ANNALS
OF THE SOUTH AFRIC
MUs
CAPE TOWN
AN
KUM
INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS
1. MATERIAL should be original and not published elsewhere, in whole or in part. When
accepted, copyright becomes the property of the Trustees of the South African Museum.
2. LAYOUT should be as follows:
(a) Centred masthead to consist of ;
Title: informative but concise, without abbreviations and not including the names of new genera or species
Author’s(s’) name(s) ;
Address(es) of author(s) (institution where work was carried out)
Number of illustrations (figures, enumerated maps and tables, in this order)
(b) Abstract of not more than 200 words, intelligible to the reader without reference to the text
(c) Table of contents giving hierarchy of headings and subheadings
(d) Introduction ;
(e) Subject-matter of the paper, divided into sections to correspond with those given in table of contents
(f) Summary, if paper is lengthy
(g) Acknowledgements
(h) References
(i) Abbreviations, where these are numerous
3. MANUSCRIPT, to be submitted in triplicate, should be typewritten and neat, double spaced
with 2,5 cm margins all round. First lines of paragraphs should be indented. Tables and a list of
legends for illustrations should be typed separately, their positions indicated in the text. All
pages should be numbered consecutively.
Major headings of the paper are centred capitals; first subheadings are shouldered small
capitals; second subheadings are shouldered italics; third subheadings are indented, shouldered
italics. Further subdivisions should be avoided, as also enumeration (never roman numerals)
of headings and abbreviations.
Footnotes should be avoided unless they are short and essential.
Only generic and specific names should be underlined to indicate italics; all other marking
up should be left to editor and publisher.
4. ILLUSTRATIONS should be reducible to a size not exceeding 12 x 18 cm (19 cm including
legend); the reduction or enlargment required should be indicated; originals larger than
35x 47 cm should not be submitted; photographs should be rectangular in shape and final
size. A metric scale should appear with all illustrations, otherwise magnification or reduction
should be given in the legend; if the latter, then the final reduction or enlargement should be
taken into consideration.
All illustrations, whether line drawings or photographs, should be termed figures (plates
are not printed; half-tones will appear in their proper place in the text) and numbered in a
single series. Items of composite figures should be designated by capital letters; lettering of
figures is not set in type and should be in lower-case letters.
The number of the figure should be lightly marked in pencil on the back of each illustration.
5. REFERENCES cited in text and synonymies should all be included in the list at the end of
the paper, using the Harvard System (ibid., idem, loc. cit., op. cit. are not acceptable):
(a) Author’s name and year of publication given in text, e.g.:
‘Smith (1969) describes...’
‘Smith (1969: 36, fig. 16) describes...’
‘As described (Smith 1969a, 1969b; Jones 1971)
‘As described (Haughton & Broom 1927)...’
‘As described (Haughton et al. 1927)...’
Note: no comma separating name and year
pagination indicated by colon, not p.
names of joint authors connected by ampersand
et al. in text for more than two joint authors, but names of all authors given in list of references.
(b) Full references at the end of the paper, arranged alphabetically by names, chronologically
within each name, with suffixes a, b, etc. to the year for more than one paper by the same
author in that year, e.g. Smith (1969a, 19695) and not Smith (1969 1969q).
For books give title in italics, edition, volume number, place of publication, publisher.
For journal article give title of article, title of journal in italics (abbreviated according to the World list of
Scientific periodicals. 4th ed. London: Butterworths, 1963), series in parentheses, volume number, part
number (only if independently paged) in parentheses, pagination (first and last pages of article).
Examples (note capitalization and punctuation)
BULLOUGH, W. S. 1960. Practical invertebrate anatomy. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.
FISCHER, P.-H. 1948. Données sur la résistance et de le vitalité des mollusques. —J. Conch., Paris 88: 100-140.
FISCHER, P.-H., DuvAL, M. & Rarry, A. 1933. Etudes sur les échanges respiratoires des littorines.— Archs
Zool. exp. gén. 74: 627-634.
