|
iy
~~
> »
Z- - my SN
o>)
ae >>>
2 4 ‘i
22D ;
we
y b)
barn AY Ms be
menu
Nar
4
we Ay
AUNEN ASS
OF THE
SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
VOLUME VII.
ANNALS
OF THE
SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
VOLUME VII.
DESCRIPTIONS or tue PALHONTOLOGICAL MATERIAL
COLLECTED sy tae OFFICERS or tHe GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
oF CAPE COLONY anp OTHERS.
PRINTED FOR THE
TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
AND
THE GEOLOGICAL COMMISSION or tHe COLONY or THE
CAPE OF GOOD HOPE
BY West, Newman & Co., LONDON
1913.
y nytt erent 201 om
Poi ie ee vay i ynerse oe et
AT TS ine arent weet w
ad
: =
@ a ; a
show an :
_ fo:
a
Kin LP ae) umater
8. tL ee ee
. ‘Grr is! ja)? he j nas
meee td 0 Cae? “pep du
TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM.
The Right Hon. Jonn Xavier Merriman, M.L.A.
Tuomas Murr, C.M.G., LL.D., M.A., F.R.S., F.R.S.E., Superintendent-General
of Education.
JoHN Wituism Jaccer, M.L.A., F.R.Stat.S.
SCIENTIFIC STAFF OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN
MUSEUM.
Louis ALBERT PrértncuEy, D.Sc., F.Z.S., F.E.S., Director.
Wiuu1amM Frepertck Purcewt, B.A., Ph.D., Keeper of Land Invertebrates, except
Insects. /
ArrHur Witttam Rocers, D.Se., F.G.S., Keeper of the Geological and Minera-
logical Collections.
Rosert Broom, D.Se., M.D., Keeper of the Paleontological Collections.
EK. P. Putnuirs, M.A., F.L.S., Assistant in Charge of the Herbarium.
K. H. Barnarp, B.A., Assistant in Charge of Fish and Marine Invertebrate
Collections.
S. H. Haveutron, B.A., Assistant in Charge of Geological Collections.
LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS.
C. W. ANDREWs.
Description of a New Plesiosaur (Plesiosaurus capensis, sp. nov.) from the
Uitenhage Beds of Cape Colony ......... HS a Gin GoUuDOmS ab OOOO
R. Broom.
F.
The Fossil Fishes of the Upper Karroo Beds of South Africa ..........
Notice of Some New South African Fossil Amphibians and Reptiles ..
On-a/large Extinct Species Of Buvalte acne o<seciee deme cee eee nee
On Evidence of a Large Horse recently Extinct in South Africa ........
On the Shoulder Girdle of Gynognathus 12.2. ..s.ecnosr see eeenieneee
An Attempt to Determine the Horizons of the Fossil Vertebrates of the
I YE OO: 5% wie Gye se cuslersieks giao Seti aistne ciase Ginie Ateiata. lain © ape RE RTE es
On the Dinosaurs of the Stormberg, South Africa ............eceeeeee
On a New Species of Propappus, and on the Pose of the Pareiasaurian
MUTED S. ete crete cle iche ays ernie et sieisyens eileen roneiertercieriiiciereereiicioets
Ona Species of Tylosaurus from the Upper Cretaceous Beds of Pondoland
On a New Type of Cynodont from the Stormberg ..............-e000-
On Some Points in the Structure of the Dicynodont Skull ............
OntthesManustandePes ol Pan erasais cei-reie elelerelersieieieicie cieicicineinie siete
On a New Mesosaurian Reptile (Noteosaurus africanus)........ 0.00000.
AURevisionlof the: Reptilesiofithe Karrool ca. acetic ce eerie:
L. Kireuin.
The Invertebrate Fauna and Paleontological Relations of the Uitenhage
DELIOS sic. svarole olrsesole. snevel cena) opstote otonete oie: aes ey avsnereleteasvs re ieyenetere ieee toner:
W. D. Lane.
Polyzoa and Anthozoa from the Upper Cretaceous Limestone of Need’s
Camp Bultalowivertecrietetrereretiiierrs scl lorie toler ttc ttciratcrer-
H. Woops.
Echinoidea, Brachiopoda, and Lamellibranchia from the Upper Creta-
ceous Limestone of Need’s Camp, Buffalo River ................6-
PAGE
309
LIST OF PLATES.
PLATE
|
|
.
|
|
Filisparsa ramosa, d’Orbigny.
Filisparsa fragilis, Marsson.
Diastopora compressa (Goldfuss).
Idmonea virgula, dOrbigny.
Crisina cenomana, d’Orbigny.
Crisina excavata, d’Orbigny.
Crisina marginata, d’Orbigny.
Tervia dorsata (von Hagenow).
Tervia gibbera, Gregory.
Entalophora virgula (von Hagenovw).
Entalophora conjugata (von Reuss).
Kntalophora echinata (Romer).
Spiropora verticillata (Goldfuss).
Entalophora madreporacea (Goldfuss).
Coptosoma capense, sp. nov.
Serpula cf. concava (J. Sow.).
Pecten (Syncyclonema) orbicularis, J. Sow.
Pecten (Camptonectes) cottaldinus, d’Orbigny
Pecten (Camptonectes) projectus, V'ate.
Pecten (Chlamys) cf. subacutus, Lam.
Lima (Acesta) obliquissima, Tate.
Lima (Mantellum) neglecta, Tate.
Perna atherstoni, Sharpe.
Mytilus uitenhagensis, sp. noy.
Modiola baini, Sharpe.
Nucula uitenhagensis, sp. nov.
Grammatodon jonesi (Tate).
Unio uitenhagensis, sp. nov.
Trigonia ventricosa (Krauss).
Trigonia kraussi, sp. nov.
Trigonia rogersi, sp. nov.
Trigonia rogersi, sp. nov.
Trigonia holubi, sp. noy.
Trigonia herzogi, sp. nov.
Trigonia rogersi, sp. nov.
Trigonia vau, Sharpe.
Trigonia stowi, sp. noy.
vill List of Plates.
PLATE
Trigonia stowi, sp. nov.
Trigonia conocardiiformis (Krauss).
Cardita nuculoides, Tate.
Astarte (Eriphyla) pinchiniana, Tate.
Anthonya lineata, sp. nov.
Tancredia schwarzi, sp. nov.
Thetironia papyracea (Sharpe).
Thetironia oblonga, sp. nov.
Trapezium? tatei, sp. nov.
Meretrix uitenhagensis, sp. nov.
VII.
NV
Meretrix uitenhagensis, sp. nov.
Mactra? dubia, sp. noy.
Pleuromya baini, Sharpe.
| Thracia sp.
|
Turbo atherstoni, Sharpe.
Turbo rogersi, sp. nov.
Turbo minutulus, sp. nov.
VIII. Natica uitenhagensis, sp. nov.
Natica rogersi, sp. nov.
Natica? mirifica, sp. nov.
Actzonina atherstoni (Sharpe).
| Limnea remota, sp. nov.
Phylloceras rogersi, sp. nov.
Bochianites glaber, sp. nov.
Meyeria schwarzi, sp. noy.
Holeostephanus wilmane, sp. nov.
Holecostephanus cf. baini (Sharpe).
Holcostephanus rogersi, sp. nov.
Meyeria schwayzi, sp. nov.
U
|
Holeostephanus cf. baini (Sharpe).
Holcostephanus rogersi, sp. nov.
Holcostephanus modderensis, sp. nov.
Meyeria schwarzi, sp. nov.
XI. Holcostephanus uitenhagensis, sp. nov.
Hybodus africanus, n. sp.
Ccelacanthus africanus, Broom.
Ceratodus ornatus, n. sp.
Hydropessum kannemeyeri, g. et sp. nov.
Helichthys draperi, S.-Voodward.
| Helichthys browni, g. et sp. nov.
Oxygnathus browni, n. sp.
| Cleithrolepis minor, n. sp.
. Pholidophorus browni, n. sp.
XIV. Gryponyx africanus, g. et sp. nov.
( Gryponyx africanus, g. et sp. nov.
| Massospondylus carinatus, Owen.
‘| Massospondylus harriesi, sp. nov.
| Aitonyx palustris, g. et sp. nov.
List of New Generic Names. 1X
PLATE
XVI. Massospondylus harriesi, sp. nov.
Massospondylus harriesi, sp. nov.
XVII.) Aitonyx palustris, g. et sp. nov.
. Geranosaurus atavus, g. et sp. nov.
XVIII. Plesiosaurus capensis, sp. nov.
XIX.— ( Pr ; ;
XXI, | Propappus rogersi, sp. nov.
-xr1_ ( Lylosaurus capensis, sp. nov.
XXIL. ; ; ;
( Tritheledon riconoi, g. et sp. nov.
DATE OF ISSUE OF THE PARTS.
Part 1, July 2, 1908.
Part 2, September 24, 1908.
Part 3, April 28, 1909.
Part 4, July 5, 1911.
Part 5, July 12, 1912.
Part 6, March 20, 1913.
LIST OF NEW GENERIC NAMES
INTRODUCED IN THIS VOLUME.
PAGE
PULOMY Kawi.) Yen MIN OSAULIA) sO LOOM y araleicls)scleveveiele re «olor eieis)o clove siels\ else BOC DOE 304
aura Oy (Cynodontia) BLOOM | er airs eve eye siete a cieole ele eve sel 1« © elle) sie s)e) ese 272
IBICCASAULU Selo Oe LST OOMMUmEctay evarerereietrenelen ietslcieielercicl sieves ollelcloielorerocciele 11 lsaieiere 276
Geranosaurus; n..¢. (Dinosauria); Broom “Vase... s 2.66 ie cee eee nesses 306
Cryponyx, ne 2. (Dinosauria), Broome nrirciis| <6 aie lsc elocie ese ao «cle elsialeie 294
Gyposaurus, n> g> (Dinosauria); Broom) <3. 5 ~ 2ccie os oe ewe ee lel nse 293
Heleophilus, n. g. (Mesosauria), Broom ......... 2... cece cece creo cece cone 277
Helichthys, n. g. (Actinopterygii), Broom. ... 2... 52.2... 000cee st cess ewees 254
Hydropessum, n. g. (Actinopterygii), Broom .......... 2022 ceeeceeeeeeecs 266
Noteosaurus, n. g. (Proganosauria), Broom ........ 0... cece rece eee ee eeee 308
Tritheledon, n. g. (Cynodontia), Broom............ccccsceeeceres pG00G0C 334
INDEX OF GENERA AND
SPECIES.
——>———_
A. PAGE PAGE
Bocutanires, Lory........ ovonon 181
ACANTHODISCUS, (WiUtlig 20 «cies si «le 207 borcherdsi (Cyprina), Tate ...... 150
Acusta, H. d A. Adams ........ 71 | bronni (Astarte), Krauss ........ 26
AcTtonina, @Orbigny ......6.4. 176 | bronni (Seebachia),............ 43, 47
acutus (Heleophilus), Broom .... 277 | browni (Euskelesaurus), Hualey.. 292
ANLUROSAURUS, Owen ......00%- 363 browni (Helichthys), Broom...... 254
/ALURosUCHUS, Broom .......... 364 browni (Massospondylus), Seeley 293
AMMORWOS JRO oa 5acnaoon Kc 304, 364 ~browni (Oxygnathus), Broom . 259
africanus (Belemnites), J'ate .... 27 browni (Pholidophorus), Broom .. 267
africanus (Capitosaurus), Broom.. 271 Busauis, Hamilton-Smith........ 279
africanus (Coelacanthus), Broom.. 253 |
africanus (Gryponyx), Broom .... 294
africanus (Hybodus), Broom .... 252 C.
africanus (Noteosaurus), Broom.. 358
ALOPECODON, Broom .....sesccee 363
ALOPOSAURUS, Broom ...eeseee . 3863
AUMMMONITES Gysveieisasie'sie eteus.s cictel 25
angulosa (Idmonea), d’Orbigny .. 6
ANTHODON, Owen weer eeots cect 362
IAN THHONIWAN MG LDU St ieiererenerelersiersrerniete BY,
antipodum (Berenicea), Tate .... 33
ARCHHOSUCHUS, Broom ....+..0+- 062
ARCTOGNATHUS, Broom ........<. 363
ARCTOSUCHUS: (BROONUs oislelelele cieierele 363
ARNOGNATHUS, Broom ........-. 363
AsTARTE, J. Sowerby ........ 26, 128
atavus (Geranosaurus), Broom 306
atherstoni (Acteonina), Sharpe 37, 176
atherstoni (Holcostephanus), Sharpe
27, 28, 31, 37, 187 |
atherstoni (Perna), Sharpe ...... 75
atherstoni (Pinna), Sharpe ...... 76
atherstoni (Psammobia), Sharpe.. 154
atherstoni (Turbo), Sharpe ...... 164
B.
baini (Holecostephanus), Sharpe
27, 28, 31, 197
baini (Modiola), Sharpe ........
eee (Mytilus), Sharpe.......... 33
baini (Pareiasaurus), Seeley...... 353
baini (Pleuromya), Sharpe ...... 167
IBAURIA, SB TOOTUs merieeienieeiee ~. 212, 364
BELEMNITES, Lamarck .......... 210
BERENICEA, Lamarch..........<- 33
calypso (Idmonea), @’Orbigny .. 5
Campronrecres, Meek .......... 65
capense (Coptosoma), Woods .... 13
capensis (Ceratodus), S.-Woodward 253
| capensis (Equus), Broom ........ 281
| capensis (Gyposaurus), Broom .. 293
capensis (Orinosaurus), Lydekker 292
capensis (Plesiosaurus), Andrews 309
capensis (Semionotus), S.- Woodward 262
| capensis (Tylosaurus), Broom .... 332
caperata (Patella), Yate ........ 163
Capitosaurus, Milnster ........ 271
CARDITA, BrUguiene | lereiieie rere 127
carinatus (Massospondylus), Owen 291
CARYOPHYLLIA, Stokes ........¢. Ti
cassiope (Trigonia), Z'ate 32, 125
cenomana (Crisina), d’Orbigny .. 5
CERATODUS PA GASSI2 \ selene 253
CHELYPosauRUsS, Broom ...... bo ahos}
CHDAM YS) BOLtEN) > «sewlereerics 69
CISTECEPHALUS, Owen ......+.+- 363
| CLEITHROLEPIS, Heerton ........ 264
C@LACANTHUS, Agussiz .......... 253
85 |
complicata (Crassatella), Tate .. 26, 27
compressa (Diastopora), Goldfuss 3
concaya, cf. (Serpula), J. Sowerby 63
conjugata (Entalophora), v. Reuss 9
conocardiiformiis (Trigonia), Krauss
23, 27, 35, 42, 119
cottaldinus (Pecten), d’Orbigny
37, 48, 65
| CRASSATELLA, Lamarck ........ 26
| Crioceras, @Orbigny ........6. 27
Index of Genera and Species.
PAGE
CRISINARGONDIGNI!... esse oss s 4
Cryprocynopon, Seeley ........ 363
CYNOCHAMPSA, Owen ..........-. 363
CYNoDRACO, Owen ......... sadcd. ett
CynoGNaTHus, Seeley ........ 283, 363
cynops (Bauria), Broom ........- 272
CyNosucHuS, Owen..... Sher ecote. bess 363
CXPRINAS LEQMATCK seo cies vic cccee 149
D.
decurrens (Tervia), Pocta ...... U
DELPHINOGNATHUs, Seeley ...... 362
dentata (Gervillia), Krauss .... 43, 47
DrapEMopoN, Seeley ...........- 364
IDTAALURODON, BROOM we <cls cece. 363
Drasropora, Lamouroux ........ 2
DictyoryGE, Egertoit.......ee.0- 262
IDTGYNODON, O1ven aeons sss 339, 363
disticha (Idmonea), Michelin .... 5
dominicalis (Gastrochena), Sharpe 162
dominicalis (Pholadomya), Sharpe
dorsata (Tervia), v. Hagenow ....
draperi (Helichthys), S.-Woodward 257
dubia (Mactra?) Kitchin ........ 156
E.
KiccasavRus, Broom .......-- 276, 362
echinata (Entalophora), Rémer 9
IDWOADOERE TROON comoonooou0doK 363
EINDOTHIODON, Owen .....0..00.. 363
FENNTALOPHORA, Lamouroux ...... 8
IHOSUCHUSS Vatson eeicce sect eens 364
HI QUUS IStNTUCUS) aeleieneeie oreie ole oie Bo eel
ErtpHostoma, Broom ......- 363
ERIPHYDA, Stoliczka ..........>- 128
ErytHrosucuus, Broom.......... 364
Kunorosaurus, Seeley ......... . 364
Kurarxerta, Broom (ined.) ...... 366
KuskeLesaurus, Hualey...... 292, 364
excavata (Crisina), d’Orbigny.... 6
JaPOERAIS MG) céocuacapoducauc 16, 77
extoni (Cleithrolepis), S.-Woodward 264
F.
Finisparsa, d@’Orbigny .......... 1
formosa (Dictyopyge), Broom .... 262
fragilis (Filisparsa), Marsson .... 2
fungatus (Hamites), Brongniart.. 25
G.
GALEcHIRUS, Broom .......... 55 6B
GAMMORSHB Oona cece s «aeciee 362
GaLErPus, Broom ......... Son00 — Gly)
|
|
33 |
7
XI
PAGE
GALESAURUS, Owen .....-.....-- 363
GASTROCHENA, Spengler ..... 162
GERANOSAURUS, Broom ...... 306, 364
gibbera (Tervia), Gregory .... 7
glaber (Bochianites), Kitchin .. ‘38, 181
GuaNnosucHus, Broom...... a Aeisis.s 363
goldfussi (Trigonia), Tate ...... 32
GomPHoGNatuHus, Seeley .......- 364
Goniomya, J. L. Agassiz ........ 159
Gorconops, OLWAD coecoocdcooode 363
Gramraronox, Meek & Hayden ws 88
GROTRIANIA, Speyer ..... SOeuOCC 26
(Carvaronpec, JERI coodeoudce 294, 364
GYPOSAURUS, Broom ........ 293, 364
18,
Jaana, J2ANts GoesoodbonoeDoUC 25
harriesi (Massospondylus), Broom 299
HELEOPHILUS, Broom........0-0- 277
HELEOSAURUS, Broom .......- s 364
IIELEOSUCHUS, Broont: o.oo... .c oc 364
HeuicutuHys, Broom ...... apetevete 254
herzogi (Astarte), Goldfuss.. 26, 47,128
herzogi (Lyrodon), Goldfuss .... 25
herzogi (Trigonia), Goldfuss 34, 40, 101
HoxcostrerHanus, Neumayr...... 184
holubi (Trigonia), Witchin.. 35, 40, 103
Horranorarsus, Seeley ......-- 293
FLOWISTA, 15 7;OOT0N werctclelcl ace cletch eve A 364
FAlY@NASUCHUS, Broom ....6...0- 363
TLVBODUSs AGQSS1Z) «yee eletse recreate 252
Hyproprssum, Broom .......-.- 266
Tr
IctrDOGNATHUS, Broom .......... 363
Icripoprsis, Broom ..... Snole el arenes 363
JETT OSUCHUSS B?OOM a.) o1eicie) leletetor= 363
IpmoneEa, Lamouroux.........26: +
imbricata (Exogyra), Krauss 27, 37,43,77
imbricata (Placunopsis), Tate 32
intermedius (Hamites), J. Sowerby 25
J.
jonesi (Grammatodon), Tate 48, 88
jonesiana (Ostrea), Tate ........ 31
K.
kannemeyeri (Ceratodus), Seeley.. 253
_ kannemeyeri (Hydropessum), Broom 266
| kannemeyeri (‘Trematosaurus),
BROOD: oeoanooo oogdDo C040 ; 270
| Karoomys, Broom ......+-.++0+: 364
kolbei (Dicynodon), Broom ...... 338
|
Xll
PAGE
kraussi (Cucullea), Tate ........ 43
kraussi (Trigonia), Kitchin.. 34, 49, 95
L.
LacazELuA, M.-Chalmas ..... Sica melD
Lima, Brugwiére ...... oe oo. efi
TIMNawA, Lamarck .......-sss« 178
lineata (Anthonya), Kitchin 137
longlandsiana (Astarte), Tate .. 128
IGYCORHINUS; BOOM \.4 alee cele 363
Tivcosaumus,, Oven ms eeiciielcicde- 363
LV COSUCHUS POON Mee eine ce icmare 363
TAVRODONI re aye oto.sie. 5 0 Stee kce's ev ercions 25
LystTROSAURUS, Cope ...........- 363
M.
Macrra, Linneus . - L566
madreporacea (Entalophora), Gold-
UBS) wee asks, lel wes aue tere avers ore aoe 10
MantELuuM, Bolten ......+.0.0- 74
marginata (Crisina), d@’Orbigny .. 6
Massosponpyuus, Owen .. 291, 293, 364
MELINODON, Broom ....c..ccoes 364
MmREDRIX. 5 QILanClomrciterettete miele 151
MESOSAURUS, Gervais.......-00- 364
MeEsosucuus, Watson ........0. 364
Wibopundy WECM Saococscococ00K6 212
MicroGomeHopon, Seeley ........ 364
minor (Cleithrolepis), S.-Woodward 266
minutulus (Turbo), Kitchin 168
mirifica (Natica?), Kitchin ...... 174
modderensis (Holcostephanus)
did (Op arearn po ht rD SoG OE 202
Moproua, Lamarck .......... ; 85
MoscHoers, Broom ......-.ccee-- 362
Weaniquisy JG CAE) nooncgou90e- 82
ING
INUNCOING ILMB soaocooucoande 171
neglecta (Lima), Z'iate ........ 37, 74
INELTHHAl OD) TOULGMeeerre sere 17
Norrosaurus, Broom........ 358, 364
NorocHampsa, Broom........ 307, 364
INUCULA, Lamarchiae eect 87
nuculoides (Cardita), Tate ...... 127
NYTHOSAURUS, Owen .........+-- 363
O.
obliquissima (Lima), Tate ...... 71
oblonga (Thetironia), Kitchin . 146
orbicularis (Pecten), J. Sowerby... 65
Ontnosaurus, Lydekker ........ 292
ornatus (Ceratodus), Broom...... 253
Index of Genera and Species.
PAGE
OSTREA, Linn@us <<. ..2s0-..0.- iy 7/7
| OstREA (Exocyra), 7’. Say...... 16, 77
OUDENODON, Owen .....2.2-- ae 338
OxyGNnaTHuS, Egerton .......... 209
12
PALAcRoDOoN, Broom ..... sieve 364
IPATTGUAN AGED 70 ONUMETeeinateleelcioe: 364
palustris (Autonyx), Broom ...... 304
papyracea (Thetironia), Sharpe .. 142
PARDOSUCHUS se 1OONtUteerieeierereteler 363
PAREIASAURUS, Owen ........ 353, 362
INGO ID BQN 3565 0000000000 163
IPinlepion, WLP gacoganoan5bo506 65
PrctEn (NritHEa), Droult ...... 17
PELOSUCHUS, Broom seacnceccces 362
PERNA, (BiUguUce4nes veercdeltleleiletere WG 03
PHOLIDOPHORUS, Agassiz ........ 267
PHYLLOCERAS, SwesS &....000 s+ 0s 179
pinchiniana (Astarte), Tate .. 33, 135
pinchiniana (Serpula), Tate ...... 64
INNA LGUNILEUS reels) elelsiereie'e sia 06
Puacunopsis, Morr. & Lycett. . 32
PLEsIosAuRuUsS, Conybeare ........ 309
| SPER UROMYA, A GUSStz teiimcerecle eis 3 Lo”
PLEUROTOMARIA, Defrance ...... 163
priscus (Bubalis), Broom ........ 279
priscus (Kecasaurus), Broom .... 276
PRISTERODON, Hurley .........- 363
PRISTEROGNATHUS, Seeley ........ 363
PROCOLOPHON, Owen ........ 3 362
PropicyNopon, Broom ....... neo GlaB
projectus (Pecten), Tate........ 48, 66
Propaprus, Seeley .......... 322, 02
PROTEROSUCHUS, Broom ......0- 364
PSAMMOBIA. EQManchseiiee cto as 154
PTYCHOMYA, AQQSS1Z <.000002..6 26,210
R.
ramosa (Filisparsa), d’Orbigny .. 2
IREMONDIA, G@b0.. oniceicee ince 26
remota (Limnea), Ivitchin .... 178
yiconoi (Tritheledon), Broom .... 334
rogersi (Holcostephanus), Kitchin 201
rogersi (Natica), Kitchin ........ 173
rogersi (Phylloceras), Kitchin .. 179
rogersi (Propappus), Broom...... 323
rogersi (Trigonia), Kitchin .. 34, 42, 99
rogersi (Turbo), Kitchin ........ 167
rubidgeanus (Pecten) .......... 32
rugulosa (Cyprina), Sharpe . 37, 149
8.
SAUROSTERNON, Hualey ........ 362
SCALOPOSAURUS, Owen .......0-. 363
Index of Genera and Species. xl
PAGE
ScaPpanopon, Broom ..... ..... 363
schenki (Astieria), Pavlow ...... 202
schwarzi (Meyeria), Kitchin .... 212
schwarzi (Tancredia), Kitchin. . 38, 139
ScyLacoenatuus, Broom (ined.) .. 366
Scynacops, Broom (ined.) ...... 366
ScyLacosaurus, Broom .......... 363
ScymnoenatuHus, Broom ..... .. 3093
Scymnoruinvs, Broom (ined.) .... 366
ScymNosauRus, Broom .........- 363
Srrpacuia, Neumayr............ 26
SEMIONOTUS, Agassiz ............ 262
SERPULA, Linn@us ...........6. 63
SESAMODON, Broom ............ 364
simplex (Reptotubigera), de Loriol 4
skirtopodus (Hortalotarsus), Seeley 293
SoLEcurtTts, de Blainville ...... 155
spinosissimum (Crioceras), Newmayr
27, 31
Sprropora, Lamouroux.......... 10
stowi (Trigonia), Kitchin .. 41, 42,115
subacutus ef. (Pecten), Lamarck.. 09
subanceps (Ammonites), Tate.... 27
subjurensis (Placunopsis), Tate .. 32
SyncycLonemMaA, Meek............ 65
Ty
WAMIBORRIAG SCCLEY) ic aieieeies ee ose) CO
SAN COREDEN, 57 Cettin vaery. «ste nie ciel 139
TAOGNATHUS, Broom ,....-2...... 363
TAPINOCEPHALUS, Owen.......... 362
tatei (Trapezium ?), Kitchin .... 148
tatei (Trigonia), Newmayr ...... 27,34,
38, 40, 125
AUATROPS Di OONUEN sete icieices ite 362
tenuis (Helichthys), Broom...... 258
{ui DUUMED ec baceoocnK0e56N 6
THAMNASTR@A, Lesauvage........ 62
Tuecripea (LacazeELua), W.-Chalmas 15
THECODONTOSAURUS, Broom ......- 364
THELEGNATHUS, Broom.......... 362
PAGE
THeETIRONIA, Stoliczka .......... 142
THRAGCTAS Deachs. a.cac<-s 22.4 L6O
TIGRISUCHUS, Owen ........ 362, 363
TITANOSUCHUS, Owen ......... 363
TrapEezium, v. Miihlfeldt ........ 148
TremaTosacrus, Braun.......... 270
TRIBOLODON, Seeley ...........- 364
TRIGONIA, Brugwiére...........- 91
TrrracHopon, Seeley .......... 364
TRITHELEDON, Broom ........ 334, 364
TROCHOSAURUS, Broom ........0. 363
ToORBONINNECUS) Wao scien ieee 164
TynosAuRuS; Marsh = jase <6 332
U.
| uitenhagensis (Holcostephanus),
TRGECRUID stereos iieea rarest 206
| uitenhagensis (Meretrix), MKitchin 151
| uitenhagensis (Mytilus), Avtchin.. 82
uitenhagensis (Natica), Kitchin .. 171
uitenhagensis (Nucula), Kitchin.. 87
uitenhagensis (Unio), Kitchin.... 89
Wixi to) WYATT cogq aoe Sau0de 6a46 89
V.
29, 41, 42,
48, 49, 110
vau (Trigonia), Sharpe ....
| ventricosa (Trigonia), Krauss 27, 29,
34, 40, 46, 49, 91
verticillata (Spiropora), Goldfuss 10
virgula (Entalophora), v. Hagenow 8
virgula (Idmonea), d’Orbigny .... 4
Wee
wilmane (Holcostephanus),
Kitchin
ie rive :
a
or 7
Ri i
ett
= .
7 a] ane 4
: ) }
ae
_ - a oe y a ;
- Mt wt oF
ote ies!
Ree. iG OU » Oo a
7 - } ;
diy Mh o ubS apm
Fal 2 or i é - . ee
: . a) iS a ' | @it < va
LL 7 _ «ft r - ae
mh vy
‘ J
7 ble 7 gees. : ae 72 | 7 |
| ed De iat —— :
=
So
- - ;
‘ ”
a; iy - —_ a) ht :
7 A : : | «4 :
| 7 ie . Oe
7 , 7 1 TT - . nif i -
: 7 y eae
= - 7 7 : 7 i vo -
a — a ita : ‘) , 7 ,
a! " - D ; . + ~,s
ty
— Pr. 7
: ’ 7 : a
a)
uy y : 7 _
= oe 7 a a
t Y ; :
; : 7 ; - Te . b 7 ;
} ‘ 7 | -2 oul ; A
Pero ik on
. ve > as ‘ 7 , :
i _ “ng -
- f a q
_ : :
| 7 -
\ fy ; 7 ; :
ae _ ,
7 > - ra _ >
7
a * - ;
; : ; :
; 7
7 ; 7
-
ol?
(1)
1.—Polyzoa and Anthozoa from the Upper Cretaceous Limestone of
Need’s Camp, Buffalo River—By W. D. Lane, M.A., F.G.S.,
British Museum (Natural History).
Plate I.
THE rock containing the Polyzoa here described, is so full of them
in places that they compose the rock nearly to the exclusion of
its other components. Such pieces closely resemble in general ap-
pearance specimens of a rock composed mainly of Polyzoa from the
Danian of Faxoe, in the island of Seeland, Denmark. Moreover, in
both rocks the surfaces of the specimens are very ill-preserved,
being rough, with the details ill-defined, as though the specimens
were covered with a thin incrustation. And in both the large
proportion of erect, cylindrical Polyzoa is remarkable.
The species described below range from the Neocomian to the
Danian, and the majority are restricted to the Chalk. In so far
as it is possible to assign a definite horizon to the deposit on the
evidence of the Cyclostome Polyzoa only, it appears that its age is
Senonian or Danian.
DIASTOPORIDA.
Genus FILISPARSA, d’Orbigny.
Gregory * places this genus among the Diastoporide because of
its resemblance to Proboscina. He says it may be regarded as
“a group of Proboscine with an erect habit’; and goes on to show
how some species of Pil’sparsa correspond with some of Proboscina.
But he also points out that Pergens{ placed the genus in the
Idmoneide. The nature of the zoarium and distribution of the
zoccia are such that the genus occupies an intermediate place
* J. W. Gregory, B.M. Cat. Cret. Bryozoa, vol. i., 1899, p. 67.
+ HE. Pergens, Rev. de Bry. du Cret. fig. par d’Orb., Bull de la Soc. Belge de
Geol., iii., 1890, Mem., p. 339.
I
2 Annals of the South African Museum.
between the two families; and thus it shows the probability of
the present classification of the Cyclostome Polyzoa being highly
artificial. But until the distribution and life history of each
described form has been determined, it is impossible to form a
natural classification of the whole. Meanwhile, the present
artificial classification must be used for lack of better.
