European Journal of Taxonomy 177: 1-19
http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2016.177
BY
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
ISSN 2118-9773
www. europeanj ournaloftaxonomy. eu
2016 • Enghoff H.
Research article
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:84816D6D-B8EE-4D90-A6DD-77C86EAC7CDB
A mountain of millipedes III: A new genus for three new species from
the Udzungwa Mountains and surroundings, Tanzania, as well as
several ‘orphaned’ species previously assigned to Odontopyge
Brandt, 1841 (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida, Odontopygidae)
Henrik ENGHOFF
Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100
Kobenhavn 0, Denmark, email:
[email protected]. dk
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:FB09A817-000D-43C3-BCC4-2BClE5373635
Abstract. The new genus Geotypodon gen. nov. is described. It includes two species from the Udzungwa
Mountains: G. millemanus gen. et sp. nov. (type species) and G. submontanus gen. et sp. nov., one
species from nearby Iringa: G. iringensis gen. et sp. nov., and 18 previously described species hitherto
incorrectly assigned to Odontopyge Brandt, 1841.
Keywords. Eastern Arc, taxonomy, new species.
Enghoff H. 2016. A mountain of millipedes III: A new genus for three new species from the Udzungwa Mountains
and surroundings, Tanzania, as well as several ‘orphaned’ species previously assigned to Odontopyge Brandt, 1841
(Diplopoda, Spirostreptida, Odontopygidae). European Journal of Taxonomy 177: 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/
eit.2016.177
Introduction
This is the third in a series of articles about the millipedes, especially the endemic Afrotropical family
Odontopygidae, of the Udzungwa Mountains, Tanzania. For general information on the Odontopygidae
and the Udzungwa Mountains see the first article in the series (Enghoff 2014); see also Enghoff &
Frederiksen (2015).
In the present article three further new odontopygid species are described from the Udzungwa Mountains
and their immediate surroundings (Fig. 1). The new species resemble several species which were
assigned to the genus Odontopyge Brandt, 1841 by Kraus (1960) and authors before him. However,
Hoffman (1991) showed that Odontopyge had been misinterpreted by virtually everybody dealing with
the genus after its original description and that Odontopyge is the correct name for a genus until then
known as Omopyge Manfredi, 1941. Hoffman (1991) rectified the situation and formally synonymized
Omopyge under Odontopyge , but by this action he left a large number of species originally described in
or subsequently transferred to Odontopyge ‘orphaned’, i.e., without a valid genus name. Some of these
have been transferred to other genera by Hoffman & Howell (1981, 2012), Hoffman (2000, 2002) and
Frederiksen & Enghoff (2015), but very many remain orphaned.
1
European Journal of Taxonomy 177: 1-19 (2016)
Kraus (1960) was aware of the situation and therefore accepted Attems ’ (1909) designation of Odontopyge
kilimandjaronus Attems, 1909, as type species of Odontopyge , mentioning that the ICZN would be
asked to make Attems’ designation valid. This, however, has not happened, and Attems’ type designation
remains invalid, as does that of Silvestri (1896: Jidus bicuspidatus Brandt, 1841) (Jeekel 1970).
Table 1 lists all species assigned to Odontopyge by Kraus (1960) and subsequent authors, with an
indication of their subsequent re-classification. Part 2 of the table includes the dubious species of
6 Odontopyge ’ listed by Kraus (1960) - many of these names were based on female specimens and may
never be resolvable.
To accommodate the new species described here, a new genus is established to which several of the
orphaned species can be assigned as well.
Material and methods
The material for this article comes from the zoological collections of the Natural History Museum of
Denmark, University of Copenhagen (ZMUC). The specimens were partly collected during field trips
TANZANIA
MIKUMI
IRINGA
W Kilombero
r Scarp
Nyambanito
Ukami
Kiranzi /
Kitungul
igulu
Wooded grassland
Woodland
| Open forest
|9 Closed forest
O Towns
Major roads
Rivers
Fig. 1 . Map of the Udzungwa Mountains, showing the collecting sites for the three new Geotypodon
species, as well as names of the Forest Reserves in question and names of individual mountains in
West Kilombero FR. Red diamonds = G. millemanus gen. et sp. nov., yellow dot: G. submontanus gen.
et sp. nov., blue triangle: G. iringensis gen. et sp. nov. Based on fig. 1 in Marshall et al. (2010) and
information in Doody et al. (2001).
2
ENGHOFF H., New millipede genus and species from the Udzungwa Mts
Table 1 . Species of Odontopyge sensu auctorum nee Brandt, 1841. The table is based on Kraus (1960),
with updates as indicated. Part 1 of the list contains species placed by Kraus and subsequent authors in
Odontopyge. Part 2 contains the “ nomina dnbicT listed by Kraus (1960). Numerous additional species
originally described in Odontopyge and transferred to other genera by Kraus and his predecessors are
not listed.
Part 1. Species assigned to ‘ Odontopyge sensu auctorum’ by Kraus and subsequent authors.
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Species
Current placement Reference
angolana Kraus, 1958
antrophila Attems, 1951
arrogans (Attems, 1935)
astragalus (Attems, 1912)
bayoni Silvestri, 1910
carli Kraus, 1960
citernii S ilvestri, 1910
delitescens Attems, 1935
dewittei Kraus, 1958
difficilis Silvestri, 1895
dispersa Carl, 1909
dorsalis Carl, 1909
errata Kraus, 1960
franco Sudani c a Attems, 1914
gracilitarsus Kraus, 1958
heteromodesta Kraus, 1960
indecisus Pierrard, 1970
intermedia Carl, 1909
kakandae Kraus, 1958
kandti kandti Carl, 1909
kandti denticulata Attems, 1937
kilembeensis Demange, 1990
kilimanjarona Attems, 1909
latifolia (Attems, 1914)
leviceps (Attems, 1909)
medjensis (Chamberlin, 1927)
meneliki Attems, 1927
multianulata Attems, 1914
ollieri Silvestri, 1907
paludosai Attems, 1953)
par dal is (Gerstacker, 1873)
picea Attems, 1938
procera Attems, 1914
procerula Kraus, 1960
pnnctulata Attems, 1912
scaphula Attems, 1912
sennae Brolemann, 1903
severini Silvestri, 1897
simplex (Chamberlin, 1927)
Geotypodon comb. nov.
