‘e.¥
: > = 7 > @G = > Pie.
z= ” = 79) ee ” Mf
Ai PMITHSONIAN _INSTITUTION NOILOLILSNI_ NVINOSHLIWS $3
7 : = ese
=! = “mt Be 4 WNW 24
a / Oe a \ 4 SS So :
a Oe a per S WS oc
Zz ii ‘i 2 a S a
NOILALILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3IYVYUSIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INS
6 Si S 0 _ 2 ee
ca ow — oo — wm
= A 5 5 ee 2 [Sf
ae > Ee > = 2 > let
= = - 2 ral — oe
= o — pia an. F
Saluyvudit s LIBRARI id ibis eoieltael pNOMLOLILSNI _ NVINOSHLINS, $3 1%
| = = < = < =
a = = a 4 |
oa e) 2 yy QS ZB 2 oY
= z = \S SS edi _ ae
A ae Gian see 5 :
INSTITUTION 1p NOILNLILSNI_ NVINOSHLINS Sa fyYVvug 11 LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN _INS q
We) rr rT) Ff a 2 -
c 2 c = z 4
< = a S Y; J 4 =
oc + &€ & [oa ; fre ve
= fs) ee 3S ay 5 a
J Pa ‘ad z % .
saiIvvyaly _t! BRARIES _MITHSONIAN _INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI ~NVINOSHLIWS “sar
= S) tte S 2 z
7 a ve je —- fa
> ae = = D E LA
te : rm > ; =<
a = = eZ 2 = We
m = m ” - a ‘ee
” = wo = ye = iF
INSTITUTION NOLLALILSNI_ pS tINWYGIT_ LIBRARIES, SMITHSONIAN INSTI
ei 2 ny DB nh a SS
= Be S - g = XN s\
> Z = > = i & =
ARG ” = ” Wie. ae a
ss LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN _ INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS $3
ir Pa) 8 Wa Ww
= oe! na oc 4 Ag ow Ke
Fa <x 4, = < | ie SS <x (5&
sy a 4 ac ¢ \ cc
2 : 5 = 5 yo
he 1 af Zz ~! aye .
INSTITUTION | NOILNLILSNI _NVINOSHLINS 4 IYVUdIT LIBRARI ES ~~ SMITHSONIAN~ INS T
ro) apg ) = 5 BY - | ‘
a oe) . — = Le
5 7 Wa = ms ie Wy, » ~
E “0 A = oa = GL = Ke
NN Si : iW AP 2 X&
= w sh = o 7 S on a
SSIUVUSIT_ULIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNIILSN!_NVINOSHLIWS $3 uy
Wi = = Sues Z i z ey = SONG z vy
; . 4+ /s EN | ye cr tf, > y < a Yyy
Vly, 5 Sr 2M, z KR 5 G2 Kam 1 G
q — ball : _ Y) Se eS ce
NOLLNLILSNI_NVINOSHLINS, Sa IUVUGIT_ LIBRARIES, SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNI
re Py ee as ZG. §
6 x Bh S = BNO Z|
2 SG4e 2 z 2NX 8
2 2G = 2 = Z
| / = > ad = > = >
. oo. Zz 7) z | an 2
LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS
& = w WW
oe . = oc a, XS we a
ee | = o = i a a —4
ee ro) 3 o = o
aul = ot = apne =
NVINOSHLIWS LIBRARIES. SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILN!
os z a Sua z
oO a w —_ My ee) a
ae - if
Aa wa ify Fa
> = > = YA Ee
2 = 2 a OG fr 2 =
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNE NVINOSHLINS sasiuvud I1 LIBRA
” Ze w z 27) : =
X = =< = Wy = = : nee
IW 2 2 7 bi lr * Z 2
‘\ z ie 2,74 fe" E é =
ie > = ~ > = >" =
1 * z 77) Se 0h za (9) = MO
K OILNLILSNI_NVINOSHLINS S3 bYvVddit LIBRARI ES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION -
G ws Fe ts OD ra
ra ft =. we ea oe
. ee = < en. <
2 oc c oc ar cr
2 0 a. oO = 0
: Wash Oo SS iss A a re oO ae
; : a ed : zZ ae 2 3
LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Saiuvudiia LIBRA
2 “00 2 m0 = w
4 a E : = 2
ie = . " E =
. m poly ee. — rm) m
= Ca ee w . £ o
NOILALILSNI NVINOSHLINS SSIYVYSIT LIBRARIES, SMITHSONIAN NOILN
t = Uy = weet op) — w
= = Pe oe eS ie =
S 2 i sp ENS = S a
ss SGee FW 8S 2 S
= 2 “yy = 2 = 2
i Z s > ae = > = a .
* 7) z 7) ee an eae
t IBRARI ES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOINLIISNI_ Sauvage _ LIBR,
ge 5 o = ae =
a = S & S
te eee o = rs) oa o
a al = onl 4 wal 9
NOILALILSN!I NVINOSHLINS S3IYVUIT INSTITUTION NOILA
°; ee rs = S ~ S
“i aa > 2) = ) —
i, > - > ri > =
, = r ai e i =
{ IBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLIWS S3IMVUSIT LIBR,
a. ” Be ie w z n 2" &
i oN STS = ee | eae ee) lee): SS
th Seer elie 4
ANNALS
OF THE
SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
VOLUME 55
PRINTED FOR THE
TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
1969-1970
LIST OF CONTENTS
Page
Hu ey, P. A.
An investigation of the Rajidae of the west and south coasts of southern Africa
(published October 1970) .. mile aie 3g ue hs re Be ee ih
PEnrITH, M.-L.
Apletodon pellegrint (Chabanaud) and other clingfishes ood Gobiesocidae) from
South West Africa (published October 1969) _—«... - she 123
PenritH, M.-L.
The distribution of the fishes of the family Clinidae in southern Africa ee
Wuly 1970) —.. oe ae a =f a ; 135
PEnrRITH, M.-L.
The systematics of the fishes of the family Clinidae in South Africa ea
September 1969) .... ute a rs : I
NEW NAMES PROPOSED IN THIS VOLUME
SUB-GENERA
Blennophis Penrith, 1969 (Clinus, Clinidae), 20
Cirrhibarbis Penrith, 1969 (Clinus, Clinidae), 25
Climacoporus Penrith, 1969 (Clinus, Clinidae), 30
Clinus Penrith, 1969 (Clinus, Clinidae), 32
Fucomimus Penrith, 1969 (Pavoclinus, Clinidae), 72
Labroclinus Penrith, 1969 (Pavoclinus, Clinidae), 74
Muraenoclinus Penrith, 1969 (Clinus, Clinidae), 28
Pavoclinus Penrith, 1969 (Pavoclinus, Clinidae), 76
Smithichthys Penrith, 1969 (Pavoclinus, Clinidae), 85
SPECIES
confundens (Raja) Hulley, 1970, 203
dissimilis (Raja) Hulley, 1970, 199
ravidula (Raja) Hulley, 1970, 196
robertst (Raja) Hulley, 1970, 190
wallace: (Raja) Hulley, 1970, 210
, Ve: hi Ps OH cet as
baa ee Te) eet
)
.
2 -
r
why
j , \ ives
a i
‘ ey
¥
/ '
2
'
‘|
_\
‘o
i
,
5
|
3
¥ ;
y 4
fi.
ve x ty ;
Ty oy a)
ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM
Volume 55 °+#£Band
September 1969 September
Part 1 Deel
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES
OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE
IN SOUTH AFRICA
By
MARY-LOUISE PENRITH
Cape Town Kaapstad
EATHSONT
DEC 9 1969
CiBRARIE2 ‘
The ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
are issued in parts at irregular intervals as material
becomes available
Obtainable from the South African Museum, P.O. Box 61, Cape Town
Die ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM
word uitgegee in dele op ongereelde tye na beskikbaarheid
van stof
Verkrygbaar van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum, Posbus 61, Kaapstad
OUT OF PRINT/UIT DRUK
I, 2(1, 3, 5, 7-8), 3(1-2, 5, t—p.i.), 5(2, 5) 7-9);
6(1, t-—pi.), 7(1, 3), 8, g(1-2), 10(1-3),
11(1-2, 7, t.—p.i.), 21, 24(2), 27, 31(1-3), 38,
44(4).
Price of this part/Prys van hierdie deel
R5.00
Trustees of the South African Museum © _ Trustees van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum
1969
Printed in South Africa by In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur
The Rustica Press, Pty., Ltd. Die Rustica-pers, Edms., Bpk.
Court Road, Wynberg, Cape Courtweg, Wynberg, Kaap
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE
FAMILY CLINIDAE IN SOUTH AFRICA
By
Mary-Louise PENRITH
South African Museum, Cape Town
(With 48 figures)
[MS. received 24 September 1967]
CONTENTS
PAGE
Introduction : , : I
Relationships and eeahention of the fermnily @inidae : : 2
Systematics of the South African Clinidae : ; ; 5 al
Origin of the South African Clinidae ; : ; : LOS
Summary . i 3 ’ : ; : Lys
ec eements ; : 2 ; : : : 5 LTR
References . ; : . s : , : ; 5 150g)
INTRODUCTION
The family Clinidae includes the klipfishes, which are characteristic of the
intertidal pools of the South African coast. Most of the common shore fish
species of the Cape Province belong to this family, which is widely distributed,
with endemic species in each region where it occurs. The relationships between
the clinids of different parts of the world, their zoogeography and possible
origins are important in indicating wider faunal relationships and paths along
which faunal dispersal may have taken place.
‘The present work is a taxonomic revision of the South African Clinidae.
The species were previously split into two groups. The species contained in
one of the groups did appear to be more closely related to each other than to
any of the species in the other group, but the second group seemed to be a
heterogeneous assemblage of species with little in common. Furthermore, the
characters used in defining numerous genera were such as sometimes to create
difficulties in the placing of undescribed species. The generic arrangement
proposed in the present work is based largely on external characters and may
change, pending more detailed osteological studies. It was felt, however, that
at this stage some rearrangement of previous classifications was necessary, and
that a publication containing figures and uniform descriptions of all the species
presently recognized, and all information known of the distribution of those
species, would form a useful basis for future work.
Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 55(1), 1969: 1-121, 48 figs.
24 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Since 1962 the South African Museum has carried out intensive collecting
of intertidal fishes from Mocamedes in southern Angola to Durban. This has
supplied large quantities of material of the common species so that the extent
of variability of characters in those species could be determined, and additional
material of the rarer species has been collected. This has enabled me to examine
fresh (as well as preserved) material of 28 of the 33 species of Clinidae described
below.
RELATIONSHIPS AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE
The Clinidae are a family of blennioid fishes. The blennioid fishes have
been defined by Gosline (1968) as perciform teleosts with the pelvic fins anterior
to the pectorals, and the number of dorsal and posterior soft anal rays cor-
responding exactly with the number of vertebrae between them. The caudal fin
is usually rounded.
The limits of the suborder Blennioidei have been subject to much change
by systematists during the last century. The definitive recent work of Gosline
(1968) has established the position of the Blennioidei among the perciform
fishes, and the limits of the suborder. Other recent reviews of the classification
of blennioid fishes have been published by Hubbs (1952), who revised the classi-
fication of tropical blennioids, and Makushok (1958), who revised the northern
blennioids. The families at present recognized as constituting the suborder
Blennioidei are listed in the comprehensive classification of fishes by Greenwood
et al. (1966), and also by Gosline (1968).
Family CLINIDAE
Diagnosis. Small, weakly-swimming blennioid fishes. Body usually covered with
cycloid scales. Suborbital bony ring weak and flexible. Jaw teeth conical and
fixed, usually in more than one series; vomerine teeth usually present, and
sometimes palatine teeth as well. Lateral line canals on head covered; lateral
line running in upper half of body in front to behind pectoral fin, then curving
down fairly sharply to mid-lateral position. Dorsal fin long, more or less con-
tinuous; first three spines may be separated to varying degree from rest of fin;
more spinous than soft elements. Anal fin long and continuous, with two spines
anteriorly. Pelvic fins with minute spine and two to four rays, jugular in posi-
tion. Dorsal, anal, pectoral, and pelvic rays unbranched. Caudal rays branched
or simple. Pseudobranchiae present. Gill membranes united, forming fold
across throat. Branchiostegal rays six to seven on either side. An upturned, hook-
like process on anterior border of cleithrum present or not.
Distribution. The Clinidae are distributed along both coasts of North, Central
and South America, the West Indies, West Africa, South and South West
Africa, Australia, New Zealand, the East Indies, Japan, the Philippines, and
the Mediterranean. Their greatest representation is in America, the West
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 3
Indies and the temperate waters of South Africa and Australia. They generally
occur in the intertidal zone of the shore or on coral reefs.
Relationships. The work of Hubbs (1952), Makushok (1958), Ford (1959), and
Gosline (1968) confirms the close relationship of the Clinidae, Tripterygidae,
and Blenniidae. Their relationship with other perciform fishes is as yet undeter-
mined (Gosline, 1968; Springer, 1968). The only clinid and blenniid fossils
known are from the Mediterranean Miocene, during which period the genera
known today were probably differentiated. Hubbs (1952) considered that the
Blenniidae diverged early from the other families, since the absence of scales
and the position of the eyes, well forward and high up in the head, indicate that
they have specialized along different lines from the Clinidae and the Triptery-
giidae, and presumably must have required a considerable amount of time to
perfect these specializations. The fossil family Pterygocephalidae, known only
from Eocene deposits, shows a mixture of percoid and blennioid features, and
evidently represents a very early line, but Hubbs (1952) stated that the Ptery-
gocephalidae show certain specializations that would remove them from the
direct line of descent of any of the modern blennioids.
Both the Clinidae and the Tripterygiidae have retained more generalized
features than the Blenntidae, but neither can be said with certainty to be more
primitive than the other. The usually compressed body of the Clinidae is more
typically percoid than the usually depressed body of the Tripterygiidae, but the
‘Tripterygiidae retain more branched fin rays than do the Clinidae, in which
branched caudal rays appear in only a few of the apparently most primitive
members of the family. The Clinidae and the Tripterygiidae have more in
common with each other than either family has with the Blenniidae, and in the
vast majority of earlier works have been treated as a single family. However,
Hubbs (1952), in his key to the families he included in a superfamily Blen-
nioidae, gave some of the features on which the families can be separated, and
they have been treated as separate by later workers, in particular Rosenblatt
(e.g. 1963).
A fairly strong link between the Clinidae and the Blenniidae appears to be
the family Chaenopsidae, which has long been of uncertain position in blen-
nioid classification. It has usually been either partially or completely submerged
in the Clinidae or the Blenniidae. Stephens (1963), revising the Chaenopsidae,
gave them family status. Springer (1964), reviewing Stephens’s work, was not
entirely satisfied that the characters on which Stephens raised the Chaenopsidae
to family status justified such an action. They have features in some ways
intermediate between those of the Clinidae and those of the Blenniidae; they
lack scales, but their affinities appear on the whole to lie more with the Clinidae
than with the Blenniidae (Bohlke, 1957). Springer (1966) continued to treat
them as a separate family in his discussion of Medusablennius chani, and they are
listed as a separate family in the classifications of Greenwood et al. (1966) and
Gosline (1968).
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE
=
i *6G61 ‘9gS61 ‘Sh61 “6261 ‘Aap ‘Po6r ‘tynzng f1961 ‘susydajg {E161 ‘sya
£16r ‘yywurg {661 ‘zi_nyog £Eg6r “9yTeMA 2 NE[Quesoy ‘o661 “eg ‘gS61 ‘uas[O ‘gggI ane (Sei Bi eee ae : ace} an
€sz61 ‘S161 ‘yoorngoy {4661 ‘qpeysreyy £gS6r ‘zitmasnepy fgh61 ‘puvsgapyipy fg&6r ‘orrapy fo061 “szaqyty $66g1 ‘uUeutey £661 “oS61 ‘Lb61
‘hh6r ‘zbGr ‘1€61 ‘szpmMog {0061 ‘ysiepy 2 UULUTIEAq fog61 ‘uosmeq ‘PS61 ‘JeMpyeD ‘oS61 ‘euapey ‘sg61 ‘ueng ‘g6gr1 ‘siogq ‘PE61
‘9c61 ‘ueA-20y, 2 eqoog £1961 ‘uemdeyD 2 WoONvag :syIOM SuIMOT[OF DY} WOIZ spJOIII [LUOTIIPpe YIIAA ‘Sp1ooat winasnyy ysutag pur
winasnyy uvorpy ynog pure £gS61 ‘GS6r “PS61 ‘sasuridg f6P6r ‘yMUg $SS61 “6E61 “SE61 43095 foggr ‘keorqoy ‘6061 ‘go061 ‘yOO]NDOW £9061
‘syivig 2 uepsof fq ‘vSS6x ‘2S61 ‘sqqnyy $6861 ‘ousapy Sgz61 ‘uyyiiy ‘ 1061-g6gr “uyjed ‘0961 ‘uewIIA-[Ty JO syIOM ay} UO ATUTeU paseg
Turua1307d Arr) WV
Sipas apjsaqut + Turdsa1uyyy WV
tprurpodoux §=© QVUIWOSTIQe'T
rurury) TuTUIpeIe Vv
Se) POLS TES jes
way O ipmpyeD =
TUIPOXATA] © . TurWOSLIqe’y]
pe ooS Ni x iprmosuqeyT =]
Gruvfang agit, aqunqny quunfqns aque I, _ agungns
SLL
Os SEL OG Sv ; O Gv O06 SEL
Fic. 1. World distribution of the tribes and subtribes of the family Clinidae.
ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM 5
The relationships within the family Clinidae are not by any means fully
determined. Hubbs (1952) discussed the relationships of the South African
and American Clinidae, but did not include the Australasian, Japanese, and
Mediterranean clinids in his scheme of classification. He divided the Clinidae
into two subfamilies, the Labrisominae and the Clininae. The Clininae are
distinguished from the Labrisominae by the presence of an upturned hooklike
process on the anterior border of the cleithrum. This process is absent in the vast
majority of the Labrisominae, although in two labrisominid species, Mala-
coctenus erdmant Smith and M. aurolineatus Smith, the hook is usually present in
adults (Springer, 1958). The Clininae are further distinguished by the presence
of radii on all scale margins. The scales are usually smaller than those of the
Labrisominae (although exceptional genera without scales occur in both
subfamilies), and the scales are often embedded in the skin.
The Labrisominae occur mainly in the tropical waters of both the Pacific
and the Atlantic American coasts and the West Indies, one species occurs in
Japan, and two species occur in tropical West Africa. The Clininae occur
mainly in the temperate waters of the west coast of America, South Africa, and
Australia, with a few representatives in New Zealand, two in Argentina, and
one in Japan and the Philippines, and the East Indies.
Hubbs (1952) divided the Clininae into two tribes, the Clinidi and the
Myxodidi. It should be noted here that Hubbs used the suffix -idi for tribes
and the suffix -ini for subtribes, but in order to comply with the recommenda-
tion of the International Code for Zoological Nomenclature (1961), the process
is reversed here and henceforth in the present work -ini will denote tribes and
-idi will denote subtribes. Hubbs considered the Myxodini to be the more
primitive group, since they are all oviparous, and the male lacks a penis for
the transmission of sperm to the female. All the American Clininae belong to
this tribe. The Clinini are distinguished by the presence in the male of a fleshy
penis, and the fact that the young are born alive in at least all the species whose
breeding habits are definitely known. All the South African clinids belong to
the Clinini. Hubbs (1952) did not mention the Australian clinids and the
Japanese clinine in his system of classification. Milward (1967) recognized
three genera of Clinidae from Australia, of which two, Cristiceps and Petraites,
are represented in western Australia. Milward found all the western Australian
species, at least, to be live-bearing and to have an intromittent organ in the
male. The Australian Clinidae of the genera Clinus, Petraites, and Cristiceps
are here included in the tribe Clinini. The Japanese species, Petraites flammeus
(Jordan & Starks, 1906), is referable to the Clinini, as it has a well-marked hook
on the cleithrum (Jordan & Starks, 1906), and a delicate intromittent organ
in the male (Dr. V. G. Springer, pers. comm.). The classification of the family
Clinidae is shown in table 1. Their world distribution is shown in figure 1.
Two of the known species of Clinidae do not fit into Hubbs’s scheme of
classification. Clinitrachus argentatus (Risso), the Mediterranean clinid, must for
the time being be regarded as incertae sedis. It lacks a hooklike projection on the
anterior border of the cleithrum, and is oviparous, the male lacking a penis.
6 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
TABLE 1. Classification of the family Clinidae (main arrangement after Hubbs,
1952, 1953a; naming of certain genera modified according to Springer, 1955,
and Bohlke & Springer, 1961; classification of the tribe Clinini new).
Family: CLINIDAE Regan, 1912
Subfamily: LABRISOMINAE Hubbs, 1952
Tribe: NEOCLININI Hubbs, 1953
NEOCLINus Girard, 1858
Tribe: MNIERPINI Hubbs, 1952
MNIERPES Jordan & Evermann, 1896;
DIALOMMUS Gilbert, 1891
Tribe: PARACLININI Hubbs, 1952
STATHMONOTUS Bean, 1885; PARACLINUS Mocquard, 1889;
EXERPES Jordan & Evermann, 1806.
Tribe: STARKSIINI Hubbs, 1952
STARKSIA Jordan & Evermann, 1896
Tribe: CRYPTOTREMINI Hubbs, 1952
ALLoCLINuUsS C.L. Hubbs, 1927; cRYPTOTREMA Gilbert, 1890.
Tribe: LABRISOMINI Hubbs, 1952
Subtribe: CALLICLINIDI Hubbs, 1952
AUCHENIONCHUS Gill, 1860; CALLICLINUS Gill, 1860;
MYERSICHTHYS Hubbs, 1952
Subtribe: LABRISOMIDI Hubbs, 1952
LABRISOMUS Swainson, 1839; MALACOCTENUS Gill, 1860
Subfamily: CLININAE Gill, 1885
Tribe: MYXODINI Hubbs, 1952
MYXODES Cuvier, 1829; HETEROSTICHUS Girard, 1854; GIBBONSIA
Cooper, 1864.
Tribe: CLININI Hubbs, 1952
Subtribe: CLINIDI Hubbs, 1952
cLinus Cuvier, 1817; PAVOCLINUS Smith, 1945; CLINOPORUS
Barnard, 1927; GYNUTOCLINUS Smith, 1945; BLENNIO-
cLinus Gill, 1860; ?PPETRAITEs Ogilby, 1886; cRISTICEPS
Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1836.
Subtribe: XENOPOCLINIDI Hubbs, 1952
XENOPOCLINUS Smith, 1947; CANCELLOxus Smith, 1961.
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 7
Guitel (1893) stated that although Valenciennes (zn Cuvier & Valenciennes,
1836) believed that further examination of this species would result in the male
being found to have a penis, his detailed examination of many specimens
revealed no such structure, the anal papilla always being small. He described
the breeding of this species in some detail; the female lays her eggs among the
fronds of algae before they are fertilized by the male. By the present definition
of the group, the lack of a hook on the cleithrum excludes it from either tribe
of the Clininae, yet it more closely resembles the Clininae than the Labri-
sominae, particularly in the nature of the small embedded scales. It is possible
that, during the long isolation of this species from other members of the Clininae,
the hook on the cleithrum may have been secondarily lost; or that this species
separated from the line leading to the Clininae before the hook had appeared.
Clinus nematopterus Giinther was described from the Sea of China in 1861.
Mr. A. Wheeler of the British Museum of Natural History has kindly examined
the type for me. It fits into the Clininae, having small, embedded scales, a hook
on the anterior border of the pectoral girdle, and a penis. It is known from a
single specimen. Dr. V. G. Springer (pers. comm.) suggests that it is probably
the same as the Japanese and Philippine clinids.
Of the three genera of Clinidae recognized in Australia (Milward, 1967),
Cristiceps is a well-defined genus occurring mainly or only in the Australian
region. Two Argentinian species of Clinidae, ezgenmanni Jordan, 1887 and
argentinus Berg, 1898, were placed in the genus Cristiceps by their original authors.
The descriptions are both very brief, but various points in them suggest that
these two South American species may not be referable to the same genus as the
Australian Cristiceps. However, they are provisionally treated as Clinini in
figure I. |
The Australian species of Clinus and Petraites that I have examined are
externally at least very similar to one another and to the South African species
of the genus Clinus. Both genera have been used for South African and Australian
Clinidae. The validity of the genus Petraites is doubtful. Ogilby (1886) created
the genus Petraites to contain certain Australian species. McCulloch (1908) said
that Petraites cannot be clearly separated from Clinus, as there are several
intermediate forms, but surprisingly went on to say that ‘no good purpose can
be served by uniting the two genera’. It seems unlikely that any good purpose
is served by retaining as separate two genera that are difficult to distinguish
from one another. However, a wider range of Australian material than has at
present been available to me would be necessary to determine whether the
genus Clinus should include both Australian and South African species, and
whether there is any justification for retaining the genus Petraztes. The Japanese
flammeus may belong to an Australian genus or may warrant a genus of its own.
SYSTEMATICS OF THE SouTH AFRICAN CLINIDAE
Maierial and methods. Most of this study is based on the clinid material in the
South African Museum collection. The collection was considerably augmented
8 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
during my study by additions of fresh material collected on the coast from
Swakopmund in South West Africa to Durban. Rotenone poison and hand-nets
were used in the collection of samples. Details of material examined are given
under the description of each species.
Where a syntype series is present in the South African Museum collection,
a specimen in good condition and agreeing with the original description has
been selected and designated as a lectotype.
Measurements were made with needle-point dividers as follows: Standard
length (tip of snout to mid-base of caudal fin); head length (tip of snout to
upper extremity of opercle); depth at anal origin; greatest diameter of orbit;
length of upper jaw (inner edge of premaxilla to upper end of maxilla) ; length
of caudal peduncle (base of last anal ray to mid-base of caudal fin) ; least depth
of caudal peduncle; height of first dorsal spine; height of fourth dorsal spine;
length of portion of fourth dorsal spine free from fin membrane. Head length
was expressed as the number of times the head was contained in the standard
length, as was body depth, and orbit diameter as the number of times it was
contained in the head length, since these measurements were so expressed by
Fic. 2. Disposition of head pore series.
a = mandibular; b = preopercular; c = nasal; d = interorbital; e = suborbital;
f = postorbital; g = supraorbital; h = occipital.
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 9
previous authors; other measurements were expressed as percentage of standard
length or of head length. Head length, body depth, orbit diameter, and caudal
peduncle measurements are given under each description; other measurements
are given where relevant. Counts were made of the number of spines and rays
in the dorsal, anal, pectoral and pelvic fins, by the usual methods; all the fin
rays in all South African Clinidae are undivided. Counts given in parentheses
are modal counts. Vertebral counts of small samples of each species were made
from X-ray photographs. Caudal vertebrae were taken to be those which had a
haemal spine. Counts of the gill-rakers of the outer series on the first arch are
given where possible. The disposition of the head pore series referred to is
shown in figure 2.
Abbreviations used in the lists of material given at the end of each species
description are $S.A.M. (South African Museum) and R.U.C. (Department of
Ichthyology, Rhodes University, Grahamstown).
The localities referred to in the distribution notes for each species are
shown in a map, figure 48, placed at the end of the paper for easy reference.
Subfamily CLININAE Gill, 1885
Diagnosis. Clinidae with an upturned, hook-like process on the anterior edge
of the cleithrum. Scales usually small and embedded, with radii on all margins.
Caudal rays always unbranched. No nuchal cirri.
Tribe CLININI Hubbs, 1952
Diagnosis. Clininae which bear their young alive. Males with a fleshy penis.
Always a cirrus above the anterior nostril. Body scales usually small and
embedded, exceptionally absent. Hook on cleithrum usually well developed,
rarely reduced or absent.
Subtribe CLINIDI Hubbs, 1952
Diagnosis. Clinini with head compressed, eyes lateral. Pelvic rays free from
membrane for greater part of length. Hook on anterior border of cleithrum
well developed.
ENstorical discussion of the classification of the South African Clinini
Various attempts have been made to classify the South African Clinini.
Valenciennes (zn Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1836), who described many of the
species, placed all the South African species that he described, as well as
Blennius superciliosus Linnaeus, in the genus Clinus Cuvier, with the exception
of capensis, for which Cuvier (1817) had erected the genus Cirrhibarbis, dis-
tinguished from Clinus by the presence of barbels on the chin and snout.
Swainson (1839) erected various genera of Clinidae, besides recognizing
Cuvier’s genera Clinus and Cirrhibarbis. Besides those two genera, three of
Swainson’s genera (Clinitrachus, Blennophis, and Labrisomus) contained South
IO ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
African species. He used body form and form of the dorsal fin (whether raised
anteriorly to form a crest or not), as well as dentition, in the definition of his
genera. He included two South African species, latipennis Valenciennes and
brachycephalus Valenciennes (= linearis Swainson) in the genus Labrisomus,
whose representatives are now included in a different subfamily from the South
African forms (table 1).
Gill (1860) discussed Swainson’s division of Cuvier’s genus Clinus. He
regarded Clinus and Clinitrachus as congeneric, as he considered the presence or
absence of a dorsal crest to be insufficient grounds for generic separation, but
Blennophis he considered valid. He removed from the genus Labrisomus most of
the species placed in it by Swainson (1839), including Jatipennis and brachy-
cephalus, erecting the genera Ophthalmolophus for the former and Blennioclinus for
the latter. He stated that, while latipennis and brachycephalus were related, the
former could be distinguished by the presence of supraorbital tentacles.
Swain (1882), in reviewing Swainson’s (1839) work, followed Gill (1860)
in synonymising Clinitrachus with Clinus, and considered Blennophis and Labrisomus
to be subgenera of Clinus. He made little attempt to sort out exactly which
species should be placed in each genus or subgenus, being chiefly concerned
with the validity or otherwise of Swainson’s proposed generic names.
The earlier South African workers, Gilchrist & Thompson (1908) and
Barnard (1927), disregarded most of the clinid genera then available, and
placed the majority of the South African species in the genus Clinus as defined
by Cuvier (1817). Gilchrist & Thompson (1908) placed one species, mentalis
Gilchrist & Thompson, in the genus Cristiceps Valenciennes on account of its
completely separate dorsal crest. Several of the other species, notably mus
Gilchrist & Thompson and laurentii Gilchrist & Thompson, also with completely
separate dorsal crests and otherwise rather similar to mentalis, were retained in
the genus Clinus. Cristiceps is an Australian genus with distinctive characters not
found in any of the South African species. In their introductory discussion,
Gilchrist & Thompson (1908: 98) also suggested that the generic name Clinoides
be used for the non-crested species, but did not use the name in their systematic
discussions.
Barnard (1927) transferred mentalis to another Australian genus, Petraites
Ogilby, and with it laurentsz, but Petraites is characterized by the presence of a
supraorbital tentacle, lacking in both mentalis and laurentii. Barnard (1927) also
described a new genus, Clinoporus, for Clinus biporosus Gilchrist & Thompson,
which lacks scales and has a peculiar lateral line very different from that of the
other clinids. In 1935 he described the species navalis and placed it in a new
genus Climacoporus, based on lateral line differences.
Smith (1945) revised the South African Clinidae and divided the group
into two subfamilies (Clininae and Myxodinae), distinguished only by the
presence or absence of a supraorbital tentacle. Among the 15 genera, seven
of them monospecific, which he recognized, nine were old genera: Clinus,
Cirrhibarbis, Blennophis, Ophthalmolophus, FPetraites, Blennioclinus, Clinoporus,
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE II
Climacoporus, and Myxodes Cuvier. Of these Myxodes had been used previously
only for South American species; the inclusion in it by Smith of the South
African live-bearing species fucorum Gilchrist & Thompson was later pointed
out to be an error (Hubbs, 1952). In addition to the above genera, Smith
described six new genera: Muraenoclinus, Blenniomimus, Fucomimus, Pavoclinus,
Labroclinus, and Gynutoclinus, four of which are monospecific.
Hubbs (1952), in a revision of the higher taxonomic categories of the
Clinidae, accepted Smith’s (1945) division of the South African species, but
reduced Smith’s subfamilies to the level of subtribes of the Clinini, which
includes all the South African species (see table 1). Hubbs named them the
‘Clinini’ and the ‘Blennioclinini’, any form of the name Myxodes being unaccept-
able for South African species. He pointed out that the South African species
fucorum, which Smith placed in the genus Myxodes on dental characters, could
not be a Myxodes on account of the penis in the male and the fact that the young
are born alive. Hubbs created a new genus, Smithichthys, for fucorum, revived
Swainson’s (1839) genus Clinitrachus for the species superciliosus Linnaeus and
robustus Gilchrist & Thompson, and used the name Clinus for the species placed
by Smith (1945) in the genus Ophthalmolophus. Apart from the changes in the
nomenclature of the genera and the lowering of the two subfamilies to the
status of subtribes, he did nothing to alter Smith’s system of classification.
Smith (1966) pointed out that the genus Clinitrachus is applicable to the
oviparous Mediterranean clinid argentatus Risso by type designation by Swainson
(1839), and created a new genus, Caboclinus, for superciliosus and robustus.
From the above it can be seen that the only definitive attempt to group the
South African Clinidae above the species level was Smith’s (1945) revision.
The major objection to this classification is his union of the non-tentacled
species into one group. The genera Blennioclinus, Gynutoclinus, and Clinoporus
have little in common with the other ‘Blennioclinini’’ or with each other apart
from the lack of a supraorbital tentacle in all except Gynutoclinus, which has a
supraorbital papilla.
A potentially useful contribution to South African clinid taxonomy was
made by Jackson (1950), but this unfortunately has remained unpublished, in
thesis form. Jackson examined the South African Clinidae and concluded that
to separate groups of species at a higher level than the generic one was incorrect.
He placed the species with a supraorbital tentacle in one genus, Clinus, having
the subgenera Clinus, Blennophis, Petraites, Ophthalmolophus, Cirrhibarbis and
Climacoporus. Most of the species lacking a supraorbital tentacle he placed in
another genus, Myxodes (this work was, of course, done prior to Hubbs’ 1952
study), having subgenera Myxodes, Blennioclinus and Labroclinus. He left Clino-
porus and Gynutoclinus, both monospecific and rare, with full generic value,
mainly (he stated) owing to lack of material for study.
Jackson’s scheme is one which, with several important modifications,
appears to me to give a more valid interpretation of the evolutionary history
of the group than any of the others. He distinguished his genera Clinus and
I2 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Myxodes on the presence or absence of a supraorbital tentacle and the relative
size of the mouth. Clinus was defined as having a tentacle over the eye and a
large mouth with powerful jaws, while Myxodes lacked a supraorbital tentacle
and had a small mouth with weak, narrow jaws.
I have made measurements of the upper jaw of samples of all the South
African species of Clinini, and the results are shown in a diagram (figure 3).
The statistical method used in preparing the diagram was that described by
Hubbs (1952); details of the method are given in the legend to the figure.
OR tse 1 Clinus anguillaris
2 Clinus striatus
3 Clinus capensis
4 Clinus dorsalis
Ra ee se 5 Clinus navalis
6 Clinus acuminatus
__ cme linus. agilis
el. 8 Clinus berrisfordi
Millis carey 9 Clinus brevicristatus
___ Clint cottoes aaa
Sue Lo ete 11 Clinus helenae
aieka Sieh, SETH ene 12 Clinus latipennis
BOOM NES] (ome sr Trade es,
13. Clinus heterodon
14 Clinus robustus
oO 2 15 Clinus superciliosus
16 Clinus taurus
Le come rs ocaieiis
‘Leaps 18 Clinus Woodi
AS ie MD IARG e cey ante tras
20 Pavoclinus graminis
21 Pavoclinus laurentii
2 ee 22 Pavoclinus litorafontis
| 23 Pavoclinus mentalis
ERA 24 Pavoclinus pavo
| 25 Pavoclinus profundus
26 Pavoclinus fucorum
_ oes 27 Blennioclinus brachycephalus
28 Blennioclinus stella
hay On | dee: 29 Clinoporus biporosus
sae es 30 Gynutoclinus rotundifrons
Se | Ee ee eee
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
°lo of head length
Fic. 3. Comparison of upper jaw lengths of the South African species of Clinini.
The method of representation is that used by Hubbs (1952) for comparative morphological
studies. In each diagram the base line represents the range of measurements recorded for the
sample, the upright line represents the mean, the open area represents the standard deviation
on either side of the mean, and the solid area represents two standard errors on either side of
the mean.
Samples of 25 specimens covering the full size range available were used where possible.
Where fewer than 25 specimens were available, all specimens were used. For species of which
fewer than 10 specimens were available, only the range and the mean are given. A full set of
data is given in Appendix A.
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 13
All the species that have a fringed supraorbital tentacle (numbers 1-18
in figure 3) have an upper jaw averaging more than 40% of the head length
in the specimens examined (which usually covered a reasonably wide size
range). Most of the species included in Jackson’s Myxodes (numbers 19-28 in
figure 3) have the upper jaw averaging less than 40% of the head length. How-
ever, the difference between the lower limits of the ranges of one group and the
upper limits of the ranges of the other group is to my mind too small to be of
much use as a definitive generic character; the overlap would render deter-
mination difficult in the case of individual specimens. There is clearly a ten-
dency for the species with fringed supraorbital tentacles (genus Clinus) to have
larger mouths than most of the other species, and this is certainly of importance
in uniting the group, although it would apparently be of little use in placing
individuals in one group or the other.
Jackson suggested that ecological considerations should be taken into
account in attempting to classify the South African Clinidae. He stated that,
while his Clinus species frequented rocky crevices and stony pools, his Myxodes
species lived in seaweed. All the species that he included in Myxodes other than
those belonging to his subgenus Blennioclinus do live in seaweed, and are modified
in body form and colour for this habitat. However, Clinus brevicristatus Gilchrist
& Thompson, a rare tentacled clinid not different from the other species of
Clinus in body form or type of colour pattern, is usually taken in seaweed
together with the seaweed dwellers of Jackson’s genus Myxodes. The occurrence
of C’. brevicristatus in seaweed, as well as other tentacled clinids on occasions,
indicates that the habitat in which any individual specimen may have been
collected is not necessarily an indication of its relationships. However, the sug-
gestion by Inger (1958) that species united by resemblance and phylogenetic
considerations will usually be adapted for the same type of habitat is in general
true of the South African Clinidae.
There are relatively few characters that can be used to differentiate
between the South African members of the Clinini above the species level,
since this group is fairly homogeneous in most respects, and many features are
common to the group as a whole. I have divided the group into five genera,
somewhat unevenly, on external characters. Two are large genera, containing
between them 26 of the 30 recognized species of Clinidi. Subgenera have been
used in these two genera to denote pairs or groups of species which appear to be
more Closely related to each other than to the other species in the genus. Of the
other three genera, two are monospecific and rare, and the third contains two
species. The five genera are compared in table 2.
Key to the genera of the South African Clinidi
1. Body covered with small scales
Body without scales ..
_ ee.
we ae Clinoporus
2. A tentacle or minute papilla over the eye Be oe a ae a Se ea:
No tentacle or papilla over the eye un e e on a ue liens
14. ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
3g. A minute, simple papilla over the eye We Br ie uw a Gynutoclinus
A fringed or branched tentacle over the eye a ae Clinus
4. Posteriormost dorsal spine much shorter than first aoa soft eve a dees notch in the
margin of the dorsal fin before the soft rays at ie Blennioclinus
Posteriormost dorsal spine almost equal to first dorsal soft Sere ; no deep notch in the
margin of the dorsal fin before the soft rays ye Be Ae oe .. Pavoclinus
Genus CLINUS Cuvier, 1817
Clinus Cuvier, 1817: 173 (type-species Blennius acuminatus Bloch & Schneider, by subsequent
designation by Swainson, 1839: 75).
Cirrhibarbis Cuvier, 1817: 174 (type-species Cirrhibarbis capensis Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valen-
ciennes, by monotypy).
Blennophis Swainson, 1839: 75 (type-species Clinus anguillaris Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valen-
ciennes, by monotypy).
Ophthalmolophus Gill, 1860: 104. (type-species Clinus latipennis Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valen-
ciennes, by monotypy).
Climacoporus Barnard, 1935: 646 (type-species Climacoporus navalis Barnard, by monotypy).
Muraenoclinus Smith, 1945: 538 (type-species Clinus dorsalis Castelnau, by monotypy).
Blenniomimus Smith, 1945: 538 (type-species Clinus taurus Gilchrist & Thompson, by original
designation).
Caboclinus Smith, 1966: 73 (type-species Clinus robustus Gilchrist & Thompson, by original
designation).
Diagnosis. A distally flattened, at least bifid tentacle over eye. Lateral line
usually of double pores and/or single pores opening above and below line ante-
riorly; posterior to post-pectoral curve usually of short separate horizontal
tubes with a pore at either end. Intromittent organ of male usually consists of
fairly long basal portion with small tip retractile between one or two pairs of
fleshy lips. Body covered with small embedded cycloid scales. 'Two bands of
villiform teeth in each jaw, outer row larger. Vomer always toothed. Upper
jaw averages more than 40% head length. Body moderately robust. Caudal
peduncle short.
Note on the type-species of Clinus
The problem of the type-species of Clinus is discussed by Hubbs (1952) and
Smith (1966). Blennius superciliosus Linnaeus was generally regarded as the type-
species of the genus, and was so designated by Swain (1882), because it is
evident from the expanded description of the genus by Valenciennes (in Cuvier
& Valenciennes, 1836) that the description was based chiefly on specimens of
superciliosus. However, Swainson’s (1839) arbitrary designation of acuminatus
Bloch & Schneider as the type-species of Clinus must stand according to the
rules of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (1961), Article
~ 69(a) (iii).
Discussion
Most of the 18 species of the genus Clinus are small and occur almost
exclusively in the intertidal zone; a few extend into deeper water, and a few
reach a fairly large size (150-350 mm). Most species live in rock-pools among
LS
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE
oejided uo uedO
poms
quosolg
jenbs ynoqy
yuosqyy
possorduroos ATy stp]
yisus] prsy
ov uvy} doy
poyivoysus ‘]yeus
dy {suo j1ed jeseg
‘pus yove 3e
orod YIM saqny
[eiuozi10y 1410Ys
jo ased s0119;s0d
¢Ayyetpour surusdo
g]8uIs sarod 1o112;0y
suiddry]
-IZAO OU ‘OINUITL
eyided
a] dunts ‘aynuryy
snurjs0jnudy)
ysny usdO
OUTS
yuosqy
jenbo ynoqy
yuosqy
QYI[-[99 “IsNqorYy,
Yysue]
pesy %oP uvy} ssavy
poyleoysua
you ‘{[eus
dij ‘suoy j1ed jeseg
ynoysno1y}
Ajse[NSIIIT MOTIQ
JO 2Aoqe sutusdo
osrey AIOA sarod
yuosqy
quosqy
snsogoury’)
ysny uedO
¥0U$
yuosqy
Ja}10Ys YONI,
juasolg
deIIpOp[
Yisu9s]
pesy %Sv—o&
peyieoysua
‘lopusys ‘suoT
dy fo;e19pour
0} JA0ys j1ed [eseg
‘puo
yous ye o10d YIM
soqn} [e,u0ZzII0Y
yro0ys jo yAed
Jo1193sod fajqnop
saiod 1o11ajuy
suiddey]
-I19A0 JOU ‘oINUTYT
yuosqy
snurjsouualg
ysny usdO
Suo]/91219poyy
quosoig
jenbo jnoqy
yuasqVy
possezdui09
ATYSIy 0} 91e19pojy
ysuey peoy %ovr
ULY} SSI] SASVIBAV
sutpnsjoid ‘osiey]
di) {9}v19pout
0} [[ews Javed [eseg
pus yore jz
910d yiIM soqny
jeuozts0y 110ys
jo yaed s0119}sod
‘MOTOq pue
aAoqe 10 AT[erpaut
suruodo ‘apduts
saiod 10119}0y
surddey]
-I9AO U91JO
‘QINUIU IO [[eVWS
yuosqy
snuns00vg
seyided
uo Jo ysny uedOQ
OS
quosqe Ayyensp)
jenbs jnoqy
juosoid us1IO
DI]-[99 sous
*jsNnqOl 0} 9}e19pPOP[
yisus] peoy %ov
UCY} IIOUL SISVIZAY
jou JO poy}esysua
‘pews ATTensn
dy {suo 0}
oye1spow jied [eseg
puo yous 7e
o10d YIM saqn}y
[e}uoz110y 1210ys
jo Aypensn y1ed
Jotsaisod £ Mojaq
Jo aAoqez Sutusdo
‘Q]SUIS JI 9,]qQnop
uayjo sarod 10119juVy
suiddey|
-I2AO SOUIT]IULOS
‘QINUIUL IO [[BUIS
poyouviq pue
peusepy ATTeIsid
EEO)
‘IpIUl[D jo vous uvoUpy YINOG oY Jo UOsIIeduIO- *% ATAV,],
ee
uo sozod snonyy
gpunped [epneyn
soueIquioul
ul] UI SMOpUIM,
yusoNysuvL I,
Awl [ess1op 1sIy
Joutds [esiop 4sv'T
sourds [esiop
UO TIIID JO s19}sNI[D
w10} Apog
Mef sodd¢
uvsd1O
7U9}} TWO TUT
oui [e191e'T
saTZoG
9joR1ua1
ye1qiovsdng
s1ojoeIeYyy)
16 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
stones and in crevices, although many species frequently hunt in sea-weeds
as well, and one species habitually occurs in beds of the green alga Caulerpa;
none, however, are particularly modified or coloured for weed-dwelling (see
Pavoclinus). They are well camouflaged and able to change colour and pattern
almost instantaneously, although there is generally a basic pattern of pigmenta-
tion that may last for a considerable time after preservation. This pattern may
be of blotches or cross-bars, and there is almost invariably an ocellate spot on
the shoulder, anterior fin spines, or opercle. The species are entirely carni-
vorous, but the diet is very varied, both between and within species. There is a
tendency in many species to develop a notch in the membrane joining the third
and fourth dorsal spines. The first three dorsal spines are often elevated to form
a crest; this is considered to be a primitive feature in the family Clinidae (Hubbs,
19530). In C. superciliosus, which has a very well developed crest, the height of
the crest shows sexual dimorphism. The other species show little or no sexual
dimorphism other than the development of a penis in the male.
An examination of the gonads of many individuals of several species of
this genus suggests that, while parasitism of the ovaries by trematodes occurs
to a varying degree, the testes of the males are normally not affected.
Jackson (1950) divided Clinus into subgenera which, with one exception,
corresponded with Smith’s (1945) genera. In attempting to group the 18 species
contained in the genus Clinus as defined above, one is confronted with the
difficulty of deciding on a method that will reflect the natural relationships of
the species within the genus. This is a problem, because there is an indication
of development along at least two major and several minor lines within the
genus. Most of the species form a more or less generalized group in which each
minor line of development is represented by a range rather than a cluster of
species.
It is proposed to use five subgenera, one of which contains a large number
of generalized species. The other four are believed to represent particular lines
of development and are easily defined; they appear to be more closely related to
each other than to the more generalized species.
Clinus navalis, C’. dorsalis, C’. anguillaris, C. striatus, and C. capensis, previously
distributed among the genera Climacoporus, Muraenoclinus, Blennophis, and
Cirrhibarbis are all rather elongate, eel-like species. Smith (1945) separated them
from each other generically for the following reasons: (1) Clinus navalis has only
one dorsal soft ray, and the lateral line pores are double for most of the length of
the line, sometimes the whole length; it was placed in the genus Climacoporus
by Barnard (1935) and retained in that genus by Smith (1945). (2) C. dorsalis
has only one dorsal soft ray, and the lateral line is of the usual type posterior to
the post-pectoral curve (i.e. of short horizontal tubes with a pore at either end) ;
Smith (1945) placed it alone in the genus Muraenoclinus. (3) C. anguillans and
C. striatus have 2-4 dorsal soft rays and scaly cheeks, and were placed in the
genus Blennophis. (4) C’. capensis has barbels on the chin and snout, and scaly
cheeks, and was placed in the genus Cirrhibarbis.
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 17
C. anguillaris and C’.. striatus are the two most eel-like species. They have
small scales on the cheeks as well as on the bases of the dorsal, anal and caudal
fins. They are very alike and form a distinct pair of species; it is proposed to
show their relationship by placing them together in a subgenus Blennophis.
C. capensis cannot be confused with any other species, on account of the
barbels on the chin and snout. In some families, e.g. Brotulidae, this feature is
considered sufficient grounds for generic distinction. Springer (1954) included
one species with a chin barbel in the clinid genus Paraclinus, whose members are
otherwise without facial barbels. In view of the fact that C. capensis resembles
Fic. 4. Distribution of C. anguillaris (open circles), C. striatus (closed circles), C. capensis (closed
triangles), C. dorsalis (open squares), C. navalis (closed squares), C. acuminatus (open triangles).
the other species of Clinus in all other respects, having the same type of supra-
orbital tentacle, lateral line, and intromittent organ, it seems preferable to
treat this species as a member of the genus Clinus. Since, however, it is set apart |
from the others by the facial barbels, it may be placed in a subgenus Cirrhi-
barbis.
The lateral line of C. navalis appears to be of the same type as that found in
the other species of Clinus, but the pores continue double for a varying distance
behind the post-pectoral curve, often along the whole length of the lateral line.
18 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
As in C. dorsalis, there is one soft ray in the dorsal fin, and the cheeks are naked,
as in the majority of species. The supraorbital tentacle is similar in C. navalis and
C. dorsalis. It is very difficult to distinguish between juvenile specimens of these
two species except on fin counts. However, since C. dorsalis differs from C. navalis
in being a far more elongate species, with 19 precaudal vertebrae as opposed to
15 in C. navalis, and has virtually all the sensory pores of the head and lateral line
system single, while in C. navalis most of the sensory pores are double, and finally,
in view of the unusual form of the intromittent organ in C. navalis, Muraeno-
clinus and Climacoporus are maintained as subgenera.
The remaining 13 species constitute the subgenus Clinus.
C. taurus and C. cottoides were placed in a genus Blenniomimus by Smith
(1945) because both species have a bony ridge over the eye, which makes the
interorbital appear concave instead of flat. The ridge is by no means striking
in small specimens of C. cottoides; and it is slightly developed in C’. latipennis and
C. helenae, which Smith placed in the genus Ophthalmolophus. C. taurus and C. cot-
toides should therefore not be separated generically or even subgenerically from
the other species, since they, particularly C. taurus, represent the extreme of the
range of development of a particular feature. The bony ridge is furthermore a
feature which in some species becomes more pronounced with age; in C. heterodon
there is no sign of a meee) in small specimens, but it may be very pronounced in
large ones.
C. superciliosus, C.. Pinan C. brevicristatus and C. woodi were previously
separated from the other tentacled species because the first three dorsal spines
were higher than the succeeding ones, forming a crest. C. superciliosus and C.
robustus were placed in the genus Clinus in a restricted sense, because they have
a notch in the membrane between the third and fourth dorsal spines less than
50% of the height of the fourth spine. The two species were subsequently
transferred first to Clinitrachus, by Hubbs (1952), and then to Caboclinus, by
Smith (1966). |
C. brevicristatus and C. wood: were placed in the genus Petraites. Species of
this genus have a notch in the fin membrane between the third and fourth
dorsal spines more than 50% of the length of the fourth spine (McCulloch,
1908), although Smith (1945) stated that the notch is complete in Petraites,
and the membrane from the third spine barely reaches the base of the fourth
spine. McCulloch (1908) stated that the two genera Clinus and Petraites are
barely distinguishable from one another, and this is certainly true of the South
African species involved, since C. superciliosus resembles C’. woodi more closely
than it does C. robustus, and C. brevicristatus is as close to forms such as C. agilis,
C. venustris, and C. cottoides as it is to C. woodt. In C. superciliosus the depth of the
notch varies from o—100% of the fourth spine, but is generally 40-60% (see
table 3). C. robustus has an extremely shallow notch. In C. woodi the membrane
from the third spine barely reaches the base of the fourth spine. In C. brevi-
cristatus the notch varies from 25-100% of the fourth spine but is usually 50-
75%, and only rarely 100%. The crest is high and triangular in C. woodi and
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 19
particularly in mature male specimens of C’. superciliosus, and is very low, scarcely
elevated, in C. robustus and C. brevicristatus. Among the other species, C. agilis
and C’.. taurus have a notch in the membrane between the third and fourth
spines but the first three spines are not elevated, and C. venustris often has the
second and third dorsal spines somewhat elevated. There is a range of crest
and notch development in this genus, and it is thus impossible to base generic
distinctions on these features. It is often difficult to decide whether individual
specimens of C. robustus and C. brevicristatus have a crest at all, while in other
individuals it is quite marked. It is also possible that the crest has been developed
or reduced separately in the various species, and that its presence does not
indicate close affinity. There are no other features to suggest a closer affinity
amongst all the crested species than amongst crested and non-crested species.
The five species previously contained in the genus Ophthalmolophus were
apparently placed there because they lacked any of the structures that distin-
guished the other genera, although in fact indications of those structures appear
in the various members of this group of species. As noted above, C. latipennis
and C. helenae show signs of a bony ridge over the eye, and may in that feature
represent stages approaching the condition seen in C. taurus and C’. cottoides, so
that the classification should in some way relate these species. C. agilis, with a
notch between the third and fourth dorsal spines, is too similar to C. brevi-
cristatus on the one hand, with a deeper notch and the first three dorsal spines
slightly elevated, and to species such as C’. acuminatus on the other hand, with no
notch or crest, to be separated even subgenerically from either. C. venustris shows
rudiments of a crest (the second and third dorsal spines are sometimes higher
than the others), but this is not sufficiently marked in every individual for the
species to be defined as having a crest. Apart from these variations of the dorsal
fin, the 13 species placed in the subgenus Clinus are united by so many common
features and are often so hard to distinguish from one another that any attempt
at separation into subgenera would be unwarranted.
I believe that while the subgenera used do represent different lines of
evolution within the genus Clinus, the species contained in the genus as a whole
form a well-defined group that are more closely related to each other than to
any other clinid species. However, should another worker wish to separate the
eel-like subgenera Blennophis, Cirrhibarbis, Muraenoclinus and Climacoporus from
the subgenus Clinus and place them in a separate genus or separate genera, there
would be little reason for serious objection to such an arrangement.
Distribution of the genus Clinus
In South Africa Clinus occurs in temperate waters. Three species (C. navalis,
C’. helenae, C’. woodi) are confined to the waters north-east of Cape Agulhas; most
of the species are restricted to the coast south of the Kei River (figs 4, 11, 19).
Only one species (C. woodi) is known to extend north of Durban to Inhambane,
where it is rare, and it does not reach the tropical waters north of that point.
On the north-west coast, two species (C. superciliosus and C. heterodon) extend
20 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
into the tropics north of Walvis Bay, but as the coast in that region is under the
influence of the cold Benguela current, conditions of water temperature and
fauna are not markedly tropical. The genus Clinus includes all the common species
of the Cape coast west of the Cape Peninsula. Twelve of the 18 species have been
recorded from the waters west of Cape Point, only one of these (C. cottoides)
being common north-east of Algoa Bay. The other five species are fairly rare
throughout the South African coastal region. It seems that this genus has its
greatest distribution in the colder regions of the South African coast.
Range. Rocky Point (18°59’S., 12°29’E) (South West Africa) to Inhambane
(23°51'S., 35°29 E) (Mozambique).
Key to the subgenera of Clinus
1. Scales on the cheeks .. op be be oa i a in i ve 22
No scales on the cheeks a weal, 23
2. Barbels on chin and snout Be 3 ae ia MM re Cirrhibarbis
(1 species, capensis)
No barbels on chin or snout = 5 3 He a ae Blennophis
(2 species)
3. One dorsal soft ray a
More than one dorsal soft ra ad a x5 sae ae + ye Clinus
(13 species)
4. More than 40 dorsal spines; most sensory pores single .. Be se: Muraenoclinus
(1 species, dorsalis)
Fewer than 40 dorsal spines; most sensory pores double I ia Climacoporus
(1 species, navalis)
Subgenus Blennophis Swainson, 1839
Blennophis Swainson, 1839: 75 (type-species Clinus anguillaris Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valen-
ciennes)
Diagnosis. Elongate eel-like clinids with small scales on cheek and dorsal, anal
and caudal fin bases, as well as over general body surface. Body robust. Dorsal
fin low, even. No cirri at dorsal spine tips. No barbels on chin or snout. Dorsal
soft rays 2-4.
Remarks. ‘Two species, one common only west of Cape Point, the other rare
throughout its range, but encountered more frequently east of Cape Point.
Both reach a large size and occur infratidally as well as in intertidal rock
pools.
Key to the species of Blennophis
1. Inner pelvic ray stout, equal in length to other two; dorsal spines 46 or more, anal rays
33 ormore .. me oe ae ve oe aM ou ae Be Clinus
(Blennophis) anguillaris
Inner (third) pelvic ray minute or absent; dorsal spines 45 or fewer, anal rays 31 or
fewer .. les », Be bd be, ait vy! Clinus (Blennophis) striatus
2I
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE
oO
G
L
(0) I v 8
0) 6 L vs
Oo L v lf
O O Co) O
oO O oO 0)
re gI 61 LS
%0o1 °% 66-06 % 69-08 %6L—oL 69-09
‘yojou jo yjdop aejnonsed v Suravy o[dures yore wio.1y suoutoads Jo Jaquinu juesoidedr ssoquinu 9y, J,
I
oO
ov
°/, 6G—0S
oO
Cr
°/, 6b-ob
GI
°/, 66-08
re
(0)
6
% 6-02
=
O
O
O
O
% 61-01
% 6-0
snanpy snui’)
sys snuy)
$njojs14910a1q
HO)
sngsngos snuary
¢poom snurj’y
snsoyiosaqns
STD)
sotvedg
‘(sueiquisut wos; daay ouTds [esIop YyIINO}J Jo % se possoidxa) sourds [esIop YANO} puv pAry} UsIMJaq sUBIqUISUT UT YI}0U JO yidoq °& a1aVv,],
22 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Clinus (Blennophis) anguillaris Valenciennes in
Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1836
(Fig. 5)
Blennius rubescens Lichtenstein, 1823: 117 (nomen oblitum).
Clinus anguillaris Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1836: 390. Gilchrist & Thompson,
1908: 133. Barnard, 1927: 862.
Blennophis anguillaris : Swainson, 1839: 75. Smith, 1945: 539, 1949: 352, pl. 78 fig. 980.
Blennophis rubescens : Smith, 1962: 40.
Description. D. XLVI-L (XLVIII-L) 2-4 (3-4); A. IT 33-37; P. 13-14 (13);
V. 13; C. 13. Gill-rakers in outer series on first arch 2-3 + 5-7. Vertebrae
18 + 38-40. Dorsal fin long, low, even. No clusters of cirri on dorsal spine tips.
Pectoral fin rounded. Inner pelvic ray well developed, stout, equal to others.
Caudal peduncle very short, length 15-5-25°% head length, depth 28-5-35:5%
head length. Caudal fin short, sub-truncate.
Body elongate, robust, eel-like, with small embedded scales extending on to
caudal, dorsal, and anal fin bases, upper edge of opercle, and cheeks. Depth
6—7-75 in standard length. Head bluntly wedge-shaped, 4:75-5:75 in standard
length. Eye 3°25-5 in head, relative size of eye decreasing with increase in
(ii) lateral
(i) ventral
GS)
(iii) anterior
(c)
Steeda phil rg eww WU, OT CNY Oy
aT Onan Wang, : ~
(b) (d) en
Fic. 5. Clinus (Blennophis) anguillaris: (a) Lateral view, male, 99 mm, S.A.M. 24206; (b) Head
pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 23
standard length of fish. Orbital tentacle prominent, with flat stalk and fine
fringe of cirri at tip. Cirrus on anterior nostril elongate, simple, with serrated
edges. Upper jaw 38-42°5% head length. Lips thick. Vomer toothed. Sensory
pores of head single in nasal, interorbital, occipital and supraorbital series,
mainly single in mandibular and preopercular series, first pore of mandibular
and last pore of preopercular series double; postorbital and suborbital series
mostly of paired pores (fig. 5 (b)).
Lateral line mostly of vertical pairs of pores in front to post-pectoral curve,
then of short separate horizontal tubes with pore at either end (fig. 5 (d)).
Intromittent organ of male with moderate basal portion and single pair of oval
dorso-lateral lips (fig. 5 (c)).
Colouring. Variable, reddish to dark maroon, or pink with reddish blotches.
Fins red- or white-tipped. Sometimes light-edged, dark ocellus on shoulder,
always present in juveniles. Often two dark radiating bars from eye across
cheek. Snout white in large, dark-red specimens. Plain buff or pinkish preserved
in alcohol. :
Location of type material. Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris.
Material examined. 36 specimens, 65-278 mm in standard length. 2 from ‘Rade
du Cap’, Paris Museum Cat. Nos. A. 2079 & 6341 (syntypes); 11 from Liide-
ritzbucht, S.A.M. 24208; 1 from Gert du Toit Bay, southern Namaqualand,
S.A.M. 24019; 4 from Doring Bay, southern Namaqualand, S$.A.M. 24020;
2 from Lambert’s Bay, S.A.M. 23887, S.A.M. 24010; 1 from Kommetjie, Cape
Peninsula, S.A.M. 23874; 9 from St. James, False Bay, S.A.M. 10526, S.A.M.
13721; 2 from Dalebrook, False Bay, S.A.M. 21538, S.A.M. 21539; 1 from
Still Bay, S.A.M. 25059; 1 from East London, 8.A.M. 19745; 2, no locality,
S.A.M. 21708, S.A.M. 21709.
Remarks. The scales on the head in this and the related species, Clinus (Blen-
nophis) striatus, might possibly be primitive characters, as also the degree of
development of the inner pelvic ray of C. anguillaris.
Nomenclature. Smith (1962) pointed out that Lichtenstein’s (1823) description
of Blennius rubescens from the Cape of Good Hope fits Clinus anguillaris. However,
the name anguillaris has been used for the present species since 1836, while
Lichtenstein’s name had not been used for well over a hundred years until
Smith revived it in 1962. According to the International Code of Zoological
Nomenclature (1961), Article 23(b), unless the International Commission
should decide otherwise, ‘a name that has remained unused as a senior synonym
in the primary zoological literature for more than fifty years is considered to be
a forgotten name (nomen oblitum)’. Forgotten names may not be used unless
the Commission so directs. Smith (1962) did not place the matter before the
Commission. The name anguillaris Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valenciennes,
1836, is thus retained for this species.
Distribution (fig. 4). The known range is Liideritzbucht (26°38’S., 15°10’E)
(South West Africa) to East London (33°00’S., 27°54’E). Fairly common on
24 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
the west coast as far south as Lambert’s Bay, becoming rather rare east of Cape
Point. Small specimens occur under stones in shallow pools near the top of the
shore, but larger specimens occur only at the bottom of the shore, and extend
into the sublittoral fringe. The species blends perfectly with the stipes of kelp
among which it occurs.
Clinus (Blennophis) striatus Gilchrist & ‘Thompson, 1908
(Fig. 6)
Clinus striatus Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908: 134. Barnard, 1927: 862.
Blennophis striatus: Smith, 1945: 539, 1949: 353, fig. 981.
Description. D. XL-XLV 2-4 (2-3); A. II 28-31 (30-31); P. 12-13 (13);
V. I 2-3; C. 13. Gillrakers in outer series on first arch 2-3 + 7-8. Vertebrae
17 + 34-35. Dorsal fin long, low, even. No clusters of cirri at tips of dorsal
spines. Pectoral fin rounded. Inner pelvic ray reduced or absent. Caudal ped-
uncle very short, length 10-20% head length, depth 23-27% head length.
Caudal fin short, subtruncate.
Body elongate, robust, eel-like, with small embedded scales extending on
to caudal, dorsal and anal fin bases, upper edge of opercle, and cheeks. Depth
6-8-25 in standard length. Head bluntly wedge-shaped, 4:5-—5:25 in standard
length. Eye 3:5—5 in head. Supraorbital tentacle prominent, with flat stalk and
fringe of fine cirri at tip. Cirrus on anterior nostril elongate, spatulate, and
slightly lobed ventrally. Upper jaw 37-44°5% head length. Lips thick. Vomer
toothed. Sensory pores of head single in nasal and interorbital series; mainly
single in mandibular and preopercular series, first mandibular and last pre-
opercular pore paired. Pores of other series double. Multiple pore in postorbital
series (fig. 6(b)).
Lateral line as in Clinus anguillaris, mainly of vertical pairs of pores opening
above and below line in front to post-pectoral curve, then of short, separate
horizontal tubes with pore at either end (fig. 6(d)). Intromittent organ of male
with moderate basal portion and single pair of narrow, crescentic dorso-lateral
lips (fig. 6(c)).
Colouring. Pink with brownish-red to dark-red mottling, fins usually reddish.
Adults occasionally have faint white longitudinal stripes. Light-edged dark
ocellus on shoulder. Two dark radiating lines from eye across cheek. Juveniles
white with longitudinal black stripes. Uniform buff to pinkish preserved in
alcohol.
Location of type material. South African Museum, Cape Town.
Lectotype. Female, 142 mm standard length, Simon’s Bay, False Bay, S.A.M.
25230.
Material examined. 11 specimens, 42-145°5 mm in standard length. 1 from
Saldanha Bay, S.A.M. 23878; 3 from Simon’s Bay, False Bay, S.A.M. 25239
(lectotype), S.A.M. 10527 (paralectotypes), 2 from Kalk Bay, False Bay,
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 25
S.A.M. 17844, S.A.M. 18086; 3 from Strandfontein, False Bay, S.A.M. 24240;
2, no locality, S.A.M. 21710, S.A.M. 21706.
Remarks. This species is very similar to Clinus anguillaris, differing from it exter-
nally only in the fin counts, in the degree of reduction of the inner pelvic ray
and in the greater number of double sensory pores on the head.
Distribution (fig. 4). The known range is from Saldanha Bay (33°00’S., 17°56’E)
to East London (33°00’S., 27°54’E). The juveniles occur high up on the shore,
but larger specimens are taken at the bottom of the shore and infratidally,
among kelp stipes. Rare.
aD
(ili) anterior
(i)ventral (ii) lateral
(c)
SDH AT ALAA AR LR
(b) SUI LEAVE UT CNS
7 8... ay Ca *
(d)
Fic. 6. Clinus (Blennophis) striatus: (a) Lateral view, female, 142 mm, S.A.M. 25239, lectotype;
(b) Head pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
Subgenus Cirrhibarbis Cuvier, 1817
Cirrhibarbis Cuvier, 1817: 174 (type-species Cirrhibarbis capensis Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valen-
ciennes).
Diagnosis: Elongate clinids. Snout pointed, with three stout, simple cirri at tip;
chin with eight stout, simple cirri. Small scales on cheek, dorsal, caudal and
anal fin bases, as well as over general body surface. Dorsal fin low, even, with
clusters of fine cirri at tips of spines.
One species, Clinus (Cirribarbis) capensis (Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valen-
ciennes).
26 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Clinus (Cirrhibarbis) capensis (Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1836)
(Fig. 7)
Cirrhibarbis capensis Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1836: 405. Swainson, 1839: 277
fig. 86. Smith, 1945: 539, 1949: 352, pl. 77 fig. 977, and fig. 977.
Clinus capensis: Giinther, 1861: 269. Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908: 131. Barnard, 1927: 853.