FInisPpARsSA RAMOSA, d’Orbigny.
Plate I.,' fig. 1.
1853. Filisparsa ramosa, d’Orbigny, Bry. Crét., p. 819, pl. 756
figs. 18-22.
Zoarium of erect, flattened, solid branches, in one plane. Zocecia
only opening on one face of the zoarium. Apertures tend to arrange-
ment in Y-shaped bands across the zoarium, but their distribution
is somewhat irregular; four or five in a series; distance between
apertures of the same series one-half times to once the diameter
of an aperture; between apertures of neighbouring series twice to
four times. Zocecia immersed.
There are three fragments of this species, one of which is
figured.
Distribution. Turonian and Senonian.
FILISPARSA FRAGILIS, Marsson.
Plate I., fig. 2.
1887. Filisparsa fragilis, Marsson, Bry. Riig.; Pal. Abh., vol. iv.,
p. 36, pl. iii., fig. 8.
Zoarium of erect, cylindrical, or slightly flattened solid branches,
in one plane. Zoccia only opening on one face of the zoarium.
Apertures arranged in single series across the zoarium; four or
five in a series; distance between apertures of the same series
one-half times or less the diameter of an aperture; between those
of neighbouring series twice-and-a-half to thrice. Zocoecia immersed,
but the boundaries between them are more or less apparent as
ridges. One fragment out of seven is figured.
Distribution. Senonian.
Genus DIASTOPORA, Lamouroux.
Diastopora is here used, as in the British Museum Catalogue, for
Diastoporidee with an erect uni-, bi-, or even multi-laminar zoarium,
consisting of fronds or of very flattened branches.
Polyzoa and Anthozoa from Upper Cretaceous Limestone. 3
DIASTOPORA COMPRESSA (Goldfuss).
Plate I., fig. 3.
1827. Ceriopora conpressa, Goldfuss, Petref. Germ., p. 37, pl. xi.,
fig. 4.
1851. Ditaxia convpressa, von Hagenow, Bry. Maastr. kr., p. 50,
pleiv.; 1g5 10:
Zoarium of erect bilaminar fronds. Zocecia immersed, and their
boundaries not apparent, or very slightly so. Apertures irregularly
arranged ; the distance between the apertures in a proximal-distal
direction is about once the diameter of an aperture; that in a
direction at right angles to the last is once or less than once the
diameter of an aperture. This definition does not distinguish D.
conupressa from Mesenterrpora Hyselyi, de Loriol (Urg. Land.: Mém.
Soc. hely. Sci. Nat., vol. xxiii., 1869, p. 40, pl. iii., fig. 1), from the
Urgonian of Neuchatel; and from the figures it is difficult to see
any difference between these two forms. But fig. 10 m. on pl. iv. of
von Hagenow’s work shows a piece of a zoarium with the apertures
elongate in a proximal-distal direction. It is only described in the
legend ‘‘ Theil der Oberfliche am oberen Rande,” but it looks as if
this were a worn surface and the elongation of the apertures were
due to the angle between the surface and the direction of the zowcia
at that level. It is possible that in M. Hyselyi the direction of the
zocecia would be perpendicular to the surface for some distance, in
which case a worn specimen would show circular apertures.
D’Orbigny’s figure of Bidiastopora Campicheana (Bry. Crét.,
1853-4, p. 800, pl. 784, figs. 6 and 8) also resembles Diastopora
compressa and Mesenteripora Hyselyt. But Pergens, who has seen
d’Orbigny’s specimens, identifies B. Campicheana with B. acuta,
d’Orbigny, and re-figures the latter (Revision des Bry. Crét. fig. par
d’Orbigny, 1890, pl. xi., fig. 7), showing it to be a form quite distinct
from D. convpressa and M. Hyselyt.
Gregory places as synonyms of Diastopora compressa the two
forms figured by d’Orbigny as Mesenteripora compressa and M.
neoconensis (Bry. Crét., 1853-4, pl. 756, figs. 10-13 and 7-9); but
both these forms have emergent zoccia.
Among the material described the only specimen referable to this
Species is a small fragment of the base of a frond. The earliest
zocecia, as would be expected, differ from the later ones; they are
further apart and slightly emergent. Near the edge of the fragment
they are seen to be close together and immersed, with their boun-
daries slightly shown. The apertures, especially near the edge,
4 Annals of the South African Museum.
where they are slightly worn, are somewhat elongated in a
proximal-distal direction.
Distribution. Senonian.
IDMONEIDA.
Genus IDMONEA, Lamouroux.
IDMONEA VIRGULA, d’Orbigny.
Plate I., fig. 4.
1851. Idmonea virgula, d’Orbigny, Bry. Crét., pl. 631, figs. 15-17.
1863. Leptotubigera simplex, de Loriol, Invert. Mt. Saléve, p. 127
pl. xvi., fig. 3.
Zoarium of a single zocecium-bearing ridge, without a selvage
short (about thrice as long as broad), rapidly becoming broader
distally. The only specimen of this species has a flat reverse face,
but does not encrust any object. But its general shape and corre-
spondence with d’Orbigny’s figure of Idmonea virgula renders it
probable that it was originally encrusting some perishable object
which has since decayed. This raises the question whether other
Idmoneidie with flat or convex reverse faces, such as Crisina
marginata, d’Orbigny, in some cases may not have been forms
encrusting some object, such as seaweed, which has_ since
perished.
Distribution. Neocomian and Cenomanian.
Genus CRISINA, d’Orbigny.
The separation of Crisina from allied Idmoneid genera, especially
from Retecava, is attended with much difficulty.* The genus is
here used as restricted by Gregory,+ and distinguished from Tervia
and Leticrisina, which Gregory regards as subgenera. Tervia is
here considered as equal to Crisina in systematic significance.
Crisina thus regarded may be defined as a genus of Idmoneide,
in which the zoarium is erect, and consists of solid branches, which
are subeylindrical or moderately compressed; the reverse face is
well developed, but does not overlie an “axial rod” as in Retecava ;
there is no unpaired median nor multiple median series of apertures
on the obverse face ; the apertures are in single lateral series, and
circular.
* See W. D. Lang, Geol. Mag., 1907, p. 125.
+ J. W. Gregory, Brit. Mus. Cat. Cret. Bry., 1899, vol. i., pp. 159, 168, and 176.
Polyzoa and Anthozoa from Upper Cretaceous Limestone. 5
CRISINA CENOMANA, d’Orbigny.
Plate I., fig. 5.
1851. Crisina cenomana, d’Orbigny, Bry. Crét., p. 732, pl. 614,
figs. 1-5.
1845. Idmonea disticha, Michelin, Icon. Zooph., p. 204, pl. lii.,
fig. 18.
1853. Idmonea calypso, d’Orbigny, Bry. Crét., p. 733, pl. 747,
figs. 10-14.
1890. Idmonea cenomana, Pergens, Revision des Bry. Crét. fig. par
d’Orbigny, p. 344, pl. xii., fig. 3.
Zoarium subcylindrical, and the reverse face is convex or flat;
there is no keel on the obverse face ; the zocecia are immersed, and
when the reverse face is flat the zocecial boundaries are clearly
marked ; the lateral series of apertures are quite regular, and just
reach the middle line of the obverse face; there are about four
apertures in each lateral series; the apertures are circular, all of
one size; those of the same series are distant less than one diameter
of an aperture; those of different series two or three diameters of an
aperture.
This definition distinguishes C. cenomana from all cretaceous
forms of Retecava as well as from others of Crisina. Those species
of Retecava which most resemble it have a very slight median keel
on the obverse face, except f. Abbotti (Gabb and Horn), (Journ.
Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, ser. ii., vol. iv., 1860, p. 404, pl. Ixix.,
figs. 45-47), but in this form there is a ridge down the obverse face
of each zocecium.
Two distinct forms are included under the above definition, and
both occur in the material here described. In the first, resembling
d’Orbigny’s figure of C. cenomana, the zoccial boundaries are hardly
visible and the reverse face is convex. In the second (pl. xlv., fig. 4),
resembling d’Orbigny’s figure of Idmonea calypso, the zocecial boun-
_daries are strongly marked and the reverse face is flat. The only
justification for placing the two forms under one name is their
identification by Pergens.* Speaking of C. cenomana, under the
synonyms of which he had placed JI. calypso, Pergens says,
‘“‘quelquefois les branches sont aplaties a la partie inférieure et
forment ainsi une variété décrite comme J. calypso.” That is,
I. calypso is an earlier growth stage of C. cenomana confined to the
proximal portions of the zoarium. In view of the very fragmentary
character of the specimens usually obtained of these erect Idmoneids,
* E, Pergens, Revision des Bry. Crét. fig. par d’Orbigny, 1890, p. 344.
6 Annals of the South African Museum.
it is exceedingly rare to get knowledge of the growth stages of any
one form. But the specimens of C. cenomana here described do not
look like proximal ends of zoaria. It is likely, then, that a form
exists whose adult zoarium over its greater extent has the characters
of I. calypso, d’Orbigny, while these are confined to the proximal
parts of an adult zoarium of C. cenomana.
Distribution of both C. cenomana and I. calypso. Cenomanian.
CRISINA EXCAVATA (d’Orbigny).
Plate I., fig. 6.
1853. Idmonea excavata, d’Orbigny, Bry. Crét., p. 742, pl. 749,
figs. 11-15.
Zoarium subtriangular with a flat or concave reverse face; the
lateral series are regular and contain six to eight apertures; the
apertures are circular; the zocecia are emergent. Idmonea filiformis,
d’Orbigny (Bry. Crét., 1853, p. 744, pl. 750, figs. 1-5), and Idmonea
lata, d’Orbigny (Bry. Crét., 1853, p. 734, pl. 748, figs. 6-10) resemble
this form, but have only three apertures in a lateral series. Jdmonea
marginata, d’Orbigny (Bry. Crét., 1853, p. 744, pl. 749, figs. 20-23),
with which Gregory unites this form, differs from it by having
immersed zocecia.
Distribution. Senonian.
CRISINA MARGINATA (d’Orbigny).
Plate I., fig. 7.
1853. Idmonea marginata, d’Orbigny, Bry. Crét., p. 744, pl. 749,
figs. 20-23.
1853. Idmonea angulosa, d’Orbigny, Bry. Crét., p. 735, pl. 748,
figs. 11-15.
Zoarium subtriangular with a flat or convex reverse face; the lateral
series are regular and each contains four or five apertures; the
apertures are circular. This form is very like C. excavata (d’Orbigny),
but has fewer apertures in a lateral series, and the zoccia are
immersed.
Distribution. Turonian and Senonian.
Genus TERVIA, Jullien.
Tdmoneide whose zoarium is erect and consists of solid branches.
There is an unpaired median series of apertures between the two
rows of simple lateral series. Tervia is considered by Gregory as a
Polyzoa and Anthozoa from Upper Cretaceous Limestone. 7
subgenus of Crisina, from which it differs in possessing a simple
median series of apertures on the obverse face. The fact that it is
not always easy to distinguish this series as composed of apertures
distinct from the most median apertures of the lateral series shows
the artificiality of the genus. This point is well exemplified in von
Hagenow’s figure of 7’. dorsata (von Hagenow).
TERVIA DORSATA (von Hagenow).
Plate I., fig. 8.
1851. Idmonea dorsata, von. Hagenow, Bry. Maastyr. kr., p. 31, pl. ii.,
fig. 10.
Zoarium subcylindrical or triangular or flattened in a plane parallel
to the obverse and reverse faces; without dorsal processes ; reverse
face flat or concave; zocecia three or four in a lateral series, im-
mersed but the boundaries are clearly marked; the distance between
the different series of apertures is one and a half to two and a half
times the diameter of an aperture; those of the same series are
distant about a quarter the diameter of an aperture. This is the
commonest form among the specimens of Cyclostomes from Need’s
Camp.
Distribution. Senonian.
TERVIA GIBBERA, Gregory.
Plate I., fig. 9.
1899. Crisina (Tervia) gibbera, Gregory, Brit. Mus. Cat. Cret. Bry.,
vol. i., pp. 173-4, Text fig. 12.
Zoarium subcylindrical with the reverse face flat and possessing
spine-like projections, bearing no zocecia, termed by Gregory ‘‘ dorsal
processes ’’’; zocecia about three in a lateral series, immersed, but
the boundaries are just shown; distance between the different series
of apertures three to four times the diameter of an aperture; those
of the same series distant about one-half the diameter of an
aperture.’ Only two specimens have been found among the material
here described.
Distribution. Senonian.
TERVIA DECURRENS (Pocta).
1892. Idmonea decurrens, Pocta, Mech. korye. Hory.; Ceska. Ak. Fr.
Jos. Pratze, sect. 2, p. 18, pl. ii., figs. 3-6.
Zoarium subtriangular in cross-section and flat on the reverse side ;
the zocecia are immersed with their boundaries apparent; apertures
8 Annals of the South African Museum.
two or three in a lateral series ; those of different series distant four
or five diameters of an aperture, those of the same series two to three
diameters of an aperture.
A single specimen is somewhat doubtfully referred to this species.
It is the proximal end of a zoarium, though the first few zocecia
appear to be missing. Beginning as a thin, cylindrical branch, the
zoarium rapidly widens and becomes compressed in a plane parallel
to the obverse and reverse faces, at the same time becoming very
curved, so that in a section along the proximal-distal axis the obverse
face appears convex and the reverse face concave. When the
breadth of the zoarium has reached about one-third of its length,
it divides into two subcylindrical branches; one of these is broken
off short, but the other continues for about 1:°5 mm., without altering
in shape. It would be interesting to know if on further growth the
branches flatten and widen, thus recapitulating the growth stages of
the first part of the zoarium ;* or whether the first part is really an
encrusting portion, whose support has decayed, which has thrown
up cylindrical branches in the same way as a Phalangella-like base
has been shown by Gregory + to throw up branches of the genus
Crisina. The general zocecial characters are those of Tervia decurrens
(Pocta), in which species it is provisionally placed.
Distribution. Cenomanian.
ENTALOPHORIDA.
Genus ENTALOPHORA, Lamouroux.
ENTALOPHORA VIRGULA (von Hagenow).
Plate I., fig. 10.
1840. Ceriopora virgula, von Hagenow, Mon. Riig.: Neu. Jahrb.,
1840, p. 646.
1851. Pustulipora virgula, von Hagenow, Bry. Maastr. kreide.,
Delis aplel., gs a3.
Zoarium consisting of smooth cylindrical branches; the apertures
are irregularly distributed on the zoarium and are very far apart,
their distance apart in a proximal-distal direction being generally
more than four times the diameter of an aperture. There are never
more than two apertures in the breadth of a branch. The zowcia
* See W. D. Lang, Geol. Mag., 1905, pp. 259-260.
t J. W. Gregory, Brit. Mus. Cat. Cret. Bry., vol. i., 1899, p. 159, text-fig. 11,
Polyzoa and Anthozoa from Upper Cretaceous Lumestone. 9
are immersed. Entalophora Pergensi, Gregory,* which the above
definition would also include, has thinner branches and the apertures
still further apart than in HL. virgula.
This is the commonest species of Cretaceous Entalophora and has
been found in most of the localities whence Cretaceous Polyzoa have
been recorded; but only one specimen has been found among the
material here described.
Distribution. Neocomian—Danian.
ENTALOPHORA CONJUGATA, von Reuss.
Plate I., fig. 11.
1872-3. Entalophora conjugata, von Reuss, Bry. unt. Quad. Palzon-
togr:, volo xx., part: 1., p. 117, pl. xxix., fig. 8.
Zoarium consisting of cylindrical branches; the apertures are
distant from one another in a proximal-distal direction more than
four times the diameter of an aperture; the apertures occur in rows
of two or three across the branch; the zocecia are immersed and
their boundaries may be faintly marked. This form is very like
EH. geminata + (von Hagenow), but the zocecia are shorter, the boun-
daries of the zocecia are less clearly marked, and the apertures occur
in groups of three instead of two as in H. geminata. A single
specimen of this species occurs among the material here described.
Distribution. Cenomanian.
ENTALOPHORA ECHINATA (Romer).
Plate I., fig. 12.
1840. Pustulopora echinata, Romer, Verst. Nordd. kr., p. 22, pl. v.,
fig. 23.
1846. Pustulopora echinata, von. Reuss., Verst. Bohm kr., p. 64,
pl. xiv., fig. 4.
Zoarium consisting of cylindrical branches; the apertures are
distant from one another in a proximal-distal direction about four
diameters of an aperture. There are about four apertures in the
breadth of a branch ; the diameter of the apertures is about 2 mm.;
the zocecia are immersed, with their boundaries more or less apparent.
This species is very nearly allied to H. madreporacea (Goldfuss),
from which it differs in having the apertures slightly further apart in
a proximal-distal direction, the zocecial boundaries more prominent,
* J. W. Gregory, Brit. Mus. Cat. Cret. Bry., vol. i., 1899, p. 226, pl. x.,
NE By Oy Lc
+ Pustulipora geminata, von Hagenow, Bry. Maas. kr., 1851, pl. i., fig. 11, p. 20,
10 Annals of the South African Musewm.
and the apertures less regularly arranged. The peristomes, too, are
higher; but in the three specimens of this species among the material
here described the peristomes are worn.
Distribution. Cenomanian to Danian.
ENTALOPHORA MADREPORACEA (Goldfuss).
Plate I., fig. 14.
1827. Ceriopora madreporacea, Goldfuss, Petref. Germ., p. 35, pl. x.,
figs. 12a and 5b.
1851. Pustulipora madreporacea, von, Hagenow, Bry. Maastr. kr.,
Des pla, fe: ts.
Zoarium consisting of cylindrical branches; the apertures are
distant from one another in a proximal-distal direction less than four
diameters of an aperture; there are four to six apertures in the
breadth of a branch; the apertures are somewhat irregularly arranged
in spirals; the zocecia are immersed. Three ill-preserved specimens
from among the Kast London material are doubtfully referred to this
species. All are very short fragments of stout branches, and, in so
far as the zocecial characters can be determined, resemble EH. madre-
poracea more closely than any other form.
Distribution. Cenomanian to Danian.
Genus SPIROPORA, Lamouroux.
Spiropora should probably be united with Hntalophora, for in
many species of the latter genus the apertures are arranged
spirally. Spiropora, however, may be defined as resembling
Entalophora, but the apertures are arranged in whorls, or, if in
spirals, these are very much looser than in Hntalophora.
SPIROPORA VERTICILLATA (Goldfuss).
Plate I., fig. 13.
1827. Ceriopora verticillata, Goldfuss, Petref. Germ., vol. i., p. 36,
plexi
1851. Cricopora verticillata, von Hagenow, Bry. Maastr. kr., p. 20,
plo ie pee a2:
Zoarium consisting of cylindrical branches, having the apertures
arranged in whorls; there are five to ten apertures in the breadth of
a branch; the whorls are distant four or five diameters of an aperture;
the distance between the apertures of a whorl is a half or less than a
half the diameter of an aperture; the zocecia are immersed, but the
Polyzoa and Anthozoa from Upper Cretaceous Limestone. ee
boundaries between them are clearly marked by thin ridges. Next
to Tervia dorsata (von Hagenow), this is the commonest species of
Cyclostome among the material here described.
Distribution. Neocomian to Danian.
ANTHOZOA.
In the Need’s Camp material are several specimens of simple
corals, thickly encrusted with Cheilostome Polyzoa. Transverse
sections show that they belong to the genus Caryophyllia, but the
species cannot be determined owing to their encrusted condition.
be ; | 7
- ~~ nme rary... ibe . *
reas Lees
ey Me Ci Beak) A Wy
RO pT hi! 9 ee Ae
a
ih Dap uta a ake A Bae iP a ; :
- OIA) Sane Haya at a ih io _ } - .
7 a ‘. ar =
ial a a — a
te + 7 a
d SG * > es a>
a — — = A
_ = Yo
7
ie
q
_
7
® a
’ 7 _ : -
a we
:
*
i
: ‘
D ; :
: "
a :
a 2 _ ve wars —_
> . = ln : mh
. ns
an ——
¢ a ;
( 13 }
2.—LHchinoidea, Brachiopoda, and Lamellibranchia from the Upper
Cretaceous Limestone of Need’s Camp, Buffalo River—By
Henry Woops, M.A., University Lecturer in Palaozoology,
Cambridge.
Plate I. and three figures in text.
An account of the deposit from which the fossils here described
were obtained is given at the end of this paper (page 425). The
large specimens of Perna were found in the hard erystalline lime-
stone ; most of the other fossils came from the polyzoa-limestone.
No species giving decisive evidence of the horizon of the limestone
has been recognised, but the affinities of the forms described seem to
show that the deposit belongs to a late stage of the Chalk.
HCHINOIDEA.
COPTOSOMA CAPENSE, sp. nov.
Plate I., figs. 15-17. Text-figure 1.
Test of medium size, with sub-circular outline, convex above,
flattened below, somewhat concave around the peristome; height
equal to less than half the diameter; greatest diameter in the
lower third.
Apical disc rather small, not preserved.
Ambulacra not quite as wide as the interambulacra. Poriferous
zones undulating. Pores unigeminal, except on the base of the test,
where they are bigeminal. Plates high, consisting of six fused
plates, with the six pairs of pores forming an arc. Hach compound
plate bears a large primary, imperforate tubercle (either very slightly
or not at all crenulate), with a large areola, and a few small tubercles
and granules around the margin. The primary tubercles are largest
14 Annals of the South African Museum.
at the ambitus, and smaller on the dorsal surface and on the base
of the test.
Interambulacral plates high, each bearing a large primary, imper-
forate, slightly crenulate tubercle with an areola of moderate size ;
these tubercles are largest at the ambitus, where they are surrounded
by a narrow band of small tubercles and granules. Above the
ambitus, and on the base of the test, the primary tubercles become
smaller; above the ambitus the surrounding band of granules
becomes much wider. At the ambitus and continued on to the base
of the test there is a row of secondary tubercles at the external
margin of the area.
Peristome of moderate size.
Fia. 1.—Coptosoma capense, sp. nov. Ambulacral and interambulacral areas. x 2.
The bigeminal pores extending from the peristome almost to the
margin of the base seem to distinguish this from other species of
Coptosoma. The form of the test is similar to that of the type
species, C. cribrum, Desor, but the granules, especially on the inter-
ambulacral areas, are much more extensively developed.
Portions of three tests have been found, the largest and most
perfect of which is here figured. In all cases the apical disc is
missing.
The only other remains of echinoids found in this deposit are some
strongly ridged spines of Czdaris, and a portion of the test of an
irregular form which may perhaps belong to Casszdulus.
Echinoidea, Brachiopoda, and Lamellibranchia 1d
BRACHIOPODA.
THECIDEA (LACAZELLA), sp.
Text-figure 2.
The ventral valve is deep, more or less conical but sometimes
rather irregular, and either slightly curved or nearly straight. The
area is large and triangular, with a raised pseudo-deltidium. On the
exterior of the shell are growth-ridges parallel to the margin of the
valve. In the interior of the valve are narrow longitudinal ridges.
Fic. 2.—Thecidea (Lacazella), sp. A, B, C, three views of the same specimen ;
D, G, a ventral valve seen from the cardinal side (D) and from the dorsal
surface (G); E, F, two dorsal valves. All x 3.
The thin median septum is joined by a short branch on each side
near the cardinal margin. This valve is deeper and less curved than
in most examples of Thecidea vermicularis (Schlotheim),* but is not
so deep as in 7’. longirostre, Bosquet.t
* For figures and references see Geinitz, Das Elbthalgeb. in Sachsen (Paleonto-
graphica, vol. xx., pt. 1, 1872), p. 162, pl. xxxv., figs. 35-38. Bosquet, Brach.
Terr. Crét. Supér. de Limbourg (1859), p. 26, pl. iii., figs. 4-11. Posselt, Brach.
danske Kridtformat. (Danmarks geol. Underség., N" 6, 1894), p. 53, pl. iii.,
figs. 23-25.
+ Bosquet, op. cit., p. 33, pl. iv., figs. 4-6
16 Annals of the South African Museunt.
The dorsal valve is oval, slightly convex, with the umbo near the
margin. The internal margin is ornamented with ridges. From
the median septum one or sometimes more branches come off on
each side.
Several examples of this species were found by Mr. Lang when
searching for Polyzoa in the broken-up rock.
LAMELLIBRANCHIA.
OsTREA, sp.
A small specimen of part of a left valve is probably an example
of O. vesicularis, Lamarck.* That species occurs in the Ariyalur
Group of Southern India, and is widely distributed in deposits of
Senonian age.
Some other examples of Ostrea, but not sufficiently perfect for
specific determination, have been found.
Fic. 4.—Perna, sp. Left valve. In-
ternal cast of part near the umbo
Fic. 3.—Ostrea (Exogyra), sp. Right and of part of the ligamental area.
valve. Natural size. Natural size.
OstREA (ExoGyra), sp.
Text-figure 3.
There are two right valves which resemble O. (Hxogyra) Langloisi,
Coquand, from the Senonian (Santonian) of Algeria and Tunis.{
* Coquand, Monogr. du Genre Ostrea (1869), p. 35, pl. xiii., figs. 2-10. Stoliczka,
Cret. Fauna S. India, vol. iii. (1871), p. 465, pl. xlii., figs. 2-4, pl. xliii., fig. 1, pl.
xlv., figs. 7-12. Peron, Brachiopodes, etc., de la Tunisie (1893), p. 175. Wanner,
Paleontographica, vol. xxx., pt. 2 (1902), p. 119, pl. xvii., figs. 10-12.
} Peron, op. cit., p. 146, pl. xxiv., figs. 14, 19.
Echinoidea, Brachiopoda, and Lamellibranchia. 17
PECTEN (NEITHEA), sp.
An imperfect specimen which appears to be part of a left valve of
Neithea is present in the collection.
PERNA, sp.
Text-figures 4-6.
There are twelve internal casts of a large sub-quadrate Perna.
In some cases portions of the shell are preserved and show a
prismatic structure similar to that seen in P. Ricordeana, d’Orb.
Fic. 5.—Perna, sp. Internal cast. Left valve and anterior view of both valves.
The posterior and the ventral margins are imperfect. x +.
‘The largest specimen has a height of about 150 mm., and its hinge-
line is about 85 mm. long. One example shows the cast of the
ligament area and grooves. This species resembles P. valida
(Stoliczka) * from the Ariyalir Group (Senonian) of Southern India,
* Cret. Fauna S. India, vol. iii. (1871), p. 409, pl. xxii., fig. 1.
2
18 Annals of the South African Museum.
and also P. cereviciana, Petho,* from the Senonian of Cereviié
(Hungary). But more perfect specimens are needed before an
exact determination can be made. The ligament grooves are less
numerous and more widely separated than in P. cereviciana, but
Fic. 6.—Perna, sp. Internal cast. A considerable portion of the posterior part
of the shell appears to be missing. x 4.
the flattened part of the shell extending ventrally from the umbo is
similar in both species.
* Die Kreide- (Hypersenon-) Fauna d. Peterwardein. Gebirges (Paleonto-
eraphica, lii., 1906), p. 234, pl. xvii.
:
Echinoidea, Brachiopoda, and Lamellibranchia. 19
NOTE ON THE LOCALITY.
These fossils were obtained by Mr. J. W. Woods, of Hast London,
from Need’s Camp, on the Buffalo River, twenty miles from the sea
and at an altitude of about 1,200* feet. Mr. Woods says the lime-
stone is “‘ exposed in two open workings about two miles apart, and
the one about fifty feet higher than the other. In the lower the
greatest thickness is six feet and seems to be composed entirely of the
remains of small shells, echinids, cup-corals, and various spines. . .
In the upper quarry the limestone is mainly crystalline and hard,
and seems to be a mass of shell of mussel type: a few ‘shark’s’
teeth have been found in it. We had a section there of eight feet
to examine, and how much more exists cannot be stated as the
workings have not gone deeper.
‘The areas where the deposits occur are completely enclosed by
dolerite: they may be described as two level ten-acre lots surrounded
by boulders; and were, I presume, old shore-basins or lagoons,
walled in by the igneous dyke, where the molluscs lived and died,
or into which they were gradually swept by the tide.”
The interest of this fauna is very great because it occurs at a place
more than half-way between the Pondoland Upper Cretaceous out-
crops and the main area of the marine Lower Cretaceous in
Uitenhage. No fossils from similarly situated beds have been
described, though limestones like that from the top quarry at
Need’s Camp are known from the neighbourhood of Sand Flats
at about 1,200 feet above sea-level.
A. W. RoGeErs.
* This is the figure given by Mr. Woods; it is probably too great by 100 feet,
as in Gamble’s list of heights the Need’s Camp beacon is said, on the authority of
Capt. W. Bailey, R.E., to be 1,144 feet above sea-level.
bo
10.
1G
12,
13.
14.
15-
( 20)
EXPLANATION OR -PiA hd:
Potyzoa AND ECHINOIDEA FROM THE Upprr Creracrous oF NEED’s Camp,
Burrato River, Cape Conony.
. Filisparsa ramosa, d’Orbigny. x 12. Obverse face of part of a zoarium,
showing tendency of apertures to be arranged in V-shaped rows (p. 408).
. Filisparsa fragilis, Marsson. x 12. Obverse face of part of a zoarium
(p. 408).
. Diastopora compressa (Goldfuss). x 12. A young zoarium, showing the first-
formed zocecia to be slightly emergent, while the more distal are im-
mersed (p. 409).
. Idmonea virgula, VOrbigny. x 12. Obverse face of zoarium (p. 410).
. Crisina cenomana, d’Orbigny. x 12. Obverse face of a specimen resembling
d’Orbigny’s figure of Idmonea calypso, showing strongly-marked zocecial
boundaries (p. 411).
. Crisina excavata (VOrbigny). x 12. Obverse face of part of a zoarium.
In the proximal part the lateral series of apertures of each side are
practically opposite, and so appear to form continuous bands across
the zoarium. Distally is a front view of the right-hand series only, and
those of the left-hand are seen in profile (p. 412).
. Crisina marginata (d’Orbigny). x 12. Obverse face of part of a zoarium viewed
rather from the right side, so that only the edges of the left-hand series
of apertures appear; the alternate arrangement of the series of apertures
is therefore not obvious in the figure (p. 412).
. Tervia dorsata (von Hagenow). x 12. Obverse face of part of a zoarium
(p. 413).
. Tervia gibbera, Gregory. x 12. Obverse face of part of a zoarium viewed
from the left-hand side. The end of a ‘‘ dorsal process’’ appears at the
top left-hand side of the figure, springing distally from the reverse face
(p. 413).
Entalophora virgula (von Hagenow). x 12. Part of a zoarium (p. 414).
Entalophora conjugata (von Reuss). x12. Part ofazoarium. Some of the
apertures appear to be arranged in whorls or spirals; but these are only
rows of three, and the series do not continue on the half of the branch
not shown (p. 415).
Entalophora echinata (Rémer). x 12. Part of a worn zoarium (p. 415).
Spiropora verticillata (Goldfuss). x 12. Part of a zoarium (p. 417).
Entalophora madraporacea (Goldfuss). x12. Part of a worn zoarium
(p. 416).
17. Coptosoma capense, sp. nov. Natural size. (p. 419).
Ann.S. Afr Mus. Vol. VII. Pas
Lee ae
HO)
T.A.Brock del. West, Newman collo.
Need’s Camp Fossils.
(21 )
3.—The Invertebrate Fauna and Paleontological Relations of the
Uitenhage Series.—By F. L. Kircntn, M.A., Ph.D., F.G.S.
CONTENTS.