‘orphaned’
‘orphaned’
‘orphaned’
Geotypodon comb. nov.
Geotypodon comb. nov.
‘orphaned’
‘orphaned’
‘orphaned’
‘orphaned’
Geotypodon comb. nov.
Calyptomastix
Geotypodon comb. nov.
‘orphaned’
Geotypodon comb. nov.
Geotypodon comb. nov.
Geotypodon comb. nov.
Geotypodon comb. nov.
Calyptomastix
‘orphaned’
‘orphaned’
‘orphaned’
Rhamphidarpoides
Callistodontopyge
Calyptomastix
‘orphaned’
‘orphaned’
Geotypodon comb. nov.
Geotypodon comb. nov.
‘orphaned’
Calyptomastix
Geotypodon comb. nov.
Geotypodon comb. nov.
Geotypodon comb. nov.
Geotypodon comb. nov.
‘orphaned’
Geotypodon comb. nov.
‘orphaned’
‘orphaned’
Hoffman (2012)
Pierrard (1970)
Hoffman (2012)
Demange (1990)
Frederiksen & Enghoff (2015)
Hoffman & Howell (1981)
Hoffman (2012)
Hoffman (2012)
3
European Journal of Taxonomy 177: 1-19 (2016)
Odontopyge
specularis Attems, 1927
Geotypodon comb. nov.
Odontopyge
stenotarsa Attems, 1938
Geotypodon comb. nov.
Odontopyge
terebrum Ribaut, 1907
‘orphaned’
Odontopyge
turn idem Karsch, 1881
‘orphaned’
Odontopyge
uv ire ns is Kraus, 1960
‘orphaned’
Odontopyge (?) vanutellii Silvestri, 1898
‘orphaned’
Part 2. Nomina dubia listed by Kraus (1960).
Original genus
(subgenus) _
Spirostreptus
(Odontopyge)
Spirostreptus
(Odontopyge)
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Ildus (Spirostreptusj
Spirostreptus
Ctenoiulus
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
Odontopyge
lulus (Spirostreptus)
Spirostreptus
(Odontopyge)
Spirostreptus
(Odontopyge)
Odontopyge
lulus (Spirostreptus)
Odontopyge
lulus (Spirostreptus)
Odontopyge
Species Current placement Reference
acutus Karsch, 1881
aequalis Porath, 1982
amaura Brolemann, 1926
angolensis Karsch, 1881
anomala Silvestri, 1896
attenuata Silvestri, 1895
bicolor Silvestri, 1897
bicuspidatus Brandt, 1841
binodiferNogQS, 1878
chatelainei Cook, 1893 Ctenoiulus Hoffman (1980)
dilatata Brolemann, 1905
dimidiatiformis Porat, 1893
diversicolor Silvestri, 1895
diversifacies Silvestri, 1898
doriae Silvestri, 1896
ecarinata Porat, 1894
exquisita Silvestri, 1896
flavotaeniatus Brandt, 1841
foveolatus Porath, 1872
r T7- i i ooi Ctenoiulus chatelainei TT .. AOA n
furcatus Karsch, 1881 „ . Honman (1980)
Cook, 1893
gestrii Silvestri, 1896
gracilicornis Brandt, 1841
jallae Silvestri, 1896
hollarii Brandt, 1841 Odontopyge Hoffman (1991)
litoranea Silvestri, 1897
4
ENGHOFF FL, New millipede genus and species from the Udzungwa Mts
Spirostreptus
(Odontopyge)
Spirostreptus
(Odontopyge)
Spirostreptus
(Odontopyge)
Odontopyge
Spirostreptus
(Odontopyge)
Odontopyge
maculatus Karsch, 1881 Callistodontopyge
m itellatus Karsch, 1881 Callistodontopyge
praetextus Porath, 1872
puerilla Daday, 1889
puncticaudisVomXh , 1872
rubripes Silvestri, 1895
Hoffman & Howell
(1981)
Hoffman (2002)
Odontopyge
ruspolii Silvestri, 1896
Spirostreptus
Odontopyge
scaliger Gerstacker, 1873
trivial is var. strigulosa Porat,
1891
Odontopyge
Spirostreptus
Odontopyge
subelegans Silvestri, 1897
sugillatus Gerstacker, 1873 Callistodontopyge
trivial is Porat, 1894
Hoffman & Howell
(1981)
Odontopyge
uebicola Silvestri, 1896
by ZMUC staff and students, partly by the NGO Frontier Tanzania (see Marshall et al. 2001). A total of
seven male specimens was examined. All are kept in 70% alcohol.
Specimens were examined in alcohol under a stereo microscope. Specimens for scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) were transferred to 96% ethanol, then to acetone, air-dried, mounted on aluminium
stubs or on pieces of flexible aluminium tape and in turn mounted on stubs, coated with platinum-
palladium and studied in a JEOF JSM-6335F scanning electron microscope.
See Enghoff (2014) for the description standards used.
Abbreviations for morphological terms used in the descriptions and on illustrations
atl = anterior distal lobe of telomere
bl = basal lamella of telomere
cx = coxa
itl = intermediate distal lamella of telomere
Ic = lateral concavity of coxa
Ifl = longitudinally folded lamella
// = longitudinal lamella
mf = anteriad metaplical flange
mla = metaplical lamella
mp = metaplica
msp = metaplical spine-like process
pn = posttorsal narrowing
pp = proplica
ptl = posterior distal lobe of telomere
pts = proximal telomeral spine
5
European Journal of Taxonomy 177: 1-19 (2016)
slm = solenomere
tl = terminal lobe of telomere
tt = torsotope
Abbreviations used in the text, other than the above
asl = above sea level
FR = Forest Reserve
ZMUC = Natural History Museum of Denmark (Zoological Museum)
Results
Taxonomy
Class Diplopoda Blainville-Gervais, 1844
Order Spirostreptida Brandt, 1833
Family Odontopygidae Attems, 1909
Subfamily Archepyginae Manfredi, 1939
Tribe Prionopetalini Hoffman, 1991
Geotypodon gen. nov.