Description. D. XXXVII-XLIV (XXXVIII-XLI) 5-9 (6); A. II 26-34
(26-29); P. 12-14 (13); V. I 2-3; C. 13. Gill-rakers in outer series on first arch
2-3 + 5-7. Vertebrae 18-21 + 32-37. Dorsal fin low, even. Clusters of 3-5
fine cirri at tips of dorsal spines. Pectoral fin rounded. Inner pelvic ray reduced,
with free tip very short, or absent. Caudal peduncle short, length 20-30%
head length, depth 18-26% head length. Caudal fin subtruncate.
Body elongate, slightly compressed, covered with small embedded scales
extending on to dorsal, caudal and anal fin bases, and cheeks. Depth 5-6 in
standard length, occasionally greater. Head narrow, pointed, 3:5-4°5 in
standard length. Snout with three stout, simple cirri at tip; chin with eight
stout, simple cirri clustered about jaw symphysis. Supraorbital tentacle pro-
minent, with broad flat stalk and fringe of fine cirri at tip. Eye 3°5-5:5 in head.
Cirrus on anterior nostril large, spatulate, with about four shallow, flat lobes
at tip. Upper jaw 37°5-47°5% head length. Lips thick. Vomer toothed. Most of
sensory pores of head double; multiple pores occur mainly in postorbital and
occipital series (fig. 7(b)).
Lateral line of vertical pairs of pores in front to post-pectoral curve, then
of short separate horizontal tubes with pore at each end (fig. 7(d)). Intromittent
organ of male with long basal portion; pair of large confluent dorsal lips and
pair of rounded ventral lips ensheathing tip (fig. 7(c)).
Colouring. Variable, pinkish, grey, or greenish mottled. Light-edged dark
ocellus on shoulder. Fins and facial cirri usually red. A juvenile specimen
from Lambert’s Bay and two specimens from the west coast of the Cape Penin-
sula, one juvenile and one adult, were milky white with longitudinal black
stripes and red fins and facial cirri. Buff to pinkish preserved in alcohol, shoulder
spot may remain distinct.
Location of type material. Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris.
Material examined. 97 specimens, 28-246 mm in standard length. 2 from Cape
of Good Hope, Paris Museum Cat. Nos. 710, 6334 (syntypes) ; 1 from Lambert’s
Bay, S.A.M. 24237; 1 from Kommetjie, Cape Peninsula, S.A.M. 23926; 1 from
Froggy Pond, False Bay, S.A.M. 23930; 2 from Kalk Bay, False Bay, S.A.M.
18224, S.A.M. 18276; 11 from Dalebrook, False Bay, 19/2/1965 and 18/4/1965,
S.A.M. not catalogued; 14 from St. James, False Bay, S.A.M. 10530, S.A.M.
12018, S.A.M. 23583, and 1962, S.A.M. not catalogued; 29 from Strandfontein,
False Bay, S.A.M. 23975, S.A.M. 24236; 1 from Gordon’s Bay, False Bay,
S.A.M. 23290; 4 from Onrust River Mouth, S.A.M. 24238: to from Still Bay,
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 27
S.A.M. 25098, S.A.M. 24665; 4 from Mossel Bay, S.A.M. 23929; 4 from Port
Elizabeth, S.A.M. 23928; 2 from Igoda Mouth, East London, $.A.M. 25099;
8 from East London, S.A.M. 23927; 3 from Gonubie River Mouth, East
London, S.A.M. 25100.
Remarks. This species can be distinguished at once from all other African clinid
species by the facial cirri, but it is considered similar enough to the other
tentacled species to be included in the genus Clinus. It is most similar to the
eel-like forms of the subgenus Blennophis in body form, type of habitat, and the
very short caudal peduncle, as well as the scaly cheeks; the clusters of cirri at
the tips of the dorsal spines, the intromittent organ with its two pairs of lips and
the high dorsal soft ray count are more similar to the conditions found in some
of the species of the subgenus Clinus.
Distribution (fig. 4). The known range is Lambert’s Bay (32°04’S., 18°20’E) to
East London (33°00’S., 17°56’E). The source of Smith’s (1949) Port Nolloth
record for this species is not known, and in spite of extensive collecting there
its occurrence has not been confirmed. It is rare west of Cape Point, but is
fairly common from False Bay eastwards. It lives in shallow pools when
small, but large adults appear to be more or less confined to the sublittoral
fringe.
(i)ventral (ji) jateral (ii anterior
(c)
(d) x
(b) aon
Fic. 7. Clinus (Cirrhibarbis) capensis: (a) Lateral view, male, 76 mm, S.A.M. 24236; (b) Head
pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
28 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Subgenus Muraenoclinus Smith, 1945
Muraenoclinus Smith, 1945: 538 (type-species Clinus dorsalis Castelnau in Bleeker).
Diagnosis. Elongate clinids with one dorsal soft ray. No scales on cheeks. Dorsal
fin low, even. No clusters of cirri at tips of dorsal spines. No barbels on chin or
snout. Most sensory pores single. Posterior part of lateral line of short separate
horizontal tubes with pore at either end.
One species, small and intertidal; fairly common on the west coast, less so
eastwards to the south coast of Natal.
Clinus (Muraenoclinus) dorsalis Castelnau in Bleeker, 1860
(Fig. 8)
Clinus dorsalis Castelnau in Bleeker, 1860: 54. Castelnau, 1861: 54. Gilchrist & Thompson,
1908: 132. Barnard, 1927: 86.
Muraenoclinus dorsalis: Smith, 1945: 538, 1949: 352, pl. 78 fig. 979.
Description. D. XLI-XLVIII (XLV-—XLVI) 1; A. IT 25-31 (26-29); P. 11-13
(12); VI 2-9; C. 13. Gill-rakers in outer series on first arch 2 + 0-3. Vertebrae
19 + 32-35. Dorsal fin low, even. No clusters of cirri at dorsal spine tips.
Pectoral fin rounded. Inner pelvic ray reduced, often absent, if present minute.
Caudal peduncle very short, length 16-5-20% head length, depth 26-33-5%
head length. Caudal fin short, subtruncate.
Body elongate, eel-like, slightly compressed, covered with small embedded
scales not extending on to fin bases or head. Depth 5-5-7. Head narrowly
wedge-shaped, snout acutely pointed, head 3-5-5 in standard length. Eye
3-4°5 in head. Supraorbital tentacle prominent, with flat stalk and terminal
fringe of fine cirri. Cirrus on anterior nostril narrow at base, tip broadly spatu-
late, with deeply serrated edge. Upper jaw 34°5-46% head length. Lips thick.
Vomer toothed. Sensory pores of head single in most series, last pore of pre-
opercular series and most pores of suborbital series double (fig. 8(b)).
Lateral line of single pores opening above and below line in front to post-
pectoral curve, then of short separate horizontal tubes with pore at either end
(fig. 8(d)). Intromittent organ of male with long basal portion; pair of dorso-
lateral lips and pair of rounded ventral lips ensheathing tip (fig. 8(c)).
Colouring. Plain dark green or red, or light greenish or brownish mottled with
darker greens, browns, and mauves. Mottled specimens have ocellate spot on
shoulder. Broad white stripe from base of first dorsal spine to tip of snout. Fins
same as general body colour. Juveniles usually uniform light brown or black
with white stripe from dorsal origin to tip of snout. Plain yellowish buff pre-
served in alcohol.
Location of type material. Unknown.
Material examined. 138 specimens, 23—71°5 mm in standard length. 26 from
Liideritzbucht, S.A.M. 10535, S.A.M. 24207; 17 from Port Nolloth, S.A.M.
24222; 22 from Lambert’s Bay, S.A.M. 23931; 3 from Saldanha Bay, S.A.M.
a —— —
— a
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 29
17913; 6 from Sea Point, S.A.M. 23932 and 17/2/1965, S.A.M. not catalogued;
14 from Kalk Bay, S.A.M. 10536; 2 from Dalebrook, False Bay, S.A.M. 24239
and 18/4/1965, S.A.M. not catalogued; 20 from St. James, False Bay, 1962,
S.A.M. 23935; 1 from False Bay, S.A.M. 23934; 5 from Onrust River Mouth,
S.A.M. 24258; 1 from Hermanus, 8.A.M. 23933; 9 from Die Dam, Bredasdorp
district, S.A.M. 24505; 3 from Still Bay, S.A.M. 18077 and April, 1965, S.A.M.
not catalogued; 4 from Great Fish Point and East London, $.A.M. 18091; 4
from East London, $.A.M. 23936.
Remarks. Clinus dorsalis most closely resembles Clinus navalis. Jackson (1950)
placed it in his subgenus Blennophis with Clinus anguillaris and Clinus striatus, but
in view of the naked cheeks and the single soft dorsal ray it seems more appro-
priate to place it in a separate subgenus.
Note on the author of Clinus dorsalis
Gilchrist & Thompson (1908), Thompson (1918), Barnard (1927) and
Smith (1945, 1949) gave Bleeker (1860) as the author of this species, but this
appears to be incorrect. The first record of the species was published by Bleeker
(1860), but it was listed as Clinus dorsalis Castelnau although Castelnau’s
description of the species was published a year later, in 1861. In a brief note
(i) ventral (ii) lateral (ili) anterior
(C)
(d) ‘.
(b) re
Fic. 8. Clinus (Muraenoclinus) dorsalis: (a) Lateral view, female, 64 mm, S.A.M. 24207; (b) Head
pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
30 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
published in 1860 Castelnau discussed the fish fauna of South Africa and
stated that he would be producing a memoir on the ichthyological fauna of
southern Africa, in which 69 new species would be described. It seems probable
that Bleeker saw and quoted from Castelnau’s list of species prior to its publica-
tion in 1861. He should not be regarded as the author of the species, since he
acknowledged Castelnau as the author, and the full description of the species
was written and published by Castelnau.
Distribution (fig. 4). The known range of this species is Liideritzbucht (26°38'S.,
15°10’E) (South West Africa) to the Natal South Coast (Smith, 1947a). Smith
(1937) gave the north-western limit of this species as Walvis Bay, stating that he
took this record from Barnard (1927). However, Barnard (1927) gave the
north-western limit as Angra Pequena (Liideritzbucht), so that the 1937
Walvis Bay record was due to an error in transcription. The occurrence of the
species north of Liideritzbucht has not been confirmed.
Usually found among stones in shallow pools high on the shore, but occurs
at all levels of the intertidal zone. This species appears to be more common west
of Cape Agulhas.
Subgenus Climacoporus Barnard, 1935
Climacoporus Barnard, 1935: 646 (type-species Climacoporus navalis Barnard).
Nemacoclinus Smith, 1937: 195 (referring to Climacoporus navalis Barnard).
Diagnosis. Fairly elongate clinids with one dorsal soft ray. No scales on cheeks.
Dorsal fin low, even. No clusters of cirri at tips of dorsal spines. No barbels on
chin or snout. Most sensory pores double; vertical pairs of pores in posterior
part of lateral line.
One species, small and intertidal, occurring only east of Cape Agulhas and
rare.
Clinus (Climacoporus) navalis (Barnard, 1935)
(Fig. 9)
Climacoporus navalis Barnard, 1935: 646. Smith, 1945: 538, 1949: 352, pl. 78 fig. 978.
Nemacoclinus navalis: Smith, 1937: 195.
Description. D. XXXV-XXXVIII 1; A. II 23; P. 12; V. I 2-3; C. 13. Gill-
rakers in outer series on first arch 1-2 + 5. Vertebrae 15 + 27-29. Dorsal fin
low, even. No clusters of cirri at tips of dorsal spines. Pectoral fin rounded.
Inner (third) ray of pelvic fin reduced or absent. Caudal peduncle short, length
25-33°5% head length, depth 25~-33-5°% head length. Caudal fin subtruncate.
- Body elongate, slightly compressed, covered with small, embedded, non-
imbricating scales extending on to dorsal, caudal, and anal fin bases but not
head. Depth 5-6:25. Head 4-5-25 in standard length, snout rounded. Eye
3-4 in head. Supraorbital tentacle prominent, with flat stalk and fringe of fine
cirri terminally. Cirrus on anterior nostril small, flap-like, slightly emarginate
SS
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 31
below apex. Upper jaw 38-44°5% head length. Lips thick. Vomer toothed.
Sensory pores of head single in nasal, interorbital, and mandibular series,
mainly double in all other series (fig. 9(b)).
Lateral line of vertical pairs of pores throughout; narrows and may
become obscure towards tail (fig. 9(d)). Intromittent organ of male long, slender
with apparently no definition into tip, basal part and lips (fig. 9(c)).
Colouring. Yellow-brown to greenish, mottled and barred irregularly with
darker green or brown; head green or reddish brown; belly cream. Light-edged
dark ocellus on shoulder. Plain buff preserved in alcohol.
Location of type material. South African Museum, Cape Town.
Material examined. 10 specimens, 18-57 mm in standard length. 1 from ship’s
bottom, Simonstown, False Bay, $.A.M. 18287 (holotype); 2 from Still Bay,
S.A.M. 25101; 1 from Port Elizabeth, S.A.M. 23889; 1 from Boknes Point,
R.U.C.; 2 from Great Fish Point, R.U.C.; 1 from Igoda Mouth, East London,
S.A.M. 25102; 2 from Xora Mouth, R.U.C.
Remarks. The arrangement of the double pores of the lateral line of this species
is exactly the same as the arrangement seen in the anterior part of the lateral
line of other species that have double pores, such as Clinus capensis. In view of
the many features which Clinus navalis has in common with other species of the
(b) ) SEH
Fic. 9. Clinus (Climacoporus) navalis: (a) Lateral view, male, 55°5 mm, S.A.M. 18287, holotype;
(b) Head pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
32 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
genus Clinus, particularly Clinus dorsalis, I believe that to set this species apart
on account of the lateral line would obscure its relationships with the rest of the
group. The intromittent organ, however, is very peculiar. In the few male
specimens available it was very strongly erect; the finer structure may have been
obscured to some extent. There is some resemblance to the erect organ of
C.. brevicristatus, which shows but little definition at the tip.
Distribution (fig. 4). The known range is Still Bay (34°23’S., 21°24’) to Port
St. Johns (31°37’S., 29°32’E). The first specimen described was found among
barnacles on a ship’s bottom at Simonstown, but the species does not normally
occur in the region of the Cape Peninsula.
Subgenus Clinus Cuvier, 1817
Clinus Cuvier, 1817: 173 (type-species Blennius acuminatus Bloch & Schneider).
Clinitrachus Swainson, 1839: 75 (in part) ; (type-species Blennius variabilis Rafinesque).
Ophthalmolophus Gill, 1860: 104 (type-species Clinus latipennis Valenciennes).
Blenniomimus Smith, 1945: 538 (type-species Clinus taurus Gilchrist & Thompson).
Caboclinus Smith, 1966: 73 (type-species Clinus robustus Gilchrist & 'Thompson).
Diagnosis. Body not elongate. Head naked. No barbels on chin or snout. More
than one dorsal soft ray.
Thirteen species, occurring mainly among rocks in intertidal pools. ‘These
species are difficult to identify from a key, as they are extremely variable. Two
keys are given, but species should always be compared with the description as
well.
Key to the species of the subgenus Clinus
1. Anterior three dorsal spines, or at least the second and third dorsal gaia elevated, higher
than fourth dorsal spine .. be Ae SR
Anterior three dorsal spines saat to or Sno oa fourth dora oe aye 6
2. Dorsal soft rays three or less. Second spine highest; no notch in membrane peareee Gard
and fourth dorsal spines .. : Clinus (Clinus) venustris
Dorsal soft rays four or more; a said of ee epin in membrane between third and
fourth dorsal spines
3. Pectoral rays 15 or more .. if ae or ye Gir (Clinus) eee
Pectoral rays 14 or fewer a ae ate
4. Crest high, triangular; dorsal fin anecnaves. over gerd sian e Se Clinus (Clinus) woodi
Crest low, rectangular to rounded; dorsal fin originates over hind margin of preopercle 5
5. Lips with vertical corrugations; diosall soft rays nine or more .. Clinus (Clinus) robustus
Lips smooth; dorsal soft rays seven or fewer .. : Clinus (Clinus) brevicristatus
6. Anotch of varying depth in membrane between third ariel fourth dorsal spines area y 17,
No notch in membrane between third and fourth dorsal spines a ae pe
7. Interorbital concave, strong bony ridges over eyes; occiput with deep transverse groove
Clinus (Clinus) taurus
Interorbital flat, no ridges over eyes; no deep occipital groove Clinus (Clinus) agilis
8. Interorbital strongly concave, a nee over eye; ee groove deep; dorsal soft
rays six orfewer .. Pe: Clinus (Clinus) cottoides
Interorbital flat, or only ce nrly concave; Mecca anaes if present shallow ST OL0)
g. Dorsal soft rays 8-9. . a ae ae LA 0) Clinus (Clinus) latipennis
Dorsal soft rays seven or fewer .. ae ae he ee ae a, on |) LO
10. Dorsal soft rays 2-3.. b 6 oy! tb: i.e i ae Clinus (Clinus) venustris
Dorsal soft rays 4-7. . ite wh: ah un br a Be At Se
If.
13.
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 33
Dorsal spines 34-37... Sy = #5 a ai a a a's My 12
Dorsal spines 33 or fewer .. a HoEMe aiey BILD
Mucous pores on head open on aepiles: : enon Say Poumcied Clinus (Clinus) helenae
Mucous pores on head open flush with surface; snout more or less wedge-shaped
Clinus (Clinus) berrisfordi
First dorsal spine shorter than fourth spine; pectoral rays usually 12; intromittent organ
of male broad and flattened towards tip a a Cling (Clinus) acuminatus
First dorsal spine equal to or very slightly longer ea fourth; pectoral rays 13; intromittent
organ of male slender, cylindrical ay oe if .. Clinus (Clinus) heterodon
Alternative key to the species of the subgenus Clinus
No. of
soft dorsal
rays
2-3 1. Dorsal spines 39-41.. se wf ne 33 Sf Clinus (Clinus) venustris
Dorsal spines 34-37. . ae a: ve a fe Clinus (Clinus) agilis
4. 1. Interorbital concave 2s sig sits ae ae Clinus (C..) cottoides
Interorbital flat Sy r, 2 SNL 2
2. First three dorsal spines Meo en Powis: tuna a ee Mt <#f Et ie}
First three dorsal spines lower than fourth, not forming a crest
3. Pectoral rays 15 or more. .. eae ae 52 Clinus (C. ) auton oars
Pectoral rays 14 or fewer Clinus (C..) brevicristatus
4. A notch in membrane between fhird aid eee dlvsell spines; dorsal spines 34-37
Clinus (C.) agilis
No notch in membrane between third and fourth dorsal spines; dorsal spines 33 or
fewer ; ‘ she Cli us ee acuminatus
BR) ial) Pirst three dessa spines iene es fourth, eae acrest .. ei ae
First three dorsal spines lower than or equal to fourth, not forming a ies r
2. Pectoral rays 15 or more .. B. oe an ms Clinus (C.) superciliosus
Pectoral rays 14 or fewer 3 ase toe
3. Crest high, triangular, pHieiaedes 3 over dl eee of ae .. Clinus (C.) wood
Crest low, originates over hind margin of preopercle .. Clinus (C.) brevicristatus
4. A notch in membrane between third and fourth dorsal spines Clinus (C.) taurus
No notch in membrane between third and fourth dorsal spines ae Ses
5. A large round black spot on the opercle . Be ete Clinus (C.) cottoides
No large black spot on opercle ; an alg Sesh nO
6. First dorsal spine lower than fourth : an oe eis
First dorsal spine equal to or a little longer than fourth Clinus (C.) berrisfordi
7. Dorsal spines 33 or fewer; pectoral rays 12 aye a Clinus (C.) acuminatus
Dorsal spines 34 or more; pectoral rays 13 HM ae Clinus (C..) helenae
6 1. First three dorsal spines high, forming a crest .. i si ae ate) he
First three dorsal spines not forming a crest Ye te sis sph, eee
2. Pectoral rays 15 or more .. te Me ie Clinus (C.) superciliosus
Pectoral rays 14 or fewer : Clinus (C.) brevicristatus
3. A notch in membrane between ined and foun Ansell spines Clinus (C.) taurus
No notch in membrane between third and fourth dorsal spines od BAe Nae
4. A large round black spot on the opercle .. As Le Clinus (C.) cottoides
No large black spot on opercle.. a i - si ae aia
5. First dorsal spine lower than fourth nF fe ee +wli/36
First dorsal spine equal to or a little longer fae Dae a be
6. Pectoral rays 12; dorsal spines 33 or fewer =i ad Clinus (C.) acuminatus
Pectoral rays 13; dorsal spines 34. or more 22 ¥- Clinus (C.) helenae
7s» Rectoralraysi12, . .. ae Na on ei ey: Clinus (C.) berrisfordi
Pectoral rays13... - ae Clinus (C.) heterodon
7 1. First three dorsal spines Sen, faerie a ee ¥ a ie = stan Peo
First three dorsal spines not forming a crest ah fe a aes Aah" WS
34. ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
No. of
soft dorsal
rays
7 2. Pectoral rays 15 or more .. ar a Ne ie Clinus (C.) superciliosus
Pectoral rays 14 or fewer : .. Clinus (C.) brevicristatus
3. First dorsal spine lower than fate eel see 12; intromittent organ of male
broad and flattened toward tip... nee Clinus (C.) acuminatus
First dorsal spine equal to or a little ene Gram fourth; pectoral rays 13; intro-
mittent organ of male slender, cylindrical a be Clinus (C.) heterodon
8 1. First three dorsal spines high, forming acrest .. we Clinus (C.) superciliosus
First three dorsal spines not forming a crest ae of Clinus (C.) latipennis
g 1. Lips with vertical mee ae Ne is A Clinus (C.) robustus
Lips smooth : he a8 Ns si sive. 2
2. First three dorsal spines fee fugarie a eres a ay Clinus (C.) superciliosus
First three dorsal spines not forming a crest ae Si Clinus (C.) latipennis
10 1. Lips with vertical corrugations .. re ae a Clinus (C.) robustus
Lips smooth ve na x sat Se ve Clinus (C.) superciliosus
11-14 ne a she iA se Ae = a3 Clinus (C.) robustus
Clinus (Clinus) acuminatus (Bloch & Schneider, 1801)
(Fig. 10)
Blennius acuminatus Bloch & Schneider, 1801: 169.
Clinus acuminatus: Cuvier, 1817: 175. Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1836: 370. Swain-
son, 1839: 75. Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908: 124. Barnard, 1927: 859. Hubbs, 1952: 106.
Smith, 1966: 73. Penrith 1967: 43, figs 1, 4(a).
Ophthalmolophus acuminatus: Smith, 1945: 542, 1949: 355, pl. 79 fig. gor.
Description. D. XX XI-XXXIII (XXXII-XXXITI) 5-7; A. II 20-24 (21-22);
P. 12-13 (12); V. I 2-3; C. 13. Gill-rakers in outer series on first arch 1-2 +
4-6. Vertebrae 16 + 27-29. Dorsal fin low, even. Clusters of 2-3 cirri at tips of
dorsal spines for about half length of dorsal fin. Pectoral fin rounded. Inner
pelvic ray reduced or absent. Caudal peduncle short, length 20°5-33°5% head
length, depth 20-35% head length. Caudal fin subtruncate.
Body slightly compressed, covered with small scales extending on to
dorsal fin base; caudal and anal fin bases and head naked. Depth 4-5-6 in
standard length. Head large, 3-2-4 in standard length, snout wedge-shaped,
angle of profile acute. Eye 2-75-5 in head. Supraorbital tentacle prominent,
with short, flattened stalk terminating in several short, simple branches. Cirrus
on anterior nostril short, flattened, trilobed. Upper jaw 34°5-50% head length,
increasing with size of fish. Lips moderate. Vomer toothed. Sensory pores of
all head series single excepting last pore of preopercular series and one pore of
suborbital series, which are double (fig. 1o0(b)).
Lateral line usually of 2-4 vertical pairs of pores in front above opercle,
then of mainly single pores opening above and below the line to post-pectoral
curve; after that of short separate horizontal tubes with pore at either end
(fig. 10(d)). Intromittent organ of male large, flattened, and spade-shaped,
with moderately long, thick basal portion, pair of small dorsal lips, and large,
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 35
broad pair of ventro-lateral lips ensheathing tip (fig. 10(c)).
Colouring. Light green with broad, well-defined dark brown cross-bars, or with
black speckling in sparse large spots with mosaic-like pattern. Tips of all fins
and of supraorbital tentacles reddish orange. Belly silvery white. Dark ocellate
spot on shoulder, and two dark radiating bands from eye across cheek. Small
juveniles white with well-defined black cross-bars. Pattern retained for several
years after preservation.
Location of type material. Unknown.
Material examined. 182 specimens, 19-113°5 mm in standard length. 17 from
Liideritzbucht, S.A.M. 10544, S.A.M. 24206; 38 from McDougall’s Bay, Port
(ii) anterior
(i) lateral
Gii) ventral
(d) a. & (b)
Fic. 10. Clinus (Clinus) acuminatus: (a) Lateral view, female, 73 mm, S.A.M. 24255; (b) Head
pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
Nolloth, S.A.M. 24220; 12 from Port Nolloth, 12/7/1960, R.U.C.; 15 from
Lambert’s Bay, S.A.M. 21477, S.A.M. 23922 and 17/1/1964, S.A.M. not cata-
logued; 18 from Lambert’s Bay, R.U.C.; 2 from Lambert’s Bay, University of
Cape Town; 2 from Schaapen Island, Langebaan, $.A.M. 23925; 8 from Sea
Point, S.A.M. 22840, S.A.M. 23211; 3 from Kommetijie, S.A.M. 10541; 3 from
Froggy Pond, False Bay, S.A.M. 23924; 28 from St. James, False Bay, S.A.M.
12023 and 1962, S.A.M. not catalogued; 2 from St. James, False Bay, R.U.C.;
21 from False Bay, S.A.M. 10542; 2 from Cape Peninsula, University of Cape
36 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Town; 4 from Onrust River Mouth, 6/11/1964, S.A.M. not catalogued;
2 from Die Dam, Bredasdorp District, S.A.M. 24508; 5, no locality,
1. OIG
Remarks. Clinus acuminatus is similar on the one hand to Clinus agilis, having a
flat interorbital, and on the other hand to species such as Clinus cottoides, Clinus
heterodon, Clinus latipennis, and Clinus helenae, which lack a notch in the membrane
between the third and fourth dorsal spines. It is also very similar to Clinus
berrisfordt. Small specimens are rather similar in appearance to Clinus dorsalis,
and occupy the same type of habitat. Smith’s (1931) suggestion that Clinus
agilis may be found to be a subspecies of Clinus acuminatus is not supported by
a comparison of the two species, which are not sufficiently alike in appearance
to be confused even in the field. Furthermore, they occur over the same geo-
graphical range and often in the same pools.
: "Ny
ted: ‘ ° ‘ y , rhe. \ ’ . - / oe
on ey
ah eg
‘: ay : , ry B ~. ee
Oh, ae F / id ; i BETES: @ A
FN ae a Beh
CCE eng ‘
Soler... Be oletee LigiezeieR SO
OSs 0-8 &
pA @
Fic. 11. Distribution of C. agilis (open circles), C. berrisfordi (closed squares), C. brevicristatus
(open squares), C. cottoides (closed circles), C. helenae (closed triangles), C. heterodon (open triangles).
Distribution (fig. 4). The known range is Liideritzbucht (26°28’S., 15°10’E)
(South West Africa) to Cape Agulhas (34°50’S., 20°00’E). It is more common
west of Cape Point. This species occurs in shallow, barren pools under stones
and ledges at the top of the intertidal region of the shore.
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 37
Clinus (Clinus) agilis Smith, 1931
(Fig. 12)
Clinus agilis Smith, 1931: 154, pl. 16, 1966: 73.
Ophthalmolophus agilis: Smith, 1945: 54, 1949: 355, pl. 77 fig. 988.
Ophthalmolophus anne Smith, 194.7): 733, fig. 2, 1949: 355, pl. 77 fig. 980.
Clinus anne: Smith, 1966: 73.
Description. D. XX XII-XXXVITI (XXXV-XXXVIT) 2-4 (3); A. IT 20-25
(22-23); P. 13-15; V. I 2-3; C. 13. Gillrakers in outer series on first arch 1-2 +
3-5. Vertebrae 16 (rarely 17) + 27-30. Dorsal fin low, first three spines not
elevated to form crest, but notch in membrane between third and fourth dorsal
spines, varying in depth, rarely absent (see table 3). Clusters of 3-4 cirri at tips
of dorsal spines for about half length of fin. Pectoral fin rounded. Inner pelvic
ray, if present, minute; usually absent. Caudal peduncle short, length 23-31 %
head length, depth 25:5-29% head length. Caudal fin subtruncate.
Body slightly compressed, covered with small scales not extending on to
fin bases or head. Depth 4°5—5-25 in standard length. Head 3-5—4:5 in standard
length, snout rounded. Eye 3—4:25 in head. Supraorbital tentacle prominent,
with flat stalk dividing into several short simple branches at tip. Cirrus on
anterior nostril long, narrow, pointed. Upper jaw 40-50% head length. Lips
fairly thick. Vomer toothed. Sensory pores of head single in nasal and
interorbital series, mainly single in mandibular and preopercular series; pores
in remaining series double or multiple (fig. 12(b)).
Lateral line of vertical pairs of pores and single pores opening above and
below line in front to post-pectoral curve, then of short separate horizontal
tubes with pore at either end (fig. 12(d)). Intromittent organ of male with long
basal portion; tip completely ensheathed by 2 pairs of confluent lips. Pair of
rounded fleshy lobes within fold, between which is minute tip (fig. 12(c)).
Colouring. Ground colour usually dark greyish or greenish, with about 7 dis-
tinct dark red and green cross-bars. Occasional specimens have pinkish or
milky ground colour with darker pink cross-bars, or vermilion ground colour
with dark brown cross-bars. Fins dark, irregularly barred; characteristic
translucent area in membrane joining dorsal soft rays. Belly silvery white to
greyish. Sprinkling of white spots over body sometimes. Head with irregular
lacy patterns in body colours, or plain dark grey. Light-edged dark ocellate
spot on shoulder usually. Juveniles white with well-defined red cross-bars.
Pattern remains for several years after preservation.
Location of type material. Department of Ichthyology, Rhodes University,
Grahamstown. One paratype in South African Museum.
Material examined. 672 specimens, 17-113 mm in standard length. 191 from
Liideritzbucht, S.A.M. 24205; 1 from Sinclair’s Island, R.U.C.; 3 from Orange
River Mouth, 5 fms, 8.A.M. 23964; 246 from Port Nolloth, S.A.M. 24214;
1 from Hondeklip Bay, March 1965, S.A.M. not catalogued; 6 from Gert du
38 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Toit Bay and 4 from Doring Bay, southern Namaqualand, S.A.M. 24232;
5 from Lambert’s Bay, R.U.C. (syntypes of anne); 108 from Lambert’s Bay,
S.A.M. 23919; 1 from Lambert’s Bay, R.U.C.; 13 from Steenberg’s Cove,
St. Helena Bay, 1962, S.A.M. not catalogued; 3 from Saldanha Bay, S.A.M.
22072, S.A.M. 23921; 5 from Langebaan, S.A.M. 21475, S.A.M. 21479;
38 from Sea Point, S.A.M. 23212, S.A.M. 23920, and 17/2/1965, S.A.M. not
catalogued; 6 from Froggy Pond, False Bay, S.A.M. 23906; 2 from Dalebrook,
False Bay, 19/2/1965, S.A.M. not catalogued; 1 from Knysna, S.A.M. 18278
(paratype); 38 from Knysna, $.A.M. 24233.
(iii) anterior
tn.
Nee
(i) ventral (ii) lateral
(c)
eae meee
in eee
(d) in
‘ee
(b)
Fic. 12. Clinus (Clinus) agilis: (a) Lateral view, female, 113 mm, Hondeklip Bay, S.A.M.; (b) Head
pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
Remarks. It has been believed for some time at the South African Museum that
this species and Ophthalmolophus anne Smith, 1947, are probably conspecific.
In attempting to identify large samples from the west coast, one might arrive
at either species in Smith’s (1949) key, or at both species for different specimens
of the same sample. Smith (1931) created agilis for seven specimens taken from
Knysna estuary, ranging in size from 55-65 mm. In 1947 he created anne for
five specimens, 24-50 mm, from the west coast, mainly Lambert’s Bay. He
differentiated anne from agilis on the following points: (1) number of dorsal
spines (34-35 for agilis, 36-37 for anne); (2) eye size (3-4 in head in agilis,
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 39
4°2-4'5 in head in anne); (3) snout length (greater in anne, no figures given) ;
(4) pectoral length (greater in anne, no figures given); (5) pelvic length (less in
anne, no figures given). Since so few specimens were examined, and the size
range of the samples did not overlap, the four points relating to body propor-
tions may probably be ignored. In the Clinidae body proportions have been
found to vary considerably with size, so that comparable size ranges are essential
for the comparison of body proportions of different species; furthermore, the
ranges found for body proportions tend to be very wide in the Clinidae, so that
other features are usually more important for delimiting species. In any case,
the orbit diameter of 19 specimens of Clinus agilis, all from the west coast and
therefore falling in Smith’s species anne, was measured and was found to -be
2-6—-4°25 in head (size range of specimens 31-93 mm in standard length), very
close to the range found by Smith (1931) for his Knysna specimens. 15 speci-
mens from Knysna, ranging from 31-59 mm in standard length, showed an
orbit diameter range 2°5-3°5 (see table 4). As far as the dorsal spine count is
TABLE 4. Comparison of orbit diameter of Clinus agilis from
south-east and south-west coasts of the Cape.
East Coast (agilis Smith) West Coast (anne Smith)
Std. length Eye in head Std. length Eye in head
(mm) (mm)
31 3-3 31 3-3
31 a. 7 31 2.8
32 3-3 31 3+3
33 3-3 33 3-3
35) 3-0 35 2.9
3 3-0 37 2.7
39 2.5 38 2.6
39 3-0 39 3-1
42 259 42 3.0
48 2.9 47 3.0
49 3-4 49-5 3-3
5! 3-5 5! 3-4
52 | 3-5 53 3-5
55 2.9 55 3-1
59 3-3 60 3.4
67 3-5
70 3.6
82 4.25
93 3.8
concerned, samples from the west coast showed a range of 33-38 dorsal spines,
which covers the range of 34-35 of agilis. Furthermore, samples from different
areas along the coast showed variation in the average number of dorsal spines
for each population. This is shown in a histogram (fig. 13). The variation from
one population to another is an interesting indication of the lack of genetic
exchange between populations along the coast, a lack not surprising in view
of the sedentary mode of life and the methods of reproduction of these small
fishes. That such variation between localities occurs makes one hesitate to
recognize even a racial difference between the east and west coast forms. The
40 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
identical intromittent organ of east and west coast specimens is the strongest
argument in favour of joining these species, since the shape of the intromittent
organ is strongly species-specific in the genus Clznus.
Smith (19475) stated that if the seven Knysna specimens and the five west
coast (Lambert’s Bay) specimens had not been so widely separated geographi-
cally he would have placed them in the same species. A study of clinid distri-
bution in South Africa has shown that there are few species from the west coast
of South Africa that do not occur at least as far east as Port Elizabeth, so that the
occurrence of a species at both Lambert’s Bay and Knysna is not unexpected,
40 60
“= 20 3 3
g g
0
39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32
dorsal spines dorsal spines
(a) Luderitzbucht (d) Lambert's Bay
40 40
o rh
wv =
5 20 ‘6 20
2 g
0
39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32
_ dorsal spines dorsal spines
‘(b) Port Nolloth (e) Sea Point
40 40
£ a
= . 20
3 z
: o
o c
jo
0
39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32
dorsal spines dorsal spines:
(c) Hondeklip Bay (f) Knysna
Fic. 13. Histogram showing dorsal spine count variation in different populations of Clinus agilis.
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 41
particularly when the species has been recorded from False Bay on several
occasions as well.
It is proposed therefore that Ophthalmolophus anne Smith, 1947, should
become a synonym of Clinus agilis Smith, 1931, since the two species are indis-
tinguishable. Clinus agilis is common on the west coast of South Africa but
becomes rare east of Cape Point.
Barnard (1948) suggested that Clinus agilis might be the young of Clinus
taurus Gilchrist & ‘Thompson, but the two species are easily distinguishable in
all stages by the shape of the interorbital, which is strongly concave in Clinus
taurus and flat in Clinus agilis, and by the number of dorsal soft rays (2-4 in
Clinus agilis and 5-6 in Clinus taurus).
Clinus agilis is in some ways intermediate between forms with a low, even
dorsal fin and no notch in the dorsal fin membrane between the third and
fourth spines, such as Clinus acuminatus, and forms with a low dorsal crest and a
notch in the dorsal fin membrane such as Clinus brevicristatus. There is a marked
similarity in appearance between Clinus agilis and Clinus brevicristatus both in
body form and colour pattern, but in the latter the first three dorsal spines are
elevated, forming a crest, and there are more dorsal! soft rays.
Distribution (fig. 11). The known range of this species is Liideritzbucht (26°28’S.,
15°10 E) (South West Africa) to Port Alfred (33°36’S., 26°54’E), common
on the west coast in pools at all levels of the shore and also taken infratidally,
but on the whole rare on the east coast, although a fairly large number of
specimens was taken in Knysna lagoon. The biota of the Knysna estuary has
been discussed by Day et al. (1952) and Day (1967). It is an exceptionally rich
faunal area, and has also received a great deal more attention than any other
area on the south coast of South Africa. A similar case of apparently discon-
tinuous distribution involving a lagoon is observed in Blennioclinus brachyce-
phalus on the west coast (Penrith, 19650), without racial differentiation of the
separated populations. |
Clinus (Clinus) berrisford: Penrith, 1967
(Fig. 14)
Clinus berrisfordi Penrith, 1967: 48, figs 3, 4(c).
Description. D. XX XITI-XXXVI (XXXIV-XXXV) 5-6; A. II 23-25 (23-
24); P. 11-12 (12); V. 1 3; C. 13. Gill-rakers in outer series on first arch 3-4 ++
6—7. Vertebrae 16 (rarely 17) + 28-31. First three dorsal spines not elevated
to form crest, but equal to or little longer than fourth dorsal spine. No notch
in membrane between third and fourth dorsal spines. Dorsal spines with clusters
of three fine cirri at tips for about half length of fin. Pectoral fin rounded. Inner
pelvic ray minute but present in all specimens examined. Caudal peduncle
short, length 20-35% head length, depth 20-35% head length. Caudal fin
subtruncate.
Body slightly compressed, covered with small scales extending on to dorsal
and caudal fin bases but not anal fin base or head. Depth 4-5-5 in standard
42 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
length. Head 3-4-4 in standard length, snout wedge-shaped, profile acute. Eye
3-4:2 in head. Supraorbital tentacle prominent, with flattened stalk ending in
several long slender filaments. Cirrus on anterior nostril with narrow stalk and.
flattened, bilobed tip. Upper jaw 36:4-50% of head length. Lips moderate.
Vomer toothed. Sensory pores of nasal, interorbital and mandibular series
single with exception of double first pore in mandibular series; pores of remain-
ing series double or multiple (fig. 14(b)).
(ii)anterior
i) lateral
oe
ii) ventral
Sf ARAN A A AN... Si ASA
oN Set care) MW WN
ie SS
NZ
'S
ns
Se
(d) ba east
\
Fic. 14. Clinus (Clinus) berrisfordi: (a) Lateral view, female, 95 mm, S.A.M. 24221, holotype;
(b) Head pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
Lateral line of usually vertical pairs of pores in front to post-pectoral curve,
few single pores opening above or below line, then of short separate horizontal
tubes with pore at either end (fig. 14(d)). Intromittent organ of male with a
long basal portion and a slender upturned tip ensheathed by a pair of bilobed
ventro-lateral lips and a small pair of rounded dorsal lips (fig. 14(c)).
Colouring. Reddish orange with about seven faint broad darker cross-bars. Two
dark radiating lines from eye across cheek. Dark ocellate spot on shoulder. Fins
reddish orange, faintly mottled and barred. Plain yellow preserved in alcohol.
Location of type material. South African Museum, Cape Town.
Material examined. 16 specimens, 37:-5-106 mm in standard length. 16 from
Onrust River Mouth, S.A.M. 24601 (holotype), S.A.M. 24221 (paratypes).
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 43
Remarks. This species is similar in appearance to Clinus acuminatus and Clinus
heterodon but differs from the former in the dorsal and anal fin counts, the form
of the intromittent organ, the height of the first dorsal spine, the form of the
supraorbital tentacle, the anterior part of the lateral line, and the habitat,
occurring at a much lower level on the shore. It differs from the latter in the
dorsal, anal, and pectoral fin counts, the intromittent organ (although of all the
species of Clinus, Clinus berrisfordi and Clinus heterodon have the most similar form
of intromittent organ), the anterior part of the lateral line, the clusters of cirri
on the dorsal spines, and in having a narrower interorbital.
Distribution (fig. 11). So far taken only at Onrust River Mouth (34°25’S.,
19°10’). The 16 specimens were taken from a weedy pool at the bottom of the
intertidal region.
Clinus (Clinus) brevicristatus Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908
(Fig. 15)
Clinus brevicristatus Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908: 118. Barnard, 1927: 856.
Petraites brevicristatus: Smith, 1945: 540, 1949: 353, pl. 78 fig. 985.
Description. D. XXXIII-XXXVI (XXXV-XXXVI) 4-7 (5); A. IT 21-24;
P. 12-14 (12-13); V. I 3; C. 13. Gill-rakers in outer series on first arch 1-2 +
3-4. Vertebrae 17-18 + 27-31. First three dorsal spines elevated to form low
crest, fourth dorsal spine 70% to over 90% first dorsal spine. Notch of varying
depth in membrane between third and fourth dorsal spines (see table 3).
Clusters of 4-6 cirri at tips of all dorsal spines. Pectoral fin rounded. Inner
pelvic ray minute. Caudal peduncle short, length 21-34:5% head length,
depth 21-28% head length. Caudal fin subtruncate.
Body slightly compressed, covered with small scales extending on to
dorsal fin base but not caudal or anal fin bases or head. Depth 4-5-5 in standard
length. Head 3-°75-4:75 in standard length, snout bluntly rounded. Eye 2-75-—
3°25 in head. Supraorbital tentacle prominent, with short subcylindrical stalk
and round, flattened tip ending in several simple branches. Cirrus on anterior
nostril prominent, elongate, flat, and narrow, with slightly indented margin.
Upper jaw 40-48-5°% head length. Lips fairly thin. Vomer toothed. Sensory
pores of head single in nasal and interorbital series and in mandibular series
with exception of first, double pore; multiple as well as double pores in supra-
orbital, postorbital, occipital and preopercular series (fig. 15(b)).
Lateral line of usually about 25 vertical pairs of pores in front (few may be
single opening above or below line), to post-pectoral curve, then of short
separate horizontal tubes with pore at either end (fig. 15(d)). Intromittent
organ of male with fairly long basal portion and single pair of dorso-lateral
lips ensheathing base of tip, which is slightly swollen, narrowing terminally
(fig. 15(c)).
Colouring. Ground colour usually light grey, with about seven vermilion cross-
bars, having shorter brown bars between them. The cross-bars may, however,
44 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
be various shades of green, brown, or deep red. The cross-bars extend on to
dorsal and anal fins, but membrane joining dorsal soft rays has irregular
translucent patches. Caudal and pectoral fins finely barred with dark brown.
A 3-shaped dark mark at base of pectoral fin, and a dark stripe from edge of
branchiostegal membrane to central edge of pectoral fin base. Operculum with
irregular dark mark; two irregular dark bands radiate from eye across cheek.
Pelvic fins barred with brown. Belly silvery white to greyish. Head grey or
pinkish. Pattern retained for several years after preservation.
Location of type material. South African Museum, Cape Town.
Material examined. 36 specimens, 37:5-106 mm in standard length. 2 from
Lambert’s Bay, R.U.C.; 1 from Simon’s Bay, False Bay, S.A.M. 24243; 1 from
Kalk Bay, False Bay, S.A.M. 9988 (holotype); 5 from Dalebrook, False Bay,
S.A.M. 23870 and 18/12/1964, S.A.M. not catalogued; 1 from St. James, False
Bay, 16/5/1965, S.A.M. not catalogued; 26 from Strandfontein, False Bay’
S.A.M. 23871, S.A.M. 23872, S.A.M. 23954, S.A.M. 23971, S.A.M. 23976,
S.A.M. 24242.
Remarks. Clinus brevicristatus is very similar to the species with a low dorsal fin,
such as Clinus cottoides, Clinus acuminatus, Clinus venustris, and particularly Clinus
agilis. ‘The species was described from a single female specimen from Kalk Bay,
é a, TIT VI Me Se ag
é iro i} Lit qog
FEL GHEE
We
(i) ventral Gi) lateral (iii) anterior
(c)
Cae SAA
A “9
—F..
ea de Pe eS oe ow aa ey ey 5
_ Sa ID a
(d) eet
(b) ae
Fic. 15. Clinus (Clinus) brevicristatus: (a) Lateral view, female, 70 mm, S.A.M. 23870; (b) Head
pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 45
in False Bay. I have collected additional specimens of both sexes from weedy
areas at Strandfontein and Dalebrook in False Bay. The new material covers a
fairly wide size range. This species is no more similar to Clinus woodi, with which
it was placed in the genus Petraiies by Smith (1945), than it is to Clinus venustris
or Clinus agilis ; in fact, it resembles the latter two species far more closely. The
development of the crest is poor in both male and female specimens of C. brevi-
cristatus, unlike that in Clinus woodi, in which the crest is high and triangular
in both sexes, and almost entirely separate from the rest of the fin. In Clinus
brevicristatus the crest is low and rounded, and resembles the crest of Clinus
agilis (with a notch in the membrane between the third and fourth dorsal spines
and the first three dorsal spines not elevated) more closely than it does the crest
of Clinus woodi. Clinus brevicristatus does not appear to reach a large size. This
species is unusual in the genus Clinus in that it lives almost exclusively in weed-
beds. The peculiar intromittent organ of C. navalis is nearest to that of C. brevi-
cristatus, which shows little definition of the thin dorso-lateral lips when fully
erect.
Distribution (fig. 11). The known range is from Lambert’s Bay (32°04’S.,
18°20'E) to False Bay (+34°10’S., 18°50’E). The species is not common.
Smith (1937) gave the range as False Bay to Great Fish Point, but the latter
limit was presumably an error, as it was not repeated in Smith’s 1945 and 1949
works. Taken at low tide in False Bay from dense beds of the green alga Caulerpa
filiformis, intertidal. _
Clinus (Clinus) cottordes Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1836
(Fig. 16)
-Clinus cottoides Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1836: 367. Swainson, 1839: 276. Gilchrist
& Thompson, 1908: 125. Barnard, 1927: 858.
Blenniomimus cottoides: Smith, 1945: 539, 1949: 353, pl. 78 fig. 983.
Description. D. XXXI-XXXVI (XXXITI-XXXIV) 4-6 (5-6); A. IT 21-25;
P. 12-14 (12-13); V. I 2-3; C. 13. Gill-rakers in outer series on first arch
2 + 5-6. Vertebrae 15 + 29-31. Dorsal fin low, even, anterior spines shortest;
no notch in membrane between third and fourth dorsal spines. Pectoral
fin rounded. Inner (third) pelvic ray minute or absent. Caudal peduncle
short, length 30°5-34°5% head length, depth 21-26% head length. Caudal fin
subtruncate.
Body slightly compressed, tapering markedly towards tail, covered with
small embedded scales extending on to dorsal and caudal fin bases but not anal
fin base or head. Depth 4:5-5:5 in standard length. Head very large, heavy,
3°25-4°25 in standard length. Snout bluntly rounded. Head becomes heavier
in relation to body with age. Eye very large, 2°-25-3°5 in head. Interorbital
concave, bony ridge above each eye. Deep groove across occiput. Supraorbital
tentacle prominent, on bony ridge, with flattened stalk and numerous long
filamentous cirri terminally. Cirrus on anterior nostril short, flattened, with
46 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
about four short, simple branches terminally. Mouth large, increasing with
size of fish, upper jaw 42-60% head length. Lips thin. Vomer toothed. Sensory
pores of head single in nasal and interorbital series and on mandible except
for first, double pore; mainly double in other series, and some multiple in
occipital region (fig. 16(b)). Some pores in supraorbital and occipital regions
Open on minute papillae.
Lateral line usually of about 18-20 vertical pairs of pores, interspersed
with or followed by few single pores opening above or below line, in front to
post-pectoral curve, then of short separate horizontal tubes with pore at either
end (fig. 16(d)). Intromittent organ of male with fairly long basal portion and
single pair of slightly papillose dorso-lateral lips below which tip, which is
slightly swollen at base with narrow termination, protrudes (fig. 16(c)).
Colouring. Ground colour slaty grey or dull greenish with irregular mottling,
often in lacy pattern with vague crossbars extending on to dorsal and anal fins,
chiefly dark grey, dark red, and whitish. Fins dusky, faintly mottled and barred.
Three small dark lines on pectoral base. Prominent round black spot on opercle.
Dark mark behind centre of eye, below which two narrow dark lines radiate
from eye across cheek. Head and lips dusky to slate-grey; terminal filaments of
supraorbital tentacles white. Belly white to greyish. Juveniles milky with fine
lacy dark markings particularly in upper half of body; opercular spot well
defined at all stages. Pattern retained for years after preservation.
Location of type material. Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris.
Material examined. 951 specimens, 18-120 mm in standard length. 1 specimen,
63 mm in standard length, Cape, Paris Mus. Cat. No. A2078 (lectotype) ;
26 from Doring Bay, southern Namaqualand, S.A.M. 24229; 4 from southern
Namaqualand, R.U.C.; 101 from Lambert’s Bay, S.A.M. 23940; 12 from
Lambert’s Bay, R.U.C.; 3 from Saldanha Bay, S.A.M. 17914; 1 from Lange-
baan, S.A.M. 21880; 6 from Mouille Point, Cape Peninsula, 5/5/1965, S.A.M.
not catalogued; 42 from Sea Point, S.A.M. 23941, S.A.M. 23942 and 17/2/1965,
S.A.M. not catalogued; 1 from Hout Bay, S.A.M. 12013; 2 from Miller’s
Point, False Bay, S.A.M. 22906, S.A.M. 23937; 164 from Froggy Pond and
Miller’s Point, False Bay, S.A.M. 23939; 113 from Dalebrook, False Bay,
19/2/1965, 3/3/1965 and 18/4/1965 S.A.M. not catalogued; 25 from St. James,
False Bay, S.A.M. 10540; 80 from Strandfontein, False Bay, S.A.M. 23978
and 12/1/1964 and 13/8/1964, S.A.M. not catalogued; 33 from Onrust River
Mouth, S.A.M. 23938, S.A.M. 24230; 2 from Hermanus, S.A.M. 18095; 4
from Die Dam, Bredasdorp district, S.A.M. 24510; 59 from Still Bay, S.A.M.
24666; 35 from Mossel Bay, S.A.M. 23947; 4 from Knysna, S.A.M. 24230;
53 from Plettenberg Bay, S.A.M. 23946; 72 from Port Elizabeth, S.A.M.
23945, S.A.M. 23985; 1 from Kidd’s Beach, East London, S.A.M. 20564;
14 from Igoda Mouth, East London, $.A.M. 25060; 104 from East London,
S.A.M. 23943, S.A.M. 23944, S.A.M. 24228, and S.A.M. 20562; 2 from
Gonubie River Mouth, East London, S.A.M. 25061; 2 from Kei Mouth,
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 47
S.A.M. 20563; 1 juvenile from Mozambique Island, R.U.C.
Lectotype of Clinus cottoides
I have examined three of the four syntypes of Clinus cottoides. Of these
three syntypes, one small specimen is identifiable as the species regarded as
Clinus cotioides in South Africa since the time of Gilchrist & Thompson (1908).
The two larger syntypes are examples of a species known as Clinus taurus Gil-
christ & Thompson. Dr. M. L. Bauchot kindly examined the remaining, dried
syntype in the Paris Museum and concluded that it too represented Clinus
taurus.
aS 2
ee
CARS
” (ii) lateral (iii) anterior
(c)
(i) ventra}
(b) AS
Tae
Fic. 16. Clinus (Clinus) cottoides: (a) Lateral view, female, 85 mm, S.A.M. 23945; (b) Head
pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
Although Valenciennes (1836 in Cuvier & Valenciennes) almost certainly
based his description of C’.. cottoides on the larger specimens, the description
applies more or less to both species; and the species was not figured. In order
not to complicate the nomenclature of the two species, I here designate the
small specimen, 63 mm, Paris Museum Catalogue No. A2078, of the four
syntypes of Clinus cotioides the lectotype.
48 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Remarks. Smith (1945) considered the concave interorbital of Clinus cottoides
and of Clinus taurus to be of generic significance. However, Clinus latipennis,
large specimens of Clinus heterodon, and to a slight degree Clinus helenae, also
have a concave interorbital with low bony ridges over the eyes. Instead of a
clear-cut division between species with and without a ridge over the eyes, there
is a series, from Clinus heterodon, in which the supraorbital ridges develop only
in large specimens, to Clinus taurus, in which the ridges are very heavy at all
stages. These species all appear to be closely related to each other and to species
lacking the ridge, such as Clinus acuminatus and Clinus berrisfordt.
Specimens of Clinus cottoides from East London were compared with speci-
mens from Lambert’s Bay, and no east-west clinal or individual population
differences were found in the fin counts of this species. Clinus cottoides does, how-
ever, attain a considerably greater size on the west coast than it does east of
Cape Point.
Distribution (fig. 11). The known range is from southern Namaqualand
(+31°40’S., 18°15’E) (Olifants River Mouth) to the Kei River (32°41’S.,
28°23’E). It is one of the most abundant species from Lambert’s Bay to the
Kei River, particularly from False Bay eastwards. A single tiny juvenile from
Mozambique Island was seen in the Rhodes University Ichthyology Depart-
ment, but this seems to be well outside the normal range for this species, which
has not been recorded otherwise much north of the Kei River. Clinus cottoides
was recorded by Kner (1865-67) from Java, but De Beaufort & Chapman
(1955) stated that this record is certainly erroneous; its occurrence outside
South African waters is most improbable.
Clinus (Clinus) helenae (Smith, 1945)
(Fig. 17)
Ophthalmolophus helenae Smith, 1945: 542, fig. 33 1949: 355, pl. 79 fig. go2.
Clinus helenae: Smith, 1966: 73.
Description. D. XXXIV-XXXVII 5-6; A II 24-25; P. 13; V. I 3; C. 13.
Vertebrae 16 + 30. Dorsal fin low, even; no notch in membrane between
third and fourth dorsal spines. No clusters of cirri at tips of dorsal spines.
Pectoral fin rounded. Inner pelvic ray minute. Caudal peduncle short, length,
30-35°5% head length, depth 20-24% head length, noticeably longer than
deep. Caudal fin subtruncate.
Body slightly compressed, covered with small embedded scales not extend-
ing on to dorsal, anal, or caudal fin bases or head. Depth 4:5—-5 in standard
length. Head 3-75-4-75 in standard length, snout bluntly rounded. Inter-
orbital slightly concave, low bony ridges over eyes; occipital grooves moderately
deep. Eye 3-5 in head. Supraorbital tentacle prominent, with flattened stalk
and terminal fringe of long fine filamentous cirri. Cirrus on anterior nostril
small, simple, flaplike. Upper jaw 39°5-52:5% head length. Lips moderately
thick. Vomer toothed. Sensory pores of head single in nasal, interorbital, and
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 49
mandibular series except for first double mandibular pore; double or multiple
in other series (fig. 17(b)). Many pores open on raised papillae, giving head a
rough appearance.
Lateral line of vertical pairs of pores in front to post-pectoral curve, then
of short separate horizontal tubes with pore at either end (fig. 17(d)). Intro-
mittent organ of male with moderately long basal portion; small pair of circular
dorsal lips and large pair of ventro-lateral lips with finely serrated ventral
margins ensheathing tip. Small pair of lateral lobes on basal portion (fig. 17(c)).
Colouring. A single fresh specimen from Kei Mouth was light grey, with darker
mottling in the form of irregular cross-bars; body and head speckled with white.
Smith (1945) described the colouring of his specimens as ‘light brown, with
seven darker broken crossbands. Darker spots and speckles on head and body.’
(i) ventral
(iii) anterior
(c)
Gi) lateral
ae a a Eee
“2.
RS
b S
(b) (a) \
Fic. 17. Clinus (Clinus) helenae: (a) Lateral view, female, 71 mm, S.A.M. 25065; (b) Head
pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
The fins are finely spotted and barred. Pattern retained for years after pre-
servation.
Location of type material. Department of Ichthyology, Rhodes University,
Grahamstown.
Material examined. 8 specimens, 67:-5-78:5 mm in standard length. 4 from
50 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Boknes Point, R.U.C. (syntypes); 3 from Cape Morgan, R.U.C. (syntypes) ;
1 from Kei mouth, $.A.M. 25065.
Remarks. Clinus helenae resembles Clinus cottoides, Clinus taurus and particularly
Clinus latipennis in the form of the head, although the concave interorbital is
least marked in Clinus helenae. It is also similar to Clinus heterodon (in which the
interorbital becomes concave only in large specimens), Clinus berrisford: and
Clinus acuminatus. The intromittent organ is similar to that of Clinus latipennis,
the only other species which has a pair of subsidiary lobes on the basal portion.
Distribution (fig. 11). The known range is Port Alfred (33°36’S., 26°54’E) to
the Bashee River (31°55'S., 28°27’E) ; rare.
Clinus (Clinus) heterodon Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1836
(Fig. 18)
Clinus heterodon Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1836: 394.
Clinus obtusifrons Penrith, 1967: 46, figs 2, 4(b).
Description. D. XXX-XXXII (XXX-XXXI) 6-7; A. II 20-22 (20-21);
P. 13; V. I 2-3; C. 13. Gill-rakers in outer series on first arch 1-2 + 5-6.
Vertebrae 16 + 27-30. First three dorsal spines not forming crest, but equal
to or a little longer than fourth spine, second spine longest. No notch in mem-
brane between third and fourth dorsal spines. No clusters of cirri at tips of
dorsal spines. Pectoral fin rounded. Inner (third) pelvic ray minute or absent.
Caudal peduncle short, length 20-35°% head length, depth 25-37:5% head
length. Caudal fin subtruncate.
Body slightly compressed, covered with small embedded scales extending
on to dorsal and caudal fin bases; anal fin base and head naked. Depth 4-5
in standard length. Head heavy, 3-2—4°5 in standard length. Interorbital con-
cave with low supraorbital ridges in large specimens. Snout bluntly rounded,
angle of profile obtuse. Eye 3-4-5 in head. Supraorbital tentacle prominent,
with flattened stalk, terminating in several short, simple branches. Cirrus on
anterior nostril flattened, expanded, and roughly triangular at tip. Upper jaw
36-4-50% head length, increasing with size of fish. Lips moderate. Vomer
toothed. Sensory pores of head single in nasal and interorbital series, mainly
single in mandibular, suborbital, and preopercular series. Mainly double and
multiple in remaining series (fig. 18(b)). A few pores in occipital region open
on raised papillae.
Lateral line of single pores, opening above or below line, in front to post-
pectoral curve, then of short separate horizontal tubes with pore at either end
(fig. 18(d)). Intromittent organ of male with moderately long basal portion
and slender, upwardly hooked tip between pair of lateral lips and small rounded
pair of dorsal lips (fig. 18(c)).
Colouring. Dusky or slaty with darker grey, irregular, lacy cross-bars, speckled
with white and sometimes dark blue when fresh. Tips of anal and pelvic rays
red. Prominent blue-edged spot on shoulder. Two dark radiating bars across
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE aie!
cheek. Tips of dorsal fin and orbital tentacles white. Pattern retained for years
after preservation.
Location of type material. Muséum National d’ Histoire Naturelle, Paris.
Material examined. 113 specimens, 20-116 mm in standard length. 1 specimen,
Cape, Paris Museum Cat. No. A 1885 (holotype); 1 from Milestone 26, north
of Swakopmund, S.A.M. 24201; 2 from Liideritzbucht, S.A.M. 24211; 1 from
Sinclair’s Island, August 1947, R.U.C.; 12 from Port Nolloth, $.A.M. 24216, 5
from Port Nolloth, 27/4/1950 R.U.C.; 4 from Hondeklip Bay, S.A.M. 24671,
S.A.M. 24670 (holotype and paratypes of obtusifrons); 1 from Hondeklip Bay,
28/4/1960, R.U.C.; 3 from Gert du Toit Bay, southern Namaqualand, $.A.M.
24253; 1 from Doring Bay, southern Namaqualand, 26/4/1960, R.U.C.; 58
from Lambert’s Bay, R.U.C.; 3 from Ysterfontein, 20/2/1948, R.U.C.; 7 from
Sea Point, S.A.M. 25068; 6 from False Bay, March 1947, R.U.C.; 8, no locality,
R.U.C.
(i) lateral
(ii) anterior
(c) (iii) ventral
a) —=---
Fic. 18. Clinus (Clinus) heterodon: (a) Lateral view, female, 124 mm, S.A.M. 24671; (b) Head
pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
Remarks. The re-examination of Valenciennes’ types indicated that the type-
specimen of the species that he named heterodon was a tentacled clinid referable
to the genus Clinus. It is in no way identifiable with the species for which the
name heterodon has been used in South African literature since Barnard (1927)
52 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
identified it as such from Valenciennes’ very brief description. The description
is very inadequate and, translated, reads ‘I did not see a tentacle over the
eye ...’. It has naturally been assumed, as it happens, incorrectly, that the
specimen he examined did not have a tentacle over the eye. Gilchrist & Thomp-
son (1908) did not identify any of the South African species they collected and
described with Valenciennes’ C. heterodon. However, Barnard (1927), assuming
the lack of a supraorbital tentacle, and using the dorsal and anal fin counts
given by Valenciennes for C. heterodon, identified a species of weed-dwelling
clinid described by Gilchrist & Thompson under the name Clinus graminis as
Valenciennes’ heterodon. This identification has been followed by subsequent
workers, so that the name heterodon has come to be applied to a species of the
genus Pavoclinus (Smith, 1945, 1949).
The species to which Valenciennes’ type and description of C. heterodon
refer is fairly common on the west coast of South Africa.
Owing to its superficial similarity in fin counts to C. acuminatus it was not
rediscovered until recently, and was described as a new species Clinus obtusifrons
(Penrith, 1967). However, since my specimens of obtusifrons agree in every
Keuse ee
Carer ne aoe ne : oe aS PES ze ee
box Ae OA i
A@ oO f
O ot A 4 4
Fic. 19. Distribution of C. latipennis (open squares), C. robustus (open triangles), C. superciliosus
(open circles), C. taurus (closed triangles), C. venustris (closed circles), C. woodi (closed squares).
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 53
way with Valenciennes’ holotype of C. heterodon, the name heterodon must
replace obtusifrons. The name graminis Gilchrist & Thompson is revived for the
species that has been masquerading under the name of heterodon in the South
African literature.
Clinus heterodon has very similar dorsal counts to Clinus acuminatus, but can
be distinguished from that species by the shape of the intromittent organ, the shape
of the snout and profile, the height of the first three dorsal spines, the greater
width of the interorbital, and the number of pectoral rays. Large specimens of
Clinus obtusifrons can be distinguished from Clinus acuminatus by the concave
interorbital and the supraorbital ridges. The intromittent organ is similar to
the type found in Clinus berrisfordi, Clinus cottoides, and Clinus brevicristatus..
Disiribution (fig. 11). The known range is from north of Swakopmund (22°40’S.,
14°34’E) (South West Africa) to False Bay (+34°10’S., 18°50’E). The
species is fairly common in pools in the middle and lower regions of the inter-
tidal zone on the coast west of Cape Point, particularly from the Olifants River
to the Orange River, but is extremely rare in False Bay.
Clinus (Clinus) latipennis Valenciennes in
Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1836
(Fig. 20)
Clinus latipennis Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1836: 394. Barnard, 1927: 860. Hubbs,
1952: 106. Smith, 1966: 73.
Clinus latipinnis: Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908, 127.
Labrisomus latipennis: Swainson, 1839: 277.
Ophthalmolophus latipinnis: Gill, 1860: 104. Smith, 1945: 542.
Ophthalmolophus latipennis: Smith, 1949: 355, fig. 993.
Description. D. XX XIII-XXXVI 8-9; A. IT 23-26; P. 13-14; V. I 2-3; C. 13.
Vertebrae 17 + 30-33. Dorsal fin low, even; no notch in membrane between
third and fourth dorsal spines. No clusters of cirri at tips of dorsal spines.
Pectoral fin rounded. Inner pelvic ray minute or absent. Caudal peduncle
short, length 27-5-33°3% head length, depth 20-33% head length. Caudal fin
subtruncate.
Body slightly compressed, covered with small embedded scales extending
on to dorsal fin base; caudal and anal fin bases and head naked. Depth
4°85-5°2 in standard length. Head 3-5-5-5 in standard length, snout bluntly
rounded. Interorbital grooves moderately deep. Eye 3:2—4:6 in head. Supra-
orbital tentacle prominent, with flattened stalk, expanded tip, and terminal
fringe of fine filamentous cirri. Cirrus on anterior nostril flattened, narrow at
base with expanded trilobate tip. Upper jaw 35-43°5% standard length. Lips
moderately thin. Vomer toothed. Sensory pores of head single in nasal and
interorbital series, single except for first pore in mandibular series, and double
in preopercular series; double or multiple in remaining series (fig. 20(b)).
Many pores open on papillae, giving head a rough appearance.
Lateral line of vertical pairs of pores in front to post-pectoral curve, then of
54 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
short separate horizontal tubes with pore at either end (fig. 20(d)). Intro-
mittent organ of male with moderately long basal portion and swollen tip
ensheathed by pair of large, flattened ventral lobes and small flattened dorsal
lobe. Three lobes at base of organ, two lateral rounded ones and one dorsal
flattened lobe (fig. 20(c)).
Colouring. Pinkish brown with faint irregular darker mottling and speckling
Fins whitish, dorsal with about seven dark cross bars not reaching upper edge
of fin. Pectoral and caudal fins with clusters of small black dots forming irregu-
lar spots. Head grey-brown, mottled. A few white spots on pectoral base and
along sides. Pattern remains for a long time after preservation.
Location of type material. Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris.
Material examined. 7 specimens, 47-102 mm in standard length. 3 specimens,
Cape, Paris Museum Cat. Nos. Azo10, Ago11, A2o12 (syntypes); 1 from St.
James, S.A.M. 10533; 2 from Die Dam, Bredasdorp district, S.A.M. 25066;
1 from Fish Hoek, December, 1966, S.A.M. 25067.
(i) ve (ii) lateral (iii) anterior (iv) dorsal
(c)
SPER '
SSE WEEE jg
em
AY,
arn
Pea
Pk a .
(d) “8 @= > eme- -=
(b)
Fic. 20. Clinus (Clinus) latipennis: (a) Lateral view, female, 82 mm, S.A.M. 25066; (b) Head
pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 55
Remarks. This species is poorly known, although it was one of the earliest
described South African Clinidae. There are four specimens in the South
African Museum, three of which were acquired recently, so that fresh material
was available for study. This species is extremely similar to Clinus helenae,
particularly in the occurrence of basal lobes around the intromittent organ.
It is distinguished from Clinus helenae in having more dorsal soft rays. It is very
similar in appearance to Clinus cottoides.
Distribution (fig. 19). The known range is from Table Bay (+33°45'S., 18°20’E)
to Cape Agulhas (34°50’S., 20°00’E); rare.
Clinus (Clinus) robustus Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908
(Fig. 21)
Clinus robustus Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908: 128. Barnard, 1927: 850. Smith, 1945: 541, 1949:
354, pl. 81 fig. 987 and fig. 987.