PAGE
I. INTRODUCTION 3 oa a a Ses ans 21
II. THe AGE OF THE FAUNA.
(a) Summary of Previous Work ... oe as ae 25
(b) Additional Evidence for Age ... fe aes ade 30
III. Comparison witH ExtTrA-HuROPEAN FAUNAS,
(a) Possible Traces of a Related Fauna wm the South-
west of Madagascar <2 39
(b) Comparison with the Fauna ¥ the Oonn Chests 4h im
Cutch oe 3 39
(c) Traces of a Related ae im ‘the Gee Die
and in Hazara (N.W. Himalayas) $i Sea 46
(d) Neoconian in German Hast Africa ... Sa see 46
(e) Neocomian in South America... ose a af 49
IV. Tue DistRIBUTION OF THE UITENHAGE FAUNA IN RELA-
TION TO SOME THEORETICAL QUESTIONS ... bie’ ol
V. Descriptions, CriticAL Norss, AND Lists oF FossIts 60
VI.-Summary oF RESULTS _... ois ie st. Sa PH,
VII. List or WORKS CITED ... Bar ws ar “3, Doo
I.—INTRODUCTION.
THE marine invertebrate fossils collected in 1900 by Mr. A. W.
Rogers and Mr. E. H. L. Schwarz from the Uitenhage Series, and
forwarded to me by Mr. Rogers on behalf of the Geological Commis-
sion, were found at localities near Uitenhage and below this on the
Zwartkop’s River, and in the valley of the Sunday’s River near and
below Dunbrodie. Further materials have been sent from the South
3
22 Annals of the South African Musewm.
African Museum, principally comprising specimens presented by
R. Rubidge and C. A. Fairbridge, and I have also received a small
but interesting collection of Mollusca found by Miss M. Wilman in
the Uitenhage strata exposed in the Coega neighbourhood. In addi-
tion to the marine fossils obtained by Messrs. Rogers and Schwarz,
some Shells of the genus Unio were collected in the Bezuidenhout’s
Valley below Blue Cliff.
In 1905 Mr. Rogers devoted some time to a further examination
of the Uitenhage beds in the valleys of the Sunday’s River and
Coega River, and made an additional collection of fossils; he also
obtained a few specimens from an exposure of Uitenhage beds at
Brentford, in Knysna.* The results of an examination of these
supplementary materials have been incorporated in the following
account, which has been withheld from publication for this purpose.
In view of the extensive manner in which the fauna of the Uiten-
hage Series has already been made known, particularly by the
writings of Krauss, Sharpe, Tate, and Neumayr, it is not surprising
to find that among the specimens collected during the preliminary
survey in the Uitenhage and Port Elizabeth Divisions comparatively
few new forms are represented. It could be gathered, however,
from the published account of this survey,+ that more prolonged
search would in all probability add materially to an already lengthy
list, and, in fact, the specimens obtained by Mr. Rogers in 1905 well
bear this out, for they include a larger proportion of new species
than that shown by the collections made in 1900.+
In the following pages I have discussed the present state of our
knowledge regarding the paleontological relations of the fauna, so
far as concerns the invertebrate remains, and then proceeded to the
description of the new materials submitted to me, while adding
critical remarks and supplementary descriptions relative to some of
the forms already known. Opportunity is also afforded by the pre-
sent study to describe and figure two Uitenhage ammonites which
are represented by specimens preserved in the collection of the
Geological Society of London, though not included in the material
sent to me from Cape Town; it is useful to have some account of
these, both for the sake of comparison with other members of the
* A new locality for Uitenhage marine fossils; see Schwarz (2), pp. 50, 74. [The
numbers in parentheses after the names of authors, in this and subsequent refer-
ences to literature, correspond with the titles of works bearing the same number
under the names of those authors in the bibliographical list with which this memoir
concludes. ]
+ Rogers and Schwarz (1).
} For an account of the survey of 1905, see Rogers (2).
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 23
same genus which occur in the Uitenhage beds and in order to
broaden the foundation for future work.
From statements made in the Reports mentioned above, it seems
that in our present state of knowledge no satisfactory subdivision of
the Uitenhage beds is possible, and that the members of the series
are so variably developed that no consistent nomenclature is to be
hoped for until detailed mapping can be carried out. Of the sub-
divisions hitherto employed, the uppermost member of the series,
the Sunday’s River or Marine Beds, has yielded the majority of the
Mollusca which are discussed in this paper. The underlying
““Wood Bed’”’ series has also furnished a few species of marine
molluses in addition to Unio and remains of fossil plants. The so-
called Enon Beds represent the lowest division of the formation in
this district. Messrs. Rogers and Schwarz, while indicating the
local significance of the adopted subdivisions, draw attention to the
limited value of this nomenclature, and mention facts which clearly
show the contemporaneous variation of facies in the series. Thus,
to the north of Uitenhage, the Marine Beds appear to be synchronous
with part of the local conglomerate of ‘‘ Enon ”’ character, and it is
pointed out that at Plettenberg’s Bay also, the Sunday’s River Beds
are partly replaced by conglomerate resembling that of the Enon
Beds, but here yielding Trigonia conocardiformis, one of the most
characteristic fossils of the Marine Beds.*
The question of the age to be assigned to the Uitenhage Series, as
is well known, has called forth strikingly different opinions from
various authors. It was suggested by Stow in 1871} that the want
of unanimity among the earlier writers might have been due to care-
less collecting and the mingling of specimens obtained from different
horizons. This author therefore made his own collections with due
regard to the localities and the individual bands in which he found
the fossils to occur, and he attempted a correlation of the fossiliferous
beds exposed in sections at various places on the Sunday’s and
Zwartkop’s Rivers. It appears highly probable, however, from the
paleontological evidence alone, that no very considerable extent of
time is represented by the whole of the beds which yield marine
fossils, and there is nothing to show that the different opinions
respecting the age of the series have been arrived at in consequence
of any radical change in the character of the fauna itself in its dis-
tribution through the strata. That any such marked change can be
* Schwarz (1), pp. 58, 61; Rogers and Schwarz (1), p. 5; Rogers (1), pp. 282-
296. See also Rogers (2), pp. 13, 15.
+ Stow (1).
24 Annals of the South African Museum.
traced is not evident from the table of sections given by Stow.*
There are, no doubt, minor differences, and local distribution accord-
ing to facies in the successive fossiliferous bands, which may be
more clearly revealed when the district comes to be mapped in
detail; but there is certainly nothing so far-reaching in this respect
as to have formed grounds for the differences of view expressed, for
instance, by Tate, who ascribed an Oolitic age to the fauna, and
Neumayr, who referred these beds to the Neocomian. +
The divergent conclusions arrived at by the earlier authors appear
rather to have resulted from the different interpretations put upon
the same peculiar association of forms when viewed in comparison
with the limited standards of Huropean type. The principal difficulty
seems to have lain in the fact that none of the fossils could be cor-
rectly identified with those of formations studied in other regions,
and the facies of the fauna, taken as a whole, did not seem to show
such agreement with that of any known assemblage as to give it the
decided stamp which might serve to put the question of age beyond
dispute. This matter has been so frequently dealt with, and its
bearings are so well known, that it may seem superfluous to dwell
upon it here at any length; but it may be useful to recapitulate
briefly the successive opinions expressed, and in some cases the
grounds upon which they were based, before proceeding to the more
thorough comparison of the fauna with its extra-Huropean equiva-
lents which recent knowledge has rendered possible.
I take this opportunity of expressing my indebtedness to Mr.
A. W. Rogers for the helpful manner in which he has furnished me
with information relating to the collections ; to Dr. A. Smith Wood-
ward, Mr. G. C. Crick, and Mr. R. B. Newton for facilitating
reference to literature and specimens in the British Museum
(Natural History); and to Mr. W. Rupert Jones for his ready
assistance during my repeated examinations of the extensive collec-
tion of Uitenhage fossils in the museum of the Geological Society of
London. My best thanks are also due to Prof. J. W. Gregory
for examining a specimen of Thammnastrea submitted to him, and to
Mr. C. D. Sherborn for assistance in a few matters relating to
bibliography ; to Mr. G. W. Lamplugh, Mr. H. A. Allen, and Mr. H.
Woods, I am indebted for several useful suggestions.
* Stow (1), fig. 3. See further remarks on this subject at the end of Section II.
of the present paper.
+ In this connection see Neumayr’s remarks on Stow’s work; Holub and
Neumayr (1), p. 270, footnote 6
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 25
II—THE AGE OF THE FAUNA.
(a) Summary of Previous Work.—In 1837, Hausmann recorded
the occurrence of some shells obtained by Hertzog from strata in
the Sunday’s River district, to which he ascribed a Lower
Cretaceous age. These included a Hamites, which was compared
with H. intermedius J. Sow. and H. funatus Brongn., and a Trigonia
which was thought to resemble 7. dedalea Park.* Goldfuss after-
wards described and figured two of Hausmann’s shells under the
names Lyrodon herzogi and Cytherea herzogi, and also considered
them to be of Greensand age.}
The examination of a small collection of lamellibranchs obtained
by F’. Krauss in 1839 from strata exposed on the Zwartkop’s River,
led that author to the conclusion that they indicated a Lower Green-
sand horizon,} and in another paper Krauss furnished excellent
descriptions and figures of these shells, maintaining a similar view
concerning their age.§
In 1851 a collection of fossil plants and molluses, obtained by
R. Rubidge on the Sunday’s River, was exhibited before the British
Association at Ipswich by Colonel Portlock, who remarked that the
shells were apparently of Jurassic age, while Dr. Harvey’s examina-
tion of the plant remains was thought to corroborate this view.||
In his well-known paper published in 1856, A. G. Bain‘) referred
the Uitenhage fossils with doubt to the Lias, basing this opinion
upon the prevalence of a supposed Liassic form, ‘‘ Gryphea incurva.”’
The shell mistaken for this, however, was Hxogyra imbricata, pre-
viously described by Krauss, which, as we shall see, bears only a
superficial resemblance to the Gryphea mentioned, and is in reality
closely comparable with certain Lower Cretaceous forms of Hxogyra.
Appended to Bain’s paper were D. Sharpe’s descriptions of the
Secondary fossils collected by Atherstone and Bain from localities
on the Sunday’s and Zwartkop’s Rivers. The forms described,
principally Mullusea, led Sharpe to the conclusion that they most
nearly resembled Huropean species of the Middle and Lower
Oolites; he compared his Ammonites atherstont with A. macro-
cephalus and A. herveyi, while believing Ammonites baina to be
related to A. huwmphresianus and other Lower Oolitic forms.
* Hausmann (1), p. 1457.
+ Goldfuss (1), Band II., p. 202, pl. 137, fig. 5 (1837); p. 239, pl. 149, fig. 10
(1840).
t Krauss (1), pp. 129, 130. § Krauss (2).
|| Portlock (1). {| Bain (1).
26 Annals of the South African Museum.
In 1867, a paper by Ralph Tate,* in which many new forms were
described and figured, added largely to our knowledge of the
Uitenhage fossils, and this author was led to some remarkable con-
clusions from his study of the fauna. He believed the assemblage
to indicate a Jurassic age, and stated that he thought it to represent
- the fauna of the Oolitic rocks of Europe, and to approximate to that
of the Great Oolite. It seems clear that in instituting this com-
parison, he made use of some molluscan types little adapted to serve
the purposes of a critical correlation, and he was at the same time
misled by several quite erroneous identifications. He also mis-
understood the affinities of the cephalopods and the significance of
certain Trigonie which alone might have been expected to form
obstacles to his conclusions. It is here scarcely necessary to do
more than refer to the curious generalisation arrived at by Tate
concerning the relation of these supposed Jurassic deposits to the
Jurassic strata of Europe, namely, that the ‘“Oolites”’ of South
Africa are the representatives of the whole of the Jurassic rocks of
Europe with the exception of the Upper Oolites, and illustrate an
intermingling of palzontological types which are analogous to, or
identical with, those distributed in successive zones in Hurope.
In his monograph on the Cretaceous lamellibranchs of Southern
India, Stoliczkat made some reference to Uitenhage forms. He
evidently believed Tate’s Crassatella complicata to belong to the
genus Ptychonya, and he ascribed Astarte herzogi Krauss to
Speyer’s genus Grotriania. He further expressed the opinion that
Krauss’s Astarte bronni might belong to the Cretaceous genus
Remondia Gabb, and thought that in addition to these and Trigonia
ventricosa, several other Uitenhage shells show a Cretaceous rather
than a Jurassic aspect; attention was drawn to the great similarity
between Trigonia ventricosa (Krauss) and the Cretaceous 7’. twber-
culifera Stol., from Southern India. While we shall see that
Stoliczka rightly recognised some of the Uitenhage forms to exhibit
Cretaceous affinities, he was in error in ascribing Astarte herzogi to
the genus Grotriania, and, as afterwards pointed out by Neumayr,
wrongly supposed Astarte bronni to belong to the genus Kemondia.
A. bron is so distinctly characterised that Neumayr proposed for
it the new generic name Seebachia—a fact which appears to have
been overlooked by Stanton, who in 1897 still tentatively included
it in the genus Remondia.
One of Tate’s Uitenhage species, the so-called Crassatella com-
* Tate (1). + Stoliczka (2), pp. 286, 294, 315 (1871).
{ Stanton (1).
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 27
plicata, was later also recognised by Dames to be a representative
of the genus Ptychomya,* and this seemed to point to a later age for
the strata from which it was obtained than that assigned by Tate.
Dames was further led to the belief in the Neocomian age of the
Uitenhage beds by a fragment of an ammonite (sent by Krauss to
L. von Buch) which he thought to be identical with Ammonites ,
astierianus d’Orb.
In the concluding chapter of his monograph on the British Fossil
Trigonie, Lycett} referred briefly to the Trigonie of the Uitenhage
Formation, and expressed his opinion that some of the most
characteristic of these point decisively to a Cretaceous age; he
also showed that the alleged occurrence of TJ. goldfusst, which Tate
had used as evidence for a Jurassic age, rested on an erroneous
determination.
The whole question of the age of this fauna was afterwards well
handled by Neumayr,} who subjected Tate’s work to some criticism.
Neumayr set on one side many molluscan types as of little signifi-
cance in a comparative study, and concluded that a costate Trigonia
(7. tater Neum.) alone exhibited a marked Jurassic character. On
the other hand, he considered a number of forms to represent
essentially Cretaceous types. Such were Holcostephanus atherstont
(Sharpe) ; Holcostephanus baini (Sharpe); Crioceras spinosissumum
(Hausm.) Neumayr; Trigonia ventricosa (Krauss); Trigonta cono-
carduformis (Krauss) ; Ptychomya complicata (Tate)§; and Hxogyra
imbricata Krauss. He suggested that Tate’s Ammonites subanceps,
which was thought by Tate to resemble the Jurassic A. anceps Rein.,
might really represent the young of Crioceras spinosissimum. It
was admitted by Neumayr that Belemnites africanus Tate, which
Tate placed in the group Canaliculati and considered to afford
strong evidence for an Oolitic age, bears a strong resemblance to
the Jurassic forms B. canaliculatus Schloth. and B. magnificus
d’Orb.; but at the same time he drew attention to the existence of
a belemnite in the Lower Cretaceous of North Germany which
seemed to share some of the characteristics of B. africanus. In a
later paper, written after an examination of Tate’s original specimen
in the collection of the Geological Society, Neumayr|| definitely
separated B. africanus from the Canaliculati, and included it in his
group of the Absoluti, which, as he remarked, extend in their
occurrence up to the Aptian; hence the conclusive nature of the
* Dames (1). + Lycett (3), p. 230 (1879).
{ Holub and Neumayr (1). § Misquoted ‘‘ implicata’’ by Neumayr.
|| Neumayr (4).
28 Annals of the South African Musewm
evidence for age furnished by the occurrence of B. africanus in the
Uitenhage beds was no longer to be recognised.* Neumayr’s
argument for the Lower Cretaceous age of this fauna appears indeed
to be overwhelmingly strong, particularly in the evidence of the
Cephalopoda, all of which he found to possess near allies in European
Neocomian forms. Regarding the two species of Holcostephanus,
Neumayr pointed out that their resemblance to the Jurassic types
with which they had previously been brought into comparison was
only of a superficial character, depending alone on a certain outward
similarity of habit.
Pavlow | has since confirmed this view, after studying South
African specimens, and has placed Holcostephanus atherstoni and
H, baint in his generic or sub-generic division Asteria, which
comprises numerous Neocomian types; he even goes so far as to
identify Holcostephanus atherstoni with H. psilostomus Neum. and
Uhlig,} from the Hilsthon of North Germany, and to the same form
he ascribes a shell from the Neocomian of Speeton.
In view of the fact that the plant remains found in the Uitenhage
beds had previously been thought to point rather to an Oolitic than
a Cretaceous age, and haying regard to the division of opinion con-
cerning the affinities of the invertebrate fauna, Messrs. Rogers and
Schwarz, in 1901, were led to adopt the provisional conclusion that
the Uitenhage Series may be assigned to the Upper Jurassic.§ In
stating this, they mention that the fauna and. flora have been con-
sidered to resemble in some degree those of the Jurassic series in
Cutch. It is well known that the resemblance between certain
lamellibranchs of the Uitenhage beds and those of the Oomia Group
in Cutch has been frequently remarked upon, but it can no longer
be maintained that the marine Oomia strata are in reality of Jurassic
age, at least so far as concerns the Trigonia-beds; but this is a
point to which we may presently return, and one which we may
consider in greater detail.
In more recent works Mr. Rogers || gives us a comprehensive
account of the Uitenhage Series, and now considers these beds to
represent a portion of the Cretaceous system. The same view
is adopted by Drs. Hatch and Corstorphine in their ‘‘ Geology of
South Africa’? (1905). With reference to the flora, Prof. A. C.
* See also Neumayr (5).
+ Pavlow and Lamplugh (1), pp. 492-497 (134-139 in authors’ copy).
{| Neumayr and Ublig (1), p. 149, pl. xxxii., fig. 2.
§ Rogers and Schwarz (1), p. 17.
|| Rogers (1), pp. 281-318; Rogers (2), pp. 15-33, 45.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 29
Seward, in his memoir on the subject,“ has shown that the Uiten-
hage plants ‘‘include types in part characteristic of Wealden and
in part indicative of Jurassic floras’’; but he believes that the
balance of evidence derived from the plants is in favour of a
Wealden age.
We thus see that recent authoritative opinions have lent strong
confirmation to the views of the earliest writers who made a study
of this fauna. Other works in which less critical reference has been
made to the age of the Uitenhage Series may now be briefly noticed.
In 1857, W. G. Atherstone suggested the partly Jurassic and
partly Cretaceous age of the Uitenhage beds,+ but Andrew Wyley,
in 1859, placed the Enon Beds so low as the New Red Sandstone,
and correlated the Sunday’s River Beds with the Jurassic (Oolites). |
Feistmantel§ evidently shared Tate’s view of an Oolitic age when
he tried to show affinities between certain Mollusca from the Uiten-
hage beds and others from the Oomia Group in Cutch in order to
prove the Lower Oolitic age of the Oomia fauna and bring about
harmony between the evidence for age furnished by the plants and
animals from those beds. In a correlation of the Indian and African
Mesozoic formations the same author also tabulated the Uitenhage
Series as Jurassic.|| G. W. Stow divided the formation into a
‘‘Lower Jurassic” and an ‘“ Upper Jurassic”’ series.f’ In 1878
W. T. Blanford, basing his view upon a study of Tate’s and Stow’s
papers, concluded that the beds containing Hamutes yielded too large
a number of Middle Jurassic forms for reference to the Neocomian ;
but he believed them to represent a very high Jurassic horizon,
while pointing out that Trigonia ventricosa and T. vauw were still
higher.***
In 1880 Griesbach classed the Uitenhage beds as Jurassic,}} while
the same view was adopted by T. Rupert Jones in 1884 t{ and by
Moulle in the following year.s§ Even so recently as 1897, Futterer
has accepted Sharpe’s and Tate’s conclusions.||||_ On the other hand,
Gurich,‘\’ Schenck,*** and Molengraaff +++ have referred these beds
“* Seward (1), p. 46. + Atherstone (1), pp. 584, 588.
} Wyley (1). [I have not seen Wyley’s Report, but his correlation is set forth
in Tate (1), p. 172, and Corstorphine (1), Appendix.]
§ Feistmantel (1). || Feistmantel (4), pp. 54, 59, 84.
“| Stow (1). ** W. T. Blanford (1), p..118.
tt Griesbach (1), pp. 90, 93. tt Jones (1); Jones (2), p. 737.
Moulle (1), p. 216. \||| Futterer (1), p. 625.
{11 Giirich (1). *** Schenck (1), p. 231.
ttt Molengraaff (1). [I have not been able to see this work, but quote the
statement and reference on the authority of Newton (2), p. 146.]
30 Annals of the South African Museum.
to the Lower Cretaceous; but in a more recently published tabular
correlation of the geological formations of the Transvaal and Cape
Colony, Molengraaff has ascribed them with a note of interrogation
to the Middle Jurassic.* In 1896 R. B. Newton published a useful
summary of previous work on the Cretaceous conchology of South
Africa,t and furnished a complete list of the known Mollusca from
the Uitenhage beds, which he classed as Neocomian. In their text-
books de Lapparent? and Kayser § have followed Holub and Neu-
mayr in assigning a Neocomian age. Passarge, in his work on the
Kalahari,|| has tabulated the Uitenhage Series with the Upper
Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous. Lemoine believes it to be of
Lower Cretaceous age.
(b) Additional Evidence for Age.—We see from the foregoing that
a comparison of the Uitenhage Mollusca with European forms
seems to point definitely to a Lower Cretaceous age, for it will
be conceded that the evidence of the Cephalopoda must be allowed
to carry the greatest weight in influencing a decision. The repre-
sentatives of Holcostephanus (sensu stricto), Hamites and Crioceras
already recorded, supply in themselves sufficiently striking evidence,
and notable additions to these are other forms of Holcostephanus, as
well as representatives of Acanthodiscus and Bochianites included
in the collections submitted for examination and described in these
pages. Two other species of Holcostephanus (sensu stricto), hitherto
undescribed, are represented in the collection of the Geological
Society of London. One of these is apparently allied to H. ather-
stont (Sharpe), but has greater lateral compression as well as other
distinctive characters. It closely resembles H. psilostomus Neum.
and Uhlig, of the European Neocomian, and is the ‘‘ compressed
variety’ of H. atherstoni mentioned by Pavlow,** who aptly sug-
gested close relationship to a shell from the Neocomian of Spain,
figured by Nicklés as Holcostephanus hispanicus. The significance
of such an assemblage of Cephalopoda in the Uitenhage beds cannot
be mistaken, quite apart from the bivalve forms to be mentioned
below and a representative of the Crustacean genus Meyeria. In
Europe the known species of Holcostephanus (sensu stricto) are
almost wholly, if not entirely, confined to strata of Upper
Valanginian and Lower Hauterivian age.
In his paper on the Uitenhage fauna R. Tate t} gave a tabular list
* Molengraaff (2), p. 119. + Newton (2).
{ de Lapparent (1), p. 1267. § Kayser (1), p. 444.
|| Passarge (1), p. 82; see also p. 597. | Lemoine (1), pp. 383, 389.
** Pavlow and Lamplugh (1), pp. 492, 496, (134 and 138 of authors’ copy).
tt Tate (1), p. 166.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 31
of some of the more important fossils, together with their supposed
extra-African allies and analogues, which, with one exception, were
thought to be Jurassic. An examination of this list shows, however,
that a different construction must now be put upon the comparisons,
as may be demonstrated by the mention of a few examples. In
addition to Holcostephanus atherstoni and H. baini, which were
erroneously thought to be allied to well-known Oolitic forms, there
is Tate’s Ammonites swhanceps, a single specimen, regarding which
that author wrote: ‘‘ It is doubtful whether this be not a mere variety
of A. anceps Reinecke, of the Middle Oolites.’’ As already men-
tioned, Neumayr thought that it might represent a stage in the
individual growth of Crioceras spinosissimum, which he supposed
to have had the whorls in contact at such an immature period.
This may be a correct view, but it seems equally probable that
we are dealing with an immature example of some species of
Hoplites (sensu lato). Tate’s specimen, of which his published
figures convey a very imperfect and even misleading impression,
shows great similarity to certain forms which have been ascribed
by Sayn to Hoplites arnoldi (Pict. and Camp.), and by Toucas
to H. botelle Kilian. These were thought by Pavlow to have
been wrongly identified, and are united by him under the name
Hoplites heteroptychus, which has more recently been included by
Uhlig in his narrower generic group Solgeria. A somewhat similar
form has been described and figured by Bogoslowsky under the
name Hoplites aff. arnoldi Pict., and this is said to occur with
Belemmites lateralis Phill. above the “ Rjasan-Horizont”’ in Russia
(Mostja River).* Hoplites subanceps is more closely and less
coarsely ornamented than this, but there are points of agreement
in the type of sculpture. Further observations on ‘“ Ammonites”’
subanceps are given in the remarks which follow the description
of a specimen ascribed to Acanthodiscus sp., in the following pages.
Ostrea jonesiana Tate was compared by Tate with O. costata Sow.
from the Oolites; but it is in reality a true Hxogyra quite compar-
able with shells of the type of H. subplicata Roem.,} from the
Hilsconglomerat of North Germany.
Pecten projectus was compared with P. lens Sow., but such a com-
parison must have little value when we remember that species of
Pecten with similar broad characteristics recur at various horizons
and are not confined to the Jurassic rocks. Pecten projectus, in
* Bogoslowsky (1), pp. 112, 138; Taf. vi., fig. 7.
+ F. A. Roemer (1), Nachtrag, p. 25, pl. xviii., fig. 17; F. A. Roemer (2), p. 47
(1840).
32 Annals of the South African Museum.
fact, compares more satisfactorily with some of the Cretaceous
forms.
The comparison of Pecten rubidgeanus with P. subspinosus Schloth.
cannot be pronounced at all fortunate, while we shall find that Lima
obliquissima shows a closer agreement of characters with Cretaceous
and later forms than with the European Jurassic shells cited by
Tate.
Placunopsis subjurensis Tate, which was compared with P. jwrensis
Roem., may perhaps be an Anomia, and in some respects closely
resembles A. pseudoradiata d’Orb.,* from the Aptian. Placunopsis
embricata Tate is compared in the table with P. substriata Lyc.,
from the Oolites. P. semistriata (Bean) was probably the English
shell with which it was intended to institute comparison, since this
name alone is mentioned in Tate’s description on page 154 of his
paper. P. zmbricata, however, is without radial ornamentation, but
is characterised by well-spaced concentric ridges which recall the
similar ornamentation of Anomia neocomiensis d’Orb., t+ though
occurring in less emphasised form. The illustration of P. imbricata
gives a very poor idea of the shell, but an examination of the
specimen dispels the notion of a close comparison with known
Jurassic forms,
Trigonia cassiope Tate is not to be united with any known Jurassic
costate Trigonia, and was accordingly renamed T’, tatei by Neumayyr.
It is well distinguished by the elongated escutcheon, the very
delicate marginal carina, and the fine character of the ornamentation
on the area and escutcheon. Tvrigonia goldfussi Tate is an immature
shell, and in all probability illustrates the youthful stage of one of
the large and robustly ornamented Pseudo-quadratee which form
such a striking feature in the Uitenhage fauna. It certainly does
not represent either Trigonia goldfussi Agassiz or T. painer Lye.
(=T. goldfusst Morr. and Lyc.), with which it was identified. Tate
himself, on page 159 of his paper, said: ‘‘ Hereafter, however, it
may be found to be the young of a distinct species.” It is therefore
the more regrettable that the error of quoting this European Jurassic
shell from the Uitenhage beds should have continued to be perpe-
trated. Stow } repeatedly used the name “ 7’. goldfussi’’ in his
paper, but I have been unable to ascertain to which of the Trigonie
he referred.
No importance can be attached to the comparison of such types as
* @Orbigny (4), p. 84; Woods (3), vol.i., p. 27, pl. v., figs. 1-3 (1899).
+ @Orbigny (3), p. 754, pl. 489, figs. 1-3 (1848).
{ Stow (1), pp. 497-514.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 33
Pinna atherstont Sharpe and P. sharpet Tate with Jurassic forms,
for it is evident that these representatives of the genus lack any
strong distinctive characters which alone would render them of
value in an estimate of geological age.
Mytilus baint Sharpe was compared with M. sowerbianus d’Orb.,
from the Oolites of Europe. It is a Modiola which certainly has
characters of form and ornamentation closely similar to those which
distinguished M. sowerbzana (d’Orb.) and M. perplicata (Etallon) ;
but this type of Modiola is by no means confined to Jurassic rocks,
having also a widely distributed representative in the Cretaceous
M. flagellifera (Forbes), to mention a well-known example.
Pholadomya domimcalis Sharpe was thought to resemble Liassic
and Oxfordian forms, but it may equally well be brought into com-
parison with Lower Cretaceous representatives ; for example, the
European Aptian shell ascribed, rightly or wrongly, to P. pedernalis
Roem.*
Astarte pinchiniana Tate was brought into comparison with
A. pumila Goldf. and A. excentrica Morr. and Lye., from the Great
Oolite of Europe. The African shell differs in important respects
from these, and, as will be pointed out below, it probably belongs to
the sub-generic group Hriphyla and is certainly most closely com-
parable with Cretaceous forms.
Berenicea antipodum Tate was believed by Tate to be related to
B. striata Haime, from the Lower Lias of France, but has been
regarded by Prof. J. W. Gregory t as a close ally of the Cretaceous
B. gracilis (Milne Edwards).
Two Uitenhage Serpule were identified by Tate with S. filaria
Goldf. and S. plicatilis Miinst., from the Inferior Oolite of Europe.
The specimens ascribed to S. plicatilis represent an adherent form
sharply carinated on the back, with a weaker carinal angle on either
side and a circular aperture, but the true S. plicatilis Goldf. has only
a single central, longitudinal keel. S. quwinquangularis Goldf. t
(Upper Jurassic) stands much closer in its characters, and a Serpula
scarcely distinguishable from this occurs in the Lower Cretaceous of
Europe, and may be found named S. quinquangularis in some collec-
tions. S. filaria Goldf. is a solitary, wholly adherent form, com-
mencing with a coiled stage. So far as can be seen from the
imperfect African specimen named S. filaria by Tate, this is a
clustering form consisting of crowded, narrow cylindrical tubes, and
* Pictet and Renevier (1), p. 60, pl. vi., fig. 7, 1855 ; Moesch (1), p. 93, pl. xxxiii.,
fig. 2. t Gregory (1), p. 112.
} Goldfuss (1), Band i., p. 230, pl. 68, fig. 8 (1831).
34 Annals of the South African Museum.
it is not distinguishable from the English Lower Cretaceous Serpule
that have been variously referred to Serpula filifornuis J. de C. Sow,
and S. plexus J. de C. Sow. We thus see that in the case of the
two Trigonie and the two Serpuleé which Tate identified with Euro-
pean Jurassic types, the determinations were so far erroneous that
they are now bereft of the significance which was attached to them
as evidence for the age of the fauna.
We may further examine the evidence for age afforded by some
of the more conspicuous bivalves, and firstly I may briefly refer to
the representatives of the genus T’rigonia, which in themselves lend
such a characteristic aspect to the fauna. Although the testimony
of these is perhaps not quite so conclusive as Lycett supposed, still,
the balance of evidence furnished by members of this genus may be
safely relied upon to give a fair indication of age, even when con-
sidered apart from associated forms, and the material we are dealing
with in the present instance is fortunately of an exceptionally favour-
able character. In the first place there is Trigonia ventricosa,
T. krausst, and 1’. rogers, all possessing the characters of the section
Scabree—a division which, so far as we know, is elsewhere only
represented in rocks of Cretaceous age. These might be considered
to be balanced by the occurrence of 7. tate, a typical member of the
section Costate, but although this division of the Trigonieé has its
maximum development in the Oolitic rocks, it is also represented in
strata of Lower Cretaceous and even later age.