um:lsid:zoobank.org:act:54706BDE-AF06-42BC-A2B3-F2D23A097B28
Type species
G. millemanus gen. et sp. nov.
Diagnosis
A genus of Odontopygidae-Prionopetalini characterized by: a long basad metaplical spine on the anterior
side of the coxa, a compact torsotope, lack of pretorsal or torsal spines/processes, a pronounced posttorsal
narrowing without spines, a division of the telopodite into solenomere and telomere immediately distal
to posttorsal narrowing, a spine emerging from the base of the telomere and curving more or less parallel
to the basal parts of the solenomere, a slender, whip-like, smooth solenomere without any outgrowths or
appendages (except sometimes a tiny subapical spine), a highly three-dimensional telomere consisting
of various lobes and lamellae with largely smooth margins.
Etymology
An anagram of Odontopyge. To be regarded as masculine in analogy with other names ending in -odon.
Other species included:
G. angolanus (Kraus, 1958) (comb. nov. ex Odontopyge )
G. bayoni (Silvestri, 1910) (comb. nov. ex Odontopyge)
G. carli (Kraus, 1960) (comb. nov. ex Odontopyge )
G. dispersus (Carl, 1909) (comb. nov. ex Odontopyge)
G. erratus (Kraus, 1960) (comb. nov. ex Odontopyge )
G. gracilitarsus (Kraus, 1958) (comb. nov. ex Odontopyge)
G. heteromodestus (Kraus, 1960) (comb. nov. ex Odontopyge)
G. indecisus (Pierrard, 1970) (comb. nov. ex Odontopyge)
G. intermedius (Carl, 1909) (comb. nov. ex Odontopyge)
G. iringensis gen. et sp. nov.
G. multianulatus (Attems, 1914) (comb. nov. ex Odontopyge)
G. ollieri (Silvestri, 1907) (comb. nov. ex Odontopyge)
6
ENGHOFF FL, New millipede genus and species from the Udzungwa Mts
G. piceus (Attems, 1938) (comb. nov. ex Odontopyge)
G. procerus (Attems, 1914) (comb. nov. ex Odontopyge)
G. procerulus (Kraus, 1960) (comb. nov. ex Odontopyge )
G. punctulatus (Attems, 1912) (comb. nov. ex Odontopyge)
G. sennae (Brolemann, 1903) (comb. nov. ex Odontopyge)
G. specular is (Attems, 1927) (comb. nov. ex Odontopyge)
G. stenotarsus (Attems, 1938) (comb. nov. ex Odontopyge)
G. submontanus gen. et sp. nov.
Descriptive notes
Species of Geotypodon gen. nov. have a typical odontopygid habitus (Fig. 2) and are mostly medium¬
sized by odontopygid standards (cf. Kraus 1966). Published numbers of podous rings range from 49
(G. ollieri) to 72 (G. multianulatus) (one has been subtracted from the published numbers because
these include the telson), and published male body diameters range from 1.7 mm (G. sennae) to 5.5 mm
(G. specularis). The majority of species have 54-66 podous rings and a diameter of 4.3-5.5 mm, but
there is a group of smaller species (G. angolanus , G. erratus , G. heteromodestus , G. ollieri) with 49-54
podous rings and a diameter of 2.2-3.2 mm. G. sennae is a particularly slender species: 66-68 podous
rings and 1.7 mm diameter, and G. multianulatus , true to its name (at least as misspelled by Kraus
(1960): multiannulatus), stands out with 72 podous rings and 4.8 mm diameter. Of the new species
described here, G. millemanus gen. et sp. nov. falls neatly in the main group, G. submontanus gen. et
sp. nov. is slightly more slender than the main group, whereas G. iringensis gen. et sp. nov. has a larger
body diameter than any other described congener (Fig. 3).
Several of the species assigned to Geotypodon gen. nov. have the same type of limbus (with hand¬
like lobes) as the type species; this is true of G. angolanus , G. carli , G. erratus , G. gracilitarsus,
G. procerulus and G. punctulatus (Attems 1912; Kraus 1958, 1960) as well as G. submontanus gen. et
sp. nov. Other species have other types of limbus: G. heteromodestus , G. indecisus, G. multianulatus, G.
piceus, G. sennae, G. specularis and G. stenotarsus (Attems 1914, 1927, 1938, 1953 [G. heteromodestus,
as Haplothysanus modestus]; Brolemann 1903; Pierrard, 1970), as well as G. iringensis gen. et sp. nov.
The limbus of procerus somewhat but not quite resembles that of G. millemanus gen. et sp. nov. (Attems
1914), and no information is available about this character in G. bayoni, G. dispersus or G. intermedius.
On the other hand, several species outside Geotypodon gen. nov. as here defined have the same type
of limbus as G. millemanus gen. et sp. nov.. This is, for example, the case for several species of
Rhamphidarpoides Kraus, 1960, including R. kilimandjarona (Attems, 1909), R. ruandensis Kraus,
1960, and R. regina (Carl, 1909) (Attems 1914; Kraus 1960; Frederiksen & Enghoff 2015), Helicochetus
spp. (e.g., Kraus 1966: figs 83-87), Solenozophyllum kazibaense Kraus, 1958 and 6 Odontopyge" dewittei
Kraus, 1958.
Remarks
Although Geotypodon gen. nov. is proposed to accommodate several species of Odontopyge sensu Kraus
(1960), its diagnosis and circumscription are narrower. Species of Odontopyge sensu Kraus (1960), may
thus lack a long basad metaplical spine on the anterior side of the coxa (present in Geoptypodon), may
have spines in the torsal region (absent in Geotypodon gen. nov.), and may lack a spine emerging from
the base of the telomere and curving more or less parallel to the basal parts of the solenomere (present
in Geotypodon gen. nov.).