Clinetrachus robustus: Hubbs, 1952: 107.
Caboclinus robustus: Smith, 1966: 73.
Description. D. XX XII-XX XIV (XXXII) 9-14 (10-11); A. IT 26-28 (26-27) ;
P. 12; V.13; C. 13. Gill-rakers in outer series on first arch 1-2 + 4-5. Vertebrae
17 + 33. First three dorsal spines slightly elevated, forming low crest, second
spine longest (first dorsal spine 0-5-4 mm longer than fourth dorsal spine).
Shallow notch in membrane between third and fourth dorsal spines, depth
variable (see table 3). Anterior dorsal spines with clusters of 3-4 cirri at tips.
Inner pelvic ray well developed, as least half length and thickness of other
rays. Caudal peduncle short, length 25-33:3°% head length, depth 24-30%
head length. Caudal fin subtruncate.
Body slightly compressed, covered with small embedded scales extending
on to bases of dorsal and caudal fins but not anal fin base or head. Depth
4°5-5°5 in standard length. Head large, heavy, 3:25-4 in standard length,
snout bluntly rounded in large specimens, somewhat subconical in smaller
ones. Eye 5—7-5 in head. Supraorbital tentacle prominent, with flattened stalk
and expanded flat tip, terminating in several short, flat, simple branches.
Cirrus on anterior nostril somewhat elongate, narrower at base, margin irregu-
larly indented. Mouth large, upper jaw 45°5-53°5% head length. Lips thick,
with distinct vertical corrugations. Vomer toothed. Sensory pores of head
double or multiple in suborbital, supraorbital, and occipital regions, otherwise
mostly single (fig. 21(b)).
Lateral line of vertical pairs of pores and single pores opening above and
below the line in front to post-pectoral curve, then of short separate horizontal
tubes with pore at either end (fig. 21(d)). Intromittent organ of male with
moderately long basal portion and two pairs of lips ensheathing tip, small
rounded dorsal pair and large ventro-lateral pair, latter with finely serrate
ventral margins (fig. 21(c)).
Colouring. Variable, olive yellow to dusky, with speckling in dark olive, red,
56 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
black, green, and white, forming obscure crossbars continuing on to dorsal and
anal fins, or dark greyish brown with vague mottling. Sometimes a few bright
orange speckles along anterior part of lateral line. Pectoral, pelvic, and caudal
fins barred. Dorsal, anal, and pelvic fins red- or orange-tipped. Usually two
dark radiating lines from eye across cheek. Uniform yellowish preserved in
alcohol.
Location of type material. South African Museum, Cape ‘Town.
Lectotype. Female, 280 mm standard Jength, Seal Island, False Bay, S.A.M.
10539.
(ii) fateral
® ventral
QD
(iii) anterior (¢)
.(b)
Fic. 21. Clinus (Clinus) robustus: (a) Lateral view, female, 121 mm, S.A.M. 23878; (b) Head
pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
Material examined. 12 specimens, 123-314 mm in standard length. 1 from Melk-
bosch, S.A.M. 24072; 8 from Kalk Bay, False Bay, S.A.M. 10537, S.A.M.
10538 (paralectotypes), S.A.M. 10539 (lectotype), S.A.M. 18087; 2 from
Dalebrook, False Bay, S.A.M. 23873; 1 from St. James, False Bay, S.A.M.
12019.
Remarks. Although Smith (1945), and following him Hubbs (1952), treated
Clinus robustus as if it were very close to Clinus superciliosus, the similarity in size
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 57
and habit between these two species probably accounted for this as much as
actual resemblance, as the two species are not easily confused. Clinus robustus
appears to be a rather primitive and generalized species; it is at least as closely
related to forms such as Clinus taurus and Clinus agilis as to Clinus superciliosus,
and at smaller sizes bears a superficial resemblance to large specimens of Clinus
acuminatus.
Distribution (fig. 19). The known range is west coast of the Cape Peninsula
(34°21'S., 18°29’E) to East London (33°00’S., 27°54’E). Fowler (1934)
recorded this species from Natal, but its occurrence there is most improbable.
The validity of all Fowler’s (1934) clinid records is doubtful. Infratidal except
in the young stages. Appears to be rare.
Clinus (Clinus) superciliosus (Linnaeus, 1758)
(Fig. 22)
Blennius superciliosus Linnaeus, 1758: 257.
Blennius mustelaris Linnaeus, 1758: 257. Gronovius, ed. Gray, 1854: 98 (mustellaris).
Blennius punctulatus Lacépéde, 1800: 460.
Blennius mustela Lacépéde, 1800: 459.
Blennius spadiceus Bloch & Schneider, 1801: 172.
Blennius capensis Forster, in Bloch & Schneider, 1801: 175.
Clinus superciliosus: Cuvier, 1817: 173. Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1836: 360.
Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908: 113. Thompson, 1918: 149. Barnard, 1927: 855. Smith, 1945;
541, 1949: 354, pl. 77 fig. 986 and fig. 986.
Clinitrachus superciliosus: Swainson, 1839: 276. Hubbs, 1952: 106 (Clinetrachus).
Blennius versicolor Pappe, 1853: 27.
Blennius mycterizans Gronovius, ed. Gray, 1854: 97.
Blennius ignobilis Gronovius, ed. Gray, 1854: 96.
Clinus dubius Castelnau, 1861: 51.
Clinus pantherinus Castelnau, 1861: 52.
Clinus marmoratus Castelnau, 1861: 52.
Clinus ornatus Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908: 116.
Clinus superciliosus var. arborescens Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908: 115.
Caboclinus superciliosus: Smith, 1966: 73.
Doubtful synonym: Blennius varius Seba, 1758: 90, 93.
Description. D. XXXI-XLII (XXXIV-XXXVI) 5-10 (7-8); A. II 21-30
(24-27); P. 15-18 (15-16); V. I 2; C. 13. Gill-rakers in outer series on first
arch 2-3 + 7-8. Vertebrae 18 + 30-32. Dorsal fin with first three spines con-
siderably elevated to form crest, higher in mature males than in females and
juveniles (table 5). Notch of varying depth in membrane between third and
fourth dorsal spines (table 3). Pectoral fin rounded. Third pelvic ray invariably
absent; present in two specimens of whole sample examined. Caudal peduncle
short, length 24-26-5% head length, depth 29-33:5% head length. Caudal fin
subtruncate. Clusters of cirri usually present at tips of first three dorsal spines.
Body slightly compressed, covered with small embedded scales, more or
less overlapping at least on front half of body, extending on to dorsal and caudal
fin bases; anal fin base and head naked. Depth 4-5 in standard length. Head
3°25-4 in standard length, snout conical to rounded in large specimens. Eye
58 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
2°5-3'75 in head. Supraorbital tentacle variable, usually small, with narrow
subcylindrical stalk and flattened spatulate tip with a few short, simple branches,
but occasionally more prominent, with fairly long subcylindrical stalk giving
off many fine filamentous branches towards tip. Cirrus on anterior nostril small,
flaplike. Upper jaw 33-55°5% head length, increasing with increase in stan-
dard length. Lips thick. Vomer toothed. Sensory pores of head mostly single,
double in occipital and supraorbital series (fig. 22(b)).
Lateral line of single and few vertical pairs of pores in front to post-pectoral
curve, then of short separate horizontal tubes with pores at either end (fig.
22(d)). Intromittent organ of male with moderately long basal portion and tip
ensheathed by complicated skinny fold, presumably derived from confluent
ventral lips, with two flat dorsal lips above; appears square when retracted
(fig. 22(c)).
Colouring. Very variable. Usually mottled and blotched pattern with con-
spicuous dark, roughly diamond-shaped blotches, lighter in centre, along base
of, and continued on to, dorsal fin. Ground colour usually buff or grey, with
red and darker mottling, but plain scarlet, crimson, bronze and green speci-
mens with fine black speckling, and red, bright green, or olive specimens with
the usual pattern in a darker shade occur. A round dark spot, which may
appear metallic blue when fresh, on dorsal crest. Head dark above, barred and
reticulated below with longitudinal stripes of lighter and darker shades, rising
from lips to eye and curving down again across cheek. Dark, comma-shaped
mark on opercle. Belly mainly white; may have reticulate markings. Branchio-
stegal membranes with reticulate markings. Fins irregularly barred; often with
bright red and orange markings in mature males. Juveniles milky with faint
dark marks along dorsal base. Pattern remains for years after preservation.
Location of type material. Unknown.
Material examined. 1,118 specimens, 29-251 mm in standard length. 57 from
Swakopmund and Milestone 26, S.A.M. 24200; 56 from Walvis Bay, S.A.M.
1381, S.A.M. 9866, S.A.M. 24203; 127 from Liideritzbucht, S.A.M. 24204;
28 from Port Nolloth, S.A.M. 24215; 1 from Kleinsee, Namaqualand, S.A.M.
18225; 17 from Hondeklip Bay, March 1965, S.A.M. not catalogued; 53 from
Gert du Toit Bay and Doring Bay, southern Namaqualand, S.A.M. 24225;
417 from Lambert’s Bay, S.A.M. 23905, S.A.M. 23914; 4 from Hoetjies Bay,
Saldanha Bay, S.A.M. 9868, S.A.M. 9869; 9 from Saldanha Bay, S.A.M. 23970,
S.A.M. 23911; 4 from Robben Island, Table Bay, S.A.M. 9859; 3 from Green
Point, Cape Peninsula, S.A.M. 22779; 88 from Sea Point, S.A.M. 23912,
S.A.M. 23915, and 17/2/1965, S.A.M. not catalogued; 1 from Hout Bay, Cape
Peninsula, S.A.M. 23908; 2 from Kommetjie, Cape Peninsula, S.A.M. 9865;
32 from Froggy Pond and Miller’s Point, False Bay, S.A.M. 23910; 8 from Kalk
Bay, False Bay, S.A.M. 9875 (syntype of ornatus) ; 11 from Dalebrook, False Bay,
S.A.M. 23913, S.A.M. 23916, S.A.M. 23917 and 18/4/1965 and 16/5/1965,
S.A.M. not catalogued; 41 from Strandfontein, False Bay, S.A.M. 23977,
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 59
S.A.M. 24223; 10 from Strandfontein and Dalebrook, 19/2/1965, S.A.M. not
catalogued; g from False Bay, S.A.M. 9871, S.A.M. 9872, S.A.M. 9873
(syntypes of var. arborescens), S.A.M. 9874 (syntype of ornatus); 51 from
Onrust River Mouth, $.A.M. 23904, S.A.M. 24226; 13 from Die Dam, Bredas-
dorp district, S.A.M. 24507, S.A.M. 24547; 10 from Still Bay, S.A.M. 25070;
2 from Mossel Bay, S.A.M. 23909; 5 from Knysna (Leisure Isle and the Heads)
S.A.M. 24227; 44 from Port Elizabeth, $.A.M. 23918, S.A.M. 23986, S.A.M.
24224; 2 from Kidd’s Beach, East London, $.A.M. 25069; 3 from Kei Mouth,
9S.A.M. 25071.
. t =o } .
(i) ventral i) lateral (ii) anteriop
(c)
(b)
Fic. 22. Clinus (Clinus) superciliosus: (a) Lateral view, male, 82-5 mm, S.A.M. 23907; (b) Head
pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
Remarks. Clinus superciliosus is the most abundant South African clinid, and also,
as suggested by the extensive synonymy, the most variable. Clinus ornatus was
described by Gilchrist & Thompson (1908) for nine mature male specimens from
Table Bay; these specimens had rather different markings from the typical
60 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
form, a better developed supraorbital tentacle, and the dorsal fin originating
further forward than in the usual variety (see table 6). It seems that, as stated
by Smith (1945), these specimens are simply an unusual variety of male
Clinus superciliosus, and unless females and juveniles can be found to correspond
with the ornatus males, they must be included in the species supercaliosus. This
species shows a stronger tendency to sexual dimorphism than the other South
African clinid species, since, apart from the intromittent organ, the crest is
0
4 2 %
ro Bi S
g g g
0 0 ' ' }
39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 3231
dorsal spines dorsal spines dorsal spines
(a) Swakopmund (t) Lambert's Bay (k) Strandfontein
no. of fish
P=
no. of fish
° 8
no. of fish
0 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 0 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31° c 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31
dorsal spines dorsal spines dorsal spines
(b) Walvis Bay (g) Saldanha Bay (1) Onrust River Mouth
2
=
¥
§ i E
& S10 = 10
° b. °o
. 9° ;
° c 2
2 c
Y 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 P 39 38 37 36 5 i
; } 35 34 33 32 31 39 38 37 36 35 3
dorsal spines dorsal spines dorsal ieee sd
(e} Lideritzbucht (h) Melkbos (m) Bredasdorp dist.
0
no. of fish
no. of fish
* n
no. of fish
3S 8
“i : - , 0
39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31
dorsal spines dorsal spines dorsal spines
(d) Orange River Mouth (i) Sea Point (n) Still Bay
no. of fish
_ nm
oO o
no. of fish
= nN
o o Oo
no, of fish
=) 8
0 0 -
39 38 37 36.35 34 33 32 31 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31
dorsal spines dorsal spines dorsal spines
(e) Port Nolloth (j) Froggy Pond (False Bay) (0) Port Elizabeth
Fic. 23. Histogram showing dorsal spine count variation in different populations of C. superciliosus.
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 61
much higher in mature males than in females or juveniles, a condition not
found in any of the other crested South African species (see table 5).
A variety of Clinus superciliosus, C.s. arborescens, was also described by Gil-
christ & Thompson (1908) for specimens which have the larger, more fila-
mentous type of tentacle over the eye, but this also appears to develop only in
some mature males. A few specimens with tentacles of the arborescens type were
taken in a large sample obtained from Onrust River mouth (January, 1963),
and there were no other differences between them and the other specimens of
the sample.
Clinus superciliosus resembles Clinus wood: most closely of all the species of
Clinus, but has higher fin counts, and the dorsal fin origin further back (table 6).
The crest of Clinus woodt, which is also high and well developed, does not appear
to show sexual dimorphism. Clinus superciliosus resembles Clinus robustus mainly
in the size attained and the habitat in which it occurs.
In a study of large samples of Clinus superciliosus, two variations that may
be related to distribution have become apparent. The height of the crest of
mature males appears to be greater east of Cape Point and the number of
dorsal spines tends to be lower. The latter is shown in fig. 23. The crest requires
further study, as no large mature males were obtained east of Hermanus, but
there was a marked difference between Hermanus district specimens and
specimens from Lambert’s Bay, St. Helena Bay, Saldanha Bay and Sea Point
on the coast west of the Cape Peninsula. Jackson (1950) also noted the occur-
rence of such variation in Clinus superciliosus, but did not give measurements.
The fin counts, which do not vary with the size of the fish, show distinct varia-
tion from one population to another (fig. 23), and the east coast populations
show on average a lower number of dorsal spines than the west coast popula-
tions.
Distribution (fig. 19). The known range is Rocky Point (18°59’S., 12°29’)
(South West Africa) to the Kei River (32°41’S., 28°23’E). The species is
exceedingly common from Swakopmund to Port Elizabeth and less common
northwards from Swakopmund and eastwards from Port Elizabeth. Intertidal
and infratidal. Linnaeus (1758) gave the type locality as India, but as his descrip-
tion seems to pertain to the South African species described above, the locality
he gave is certainly erroneous.
TABLE 5. Height of dorsal crest in Clinus superciliosus
Height of crest (% of standard length)
10-12°9% 13-15°9% 16-18:9% 19%
Females
(no. of 63 6 O 0)
Juvenile males
(no. of 25 21 O )
fish)
Mature males
(no. of 2 6 17 32
fish)
62 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
TaBLE 6. Comparison of Clinus superciliosus (mature males) ‘ornatus’ males, and Clinus woodt
(males and females) (Abbreviations: S.L. = standard length; H.L. = head length; Snt. =
snout; D.O. = dorsal fin origin).
S.L H.L. as Snt.-D.O
(mm) % of S.L as % H.L
superciliosus 163 25°2 78-0
165 26-6 79°5
103 26-7 80:0
112 24°0 96-5
131 26-0 76°5
‘ornatus’ 70 24.°2 67°5
88-5 24°8 68-0
72 25°7 19°9
I51 PB 70:0
166°5 22°8 70°0
14! 24°0 66-0
077) 23°8 62-0
167 22°8 68-5
woodt 81 28-4 61-0
96 29°2 59°0
95 27°4 54°09
112 27°6 61-0
146 27°0 58:0
Clinus (Clinus) taurus Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908
(Fig. 24)
Clinus taurus Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908: 126. Barnard, 1927: 858.
Blenniomimus taurus: Smith, 1945: 539, 1949: 353, pl. 78 fig. 982.
Description. D. XXX-XXXVI (XXXII-XXXIV) 5-6; A. II 20-24 (21-23);
P. 12; V. I 2-3; C. 13. Gill-rakers in outer series on first arch 3-4 + 7-8.
Vertebrae 16 + 28-30. Dorsal fin low, even. Notch in membrane between third
and fourth dorsal spines (table 3). No clusters of cirri at tips of dorsal spines.
Pectoral fin rounded. Inner pelvic ray minute or absent. Caudal peduncle
short, length 20-32% head length, depth 21-23:5°% head length. Caudal fin
subtruncate.
Body slightly compressed, tapering towards tail, covered with small
embedded scales extending on to dorsal and caudal fin bases but not on to anal
fin base or head. Depth 4-5 in standard length. Head very heavy, 3°5-4°25 in
standard length. Snout bluntly rounded. Interorbital markedly concave, heavy
bony ridges over eyes. Occipital groves deep. Eye 3—-4°5 in head. Supraorbital
tentacle prominent, with flattened stalk and terminal fringe of fine cirri,
filamentous. Cirrus on anterior nostril small, flattened, flaplike. Mouth large,
upper jaw 42-53% head length. Lips moderately thin. Vomer toothed. Sensory
pores of head single in nasal and mandibular series except first, double mandi-
bular pore; multiple in all other series (fig. 24(b)). Most pores open on raised
papillae; head very rough.
Lateral line of vertical pairs of pores, with multiple pores in front to post-
pectoral curve, then of short separate horizontal tubes with pore at each end
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 63
(fig. 24(b)). Intromittent organ of male with fairly long basal portion; pair of
crescentic dorsal lips and pair of rounded, confluent ventral lips ensheathing
slender tip (fig. 24(c)).
Colouring. Ground colour in the fresh specimens examined pale green or yellow,
with about seven heavy dark brown cross-bars; head mottled with lilac. Fins
orange-tipped. Plain yellow preserved in alcohol.
Location of type material. South African Museum, Cape Town.
Lectotype. Male, 154. mm standard length, St. James, no other data, S.A.M.
10451.
(a)
ii lateral
Se eee 2
iii anterior
(c)
, 4,
fp SAFER Ha Aut cn re
SIAR Het
&
(a) ‘%
2
(b) \,
XS
Fic. 24. Clinus (Clinus) taurus: (a) Lateral view, male, 116 mm, Dalebrook, 12/1/1966, S.A.M.;
(b) Head pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
Material examined. 17 specimens, 74-1885 mm in standard length. 1 from
Lambert’s Bay, S.A.M. 24008; 1 from Kommetjie, Cape Peninsula, $.A.M.
10454 (paralectotype) ; 4 from Strandfontein, False Bay, S.A.M. 24234; 11 from
False Bay, S.A.M. 10451 (lectotype), S.A.M. 10450, S.A.M. 10452, S.A.M.
10453 (paralectotypes), 2 specimens, Cape, Paris Museum Cat. No. A. 2077
(syntypes of C’. cottozdes).
64 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Remarks. Clinus taurus resembles Clinus cottoides, Clinus latipennis, Clinus helenae, and
Clinus heterodon in having a concave interorbital, and represents the greatest
development of the bony supraorbital ridges. It attains a larger size than the
other species with a concave interorbital, and differs from them in having
notches in the membrane between the four or five anterior dorsal spines,
deepest between the third and fourth spines. In these respects it resembles
Clinus robustus more closely, although Clinus robustus has a crest. The head
pore system and the anterior part of the lateral line have more numerous pores
than any of the other species of the genus Clinus.
Distribution (fig. 19). The known range of this species is Lambert’s Bay
(32°04'S., 18°20’E) to Port Alfred (33°36’S., 26°54’E). It is rare, and occurs at
the bottom of the intertidal zone and infratidally.
Clinus (Clinus) venustris Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908
(Fig. 25)
Clinus venustris Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908: 130. Barnard, 1927: 861. Smith, 1966: 73.
Ophthalmolophus venustris: Smith, 1945: 542. Smith, 1949: 355, fig. ggo.
Description. D. XXXVII-XLI (XXXIX-XLI) 2-3; A. II 23-28 (24-27);
P. 14; V. I 2; C. 13. Gill-rakers in outer series on first arch 3 + 6-8. Vertebrae
18 (rarely 17) + 28-31. First dorsal spine low, about equal to fourth; second,
and to lesser extent third, dorsal spines elevated, second spine 0-5-3 mm
higher than first or fourth spines. No notch in membrane between third and
fourth dorsal spines, but second and third spines project above membrane.
Clusters of 2-3 cirri at tips of dorsal spines for about half length of fin. Pectoral
fin rounded. Third pelvic ray absent. Caudal peduncle short, length 26-5-33%
head length, depth 23°5-29% head length. Caudal fin subtruncate.
Body slightly compressed, covered with small embedded scales not extend-
ing on to fin bases or head. Depth 4-5 in standard length. Head 3°75-4.75 in
standard length, forehead sloping rather steeply to eyes. Snout bluntly rounded.
Eye 2°25-3°75 in head, noticeably large. Supraorbital tentacle with short,
flattish stalk and flattened tip ending in several short, simple branches. Cirrus
on anterior nostril flattened and spoon-shaped, margin shallowly indented.
Upper jaw 39-48% head length. Lips moderately thick. Vomer toothed.
Sensory pores of head single in nasal and interorbital series, mainly single in
mandibular, preopercular, and postorbital series, double in remaining series
(fig. 25(b)).
Lateral line of vertical pairs of pores in front to post-pectoral curve, then
of short separate horizontal tubes with pore at either end (fig. 25(d)). Intro-
mittent organ of male with moderately long basal portion; confluent pair
of dorsal lips and large pair of ventro-lateral lips, both with serrated inner
margins, ensheathing slender tip (fig. 25(c)).
Colouring. Very variable. Specimens from the coast north of Lambert’s Bay
pale buff with brown streaks, speckles, and reticulations. Bright blue red-
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 65
edged spot over first three dorsal spines. Fins red-tipped, anal fin often entirely
red. Branchiostegal membranes pale with fine black dots. Characteristic dark
line along edge of united gill membranes. Four specimens taken at Sea Point
were plain crimson. Uniform yellow preserved in alcohol.
Location of type material. South African Museum, Cape Town.
Lectotype. Male, 103 mm standard length, Fish Hoek, False Bay, S.A.M. 25238.
Material examined. 43 specimens, 40-106 mm in standard length. 13 from Liide-
ritzbucht, S.A.M 24212; 2 from Port Nolloth, $.A.M. 24217; 1 from Honde-
klip Bay, S.A.M. 25072; 1 from southern Namaqualand, S.A.M. 24017;
7 from Saldanha Bay, S.A.M. 18462; 4 from Sea Point, $.A.M. 23948 and
17/2/1965, S.A.M. not catalogued; 15 from Fish Hoek, False Bay, S.A.M.
a
= g Se
= SS
oS Swe eee eee
a
(ii)lateral (iii) anterior
(c)
(i) ventral
ap PRARRARA RAR AAAS LAA A en 4
RR a A 20,
(d) X
(b)
Fic. 25. Clinus (Clinus) venustris: (a) Lateral view, male, 91 mm, S.A.M. 25072; (b) Head pore
system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
25238 (lectotype), S.A.M. 10543 (paralectotypes).
Remarks. This species is not strikingly similar to any of the other species of
Clinus, and appears to be almost as close to forms such as Clinus superciliosus and
Clinus woodi as to forms such as Clinus acuminatus and Clinus agilis. The form of the
dorsal fin is different from that of any of the other species.
66 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Distribution (fig. 19). The known range is from Liideritzbucht (26°28'S.,
15°10’E) (South West Africa) to Port Alfred (33°36’S., 26°54’E). This rare
species occurs infratidally and in pools at the bottom of the intertidal region.
It is taken intertidally more frequently west of Cape Point than from False
Bay eastwards.
Clinus (Clinus) wood: (Smith, 1945)
(Fig. 26)
Petraites woodi Smith, 1945: 540, fig. 2, 1949: 353, pl. 77 fig. 984.
Description. D. XXVII-XXXI 5; A. II 21-24; P. 12-13; V. I 2; C. 13. Verte-
brae 15 + 27. First three dorsal spines elevated, forming high, triangular crest;
third and fourth dorsal spines widely separated, membrane from third spine
barely reaches base of fourth (table 3). First dorsal spine originates far forward,
over hind margin of eye (table 6). Clusters of cirri at tips of at least first three
dorsal spines. Pectoral fin rounded. Third pelvic ray absent. Caudal peduncle
short, length 21-5-33°5% head length, depth 21-5-23°5°% head length. Caudal
fin subtruncate.
Body slightly compressed, covered with small, embedded, more or less
overlapping scales extending on to dorsal and caudal fin bases but not anal fin
base or head, apart from three scales at upper anterior edge of opercle. Depth
3°5-4 in standard length. Head 3-5-4 in standard length, snout rounded, rather
more conical in smaller specimens. Eye 3-4 in head. Supraorbital tentacle with
cylindrical stalk giving off fine filamentous branches towards tip. Cirrus on
anterior nostril short, flattened, bilobed. Mouth large, upper jaw 50-53°5%
head length. Lips moderately thick. Vomer toothed. Sensory pores of head very
small, single in nasal, interorbital and supraorbital series, mainly single in
mandibular series; mainly double, occasionally multiple in remaining series
(fig. 26(b)). |
Lateral line narrow in front, difficult to see in detail, of vertical pairs of
pores or single pores opening above or below line to post-pectoral curve, then
of short separate horizontal tubes with pore at each end (fig. 26(d)). Pores very
minute. Intromittent organ of male with fairly long basal portion; tip
ensheathed by small pair of round dorsal lips and large pair of ventro-lateral
lips, almost confluent, with constriction in centre (fig. 26(c)).
Colouring. No fresh specimens seen. Smith (1945) described the colouring as
‘vivid in marbled olive, brown, and red, with obscure irregular cross-bars. One
or two red oblique bars across cheek.’ Uniform yellow preserved in alcohol.
Location of type material. Department of Ichthyology, Rhodes University,
Grahamstown.
Material examined: 6 specimens, 81-146 mm in standard length. 1 from Xora
Mouth, S.A.M. 24241; 5 from Xora Mouth, R.U.C. (paratypes).
Remarks. Clinus woodt appears to be very close to Clinus superciliosus. The range
of distribution of these two species does not overlap, but they are clearly speci-
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 67
fically distinct. The male Clinus superciliosus described by Gilchrist & Thompson
(1908) as Clinus ornatus approaches Clinus woodi in the forward displacement of
the dorsal origin and the form of the supraorbital tentacle. The intromittent
organ of Clinus woodi approaches the type found in Clinus agilis, and a!so is
rather similar to that of Clinus superciliosus, in which the tip is surrounded by an
almost continuous fold of skin.
Distribution (fig. 19). The known range is Kei Mouth (32°41’S., 28°23’E) to
Inhambane (23°51’S., 35°29’E) (Mozambique). The species is said to be
fairly common (Mrs. M. M. Smith, personal communication).
(i)ventral Gi) lateral
(iii) anterior
(c)
5 wy) s
= ASS
(d) seer
Fic. 26. Clinus (Clinus) woodi: (a) Lateral view, female, 112 mm, Xora Mouth, July 1962, R.U.C.;
(b) Head pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
Genus PAVOCLINUS Smith, 1945
Cristiceps non Valenciennes, Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908: 138 (type-species Cristiceps australis
Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valenciennes, by monotypy).
Pavoclinus Smith, 1945: 545 (type-species Clinus pavo Gilchrist & Thompson, by original designa-
tion).
Labroclinus Smith, 1945: 544 (type-species Cristiceps mentalis Gilchrist & Thompson, by original
designation).
68 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Fucomimus Smith, 1945: 544. (type-species Clinus mus Gilchrist & Thompson, by monotypy).
Myxodes non Cuvier, Smith, 1945: 544 (type-species Myxodes viridis Valenciennes in Cuvier &
Valenciennes, by monotypy).
Smithichthys Hubbs, 1952: 107 (type-species Clinus fucorum Gilchrist & ‘Thompson, by
monotypy).
Diagnosis. No tentacle over eye. Lateral line narrow in front, mainly of single
pores opening medially or above and below line to post-pectoral curve, then
of short separate horizontal tubes with pore at either end. Body covered with
small cycloid scales, imbricating or not. Intromittent organ of male with short
basal portion and very large conical tip surrounded at base by single pair of
dorso-lateral lips. Body compressed, sometimes deep. Caudal peduncle usually
elongate. Vomer toothed or not. Usually anterior crest of elevated first three
dorsal spines, separated from rest of fin or not. Exclusively weed-dwelling
species. Mouth fairly small, upper jaw averages less than 40% head length. No
clusters of cirri at tips of dorsal spines.
Discussion
Smith (1945) arranged six species in four genera as follows:
1. Pavoclinus: forms with teeth on the vomer, and the first three dorsal spines
elevated to form a crest, which is not separated from the rest of the fin by a
notch in the membrane. Two species, pavo Gilchrist & Thompson and graminis
Gilchrist & Thompson. Two additional species have subsequently been added
to this group, profundus Smith, 1960 and lztorafontis Penrith, 1965.
2. Labroclinus: forms with teeth on the vomer, and the first three dorsal spines
elevated to form a crest, which is separated from the rest of the fin by a deep
notch, the membrane from the third spine barely reaching the base of the fourth.
Two species, mentalis Gilchrist & ‘Thompson and Jaurenti Gilchrist & Thompson.
3. Fucomimus: forms lacking teeth on the vomer, with two bands of teeth
in each jaw. One species, mus Gilchrist & Thompson.
4. Myxodes: forms lacking teeth on the vomer, with one row of teeth in the
jaw. One species, fucorum Gilchrist & Thompson. Hubbs (1952) pointed out
that, as Myxodes is a South American genus of oviparous Clinidae, lacking a
fleshy penis in the male, and having external fertilization, fucorum, with a penis
in the male and internal fertilization, cannot be a member of the genus Myxodes,
and he proposed a new generic name, Smithichthys, for that species.
I believe that the features uniting the eight species mentioned above are
too numerous and important to allow their separation into more than one
genus, and they are therefore placed together in the genus Pavoclinus. I have
used the name Pavoclinus, which contains all the most typical members of the
genus, because this will necessitate the least number of alterations of name
and additions to the synonymy. The names Fucomimus and Labroclinus have page
preference over Pavoclinus. 'To use either Fucomimus or Labroclinus would result
in extensive additions to the synonymy of the species. In the interest of maintain-
ing the stability of the nomenclature, I therefore claim the privilege of the first
reviser of the group to use Pavoclinus (International Commission for Zoological
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 69
Nomenclature, 1964, article 24(a), recommendation 24A).
The elongation of the caudal peduncle, compression of the body, and the
coloration, including the frequently occurring translucent patches in the fin
membranes, are presumably all modifications for a weed-dwelling existence.
However, these similarities seem to be too many to be the result of convergence,
and appear to indicate close relationship. Clinus brevicristatus and Gynutoclinus
rotundifrons are also habitually weed-dwellers, but these two species do not share
the features common to the Pavoclinus species. There is also considerable uni-
formity in the form of the intromittent organ of the Pavoclinus species. I believe
that division of this group into more than one genus would obscure the relation-
ships of the species.
Four subgenera are used to indicate the relationships of the species within
the genus. Three of these are monospecific, and the fourth contains a closely
related group of species.
The lack of vomerine teeth in the two species mus and fucorum appears to
warrant their separation from the remaining species at a subgeneric level.
Although it is possible that they are more closely related to one another than
to any of the other species, mus and fucorum differ sufficiently from one another
to justify the retention of Smithichthys and Fucomimus as separate subgenera.
Pavoclinus mus differs from P. fucorum in having two rows of teeth in each jaw,
the snout not upturned, the form and position of the dorsal fin origin, and in
having 11 as opposed to 13 primary caudal rays (unique among the South
African Clinidae). —
The species favo, graminis, and laurentii are so similar that even subgeneric
distinction on account of the separation in laurentii of the dorsal crest seems
unwarranted. However, the close association of laurentii with mentalis (Barnard,
1927; Smith, 1945), does not appear to be correct. Pavoclinus graminis, P. pavo,
and P. laurentii all have fewer than 35 dorsal spines and fewer than 25 anal rays,
while P. mentalis is markedly elongate, with a high number of dorsal and anal
elements (35-39 dorsal spines and 29-30 anal rays). P. mentalis has a long skinny
projection at the lower jaw symphysis, and reaches a very large size. On account
of its peculiar features, and to emphasise the particularly close relationship
between the species favo, graminis, laurentii, litorafontis, and probably profundus,
mentalis is placed in a separate subgenus Labroclinus.
Pavoclinus graminis and P. laurentii are the two least strongly modified species,
having a fairly normal body shape rather like that of most species of the sub-
genus Clinus (Clinus). Pavoclinus pavo and P. litorafontis are somewhat more
compressed, with rather longer caudal peduncles. It is proposed to include
these four species in a subgenus Pavoclinus, together with, provisionally, Pavo-
clinus profundus, which is at present known only from the unique type.
The eight species of Pavoclinus are compared in table 7.
Distribution. West (26°38’S., 15°10’E) to east (23°51’S., 35°29’E) coasts of
South Africa (fig. 27), mainly east of Cape Point, only one species, Pavoclinus
pavo, occurring west of Cape Point. Mainly intertidal, in seaweed.
2A9 Jo UISIeUI
Joel EN @)
quasqy
quasqy
o&-S .z
G.zo-Lb
G.12-GL.€1
G-€
ob—c&
G.>-G.¢
GL.v_-F
a1eINPOP[
I
(G1) &1-s1
12-61
(9-S) 9-?
(0€-62) 18-gz
wnsomnf
‘o19do01d
JIAO
yuosqy
quosoIg
ale
V.9&
Q-S
v.9&
g-¥
6.¢
onUIyy
€1
oI
1G
V
os
I
I
‘o1adoo1d “o1adoo1d
JIAO JIAO
quosqy yuosqy
yuasolg quosolg
1E—G .gz G.€6-G.cz
C.9b-of GL-G.9G
G.o1-G.G G.91-6
b-& G-C/.§
G.9&—az G.1b-G.€€
G-GL.§ GL.G-¢.7
GL.b-S.§¢ G-G/.§
aInuIyy pedopaasp-T][9
G1 G1
(G1) GI-11 SI-11
(3-02) Gz-oz (Ez) Ss-0z
(&) bz gL
(E-1£) g&-o§ (z&-18) zS-6z
ee ee eee eee
snpunfosg
oand syuofo10j1)
‘d19doa1d
IIAO
daeap ‘yuaso1g
yuasoIg
Gz—ze
Lv-€&
61-9
GL.€-GL.z
1b—9&
¢.¢_p
GL.0-Gz.P
a} 2IIPOp
G1
oI
(SZ—-13)
c-Y
(z&-0&) 8-6
quand]
SS—OG
‘d19do01d
I2AO
quasqy
yuasolg
1$—gz
G.96-S.9z
11-G.9g
GL.€-G.z
9&-0&
C_f
GL.P-G.§
a1 LIIPOP[
€1
ZI
(%-zz) b2-16
(S) 9?
(8-z&) SE-o8
SUMUDAS
‘o1adoo1d
JIAO
doap ‘jusso1g
quIsoIg
Gs—0%
ob-S&
G/L.o1-6
GL.G-G/.P
ob—SS
¢.¢-¢.P
CL.v-¥
pedojpeasp-Tj2
SI
ZI-I1
(0-62) o&—Lz
(4-9) 8-9
(ZE-96) 6E-SE
SIDIUIUL
“otodoo1d
JIAO
daap ‘jusso1g
quosqy
G.Lo—bz
GL—09
¢.a1-9
GL.€-G.z
G.€&-Le
¢.v-G.§
c_V
2712 1Opoyy
II
OI
(41-S1) g1-F1
(&) DE
(La-gz) gz—Gz
SNUL
‘O'd
jo uontsog
‘SP = ION
4199} DUIIOUIO A.
CTH %) ‘G'd'D
CTH %) “T'dO
CTS %) ‘sp 181
"TH ur ohg
CTH %) Mel
yideq Apog
"TS UlcTH
Aes orajod pis
sXKez jepnery
shed [210}99g
shel [euy
shei [esioq
souids [esioq
ee ee
srojoeIeyyy
‘gporedooid = -doaaid Jo -oradoaad {urS110 wy [esiop
‘O'd ‘wdep spunped jepnes = -q:g'y : yisuey aounped yepnes = “q-g°5 ‘auids jesiop
‘sp ‘mel toddn = mef -q ‘y)8u97 peoy = "TH ‘yisusy_ paepurys = -q-9 : SUOTIVIADIQGY
“snutjs0ang JO satsads ay} Jo uostredurory *Z aIavy,
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 71
Fic. 27. Distribution of P. mus (open triangles), P. fucorum (closed triangles), P. mentalis (half-
closed circles), P. pavo (open circles), P. graminis (closed circles), P. litorafontis (closed squares),
P. laurentii (+), P. profundus (open square).
Key to the species of Pavoclinus
I.
Vomer toothed ai ae ae as Ae af: a aye a8 Be |e
Vomer edentate ee a we ie ee itis)
A prominent projecting dips of att on the een jaw at the symphysis
Pavoclinus (Labroclinus) mentalis
No flap of skin at lower jaw symphysis .. xe ae a: BY ae sash es
First three dorsal spines raised to form a crest a Aus si Sis ais
First three dorsal spines not forming a crest ae Pavoclinus (Pavoclinus) profundus
Membrane from third dorsal spine barely reaches base of fourth
Pavoclinus (Pavoclinus) laurentii
Membrane from third dorsal spine reaches more than halfway up fourth Le ha
Inner pelvic ray stout, equal to others; 7-8 dorsal soft rays
Pavoclinus (Pavoclinus) litorafontis
Inner pelvic ray reduced; 6 or fewer dorsal soft rays
Dorsal soft rays 4-6; caudal peduncle less than 40% of ee Tenet snout subconical
; Pavoclinus (Pavoclinus) graminis
Dorsal soft rays 2-4; caudal peduncle more than 40% of head length; snout acute
Pavoclinus (Pavoclinus) pavo
Snout upturned, pug-like; one row of teeth in each jaw; caudal rays 13
Pavoclinus (Smithichthys) fucorum
Snout normal; 2 rows of teeth in each jaw; caudal rays 11 Pavoclinus (Fucomimus) mus
72 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Subgenus Fucomimus Smith, 1945
Fucomimus Smith, 1945: 544 (type-species Clinus mus Gilchrist & Thompson).
Diagnosis: Vomer edentate; two rows of teeth in each jaw. First three dorsal
spines elevated to form crest. Membrane from third spine barely reaches base
of fourth. Snout not puglike. Body highly compressed. Scales minute, embedded,
non-imbricating. Lateral line scales not distinct. Caudal peduncle long. Caudal
rays Il.
One species, Pavoclinus (Fucomimus) mus (Gilchrist & Thompson).
Pavoclinus (Fucomimus) mus (Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908)
(Fig. 28)
Clinus mus Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908: 119. Barnard, 1927: 864.
Fucomimus mus: Smith, 1945: 544, 1949: 356, pl. 79 fig. 997 and fig. 997.
Description. D. XXV-XXVIII (XXVI-XXVII) 3-4 (3); A. IT 14-18 (15-17);
P. 10; V. I 3; C. 11. Gill-rakers in outer series on first arch 3-4 + 5-7. Verte-
brae 14 + 27-28. First three dorsal spines elevated to form low crest, well
separated from rest of fin by wide gap between third and fourth dorsal spines;
membrane from third dorsal spine barely reaches base of fourth. Pectoral fin
rather narrow, upper edge straight. Inner pelvic ray always present, about half
length and diameter of other two rays. Dorsal fin with translucent membranes
between groups of 2-4 spines. Caudal peduncle long, length 60-75% head
length, depth 24—27-5°% head length. Caudal fin subtruncate.
Body highly compressed, covered with minute, embedded, isolated scales
not extending on to dorsal, caudal, or anal fin bases, or head. Depth 3°5-4°5
in standard length, deepening with increase in standard length. Head 3°75—5
in standard length, snout rounded. Eye 2-5-4 in head. No supraorbital tentacle.
Cirrus on anterior nostril slightly elongate, curved forward over nostril. Upper
jaw 27-33°5% head length, mouth small. Lips moderately thick. Vomer eden-
tate. Sensory pores of head mostly single in all series (fig. 28(b)).
Lateral line narrow in front, of single, more or less medially opening pores
to post-pectoral curve, then of short separate horizontal tubes with pore at
either end (fig. 28(c)). Intromittent organ of male with short thick basal por-
tion, long, fairly slender conical tip, and pair of lobed dorso-lateral lips (fig.
28(b)).
Colouring. Very variable. Ground colour various shades of green or brown,
mottled and streaked in intricate patterns with yellow, mauve, olive, black,
white, dark green, dark brown, and silver. Dorsal and caudal fins with translu-
cent patches. Other fins green or brown. Belly not lighter than general ground
colour. Juveniles uniform dark brown. Uniform yellow preserved in alcohol.
Location of type material. South African Museum, Cape Town.
Lectotype. Male, 75 mm standard length, St. James, Kalk Bay, no other data,
S.A.M. 25233.
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 73
Maiterial examined. 310 specimens, 22-86 mm in standard length. 2 from Froggy
Pond, False Bay, S.A.M. 23893; 1 from Glencairn, False Bay, S.A.M. 23883;
2 from Kalk Bay, False Bay, S.A.M. 17936, S.A.M. 18075; 82 from Dalebrook,
False Bay, S.A.M. 23880, S.A.M. 23895, S.A.M. 23897, and 18/12/1964,
19/2/1965 and 18/4/1965, S.A.M. not catalogued; 9 from St. James, Kalk
Bay, False Bay, S.A.M. 25233 (lectotype), S.A.M. 10531 (paralectotypes) ;
11 from St. James, False Bay, S.A.M. 12021, and 16/5/1965, S.A.M. not cata-
logued; 173 from Strandfontein, False Bay, S.A.M. 23879, S.A.M. 23884,
S.A.M. 23961, S.A.M. 23973, S.A.M. 24246, and 19/2/1965 S.A.M. not
catalogued; 4 from Strandfontein and Dalebrook, False Bay, S.A.M. 23882;
1 from Cape Peninsula, $.A.M. 23890; 1 from Gordon’s Bay, False Bay, $.A.M.
23292; 9 from Onrust River Mouth, $.A.M. 24247; 6 from Still Bay, S.A.M.
25073; 1 from Kidd’s Beach, East London, $.A.M. 25074; 1 from Igoda Mouth,
East London, $.A.M. 25075; 4 from Gonubie Mouth, East London, $.A.M.
25076; 3 from Kei Mouth, S.A.M. 25077.
Remarks. Pavoclinus mus is a highly modified weed-dwelling species. The deep,
strongly compressed body and the elongate caudal peduncle are like those of
Pavoclinus fucorum. I consider the difference in dentition important enough in
conjunction with other features to separate mus and fucorum at the subgeneric
ra
(iii) anterlor
(i) ventral (ii) lateral
(c)
Fic. 28. Pavoclinus (Fucomimus) mus: (a) Lateral view, female, 61 mm, Strandfontein, 19/2/1965,
S.A.M.; (b) Head pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
74 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
level, especially since Pavoclinus mus has on the whole as many or more features
in common with the species placed in the subgenus Pavoclinus than with Pavo-
clinus fucorum. Pavoclinus mus is rather similar to Pavoclinus pavo in having an
extremely small mouth, a similar, although more exaggerated, body shape, and
a rather delicate build compared with the other species.
Distribution (fig. 27). The known range is False Bay (--34°10’S., 18°50’E) to
the Kei River (32°41’S., 28°23’E). Quite abundant in dense growths of sea-
weed, particularly in the green alga Caulerpa filiformis, intertidal.
Subgenus Labroclinus Smith, 1945
Labroclinus Smith, 1945: 544 (type-species Cristiceps mentalis Gilchrist & Thompson).
Diagnosis: Vomer toothed; two rows of teeth in each jaw. First three dorsal
spines form high crest. Membrane from third dorsal spine barely reaches base
of fourth. Anal rays more than 25. Scales overlapping on anterior half of body.
Caudal rays 13. Prominent skinny flap on lower jaw symphysis.
One species Pavoclinus (Labroclinus) mentalis (Gilchrist & Thompson).
Pavoclinus (Labroclinus) mentalis (Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908)
(Fig. 29)
Cristiceps mentalis Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908: 139.
Petraites mentalis: Barnard, 1927: 866.
Labroclinus mentalis: Smith, 1945: 544, 1949: 357, pl. 81 fig. 998.
Description. D. XXXV-XXXIX (XXXVI-XXXVII) 6-8 (6-7) A. II 27-32
(29-30); P. 11-12; V. 1 3; C. 13. Vertebrae 16 + 37. First three dorsal spines
elevated to form crest, separated from rest of fin by wide gap between third and
fourth dorsal spines. Membrane from third dorsal spine barely reaches base of
fourth. Pectoral fin with upper edge more or less straight. Inner pelvic ray
stout, equal to others. Caudal peduncle fairly long, length 35-40% head length,
depth 20-25% head length. Caudal fin subtruncate.
Body highly compressed, covered with small embedded scales extending
on to dorsal and caudal fin bases but not anal base or head, more or less over-
lapping on front half of body. Depth 4:5—5-5 in standard length. Head 4-4°75
in standard length, snout narrowly pointed. Eye 4:25-5:75 in head. No supra-
orbital tentacle. Cirrus on anterior nostril small, flaplike over nostril. Upper
jaw 35-40% head length. Lips thick. Prominent flap of skin on lower jaw at
symphysis. Vomer toothed. Sensory pores of head mostly single, occipital series
double (fig. 29(b)).
Lateral line of mainly single pores opening above or below line or medially
in front to post-pectoral curve, then of short separate horizontal tubes with pore
at either end (fig. 29(d)). Intromittent organ of male with short basal portion
and large conical tip with pair of crescentic dorso-lateral lips ensheathing it at
base (fig. 29(c)).
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 75
Colouring. No fresh specimens seen. According to Smith (1949), ‘most vivid and
brilliant colouring, rather varied, aptly named ‘Rainbow-fish’. The young with
brilliant silvery iridescent spots along body’. Uniform yellowish preserved in
alcohol.
Location of type material. South African Museum, Cape Town.
Material examined. 8 specimens, 131-224 mm in standard length. 1 from East
London, 8.A.M. 9889 (holotype) ; 4 from East London, R.U.C.; 2 from Bizana
Coast, R.U.C.; 1 from Xora Mouth, R.U.C.
_ Gii) anterior
(i) ventral (ii) lateral
3 (c)
\
(b) (d) poe
Fic. 29. Pavoclinus (Labroclinus) mentalis: (a) Lateral view, female, 165 mm, East London, R.U.C.;
(b) Head pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
Remarks. Pavoclinus mentalis was placed by Gilchrist & Thompson (1908) in the
genus Cristiceps Valenciennes on account of its fully separated dorsal
crest, although the same authors placed all the other South African Clinidae
then described in the genus Clinus. The genus Cristiceps is Australasian and the
species included in it are characterised by a high, sickle-shaped separate dorsal
crest originating well forward over the eye, an elongate, very slender caudal
peduncle, and a long, simple tentacle over the eye. Pavoclinus mentalis has no
supraorbital tentacle, the crest originates in the usual position over the hind
76 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
margin of the preopercle, and the caudal peduncle, although somewhat
elongate, is not very slender. The species therefore can not be included in the
genus Cristiceps.
Barnard (1927) commented on the similarity between mentalis and
laurentit and placed them in the genus Peirattes, also Australian. Petraites has a
fringed supraorbital tentacle and is probably not distinct from Clinus, so that the
inclusion of mentalis and laurentw in Petraites was unsuitable. In 1945 Smith
erected the genus Labroclinus for mentalis and laurentu. The association of mentalis
and laurenia by these authors appears to have been based entirely on the separa-
tion of the dorsal crest, and may also have been influenced by the very similar
distribution of the two species. As has been pointed out, neither of these species
should be separated from the species of the genus Pavoclinus, but mentalis is
considered to differ sufficiently from laurentii and the other species to warrant
subgeneric separation.
When Smith (1945) designated mentalis as type-species of Labroclinus he
cited it as ‘Clinus’ mentalis Gilchrist & Thompson, but this is incorrect, as the
name Clinus had never been used for mentalis.
Distribution (fig. 27). The known range is Port Alfred (33°36’S., 26°54’E) to
St. Lucia Bay (28°23’'S., 32°25’E). The species is rare, and occurs infratidally
as well.
Subgenus Pavoclinus Smith, 1945
Pavoclinus Smith, 1945: 545 (type-species Clinus pavo Gilchrist & Thompson).
Diagnosis. Vomer toothed; two rows of teeth in each jaw. First three dorsal
spines forming crest or not. With or without notch in membrane between
third and fourth dorsal spines. Scales usually overlapping on at least front half
of body. Body compressed. Caudal rays 13. No skinny flap on lower jaw sym-
physis. Anal rays less than 25.
Five species. Pavoclinus graminis is the most generalized species, having the
shortest caudal peduncle and the least compression of the body. Pavoclinus
laurentii has a rather longer caudal peduncle but is also not greatly compressed.
Pavoclinus pavo and Pavoclinus litorafontis are highly compressed forms with an
elongate caudal peduncle. Pavoclinus profundus is a peculiar infratidal species
known only from the holotype; it resembles the other species of this subgenus
more closely than it does any of the other clinids, but the dorsal fin is without
any crest and the caudal peduncle is quite short.
Pavoclinus (Pavoclinus) graminis (Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908)
(Fig. 30)
Clinus graminis Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908: 136.
Clinus heterodon non Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valenciennes, Barnard, 1927: 863. Smith, 1935:
217.
Pavoclinus heterodon: Smith, 1945: 545, 1949: 357, pl. 80 figs roor.
Description. D. XXX-XXXV (XXXII-XXXIID) 4-6 (5); A. IL 21-24 (22-29);
P. 12; V. 13; C. 13. Gill-rakers in outer series on first arch 2-3 + 4-5. Verte-
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE TA
brae 15 + 29-31. First three dorsal spines elevated to form crest, fairly low,
second spine highest. No notch in membrane between third and fourth dorsal
spines. Pectoral fin with upper edge more or less straight. Inner pelvic ray
slender, about half length and diameter of others. Caudal peduncle moderate,
26-5-38°5°% head length, depth 26-31% head length. Caudal fin subtruncate.
Body moderately compressed, covered with small embedded scales extend-
ing on to dorsal and caudal fin bases but not anal fin base or head, overlapping
over whole body surface. Depth 4-5 in standard length. Head 3:5-4:75 in
standard length, snout rounded to bluntly conical. Eye 2:5-3:75 in head. No
supraorbital tentacle. Cirrus on anterior nostril very small, flaplike, covering
nostril. Upper jaw 30-36% head length, mouth small. Lips moderately thick.
Vomer toothed. Sensory pores of head mainly single in nasal, interorbital,
mandibular and preopercular series, double or multiple in other series (fig.
30(b)).
Lateral line of single pores opening above or below line in front to post-
pectoral curve, then of short separate horizontal tubes with pore at either
end (fig. 30(d)). Intromittent organ of male with short basal portion and large
conical tip emerging between pair of curved more or less confluent dorso-lateral
lips (fig. 30(c)).
Colouring. Very variable, green, brown, red, often mottled, streaked or with
cross-bars of yellow, silver, or deeper shades of the ground colour; pearly spots
on body in young specimens, which are usually otherwise plain red. Fins plain
or barred, with small translucent areas particularly on dorsal and caudal fins.
Belly usually not lighter than ground colour. Colours tend to be brighter and
more variable further east along the coast. Uniform yellow preserved in
alcohol.
Location of type material. South African Museum, Cape Town.
Lectotype. Female, 126 mm, St. James, donated by Mr. Langschmidt, $.A.M.
25240.
Material examined. 100 specimens 24-141 mm in standard length. 1 from Miller’s
Point, False Bay, S.A.M. 23899; 8 from Dalebrook, False Bay, S.A.M. 23806,
S.A.M. 23900 and 18/12/1964 and 18/4/1965 S.A.M. not catalogued; 12 from
St. James, S.A.M. 25240 (lectotype), S.A.M. 10523 (paralectotypes) and
16/5/1965, S.A.M. not catalogued; 12 from Strandfontein, False Bay, S.A.M.
23885, S.A.M. 23901, S.A.M. 24249; 4 from Still Bay, S.A.M. 25078, 4 from
Kidd’s Beach, East London, $.A.M. 25079; 4 from Igoda Mouth, East London,
.S.A.M. 25080; 22 from East London, $.A.M. 23903, S.A.M. 25081; 4 from
Gonubie Mouth, $.A.M. 25083; 17 from Port St. John’s, S.A.M. 23902.
Remarks. Clinus heterodon was described from the Cape by Valenciennes (1836),
and listed by Gilchrist & Thompson (1908), who stated that they had not
rediscovered the species here. Barnard (1927) identified the specimens from
which they described graminis as C. heterodon of Valenciennes. However, the
original description of C. heterodon was so inadequate that one could not base
78 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
an identification on it without examining the holotype. I found that the holo-
type is a tentacled clinid of the genus Clinus. Gilchrist & Thompson’s name
graminis therefore stands for the species of the genus Pavoclinus described above.
Distribution (fig. 27). The known range is False Bay (+34°06'S., 18°50’E) to
Inhambane (23°51'S., 35°29’E) (Mozambique), becoming more common
eastwards. Usually intertidal, in weed. Smith (1945 and 1949) gave Port
Nolloth as the north-western limit of this species, but its occurrence anywhere
west of Cape Point has not been confirmed, and it seems certain that the record
Was an error.
(ii) lateral (iii) anterior
(c)
Fic. 30. Pavoclinus (Pavoclinus) graminis: (a) Lateral view, female, 115 mm, S.A.M. 25083
(b) Head pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
Pavoclinus (Pavoclinus) laurentii (Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908)
(Fig. 31)
Clinus laurentii Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908: 120. Smith, 1935: 218, fig. 5.
Petraites laurentii: Barnard, 1927: 866.
Labroclinus laurentii: Smith, 1945: 544, 1949: 357, pl. 80 fig. 999 and fig. 999.
Description. D. XXIX-XXXITI (XXX-XXXII) 4-5; A. II 20-22 (21-22);
P. 12; V. 1 3; C. 13. Gill-rakers in outer series on first arch 2-3 + 4-6. Verte-
brae 15 + 27-29. First three dorsal spines elevated to form crest. Membrane
from third to fourth dorsal spine barely reaches base of fourth. Crest moderate,
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 79
second spine highest. Pectoral fin somewhat rounded, but upper edge fairly
straight. Inner pelvic ray about half length of other two, very slender. Caudal
peduncle moderate, length 33-47% head length, depth 22-33% head length.
Caudal fin subtruncate.
Body moderately compressed, covered with small embedded scales extend-
ing on to dorsal and caudal fin bases but not anal fin base or head, overlapping
on front half of body. Depth 4-5-5 in standard length. Head 4:25-4:75 in
standard length, snout rounded to bluntly conical. Eye 2°75-3-75 in head.
No supraorbital tentacle. Cirrus on anterior nostril small, flaplike. Upper jaw
36-41% head length. Lips moderately thick. Vomer toothed. Sensory pores
of head mostly double, many multiple pores in occipital region (fig. 31(b)).
(ii) lateral (iii) anterior
(c)
(i) ventral
(d) Ne
(b)
Fic. 31. Pavoclinus (Pavoclinus) laurentii: (a) Lateral view, male, 110 mm, Xora, May 1948,
R.U.C.; (b) Head pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
Lateral line of vertical pairs of pores or single pores opening above or
below line in front to post-pectoral curve, then of short separate horizontal
tubes with pore at either end (fig. 31(d)). Intromittent organ of male with
short basal portion and large, conical tip, ensheathed at base by pair of con-
fluent dorso-lateral lips (fig. 31(c)).
Colouring. No fresh specimens seen. Smith (1949) described the colouring as
‘most variable, but beautiful and delicate colours and markings, brown, red,
yellow, green, mottled and marbled.’ Uniform buff to yellow preserved in
alcohol.
80 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Location of type material. South African Museum, Cape Town.
Lectotype. Female, 108 mm standard length, Winkelspruit, Natal, collected by
L. Robinson, donated by R. Robinson, $.A.M. 25234.
Material examined. 15 specimens, 66-117 mm in standard length, 3 from Xora
Mouth, R.U.C.; 1 from Bizana Coast, R.U.C.; 1 from Port St. John’s, R.U.C.;
1 from Isipingo, R.U.C.; 3 from Winkelspruit, Natal, $.A.M. 25234 (lectotype),
S.A.M. 9888 (paralectotypes); 4 from Natal, S.A.M. 10927, S.A.M. 16157,
S.A.M. 18515; 1 from Inhaca Island, Mozambique, R.U.C., 1 from Inhambane,
Mozambique, R.U.C.
Remarks. Pavoclinus laurentii is similar to Pavoclinus mentalis in the separation of
the dorsal crest and in its distribution, but resembles Pavoclinus graminis in body
shape, head shape, fin counts, and relative size of eye, and appears to be closer
to the more generalized species than to Pavoclinus mentalis.
Distribution (fig. 27). Port Alfred (33°36’S., 26°54’E) to Inhambane (23°51’S.,
35°29’E) is the known range. The species is said to be not uncommon (Smith,
1949) in weedy pools.
Pavoclinus (Pavoclinus) litorafontis Penrith, 1965
(Fig. 32)
Pavoclinus litorafontis Penrith, 1965a: 212, pl. 5, and figs 1 and 2.
Description. D. XXIX-XXXII (XXXI-XXXII) 7-8; A. II 20-23 (23); P.
11-12; V. 13; C. 13. Gill-rakers in outer series on first arch 3-4 + 5-6. Verte-
brae 17 + 32-33. First three dorsal spines elevated to form crest, decreasing
in relative height with increase in size of fish. No notch in membrane between
third and fourth dorsal spines. Upper edge of pectoral fin more or less straight.
Inner pelvic ray stout, equal to others. Caudal peduncle long, length 58-5-75%
head length, depth 22-5~33-5°% head length. Caudal fin subtruncate.
Body compressed, covered with small embedded scales extending on to
dorsal and caudal fin bases but not anal fin base or head, overlapping over most
of body surface. Depth 4°5-5:75 in standard length. Head 3:75—5 in standard
length, snout subconical. Eye 3°5—4:25 in head. No supraorbital tentacle. Cirrus
on anterior nostril very small. Upper jaw 33°5-41°% head length. Lips mod-
erately thick. Vomer toothed. Sensory pores of head mostly single (fig. 32(b)).
Lateral line of single pores in front to post-pectoral curve, then of short
separate horizontal tubes with pore at either end (fig. 32(d)). Intromittent
organ of male with short basal portion and large, conical tip; single pair of
crescentic dorso-lateral lips ensheathing base of tip (fig. 32(c)).
Colouring. Green, striped in shades of darker green, yellow, and silver longitu-
dinally. Usually a yellow or silver stripe across cheek. Fins green, usually with
translucent patches; always translucent patches in the caudal fin. Belly no
lighter than ground colour, underparts green. Juveniles green or brown with a
broad silver longitudinal stripe mid-laterally. Uniform yellow preserved in
alcohol.
wa
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 81
Location of type material. South African Museum, Cape Town.
Material examined. 22 specimens, 27—190 mm in standard length. 14 from Strand-
fontein, False Bay, S.A.M. 23876, S.A.M. 23877, S.A.M. 23952, S.A.M. 23962,
S.A.M. 23972, S.A.M. 24052 (holotype), S.A.M. 24248, and March, 1965,
S.A.M. not catalogued; 8 from Onrust River Mouth, S.A.M. 24081, S.A.M.
24.257.
Remarks. Pavoclinus litorafontis appears to be the most strongly modified member
of the subgenus Pavoclinus, and has the most elongate caudal peduncle in that
subgenus. It is closest to Pavoclinus graminis in the form of the dorsal fin and the
(ii) lateral
G) ventral
@®)
(iii) anterior
(c)
“a,
(b) ‘
(d) Se
sk
oe
sae
Fic. 32. Pavoclinus (Pavoclinus) litorafontis: (a) Lateral view, male, 89 mm, S.A.M. 23876;
(b) Head pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
head. It resembles Pavoclinus mentalis in the body proportions but not the fin
counts other than the number of soft dorsal rays and the strong development
of the inner pelvic ray. It attains a larger size than the other species of the
subgenus Pavoclinus. Juveniles have a very poorly developed intromittent organ
and it is usually impossible to sex small specimens externally.
Distribution (fig. 27). The known range is False Bay (-34°10’S., 18°50’E) to
Cape Agulhas (34°50’S., 20°00’E); not common, in sea-weed low down on
the shore, particularly in beds of the green alga Caulerpa filiformis.
82 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Pavoclinus (Pavoclinus) pavo (Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908)
(Fig. 33)
Clinus pavo Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908: 123. Barnard, 1927: 857.
Pavoclinus pavo: Smith, 1945: 545, 1949: 357, pl. 81 figs 1000.
Description. D. XXX-XXXVI (XXXI-XXXIII) 2-4 (3); A. IT 20-23 (20-22);
P. 11-12 (12); V. I 2-3; C. 13. Gill-rakers in outer series on first arch 2-4 + 4-6.
Vertebrae 15 + 28-31. First three dorsal spines elevated to form crest, second
spine longest. No notch in membrane be'ween third and fourth dorsal spines.
Pectoral fin with upper edge more or less straight. Inner pelvic ray minute or
absent. Caudal peduncle long, 40-47 % head length, depth 20-30% head length.
Caudal fin subtruncate.
Body compressed, covered with small embedded scales extending on to
base of dorsal fin but not caudal and anal fin bases or head, overlapping on at
least front half of body. Depth 3-75-5 in standard length, body deepening with
increase in standard length. Head 3:5-4:75 in standard length, snout narrow,
acutely pointed. Eye 3-4 in head. No supraorbital tentacle. Cirrus on anterior
nostril flattened, flaplike, curving forward over nostril. Upper jaw 22-36:5%
head length, mouth small. Lips thick. Vomer toothed. Sensory pores of head
mostly single, occipital series and a few of preopercular and suborbital series
double (fig. 33(b)).
Lateral line of single pores opening above and below line in front to post-
pectoral curve, then of short separate horizontal tubes with pore at either end
(fig. 33(d)). Intromittent organ of male with moderate basal portion and large,
conical tip, swollen at base, and surrounded basally by large fleshy pair of
ovoid dorso-lateral lips (fig. 33(c)).
Colouring. Variable, green, brown or red, sometimes mottled and striped longi-
tudinally with yellow, lighter shades of the main colour and silvery white.
Belly of same shade as ground colour. Often pearly spots on body. Dorsal and
caudal fin with translucent patches. A specimen taken from kelp at Hondeklip
Bay was olive yellow, with three turquoise blue ocellate spots on side and a
turquoise blue line across cheek. Uniform yellow preserved in alcohol.
Location of type matertal. South African Museum, Cape Town.
Lectotype. Male, 88 mm standard length, St. James/Kalk Bay area, intertidal
pools, no other data, S.A.M. 25236.
Material examined. 59 specimens, 15-111 mm in standard length. 1 from Shear-
water Bay, Liideritzbucht, $.A.M. 24213; 2 from Port Nolloth, S.A.M. 24218;
3 from Hondeklip Bay, S.A.M. 25084; 3 from Lambert’s Bay, S.A.M. 23250;
1 from Langebaan, S.A.M. 21476; 1 from Melkbosch, 20/10/1964, S.A.M. not
catalogued; 1 from Table Bay, S.A.M. 4728; 1 from Miller’s Point, False Bay,
S.A.M. 23894; 1 from Glencairn, False Bay, S.A.M. 23891; 1 from Kalk Bay,
False Bay, S.A.M. 17935; 9 from Dalebrook, False Bay, S.A.M. 23888, S.A.M.
23898, and 18/4/1965, S.A.M. not catalogued; 2 from St. James/Kalk Bay,
False Bay, S.A.M. 25236 (lectotype), S.A.M. 10532 (paralectotype); 4 from
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 83
St. James, 16/5/1965, S.A.M. not catalogued; 3 from Onrust River Mouth,
S.A.M. 24251; 15 from Kidd’s Beach, East London, S.A.M. 25085; 4 from
Igoda Mouth, East London, $.A.M. 25086; 1 from East London, S.A.M.
23892; 6 from Kei Mouth, $.A.M. 25087.
Remarks. Pavoclinus pavo is apparently the only species of the genus Pavoclinus
occurring on the coast west of Cape Point, although it is much more common
east of Cape Agulhas. It is smaller and more delicately built than most of the
other species which occur intértidally.
Distribution (fig. 27). The known range is Liideritzbucht (26°38’S., 15°10’E)
(South West Africa) to the Kei River (32°41’S., 28°23’E). It is nowhere very
(ii) lateral (ii) anterior
(c)
(i) ventral
(b) \
Fic. 33. Pavoclinus (Pavoclinus) pavo: (a) Lateral view, male, 60 mm, S.A.M. 23888; (b) Head
pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
common, but is not uncommon towards the eastern limit of its range. It lives
intertidally in sea-weed. All the west coast specimens were taken in kelp, but
in False Bay and localities eastward most of the specimens were found curled
round the bases of short bushy growths of algae such as Hypnea spicifera; also in
Caulerpa beds. | |
Pavoclinus (Pavoclinus) profundus Smith, 1960
| (Fig. 34)
Pavoclinus profundus Smith, 1960: 689, fig. 1.
Description. D. XXX 4; A. IT 21; P. 12; V. 1 3; CG. 13. Vertebrae 14 + 27.
First three dorsal spines not elevated to form crest, but fourth spine slightly
84 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
shorter than third or fifth. No notch in membrane between third and fourth
dorsal spines. Upper edge of pectoral almost straight. Inner pelvic ray minute,
bound to outer rays by membrane, tip not free. Caudal peduncle moderate,
length 36-4°% head length, depth 27-2°% head length. Caudal fin subtruncate.
Body highly compressed, sparsely covered with small embedded scales, not
overlapping. Head naked. Depth at anal origin 4:8 in standard length. Head
39 in standard length, snout acutely pointed. Eye 3 in head. No supraorbital
tentacle. Cirrus on anterior nostril a small flap. Upper jaw 36-4°% head length,
mouth small. Lips moderately thin. Vomer toothed. Sensory pores of head
mostly single (fig. 34(b)).
Lateral line of single pores opening above or below line or medially in
front to post-pectoral curve, then of short separate horizontal tubes with pore
at either end, becoming obscure on caudal peduncle (fig. 34(d)). Intromittent
organ of male with short basal portion and large conical tip; pair of elongate
fleshy dorso-lateral lips partially ensheathing tip (fig. 34(c)).
Colouring. Only the preserved type seen. Detailed description of fresh colouring
given by Smith (1960). Uniform buff preserved in alcohol.
(i) ventral (ii) lateral (iii) anterior
(c)
ee ee ee ee ne ee =!