Konn, A. J. 1960a. Ecological notes on Conus (Mollusca: Gastropoda) in the Trincomalee region of Ceylon. —
Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (13) 2: 309-320.
Koun, A. J. 19605. Spawning behaviour, egg masses and larval development in Conus from the Indian Ocean. —
Bull. Bingham oceanogr. Coll. 17 (4): 1-51.
THIELE, J. 1910. Mollusca: B. Polyplacophora, Gastropoda marina, Bivalvia. In: SCHULTZE, L. Zoologische
und anthropologische Ergebnisse einer Forschungsreise im westlichen und zentralen Siid-Afrika 4: 269-270.
Jena: Fischer. — Denkschr. med.-naturw. Ges. Jena 16: 269-270.
(continued inside back cover)
ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM
Volume 72 ~ +#Band
December 1976 December
Part 1 Deel
aN
RUSS
1S B:B.B:9.0)
SSS
‘<> >
YS
cS
27 S
S“ourg now WSs
A NEW SPECIES OF BRADYIDIUS (COPEPODA,
CALANOIDA) FROM THE MGAZANA ESTUARY,
PONDOLAND, SOUTH AFRICA, AND A REVIEW OF
THE CLOSELY RELATED GENUS PSEUDOTHARYBIS
By
JANET M. BRADFORD
Cape Town Kaapstad
The ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
are issued in parts at irregular intervals as material
becomes available
Obtainable from the South African Museum, P.O. Box 61, Cape Town
Die ANNALE VAN DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE MUSEUM
word uitgegee in dele op ongereelde tye na beskikbaarheid
van stof
Verkrygbaar van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum, Posbus 61, Kaapstad
OUT OF PRINT/UIT DRUK
1, 2(1, 3, 528), 322,425, tpi), 5-3) 507-9):
6(1, t.-p.i.), 71-4), 8, 9(1-2), 10(1),
1122465: 7, tpi); 1565) 240), 27, 31123). 33
Price of this part/Prys van hierdie deel
R1,70
Trustees of the South African Museum © Trustees van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum
1976
ISBN 0 949940 98 4
Printed in South Africa by In Suid-Afrika gedruk deur
The Rustica Press, Pty., Ltd., Die Rustica-pers, Edms., Bpk.,
Court Road, Wynberg, Cape Courtweg, Wynberg, Kaap
A NEW SPECIES OF BRADYIDIUS (COPEPODA, CALANOIDA)
FROM THE MGAZANA ESTUARY, PONDOLAND, SOUTH AFRICA,
AND A REVIEW OF THE CLOSELY RELATED GENUS
PSEUDOTHARYBIS
By
JANET M. BRADFORD
New Zealand Oceanographic Institute, Department of Scientific
and Industrial Research, Wellington
(With 5 figures and | table)
LMS. accepted 28 April 1976]
ABSTRACT
A new species, Bradyidius hirsutus, is described. Four species previously attributed to
Bradyidius are transferred to Pseudotharybis which is placed in the Aetideidae.
CONTENTS
Introduction ;
Description of material 2,
Review of Pseudotharybis . 9
Acknowledgements. ‘ ; 9
References : 9
INTRODUCTION
The nine previously known species of the aetideid genus Bradyidius are
B. angustus (Tanaka, 1957), B. arnoldi Fleminger, 1957, B. bradyi (Sars, 1902) (see
Matthews (1964) for discussion of priority of specific name bradyi over armatus),
B. luluae Grice, 1972, B. pacificus (Brodsky, 1950), B. saanichi Park, 1960, B.
similis (Sars, 1902), B. spinifer Bradford, 1969a, and B. tropicus Wolfenden, 1905.
Both sexes are known except for B. angustus described only from the male, and
B. tropicus described only from the female and which has not been ,morpho-
logically distinguished from B. bradyi except that it is smaller and has fewer,
coarser teeth on the terminal exopod spine of legs 2-4 (Wolfenden 1905: 1006).
At the end of this paper four species, previously attributed to Bradyidius, are
removed to another genus.