None of the characters listed in the diagnosis are exclusive to Geotypodon gen. nov.: Notably, the
conspicuous coxal metaplical anterior spine is also found in, e.g., several species of Rhamphidarpoides
and Raduliverpa Frederiksen & Enghoff, 2015 (Frederiksen & Enghoff 2015) as well as Spinotarsus
Attems, 1909 (Kraus 1960, 1966), but the species in question differ from Geotypodon gen. nov. by
7
European Journal of Taxonomy 177 : 1-19 ( 2016 )
either having the solenomere with spines or fluting ( Rhamphidarpoides , Raduliverpa ) or by having
characteristic structures on the telomere (“Basallamelle” and/or “Bogenlamelle” sensu Kraus 1960)
( Spinotarsus ).
A spine emerging from the base of the telomere is also found in several other ’ Odontopyge’ species,
e.g., citernii Silvestri, 1898, difficilis Silvestri, 1895, and severini , Silvestri, 1897 - see Kraus (1960),
where this spine is called “Tibialdorn”. It is also found in Rhamphidarpoides species (Frederiksen &
Enghoff 2015), in Calyptomastix kakandae (Kraus, 1958), as well as several Spinotarsus species, etc.
In the Chaleponcus dab ague ns is-group there is a spine at almost the same place, but emerging from the
base of the solenomere instead of the base of the telomere (Enghoff 2014).
Considering the notorious mosaic-like distribution of morphological characters throughout the family,
the genus Geotypodon gen. nov. as defined here is quite possibly not a monophyletic group, cf. the
Discussion section (see below). Until a more satisfactory analysis of relationships within Odontopygidae
becomes available, the new genus can, however, serve as a ‘home’ for several (but not all) ‘orphaned’
species hitherto classified in Odontopyge.
Geotypodon millemanus gen. et sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:D65889F9-1063-4FBB-AEBB-A594052220Bl
Figs 1-4
Diagnosis
A species of Geotypodon gen. nov. in which the gonopod coxal metaplica is produced mesad in a thin
lamella, a small longitudinal lamella, perpendicular to the other, is present on the anterior part of the
Photo: Nikolas loannou, feb 2009
Fig. 2. Geotypodon millemanus gen. et sp. nov., paratype from West Kilombero Scarp FR after nine
years in alcohol. Photograph by N. loannou.
8
ENGHOFF H., New millipede genus and species from the Udzungwa Mts
metaplica, the telomere is apically divided into two lobes of approximately equal size, and the limbus
lobes are multi-cusped, hand-like. It shares these characters with G. submontanus gen. et sp. nov., but
differs from that species in larger size, straight mesal margin of metaplical lamella and absence of a
spine-like process on the posterior apical telomeral lobe.
Etymology
The name is a Fatin noun in apposition, meaning “a thousand hands” and referring to the hand-like
limbus lobes. A specimen with a diameter of 5 mm will have a body perimeter of approximately 15 mm
Assuming that the limbus covers only 10 mm, and taking into account that each “hand” occupies about
10 microns of the perimeter, each body ring will carry about a thousand “hands”, and a specimen with
60 body rings will therefore have roughly 60,000 “hands”.
Material studied (total: 4 c?c?)
Holotype
TANZANIA: S, Iringa Region, Iringa District, Udzungwa Mts, West Kilombero Scarp FR, 07°50'38.4"S,
36°22T7.6" E, montane forest, 1390-1410 m asl. Plot Paradiso, casual, 18 Nov. 2000, Frontier Tanzania
leg. (ZMUC00040350).
Paratypes
TANZANIA: 2 SS, same data as holotype (ZMUC100969, ZMUC00040345); 1 S, Iringa Region,
Iringa District, Udzungwa Mts, Kiranzi-Kitungulu FR, 08°09' S, 35°05' E, forest, 1500 m asl, Jan. 1996,
M. Andersen, P. Gravlund & A. Jakobsen leg. (ZMUC00046991).
Number of podous rings
Fig. 3. Body size of males of Geotypodon spp. Bold symbols indicate numbers of podous rings and
midbody vertical diameter of the new species described here. Small circles and shaded areas indicate
published measurements for other Geotypodon species.
9
European Journal of Taxonomy 177 : 1-19 ( 2016 )
Fig 4. Geotypodon millemanus gen. et sp. nov., paratype from Kiranzi-Kitungulu FR. A-E: Right
gonopod. A. Posterior view. B. Anterior view, telomere in red oval. C. (Posterior-)mesal view, solenomere
(yellow) and proximal telomeral spine (green) coloured. D. (Anterior-)mesal view. E. Telomere (part of
coxa at lower left), basal (dorsal) view. F. Limbus. Abbreviations: atl = anterior distal lobe of telomere;
bl = basal lamella of telomere; itl = intermediate distal lamella of telomere; ll = longitudinal lamella;
mf= anteriad metaplical flange; mla = metaplical lamella; mp = metaplica; msp = metaplical spine-like
process; pn = posttorsal narrowing; pp = proplica; ptl = posterior distal lobe of telomere; pts = proximal
telomeral spine; slm = solenomere; tt = torsotope. Scales: A-E = 0.1 mm, F = 0.01 mm.
10
ENGHOFF H., New millipede genus and species from the Udzungwa Mts
Type locality
TANZANIA, Iringa Region, Iringa District, Udzungwa Mts, West Kilombero Scarp FR, 07°50'38.4" S,
36°22T7.6" E, montane forest, 1390-1410 m asl, cf. Marshall et al. (2001).
Description
Size. Fength ca. 9 cm. Diameter 4.8-5.1 mm. 60-66 podous rings, no apodous rings in front of telson.
Colour. After 15 years in alcohol somewhat faded, but pattern still evident. Upper part of head blackish,
lower part yellowish. Overall colour of body ventrally and laterally yellowish. Posterior ca. 40% of
metazona amber, in front of amber zone a blackish zone; blackish zone narrow laterally, becoming wider
dorsally where extending onto posterior V4-V3 of prozona; resulting mid-dorsal dark band becoming
narrower towards head. Telson blackish with yellowish margins, legs yellowish.
Head. Without peculiarities.
Collum. With a marginal and a submarginal furrow.