Ae,
(Bee (d)
Fic. 34. Pavoclinus (Pavoclinus) profundus: (a) Lateral view, male, 43 mm, R.U.C., holotype;
(b) Head pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 85
Location of type material. Department of Ichthyology, Rhodes University,
Grahamstown.
Material examined. 1 specimen, 43 mm in standard length, Knysna, 20 fms,
R.U.C. (holotype).
Remarks, This species is known only from the holotype, and in spite of the lack
of a marked dorsal crest it has so many features in common with the other
members of the subgenus Pavoclinus that it is placed in that subgenus. Not least
of these similarities is the form of the intromittent organ. The holotype was
stated by Smith (1960) to be a female, but the specimen is clearly a male with
an intromittent organ of a type very similar to that of the other species of
Pavoclinus.
Disiribution (fig. 27). Known from one locality, Knysna (34°03’S., 23°03’E);
dredged in 20 fathoms from a rocky bank.
Subgenus Smithichthys Hubbs, 1952
Myxodes non Cuvier, Smith, 1945: 544 (type-species Myxodes viridis Valenciennes in Cuvier &
Valenciennes).
Smithichthys Hubbs, 1952: 107 (type-species Clinus fucorum Gilchrist & Thompson).
Diagnosis. Vomer edentate; single row of teeth in each jaw. Snout upturned,
puglike. First four or five dorsal spines elevated to form high, rounded dorsal
crest. Body highly compressed. Scales minute, non-imbricating. Caudal
peduncle elongate; caudal rays 13.
One species, Pavoclinus (Smithichthys) fucorum (Gilchrist & Thompson).
Pavoclinus (Smithichthys) fucorum (Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908)
(Fig. 35)
Clinus fucorum Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908: 121. Barnard, 1927: 853.
Myxodes fucorum: Smith, 1945: 544, 194.9: 356, pl. 81 fig. go6.
Smithichthys fucorum: Hubbs, 1952: 107. Smith, 1953: 356, pl. 81 fig. 996.
Description D. XXVIII-XXXI (XXIX-XXX) 4-6 (5-6); A. II 19-21; P.
12-13 (12); V. 13; GC. 13. Vertebrae 15 + 28-29. First dorsal spine originates
well forward, over hind margin of eye. First four or five dorsal spines elevated
to form high rounded crest. No notch in dorsal fin membrane between any of
the spines; all spines evenly placed. Dorsal spines of varying lengths, giving
outline of fin markedly undulating appearance. Pectoral fin more or less
rounded, upper edge somewhat straight. Inner pelvic ray stout, almost equal
to others Caudal peduncle long, length 47—62-5% head length, depth 23°5-30%
head length. Caudal fin subtruncate, very large.
Body highly compressed, deep, covered with small embedded scales not
extending on to fin bases or head, not overlapping. Depth 3-5-4 in standard
length. Head 44:75 in standard length, snout rounded, upturned, puglike.
Eye 3-5 in head. No supraorbital tentacle. Cirrus on anterior nostril short,
with expanded trilobate tip. Upper jaw 32-42% head length. Lips fairly
86 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
thick. Vomer edentate; single row of teeth in each jaw. Sensory pores of head
mostly single, a few double in supraorbital and suborbital series (fig. 35(b)).
Lateral line of single pores opening more or less medially in front to post-
pectoral curve, then of short separate horizontal tubes with pore at either end
(fig. 35(d)). Intromittent organ of male with moderate basal portion and long,
conical tip, ensheathed basally by wing-like pair of dorso-lateral lips (fig. 35(c)).
Colouring. Uniform dark brown or olive, edges of fins lighter or transparent; two
irregular translucent patches in caudal fin. A bright silvery iridescent spot
behind pectoral fin. Uniform yellow preserved in alcohol.
Location of type material. South African Museum, Cape Town.
Lectotype. Male, 160 mm standard length, St. James, no other data, S.A.M.
29239-
Material examined. 13 specimens, 42-196 mm in standard length. g from St.
James, False Bay, S.A.M. 25235 (lectotype), S.A.M. 10524 (paralectotypes),
(i) ventral
(ii) lateral
(c)
*
(d) ~
poe
(b)
Fic. 35. Pavoclinus (Smithichthys) fucorum: (a) Lateral view, male, 101 mm, St. James, 16/5/1965,
S.A.M.; (b) Head pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
- ae
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 87
S.A.M. 12020, and 16/5/1965, S.A.M. not catalogued; 2 from Muizenberg,
False Bay, S.A.M. 10525; 2 from Strandfontein, False Bay, S.A.M. 23886 and
March, 1965, S.A.M. not catalogued.
Remarks. Pavoclinus fucorum is a peculiar, rare, highly specialised weed-dwelling
species. It resembles Pavoclinus mus in lacking vomerine teeth, but otherwise
differs from it in as many ways as it does from the members of the other sub-
genera of Pavoclinus.
Distribution (fig. 27). The known range is False Bay (+34°10’S., 18°50’E) to
the Bashee River (31°55’S., 28°27’E); rare, in sea-weed. At the bottom of the
intertidal region and infratidal.
Genus BLENNIOCLINUS Gill, 1860
Blennioclinus Gill, 1860: 103 (type-species Clinus brachycephalus Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valen-
ciennes, by monotypy).
Diagnosis: No supraorbital tentacle. Last dorsal spine about half length of first
dorsal ray, deep notch in profile of dorsal fin before dorsal soft rays. Lateral line
of double pores anteriorly to post-pectoral curve, then of short separate hori-
oss F ee.%e -
eet : .
ee 8 oe ote 0 ree ete et eee. ws
lo ot 0 oo ote teen tS CAE
wy +6
¢ at [e)
Fic. 36. Distribution of B. brachycephalus (open circles), B. stella (closed circles), Clinoporus
biporosus (closed squares), G. rotundifrons (half-closed circles), Cancelloxus burrelli (open triangles),
X. leprosus (closed triangles), X. kochi (open squares).
88 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
zontal tubes with pore at either end. Intromittent organ of male with short or
moderate basal portion and long slender tip concealed between pair of very
large lateral lips. Body covered with small embedded cycloid scales, not extend-
ing on to fin bases or head. First three dorsal spines elevated to form low crest.
Notch in membrane between third and fourth dorsal spines. Clusters of cirri
at tips of at least anterior dorsal spines. Vomer toothed. Head short, profile
rounded.
Two species.
Discussion. The genus Blennioclinus was included by Smith (1945) in his Myxo-
dinae on account of the lack of a supraorbital tentacle. However, the two
species brachycephalus and stella are not weed-dwellers and are further set apart
from the genus Pavoclinus by the notch in the profile of the dorsal fin before the
dorsal soft rays, the clusters of cirri at the tips of the dorsal spines, the body form,
the type of intromittent organ, and the high number of double pores in the
anterior part of the lateral line. They differ from the genus Clinus mainly in
having a notch before the dorsal soft rays, and in lacking a supraorbital tentacle.
I therefore regard the genus Blennioclinus as distinct from the other clinid genera.
Distribution. West and east coasts of South Africa (fig. 36).
Key to the species of Blennioclinus
1. 8-11 dorsal soft rays ey) aN vf a? ae Blennioclinus brachycephalus
6-7 dorsal soft rays - ie a We oe ad Blennioclinus stella
Blennioclinus brachycephalus (Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1836)
(Fig. 37)
Clinus brachycephalus Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1836: 371. Gilchrist & Thompson,
1908: 135. Barnard, 1927: 852.
Labrisomus linearis Swainson, 1839: 277.
Blennioclinus brachycephalus: Gill, 1860: 103. Smith, 1945: 543, 1949: 356; pl. 79 fig. 995.
Description. D. XXVI-XXX (XXVITI-XXIX) 8-11 (9-11); A. II 19-25
(21-24); P. 12-15 (13-14); V. I 3; C. 13. Gill-rakers in outer series on first
arch 2-3 + 3-5. Vertebrae 17 + 28-30. First three dorsal spines slightly
elevated, first spine o-2 mm longer than fourth, crest very low. Third and fourth
dorsal spines more widely spaced than others, very shallow notch in membrane
between them. Dorsal spines decrease in height posteriorly, last spine very
short, dorsal soft rays much higher; deep notch in profile of dorsal fin before
dorsal soft rays. Clusters of 3-4 cirri at tips of most dorsal spines. Pectoral fin
rounded. Inner pelvic ray short, slender. Caudal peduncle moderate, 35-40%
head length, depth 23-31% head length. Caudal fin subtruncate.
Body slightly compressed, covered with minute embedded scales not
extending on to dorsal, caudal, or anal fin bases or head. Depth 5-5-75 in
standard length. Head short, bluntly rounded, 4-5 in standard length. Eye
2°5-3°5 in head. No supraorbital tentacle. Cirrus on anterior nostril flattened,
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 89
irregularly trilobed. Upper jaw 28-5-34% head length, mouth small. Lips
thin. Vomer toothed. Sensory pores of head mostly double, with multiple pores
mainly in occipital series (fig. 37(b)).
Lateral line of about 30-35 multiple pores in front to post-pectoral curve,
then of short separate horizontal tubes with pore at either end (fig. 37(d)).
Intromittent organ of male with moderate basal portion and slender tip
ensheathed by large pair of lobed dorso-lateral lips (fig. 37(c)).
Colouring. Ground colour creamy fawn, much overlain with dark brown blotches
and reticulations, denser dorsally. Belly creamy or bright yellow, with dark
band running from isthmus towards vent, having broad dark symmetrical
vertical branches running up to the densely mottled area above. Sometimes
aD
(iii) arterior
Lp (ii) lateral
(i) ventral
(c)
el ew
ANNs Uy
Sr a
& 3 (d) SL
Fic. 37. Blennioclinus brachycephalus: (a) Lateral view, male, 73 mm, S.A.M. 23974; (b) Head
pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
fine orange stripes alternate with dark bands. A red-edged bright blue semi-
circular spot behind pectoral fin. Head dark above to lighter brown below.
Two mauve wavy lines on preopercle and opercle. Dark irregular band from
below eye to angle of jaw. Spinous dorsal dark brown, with red tips to spines.
Dorsal soft rays dark brown, membrane joining them cream barred with brown
between first five rays, then plain cream. Anal fin with broad brown cross-bars,
ground colour creamy, tips of rays red. Pectoral fin cream with dark brown
cross-bars. Pelvic fins dark at base, then cream with two narrow red bars
distally. Caudal fin cream with irregular dark brown markings. Branchiostegal
gO ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
membranes mauve, with dark brown cross-bars. Juveniles plain dark red with
longitudinal row of large silvery spots along side. Pattern remains defined for
some time after preservation, slowly fading to yellow-buff.
Location of type material. Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris.
Material examined. 223 specimens, 17-100 mm in standard length. 1 from Cape,
Paris Museum Cat. No. A2013 (holotype); 12 from Liideritzbucht, S.A.M.
24210; 2 from Simon’s Bay, False Bay, S.A.M. 10534; 13 from Dalebrook,
False Bay, 18/12/1964, 19/2/1965, 18/4/1965 and 16/5/1965, S.A.M. not cata-
logued; 2 from St. James, False Bay, S.A.M. 12014; 146 from Strandfontein,
False Bay, S.A.M. 23875, S.A.M. 23953, S.A.M. 23970, S.A.M. 23974 and
20/11/1964, and 13/8/1964, S.A.M. not catalogued; 1 from Gordon’s Bay,
False Bay, S.A.M. 23293; 1 from Die Dam, Bredasdorp district, S.A.M. 25088;
25 from Still Bay, S.A.M 18265, S.A.M. 25089; 1 from Port Elizabeth, S.A.M.
24244; 2 from East London, $.A.M. 18092; 2 from Kei Mouth, 8.A.M. 25090.
Remarks. Blennioclinus brachycephalus is the more widely distributed and common
of the two species of Blennioclinus. It is also the larger. ‘The notched profile of
the dorsal fin is interesting, since the same condition is found in some of the
American Labrisominae, e.g. Labrisomus and Malacoctenus, but not in any of the
other Clininae.
Distribution (fig. 36). Liideritzbucht (26°38’S., 15°10’E) (South West Africa)
to the Kei River (32°41’'S., 28°23’E); locally common east of Cape Point, in
pools at the low tide mark, usually among pebbles and sea-urchins. The species
has not been found at any localities on the west coast between Melkbosch (west
coast of Cape Peninsula) and Liideritzbucht (Penrith, 19655). The Lideritz-
bucht specimens were all collected in sheltered areas, not on the open coast.
They are in no way different from the south coast populations.
Blennioclinus stella Smith, 1945
(Fig. 38)
Blennioclinus stella Smith, 1945: 543, fig. 4, 1949: 386, pl. 79 fig. 994.
Description. D. XXIV-—XXVIII 6-7; A II 19-21; P. 12; V. I 3; C. 13. Gill-
rakers in outer series on first arch 1-2 + 4-6. Vertebrae 13 + 25-27. First
three dorsal spines elevated to form low crest. Gap between third and fourth
spines wider than between other spines; deep notch in membrane between
third and fourth spines. Dorsal spines decrease in height posteriorly, last spine
very short, dorsal soft rays much longer, resulting in deep notch in profile of
dorsal fin before dorsal soft rays. Clusters of cirri at tips of first three dorsal
spines. Pectoral fin rounded. Inner pelvic ray minute. Caudal peduncle short,
length 27°5-33% head length, depth 27-5-33:5°% head length. Caudal fin
subtruncate.
Body slightly compressed, covered with small embedded scales not extend-
ing on to dorsal, caudal, or anal fin bases or head. Depth 5:25-5:75 in standard
length. Head 3°75-5:25 in standard length, snout rounded. Eye 2-5-3:25 in
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE gi
head. No supraorbital tentacle. Cirrus on anterior nostril elongate, narrow
proximally, with tip expanded and deeply serrate. Upper jaw 37°5-47:5%
head length. Lips moderately thick. Vomer toothed. Sensory pores of head
mostly double, single in nasal, interorbital and in most of preopercular series
(fig. 38(b)).
Lateral line of 20-25 vertical pairs of pores in front to post-pectoral curve,
then of short separate horizontal tubes with pore at either end (fig. 38(d)).
Intromittent organ of male with slender tip ensheathed by pair of large, flat
ventro-lateral lips, with slightly serrate margins (fig. 38(c)).
Colouring. No live or unpreserved specimens seen. Smith (1945) described the
colouring as ‘variably brown, red and orange mottled. Three narrow bars
(b) NS
T= > exp
Fic. 38. Blennioclinus stella: (a) Lateral view, male, 39:5 mm, Xora, August 1947, R.U.C.;
(b) Head pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
across head, one through eye to cheek. Eight to ten cross-bars on body, spread-
ing to dorsal fin. Sometimes iridescent silvery patches along flanks.’ Two very
small freshly preserved juvenile specimens examined were yellowish red,
mottled and barred. Uniform yellow preserved in alcohol.
Location of type material. Department of Ichthyology, Rhodes University,
Grahamstown.
Material examined. 7 specimens, 26-38 mm in standard length. 2 from Port
Elizabeth, S.A.M. 24245; 3 from Cape Morgan, R.U.C.; 2 from Xora Mouth,
August 1947, R.U.C.
92 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Remarks. Blennioclinus stella is the smallest of the South African Clinidae. It is
very similar to Blennioclinus brachycephalus, but can be distinguished from it by
the lower number of dorsal soft rays.
Distribution (fig. 36). Port Elizabeth (33°58’S., 25°36’E) to Durban (29°53’S.,
31°oo’E); not common in southern part of range at least; usually in shallow
pools at the bottom of the shore, among sand and pebbles (Professor J. L. B.
Smith, personal communication).
Genus CLINOPoRUs Barnard, 1927
Clinoporus Barnard, 1927: 864 (type-species Clinus biporosus Gilchrist & Thompson, by monotypy).
Diagnosis: Body and head without scales, elongate, robust. No supraorbital
tentacle. Dorsal fin low, even, anterior spines not raised to form crest. Lateral
line of large pores opening above and below line throughout, very broad and
conspicuous. Pores on head large. Vomer toothed.
One species, Clinoporus biporosus (Gilchrist & Thompson).
Discussion. Clinoporus is a peculiar genus whose only known representative is
infra- rather than intertidal. The lateral line is very distinctive and unlike that
of any other clinid. The lack of scales is unique in the Clininae. C. L. Smith
(1957) investigated the possibility of the degree of scaling of clinids being related
to the amount of water movement in the environment of the adult, but conclu-
ded that the two factors are not correlated.
The inclusion of Clinoporus biporosus in the ‘Myxodinae’ by Smith (1945),
together with Pavoclinus, Blennioclinus and Gynutoclinus, solely on the basis of the
lack of a supraorbital tentacle is unjustifiable, since this species bears no resem-
blance to either the weed-dwellers of the genera Pavoclinus and Gynutoclinus or
to the species of Blennioclinus.
Clinoporus biporosus (Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908)
(Fig. 39)
Clinus biporosus Gilchrist & Thompson, 1908: 137.
Clinoporus biporosus: Barnard, 1927: 864. Smith, 1945: 545, 1949: 358, pl. 82 fig. 1003.
Description. D. XX XVIII-XLI 3; A. II 27-28; P. 12-13; V. 13; C. 13. Verte-
brae 17 + 32-35. Dorsal fin low, even, no notch in membrane between third
and fourth dorsal spines. No clusters of cirri at tips of dorsal spines. Pectoral fin
rounded. Inner pelvic ray minute. Caudal peduncle short, length 23-26% head
length, depth 28-5-31 °% head length. Caudal fin subtruncate.
Body robust, elongate, naked. Depth 6-25-6-85 in standard length. Head
4°5-6-25 in standard length, snout rounded. Sensory pores large and conspi-
cuous, mostly single (fig. 39(a)). Eye 2-75-4:25 in head. No supraorbital
tentacle. Cirrus on anterior nostril small, flaplike. Upper jaw 34-43% head
length. Lips moderately thick. Vomer toothed.
a
a
a
I , —, —_s
EE
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 93
Lateral line throughout of large pores opening above and below line, close
together and numerous; line broad; ends in single pore on caudal peduncle
(fig. 39(a)). Intromittent organ of male with moderate basal portion and small
tip protruding between two rounded ventral lips (fig. 39(b)).
Colouring. No fresh specimens seen; uniform red, brown or orange (Smith,
1949). Uniform buff preserved in alcohol.
Location of type material. South African Museum, Cape Town.
Lectotype. Female, 117 mm, St. James, S.A.M. 25241.
Material examined. 7 specimens, 46-116 mm in standard length. 3 from Saldanha
Bay, S.A.M. 18463; 2 from St. James, False Bay, S.A.M. 25241 (lectotype),
(ii) lateral (iii) anterior
(i) ventral
(b)
Fic. 39. Clinoporus biporosus: (a) Lateral view, female, 117 mm, S.A.M. 25241, lectotype;
(b) Intromittent organ of male.
S.A.M. 10529 (paralectotype), 1 from False Bay, 14 fathoms, S.A.M. 10528
(paralectotype); 1 from False Bay, dredged, S.A.M. 23949.
Distribution. Saldanha Bay (33°00’S., 17°56’E) to False Bay (+34°10'S.,
18°50’E) is the known range. Rare, mainly infratidal.
Genus GYNUTOCLINUs Smith, 1945
Gynutoclinus Smith, 1945: 545 (type-species Clinus rotundifrons Barnard, by monotypy).
Diagnosis: A minute simple papilla over eye. Body highly compressed. Head
spherical, inflated, with pores opening on prominent papillae. Body covered
with minute, embedded, cycloid scales, which do not extend on to median fin
bases or head. Lateral line of single, more or less medially opening pores in
front to post-pectoral curve, then of short separate horizontal tubes with pore
at either end, becoming obscure caudally. Intromittent organ of male with long
basal portion; tip ensheathed by two pairs of lips. Vomer toothed.
A single, rare species, Gynutoclinus rotundifrons Barnard.
04. ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Gynutoclinus rotundifrons (Barnard, 1937)
(Fig. 40)
Clinus rotundifrons Barnard, 1937: 63, fig. 4.
Gynutoclinus rotundifrons: Smith, 1945: 545, 1949: 358, fig. 1002. Penrith, 19654: 215, figs 3, 4.
Description. D. XXX-XXXII 8; A II 22-23; P. 12-14; V.13; C. 13. Vertebrae
16 + 28-29. First four dorsal spines slightly elevated to form low, rounded
crest, second and third spines highest. All spines evenly placed. No clusters of
cirri at tips of dorsal spines. No notches in membrane between any of the dorsal
spines. Profile of dorsal fin undulating. Pectoral fin rounded. Inner pelvic ray
reduced, not more than half other two rays. Caudal peduncle short, length
28-6-36:4% head length, depth 27-5-32°% head length. Caudal fin subtruncate.
Body highly compressed, deepening with age, covered with small scales
not extending on to bases of dorsal, caudal, or anal fins, or head. Depth 3°5—5-2
in standard length. Head 3:7—-4:15 in standard length, spherical, inflated,
broad, with pores opening on raised papillae. Eye 3:5-5 in head. Minute
simple papilla over eye. Anterior nostril tubular, cirrus large, flat, deeply
bilobed. Posterior nostril conspicuous, surrounded by short skinny lobes. Upper
jaw 42°5-54°5% of head length. Lips very thin. Vomer toothed. Sensory pores
of head mostly double (fig. 40(b)), opening on raised papillae.
Lateral line of single, more or less medially opening pores in front to post-
pectoral curve, then of short, separate horizontal tubes with pore at either end
(fig. 40(d)), obsolete on caudal peduncle on largest specimen, the holotype.
Intromittent organ of male with long basal portion and a clubshaped tip,
ensheathed by pair of thin, crescentic lateral lips and minute pair of more or
less confluent dorsal lips (fig. 40(c)).
Colouring. Male from Lambert’s Bay: ground colour pale brown with about
seven darker brown irregular cross-bars, edged with iridescent blue fine broken
lines. A very dark brown, narrow, vertical line behind and above the pectoral
axil, and another at end of caudal peduncle. Cross-bars continued on to dorsal
fin, with translucent patches between; small black dots on translucent areas.
Dorsal fin dark brown posteriorly, with single small translucent patch near
beginning of dorsal soft rays at base. Caudal fin translucent, with very faint
brown cross-bars, darkening at margins so that margins appear to be spotted.
Pectoral fin translucent with four very fine dark cross-bars, proximal one
curved. Anal fin mainly dark brown, with two translucent patches. Head mainly
light brown below. Dark stripe from below eye forwards in front of inflated
cheek to angle of jaw. Head above and opercular region deep pink. Snout pink
with darker pink bar between eyes and another above upper lip; fine darker
pink line down middle. Eye silvery with brown radii. Chin and lips light brown
mottled heavily with darker brown. Branchiostegal membranes and jugular
region silvery grey with fine black speckling. Pelvic fins light brown with dark
brown cross-bars. Belly silvery with golden brown sheen. Intromittent organ
greyish with fine black speckling. Juvenile from Lambert’s Bay yellow, under-
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 95
parts lighter. Dorsal fin with alternating pink and translucent patches. Anal
fin yellow. Caudal and pectoral fins translucent. Pelvic fins yellow with brown
cross-bars. Uniform pinkish to yellow preserved in alcohol.
Location of type material. South African Museum, Cape Town.
Material examined. 8 specimens, 26-95 mm in standard length. 1 from Liideritz-
bucht, S.A.M. 25091; 2 from Lambert’s Bay, $.A.M. 24007, S.A.M. 24082;
4 from Lambert’s Bay, R.U.C.; 1 from Oudekraal, Cape Peninsula, $.A.M.
18587 (holotype).
(iii) anterior
(i) ventral
(c)
Le a a arr ee
Sea ma —
X
X
XS
(d) \
(b) Se
Fic. 40. Gynutoclinus rotundifrons: (a) Lateral view, female, 85 mm, S.A.M. 18587, holotype;
(b) Head pore system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
Remarks. This very rare species does not appear to be very close to any of the
other species, although it has certain modifications for a weed-dwelling habit
such as the strong compression of the body. It is known from eight specimens,
four in the South African Museum, and four in the Rhodes University Ichthy-
ology Department, the latter taken from the stomachs of sea-birds at Lambert’s
Bay and therefore in rather poor condition. The species was included by Smith
96 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
(1945) in the ‘Myxodinae’, but in fact it has a small supraorbital tentacle,
although this is not very distinct in the long-preserved holotype. The tentacle
is quite prominent in fresh specimens. The intromittent organ of this species is
very similar to the type found in the genus Clinus.
Distribution (fig. 27). The known range is Liideritzbucht (26°38’S., 15°10’S) to
Cape Point (34°21'S., 18°29’E); in kelp at the bottom of the shore. Apparently
very rare.
Subtribe XENOPOCLINIDI Hubbs, 1952
Diagnosis: Clinini with hook on pectoral girdle sometimes reduced or absent.
Head depressed; eyes dorsal. Pelvic fins of three slender, equal rays, united
from base to tips by membrane. Dorsal fin low, even.
Discussion. Smith (19475) described a new genus and species of clinid, Xeno-
poclinus kocht, from a rock-pool at Lambert’s Bay on the south-western Cape
coast approximately 200 miles north of Cape Town. He placed this species in
the family Clinidae, but distinguished it by creating for it a separate ‘subfamily’
(equivalent to a subtribe in Hubbs’ 1952 classification). Subsequently another
genus and two more species, Xenopoclinus leprosus and Cancelloxus burrelli, obviously
closely related to Xenopoclinus kochi, were described from the Lambert’s Bay
area by Smith (1961). Smith then separated the three species from the Clinidae
and created for them a new family, Xenopoclinidae.
The three species are all adapted to a sand-burrowing existence. The body
is elongate, and the head is depressed, with the eyes in a dorsal, anterior posi-
tion. The pectoral fins are pointed, the middle rays being longer, and are used
in sweeping back the sand when burrowing. The jugular pelvic fins consist of
a minute spine and three rays of about equal length joined by a membrane that
extends well up between them, having the appearance of an amphibian webbed
foot. In Xenopoclinus kochi, but not in the other species, the opercular membranes
are expanded and overlap below. The opercular membranes of Cancelloxus
burrellt are expanded slightly above to form a fold over the pectoral axil.
In other respects they are much like the South African Clinidae. The
scales are minute, embedded, and cycloid. The jaw teeth are conical and fixed,
with usually a row of villiform teeth behind, at least at the jaw symphyses. The
two species of Xenopoclinus have teeth on the vomer, but in Cancelloxus the vomer
is edentate. There are no palatine teeth. The lateral line canals on the head are
covered; the lateral line itself is variable. In Xenopoclinus kochi the lateral line
follows a similar course to that of the Clinidae but is interrupted behind the
level of the pectoral fin, so that the anterior, dorsal portion is separate from the
posterior, mid-lateral portion. In Xenopoclinus leprosus the lateral line is similar
to that of the Clinidae, with no interruptions. In Cancelloxus burrelli the lateral
line is continuous, but curves down very much more gently than in the other
species to a mid-lateral position.
The dorsal fin is low and continuous, the anterior spines being the shortest,
and there are many more spinous than soft elements. There are two anal spines.
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE Q7
All the soft fin rays are unbranched. The gill membranes are united, forming a
fold across the throat. There are six branchiostegal rays on either side. Xenopo-
clinus kochi has an upturned, hook-like process on the anterior border of the
pectoral girdle, but the other species show reduction or absence of this feature.
The young are born alive, and the male has a fleshy penis for the transmission
of sperm.
The question arises as to whether these three species, which have so much
in common with the South African Clinidae, should be placed in a separate
family.
Smith (1961) differentiated the Xenopoclinidae from the Clinidae by the
following characters: (i) the peculiar head, (11) the expanded opercular mem-
brane, (iii) the form of the pelvic fins, and (iv) the greater relative length of the
anal fin.
The form of the head and pelvic fins are associated with the sand-burrow-
ing habit of these fishes. The expanded opercular membranes occur only in one
of the three species, so cannot be considered as a strong differentiating character.
The species which shows this feature burrows in finer sand than the other two
species, and may have developed the expanded opercular membranes as a
result of this.
The meaning of the greater ‘relative’ length of the anal fin is not entirely
clear. The length of the anal fin base, about 60% standard length, is somewhat
greater in the Xenopoclinidi than in the South African Clinidi, about 40-50%.
This 10% difference seems hardly great enough to warrant separation at the
family level, in view of the considerable similarities between the two groups.
However, it is probable that by ‘relative’ length of the anal fin Smith (1961)
meant the number of anal elements relative to the degree of elongation of the
body as reflected by body depth in standard length. If this is the case, then the
anal fin is not relatively longer in the Xenopoclinidi than in the elongate species
of South African Clinidi. Xenopoctinus kochi and X. leprosus, with a body depth of
6-8, have 29-30 and 28-34 anal rays respectively; Clinus capensis, with a body
depth of 5-6, has 26-34 anal rays, C. dorsalis, body depth 5-5-7, has 25-31; and
C. anguillaris, the most elongate of the South African Clinidi, with a body depth
of 6-8, has 33-37 anal rays. Cancelloxus burrelli has a greater number of anal
rays (38-43) than any of the South African Clinidi, but the body depth is
8—11, greatly elongated in comparison with the other species. If only the number
of anal rays is considered, with no regard for the elongation of the body, then
Cancelloxus burrelli certainly has a longer anal fin than any of the South African
Clinidi, but the anal counts of Xenopoclinus kochi and X. leprosus fall well within
the ranges found among the South African Clinidi.
It seems, then, that the differences between the South African Clinidi
and the Xenopoclinidi are those concerned with the adaptation of the Xeno-
poclinidi to a burrowing existence; the depressed head with dorsally placed
eyes, the modified pelvic and pectoral fins, and the expansion of the opercular
membranes of Xenopoclinus kochi.
98 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Owing to the large number of features which the Xenopoclinidi share with
the Clinidi, particularly with the South African species, it is felt that separation
at the family level is unjustified, since it serves only to obscure the obvious
similarity of the two groups of species. That the Xenopoclinidi were derived
from the South African Clinidi, or at least from a common ancestor which had
already developed internal fertilization and a penis in the male, seems very
probable in view of the similarities of the two groups, particularly with regard
to the reproductive organs. Although the hook on the pectoral girdle, so charac-
teristic of the Clininae, is apparently in the process of being lost in the Xeno-
poclinidi, it is invariably present in Xenopoclinus kocht, and traces of it are present
in the other species. Sixteen specimens of Cancelloxus burrelli, including the
(b)
Fic. 41. Anterior border of cleithrum of: (a) Clinus superciliosus; (b) Xenopoclinus kochi (c) Xenopo-
clinus leprosus; (d) Cancelloxus burrellt.
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 99
holotype, were examined, all of which had a projecting bony lamina on the
anterior border of the pectoral girdle. Of a sample of 89 specimens of Xeno-
poclinus leprosus examined, 32 had a small knob-like process on the anterior
border of the pectoral girdle. This feature is illustrated in figure 41.
Hubbs (1952) gave Smith’s (1949) subfamily Xenopoclininae the status
of a subtribe of the Clinini. He named the subtribe “Xenopoclinini’. It is pro-
posed here that this arrangement should be adopted, and that the three species
Aenopoclinus kochi, X. leprosus and Cancelloxus burrelli be placed in the subtribe
Xenopociinidi.
The resemblance the Xenopoclinidi bear to the American sand-burrowing
family known as the Dactyloscopidae is at first sight startling. The head, pec-
toral fins, and particularly the pelvic fins are strikingly similar in the two groups.
Smith (1961) noted this resemblance, but pointed out that they differ in that the
Xenopoclinidi have vomerine teeth (two of the three species), many more
dorsal spines than dorsal soft rays, small, embedded, non-imbricate scales,
united gill membranes forming a fold across the throat, and at least some
vestige of a hook on the pectoral girdle; on the other hand, they lack skinny
fringes on the opercle and lips, which are characteristic of the Dactyloscopidae.
The Xenopoclinidi differ further from the Dactyloscopidae in having a gene-
rally more elongate body, unbranched caudal rays, the uppermost pectoral
ray articulating with a pectoral radial (it articulates with the scapula in the
Dactyloscopidae, Dr. V. G. Springer, personal communication), the ecto-
pterygoid and mesopterygoid distinct (these two bones are fused in the Dacty-
loscopidae, Dr. V. G. Springer, personal communication), and a fleshy penis
in the male.
Key to the genera of the Xenopoclinidi —
1. WVomer toothed. Lateral line curves down sharply behind pectoral fin, may be discontinuous
over curve. A simple papilla or flap above the eye Ap Xenopoclinus
Vomer edentate. Lateral line curves down very gently from How to sasdhicen position. No
papilla or flap above the eye sm he aM er. ae ie .. Cancelloxus
Genus XENOPOCLINUS Smith, 1947
XAenopoclinus Smith, 194.7): 732 (type-species Xenopoclinus kochi Smith, by monotypy).
Xenopoclinops Smith, 1961: 354.
Diagnosis. A disc-like, fleshy papilla or simple flap over eye. Body elongate,
compressed, covered with minute embedded cycloid scales not extending on to
median fin bases or head. Vomer toothed. Lateral line curves down sharply to
medial position behind pectoral fin, discontinuous over curve.
Discussion. Smith (1961) divided this genus into two subgenera on the basis of
the presence or absence of a hook on the pectoral girdle, and whether or not
the opercular membranes were expanded and overlapped below. However, I
believe that, as suggested by Huxley (1940), the primary purpose of subgenera
is to indicate relationships between pairs or groups of species in genera, and
I0O ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
therefore that the use of the subgeneric rank in a genus containing only two
species is not warranted. The two species included in the genus Xenopoclinus
are obviously more closely related to one another than to the species for which
the other genus, Cancelloxus, was erected, and therefore should be included in
one genus.
Key to the species of Xenopoclinus
1. Hook on pectoral girdle well developed. Opercular membranes expanded, overlapping
below oF be Bis ale rt ae - x Xenopoclinus kochi
Hook on pectoral girdle reduced to a small knob, or absent. Opercular membranes not
expanded and overlapping below a: Ae 2 3 Xenopoclinus leprosus
Aenopoclinus kochi Smith, 1947
(Fig. 42)
Xenopoclinus kochi Smith, 19475: 732, fig. 1, 1949: 358, fig. 1004.
Xenopoclinus (Xenopoclinus) kochi: Smith, 1961: 352, fig. 2.
Description. D. XXXITI-XXXVII (XXXIV-XXXV) 8-11 (9); A. IT 29-30;
P. 12-13 (12); V. 1 3; C. 13. Gill-rakers in outer series on first arch 2 + 0-2.
Vertebrae 15 + 34-35. Dorsal fin low, even, anterior spines shortest. Third
spine a little shorter than first or fourth. No notch in membrane between third
and fourth dorsal spines; spines evenly placed. Soft dorsal rays a little longer
than spines. Spines fairly soft. No clusters of cirri at tips of dorsal spines. Pec-
toral fin with central rays elongate, upswept, fin pointed; lower rays short,
curling forward. Pelvic fin of three rays, equal in length, united by membrane
from base to tips, resembling a frog’s foot. Caudal peduncle short, length
30-40% head length, depth 25-35% head length. Caudal fin subtruncate.
Body elongate, compressed, covered with minute embedded scales not
extending on to bases of dorsal, caudal, or anal fins, or head. Depth 6-7-5
in standard length. Head depressed, 3°75—5 in standard length. Snout subacute.
Lower jaw projects. Eyes dorsally situated, almost adjacent, 4-6-5 in head.
Flat, fleshy papilla over eye. Anterior nostril tubular, cirrus short simple flap.
Upper jaw 30-40% head length. Lips moderate. Vomer toothed. Sensory pores
of head mostly double, multiple pores in postorbital region (fig. 42(b)). Oper-
cular membranes expanded, overlapping below.
Lateral line of mostly vertical pairs of pores in front to behind pectoral fin;
ends abruptly there and is continued below in the mid-lateral line, consisting
of short separate horizontal tubes with pore at either end (fig. 42(d)). Intro-
mittent organ of male with long basal portion and rounded tip ensheathed
below by two rounded ventro-lateral lips and above by hood-like fold (fig. 42(c))
Hook on anterior edge of pectoral girdle well developed.
Colouring. Ground colour stony pinkish mauve with about six irregular olive
green cross-bars, running into vague olive mottling posteriorly. Cross-bars
edged with darker olive. On head behind eyes are two adjacent olive rings.
Fins hyaline except dorsal, where olive cross-bars may continue on to fin.
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE IOI
Pectoral base olive. Belly whitish. Dark olive bar at caudal base. Two dark
olive blotches on preopercle, sometimes lighter one between; olive stripe from
front of eye to upper lip on either side. Speckled and mottled all over body
and head with silvery white. Cross-bars more distinct in juveniles. Pupil black,
iris gold; papilla over eye white. Pattern retained for some time after preserva-
tion.
Location of type material. Department of Ichthyology, Rhodes University,
Grahamstown.
Material examined. 13 specimens, 26-73 mm in standard length. 8 from Lam-
bert’s Bay, S.A.M. 24667; 5 from Lambert’s Bay and Doring Bay, R.U.C.
(including holotype).
Distribution (fig. 36). Known only from Lambert’s Bay and Doring Bay in
southern Namaqualand (-(32°00’S., 18°20’E). Not common, in pools and
gullies at the bottom of the intertidal zone with much kelp. Burrows in fairly
coarse shingly sand.
eS)
i) ne Gi) [ateral Gii) anterior
(c)
ee
(d) au
Fic. 42. Xenopoclinus kochi: (a) Lateral view, female, 72 mm, S.A.M. 24667; (b) Head pore
_ system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
Xenopoclinus leprosus Smith, 1961
(Fig. 43)
Xenopoclinus (Xenopoclinops) leprosus Smith, 1961: 354, fig. 3.
Description. D. XXXITI-XXXVI (XXXIV-XXXV) 7-12 (9-11); A. II
28-34 (31-32); P. 11-13 (11-12); V. I 3; C. 13. Gill-rakers in outer series on
first arch 1-2 + 2-5. Vertebrae 15 + 35-36. Dorsal fin low, even, spines
102 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
increasing in height posteriorly. Third spine a little lower than fourth or second
first may be slightly higher, especially in juveniles. Soft dorsal rays a little
longer than spines. Spines soft. Pectoral fin not elongate, slightly upswept,
lower rays thickened. Pelvic fin of three equal rays joined throughout length
by membrane, resembling a webbed foot. Caudal peduncle short, length
20-33% head length, depth 20-33% head length. Caudal fin subtruncate.
Body elongate, compressed, covered with minute embedded scales not
extending on to dorsal, caudal, or anal fin bases or head. Depth 6-25-8-75 in
standard length. Head depressed, 4:75-5 in standard length in adults, 4-4°5
in standard length in juveniles. Snout subacute. Eyes dorsal, adjacent, 4-6°5
in head. Flattened, flaplike tentacle over eye, edge irregularly and shallowly
notched. Anterior nostril tubular, cirrus flaplike, sometimes terminally notched.
Upper jaw 33-43°5 %head length. Lips moderate. Vomer toothed. Opercular
membranes normal, not expanded or overlapping below. Sensory pores of head
mostly double (fig. 43(b)).
Lateral line of vertical pairs of pores and single pores in front to post-
pectoral curve, where it ends abruptly; continued in mid-line as short separate
horizontal tubes with pore at either end, very obscure in most specimens (fig.
43(d)). Intromittent organ of male with fairly long basal portion and short tip
ensheathed by pair of united ventral lips (fig. 43(c)).
‘ RS
SARK AG
QO A
WS,
4 SS. SSN
CHK SD
(iii) anterior
(ji) lateral
(c)
(i) ventral
ee fae Nee pete ee ee i
A LT WEES TES reseed SP
(b) (d)
Fic, 43. Xenopoclinus leprosus: (a) Lateral view, male, 62 mm, S.A.M. 24668; (b) Head pore
system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 103
Hook on anterior border of pectoral girdle usually absent; if present,
reduced to small knob.
Colouring. Ground colour light brown below grading to chocolate above. Three
large white saddles in upper half of body. Head white, except for an area,
enclosed by a line on each side from dorsal origin to eye and from eye vertically
down cheek, which is sand-coloured in life, becoming dark brown or jet black on
preservation in spirit. Pectoral base yellow. Dorsal fin brown above dark areas
on body, hyaline above white saddles. Other fins hyaline. Iris golden, pupil jet
black. Belly light brown to cream. Pattern retained on preservation although
colours fade.
Location of type material. Department of Ichthyology, Rhodes University, Grahams-
town.
Material examined. 95 specimens, 22—68-5 mm in standard length. 1 off Orange
River Mouth, 10 fathoms, U.C.T.; 89 from Lambert’s Bay, S.A.M. 24668;
5 from Lambert’s Bay, R.U.C. (holotype and paratypes).
Distribution (fig. 36). The known range is Orange River Mouth (28°38’S.,
16°24’E) (infratidal, dredged) to Lambert’s Bay (32°04’S., 18°20’E) (in
intertidal pools and gullies at lowest levels of shore). Burrows in very coarse
shingle and broken mussel shells. Fairly common but patchily distributed.
Cancelloxus burrelli Smith, 1961
(Fig. 44)
Cancelloxus burrelli Smith, 1961: 355, figs 1, 4.
Description. D. XXXIV-XXXIX (XXXVI-XXXVII) 10-14 (10-13);
A. II 38-43 (41); P. 13-15 (13-14); V. 13; C. 13. Gill-rakers in outer series on
first arch 0-2 + 5-8. Vertebrae: females 20-21 + 44-45, males 19 + 43-46.
Dorsal fin low, even, anterior spines lowest, soft rays a little higher than spines.
Spines soft. Pectoral fin with middle rays elongate, pointed and upswept, lower
rays thickened. Pelvic fin of three equal rays, joined from bases to tips by
membrane, resembling a webbed foot. Dorsal fin originates well behind head.
Caudal peduncle short, length 23:5-31% head length, depth 20-28-5°% head
length. Caudal fin subtruncate.
Body elongate, compressed, covered sparsely with minute scales not
extending on to dorsal, caudal, or anal fin bases, or head. Depth 8-11 in standard
length. Head depressed, 4:25—5°5 in standard length, snout pointed. Eyes oval,
adjacent, 3°75-4°75 in head. No tentacle or papilla over eye. Anterior nostril
tubular, cirrus small simple flap. Upper jaw 26-29% head length. Lips fairly
thick. Lower lip produced at symphysis into acute process. Vomer edentate.
Few or no teeth at sides of jaw, patch at each symphysis. Opercular mem-
branes normal, not expanded or overlapping below. Sensory pores of head
mostly single, opening flush with skin surface (fig. 44(b)).
Lateral line of single pores opening more or less medially in front, then of
short separate horizontal tubes with pore at either end, sloping gradually to
104 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
mid-line behind pectoral fin (fig. 44(d)). Intromittent organ of male extremely
large. Basal portion long and stout, terminating anteriorly in pair of horn-like
lobes between which tip protrudes. Tip conical, curving up towards belly.
Flat fleshy lobe dorsally at base of tip. Belly of male deeply grooved. Intro-
mittent organ illustrated in fig. 44(c). Vent of female large and crescent-
shaped, surrounded by fleshy fold produced posteriorly into two lobes, one on
either side of first anal spine. Each lobe with thick fleshy dorsal portion over-
laid by thin skinny lobe ventrally.
Colouring. Ground colour cream, semi-translucent. Bright silver broken stripe
mid-laterally. Irregular olive patches above. Eleven olive saddles above, edged
darker. Olive stripe from eye to posterior edge of opercle; below this stripe a
broad silver stripe. Lips and underparts cream. Pectoral base silver. Fins
hyaline. Pupils jet black, iris narrow and golden. In alcohol the ground colour
becomes opaque and the olive turns golden brown, later fades completely.
ta x, SN i
KN - ee a © S BRE RY, Re PTR
AERA TA TAI otal ate MCU LLCS Na he ANC RG RSS ERS ECC INC
( ) ARR, OX CAE SRS
Gi) lateral
(I) ventral (c)
eT
(d)
Fic. 44. Cancelloxus burrelli: (a) Lateral view, female, 105 mm, S.A.M. 24669; (b) Head pore
system; (c) Intromittent organ of male; (d) Lateral line.
Location of type material. Department of Ichthyology, Rhodes University,
Grahamstown.
Material examined. 19 specimens, 75:5-107 mm in standard length. 1 from off
Orange River Mouth, 5 fathoms, $.A.M. 23272; 1 from Lambert’s Bay, R.U.C.
(holotype); 3 from Lambert’s Bay, R.U.C. (paratypes); 14 from Lambert’s
Bay, S.A.M. 246609.
Distribution (fig. 36). The known range is Orange River Mouth (28°38’S.,
16°24’E) (infratidal, 5 fathoms) to Lambert’s Bay (32°04’S., 18°20’E),
mainly in gullies and inlets open to the sea at the base of the intertidal zone, in
coarse shingle. Not common.
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 105
ORIGIN OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN CLINIDAE
The presence of a hooklike projection on the anterior border of the clei-
thrum, small scales with radii on all margins, and the very similar general
appearance of the less specialized members of both groups, point to a common
origin of the Myxodini and the Clinini. Hubbs (1952) considered the Myxodini
to be ancestral to the Clinini because the Myxodini are oviparous, fertilization
is external, and there is no intromittent organ in the male.
The derivation of the South African species from the most generalized of
the American myxodids, the species of the genus Gibbonsia, would not be
difficult. If one of the American species such as Gibbonsia metzi C. L. Hubbs
were to develop viviparity, the result would be a clinid very similar to some of
the more generalized South African clinids such as Clinus robustus. I examined
specimens of Gzbbonsia, Myxodes, and Heterostichus, and, apart from the lack of an
intromittent organ in the male, they are strikingly similar to the South African
clinids.
Clinoporus
Blennioclinus
Pavoclinus
Clinus
Gynutoclinus
Fic. 45. Hypothetical intergeneric relationships of South African Clinidi.
106 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
In a consideration of the origins of a group it is often difficult to decide
which characters are primitive and which are advanced. Table 8 gives what I
consider to be the primitive condition for twenty characters which have been
used in my study. In some cases the definition of the primitive condition is
based on the statements of Hubbs (19530) regarding typically clinid characters,
and in others on the conditions prevailing in the genus Gibbonsia.
Of the two subtribes of Clinini represented in South Africa, the Clinidi
have by far the greatest representation, with five genera and 30 species in
South African waters. The genera apparently represent two major lines of
evolution and three minor ones. The hypothetical intergeneric relationships are
shown in figure 45. The method used for devising the figure is similar to that
used by Stephens (1963). The lateral position is based purely on morphological
resemblance and the horizontal distances are arbitrary, but the vertical position
indicates the ‘primitiveness’ of the genera. The “primitiveness’ is determined by
the number of points awarded for each of the twenty characters listed in table 8,
from no points for the ‘primitive’ condition of a character up to ten points for an
‘advanced’ condition. The thickness of the lines indicates the relative number
of species.
100
dorsalis
capensis
venustris
2
©
>
%
c
striatus
brevicristatus
acuminatus
cottoides
berrisfordi
heterodon
latipennis
superciliosus
Fic. 46. Hypothetical interspecific relationships of the South African genus Clinus.
The two major lines, leading to the genera Clinus and Pavoclinus, retain a
fairly high number of ‘primitive’ characters, but these are not the same in the
two groups; for instance, the supraorbital tentacle is retained in Clinus but lost
in Pavoclinus, whereas the ‘primitive’ arrangement of the anterior dorsal spines
for this group is retained in several of the species of Pavoclinus, but in none of the
species of Clinus. The species of Pavoclinus are more specialized for a particular
habitat than are the species of Clinus.
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 107
In the genus Clinus there appears to have been a tendency to reduce the
height of the anterior dorsal spines. (This tendency is apparently paralleled in
the Labrisomini (Hubbs, 1953)).) In those species of Clinus in which the
anterior dorsal spines are high, the membrane, especially that between the
third and fourth dorsal spines, is incised to a greater or lesser degree; this is also
Vv)
J
110 E
fucorum
10
graminis
laurentii
‘Davo
profundus
~“mentalis
ad
~~
O
a
41]
[as
Oo
a
Fic. 47. Hypothetical interspecific relationships of the South African genus Pavoclinus.
108 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
the case in two species in which the anterior spines are low. In three of the four
subgenera (comprising, however, less than one third of the species in the genus)
there is a tendency towards elongation of the body and an eel-like habit. These
forms are thought to have diverged early from the main branch (see fig. 46,
Clinus anguillaris, C’. striatus, C. capensis, C. dorsalis and C. navalis). All the species
involved show considerable specialization, which would have required a rela-
tively long time, yet retain certain primitive characters such as the facial and
supraopercular scales in the subgenus Blennophis and the facial scales in the
subgenus Cirrhibarbis. All the less specialized species of Clinus have the head
region completely naked, except for C. woodi, which retains three supraopercular
scales on either side. ‘The tendency to reduction of scaling in the head region
has occurred in all the genera of South African Clinini, most of which lack
scales on the head, and the scaling of the fin bases has become reduced as well.
Figure 46 shows the hypothetical inter-relationships of the species of Clinus.
The figure has been drawn up in the same way as figure 45, using the characters
listed in table 8.
All the species of the genus Pavoclinus are modified for a weed-dwelling
habit. The supraorbital tentacle has been lost, and in this feature they are more
‘advanced’ than the species of Clinus, but the arrangement of the dorsal fin in
Pavoclinus graminis, P. litorafontis and P. pavo is very similar to that of the species
of Gibbonsia, and is therefore considered to be primitive. As in the genus Clinus
there has been a reduction in the extent of the scaling, and in all the species of
Pavoclinus the head region is entirely naked. The hypothetical relationships of
the species are shown in figure 47, which has been drawn up in the same way
as figures 45 and 46.
The subgenus Labroclinus, containing one species (Pavoclinus mentalis), may
have diverged fairly early. It retains several ‘primitive’ features; the fin counts
are higher than those in the other subgenera of Pavoclinus, being similar to the
intermediate fin counts of the Clinus (Clinus) group of species; the dorsal and
caudal fin bases are scaled; the vomer is toothed, and the caudal peduncle is
only moderately elongate. On the other hand, it has apparently specialized
features such as the complete separation of the dorsal crest and the skinny flap
on the lower jaw symphysis. It presumably arose by specialization from a form
such as Pavoclinus laurent, which has a separate dorsal crest.
The other two monospecific subgenera, Fucomimus and Smithicthys, are
highly specialized weed-dwellers and retain very few ‘primitive’ characters.
The fin counts are reduced, the scales are minute and do not extend to the
median fin bases, the vomer is edentate, and the caudal peduncle is very long.
Pavoclinus (Fucomimus) mus has a separate dorsal crest, and a low number of
dorsal soft rays; the number of caudal rays is reduced to eleven. Pavoclinus
(Smithichthys) fucorum has a peculiar form of crest with at least the first four
dorsal spines involved, an upturned snout, and the teeth reduced to one row in
each jaw. The lack of vomerine teeth in the subgenera Fucomimus and Smith-
ichthys is paralleled in the South American genus Myxodes, to which the species
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 109
Pavoclinus (Smithichthys) fucorum was referred by Smith (1945).
The remaining species constituting the subgenus Pavoclinus form a rela-
tively compact group; in one of the five species the fin membrane is incised
between the third and fourth dorsal spines, and in one of the species, Pavo-
clinus profundus, the anterior dorsal spines are low, and the scales are minute.
The three remaining genera are minor groups and have undergone little
or no speciation. |
Blennioclinus is apparently not close to any of the other genera, but in the
character of the anterior part of the lateral line and in the body form and habit
resembles Clinus rather than Pavoclinus. The notch in the profile of the dorsal fin
before the dorsal soft rays in this genus is unique in the Clininae, although it
commonly occurs in the labrisominid genera Labrisomus and Malacoctenus
(Springer, 1958, pls. I-VII). However, as Blennioclinus clearly belongs to the
Clininae, it is difficult to see how this character may have developed. In this
connexion it is interesting to note that there are various features which appear
scattered throughout the clinids in apparently not very closely related forms.
Examples are the flap of the skin on the lower jaw symphysis developed in some
of the American tribe Paraclinidi, e.g. Paraclinus barbatus Springer (Springer,
1954, fig. 1), in Pavoclinus mentalis (fig. 29), in Cancelloxus burrelli (fig. 44) and
in members of the related family Chaenopsidae, e.g. Chaenopsis alepidota alepidota
(Gilbert) (Stephens, 1963 pl. 12); the reduction of the number of dorsal soft
rays to one in the Paraclinidi (Hubbs, 1952) and the subgenera Climacoporus
and Muraenoclinus of the genus Clinus; and the development of the hook on the
pectoral girdle, so characteristic of the Clininae, in the adults of two Labri-
sominae, Malacoctenus erdmani Smith and Malacoctenus aurolineatus Smith (Sprin-
ger, 1958). I believe that these shared characters are strong evidence for a
monophyletic origin of the Clinidae as a whole.
Clinoporus, the most specialized of the five South African genera of Clinini,
is apparently most closely related to the genus Clinus and may have been derived
from the line leading to the eel-like species of Clinus by loss of the scales and
mod.fications of the lateral line. Since the single species, Clinoporus biporosus,
is the only species of the South African Clinini (other than the little-known
Pavoclinus profundus) that is normally taken in relatively deep water beyond the
limits of the infratidal fringe, it might be expected to differ markedly from the
predominantly intertidal Clinidae.
Gynutoclinus retains the greatest number of ‘primitive’ characters, although
the peculiar form of the head excludes it from the direct line of descent of any
of the other genera. The rarity of its single species suggests that it has not
proved as successful in those habitats where it has been taken as at least three
of the other four genera; Clinoporus is also represented by a single, apparently
rare species, but the inaccessibility of the usual habitat of Clinoporus may con-
tribute considerably to the impression of rarity.
Gynutoclinus has features in common with both Pavoclinus and Clinus, but
it appears to have followed an independent pattern of evolution. The intro-
I1O ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
mittent organ of the male is similar to the type found in the genus Clinus, and
there is a vestigial supraorbital tentacle; the characters shared with Pavoclinus
are chiefly those associated with adaptation to a weed-dwelling existence.
The other subtribe, the Xenopoclinidi, apparently have a common deriva-
tion with the Clinidi from a myxodidlike ancestor, and the high degree of
Table 8. Characters used in the consideration of specialization in South
African Clinini.
Characters
Presence or absence of scales on body
Degree of scaling on head
Degree of scaling on median fin
bases
Arrangement of jaw teeth
Presence or absence of teeth on
vomer
Position of dorsal fin origin
Height of anterior dorsal spines
Presence or absence of a notch in
membrane between third and
fourth dorsal spines
Number of dorsal spines
Number of dorsal rays
Number of anal rays
Development of third pelvic ray
Arrangement of posterior part of
lateral line
Arrangement of anterior part of
lateral line
Presence or absence of supraorbital
tentacle
Shape of head
Snout shape
Presence or absence of facial barbels
Condition of jaw symphysis
Length of caudal peduncle
‘Primitive’ condition
Scales present
Scale patches on cheek and above
opercle.
Scales on dorsal, caudal, and anal
fin bases
A row of small teeth behind front
row of jaw teeth
Vomer toothed
Over hind margin of preopercle
First three dorsal spines higher than
succeeding spines
Notch in membrane absent
30-40
5-10
20-30
Stout, equal to other two
Short separate horizontal tubes with
a pore at either end
Single pores opening more or less
medially
Supraorbital tentacle present
Compressed, not inflated
Sloping to mouth, not upturned
Facial barbels absent
Smooth, without projecting skinny
flap
Short to moderate, 20-40% of head
length
ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM III
specialization of this group suggests that the divergence probably occurred
early. It is possible to derive the Xenopoclinidi from a form tending towards
elongation of the body such as might have given rise to Clinoporus and the eel-
like species of Clinus.
Note on the geographical origin of the Clininae
As can be seen from figure 1, the Clinidae are a widespread family, occurring
in the tropics and the temperate regions of the southern hemisphere. Because
the greatest occurrence of the family as a whole is in the tropics of Central
America, this region has been considered to be their centre of origin (Hubbs,
1952; Springer, 1958). The South African and Indo-Australian forms are all
viviparous and have been considered to have spread to those regions from
America some time after the origin of the group; closely related oviparous forms
occur in South America. Most of the clinids of the Pacific coast of America and
all the clinids except two species of the Atlantic coast of America belong to the
apparently more primitive subfamily the Labrisominae. The subtribe Calli-
clinidi, which Hubbs (1952) considered to be the most primitive of the Labri-
sominae, is apparently confined to the Pacific coast of South America. The
tribe Neoclinini, also primitive but of rather uncertain systematic position, is
also confined to the eastern Pacific, with one, or at most a few, representatives
in Japan, the Ryukyus and Korea.
It has generally been assumed that the Clininae and the Labrisominae have
had a common origin, and this view is supported by the shared features listed
in the previous section. However, it is as well to remember that insufficient
comparison -has been made between the Labrisominae and the Clininae to
determine whether either could actually be ancestral to the other; on the whole
a common origin from a more primitive group is most probable.
- Briggs (1955), following Matthew (1915), considered’ the centre of origin
or ‘centre of dispersal’ of a group to be that area in which the most progressive
species of the group are found, rather than the area where the greatest number
of species, regardless of their state of advancement, occur. The most primitive
species are then found to have a peripheral distribution about this area.
If the Labrisominae and the Clininae are considered separately, the follow-
ing emerges: the most progessive Labrisominae undoubtedly occur in the
tropical waters of Central America. The Calliclinidi occur on the periphery of
this region, in temperate Pacific South American waters. But the most progres-
sive Clininae do not occur in the American region; they occur in the temperate
waters of South Africa and Australia. The more primitive Clininae, the Myxo-
dini, the Japanese flammeus with its small intromittent organ, and probably the
Mediterranean clinid, occur mainly on the periphery of this region. This
suggests, then, that the Labrisominae had an Atlanto-East-Pacific origin,
whereas the Clininae had an Indo-West-Pacific origin.
Briggs (1955) pointed out that it has been proved for several plant and
land animal groups, where there is an extensive fossil record, that their centre
M4 THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE
of origin lies far from the area in which their greatest modern occurrence lies.
Unfortunately the inadequacy of the Tertiary fish fossil record has made it
necessary to rely to a large extent on modern distribution alone. However, there
are some indications that the Labrisominae may have originated and undergone
at least some radiation in the Tethys Sea before conditions there became
unsuitable for a tropical group, and that they then became established and
underwent extensive radiation in the Atlanto-East-Pacific while the Pacific and
Atlantic coasts of Central America were still in free communication. Labrisomus
nuchipinnis (Quoy & Gaimard) occurs on the tropical Atlantic coast of America,
in the West Indies, the Madeira Islands, the Canary Islands, the Cape Verde
Islands and the coast of tropical West Africa as far south as Mocamedes in
Angola. Malacoctenus africanus (Cadenat) has been recorded from Dakar,
Senegal, in West Africa. Arambourg (1921, 1927, 1943), described a fossil
species which he called Labrisomus pronuchipinnis from the Miocene ‘Tethys
deposits of Algeria. He referred it to the relatively small category of Mediter-
ranean fossil species having their main affinities with the fauna of the Atlantic
(Arambourg, 1943). Steinitz (1950, q. Hubbs, 19535) believed the occurrence
of Labrisomus nuchipinnis in West Africa to date from the time of the Tethys Sea.
Hubbs (19536) and Springer (1958) disagreed with this view, because they
considered that a species could not remain undifferentiated on both sides of
the Atlantic for so long a time, and Hubbs (19530) suggested that the fact that
Labrisomus nuchipinnis apparently has a rather longer pelagic larval stage than is
usual for clinids might account for its transport across the Atlantic. However,
the species of Malacoctenus apparently have a particularly short larval stage
(Springer, 1958), so that this would not account for the occurrence of a species
of Malacoctenus in West Africa, if it is assumed to be derived from the American
species of Malacoctenus. To explain the occurrence of Labrisomus pronuchipinnis
in Mediterranean deposits and the occurrence of Labrisomus nuchipinnis and
Malacoctenus africanus in West Africa, we must, if the group is considered to be
American in origin, postulate a Tethys crossing for Labrisomus pronuchipinnis
and two recent crossings for the two modern species. The two recent crossings,
at least, are not favoured by the prevailing current systems, although this
appears often to be the case in shore fish distribution (Briggs, 1967). Perhaps as
far as the Labrisominae are concerned it might be preferable to agree with
Steimitz (1950) and to suggest that, although on the whole one would expect
genetically isolated populations such as the American and West African
Labrisomus nuchipinnis to become specifically distinct, Labrisomus nuchipinnis is
clearly a robust and successful species where it occurs, and it may have had no
tendency to undergo any change. This latter is not surprising, since Ekman
(1953) pointed out that the West African region is in fact a faunally poor area
that few groups have found suitable for extensive radiation. Labrisomus nuch-
pinnis may be the exception that proves the rule regarding isolated populations;
whether we regard it as exceptional as regards speciation or exceptional as
regards crossing the Atlantic from America to Africa, it remains an exception;
pre
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE
‘ssorr) oder JO YRAOU SopIUI O1S Sor] 1 INq UMOYs jOU st ‘pa}d9][OD seM PTUT[D B YITYM 7B Jsvood ULITIFY 1S9AA YING IY}
uo yurod jsourussyj}s0U 94} “UIOg AxDOY 3X9} 9Y} UT O} PIIIOJII SOTII[VIOT OY) SUTMOYS VoLIPY UJOYINOSs Jo dep ‘gv ‘O17
=i
Aeg
asie4 quiog 2ded
Sa]! OOL adoH poos jo adeD
ee — ee
P2aasV y4oY,
WIOd Ysi4 yea? auosped aded
uopuo7 4se3
YINOW 42aAIy 1ay
WY e40j0D
YINOW 42AIY 2ayseg ae ees
Aeg sjdeaquie7
5,uYyo,
Yor IS Wo ‘YY sqUEsO \Aeg Buls0og
P4EMPA 340d JUIOd J4ND
BONIAONd Adv
puejenbewen
Keg dij}2puoH
NO|YPLuy)
Aeg s,pueusiy as UJOIION WOd
Asenjs3 e19n7 4s
tats,
aN punWwafueso
d
is
? ny off
puejninz , ten
1zeBueduin
2ngZzp4epn7
sonbsuew O5U247O-}6 ; etedlsbe tes euanbag e4buy
Keg eobej2q
SSeS Sewen eens ence cnsnas sease (anseease
auequieyu
VolusyY 1SSM HLNOS
Keg sIAIeM
punwidoxemMs
SANOIGaWVZOW QZ 2U0jSaIIN
ssouD aded
Mees 99 ees ae es =
92 ; ve
I1i4 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
at least by adopting the former view Labrisomus pronuchipinnis and Malacoctenus
africanus do not have to be regarded as similarly exceptional.
It seems possible that the common stock which gave rise to these two sub-
families was a tropical Tethys Sea group which, in common with most of the
early Tertiary Thethys fauna, died out when climatic conditions changed.
Ekman (1953) noted that both the Indo-West-Pacific and the western Atlantic
(Atlantic-East-Pacific region) received forms from the Tethys Sea which are
now either no longer predominant or are no longer found at all in the Mediter-
ranean or the eastern Atlantic. The Atlanto-East-Pacific would then have
received the Labrisominae, already to some extent differentiated, from the
Tethys Sea, and these forms would have found this area highly suitable for
adaptive radiation. The Clinidi, on the other hand would have become estab-
lished in the temperate Indo-West Pacific and there undergone adaptive
radiation and developed viviparity. The Myxodini may either have reached
South America by crossing the eastern Pacific from the Indo-West-Pacific, or
may have arisen separately from the viviparous Indo-West-Pacific Clinini. The
latter seems more likely; the hook on the pectoral girdle may not indicate as
close a relationship as it has been thought to do, since it does appear in two
Labrisominae. In any case, if the forerunners of the Clininae were present in
the Tethys Sea, it is possible that some migrated to the Indo-West-Pacific and
gave rise to the viviparous Clinini, while others, very similar, migrated with
the Labrisominae to the Atlanto-East-Pacific and there gave rise to the Myxo-
dini. However, such considerations of the zoogeographical origin of a group are.
always of a highly speculatory character.
| The mechanism of such dispersal of virtually sedentary forms, whether
. now or in Tertiary times, is of course unknown. Ekman (1953) stated that the |
. only conceivable method of dispersal over long distances for forms with a short ©‘
- or no pelagic larval period is by attachment to or entanglement in sea-weed.
He cited two cases of wide distribution of viviparous echinoderms which he
considered could have occurred in no way other than by transport in sea-weed.
One is the brittle-star Amphipholis squamata (Della Chiaje), which occurs from
the Red Sea to South Africa, Hawaii, the Society Islands and the west coast of
America; it also occurs at the southern tip of Patagonia, indicating that it was
transported round Cape Horn. It is obviously far more eurythermic than any
of the Clinidae. The other is the starfish Asterina exigua (Lamarck), endemic to
South Africa, which also occurs on the island of St. Helena, where it was
apparently carried in drifting material from South Africa by a branch of the
Benguela current.
The transport in sea-weed of the ancestor of, for instance, the Australian
Clinini from South Africa is quite likely. It would be quite possible for a weed-
dwelling clinid to live for a fairly long period of time in a floating mass of
weed, provided that the food supply lasted until land was reached, and to
become established in the new area if conditions were suitable. Viviparity
would favour this type of dispersal, since only one gravid female would be
i
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE 115
needed to carry quite a large number of fishes to the new area.
Finally it may be said that there is a modern record of a clinid surviving a
long journey when being transported by a ship, although the specimen met
with a fate on arrival that precluded its becoming established in the new area.
Clinus navalis (Barnard) .was first described from a specimen recovered
from amongst barnacles on a ship’s bottom at Simonstown in False Bay, Cape
Peninsula, some two hundred miles west of the western limit of the range of the
species, and some five hundred miles west of the last port where it could have
been picked up. It was apparently found in good health.
I am not suggesting that this example can be used to explain the distribu-
tion of, for instance, the West African clinids, since their existence in Africa
obviously antedates regular ship crossings; the example is merely given to show
that clinids can survive passive transport at least over a short period, by ships,
and the underside of ships, discharging oil, etc., might be considered to be a
less hospitable environment than a free-floating raft of weed.
SUMMARY
This work consists of a systematic revision of the South African Clinidae.
The relationships of the South African Clinidae with the Clinidae of other parts
of the world are briefly considered. Classification of the South African Clinidae
above the generic level is revised, and the several South African clinid species
are regrouped in seven genera, which arrangement seems to reflect the natural
relationships within the group better than the. previous assemblage of small
genera. The family Xenopoclinidae Smith, .1961 is included in the family
Glinidae. Some comment js':made on the evolution and zoogeography of the
Clinidae. lg en oe : iA
— ~
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am grateful to the council for Scientific and Industrial Research for a
grant which supported me for part of the time during which this research was
undertaken, and to the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research and the
South African National Committee for Oceanographic Research for grants
towards collecting expeditions.
I am indebted to Dr. N. A. H. Millard of the Zoology Department,
University of Cape Town, for helpful criticism and guidance throughout this
work; to Dr. V. G. Springer of the Division of Fishes, Smithsonian Institution,
United States National Museum, for many helpful suggestions and valuable
criticisms of the manuscript, as well as much useful comparative material; to
Dr. F. H. Talbot of the Australian Museum, Sydney, and formerly of the South
African Museum, for much help in the initial stages of the project; to the late
Professor J. L. B. Smith and to Mrs. M. M. Smith of the Ichthyology Depart-
ment, Rhodes University, and Professor J. H. Day of the Zoology Department,
University of Cape Town, for helpful discussions.