Trigoma pemnsularis Coquand,* from the Aptian of Spain, cer-
tainly shows characters of degeneration not shared by T. tatez, but
the Oomia strata of Cutch have yielded two normal representatives
of the Costatze, which, together with some degenerate derivatives of
this section, are accompanied by Trigoni@ which exhibit a decidedly
Cretaceous aspect. Another unmodified costate form, 7. anguste-
costata Behr. + occurs in the Argentine Republic in strata which
are regarded by Behrendsen as Upper Cretaceous, while a typical
member of this section has been described by E. Ascher from the
Grodischter beds (Hauterivian) of Silesia. }
Trigonia herzogs (Goldf.), another very characteristic Uitenhage
form, was believed by Lycett to belong to the Quadrate, which, so
far as known, are exclusively Cretaceous. Steinmann,§$ however,
pointed out that Trigonia herzogi differs in several important par-
* Coquand (1), p. 129, pl. xxiii., fig. 3.
+ Behrendsen (1), p. 6, pl. 3, fig. 7.
t Ascher (1), p. 159 [25], p. xiii. [ii.], fig. 10.
§ Steinmann (2).
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 30
ticulars from all known Quadratz, and found that the special features
which distinguish this Uitenhage shell from the Jurassic Clavellate
on the one hand and the Cretaceous Quadrate on the other, are
shared by Trigonia transitoria Steinm. from Lower Cretaceous rocks
in Bolivia, Chili, and the Argentine Republic. He therefore sug-
gested a new group-name, the Pseudo-quadrate, to comprise these
two Trigonie, which were the only examples known to exhibit these
peculiar distinguishing characters. Trigoima newquensis Burckhardt, *
which occurs with J. transitoria in Neocomian rocks at Las Lajas
on the Rio Agrio (Argentine), falls under the same heading, while
T. mamillata + from the Oomia strata in Cutch must also be referred
to this group. Still another form, described in these pages (7’. holubz),
is clearly referable to the same category. Although the five members
of the Pseudo-quadrate known to us are all similarly differentiated
from the typical Clavellatz, it’ is not certain that they are all so
closely related to one another as might at first sight appear to be
the case; some, at least, may possibly have been independently
evolved from clavellate ancestors.{ Nor is it by any means certain
that they bear any close and direct relationship to the true Quadrate,
and though definite indications on this point fail us, it is quite
probable that the Quadratz and Pseudo-quadratze represent parallel
and independent groups of derivatives arising from Jurassic Clavel-
late. It is therefore evident that the Trigoni@ of the group Pseudo-
quadratz cannot yet be considered in themselves to furnish quite
such reliable guidance to geological age as the true Quadratz, but at
the same time their general aspect, by comparison with the Quadrate,
strongly suggests a Cretaceous age, while the known South American
representatives must, in fact, be regarded as Neocomian. Some of
the most important features wherein the Quadratz differ from the
Clavellatze are also exemplified in the Pseudo-quadrate. Lycett
laid great emphasis on the presence or absence of sculpture on the
escutcheon in distinguishing between the Jurassic Clavellatz on the
one hand, and the Cretaceous Clavellate and Quadratz on the other,
and in regard to this feature all the Pseudo-quadratz agree with the
Quadrate in having coarsely nodose ornamentation on the escutcheon.
Further remarks on the points of agreement between these groups
are appended to the description of Trigonia holubi,
Trigonia conocarduformis (Krauss) was thought by Lycett to fall
* Burckhardt (2), p. 74, Taf. xiv., figs. 4-6.
¢ Kitchin (1), p. 100, pl. ix., figs. 8, 9; pl. x., figs. 1-3.
{ Remarks on this subject will be found to follow the description and the dis-
cussion of the relationships of Trigonia holubi, in these pages.
36 Annals of the South African Museum.
within the section Scabrz, but a near relationship to members of
this division is scarcely to be inferred from the adult characters
displayed by this peculiar form, while a study of the young shell
does not plainly reveal its affinities. A general comparison, how-
ever, shows that this Trigonia differs from the Jurassic Clavellatz
in a manner somewhat analogous to that which distinguishes the
Scabree, and a very closely similar and probably intimately related
form occurs in the Neocomian of the Argentine Republic.
On the whole, so far as this Trigonia-assemblage is comparable
with European forms, it must certainly be considered to display a
Cretaceous rather than a Jurassic character, though when regarded
collectively, it is without counterpart in the European area. The
significance of other Trigonie@ included in this fauna will be discussed
presently.
Still further indications of geological age are to be derived from
a comparison of the Uitenhage lamellibranchs with European types.
One of the shells submitted to me, which proves to be identical with
a form previously described by Sharpe, who did not recognise its
true generic position, is an example of the well-characterised genus
Thetironia, which in Europe is widely distributed in Lower
Cretaceous and higher strata, though it has not been recorded from
rocks of an earlier age. A second species of Thetironia is also
included in the collection. Solecwrtws is another genus not known
to occur in rocks older than Cretaceous, and a representative of this
must now be added to the list of Uitenhage molluscs. The speci-
mens sent to me for examination also include examples of Pecten
which can only be identified with the Cretaceous P. orbicularis
J. Sow. and P. cottaldinus d’Orb., while a third form may be most
aptly brought into comparison with P. swbacutus Lam. A repre-
sentative of the Cretaceous genus Anthonya must also be recorded
in this connection.
Gervillia dentata Krauss, though belonging to the group of
G. aviculoides,* typically represented in Jurassic rocks (G. deecks
Frech; G. aviculoides Sow.), has a close counterpart in G‘. anceps
Desh. and G. swblanceolata d’Orb., in the Lower Cretaceous of Europe.
A form closely similar, and perhaps identical, occurs also in the
Neocomian of German Hast Africa. The long lateral tooth which
Krauss thought to be so highly distinctive of G. dentata as almost
to justify the establishment of a new genus, is a normal feature of
the group, and is well developed in G. anceps.{ Another common
* Frech (1). + Frech (1), pp. 612, 613.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 37
and characteristic Uitenhage shell is Hxogyra imbricata Krauss, and
this belongs to a general type well exemplified in the Lower
Cretaceous strata of Europe and South America. Lima neglecta
Tate, belongs to the sub-generic division Mantellum, and most
closely resembles forms which occur in the Lower Cretaceous of
Europe. Reference has already been made to Ptychomya complicata
(Tate), which is a typical representative of a genus widely dis-
tributed in the Lower Cretaceous rocks, where it first makes its
appearance.
It is abundantly evident, then, that many of the most important
and distinctive molluscan forms, amongst those with which we are
dealing, give similar indications of geological horizon. There can
be no doubt, indeed, that the marine Uitenhage fauna is of Neocomian
age, though it is perhaps not possible to arrive at a very precise and
positive estimate of equivalence with the divisions of the Neocomian
in Europe, owing to the want of close coincidence in the faunas as
developed in such widely separated regions. But Holcostephanus
atherstoni (Sharpe) and H. wilmane sp. nov., if not actually repre-
sented in Europe, have very close allies there in the Valanginian
and Hauterivian, and the Uitenhage Marine Beds may, in my
opinion, be certainly correlated with these divisions. Further, it
seems to me highly probable that the Marine Beds represent not
more than the strata at the top of the Valanginian and the base of
the Hauterivian.
The possibility that the lowest marine strata may be of greater
age than Neocomian is not only most remote, but is contradicted
by the paleontological evidence, so far as this goes. Fossiliferous
strata, yielding a marine molluscan fauna characterised by the
prevalence of Gasteropoda and the remains of oysters, occur at
Dunbrodie (Sunday’s River) associated with plant-bearing beds, and
are in the lower part of the Uitenhage Series ; according to Messrs.
Rogers and Schwarz they may be classed with the so-called ‘‘ Wood
Bed” series. Amongst the fossils collected here are Act@onina
atherstom (Sharpe), Cyprina rugulosa Sharpe, and a Pecten which
I have identified as Pecten cottaldinus dOrb. While Acteonina
atherstont is found also in the highest part of the Marine Beds
on the Zwartkop’s River and with the characteristic Trigoni@ on the
Sunday’s River, Stow recorded the occurrence of Cyprina rugulosa
with similar associates. Although the Wood Bed series was not
seen in the Zwartkop’s River Valley below Uitenhage, the lowest
part of the Marine Beds in the Zwartkop’s River section, exposed
in a clay-pit near Rawson Bridge, yielded Acteonina atherstone and
4
38 Annals of the South African Musewm.
shells most probably referable to Bochianites glaber sp. nov.; the
latter has close affinities with European Neocomian forms and
occurs at a higher level in the Marine Beds one mile from Rawson
Bridge on the main line, up side. It is also worthy of remark that
the lowest marine strata found, either at Dunbrodie or in the
Zwartkop’s River Valley, yielded no single form which suggests
stronger affinities to Upper Jurassic than to Lower Cretaceous
types; but those very forms, such as Tvrigonia tatei Neum. or
Tancredia schwarzi sp. noy., which if considered alone might with
some reason have been thought to point to a Jurassic age, occur in
the higher part of the Marine Beds, associated with characteristic
Mollusca of undoubted Neocomian type.
During his visit to the Sunday’s River district in 1905, Mr. Rogers
found additional evidence to show that the whole of the Uitenhage
beds there exposed were deposited with comparatively great rapidity.
He found that forms which are represented in the strata by abundant
individuals occur much more generally distributed throughout the
whole thickness of beds than was at first suspected. Some of the
most typical species of the marine facies (for instance, the familiar
Trigome) were observed to occur, together with layers of lignite,
at the very base of the Sunday’s River Beds, where Mr. Rogers had
expected to find forms characteristic of the Wood Bed facies. These
marine forms occur also 300 feet higher in the series, and since the
lower beds of the series were seen to be assuming, in some degree,
the aspect of the Wood Bed development, the discovery of the
familiar marine forms in them occasioned some surprise. Mr.
Rogers noted the occurrence of Hamites near the mouth of the
river, where Stow obtained it at first, but he also found it high
up the river in a rock which showed resemblance to the strata of
the Wood Bed series. He concludes from his observations during
this second survey, that Stow must have been led through insufficient
collecting to assign a too restricted vertical distribution to various
species. Mr. Rogers believes that from the same cause his own
records are likely to prove faulty, and that exhaustive collecting
would still more fully demonstrate the extensive vertical distribution
of many of the forms throughout the beds exposed.*
The above considerations lend great support to the results of a
comparative study of the fauna, namely, that no forms are known
to occur in these beds which give definite indications of the presence
of more than the equivalent of a single paleontological stage.
Allowing, then, that the cephalopods, supported in no small degree
* For the published account of the 1905 survey, consult Rogers (2), pp. 15-33.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 39
by the lamellibranchs, afford satisfactory data for a comparison with
European standards, we may safely conclude that no portion of the
Uitenhage Series represents a period of time earlier or later than
the Neocomian. It must be said, indeed, that the almost entire
restriction of Holcostephanus, sensu stricto (= Astierra Auctorum),
to the upper part of the Valanginian and lower beds of the
Hauterivian in Europe * suggests much narrower limits, when we
consider how important a place is taken by members of this genus
in characterising the cephalopod-fauna of the Uitenhage beds.
Leaving, now, the consideration of evidence which leads to these
conclusions, we may proceed to compare the Uitenhage fauna with
those occurrences in extra-Huropean regions which, in greater or
less degree, bear the imprint of a similar facies.
III.—COMPARISON WITH EXTRA-EUROPEAN FAUNAS.
(a) Possible Traces of a Related Fauna im the South-west of
Madagascar.—Douvillé has drawn attention to the occurrence
of some lamellibranchs obtained by Lieutenant Boutonnet from
deposits situated in the Fiherenga Valley, in the basin of the
Isakondry River, east of Tullear.t Mention is made of a large
Trigonia, said to be analogous to some of the Trigonie of the Oomia
beds in Cutch and of the Uitenhage Series, and with this is asso-
ciated a shell referred by Douvillé to the genus Pycnodonta, and said
by him to be closely comparable with Hxogyra imbricata Krauss
(also referred to Pycnodonta by Prof. Douvillé). On the evidence of
these fossils, the strata containing them are considered by Douvillé
to be of Cretaceous age, and Lemoine classes them provisionally as
Lower Cretaceous. The account of these fossils so far published
is unfortunately meagre, and it must here suffice to have drawn
attention to the occurrence of forms in Madagascar which may
possibly indicate the presence of a fauna of Uitenhage character.
(b) Comparison with the Fauna of the Oomia Group in Cutch.—
Striking data for correlation are to be found among the lamelli-
branchs which constitute so large a part of the Uitenhage fauna,
and it becomes apparent that some of the conspicuous elements
which help to lend a definite character to the assemblage, while
finding no exact parallel in the European area, have an unmis-
takable counterpart in the fauna of the Oomia Trigonia-beds. This
* In North Germany, for instance, the restriction of these forms to such narrow
limits is well marked. See von Koenen (3), pp. 4, 8, 9.
+ Douvillé (2), p. 8388; Douvillé (4), p. 215; Lemoine (1), p. 176.
40 Annals of the South African Musewm.
agreement is the more remarkable from the fact that in seeking
additional data for comparative study among the cephalopods of the
Oomia beds, the indications of community furnished by the lamelli-
branchs are found to obtain no positive support. The cephalopods
described by Waagen* from the Oomia Group, with the exception of
the belemnites, do not comprise representatives of any of the genera
obtained from the Uitenhage beds, and moreover, when brought into
comparison with European forms, seemed to Waagen to indicate a
Tithonian or Portlandian age.
Stoliczka+ first directed attention to the great similarity between
a Trigonia collected by Wynne during the geological survey of
Cutch,* and the South African 7. ventricosa (Krauss), and the identity
of these was afterwards confirmed when the Oomia shell was definitely
referred to J. ventricosa by Waagen,$ Feistmantel,|| and W. T.
Blanford.‘/ Feistmantel, in 1876,** noted the close similarity be-
tween Trigonia herzogi from the Uitenhage beds and a Trigonia from
the Oomia Group which I have recently described under the name
T. mamillata. As already pointed out, 7. mamuillata is comparable
with 7’. herzogi and the South American 7’. transitoria in the manner
in which it exhibits characters somewhat intermediate between those
of the Clavellatea and the Quadrate, but it bears a still closer
resemblance to 7. holubi sp. nov. Owing to their large and massive
shells, and their well-characterised sculptural plan, the members of
this group of Trigonie form a prominent feature in the faunas in
which they occur, and supply significant data in the present com-
parative study.
The basis for comparison is further strengthened by the association
of true Costatz with members of the Scabra, both in the Oomia
and the Uitenhage strata—a fact to which I have already referred.
T. parva accompanies 7’. ventricosa in Cutch, and although T” tens,
another costate form, has not been recorded from any of the
localities where 7’. ventricosa is found, it occurs in beds at least not
older than those from which the remaining Oomia Trigoni@ have
been obtained. In the Uitenhage Series we have 7’. tatez, which,
although not closely comparable with T. tenwis, and distinguished by
much coarser ribbing of the flanks, also shares some of the charac-
teristics by which the Oomia form is contrasted with most of the
* Waagen (1). + Stoliczka (2), p, 315 (1871).
+t Wynne (1), pp. 225, 231. § Waagen (1), p. 237.
|| Feistmantel (2), p. 164; (3), p. xxxvii.
“| Medlicott and Blanford (1), p. 261; (2), p.224. See also Kitchin (1), p. 104.
** Feistmantel (1), p. 116.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series, 41
Costate from the Jurassic rocks of Europe. These distinguishing
features are the elongated oval figure, the delicate sculpture of the
marginal carina and area, and the elongated form and fine ornamen-
tation of the escutcheon; they lend an aspect of similarity which
cannot be overlooked, especially when these lingering examples of a
typically Jurassic section are brought into comparison with the
majority of European representatives.
Other Trigonie which serve in most conspicuous manner to
characterise the faunas under consideration, and certainly at first
sight appear to furnish the strongest corroborative data in a correla-
tion, are the members of the group of Trigonia v-scripta in the
Oomia beds and the group of JZ. vaw in the Uitenhage Formation.
The similarity of one of the Oomia T'rigonie to T. vaw Sharpe seems
to have been first pointed out by Feistmantel,* and W. T. Blanford t
shortly afterwards suggested that a shell from the Oomia Group,
which was ascribed by Feistmantel to the genus Goniomya, might in
reality represent the African 7. vau. Which of three Oomia forms
was here and elsewhere} referred to in this connection is uncertain,
but it is possibly the one which I have described under the name 7’.
v-scripta,§ although the less well-known 7’. dubia in reality bears a
much closer resemblance to JT. vauw, particularly in the outline.
When dealing with the Oomia Trigonie I pointed out that 7’.
v-scripta, when adult, more closely approaches an undescribed
Uitenhage form which is associated with 7. vaw. This is T. stowz,
described in these pages, and it is certainly closely allied to 7’. vaw ;
the youthful characters of shape and ornament are practically
identical in these two types, but a marked divergence is observed to
accompany progressive growth, and the adult forms are perfectly
distinct. The characters of the youthful period in 7’. v-scripta are
also practically the same as in 7’. recwrva, with which it is associated
in the Oomia beds, and in this case likewise, wide divergence is
exhibited as the adult characters are required. But the marked
differences which exist between the essential features in the youthful
stage of the two Uitenhage and the two Oomia shells respectively
induced me, when describing the Cutch Trigoni@, to distinguish
between the ‘‘ Group of 7. vaw’’ and the ‘‘ Group of 7’. v-scripta.”
Subsequent examination of further material has strengthened the
belief that we are here dealing with a case of convergent development,
and that close alliance is by no means to be inferred from the
* Feistmantel (1), p. 116. + W. T. Blanford (1), p. 118.
{ Medlicott and Blanford (1), p. 261.
§ Kitchin (1), p. 70, pls. vii., figs. 6-8; viii., figs. 1-3,
42 Annals of the South African Musewm.
similarity in the adult stage in members of these two groups,
however peculiar and striking may be the characters which appear
to unite them, and at the same time to differentiate them from all
other sections of the genus with which we are acquainted. Since
the members of these two groups appear to illustrate mere homao-
morphy, their value as evidence in the correlation of the faunas
becomes very much reduced, and if dissociated from the forms which
accompany them, they could not well be considered to afford proof
of contemporaneity. But whatever be the causes that determine the
evolution along converging lines in shells which, by their youthful
characters, betray a heterogenetic origin, we may in this case safely
infer from their occurrence with an association of forms in so many
respects similar, that they acquired their common characters at
approximately the same time.
Before concluding this comparison of the Uitenhage and Oomia
Trigonié, attention may be directed to certain broad features of
general habit which in some measure lend a distinctive aspect to
several members of the genus in the faunas under discussion; and
it will be noticed that while these features serve in great degree to
imprint a facies on the assemblage which brings it into contrast
with European occurrences, the same broad distinguishing characters
are not confined to one section of the genus, but are shared by
members of stocks not intimately related. There is the tendency to
great posterior elongation of the shells, and in some cases a
siphonal gape; the obliteration of the carinz with disappearance of
a definite demarcation between flank, area, and escutcheon; the
dwindling and disappearance of sculpture on the area; and in
several instances the situation of the umbones relatively far from
the anterior extremity. In the Oomia beds these points are illus-
trated in varying degree in certain degenerate derivatives of
Costate, and in the group of TY. v-scripta; in the Uitenhage beds
they are exemplified in 7’. vau, T. stowi, T. rogersi, and T’. conocardic-
formis. In both Trigonia vauw and T. dubia the parallelism with the
genus Gomomya cannot be overlooked, and I have previously
suggested that if complete shells of these could be procured, they
would be found to gape at the siphonal end; this idea is now
supported by a specimen of 7’. stowz sent to me from the South
African Museum, which is almost uninjured at the siphonal border,
and which plainly exhibits a gaping habit.
We do not find further aids to comparison amongst the few Oomia
Mollusca which have already been described, and a detailed account
of the remaining lamellibranchs collected by Wynne and Stoliczka
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 43
from these beds is still in course of preparation; but I am indebted
to the Director of the Geological Survey of India for permission to
utilise the Indian specimens at present in my keeping for the purpose
of this correlation. Several Oomia types at once suggest most
strongly their affinity to Uitenhage forms, and these are the
following. An Hxogyra occurring in Oomia beds at the Trummo
River is certainly not distinguishable from individuals of H. imbricata
Krauss, and may at any rate be thus provisionally named; an
Astarte found in association with Trigonia ventricosa and other
characteristic Oomia forms very closely resembles Astarte herzogi
Krauss, though it is not identical with it; there are fragments of a
large, coarsely-ribbed Cucwllea which, so far as can be seen, shares
all the distinguishing features of the strongly characterised Cucullea
krausst Tate; a large Gervillia very closely resembles G. dentata
Krauss, and is probably identical with it;* and lastly, the Oomia
beds have yielded specimens referable to the genus Seebachia, other-
wise only known by Seebachia bronni (Krauss), from the Uitenhage
Series. Two of these individuals from Cutch very closely resemble
S. bronni, and it is not improbable that they are identical with it.
The closely similar character of these lamellibranch-faunas is
clearly shown when we place side by side the identical, proximate,
and analogous types, as follows :—
Uitenhage Beds. Oomia Beds.
Exogyra imbricata Hxogyra inbricata
Cucullea kraussi Cucullea kraussi
Gervillia dentata Gervillia dentata ?
Astarte herzogi Astarte sp., near herzogi
Trigonia ventricosa Trigonia ventricosa
Trigonia holubt
Trigonia herzogi | (Pseudo-quadrate) Trigonia mamillata
Trigome of the vau Trigome of the v-scripta
group group
Seebachia bronni Seebachia bronni ?
A more critical and detailed study of the Oomia lamellibranchs
may possibly reveal further connecting links, but two inferences may
already safely be drawn from the general agreement observed to
exist between these geographically widely separated faunas. Firstly,
despite the absence of clues to correlation derivable from the Cepha-
lopoda, we may conclude that the faunas were approximately con-
* See also W. T. Blanford (1), p. 118.
ike Annals of the South African Museum.
temporaneous ; and secondly, that the lines of intercourse between
the two areas were probably much more direct than was formerly
believed to be the case.
This correlation appears therefore to be in conflict with Waagen’s
conclusions concerning the age of the marine Oomia beds, which
were thought to be Portlandian, but a brief consideration will show
that this difficulty is more apparent than real. Doubts might per-
haps be expressed as to the validity of a comparison based solely
upon lamellibranch types, and it must be admitted that in many
similar cases it would be right to place greater confidence in the
evidence of cephalopods; but in the present instance the lamelli-
branehs compared are peculiarly well characterised, and indeed com-
prise no single form known in the European area. On the soundness
of the evidence which these well-marked types afford, and upon which
the above conclusions are founded, I think no doubt can reasonably
be cast.
The Mollusca of the marine Oomia beds, shown by Stoliczka to occur
in the lower part of the group, cannot be said to give such definite
indications of geological age as are to be derived from a study of the
Uitenhage fauna. The ammonites from these lower Oomia beds
were considered by Waagen to show close affinity with Upper Jurassic
forms in Europe, and he believed some of the T'rigonie to corroborate
fully his view concerning the Portlandian age.* But a detailed
study of the Trigonie has shown that this belief was not well founded,
and the relationship of any of the Oomia forms to the Portlandian
Gibbose is at the best a matter for conjecture. I have provisionally
referred one of these Trigoni@ to the group Gibbose on the strength
of a certain broad similarity of characters, while at the same time
recognising the possibility that this form may represent an aberrant
derivative of some costate stock. Judged by analogy with Trigonia
retrorsa, which can only be regarded as a degenerate costate type, the
relationship of 7’. spisszcostata to the Gibbose is extremely doubtful,
but nothing more definite on this point can be said until material can
be collected in a sufficiently favourable state of preservation to throw
light on the nature of the youthful stage. Other Oomia Trigone
which exhibit characters simulating those of the Portlandian Gibbose
have been shown to be allied to the section Costatze, and nothing
quite comparable with these diversely modified derivatives is known
in Jurassic rocks, though the late adult stage of 7. peninsularis Cogq.,
from the Aptian of Spain, shows an analogous obliteration of sectional
features which was regarded by Lycett to indicate degeneracy. The
* Waagen (1), p. 233 (1875).
The Invertebrate Fawna of the Urtenhage Series. 45
value of Trigonia mamillata as an indication for age has already been
considered, and the supposition of the Cretaceous rather than the
Jurassic affinities of this form receives emphatic support from the
presence of Trigonia ventricosa and T. pulchra, both members of the
section Scabre. Though claiming corroboration of his views from
Trigonie which he supposed to be related to Portlandian forms,
Waagen did not state that these were found in actual association
with his Oomia ammonites; and the fact that none of the critical
ammonite-species upon which he relied in his correlation is recorded
from any of the localities—such as Goonaree, Oomia, or Huroora,—
where the Trigonia-beds are well developed, gives room for the
suggestion that the ammonites and lamellibranchs may not represent
horizons of quite the same geological age. Further, if we examine
Waagen’s descriptions and figures of the four ammonites which were
thought to represent European forms, it may perhaps be allowed
that too much reliance has been placed on the evidence they were
supposed to afford. Two were referred only with doubt to the
respective European species; of the remainder, one represents a
type of Perisphinctes which, so far as can be judged from the
description and figure, does not justify the definite conclusions drawn
by Waagen concerning its relation to a European Portlandian form.
The other, a single specimen referred to the Tithonian Perisphinctes
eudichotomus Zittel, is so preserved that the lobe-line is not visible,
and a comparison of Waagen’s figure with Zittel’s original specimen
in the Paleontological Collection of the State at Munich shows that
the Indian form is rather thicker and more inyolute, though the
agreement is otherwise good.
It is scarcely necessary to dwell at any length on the question of
the alleged discrepancy between the evidence of the plant and animal
remains in settling the age of the Oomia beds, since this matter has
already been so fully dealt with. The plants of the Oomia group
were obtained from strata for the most part above the marine beds
which yielded the cephalopods and lamellibranchs, but they led
Feistmantel to refer these beds to the Middle Jurassic. Even should
a revision of the Oomia plants prove the correctness of Feistmantel’s
view that the flora exhibits Oolitic affinities, there are many reasons
why the evidence of the marine fauna must be allowed to outweigh
that of the plants in a correlation with European stratigraphical
standards.*
Putting on one side the ammonites, the exact bearings of which
on this question are somewhat doubtful, it may be said that there is
* W. T. Blanford (2).
46 Annals of the South African Musewm.
nothing in the fauna of the Oomia Trigonia-beds to contradict the
results reached by a study of the Uitenhage Mollusca, and a con-
sideration of all the available evidence seems to justify the conclusion
that here also we are dealing with the part equivalent of the
Neocomian in Europe.
(c) Traces of a Related Fauna in the Godavari District and im
Hazara.—Traces of the Uitenhage-Oomia lamellibranch-fauna, as
principally indicated by the presence of Trigonia ventricosa, have
also been found to occur in an outlier of the Tripetty beds about
24 miles north-east of Coconada near the south-east coast of the
peninsula of India.* Trigonia ventricosa is said to be here
accompanied by Tvrigonia smeei, a characteristic fossil of the
Oomia Group in Cutch, though it seems possible that this may be
7’. crassa, an Oomia form of similar type.t The small collection
of fossils from near Coconada was examined and named by Stoliczka,
and it comprises Znoceramus and a few other lamellibranchs as well
as Helicoceras and other remains of cephalopods.
Trigonia ventricosa has also been recorded from strata exposed in
the Margalla Pass in Hazara (N.-W. Himalayas), where it is said to
be found in profusion.} The bearings of these occurrences in a dis-
cussion of the broad question of distribution will be considered below.
(d) Neoconuan in German East Africaa—The Lower Cretaceous
fossils collected during W. Bornhardt’s journeys in German East
Africa (1895-1897), and described by G. Miiller,§ are of special
interest in the present connection, because they exhibit in some
measure a Uitenhage facies and also furnish strong links with the
molluscan fauna of the Oomia Group. The remains of Cephalopoda
are unfortunately very scanty and again fail us as a basis of com-
parison, but important links are found in some of the lamellibranchs,
which include well-characterised Trigonieg. Foremost amongst these
is Trigonia ventricosa, occurring at a locality -8 km. north of the
Nkundi stream, 29 km. north-west of Kiswere, in strata ascribed to
the Lower Neocomian and brought into correlation with the Uitenhage
beds by Dr. Miiller. Trigonia beyschlagi G. Miller, which here
accompanies 7’. ventricosa in great abundance, appears to have no
counterpart in the Uitenhage beds, but it clearly belongs to the same
category of modified Costate as 7’. smeez|| and ZT. crassa‘ from the
* King (1), p. 229; Feistmantel (2), p. 164; Feistmantel (3), p. xxxvii.
+ Kitchin (1), pp. 42, 43.
{ Wynne (2), p. 125; Medlicott and Blanford (1), p. 503.
§ G. Miiller (1). || J. de C. Sowerby (8), pl. lxi., fig. 5.
“| Kitchin (1), p. 44; pl. iv., figs. 4—6, pl. v., figs. 1-3.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 47
Oomia beds in Cutch; the resemblance to T. crassa is indeed very
striking, though I have elsewhere stated reasons why these two
forms cannot be considered identical.* But 7. beyschlagi is certainly
either closely related to 7’. crassa or illustrates a stage of removal
from the normal ancestral costate plan, on some parallel line, quite
comparable with that exemplified by the Oomia form. It was
probably in consequence of insufficient acquaintance with Trigonia
smeei that Miiller failed to recognise the true relationships of this
peculiar shell; the points of similarity to the Uitenhage shell See-
bachia bronni (Krauss), to which he called attention, are merely
superficial, involving the general outward habit only. Uhligt has
expressed the opinion, however, that the grounds for the generic
separation of these two forms are hardly convincing; but he can
scarcely have compared the figure showing the dentition of the right
valve of Trigonia beyschlagit with Neumayr’s excellent correspond-
ing illustration of Seebachia.§ A glance at these figures proves
beyond question that Miller was right in assigning his shell to the
genus T'rigonia, and now it is interesting to find the clue to its
narrower relationships by a comparison with the Oomia forms, a
detailed account of which had not appeared at the time when Miiller
wrote.
Amongst the fossils collected at a locality in the district of Ntandi,
30 km. west of Mtshinga, which Miiller considered to indicate a Middle
Neocomian horizon, a large Gervillia, apparently identical with
G. dentata Krauss, serves as a connecting link to both the Uitenhage
and Oomia faunas. There is also a Ptychomya (Ptychonya hauche-
cornet Mill.) which, though distinct from P. convplicata (Tate), may
possibly be nearly related to it. TZrigonia bornhardti Miller, from
the same locality, is only so far comparable with the Uitenhage-
Oomia Trigonie, that in common with some of these it exhibits a
marked posterior elongation, with absence of sculpture from the area
and the posterior part of the flank in the adult shell, in which also
the area has ceased to be demarcated from the flank. An Astarte
from the Oomia T’rigonia-beds compares very closely with the shells
from Ntandi described by Miiller under the name Hriphyla stuht-
mannt, particularly in the character of the hinge and the very deep
lunule, though it differs somewhat in the outline and ornamentation ;
Astarte herzogi from the Uitenhage beds also belongs to the same
division of the genus.
* Kitchin (1), p. 121. + Ublig (8).
+ G. Miller (1), pl. xix., fig. 3.