Body rings. Almost perfect cylinders, not vaulted; suture straight; ozopores ca. three diameters behind
suture.
Fimbus (Fig. 4). Consisting of isolated hand-like lobes of ca. 10 microns’ length, each with 3-6 ‘fingers’
and each with a ridge running along its length.
Anal valves. Each with a well-developed dorsal spine and a smaller, yet distinctive ventral one; margin
raised, with 3 setae not borne on tubercles.
Male legs. From 5 th pair with postfemoral and tibial pads on all legs, except last four pairs; tibial pads
absent from several pairs in front of these.
Gonopod coxa (Fig. 4). Slender, slightly sigmoid. Proplica ( pp ) ending in small proplical lobe hidden
behind anterior edge of metaplical lamella ( mla ), on Fig. 4B. Metaplica ( mp ) with poorly developed
basal anteriad flange (mf ), disto-mesally expanded into thin lamella (mla), with a straight mesal margin,
tip of metaplica formed by blunt-triangular extension of mla', a second smaller longitudinal lamella (11)
on anterior surface of metaplica partly covering proplical lobe; metaplica at level of proplical lobe, with
a long, slightly curved spine-like process (msp) directed toward base of coxa on its anterior side.
Gonopod telopodite (Fig. 4). Arculus 90°. Torsotope (tt) simple, compact, without processes (Fig. 4B).
Posttorsal narrowing (pn ) pronounced, very slender, without processes or spines (Fig. 4B). Telopodite
just distal to posttorsal narrowing dividing into slender, whip-like solenomere and complicated telomere.
Solenomere (slm) curved in 3 dimensions (at least on preserved specimens), apically pointed, without
any outgrowths (Fig. 4A, C, E). Efferent groove continuing from posttorsal narrowing onto solenomere
and running all the way to its tip. Telomere with long, stout basal spine (pts ), spine first curving in parallel
with solenomere, but then becoming straight and directed mesad (Fig. 4A, C). Telomere close to pts with
a basal lamella (bl) (Fig. 4A), followed by several complicated lamellar parts; basal part of telomere
partly sheathing base of solenomere, distal part divided into two equally-sized thin lobes (atl and ptl),
which initially diverge at ca. 90° but then curve towards each other (Fig. 4B, D-E). An intermediate
lamella (itl) lodged in the space between atl and plm (Fig. 4D). Surfaces of atl and ptl facing each other,
concave, margins of each lobe subparallel, smooth; telomere entirely without denticles or spines.
11
European Journal of Taxonomy 177: 1-19 (2016)
Distribution and habitat
Known from West Kilombero FR and Kiranza-Kitungulu FR. Altitudinal range: 1145-1500 m asl.
Haibtat: (montane) forest.
Coexisting species
In Kiranza-Kitungulu FR G. millemanus gen. et sp. nov. was found in the same sample as Chaleponcus
dabagaensis Kraus, 1958 and C. gracilior Enghoff, 2014. In West Kilombero FR no other odontopygids
were found in the same sample as G. millemanus gen. et sp. nov., but G. submontanus gen. et sp. nov.,
Chaleponcus basiliscus Enghoff, 2014, G. circumvallatus Enghoff, 2014, G. gracilior , G. ibis Enghoff,
2014, G. netus Enghoff, 2014, G. tintin Enghoff, 2015, Aquattuor longipala Enghoff 2015 and
A. udzungwensis Enghoff, 2015 also occur in West Kilombero FR.
Geotypodon submontanus gen. et sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:02DBFF6A-56Al-4EB3-9001-AF063F22ClB6
Figs 1, 3, 5
Diagnosis
A species of Geotypodon gen. nov. in which the gonopod coxal metaplica is produced mesad in a thin
lamella, a small longitudinal lamella, perpendicular to the other, is present on the anterior part of the
metaplica, the telomere is apically divided into two lobes of approximately equal size, and the limbus
lobes are multi-cusped, hand-like. Shares these characters with G. millemanus gen. et sp. nov., but
differs from that species in smaller size, bicuspid mesal margin of metaplical lamella and presence of a
spine-like process on the posterior apical telomeral lobe.
Etymology
The name is a Latin adjective referring to the habitat.
Material studied (total: 1 f)
Holotype
TANZANIA: <$, Iringa Region, Iringa District, UdzungwaMts, West Kilombero Scarp FR, 07°53T9.5" S,
36°23'11.6" E, submontane forest, 1145 m asl, trapsite Ukami, casual, Nov. 2000, Frontier Tanzania leg.
(ZMUC00046992).
Type locality
TANZANIA, Iringa Region, Iringa District, Udzungwa Mts, West Kilombero Scarp FR, 07°53T9.5" S,
36°23'11.6" E, submontane forest, 1145 m asl, cf. Marshall et al. (2001).
Description
Size. Length ca. 7 cm. Diameter 3.8 mm. 60 podous rings, no apodous rings in front of telson.
Other characters. As in G. millemanus gen. et sp. nov., with the following exceptions:
- telson (after 15 years in alcohol) yellowish,
- postfemoral and tibial pads on male legs smaller,
- metaplical lamella ( mla ) produced mesad, with two sharp angles (Fig. 5A-B),
- posterior distal lobe of telomere (ptl) apically with a dark, spine-like process (Fig. 5E).
Distribution and habitat
Known only from West Kilombero FR. Altitude: 1145 m asl. Habitat: submontane forest.
12
ENGHOFF H., New millipede genus and species from the Udzungwa Mts
Fig. 5. Geotypodon submontanus gen. et sp. nov., holotype. A-E. Feft gonopod. A. Anterior view.
B. Posterior view. C. Apical part of coxa and proximal part of telopodite, anterior view. D. (Anterior-)
mesal view. E. Posterior distal lobe of telomere; insertion highlights spine-like process. F. Fimbus.