The new species of Bradyidius described below was found in plankton
samples from the Mgazana Estuary, Pondoland, South Africa (31° 50’ S).
Although Bradyidius is known to be a benthic genus these particular specimens
were taken by T. Wooldridge on 1 September 1972 at night just below the
surface on an incoming tide at the mouth of the Mgazana Estuary. The depth
at this locality is about 3 metres at low tide, salinity 35,0%, (measured by hydro-
meter) and temperature 17,8°C.
1
Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 72(1), 1976: 1-10, 5 figs, 1 table.
2 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Dissected specimens of the presently described new species of Bradyidius
were mounted unstained in Euparal and observed using phase contrast. Descrip-
tions have been made from paratype material.
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
Bradyidius hirsutus sp. nov.
(Figs 1-5)
Holotype
SAM-A13661 in the South African Museum, Cape Town. Adult female in
plankton sample from mouth of Mgazana Lagoon, collected by T. Wooldridge,
1 September 1972.
Paratypes
SAM-A13662 in the South African Museum, Cape Town; | male whole,
2 males and 2 females dissected, collection data as above.
BM(NH)1975.1124 (1 female), BM(NH)1975.1125 (1 male) in the British
Museum (Natural History), London; collection data as above.
P295 in the New Zealand Oceanographic Institute, Wellington, collection;
1 female and | male, collection data as above.
Description
Female: Holotype 1,61 mm, paratype specimens 1,59-1,68 mm.
Head and pedigerous segment | separate, pedigerous segments 4 and 5
fused. Rostrum bifurcate with slightly divergent points. Posterior metasomal
points extend not quite to posterior border of genital segment.
Antenna | does not extend quite to posterior metasomal points, of 24 joints,
each with annulate setae, joints 8 and 9 fused, joints 18-25 bear very long
annulate setae as typical for the genus.
Antenna 2. Endopod joint | with 1 seta, joint 2 with 7 outer setae, 7 inner
setae (1 small); exopod joint | with | small seta and joint 2 with 3 setae.
Mandible. Basipod 2 with | seta; endopod joint 1 with 1 large and 2 small
setae, joint 2 with 10 setae, 1 of them small.
Maxilla 1. Inner lobe 1 with 14 spines and setae, inner lobe 2 with 5 setae,
inner lobe 3 and 4 setae, basipod 2 with 5 setae, endopod with at least 13 setae,
exopod with 10 setae, outer lobe 1 with 9 setae and outer lobe 2 naked.
Maxilla 2. Lobes 1-5 each with 3 spine-like setae, lobe 5 with 1 of these
spines very thick and heavy. Terminal part of limb with 7 setae.
Maxilliped as in other Bradyidius.
Leg 1. Basipod 1 with outer edge patch of spines, outer edge spines of
exopod joints | and 2 not extending beyond base of spine on next joint, outer
edge spine on exopod joint 3 longer than its joint.
Leg 2. Basipod 1 with outer edge patch of spines; anterior surface of
endopod naked, posterior surface of endopod joint 2 with small hairs covering
about half area. Terminal exopod spine with 17 or 21 teeth.
A NEW SPECIES OF BRADYIDIUS 3
0,l1mm
== AGB
SDE
Fig. 1. Bradyidius hirsutus sp. nov. Female.
A. Lateral view. B. Dorsal view. C. Rostrum. D. Genital segment, lateral view. E. Urosome,
dorsal view.
Leg 3. Basipod 1 with outer edge patch of spines; anterior surface of
endopod joints 2 and 3 with small hairs covering slightly smaller area than spines
on posterior surface. Terminal exopod spine with 18 or 19 teeth.
Leg 4. Posterior surface of endopod joints 2 and 3 also anterior surface of
endopod joint 3 with small hairs. Terminal exopod spine with 20-23 teeth.
Leg 5 absent.
Male: Paratypes 1,36-1,53 mm.
Head and pedigerous segment 1 also pedigerous segments 4 and 5 com-
pletely fused. Rostrum bifurcate with slightly diverging points. Posterior meta-
somal points extend as far as posterior border of urosome segment 1.