§ Holub and Neumaypyr (1), pl. ii., fig. 40.
48 Annals of the South African Musewm.
Still greater interest attaches to a Trigonia which strongly recalls
the peculiar types belonging to the group of 7. v-scripta in the
Oomia Trigonia beds and the Uitenhage group of 7. vaw. This
is T. kiihni Mill., found in strata ascribed to the Upper Neocomian
at a locality 23 km. west-south-west of Mtshinga, and it possesses
characters which appear to indicate relationship to one of the groups
mentioned rather than to the members of other groups with which
Dr. Miller has also brought it into comparison. Trigonia kiihna, ib
is true, seems to be distinguished from 7. vaw as well as from T.
v-scripta and its allies both by its less equilateral form and the
persistent ornaments of its escutcheon; but to judge from the
description, and especially from the figure of an imperfect specimen*
which shows the convexity of the anterior profile and the crowded
ribs of the frontal series obliquely crossing the growth lines—just as
in the Oomia 7’. recurva—there can be little doubt about the position
of this shell relative to the main divisions of the genus. Whether it
is more closely allied to the group of J. v-scripta or to T. vaw and
T. stowt sp. nov., cannot be ascertained until more perfect specimens
can be obtained and the sculpture of the youthful growth-stage
examined.
Of less significance, perhaps, is the occurrence of Pecten striato-
punctatus Roem., which was found with Gervillia dentata, and Arca
witenhagensis Miller, which accompanies Trigonia beyschlagz. They
may be brought into near comparison with Pecten projectus Tate and
Arca jonesi Tate, though little importance could be attached to such
types as these, if taken alone. Another Pecten, from the same
locality as that from which P. striato-punctatus was obtained, was
considered by Miiller to represent very probably P. cottaldinus
d’Orb., which also occurs in the Uitenhage beds. The relationship
of the Oomia fauna to that described from German East Africa is of
course what we might expect to find, having regard to the manner
in which a close connection between the Upper Jurassic faunas of
East Africa and Cutch has been demonstrated by those who have
studied the Cephalopoda.
Enough has been said to indicate the position taken by these Hast
African occurrences in a widely distributed Neocomian fauna of
southern type, and to show that such connecting links as are
available, no less than the general aspect which the fauna, wherever
it is developed, derives from the prevalence of peculiarly charac-
terised Trigonia, plainly serve to unite the molluscan assemblages
of these three remotely separated districts in the eastern hemisphere.
* G. Miiller (1), Taf. xxv., fig. 8.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 49
Some indications of a western extension of the same type of fauna
are to be recognised on the South American continent.
(e) Neocomian in South America.—Amongst the fossils collected
in 1899 by the late J. B. Hatcher from the Pueyrrydon Series in
Patagonia * are several lamellibranchs of distinctive type which
permit of close comparison with some of those above discussed.
They have been described and figured by Stanton,} who was led
to ascribe a Lower Cretaceous age to the Pueyrrydon Series, though
he was unable to establish a narrower correlation with the forma-
tions of other regions. The most striking resemblances to Uitenhage
forms are seen in two Zrigoni@ from the Belgrano beds, T. sub-
ventricosa Stanton, a member of the section Scabre, and T’.. hetero-
sculpta Stanton, believed by Stanton to be allied to 7. vaw Sharpe.
Trigonta subventricosa certainly approaches very closely to 7’. ven-
tricosa, particularly in the wide spacing and robustness of the
anterior varices. The differences in the sculpture pointed out by
Dr. Stanton appear to be less emphasised when this Patagonian
form is brought into comparison with the large and more coarsely
ornamented 7’. kraussi sp. nov., which occurs with 7’. ventricosa. But
if the relations of height to length exhibited by the figured specimen
of T. subventricosa be those which characterise the average shells
of that form, then there is good ground for the separation of these
three members of the Scabre, which at the same time appear to be
united by similar broad features of peculiar form and ornament.
They are the only known examples of this particular extreme type,
and probably represent a group in this southern developmen
parallel with that of which TZ. scabricola Lycett and 7’. alzformis
Park. are typical members in Europe.
The ornamentation of 7. heterosculpta is of such a kind as to
recall instantly the conspicuous shells of the groups of 7. v-scripta
and 7. vau. The principal points of resemblance are thé manner in
which steeply inclined ribs of two series on the flank meet to form
an angular pattern, and the absence of sculpture from the area and
the posterior portion of the flank in the adult shell. 7’. heterosculpta
is certainly not to be brought into comparison with the European
Undulatz, but its whole aspect suggests a close connection with the
group of 7. vau. Its near relationship to 7. vaw and 7’. stow? is
clearly to be inferred from a comparison of the youthful characters,
which are very similar, and affinity with these rather than with the
Indian group of 7. v-scripta is exactly what we might expect to
find, having regard to the geographical relationships. The adult
* Hatcher (1). + Stanton (3),
50 Annals of the South African Museum.
T. heterosculpta differs, however, from its African allies by the less
posterior elongation of the shell.
Here again, in the Belgrano beds, we find an associated Gervillia
of large dimensions, which does not appear to be widely removed
from G. dentata Krauss, while a large Astarte (A. perlata Stanton)
with short and deeply excavated lunule, may be said to have its
parallel in the Oomia beds of Cutch, if we confine the comparison
to broad outward features. At a somewhat lower horizon in the
Pueyrrydon Series (the Gio beds) Ostrea tardensis Stanton, which
occurs abundantly, represents a type of Ostrea or Hxogyra which
has much in common with Exogyra imbricata Krauss; and to judge
from the description of O. tardensis, it seems likely that these two
forms may really be very closely comparable. A special value can-
not, of course, be attached to the comparison of such types as these
if studied alone, but the resemblance gains significance when viewed
in connection with the other Mollusca above discussed. It will be
seen therefore, that although the basis of comparison is somewhat
slender, yet the occurrences above noted in no slight measure
suggest the closest alliance with the molluscan fauna of the South
African Neocomian ; and it may be added that there is nothing in
the Pueyrrydon fauna itself to contradict the assumption that we
are dealing with a western part-equivalent of the Uitenhage
development.
A search for further traces of the characterising elements of the
Uitenhage fauna in the Lower Cretaceous deposits of South America
reveals evidences of a very suggestive description. The Lower
Cretaceous beds in Bolivia and Chili which have yielded Trigonia
transitoria Steinmann * are probably of similar age and seem to
represent the more northerly equivalents or part-equivalents of the
Pueyrrydon Series. Trigonia transitoria has also been found to
occur abundantly at the Arroyo Triuguico and at Quili Malal in
the Argentine Republic, in strata ascribed by Behrendsen + to the
Neocomian. It occurs, moreover, with significant associates in the
Trigonia-beds of Lower Neocomian age exposed on the left bank
of the Rio Agrio, opposite to Las Lajas (Argentine Republic) ; }
these beds yield another member of the Pseudo-quadrate (7’.
neuquensis Burckhardt) and a Trigonia very closely resembling the
South African 7’. conocardiiformis,§ as well as an Hriphyla in some
respects comparable with the South African Astarte (Hryphyla)
* Steinmann (1), p. 260; Steinmann (3); R. A. Philippi (1), p. 63; Paulcke (1),
p. 297. + Behrendsen (1), p. 25.
+ Burckhardt (1), p. 21. § Burckhardt (2), pp. 72-75, 111, 112.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 5]
herzogi. Dr. Stanton has suggested that a Trigonia quoted by
Behrendsen* as “ T'rigonia cf. aliformis Park.” from supposed Upper
Neocomian beds at the Arroyo Pequenco may possibly be identical
with the Patagonian 7. suwbventricosa. It is accompanied by an
oyster which Behrendsen identified with Hxogyra couloni, and found
to agree well with the figures of Ostrea couloni cited by Bayle and
Coquand+ from the Neocomian at Arqueros in Chili. The Chilian
shells ascribed to O. cowloni bear a considerable resemblance to the
Uitenhage Hxogyra imbricata Krauss, with which Coquand even later
identified them,} and accompanying this oyster in Chili is Trigoma
delafosset Bayle and Coquand, the resemblance of which to 7’. ven-
tricosa has been elsewhere remarked upon.$ Associated with these
forms is a Crioceras identified by Bayle and Coquand with the
European C. duvali Lév., thus recalling the analogous association
of Trigonia ventricosa, Crioceras spinosissimum and Exogyra imbri-
cata in South Africa. Of the above-mentioned Mollusca, Trigonia
delafosset, T. transitoria, T. newquensis, and T. cf. conocardiformis
suggest very strongly their relationship to Uitenhage and Oomia
forms. It should be noted also that Philippi has described Trigonie
from localities in Chili, which share the characters of peculiar
sculpture and siphonal elongation shown by the group of T. vaw
Sharpe, while 7. eximua R. A. Philippi, from the Tinguirica valley
in Chili, appears to be closely related to 7. conocardiiformis (Krauss)
and Burckhardt’s 7. ef. conocardiformis.
IV.—THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE UITENHAGE FAUNA
IN RELATION TO SOME THEORETICAL QUESTIONS.
We may now briefly consider in what measure the correlation
of the Uitenhage Neocomian fauna with the similar assemblages in
German Hast Africa and in Cutch bears upon the theory of an Indo-
African land barrier during early Cretaceous times; and further, we
may inquire how far the facts concerning the dispersal of these
Mollusca have significance in relation to Neumayvr’s theory of distvri-
bution according to climatic zones, as deduced from a study of the
Cephalopoda. The one question is in reality largely bound up with
the other, and since in both cases the inquiry is of a so purely
paleontological character, it may be of advantage briefly to review
the evidence now available. Moreover, it is advisable to glance at
* Behrendsen (1), p. 418. + Bayle and Coquand (1), p. 37.
+ Coquand (2), p. 158.
§ Lycett (3), p. 120 (1875) ; Kitchin (1), p. 108; Paulcke (1), p. 296.
52 Annals of the South African Museum.
these aspects of the distribution as now known to us, because
Neumayr himself attached very great importance to the testimony
of the Uitenhage fauna in supporting both the above theories. But:
at that time it was not known that the links connecting the bivalve-
faunas of the Uitenhage and Oomia strata were so numerous or
complete as they are now proved to be, while the existence of
a related molluscan assemblage in German East Africa was un-
suspected.
Although Neumayr was led to the theory of a great equatorial
enclosed sea (‘‘ Ethiopian Mediterranean ’’) chiefly by a comparative
study of faunas of essentially Jurassic character, yet he felt justified
in utilising the Uitenhage fauna also as an aid in this paleeogeographic
reconstruction.* He believed that the radical differences between
the Mollusca of these beds and the more northerly East African
occurrences of Upper Jurassic age were an indication that the
faunas had for some time lived in distinct areas separated by a land
barrier, and from this he thought to derive support for a theory the
truth of which had seemed to be attested by evidence of a different
character.+ In spite of weighty opposition,{ this theory of a land
connection extending from the Indian peninsula through Madagascar
to South Africa at the beginning of Cretaceous times has continued
to find favour, and it is only comparatively recently that the signifi-
cance of the paleontological evidence has again been called in
question. In view of the presence of some traces of the Uitenhage
fauna in the Godavari district and also in Cutch and Hazara,
Neumayr supposed that a connection between the equatorial and
southern waters must have existed in the form of a strait, the
situation of which he believed to be most probably about the present
Gangetic plain. The late Dr. W. T. Blanford held a similar view ; §
he summarised the main arguments in favour of the theory,
suggesting that a shallow water connection near India,— situated
very possibly to the eastwards, though not precisely as Neumayr
supposed,—would account for the northerly dispersal, and that if this
were later converted into land, the ‘progressive diminution of
European species in the three stages of the S. Indian Cretaceous
beds would be explained by the increasing effect of isolation.”
Professor Suess also speaks of these traces of the Uitenhage fauna
in Cutch and in the Salt Range as possible indications of an
* Neumayyr (3); Neumayr (6), pp. 259, 261, 295, 296, 529.
+ Stow (1), p. 546; H. F. Blanford (1), pp. 534-540; Medlicott and Blanford
(1) pp xxine Icy lixcxit 297,
+ Wallace (1), pp. 422-427. § W. T. Blanford (3), pp. 98, 99.
The Invertebrate Fawna of the Uitenhage Series. 53
encroachment of the southern development into the northern
region.* With reference to the same subject, Mr. R. D. Oldham
wrote: ‘This barrier does not seem to have been absolutely
continuous throughout the jurassic period, or there may have been a
mode of communication round the north of the Peninsula of India
by which some migration took place, and so the presence of a few
Cutch species, which are also found on the east coast of India and
in South Africa, is accounted for.”’ +
The belief in this supposed land mass extending through
Madagascar and cutting off an equatorial basin from the colder
southern ocean, has been thought to receive the strongest support
from a comparison of some belemnites of Neocomian age found at
localities in the north-west of Madagascar.| Neumayr found that
while these belemnites belong to groups which in their distribu-
tion are essentially associated with the equatorial and South
European development, the single belemnite (B. africanus Tate)
then known from the Uitenhage beds is not closely comparable
with any of these, but belongs to a group distributed in the northern
hemisphere only in the boreal region and in the northern part of the
temperate zone.§ From this he drew the conclusion that these
representatives of contrasted groups of belemnites belong to faunas
of radically different type, which flourished in separate geographical
regions. Much has been made of this piece of evidence, which, so
far as it goes, is admittedly very suggestive. The late Dr. W. T.
Blanford || more recently drew attention to some independent
evidence of another kind which indirectly lends support to the
theory of an Indo-African land barrier in pre-Tertiary times, but this
only bears on the general question of the existence of a barrier,
without any possibile reference to its state of completeness during
any part of the Cretaceous period. Dr. F. Kossmat ‘i has shown
that so far as the distribution of the faunas of Ariyalur (Senonian) age
was known at the time when he wrote, the evidence was in favour of
a barrier separating the waters of the Mediterranean province (with
its easterly extension) from the South Indian ocean. He concluded
from a careful comparative study of the Cephalopoda that the fauna
represented in the Trichinopoly-Pondicherry districts had inter-
course with the European area only by way of Natal and to the
west.
The distribution of the much older Uitenhage fauna must certainly
* Suess (1), p. 536. t+ In Medlicott and Blanford (2), p. 211.
t Newton (1), p. 333. § Neumayr (5).
|| W. 'T. Blanford (4). “| Kossmat (1), Kossmat (2).
5
54 Annals of the South African Museum.
lead us to a somewhat different conclusion concerning the relation of
the equatorial and the southern ocean at that period. In order
to form an approximately correct picture, we must at least compare
faunas of similar age, for it is probable that migration from one area
into another may take place exceedingly rapidly when measured
by geological standards, and that a fauna may thus become quickly
modified as regards some of its most salient characteristics.
Dr. Kossmat has brought forward evidence to show that in the
migration of Upper Cretaceous cephalopods ‘the distribution of
the species did not require any geologically measurable time.” *
In contrasting the Uitenhage fauna with any occurrences on the
western shore of his equatorial sea, Neumayr was not able to
compare with contemporaneous faunas, except perhaps that of the
Belemnite-beds in the north-west of Madagascar. But in this case
the possible grounds of comparison were of the most slender
description, since in the Neocomian of Madagascar the known fauna
consisted solely of belemnites ; and hence the very hazardous nature
of the generalisations which Neumayr was led to make as a result of
the comparison. It is very probable that the great contrast between
these faunas may owe its strength in no slight measure to differences
of local facies, a factor which does not seem to have been sufficiently
taken into account; + the Belemnite-beds of Madagascar probably
represent deeper water conditions, in contrast to the littoral character
exhibited by the Uitenhage molluscs. Moreover, it is easy to
conceive that the lines of communication between the two areas
were in reality somewhat indirect, without necessarily accepting
Neumayr’s extreme interpretation of the facts. It may be admitted
that the arguments drawn from evidence furnished by distribution at
an earlier and a considerably later age decidedly favour the view
that in Neocomian times a ridge extended from India to South
Africa ; this, however, may have been only partially elevated into
land, and one or more intervening tracts of shallow water would suffice
to allow passage from north to south. Pavlow} and Uhlig§ have
pointed out the very close affinity between species of Holcostephanus
from the Uitenhage beds and H. schenki (Opp.) from the Spiti
Shales, while Kossmat has also remarked on the close relationship
between Uitenhage fossils and Lower Neocomian forms in the Salt
* Kossmat (3), pp. 78-81.
+ Since these sentences were written (in 1903), Lemoine has expressed the same
opinion ; see Lemoine (1), p. 391.
+ Pavlow and Lamplugh (1), p. 493 (p. 135 of authors’ separate copy).
§ Uhlig (4), p. 132.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 5)
Range.* He thinks this cannot readily be explained except by
an oceanic connection separating India and Africa. In addition, the
question of the existence of very strong paleontological links con-
necting the Uitenhage fauna with that of the marine Oomia beds
in Cutch, concerning which some doubts might at one time have
been held, and were, in fact, expressed, may now be considered
to have been definitely settled, and this cannot be lightly set on one
side. Further, the recent discovery in the Uitenhage beds of
belemnites which are related to the Neocomian Hastati of Europe,
a group represented in the north-west of Madagascar, has undoubted
significance, and helps materially to invalidate Neumayr’s ingenious
argument.
There is, indeed, no evidence that the means of communication
lay only by way of the east coast of the Indian peninsula and
thence to Cutch, and while the occurrence of Trigonia ventricosa
near Coconada might seem to suggest that the submergence of the
ridge was not so great. as to preclude the migration of some littoral
types, the discovery of a Neocomian fauna in German East Africa
showing relationship to that of the Uitenhage Series, throws some
fresh light on the question and appears to require a more direct line
of communication. This may most reasonably be supposed to have
existed in some nearer passage, situated between Africa and India,
as above indicated. The seeming absence of the Uitenhage cepha-
lopods or of the genus Seebachia from the Neocomian of German
East Africa may very probably be due to our imperfect knowledge
of the fauna in this less frequented district. The Cephalopoda of
the Uitenhage Series, although perhaps rarer in their occurrence
than the lamellibranchs, are well known because these beds have
been more thoroughly and more frequently searched than those in
German East Africa.
We may here note Dr. G. Miiller’s suggestion + to the effect that
Stow’s record of Uitenhage lamellibranchs from the Zambesi,{
which was discredited by Holub,§ may after all prove to have
been authentic. Until this record can be substantiated, however,
the suggestion may perhaps be without special significance as
pointing to the direction in which a fauna of intermediate
character may be sought for. The fact that it is not in the
nearer East African Neocomian, but in the more remote Oomia
strata that the higher percentage of Uitenhage forms is found to
occur, may possibly indicate that the passage between north and
* Kossmat (3), p. 78, footnote. + G. Miiller (1), p. 571.
t Stow (1), p. 505, in editorial footnote. § Suess (1), p. 541, note 28.
56 Annals of the South African Museum.
south was not situated in close proximity to the present African
continent. On this point nothing definite can at present be said,
and it must be admitted that recent advances in our knowledge of
the Mesozoic rocks in Madagascar and on the east coast of Africa can
only serve as a warning against premature speculation on such a
subject. As regards Jurassic deposits, we now know that, contrary
to formerly held belief, these are not confined to the north-west
coast region of Madagascar, for strata of Oxfordian age have been
shown to be present in the south-west part of the island, in the
basin of the River Isakondry, east of Tullear.* Professor Douvillé
considers that in these deposits the contrast in faunistic and litho-
logical facies to the strata of corresponding age in the north-west of
the island may be accounted for by different conditions of sedimen-
tation, and is not to be ascribed to deposition in separate basins. +
As remarked on a previous page, deposits which may perhaps
be equivalent or partly equivalent to the Uitenhage Series,
also occur in the Isakondry basin. Prof. Douvillé has given
brief notices of the fossils found in these beds by Lieutenant
Boutonnet, and has drawn attention to the occurrence here of a
large Trigonia which, he says, recalls the Trigonie of the Oomia
beds in Cutch and the Uitenhage beds in South Africa. Associated
with this is a shell which closely resembles Exogyra imbricata
Krauss (referred to by Prof. Douvillé under the generic name
Pycnodonta).{ The same region in Madagascar has furnished a
Cenomanian fauna which is said to show relations to the corre-
sponding faunas both of Europe and Southern India.§ Concerning
the conditions at a later period, the discovery of fossiliferous
Senonian deposits at Fanivelona and Marohita on the east coast
of Madagascar is very significant. The fossils found on the River
Sakaleou, 10 km. from the coast and 30 km. north of Mahela,
are stated by Prof. Boule to include forms which show clear rela-
tionship to the fauna of Ariyalur type in Southern India and also to
the Senonian of Baluchistan.|| Some of Prof. Boule’s remarks on
this subject are as follows: ‘‘ Hitherto it has been admitted that the
eastern coast of Madagascar is lacking in all sedimentary deposits of
the Secondary era, and this belief has played an important réle in
the theories expressed by various scientists; Oldham, Neumayr,
Suess, Kossmat, etc., on the former distribution of land and sea and
concerning the existence, during the Secondary era, of a continent
* Boule (2), p. 131. + Douvillé (3), p. 435.
t Douvillé (2), p. 388; Douvillé (4), p. 215; Lemoine (1), p. 176.
§ Boule (1), p. 184. || Boule (2), pp. 132, 133.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 57
uniting Africa with India (Lemuria of the zoologists). This hypo-
thesis appears to be justified in the case of the Triassic epoch, since
there are close relationships, both from the palzontological and
stratigraphical point of view, between the deposits of India and
of the south of Africa (fauna with dicynodont reptiles; Glossopteres
flora) ; but the hypothesis can no longer be applied to the Jurassic
epoch, for various reasons which would take too long to enumerate
here. As to the Cretaceous epoch, the discovery, on the east coast,
of the fossils mentioned above, compels us to admit that our great
colony was already an island. The affinities of these fossils with
those of the west as well as with those of the east of India support
the same conclusion.” * Haug has confirmed the analogies between
the Upper Cretaceous faunas of India and Madagascar, but he con-
siders that the discovery of Senonian deposits on the east side of
Madagascar does not weaken the hypothesis of an Indo-Malagasy
continental mass.{ In discussing M. Haug’s paper, Prof. Boule
maintained that the theory of a land barrier is now very difficult to
uphold, and thought that recent discoveries in Madagascar greatly
weaken the theory.{ Again, with M. Thevenin, he has written as
follows: “If it has truly existed, the Indo-Malagasy continent
must have been reduced then to a long Indian peninsula or to
a suite of islands situated on positions where one to-day observes
depths of 6,000 metres.”’ §
Turning now to the African mainland, it may be remarked that
from the coast, as far south as Delagoa Bay, an Aptian fauna has
been described which, while later than the Uitenhage fauna, and
consequently not to be closely compared with it, contains cephalo-
pods exhibiting the closest relationship to those of the Aptian with
Acanthoceras martini in Southern Europe.|| This in itself appears
to be sufficient to throw doubt upon the existence of a barrier near
the African coast at that period. Further, the recent discoveries of
an Upper Cretaceous fauna in Mozambique, showing clear affinities
with the Southern Indian development (Utatur and Ariyalur stages),
seem quite to disprove the existence of a permanent barrier even at
the approach of that later time which we have hitherto thought to
furnish the most sure evidences of separation. It is apparent that
* See also Boule (3) ; Boule (4), pp. 684, 685; Douvillé (4), p. 215; Boule (5);
Boule and Thevenin (1), p. 59; Lemoine (1), p. 232.
+ Haug (1), p. 397. t Haug (1), p. 398.
§ Boule and Thevenin (1), p. 59. See also Woods (4), p. 348.
|| Kilian (2); Kilian (3).
‘| Choffat (1); Choffat (2); Choffat (3); Lemoine (1), p. 396.
58 Annals of the South African Musewm.
although the known evidence seems to be on the whole destructive
of Neumayvr’s view regarding the isolation of the Uitenhage fauna,
yet any attempt to reconstruct precisely the geographical relations
of the region under consideration in early Cretaceous times must
still remain purely within the realm of speculation.
One point at any rate is clear, that the argument based upon the
sharp contrast between the Neocomian fauna of Cape Colony and
comparable occurrences situated on the African continent to the
north of the supposed separating ridge, can no longer be utilised.
We are now able to compare contemporaneous faunas in which, so
far as the lamellibranch element is concerned, the validity of the
comparison is not impaired by differences of facies due to local con-
ditions; and the supposed contrast is no longer perceivable. The
apparently almost complete restriction of the Uitenhage cephalopods
to the southern district in Africa may still seem to require some
further explanation, but should scarcely occasion more surprise than
the fact that only one species from the Neocomian Belemnite-beds
of north-west Madagascar is included in the East African fauna
described by Miiller, although both inhabited the equatorial waters.
As a further example of the risk of making premature deductions
from the apparent dispersal of cephalopods, it may be noted that
not one of the cephalopod-genera of the Uitenhage area has been
recorded from the Pueyrrydon series in Patagonia, although the
occurrence of these forms there would be exactly in accord with
a distribution regulated by the principles upheld by Neumayr. The
evidence of the other Mollusca seems, indeed, to lend every support
to the view that a continuous shore-line extended between South
Africa and South America, and this idea has gained further
justification from the recent work of C. Burckhardt.
This brings us to inquire whether the Uitenhage ammonitoids are
in reality so peculiarly restricted in their geographical distribution as
at first appears. It is certainly remarkable that no definite traces of
them have been found in the African equatorial regions,* while close
allies are known from Western Europe and the Himalayas. Indeed,
it may be said that these cephalopods exhibit in the main a
distinctly ‘‘Middle Huropean’’ facies, and thus at first sight
seem to lend support to Neumayr’s distribution theory. We
have seen that amongst the lamellibranchs, leaving out of account
* A very badly preserved ammonite found at one of the localities visited by
Bornhardt has been referred to the genus Holcostephanus. Whether this indicates
the presence of Uitenhage forms, which appears not improbable, further collecting
alone may be expected to decide. + Neumayr (2).
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 59
many apparently cosmopolitan forms, some of the most characteristic
and highly specialised types follow a very different distribution. It
might perhaps be supposed that members of this class, owing to
their relatively passive habit, were more inured to varied environ-
ment than the cephalopods, while these, on the other hand, possibly
equipped with better facilities for exercising choice of station, were
more delicately adjusted to conditions of temperature, ood-supply,
and other special characters of environment. Nothing, however, is
known regarding the exact mode of life of these cephalopod-types ;
but while the evidence so ably handled by Neumayr seemed for
some time inevitably to urge the acceptance of his fascinating theory,
a body of facts has since been brought to knowledge which must
surely indicate that climatic conditions played at the most an insig-
nificant part in regulating the dispersion of ammonites, and that
distribution of land and sea is in reality to be recognised as the most
potent determining factor.* It is therefore scarcely conceivable that
in the case of the Uitenhage fauna a distribution of land and sea
which permitted the migration of well-characterised lamellibranch-
forms over such a wide area, could have offered any obstacles to a
similar geographical range for some, at least, of the cephalopod types.
It must be remembered, too, that members of the true Holco-
stephanus (Pavlow’s Astieria) have been described from the Mazapil
district in Mexico. +}
It becomes plainly apparent that with the limited evidence as yet
available, the only reasonable course is to suspend judgment con-
cerning the exact significance of the Uitenhage Cephalopoda in this
question of distribution, and a definite pronouncement will only be
justifiable when our knowledge of the Indian and African Neocomian
faunas is more complete. In view of the facts to which reference
has already been made, it is necessary to abandon the supposition
that these cephalopods were excluded from the equatorial waters ;
but in the meantime there is nothing to show whether the absence
of these forms from the Neocomian of German East Africa and
Cutch is merely apparent,—in which case the fact of their occur-
ence there may become established by extended search,—or whether
it is real, and to be accounted for by causes of a local character. In
this connection it is well to bear in mind that in Europe certain
Cephalopoda of the Chalk, though living under conditions which
might be expected to have assured exceptional uniformity of environ-
* Kossmat (2), p. 53; Nikitin (2); Burckhardt (2), pp. 115-135; Solger (1),
pp. 220-221; G. Boehm (2); Tornquist (1), p. 285; Ortmann (1); Stanton (2)
Burckhardt (3), p. 179. + Burckhardt (3), p. 183-185.
60 Annals of the South African Musewm.
ment, were nevertheless peculiarly local in their occurrence, even
within a relatively restricted area. The greater, then, is the neces-
sity for caution in generalising from scanty data regarding the
insufficiently explored littoral Neocomian deposits with which we
are dealing.
V.—DESCRIPTIONS, CRITICAL NOTES, AND LISTS OF
FOSSILS.
In the records of occurrence accompanying the following
descriptions, it will be understood that when no collector’s name
is mentioned, and no other indications are given, the specimens in
question were obtained by Mr. A. W. Rogers and Mr. E. H. L.
Schwarz in 1900 or by Mr. Rogers in 1905. The numbers quoted
in parentheses refer to numbers printed on labels affixed to the
specimens. All the specimens obtained in 1900 by Messrs. Rogers
and Schwarz, and some also sent to me from the collection in the
South African Museum, are labelled with plain numbers printed on
yellow paper. Those collected in 1905 by Mr. Rogers have blue
labels bearing a number followed by an alphabetical letter. A few
of the specimens from the South African Museum and all those
comprising the collection obtained by Miss M. Wilman at Coega
are without numbers.
With the exception of Holcostephanus bain, H. modderensis, and
H. wilmane, all the fossils fully dealt with in these pages are repre-
sented in the collections submitted to me by Mr. Rogers; but it need
scarcely be remarked that these only include examples of about two-
thirds of the species of invertebrates known to occur in the Uitenhage
Series, and it may be added that the published accounts of several
types figured or described by Sharpe and Tate call for critical
revision at some future time. To deal exhaustively with all the
invertebrate forms hitherto recorded from the Uitenhage beds is
beyond the scope of this memoir; and since a single compiled list
of the whole fauna, including names taken without criticism from
other works, would be open to obvious objection, it will be found
that lists of species with localities given at the close of this descrip-
tive section, contain names which, except those of the ammonites just
mentioned, refer only to specimens entrusted to me by Mr. Rogers.
Additional notes of occurrences, however, frequently accompany the
following descriptions and comparisons, and are based on specimens
preserved in the collection of the Geological Society of London or in
the British Museum (Natural History). A few forms not dealt with
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 61
in detail below have already been briefly noticed in the second section
of this paper, in so far as it seemed necessary to draw attention to
their significance in reference to the question of geological age: the
names of these, and the remainder of the invertebrate fossils of the
Uitenhage Series which have hitherto been recorded, are brought
together in the supplementary list and brief accompanying notes
with which the present section of this memoir concludes.
In those few instances in which Uitenhage forms are referred to
European species, I have refrained from burdening the subjoined
accounts with full synonymic lists, but have given a reference to the
original description and, where possible, to a recent work in which
fuller guidance to the literature of the species may be obtained.
Throughout the following pages, however, nomenclatural references
are restricted to those works which contain such information as to
insure, in my belief, the truly synonymic value of the citations.
In the description of the Gasteropoda a conventional orientation
is employed for the sake of clearness, and when use is made of the
terms “above’”’ and ‘“‘ below”’ in this connection it is assumed that
the specimen be held with the apex directed vertically upwards.
The terms ‘“ nepionic’’ occasionally employed with
reference to the young or immature stages in some of the lamelli-
branchs described below, are so well known and so frequently used
as to call for no explanation here.*
For an account of the available geological information in connec-
tion with the occurrence of the specimens obtained in 1900 reference
should of course be made to the Report by Messrs. Rogers and
Schwarz,{ but this may be supplemented by a brief note contained
in a letter written to me by Mr. Rogers, to the following effect:
‘“The specimens from Dunbrodie and Blue Cliff are from the lower
beds of the Uitenhage Series, those from the Clay Pit near Rawson
Bridge from the lowest marine beds in the Zwartkop’s River section.