Abbreviations: atl = anterior distal lobe of telomere; itl = intermediate distal lamella of telomere; ll =
longitudinal lamella; mla = metaplical lamella; msp = metaplical spine-like process; ptl = posterior distal
lobe of telomere; pts = proximal telomeral spine. Scales: A-D = 0.1 mm, E = 0.05 mm, F = 0.01 mm
13
European Journal of Taxonomy 177: 1-19 (2016)
Coexisting species
No other odontopygids were found in the same sample as G. submontanus gen. et sp. nov., but
G. millimanus gen. et sp. nov., Chaleponcus basiliscus Enghoff, 2014, C. circumvallatus Enghoff 2014,
C. gracilior , C. ibis Enghoff 2014, C. netus Enghoff, 2014, C. tintin Enghoff, 2015 , Aquattuor longipala
Enghoff, 2015 and A. udzungwensis Enghoff, 2015 also occur in West Kilombero FR.
Geotypodon iringensis gen. et sp. nov.
um:lsid:zoobank.org: act: 0171D40F - 1E0D-4194-8D1B-045D46F92095
Figs 1, 3, 6
Diagnosis
A species of Geotypodon gen. nov. in which the gonopod coxal metaplica is apically rounded, the
telomere is apically divided into a small posterior lobe and a large anterior lobe, which gives rise to a
strongly curved terminal lobe, and the limbus lobes are pointed triangular.
Etymology
The species is named after the type locality.
Material studied (total: 2 SS)
Holotype
TANZANIA: <$, IringaRegion, 10 km E of Iringa city, 7°46' S, 35°42' E, Mar.-Apr. 1996, F.F. Sorensen
leg. (ZMUC00046993).
Paratype
TANZANIA: 1 S, same data as holotype (ZMUC00046994).
Type locality
TANZANIA: Iringa Region, 10 km east of Iringa city, 7°46' S, 35°42' E.
Description
Size. Length ca. 9 cm. Diameter 6.0-6.1 mm. 61-67 podous rings, no apodous rings in front of telson.
Colour. After 19 years in alcohol uniform greyish; posterior part of metazona amber, legs and antennae
dark brownish.
Head. Without peculiarities.
Collum. With a marginal and a submarginal furrow.
Body rings. Almost perfect cylinders, not vaulted; suture straight; ozopores ca. three diameters behind
suture.
Limbus (Fig. 6). With sharply pointed lobes.
Anal valves. Each with a well-developed dorsal spine and a smaller, yet distinctive ventral one, margin
raised, with 3 setae not borne on tubercles.
Male legs. From 4 th pair with postfemoral and tibial pads on all legs, except last few pairs where only
postfemoral pads are present.
14
ENGHOFF FL, New millipede genus and species from the Udzungwa Mts
Fig. 6. Geotypodon iringensis gen. et sp. nov. A-D. Holotype, left gonopod. A. Anterior view. B. Posterior
view. C. Mesal-ventral view. D. Telomere and solenomere, basal (dorsal) view. — E. Paratype, limbus.
Abbreviations: atl = anterior distal lobe of telomere, bl = basal lamella of telomere, ex = coxa (seen
from the basis, with remains of muscles); itl = intermediate distal lamella of telomere; Ic = lateral
concavity of coxa; Ifl = longitudinally folded lamella; mf= anteriad metaplical flange; mp = metaplica;
msp = metaplical spine-like process; pn = posttorsal narrowing; pp = proplica; ptl = posterior distal
lobe of telomere; pts = proximal telomeral spine; slm = solenomere; tl = terminal lobe of telomere; tt =
torsotope. Scales: A-D = 0.2 mm, E = 0.01 mm
15
European Journal of Taxonomy 177: 1-19 (2016)
Gonopod coxa (Fig. 6). Basally parallel-sided, with antero-lateral concavity ( Ic ) (Fig. 6A). Proplica
ending in small proplical lobe (hidden behind anterior edge of metaplica on Fig. 6A). Metaplica with
poorly developed basal anteriad flange ( mf) (Fig. 6A), distally regularly rounded and projecting laterad
as semicircular lobe; metaplica at level of proplical lobe, with a long, latero-basad process ( msp ) on
anterior side of coxa (Fig. 6A-B); process straight and slender in anterior view, slightly curved and
broader in lateral view.
Gonopod telopodite (Fig. 6). Arculus 90°. Torsotope (tt) simple, compact, without processes (Fig. 6A).
Posttorsal narrowing (pn) pronounced, very slender, without processes or spines (Fig. 6A). Telopodite
just distal to posttorsal narrowing dividing into slender, whip-like solenomere and complicated telomere.
Solenomere ( slm ) curved in 3 dimensions (at least on preserved specimens), apically pointed, without
any outgrowths (Fig. 6A-D). Efferent groove continuing from posttorsal narrowing onto solenomere
and running all the way to its tip. Telomere with short, dark basal spine (pts) (Fig. 6B) and a basal
lamella ( bl) (Fig. 6A), followed by a slender part formed by a longitudinally folded lamella (If 7) with
irregular edges (Fig. 6B-C); distal part divided into a slender posterior lobe (ptl ) and a large, broad
anterior lobe (atl) (Fig. 6A-B, D), the latter terminally giving rise to a slender, strongly curved terminal
lobe (tl, curvature not visible on Fig. 6D). An intermediate lamella (itl) lodged in the space between atl
and plm (Fig. 6B).
Distribution and habitat
Known only from the environs of Iringa city. The altitude of the type locality will be at ca. 1600 m asl.
Coexisting species
No other odontopygid species were found together with G. iringensis gen. et sp. nov.
Notes
Geotypodon iringensis gen. et sp. nov. is very similar to G. multianulatus from Kenya, but there are
differences, including that in G. multianulatus the gonopod coxa has a much larger, narrower and less
rounded lateral lobe, and the solenomere has a small subdistal spine (cf. Discussion section).
Discussion
Of the three species described here, G. millemanus gen. et sp. nov. and G. submontanus gen. et sp. nov.,
both from the Udzungwa Mountains proper, are particularly similar, notably sharing the lamellar
structure of the mesal part of the coxal metaplica and the apically divided telomere with an intermediate
lamella (itl) between the apical and posterior distal lobes (atl and ptl). G. iringensis gen. et sp. nov. does
not have the metaplical lamella, but its telomere has the same distal elements (atl, itl, ptl) as the two
other species. In most other species of Geotypodon gen. nov. as here defined, the telomere does not show
a similar apical subdivision. Exceptions are G. multianulatus, G. sennae and G. specularis, where the
telomere is divided into two large lobes (Attems 1914, 1927; Brolemann 1903).