116 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
I am grateful to the South West African Administration and in particular
Mr. C. G. Coetzee, Director of the State Museum, Windhoek, for making it
possible for me to collect on the South West African coast between Rocky Point
and the Kunene River Mouth, and for giving me every assistance in the
collecting.
I am indebted to the following individuals for placing specimens in existing
collections at my disposal, or where this was not possible, examining specimens
for me: the late Professor J. L. B. Smith (Ichthyology Department, Rhodes
University), Dr. M. L. Bauchot (Muséum National d’ Histoire Naturelle, Paris),
Mr. A. Wheeler (British Museum of Natural History), Dr. V. G. Springer
(Smithsonian Institution, United States National Museum), Professor J. H.
Day (University of Cape Town), Dr. F. H. Talbot (Australian Museum,
Sydney), Dr. Y. Tominaga (Misaki Marine Biological Station, Japan), and
Dr. J. E. Bohlke (Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia).
Many people assisted by collecting and donating specimens for this pro-
ject; I am indebted particularly to the late Prof. J. L. B. Smith, Misses G. G.
Jones, S. C. Penrith, R. M. Tietz and Messrs. C. D. Berrisford, D. H. Eccles,
N. R. Fuller, S. X. Kannemeyer, B. F. Kensley, P. Pretorius for help with
collections and donation of material.
I am especially indebted to my husband, Mr. M. J. Penrith, of the Oceano-
graphy Department, University of Cape Town, who collected most of the
material for this project, and gave much valuable advice and help in the pre-
paration of the manuscript.
The Trustees of the South African Museum thank the South African
Council for Scientific and Industrial Research for a grant in aid of publication.
This work formed part of a thesis submitted for the degree of Ph.D. at
the University of Cape Town in October 1965.
REFERENCES
Au-Utuman, H. S. 1960. Revision of the Pacific forms of the tribe Starksiidi. Tex. 7. Scz. 12:
163-175.
ARAMBOURG, C. 1921. Sur la faune ichtyologique d’Oran. C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 172:
1232-1245.
ARAMBOURG, C. 1927. Les poissons fossiles d’Oran. Matér. Carie géol. Algér. (Paléont.) 6: 1-298.
ARAMBOURG, C. 1943. Sur la distribution mésogéenne de quelques poissons actuels et fossiles.
— C.4r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 217: 462-464.
BARNARD, K. H. 1927. A monograph of the marine fishes of South Africa. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 21:
419-1065.
BARNARD, K. H. 1935. Notes on South African marine fishes. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 30: 645-658.
BARNARD, K. H. 1937. Further notes on South African marine fishes. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 32: 41-67.
BARNARD, K. H. 1948. Further notes on South African marine fishes. Ann S. Afr. Mus. 36:
341-404.
BeaurortT, L. F. pe & CHapmMan, W. M. 1951. The fishes of the Indo-Australian archipelago. IX.
Percomorphi (concluded), Blennoidea. Leiden: Brill.
BEEBE, W. & TEE-VAN, J. 1928. The fishes of Port-au-Prince Bay, Haiti. Zoologica, N.Y. 10:
1-279.
BrrBe, W. & TEE-VAN, J. 1934. A new genus and species of scaleless blenny, Somersia furcata,
from Bermuda. Am. Mus. Novit. 730: 1-3.
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE BY]
Bere, C. 1898. Comunicaciones ictiolégicas. Comun. Mus. nac. Buenos Aires 12 9-13.
BLEEKER, P. 1860. Over eenige vischsoorten van de Kaap de Goede Hoop. Natuurk. Tijdschr.
Ned.-Indié 21: 49-80.
Biocu, M. E. & ScHNEIDER, J. G. 1801. Systema ichthyologia iconibus ex illustratum. Post obitum
auctoris onus inchoatum absolvit, correxit, interpolavit Johann Gottlob Schneider. Berolini.
BOuLKE, J. E. 1957. A review of the blenny genus Chaenopsis and a description of a related genus
from the Bahamas. Proc Acad. ‘nat. Sct. Philad. 109: 25-57.
BOutuxe, J. E. & SPRINGER, V. G. 1961. A review of the Atlantic species of the clinid fish genus
Starksia. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 113: 29-60.
Brices, J. C. 1955. A monograph of the clingfishes (order Xenopterygii). Stanford ichthyol. Bull.
6: 1-224.
Briccs, J. C. 1967. Dispersal of tropical marine shore animals: Coriolis parameters or competi-
tion ? Nature, Lond. 216: 350.
Buen, F. pg. 1962. Fauna chilena. Peces de la familia Clinidae. Montemar 2: 53-96.
CADENAT, J. 1950. Poissons de mer du Sénégal. Init. afr. 3: 1-345.
CALDWELL, D. K. 1954. Additions to the known fish fauna in the vicinity of Cedar Key, Florida.
Q. 7. Fla. Acad. Sct. 17: 182-184.
CASTELNAU, F. L. 1860. Note sur les poissons de |’Afrique australe. C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci.,
Paris 50: 788-789.
CASTELNAU, F. L. 1861. Mémoire sur les poissons de l’ Afrique australe. Paris: Bailliére.
Cuvier, G. L. C. F. D. 1817. Le régne animal distribué d’aprés son organisation. 2. Poissons. Paris:
Fortin, Masson.
Cuvier, G. L. C. F. D. & VALENCIENNES, A. 1836. Histoire naturelle des poissons. 11. Paris: Levrault.
Dawson, C. 1960. Starksia ocellata, a new sponge inquiline from South Carolina. Copeia 1960: 75.
Day, J. H. 1967. The biology of Knysna estuary, South Africa. Estuaries 1967: 397-407.
Day, J. H., Mittarp, N. A. H. & Harrison, A. D. 1952. The ecology of South African estuaries.
Part III: Knysna, a clear open estuary. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 33: 367-413.
De tFin, F. T. 1898-1901. Catalogo de los peces de Chile. Ruta chil. Hist. nat. 3: 95-99.
EKMAN, S. 1953. Coogeography of the sea. London: Sidgwick & Jackson.
EVERMANN, B. W. & Marsu, M. C. 1900. Descriptions of new genera and species of fishes from
Puerto Rico. Rep. U.S. Commar Fish. 25: 351-362.
Forp, R. F. 1959. A study of the major classification of blennioid fishes based upon cranial nerve evidence.
Thesis submittedfor degree of M.A. (Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University.)
Fow er, H. W. 1931. Fishes obtained by the Barber Asphalt Company in Trinidad and Vene-
zuela in 1930. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 83: 391-410.
Fow er, H. W. 1934. Fishes obtained by Mr. H. W. Bell-Marley chiefly in Natal and Zululand
in 1929-1932. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 86: 485-514.
Fow ter, H. W. 1942. A list of fishes known from the coast of Brazil. Archos Zool. Est. S. Paulo 3:
115-184.
Fow ter, H. W. 1944. Results of the Fifth George Vanderbilt Expedition (1941) . . . The fishes.
Monogr. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 6: 57-529.
Fow.er, H. W. 194.7. Notes on Bahama fishes obtained by Mr. Charles G. Chaplin in 1947,
with descriptions of two new species. Notul. Nat. 190: 1-14.
Fow er, H. W. 1950. Results of the Catherwood-Chaplin West Indies Expedition, 1948. Part
III. The fishes. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 182: 69-93.
Fow er, H. W. 1953. On a collection of fishes made by Dr. Marshall Laird at Norfolk Island.
Trans. R. Soc. N.Z. 81: 257-267.
GarMAN, S. 1899. Reports on an exploration off the west coasts of Mexico, Central and South
America, and off the Galapagos Islands, in charge of Alexander Agassiz, by the U.S. Fish
Commission steamer ‘Albatross’, during 1891. XXVI. The fishes. Mem. Mus. comp. ool.
Harv. 24: 1-431.
GiILBERT, C. M. 1goo. Results of the Branner-Agassiz Expedition to Brazil. Proc. Wash. Acad.
Sci. 2: 161-184.
Gitcurist, J. D. & THompson, W. W. 1908. The Blenniidae of South Africa. Ann. S. Afr. Mus.
6: 97-142.
Git, T. 1860. Monograph of the genus Labrosomus Swainson. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 12:
102-108.
Gostine, W. A. 1968. The suborders of perciform fishes. Proc. U.S. nain. Mus. 124: 1-78.
118 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Gray, J. E. 1854. Catalogue of the fish collected and described by Laurence Theodore Gronov, now in the
British Museum. London: Woodfall & Kinder.
GREENWOOD, P. H., Rosen, D. E., Weitzman, S. H. & Myers, G. S. 1966. Phyletic studies of
teleostean fishes, with a provisional classification of living forms. Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist.
131: 341-456.
GrirFin, L. T. 1926. Description of New Zealand fishes. Trans. Proc. N.Z. Inst. 56: 538-546.
GuITEL, F. 1893. Observations sur les moeurs de trois Blenniidae, Clinus argentatus, Blennius
montagui et Blennius sphynx. Archs. Zool. exp. gén. (3) 13 325-384.
GUNTHER, A. 1861. Catalogue of the acanthopterygian fishes in the British Museum. 3. London: British
Museum.
Herre, A. W. 1936. Notes on the fishes in the zoological museum of Stanford University. V. New
or rare Philippine fishes from the Herre 1933 Philippine Expedition. Philipp. F. Sct. 59:
357-382.
Herre, A. W. 1939. The Philippine blennies. Philipp. 7. Sci. 70: 315-372.
HILDEBRAND, S. F. 1946. A descriptive catalog of the shore fishes of Peru. Bull. U.S. natn. Mus.
189: 1-530.
Husss, C. 1952. A contribution to the classification of the blennioid fishes of the family Clinidae,
with a partial revision of the eastern Pacific forms. Stanford ichthyol. Bull. 4: 41-165.
Husss, C. 1953a. Revision and systematic position of the blenniid fishes of the genus Weoclinus.
Copeia 1953: 11-23.
Husss, C. 1953). Revision of the eastern Pacific fishes of the clinid genus Labrisomus. Zoologica,
N.Y. 38: 113-136.
Hux.ey, J. S. (ed.) 1940. The new systematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
IncER, R. F. 1958. Comments on the definition of genera. Evolution, N.Y. 12: 370-384.
INTERNATIONAL TRUST FOR ZOOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE, 1961. International code of zoological
nomenclature adopted by the XV International Congress of Zoology, London, July 1958. London:
The Trust for the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature.
INTERNATIONAL TRUST FOR ZOOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE, 1964. International code of zoological
nomenclature adopted by the XV International Congress of zoology, London, July 1958. London:
‘The Trust for the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature.
Jackson, P. B. N. 1950. The fishes of the intertidal zone of the Cape Peninsula. Thess for the degree of
M.Sc. (Zoology Department, University of Cape Town).
JORDAN, D. S.-1887. Description of two new species of fishes from South America. Proc. Acad.
nat. ‘Sci. Philad. 39: 387-388.
Jorpan, D. S. & Starks, E. C. 1906. List of fishes collected on dicacen and Yalan, offshore
' ‘islands of southern Japan, by Robert Van Vleck Anderson, with descriptions of seven new
species. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 303-695-706. | ;
Kuausewitz, W. 1958. Fische aus dem Atlantik und Pasifik. Senckenberg. bah 39: “784 Lie
Kner, R. 1865-7. Reise dsterreichischen Fregatte ‘Novara’ um die Erde in den Jahren 1857-1859, unter
a Befehlen des Commodore B. von Wiillerstorf-Urbair. Zoologischer Theil, Fische. Wien: K.K.
Hof-u. Staatsdruckerei.
LackpEpE, B. G. E. DE. 1800. Histoire naturelle des poissons. 2. Paris: Plasson.
LicHTENSTEIN, M. H. C. 1823. Verzeichniss der Doubletten des zoologischen Museums der Konigliche
Universitit zu Berlin, nebst Beschreibung vieler bisher unbekannter Arten von Sdugethieren, Vogeln,
Amphibien und Fischen. Berlin: Trautwein.
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae . . . Editio decima, reformata. 1. Holmiae.
MakusHok, V. M. 1958. The morphology and classification of the northern blennioid fishes
(Stichaeoidae, Blennioidei, Pisces). Trudy. zool. Inst. Akad. Nauk. S.S.S.R. 25: 3-129. (Trans-
lation by A. Gosline, U.S. National Museum, April 1959).
McCuttocn, A. R. 1908. Studies on Australian fishes. Rec. Aust. Mus. 7: 36-43.
McCuttocu, A. R. 1915. Notes on, and descriptions of, Australian fishes. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W.
_ 402 259-277.
McCuttocn, A. R. 1922. The fishes and fish-like animals of New South Wales. Aust. Zool. 2:
86-130.
McCuttocn, A. R. 1929. A check-list of the fishes recorded from Australia. Mem. Aust. Mus. 5:
1-534:
McLeay, W. 1882. Descriptive catalogue of the fishes of Australia, part 3. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W.
6: 1-138.
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE I19
MarsHAa.t, T. C. 1957. Ichthyolog ical notes. Ichthyol. Notes Qd 1: 117-137.
MatruHew, W. D. 1915. Climate and evolution. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 24: 171-318.
Meap, G. W. 1958. A catalog of the type specimens of fishes formerly in the collection of the
Department of Tropical Research, New York Zoological Society. <oologica, N.Y. 43:
131-134.
METZELAAR, J. 1922. On a collection of marine fishes from the Lesser Antilles. Bijdr. Dierk.
Feestnummer: 133-141. -
Mitwarop, N. E. 1967. The Clinidae of Western Australia (Teleostei, Blennioidae). 7. Proc. R.
Soc. West. Aust. 50: 1-9.
Morrow, J. E. 1957. Shore and pelagic fishes from Peru, with new records and the description
of a new species of Sphaeroides. Bull. Bingham oceanogr. Coll. 16: 5-55.
Ocitsy, J. D. 1886. Descriptions of new fishes from Port Jackson. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 10:
225-230.
OtsEen, A. M. 1958. New fish records and notes on some uncommon Tasmanian species. Pap.
Proc. R. Soc. Tasm. g2? 155-159.
Pappe, L. 1853. Synopsis of the edible fishes at the Cape of Good Hope. Cape Town: Van de Sandt de
Villiers & Tier.
Parr, A. E. 1930. Teleostean shore and shallow-water fishes from the Bahamas and Turks
Island. Bull. Bingham oceanogr. Coll. 3: 1-148.
PenritH, M.-L. 1965a. Studies on the South African Clinidae. I. Description of a new species of
Pavoclinus, and redescription of Gynutoclinus rotundifrons (Barnard). Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 48:
QII-217.
PenritH, M.-L. 1965). Note on an extension of the known ranges of distribution of some species
of Clinidae (Pisces). S. Afr. F. Sci. 613 423-424.
PEnrRITH, M.-L. 1967. Studies on the South African Clinidae. II. Two new species of the genus
Clinus from the western Cape. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 50: 43-59.
ROSENBLATT, R. H. 1963. Speciation in marine shore fishes. In Harding, J. P. & Tebble, N., eds.
Speciation in the sea: 171-180. London: Systematics Association.
ROSENBLATT, R. H. & WALKER, B. W. 1963. The marine fishes of the Galapagos Islands. Occ.
Pap. Calif. Acad. Sci. 44%-97-104.
ScHuttz, L. P. 1949. A further contribution to the ichthyology of Venezuela. Proc. U.S. nain.
Mus. 99: 1-211.
Scott, E. O. G. 1935. Observations on some Tasmanian fishes. Part II. Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasm.
1934: 63-73.
Scott, E. O. G. 1939. Observations on some Tasmanian fishes. Part IV. Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasm.
1938: 139-159. |
Scott, E. O. G. 1955. Observations on some Tasmanian fishes. Part VII. Pap. Proc. R. Soc.
Tasm. 89: 131-146.
SmiTH, C. L. 1957. Two new clinid blennies (Malacoctenus) from Puerto Rico Occ. Pap. Mus.
Kool. Univ. Mich. 585: 1-15.
Smit, J. L. B. 1931. New fishes from South Africa. Rec. Albany Mus. 4: 145-160.
SmiTH, J. L. B. 1935. New and little-known fishes from South Africa. Rec. Albany Mus. 4: 169-235.
SmiTH, J. L. B. 1937. New records of South African fishes. Ann. Natal Mus. 8: 167-197.
Situ, J. L. B. 1945. The fishes of the family Clinidae in South Africa. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (11)
T2? 535-546.
SmitTH, J. L. B. 1947a. Brief revisions and new records of South African marine fishes. Ann. Mag.
nat. Hist. (11) 14: 335-346.
SmitTH, J. L. B. 194.7. New clinid fishes from South Africa. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (11) 14: 732-736.
SMITH, J. L. B. 1949. The sea fishes of southern Africa. Cape Town: Central News Agency.
SmiTH, J. L. B. 1953. The sea fishes of southern Africa. Rev. ed. Cape Town: Central News Agency.
SmiTH, J. L. B. 1960. A new species of South African clinid fish. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (13) 3:
689-691.
SmitH, J. L. B. 1961. Fishes of the family Xenopoclinidae. Ichthyol. Bull. Rhodes Univ. 20: 351-356.
Situ, J. L. B. 1962. Fishes from the Cape described by Lichtenstein in 1823. S. Afr. F. Sct.
58: 390-40.
SMITH, J. L. B. 1966. Certain rare fishes from South Africa with other notes. Occ. Pap. Dept.
Ichthyol. Rhodes Univ. 7: 65-80.
SPRINGER, V. G. 1954. Western Atlantic fishes of the genus Paraclinus. Tex. 7. Sci. 6: 422-441.
120 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
SPRINGER, V. G. 1955. The taxonomic status of the fishes of the genus Stathmonotus, including a
review of the Atlantic species. Bull. mar. Sci. Gulf Caribb. 5: 66-80.
SPRINGER, V. G. 1958. Systematics and zoogeography of the clinid fishes of the subtribe Labri-
somini Hubbs. Publs Inst. mar. Sci. Univ. Tex. 5: 418-491.
SPRINGER, V. G. 1964. A review of: A revised classification of the blennioid fishes of the American
family Chaenopsidae by J. S. Stephens, Jr. 1963. Copeza 1964: 591-593.
SPRINGER, V. G. 1966. Medusablennius chani, a new genus and species of blennioid fish from the
Tuamotu Archipelago: its implication on blennioid classification. Copeia 1966: 56-60.
SPRINGER, V. G. 1968. Osteology and classification of the fishes of the family Blenniidae. Bull.
U.S. natn. Mus. 284: 1-85.
Starks, E. C. 1913. The fishes of the Stanford Expedition to Brazil. Leland Stanford jr Univ.
Publs Univ. Ser. 12% 1-77.
StTEInITz, H. 1950. On the zoogeography of the teleostean genera Salarias, Ophioblennius and
Labrisomus. Archo zool. ital. 35: 325-348. (Not seen).
STEPHENS, J. S. Jr. 1961. Range extension of the temperate blennioid fish, Neoclinus bryope, into
the tropical western Pacific. Copeia 1961: 484-485.
STEPHENS, J. S. Jr. 1963. A revised classification of the blennioid fishes of the American family
Chaenopsidae. Univ. Calif. Publs Zool. 68: 1-133.
SuzukI, K. 1964. Results of the Amami Expedition. II. Fishes. Rep. Fac. Fish. Univ. Mie 5: 153-
188.
Swain, J. 1882. A review of Swainson’s genera of fishes. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 34: 272-284.
Swainson, W. 1839. The natural history and classification of fishes, amphibians and reptiles,
or monocardian animals. In The Cabinet Encyclopaedia. 8. London: Longman, Orme, Brown,
Green & Longmans.
TuHompson, W. W. 1918. Catalogue of the fishes of the Cape Province. Mar. biol. Rep. Cape Tn 4:
75-177:
WHITLEy, G. P. 1929. Johnston’s memoranda relating to the fishes of Tasmania. Pap. Proc. R.
Soc. Tasm. 1928: 44-69.
WHITLEY, G. P. 1945. New sharks and fishes from Western Australia. Aust. Zool. 11: 1-42.
Wuit ey, G. P. 1956. Ichthyolegical notes. Aust. Zool. 12: 251-261.
Wait ey, G. P. 1959. Ichthyological snippets. Aust. Zool. 12: 310-323.
APPENDIX A. Data for fig. 3 (comparison of upper jaw lengths of South African Clinidi).
(Data as % of head length.)
Std. Std. Std. No. of
dev. err. err. fish
X2
Range Mean o om 20m N
Clinus anguillaris a -- 36°3-43:0 40°0 0°35 0:07 0-14 25
Clinus striatus .. cS fe 37 OAdar 40°2 — oe = 9
Clinus capensis .. aes eal SOAs Ng 2°48 0°51 1-02 25
Clinus dorsalis .. We -. 34°8-50°0 40°1 3°63 0:74 1°48 25
Clinus navalis .. at -- 38°0-44°5 40°7 — — — 5
Clinus acuminatus a 2. 35°9-45°5 40°2 2°53 0°52 1-04 25
Clinus agilis we, 8 .. 40°0-50°0 44°2 2°46 0°52 1°04 25
Clinus berrisfordi . . Me .- 36°4-50°0 43°3 3°94 1°02 2°04 16
Ciinus brevicristatus se -. = 38°5-46°5 Ane 1°70 036 0-72 23
Clinus cottoides .. if .. 43:°7-60°0 49°1 4°17 0°85 1-70 25
Clinus helenae... ae 22 89°5=52°5 44.°3 — — = 3
Clinus latipennis .. a 2s 34°5-43°5 39°3 — — — 3
Clinus heterodon .. ihe -. 36°4-50°0 44°2 4:26 0°87 Lan 25
Clinus robustus .. a 2) 45°5-53°5 49°4 — — —_ 8
Clinus superciliosus we fol Biase Ris V0) 41°2 2°85 0°58 1:16 25
Clinus taurus ae a SO BXSO ets 90) 44°4 4°36 0°97 1°94 19
Clinus venustris .. AY -. 35°3-48-0 41°2 3°92 0:82 ~=1°64 25
Clinus woodi oe a -» 48°0-51°5 49°8 — — = 5
Pavoclinus mus .. a se eOM Oa 29°8 B28 0-46 0°92 25
Pavoclinus graminis. oe .. 27°6-38°6 330 2°45 0°51 L02 25
i
THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE
Pavoclinus laurentii
Pavoclinus litorafontis
Pavoclinus mentalis
Pavoclinus pavo
Pavoclinus profundus
Pavoclinus fucorum a
Blennioclinus brachycephal.
Blenniclinus stella
Clinoporus biporosus ;
Gynutoclinus rotundifrons . .
36-0-41°
33°3-42°
ga) 0-40"
22°0-43°
36°4
32°4-42°
28° 6-36:
31° 547°
34° 1-43°
40°0-43°
ono Oo
oonwn ©
© 09
“I “I
COW NHB HO
©
1°39
Deay
4°36
2°06
0-40
0°45
0:89
0:42
0:80
0°86
—-
1-78
0:84
a!
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
I
I
|
}
|
|
ove
INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS
Based on
CONFERENCE OF BIOLOGICAL EDITORS, COMMITTEE ON FORM AND STYLE. 1960.
Style manual for biological journals. Washington: American Institute of Biological Sciences.
MANUSCRIPT
To be typewritten, double spaced, with good margins, arranged in the following order:
(1) Heading, consisting of informative but brief title, name(s) of author(s), address(es) of
author(s), number of illustrations (plates, figures, enumerated maps and tables) in the article.
(2) Contents. (3) The main text, divided into principal divisions with major headings; sub-
headings to be used sparingly and enumeration of headings to be avoided. (4) Summary.
(5) Acknowledgements. (6) References, as below. (7) Key to lettering of figures. (8) Explana-
tion to plates.
ILLUSTRATIONS
To be reducible to 4 in. X 7 in. (7 in. including caption). A metric scale to appear with
all photographs.
REFERENCES
Harvard system (name and year) to be used: author’s name and year of publication given
in text; full references at the end of the article, arranged alphabetically by names, chronologi-
cally within each name, with suffixes a, b, etc. to the year for more than one paper by the
same author in that year.
For books give title in italics, edition, volume number, place of publication, publisher.
For journal articles give title of article, title of journal in italics (abbreviated according to
the World list of scientific periodicals. 4th ed. London: Butterworths, 1963), series in
parentheses, volume number, part number (only if independently paged) in parentheses,
pagination.
Examples (note capitalization and punctuation)
BuLLoucuH, W. S. 1960. Practical invertebrate anatomy. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.
FiscHER, P.-H. 1948. Données sur la résistance et de le vitalité des mollusques. 7. Conch., Paris
88: 100-140. |
FiscHER, P.-H., DuvAt, M. & Rarry, A. 1933. Etudes sur les échanges respiratoires des littorines.
Archs Zool. exp. gén. 74: 627-634.
Koun, A. J. 1960a. Ecological notes on Conus (Mollusca: Gastropoda) in the Trincomalee
region of Ceylon. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (13) 2: 309-320.
Koun, A. J. 1960). Spawning behaviour, egg masses and larval development in Conus from
the Indian Ocean. Bull. Bingham oceanogr. Coll. 17 (4): 1-51.
THIELE, J. 1910. Mollusca: B. Polyphacophora, Gastropoda marina, Bivalvia. In Schultze, L.
Koologische und anthropologische Ergebnisse einer Forschungsreise im westlichen und zentralen Siid-
Afrika. 4: 269-270. Jena: Fischer. Denkschr. med.-naturw. Ges. Jena 16: 269-270.
ZOOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE
To be governed by the rulings of the latest International code of zoological nomenclature issued
by the International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature (particularly articles 22 and 51).
The Harvard system of reference to be used in the synonymy lists, with the full references
incorporated in the list at the end of the article, and not given in contracted form in the
synonymy list.
Example
Scalaria coronata Lamarck, 1816: pl. 451, figs 5 a, 6; Liste: 11. Turton, 1932: 80.
f ie |
Mie
& ye i ne) My
RM i YY ATA
AE Teoh done bul ‘taht Nie 4
i Sbe) andi re fe ee eae Pos ee A
San sea weel TT) i i ee era Sa a bong Obie stein:
ih ia if } ae ‘ :- D me} ‘ an i + %
Lis" nevis (astute Boke) aeRO,
‘ i Ni ie he ih 1 A Pepe ty LSC oa hebtane)) ce kta 3 th
saa hiss PUNE sivids Rea we Ua
we Ant giagk Weg can eaectnge bats ohygices ange “|
; ae AT OY AE UE wong i ol YS iy 1 (a) Gah
Ul
rr i ey Niko cha anu yn (0k eras
% bt if oO) (aRAy
“y te f ' “pit
i i LS tae + Un
j se » wohil¢
| '
es, ' P v's
| i it
h y
’ ‘ ae
;
, se? PAL
Li, “i che 8 is fee ik
: ts z \y | L 48 wit Ee Pe ith
| , , Wt ora) ‘Winey "
2 J 7 P 5 +3 t , 1 J ny ite a eh
| ;
O/-66
ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM
Volume 55 +#Band
October 1969 Oktober
Part. 2 Deel
_ APLETODON PELLEGRINI (CHABANAUD) AND
OTHER CLINGFISHES (PISCES: GOBIESOCIDAE)
FROM SOUTH WEST AFRICA
|
} MARY-LOUISE PENRITH
alt HSUny, ,
o™ 4,
Cape Town Kaapstad
DEC SYS Sos
f/8RARIED
The ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
are issued in parts at irregular intervals as material -
becomes available
Obtainable from the South African Museum, P.O. Box 61, Cape Town
Die ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM
word uitgegee in dele op ongereelde tye na beskikbaarheid
van stof
Verkrygbaar van die Suid-Afrikaanse iiceennt Posbus 61, Kaapstad
OUT OF PRINT/UIT DRUK
1, 2(1, 3, 5, 7-8), 3(1-2, 5, t-p-l.), 5(2, 5, 7-9),
6(1, t.—p.i.), TO By) 8, g(1-2), FO(1—2)55
(L250 fpr Pale) an 2 lene (2) 29 om Ta uae
44(4).
Price of this part/Prys van hierdie deel
R1.20
Trustees of the South African Museum © Trustees van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum
1969
Printed in South Africa by ia In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur
The Rustica Press, Pty., Ltd. Die Rustica-pers, Edms., Bpk.
Court Road, Wynberg, Cape Courtweg, Wynberg, Kaap
APLETODON PELLEGRINI (CHABANAUD) AND OTHER
CLINGFISHES (PISCES: GOBIESOCIDAE) FROM
SOUTH WEST AFRICA
By
Mary-LovuisE PENRITH
South African Museum, Cape Town
(With 5 figures)
[MS. received 14. May 1969]
CONTENTS
PAGE
Introduction . } : : Hh) neg
Systematic discussion . ; ey yp zs
Remarks on distribution. mae
Summary . OF calwent ait a 5, Ge
eerer iedee stent ‘ . Stee
INCIERCHCES RE a oe hes wy 2h B84
INTRODUCTION
It is not unusual that the presence of a group such as the clingfishes, most
of which are small and inconspicuous, should remain undetected in areas in
which very little collecting has been done. Smith (1964), discussing the cling-
fishes of the western Indian ocean and the Red Sea, pointed out that no cling-
fishes had up to that time been recorded from tropical West Africa south of
Ghana. His distribution maps showed no records of Gobiesocidae on the
western African coast between Ghana in the north and Port Nolloth in the
south.
Smith (1964) suggested that the lack of records of Gobiesocidae from the
west coast of Africa was probably due rather to lack of sampling of the area
than to a genuine deficit of clingfishes there, and this appears to be true.
Collecting on the South West African coast by the South African Museum
and the State Museum, Windhoek, has indicated that three species of Gobie-
socidae occur intertidally in South West Africa, and one of these has also been
found in southern Angola.
Smith (1964) listed five species of Gobiesocidae ee knysnaensis Srnith,
Chorisochismus dentex (Pallas), Eckloniaichthys scylliorhiniceps Smith, Lepadichthys
coccinotaenia Regan, Pherallodus smithi Briggs) as occurring intertidally in the
South African region. Of these, Pherallodus smithi is known from the single type
specimen collected at Durban in 1934, and Lepadichthys coccinotaenia, a species
of the tropical western Indian ocean, occurs rarely on the Natal coast. The
other three species are found further westwards. Briggs (1955) recorded four
species from north-west African shores and islands (Afletodon pellegrini (Chaba-
123
Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 55(2), 1969, 123-134, 5 figs.
124 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
rly ae
aS
ANGOLA
‘Kunene R,
A\Honolulu
A
A Liideritzbucht
O -Apletodon peliegrini
4 4 —Chorisochismus dentex
| @ 4 - Eckloniaichthys scylliorhinicleps
Fig. 1. Records of clingfishes from the South West African region.
APLETODON PELLEGRINI AND OTHER CLINGFISHES FROM S.W.A. 125
naud), Lepadogaster candolle: Risso, Lepadogaster lepadogaster lepadogaster (Bonna-
terre), Lepadogaster zebrina Lowe), while the genus Diplecogaster is represented
in deeper water in this area, as it is off southern Africa (Briggs, 1955; Smith,
1964). Two specimens of Apletodon pellegrini in the Muséum d’ Histoire Naturelle,
Paris, collected at Annobon island just south of the equator by A. Stauch,
represent the southernmost record for any clingfish in the West African
tropical region.
The three species here recorded from South West Africa are Chorisochismus
dentex, Eckloniaichthys scylliorhiniceps, and Apletodon pellegrim. The localities
from which these species were recorded are shown in figure 1. The South West
African records of Chorisochismus dentex and Eckloniaichthys scylliorhiniceps represent
considerable north-westward extensions of their distributional ranges.
The identification of the South West African specimens of Apfletodon
necessitated comparison with both northern and southern (Apletodon knysnaensis)
specimens, and this comparison led me to conclude that Apletodon pellegrint
and A. knysnaensis are not specifically distinct in spite of their apparent geo-
graphical separation.
Abbreviations used
P.M. — Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris.
R.U.C.—J. L. B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology, Rhodes University,
Grahamstown.
S.A.M.—South African Museum, Cape Town.
S.M.—State Museum, Windhoek, South West Africa.
U.Z.M. —Universitets Zoologiska Museum, Copenhagen, Denmark.
SYSTEMATIC Discussion
Apletodon pellegrint (Chabanaud, 1925)
(Fig. 2)
Lepadogasier (Mirbelia) Pellegrini Chabanaud, 1925: 283, 286.
Apletodon pellegrini: Briggs, 1955: 27 (synonymy and references). Blanc, Cadenat & Stauch,
1968: 252.
Apletodon knysnaensis Smith, 1964: 590, pl. 93 B, C, pl. 96 A-F, pl. 97 B-F.
Material on which description 1s based: 1 specimen, 29 mm standard length,
S.A.M. 24942, intertidal pool, Mogamedes, southern Angola; 1 specimen, 26
mm standard length, S.M. 5216, intertidal pool, Rocky Point, S.W.A.; 2
specimens, 25 & 22 mm standard length, S.A.M. 25247, intertidal pools,
Rocky Point, S.W.A.; 1 specimen, 34 mm standard length, S.A.M. 25263,
intertidal pool, Rocky Point, S.W.A.; 2 specimens, 42 & 32 mm standard
length, S.A.M. 25257, intertidal pools, Méwe Bay, S.W.A.; 1 specimen, 34 mm
standard length, $.M. 5268, intertidal pool, Méwe Bay, S.W.A.
Other material examined: 3 specimens, P.M. 25-239, 25-240, 25-241, Cap
126 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Blanc (syntypes); 1 specimen, P.M. 07-257, Senegal (syntype); 2 specimens,
P.M. 59-65, 59-66, Senegal; 2 specimens, P.M. 1965-623, Annobon Island;
3 specimens, U.Z.M., Senegal (Dakar); 1 specimen, R.U.C., Knysna (allotype
of A. knysnaensis); 1 specimen, R.U.C., Knysna (holotype of A. knysnaensis) ;
5 specimens, R.U.C., Knysna; 1 specimen, R.U.C., Lambert’s Bay; 5 speci-
mens, R.U.C., Bird Island, Port Elizabeth; 4 specimens, S.A.M. 25250,
Froggy Pond, False Bay; 9 specimens (10-20 mm standard length), S.A.M.
25257 & S.M. 5269-5271, Mowe Bay, S.W.A.
Description: D. 5-6; A. 5-6; P. 21-22; C. 10-12. Gills three and one half.
Third gill arch with six minute gill-rakers. Maximum depth of body 4:4—5-7
in standard length. |
Head broad, depressed, 2:3-2-4 in standard length, maximum breadth of
head 2:75-3:25 in standard length. Eye round, orbit diameter 4-5-6 in head.
Interorbital width greater than orbit diameter, 3-3-7 in head. Snout a little
longer than eye, rounded, 3-3-7 in head. Anterior nostril tubular, posterior
nostril a simple pore. Mouth terminal, upper jaw 2:25-3-7 in head, breadth
of mouth at posterior angles of jaw 2-2-8 in head. Teeth conical, caniniform;
four distinctly compressed, enlarged, incisiform teeth in front of upper jaw of
25, 34 (both), 32, and 42 mm specimens.
Dorsal and anal fins in posterior fourth of body. Anus anterior to dorsal
origin, slightly nearer to pectoral tip than to caudal base. Pelvic disc double,
fringed with small branched papillae, disc length 2-9—-3-8 in standard length.
Caudal peduncle very short, 4:5-5°5 in head length, deeper than long, depth
3-3-7 in head length. Caudal fin rounded.
Colouring: Upper parts dark red to reddish brown in Rocky Point specimens
and 34 mm Mowe Bay specimen, light green in 32 and 42 mm Mowe Bay
specimens. Angolan specimen red with greenish mottling. A light bar across
interorbital in the three largest specimens. Underparts of all specimens lighter,
creamy buff. Throat with fine red spots in all except the 32 and 42 mm speci-
mens. Pectoral fins hyaline; pelvic disc hyaline in most specimens, orange in
32 and 42 mm specimens. Dorsal, anal, and caudal fins barred with main
colour of upper parts.
Habitat: Intertidal; the Rocky Point specimens were collected amongst mussels
(Perna perna (Linnaeus)) and coralline algae in pools at the middle levels of
the intertidal zone of the shore. The Méwe Bay specimens were collected under
large stones in pools at the middle levels of the shore amongst brachiopods
(Discinisca tenuis (Sowerby)).
Distribution: Dakar, Senegal, to the Cape Verde, Canary, and Madeira Islands
(Briggs, 1955); Annobén Island (Blanc, Cadenat & Stauch, 1968); Lambert’s
Bay to Port Elizabeth (Smith, 1964).
Remarks
Three species have been included in the genus Apletodon Briggs: A. pellegrini;
A. microcephalus (Brook), from Sicily to Scotland (Briggs, 1955), with a sub-
APLETODON PELLEGRINI AND OTHER CLINGFISHES FROM S.W.A. 127
5mm
Fig. 2. Apletodon pellegrint (Chabanaud).
species A. m. bacescut Antoniu Murgoci from the Black Sea (Murgoci, 1964);
and A. knysnaensis Smith, from the southern coast of South Africa from Lambert’s
Bay to Port Elizabeth (Smith, 1964).
Comparison of specimens of A. pellegrint and the typical form of A. micro-
cephaius indicates that they are two clearly distinct species which differ in a
number of features, the most marked difference being the considerably narrower
head of A. microcephalus. A. pellegrini and A. knysnaensis are by no means as
readily separable.
Smith (1964) distinguished A. knysnaensis from A. pellegrini chiefly on the
length of the head in profile and the position of the anus with regard to the
pectoral fin and the caudal base. He stated that A. knysnaensis was extremely
similar to A. pellegrini, and that, but for the great distance separating the two
forms geographically, he might be tempted to accord the southern form sub-
specific status only.
128 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
I can find no difference between the South West African and Angolan
specimens and specimens of A. pellegrin from the northern hemisphere and
Annoboén Island. Furthermore, comparison of the northern hemisphere, Angolan,
and South West African specimens of A. pellegrint with specimens, including the
types, of A. knysnaensis, indicates that these two species are in fact indistinguish-
able. The position of the anus with regard to the pectoral tip and the caudal
base appears to vary, but in the majority of specimens (all the northern
hemisphere, Annobon, and Angolan/South West African specimens and
several of the southern ones) the anus was found to be slightly nearer the
pectoral tip. As far as the profile head length is concerned, there is much
overlap: measurements are given in table 1. Judging from the proportions
given by Smith (1964), he may have made his measurements slightly differently
from mine, but the difference between southern and northern forms is in any
event so slight as not to warrant even subspecific separation.
TABLE I
Comparison of head lengths (profile) of Apletodon pellegrinit from the northern hemisphere,
Angola/South West Africa, and the southern coast of South Africa.
Locality Standard length Head length in
(mm) standard length
Cap Blanc . , : : 25 2a
Cap Blanc . : ‘ ; 29 B)A-
Senegal. ! : 3 é 28 22
Senegal. ; : : : 20 2°2
Dakar . : j : : 28 F437)
Dakar . : 5 : : 20 2°5
Dakar . : : : : 18 Bag
Mocamedes . ? ; , 29 2°4
Rocky Point . ; : : 34 2°4
Rocky Point . , ; : 25 P40:
Rocky Point . : : ‘ 26 2°*4
Rocky Point . : P : 22 2A
Mowe Bay . : : ; 42 2a
Mowe Bay . ; ; : 34 2°4
Mowe Bay . ; ; : 32 Qe
Lambert’s Bay : 5 ; 32 POG |
False Bay : : . 25 24g:
False Bay : : : 21 2723:
False Bay : : . 20 2°5
False Bay 99): , ‘ A 21 2°3
Knysna ; ; : , 33 Qf
Knysna , : : ; 24. 2°4
Knysna : ‘ : E 32 2°5
Knysna : : : : 29 29
Knysna 5 : é : 34. 2°4
Knysna ; ; 5 , 24 2°4
Knysna é : : : 23 PING |
Port Elizabeth : : q 25 2°5
Port Elizabeth : : : 23 2°6
Port Elizabeth ; : ‘ 26 2:6
Port Elizabeth i : : 25 2°8
Port Elizabeth ; ; ; 23 Bia
APLETODON PELLEGRINI AND OTHER CLINGFISHES FROM S.W.A. 129
It seems then that there are two species of the genus Apletodon, one con-
fined to the North Atlantic and Mediterranean region, and one widely distri-
buted along the African coast, including offshore islands.
Chorisochismus dentex (Pallas, 1769)
(Fig. 3)
Cyclopierus dentex Pallas, 1769: 6, pl. 1.
Chorisochismus dentex: Giinther, 1861: 490. Barnard, 1927: 423. Smith, 1949: 384, pl. 87 fig.
1086; 1964: 587, pl. 94 A, B, C. Briggs, 1955: 40 (synonymy and references).
Material : 7 specimens, 92—167 mm standard length, $.M. 4929-4934, intertidal
pools, Rocky Point, S.W.A.; 6 specimens, 99-190 mm standard length, $.A.M.
25221, intertidal pools, Rocky Point, S.W.A.; 1 specimen, 115 mm standard
length, $.M. 4405, intertidal pool, 42 miles north of Unjab River mouth,
S.W.A.; I specimen, 133 mm standard length, $S.A.M. 25228 intertidal pool,
42 miles north of Unjab River mouth; 1 specimen, 128 mm standard length,
S.A.M. 25231, Honolulu, $.W.A.; 13 specimens, 11-115 mm standard length,
50mm
Fig. 3. Chorisochismus dentex (Pallas).
I30 Ao ~ \'" ANNALS OF THE SOUTH. AFRICAN MUSEUM —
S.A.M. 24209, Liideritzbucht, S.W.A.; 22 specimens, 11-84 mm standard
length, S.A.M. 25248, Liideritzbucht, S. W.A.
Description: D. 7-8; A. 6; P. 21-23; C. 9-10. Gills three and one half. Reel
gill arch with four minute gill-rakers. Maximum depth of body 3-2—4-1 in
standard length in 84-190 mm specimens, 4:5-5°3 in standard length in
smaller specimens. _ .
Head broad, not strongly depressed, 1-9-2°5 in standard length, breadth
of head about equal to, usually very slightly less than, length; 1-9—2-9 in standard
length. Eye round, orbit diameter 3-2—4-9 in head. Interorbital width about
equal to eye in large specimens, less in smaller specimens, 2°7—5:2 in head
length. Snout a little longer than eye, bluntly rounded, '2:6—3-7 in head.
Anterior and posterior nostrils tubular, anterior nostril with a simple expanded
dermal flap on posterior rim. Mouth terminal, upper jaw 2:4-3:3 in head,
breadth of mouth at posterior angles of jaws 1-4~3-2 in head, broadening with
increase in standard length. Teeth mainly conical, enlarged, prominent, and
slightly compressed in front.
- Dorsal and. anal fins in posterior third of body. Anus well anterior to
dorsal origin. Urogenital papilla of male very much larger than that of female.
Pelvic disc single, length 2-6—3-2 in standard length. Caudal fin subtruncate.
Caudal peduncle 2:3-4°3 (3-4 in most specimens) in head length, longer than
deep, depth 4:3—5:8 in head length.
Colouring: Very variable; most specimens pinkish or greenish mottled to match
surroundings. Underparts creamy.
Habitat: Intertidal and infratidal; clings to rocks.
Distribution: Alexander Bay (South African Museum) ; Port Nolloth to northern
Natal (Zululand) coast (Smith, 1964). /
Remarks
This is the only species of clingfish that is common on South West African
shores.
Eckloniaichthys scylliorhiniceps Smith, 1943
(Fig. 4)
Eckloniaichthys scylliorhiniceps Smith, 1943: 67, fig. 1; 1949: 384, pl. 87 fig. 1087; 1964: 584,
ge pl. 92 D, pl. 93 D,; E. Briggs, 1955: 72.
Material: 1 specimen, 15 mm standard length, S.A.M. 25240, intertidal pool,
Agate Beach, Liideritzbucht. )
Description: D. 5; A. 5; P. 18; C. 10. Gills three. Each gill arch with four
minute gill-rakers. Maximum depth of body 7:5 in standard length.
Head depressed, 3-0 in standard length, maximum breadth of head 5:0
in standard length. Eye round, orbit diameter 5-0 in head. Interorbital width
equal to orbit diameter. Snout twice length of eye, narrowly rounded, 2-5 in
head. Mouth subterminal, inferior, upper jaw 5:0 in head, width of mouth at
APLETODON PELLEGRINI AND OTHER CLINGFISHES FROM S8.W.A. I31I
——_———— ee |
5mm
Fig. 4. Eckloniaichthys scylliorhiniceps Smith.
posterior angles of jaws 5:0 in head. Teeth minute, bluntly conical in upper
jaw, lower jaw with six blunt incisiform teeth at front of jaw, followed by three |
caniniform teeth on either side.
_ Dorsal and anal fins in posterior fourth of body. Anus in front of dorsal
origin. A flat fleshy pad on lower part of pectoral base. Pelvic disc single, length
50 in standard length. Caudal peduncle 1-7 in head length, much longer
than deep, depth 5-0 in head length. Caudal fin rounded.
Colouring: Upper parts plain dark olive brown, lower parts creamy.
Habitat: Clinging to kelp stipe in intertidal gully.
Distribution: Sea Point (west coast of Cape Peninsula) (South African Museum) ;
False Bay to East London (Smith, 1964); Kei River mouth (South African
Museum).
Remarks
This small, rather rare clingfish is always found attached to algae. On the
west coast, where it has been found only on kelp (Ecklonia and Laminaria), it
132 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
is brown; from False Bay eastwards it usually occurs on Caulerpa, and is then
bright green.
The Liideritzbucht specimen is a female; males of this species are easily
distinguished by the very large urogenital papilla.
REMARKS ON DISTRIBUTION
The known distribution of the three species of clingfishes recorded from
South West Africa is shown in figure 5. Two of the species, Chorisochismus
dentex and Eckloniaichthys scylliorhiniceps, appear to be endemic to the southern
African region, while the third is very widely distributed from northern West
Africa to southern Africa.
Chorisochismus dentex is the only really common intertidally occurring
clingfish on the southern African coast. It is one of the few endemic southern
African intertidal fish species that extend to the northern coast of South West
Africa.
Eckloniaichthys scylliorhiniceps is known from relatively few specimens,
probably mainly because it is a minute and very cryptic species and its habitat
is difficult to sample. Both it and Apletodon pellegrini are likely to be found at
further localities.
At the present state of knowledge, there are several considerable gaps in
the distribution of Apletodon pellegrini, the greatest of which are the stretches of
coast between Dakar and Annobén Island, Annoboén Island and Mocgamedes,
and Rocky Point and Lambert’s Bay. Considering that these fishes are small
and inconspicuous, and the intertidal zone of the shore in tropical West Africa
is poorly known, at least some of these gaps may be apparent rather than real.
However, Rocky Point and Lambert’s Bay both lie in transitional areas where,
owing to changing hydrographic conditions, overlap of different faunal provinces
occurs. Between them is the stretch of coast where very low temperatures
prevail owing to the Benguela upwelling system; if Apletodon pellegrini really is
absent from this region, its absence may be related to hydrographic conditions.
SUMMARY
Three species of clingfishes are recorded from South West Africa, a
region from which no clingfishes were previously known. In the light of the
South West African material, a southern African species is synonymised with
a species from northern West Africa. The South West African material is
described, and the distribution of the three species is briefly discussed.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am grateful to the South African National Committee for Oceanographic
Research for a grant towards the expenses of one of the expeditions to South
APLETODON PELLEGRINI AND OTHER CLINGFISHES FROM S.W.A. 1393
O
H
AA
O
A fe
AOKao4
} —Apletodon pellegrini A
| -Chorisochismus dentex
-Eckloniaichthys scylliorhiniceps
Fig. 5. Distribution of Apletodon pellegrini, Chorisochismus dentex and Eckloniaichthys scylliorhiniceps.
194 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
West Africa and Angola. I am indebted to the South West African Administra-
tion, and in particular Mr. C. G. Coetzee, Director of the State Museum,
Windhoek, for making it possible for me to visit the northern coast of South
West Africa.
My grateful thanks are due to those who assisted in the collection of
material: Mr. M. J. Penrith, of the Oceanography Department, University of
Cape Town; Mr. C. G. Coetzee, Dr. P. G. Olivier, and J. Batista of the State
Museum, Windhoek; Mr. B. F. Kensley, of the South African Museum; Mr.
C. D. Berrisford, of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Durban;
Mr. N. A. S. Reay.
I am indebted to the following individuals for the loan of material for
comparison: Mrs. M. M. Smith, of the J. L. B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology,
Rhodes University, Grahamstown; Dr. M. L. Bauchot, of the Muséum National
d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris; Dr. J. Nielsen, of the Universitets' Zoologiska
Museum, Copenhagen; Dr. P. J. Whitehead, of the British Museum (Natural
History).
My very grateful thanks are due to Mr. B. F. Kensley for the illustrations
used in figures 2, 3, and 4, and to Mr. M. J. Penrith for commenting on the
manuscript. |
The Trustees of the South African Museum are grateful to the Council
for Scientific and Industrial Research for a grant to publish this paper.
REFERENCES
BARNARD, K. H. 1925-27. A monograph of the marine fishes of South Africa. Ann. S. Afr. Mus.
21: 1-1065.
Buianc, M., Capenat, J. & Staucu, A. 1968. Contribution a l’étude de l’ichthyofaune de Vile
onae uate Bull. Inst. fond. Afr. noire (A) 30: 238-256.
Briccs, J. C. 1955. A monograph of the clingfishes (order Xenopterygii). Stanf. ichthyol. Bull.
6: 1-224.
(CHaABANAUD, P. 1925. Lepadogaster (Mirbelia) bimaculatus Penn., microcephalus Brook et Pellegrini,
nov. sp. (Pisces Gobiesocidae). Bull. Mus. Hist. nat., Paris 1925: 283-287.
Guntuer, A. C. L. G. 1861. Catalogue of the acanthopterygian fishes in the collection of the British
Museum. 3. London: Trustees of the British Museum.
Mourcocr, A. 1964. Contribution a la connaissance des gobiesocides (ordre des Xenopterygii)
de la mer Noire. Rev. roum. Biol. (Zool.) 9: 297-306.
Patras, P. S. 1769. Spicilegia zoologica .. . 7. Berolini..(Not seen.)
SmirH, J. L. B. 1943. Interesting fishes Be three genera new to South Apter with a note on
Mobula diabolus (Shaw). Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 30: 67-77.
SmiTH, J. L. B. 1949. The sea fishes of southern Africa. Cape Town: Central News Agency.
SmiTH, J. L. B. 1964. The clingfishes of the western Indian ocean and the Red Sea. ehayok
Bull. Rhodes Univ. 30: 581-596.
INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS
Based on
CONFERENCE OF BIOLOGICAL EDITORS, COMMITTEE ON FORM AND STYLE. 1960.
Style manual for biological journals. Washington: American Institute of Biological Sciences.
MANUSCRIPT
To be typewritten, double spaced, with good margins, arranged in the following order:
(1) Heading, consisting of informative but brief title, name(s) of author(s), address(es) of
author(s), number of illustrations (plates, figures, enumerated maps and tables) in the article.
(2) Contents. (3) The main text, divided into principal divisions with major headings; sub-
headings to be used sparingly and enumeration of headings to be avoided. (4) Summary.
(5) Acknowledgements. (6) References, as below. (7) Key to lettering of figures. (8) Explana-
tion to plates.
ILLUSTRATIONS
To be reducible to 42 in. x 7 in. (7 in. including caption). A metric scale to appear with
all photographs.
REFERENCES
Harvard system (name and year) to be used: author’s name and year of publication given
in text; full references at the end of the article, arranged alphabetically by names, chronologi-
cally within each name, with suffixes a, 5, etc. to the year for more than one paper by the
same author in that year.
For books give title in italics, edition, volume number, place of publication, publisher.
For journal articles give title of article, title of journal in italics (abbreviated according to
the World list of scientific periodicals. 4th ed. London: Butterworths, 1963), series in
parentheses, volume number, part number (only if independently paged) in parentheses,
pagination.
Examples (note capitalization and punctuation)
BuLLoucH, W. S. 1960. Practical invertebrate anatomy. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.
FIscHER, P.-H. 1948. Données sur la résistance et de le vitalité des mollusques. 7. Conch., Paris
88: 100-140.
FiscHER, P.-H., Duvat, M. & Rarry, A. 1933. Etudes sur les échanges respiratoires des littorines.
Archs Zool. exp. gén. 74: 627-634.
Koun, A. J. 1960a. Ecological notes on Conus (Mollusca: Gastropoda) in the Trincomalee
region of Ceylon. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (13) 2: 309-320.
Koun, A. J. 19605. Spawning behaviour, egg masses and larval development in Conus from
the Indian Ocean. Bull. Bingham oceanogr. Coll. 17 (4): 1-51.
THIELE, J. 1910. Mollusca: B. Polyplacophora, Gastropoda marina, Bivalvia. Jn Schultze, L.
Koologische und anthropologische Ergebnisse einer Forschungsreise im westlichen und zentralen Siid-
Afrika. 4: 269-270. Jena: Fischer. Denkschr. med.-naturw. Ges. Jena 16: 269-270.
ZOOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE
To be governed by the rulings of the latest International code of zoological nomenclature issued
by the International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature (particularly articles 22 and 51).
The Harvard system of reference to be used in the synonymy lists, with the full references
incorporated in the list at the end of the article, and not given in contracted form in the
synonymy list.
Example
Scalaria coronata Lamarck, 1816: pl. 451, figs 5 a, 6; Liste: 11. Turton, 1932: 80.
|
if
uy
a
eee
u
a
pre
'
, ; I - pr EX Re Ki i¥), 3 (
ae | f hie weet i ae Ab
j MPI j Pht i, . ‘* iy Lian te at Wee Aris ae Py ea j a Ass,
ae
Vii Dead ony Dy
ae TRG? BRS
eM,
4 Veit ng!
.
bay eae Ry, ‘ n
p F © ad 7 i Wile, UG -
rie: 5k ieee ey le -
MRM ci. |) 3) D> i RAR |
ery ;
op) Seo yale Te - aay Wingo ty art ithe
ys rT oe
; aye WA ae +
,
S } it
y 2 4 ape have ] Es An
i
/
¥
>
‘*~
+
ai
N
,
re
Ps
4
z 4
5
- f
rl
4 7s
F
i
\
;
O/,66
PEN ALS “OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN,MUSEUM
ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM
Volume 55 #£Band
July 1970 Julie
Pare forge Deck
THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE FISHES OF THE
PeMILY CLINIDAE IN. SOUTHERN AFRICA
By
MARY-LOUISE, PENRITH
Cape Town Kaapstad
a HSOW—~
SEP 11 1970
“i8RARIL2
The ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
are issued in parts at irregular intervals as material
becomes available
Obtainable from the South African Museum, P.O. Box 61, Cape Town
Die ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM
word uitgegee in dele op ongereelde tye na beskikbaarheid
van stof
Verkrygbaar van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum, Posbus 61, Kaapstad
OUT OF PRINT/UIT DRUK
I, Ain 3> D> 7-8), Be, 5> te ls 5(2, 5> 7-9)>
6(1, tea Dele) Fa S)e 8, O(1-2)), 10(1),
11(1-2, 5, 7, tpl), 21, 24(2), 27, 31(1-3),, 38,
44(4).
Price of this part/Prys van hierdie deel
R1.35
Trustees of the South African Museum (© ‘Trustees van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum
1970
Printed in South Africa by In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur
The Rustica Press, Pty., Ltd. Die Rustica-pers, Edms., Bpk.
Court Road, Wynberg, Cape Courtweg, Wynberg, Kaap
THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE FISHES OF THE FAMILY
CLINIDAE. IN SOUTHERN AFRICA
By
Mary-Louise PENRITH
South African Museum, Cape Town
(With 5 figures)
[MS. received 20 October 1969]
CONTENTS
PAGE
Introduction . : : F ; : : : é to
Methods . : , ; ‘ ‘ : ; ’ ergo
Note on the stability of South African clinid populations 136
South African intertidal faunal provinces . : : sp BO
Distribution of the South African Clinidae. : ; EO)
Discussion fs : ; : : : s : . 145
Summary. : : ; : . 148
Acknowledgements é : : : : : . 149
References ; : : , : : . 149
INTRODUCTION
Thirty-five species of the family Clinidae are known from the coast of
Africa. Two of them belong to the subfamily Labrisominae and these are
restricted to tropical West Africa. The remaining 33 all belong to the tribe
Clinini of the subfamily Clininae (Hubbs, 1952; Penrith, 1969), and all are
endemic to southern Africa between the Kunene River on the west coast and
Inhambane in Mocambique. In spite of intensive collecting by the late Pro-
fessor J. L. B. Smith in tropical East Africa, no clinids have been recorded from
the east coast north of Inhambane.
The distribution of the dominant elements of the intertidal fauna and
flora of South Africa was described by the late Professor T. A. Stephenson and
his colleagues before the Second World War, and the main conclusions are
summarized in three papers (Stephenson, 1939, 1944, 1948). These conclusions
were not based on shore fishes, which are difficult to catch, but Stephenson
(1948) noted that the distribution of the Clinidae outlined by Smith (1945)
agreed closely with the distribution of other shore animals. Stephenson further
suggested that, since the clinids dealt with by Smith are all endemic, the
details of their distribution would be particularly interesting. This stimulated
135
Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 55 (3), 1970, 135-150, 5 figs.
guasTHSOWAN §=gep 03 WI"
INSTITUTION S
136 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
the present study, and the data obtained have provided new evidence to test
Stephenson’s conclusions regarding the limits of the faunistic provinces around
southern Africa.
In broad outline it may be said that the clinids are the dominant group
of fishes that live permanently on the shores of the Cape Province and southern
South West Africa. Further north along the shores of South West Africa the
clinids are largely replaced by other families of shore fishes, and this is also
true on the coasts of Natal and Mocambique. Around the Cape, from Liideritz-
bucht in southern South West Africa, to the Transkei, where clinids predominate,
there are changes in species composition and abundance that are similar to the
changes in other intertidal animals.
METHODS
Many collecting trips to various parts of the coast between Mocamedes
in southern Angola and Durban have been carried out by the South African
Museum since 1963. An outline of the southern African coast with the localities
where collections were made is shown in figure 1. Where possible, localities
were visited more than once. The records obtained from these field trips, both
with regard to occurrence and abundance of species, form the basis of the
present work. In addition, records supported by identified specimens in the
collections of the South African Museum, the J. L. B. Smith Institute of Ich-
thyology (formerly Department of Ichthyology), Rhodes University, Grahams-
town, and the Zoology Department, University of Cape Town, have been used.
Finally, certain individuals have made collections in particular areas on behalf
of the South African Museum; these are acknowledged below.
NOTE ON THE STABILITY OF SOUTH AFRICAN CLINID POPULATIONS
Many fishes, even ones which are permanent inhabitants of the intertidal
region of the shore, are unsuitable subjects on which to base conclusions regard-
ing faunal distribution boundaries, owing to their mobility. Many intertidal
fishes show seasonal variation in distribution (Dr. V. G. Springer, personal com-
munication). However, the South African Clinidae appear to be an extremely
sedentary group of fishes, forming a highly stable intertidal population.
Collecting in all months of the year over a period of more than four years on
both east and west coasts of the Cape Peninsula produced no evidence for any
kind of seasonal variation in either the occurrence or the proportions of the
different species making up the clinid population.
_ There seems to be little reason for the Clinidae to show seasonal variation
in their occurrence on South African shores. Conditions of temperature, at
least, normally one of the strongest factors influencing seasonal variation, tend
to vary relatively little at any given locality on the South African coast. A
series of maximal and minimal monthly mean surface temperatures for localities
137
FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE IN SOUTHERN AFRICA
‘QPCUL JIM SUOTIIIT[OO YOIYM 3Y SOTI[VIO], SUIMOYS VOTIFY UIIYINOS Jo suITIsvOrD *1 “BI
anbut WI
OSuasioy
UMOL adpe
Avg odyuopipg
‘y biag Dg DUI)H "Is
Adg §42qWo7
‘YY SIUOTIO
"WY U2QD
hog diyapuoy
YIOHON 140g
WYONG ZytsapN7
Apg s32uads
WH DYAIAS
hog S!AjDM
punwdoyoms
$8015 adD>
VM'S
Apg bsJoy'
——S,02
Wiad 44204)
Ols4 ado’
"4 auauny
sapauirso/y
VIOONV
138 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
from Saldanha Bay to Durban given by Isaac (1937) show differences of rarely
more than 6:5°C between maxima and minima, and frequently less. From data
given by Marchand (1932), Buys (1957) and Division of Sea Fisheries annual
reports (1963, 1964) the same appears to be true of localities north-west of
Saldanha Bay. These fluctuations are smaller than would occur in the intertidal
zone from day to night, and would not be expected to affect intertidal animals.
Furthermore, the habits of the South African Clinidae make it unlikely
that populations would move about freely. Seasonal mobility is often related
to breeding. All the South African Clinidae bear their young alive, fertilization
being internal. Mature females of several common species (Clinus acuminatus,
C’. cottoides, C’. superciliosus, Blennioclinus brachycephalus and Pavoclinus mus) from
one or two localities in False Bay, showed eggs and embryos in several stages
of development in all or almost all months of the year. From this it appears that
there is no fixed breeding season. Preliminary observations in an aquarium
tank indicated that raised temperature produces increased sexual activity in
Clinus acuminatus at least, but the degree of solar warming of intertidal pools
during periods of low tide is probably the determining factor here. Clinidae
have been observed mating in a tidal pool in False Bay on warm sunny days
in winter, when general sea temperatures in the area were low.
Another factor restricting the mobility of Clinidae may be territoriality.
Gilchrist & Thompson (1911) observed territorial behaviour in Clinidae both
in the field and in an aquarium. A further indication that territoriality exists
is the fact that a pool which has been more or less cleared of fishes by rotenone
poisoning will remain unoccupied for periods of six to eight months, although
the effects of the poison disappear with the first high tide, and then occupation
will be by small, maturing fishes. It seems, therefore, that the South African
Clinidae may be considered as reliable as any animal in indicating boundaries
to faunal distribution.
SoutTH AFRICAN INTERTIDAL FAUNAL PROVINCES
On the basis of a series of detailed surveys of rocky intertidal shores at a
number of localities from Port Nolloth to Durban, Stephenson (1944, 1948)
recognized three faunal provinces in the South African intertidal zone: the west
coast, from the Orange River to Cape Point; the south coast, from Cape Point
to the region of Qolora/Port St. John’s; the east coast, from Port St. John’s to
northern Natal. The areas between Kommetijie, on the west coast of the Cape
Peninsula, and Cape Agulhas, and between Port Elizabeth and Port Edward,
showed a marked overlap between faunal provinces. Ekman (1953) followed
closely Stephenson’s conclusions regarding the South African faunal provinces,
placing the boundary between the south and south-west (‘Namaqua’) faunas
in the region of the Cape of Good Hope, and the southern boundary of the
tropical south-east African fauna south-west of Durban. The position of this
latter boundary is not clear, but Ekman suggested that Algoa Bay might
FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE IN SOUTHERN AFRICA 139
constitute the southern boundary of distribution of a subtropical fauna extending
from there to the area of Durban. Ekman recognized the area from Algoa Bay
to Cape Agulhas/Cape Point as an independent zoogeographical province,
and followed Stephenson (1944, 1948) in treating it as warm-temperate,
although he pointed out that according to the temperature divisions he used it
was subtropical rather than temperate. On the west coast, Ekman placed the
northern boundary of the ‘Namaqua’ faunal province in the region of Cape
ityetoy
Knox (1960), discussing the biogeography of the southern oceans, gave
a division of South Africa into a cold-temperate “West African Province’,
extending from the Cape Peninsula to about 18°S (i.e. the region of Cape Frio),
and a warm-temperate “Cape Province’. Surveys made on the coast of South
West Africa, north of the Orange River, show that the west coast province
extends at least as far north as Liideritzbucht, but that further north the inter-
tidal fauna of rocky shores is of a different nature (Penrith & Kensley, in press).
The northern boundary of the west coast province lies somewhere between
Liideritzbucht and Walvis Bay.
The three faunal provinces proposed by Stephenson are closely related to
temperature conditions around the South African coast. Owing to the Benguela
upwelling system, the water of the west coast is cold, inshore surface tempera-
tures on the open coast seldom rising above 15°C between Cape Point and
Liideritzbucht (Marchand, 1932; Isaac, 1937). From Walvis Bay northwards
warmer inshore surface temperatures (16-18°C in summer) are encountered
(Stander, 1964). The south coast east of Cape Point is warmer than the west
coast, with monthly mean inshore temperatures of 15-20°C (Marchand, 1932;
Isaac, 1937; Stephenson, Stephenson & Du Toit, 1936). The east coast is
subtropical in character; Marchand (1932) found monthly mean temperatures
inshore varying from 18 to 24°C.
Day (1967), discussing the distribution of polychaete worms around
southern Africa, considered that the west and south coast faunal provinces are
not distinct if the regions below the intertidal zone are considered as well. This
is probably because offshore bottom temperatures are more uniform east and
west of Cape Point (Day, 1967). Day noted that many of the differences
between the west and east coast faunal provinces are of relative abundance
rather than of occurrence. Apart from such differences in relative abundance,
there are many similarities between the west and south coast faunas; each
shows a high degree of endemism, about 45% of the species occurring there
being endemic (Day, 1967). Numerous species are common to both coasts.
DISTRIBUTION OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN CLINIDAE
Of the 33 species of South African Clinidae, 30 belong to the subtribe
Clinidi, and the following discussion will be concerned with these species.
The other three species, belonging to the subtribe Xenopoclinidi, are specia-
ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
140
auDqwupyy|
“WOLUTUTOD 0} JUaseId AyIePNSa1 aie satdads YOTIYM JOAO SoSULI 9}LOIPUT SIU] Pedy], “tpruryy Jo saroods uvowyy YIMOG oy} Jo uOTNGINSIC *% “SI
@ snpunjoud y
a OAD J
eS ees
SijDJuawW Yy
—SIJUOJ DIOP}
wnsoony g
SUOIJIPUNJOU +5
I1Poom *>
rr slJysnuaa *>
SN4NDdy *>
snsoljiouadns - PE TE tt
SNYDIIYS “>
snysnqol ‘>
SI|DADU ‘>
—— siuuadi3}d| ‘>
<0 P01 3324 5
aduajay ‘>
SJS—— SIIDSJOP “>
S2Pi0}0) ‘5
a ——— OSE) SS)
SNYDISIJIIABIG “>
® ipsojsissaqg ‘D tapj{in6ub “>
a LO EE RE SOI :
a se
SEE eee | SNDUIWINID “>
snsosodiq ‘ds
o—_—_-@———. oj/218 ‘9
EEE SEES LS, ene = = = He ~~ -@ SnidydashyoDIG ‘g
ea
i w vu QO wn 0 mm w =
re) Pad 9 ce} © AEA o 2 =< zo a ie re) ao < bod ples Sy
: ° ° = aan
& a) = n nas ~< a 3 0 3 7 rs Q. =a a wo
a ig c re > om fe uv an 3° = = r* Lian x Pa) Za
p= ] aR : eR =e
ees 2g ee 8 Seem 8 Sy 2 8 z <8 Se ge
o oO . om — e g, a oo, Qo fom 3 Oo o 2,
Cc 5 3 N oO ns y = = le = Re = 5
z a ® a Qa cr fe) fe) =]
° a°¢ s< wo — xr a. ~
a Zz 9 eR a @ > fe.
= —— td co << a
c am > S
R
rt)
a
-FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE IN SOUTHERN AFRICA 141
lized sand-burrowers which have been found intertidally only in the Lambert’s
Bay area, and I consider their distribution too imperfectly known to be dis-
cussed further here.