Those from the Grass Ridge, Uitenhage, and from the kloofs near
Red House and Picnic Bush belong to the highest beds we found,
and the specimens from the Graaff-Reinet railway section and those
from the main line up-side of Rawson Bridge are from the middle
portion of the marine beds.’’ JI am informed that the collection
obtained at Coega by Miss Wilman was made at a locality on the
farm of that name, though outside the river valley, while the label
‘‘Coega River” refers to a section in the river valley on the same
farm, but probably on a rather lower horizon in the Marine Beds.
* See Hyatt (1); Jackson (1), p. 293; Buckman and Bather (1); Hyatt (2), p. 94.
+ Rogers and Schwarz (1); also Rogers (1), pp. 281-292.
and ‘ neanic,’
62 Annals of the South African Musewm.
In the case of the specimens from the collection of the South African
Museum labelled ‘‘Sunday’s River,’’ no more detailed account of
locality is available, but these are all typical Mollusca of the Marine
Beds or Sunday’s River Beds. Of all the fossils examined, the only
forms which indicate fresh-water conditions are the Unio from the
Wood Beds of the Bezuidenhouts River, below Blue Cliff station, and
a single specimen of Linnea from the section at Buck Kraal, Sunday’s
River. Whatever may be the exact relation of the fossiliferous beds
exposed below Dunbrodie (occurring below a band containing plant
impressions) to the main part of the ‘‘ Wood Bed”’ series, the fauna
from Dunbrodie is essentially a marine one: as already stated in the
second section of this paper, there is no reason on paleontological
grounds to suppose that this small marine assemblage, characterised
by the prevalence of Gasteropoda, is materially older than the fauna
yielded by the Trigonia-bearing Marine Beds.
The collection obtained by Mr. Rogers from the Marine Beds of
the Coega River and Sunday’s River valleys, in 1905, includes some
interesting additions to the fauna. For full information concerning
the occurrence of these and commoner associated forms, the recent
report by Mr. Rogers should be consulted.* This work adds
materially to our knowledge of the Sunday’s River Beds, particularly
with regard to the vertical distribution of many of the Mollusca in
the extensive sections examined ; but the results in no way strengthen
the hope that a scheme of zonal subdivision of the Marine Beds may
soon be within reach of attainment. On the contrary, the evidence
obtained by Mr. Rogers, as already mentioned, seems to emphasise
the striking similarity in the aspect of the fauna throughout the
whole thickness of beds exposed.
The few specimens found by Mr. Rogers in a patch of marine
Uitenhage beds at Knysna Estuary + only represent the product of
a hasty search, and it is believed that careful collecting at this new
locality may yield good results.
Crass ANTHOZOA.
Genus THAMNASTRAA } Lesauvage.
THAMNASTRA Sp.
There are several specimens of a T’hamnastrea from the locality
between milestones 244 and 242 on the railway between Uitenhage
* Rogers (2), pp. 22-33. + Schwarz (2), pp. 50, 74.
{ For remarks on the correct application of this generic name see Gregory (2),
p. 131.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 63
and Graaff-Reinet (345-349). These occur in a hard limestone
matrix, and the coral itself is replaced by crystalline carbonate of
lime and is in a condition unfavourable for detailed study. The
corallum is relatively slender, subcylindrical and branching in form.
The calicinal centres are situated at about 2 mm. from one
another.
Prof. J. W. Gregory has seen a specimen of this form, and con-
siders that it may be correctly assigned to the genus Thammnastrea.
In view of the scanty material so far obtained, and its imperfect con-
dition, a fuller description and comparison with described species
may be deferred for the present.
Crass ANNELIDA.
GENus SERPULA Linnezus.
Serpuna cf. concava (J. Sowerby).
Plate IT., figs. 1, la.
Cf. 1814. Vermicularia concava J. Sowerby, The Mineral Conchology
of Great Britain, vol. i., p. 125, Tab. 57, figs. 1-5.
», 1836. Vermetus concavus J. de C. Sowerby, Trans. Geol. Soc.
Lond., ser. 2, vol. iv., p. 348, pl. xviii., fig. 10.
», 1884. Vermicularia concava R. Damon, Geology of Weymouth,
Portland and Coast of Dorsetshire, 2nd edition, p. 128,
fig. 48.
Description.—The tube is wound in the form of a very flat spire,
widely umbilicated, with the apical part not projecting above the
outside whorl when viewed in lateral profile. The whorls are in
‘close contact, or slightly embracing. The tube is of slightly flat-
tened cylindrical or oval section, the flattening at right angles to
the axis of the spire. After the third whorl the tube ceases to be
coiled and becomes free. The surface of the tube is marked by
numerous irregular transverse wrinkles and furrows.
Dimensions.—
Greatest diameter across the whorls ................4. 9 mm.
Greatest external diameter of the tube at the close
Ole THERCOU EM STACK 26.2 ces nee 0s sc cedeumienwsieselesone Sis
Occurrence.—A single specimen was found between milestones
64 Annals of the South African Museum.
245-243 on the railway between Uitenhage and Graaff-Reinet (332),
in the railway cutting.
Remarks.—The specimen described in all probability has not
attained its full growth, and the manner in which the tube for
about the last 2 mm. of its length has grown free from the coil
suggests that we have only the commencement of an uncoiled stage
illustrated in this individual.. The subsequent growth of the tube
was probably in a more or less nearly straight line as in Serpula
concava, and it is impossible to say what dimensions the detached
portion of the tube might attain.
In general aspect this Serpula very closely resembles S. concava
(Sow.) (Upper Greensand), and agrees in the dimensions of the
coiled stage, but without a sufficient number of specimens for critical
comparison nothing further can be said regarding its actual affinities.
A similar form from the Neocomian of France was figured by Ley-
merie as Serpula lituola.* In the general habit and mode of growth
there is also resemblance to S. damesi Noetling, + from the Ceno-
manian boulders of North Germany, but the African form differs in
the smaller number of whorls, the smaller dimensions, and the
thinner walls of the tube.
SERPULA PINCHINIANA Tate.
1867. Serpula (Vermilia) pinchinana R. Tate, Quart. Journ. Geol.
Soc., vol. xxiii., p. 163, pl. ix., figs. 10a—c.
The large cylindrical tubes of this form are sometimes seen
attached to massive lamellibranch-shells such as Hxogyra imbricata
Krauss, or one of the pseudo-quadrate Trigoni@. The adherent
stage is irregular in the direction of its growth: it sometimes follows
a sinuous course, and in some cases the tube is bent sharply
back upon its path and grows over itself. The generally smooth
surface of the tube is occasionally marked by irregular annular
thickenings.
Mr. Rogers collected specimens from the Cliff on Buck Kraal,
Sunday’s River, attached to Trigonia herzogi (122h), and at the left
side of the Coega Valley, half a mile down from the railway (458g,
on Trigonia holubi). Another example is attached to a valve of
Exogyra imbricata from the Sunday’s River (303), belonging to the
collection of the South African Museum.
* Leymerie (3), pl. 6, fig. 5.
+ Noetling (1), p. 10 [206], Taf. i., figs. 8-10.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Urtenhage Series. 65
Crass LAMELLIBRANCHIATA.
Genus PECTEN O. F. Miiller.*
Sus-Genus SYNCYCLONEMA F. B. Meek.
PrEcTEN (SYNCYCLONEMA) ORBICULARIS J. Sowerby.
Plate II., figs. 2, 3.
1817. Pecten orbicularis J. Sowerby, Mineral Conchology of Great
Britain, vol. i1., p. 193, tab. 186.
1902. Pecten (Syncyclonema) orbicularis H. Woods, Mon. Cret.
Lamell. Engl., vol. i., part iv., p. 145, pl. xxvii., and
text-fig. 1. (Palezeontographical Society.)
Two specimens sent to me from the South African Museum appear
to differ in no respect from typical examples of this widely distributed
form. Oneof the specimens, a single valve, has a delicate concentric
banding extending over the whole surface—a character by which it may
be recognised as a right valve. With the exception of its imperfect
preservation in the umbonal region and its somewhat smaller dimen-
sions, this specimen agrees very perfectly with the right valve
figured by Mr. Woods in pl. xxvii., fig. 11 of his monograph (see
above). The other specimen appears smooth to the naked eye, but
shows minute and delicate, faint concentric markings under the lens.
This represents a left valve, and it has the anterior ear preserved.
Length 26°5 mm.; height 28 mm.
A small specimen (a left valve) referable to the same species was
found by Mr. Rogers in the Coega River Valley. Length 13 mm.;
height 15 mm.
Locality—Sunday’s River (279, 280). Coega Valley, on the left
side of the valley, half a mile down from the railway (453g).
Sus-ceEnus CAMPTONECTES F. B. Meek.
PECTEN (CAMPTONECTES) COTTALDINUS d’Orbigny.
Plate IT., fig. 4.
1847. Pecten cottaldinus A. d’Orbigny, Paléont. Frang., Terr. Crét.
vol. iii., p. 590, pl. 431, figs. 7-11.
* For a full account of the generic and sectional divisions of Pecten see Verrill
(1); for further references to recent literature on this subject consult Woods (3),
vol. i., p. 145 (1902).
66 Annals of the South African Museum.
1902. Pecten (Camptonectes) cottaldinus H. Woods, Mon. Cret.
Lamell. Engl., vol. i., part iv., p. 156, pl. xxix., figs. 1-3.
(Palzontographical Society.)
A specimen collected by Messrs. Rogers and Schwarz agrees so
closely with Pecten cottaldinus that it can only be considered identical.
It is a right valve in which, unfortunately, the anterior ear is the
only portion which retains the shell wholly preserved ; the remainder
of the valve is for the most part in the form of a cast. Here and
there, where some of the inner layers of the shell are adhering to
the cast, a faint and broad concentric waving is seen ; this, however,
does not seem to be markedly impressed upon the cast and appears
to die out towards the posterior margin. It probably stands in
relation to shell structure and not to surface sculpture, for the
faint folds are too broad to correspond with the concentric surface
warkings which are exhibited by European specimens. The specimen
agrees with P. cottaldinus in all characters of proportion and outline,
as well as in the shape and relative size of the ears and the deep
byssal notch.
Dimensions.—Length 38 mm. ; height 42 mm.
Occurrence.—Dunbrodie, in the cliff below the old school-house on
the right bank of Sunday’s River (305, 306).
Remarks.—This form is well distributed in the Neocomian (princi-
pally the Hauterivian) and Aptian of Europe, and it has also been
recorded by G. Miiller from the Neocomian of German East Africa.
PECTEN (CAMPTONECTES) PROJECTUS Tate.
Plate II., figs. 5, 5a.
1867. Pecten projectus R. Tate, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxiii.,
p. 165; pl. ax. 128.16.
Supplementary Descriptive Note-—The ears are very unequal and
the byssal notch deep. The delicate ornamentation of the valve
surface presents a very variable aspect in different states of preser-
vation, and under different conditions of illumination and enlarge-
ment. In frequent instances it appears to consist of fine, radiating,
impressed linear striz, diverging from the middle line and increasing
by bifurcation when traced towards the valve margins. When the
surface is not very perfectly preserved, these lines may appear to be
separated by plain flattened interspaces, while the lines themselves
may exhibit an imperfect punctate structure. Where the surface is
perfectly preserved, however, the ornaments are observed to be of
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 67
a much more complex nature. If, in a suitably preserved adult
specimen, the surface half-way down the valve and below this be
examined under slight magnification and with favourable illumina-
tion, it is seen that the raised interspaces or minute flattened ribs
themselves exhibit a peculiar punctate structure on that side of the
rib nearest to the lateral margin of the valve. This is developed in
such a way that the outer margin of each little rib is cut into by a
series of minute wedge-shaped indentations, which leave more
prominent projecting portions of the rib standing out somewhat
after the manner of the hydrothecz on a graptolitic stipe. In some
cases the successive wedge-shaped grooves may almost cross the rib,
but for the most part the margin of the rib which is nearest to the
middle line of the valve is straight and entire.
Another peculiarity of the ornamentation is seen in some cases in
the manner in which, when the radial strie are traced upwards from
the valve-margin towards the place of convergence at the middle
line, by favourable illumination they may be observed to be continued
upwards across the middle line, giving rise to a slight intercrossing
here.
In the left valve the anterior ear is large and rectangular, the
posterior ear small. This valve has a rather more equilateral
aspect than the right valve, which is sometimes very markedly
inequilateral.
Dimensions.— (1) (2) (3)
Height 13 ; 19 ; 21 mm.
Length 12 ; i) : PAN)
No. (3) is Tate’s figured type specimen.
Occurrence.—Railway cutting between milestones 241-243 on the
Uitenhage to Graaff-Reinet railway (297, 350); also obtained by Miss
M. Wilman at Coega River. Tate says: ‘Collected by Dr. Rubidge
in a soft, yellowish-grey, sandy limestone at the Zwartkop River
Heights, and at Prince Alfred’s Rest; in both localities it is
frequent.”
Remarks.—The notched sculpture of the ribs, described above,
may be well observed when the preservation is exceptionally good.
It appears only in faint traces in a portion of the surface of one
of the specimens examined by Tate, and in other individuals less
well preserved the markings only consist of radiating linear stri,
obscurely punctate in places, with smooth interspaces. A right
valve from the Coega River, which agrees closely with Tate’s figured
type, has the surface so well preserved that the intimate details of
sculpture exhibited call for the above additional descriptive note.
68 Annals of the South African Musewm.
The delicate notched structure is also well shown in specimens from
the above-mentioned locality near Uitenhage.
Tate brought this shell into relationship with Pecten lens Sowerby,
a Jurassic form; and although it shares with this and with the
Portlandian P. morini de Loriol * some of the principal features which
characterise these familiar Jurassic types, yet it may equally well be
brought into comparison with Cretaceous forms. The Jurassic
shells mentioned, besides differing in the outline, have simply strize
with a punctate structure, but no encroachment of this sculpture into
the interspaces between the linear stria. Pecten suprajurensis
Buvignier,| an Upper Jurassic form, approaches much more closely
to P. projectus in general character and outline, possessing a similar
bulging frontal profile, but is likewise merely ornamented by delicately
punctate linear striae with smooth interspaces, attaining, moreover,
much larger dimensions. Pecten buchi Roem.,} also Upper Jurassic,
is well distinguished by its almost equilateral outline and by the minute
transverse striations which cross the interspaces between the radial
linear strie.
Pecten striato-punctatus Roemer,§ from the Neocomian and Aptian
of Europe, is more equilateral in outline and is more delicately
ornamented; the punctate structure is much more minute and
confined wholly to the stria, leaving the very narrow intervening
spaces smooth. ||
Pecten curvatus Geinitz,‘' though having greater relative height
than P. projectus, sometimes seems to approach the somewhat in-
equilateral form of this, though in figures of other shells which have
been united with P. curvatus** the valves are almost equilateral.
Although Geinitz figured the magnified ornamentation of the valve-
surface so as to produce an aspect of sculpture widely different from
that given for instance by Reuss, yet it appears from the descriptions
that punctate linear strize with smooth interspaces characterise these
forms.
Nilsson’s P. virgatus, of Upper Chalk age from Sweden,t+t+ is
* de Loriol and Pellat (1), p. 107, pl. x., fig. 6.
+ Buvignier (1), p. 24, pl. xix., figs. 21-23.
¢ F. A. Roemer (1), pl. xiii., fig. 8 (1836), and Nachtrag, p. 27; de Loriol, Royer
and Tombeck (1), p. 389, pl. xxii., figs. 12, 13.
§ F. A. Roemer (1), Nachtrag, p. 27; d’Orbigny (3), p. 592, pl. 482, figs. 4-7
(1847); Woods (3), vol. i., p. 157, pl. xxix., figs. 4-6 (1902).
|| See also figures given by de Loriol under the name P. arzierensis ; Loriol (3),
pl. iv., figs. 3-5. ‘| Geinitz (1), p. 16, Taf. iii., fig. 13.
** Geinitz (2), Theili., p. 193, Taf. 43, fig. 15 (1872); Theil ii., Taf. 10, fig. 1,
(1872) ; Reuss (1), part ii., p. 28, Taf. 39, fig. 6 (as P. divaricatus).
tt Nilsson (1), p. 22, Tab. ix., fig. 15.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 69
more equilateral and more coarsely ornamented than P. projectus,
and it has been shown, moreover, by Hennig* that Nilsson’s
unsatisfactory figure is misleading; this shell really has relatively
strong ribs with linear interspaces, increasing by division and
insertion and not diverging from the middle line in the manner
represented by Nilsson. The delicate transverse striz which cross
the radial ornaments are scarcely comparable with the notching
of the ‘‘ribs”’ shown by P. projectus. The shell from the Gosau
beds described by Zittel under the name P. virgatus} is almost
equilateral, and is much higher in outline than P. projectus.
The shell from the Cretaceous of the east end of Maud Island
(Queen Charlotte Islands), ascribed to Camptonectes curvatus Geinitz
by Whiteaves,} is somewhat similar to P. projectus, to judge from the
figure of a right valve, but it is more equilateral in form.
A Pecten from the Neocomian in German East Africa was
described by G. Miiller § under the name P. striato-punctatus, but
the specimen figured is so preserved that a comparison with P.
projectus is difficult, although it appears to differ from this in being
more equilateral.
Pecten (Camptonectes) pueyrrydonensis Stanton,|| from the Bel-
grano beds (Lower Cretaceous) of Patagonia is another shell of
similar type, but differs at least in the more equilateral form of the
right valve.
Pecten kamerunensis von Koenen,* from Lower Cretaceous strata
in the Cameroons, differs from P. projectus by the more equilateral
form and the rather coarser ornamentation, with stronger lateral rib-
development. Von Koenen describes how the furrows appear here
and there divided by swellings into little grooves, but says that this
stands in connection with the crossing of lines of growth—a relation
not to be observed in the minute ornamentation of P. projectus.
Sus-cEnus CHLAMYS J. F. Bolten.
PrECTEN (CuHuLAmys) cf. susacutus Lamarck.
Plate II., figs. 6, 6a.
Cf. 1819, Pecten subacutus J. B. de Lamarck, Hist. Nat. des Anim.
sans Vert., vol. vi., p. 181.
* Hennig (1), p. 41, pl. 2, figs. 28, 33. + Zittel (2), p. 109, pl. xvii., fig. 8.
t Whiteaves (3), p. 242, pl. 32, fig. 4. § G. Miller (1), p. 550, Taf. 24, fig. 7,
|| Stanton (3), p. 12, pl. iv., fig. 1.
‘| von Koenen (1), p. 20, Taf. iii., figs. 14, 15.
6
70 Annals of the South African Musewm.
Cf. 1847. Pecten subacutus A. d’Orbigny, Paléont. Frang., Terr. Crét.,
vol. iii., p. 605, pl. 435, figs. 5-10.
», 1872. Pecten subacutus H. B. Geinitz, Das Elbthalgeb. in
Sachsen, part i., p. 195, pl. xliv., fig. 5 (Paleeonto-
graphica, vol. xx.).
,», 1902. Pecten (Chlamys) subacutus H. Woods, Mon. Cret. Lamell.
Bmegl.; vol. is part) iv., p. 169s pk xxxi., fess 7-9:
(Paleeontographical Society.)
Descriptive Note.—A single specimen sent from the collection of
the South African Museum seems to approach very closely to P. sub-
acutus. The shell is ovate in outline, prolonged dorsally, with an
acute apical angle (about 80°). The inflation is slight, with the left
valve a little more convex than the right.
The valves are ornamented by about 22 strong, angular ribs with
sharp summits. Near the inferior margin the summits of the ribs
are separated from one another by a distance of about 2mm. On
parts of the shell the ribs are studded with numerous blunt, spinose
projections. Where the surface is well preserved the ribs and inter-
spaces are seen to be ornamented by very delicate, transverse linear
markings, most clearly visible in the interspaces. Near the inferior
margin these become obscurely developed and are masked by
coarser ridges and grooves of accretion. The hinge-line and ears
are unfortunately not preserved, but having regard to the other
characters there is no reason to suppose that they differed essentially
from those of P. subacutus.
Dimensions.—Height (about) 42 mm.; length 85 mm.
Occurrence.— Marine Beds of Sunday’s River (304).
Remarks.—Pecten subacutus is characteristic of the Cenomanian
in Europe, but this African shell approaches more closely to it
than to any form from the Lower Cretaceous with which I am
acquainted. In the imperfect material at disposal, no features
are apparent which would justify a definite separation from the
European form, yet in the absence of the ears in this specimen
and the lack of further comparative material, the question of identity
must remain open.
Pecten urgonensis de Loriol,* common in the Urgonian of Grand
Saléve, is a shell of very similar type, so far as can be judged from
de Loriol’s description and figures; but apparently its scaly orna-
ments are larger and more prominent, and the surface is perhaps
more coarsely ribbed.
* de Loriol (2), p. 389, pl. C, figs. 25, 26.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 71
Genus LIMA J.G. Bruguiére.
Sus-cenus ACESTA H. and A. Adams.
Lima (ACESTA) OBLIQUISSIMA Tate.
Plate IT., fig. 7.
1867. Lima obliquissima R. Tate, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxiii.,
p: 196, pl. ix., fig: 3.
Supplementary Descriptive Note-——The shell has great height in
comparison with length. The posterior outline is gently rounded,
the anterior profile straight. The straight anterior border passes
at its lower end by a somewhat sudden curve into the rounded
inferior border. The valves are most convex in the umbonal half and
near the anterior side ; they become flatter posteriorly and inferiorly.
Anteriorly, the flank passes abruptly, though without marked cari-
nation, into an extensive, flat frontal face, truncating the shell. This
frontal area is in no degree sunk or concave in form. The umbones
are acute and sharp, terminal at the anterior extremity of the
hinge-line; the superior border of the shell is straight and very
short, and truncates the shell to form a right angle with the
anterior border, The anterior ear is rudimentary or not developed ;
the posterior ear is much reduced, and not definitely demarcated
from the flank.
The ornamentation consists of delicate linear radial grooves,
very crowded near the umbo, gradually diverging until, at a distance
of 40 mm. from the umbo, they may be separated by interspaces
2mm. broad. At a distance exceeding 30 mm. from the umbo, these
lines are almost or quite absent from the middle part of the flank,
though well impressed on the lateral parts. The lines follow a
more or less irregular and wavy course and are sometimes suddenly
deflected to right or left when traced down from a prominent
concentric growth-line. When well preserved, the linear orna-
ments show a minutely punctate structure, most perfectly developed
in the umbonal half of an adult shell. The interspaces are very
gently convex or are flat, but are without sculpture. On the frontal
area the ornaments are of a more pronounced character, and may
take the form of imbricating ridges with the edges directed away
from the valve-margin. They radiate from the umbonal region
and pass along the frontal face, gradually approaching the frontal
valve-margin and forming an acute angle with this. On the frontal
area, therefore, the ornaments are very obliquely crossed by the
lines of accretion.
72 Annals of the South African Museum.
Dimensions.—
Greatest measurement radially from the umbo ... 64 mm.
Greatest length measurement, at right angles to
(aoa ERs] emma Aacaoh cath atom ts ORG Aer ay erase eae ae 40 ,,
Greatest depth of a single valve ..................00. Ome
Occurrence.—Railway cutting between milestones 244-243 on the
line from Uitenhage to Graaff-Reinet, about three miles from
Uitenhage (346); also stated to occur at Grass Ridge. Specimens
in the collection of the Geological Society are labelled ‘‘ Sunday
River’ (Rubidge) and “ Zwartkop River’”’ (H. Longlands), Tate’s
record of locality is ‘‘in a yellow shell-rock from the Zwartkop
River sandstone, with Placuwnopsis undulata and fossil wood
(Rubidge).”” Fine specimens sent to me from the South African
Museum are from the Sunday’s River. Mr. Rogers obtained this
form on the left side of the Coega Valley, half a mile down from the
railway (455g).
Remarks.—Tate unhappily brought this shell into comparison with
two British Jurassic forms, L. rigidula (Phill.) from the Cornbrash,
and L. ovalis (J. Sow.) from the Great Oolite. Lima rigidula* is of
quite another type ; it has a widely different outline, is comparatively
coarsely ornamented, and has well-developed anterior and posterior
ears. LL. ovalis,| more oblique and anteriorly produced, with
minutely delicate and crowded linear ornaments, can scarcely be
brought into close comparison.
Lima obliquissima in reality may be most closely compared with
those shells to which has been applied the sub-generic name Acesta, *
represented in Cretaceous and later strata, and existing at the
present day. The characters whereby this group of forms is distin-
guished from Plagiostoma and other divisions of the genus have
been clearly set forth by E. Philippi in his analysis of Lima.s
Although I have as yet been unable to ascertain the position and
form of the ligament pit in L. obliquissima, the close agreement in
other features can leave little or no doubt that this shell must be
united with Acesta, if this sub-generic group be adopted at all.
These features are principally seen in the great relative height of the
valve ; the anteriorly little-produced outline; the anterior and ter-
minal position of the umbones; the great reduction of the anterior
ear and the imperfectly demarcated posterior ear. The fine linear
* Phillips (1), p. 116, pl. vii., fig. 13.”
+ J. Sowerby (1), tab. 114, fig. 3 (1815); Morris and Lycett (1), Part 2, p. 29,
pl. iii., fig. 5.
{| H.and A. Adams (1), p. 558. § E. Philippi (1), p. 680.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 73
sculpture of the flank, it is true, recalls that of some Plagiostome,
but the shell is in other respects strongly contrasted with that
group. Concerning the value of the sub-generic name Acesta, par-
ticularly in the application to fossil forms, opinions have widely
differed. It was accepted by Stoliczka* and by Zittel,} and latterly
by Philippi, while regarded by Fischer as only representing a
section of Lima.t This last author merely quotes the living type
species, L. excavata. G. Boehm, however, has expressed the
opinion that the sub-genus Acesta cannot be upheld,§ pointing
out that the original diagnosis is inaccurate; that the name is
unpractical in its application to fossil forms, in many of which
the direction and position of the ligament pit, upon which the
exact determination depends, cannot be investigated; and further,
that the distinctive features of the proposed sub-genus are of slight
importance. The first of these objections can have little weight,
merely depending, as pointed out by Philippi, upon an original
error of orientation. There is something to be said for the last
point, perhaps, and it is clear that amongst fossil representatives
of the genus there are some forms which illustrate in varying
degrees the inequilateral character and the development of the
anterior auricle. The name, however, though possibly not standing
for a natural group, may for the present be conveniently em-
ployed to indicate the apparent affinities of the forms to which it
is applied.
L. obliquissima shows a striking outward similarity to the typical
living Lima (Acesta) excavata (Fabr.) Chemn.,|; though differing
from this by the relatively more elongated outline, the shorter hinge-
line, and the more restricted posterior cardinal expansion of the flank.
A Neocomian shell having great resemblance in form to L. obliquis-
sima is Lima wndata (Desh.) Leym.,*’ but it is distinguished by its
longer hinge-line and stronger ornaments. In the shortness of the
superior margin and the character of the surface ornamentation,
Lima orbignyana Math.** shows closer agreement, but it is dis-
tinguished from L. obliquissima by the more perfectly demarcated
posterior ear, the concave outline behind this, the concave anterior
area and the extension of linear ornaments over the whole flank.
Matheron’s figure shows a distinctly developed projecting anterior
* Stoliczka (2), pp. 413-415. + Zittel (5), p. 26 (1881).
t Fischer (1), p. 941 (1886). § G. Boehm (1), p. 625.
|| E. Philippi (1), Taf. xxiv., fig. 5.
“| Leymerie (2), p. 10, pl. 8, fig. 8; d’Orbigny (3), p. 528, pl. 414, figs. 9-12
(1847). ** Matheron (1), p. 182, pl. 29, figs. 3, 4
74 Annals of the South African Musewm.
auricle, though this is represented as much more reduced in the
figure given by d’Orbigny.
A Lima from the Lower Cretaceous of England, ascribed by W.
Keeping * to Roemer’s L. longa, shows great similarity in general
form and outline. It differs, however, from the African shell by the
relatively longer hinge-line and more extensive posterior ear, and
although appearing to vary considerably in regard to the surface
ornamentation, is characterised by a more pronounced type of radial
sculpture ; Z. longa is further distinguished by the possession of
great height measurement in proportion to its length.
There is closer agreement, again, between ZL. obliquissima and
L. tenuwitesta Whitfield, | from Upper Cretaceous rocks in Syria.
The two are practically identical in outline and the relative length
of the superior border, but L. tenwitesta has the linear striz of the
surface more numerous and closely crowded at a given distance
from the umbonal apex.
Sus-cENus MANTELLUM J. F. Bolten.
Lima (MANTELLUM) NEGLECTA Tate.
Plate II., figs. 8, 8a.
1867. Lima neglecta R. Tate, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxiii,
p. 156, pl. vii., figs. 4a, 40.
Three specimens, all left valves, are referable to this species. The
ribs are acutely ridged, with sharp summits. The middle of the
angular interspace is sometimes occupied by a fine linear ridge, and
occasionally a second one may be present. These are stronger than
the numerous, delicate, linear ridges which are developed on the
sloping sides of the main ribs.
A specimen 20 mm. in length has a greatest diameter, measured
at right angles to the length, of about 12 mm.
Occurrence.—On the left side of the Coega Valley, half a mile down
from the railway (448g, 449g, 453g). The specimen described by
Tate, numbered 11,013 in the collection of the Geological Society of
London, came from the Sunday’s River.
Remarks.—Tate’s figure of this species is very inadequate, and
does not give a good idea of the shell. The appearance of two sets
* Keeping (1), p. 112, pl. v., fig. 6.
+ F. A. Roemer (1), p. 79, Taf. xiii., fig. 11 (1836) ; (2), p. 57 (1841). Since the
above lines were written, Mr. H. Woods has published an account of this shell and
considers that the Upware specimens were rightly identified with the German form:
Woods (3), vol. ii., p. 25 (1904).
+ Whitfield (1), p. 390, pl. iv.a, figs. 1, 2.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 75
of ribs directed away from a dividing line, so clear a feature in the
figure, is quite erroneous. In the specimen itself, an appearance of
dichotomy occurs only in one rib, and this seems to be due to an
accident of preservation. There is a crack in the shell, and a
portion of the valve on one side has become pushed slightly over
the surface on the other side of the crack. From an examination of
the specimen it is difficult to say with certainty whether this injury
took place during the life of the animal, or subsequently, but the
resulting irregularity in the sculpture was in any case not a normal
character.
There is a close general resemblance between LD. (Mantellwm)
neglecta and L. parallela J. de C. Sow.;* but in Lima neglecta
the oblique elongation is greater and the posterior ribs are more
crowded and delicate. Lima (Mantellum) gaultina Woods + is more
closely similar to Z. neglecta in outline, but its antero-ventral border
is more narrowed, and the fine linear rib in the interspace between
the main ribs is lacking.
Genus PERNA J. G. Bruguiére.
PERNA ATHERSTONI Sharpe.
Plate II., fig. 9.
1856. Perna atherstont D. Sharpe, Trans. Geol. Soc. Lond., ser. 2,
vol. vil., p. 193, pl. xxii., figs. 4, 4a.