The unsatisfactory state of odontopygid taxonomy was characterized as follows by Hoffman & Howell
(2012): “That classification of odontopygid millipeds remains in a highly unsettled condition is due
both to the inherent complexity of the male genitalia and the traditional reliance on a few obvious
key-characters (a priori definition) instead of groupings made on the basis of overall similarity of the
appendages. Either approach is further complicated by frequent contradictory states of characters as
expressed in coxal or telopodital regions. Almost identical coxal forms may recur randomly amongst
taxa defined on the basis of the telopodite and thought to be not closely related. Body form tends to be
of monotonous similarity throughout the group, and female genitalia have so far provided very few
insights into relationships.” Hoffman & Howell went on to speculate that “The impression is thus gained
16
ENGHOFF H., New millipede genus and species from the Udzungwa Mts
of a group of organisms which have stabilized their general Gestalt whilst expressing innate genetic
variability dominantly in permutations of male reproductive structures. A young evolutionary status is
implied by the paucity of strong discontinuities in character systems and typical spectral expression of
traits.” Anybody who has tried to refer odontopygid specimens to a genus will agree that this is not easy.
Whereas the gonopods of each species are often highly characteristic, when it comes to grouping the
species, the problems are massive.
As an illustrative example, one may mention the record of Odontopyge cf. picea by Dieudonne (2014).
The record is illustrated with a very nice optical photo of the gonopods, and they do indeed look very
much like Geotypodon picea gen. et comb. nov. Examination of several specimens from among the
material recorded by Dieudonne, kindly put at my disposal by Didier VandenSpiegel (Royal Museum
for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium), did, however, reveal that whereas the specimens in most respects
agree with the definition of Geotypodon gen. nov. given above, they differ in a striking detail: just distal
to the posttorsal narrowing where the solenomere and the telomere begin, there is a peculiar sclerite
protruding from the main telopodite axis. The basal telomeral spine sometimes curves between this
sclerite and the main axis. Such a sclerite is absent from the true G. picea (Attems 1938: fig. 32).
Furthermore, the solenomere of these specimens has a tiny spine-like side branch near the tip, whereas
the solenomere tip is not visible on Attems’ figure and is not mentioned in the description. (As noted
above, one of the few differences between G. iringensis gen. et sp. nov. and G. multianulatus is that the
latter species has a similar small subapical spine.)
An alternative approach to odontopygid classification is clearly needed, and molecular characters are the
obvious choice. This will, however, require a huge effort. A search for “Odontopygidae” in GenBank
yields no results whatsoever, so there is scope for large-scale sampling and sequencing of well-vouchered
odontopygids.
This way, a more satisfactory classification may one day be obtained, but until then, in order to be
able to handle the amazing diversity of odontopygids, several existing genera need to be revised and
probably split into several smaller genera. This approach might seem to be at variance with the ideas
expressed by Hoffman & Howell (2012), i.e., “traditional reliance on a few obvious key-characters
(<a priori definition) instead of groupings made on the basis of overall similarity”, but at least as a
temporary solution such a splitting approach will be useful. Taking the monographic work of Kraus
(1960, 1966) as the starting point, several such splits have already been made by Demange (1981),
Frederiksen & Enghoff (2015), Hoffman (2002) and Hoffman & Howell (2012). One further split is
proposed in the present paper.
Around 400 species of Odontopygidae have been described (Enghoff 2014), but virtually every new
collection of millipedes from the Afrotropical region contains undescribed species. The number of
described odontopygid species can therefore potentially be multiplied by an unknown factor (5? 10?),
and the number of genera will - at least temporarily - also need to be multiplied, hopefully to a somewhat
smaller degree.
Acknowledgements
Thanks are due to Mogens Andersen, Peter Gravlund, Andy Jakobsen and Fine Sorensen, as well as
Frontier Tanzania, for collecting the specimens studied here, to Hans Reip for providing access to
old literature, to Nicholas Ioannou for photography, and to Didier VandenSpiegel, Royal Museum for
Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium, for lending important comparative material.
17
European Journal of Taxonomy 177: 1-19 (2016)
References
Attems C. 1909. Myriopoda. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der schwedischen zoologischen Expedition
nach dem Kilimandjaro, dem Meru und den umgebenden Massaisteppen Deutsch-Ostafrikas 1905-1906
3 (19): 1-64.
Attems C. 1912. Myriopoden. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der deutschen Zentral-Afrika-Expedition
1907-1908 unter Fuhrung Adolf Friedrichs, Herzog zu Mecklenburg 4 (Zoologie): 297-324.
Attems C. 1914. Afrikanische Spirostreptiden nebst Uberblick iiber die Spirostreptiden orbis terrarum.
Zoologica 25 (65/66): 1-233.
Attems C. 1927. Diplopoda. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Expedition R. Grauer nach Zentralafrilca,
Dezember 1909 bis Februar 1911. Annalen des naturhistorischen Museums Wien 41: 51-90.
Attems C. 1938. Diplopoden des Belgischen Congo. Polydesmoidea, 2. Nachtrag und Spirostreptoidea,
1. Nachtrag. Revue de Zoologie et de Botanique Africaines 31: 225-313.
Attems C. 1953. Neue Myriapoden des Belgischen Congo. Annales du Musee Royal du Congo Beige,
Sciences zoologiques 18: i-xii + 1-139.
Brolemann H.W. 1903. Materiali per lo studio della Fauna Eritrea raccolti nel 1901-03 dal dr. A.
Andreini tenente medico. I. Myriapodes. Bollettino della Societa entomologica italiana 35: 96-153.
http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/25171941
Demange J.-M. 1981. Contribution a la connaissance de la faune myriapodologique du Zaire (Myriapoda:
Diplopoda). Pubblicazioni dell Tstituto di Entomologia dell ’Universita di Pavia 15: 1-19.