Nine of the 30 species of Clinidi occur both inter- and infratidally, larger
specimens in general being taken in deeper water; 14 have been taken more or
less exclusively intertidally, and seven occur mainly infratidally, although
juvenile and even adult specimens may occur intertidally from time to time in
most cases; Clinus woodi occurs intertidally in the northern part of its range, but
is infratidal further south (Mrs. M. M. Smith, personal communication). The
species in these three categories are listed for reference in table 1.
The known ranges of distribution of the 30 South African species of Clinidi
are shown in figure 2. Most of the species occur between Liideritzbucht and
the Kei River mouth; this is shown in a graph illustrating the number of
species recorded from different localities along the coast (fig. 3). Two of the
species, Clinus berrisfordi and Pavoclinus profundus, are known only from their
single type localities. Of the remaining 28, 14 are common, fairly common, or
at least regularly present over part or the whole of their known ranges of distri-
NO. OF SPECIES
iD
anwhuaOrtoos
Cape Frio
Torra Bay
Swakopmund
Spencer Bay
Port Nolloth
Lamberts Bay
Hermanus
East London:
Durban
Inharmbane
Lourenco Marques
Fig. 3. Number of species of Clinidi present along each stretch of coast of approximately 100
miles, from Cape Frio to Inhambane.
142 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
bution (indicated by thickened lines in figure 2); three are, at most, regularly
present in particular and limited habitats, and 11 are apparently rare (table 2).
It may be noted that all the mainly infratidal species fall in the categories of
less frequent occurrence, and this picture might change if sampling of the
infratidal region down to about 30 metres depth were more effective.
TABLE I
Inter- & Infratidal Mainly intertidal Mainly infratidal
Clinus acuminatus
Clinus agilis
Clinus berrisfordi
Clinus brevicristatus
Clinus cottoides
Clinus dorsalis
Clinus helenae
Clinus heterodon
Clinus latipennis
Clinus navalis
Blennioclinus brachycephalus
Blennioclinus stella
Pavoclinus mus
Pawoclinus pavo
Clinus anguillaris
Clinus capensis
Clinus striatus
Clinus superciliosus
Clinus venustris
Pavoclinus fucorum
Pavoclinus graminis
Pavoclinus laurentii
Pavwoclinus litorafontis
Clinoporus biporosus
Clinus robustus
Clinus taurus
Clinus woodi
Gynutoclinus rotundifrons
Pavoclinus mentalis
Pavoclinus profundus
TABLE 2
Frequency of occurrence of South African Clinidi
Single record only
Clinus berrisfordi
Pavoclinus profundus
Regularly present
in particular
habitats of rare
occurrence only
Rare/Little known
Clinoporus biporosus Blennioclinus stella
Clinus brevicristatus
Pavoclinus litorafontis
Clinus helenae
Clinus latipennis
Clinus navalis
Clinus robustus
Clinus striatus
Clinus taurus
* Clinus wood
Gynutoclinus rotundifrons
Pavoclinus fucorum
Pavoclinus mentalis
Common, fairly
common or regularly
present over part
or whole range
Blennioclinus brachy-
cephalus
Clinus acuminatus
Clinus agilis
Clinus anguillaris
Clinus capensis
Clinus cottoides
Clinus dorsalis
Clinus heterodon
Clinus superciliosus
Clinus venustris
Pavoclinus graminis
Pavoclinus laurentii
Pavoclinus mus
Pawoclinus pavo
*This species is said to occur in fair numbers (Mrs. M. M. Smith, personal communi-
cation) but is not easily accessible for collecting over some of the range and the range
over which it is common is consequently not known.
FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE IN SOUTHERN AFRICA 14%
The extreme limits of distributional ranges of species are seldom fixed and
reliable; most species dwindle in numbers towards the ends of their ranges,
and as it is impossible to sample an area completely, the most easterly and
westerly members of a species may never be caught. It is not easy, however,
to be mistaken about whether a species is common in a given area or not. In
attempting to pinpoint areas where faunal changes occur, I have in the first
instance considered the ranges over which 14 species were regularly present
(i.e. an invariable constituent of the fauna) to common intertidally. Figure 4
shows the number of eastern and western limits of these ranges occurring on
each approximately 1oo-mile stretch of coastline between Cape Frio and
Inhambane.
From figure 4 it can be seen that 24 of the 28 range limits occur on the
following stretches of coast: (1) 100 miles south from Spencer Bay; (2) 100 miles
10)
WY
bs
2
a=
Bee a
Or 25
Zi
<
jag
LL
O
O
Z
O
a ——ty
2 I Vie is > - 2 5
agg | ) Mm 2 ‘e) S = s
Eads ike = = 419) te ie
Oe or IS O 7 @ a c
ee ee = Soe 5 5 2 E
4 es eS ~ oS ; ‘a is
Os ht alae ie a 5 2 ~ °
coe & ee 2 o
ts 8
=}
ie}
—J
Fig. 4. Number of limits of ranges over which 14 species of Clinidi occur as regularly
present to common along stretches of coast of approximately 100 miles between Cape
Frio and Inhambane.
west from Hermanus; (3) 100-mile stretch in the vicinity of East London/Kei
River mouth/Bashee River mouth. One of the remaining limits occurs immedi-
ately adjacent to (2), and the other three lie west and east of Spencer Bay or
East London/Bashee River respectively.
It is evident that major changes in the nature of the clinid fauna occur in
two of the areas (Cape Point/Cape Agulhas and East London/Bashee River)
suggested as faunal province boundaries by Stephenson, and that a third major
change occurs in the vicinity of Liideritzbucht. The clinid faunas of the different
intertidal provinces can now be considered.
1. The coast north of Liideritzbucht
Only one species of clinid, Clinus superciliosus, occurs at all commonly north
of Liideritzbucht. It was fairly common at Sylvia Hill, Walvis Bay and Swakop-
144 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
mund. Small numbers were collected at Torra Bay, Mowe Point and Rocky
Point, where it was rare, two species of blennies (Blennius cornutus and Blennius
vandervekeni), and the clingfish Chorisochismus dentex being the common fishes
of the intertidal zone of northern South West Africa. Single specimens of Clinus
heterodon have been collected at Swakopmund and Sylvia Hill.
2. The west coast (Liideritzbucht to Cape Point)
Apart from a goby, Coryphopterus nudiceps, and a clingfish, Chorisochismus
dentex, both of which are fairly common, all the common intertidal fishes of
the west coast are Clinidae. The most abundant clinid of the intertidal
zone in this area is Clinus agilis. Clinus superciliosus is very common at
all levels of the intertidal zone and below. Clinus acuminatus is common and
Clinus dorsalis fairly common in pools at the top of the intertidal zone, juveniles
of the latter species occurring at lower levels as well. Clinus anguillaris and Clinus
venustris are regularly present in small numbers in pools at the bottom of the
intertidal zone, the former species occurring infratidally as well. Occasional
specimens of Pavoclinus pavo and Gynutoclinus rotundifrons have been taken
amongst algae.
From the region of Lambert’s Bay southwards to Cape Point, the typical
west coast clinid fauna described above is modified by the addition of typically
south coast forms, notably Clinus cottoides, which is common from Lambert’s
Bay southwards but has not been taken north of the Olifants River mouth.
3. The south coast (Cape Point to Kec River mouth)
The south coast has a larger number of common intertidal fish species than
the west coast, and again most of these are Clinidae. The gobies Coryphopterus
caffer and Ctenogobius saldanha and the clingfish Chortsochismus dentex are also
common, and from Knysna eastwards two blennies, Blennius cornutus and
Blennius steindachnert, became fairly common.
Clinus cottoides is the most abundant intertidal species from Cape Point
eastwards to East London. Clinus superciliosus is very common at all levels of the
shore at least as far east as Port Elizabeth, decreasing in numbers in the East
London area. Clinus dorsalis is fairly common at the top of the shore. Clinus
anguillaris is regularly present in small numbers, and the closely related species
Clinus striatus is occasionally found from Saldanha Bay eastwards. Clinus capensis
is fairly common in pools at all levels of the shore, the adults being mainly
infratidal. Blennioclinus brachycephalus is common in pools at the lowest levels of
the shore. In weed-beds, particularly of the green alga Caulerpa filiformis, and
in algal clumps in rock pools, the species Pavoclinus mus, Pavoclinus graminis, and
Pavoclinus pavo are common, and Pavoclinus fucorum occurs more rarely.
Clinus agilis and Clinus heterodon decrease sharply in numbers east of Cape
Point. The former occurs very rarely on the south coast as far as Port Alfred,
and fair numbers have been found in the Knysna lagoon (Penrith, 1969).
Clinus heterodon has not been recorded east of False Bay, where it is extremely
FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE IN SOUTHERN AFRICA 145
rare. Clinus acuminatus is fairly common in False Bay, but has not been recorded
east of Hermanus, where it is rare. Clinus venustris is rare east of Cape Point, and
is usually taken infratidally. Clinus robustus and Clinus taurus, both large, mainly
infratidal species, occur on the south coast.
A. The east coast, north-east of the Kei River mouth, to Inhambane
As on the coast north of Walvis Bay, Clinidae do not form a major con-
stituent of the intertidal fish fauna. Pavoclinus laurenti is fairly common as far
north as Inhaca Island, Mocambique (Mrs. M. M. Smith, personal com-
munication) and Pavoclinus graminis as far as Port St. John’s. Blennioclinus stella
was taken in fair numbers from a single locality in the vicinity of Durban,
although it is not generally common. Most of the other species apparently
disappear before Durban is reached. The common intertidal fishes of the east
coast are blennies (mainly Blennius steindachneri, Omobranchus banditus, Hal-
mablennius striatomaculatus and Croaltus bifilum) and gobies (particularly Bathy-
gobius fuscus).
5. Lhe coast from Inhambane northwards
No Clinidae have been recorded north of Inhambane.
Discussion
As all the South African clinid species are endemic, it is not surprising
that the majority of them occur in the west and south coast intertidal faunal
provinces. Day (1967) pointed out that, as far as polychaete worms were
concerned, the Cape/South West African province (i.e. the west and south
coasts) is dominated by endemics. The Natal (east) coast has some endemics,
but also a considerable number of species from other sources; to the north-west
and north-east of these provinces are faunal provinces consisting mainly of West
African and Indo-Pacific tropical species respectively. Almost all the intertidal
fishes of the west and south coasts are endemic to the South African region,
while from the Bashee River north-eastwards and from Swakopmund north-
westwards the percentage of endemics is lower.
Within the South African region, the clinid faunas of the west, south, and
east coasts show differences in species composition and in the abundance of
species which occur in more than one intertidal faunal province.
From figure 2 it can be seen that the general pattern of distribution of
South African Clinidi, as far as it is known, corresponds with the intertidal
faunal provinces mentioned above. The 28 species of Clinidi known from more
than a single locality fall, at the present state of knowledge of their distribution,
into the following categories: (1) species characteristic of the south coast;
(2) species characteristic of the west coast; (3) species characteristic of the
east coast; (4) species characteristic of both west and south coasts; (5) species
characteristic of both south and east coasts; (6) species apparently restricted to
the south-west coast overlap; (7) species apparently restricted to the south-east
146
ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
coast overlap. The 28 species are arranged in these categories in table 3 and
figure 5.
TABLE 3
Distributional categories of South African Clinidi.
W. & S. S. & E. W/S E/S
West coast South coast East coast coasts coasts overlap overlap
I 2 3 4 5 6 7
Clinus Clinus Blennioclinus Clinus Pavoclinus Clinoporus Clinus
acuminatus capensis stella anguillaris graminis biporosus helenae
Clinus Clinus Pavoclinus Clinus Clinus Clinus
agilis cottoides laurentir dorsalis navalis brevicristatus
Clinus Blennio- Pavoclinus Clinus Clinus
heterodon clinus mentalis superciliosus latipennis
brachyce-
phalus
Clinus Pavoclinus Clinus Pavoclinus
venustris Sucorum woodi litorafontis
Gynuto- Pavoclinus
clinus mus
rotundifrons Pavoclinus
pavo
Clinus
robustus
Clinus
striatus
Clinus
taurus
| ——_
| £ oO x E 2
| z x0} £ (0), ey Se 6 sey EE ee 5
| 3 2 i) es £ we ens 2 |
E is 2 aT Se Ts : 2 9
a 2 z te 2 mt <a ior = 3 lee
=x i) 2 9 » w ~ x B =! ¥
: 3 5 §o ¢ = Sone Bie E wig
o a & a ty © x er ence oie A hes
Le es eaters
|
Ol
:
N
Cs
Fig. 5. Graphic representation of the various components of the South African Clinidi population.
I—west coast; 2—south coast; 3—east coast; 4—west and south coasts; 5—south and east
coasts; 6—west/south coast overlap; 7—east/south coast overlap. (See table 3.)
FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE IN SOUTHERN AFRICA 147
All the species belonging to categories 6 and 7 are rare species, and these
categories may be apparent rather than real.
Four species, Clinus agilis, Clinus venustris, Blennioclinus brachycephalus and
Pavoclinus pavo, have been placed among the species characteristic of a single
intertidal faunal province only, although the extremes of their recorded ranges
of distribution encompass both west and south coast provinces. However, the
change in incidence of these species in the region of Cape Point is so marked
that they are here taken to be characteristic of only one intertidal faunal pro-
vince. Clinus agilis and Clinus venustris were collected at all localities between
Liideritzbucht and Cape Point on the west coast but are extremely rare east of
Cape Point. Blennioclinus brachycephalus has been recorded reliably from the
west coast only at Liideritzbucht, where small numbers were found in sheltered
embayed areas. Pavoclinus pavo was collected at a few west coast localities, but
is common from False Bay eastwards.
The fact that the distribution of the South African Clinidi corresponds
closely with the South African intertidal faunal provinces, which are largely
determined by temperature factors (Stephenson, 1948), suggests that South
African clinid distribution is dependent on temperature. The effect of tem-
perature on the distribution of a species may be twofold. Each species has a
wider or narrower temperature range at which it can successfully exist, and its
spread to areas outside this temperature range will be prevented by the direct
effect of temperature. Secondly, other organisms which make a habitat suitable
for a species may have a more limited temperature range, and their absence
may prevent that species from spreading to areas not unsuitable from a point
of view of temperature itself. Alternatively, a species may be prevented from
spreading towards the ends of its possible temperature range by the intrusion
of competitive species with overlapping temperature ranges.
Too little is known of the ecology of the South African Clinidi to estimate
the importance of direct and indirect influence of temperature, or of other
factors, in restricting their distribution. There are certain indications that at
least both temperature effects probably operate.
Most of the clinid species do not appear to be strongly specific to a parti-
cular type of habitat. However, in spite of the fact that intertidal pools are not
subject to the same conditions as the intertidal slopes that are exposed for
varying lengths of time during periods of low tide, the Clinidi show vertical
zonation comparable with that shown by other intertidal organisms (Stephen-
son, 1944, 1948). It has been pointed out by Day (1967) that the west and south
coast faunal provinces are more sharply divided intertidally than infratidally,
and that the faunas at least below 100 m are similar, as might be expected
since at this depth temperatures east and west of Cape Point are uniform. In
general, of the better known species, the more strictly intertidal ones (Clinus
acuminatus, Clinus agilis, Clinus cottoides, Clinus heterodon, Blennioclinus brachyceph-
alus, Pavoclinus mus, Pavoclinus pavo) are more restricted in at least their ranges
of optimal occurrence than most of the species which occur infratidally as well
148 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
(Clinus anguillaris, Clinus superciliosus, Pavoclinus graminis). Clinus dorsalis is widely
distributed and occupies a similar niche at the top of the intertidal zone to
Clinus acuminatus, but, unlike Clinus acuminatus, occurs at all levels of the shore in
the juvenile stages. This may protect the young from the extremes of solar
heating to which the adults are subjected during periods of low tide. Clinus
venustris shows a change in zonation east of Cape Point which is presumably
the direct result of temperature, as it becomes infratidal as higher temperatures
are encountered. Clinus capensis, with a similar habitat to Clinus anguillaris, is less
widely distributed; other largely infratidal species, Clinus robustus, Clinus striatus,
Clinus taurus, and Clinus woodi, also appear to have restricted distributions.
Unfortunately, the greatest depths at which these species occur are not known.
Clinus superciliosus has been taken from depths of 60 metres.
A possible instance of dependence on another organism is shown by
Clinus cottoides. This species is abundant in midtidal pools, in the zone charac-
terized on the south coast by a dense belt of barnacles (Stephenson, 1948).
This balanoid zone is scarcely developed on the west coast, especially north
of Lambert’s Bay (Bright, 1938; Stephenson, Stephenson & Day, 1940).
Barnacle legs form an important constituent of the diet of Clinus cottoides, and
it is possible that this species avoids areas lacking barnacles.
Gynutoclinus rotundifrons and the species of the genus Pavoclinus are specia-
lized for living in algae. None of them are restricted to a particular alga, with
the possible exception of Gynutoclinus rotundifrons, which has so far been taken
only in kelp. However, of the species occurring on the south coast, Pavoclinus
pavo and Pavoclinus graminis show a wider preference for beds of Caulerpa filuformis,
which does not occur west of Cape Point (Simons, zn Day, 1969), and is fairly
characteristic of the south coast. P. mus has not been observed in infratidal
Caulerpa beds at a depth of approximately 10 metres (M. J. Penrith, personal
communication) and is probably intertidal.
Too little is known at present about the biology of South African intertidal
fishes to estimate the effects of interspecific competition. Towards the western
and eastern limits of the South African region the clinid fauna is replaced by
other mainly tropical groups, and in these regions competition with other
groups may occur.
SUMMARY
The distribution of the South African fishes belonging to the subtribe
Clinidi (Pisces: Clinidae) is discussed. All the species are endemic to the South
African region (Kunene River to Inhambane), but within this region the dis-
tribution of the species is not uniform. It is, as far as can be determined at
present, related to water temperatures, and agrees with the distribution patterns
of other groups of intertidal animals. Factors such as habitat, food preferences,
and competition might influence the distribution of individual species, the
influence of temperature in these cases being indirect.
FISHES OF THE FAMILY CLINIDAE IN SOUTHERN AFRICA 149
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I should like to acknowledge the financial assistance received from the
Council for Scientific and Industrial Research and the South African National
Committee for Oceanographic Research towards field trips undertaken in
connection with this work. I am grateful to the South West African Administra-
tion and in particular Mr. C. G. Coetzee, Director of the State Museum, Wind-
hoek, for making expeditions to the northern coast of South West Africa possible.
I am grateful to Professor J. H. Day, of the Zoology Department, Univer-
sity of Cape Town, and the late Professor J. L. B. Smith and Mrs. M. M. Smith
of the J. L. B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology, Rhodes University, Grahamstown,
for making their records available to me and for many helpful discussions; in
particular to Professor J. H. Day for critical reading of the manuscript. I am
also grateful to Dr. N. A. H. Millard of the Zoology Department, University
of Cape Town, for guidance during the preparation of this work for a thesis.
I am grateful to the following individuals who made collections on my behalf:
Mr. A. de Freitas, of the Marine Biological Institute, Lourenco Marques;
Mr. C. D. Berrisford, of the National Institute for Water Research, Durban;
Miss R. M. Tietz, of the Albany Museum, Grahamstown; Mr. C. G. Coetzee,
of the State Museum, Windhoek. I should like to record my gratitude to the
numerous individuals who have assisted in collecting material and donated
interesting specimens.
I am indebted to my husband, Mr. M. J. Penrith, who collected most of
the material and gave much helpful advice and information.
Much of this work formed part of a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philo-
sophy at the University of Cape Town (December 1965).
The Trustees of the South African Museum are grateful to the Council
for Scientific and Industrial Research for a grant to publish this paper.
REFERENCES
Bricut, K. M. F. 1938. The South African intertidal zone and its relation to ocean currents.
III. An area on the northern part of the west coast. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 26: 67-88.
Buys, M. E. L. 1957. Temperature variations in the upper 50 metres in the St. Helena Bay area,
September 1950—August 1954. Investl Rep. Div. Sea Fish. Un. S. Afr. 2°73 1-114.
Day, J. H. 1967. A monograph on the Polychaeta of southern Africa. London: British Museum (Natural
History).
Day, J. H. 1969. A guide to marine life on South African shores. Cape Town: A. A. Balkema, for the
University of Cape Town.
EKMAN, 8S. 1953. <oogeography of the sea. London: Sidgwick & Jackson.
Gitcueist, J. D. F. & THompson, W. W. 1911. The Cape klipfishes of South Africa. S. Afr. 7.
Sct. 73 214-224.
Husss, C. 1952. A contribution to the classification of the blennioid fishes of the family Clinidae,
with a partial revision of the eastern Pacific forms. Stanf. ichthyol. Bull. 4: 42-165.
Isaac, W. E. 1937. South African coastal waters in relation to ocean currents. Geogr. Rev. 27:
651-664.
Knox, G. A. 1960. Littoral ecology and biogeography of the southern oceans. Proc. R. Soc.
(B) 152: 577-624.
150 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
MarcHAND, J. M. 1932. Hydrographic investigations during 1930. Rep. Fish. mar. biol. Surv. Un.
S. Afr. 8: 1-30.
PenritH, M.-L. 1969. The systematics of the fishes of the family Clinidae in South Africa. Ann.
S. Afr. Mus. 55: 1-121.
PenritH, M.-L. & Kensey, B. F. (In press.) The constitution of the fauna of rocky intertidal
shores of South West Africa. Part 1. Liideritzbucht. Cimbebasia (A).
PenritH, M.-L. & Kenstey, B. F. (In press.) The constitution of the fauna of rocky intertidal
shores of South West Africa. Part 2. Rocky Point. Cimbebasia (A).
Situ, J. L. B. 1945. The fishes of the family Clinidae in South Africa. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist.
(11) 12: 535-546.
Soutu Arrica. Division of Sea Fisheries. 1963. Annual report for the period 1st April 1959 to
31st March 1960. Rep. Div. Sea Fish. 8. Afr. 312 1-242.
SoutH AFrica. Division of Sea Fisheries. 1964. Annual report for the period 1st April 1960 to
31st March 1961. Rep. Div. Sea Fish S. Afr. 32: 1-267.
STANDER, G. H. 1964. The pilchard of South West Africa (Sardinops ocellata). The Benguela
current off South West Africa. Investl Rep. mar. Res. Lab. S.W. Afr. 12: 1-43.
STEPHENSON, T. A. 1939. The constitution of the intertidal fauna and flora of South Africa.
Part I. 7. Linn. Soc. (Zool.) 40: 487-536.
STEPHENSON, T. A. 1944. The constitution of the intertidal fauna and flora of South Africa.
Part II. Ann. Natal Mus. 10: 261-357.
STEPHENSON, T. A. 1948. The constitution of the intertidal fauna and flora of South Africa.
Part III. Ann. Natal Mus. 11: 207-324.
STEPHENSON, T. A., STEPHENSON, A. & Day, J. H. 1940. The South African intertidal zone and
its relation to ocean currents. VIII. Lambert’s Bay and the west coast. Ann. Natal Mus. 9:
345-380.
STEPHENSON, T. A., STEPHENSON, A., & Du Tort, C. A. 1936. The South African intertidal zone
and its relation to ocean currents. I. A temperate Indian ocean shore. Trans. R. Soc. S.
Afr. 24% 34.1-382.
INST RUCEIONS FO AUTHORS
Based on
CONFERENCE OF BIOLOGICAL EDITORS, COMMITTEE ON FORM AND STYLE. 1960.
Style manual for, biological journals. Washington: American Institute of Biological Sciences.
MANUSCRIPT
To be typewritten, double spaced, with good margins, arranged in the following order:
(1) Heading, consisting of informative but brief title, name(s) of author(s), address(es) of
author(s), number of illustrations (plates, figures, enumerated maps and tables) in the article.
(2) Contents. (3) The main text, divided into principal divisions with major headings; sub-
headings to be used sparingly and enumeration of headings to be avoided. (4) Summary.
(5) Acknowledgements. (6) References, as below. (7) Key to lettering of figure. (8) Explana-
tion to plates.
ILLUSTRATIONS
To be reducible to 4? in. X 7 in. (74 in. including caption). A metric scale to appear with
all photographs.
REFERENCES
Harvard system (name and year) to be used: author’s name and year of publication given
in text; full references at the end of the article, arranged alphabetically by names, chronologi-
cally within each name, with suffixes a, b, etc. to the year for more than one paper by the same
author in that year.
For books give title in italics, edition, volume number, place of publication, publisher.
For journal articles give title of article, title of journal in italics (abbreviated according to the
World list of scientific periodicals. 4th ed. London: Butterworths, 1963), series in parentheses,
volume number, part number (only if independently paged) in parentheses, pagination.
Examples (note capitalization and punctuation)
BULLOUGH, W. S. 1960. Practical invertebrate anatomy. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.
Fiscuer, P.-H. 1948. Données sur la résistance et de le vitalité des mollusques. 7. Conch., Parsi
88: 100-140.
FiscHer, P.-H., DuvaL, M. & Rarry, A. 1933. Etudes sur les échanges respiratoires des littorines.
Archs Zool. exp. gén. 74: 627-634.
Konn, A. J. 19604. Ecological notes on Conus (Mollusca: Gastropoda) in the Trincomalee region
of Ceylon. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (13) 2: 309-320.
Konan, A. J. 19606. Spawning behaviour, egg masses and larval development in Conus from the
Indian Ocean. Bull. Bingham oceanogr. Coll. 17 (4): 1-51.
THIELE, J. 1910. Mollusca: B. Polyplacophora, Gastropoda marina, Bivalvia. Jn Schultze, L.
Koologische und anthropologische Ergebnisse einer Forschungsreise im westlichen und zentralen Stid-
Afrika. 4: 269-270. Jena: Fischer. Denkschr. med.-naturw. Ges. Jena 16: 269-270.
ZOOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE
To be governed by the rulings of the latest International code of zoological nomenclature issued
by the International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature (particularly articles 22 and 51).
The Harvard system of reference to be used in the synonymy lists, with the full references
incorporated in the list at the end of the article, and not given in contracted form in the synonymy
list.
Example
Scalaria coronata Lamarck, 1816: pl. 451, figs 5 a, b; Liste: 11. Turton, 1932: 80.
sa Tete i
if i
- |
“ip | seh ft
Bh | i
| | '
H.|
polly , en i Rear 4 ‘ hey "
‘ iPithy juin cas twa) L A AM,
‘i “Et "
j - nf eh ‘ ; aly q On a . ry cei radi
; eae 4 AH? i Ore k may a Mi
| ! eee eS ee ke caihgapaneet hehe a: aay): _ Siobwaiias
{' | We oe #1, favi i : ith y DADL ote Pavive Pek’? f 54 ri ryokan ro
i | il.) Bi Rai Bay Ty rah a teal ede aes itu) a aa,
1 ae . Chey! TSP! Aes i Bi 2) Lt Lae hel, blaeat) hh ig Yi riheeyy a:
Hi
| ¢ oe { PAA Ad ms (Hed sani Ty i AY ha a fi
f ty v jue
wr rey Ah TO! 7 eee ae eave aie a? vy yy
; \ V's
| ;
} i Hi }
|
| \ ' y t bi ay ' ’ a9 : The
|
1 I . % ¢ i ' f ‘
: : ea i rant Sp ig HK,
AAS. one
| | inp : !
: ' ; Lis ws MY oerrisy Vw ah
ee
| ‘ t i ‘ if ; yiz
}
| ° i ‘ PPS ak rial
| A | [ J
ge) ~ ‘ea +? ht! AW
~*y
i]
|
| ¥ ‘ (
|
tr) )
| -
} | 4 eye)
Bet}
1, | n
- A PPG Vey
t
\\| ;
vi" \’ (Wea
| cqehtigeh) | 1 si RE
it ‘ee sus
ia - Ph AL ’ i erg Cr ePey
mengaltk, Ai Nd
t a
_ ba ar nie eee ight a
‘ Yee ra Pecvaeit
: a een’ Nal Wen Bae ee Pith
Ki ¥
£
on 1s ae:
rc a oe > ti
: a1?
y : ee : fat jit TF
| ‘ oun) hs eae Mba) We
' ‘ ' ea : ee oars ie ae |
1 ‘ Re ¢ 4
oh 2 hosed Wiles sn giant) mati | By
Lame Se 3 Mss Ae, r
F 5
hay Wane na AOE
+
} 4 ,
4
| 4
% Pe ff
Be? / GS
ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM
Volume 55 °#Band
October 1970 Oktober
Part) «i -2- Deel
“ie
q li ay e
i Ww
AN INVESTIGATION OF THE RAJIDAE —
OF THE WEST AND SOUTH COASTS
OF SOUTHERN AFRICA
By
P. Ay HULLEY
HSON
a Ni4y
FEB 292 1971
{iBRARIE?
Cape ‘Town Kaapstad
The ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
are issued in parts at irregular intervals as material
becomes available
Obtainable from the South African Museum, P.O. Box 61, Cape Town
Die ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM
word uitgegee in dele op ongereelde tye na beskikbaarheid
van stof
Verkrygbaar van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum, Posbus 61, Kaapstad
OUT OF PRINT/UIT DRUK
I, 2(1, 3> 5» 7-8), 3(1-2, 5» t—pu.), 5(2, 5» 7-9);
6(1, tt.) HOS) hs 8, 9(1-2), 10(1),
I1(I-2, 5, 7, t.-p.i.), 21, 24(2), 27, 31(1-3), 33, 38,
44(4).
Price of this part/Prys van hierdie deel
R5.00
Trustees of the South African Museum © _ Trustees van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum
1970
Printed in South Africa by In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur
The Rustica Press, Pty., Ltd. Die Rustica-pers, Edms., Bpk.
Court Road, Wynberg, Cape Courtweg, Wynberg, Kaap
AN INVESTIGATION OF THE RAJIDAE OF THE
WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA
By
PAS PULLEY
South African Museum, Cape Town
(With 13 plates, 21 figures and 1g tables)
[MS. received 20 November 1969]
CONTENTS
PAGE
Introduction . : : é 5 : BSR
Method . : ‘ : : : 3 Bibb see
syseemmatic discussion’) fh. So. 153
Summary . : OA Ce Oe a eR? © Ge
Acknowledgements. Sh ee 2 De
References. 5 : : : : | (OES
INTRODUCTION
This paper represents the results of a three-year survey of the Rajidae of
the west and south coasts of southern Africa, and is intended as a paper
accompanying that of Wallace (1967) on the batoid fishes of the east coast of
southern Africa. All known species of southern African Rajidae have been
included in the given key, but, for descriptions of species which are exclusively
east coast in distribution, Wallace’s (1967) publication should be consulted.
The area originally covered by the survey extends from about Swakop-
mund on the west coast of South West Africa to Port Elizabeth on the south-
east coast of the Republic of South Africa. The majority of the specimens
have been obtained by commercial trawlers fishing on the continental shelf
between 250 and goo metres with otter trawls, while the rest have been taken
at shallower depths by research vessels. The area of survey has been extended
northwards along the west coast to 09°40’S by the examination of material
taken by R. V. Walther Herwig in 1967. The results of this cruise are given in
table 1.
The classification of South African skates is more or less tentative, for
members of this difficult family show great variability in their morphological
characters, which vary with age and/or sex in the individuals within a species.
Furthermore, some of the type specimens of South African rajids, obtained by
the Government Marine Survey at the beginning of this century, have been
lost, so that it is difficult to verify original descriptions, especially where these
are based on juvenile specimens. It is not surprising, therefore, that skate
taxonomy has received casual treatment from South African systematists.
Recently, however, Wallace (1967) has revised the east coast species, while
151
Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 55(4), 1970: 151-220, 13 pls, 21 figs, 19 tables.
152 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Hulley (1966, 1969) has shown that several species are identical with European
species from the corresponding latitudinal belt in the northern hemisphere,
and represent cases of bipolar distribution (Ekman, 1953).
Leigh-Sharpe (1920-6) has suggested the formation of pseudo-genera
within the Rajidae based on clasper structure, but detailed descriptions of the
anatomy of these organs in South African skates and their taxonomic significance
above the species level will be published in the near future.
Although precaudal vertebral counts appear to be of greater value for
separation of the family above the species level (Ishiyama, 1952), the external
and internal structures of the clasper glans are species specific without exception
(Ishiyama, 1958, 1967; Hubbs & Ishiyama, 1968) and may be used for com-
parison of geographically separated species (Hulley, 1966).
Zoogeographical and depth distributional patterns for the species are to
be dealt with in a later paper; in the interim period, however, some idea of
this may be obtained from the lists of material.
TABLE I. Rajidae taken by R.V. Walther Herwig off the west coast of southern Africa in 1967.
Station No. Position Depth Species No. of
WH |67 m Specimens
6 09°40’S, 12°58’E 100 . miraletus Linnaeus
10 10°28’S, 13°02’E 700 . straeleni Poll
12 10°41’S, 13°29’E 100 miraletus Linnaeus
14 11°04’S, 13°30’E 440 . miraletus Linnaeus
15 11°30’S, 13°25’E 110 miraletus Linnaeus
17 16°14’S, 11°33’E 100-120 miraletus Linnaeus
18 18°30’S, 11°27’E 310 . Straeleni Poll
miraletus Linnaeus
19 18°35/S, 11°25’E 400 . straeleni Poll
20 18°45/S, 11°20’E 500 . leopardus Von Bonde & Swart
confundens n.sp.
doutret Cadenat
32 20°25’S, 12°02’E 500 leopardus Von Bonde & Swart
confundens n.sp.
doutrer Cadenat
33 22°03’S, 13°12’E 200 leopardus Von Bonde & Swart
confundens n.sp.
straelent Poll
leopardus Von Bonde & Swart
confundens n.sp.
. confundens n.sp.
. confundens n.sp.
. caudaspinosa Von Bonde & Swart
clavata Linnaeus
. smith (Miiller & Henle)
confundens n.sp.
clavata Linnaeus
clavata Linnaeus
parcomaculata (Von Bonde & Swart)
dissimilis n.sp.
ravidula n.sp.
37 22°15’S, 12°46’E 500
43 23°00'S, 13°02’E 400
is 30°02’S, 14°39’E 510
89 32°06’S, 16°22’E 400
100 34°12’S, 17°34’E 630
126 27°13'S, 14°31’E 320
161 26°25'S, 14°18’E 300
178 32°39'S, 17°25’E 245
194. 33°47'S, 17°14’E 1 000
wee eNO NHN SB ee eee ND eH D eee eee ODD DH HIB DYNA BO}
195 33°49'5, 17°13’E 1 000 Sspinacidermis Barnard
. ravidula n.sp.
196 33°51'S, 17°14’E ~—s- 1: 350 . Spinacidermis Barnard
PO PO PRY PPO SD Py Fo Py Oe Pe Po Pu Pe By By Py Fe Dy 2 Do Pe Dy Fe Py De Pe De De Pe
. robertsi n.sp.
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 153
METHOD
Standard procedures in morphometry have been followed in this paper,
and to interpret the variations in the proportional dimensions which take
place during growth and which exist between the sexes, as many specimens as
possible from each of the species have been examined and measured. As a
check against the high intraspecific variability shown by rajids, counts of the
number of precaudal vertebrae have been made and, where possible, the morpho-
logical structures of the claspers of adult males have been examined. For each
species, figures of the external morphology of the clasper glans have been given.
In order to conform with previous work, the scheme of measurement
which has been adopted in this paper is that of Bigelow & Schroeder (1953),
and is represented diagrammatically in figure 1. Measurements of each specimen
have been recorded to the nearest millimetre and have been calculated as
permillage (thousandths) of the total length of the specimen. For a given
species, the mean of each particular measurement has been calculated and is
expressed in tabular form, together with the range of variation of that measure-
ment. In some cases, where few specimens were available, the proportional
dimensions of each specimen are given.
It should be noted that Hubbs & Ishiyama (1968) have suggested that
the disc width should be used as a basis for computing the proportional sizes
of the body parts, since the growth of the tail is negatively allometric (hetero-
gonic) and the tail is frequently damaged. However, this work has shown that
a much wider variation for each measurement (except the disc length) is
obtained when disc width is used, and the total length has therefore been
employed as the basis of calculation in all cases.
There would appear to be differences used in the terminology of the
structures of the clasper glans by Leigh-Sharpe (1920-6), by Ishiyama (1958)
and by Ishiyama & Hubbs (1968). Stehmann (1969) has evaluated these, and
the terminology used in this paper is mainly in accordance with his findings.
Vertebral counts were facilitated by the use of X-ray photography. The
number of precaudal vertebrae (Vprd) has been taken as the number of caudal
vertebrae up to the origin of the first dorsal fin (Ishiyama, 1952; Krefft, 1968q) ;
the number of trunk vertebrae (Vtr) and total count (V2’) are given according
to Krefft (1968q).
Although Bigelow & Schroeder (1953) have employed X-ray photography
in examinations of the snout, this method has not been used in the present
study, because of the small extent of calcification of the rostral cartilages
(Ishiyama & Hubbs, 1968). The rostral cartilages and rostral appendices were
examined by dissection.
SYSTEMATIC DiIscussION
Family Rajidae
Flat, depressed head and body, forming a rhomboidal disc. Eyes prominent,
rising above level of head; spiracles close behind eyes. Tail moderately slender,
ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
woe
“UJ [eSIOP ISI JO UISTIO 0} JUDA JO a[PprlU—Y ‘yp ynour—@&
‘goueysIp [eseusayuI—q {y}Sus] [eseusid—O SyjSuay peroord—NJ {3UaA Jo a[pPpruu 0} nous—JW SUy [esIop PUoeS Jo ySus] aseq—'T
‘gouds [es1opisqUI—y {Uy [esIop IsIy Jo ySusT aseq — [ {e0urjstp sepnovstdsssyuI—]J foouysip [eiqro193Ul—H Sapesds pue s49—*)
‘ako Jo Ja}aUIeIp [eUIPNSUO]— J SYIPIM osIp—W SYYPIM OsIp 389}8218 0} Jnous—] ‘yISuUsT Nous —1) SyyBus] osIp—g {YISsu2] [e101-—V
*suauutoods a}yeys 1OF JUIUIINSVIUL JO BULBS *I “OL
<q
(=)
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 155
but not whip-like, with caudal fin reduced to a membranous fold. Two dorsal
fins. Pelvic fins with outer margins either weakly concave, or so deeply concave
that anterior lobe forms separate, three-jointed, limb-like structure. Skin on
dorsal surface of disc and tail with small spinules and spines, or larger thorn-
like denticles, or both, but without serrate tail spines. Ventral surface smooth,
or with pointed spines, or with small, flattened asperities.
In this family eight genera are distinguished, but only three of these occur
in the eastern South Atlantic.
Key to Genera
1 (a) Anterior lobe of pelvic fin forming slender, three-jointed limb-like structure, separate
externally from posterior fin-like region (fig.2 A) .. : Ps Cruriraja
(6) Anterior lobe of pelvic fin continuous externally with eeeenae anon along outer margin
of fin, not forming a separate limb (fig. 2 B) .. ie : ie : Se Gn
2 (a) Anterior radials of pectoral fins falling distinctly short of tip of snout; lees appendices
fused to stout, rod-like rostral bar throughout their aican Shield usually present in
clasper glans (figs 5-11, 15, 17-19) : Raja
(6) Anterior radials of pectoral fins Beers aig 5 tip oF en: eesel appendices
broadly united basally and hanging posteriorly free from soft, delicare rostral bar, without
anterior notch; each appendix separated posteriorly from axial bar by a notch about
4 as long as appendix. Shield absent in clasper glans (fig.21 B) ... .. Bathyraja
r I
Fic. 2. Ventral surface of pelvic fin: A. Cruriraja; B. Raja.
Genus cRURIRAJA Bigelow & Schroeder
Cruriraja Bigelow & Schroeder, 1948: 549; 1953: 313. Smith, 1964: 286. Wallace, 1967: 7, fig. 3.
Type-species: Cruriraja atlantis Bigelow & Schroeder, 1948.
Pectorals with radials of ordinary form, without lateral processes. Outer
margins of pelvics deeply notched, to form an anterior, limb-like structure,
consisting of three articulated segments, externally distinct from posterior,
fin-like lobe of pelvic. Tips of anterior rays of pectorals falling short of tip of
rostral cartilage.
I 56 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Three species of Cruriraja have been recorded in the southern African
region (Smith, 1964); one east coast species, one west coast species and one
species common to both coasts.
Key to species
1 (a) No thorns on tip of snout, along rostral ridge or in interspace between dorsal fins
C.. durbanensis
(b) A group of spines on tip of snout and along rostral ridge; thorns in dorsal interspace 2
2 (a) No thorns on mid-line of back above anterior half of abdominal region. Interdorsal
space usually less than half base length of first dorsal. Single enlarged thorn on anterior
dorsal border of clasper glans; ventral border with dermal denticles. . C.. triangularis
(b) Thorns present on mid-line of back above anterior half of abdominal region. Interdorsal
space usually greater than half base length of first dorsal. A single, enlarged thorn on
anterior dorsal border of clasper glans and an eperon on anterior ventral border (fig. 4)
C. parcomaculata
Cruriraja durbanensis (Von Bonde & Swart, 1923)
(Fig. 3)
Raia durbanensis Von Bonde & Swart, 1923: 11, pl. 22, fig. 1. Barnard, 1925: 69.
Cruriraja durbanensis: Bigelow & Schroeder, 1948: 550; 1953: 3153 1962: 199. Smith, 1964: 287.
Wallace, 1967: 7.
Types
The holotype, a juvenile male (232 mm total length) taken in 859 metres
at 30°10:00’S, 14°33:00’E, formerly in the collection of the Government
Marine Survey; now missing. The paratype, a female (311 mm total length)
also missing. The locality and depth for the paratype are noted as unknown.
Material
No specimens were available.
Unfortunately, the name C. durbanensis is misleading, as the type locality
given for this species, Station 343 (Von Bonde & Swart, 1923), is at a point
in the Atlantic Ocean about 640 km north-west of Cape Town. Bigelow &
Schroeder (1948, 1953) erroneously give the locality as off the Natal coast in
420 fathoms (769 m).
C. durbanensis is most easily distinguished from all other species of this
genus by the fact that there are no thorns on the snout and rostral cartilage,
and no thorns in the interdorsal space.
Description (Barnard, 1925: 69)
‘Width equal to distance from snout almost to middle of tail. In male
snout pointed but not produced, about 90°, anterior margin almost straight.
In female snout rounded, without point, anterior margins undulate. Outer
pectoral angle broadly rounded, hind margin moderately convex. Eye a little
less than interorbital width, 4 in preocular length of snout. Whole upper
surface of disc and upper and lateral surfaces of tail covered with spinelets;
in male 1 large spine in front of, 2 behind orbit; in female 5 and three respe-
tively; 2 (male) or 1 (female) suprascapular spines; a median row from occiput
ft
Se
————S””—”—”—”—”—”.TC—C PN rrr
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 157
to 1st dorsal in male; in female only extending about half-way along tail;
lower surface quite smooth.’
Colour
‘Reddish brown, lighter beneath.’
Fic. 3. Cruriraja durbanensis: the type, immature male. Dorsal view. (After
Von Bonde & Swart, 1923.)
Cruriraja parcomaculata (Von Bonde & Swart, 1923)
(Pl. 1A; Figs 4 A, 4 B)
Raia parcomaculata Von Bonde & Swart, 1923: 9, pl. 21, fig. 2.
Raja parcomaculata: Norman, 1935: 46.
Raia miraleius (non Linnaeus) Barnard, 1925: 68 (partim).
Raia smithi (non Miller & Henle) Smith, 1961: 66, fig. 68.
Raja caudaspinosa (non Von Bonde & Swart) Norman, 1935: 43 (partim).
Cruriraja parcomaculata: Bigelow & Schroeder, 1948: 5503; 1953: 315; 1962: 199. Smith, 1964:
288, pl. 26, fig. 27. Wallace, 1967: 11.
Types
The holotype, a juvenile (181 mm total length), trawled off Durban
(29°57°30'S, 31°34°15’E) in 545 metres, formerly in the collection of the
I 58 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Government Marine Survey; now missing. A single paratype, juvenile female
(108 mm total length) taken at the same locality and formerly in the same
collection, now in the collection of the British Museum (Natural History).
Material
II specimens of both sexes (160-550 mm total length) trawled off the
west coast from WNW Lideritzbucht to Cape Columbine in 267-622 metres
and from the east coast in Algoa Bay at 193 metres. 8 specimens preserved in the
collection of the South African Museum (SAM 24352-4, 24412, 24662).
C. parcomaculata was thought to be an east coast species (Smith, 1964),
but it is now known to occur along the south and west coasts of southern
Africa, where it is taken fairly regularly in commercial trawls. While the type
specimens were taken off Durban (Von Bonde & Swart, 1923), Wallace (1967)
has not recorded the species during a three-year survey, so that C. parcomaculata
probably does not extend further north than about Port Alfred on the east
coast, and is replaced by C’ triangularis in the region Durban to Barra da Falsa
(Wallace, 1967).
C. parcomaculata closely resembles the east coast species C. triangularis, but
differs from it in having a compatatively broader disc, a greater interdorsal
space and a continuous median series of thorns along the back, which in
adults, where there is development of lateral rows, gives rise to the distinctive
‘cross’ pattern of spines. It should be noted that the definitive character given
2-0cm
ap
th . sn
Fic. 4. Cruriraja parcomaculata.
A: external view of right clasper from the dorsal side.
B: lateral view of right clasper, opened to show structural features of the glans.
ap—apopyle; bs—boss; hp—hypopyle; kn—knob; ‘ps’—‘pseudosiphon’; rh—rhipidion;
sh—shield; ep—eperon; sp—spike; st—sentinel; th—thorn; se—sentina.
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 159
by Smith (1964) for the separation of the two species—the position of the line
across the widest part of the disc—is not so marked in adults, where there is
an overlap of critical values. Comparison of the claspers of the two species has
shown that there are major differences in both external and internal structures.
This confirms that C. parcomaculata and C’. triangularis are distinct species.
A large specimen (BM. 1935. 5.2.64) taken by the Discovery and identified
as R. caudaspinosa by Norman (1935) is in fact C. parcomaculata.
TABLE 2. C. parcomaculata. Measurements expressed as permillage of the total length. Number |
of specimens II.
Character Mean Range
Total length : : : : : H I 000
Disc width : . ‘ : : : 591 568-627
Disc length ; : : ‘ : 451 427-521
Snout to greatest disc cee : é : 278 2490-314
Snout to middle of vent : ‘ ; 390 360-437
Middle of vent to 1st dorsal se, é : 479 459-519
Snout length 2 : : : : 3 95 84-108
Preoral length . : : , ; ; 110 99-118
Prenasal length . ; : 2 : 5 83 76-88
Eye, longitudinal diameter . ; é : 41 20-55
Eye and spiracle : i 3 : : 52 44-60
Spiracle . : : ‘ ‘ ; 23 16-31
Interorbital Dyeae : 4 : ; : 32 28-38
Interspiracular distance ; ; : i isi 66-82
Internasal distance. : : : : 50 44-59
Mouth width. . : é : s 61 52-70
Gill slit lengths: ist. : ; ‘ 4 16 14-21
ard’. : : é ; 17 15-20
5th : : ; : 14 10-17
Distance between inner ends of gill slits:
ESE vie : : : : 126 116-140
5th: : : : 2 53 46-60
Pelvic fin (anterior lobe) :
anterior margin . ; : i I14 101-133
length. : ‘ ‘ . : ‘ 97 79-116
base width . : : ‘ 3 ; 27 21-34,
1st dorsal fin: height : : : : 28 20-34
base length : ‘ : 42 32-59
and dorsal fin: height : : : 4 20) 20-35
base length ! : : 38 32-48
Interdorsal space : : : : 39 28-49
Description
Disc 1-:2-1°4 times as broad as long, its width 1-6—1-8 in total length;
angular in front, with maximum angle in front of spiracles 120° in juveniles
and females and 112° in adult males; anterior margins weakly concave close
behind tip of snout and again at level of spiracles; outer angles narrowly
rounded, posterior angles broadly so; posterior and inner margins convex.
Axis of greatest breadth 1-4—1-6 times as far from tip of snout as from posterior
edge of disc. Tail with lateral folds, well developed and expanded on posterior
third, so that tail is narrower at middle of length than distally; its length from
160 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
middle of vent to origin of first dorsal fin 1-1-1-2 times the distance from middle
of vent to tip of snout; its length from middle of vent to tip of tail 1-4-1-7
times the distance from middle of vent to tip of snout.
Juvenile specimens with 5 thorns around inner edge of each orbit and 1
pair of widely separated thorns between spiracles; 1 median nuchal thorn and
2 scapular thorns on each side; a row of 23-27 thorns along mid-line of back
and tail, extending from immediately behind scapular region to origin of first
dorsal; median row flanked on each side by an irregular series of smaller
spines; 2—3 thorns in dorsal interspace. Whole upper surface of disc with fine
spinules, except on outer posterior edges; larger spines on tip of snout
and along anterior margins. Lower surface of disc and tail completely
smooth.
Adult specimens with 11-13 thorns around inner margin of each orbit
and spiracle; 2 pairs of thorns between spiracles; 2 (sometimes 4) median
nuchal thorns, usually arranged in a double series; 3 scapular thorns on each
side; 4-5 irregular rows of stellate-based thorns along mid-dorsal region from
nuchal thorns to origin of first dorsal, diminishing to a double series of slender,
recurved thorns about half-way along tail; a single lateral row of smaller
spines on each side of tail, from about posterior edge of pelvics to about level
of dorsal interspace; 4-8 thorns in interspace between dorsals. A group of
thorns on tip of snout and along rostral cartilage, and numerous, irregularly
arranged, stellate-based spines along anterior margins of disc to outer angles.
Otherwise smooth on upper surface, except in some cases a few small spines
at inner margin of pectoral. Lower surface of disc and tail without spines.
Snout slightly pointed but not produced, its length in front of orbits
2‘6-3'5 times as long as distance between orbits; its length in front of mouth
I'g—-2'4 times as long as spiracles; distance between orbits 1-0-1-8 in length
of orbit. Rostral cartilage projecting from cranium as hard bar; anterior rays
of pectorals extending about half the distance from front of orbits to tip of snout.
Mouth almost straight; nasal curtain not fringed; expanded posterior
margin of nostril conspicuously fringed. Teeth arranged in 39-44 rows in
upper jaw, juveniles with 30-31 rows; teeth blunt and flat and arranged
in quincunx in juveniles, but sharp pointed and regularly arranged in
adults.
Pelvic fins divided into slender, limb-like anterior lobe, arising separately
from ventral surface of disc, and posterior fin-like lobe.
Dorsal fins similar in shape with rounded apices; first dorsal usually
larger than second; dorsal interspace varying considerably from o-6-1-5 times
as long as base of first dorsal.
Number of precaudal vertebrae (Vprd) 66-69.
Colour
Juveniles uniformly brown, sometimes with scattered darker patches on
disc and tail. Adults typically uniformly brown, with irregular lighter and
darker areas. Lower surface of disc and tail white.
es
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 161
Genus RAJA Linnaeus, 1758
Raja Linnaeus, 1758: 231.
Type-species: Raja clavata Linnaeus, 1758 (as designated by Jordan & Gilbert,
1883).
Pectorals with radials of ordinary form, without lateral processes. Outer
margins of pelvics more or less concave, but not deeply notched and not
forming separate, limb-like structure. Tips of anterior rays of pectoral fins
falling short of rostral appendices. Rostral cartilage stout and bar-like, without
segment; rostral appendices fused to lateral edges of rostral cartilage throughout
length. Characters otherwise the same as for the family.
Genus BATHYRAJA Ishiyama, 1968
Bathyraja Ishiyama & Hubbs, 1968: 407, figs 1, 2.
Type-species: Bathyraja tsotrachys (Giinther, 1877)
Pectorals with radials of ordinary form, without lateral processes. Outer
margins of pelvics more or less concave, but not forming a separate, anterior,
limb-like structure. Rostral appendices broadly united basally with rostral bar,
and extending posteriorly as unnotched processes; posterior wings of rostral
appendices separate from rostral bar. Shield absent in clasper glans. Characters
otherwise the same as for the family.
Note: Ishiyama & Hubbs (1968) also define the genus Bathyraja by the presence
of a pseudosiphon in the clasper glans. Investigation of the claspers of the
radiata-complex has revealed that a true pseudosiphon, as defined by Ishiyama
(1958) and subsequently modified by Ishiyama & Hubbs (1968), is definitely
present in the species R. radiata, R. doellojuradoi, R. hyperborea and R. robertsi
n.sp. Furthermore, Ishiyama & Hubbs (1968) restrict Bathyraja to the Indo-
Pacific and Breviraja to the Atlantic, but the distributional pattern of Bathyraja
smithit shows this to be incorrect. Krefft (personal communication) suggests
that Breviraja is confined to slope areas in the tropics, whereas Bathyraja is a
bipolar, antitropical genus.
KEY TO SPECIES OF Raja AND Bathyraja
t (a) Mucus pores on ventral surface of disc pigmented, appearing as small black spots and
Sieeaks ~ *... uae ee. Ld Be abe
(6) Mucus pores on conta eee af ise ae piememed a i een aS
2 (a) Tail long and slender; snout markedly produced and very maimed R. lanceorostrata
(6) Tail not long and Specie: snout somewhat pointed but not very produced pe BG
3 (a) Ventral surface of disc completely covered by small, close-set asperities R. springert
(6) Ventral surface of disc never completely covered by small asperities, although spines
and spinules may be present on tip of snout, internasal region and anterior margins
of disc
4 (a) Distance from parila of vent to > tip of snout greater ‘than distance ees middle of vent
to tip of tail, by an amount about equal to or greater than the preorallength = R. doutrei
(5) Distance from middle of vent to tip of snout equal to or greater than the distance from
middle of vent to tip of tail, by an amount less than half the preoral length site LAG,
5 (a) Snout produced; interorbital distance about 5:5 in snout length; internasal distance
about 3 in preoral length + Se ~ est au v6 R. stenorhynchus
162
ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
KEY TO SPECIES OF Raja AND Bathyraja (continued)
(0)
6 (2)
)
20 (a)
(5)
Snout not produced; interorbital distance 3—4 in snout length; internasal distance about
2 in preoral length FS ; : #g R. pullopunctata
Distance from middle of vent to origin Mor frat doral fin eclates than distance from
middle of vent to tip of snout ..
Distance from middle of vent to ee a ee: dona fig be toan dig fun auniale
of vent to tip of snout .. : si ver
Upper surface of disc and tail couplet) sopeted sie fing eR a single row of
spines along mid-dorsal region of back and tail at ay ar R. spinacidermis
Upper surface of disc and tail without close-set spinules; 3 rows of thorns along mid-
dorsal region of back and 5 rows on tail ey ; : a: R. caudaspinosa
Upper surface of disc and tail liaiairiay, covered witla Gane close-set spinules; no
enlarged thorns on disc or tail . Le, : ae R. spinacidermis
Upper surface of disc and a never donne peed “en spinules (except some
juveniles) ; larger thorns always present on disc or tail xs ae 3 9
Less than 30 rows of teeth in upper jaw ae > ae AN ois) le aes
More than 30 rows of teeth in upper jaw__.. ae us oi dn Ppt ih fe)
Snout produced and sharply pointed .. Ag. re ad, bis cs R. alba
Snout not produced and not sharply pointed. . Bis at oe it rE
Ocelli present on upper surface of disc te 5}: vE dg as Beer ©
Ocelli absent on upper surface of disc. . a he oe ae oe ene md:
Ocelli black and yellow marbled ie oh af Ne ae 23 SP
Ocelli not marbled Ms : 13
Ocelli circular or only very settles pee: cite caussane of ches depaae rings of
colour... ae R. miraletus
Ocelli strongly horizontally we. consisting of a single Aas ring enclosing one or two
dark spots By aie .. R.clavaia
Distance from middle af vent to fap We snout about 1-5 times vereaees than distance from
middle of vent to tip of tail... : 15
Distance from middle of vent to tip a snout iss a eae Ga mate of oe to
tip of tail .. BA Ab. ve 33 et) a6
Upper surface of disc wath peleae nated fidras on anterior margins, rostral cartilage
and posterior angles. Ventral surface of disc white with some scattered darker blotches
R. radiata
Upper surface of disc without stellate based thorns on anterior margins, rostral cartilage
and posterior angles. Ventral surface of disc dark grey with white triangular patches
between nostrils, around mouth and at pectoral girdle al oF .. R. robertsi
Less than 50 rows of teeth in upper jaw a ey a ic By barn 7)
More than 50 rows of teeth in upper jaw... so oNgenet
Median row of thorns along back and tail absent. No apne on ronda canes
R. ravidula
Median row of thorns on back and tail se present. hors present on rostral
cartilage .. ‘ Bs
A single row of heme Plane paid’ daeel nomen oe back aad etl avealicen rows of
thorns (when present) always lateral. Number of precaudal vertebrae 46-54 .. 19
3 or more rows of thorns along mid-dorsal region of back and tail; auxiliary rows of
thorns semi-lateral in position; number of precaudal vertebrae 55-60 ; 20
Shield in clasper glans well developed and me (fig. 11 C); dorsal oaeee of disc
grey with numerous darker regular spots. . R. straeleni.
Shield in clasper glans poorly developed (fig. 10 C); dona es of ates ae or without
numerous irregular darker blotches. .. Be .. . clavata
Reduction in size to eventual loss of mid- durant rows ao Horas from disc to tail; lower
surface of tail uniformly grey with white distal tip; See vertebral count 65-69; ;
clasper with a slit and a cleft (fig. 15 C) Ae ne . R. dissimilis
Mid-dorsal rows of thorns large and continuous to aes of ba! dorsal fin; ie surface
of tail white or with scattered darker blotches; precaudal vertebral count 55-63;
clasper with two slits (fig. 17 C) ha} xt ne be ie R. confundens
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 163
KEY TO SPECIES OF Raja AND Bathyraja (continued)
21 (a) Distance from middle of vent to origin of first dorsal fin longer than distance from tip
of snout to greatest disc width, by an amount greater than the preoral length; precaudal
vertebral count 70; spike in clasper glans bilobed (fig. 19 C) by .. R. wallacei
(6) Distance from middle of vent to origin of first dorsal fin longer than distance from tip
of snout to greatest disc width, by an amount less than the preoral length; precaudal
vertebral count 55-58; spike in clasper glans bulbous but not bilobed (fig. 18 C)
R. leopardus
Note: R. ackleyi Garman has been recorded from the south Atlantic (Poll, 1951) at 3°10’S,
9°36’E and 4°58’S, 11°20’30’E, but this is outside the area of this survey.
A
Fic. 5. Raja doutrei.
A: rostral bar and rostral appendices.
B: external view of left clasper from the dorsal side.
C: lateral view of right clasper, opened to show structural features of the glans.
ap—apopyle; cf—cleft; hp—hypopyle; rh—rhipidion; sh—shield; sp—spike; st—sentinel.
164 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Raja doutrer Cadenat, 1960
(Pl 1B3, Figs 5 A,B, :G)
Raia doutrei Cadenat, 1960: 294, figs I-11, 13, 15.
Raja batis (non Linnaeus) Hulley, 1966: 512.
T ype
The holotype, a juvenile male (591 mm total length) taken at Sud Fosse
Kayar, Senegal, in 450-500 metres in the collection of the Muséum National
d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris.
Material
Two adult males (845, 931 mm total length) taken SW by W Liideritz-
bucht in 494 metres. Both specimens in the collection of the South African
Museum (SAM 24699, 24700). A single female (SAM 34564) from the same
locality not suitable for measurement.
This is a new record for this species in the South Atlantic. The specimens
were originally thought to be R. batis Linnaeus (Hulley, 1966), but comparison
of the claspers with those of R. batis from the North Atlantic (Hulley, 1966:
figs 6, 7) has revealed that these specimens do not belong to the latter species.
However, the specimens are identical in shape, coloration, teeth count and
spination pattern, particularly on the tail, to R. doutre: from the coast of
Senegal (Cadenat, 1960). Counts of the number of precaudal vertebrae
(Vprd 46 in the type) confirm this identification.
R. doutre: closely resembles the east coast species R. stenorhynchus, but may
be distinguished from this species by its comparatively shorter, narrower snout,
longer and wider disc, and by its longer tail. Furthermore, it appears that the
tooth count in the upper jaw is slightly lower than that of R. stenorhynchus,
although the validity of this small difference as a taxonomic character is open
to question.
Description
Disc about 1-2 times as broad as long, its width 1-3-1-4 in total length;
maximum angle in front of spiracles 72°; anterior margins sinuous from snout
to outer angles, convex at level of nostrils and concave a little behind level of
mouth; outer angles sharply rounded, posterior margins gently convex. Axis
of greatest breadth 1-5-1-9 times as far from tip of snout as from posterior
edge of disc. Tail expanded distally with well-developed lateral folds, especially
on posterior third; its length from middle of vent to origin of first dorsal fin
2°0-2°2 in length from middle of vent to tip of snout; its complete length from
middle of vent to tip of tail 1-5 in length from middle of vent to tip of snout.
Adults with 6-7 thorns around inner margins of each orbit and above
each spiracle; 0-1 very small, median nuchal thorn. A series of 13-26 thorns
along midline of tail from above vent to origin of first dorsal; 1-2 thorns in
dorsal interspace. No lateral rows of thorns on tail in adult males, but females
typically with thorns in a single series on each side. Spines on dorsal surface
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 165
TABLE 3. R. doutrei. Measurements expressed as permillage of the total length.
3 Number of specimens 2.
SAM SAM
Character 24699 24.700
Total length 3 ‘ t ‘ ‘ é I 000 I 000
Disc width : : ‘ P , : 723 751
Disc length : : : ‘ : ; 605 626
Snout to greatest disc width . : : 2 308 374
Snout to middle of vent ; : z : 505 600
Middle of vent to 1st dorsal origin. : : 300 269
Snout length : : A : é : 197 199
Preoral length . . . : . : 1Q2 192
Prenasal length . : : : ; ; 175 173
Eye: longitudinal diameter . : ‘ : 38 46
Eye and spiracle k : P : ; 53 56
Spiracle . : ; : : ! : 17 23
Interorbital distance . ‘ ; : : 51 50
Interspiracular distance : ; t : i 68
Internasal distance. : 4 : QI 95
Mouth width. 3 ‘ : : : QI 99
Gill slit lengths Ist. : : : ‘ 37) 19
ord). : : : : 17 20
5th «. : H 5 : 13 17
Distance between inner ends of gill slits:
Sty. 3 ; : F ‘ 153 164
5th : ‘ ‘ : 94 95
1st dorsal fin: height : : : 3 33 44.
base length ‘ j : 49 45
and dorsal fin: height ‘ ‘ : : 49 45
base length ; : ‘ 48 45
Interdorsal space ; : : : ; 18 17
on tip of snout and along anterior margins of disc from about opposite eyes
to outer angles. Ventral surface with spines on snout and along anterior
margins to level of mouth. Otherwise smooth on both dorsal and ventral
surfaces.
Snout produced and slightly pointed, its length in front of orbits 3-8—4-0
times as long as distance between orbits; its length in front of mouth 2-0-2°1
times as great as distance between nostrils. Orbits 2-0—2-2 times as long as
spiracles; distance between orbits 1-1-1-3 times as great as length of orbit.
Rostral cartilage projecting from cranium as hard bar, with rostral appendices
fused to bar throughout their length; anterior tips of pectoral fins falling short
of appendices.
Mouth slightly arched; nasal curtain fringed; expanded posterior margin
of nostril heavily fringed. Teeth arranged in 32 regular rows in upper jaw,
each with a single, large, posterior cusp.
Anterior lobes of pelvics fin-like and continuously connected with posterior
lobes along outer margin of fin.
Dorsal fins similar in size and shape, with broadly rounded apices. Small
but definite interspace between dorsals, its length 37°% as long as base of first
dorsal.
166 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Number of precaudal vertebrae (Vprd) 47-49 (male), 43 (female).
Colour
Upper surface of disc and tail uniformly brown, with some scattered,
irregular, darker blotches. Lower surface brown; terminal ends of mucus
pores pigmented, appearing as widely-spaced black spots on the snout and
anterior margins of the disc.
Raja pullopunctata Smith, 1964
(PI. 2 A, B. Figs 6 A, B,C)
Raia pullopunctata Smith, 1964: 285, pl. 25.
Raja pullopunctata: Hulley, 1966: 505, figs 4, 5. Wallace, 1967: 13, fig. 7.
Raia batis (non Linnaeus) Thompson, 1914: 156. Von Bonde & Swart, 1923: 3. Barnard, 1925:
70, non pl. 4, fig. 3. Smith, 1961: 66, pl. 3, fig. 65.
Raja batis (non Linnaeus) Norman, 1935: 39. Fowler, 1941: 385. Bigelow & Schroeder, 1953: 146.
Raja campbelli Wallace, 1967: 24, fig. 12.
Raia stabuliforis: Von Bonde & Swart, 1923: 12.
Types
The holotype of R. pullopunctata, a juvenile male (205 mm total length)
and paratype, a female (175 mm total length), both trawled in 183 metres in
Algoa Bay, in the collection of the J. L. B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology,
Grahamstown.
The holotype of R. campbelli, a female (663 mm total length) and paratype,
a male (386 mm total length), trawled east of Durban in 320 metres and
north-east of Durban in 137 metres respectively, in the collection of the Oceano-
graphic Research Institute, Durban.
Material
Seven female and four male specimens (221-1250 mm total length)
trawled from west of Cape Town to Port Alfred in 91-457 metres, including
the types and paratypes of R. pullopunctata and R. campbelli. Eight specimens
preserved in the collection of the South African Museum (SAM 22635, 22652,
24349-51, 24456, 24497).
On the basis of external morphology, Smith (1964) distinguished between
R. pullopunctata and the European species R. batis, to which the South African
material had previously been referred. This distinction has been confirmed by
Hulley (1966) after detailed examination of the clasper structures of the two
species.
Recently Wallace (1967) has described a new species of ‘black-bellied’
skate, R. campbelli, from the Natal coast. This species closely resembles R.
pullopunctata but was distinguished from it on the basis of the shape of the snout
and the spination of the rostral cartilage. It must be pointed out, however,
that Wallace only examined juvenile specimens of R. pullopunctata (340 mm
maximum total length). Specimens of R. pullopunctata in the collection of the
South African Museum, show a range of variation in the above characters.
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 167
In more mature specimens (387-1250 mm total length) spinules appear first
on the ventral tip and then on the dorsal tip of the rostral cartilage, while the
shape of the snout varies with age: width of disc at level of orbits 2-3—2-6 times
the preorbital length of the snout in juveniles (221-344 mm total length);
2°0-2°3 times in more mature specimens (387-540 mm total length); and
=
; 5-0cm \
ap
Fic. 6. Raja pullopunctata.
A: rostral bar and rostral appendices.
B: external view of right clasper from the dorsal side.
C: lateral view of right clasper, opened to show structural features of the glans.
ap—apopyle; cf—cleft; hb —hypopyle; rh—rhipidion; sh—shield; sp—spike.
168 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
1-8—1-9 times in adult specimens (660-1250 mm total length). It is therefore
held that specimens described as R. campbelli are specimens of R. pullopunctata.
This is further supported by the fact that there is no difference in the precaudal
vertebral count between the two species.
R. pullopunctata most closely resembles R. flavirostris Philippi from the
Falkland Islands, but may be distinguished from this species by the length of
the tail and by the number of teeth in the upper jaw. Examination of the
claspers of R. flavirostris has shown the two species to be distinct. Furthermore,
the precaudal vertebral count in R&. flavirostris appears to be slightly less than
that for R. pullopunctata.