Antenna | does not extend beyond posterior metasomal points; of 21 or
22 joints, most with annulate setae, 8-10, 12-i3 fused as are 20-21 on right
side; joints 1-12 with large aesthetes.
4 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Antenna 2 similar to that of female except basipod 1 with row of con-
spicuous hairs, exopod joint 1 without setae, endopod joint 2 with 2 setae;
endopod joint 2 with 6 outer setae.
Mandible blade without teeth, basipod apparently without seta, endopod
joint 2 with 10 setae.
Maxilla 1 inner lobes 1-3 without spines or setae, endopod with a few rudi-
mentary setae, exopod and outer lobe 1 with setae.
Maxilla 2 reduced to small lobe without setae.
Maxilliped similar to that of female except basipod 1 has 2 setae distally.
Legs 1-4 similar to those of female except outer edge exopod spines smaller.
Terminal spine of legs 2-4 with 20-23, 20-22, and 24—26 teeth respectively.
Fig. 2. Bradyidius nirsutus sp. nov. Female.
A. Antenna 1. B. Antenna 2. C. Mandible. D. Maxilla 1. E. Maxilla 2. F. Maxilliped.
A NEW SPECIES OF BRADYIDIUS 5
Fig. 3. Bradyidius hirsutus sp. nov. Female.
A. Leg 1, anterior view. B. Leg 2, posterior view. C. Leg 3, anterior view and posterior view
of endopod. D. Leg 4, posterior view and anterior view of endopod.
Leg 5 uniramous on each side, hardly extending beyond caudal rami, right
leg styliform, of 4 joints; left leg of 5 joints, penultimate joint with inner distal
knob bearing a fine spinule, terminal joint with row of small spinules.
Etymology
From the Latin hAirsutus = hairy, referring to the fact that hairs are to be
found on both the anterior and posterior surfaces of legs 3 and 4.
Discussion
All the species of Bradyidius are compared in Table | in so far as they are
known.
Female Bradyidius hirsutus may be distinguished primarily from B. arnoldi,
B. saanichi and B. spinifer, the three species it most resembles in respect to the
length of the posterior metasomal points in that the anterior surfaces of legs 3 and
4 as well as posterior endopod surfaces of legs 2-4 are ornamented with many
small hairs. Also the rostral points of B. hirsutus are slightly divergent but in
B. arnoldi not divergent and in B. saanichi strongly divergent (exact shape not
ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
‘7 podiseq = *g ‘podopus = ry ‘¢-] sso, = *—-'g ‘7 ‘{ yurof podoxs = *“tay !uMOoUy JOU UOT}eUTIOJUT —
*@ 19] Jopr0q
[eIsIp puodaq ysnf spus}xo %oyY
JYSII Jop1og [e}sIp :snowrelUy~)
TRY Yo] o[Ppru 0} spusjxo “oy
JYZII Jopsog [e\sIp :snowesU”E
snowelig
snowelig
snowPelg
TRY 19] SPP 0} spus}xo %ay
JUSII Jop1og [e}sIp :snowesnuy
Jo] URY} J9}10Ys
yonur 39] WWII : snowelUu
snowelg
*q 1J9] Jop10q
[e1sIp puodsoq ysnf spus}xo *ay
JYSII Jop1og [eIsIp :snowenuy
°d
ATIVN