Demange J.-M. 1990. Sur une collection de Myriapodes de EOuganda (massif de Ruwenzori).
(Diplopodes et Chilopodes). Atti della Accademia nazionale dei Lincei. Rendiconti Classe di science
fisiche, matematiche e naturali. Sezione III (Botanica, zoologia,fisiologia e patologia) 87: 553-560.
Doody K.Z., Howell K.M. & Fanning E. (eds) 2001. West Kilombero Scarp Forest Reserve - Zoological
Report. Report for the Udzungwa Mountains Forest Management and Biodiversity Conservation Project,
MEMA, Iringa, Tanzania.
Enghoff H. 2014. A mountain of millipedes I: An endemic species-group of the genus Chaleponcus Attems,
1914, from the Udzungwa Mountains, Tanzania (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida, Odontopygidae). European
Journal of Taxonomy 100: 1-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/eit.2014.10Q
Enghoff H. & Frederiksen S.B. 2015. A mountain of millipedes II: The genus Aquattuor Frederiksen,
2013 - five new species from the Udzungwa Mountains and one from Mt. Kilimanjaro, Tanzania
(Diplopoda, Spirostreptida, Odontopygidae). European Journal of Taxonomy 150: 1-25. http://dx.doi.
org/10.5852/eit.2015.150
Frederiksen S.B. & Enghoff H. 2015. East African odontopygid millipedes 4: A restricted redefinition
of the genus Rhamphidarpoides Kraus, 1960, a related new genus, five new species, and notes on
solenomere function (Diplopoda; Spirostreptida; Odontopygidae). Zootaxa 3926: 541-560. http://
dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3926.4.5
Hoffman R.L. 1980 (for 1979). Classification of the Diplopoda. Museum d'Histoire naturelle, Geneva.
Hoffman R.L. 1991. What is Odontopygel A solution to a long standing nomenclatorial enigma in the
Diplopoda (Spirostreptida Odontopygidae). Tropical Zoology 4: 65-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0394
6975.1991.10539475
Hoffman R.L. 2000. A note on the identity of Spirostreptus acutus Karsch (Spirostreptida, Odonto¬
pygidae). Myriapodologica 7 (4): 29-33.
Hoffman R.L. 2002. Review of Callistodontopyge, a genus of strikingly colored East African diplopods
(Spirostreptida: Odontopygidae). Myriapodologica 7 (10): 85-99.
18
ENGHOFF H., New millipede genus and species from the Udzungwa Mts
Hoffman R.F. & Howell K.M. 1981. Anew genus, composed of brightly colored East African species,
in the diplopod family Odontopygidae (Myriapoda, Diplopoda). Revue de Zoologie africaine 95 (3):
687-696.
Hoffman R.F. & Howell K.M. 2012. Anew genus of odontopygid millipedes from Tanzania (Diplopoda:
Spirostreptida: Odontopygidae). Journal of East African Natural History 101 (1): 61-12. http://dx.doi.
org/10,2982/028.101.0104
Jeekel C.A.W. 1970. Nomenclator Generum et Familiarum Diplopodorum. A List of the Genus and
Family-Group Names in the Class Diplopoda from the 10 th Edition of Linnaeus , 1758 , to the end of
1957. Monografieen van de Nederlandse Entomologische Vereniging 5, Feiden, The Netherlands.
Kraus O. 1958. Myriapoda (Chilopoda, Diplopoda). Parc National de LUpembal. Mission G.F. de Witte
54 (1): 1-67.
Kraus 0.1960. Athiopische Diplopoden I. Monographic der Odontopygidae-Odontopyginae (Diplopoda,
Spirostreptoidea). Annalen van het Koninklijk Museum van Belgisch-Congo 82: 1-207.
Kraus O. 1966. Phylogenie, Chorologie und Systematik der Odontopygoideen (Diplopoda, Spiro-
streptomorpha). Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 512: 1-143.
Marshall A.R., Brink H. & Topp-Jorgensen J.E. 2001. Millipede Diversity and Distribution - West
Kilombero Scarp Forest Reserve. In: Doody K.Z., Howell K.M., & Fanning E. (eds) West Kilombero
Scarp Forest Reserve - Zoological Report. 124-132. Report for the Udzungwa Mountains Forest
Management and Biodiversity Conservation Project, MEMA, Iringa, Tanzania.
Marshall A.R., Jorgensbye H.I.O., Rovero F., Platts P.F., White PCX. & Fovett J.C. 2010. The species-
area relationship and confounding variables in a threatened monkey community. American Journal of
Primatology 72: 325-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aip.2Q787
Ntashavu D. 2014. Etude systematique et ecologique des Diplopodes des ecosystemes forestiers du Burundi
occidental. Rapport de stage au Musee Royal de FAfrique Centrale de Tervuren, Belgique. Available from
ht tp://bi.chm-cbd.net/biodiversitv/documents-sur-la-biodiversite-du-burundi/recherches-en-cours/
recherches - pour-2014/recherche-sur-les-araignees-des-ecosystemes-forestiers-du-burundi/etude -
svstematique-et-ecologique-des-diplopodes-des-ecosvstemes-forestiers-du [accessed on 19 Feb. 2016]
Pierrard G. 1970. Odontopygidae nouveaux d’Afrique centrale (Myriapoda - Diplopoda). Revue de
Zoologie et de Botanique africaines 81 (1-2): 197-206.
Silvestri F. 1896.1 Diplopodi. Parte 1. Sistematica. Annali del Museo civico di Storia Natural di Genova
36: 121-254. http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/7697911
Manuscript received: 8 October 2015
Manuscript accepted: 26 November 2015
Published on: 26 February 2016
Topic editor: Rudy Jocque
Desk editor: Kristiaan Hoedemakers
Printed versions of all papers are also deposited in the libraries of the institutes that are members of the
EJT consortium: Museum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France; Botanic Garden Meise, Belgium;
Royal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium; Natural History Museum, Fondon, United
Kingdom; Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium; Natural History Museum of
Denmark, Copenhagen, De nm ark.
19