R. pullopunctata is most easily distinguished from other South African
skates, except R. lanceorostrata and R. stenorhynchus, by the black-spotted ventral
surface of the disc and by the presence of a single large, median nuchal thorn
(sometimes 2). It may be separated from R. lanceorostrata by the shape of the
tail and snout, and from R. stenorhynchus by the shape of the disc and the nature
of the rostral cartilage.
TABLE 4. R. pullopunctata. Measurements expressel as permillage of the total length.
Number of specimens 10.
Character Mean Range
Total length ; ‘ : : : : I 000
Disc width : ; ‘ , . : 734 678-784
Disc length : : : ; : : 573 550-598
Snout to greatest disc width . : ‘ ; 320 294-366
Snout to middle of vent : : : : 526 493-567
Middle of vent to 1st dorsal origin. , ; 304. 272 eee
Snout length ‘ , : 5 ‘ ; 165 147-189
Preoral length . ‘ ; , ; : 167 156-183
Prenasal length . : : , . ; 136 120-152
Eye: longitudinal diameter . ; : ; 40 29-46
Eye and spiracle y : : : ; 54 50-53
Spiraclela : : : » , ; 22 19-26
Interorbital distance . : : ; ; 48 43-46
Interspiracular distance : : : : 72 70-75
Internasal distance . : ; ‘ : 88 79-95
Mouth width . : } : ; , 92 88-96
Gill slit lengths: 1st. . L ; ' 15 12-20
and . , : : A 16 12-23
5th : 4 4 i 13 I1-19
Distance between inner ends of gill slits:
TSt |e : : : , 162 155-171
Ae ata : ; ; : 93 82-98
ist dorsal fin: height : : : 34 24-39
base length . : A f 52 42-62
and dorsal fin: height : ‘ : : 30 18-35
base length . A 4 ; 49 40-58
Interdorsal space , : ; ¢ : 28 21-36
Description
Disc about 1-2-1-4 times as broad as long, obtuse in front, with anterior
angle in front of spiracles 92°-108°; anterior margins weakly concave posterior
to snout in juveniles (width of disc at level of orbits 2:3—-2-6 times in preorbital
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 169
length of snout), but more sinuous and particularly concave abreast of spiracles
in older specimens (width of disc at level of orbits 1-8—2-3 times in preorbital
length of snout); posterior and outer angles broadly rounded. Axis of greatest
breadth 1-1-1-4 times as far from tip of snout as from posterior edge of disc.
Tail with moderately wide lateral folds (wide in adults), its length from middle
of vent to origin of first dorsal fin 1-6-1-9 in length of middle vent to tip of
snout.
Juvenile specimens with 2 thorns in front of orbit and 1 behind; a single,
large, median nuchal thorn; a row of 8-12 thorns along mid-line of tail, from
above vent to origin of first dorsal fin; and 1 thorn in interspace between first
and second dorsals. No lateral rows of spines on tail. Otherwise entire dorsal
and ventral surfaces of disc and tail naked.
Larger specimens with 3-4 thorns around inner margin of orbit; a single,
median nuchal thorn (sometimes worn); a row of 10-12 thorns along mid-line
of tail, from above vent to origin of first dorsal; and 1-2 thorns in dorsal inter-
space. No lateral rows of thorns on tail. Upper surface of disc smooth, but
lower surface with spinules on tip of snout and anterior edges of disc to about
level of nostrils, and on internasal area.
Adult specimens with 5-8 thorns around inner margin of orbit; 1 median
nuchal thorn (sometimes 2), usually worn; a row of 26-27 thorns along mid-
line of tail, from above vent to origin of first dorsal; and 3—4 thorns in dorsal
interspace. A single, irregular row of lateral caudal thorns (15-20) on each
side of tail, from about posterior edge of pelvics to interspace between dorsals.
Dorsal surface of disc and tail with widely spaced, blunt asperities, except on
suprascapular region. Spinules on ventral surface of snout, anterior margins
to level of nostrils and on internasal area.
Snout produced, more markedly so in adults, its length in front of orbits
3°4-4'1 times as long as distance between orbits; its length in front of mouth
I-Q-2°0 times as great as distance between nostrils. Orbits 1-5-1-9 times as
long as spiracles; distance between orbits 1-5—1-9 times as great as length of
orbit. Rostral cartilage projecting from cranium as hard bar, with rostral
appendices fused to the bar throughout their length; tips of anterior rays of
pectoral fins falling short of appendices.
Mouth slightly arched; nasal curtain not fringed; expanded posterior
margin of nostril heavily fringed. Teeth with single, large cusp in males, but
more or less flat in females and juveniles, arranged in 53-58 rows in upper jaw.
Anterior lobes of pelvics fin-like and continuously connected with posterior
lobes along outer margin of fin.
First dorsal fin usually only slightly larger than second, but similar in
shape, with convex anterior margin and broadly rounded apex; interspace
between dorsals 47—73°% as long as base of first dorsal.
Number of precaudal vertebrae (Vprd) 50-58.
Colour
Dorsal surface light brown to biscuit, sometimes darker, with numerous
170 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
small darker spots and blotches. Ventral surface greyish, with terminal ends
of mucus pores darkly pigmented, appearing as black spots and streaks.
Raja caudaspinosa (Von Bonde & Swart, 1923)
(PIS 9 A, Bs Pies 7 a5.)
Raia caudaspinosa Von Bonde & Swart, 1923: 8, pl. 21, fig. 1. Barnard, 1925: 66.
Raja caudaspinosa: Norman, 1935: 43 (partum). Fowler, 1941: 376.
non Raia caudaspinosa: Smith, 1961: 67, non fig. 72 (= R. leopardus).
Raia albalinea Von Bonde & Swart, 1923: 6, pl. 20, fig. 1.
Types
The holotype of R. caudaspinosa, a female (346 mm total length), trawled
off the Natal coast in 512 metres, formerly in the collection of the Government
Marine Survey; now missing.
The paratype of R. albalinea, a juvenile female (108 mm total length),
taken at 32°3:00’S, 16°2-00’E in 512 metres, formerly in the collection of the
Government Marine Survey; now in the British Museum (Natural History).
The type of R. albalinea taken by the Government Marine Survey, now missing.
Material
31 specimens of both sexes (304-580 mm total length) trawled between
292 and 914 metres from Port Nolloth to west of Cape Town. 29 specimens
preserved in the collection of the South African Museum (SAM 23187, 24420,
24449).
Although the number of precaudal vertebrae in the tail is indicative of
the genus Bathyraja (Ishiyama & Hubbs, 1968), this species has been retained
in the genus Raja because of the structure of the rostral bar and rostral
appendices, and because both a rhipidion and shield are present in the clasper
glans.
While resembling R. wallacei and R. confundens in the heavy spination of
the tail, R. caudaspinosa may be separated from these and from all other known
South African species except juvenile specimens of R. spinacidermis by virtue
of the fact that the distance from the middle of the vent to the origin of the
first dorsal fin is greater than the distance from the middle of the vent to the
tip of the snout. In this and other characters, R. caudaspinosa most closely
resembles R. fyllae Liitken from the northern Atlantic, but differs in being
comparatively narrower across the disc, having a shorter snout and a narrower
tail than the latter species. Unlike R. fyllae, juvenile specimens of R. caudaspinosa
possess dark cross-barring on the tail, which is more typical of R. senta Garman,
but they differ from this species in spination. Furthermore, Bigelow & Schroeder
(1953: 199) report that ‘the range of R. fyllae appears to be defined by its
preference for a narrow temperature range of a few degrees above the freezing
point of salt water’, so that while this condition may be satisfied on the South
African west coast, it seems unlikely that it applies to the waters off Natal
(type taken in 512 metres).
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA Lf
Examination of the type of R. albalinea led both Barnard (1925) and
Norman (1935) to include this species as a synonym of R. caudaspinosa. Unfor-
tunately the type is now missing, but a comparison of the position of the vent
in the paratype with its position in R. caudaspinosa has led the present author
to accept this synonymy.
ap
hp
2.0 cm
£3 BAN 8 2.0cm
cn BE Waal 3
e ‘ E 3
Fic. 7. Raja caudaspinosa.
A: rostral bar and rostral appendices.
B. external view of right clasper from the dorsal side.
C: lateral view of right clasper, opened to show structural features of the glans.
ap—apopyle; cf—cleft; hp—hypopyle; ae a se—sentina; sh—shield; sp—spike;
st—sentinel.
172 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
TABLE 5. R. caudaspinosa. Measurements expressed as permillage of the total length.
Number of specimens 31.
Character Mean Range
Total length f , : : : : I 000
Disc width : 3 ; j , f 547 520-573
Disc length } . ‘ : 405 379-446
Snout to greatest disc = falas : ; ; 250 214-273
Snout to middle of vent 4 ; 4 393 372-409
Middle of vent to 1st dorsal ie ; : 468 450-494.
Snout length ; : : : ; ; 78 66-87
Preoral length . : ; : ; , 85 72-96
Prenasal length . : ; : : ; 63 55-74
Eye: longitudinal diameter . : : , 40 36-43
Eye and spiracle : : ; ; : 49 46-52
Spiracle . : : : : ; 19 16-23
Interorbital disauee : : : : , 33 30-36
Interspiracular distance : : : 66 59-74.
Internasal distance. f : : ; 60 55-64
Mouth width. ; : : : : 68 57-78
Gill slit lengths: 1st. : 3 : 4 15 11-18
ard)! : : ; : 17 13-18
5th : : . 13 10-16
Distance between inner ends ae oil slits:
AS OH, 00 , ; : ; 137 126-144
bb ne y : ‘ : 7h 58-83
1st dorsal fin: height ; : : : 26 20-36
base length . ; ; ; 51 44-57
ond dorsal fin: height ; : 5 ; 26 21-34
base length . ; ; : 51 43-59
Interdorsal space : ; : : , )
Description
Disc about 1:2—1-4 times as broad as long, its width 1-7—1-9 in total length;
conspicuously obtuse in front, with maximum angle in front of spiracles
125°-130°; anterior margins evenly convex in juveniles, but considerably
concave at level of spiracles in adults, and particularly indented in adult males;
outer angles broadly rounded, posterior margins evenly convex. Axis of
greatest breadth 1-1—-1-9 times as far from tip of snout as from posterior edge
of disc. Tail with moderately wide lateral folds along posterior third, its length
from middle of vent to origin of first dorsal fin 1-1-1-3 times as great as distance
from middle of vent to tip of snout.
Specimens typically with dorsal surface of disc smooth; large stellate-
based thorns on anterior margins arranged in 4-6 irregular rows and on snout
and rostral cartilage; 5-9 large thorns around inner margins of each orbit;
o-1 pair thorns between orbits and 1-2 pairs between spiracles; 4-5 median
nuchal thorns with 3-5 thorns in a group posteriorly and 3-4 scapular thorns;
a median series of 22-33 thorns along mid-line of back and tail to first dorsal
origin, decreasing in size posteriorly, but never absent. Median series flanked
by 1 row of equally large thorns on back, and 2 rows on each side on tail,
making 5 rows of thorns in this region; lateral rows extending to origin of
second dorsal. No interdorsal thorns. Small spines and spinules on anterior
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 173
edges of disc and on tail. Dorsal fins spinulose. Ventral surface smooth.
Snout obtuse and not produced, its length in front of orbits 2-0—2-6
times as long as distance between orbits; its length in front of mouth 1-2-1°6
times as great as distance between nostrils. Orbits 1-4-2-7 times as long as
spiracles; distance between orbits 1-1-1-4 in length of orbit. Rostral cartilage
projecting from cranium as hard bar with rostral appendices fused to bar
throughout their length; anterior rays of pectorals extending about two-thirds
the distance forward from level of front of orbits towards tip of snout.
Mouth arched medially; nasal curtain deeply fringed; expanded posterior
margin of nostril heavily fringed. ‘Teeth in 32-36 rows in upper jaw, arranged
in quincunx and closely crowded medially; flattened and blunt in females but
with sharp posterior cusp in males.
Anterior lobes of pelvics fin-like and continuously connected with posterior
lobes along outer margin of fin.
First and second dorsals confluent; second dorsal a little longer and lower
than first, and continuous with caudal.
Number of precaudal vertebrae (Vprd) 66—73.
Colour
Upper surface of disc dusky-grey to brown, with or without some darker
spots. Lower surface of disc and tail pale.
Raja spinacidermis Barnard, 1923
| (Pl. 4 A, B)
Raia spinacidermis Barnard, 1923: 440; 1925: 73, pl. 4, fig. 6. Smith, 1961: 66.
Raja spinacidermis: Norman, 1935: 46. Fowler, 1941: 392.
Raja mollis Bigelow & Schroeder, 1950: 388, pl. 2; 1953: 237, fig. 51. Templeman, 1965: 268,
figs 10-13. Krefft & Liibben, 1966: 380, figs 1, 2.
? Raia plutonia: Barnard, 1925: 68.
Type
The holotype of R. spinacidermis, a female (600 mm total length), probably
trawled off Cape Point in deep water (locality label lost), formerly in the collec-
tion of the South African Museum; now in the collection of the British Museum
(Natural History).
The holotype of R. mollis, a juvenile male (262 mm total length), from
41°53'N, 65°35’W in 1568 metres, in the collection of the United States National
Museum.
Material
The holotype and two specimens, a juvenile male (377 mm total length)
and a juvenile female (638-5 mm total length), taken by R.V. Walther Herwig
at Station WH 195/67 (33°49’S, 17°13’E) in 1 000 metres, and at Station WH
196/67 (33°51'S, 17°41'E) in about 1 350 metres. These two specimens in the
collection of the Institut fiir Seefischerei, Hamburg.
This species is retained in the genus Raa because the rostral bar extends
174 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
forwards beyond the anterior extremities of the pectoral rays, and because the
precaudal vertebral count is within the range for this genus (Ishiyama, 1967).
R. spinacidermis was previously known only from a single adolescent
specimen, the holotype, but two specimens were taken by R.V. Walther Herwig
in deep water off Cape Town in 1967. It may be distinguished from all other
known South African species by the spinulose nature of the whole upper surface
of the disc and tail and by the complete absence of larger thorns.
R. mollis, which has been taken in deep water in the eastern and western
North Atlantic (Bigelow & Schroeder, 1950, 1953; ‘Templeman, 1965; Krefft
& Liibben, 1966), so closely resembles R. spinacidermis in proportional dimen-
sions, tooth count and in its peculiar spination pattern, that it is considered
that these two species are synonymous. However, the vertebral count in R.
mollis (Vtr 25-29; Vprd 67-72) is slightly higher than that of R. spinacidermis
(Vtr 25; Vprd 60-65), the difference probably being due to environmental
factors. Although the two are widely separated geographically, this fact seems
to have little systematic bearing so far as deep-water species are concerned, cf.
R. richardson: (Garrick, 1961; Forster, 1965).
Although R. spinacidermis resembles R. ravidula, also from deep water off
the Cape, in the spinulose nature of the upper surface of the disc, it differs
markedly in the absence of thorns around the orbits, absence of thorns along
the mid-dorsal region of the back and tail, and in tooth count. The snout is
not as produced as in R. ramdula.
Norman (1935) held that the two spinulose juveniles, reported as R.
plutonia Garman by Barnard (1925), are specimens of R. spinacidermis, for
despite the presence of enlarged thorns above the orbits and along the mid-
line of the back and tail, the median series of thorns in the larger specimen
showed signs of disappearance, i.e. a similar relationship between juveniles
and adults as in R. fullonica (Clark, 1926). Although these specimens were not
available to the present author, two almost identical specimens (SAM 22911,
24450), answering exactly to Barnard’s (1925) description of R. plutonia, were
examined. The tooth count in these specimens is 36-38 rows in the upper jaw,
slightly higher than that of R. plutonia (32-36; Barnard, 1925), but well below
the range for R. spinacidermis. Furthermore, the shape of the disc and length of
the tail suggest a closer similarity with R. caudaspinosa, i.e. a similar relationship
between juveniles and adults as in R. fyllae (Clark, 1926; Bigelow & Schroeder,
1953). However, until further material becomes available, Norman’s (1935)
synonymy has been tentatively accepted.
Description
Disc about 1-2—1-4 times as broad as long, its width 1-4—1°5 in total length;
obtuse in front with anterior angle in front of spiracles 107°; anterior margins
almost straight; posterior margins evenly convex; outer and posterior angles
broadly rounded. Axis of greatest breadth 1-4-1-7 times as far from tip of
snout as from posterior edge of disc. Tail with well-developed lateral folds on
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 175
TABLE 6. R. spinacidermis. Measurements expressed as permillage of the total length.
Character Type 3 Q
(377 mm) (6385 mm)
Total length : : : f 4 1 O00 I 000 I 000
Disc width : : : : «OA 660 701
Disc length : i : : SUP Reply 538 542
Snout to greatest disc width . : =| )307 335 315
Snout to middle of vent ; : A AO6 482 487
Middle of vent to 1st dorsal origin. se SARICT: 391 379
Snout length . : f i Hin pi (ills tg 166 I5I
Preoral length . f ; : a) (126) 166 148
Prenasal length . ; : : a xOG) = 136 114
Eye: longitudinal diameter . : : 33 a7 36
Eye and spiracle R : ; p 42 46 47
Spiracle . 5 : 2 ¢ ; 20 — =
Interorbital distance . : : : 45 40 36
Interspiracular distance : : : 65 70 64
Internasal distance. : : ‘ 83 89 79
Mouth width =. : ; ; : 83 go 87
Gill slit lengths: 1st. 4 : : 13 15 14
ord |. i é ‘ 17 17 16
pidclnan ; - d iit 13 10
Distance between inner ends of gill slits:
Ist) #5 ; s 4), HBO 140 147
5th). ; : : 89 84 gI
ist dorsal fin: height : : : 29 22 22
base length . 3 A 47 50 48
2nd dorsal fin: height ; t é 27 26 19
base length . : : 42 45 55
Interdorsal space ‘ : . : 0) O O
* Measurements made on damaged snout of type specimen.
posterior third; its length from middle of vent to origin of first dorsal fin 1-1-1-3
in length from middle of vent to tip of snout.
Entire upper surface of disc, and upper and lateral surfaces of tail with
closely-set, fine, setiform spinules, larger and coarser on tail than elsewhere;
enlarged spines or thorns absent on disc and tail in adults, but juveniles with
1-4 enlarged spines before orbit, 0-3 spines behind, and a median row of
spines along back and tail, becoming reduced and finally absent in front of
first dorsal origin. Enlarged spines are lost with growth (?). Ventral surface
with spines on tip of snout and on tail, except on median line of distal two-thirds.
Snout pointed but not produced; its length in front of orbits 3-8—4-2 times
as long as distance between orbits; its length in front of mouth 1-5—-1-9 times
as great as distance between nostrils. Orbits 1-6 times as long as spiracles;
distance between orbits 1-0-1°3 times as great as length of orbit. Rostral
cartilage projecting from cranium as hard bar, extending beyond anterior
extremities of pectoral rays.
Mouth slightly arched; nasal curtain not fringed; expanded posterior
margin of nostril fringed. Teeth arranged in 54-60 regular rows in upper jaw,
blunt with posterior cusp laterally, slightly pointed medially.
I 76 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Anterior lobes of pelvics fin-like and continuously connected with posterior
lobes along outer margin of fin.
Dorsal fins about similar in size and shape, with broadly rounded apices;
dorsal fins completely spinulose. First and second dorsals confluent.
Number of vertebrae Vtr 28; Vprd 65; V2' 93.
Colour
Pale slate grey, becoming slightly darker towards posterior margins of
pectorals, and distinctly darker on pelvics. Lower surface similarly and as
deeply coloured as upper surface, with white mottling on distal region of tail.
Raja alba Lacépéde, 1803
(Pl. 5 A, B; Figs 8 A, B, C)
Raja alba Lacépéde, 1803: 663, pl. 20, fig. 1. Norman, 1935: 40. Fowler, 1936: 115; 1941: 365:
Van Bruggen, 1965: 190. Hulley, 1966: 497, fig. 8. Wallace, 1967: 27, figs 13-15.
Raia alba: Von Bonde & Swart, 1923: 5. Smith, 1961: 66, fig. 67; 1964: 285. Thorpe, 1964: 27.
Raja marginata Lacépdée, 1803: 663, pl. 20, fig. 2. Thompson, 1914: 158.
Raia marginata: Regan, 1908: 242. Gilchrist & Thompson, 1916: 285. Barnard, 1925: 65, pl. 4,
fig. 1. Clark, 1926: 409, pls 28, 29, 30, 31a. Von Bonde, 1932: 33. Barnard, 1947: 26, pl. 3,
figs 11, Ila.
Type
The locality of the types of R. alba and R. marginata not given in the original
description.
Material
21 specimens of both sexes (286-816 mm total length), trawled from False
Bay to Port Alfred in 110-183 metres. 9 specimens preserved in the collection
of the South African Museum (SAM 3235, 13026, 22578, 22633, 23590, 24320,
24336).
Clark (1926) has shown that R. marginata is synonymous with R. alba, the
common spearnose skate of the north-eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean.
This species extends southwards from this region, along the western coasts of
Morocco (Pietschmann, 1906), West Africa (Fowler, 1936) and Angola
(Franca, 1959) and is reported in South Africa under the same name. Norman
(1935) pointed out that the snout appears to be slightly longer in European
specimens than in South African specimens, but he was unable to detect any
other important difference.
The claspers of a mature male of R. alba (1 700 mm total length) in the
collection of the Oceanographic Research Institute, Durban, have been
examined (fig. 8). The present author is unable to detect a single difference
between the structure of the clasper of this specimen and the description of
the clasper of European specimens of R. alba (Leigh-Sharpe, 1924, fig. 15),
and therefore holds that R. alba from southern Africa is identical to R. alba
from the northern hemisphere.
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 177
10-0cm
Pe a ea
ap a)
[ 5.0cm
pc
A
sh
5:0em
Fic. 8. Raja alba.
A: rostral bar and rostral appendices.
B: external view of right clasper from the dorsal side.
C: lateral view of right clasper, opened to show structural features of the glans.
ap—apopyle; cf—cleft; hp—hypopyle; pc—pecten; ‘pr’—‘pseudorhipidion’; sh—shield;
st—sentinel.
178 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
TABLE 7. R. alba. Measurements expressed as permillage of the total length.
Number of specimens 21.
Character Mean Range
Total length ; ; : . , 3 I 000
Disc width : : ‘ ? : : ota fi 754-804
Disc length : . : ; : 537 511-566
Snout to greatest disc galin : : : 350 300-410
Snout to middle of vent , : ; 403 465-516
Middle of vent to 1st dorsal eee ; : 329 314-359
Snout length ; : : : ; : 155 141-164
Preoral length . k : : ; é 149 129-162
Prenasal length . : ; : ; : 119 103-132
Eye: longitudinal diameter . : 3 : 41 33-47
Eye and spiracle B ; ; . . 57 52-61
Spiracle . : ‘ : 5 : 25 19-35
Interorbital eens: ; : : ; : 54 49-59
Interspiracular distance : } ; ; 70 63-76
Internasal distance . i s , : gl 84-97
Mouth width. : : ; : : go 81-101
Gill slit lengths: 1st. : : : : 18 16-21
ord ; : : : 19 16-23
5th ? : : re 10-14
Distance between inner ends ioe eill slits:
Stole : ; ? : 175 166-186
Bia ; : ; ; 104 96—109
1st dorsal fin: height ; ; : : 33 Pej |
base length . ; : : 60 50-66
2nd dorsal fin: height ; : : : 29 20-35
base length . ; : : 62 56-69
Interdorsal space : : ; : : 7 0-34
Description
Disc about 1:4-1°5 times as broad as long, its width 1-2—1°3 in total length,
with maximum angle in front of spiracles about 105°; anterior margins concave
just behind tip of snout, convex opposite eyes and again concave opposite
spiracles; outer angles pointed, posterior angles broadly rounded. Axis of
greatest breadth 1-3-2-2 times as far from tip of snout as from posterior edge
of disc. Tail short and broad, tapering posteriorly, with lateral folds well
developed on posterior third; its length from middle of vent to first dorsal
origin 1°4-1-°6 in length from middle of vent to tip of snout.
Juvenile specimens with 1 thorn in front of orbit and o-1 thorn behind.
Nuchal and scapular regions and mid-line of back without thorns. 10-16 thorns
along mid-line of tail, from about posterior edge of pelvic to origin of first
dorsal, and o-2 thorns in dorsal interspace. 7-17 lateral caudal thorns in a
single row on each side. Otherwise dorsal surface of disc and tail smooth.
Ventral surface with spinules on tip of snout, internasal region and anterior
margins of disc to about level of mouth; spinules arranged in 3—4 irregular rows.
Adult specimens with a row of thorns about inner margins of orbits. Nuchal
and suprascapular thorns absent. 16-30 thorns along mid-line of tail, from
about posterior edge of pelvics to origin of first dorsal fin, and o—2 thorns in
dorsal interspace. A single row of 17-29 lateral caudal thorns on each side,
irregularly arranged and generally uneven on the two sides. Spinules on dorsal
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 179
surface of disc on snout, rostral cartilage, anterior margins and mid-line of
back. Ventral surface with spinules on snout, internasal region, anterior
margins, abdomen and gill slits. Spinules on both dorsal and ventral surfaces
of tail.
Snout abruptly narrowed and produced into a long, sharp point; its
length in front of orbits 2-5—-3-2 times as long as distance between orbits; its
length in front of mouth 1-4-2-4 times as great as distance between nostrils.
Orbits 1-4—2-4 times as long as spiracles; distance between orbits 1-2—1-6 times
as great as length of orbit. Rostral cartilage projecting from cranium as hard
bar, with rostral appendices fused to bar throughout their length; anterior
rays of pectorals extending half the distance forward from level of front of
orbits towards tip of snout.
Mouth slightly arched; nasal curtain not fringed; expanded posterior
margin of nostril heavily fringed. Teeth arranged in 40-45 regular rows in
upper jaw, with long conical points in middle of jaw, more obtuse with shorter
points laterally.
Anterior lobes of pelvics fin-like and continuously connected with posterior
lobes along outer margin of fin.
Dorsal fins large, similar in shape with broadly rounded apices; height of
first dorsal generally slightly greater than height of second, and base of first
shorter than second; interspace between dorsals distinct, 0-58% as long a
base of first dorsal.
Number of precaudal vertebrae (Vprd) 62-67.
Colour
Juveniles uniformly brownish, darker towards extremities of pectoral,
pelvic and caudal fins. Adults typically grey to brown, with or without scattered
white spots. Ventral surface of disc white, tail and margins of pectorals and
pelvics brownish to black, especially in juveniles.
Raja miraletus Linnaeus, 1758
(Pi iB; Biss 9. .A, B.C)
Raja miraleitus Linnaeus, 1758: 231. Thompson, 1914: 158. Fowler, 1936: 114; 1941: 375. Poll,
1949: 190, fig. 4; 1951: 107, fig. 53. Wallace, 1967: 31, figs 16, 17. Hulley, 1969: 137,
figs 1-3.
Raia miraletus : Von Bonde & Swart, 1923: 5. Barnard, 1925:68 (partim) ; 194.7: 26. Clark, 1926: 9.
Raja ocellifera: Thompson, 1914: 158. Fowler, 1925: 193. Norman, 1935: 42. Fowler, 1941: 375.
Van Bruggen, 1965: 190.
Raia ocellifera Regan, 1906: 2, pl. 2; 1908: 242. Garman, 1913: 365. Gilchrist & Thompson
1916: 286. Von Bonde & Swart, 1923: 5. Barnard, 1925: 67; 1947: 26, pl. 4, fig. 2. Von
Bonde, 1933: 32. Smith, 1961: 66, pl. 3, fig. 69; 1964: 285.
? Raza ocellifera: Samuel, 1963: 99.
Type
The holotype of R. ocellifera, a male (460 mm total length) from Algoa Bay,
and paratype, a female (480 mm total length) from Natal in 73 metres, in the
collection of the British Museum (Natural History).
180 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
3-0cm j
y
°
a
3
[=
Fic. 9. Raja miraletus.
A: rostral bar and rostral appendices.
B: external view of right clasper from the dorsal side.
C: lateral view of right clasper, opened to show structural features of the glans. ;
ap—apopyle; cf—cleft; ‘ps’—‘pseudosiphon’ (pocket); pr—pseudorhipidion; se—sentina;
sh—shield; si—signal; st—sentinel.
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 181
Maierial
24 specimens of both sexes (125-510 mm total length), trawled between
Cape Agulhas and Natal in 48-78 metres, and 23 specimens (272-504 mm
total length) taken by R.V. Walther Herwig from 18°30’S to 09°40’S in 100-440
metres. II specimens preserved in the collection of the South African Museum
(SAM 13022, 13032, 15480, 16228, 16347, 21274, 22789). Three specimens
from Angola (Belgian South Atlantic Expedition, Station 15: WNW Banana)
and two specimens from Sierra Leone (Walther Herwig Station 125/1964) also
examined.
Norman (1935) pointed out that R. ocellifera Regan from South Africa is
closely related to R. miraletus Linnaeus from the Mediterranean and the west
coasts of Africa, but considered the two to be distinct because of differences in
tail length, interorbital distance, tooth count and nature of the ocellus. After
comparative morphometric studies on the two species, Wallace (1967: 33)
considers ‘the variation recorded to be within the limits expected of two
geographically separated populations of the same species’, and holds that the
South African specimens should be referred to R. miraletus.
Hulley (1969) agrees with Norman (1935) in that the snout is longer and
the interorbital distance narrower in Mediterranean specimens of R. miraletus
than in South African specimens, but has pointed out that these differences
are less noticeable in West African and Angolan specimens when compared
with South African specimens. It would appear that these slight differences
are of secondary importance in the systematics of this species, as is the small
difference in the structure of the ocellus. Furthermore Hulley (1969) has shown
that while the tail length is comparatively shorter in West African specimens,
the range in number of precaudal vertebrae is the same in the two populations;
also there is no difference in tooth count. Comparative anatomical studies of
the claspers (Hulley, 1969) have confirmed that R. ocellifera is synonymous with
R. miraletus.
The presence of a bluish-black ocellus at the base of each pectoral fin
distinguishes R. miraletus from all other South African skates, except some
juveniles of R. clavaia. However, in R. miraletus the ocellus is circular (or only
very slightly ovate) and consists of three distinct rings of colour, while in R.
clavata the ocellus is markedly horizontally ovate and is usually composed of a
single dark ring enclosing one or two small dark spots.
Description
Disc about 1-3-1-4 times as broad as long, its width 1-4-1-6 in total
length; obtuse in front, with anterior angle in front of spiracles 110°-116°;
anterior margins weakly concave behind tip of snout and gently concave
between level of spiracles and outer corners; outer angles broadly rounded;
posterior margins evenly convex. Axis of greatest breadth o-g—1-3 times as far
from tip of snout as from posterior edge of disc. 'Tail with narrow lateral folds;
its length from middle of vent to origin of first dorsal fin 1-1-1-4 in length from
middle of vent to tip of snout. —
182 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
TABLE 8. R. miraletus. Measurements expressed as permillage of the total length.
Number of specimens 24.
Character Mean Range
Total length : : : t , , I 000
Disc width . : , : ; , 683 630-724
Disc length ; : , : : : 5II 477-529
Snout to greatest disc width . ; : ‘ 263 237-299
Snout to middle of vent ; : : : 450 420-484
Middle of vent to 1st dorsal origin ; : 350 317-387
Snout length : : : : : : 113 94-136
Preoral length . , Q . : : 105 83-127
Prenasal length . : : : ; ; 84 66-99
Eye: longitudinal diameter . : ; : 35 29-40
Eye and spiracle ; : , 1 ; 51 45-56
Spiracle . ; : i : : ‘ 23 19-26
Interorbital distance . J f ; ; 43 38-48
Interspiracular distance : : ; : 62 51-72
Internasal distance. 4 L ¢ : 80 68-87
Mouth width . ; : ; : ; 82 67-88
Gill slit lengths: rst. ; ; A ‘ 20 17-23
BuGl ; ; : Y 20 18-23
5th ! : : 14 II-17
Distance between inner ends of gill slits:
RSEa : ; : ‘ 143 130-157
mth ©. : : : : 74 62-89
1st dorsal fin: height ) 5 : : 24 18-29
base length . ; ; : 56 47-65
end dorsal fin: height : : : 3 24. 19-27
base length . : ; : 59 45-69
Interdorsal space ‘ : : ; ‘ QI 10-28
Juvenile specimens with 2 thorns in front of orbit and 1 behind; o-2
thorns above spiracles; 3 nuchal thorns; 1 scapular thorn on each side; a row
of 18-23 thorns along mid-line of back and tail from scapular region to origin
of first dorsal and o—2 thorns in dorsal interspace. Sometimes a few small
spines situated semi-laterally on tail, otherwise dorsal and ventral surfaces
smooth.
Older specimens show an increase in the number of thorns around orbits
and on tail, but a reduction (to complete loss) of thorns along mid-line of
back and on scapular region. Adults typically with 4-8 thorns around inner
margins of orbits; o-2 median nuchal thorns; a row of 12-27 thorns along
mid-line of tail, from above axils of pelvics to first dorsal origin, and 1-2
thorns in dorsal interspace. Lateral rows of thorns on tail in 1-2 rows, generally
unequal in number on the two sides and ranging from 8-16 thorns in semi-
lateral rows and 0-13 in lateral rows. Dorsal surface with spinules on snout,
anterior margins to level of spiracles, mid-line of back, and some specimens
with a small group of stellate-based spines on posterior pectoral angle. Ventral
surface with spines on snout, internasal region and anterior margins of disc
to about level of nostrils.
Snout obtuse and not produced; its length in front of orbits 2-3~-3-1 times
as long as distance between orbits; its length in front of mouth 1-1-1-5 times
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 183
as great as distance between nostrils. Orbits 1-2-1-8 times as long as spiracles;
distance between orbits 1-1-1-4 times as great as length of orbit. Rostral
cartilage projecting from cranium as hard bar, with rostral appendices fused
to bar throughout their length; anterior rays of pectorals extending about
two thirds the distance forward from level of front of orbits towards tip of
snout.
Mouth slightly arched; nasal curtain fringed; expanded posterior margin
of nostril heavily fringed. Teeth arranged in 42—50 rows in upper jaw, usually
with a single median point in middle of jaw, more obtuse with shorter points
laterally.
Anterior lobes of pelvics fin-like and continuously connected with posterior
lobes along outer margin of fin.
Dorsal fins similar in shape and about equal in size; interspace between
dorsals usually small but distinct, up to 66% as long as base of first dorsal.
Number of precaudal vertebrae (Vprd) 47-52. Krefft (19682) gives the
following count for R. miraletus: Vtr 25-29; Vprd 44-52; V2' 70-81.
Colour
Brownish, with or without numerous small darker spots; a large blue-black
ocellus at the base of each pectoral, consisting of three definite rings of
colour. Ventral surface pale, with or without a small dark spot on tip of
snout.
Raja clavata Linnaeus, 1758
(Pl. 6A; Figs 10 A, B, C)
Raja clavata Linnaeus, 1758: 232. Gilchrist, 1922: 7. Fowler, 1936: 110; 1941: 360. Poll, 1949:
188, fig. 3. Hulley, 1966: 497, figs 1-3. Wallace, 1967: 35, figs 18, 19.
Raia clavata: Barnard, 1925: 64, pl. 4, fig. 2; 1947: 26, pl. 4, fig. 1. Von Bonde, 1933: 32.
Raja rhizacanthus: Thompson, 1914: 158. Norman, 1935: 40. Smith & Smith, 1966: 209, fig.
Rata rhizacanthus Regan, 1906: 3, pl. 3; 1908: 242. Gilchrist & Thompson, 1916: 286. Von
Bonde & Swart, 1923: 5. Smith, 1961: 67, pl. 3, fig. 71.
Raja capensis Miller & Henle, 1841: 151. Gray, 1851: 112. Bleeker, 1860: 58. Dumeéril, 1865:
540, pl. 12, figs 11, 12. Kner, 1865: 419. Gilchrist, 1902: 168. Thompson, 1914: 157.
Gilchrist, 1921: 27.
Raia capensis: Sauvage, 1891: 510. Von Bonde & Swart, 1923: 4.
Raia barnardi: Smith, 1961: 67, pl. 3, fig. 70.
? Raja maculata: Bleeker, 1860: 58. Gilchrist, 1902: 168. Thompson, 1914: 157.
? Raia maculata: Barnard, 1925: 71. Von Bonde, 1933: 32.
? Raia oculata: Von Bonde & Swart, 1923: 4.
Types
The holotype of R. rhizacanthus, a juvenile male (210 mm total length),
from the coast of Natal in 73 metres, in the collection of the British Museum
(Natural History).
The paratype of R. capensis in the collection of the Muséum National
d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris.
184 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
L ‘Ocm
10-0cm
Fic. 10. Raja clavata.
A: rostral bar and rostral appendices.
B: external view of right clasper from the dorsal side.
C: lateral view of right clasper, opened to show structural features of the glans.
ap—apopyle; cf—cleft; fn—funnel; hp—hypopyle; pr—pseudorhipidion; ‘ps’—‘pseudosiphon’
(pocket) ; se—sentina; si—signal; sh—shield; sp—spike; st—sentinel.
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 185
Material
41 specimens of both sexes (171-790 mm total length), trawled between
Cape Columbine and Algoa Bay in 55-548 metres. 30 specimens preserved in
the collection of the South African Museum (SAM 22786-8, 23006-8, 24324-8,
24330-5, 24337-8, 24355-60, 24534-40).
Although the South African species R. rhizacanthus Regan was previously
thought to be distinct from the European ‘thorn-back’ skate R. clavata Linnaeus
because of differences in the spination and in the position of the vent (Norman,
1935), several authors (Barnard, 1925; Fowler, 1936, 1941) considered the
two to be synonymous. Comparative anatomical studies of the claspers (Hulley,
1966) and detailed morphometric measurements (Wallace, 1967) have con-
firmed that the South African specimens should be referred to R. clavata.
R. herwigi, R. maderensis, R. siraelent and R. clavata form a definite sub-group
of the genus Raja but at present the systematics of this complex of species,is
uncertain. R. clavata closely resembles R. straelent in proportional dimensions,
tooth count and number of vertebrae, but differs from this species in its intensity
and pattern of coloration, the degree of development of the shield in the
clasper glans and in its distribution. In the South Atlantic, R. clavata appears
to have a northern limit at 26° and is replaced by R. straeleni over the area
22°5 to 0°. |
Adult specimens can easily be recognized by the spinulose nature of the
dorsal surface of the disc and by the presence of enlarged buckler-like thorns,
especially in females (these thorns are absent in R. straeleni). Adults resemble
B. smithi in shape, but may be distinguished from this species by the number
of rows of teeth in the upper jaw, the structure of the rostral cartilage and rostral
appendices, and by the presence in R. clavata of lateral rows of thorns on the
tail. It should be noted that the dental formula for R. clavata given by Wallace
(1967) as 23—26 rows in the upper jaw, is inconsistent with previous investiga-
tions: Regan (1906) reported 36 rows in the type, Barnard (1925) gave 38-44
and Norman (1935) 36-44 rows. In the specimens examined by the author,
the range was found to be 36—45, which corresponds with the 36-44 rows in
European specimens (Clark, 1926). Juvenile specimens of R. clavata are generally
smooth (sometimes with spinules along the anterior margins of the disc) and
lack a lateral series of thorns on the tail. These facts, together with the lack of
a produced and pointed snout and a tooth count of more than 30 rows in the
upper jaw, separate this species from all other known South African skates,
except R. miraletus. However, R. miraletus possesses ocelli on the dorsal surface
of the disc.
Some juveniles of R. clavata possess a pair of ocelli at the bases of the
pectoral fins, which may lead to confusion with R. miraletus. In R. miraletus,
however, the ocellus is circular (or only very slightly ovate) and consists of
three definite rings of colour, while in R. clavata, the ocellus is markedly hori-
zontally ovate and is usually composed of a single dark ring, within which are
two (sometimes one) darker spots.
186 f ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
TABLE g. R. clavata. Measurements expressed as permillage of the total length.
Number of specimens 41.
Character Mean Range
Total length : : ; . : : I 000
Disc width : : : 4 5 : 731 679-773
Disc length : j : : 3 ‘ 529 481-569
Snout to greatest disc width . 4 : ; 308 280-336
Snout to middle of vent ‘ : . : 471 432-517
Middle of vent to 1st dorsal origin. y : 349 317-390
Snout length : , ‘ ‘ : : 133 120-155
Preoral length . ; : . ; : 123 106-142
Prenasal length . : : : : : 102 87-119
Eye: longitudinal diameter . ; : : 35 23-41
Eye and spiracle P : , : ; 49 45-56
Spiracle . ; ‘ : ¥ ; : 23 1O-27
Interorbital distance . : : ; ; 47 41-52
Interspiracular distance : : : : 70 65-75
, Internasal distance. : : ‘ : 84 76-92
Mouth width. : ‘ : ; : 82 77-91
Gill slit lengths: 1st. , : ; : 20
andy ie 4 ; : d 21
Fthy : 5 . P 14
Distance between inner ends of gill slits:
ESC) (us : ; : : 159 135-177
5th , : ; . 83 73-97
1st dorsal fin: height 5 : ; ; 29 19-39
base length . ; ; ‘ 58 45-71
2nd dorsal fin: height ; ; : : 30 21-37
base length . : q : 60 45-76
Interdorsal space : , F ; ; 19 0-35
Description
Disc about 1-3—1-4 times as broad as long, its width 1-3-1°5 in total length;
obtuse in front, with anterior angle in front of spiracles 80°-100°; anterior
margins weakly concave behind tip of snout and again at level of spiracles,
more deeply so in males than in females; outer and posterior angles broadly
rounded. Axis of greatest breadth 1-2—1-8 times as far from tip of snout as from
posterior edge of disc. Tail with moderately developed lateral folds on posterior
third; its length from middle of vent to origin of first dorsal fin 1-2-1-6 in
length from middle of vent to tip of snout.
Juvenile specimens with 2 thorns in front of orbits and 1 behind: 1 supra-
spiracular thorn and 1 pair of thorns between spiracles; 2-4 median nuchal
thorns; 2 scapular thorns on each side; a row of 24-30 thorns along mid-line
of back and tail from scapular region to origin of first dorsal fin; 1-2 thdrns
in dorsal interspace. No lateral rows of thorns on tail. Dorsal surface with
spinules on snout, interorbit, anterior margins of disc and along mid-dorsal
region of back and tail. Ventral surface smooth.
Older specimens show a reduction in number of preorbital, postorbital,
supraspiracular, interspiracular and scapular thorns, until these disappear in
the adult. Adults typically with no thorns around inner margins of orbits and
above spiracles, no nuchal spines, no scapular thorns and no enlarged thorns
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 187
along the mid-line of back; a row of 19-41 thorns along mid-line of tail from
above vent to origin of first dorsal fin; 1-2 thorns in dorsal interspace. A row
of lateral caudal thorns on each side (sometimes two), irregularly arranged.
Widely-spaced spinules on dorsal surface of snout, interorbit and mid-dorsal
region of back and tail. Ventral surface spinulose along anterior margins of
disc and around vent. Buckler-like thorns on dorsal and ventral surfaces of
disc, especially around vent, in some specimens, particularly females.
Snout pointed but not produced; its length in front of orbits 2-6—3-4 times
as long as distance between orbits; its length in front of mouth 1-3-1-7 times
as great as distance between nostrils. Orbits 1-3—2-0 times as long as spiracles;
distance between orbits 1-I1-1-4 times as great as length of orbit. Rostral
cartilage projecting from cranium as hard bar, with rostral appendices fused
to bar throughout their length; tips of pectoral fins falling short of appendices.
Mouth slightly arched; nasal curtain slightly fringed; expanded posterior
margin of nostril heavily fringed. Teeth arranged in 36-45 rows in upper jaw,
with large cusp in sexually mature males, but blunt and flat in juveniles and
females.
Anterior lobes of pelvics fin-like and continuously connected with posterior
lobes along outer margin of fin.
Dorsal fins similar in shape, with broadly rounded apices; first dorsal
usually slightly smaller than second; interspace between dorsals usually about
30% as long as base of first dorsal, but varying between 0% and 66%.
Number of precaudal vertebrae (Vprd) 45-53.
Colour
Colour variable, particularly in juveniles. Brownish or grey-brown, with
or without numerous irregular darker and lighter spots or with larger irregular
darker blotches. Juveniles generally with a dark, horizontally ovate ocellus at
the base of each pectoral, consisting of a single dark ring enclosing two (some-
times one) dark spots. Ventral surface pale, margins of pectorals generally
greyish, occasionally with some darker irregular patches.
Raja straelent Poll, 1951
(PG B: Figs 11 A, B,C)
Raja straelent Poll, 1951: 118, fig. 54. Krefft, 1968a: 66, pl. Va.
Types
The holotype, a mature male (620 mm total length), trawled in 100-110
metres at 13°05’S, 12°46’E, in the collection of the Institut Royal des Sciences
Naturelles, Brussels. 21 paratypes in the same collection.
Material
The holotype and paratypes, as well as 8 specimens trawled in 200-700
metres by R.V. Walther Herwig between 10°28’S and 22°03’S. Measurements
taken on 16 specimens including the holotype. Material from the R.V. Walther
Herwig located in the collection of the Institut fiir Seefischerei, Hamburg.
188 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
R. straeleni forms part of the clavata-complex of species. The systematics of
this complex, which includes the species R. clavata, R. herwigi, R. maderensis and
R. straeleni is as yet uncertain. In the South Atlantic, R. straeleni has been found
in the region between the equator and about 22°S and is replaced by R. clavata
to the south of this limit.
ap
cf
‘ps
Mis
pr
; A
Fic. 11. Raja straelen.
A: rostral bar and rostral appendices.
B: external view of right clasper from the dorsal side.
C: lateral view of right clasper, opened to show structural features of the glans.
ap—apopyle; cf—cleft; fn—funnel; hp—hypopyle; pr—pseudorhipidion; ‘ps’—‘pseudosiphon’
(pocket) ; se—sentina; sh—shield; si—signal; sp—spike; st—sentinel.
em
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 189
R. straelent very closely resembles R. clavata, and while there are noticeable
differences in colour pattern and intensity, which appear to be constant in
R. straeleni, there is only a slight difference in the external morphology of the
claspers of the two species — the shield in R. straeleni is more strongly developed,
suggesting a difference in the degree of development of the ventral terminal
cartilage. Morphometric proportions and vertebral counts are similar in the
two species.
On the basis of colour pattern, the taxonomic significance of which is at
present unknown, distribution and the structure of the shield, R. straeleni has
been retained for the moment as a separate species. Detailed investigations of
the skull and the nature of the clasper cartilages should elucidate this problem.
TABLE 10. R. straeleni. Measurements expressed as permillage of the total length.
Number of specimens 16.
Character Mean Range
Total length ; : ; é : I 000
Disc width 2 : : 3 : : 672 614-729
Disc length ; : : b é : 503 471-525
Snout to greatest disc width . : : : B29 2902-357
Snout to middle of vent ; : : : 465 439-500
Middle of vent to 1st dorsal origin. : : 343 326-383
Snout length : : : F : : 132 124-144
Preoral length . : : : : : 125 112-135
Prenasal length . ; ‘ , é é 102 93-109
Eye: longitudinal diameter . : ; : 40 33-49
Eye and spiracle ; i é : ; 55 48-60
Interorbital distance . : : : : 44 40-48
Interspiracular distance : ‘ : : 69 63-72
Internasal distance. Z : : : 88 84-92
Mouth width. ; : : i : 86 81-94
Gill slit lengths: 1st’. : P ‘ ‘ 21 17-28
ard x, ‘ : : : 23 17-28
Rea. . ‘ 3 5 16 14-22
Distance between inner ends of gill slits:
ESE( : : , , 163 150-180
Bile © : 2 : § 83 69-90
1st dorsal fin: height : : : j 29 22-34.
base length . : : : 61 54-70
and dorsal fin: height ; : : , 27 23-32
base length . . 5 : 60 55-70
Interdorsal space : : : ‘ : 34 27-56
Description
Disc about 1-2—1°5 times as broad as long, its width 1-4—1-7 in total length;
obtuse in front, with anterior angle in front of spiracles about 95°—100°; anterior
margins weakly concave behind tip of snout and again at level of spiracles;
outer angles rounded, posterior margins evenly convex. Axis of greatest breadth
1-5—2-0 times as far from tip of snout as from posterior edge of disc. Tail with
lateral folds on posterior half; its length from middle of vent to origin of first
dorsal fin 1-2-1-5 in length from middle of vent to tip of snout.
1-2 thorns in front of orbits and 1-3 behind; o—1 thorn above each spiracle;
190 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
4-5 median nuchal thorns; o—2 scapular thorns; a row of 20-52 thorns along
mid-line of back and tail, from about axis of greatest breadth to first dorsal
origin; o—6 thorns in dorsal interspace. A few lateral thorns on anterior region
of tail, becoming regularly arranged and hook-like posteriorly. Dorsal surface
in males entirely covered with small spines, but in females spinules only on
tip of snout, mid-dorsal region of back and tail, and anterior margins of disc.
Ventral surface with spines on tip of snout and along anterior margins of disc;
otherwise smooth.
Snout pointed but not produced; its length in front of orbits 2-8—3-2
times as long as distance between orbits; its length in front of mouth 1-3-1°5
times as great as distance between nostrils. Distance between orbits 0-8-1-4
times as great as length of orbit.
Mouth slightly arched; nasal curtain fringed; expanded posterior margin
of nostril heavily fringed. Teeth arranged in 36-45 (35-42: Poll, 1951) rows
in upper jaw, blunt and flat in smaller specimens, but sharp-pointed in adult
males.
Anterior lobes of pelvics fin-like and continuously connected with posterior
lobes along outer margin of fin.
Dorsal fins similar in shape with broadly rounded apices; first dorsal
usually smaller than second; interspace between dorsals 17°%-104% as long
as base of first dorsal.
Vertebral count: Vtr 24-28; Vprd 48-52; V2 73-78 (Krefft, 19682).
Colour
Dorsal surface brown to grey with numerous dark spots on whole of disc
except snout, pelvic fins and tail; spots regularly arranged. Ventral surface of
disc pale or mottled grey, sometimes with a darker margin along posterior
edges of pectorals and pelvics. Krefft (1968a) reports that in juveniles there is
no evidence of darker spots on the dorsal surface.
Raja robertsi n.sp.
(PL8. A; B; Figs 12¥AeB)
Type
A juvenile male (773 mm total length), trawled west of Cape Town by
R.V. Walther Herwig (Station No. WH 196/67: 33°51’S, 17°14’E) in 1350
metres, in the collection of the Institut fir Seefischerei, Hamburg.
Material
A single specimen, the holotype.
This species forms part of the radiata-group, the distribution and interrela-
tionships of which have been discussed by Krefft (1968). The group is charac-
terized by a lozenge-shaped disc, short tail and by the presence of a single mid-
dorsal row of stout spines, extending from the nuchal region (in some species
from the axils of the pelvics) to the origin of the first dorsal fin. Preliminary
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA IQ!
examination of the claspers of this group of species has revealed the presence
of a pseudosiphon in the outer dorsal wall of the clasper glans. Although the
type of R. robertsi is a juvenile male (clasper length 61 mm), the existence of
the pseudosiphon can already be detected in the still undeveloped clasper.
In the Atlantic, at least, the radiata-group appears to be divisible into
two sub-groups: the heavily-spined species, comprising the North-South
Atlantic pairs R. radiata—R. doellojuradoi and R. hyperborea—R. frerichsi: and the
sub-group comprising the North Atlantic species R. jensent and the South
Atlantic species R. georgiana, in which there are no enlarged stellate-based
thorns on the anterior margins and posterior angles of the pectorals. R. roberts:
is a member of this second sub-group.
Although it resembles R. georgiana in tooth count and spination of the
orbit, R. roberist can easily be separated from this species by the characteristic
dark coloration of its ventral surface. It most closely approximates to the North
Atlantic species R. jenseni in lacking large rostral thorns and in ventral colora-
tion, but differs markedly from this species in tooth count (56-66 rows in
upper jaw in R. jenseni (Bigelow & Schroeder, 1953): 42 rows in R. robertsz),
preoral length and scapular spination. Furthermore, there are fewer thorns in
the mid-line of the disc and tail in R. roberisz. |
ap
3-0cm
Fic. 12. Raja robertsi.
A: rostral bar and rostral appendices.
B: external view of right clasper from the dorsal side.
ap—apopyle; “ps’—‘pseudosiphon’.
In tooth count and general coloration, R. robertsi falls close to R. badia
caught in 1270 fathoms in the Gulf of Panama (Garman, 1899). However,
R. badia belongs to the heavily spined sub-group (Berg, 1911 considers it to be
a possible synonym of R. hyperborea (Bigelow & Schroeder, 1953)) and therefore
differs in the spination of the disc.
This species has been named in honour of Mr. J. Douglas Roberts, who
by his kind generosity, made the study of the Walther Herwig material in
Hamburg possible.
192 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM ~*
TABLE 11. R. robertsi. Measurements expressed as permillage of the total length.
A single specimen, the type (773 mm total length).
Character Dimensions
Total length : ; A : , : : ; I 000
Disc width : : 3 : : : . : 729
Disc length , : : : A ; : 569
Snout to greatest disc width . : ‘ : ; : 428
Snout to middle of vent ‘ : : p : : 581
Middle of vent to 1st dorsal origin. , : : : 311
Snout length : : ; : : : F E 145
Preoral length . : : 4 : : : , 142
Prenasal length . : : s : : ; : 108
Eye: longitudinal diameter . : : : : ‘ 44
Eye and spiracle : ; : . : : 63
Interorbital distance . : ; ; , : 68
Interspiracular distance : ; , atone ‘ 107
Internasal distance. i d i : é ? 121
Mouth width. : : : 3 : ; ' 131
Gill slit lengths: 1st. ; ; : ‘ ; ‘ I5
Bra) J. : : : : : : 14
5th : : 2 : ‘ F II
Distance between inner ends of gill slits:
LES Bev 4 : , : : ; 215
5th ; ; , ; : ; 155
1st dorsal fin: height : : ; : ; iy
base length . : : : , : 45
2nd dorsal fin: height i : é : 15
base length . ; ; , ; 40
Interdorsal space : : : ih a : : 0)
Description
Disc 1-3 times as broad as long, its width 1-4 in total length; obtuse in
front, with anterior angle in front of spiracles 96°: anterior margins concave
just behind tip of snout and more deeply concave just posterior to level of
spiracles; outer angles somewhat pointed, posterior margins almost straight.
Axis of greatest breadth 3-4 times as far from tip of snout as from posterior
edge of disc. ‘Tail with fairly well developed lateral folds along its entire length;
its length from middle of vent to origin of first dorsal fin 1-9 in length from
middle of vent to tip of snout; its length from middle of vent to tip of tail 1-4
in length from middle of vent to tip of snout.
Spination:
Preorbital thorns . 1/1
Postorbital thorns . 1/1
Supraspiracular thorns . 1/1
Median nuchal thorns . 2
Scapularthorns yo ei eect ene
A single row of 21 (+ 1 scar) stout thorns extending from nuchal region
almost to origin of first dorsal. No lateral rows of thorns on disc or tail. 1 small
stellate-based spine on rostrum, no thorns on anterior margins and posterior
angles of pectorals; entire upper surface of disc and tail covered with close-set
spinules. Malar spines present. Ventral surface of disc and tail smooth.
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 193
Snout obtuse and not produced; its length in front of orbits 2-4 times as
long as distance between orbits; its length in front of mouth 1-2 times as great
as distance between nostrils. Distance between orbits 1-5 times as great as
length of orbit. Rostral cartilage extending from cranium as hard bar, with
rostral appendices fused to bar throughout their length; anterior rays of
pectorals extending half the distance forward from level of front of orbits
towards tip of snout.
Mouth slightly arched; nasal curtain not fringed; expanded posterior
margin of nostril fringed; no barbel-like lobe on inner edge of each nostril,
but a slight fleshy fold present. Teeth arranged in 42 regular rows in upper
jaw, with round bases and large, sharp posterior cusps.
Anterior lobes of pelvics fin-like and continuously connected with posterior
lobes along outer margin of fin.
Dorsals more or less similar in size with convex anterior margins and
rounded apices; first dorsal continuous with second.
Vertebral count: Vtr 32, Vprd 55, V2 87.
Colour
Dorsal surface of disc greyish with a few scattered darker patches over
disc and tail; pelvics somewhat darker. Ventral surface of disc uniformly grey
to black, tending to be darker at posterior margins of pectorals, tips of anterior
lobes of pelvics and on tail. A white inverted-triangular patch in median position,
with base line on level of pectoral girdle. Lower jaw and area about nostrils
white.
Clasper structure
The type is an immature male, in which definite structures in the clasper
glans cannot be identified. However, the claspers are of the short, spatulate
variety and a pseudosiphon can be distinguished in the outer dorsal surface of
the glans (fig. 12).
Raja radiata Donovan, 1807
(Pi JPA; Hig. 19)
Raja radiata Donovan, 1807: pl. 114.
Material
‘Two specimens, a male (573 mm total length) and a female (616 mm total
length), trawled west of Cape Town in 548-640 metres. Both specimens pre-
served in the collection of the South African Museum.
This species represents a new record for the eastern South Atlantic. R.
radiata is retained in the genus Raja because of the structure of the snout and
a precaudal vertebral count of 58-62. It can easily be distinguished from all
other South African species, except R. robertsi, by its extremely short tail, and
differs from R. robertst in the heavy spination of the disc and tail.
R. radiata forms part of the radiata-group of species, which are charac-
194 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
terized by their lozenge-shaped disc, short tail and single mid-dorsal row of
stout thorns. The distribution and interrelationships of this group have been
discussed by Krefft (19680). |
In appearance and type of spination, R. radiata falls into the heavily-
spined sub-group of the radiata-complex. R. radiata is so closely allied to R.
doellojuradot, recorded from the western South Atlantic, that Bigelow &
Schroeder (1953: 255) point out that ‘no reliable criteria have been found to
distinguish the one from the other’. Pozzi (1935, 1936) and Norman (1937)
hold that in R. radiata the tail is longer, so that the vent is nearer to the tip of
the snout than to the end of the tail; the teeth are more numerous (38-46
rows in upper jaw in R. radiata; 31-34 rows in R. doellojuradoz); there are only
2 scapular thorns; and the spines on the disc are less well developed, there
being less than ro in the mid-line of the tail posterior to the axils of the pelvics.
Krefft (personal communication), in comparing six specimens of R. radiata
from the northern Atlantic with five specimens of R. doellojurado: from the
western South Atlantic, has found that there is no difference in the number
and distribution of the median thorns and no difference in spination except
in the number of scapular thorns. Whereas in R. radiata two large scapular
thorns exist, the third one being either vestigial or much smaller than the
outer ones, in R. doellojuradoi the three scapular thorns are of the same size.
In the South African specimens, tooth count favours their identity with
R. radiata, and while size at first maturity may be a questionable taxonomic
character, the size of the two specimens is well above the 530 mm total length
limit for R. doellojuradoi (Krefft, personal communication). Furthermore the
rajid distribution of the Atlantic suggests that the South African fauna, which
AS
r 5-O0Ocm
Fic. 13. Raja radiata.
Rostral bar and rostral appendices.
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 195
contains a number of European species (Hulley, 1966; 1969) is more closely
related to that of the North Atlantic than to that of South America, i.e. a distri-
bution following the continental slopes from north to south seems more feasible
than an east—west distribution, which presupposes a crossing of the deep-sea
plane or a very old ‘Gondwanaland’ distribution. This seems all the more likely
since the generic and specific composition of the skate fauna of the eastern
South Atlantic differs markedly from that of the western Seuth Atlantic.
TABLE 12. R. radiata. Measurements expressed as permillage of the total length.
Number of specimens 2.
Character Male Female
Total length : : ‘ : : : . I 000 I 000
Disc width : ; ; ‘ : on GO4: Tif
Disc length : j : ; : 5 3 BOR 566
Snout to greatest disc leans : : 7 IN AOS 360
Snout to middle of vent ; : ; ROT 575
Middle of vent to 1st dorsal wees. : 3 Sy ital 326
Snout length ; : : : : : ae GO 149
Preoral length . : : : : ; se ED 148
Prenasal length . : : : ; § i (LG 112
Eye: longitudinal diameter . ; : : P 42 33
Eye and spiracle : : ; : : : 60 54
Spiracle . 3 é 3 : : ; 30 27
Interorbital Histaince 3 : : ; : : 65 WZ
Interspiracular distance ‘ ; : é <b LEOR 101
Internasal . ‘ : , : : : A 117 III
Mouth width . ‘ A : : : te aLIS 112
Gill slit lengths: 1st. ; F - : ; 13 12
Chit 0 ee : : : : 3 17 16
5th : . : 5 : 9 9
Distance between inner ends of gill slits:
TSEMA: : : : : R21 205
Be . z : : ey nara: 142
1st dorsal fin: height 2 : . ; : 23 QI
base length . : : ; : 40 36
and dorsal fin: height : ! : : : 20 19
base length . : : ; : 43 41
Interdorsal space é : : 5 : : 6 8
Description
Disc about 1-2—1°3 times as broad as long, its width 1-3 in total length;
obtuse in front, with anterior angle in front of spiracles about 100°; anterior
margins slightly concave close behind tip of snout, otherwise almost straight;
posterior angles much more broadly rounded than outer angles. Axis of greatest
breadth 1-7—2-1 times as far from tip of snout as from posterior edge of disc.
Tail with well-developed lateral folds beginning at axils of pelvics; its length
from middle of vent to origin of first dorsal fin 1-8 —1-9 in length from middle
of vent to tip of snout; its length from middle of vent to tip of tail 1-4-1°5 in
length from middle of vent to tip of snout.
Upper surface of disc with a median row of 18 large, conspicuous thorns
on radiate bases, extending from nuchal region to origin of first dorsal; 5-6 of
these anterior to axils of pelvics, and 13-14 laterally compressed thorns from
196 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
axils of pelvics to origin of first dorsal, decreasing in size posteriorly. Mid-line
of back with 2-3 irregular rows of smaller thorns on stellate bases on either
side of the mid-dorsal row, extending almost from the nuchal region to first
dorsal origin, becoming sharper and recurved posteriorly ; small spines in dorsa]
interspace. Anterior, median and posterior areas of pectorals with scattered
thorns and smaller spines; thorns present on rostral projection, interorbit and
interspiracular regions and on sides of tail; naked areas confined to anterior
parts of pelvics. 1 large thorn in front of orbit and 1 behind; 1 thorn directly
above each spiracle, close to postorbital thorn; 2 nuchal thorns in mid-line;
2-3 scapular thorns, the third vestigial. Ventral surface of disc and tail com-
pletely smooth.
Snout obtuse and not produced; its length in front of orbits 2:1-2:4 times
as long as distance between orbits; its length in front of mouth 1:3 times as
great as distance between nostrils. Orbits 1-2—-1-4 times as long as spiracles;
distance between orbits 1:6—-2-2 times as great as length of orbit. Rostral
cartilage projecting from cranium as hard bar, with rostral appendices fused
to bar throughout their length; anterior rays of pectorals extending two-thirds
the distance forward from level of front of orbits towards tip of snout.
Mouth slightly arched, more so in the male than in the female; nasal
curtain not fringed; expanded posterior margin of nostril heavily fringed.
Teeth arranged in 37-39 regular rows in upper jaw, with round bases and large,
sharp posterior cusp.
Anterior lobes of pelvics fin-like and continuously connected with posterior
lobes along outer margin of fin. .
Dorsals similar in shape and about similar in size, with convex anterior
margins and broadly rounded apices; interspace between dorsals 14-23% as
long as base of first dorsal.
Number of precaudal vertebrae (Vprd) 58-62.
Colour
Upper surface brownish-grey, with scattered irregular black blotches,
especially on anterior limb of pelvic fin. Ventral surface white, with darker
spots and blotches on tail and pelvics, and black spot on tip of tail.
Raja ravidula nu. sp.
(Pligg AyBe Pigs)
Types
The holotype, a juvenile male (634°5 mm total length), trawled west of
Cape Town by R.V. Walther Herwig (Station No. WH _ 195/76: 33°490'S,
17°13’E) in 1000 metres, in the collection of the Institut ftir Seefischerei,
Hamburg. The paratypes, a juvenile male (605 mm total length) and a juvenile
female (631°5 mm total length), trawled west of Cape Town by R.V. Walther
Herwig (Station No. WH 194/67: 33°47’S, 17°14’E) in 1 000 metres, in the
same collection.
es
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 197
Material
The holotype and paratypes.
This species of deep-water skate differs from all known South African
species with less than 50 rows of teeth in the upper jaw in that a median row
of thorns along the back and tail is absent. In lacking a median row of thorns
it approximates to the European species R. fullonica, which has been recorded
as far south as Morocco (Murray & Hort, 1912). However, it may be dis-
tinguished from this species by its lower tooth count (39-44 rows in upper jaw
in R. ravidula; 58-68 rows in R. fullonica), lack of thorns on the tip of the rostrum
and by the number and arrangement of the nuchal spines.
TABLE 13. R. ravidula. Measurements expressed as permillage of the total length.
Character Type Paratype Paratype
3 3 2
Total length ; 4 : . : I 000 I 000 I 000
Disc width : ‘ : : : 561 578 570
Disc length ; : : : : 489 505 482
Snout to greatest disc width . ! : 291 314 312
Snout to middle of vent : : : 491 496 487
Middle of vent to 1st dorsal origin. é 384. 391 4.03
Snout length ; ; ; : ‘ 138 142 148
Preoral length . ; : ! ; 149 147 155
Prenasal length . : : : y 126 126 133
Eye: longitudinal diameter . ; : 38 38 38
Eye and spiracle ‘ ; : : 50 50 49
Interorbital distance . : : ; 32 30 30
Interspiracular distance i ‘ : 72 71 71
Internasal distance : : ‘ ; 82 84 84
Mouth width : ; : : FP 83 7
Gill slit lengths: st. : ; : 14 15 13
Sra)“ f ss : 15 18 14
Btls. : : : II 12 II
Distance between inner ends of gill slits:
WSEnI : : : 132 131 138
Bey pie : 4 3 go 87 QI
1st dorsal fin: height : j ‘ 29 oT 33
base length . : ; 48 50 43
and dorsal fin: height ‘ : 4 27 25 34.
base length . : : 48 45 50
Interdorsal space : ; sents 8 oO O
Description
Disc about 1-1—1-2 times as broad as long, its width 1-7—1°8 in total length;
maximum anterior angle in front of spiracles about 92°; anterior margins
weakly concave behind tip of snout and again at level of spiracles; outer and
posterior angles broadly rounded, posterior margins evenly convex. Axis of
greatest breadth 1-5-1-8 times as far from tip of snout as from posterior edge
of disc. Tail with moderately wide lateral folds on posterior third; its length
from middle of vent to origin of first dorsal fin 1-2-1-3 in length from middle
of vent to tip of snout.
198 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
No thorns along mid-line of back and tail (paratype with 1 small thorn
in mid-line at about half tail length). A single series of thorns on each side of
mid-line, extending from nuchal region to first dorsal origin, widely spaced on
back, but, close-set and larger on tail. No thorns on rostral cartilage or between
dorsal fins. Entire dorsal surface of disc covered with blunt, flat, widely-spaced
asperities, tail with larger and more pointed spinules. Ventral surface of disc
and tail smooth.