Occurrence.—This shell was found at Dunbrodie (Sunday’s River),
in the cliff below the old school-house (282, 305, 320), and at
Walton’s Farm, below Dunbrodie (311). It was recorded by Sharpe
from the same place (Geelhoutboom) ‘in greenish grit with
fragmentary shells.”
fiemarks.—These specimens from Dunbrodie were thought to
represent very probably a new form, but a comparison with Sharpe’s
original specimens of P. atherstoni shows that they differ from these
in no essential particular. One of the Dunbrodie individuals, it is
true, shows a slight difference in outline ; its antero-inferior border,
at a distance of 15 mm. from the umbonal apex, has a broad in-
dentation or inward curve in profile, somewhat more strongly
developed than in the original of Sharpe’s figure 4. Other specimens
which I have examined exhibit this feature in less degree, and it
appears to be a character which is subject to some individual
* For full description and references to literature see Woods (3), vol. ii., part 1,
p. 28, pl. v., figs. 14, 15 (1904).
t Woods (8), vol. ii., part 1, p. 31, pl. v., figs. 16-20 (1904).
76 Annals of the South African Museum.
variation. The convex fold of the valve, passing back from the
umbo, is marked off from a small, flattened, marginal portion of
the valve between the fold and the antero-inferior margin near
the umbonal end, in clearer manner as a rule than is depicted in
Sharpe’s figure. In this respect the figure is misleading, for the
fold is well developed in the original specimen. In another point,
also, the illustration leaves something to be desired; the postero-
inferior border, restored by a dotted line, should in reality have been
represented as arounded curve similar to that followed by the outline
of the same part in Perna mytiloides Lam., and should not have
been drawn in the angular or sub-angular form which lends such
a false aspect to the outline of the shell as depicted in Sharpe's
work,
P. atherstoni is characterised by its oblique figure and the rela-
tively great length of the hinge-line. In these features it recalls
P. mytiloides Lam., from the Upper Oolites of England,* which in
general aspect it much resembles; but in P. atherstoni the shell is
less sharply pointed and produced at the umbo, is less inflated
anteriorly, and is more obliquely elongated. There are further
points of difference which it is unnecessary to recount.
Genus PINNA Linneus.
PINNA ATHERSTONI Sharpe.
1856. Pinna atherstoni D. Sharpe, Trans. Geol. Soc. Lond., ser. 2,
WOl. vile) ps 193; plixxu shes Wy
Occurrence.—Railway cutting between milestones 244-243 on the
railway from Uitenhage to Graaff-Reinet, about three miles from
Uitenhage (329, 330), where it is very abundant in a bed of nodular
limestone.
Remarks.—It has been notedby Messrs. Rogers and Schwarz that
this shell, associated with Holcostephanus atherstont, marks the
most constantly recognisable zone in the Marine Beds of the Zwart-
kop’s River valley.
Pinna atherstoni was compared by Sharpe and Tate with P.
hartmanni Zieten, from the Lias of Europe, and it certainly agrees
more closely with P. hartmanim, as figured by Goldfuss,} than with
the generality of Cretaceous forms, most of which are more elon-
gated and slender in outline. The original figure given by Zieten }
* Damon (1), pl. ii., fig. 5.
+ Goldfuss (1), Band ii., p. 164, Tab. exxvii., fig. 3b (1837).
t Zieten (1), p. 73, Tab. 55, fig. 5 (1833).
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 77
has, however, a very different aspect from that of Goldfuss; it
apparently has a narrower apical angle, and the surface ornaments
are so delineated as to be scarcely comparable with those of P.
atherstoni. The resemblance of P. atherstoni to the Liassic form
usually known by Zieten’s name is clearly a fact of no importance
in the question of the age of the Uitenhage fauna. It may be noted
that a specimen of Pinna from the Perna-bed of Atherfield, Isle of
Wight, preserved in the Sedgwick Museum at Cambridge, has form
and proportions closely similar to those of P. atherstoni. The
specimen is unfortunately ill-preserved and unfitted for a de-
tailed comparison. A similarly broad form has also been recorded
from the Buda Limestone, the upper part of the Lower Cretaceous
series of Texas.*
Genus OSTREA Linneus.
OSTREA sp.
Specimens of Ostrea (305, 306, 336) which occur in the cliff below
the old school-house at Dunbrodie (right bank of Sunday’s River),
in association with Perna atherstoni, Pecten cottaldinus and Gastro-
chena dominicalis, are in a very poor state of preservation and
consist chiefly of fragments. Valves of flattened form measure
upwards of 40 mm. from the umbo to the opposite border and about
30 mm. from margin to margin in a direction perpendicular to this.
The outline of the valve becomes broadly pointed at the umbonal
end. Other imperfect individuals are represented by valves of
smaller dimensions, and these appear to be less elongated and more
convex. None of the valves suffices for specific determination, but
it is probable that two forms are represented.
Genus EXOGYRA T. Say.
EXoGYRA IMBRICATA Krauss.
1843. Hxogyra imbricata F. Krauss, Amtlicher Bericht tiber die
zwanzigste Versammlung der Gesellsch. deutsch.
Naturforscher und Aerzte zu Mainz im Sept., 1842,
pe L298;
1850. Exogyra imbricata F. Krauss, Noy. Act. Acad. Cees. Leop.-
Carol. Nat. Cur., vol. xxii., pt. 2, p. 460, Tab. 50, figs.
2a-2d.
1856. Gryphea imbricata D. Sharpe, Trans. Geol. Soc. Lond.,
Sera) vol. vil, p. 197, pl. xxiii, figs: 3a, 3d.
* Shattuck (1), p. 19, pl. vii.
78 Annals of the South African Musewm.
1867. Ostrea imbricata R. Tate, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soe., vol. xxiil.,
p. 164.
1904. Pycnodonta imbricata H. Douvillé, Bull. Soc. Géol. France,
ser. 4, tome iv., p. 215.
Occurrence.—This form is widely and abundantly distributed in
the Marine Beds of the Zwartkop’s, Sunday’s, and Coega River
valleys. It was met with at almost all the exposures in the
Zwartkop’s valley visited by Messrs. Rogers and Schwarz. HEx-
amples sent to me are from the railway cutting between milestones
244-243 on the railway from Uitenhage to Graaff-Reinet (312),
and others were collected by Miss M. Wilman at Coega. Speci-
mens sent from the collection of the South African Museum are
from the Sunday’s River (300, 301, 302, 303).
Riemarks.—A striking character of the late adult and senile
condition of H. imbricata consists in the prodigal manner in which
shell substance is added at the margins of the valves, particularly
noticeable in the smaller (right) valve in the neighbourhood of the
hinge. Here, with its margin consisting of many coarse, imbri-
cating lamin, this valve may attain a thickness exceeding 30 mm.
The ligament pit is seen to be strongly curved near the apex, but
straight in the portion representing the later growth-stages.
This abundant and characteristic shell has given rise to some
differences of opinion concerning its generic position within the
Ostreidz, which, however, may be sufficiently accounted for by the
great variability of form exhibited by different individuals, and by
the fact that the shell presents features which are recognised as
leading characteristics of both Hxogyra and Gryphea. For this
reason Tate used the name Ostrea in the broad sense, stating his
opinion that the species in question “affords a good illustration of
the mere sectional value (which cannot at all times be employed) of
the groups Hxogyra and Gryphea.” In many instances, it must
be admitted, apparent passage forms seem to render difficult the
definite separation of the three genera, so easily distinguishable
when represented in their more characteristic aspects.* Jackson
has made some luminous observations on the relation of these three
genera and on the influence of the character of attachment by
cementation in producing modifications in members of the Ostreide. +
He believes that Gryphea and Exogyra ‘are probably aberrant
members of the Ostreide, not typical forms in the line of evolution
of the group.”
* Leymerie (la). See also Peron’s remarks on these genera, Peron (1),
pp. 107-9. + Jackson (1), sections v. and vii.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Urtenhage Series. 7
It is highly probable that the shells classed as Gryphea do not
represent a homogenetic group, but are polyphyletic in origin, in-
cluding repeated offshoots from an ostrean stock, While, in the
progress from Ostrea to Gryphea, there is diminished duration of
the attached habit, so that the typical Gryphea is fixed by cementa-
tion of the left valve only during the young stage, examples are not
wanting in which the highly specialised characters of Gryphea are
seen to become modified by the acquirement once again of more
prolonged attachment. As an instance of this, reference may be
made to the shells which, at the close of the deposition of the
Oxford clay in England, seem to have largely replaced the familiar
Gryphea dilatata J. Sow. In these modified forms, the attached
valve did not become free until the neanic stage had been com-
pleted or the adult stage had been well entered upon, and the shell
therefore perforce retained a relatively flatter and more ostreiform
aspect. Haxogyra imbricata might be thought, on cursory exami-
nation, to bear no slight analogy to these: the area of attachment
has very frequently a similar relation, in point of dimensions, to
the whole fully-grown valve, and it is only on the cessation of
attachment that the individual acquires the manner of growth of a
Gryphea and develops the arcuate form which led Sharpe to institute
comparison with Liassic shells. It must be realised, however, that
in this African form we have an illustration of the passage from a
more complete to a less persistent duration of attachment, in the
life of the individual, for a study of the youthful stage shows beyond
doubt the exogyrate ancestry, and this may be clearly seen in many
specimens in which the nature of the youthful characters did not
become masked by the modifications incidental to fixation. The
duration of attachment varied very much in different individuals,
and no doubt often depended upon the nature and form of the object
to which the young shell adhered. In some cases a relatively large
area of attachment may retain the impress of some foreign surface,
such as that of the large and coarsely ribbed Cucullea kraussi
Tate, or a pseudo-quadrate Trigonia, in a manner which largely
obscures the true nature of the umbonal region. Other individuals,
again, seem to have secured themselves to some less suitable or
stable surface, and at an earlier stage to have entered upon the
period of freedom. In these, as in some which have been attached
to an even surface, the characters of the fixed stages are clearly seen
to be those of a true Hxogyra, and present the strongest contrast to
* Compare also figure of Gryphea alligata from the Corallian of NELUSSHE
Quenstedt (1), p. 752, Tab. 91, fig. 25 (1857).
80 Annals of the South African Museum.
the features of the nepionic and neanic stages of Gryphea as illus-
trated, for instance, in the admirable descriptions and figures given
by Hill and Vaughan of members of the genus occurring in the Lower
Cretaceous strata of Texas.* When we see how closely the manner
of growth in the adult stage of H. imbricata often simulates that of
a true Gryphea with simple ostrean ancestry, it must be admitted
that the parallelism is very striking.
It would be difficult to indicate within narrow limits the true
relationship of Hxogyra imbricata, but it is evident that its nearest
morphic counterparts are essentially characteristic of Lower Creta-
ceous rocks. Thus, a very close resemblance exists between this
form and some of the shells classed by Leymerie under the name
Exogyra sinuata and EH. subsinwata. Leymerie first regarded all
these as varieties of Hxogyra sinuata,t and included forms to which
numerous specific names had previously been applied. He subse-
quently separated H. swbsiiwata as a species distinct from H. sinuata,
and used several varietal designations of both. Regarding the
value of the nomenclature employed by this author or by Coquand}
in dealing with the forms comprised within this perplexing group,
Iam at present unable to attempt the critical and detailed study
which alone would warrant the expression of any judgment; in like
manner, the varying use of the name Hxogyra coulont by different
authors has given rise to such a degree of confusion that, in insti-
tuting comparisons, it must suffice to make reference to actual
figures or descriptions, leaving aside for the time being all question
of the value or correctness of the specific names attached to certain
of these.
Krauss rightly recognised the broad relationships of LH. imbricata
and believed it to be nearly related to ‘“ Gryphea couloni Defr.,”’
from which, however, he found it to differ in the following points:
“Tt is larger, more thick-shelled, longer and narrower; has a keel
narrower at the end (though always rounded), more concave laminz
lying much higher one upon the other, and a stronger umbo bent
further over the opercular valve, than in Gryphea coulom Defy.”
Some of the shells figured by d’Orbigny as Ostrea couloni§ show
no slight resemblance to selected individuals of H. imbricata, but are
narrower than the generality of the Uitenhage specimens, and the
imbricating lamelle of the larger valve are more prominent and
irregular. The broad, plicated specimens figured by d’Orbigny
under the same name on plate 466 of his work cannot be brought
* Hill and Vaughan (1). + Leymerie (1).
+ Coquand (2). § d’Orbigny (3), pl. 467, figs. 1-3 (1848).
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 81
into comparison. The shells figured by Coquand* as Ostrea couloni
include narrow forms, more elongated and more decidedly carinated
than H. imbricata, as well as a broad type, developing plications
of the larger valve in the later adult stage, which is in no respect
closely comparable with the form we are considering.
Sowerby’s Exogyra sinuata,t though itself very variable, is
typically widely separated from EH. imbricata by the strong carina-
tion of the larger valve and the widely expanding form of this, with
the much less arcuate habit of growth and the considerably greater
adult dimensions. Some French forms figured by Leymerie and
brought into relationship with Sowerby’s species, though perhaps
erroneously, afford, on the other hand, material for a close com-
parison with H. imbricata. Thus, Leymerie’s EH. sinwata, var.
elongata {| can be fairly closely matched, while extreme individuals
of H. wmbricata, in their narrow outline and very arcuate growth,
nearly resemble that author’s figure of H. swhsinuwata, var. aquilina.§
The shell from the Neocomian of the Haute-Marne figured by Bayle ||
as Aetostreon aquilinum (Leym.), again, closely resembles very narrow
and curved specimens of the African form.
Ostrea tardensis Stanton,” from the Lower Cretaceous Gio beds
of Patagonia, may, in selected individuals, somewhat closely
approach H. imbricata, but its near relationship to this must be
considered doubtful; it seems, however, to represent in some
respects an analogous type. The exogyrate character of the
umbonal region is only feebly indicated, according to Dr. Stanton,
who says that the ‘lower valve is very thick and very convex,
obscurely carinate, with the beak more or less twisted laterally, but
not distinctly coiled.” It differs also by frequently acquiring a
marked crescentic form in the adult. If the Patagonian shell had
a true exogyrate ancestry, which appears probable, the early
characters seem to have so far disappeared as to indicate that
relationship to H. wmbricata is probably somewhat remote.
The shell from the Neocomian cf Arqueros in Chili described by
Bayle and Coquand as Ostrea coulon,** and afterwards brought into
association with a heterogeneous company under the collective name
* Coquand (2), p. 180, pl. 65, fig. 10; pl. 71, figs. 8-10; pl. 74, figs. 1-5; pl. 75,
figs. 1-6, 22.
+ J. Sowerby (1), vol. iv., Tab. 336 (1822). [As Gryphea. |
{ Leymerie (2), p. 17, pl. 12, fig. 2.
§ Ibid., pl. 12, figs. 6, 7.
|| Bayle (1), pl. exl., figs. 3-5.
{ Stanton (3), p. 11, pl. i., figs. 1, 2; pl. ii., figs. 1, 2.
** Bayle and Coquand (1), p. 37, pl. vii. figs. 1, 2.
82 Annals of the South African Musewm.
“ Ostrea aquilina”’ by Coquand,* closely resembles many specimens
of EH. wmbricata in the form and inflation of the valves and in the
degree of curvature of the umbonal region; but it differs by the
more marked carination of the larger valve. Remes has considered
both the Chilian shell and Exogyra imbricata Krauss to be identical
with Sowerby’s Hxogyra sinuata,t but this is certainly an error,
The same author, however, has figured an Hxogyra from Stramberg, t
ascribed by him to Hxogyra subsinuata Leym., to which selected
individuals of H. imbricata, in which the surface of attachment is
relatively large, may show considerable resemblance.
An exogyrate shell from the Bajocian of Abyssinia was ascribed by
Douvillé § to H. ambricata Krauss, but this was an erroneous identi-
fication, as already pointed out by G. Miiller.|| The resemblance
of the small specimens figured by Douvillé to selected young
individuals of H. zmbricata is indeed not a distant one, but many
of the Uitenhage specimens are attached by a very much larger
surface, and, moreover, attain a colossal size in comparison with
Douvillé’s types, if these represent the adult stage. The variation
in EH. imbricata is so great that a more detailed and critical com-
parison could not be entered upon without a substantial suite of
specimens of the Abyssinian shell.
A shell from the Isakondry basin in Madagascar (presumably
from strata of Lower Cretaceous age) is stated by Douvillé to bear
a close resemblance to Hxogyra wmbricata Krauss.‘
Genus MYTILUS Linneus.
MytTILUS UITENHAGENSIS sp. nov.
Plate ©f., figs. 10; dy ila:
Description.—The shell is slender and elongated in outline, sharply
pointed in front, and antero-ventrally truncated. The hinge-margin
is straight, and passes backwardly by a curve into the obliquely
sloping posterior margin, which is only very slightly convex in
outline until the posterior end of the valve is reached. In profile,
the antero-ventral margin is straight, passing from the acutely
pointed umbo to the posterior angle of the valve, where it abruptly
cuts the curved outline of the posterior margin.
The antero-ventral area is flat, and its surface is perpendicular
* Coquand (2), p. 158. { Remes (1), p. 216.
t Remes (1), pl. xxi. (iv.), figs. 2a, 2b.
§ Douvillé (1), p. 230, pl. xii., figs. 8, 9. || G. Miiller (1), pp. 569, 570.
{| Douvillé (2), p. 388; Douvillé (4), p. 215; Lemoine (1), p. 176.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 83
to the plane of symmetry of the valves. The junction of this portion
of each valve with the very gently convex upper portion is acutely
angular, giving rise to a sharp carinal ridge which, however, becomes
very slightly blunted towards the posterior end of the valve.
The shell is devoid of sculpture, but its smooth upper surface is
marked by numerous delicate growth-lines which form a sweeping
curve between the hinge-margin and the carinal ridge. The antero-
ventral area is sometimes marked by coarser, rounded, obliquely
running ridges of accretion. Traces of the narrow, elongated,
fossilised ligament have been observed.
Dimensions.—
Length of the antero-ventral margin ................0c.ceeeeseeeee 37 mm.
encthvok the cardinal margins... vos seqe) es eccaascaesaccoseeeeee Gi
Greatest breadth of flank between the carinal ridge and the
POSTEKIO“ Val Ve=mMaAnsin owe .seese ccna ctwesseccetee seeessateees 1345
Greatest width of the antero-ventral area in one valve ...... tne
Occurrence.—Found at Dunbrodie, Sunday’s River (319). Speci-
mens collected by Atherstone and preserved in the British Museum
(Natural History) are labelled ‘‘Cuylers.” Also collected by Mr.
Rogers from the lowest beds on Zoet Geneugd, right bank of
Sunday’s River (64h), and in the Coega Valley, one mile up the
line from Coega station (479g).
Remarks.—This is doubtless the form noticed by Krauss * in the
lowest fossil-bearing beds on the left bank of the Zwartkop’s River
below Uitenhage, in association with Trigonia herzogi, T. conocardit-
fornus, and T. ventricosa, Krauss speaks of a Mytilus “ with a sharp
ridge running from the umbo to the hinder extremity and a flat
truncated surface extending from this ridge to the ventral margin.”
The shell was capable of attaining dimensions exceeding those
of the larger specimen figured here. A specimen in the Geological
Society’s collection, incomplete at the posterior end, must have
originally measured 50 mm. in length; the maximum breadth of
its flat area is 11 mm. in each valve. Two imperfect large valves
now preserved in the British Museum (Nat. Hist.), which form part
of a collection at one time placed in the Museum of Practical
Geology, probably had a length of fully 45 mm. when complete.
The antero-ventral area measures about 9 mm. in breadth in one
of these, while the greatest breadth of the flank, measured by a line
perpendicular to the carinal margin, is 18 mm. The area is perfectly
flat and the carinal ridge acutely sharp.
In the absence of knowledge regarding the interior of the shell,
* Krauss (2), p. 443.
84 Annals of the South African Museum.
this form can at present only be looked upon as a representative
of the genus Mytilus. No doubt, indeed, concerning its generic
position could have been reasonably suggested, had not a detailed
study of the externally very similar Mytilus lanceolatus J. de C.
Sowerby, led Mr. H. Woods to ascribe that shell to the genus Dreis-
sensia,* a determination which was based upon the presence of an
umbonal septum. A strong case was made out by Mr. Woods for
the existence of marine forerunners of the modern Dreissensia, an
inhabitant of brackish and fresh waters, and he was also supported
by the opinion of M. Cossmann, who has found the genus to be
associated with marine forms in the Upper Eocene of the Paris
basin. In view of close external similarity to Driessensia lanceo-
lata it would not be surprising if the shell here described were
eventually also shown to be furnished with an umbonal plate,
but until this can be proved it will be necessary to retain the name
Mytilus.
Compared with Dreissensia lanceolata (= Mytilus lanceolatus J.
de C. Sow.)} from the Lower Greensand and Upper Greensand and
Blackdown Beds of England, WM. witenhagensis is seen to agree closely
in general form, but to be distinguished by several points of detail.
In the African shell the antero-ventral area is flat throughout its
extent, which is not the case in the European form; in M. witen-
hagensis the carinal ridge is more sharply acute in the umbonal
region than in many examples of D. lanceolata. Further distin-
guishing features possessed by M. witenhagensis are the relatively
slightly shorter hinge-line, the less steeply sloping outline of the
posterior margin, the relative narrowness of the flank between the
carinal ridge and the posterior margin, and the absence of con-
centric ornaments at any stage of growth. The shell from the
Cretaceous of Shingle Bay, Skidegate Inlet (Queen Charlotte
Islands), described by Whiteaves under the name Mytilus lanceo-
latus,t may or may not be identical with the European form.
To judge from the description and figures, it shows considerable
similarity to MW. witenhagensis, though appearing to differ by the
imperceptible passage of the hinge-border into the posterior border,
the curved outline of the carinal margin, and the concavity of the
antero-ventral area.
Several forms described from the Senonian Greensand of Aachen
* Woods (8), vol. i., p. 110 (1900).
+ J. de C. Sowerby (1), vol. v., p. 55, Tab. 439, fig. 2 (1823); H. Woods (8),
vol. i., p. 110, pl. xviii., figs. 13-15, pl. xix., figs, 1-11 (1900).
t Whiteaves (3), p. 236, pl. 31, figs. 7, 7a.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 85
by J. Miiller,* and united by Holzapfel+ under the name Septifer
tequlatus, may possibly be identical with Sowerby’s M. lanceolatus,
according to the view of Prof. Holzapfel and Mr. H. Woods. While
the points of difference from M. witenhagensis are in the main those
noted above in the case of the English shell, the specimens from
Aachen dealt with by Prof. Holzapfel appear to be still more strongly
distinguished by their frequently curved antero-ventral margin and
their well-marked concentric ornament.
In Mytilus tornacensis d’Archiac,} from the Tourtia of Tournay,
the hinge-line is relatively longer than in M. witenhagensis, while the
antero-ventral area is not flat and the carina is much less sharp ; there
are also markings on the shell at right angles to the lines of growth.
A form bearing greater similarity to MW. witenhagensis is Mytilus
triangularis J. Bohm,$ from the Trigonia-sandstone of Lebanon.||
This has a similar elongated outline, sharp carinal ridge and
flattened antero-ventral area; but it is apparently well distin-
guished by the manner in which the hinge-margin and posterior
margin pass imperceptibly by a curve into one another when viewed
in profile. In MM. triangularis, too, the flank between the carina
and the posterior margin is slightly narrower, while Dr. Bohm’s
figure 11 represents the outline of the carina as somewhat curved.
In order to illustrate how great a sameness of characters may
persist or recur in mytiloid shells, it is only necessary to refer to
such a form as M. aviothensis Buv.{! from the Lias of Avioth, Breux.
This closely resembles M. triangularis, from the Syrian Cretaceous,
in most outward characters, and differs from M. witenhagensis
chiefly in those points which distinguish MM. triangularis also,
though exhibiting a slight convexity of the antero-ventral area not
developed in these Cretaceous forms.
' Genus MODIOLA Lamarck.
MoptioLa BAINI Sharpe.
Plate IT., figs. 12, 12a.
1856. Modiola bain D. Sharpe, Trans. Geol. Soc. Lond., ser. 2,
Vol. vil. p. 193; pl. xxii., figs. 2, 3.
Supplementary Descriptive Note-—As an addition to Sharpe’s
description, it may be noted that the oblique lateral ‘‘ keel’ is only
* J. Miiller (1), p. 35. + Holzapfel (1), p. 218, Taf. xxv., figs. 1-9.
t d’Archiac (1), p. 307, pl. xv., fig. 3. § J. Bohm (2), p. 218, Taf. vii., fig. 11.
|| For remarks on the age of this sandstone see Rehbinder (1), p. 87.
| Buvignier (1), p. 24, pl. xvi., figs. 35-37.
U
86 Annals of the South African Museum.
developed as a rounded folding of the valve. Above this the surface
is evenly convex, while below it the valve is flattened. An un-
crushed specimen therefore shows in transverse section an outline
different from that depicted by Sharpe in his figure 3b. It is true
that the upper portion of the valve also becomes much flattened in
the posterior part of an adult specimen, but only near the siphonal
margin. The ribs, starting above at the valve-margin, are directed
obliquely backwards, and before the lateral fold is reached they
bifurcate, at the same time curving sharply with the convexity back-
wardly directed. An occasional extra, curved rib is here intercalated.
Just below the lateral fold the ribs unite again in twos or threes and
pass forward in the form of a number of fine, unequally spaced
ridges which occupy the lower flattened portion of the valve and run
roughly parallel to one another and to the lower margin. In addi-
tion to these ridges, the valve below the oblique lateral fold is
ornamented by a series of very numerous and crowded, delicate,
vertically running raised stripes or wrinkles. This vertical wrink-
ling is very regular, and occupies the whole of the surface below the
lateral fold, crossing the horizontal ridges at right angles. The
wrinkles, which number upwards of forty within a space of 10 mm.,
are developed both on the ridges and interspaces.
Occurrence.—Collected in the Zwartkop’s River valley, one mile
north-east of Rawson Bridge (281). Recorded by Sharpe from the
Sunday’s River at ‘C. Roe’s drift,’’ and by Stow from above Modder
Drift and from M’Loughlin’s Bluff, on Sunday’s River.
Remarks.—The specimens figured by Sharpe, in the collection of
the Geological Society, show the vertical wrinklings on the lower
portion of the valve, though no mention was made of these. Well-
preserved specimens exhibit these structures very clearly, and show
that they form a definite part of the sculpture.
The group to which this shell belongs is more characteristic of
Jurassic than of Cretaceous rocks. M. sowerbiana (d’Orbigny)
(=M. plicata Sow.),* a typical Oolitic form, has a much more
numerous division of the ribs above the lateral fold, and is rather
more curved in outline. M. perplicata (Etallon),+ from the Upper
Jurassic of Europe, is similar in the bifurcation of its ribs; but it
attains a greater height in relation to length, and has also a more
curved outline. The descriptions and figures of M. perplicata }
* d’Orbigny (4), vol. i., pp. 282, 312; J. Sowerby (1), vol. iii., Tab. 248, fig. 1 (1819).
+ Thurmann and Etallon (1), p. 223, pl. xxix., fig. 8 (1862); Loriol and Pellat
(2), p. 156 (312), pl. xviii., figs. 19, 20.
{ See also Loriol, Royer, and Tombeck (1), p. 348, pl. xix., figs. 10, 11.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 87
make it clear that the vertical striping on the lower part of the flank
is developed in that form also; the same occurs in M. medus
(d’Orbigny), an allied shell from the Kimeridge.
A shell of very similar type to M. baini is M. flagelltfera (Forbes), *
from the Upper Cretaceous of Europe and Southern India; but an
examination of the type specimens in the Geological Society’s collec-
tion shows that these have the ribs dividing chiefly into groups of
three, and the lower part of the flank entirely lacks any traces of the
fine vertical stripes.
A fragment of a similarly ornamented, elongated Modiola from the
Cenomanian of the Sarthe, was considered by d’Orbigny to be speci-
fically distinct from others previously described, and was figured by
Guéranger | as Mytilus sarthensis. It may be clearly seen from
that author’s photographic illustration that this differs from M. bain
by the relatively greater disparity in the number of large and small
ribs; in the French shell there are three small ribs to each of the
major ribs.
Modiola rubidger (Tate),} from the Uitenhage Marine Beds, also
bears a general resemblance to M. bauw. In M. rwbidger, however,
the ornaments on the upper part of the valve consist of relatively
few, gently rounded folds in place of the well-defined narrow rounded
ribs in M. bani; in addition, these folds are themselves ornamented
by finer linear markings which pass backwards along them and then
curve forward to run parallel to the lower margin. In M. rubidger
there is also an absence of vertical striping on the lower part of the
valve.
Genus NUCULA Lamarck.
NUCULA UITENHAGENSIS sp. nov.
Plate II., fig. 13.
Description of a Single Specimen.—The shell is oval in outline,
short and high posteriorly, moderately inflated. The cardinal
margin slopes down forwards from the umbo with a gently convex
outline, and passes by a curve into the rather short anterior margin.
The posterior margin falls steeply from the umbo and passes by a
rather sharp curve into the long, gently convex inferior margin.
The greatest height is at the umbo. The umbonal region is rounded
and broad, and not strongly prominent. From the umbo a very
faintly developed, blunt ridge of the valve-surface passes forward,
* Forbes (2), p. 152, pl. xvi.; fig. 9; Woods (3), vel. i., p. 99, pl. xvii., figs. 1, 2
(1900).
+ Guéranger (1), p. 17, pl. xxiii., fig. 1. t Tate (1), p. 157, pl. ix., fig. 11.
88 Annals of the South African Museum.
cutting off a narrow, flattened, or slightly concave area contiguous
with the cardinal margin. The greatest inflation occurs at about the
middle of the valve.
The surface bears numerous closely spaced, delicate, raised, con-
centric linear ornaments, very weakly developed and indistinct in
the umbonal part of the shell, more strongly developed in the
inferior half of the valve. These linear ornaments are not produced
with perfect regularity, but show occasional inequalities in their
spacing, and an occasional coalescence of adjacent lines may be
observed, particularly in the posterior part of the valve.
Dimensions .—:
Lien gil ssc nae eset eae noch haw tamer 17 mm
Greatest height. .65...saseeseee eee 11s aes
Greatest depth of a single valve ......... OE:
Occurrence.—Found by Mr. Rogers in a wash-out 100 feet above
Coega station, at a point one mile north of Coega Hotel (441).
temarks.—The specimen described has both valves in position,
and is perfect except posteriorly. When the above description was
written the right valve was quite perfect, though the lunular region
(in this genus posterior to the umbo) was somewhat obscured by
very hard matrix, but an attempt to remove this resulted in slight
injury to the valve at the posterior border, so that the margin there
is now not quite perfect. Unfortunately a single specimen only was
obtained, but it seems to be sufficiently well preserved and well
characterised to support the establishment of a new species.
The shell is distinguished by its oval form and rounded, soft out-
lines. In these respects it bears a considerable resemblance to
Nucula obtusa J. de C. Sow., from the Upper Greensand and Black-
down Beds of England.*
Genus GRAMMATODON F. B. Meek and F. V. Hayden.
GRAMMATODON JONESI (Tate).
Plate II., figs. 14, 14a.
1867. Arca (Cucull@a?) jonesi R. Tate, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc.,
vol. xxiti.,) ps l6L.plax. igo,
Occurrence.—Collected by Miss M. Wilman at Coega. This shell
is also recorded by Messrs. Rogers and Schwarz as occurring in the
highest of three beds of sandstone on the Grass Ridge road near
Uitenhage.t| The specimens described by Tate occurred “in a
* Woods (3), vol. i., p. 22, pl. iv., figs. 2, 3, 4 (1899).
+ Rogers and Schwarz (1), p. 9.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 89
greenish-grey sandy marl, rather hard and very calcareous, near the
Bridge on the Zwartkop River.”
Dimensions.— (1) (2) (3) (4)
Ibengtht etn esse scene 13 : 18 ; 21 ; 22 mm.