JUDSIOAIP JOl0}ue
ANYsis pue JOLI9}SsOg
— IOIIO}SOg
= oUON
JUOBIDAIP
A[3U011S oUON
JUISIOAIP
10N dUON
JUDBIOAIP
A[SUONS (P) 10119}S0g
JUDBIOAIP
Anysits JOII9}SOd
JUOSIOAIP
JON IOIIN}SOg
qUOSIOAIP
A[ prey JOIIN}SOg
ourds }xou
aseq Yoel JOU Sood
oulds yxou Suoje AemM
Jey I9A0 spus}xgq
poq ‘g Ul SY
ourds
JxoU 9S8eq SOYORIY
ourds
yxou oseq soyovoy
oulds yxou suoje
ABM Jey Spud}x”
ourds
yXOU OSEq SOYOVOY
jews AIDA,
JUDUISAS [e}IUNS JOpI0g
IOLI9}Ssod 0} JSOWY
JUOWUZIS [e}IUNT IOp10q
JIOIIa}sod 0} JSOW]Y
yuoWIdOs [e}I1UN3
9[Ppru puosoq A] prey
JUDLUBOS [vIIUDS JOp10q
IOLI9}sod 0} JSOWLY
quowides [e}Uss
P.ry}-oUO [BUILT
JUOLUBIS [e}IUNS JOp10q
JIolo}sod puodsoq ysn¢
juoWdes [e}IUOT
IOp1o0g I0119]sOg
JUOWIBOS [e}IUIS J9p10q
JO1I19}sod 0} Jsow]y
€S‘I-9ET P
89 T-6S'T 5
uMouyuUN
(64)
96'I
pL‘Z
v7
Se
o'€
v7'T-10°7
96‘T-£€°T
e‘€
a
C7 €-00'E P
CMS
077 ©
697
€Z [I-61 L ©
p9T 3
Ot Fo Ot Fo
Fo OF Fo OF tO
LET
umouyun &
“Aou ‘ds
SHINSAITY ‘g
snaidod] “g
dafuds “g
SUIUMS
1O1UDDS *gF
snoifiovd “gf
apnjn] “Ff
1ApdAqG “
IpJOUAD “J
SNISNSUD “F
wundjsoy %—%g 1y sauids aapfans
40149JSOd—AO1MaJUp
AIVW + JIVWaAdA
snipidpoig yO soieds Jo uostieduiod
Toy fo auids
aspa 4ajno "q
SaSSaIOAd JDUIOSDIJOUL
doldajsod {oO Juajxyq
AIVWaAt
[ @1av.L
(WM) Y1sUuaT
saigady
A NEW SPECIES OF BRADYIDIUS 7
known for B. spinifer) and the outer edge spine of leg 1 exopod joint 1 does not
reach the base of the next spine in B. hirsutus, is very small in B. arnoldi, reaches
the base of the next spine in B. saanichi and extends half-way along the next spine
in B. spinifer.
The male of B. hirsutus is most like that of B. angustus even to the propor-
tions of leg 5 but differs from it chiefly in the ornamentation on the anterior and
posterior surfaces of legs 3 and 4. Also exopod joint | of antenna 2 has no setae
in B. hirsutus whereas it appears to have a seta in Tanaka’s (1957) illustration
and the rostrum of B. hirsutus has a much wider notch at the base of the points
than in B. angustus.
It appears the setation of the female maxilla 1 may be conservative.
Re-examination of the holotype of B. spinifer revealed that the basipod 2 in
fact has 5 setae, not 4 as described by Bradford (1969a) so B. spinifer does not
differ from B. /ulae in this respect.
Fig. 4. Bradyidius hirsutus sp. nov. Male.
A. Lateral view. B. Dorsal view. C. Rostrum. D. Urosome, dorsal view.
oo
ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
PRR
~
> >DDMMADH DRAW AWN :
Fig. 5. Bradyidius hirsutus sp. nov. Male.
A. Left antenna 1. B. Antenna 2. C. Mandible. D. Maxilla 1. E. Maxilliped and rudimentary
maxilla 2. F. Leg 1, anterior view. G. Leg 2, anterior view and posterior view of endopod.
H. Leg 3, anterior view and posterior view of endopod. I. Leg 4, anterior view and posterior
view of endopod. J. Leg 5.