Snout pointed and a little produced; its length in front of orbits 4-3-4:8
times as long as distance between orbits; its length in front of mouth 1-8 times
as great as distance between nostrils. Distance between orbits 1-2-1°3 in length
of orbit. Rostral cartilage projecting from cranium as hard bar, with rostral
appendices fused to bar throughout their length; tips of pectoral rays falling
short of appendices.
3-0 cm
Fic. 14. Raja ravidula.
Rostral bar and rostral appendices.
Spination Holotype 3 Paratype 3 Paratype 2
Preorbital thorns. : : , 3/3 4/4. 3/3
Postorbital thorns ; : ! 3/3 3/3 3/3
Supraspiracular thorns. A : 1/1 1/1 1/1
Interspiracular thorns . ; : 1/o o/o o/1
Median nuchal thorns , i 6 6 6
Lateral nuchal thorns . ; : 4/3+2 4/4 2+3/2+2
Scapular thorns . . : ; 2/2 o/t 3/2
Mouth slightly arched; nasal curtain slightly fringed; expanded posterior
margin of nostril heavily fringed. Teeth arranged in 39-44 rows in upper jaw,
blunt and flat with small posterior cusp. |
Anterior lobes of pelvics fin-like and continuously connected to posterior
lobes along outer margin of fin.
Dorsals similar in shape, with broadly rounded apices; first dorsal usually
slightly larger than second; interspace between dorsals 0°4-16:5% as long as
base of first dorsal.
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 199
Vertebral count Holotype § Paratype 3 Paratype 2
Vir. : ‘ : as : 33 30 30
Vprd. : : ; ; : 69 69 70
Ree. 3 : ; P : 102 99 100
Colour
Dorsal surface of disc pale grey, becoming darker along posterior margins
of pectorals and pelvics and at distal end of tail. Ventral surface of disc white,
but darker at margins of pectorals; pelvics white with dark blotches at axils,
on tip of anterior lobe and at anterior end of vent; tail greyish-brown becoming
mottled with white posteriorly.
Raja dissimilis n.sp.
(Pl. 10 A, B; Figs 15 A, B, C)
Types
The holotype, a mature male (640 mm total length), trawled west of
Cape Town by R.V. Walther Herwig (Station No. WH 194/67: 33°47'S, 17°14’E)
in I 000 metres, in the collection of the Institut fiir Seefischerei, Hamburg.
Two paratypes, females (424°5 mm, 501 mm total length), taken at the same
locality, in the collection in Hamburg.
Material
The type and paratypes.
R. dissimilis is unique among the southern Atlantic skates in that it shows
a marked reduction in size, to eventual loss, of mid-dorsal thorns from the
disc to the tail. In this respect and in tooth count, it resembles R. senta from the
northern Atlantic, but may be distinguished from this species in that lateral
rows of thorns are present on the disc and tail, and that it lacks the pale cross-
barring of the tail which is typical of R. senta (Bigelow & Schroeder, 1953).
In R. dissimilis, the ventral surface of the tail, from about the posterior edge of
the pelvics to about the origin of the first dorsal fin, is a uniform grey colour,
the tip of the tail being pale white. This peculiar tail coloration may result in
confusion with R. griseocauda from the Patagonian—Falkland region, but in this
species the tooth count is lower (30-36 rows in upper jaw in R. griseocauda
(Norman, 1937); 37-41 rows in R. dissimilis) and there are major differences in
ocular, scapular and caudal spination.
In morphometric dimensions, R. dissimilis approximates to R. leopardus,
but it differs from this species in its lower tooth count (52-70 rows in upper
jaw in R. leopardus), its peculiar caudal spination and in ventral coloration.
Its identity is confirmed by its higher vertebral count (R. dissimilis Vtr 29-30;
Vprd 65-69; VX 94-99; R. leopardus Vtr 31-33; Vprd 55-58; VX 88-go) and
by the presence of two well-defined slits in the inner dorsal border of the
clasper glans. By these facts, R. dissimilis is also distinguished from R. confundens,
which has a similar tooth count. In R. confundens the vertebral count is lower
(Vtr 28-30; Vprd 55-63; V2’ 84-92), and there is no distinct proximal slit in
the glans. Furthermore, the snout in R. dissimilis is comparatively longer and
the spination of the tail much less heavy than in R. confundens.
200 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
2:0cm
Fic. 15. Raja dissimilis.
A: rostral bar and rostral appendices.
B: external view of right clasper from the dorsal side. |
C: lateral view of right clasper, opened to show structural features of the glans.
ap—apopyle; cf—cleft; rh—rhipidion; hp—hypopyle; sh—shield; sp—spike; st—sentinel.
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 20!
A ee! coat oan eT snout
B so. oo
VAN con am eae
i preota
Ae renasal
== p
A a internasal
A ae interorbit
SSS | SSeS
: 10 20
°
Te total length
Fic. 16.
Comparison of cranial measurements of R. confundens and R. leopardus after
the method of Hubbs & Hubbs (1953). In each diagram the base line
represents the range of the measurement, the vertical line represents the
mean, the open area represents the standard deviation on each side of the
| mean, and the solid area represents two standard errors on either side of
the mean.
A— Raja leopardus B— Raja confundens
TABLE 14. R. dissimilis. Measurements expressed as permillage of the total length.
Character Type Paratype Paratype
(501 mm) (424°5 mm)
Total length P : : : . 1000 I 000 I 000
Disc width : : : ~ : 609 571 593
Disc length 3 ; 3 ; ~ 495 503 516
| Snout to greatest disc width . : “1a 308 318 312
| Snout to middle of vent ; : / e506 485 502
Middle of vent to 1st dorsal origin. Be} by) 395 413
Snout length. 5 J ; ant3o 143 I51
Preoral length . : : ; elo 150 161
i Prenasal length . 3 Cee y: 126 141
Eye: longitudinal diameter . : : 35 39 40
Eye and spiracle ; : ; : 47 46 51
Interorbital distance . : ‘ : 33 ZI 36
' Interspiracular distance : : : 67 66 75
Internasal distance. é é 3 84 80 85
. Mouth width. j : : , 87 71 80
Gill slit lengths: rst. ; d : 14 14 13
Bedi... : , : 19 16 16
thy’. : é : 12 13 10
. Distance between inner ends of gill slits:
TSEne. : : : 139 140 141
EA As : ; ‘ 88 86 94.
Ist dorsal fin: height i : : 31 19 31
base length . : . 50 52 45
and dorsal fin: height : ; : 28 28 26
base length . : : 43 51 4I
Interdorsal space : : , : oO O O
202 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Description
Disc about 1-1—-1°2 times as broad as long, its width 1-6—1°8 in total length;
sharp-pointed in front with anterior angle in front of spiracles 88°—93°; anterior
margins concave just behind tip of snout and again at level of spiracles, more
so in adults than in juveniles; outer and posterior angles broadly rounded.
Axis of greatest breadth 1-5-1°7 times as far from tip of snout as from posterior
edge of disc. ‘Tail with moderately wide lateral folds on posterior half; its
length from middle of vent to origin of first dorsal fin 1-2—1-3 in length from
middle of vent to tip of snout.
Spination Holotype Paratype Paratype
(424°5 mm) (501 mm)
Preorbital thorns. : ; : 7/8 2/1 4/4
Postorbital thorns : : ; 2/5 2/2 3/2
Supraspiracular thorns. : : 1/1 1/1 1/1
Interspiracular thorns . : ; 1/1 1/1 1/1
Median nuchal thorns . 5 : 1/2 1/1 2/3
Scapular thorns . : ; 4 o/o 3/3 2/2
A series of 20-32 thorns on mid-line of back and tail extending from about
nuchal region almost to first dorsal origin in juveniles, but only extending
three-quarters of tail length in adults. Median series flanked on each side on
tail (juveniles) and on back and tail (adults) by a row of 16—35/17—38 thorns.
Thorns along mid-dorsal region of back and tail becoming smaller and more
widely-spaced posteriorly, until in larger specimens, thorns indistinguishable
from spinules in region in front of first dorsal origin. Juveniles with spinules
over whole of disc and tail, no large thorns on rostral cartilage; adults with
spinules on interorbit and on tail, otherwise naked, except for 2 rostral thorns.
Ventral surface of disc and tail smooth.
Snout pointed and a little produced; its length in front of orbits 4:1-4-6
times as long as distance between orbits; its length in front of mouth 1-7-1-9
times as great as distance between nostrils. Distance between orbits 1-1—1-3 in
length of orbit. Rostral cartilage extending from cranium as hard bar with
rostral appendices fused to bar throughout their length; anterior rays of pectoral
fins falling short of rostral appendices.
Mouth slightly arched, more so in adults than in juveniles; nasal curtain
fringed; expanded posterior margin of nostril heavily fringed. Teeth arranged
in 37-41 rows in upper jaw, blunt and flat in females, sharp-pointed in adult
males. .
Anterior lobes of pelvics fin-like and continuously connected with posterior
lobes along outer margin of fin.
First and second dorsals more or less similar in size and shape; first dorsal
continuous with second.
Vertebral count: Holotype Paratype Paratype
(424°5 mm) (501 mm)
Vir : : : 3 : cae 29 30
Vprd : : : : ; 67 65 69
Va , : : : : 98 04 99
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 203
Colour
Upper surface of disc and tail uniformly dark grey, tail mottled with white
posteriorly. Ventral surface pale, posterior margins of pectorals and pelvics
dark grey. Ventral surface of tail uniformly grey, becoming mottled with white
posteriorly; region below dorsal fins white.
Raja confundens n.sp.
(PI rr Ay Be iics 17 A,/ 5, C)
? Raja barnardi: Krefit, 1968a: 61, pls IIIc, IV.
Types |
The holotype, a juvenile male (378 mm total length), trawled off Cape
Columbine in 620 metres, in the collection of the South African Museum
(SAM 24411). The paratype, a male (478 mm total length), taken east of
Cape Point in 660 metres, in the same collection (SAM 24479).
Material |
22 specimens of both sexes (363-677 mm total length) including the
holotype and paratype, trawled between Walvis Bay and east of Cape Point
in 350-660 metres. Only 2 specimens preserved in the collection of the South
African Museum (SAM 24480, PN 3), the others discarded at sea.
10 specimens trawled by R.V. Walther Herwig in 200-500 metres between
Hondeklip Bay and Cape Frio also examined. These specimens in the collec-
tion of the Institut fiir Seefischerei, Hamburg.
R. confundens closely resembles the common South African west coast
species R. leopardus, with which it is taken in trawls, but it may easily be
distinguished from this species by its heavier spination pattern, particularly on
the tail, and by its lower tooth count. The head in R. confundens is shorter and
broader than in R. leopardus (cf. tables 15 and 16). ‘These differences have been
plotted graphically, according to the method of Hubbs & Hubbs (1953) and
as there are no overlaps of standard deviations (except interorbit) the differences
are significant (fig. 16). Furthermore, although the precaudal vertebral count
is similar in the two species, there is a small difference in the range of trunk
vertebrae. The identity of R. confundens is confirmed by its clasper structure.
The species identified as R. barnard:t by Norman (1935) was distinguished
from R. leopardus on the basis of a lower tooth count (40-42 rows in the upper
jaw), which corresponds to that of R. confundens, and because of a single row
of thorns along the back and tail. Krefft (1968a) on re-examination of the
type of R. barnard: has shown that there are more than 50 rows of teeth in the
upper jaw, while scattered lateral thorns in the juvenile type suggest the forma-
tion of lateral rows in the adult. There is no significant difference in tooth count,
spination, vertebral count and proportional dimensions between R. barnardi
and R. leopardus, and it is therefore held that these two species are synonymous.
Krefft (1968a) has referred four specimens obtained in the tropical east
Atlantic by the Galathea and Atlantide expeditions to R. barnardi. These specimens
are smaller than the type of R. barnardi, and yet possess a heavier spination
204. ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
pattern and a lower tooth count. Examination of the proportional measurements
and vertebral counts, suggests that these specimens should rather be referred
to R. confundens.
The strongly re-curved thorns along the back and tail may cause R.
confundens to be identified with R. caudaspinosa, but it differs markedly from
this species in tail length and in tooth count.
TAS
| 5.0 cm |
2.5cm
4.0cr
Cc
Fic. 17. Raja confundens.
A: rostral bar and rostral appendices.
B: external view of right clasper from the dorsal side.
C: lateral view of right clasper, opened to show structural features of the glans.
ap—apopyle; cf—cleft; dd—dermal denticles; hp—hypopyle; rh—rhipidion; se—sentina;
sh—shield; sl—slit; sp—spike; st—sentinel.
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 205
TABLE 15. R. confundens. Measurements expressed as permillage of the total length.
Number of specimens in the range 20.
Character Type Paratype Range
Total length : : : F : T1000 I 000
Disc width : ; : : : 595 596 558-668
Disc length . : 2 487 459 442-529
Snout to greatest disc iclttae , g 320 280 280-340
Snout to middle of vent ‘ : 444. 441 444-521
Middle of vent to 1st dorsal see : 413 397 360-413
Snout length : : 3 : 124 107 IOI—124
Preoral length . . ‘ : 3 136 118 107-137
Prenasal length . ; : : : III 94 81-111
Eye: longitudinal diameter . ‘ : 37 37 36-47
Eye and spiracle : . . ; 50 51 46-60
Spiracle . : ‘ : : 25 20 20-28
Interorbital Genes . : : . 36 36 36-44
Initerspiracular distance : : : 61 63 57-74
Internasal distance. . : : 69 75 69-85
Mouth width . 3 : : ‘ 69 69 69-95
Gill slit lengths: st. : ; : 18 17 14-24
Ore hs ; : : 19 18 15-25
5th : : 14 10 10-15
Distance between inner ends as call slits:
FSEs|). < ; ; ; 148 154 148-170
5th: : : . 82 86 82-101
1st dorsal fin: height : : ‘ 29 23 24-44.
base length . ; : 60 75 44-61
and dorsal fin: height ‘ : ‘ 32 22 19-38
base length . : : 60 69 41-61
Interdorsal space : : ; } oO ) 0-12
Description
The figures in parentheses refer to the range of variation for 20 specimens,
not including the type and paratype.
Disc about 1-2—1°3 (1:2-1°3) times as broad as long, its width 1-5~-1-7
(1°5-1°8) in total length; obtuse in front, with anterior angle in front of
spiracles 100° (99°—120°); anterior margins weakly concave just behind tip of
snout; outer angles broadly rounded, posterior margins evenly convex. Axis
of greatest breadth 1-6—1-9 (1-4-1-°8) times as far from tip of snout as from
posterior edge of disc. Tail with lateral folds along posterior third; its length
from middle of vent to origin of first dorsal fin 1-1 (1:1-1-4) in length from
middle of vent to tip of snout.
Spination Holotype Paratype Range
Circumorbital thorns . ‘ : 6/6 6/6 5/6-10/10
Supraspiracular thorns. : : 1/1 1/1 1/1—1/2
Interspiracular thorns . : : 1/1 1/2 1/1-2/2
Median nuchal thorns . é : 4 5 2-9
Lateral nuchal thorns . : 5 2/1 4+1/3 1/2-5-+2/3+5
Scapular thorns . ; : 2/2 2/2 2/2-3/3
| A row of 18-21 (17-24) thorns along mid-line of back and tail, from about
| nuchal region or just posterior to nuchal region to origin of first dorsal. Mid-
dorsal thorns flanked on each side by a single row of larger, recurved thorns,
206 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
extending almost to first dorsal; smaller hooked spines situated laterally on
tail from about axils of pelvics to about half tail length; smaller flattened
asperities scattered laterally over tail. Stellate-based thorns on rostral cartilage
and along anterior margins of disc to outer angles. Some specimens with a
patch of spines on each posterior angle of disc. Ventral surface of disc and tail
smooth.
With increasing size, spination pattern becomes heavier and more complex,
so that 3 rows of thorns extend from nuchal region to origin of first dorsal and
a further row of semi-lateral thorns is developed on the tail, making 5 rows in
this region.
Snout rounded and not produced; its length in front of orbits 3-0-3-4
(2°5-3°3) times as long as distance between orbits; its length in front of mouth
1'6-1'g (1°4-2°0) times as great as distance between nostrils. Orbits 1-5-1°8
(1-1-2'0) times as long as spiracles; distance between orbits 1-0 (0°g-1°4) as
great as length of orbit. Rostral cartilage projecting from cranium as hard bar
with rostral appendices fused to bar throughout their length; tips of pectoral
rays falling short of rostral appendices.
Mouth slightly arched; nasal curtain fringed; expanded posterior margin
of nostril heavily fringed. ‘Teeth arranged in 44 rows in upper jaw (39-45),
broad and flat in females and juveniles, but sharp-pointed in mature males.
Anterior lobes of pelvics fin-like and continuously connected with posterior
lobes along outer margin of fin.
First and second dorsals confluent, sometimes with a small interdorsal
space; second dorsal about equal in size to first.
Vertebral count: Vtr 28-30; Vprd 55-63; V2 84-02.
Colour
Dorsal surface of disc and tail uniformly dark grey. Ventral surface with
irregular darker patches along posterior margins of pectorals and pelvics,
about vent and along tail.
Raja leopardus Von Bonde & Swart, 1923
(Pl. 12 A; Figs 18 A, B, C)
Raia leopardus Von Bonde & Swart, 1923: 7, pl. 20, fig. 2. Barnard, 1925: 74. Smith, 1961: 67,
7) tien 7a:
Raja leopardus: Norman, 1935: 44. Fowler, 1941: 390.
Raja barnardi Norman, 1935: 43, fig. 14; Fowler, 1941: 371.
Raia quadrimaculata (non Risso) Von Bonde & Swart, 1923: 5. Barnard, 1925: 70, pl. 4, fig. 5.
Raia lintea (non Fries) Barnard, 1925: 72.
Raia naevus (non Miller & Henle) Barnard, 1925: 72.
Types
The holotype of R. leopardus (247 mm total length), taken in 73 metres off
the coast of Natal, formerly in the collection of the Government Marine
Survey; now missing. 'T'wo juvenile specimens labelled ‘cotype’ in the collection
of the British Museum (Natural History).
}
;
%
5]
:
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 207
The holotype of R. barnardi, a juvenile male (375 mm total length),
trawled by the Discovery off the west coast of the Cape Peninsula (34°00’S,
17°58’E) in 173-210 metres, in the collection of the British Museum (Natural
History).
Material
70 specimens of both sexes (269-957 mm total length) trawled from WNW
Liideritzbucht to east of Cape Point in 300-660 metres. 26 specimens preserved
ae \
4:0 cm
2:0 cm
/ Fic. 18. Raja leopardus.
| A: rostral bar and rostral appendices.
B: external view of right clasper from the dorsal side.
C: lateral view of right clasper, opened to show structural features of the glans.
i ap—apopyle; cf—cleft; dd—dermal denticles; hp—hypopyle; rh—rhipidion; sh—shield;
f sl—slit; sp—spike; st—sentinel.
208 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
in the collection of the South African Museum (SAM 22478, 24341, 24421-2,
24453-5, 24475-7, 24481-4, 24486-92).
R. leopardus is the commonest skate taken by commercial trawlers on the
west coast of South Africa. It so closely resembles R. wallace: in external form,
that it is difficult to distinguish between the two on the basis of measurement
alone. However, there appears to be differences in the structure of the clasper
glans and in the precaudal vertebral count, but the two species may yet prove
to be synonymous.
R. leopardus has previously been confused with the North Atlantic species
R. naevus and R. lintea. Norman (1935) has pointed out the differences between
R. leopardus and R. naevus. R. leopardus may be distinguished from R. lintea by
having three rows of thorns along the mid-dorsal region of the back, in which
the thorns in the median row on the tail are the smallest. In R. lintea there is
always one row of spines along the back, while the median row on the tail
always has the largest thorns.
The species identified as R. barnardi by Norman (1935) was distinguished
from R. leopardus on the basis of a lower tooth count and the presence of a
single row of spines along the back and tail. Krefft (1968a) on re-examination
of the type of R. barnardi has found that there are more than 50 rows of teeth
in the upper jaw, while the presence of scattered lateral thorns on the tail of the
juvenile type suggests the formation of lateral rows in the adult. There is no
significant difference in tooth count, spination, vertebral count and proportional
dimensions between R. leopardus and R. barnardi, and it is therefore held that
the two species are synonymous.
It should be noted that the specimens identified as R. barnard: by Wallace
(1967) do not follow the type description for that species, and have been referred
to a new species R. wallacei.
Description
Disc about 1-1—1-3 times as broad as long, its width 1-5-1-7 in total length;
obtuse in front, with anterior angle in front of spiracles 100—110°; anterior
margins concave just behind tip of snout and again at level of spiracles, more
so in adult males than in females and juveniles; outer and posterior angles
broadly rounded. Axis of greatest breadth 1-4-1-9 times as far from tip of
snout as from posterior edge of disc. Tail with moderately wide lateral folds
on posterior third; its length from middle of vent to origin of first dorsal fin
I-I-1°5 in length from middle of vent to tip of snout.
Juvenile specimens with 4-5 thorns around inner margin of orbit; 0-1
thorn above spiracles; 1 pair small thorns between spiracles; 3-5 median
nuchal thorns; 1-2 scapular thorns. A row of 25-30 thorns along mid-line of
back and tail from nuchal region to origin of first dorsal fin. No interdorsal
thorns. Usually 3-6 small thorns situated semi-laterally on each side of tail at
about level of pelvics; remainder of tail with small fine spinules. Dorsal surface
with spines on tip of snout and anterior margins of disc to level of spiracles,
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 209
TABLE 16. R. leopardus. Measurements expressed as permillage of the total length.
Number of specimens 70.
Character Mean Range
Total length 3 : : , g ‘ I 000
Disc width j : : : : , 620 571-692
Disc length ‘ : ; : 510 481-543
Snout to greatest disc nade : : A 313 278-343
Snout to middle of vent : : : 4.90 435-553
Middle of vent to 1st dorsal oie ; F 374. 336-419
Snout length : ‘ : : , : 134 I1I—152
Preoral length . . h , : : 14! 122-169
Prenasal length . : : , ; : 115 94-139
Eye: longitudinal diameter . : : : 36 28-34.
Eye and spiracle : : ; ; : 50 46-56
Spiracle . ‘ : ‘ ‘ A 22 17-34
Interorbital Bi ence : : : : : 35 30-44.
Interspiracular distance : : : ; 60 48-69
Internasal distance . ; ; : 1 67 61-79
Mouth width. ‘ : 4 : ‘ 75 56-93
Gill slit lengths: rst. ‘ ; : : 14 11-24
sid ty : : : i 16 13-23
5th ‘ ‘ : ; II 7-21
Distance between inner ends of ell slits:
1 : : : : 147 135-176
Reh : : : ; 84 61-110
1st dorsal fin: height ; , : ‘ 29 21-44
base length . ; : : 54. 41-65
2nd dorsal fin: height : : : : 29 21-41
base length . , : ; 53 44-67
Interdorsal space ; : ; : : oO o-18
and wider spaced asperites over remainder of disc and pelvics. Ventral surface
with spines on tip of snout.
Older specimens with 5-13 thorns around inner margin of each orbit and
above spiracles; 1-2 pairs small inter-spiracular thorns; 4-9 median nuchal
thorns, usually with 1-2 lateral rows forming a triangular patch; 2-3 scapular
thorns. A median series of 19-29 widely-spaced thorns along the back and tail
to origin of first dorsal, becoming reduced in size posteriorly and flanked on
each side by 1 row thorns along back and 2-3 rows on tail; lateral and semi-
lateral rows of thorns not greatly enlarged. Dorsal surface of disc with spines
on snout, anterior margins of pectorals and sides of tail. Ventral surface with
spines on tip of snout and along anterior margins.
Snout slightly pointed but not produced; its length in front of orbits 2-8-4:4
times as long as distance between orbits; its length in front of mouth 1-5-2°3
times as great as distance between nostrils. Orbits 1-o—2-1 times as long as
spiracles; distance between orbits o-g-1-4 times as great as length of orbit.
Rostral cartilage projecting from cranium as hard bar with rostral appendices
fused to bar throughout their length; anterior rays of pectoral fins falling short
of rostral appendices.
Mouth slightly arched; nasal curtain fringed; expanded posterior margin
of nostril heavily fringed. Teeth arranged in 52—70 rows in upper jaw, with
large posterior cusp in males, but blunt and flat in juveniles and females.
210 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Anterior lobes of pelvics fin-like and continuously connected with posterior
lobes along outer margin of fin. First and second dorsals confluent, sometimes
with a small interdorsal space; second dorsal usually slightly smaller than first.
Vertebral count: Vtr 31-33; Vprd 55-58; V2 88-90.
Colour
Dorsal surface of disc uniformly brown to grey, sometimes with numerous
dark spots, especially in juveniles. Norman (1935) reports the presence of a
naevus-like ocellus at the base of each pectoral fin, particularly in adults. Ventral
surface uniformly pale or with irregularly arranged darker blotches and patches
on pectorals and pelvics.
Raja wallacei n.sp.
(Pl. 12 B; Figs 19 A, B)
Raja barnardi (non Norman) Wallace, 1967: 39, figs 20, 21.
T ype
The holotype of R. wallacei, an adult male (842 mm total length), trawled
at 34°10'S, 17°45’E in 292 metres, in the collection of the Oceanographic
Research Institute, Durban. The paratype, a female (489 mm total length)
ap
B
Fic. 19. Raja wallacei.
A: external view of right clasper from the dorsal side.
B: lateral view of right clasper, opened to show structural features of the clasper glans.
ap—apopyle; cf—cleft; dd—dermal denticles; hp—hypopyle; pt— promontory; rh—rhipidion;
se—sentina; sh—shield ; sl—slit; sp—spike; st—sentinel.
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 2i1
taken SE Durban Bluff also in the same collection.
Material
The holotype and paratype. Wallace (1967) has examined 20 specimens.
Wallace (1967) confused this species with R. barnardi, which was taken at
the same locality. Comparison of the types of R. wallace: with R. barnardi has
revealed that in R. wallace: the precaudal vertebral count is higher, the snout
shorter, the interorbital distance greater than in R. barnardi. It should be noted
R. barnardi is now held to be synonymous with R. leopardus.
R. wallace: closely resembles the common west coast skate R. leopardus, but
may be distinguished from it by its greater number of precaudal vertebrae.
Furthermore there are slight differences in the structure of the clasper glans.
So closely are these two species related, however, that on the basis of measure-
ment alone it is difficult to separate the one from the other. They may yet
prove to be synonymous. #. wallace: seems to be characterized by the presence
of dark blotches on the tip of each pelvic fin.
Although the holotype of R. wallacei was taken in Cape waters, the present
author has not recorded this species during the survey. ‘The species would seem
to occur along the whole of the coastal region from the Cape to north of the
Limpopo River mouth (Wallace, 1967).
TABLE 17. R. wallacei. Measurements expressed as permillage of the total length.
Character Type Paratype
(B 155) (B 126)
Total length f ; : : é . 1000 I 000
Disc width : : : : ; : 625 557
Disc length ; : : , : 4 494. 466
Snout to greatest disc width . : 4 : 289 286
Snout to middle of vent 3 : ; : 472 448
Middle of vent to 1st dorsal origin. 3 ‘ 400 413
Snout length : 3 : E ‘ 2 96 112
Preoral length . ; : é : , 102 124
Prenasal length . é : : : : 73 99
Eye: longitudinal diameter . ; : : 36 40
Eye and spiracle ; : 4 : 5 55 56
Spiracle . : : i : : 25 21
Interorbital distance . ‘ : : : 42 37
Interspiracular distance : : ; : 62 62
Internasal distance : : : . é 69 70
Mouth width . 2 : X k ‘ 82 76
Gill slit lengths: 1st. : , : ; 20 14
grad... , ? : : aD 17
5th : : i : 15 13
Distance between inner ends of gill slits:
WSt | : : ; : 158 142
Gila oe : : : : 88 86
ist dorsal fin: height : ; : ‘ oy) 29
base length . ‘ : : 53 61
and dorsal fin: height 4 : . ; 27 27
base length . : E é 51 57
Interdorsal space eae : : : 20 Q
Pag ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Description
Disc about 1-2—1°3 times as broad as long, its width 1-6—1-8 in total length;
obtuse in front with maximum angle in front of spiracles about 110°; anterior
margins concave just behind tip of snout and again at level of spiracles; outer
and posterior angles broadly rounded, posterior margins slightly convex. Axis
of greatest breadth 1-4-1-6 times as far from tip of snout as from posterior edge
of disc. ‘Tail with narrow lateral folds; its length from middle of vent to origin
of first dorsal fin 1-1-1-2 in length from middle of vent to tip of snout; its
length from middle of vent to tip of tail 1-1-1-3 times as long as distance from
middle of vent to tip of snout.
Spination Holotype Paratype
Circumorbital thorns . : 4 ; : 8/10 7/8
Supraspiracular thorns. ; : : 2/3 2/3
Interspiracular thorns . ; : : : o/o 1/1
Median nuchal thorns : : I 7
Lateral nuchal thorns . , : : 3 1/1 4/4
Scapular thorns . ; ; ; ; ; o/o 1/2
No median row of thorns in holotype, but paratype with 34 thorns along
mid-line of back and tail from about nuchal region to first dorsal origin; no
thorns in dorsal interspace. Median row (or mid-line) flanked on each side by
a single row of thorns from about nuchal region to axils of pelvics, increasing
to two rows on each side from axils to level of interdorsal space. Dorsal surface
with spines on tip of snout, along anterior margins of disc to outer angles, and
on tail. Ventral surface with spinules on tip of snout and anterior margins of
disc to level of mouth. Otherwise smooth.
Snout not produced, but with short terminal projection; its length in
front of orbits 2-3~-3-1 times as long as distance between orbits; its length in
front of mouth 1-5-1°8 times as great as distance between nostrils. Orbits 1-5—1-9
times as long as spiracles; distance between orbits 0-g—-1-2 times as great as
length of orbit.
Mouth slightly arched; nasal curtain fringed; expanded posterior margin
of nostril heavily fringed. Teeth arranged in 59-67 regular rows in upper jaw,
with round bases and sharp posterior cusp.
Anterior lobes of pelvics fin-like and continuously connected with posterior
lobes along outer margin of fin.
First dorsal larger than second and separated from it by a small but definite
space; interspace between dorsals about 39% as long as base of first dorsal.
Number of precaudal vertebrae (Vprd) 70.
Colour
Upper surface uniformly brown with scattered, irregular lighter spots.
Naevus-like ocellus at base of each pectoral. Lower surface pale, with a single,
dark blotch on tip of anterior lobe of pelvic fin.
EE
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 213
Bathyraja smithi (Miller & Henle, 1841)
(Pl. 13; Figs 20 A, B, C; 21 A, B)
Raja smithi Miiller & Henle, 1841: 150, pl. 49, fig. 1. Gray, 1851: 112. Bleeker, 1860: 58.
Dumeéril, 1865: 553. Giinther, 1870: 467. Gilchrist, 1902: 168. Thompson, 1914: 159.
Raja smithi: Norman, 1935: 41. Fowler, 1941: 364.
Raia smith: Garman, 1913: 366. Von Bonde & Swart, 1923: 5.
Raia smithi: Barnard, 1925: 66, pl. 4, fig. 4.
non Raia smithi: Smith, 1961: 66, non pl. 3, fig. 68 (= C. parcomaculata).
Raja eatonit Giinther, 1876: 390; 1879: 166.
Raja eatont Giinther, 1880: 15.
Raia eatoni: Garman, 1913: 365.
Types
The holotype of R. eatoni, a male (26-5 in. (673 mm) total length), from
Royal Sound, and holotype of R. smithi, a dried skin, from South Africa, in
the British Museum (Natural History). A mature male specimen, labelled type of
'R. smithiu, from the Bosphorus, in the Muséum National des Sciences Naturelles,
Paris, does not belong to this species and should be referred to R. clavata.
A
100 mm By :
Fic. 20. Bathyraja smithit.
A: rostral bar and rostral appendices.
B, C: dorsal view of immature males, showing variation in spination.
214. ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Material
10 specimens of both sexes (309-1 141 mm total length), trawled east of
Cape Point in 658-868 metres. 7 specimens preserved in the collection of the
South African Museum (SAM 24473, 15666).
Although previously included in the genus Raja, this species should now
be referred to the genus Bathyraja because of the nature of the rostral bar and
rostral appendices, the number of precaudal vertebrae, and the lack of a shield
in the clasper glans. Ishiyama & Hubbs (1968) also define the genus by the
presence of a pseudosiphon in the clasper glans, but this is present in species
of the radiata-group, and suggest that the genus Bathyraja is restricted to the
Pacific. However, Dr. G. Krefft (personal communication) suggests that
Bathyraja is a bipolar, antitropical genus.
B. smithii is most easily distinguished from all other known South African
species by its low tooth count (less than 30 rows in the upper jaw) and by the
lack of lateral rows of thorns on the tail. Adults resemble some specimens of
R. clavata in shape, but differ in tooth count and spination. It should be noted
5.0
cm
2.0cm |
Fic. 21. Bathyraja smithii.
_ A: external view of right clasper from the dorsal side.
B: lateral view of right clasper, opened to show structural features of the glans.
ap—apopyle; hp—hypopyle; kn—knife; pj—projection; rd—ridge; ‘ps’—‘pseudosiphon’;
sl—slit.
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 215
that Wallace (1967) gives a tooth count of 23-26 rows for R. clavata. This is
inconsistent with previous work and with the investigations of this paper.
The dorsal surface of the disc of B. smithii is devoid of large thorns, except
in juvenile specimens, which resemble R. spinacidermis. However, R. spinacidermis
has a higher tooth count. The smoky-black borders to the ventral margins of
the pectoral and pelvic fins may lead to confusion with R. alba, but this species
can easily be distinguished by its produced and pointed sriout.
Although Giinther (1879) and Garman (1913) consider R. eatonii to be
closely allied to B. smithii, and Barnard (1925) regards R. eatonii as a sub-species,
Norman (1935) holds the two to be distinct on the basis of differences in spina-
tion and because of a longer snout in R. eatoni. Preliminary external examina-
tion of the claspers of the type of R. eatoni, has led me to synonymise the two
species, until an examination of the clasper cartilages can be made.
TABLE 18. B. smithii. Measurements expressed as permillage of the total length.
Number of specimens 10.
Character Mean Range
Total length : : ¢ 4 : d I 000
Disc width ; : ‘ ‘ : : 708 680-745
Disc length ; : A : : : 529 513-544
Snout to greatest disc width . é : : 324 302-338
Snout to middle of vent : : : : 517 498-543
Middle of vent to 1st dorsal origin. : : 355 335-376
Snout length : : : : : . 121 97-134
Preoral length. : : : : : 115 105-131
Prenasal length . : 4 : : : 89 82-99
Eye: longitudinal diameter . A ’ : 33 29-47
Eye and spiracle : : : : : 49 40-57
Spiracle . : ‘ : 2 : ‘ 26 19-30
Interorbital distance . : : : : 56 49-61
Interspiracular distance ie) ees : F 79 75-84
Internasal distance , d : ‘ 3 QI 84-98
Mouth width . : 2 3 : , 86 78-93
Gill slit lengths: 1st. . : : < 14 12-18
ord}: ‘ ‘ ‘ : 16 13-17
5th.’ : : : 14 12-18
Distance between inner ends of gill slits:
TStas : : : : 180 17I—190
5th . ; , 5 bs 122 109-136
1st dorsal fin: height : : ‘ : QI 14-29
base length . : ; : 38 32-50
and dorsal fin: height : ; i : 20 17-28
base length . : ‘ : 36 28-44
Interdorsal space 5 ; : : : 14 7-22
Description
Disc about 1:3-1°4 times as broad as long, its width 1-3-1°5 in total
length; obtuse in front, with anterior angle in front of spiracles 90°—100°:
anterior margins weakly concave posterior to snout in juveniles, but more
sinuous in adults and particularly concave at level of spiracles in mature males;
posterior and outer angles broadly rounded. Axis of greatest breadth 1-2-1-7
times as far from tip of snout as from posterior edge of disc. ‘Tail with moderately
216
ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Location and collection numbers of South African rajid material.
TABLE 19.
Species Institution Type Coll. No.
C. parcomaculata . B.M.(N.H.) paratype 1935-7-14.1
R. albalinea. B.M.(N.H.) paratype 1935.7.14.4
R. spinacidermis . B.M.(N.H.) holotype 1935-7-19.7
R. ocellifera B.M.(N.H.) syntypes 1895.12.27.14
1905.6.8.14
R. rhizacanthus B.M.(N.H.) holotype 1905.6.8.13
R. leopardus . B.M.(N.H.) 2 ‘cotypes’ 1935-7-14.3
R. barnardi . B.M.(N.H.) holotype 1935.5.2.65
B. smithi B.M.(N.H.) holotype 1953.8.10.1
B. eatonu B.M.(N.H.) holotype 1876.3.23.21
R. pullopunctata . J.L.B.S. holotype —
paratype —
C. triangularis JcL.B,5. holotype —
paratype —
R. campbell. ORR holotype B 804
paratype B 859
R. wallace . OnE holotype B 155
paratype B 126
R. stenorynchus O.R.I. holotype B 186
R. springert . O.R.I. holotype B 909
paratype B 185
R. lanceorostrata . ORE holotype B 869
paratype B 868
R. doutret M.N.H.N. holotype 59, 41
R. capensis . M.N.H.N. paratype 1333
R. straeleni . I.R.S.N. holotype I.G. 16808; 99
20 paratypes I.G. 16808; 100-107
R. robertst LS-H. holotype 54/67
R. ravidula . I.S.H. holotype 50/67
2 paratypes 47a, b/67
R. dissimilis. iS. holotype 46a/67
2 paratypes 46b, c/67
R. confundens S.A.M. holotype 24411 ;
paratype 24479
B.M.(N.H.) — British Museum (Natural History), London.
J-L.B.S. — J.L.B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology, Grahamstown.
O.R.I. — Oceanographic Research Institute, Durban. :
M.N.H.N. — Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris. |
I.R.S.N. | — Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles, Brussels. a
1.S.H. — Institut flir Seefischerei, Hamburg.
S.A.M. — South African Museum, Cape Town.
wide lateral folds; its length from middle of vent to origin of first dorsal fin
1:3-1°6 in length from middle of vent to tip of snout. |
Juveniles with 1 thorn in front of orbit and 1-2 behind; 2 median nuchal
spines; 3—4 scapular thorns; a row of about 30 thorns along mid-line of back
and tail from nuchal region to first dorsal origin; 1 thorn in dorsal interspace.
Entire upper surface of disc and tail with widely-spaced spinules. Ventral
surface smooth.
Larger specimens with ocular, nuchal and scapular thorns absent; 14-19
large thorns along mid-line of tail from above vent to origin of first dorsal fin;
ee
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA |
o-1 thorns in dorsal interspace. Dorsal surface of disc and tail spinulose, but
no lateral rows of thorns on tail. Ventral surface smooth.
Snout obtuse; its length in front of orbits 2-0-2-6 times as long as distance
between orbits; its length in front of mouth 1-1—1-4 times as great as distance
between nostrils. Orbits 1-o-1-4 times as long as spiracles; distance between
orbits 1-5—1-9 times as great as length of orbit.
Rostral cartilage elongate with delicate, slender bar, extending to tip of
snout without a segment; rostral appendix attached to extremity of rostral bar
on each side, with distal part free from lateral sides of rostral cartilage; radial
cartilages of pectorals extending anteriorly almost to rostral appendices.
Mouth slightly arched; nasal curtain not fringed; expanded posterior
margin of nostril heavily fringed. Teeth with a single large cusp, arranged in
24-28 regular rows in upper jaw.
Anterior lobes of pelvics fin-like and continuously connected with posterior
lobes along outer margin of fin.
Dorsal fins similar in shape and about equal in size, with convex anterior
margins and broadly rounded.apices; interspace between dorsals 22-40% as
long as base of first dorsal.
Number of precaudal vertebrae (Vprd) 68—71.
| Colour
Dorsal surface more or less uniformly greyish or brownish in preserved
specimens, sometimes with small white spots. Ventral surface white, with black
blotches between gill slits and around vent; anterior margins of pectorals
narrowly and posterior margins of pectorals and pelvics broadly coloured
black; ventral surface of tail smoky- black.
SUMMARY
This paper consists of a systematic revision at the species level of the
Rajidae of the west and south coasts of southern Africa. Five new species are
described, three of which are known only from deep water, while two species
are recorded for the first time in the South Atlantic. Keys to the southern
African rajid fauna are given.
Natural relationships between the species are evident, suggesting a
regrouping of the Raja species at the generic or sub-generic level. The signifi-
cance of these relationships will be dealt with in a later paper.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am deeply indebted to Mr. S. X. Kannemeyer of the South African
Museum for his assistance during all phases of this work, and to Mr. P. Henry
of the Kaap-Kunene Group of Fisheries for the collection of many specimens.
I am extremely grateful to the late Prof. J. L. B. Smith and Mrs. M. M. Smith
of the J. L. B. Smith Institute for Ichthyology, Grahamstown, and to Dr. G.
Krefft of the Institut fiir Seefischerei, Hamburg, for access to their collections
and especially for their many valuable and inspiring comments. Also of the
\
218 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Institut fiir Seefischerei, I should like to express my special thanks to Dr. M.
Stehmann for his advice and recommendations, to Dr. F. Mombeck for the
collection of the Walther Herwig material, and to Miss Christa Liibben, not
only for the photographs of R. spinacidermis and R. straeleni, but also for her kind
help during my visit to Hamburg. I wish to acknowledge Dr. A. E. F. Heydorn
and Mr. J. Wallace of the Oceanographic Research Institute, Durban, for
the facilities offered to me during my stay, and Prof. R. Ishiyama of the Tokyo
University of Fisheries for much valuable advice.
My thanks are also due to: Dr. S. Springer of the United States National
Museum, for X-ray photographs of R. oregoni, R. mollis and R. garricki and Miss
P. Verity of the Nuffield Institute of Comparative Medicine for X-rays of
R. spinacidermis, Dr. W. ‘Templeman for X-rays of R. mollis, Drs H. Wormald
and R. Hindle of Durban, Dr. B. Hirschson of Cape Town and Mr. N. Peddie
of Kodak (South Africa) for assistance with X-rays; Drs P. H. Greenwood and
N. B. Marshall of the British Museum (Natural History), Dr. J. P. Gosse of
the Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Dr. M. Poll of the Musée
Royal d’Afrique Centrale, Tervuren, Dr. P. J. Castle, formerly of Rhodes
University, and Messrs M. J. Holden and C. N. Humphries of the Fisheries
Laboratory at Lowestoft, all for the loan of specimens.
The Trustees of the South African Museum thank the South African Coun-
cil for Scientific and Industrial Research for a grant in aid of publication.
REFERENCES
BARNARD, K. H. 1923. Diagnoses of new species of marine fishes from South African waters.
Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 13: 439-445.
BARNARD, K. H. 1925. A monograph of the marine fishes of South Africa. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 21:
1-418.
BARNARD, K. H. 1947. A pictorial guide to South African fishes. Cape Town: Maskew Miller.
BicELow, H. B. & ScHROEDER, W. C. 1948. New genera and species of batoid fishes. 7. mar. Res.
7? 543-566.
BicELow, H. B. & SCHROEDER, W. C. 1950. New and little known cartilaginous fishes from the
Atlantic. Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv. 103: 383-408.
BicELow, H. B. & ScHROEDER, W. C. 1953. Fishes of the western North Atlantic. Part 2.
Sawfishes, guitarfishes, skates and rays. Chimaeroids. Mem. Sears Fdn mar. Res. 1 (2):
i-—xv, 1-588.
BIGELow, H. B. & ScHROEDER, W. C. 1962. New and little known fishes from the western Atlantic.
Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv. 128: 159-244.
BLEEKER, P. 1860. Over eenige vischsoorten van de Kaap de Goede Hoop. Nat. Tijdschr. Ned.
Ind. 21: 49-80.
CADENAT, J. 1960. Notes d’ichthyologie ouest-africaine. XXVII. Raja doutrei, espéce nouvelle
des eaux profondes des cétes du Sénégal. Bull. Inst. fr. Afr. noire (A) 22: 294-312.
Ciark, R. S. 1926. Rays and skates, a revision of the European species. Scient. Invest. Fishery
Bd Scotl. 1926: 1-66.
DumiriL, A. 1865. Histoire naturelle des poissons ou ichthyologie générale. 1. Elasmobranches, plagio-
stomes et holocéphales ou chimeres. Paris.
Donovan, E. 1807. The natural history of British fishes. 5. London: Rivington.
EKMAN, S. 1953. <oogeography of the sea. London: Sidgwick & Jackson.
Forster, G. R. 1965. Raja richardsoni from the continental slope of south-west England. 7. mar.
biol. Ass. U.K. 45% 773-777-
Fow er, H. W. 1925. Fishes from Natal, Zululand and Portuguese East Africa. Proc. Acad. nat.
Sct. Philad. 77: 187-272.
RAJIDAE OF WEST AND SOUTH COASTS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA 219
Fow.er, H. W. 1936. Marine fishes of west Africa based on the collection of the American
Museum Congo Expedition 1909-15. Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 70% i-vii, 1-1493.
Fow.er, H. W. 1941. Contributions to the biology of the Philippine archipelago and adjacent
regions. ‘The fishes of the groups Elasmobranchii, Holocephali, Isopondyli, and Ostarophysi
obtained by the United States Bureau of Fisheries steamer ‘Albatross’ in 1907 to 1910,
chiefly in the Philippine Islands and adjacent seas. Bull. U.S. nain. Mus. 100 (13) : i-x, 1-879.
FRANCA, F.. DA. 1959. Subsidio para um catalogo dos nomes vernaculos dos peixes marinhos de
Angola. Notas mimeogr. Cent. Biol. pise. 5: 1-37.
_ Garman, S. 1899. Reports on an exploration off the west coasts of Mexico, Central America
and South America and off the Galapagos Islands, in charge of Alexander Agassiz, by the
U.S. Fisheries Commission steamer ‘Albatross’ during 1891, Lieut. Commander Z. L.
Tanner U.S.N. commanding. XXVI. The fishes. Mem. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv. 24: 1-431.
GarMAN, 8. 1913. The Plagiostomia (sharks, skates and rays). Mem. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv. 36:
i-xil, 1-528.
Garrick, J. A. F. 1961. Studies on New Zealand Elasmobranchii. Part XIII. A new species of
Raja from 1 300 fathoms. Trans. R. Soc. N.Z. 88: 743-748.
Gitcurist, J. D. F. 1902. Catalogue of fishes from South Africa. Mar. Invest. S. Afr. 1: 97-99.
GitcurisT, J. D. F. 1922. Report for the year 1921. Annexure A, Annexure B. Rep. Fish. mar.
biol. Surv. Un. S. Afr. 23 7-59.
GitcuRisT, J. D. F. & THompson, W. W. 1916. A catalogue of the sea fishes recorded as
Natal. Ann. Durban Mus. 1: 255-431.
Gray, J. E. 1851. List of the specimens of fish in the collection of the British Museum. Part 1. Chondro-
pterygii. London: Trustees of the British Museum.
GUNTHER, A. 1870. Catalogue of the fishes in the British Museum. 8. Catalogue of the Physostomi,
including the families Gymnotidae, Symbranchidae, Muraenidae, Pegasidae and of the
Lophobranchii, Plectognathi, Dipnoi, Ganoidei, Chondropterygii, Cyclostomata, Lepto-
cardii in the British Museum. London: Trustees of the British Museum.
- GUNTHER, A. 1876. Remarks on fishes, with descriptions of new species in the British Museum,
chiefly from southern seas. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (4) 172 389-402.
GunTuHeEr, A. 1879. An account of the petrological, botanical and zoological collections made
in Kerguelen’s Land and Rodriguez, during the transit of Venus Expeditions carried out
by order of Her Majesty’s Government in the years 1874-75. Fishes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc.
168: 166.
GUnTHER, A. 1880. Report on the shore fishes procured during the voyage of H.M.S. Challenger
in the years 1873-1876. Rep. Voy. ‘Challenger’ 1873-1876 (Zool.) 1 (6): 1-82.
Huess, C. L. & Huss, C. 1953. An improved graphical analysis and comparison of series of
samples. Syst. Zool. 2: 49-57.
Husss, C. L. & Isuryama, R. 1968. Methods for the taxonomic study and description of skates
(Rajidae). Copera 1968: 483-491.
Huttey, P. A. 1966. The validity of Raja rhizacanthus Regan and Raja pullopunctata Smith, based
on a study of the clasper. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 48: 497-514.
Huttey, P. A. 1969. The relationship between Raja miraletus Linnaeus and Raja ocellifera Regan
based on a study of the clasper. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 52: 137-147.
Isntyama, R. 1952. Studies on the rays and skates belonging to the family Rajidae, found in
Japan and adjacent regions. 4. A revision of three genera of Japanese rajids, with descrip-
tions of one new genus and four new species mostly occurred in northern Japan. 7. Shimonoseki
Coll. Fish. 2: 1-34.
IsHtyamMa, R. 1958. Studies on the rajid fishes (Rajidae) found in the waters around Japan.
J. Shimonoseki Coll. Fish. 72 193-394.
Isuiyama, R. 1967. Fauna Japonica. Rajidae (Pisces). Tokyo: Biogeographical Society of Japan.
IsHryama, R. & Husss, C. L. 1968. Bathyraja, a new genus of Pacific skates (Rajidae) regarded
as phyletically distinct from the Atlantic genus Breviraja. Copeia 1968: 407-410.
Kner, P. 1865-1867. Reise der dsterreichischen Fregatte Novara um die Erde. Fische. Zoologischer
Theil. x (5): 1-433. Wien: K.-K. Hof- und Staatsdruckerei.
Krerrtr, G. 1968a. Knorpelfische (Chondrichthyes) aus dem tropischen Ostatlantik. A tlantide
Rep. 10: 33—76.
Krerrt, G. 19685. Neue und erstmalig nachgewiesene Knorpelfische aus dem Archibenthal des
Siidwestatlantiks, einschliesslich einer Diskussion einiger Etmopterus-Arten stidlicher Meere.
Arch. Fischereiwiss. 19 (1): 1-42.
220 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
KrerrT, G. & LUspsen, C. 1966. Raja mollis Bigelow & Schroeder, 1950 (Batoidea, Elasmobranchii
Chondrichthyes), ein Erstfund im Nordost-Atlantik. Zool. Anz. 176: 385-395.
LackPEDE, B. G. E. 1803. Histoire naturelle des poissons. 5. Paris: Plassan.
LeIGH-SHARPE, W. H. 1920. The comparative morphology of the secondary sexual characters
of elasmobranch fishes. Memoir I. The claspers, clasper siphons and clasper glands.
F. Morph. 34: 254-265.
LEIGH-SHARPE, W. H. 1921. The comparative morphology of the secondary sexual characters
of elasmobranch fishes. Memoir II. 7. Morph. 35: 263-358.
LeIGH-SHARPE, W. H. 1922. The comparative morphology of the secondary sexual characters
of elasmobranch fishes. Memoirs III, IV, V. 7. Morph. 36: 191-244.
LEIGH-SHARPE, W. H. 1924. The comparative morphology of the secondary sexual characters
of elasmobranch fishes. Memoirs VI, VII. 7. Morph. 39: 553-577.
LEIGH-SHARPE, W. H. 1926. The comparative morphology of the secondary sexual characters
of elasmobranch fishes. Memoirs VIII, IX, X, XI. 7. Morph. 42: 307-368.
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae. 10th ed. Holmiae: Laurentii Salvii.
Mutter, J. & HENLE, F. G. J. 1841. Systematische Beschreibung der Plagiostomen. Berlin: Veit.
Norman, J. R. 1935. Coast fishes. Part I. The south Atlantic. ‘Discovery’ Rep. 12: 1-58.
Norman, J. R. 1937. Coast fishes. Part II. The Patagonian region. ‘Discovery’ Rep. 16: 1-150.
PIETSCHMANN, V. 1906. Ichthyologische Ergebnisse einer Reise nach Island. Annin naturh. Mus.
Wien 21: 72-148.
Pott, M. 1949. Résultats scientifiques des croisiéres. du navire-école belge ‘Mercator’. IV.
Poissons. Mém. Inst. r. Sci. nat. Belg. (2) 33: 173-269.
Poti, M. 1951. Poissons. II. Sélachiens et chiméres. Résult. scient. Exped. océanogr. belge Atlant.
sud 4 (1): 12-154.
Pozzi, A. J. 1935. Comunicacion preliminar sobre una nueva especie de ‘raya’ de la costa atlan-
tico Argentina Raia doello-juradoi n. sp. Physis 11: 419-492.
Pozzi, A. J. 1936. Descripcién de la nueva especie de ‘Raya’ Raja doello-juradoi Pozzi. An. Mus.
argent. Cienc. nat. 38: 418-422.
Recan, C. T. 1906. Descriptions of new or little known fishes from the coast of Natal. Ann.
Natal Mus. 1: 1-6.
Recan, C. T. 1908. A collection of fishes from the coasts of Natal, Zululand and Cape Colony.
Ann. Natal Mus. 1: 241-255.
SAMUEL, C. T. 1963. Bottom fishes collected by R.V. Conch off the Kerala coast. Bull. Dep. mar.
Biol. Oceanogr. Unw. Kerala 1: 97-121.
SauvaGE, M. H. 1891. Histoire naturelle des poissons. Jn GRANDIDIER, A., ed. Histoire physique,
naturelle et politique de Madagascar. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.
Situ, J. L. B. 1961. The sea fishes of southern Africa. 4th ed. Cape Town: C.N.A.
SmitH, J. L. B. 1964. Fishes collected by Dr. Th. Mortensen off the coast of South Africa in
1929, with an account of the genus Cruriraja Bigelow & Schroeder, 1954 in South Africa.
Vidensk. Meddr dansk naturh. Foren. 126: 283-300.
SMITH, J. L. B. & Smiru, M. M. 1966. Fishes of the Tsitsikama Coastal National Park. Johannesburg:
National Parks Board of Trustees.
STEHMANN, M. 1969. Vergleichend morphologische und anatomische Untersuchungen zur
Systematik der nordeuropaischen Rochen der Familie Rajidae. Ph. D. Thesis: University
of Kiel (unpublished).
TEMPLEMAN, W. 1965. Rare skates of the Newfoundland and neighbouring areas. 7. Fish. Res.
Bd Canada 22: 259-279.
TuHompson, W. W. 1914. Catalogue of fishes of the Cape Province. Mar. biol. Rep. Un. S. Afr.
2: 132-167.
TuHorPE, T. 1964. Record rays. Fld Tide 6 (3): 27.
VAN BruGcEN, A. C. 1965. Records and observations in the Port Elizabeth oceanarium in 1960.
Kool. Gart. Lpz. 34% 190-191.
Von Bonpbg, C. 1933. Report No. 10 for the year ending December, 1932. Annexure A.
Annexure B. Rep. Fish. mar. biol. Surv. Un. S. Afr. 10: 32-103.
Von Bonbe, C. & Swart, N. B. 1923. The Platosomia (skates and rays) collected by the S.S.
‘Pickle’. Rep. Fish. mar. biol. Surv. Un. S. Afr. 3 (Spec. Rep. 5): 1-22.
WALLACE, J. H. 1967. The batoid fishes of the east coast of southern Africa. Part III. Skates and
electric rays. Investl Rep. oceanogr. Res. Inst. 17: 1-62.
‘UI PUL WD UI 9[VIG “MoIA [esIOc[ ‘(paaouror
suy o1Aqod jo dy pure sszodsejo fapeur) sayjnop ‘y ‘g ‘ut pue wo UI B[BIG *MOIA [eso ‘(a]TeuIsy) vyvjnovU0IIDd “1 “VW
A
Plate 1
ea]
V
‘UI PUB UID Ul 9[eIg “MITA [eso] *(paAourer Jodseyo
pue uy o1ajod yy 8t1 fayeur) vynjsundoyng ‘y"q “Ul puv WD UT 9[BIG “MOTA [esIOd ‘(gyeur atuaanl) nynjoundoynd ‘YW
V
Plate 2
fea]
Ann. S. Afr. Mus., Vol. 55
Plate 3
Ann. S. Afr. Mus., Vol. 55
UID UT BTVOG *MOTA [esIO]
(
aTBWdy
)
psourdsppnvo
a
a
‘ul pur
‘UT PUY WD UT 9[BOG ‘MoTA |esIOC
.
(oyeun
V
)
psourdsppnva
ad
V
Ann. S. Afr. Mus., Vol. 55 Plate 4
1ew.
(adolescent). Dorsal v
dermis
mact
Wy
Aaa
B. R. sp
In.
d
in cm an
Scale
1ew.
.
le). Dorsal v
juveni
A.? R. spinacidermis (
Plate 5
Ann. S. Afr. Mus., Vol. 55
‘Ul pUv WO UT OTVOG *“MoIA [es
10d
‘(ajeun) vgyy ‘yg
"Ul pUL WO UT 9IPIG ‘MTA [es1og] *(ayeur aprusAnf
)
Dq]D
ai
\
r
Ann. S. Afr. Mus., Vol. 55 Plate 6
B. R. straeleni (male). Dorsal view.
A. R. clavata (female). Dorsal view. Scale in cm and in.
‘ul pue
WI UT 9[VOG “MIIA [esto *(ayeutoy) snyaypurw say ‘@ = “UL pue wo ur a[eog ‘Mata [essoq ‘(ayeur a[tusAnl) vypipvs say vy
Plate 7
Ann. S. Afr. Mus., Vol. 55
Plate 8
Ann. S. Afr. Mus., Vol. 55
WO UT Beg “MATA [eIUDA “FGA L ‘ds ‘u “spuagos *y *g
q
‘ul pue
‘UI PUL WO Ul 9feoG “MTA [esIOd "|qA L ‘ds ‘u “wspiagou yy “WV
Plate 9
Ann. S. Afr. Mus., Vol. 55
UT OTIS *MOTA [e.I}UD A °
ddAL
.
ds
U
“‘pynpian.s
d a
‘Ul pue Wd
“UT PUL UD UT 9[VIG “MaTA [es1Oq “AAT,
V
.
ds
u
¢
DINpIADA
ad
V
Plate 10
Ann. S. Afr. Mus., Vol. 55
2[VIG “MOTA [VIIUIA “AGA, ‘ds ‘u
‘symussip “Yq
‘UI pue WO UT
“UL PUL UID UT I[VIG “MIIA [esIOT "YALL ‘ds ‘u ‘synwassp -y vw
Plate 11
Ann. S. Afr. Mus., Vol. 55
Q[VIG *MOTA [VIIA
dd AL
ds
U
‘suapunfuoa
ad
a
Ul pue WO UT
‘UI pUv WD UI B[vVOG “MoTIA [eSIOC] “AqAL,
‘ds
V
Uu
¢
suapunfuoa
ad
V
Plate 12
Ann. S. Afr. Mus., Vol. 55
‘MIA TeSIO(, “Ad AL ‘ds ‘u “vasvyjom “yg
‘UT PUB WD UI aeog “MOTA TesIOd *(I]eUIaF) supundoa) “y-W
Ann. S. Afr. Mus., Vol. 55 Plate 13
B. smithit (female). Dorsal view. Scale in cm and in.
awake
INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS
Based on
CONFERENCE OF BIOLOGICAL EDITORS, COMMITTEE ON FORM AND STYLE. 1960.
Style manual for biological journals. Washington: American Institute of Biological Sciences.
MANUSCRIPT
To be typewritten, double spaced, with good margins, arranged in the following order:
(1) Heading, consisting of informative but brief title, name(s) of author(s), address(es) of
author(s), number of illustrations (plates, figures, enumerated maps and tables) in the article.
(2) Contents. (3) The main text, divided into principal divisions with major headings; sub-
headings to be used sparingly and enumeration of headings to be avoided. (4) Summary.
(5) Acknowledgements. (6) References, as below. (7) Key to lettering of figure. (8) Explana-
tion to plates.
ILLUSTRATIONS
To be reducible to 12cm x 18cm (19cm including caption). A metric scale to appear with
all photographs.
REFERENCES
Harvard system (name and year) to be used: author’s name and year of publication given
in text; full references at the end of the article, arranged alphabetically by names, chronologi-
cally within each name, with suffixes a, b, etc. to the year for more than one paper by the same
author in that year.
For books give title in italics, edition, volume number, place of publication, publisher.
For journal articles give title of article, title of journal in italics (abbreviated according to the
World list of scientific periodicals. 4th ed. London: Butterworths, 1963), series in parentheses,
volume number, part number (only if independently paged) in parentheses, pagination.
Examples (note capitalization and punctuation)
BULLOUGH, W. S. 1960. Practical invertebrate anatomy. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.
FiscHER, P.-H. 1948. Données sur la résistance et de le vitalité des mollusques. 7. Conch., Paris
88: 100-140.
FiscHER, P.-H., Duvat, M. & Rarry, A. 1933. Etudes sur les échanges respiratoires des littorines.
Archs Zool. exp. gén. 74: 627-634.
Konn, A. J. 19602. Ecological notes on Conus (Mollusca: Gastropoda) in the Trincomalee region
of Ceylon. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (13) 2: 309-320.
Konn, A. J. 19600. Spawning behaviour, egg masses and larval development in Conus from the
Indian Ocean. Bull. Bingham oceanogr. Coll. 17 (4): 1-51.
THIELE, J. 1910. Mollusca: B. Polyplacophora, Gastropoda marina, Bivalvia. Jn scHULTZE. L,
Koologische und anthropologische Ergebnisse einer Forschungsreise 1m westlichen und zentralen Siid-
Afrika. 4: 269-270. Jena: Fischer. Denkschr. med.-naturw. Ges. Jena 16: 269-270.
ZOOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE
To be governed by the rulings of the latest International code of zoological nomenclature issued
by the International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature (particularly articles 22 and 51).
The Harvard system of reference to be used in the synonymy lists, with the full references
incorporated in the list at the end of the article, and not given in contracted form in the synonymy
list.
Example
Scalaria coronata Lamarck, 1816: pl. 451, figs 5 a, b; Liste: 11. Turton, 1932: 80.
POEM Oy Muti’ vile Rab P fae f
By Ly ¢ /. | =u
j d
4
iW . ia i pty
baie OAS FSS te thefnie WY 7
os
i
|
|
nal =
riImirints : va NATTA Sfeles 28 88) oe BIR AI oe ee ee ee e-em ee —e — - IT ROC OAILRA AL IAIQ Te Tipriojal AiO tk OL LA. ALLO RIWIAIQCLE ET LiALC a
a @ — oo om w ‘Ee w one Lee]
il om > DW = > Ee: > be >
ae Fe a N = % = —_ = e =
mm LDS = ™m z py m On 0c = ; m = m
w = rp) eee ” — wn = . nw
IWS Sa iyvusg rou B RAR ] BS MITHSONIAN INSTITUTION | NOILNLIZSNI NVINOSHIINS = S3 iyvua ru! B RAR ! ESE
4 = 2 ‘y eae S — MQ ~. paar =< =|
Te? 4a NE a \SEE : & o 5
5 ty 4 RV y = oO
ye Gy - = = S = 2 : 2
Y = *¢ = > = = > >
= 5 . 2 z z i 2 =
AN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3INVYSIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILALILSNI
BRARIES
»S
NOILNLILSNI
LIBRARIES
LIBRARIES
NOILNLILSNI
IWS S3IYvyusi NVINOSHLINS S3tYVvVugil LIBRARIES
INSTITU"
SONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNILILSNI SMITHSONIAN
INSTITUTION NOILOLILSNI
SAtYVYdIT LIBRARIES
INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI
INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI
z c z - =
Oo reed [@) eae APR
— wo a & ee] tf 00]
= y, 2 = We 20 Ey, =
., = [| = SASS = AW 1,° 73
2 _ - KGS ~ ¥ ~
\ S SS
n n .
m AN m m
= eh Zz Ss m rm
AN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3I1NVYSIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS S31YY
NVINOSHLINS S31YVYdiIT LI
” z w = oD)
= = &: = @,: : : : :
eS = Oi m= = pe = i
Js Mai Ye: iO SS gs NNE 72: :
BX SEND a od Paes Mh hy Sai S Ss
y = SX SS = LM ee = rao ai = = ENS = = = =.
zs 5 : - se : 3 :
IWS S3 lYVYdiIT LIBRARI ES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION te LSM NINOSHLINS _LIBRARI ES SMITHSONIAN _INSTITUT
> > 2 z wp 2
ff) z 507 us = us ” us 7 lu Wn OD
= 4 = 4 = = re 2 = Uy ®
N = = = Bee =f = aet ~j < i fo 7 A
S < “oe < e Pe: Ee = “fle
Wr 3 oi = me = =! fre a
Yom = om. = aa re) \ = o = re)
NAN INSTITUTION NOILOLILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3Ily¥vug sis ee ee nck ee 1yVvYg
“ 5 - «. §& = S .: = a
, «0 — o XN = = On ed bE WY, —
= NYG = Pe) eee x Es) y S SAM
py 2 = 2 WAR 5 ~ 5 YY ® 5 2 NAR 5 fs
ee Se eee Oe ee =
4 z | “” i 7) a
JES. SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILALILSNI_NVINOSHLIWS S31YvYal1_LIBRARIE
- 3S z SX 2
. a7.) a3 Ws = “
we . y fi, pace o af Xs o =-
efUf 2 < 2WK = 2
“iy i o0 a NS m =.
_ “i Oo — e) ~ Oo
z —! = ta aol =
| I NVINOSHLIWS $3 IYVEGIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION _ NOILNLILS!
;
EEX Oo a Oo ee O
ae x = od = Giy, > =
Ss = au = Ait =
> SANG E > = sp =
= XA E = , = oe
oe 2 m Q° ; g
Pi ow honk — a) = wn =
FES (SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI_ NVINOSHLIWS | eee hs
= = = | < ; = > sr
4 > ar jar z
= 5 : : 3 = 5 ‘NY
a 7 n CW a a:
9 a3 . oO as ) i Ars
= & =e = =. =
a ine a 2 ee
NI_NVIN SAIMVNGIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILS!
Z oo Z 7 z uw
2) ex ” a w ae
i _< a < oe | <
y t = A = :
Fl Oo sis ro) a o =
= J = — z= 4
1Es INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI NVINOSHLINS S3iuvudi 7 LIBRARIE
| = RG 2 & | = fi
a i oe te a
3 4 3 a 4 > ea
= ¥ = = = = =
- NS = = E =
ie. m Nonny 2 1 2 m
a w = wn —— w
LSNI_NVINOSHLINS S3IYVYEIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION | NOILNLILS
ae: = Re a a et) gee =
xs : SQL Z :
C4 ‘ : S ~ :
ro an = O = O ?
oe = = = = =
| 2 a Te a BP ee:
HES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILMIILSNI_NVINOSHIINS S31UVYSIT_LIBRARIE
= = rae mm
; uJ uJ * uu
2. oe fo = = 2 NS 5 =
oGwZy c : ZR = =
ys/ = Zz = = Ae ag aN = =
eee ae Se:
pt is ad
LSNI— ‘SAlYVYGIT LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN_INSTITUTION NOILNLILS
ee = a S | a =
YON = = Z —
) 23 5 ay & Yip a :
4 ~— vu? is 17) =
TES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOILNLILSNI_NVINOSHLINS, S31YVus!T
| s a 7" Sa = gh, =
— F2 4 = 4 z
A as f,
ws a 3 AD os D
SS me = 3 sae re - :
Se = é : Boies
LSNI_NVINOSHLINS LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN _INSTITUTION none a
= =
w u; ut a: uJ Yr J
ce rw Ws. < if sh {E 4S) < iy OR <
‘wii
a ae oe ea