A NEW SPECIES OF BRADYIDIUS 9
REVIEW OF PSEUDOTHARYBIS
Females of three species attributed to Bradyidius by Bradford (19695),
B. robustus, B. brevispinus and a stage V B. spinibasis (erroneously referred to
as B. spinatus in the text (Bradford 1969a: 484)) have subsequently been recog-
nized by the author as fitting T. Scott’s (1909a) brief description of Pseudotharybis
because of the unique form of the female fifth legs which hardly varies from one
species to another. Although T. Scott (1909a) implied Pseudotharybis was a
tharybid, lack of sensory appendages terminally on maxilla 2 precluded that
conclusion. This genus is here placed in the family Aetideidae, closely related
to Bradyidius and Aetideopsis, and is one of the few genera in the family to have
a female fifth leg.
The male of B. robustus Bradford, 1969a along with B. dentatus Bradford,
1969a indicates the form of male Pseudotharybis which hardly differs from that
of Bradyidius or Aetideopsis except that the posterior metasomal points are
represented in Pseudotharybis by a small posterodorsal tooth and in the other
two genera by a posterior spine. Thus the genus Pseudotharybis now contains
the following species: P. zetlandicus T. Scott, 1909a, P. brevispinus (Bradford,
1969a), P. dentatus (Bradford, 1969a), P. robustus (Bradford, 1969a), and P.
spinibasis (Bradford, 1969a). There is also a possibility that Aetideopsis magna
Grice & Hulsemann, 1970 belongs to this genus. Pending a closer examination
of the genera Aetideopsis, Bradyidius and Pseudotharybis the exact limits of each
genus, especially with reference to the males, remains uncertain.
T. Scott’s (19094) P. dubius must be removed from Pseudotharybis as there
appear to be important differences from all other species in the genus. For
example maxilla 1 inner and outer lobe | are well developed but the remaining
parts are reduced in size and have a smaller number of setae, maxilliped basipod
1 has a strong spiniform seta on its distal border and leg 5 is of a different shape.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am indebted to Mr T. Wooldridge of the Port Elizabeth Museum for
bringing the new species of Bradyidius to my attention.
REFERENCES
BRADFORD, J. M. 1969a. New species of Aetideopsis Sars and Bradyidius Giesbrecht (Copepoda:
Calanoida) from the Southern Hemisphere. —N.Z. J/ mar. freshw. Res. 3: 73-97.
BRADFORD, J. M. 1969b. New genera and species of benthic calanoid copepods from the New
Zealand slope. N.Z. JI mar. freshw. Res. 3: 473-505.
Bropsky, K. A. 1950. Calanoida of the far eastern seas and polar basin of the U.S.S.R.—
Opred. Faune SSSR 35: 1-442. (Translation: Israel Program for Scientific Translation,
Jerusalem, 1967).
FLEMINGER, A. 1957. New calanoid copepods of the families Aetideidae, Euchaetidae, and
Stephidae from the Gulf of Mexico.— Fishery Bull. Fish Wildl. Serv. U.S. 57: 355-63.
Grice, G. D. 1972. The existence of a bottom-living calanoid copepod fauna in deep water
with descriptions of five new species. — Crustaceana 23: 219-42.
10 ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
Grice, G. D. & HULSEMANN, K. 1970. New species of bottom-living calanoid copepods collected
in deep water by the DSRV Alvin.— Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv. 139: 185-227.
MattuHews, J. B. L. 1964. On the biology of some bottom-living copepods (Aetideidae and
Phaennidae) from western Norway.— Sarsia 16: 1-46.
Park, T. 1960. A new species of Bradyidius (Copepoda: Calanoida) from the Pacific coast of
North America.—J. Fish Res. Bd Canada 23: 805-11.
Sars, G. O. 1902, 1903. Copepoda. In: An account of the Crustacea of Norway 4. Bergen:
Bergen Museum.
Scort, T. 1909a. On some new and rare Entomostraca from the Scottish Seas.— Ann. Mag.
nat. Hist. (8) 3: 122-30.
Scott, T. 1909b. On new and rare Crustacea from Scottish waters. — Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (8)
4: 31-6.
TANAKA, O. 1957. The pelagic copepods of the Izu region, middle Japan. Systematic account
Ill. Family Aetideidae (Part I).—Publs Seto mar. biol. Lab. 6: 31-68.
WOLFENDEN, R. N. 1905. Notes on the collection of Copepoda. Jn: GARDINER, J. S. (ed.) The
Fauna and Geography of the Maldive and Laccadive Archipelagoes 2: suppl. 1: 989-1040.
Cambridge: University Press; London: Clay.
6. SYSTEMATIC papers must conform with the International code of zoological nomenclature
(particularly Articles 22 and 51).
Names of new taxa, combinations, synonyms, etc., when used for the first time, must be
followed by the appropriate Latin (not English) abbreviation, e.g. gen. NOV., sp. nov., comb.
nov., syn. nov., etc.
An author’s name when cited must follow the name of the taxon without intervening
punctuation and not be abbreviated; if the year is added, a comma must separate author’s
name and year. The author’s name "(and date, if cited) must be placed in parentheses if a
species or subspecies is transferred from its original genus. The name of a subsequent user of
a scientific name must be separated from the scientific name by a colon.
Synonymy arrangement should be according to chronology of names, i.e. all published
scientific names by which the species previously has been designated are listed in chronological
order, with all references to that name following in chronological order, e.g.:
Family Nuculanidae
Nuculana (Lembulus) bicuspidata (Gould, 1845)
Figs 14-15A
Nucula (Leda) bicuspidata Gould, 1845: 37.
Leda plicifera A. Adams, 1856: 50.
Laeda bicuspidata Hanley, 1859: 118, pl. 228 (fig. 73). Sowerby, 1871: pl. 2 (figs 8a—b).
Nucula largillierti Philippi, 1861: 87.
Leda bicuspidata: Nicklés, 1950: 163, fig. 301; 1955: 110. Barnard, 1964: 234, figs 8-9.
Note punctuation in the above example:
comma separates author’s name and year
semicolon separates more than one reference by the same author
full stop separates references by different authors
figures of plates are enclosed in parentheses to distinguish them from text-figures
dash, not comma, separates consecutive numbers
Synonymy arrangement according to chronology of bibliographic references, whereby
the year is placed in front of each entry, and the synonym repeated in full for each entry, is
not acceptable.
In describing new species, one specimen must be designated as the holotype; other speci-
mens mentioned in the original description are to be designated paratypes; additional material
not regarded as paratypes should be listed separately. The complete data (registration number,
depository, description of specimen, locality, collector, date) of the holotype and paratypes
must be recorded, e.g.:
Holotype
SAM-A13535 in the South African Museum, Cape Town. Adult female from mid-tide region, King’s Beach,
Port Elizabeth (33.51S, 25.39E), collected by A. Smith, 15 January 1973.
Note standard form of writing South African Museum registration numbers, date and geographical positions.
7. SPECIAL HOUSE RULES
Capital initial letters
(a) The Figures, Maps and Tables of the paper when referred to in the text
e.g. ‘... the Figure depicting C. namacolus...’; *...in C. namacolus (Fig. 10)...’
(b) The prefixes of prefixed surnames in all languages, when used in the text, if not preceded
by initials or full names
e.g. Du Toit but A. L.du Toit; Von Huene but F. von Huene
(c) Scientific names, but not their vernacular derivatives
e.g. Therocephalia, but therocephalian
Punctuation should be loose, omitting all not strictly necessary
Reference to the author should be expressed in the third person
Roman numerals should be converted to arabic, except when forming part of the title of a
book or article, such as
“Revision of the Crustacea. Part VIII. The Amphipoda.’
Specific name must not stand alone, but be preceded by the generic name or its abbreviation
to initial capital letter, provided the same generic name is used consecutively.
Name of new genus or species is not to be included in the title: it should be included in the
abstract, counter to Recommendation 23 of the Code, to meet the HEGRE of Bio
logical Abstracts.
“Wit
JANET M. BRADFORD
A NEW SPECIES OF BRADYIDIUS (COPEPODA,
CALANOIDA) FROM THE MGAZANA ESTUARY,
PONDOLAND, SOUTH AFRICA, AND A
REVIEW OF THE CLOSELY RELATED GENUS
PSEUDOTHAR YBIS