Hiei ght ae tasseisioceass 9. ff “ieheemea tutes 5 > cag: 3)
Depth of asingle valve 4 : — ‘ 6 , =
No. (2) is Tate’s figured specimen.
Remarks.—This form is closely similar in general type to G. secwris
(Leym.) * (Lower Cretaceous) and G. carinatus (Sow.) + (Gault and
Upper Greensand), and although I have been unable to ascertain
the characters of the hinge, the close agreement in form and orna-
mentation is perhaps sufficient justification for classing this shell in
the same generic group of the Arcide. In the use of the name
Grammatodon I follow Mr. Woods.
Compared with G. secwris, our shell is found to differ by the con-
siderably finer and more closely spaced ribs on the flank of the left
valve. With regard to the ribbing, there is greater similarity to
G. carinatus, but this, on the whole, is a decidedly more equilateral
shell, although specimens might be selected which in most respects
closely approach G. jonest. G. carinatus frequently attains much
larger dimensions, with a proportionately coarser development of
the ornaments, than G. jonesi. A shell of similar type, and perhaps
related to G. jonesi, occurs in the Lower Neocomian beds of German
Kast Africa, which were correlated by G. Miiller with the Uitenhage
Series. Miller described and figured this under the name Arca
witenhagensis,§ and drew attention to the apparent relationship to
Arca jonest Tate, A. witenhagensis, which is associated with
Trigonia ventricosa (Krauss) and 7’. beyschlagi Miller, differs from
Grammatodon jonesi by the fewer number and much greater breadth
of its ribs.
Genus UNIO A. J. Retzius.
UNIO UITENHAGENSIS sp. nov.
Plate IT., figs. 15, 15a.
Description.—The shell is of elongated oval outline, posteriorly
produced, and laterally compressed in the postero-inferior region of
* Leymerie (2), p. 6, pl. vii., figs. 6, 7; Woods (3), vol. i., part 1, p. 44, pl. vii.,
figs. 14, 15, pl. viii., figs. 1, 2 (1899).
+ J. Sowerby (1), vol.i., p. 96, Tab. 44, lower figure (1813) ; Woods (8), vol. i.,
p. 45, pl. viii., figs. 3-8 (1899). t Woods (2).
§ G. Miller (1), p. 542, pl. xxv., fig. 5. [This name seems very unhappily
chosen. |
90 Annals of the South African Museum.
the adult. The umbones are situated at almost one-third of the
shell’s total length from the anterior extremity. The umbonal
region is relatively very inconspicuous, and of blunt, rounded form.
The shell-substance is for the most part very thick, but becomes
attenuated at the pallial margin. The upper margin in front of the
umbo passes by a curve into the rather short, convex anterior border.
The posterior margin merges into the upper margin and slopes
obliquely back, to pass by an abrupt curve into the inferior
margin.
The greatest height is at the umbo, and the greatest inflation,
which is relatively weak, occurs below the umbonal region, in the
superior half of an adult individual. About the middle of the shell
near the pallial margin the valves appear slightly constricted, as
though laterally pinched in. The surface is marked by numerous
noticeable furrows and ridges of accretion.
Dimensions.— (1) (2)
Greatest length. s2.--¢-- 4052-00 37 : 43 mm,
Greatest height)<5,...20).0¢scce-c--2 Ot ‘ Bsa
Greatest depth of a single valve 7 : 854,
Occurrence.—In a hard calcareous band in the rocks of Ather-
stone’s ‘“‘ Wood Bed” series, on the north bank of the Bezuiden-
hout’s River below Blue Cliff station (322, 323).
Remarks.—The shells still retain traces of the strong periostracum,
and the elongated external ligament is also in part preserved. This
is apparently the form cited by Messrs. Rogers and Schwarz as
Psammobia,* and such a generic determination might appear to
receive some support from the elongated oval figure of the shell, the
inconspicuous umbones, the relatively compressed aspect of the
valves, and the lengthened external ligament. The valves, how-
ever, are very thick, and this character, as well as the wrinkled
surface and the blunt and obviously corroded umbones, proclaims
another generic position; moreover, the pallial line is entire. In
the shell-structure, also, although this has become obliterated in its
intimate characters through replacement by calcite, it can be clearly
observed that a line of demarcation separates a thin outer layer,
representing the original prismatic layer, from the relatively thick
inner portion, formerly consisting of nacreous substance.
This form differs from Unio porrectus J. de C. Sow.,+ from the
Wealden, by the less strongly elongated outline and the much less
tapering posterior extremity. Unio antiquus J. de C. Sow.
* Rogers and Schwarz (1), p. 13.
+ J. de C. Sowerby (1), vol. vi., Tab. 594, fig. 1 (1828).
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 91
(Wealden) * is rather less equilateral, the umbonal region is more
prominent, and the antero-superior border more steeply sloping.
Unio martini J. de C. Sow. (Wealden) | is more equilateral, much
higher and less slender in figure, and probably a more inflated
form.
Unio subsinuata Koch and Dunker,} from the Wealden of North
Germary, is in some respects similar, notably in the form of the
posterior half of the shell and the position of the umbones, but
differs markedly in the horizontally produced superior margin in
front of the umbones. Unio voltzi Koch and Dunker,§ though
regarded by those authors as distinct from the last, differs in similar
manner from Unio witenhagensis. Unio planws Roem.|| is more
compressed in form and has a less sloping antero-superior outline.
A comparison with the figures and descriptions of the forms of
Unio from the Jurassic and Cretaceous rocks of North America
does not show that resemblances exist which call for special remark.
Genus TRIGONIA J. G. Bruguiére.
TRIGONIA VENTRICOSA (Krauss).
Plate III., figs. 1, la.
1843. Lyriodon ventricosa F. Krauss, Amtlicher Bericht tiber die
zwanzigste Versammlung der Gesellsch. deutsch. Natur-
forscher und Aerzte zu Mainz im Sept., 1842, p. 130.
1850. Lyrodon ventricosus F. Krauss (partim), Nov. Act. Acad.
Cees. Leop.-Carol. Nat. Cur., vol. xxii., pt. 2, p. 456,
Tab. 49, figs. 2c-2f, (exclude figs. 2a, 20).
1871. Trigonia ventricosa F. Stoliezka, Cretaceous Fauna of
Southern India, vol. ii., The Pelecypoda; p. 315,
pl. xv., figs. 9. 9a. (Palzeontologia Indica.)
1875. Trigonia ventricosa J. Lycett, Mon. Brit. Foss. Trigonie,
p. 119, and text-figures. (Palewontographical Society.)
1877. Trigonia ventricosa O. Feistmantel, Foss. Flora of the
Gondwana System, vol. i., pt. 3, p. 164. (Paleontologia
Indica.)
* J. de C. Sowerby (1), vol. vi., Tab. 594, figs. 3-5 (1828).
+ J. de C. Sowerby (2), p. 346, pl. xxi., fig. 17.
{ Koch and Dunker (1), p. 58, Tab. vii., fig. 2; Dunker and Meyer (1), p. 26,
Taf. xi., figs. 4, 5.
§ Koch and Dunker (1), p. 59, Tab. vii., fig. 3.
|| F. A. Roemer (1), p. 95, Taf. v., fig. 14; Dunkerand Meyer 1), p. 27, Taf. xi.,
fig. 8.
92 Annals of the South African Museum.
1879. Trigonia ventricosa W. T. Blanford, in Medlicott and Blan-
ford, Manual of the Geology of India, pt. 1, p. 261, with
' text-figure.
1880. Trigonia ventricosa O. Feistmantel, Foss. Flora of the Gond-
wana System, vol. ii., p. xxxvii. (Paleeontologia Indica.)
1893. Trigona ventricosa W. T. Blanford, in Medlicott and Blan-
ford, Manual of the Geology of India (2nd _ edition
revised and partly rewritten by R. D. Oldham), p. 225,
with figure.
1900. Trigonia- ventricosa G. Miller, Verstein. des Jura und der
Kreide, Deutsch-Ost-Afrika, Band vii., p. 5438, Taf. xix.,
figs. 4, 5.
1903. Trigona ventricosa F. L. Kitchin, Jurassic Fauna of Cutch,
vol. iii, pt. 2, The Lamellibranchiata; p. 104, pl. x.,
figs. 4-8. (Paleontologia Indica, Ser. IX.).
1905. Trigonia ventricosa A. W. Rogers, An Introduction to the
Geology of Cape Colony, p. 291, fig. 25 (2).
Occurrence.—This widely distributed and very characteristic form
occurs in the Marine Beds at various localities on the Sunday’s
and Zwartkop’s Rivers. It was collected by Messrs. Rogers and
Schwarz at a kloof on the left side of the Zwartkop’s River, east-
north-east of Red House (308), and was found to occur abundantly
in a cliff at ‘‘ Picnic Bush’’; it is also cited from localities in the
neighbourhood of Uitenhage, on the road to the top of Grass Ridge
and in the railway cutting between milestones 244-243 on the
Graaff-Reinet railway, about three miles from Uitenhage.* Mr.
Rogers collected it on the left side of Coega Valley, half a mile down
from the railway (463g), and in a small kloof three miles up the left
bank of Sunday’s River (14h, 15h). Stow remarked upon the great
abundance of this shell in the cliff at ‘‘ M’Loughlin’s Bluff” or
“Prince Alfred’s Rest’’ on the Sunday’s River. + Krauss found it
in the left bank of Zwartkop’s River below Uitenhage, associated
with Trigonia herzogi and T. conocardifornus.
In German East Africa, shells referred to this species have been
found in strata ascribed by G. Miiller to the Lower Neocomian and
brought by him into relationship with the Uitenhage beds, at a
locality a short distance to the north of the Nkundi stream, 29 km.
north-west of Kiswere. There they occur with Trigonia beyschlagi,
which shows strong resemblance to TJ. crassa Kitchin, from the
Oomia marine beds in Cutch.
* Rogers and Schwarz (1), pp. 8-10. + Stow (1), p. 502.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 93
In India, 7. ventricosa occurs numerously at various localities in
the marine beds of the Oomia Group in Cutch, notably in the
neighbourhood of Oomia and Goonaree; it is also stated to have
been found by King in an outlier of the Tripetty beds at Inna-
parazpolliam, to the north-west of Coconada on the south-eastern
side of the Indian peninsula * It is recorded, too, from the
Margalla Pass in the district of Hazara, where it is said to occur in
abundance. +
Remarks.—Trigonia ventricosa bears a general resemblance to
members of the aliformis group of the section Scabre, particularly
to T. aliformis Park.,* with which it was confounded by von Buch,
and to T. scabricola Lycett ; § but the relative shortness and great
height of the outline, the very strong anterior inflation, and the
coarse and salient character of the ornaments on the anterior part
of the adult shell, serve to separate it from all known members of
the section in Europe. It has been repeatedly pointed out that
much closer agreement is shown to T. tuberculifera Stoliczka, from
a higher horizon in the Cretaceous rocks of Southern India. The
resemblance appears to be remarkably great, but unfortunately
Stoliczka’s description and figures of J. tuberculifera leave some-
thing to be desired. I have elsewhere drawn attention to the fact
that in the figure of the front view of Stoliczka’s type || the ribs of
the right and left valve are represented as though placed opposite to
one another at their frontal terminations; in JZ’. ventricosa, on the
other hand, as in other members of the section, these ribs alternate
in position, and it seems probable that an error was committed in the
execution of this figure of 7. tuberculifera.
A comparison of 7. ventricosa with T. krausst sp. noy. will be
found in the remarks appended to the description of the latter.
T. subventricosa Stanton, from the Belgrano beds of the
Pueyrrydon Series in Patagonia,‘! so far as can be gathered from
the description and figures of that shell, is of very similar type, but
seems to be less strongly inflated, and to be of relatively more
elongated form.
T. delafosset Bayle and Coquand,** from the Neocomian of Chil,
also shows a general agreement with TJ. ventricosa, and may
* King (1), p. 229; Feistmantel (2), p. 164; Feistmantel (3), p. xxxvii.
+ Wynne (2), p. 125; Medlicott and Blanford (1), p. 503.
t Parkinson (1), p. 176, pl. xii., fig. 9; Lycett (3), p. 116, pl. xxv., figs. 3-6
(1875). § Lycett (3), p. 130, pl. xxvii., figs. 4, 5.
|| Stoliczka (2), pl. xv., fig. 10 (1871). {| Stanton (8), p. 18, pl. iv., figs. 19, 20
** Bayle and Coquand (1), p. 37, pl. viii., fig. 27; R. A. Philippi (1), p. 85,
pl. xxxvi., fig. 4; Paulcke (1), p. 296, Taf. xvii., fig. 9.
94 Annals of the South African Museum.
perhaps be closely related. It appears, however, to have more
closely spaced and less coarsely nodose ribs. To judge from the
description and figures of TJ. delafossei given by Paulcke, the
escutcheon is more sharply demarcated from the area than in
T. ventricosa; T. delafossei also does not appear to have attained
such large dimensions. Another South American form, TJ. nepos
Paulcke, from the Neocomian of Chili, shows to some extent a
similarity to J’. ventricosa, especially if the smaller individuals
figured by Paulcke * be compared with specimens of similar size ;
T. nepos, however, has more delicate sculpture and is also well
distinguished by the peculiar arrangement of the ribs towards the
frontal face. In the work cited above, Paulcke brings 7. nepos and
T. delafosset into close relationship; yet he perceives in 7’. nepos an
exceedingly close resemblance to JT. baylei Dollfus, + from the Kime-
ridge of Europe, and recognises in the similarity an indication of the
scaphoid ancestry of these Cretaceous forms. It may be pointed
out that the principal character upon which he relies, the existence
of a more or less independent series of anterior ribs, is a feature to
which, alone, such significance can certainly not be attached. It
represents a plan of sculpture which has appeared repeatedly and
independently in various Trigonia-stocks, and in T. baylet and other
typical Jurassic Scaphoidex is associated with well-marked cha-
racteristics which indicate the very high improbability of such
direct relationship as that suggested. In T. ventricosa, T. delafossei,
and T’. nepos, just as in the 7’. alifornis group of Europe, the very
prominent and highly inflated umbonal region, the extreme incurva-
tion of the umbones, the relatively very narrow area and the
crenulation of the shell margin, are characters which are conspicu-
ously developed in these well-marked and specialised groups. In
T. baylei and similar Scaphoidez, the laterally compressed form,
the weak umbonal incurvation, the nodose carinze and delicately
sculptured area, no less than the relations of frontal to lateral
coste, are also characters of specialisation, and judging by the
evidence of early growth-stages, these shells had ancestry in
simple clavellate forms. A similar though independent ancestry
seems also very probable in the case of the various groups classed
under the broad heading Scabre.
In the published description of the Trigoni@ from the Oomia
Group in Cutch, it is stated that the Indian specimens ascribed to
T. ventricosa “ although exhibiting great variability, offer no features
* Paulcke (1), p. 293, Taf. xvii., fig. 8.
+ Dollfus (1), pl. xv.; Bigot (1), p. 309 [51], pl. xii., fig. 10.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uttenhage Serves. 95
except their state of preservation by which they may be dis-
tinguished from those occurring in South Africa.”* Having due
regard to the range of individual variation shown by the specimens
which occur in the Oomia beds, I believed this statement to be
quite accurate, but a reconsideration of this matter and a renewed
comparison between a larger number of specimens now necessitates
a slight modification. While it is seen that the limits of individual
variation among the Indian specimens cover differences greater
than those to be observed between the average characters shown
by examples of the species from the one region and those from the
other, it should be noted that in India many of these shells exhibit
a somewhat less degree of inflation than that seen in most of the
South African examples. The specimens from Cutch sometimes
have the tubercular ornaments rather more prominently developed,
though in certain cases the effect of prominence seems to have
been enhanced by the mode of preservation of the shells. There
is also a tendency to have the tubercles less closely crowded
together and less regularly moniliform than in the specimens from
South Africa. It is difficult to say in how far these characters
may have been the product of strictly local conditions. There
certainly appears to have been a greater range of individual varia-
tion and greater instability than is shown by the specimens from
the Uitenhage beds. At the same time, the agreement between a
selected series of specimens from the one region and a suite of
individuals from the other is remarkably close, and, all things
considered, I do not think that the points of difference, above
noted, suffice for the establishment of two separate species, or,
indeed, even for the satisfactory recognition of two well-defined
local races.
TRIGONIA KRAUSSI sp. Noy.
Plate IIT., figs. 2, 2a.
1850. Lyrodon ventricosus F. Krauss (partum), Nov. Act. Acad. Cees.
Leop.-Carol. Nat. Cur., vol. xxii., pt. 2, Tab. 49, figs. 2a,
2b (exclude figs. 2c—2f).
Description.—The shell is relatively short, anteriorly very high,
with the upper and lower margins rapidly converging posteriorly
towards the very short siphonal margin. The valves are anteriorly
very strongly inflated, but posteriorly compressed. The umbones
are prominent, strongly incurved and markedly recurved, and
situated close to the anterior end. The greatest height is attained
* Kitchin (1), p. 107.
96 Annals of the South African Musewm.
at the umbo, and may exceed the total length. The valve is almost
vertically truncated anteriorly and in its anterior part attains such
relatively great depth that a flattened frontal face of considerable
extent becomes developed.
In the youthful stage the ribs of the flank are concentric in
arrangement, extending from the carinal angle to the frontal border.
As growth proceeds, subsequently formed ribs terminate anteriorly
at the frontal border but posteriorly at an increasing distance from
the carinal angle. The ribs at the same time attain a more steeply
inclined direction, and the last-formed rib of the frontal series is
very short and almost vertical. In the early adult stage narrow,
closely spaced ribs extend between the carinal angle and the upper
terminations of the swollen frontal ribs, or may be looked upon as
the attenuated upward prolongations of these since the two sets are
so far in continuity. Successively formed narrow ribs, constituting
a posterior series, have their upward terminations slightly removed
from the carinal angle, and in the posterior half of a fully grown
specimen these crowded ribs of the posterior series entirely occupy
the flank. The ribs of the anterior series are very prominent and
coarsely tubercular, and may be elevated to a height of 7 or 8 mm.
above the surface of the interspaces. These ribs are very widely
spaced, the interspaces reaching 8 mm. in breadth in the adult stage ;
on the frontal face the ribs sweep round in a broad curve towards
the anterior valve-margin. The development of the earlier-formed
ribs is not continued in the later growth-stages, so that in a large
specimen the frontal face is partly without sculpture in its upper
part, towards the valve-border. The ribs of the posterior series are
at first vertically directed, but the majority of them have a marked
backward inclination when traced downwards. They are relatively
weak, and are separated by interspaces less than 2 mm. in breadth.
The whole surface of the flank is crossed by crowded lines of growth
which are most plainly visible in the wide interspaces between ribs
of the anterior series.
The carinal angle is represented by a blunt, rounded fold in the
adult shell. The area is very narrow, and is without ornamentation
in the adult stage, except a strongly impressed median longitudinal
groove. The escutcheon is relatively broad and is deeply excavated
in form.
Dimensions .—
Length (approximate) /- secs mee-es-ecst-2ceoss- se ances 75 mm
Height measured from the umbonal region......... Sosa
Greatest depth of a single valve................ssssee0 mo) oy
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 97
Occurrence.—Messrs. Rogers and Schwarz record the occurrence
of this shell (“the large variety of JT. ventricosa’’) * in the railway
cutting between milestones 244-242 on the line from Uitenhage to
Graaff-Reinet, about three miles from Uitenhage. The specimen
from the South African Museum, here figured, is probably from the
Sunday’s River. Krauss met with this form in the left bank of the
Zwartkop’s River below Uitenhage.
Remarks.—This characteristic Trigonia, which belongs to the
section Scabre, may be said to exhibit in very exaggerated manner
some of the most striking features which render 7. ventricosa
(Krauss) so conspicuous amongst the members of this section.
T’. ventricosa, though so well distinguished by its form and ornamen-
tation, is in some respects comparable with the European T.
scabricola Lycett or T. alifornis Park., and was even considered
identical with the latter by L. von Buch.{ TZ. kraussz is so far
removed from European members of the section that a detailed
comparison with these is unnecessary, and it only remains to draw
attention to the characters which differentiate it from J. ventricosa
and the apparently closely allied 7. swhventricosa which occurs in
the Belgrano beds of Patagonia.
T. krausst is principally distinguished by its large size and the
very prominent character and wide spacing of the anterior ribs,
Another striking feature is the great anterior inflation and extensive
flattened frontal face. In other respects the resemblance to TZ’.
ventricosa is so great that I was led to ask Mr. Rogers whether he
was aware of the existence of specimens intermediate in character
between the extremes ; his reply, however, was in the negative. So
many specimens of ZT’. ventricosa have been obtained by various
collectors, and the Uitenhage 7rigonie@ are so well represented in
European museums that we might certainly expect to find inter-
mediate forms, if such existed, in some of the collections. No
specimens connecting the extreme forms appear to have been found,
and amongst the Trzgone of the Oomia beds in Cutch the representa-
tives of J’. ventricosa, met with in abundance, agree with the smaller
typical form in South Africa.
T’. krawssi has approximately double the dimensions of 7’. ventricosa,
but is, perhaps, slightly shorter relatively to height. The number
of anterior ribs formed in the youthful and early adult stages may
perhaps be not widely different, but the spacing of the ribs rapidly
widens in the larger form, and the interspaces may reach 8 mm. in
* Rogers and Schwarz (1), p. 10. + von Buch (1), p. 23.
98 Annals of the South African Museum.
width. In the adult 7. krausst, within a space of 33 mm. measured
backwards along the flank from the lower end of the frontal margin,
three ribs only are included. At a height, measured from the umbo,
which represents the full adult height of 7’. ventricosa, the anterior
ribs on the flank of 7. krausst are already much more robust and
more widely spaced than in 7’. ventricosa. The anterior inflation is
also much stronger. These very well-marked differences in characters
developed at a comparable stage in the two forms lead me to
separate definitely 7. krawssi from T. ventricosa. It may well be the
case that we are here dealing with two branches of a not far re-
moved ancestral stock, both of which have evolved along similar
lines, but one more rapidly than the other. The more advanced
type may be recognised in T. krawssz, from the fact that it exhibits
all the late adult characters of 7. ventricosa while yet in the early
adult stage itself; the late adult characters of 7. kraussi are never
reached in 7. ventricosa. It is highly improbable, indeed, that this
giant form merely represents extreme individual variation in T.
ventricosa, and its separation from this seems to me to be
justified.
There is a close general agreement with TJ. subventricosa
Stanton,* especially in the large dimensions, but the Patagonian
shell is relatively more elongated, has the valves less strongly
inflated, and the flattened frontal face less extensively developed.
In J. kraussi the umbonal region is more narrowed in form and
considerably more prominent, taking Dr. Stanton’s figure to repre-
sent a typical specimen of the Patagonian shell.
Both 7. ventricosa and T. krausst are figured by Krauss as repre-
sentatives of the same form, and he makes no mention of the
differences to which I have above alluded, though these are
plainly shown in the figures which accompany his description of
T. ventricosa. In deciding which of Krauss’s specimens are to
bear the name TY. ventricosa it is well to note that his descrip-
tion more accurately applies to the small specimens, and it
may further be observed that when he spoke of the species as
“particularly numerously’”’ represented he must have referred
to the smaller form. This alone has been abundantly collected
and it has also been frequently spoken of in the literature
under the name JZ’. ventricosa. Moreover, no less than six
authors have figured the smaller shells under the name given
by Krauss.
* Stanton (3), p. 18, pl. iv., figs. 19, 20
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Serves. 99
TRIGONIA ROGERSI Sp. Nov.
Plate TIL., figs. 3, 83a; IV., fig. 1; V., fig. 2.
Description.—The shell is of somewhat elongated form; it is
anteriorly high and is posteriorly more siender in outline and con-
siderably produced. The valves are moderately inflated in the
anterior half of the shell, and are posteriorly more compressed.
Anteriorly, the surface of the valve curves round towards the frontal
margin so as to give the shell some appearance of anterior flattening
or even truncation, most marked in specimens of large size. The
umbones are situated at about one-quarter of the total length from
the anterior extremity. They are prominent, well incurved, and
slightly recurved. The cardinal margin slopes down gradually,
forming a long, almost straight outline, and passes by a rather
abrupt curve into the short, convex posterior border. In front of
the umbo the valve margin falls steeply at once to form the lengthy
frontal border, gently and regularly convex in outline, which passes
by a regular and broad curve, without break, into the lower border.
This in turn has a gently convex outline, and slopes up gradually
towards the posterior margin. The greatest height falls at the umbo.
The cost of the flank are concentric in arrangement until the
close of the neanic stage, becoming then more and more downwardly
inclined, when traced from their commencement at the carinal
angle. In an adult specimen the ribs in the anterior third of the
shell are not at all curved in form as they pass obliquely down the
flank, but on the frontal face of the valve they curve rapidly so as to
approach the frontal margin horizontally. The successive cost are
more and more steeply directed until at about the middle of the
valve their direction is vertical. Posteriorly to this they have a very
slight backward inclination. The ribs in the anterior, inflated part
of the shell are prominent, strongly nodose or tubercular, and are
separated by interspaces as broad as the ribs themselves; on the
frontal face the interspaces are much wider. The ribs of the
posterior half of the shell are narrower and less prominent in
character, are only weakly nodose, and are more closely crowded
together. In a large individual, about a dozen large, prominent ribs
may be counted in the anterior part of the valve. In the early adult
period, occasional short rows of delicate nodes of unequal extent may
be intercalated on the surface between the main ribs where these
approach the valve margin on the frontal face. On the surface
of the valves clearly marked lines of growth are well seen as they
cross the interspaces, but are either little conspicuous or absent on
100 Annals of the South African Museum.
the tubercles of the ribs. In the largest individuals, characters of
senility are seen in the imperfect rib-formation near the lower
margin, and the replacement of sculpture by simple ridges and lines
of accretion at the frontal margin, where the ribs may then be seen
to terminate at some little distance from the actual margin.
For a distance of about 15 mm. from the umbonal apex a very
delicately nodose, narrow marginal carina is present. It then
dwindles abruptly and disappears, while the carinal angle becomes
less marked when traced posteriorly and is replaced ultimately by a
gentle and rounded fold of the valve surface.
The area is very narrow anteriorly, and gradually broadens
posteriorly. For a distance of about 15 mm. from the umbonal
apex it is ornamented by delicate, slightly granular, transverse ridges
separated by narrow grooves. The terminations of these ridges at
the carinal angle do not correspond strictly with the upper termina-
tions of the ribs on the flank, but the ridges on the area are rather
more numerous than these. Each of the ridges terminates inwardly
in a delicate, transversely elongated node, a row of which takes the
place of an inner carina. Ata distance greater than 15 mm. from
the umbonal apex the area is without sculpture, though two or three
further inner-carinal nodes may be present. The area is divided by
a well-marked longitudinal groove into a narrower, superior, and
broader inferior portion. The groove is continued right to the
posterior margin. At the posterior end of a specimen measuring
84 mm. in length, the area is about 20 mm. in breadth. The
escutcheon is of great size and length, and at the middle of the shell
it is much wider than the area. In its anterior half it is of well-
excavated, concave form. Its ornaments consist of numerous, fine,
beaded ridges or lines of delicate nodes passing from the inner-
carinal nodes rather obliquely backwards across to the cardinal
margin. At 30 mm. from the umbonal apex these ornamenting lines
cease to be formed, and several of them situated posteriorly in the
series do not extend to the cardinal margin. Posteriorly, the inner
carinal ridge of the valve becomes obsolete and the smooth
escutcheon ill-defined. The ligament space is relatively long,
measuring 18 mm. in length in a specimen having a length of
84mm. In each valve it shows at the cardinal margin a straight
lath-like ridge, becoming gradually thinner when traced back from
the umbo, separated from the escutcheon by a straight, deep, narrow
groove.
The central tooth of the left valve is of relatively great size and
prominence, and its inferior indentation is deep. The inner surface
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Serves. 101
of the valve margin is smooth, in the anterior part of the shell at
least. If there is any crenulation at all, it is confined to the posterior
half of the valve, and must be of a weak description.
Dimensions.— (1) (2) (3)
hength (estimaitied)) <25.....2.6.+.00- 78 ; 84 : 135 mm.
GreatestiWerghh s.tsicceceeseecdee ee 53 : 58 : G2;
Greatest poe of a single valve 19 23 5 32: 4,
Obtained by Mr. Rogers got a bare slope W. 30S.
from the middle of Barkly Bridge, on the farm Olifant’s Kop,
Sunday’s River (20h) ; also from Coega Valley, east of the railway,
one mile up the line from Coega station (472g).
Remarks.—This is an elongated representative of the section
Scabre, and, generally speaking, it exhibits the normal characters
of the section. It is remarkable, however, for its very large size and
for the manner in which it shares the character of posterior elonga-
tion with other Trigoni@ from the Uitenhage beds and from the
Oomia beds of Cutch. This prolongation at the siphonal end, and
the absence of sculpture from the area in the later adult stages are
characters similarly shown in members of the group of Trigonia vau
and in ZT’. conocardiifornis (Uitenhage Series) and in members of the
group of 7’. v-scripta and certain degenerate Costatee (in the Oomia
beds). There are evidences of degeneracy in all these forms. In the
specimen numbered (2) in the above table of measurements, one valve
is almost complete at the siphonal border, and the form of the valve
at that part suggests that in the complete shell a slight posterior
gape may have been developed, just as in 7’. stow2.
In the neanic and early adult stages, 7’. rogersz bears a consider-
able resemblance to the same stages in 7’. ventricosa (Krauss). It
differs, however, in details of the sculpture on the area and escutcheon,
and with advancing growth, the characters of outline, degree of
inflation, and ribbing of the shell are so widely distinct in the two
forms as to need no comparison here.
TRIGONIA HERZOGI (Goldfuss).
Plate V., fig, 1
1837. Lyrodon herzogiti (Hausmann) A. Goldfuss, Petrefacta
Germaniz, Band ii., Lief. 6, p. 202, Tab. cxxxvii.,
fig. 6.
1850. Lyrodon herzogii F. Krauss, Nov. Act. Acad. Cas, Leop.-
Carol. Nat. Cur., vol. xxii., pt. 2,'p. 453, Tab. 48,
fig. 3.
102 Annals of the South African Museum.
1882. Trigonia herzogi G. Steinmann, Neues Jahrbuch fiir Mine-
ralogie, Band i,)p..220) Mat. vil, figs, 12 latex
figs. 1,2.
Occurrence.—This is an abundant and characteristic form in the
Sunday’s River Beds. It was recorded by Hausmann from the
neighbourhood of Enon, and by Krauss from the left bank of the
Zwartkop’s River below Uitenhage; also by Stow * from various
localities on the Sunday’s and Zwartkop’s Rivers. A fine specimen
sent to me from the South African Museum is from the Sunday’s
River (289). Messrs. Rogers and Schwarz found T. herzogi on the
north side of the Zwartkop’s River at a locality to the west of
Rawson Bridge, and at Picnic Bush; also further up the river on the
road from Perseverance Farm to the Salt Pan, and at Cuyler Manor.
Near Uitenhage, they record this form from two beds of sandstone
exposed in dry watercourses on the ascent of the Grass Ridge road ;
in the railway cutting between milestones 2441-243 on the Graaff-
Reinet railway; and on the road to Hillwacht, where the path leaves
the plain. On the Sunday’s River it was found near the top of the
white krantz on Wolve Kraal, on the north bank of the river.
The collection made in 1905 by Mr. Rogers includes several
specimens of 7. herzogi, which came from the following localities: the
left side of Coega Valley, two miles down from the railway (468g) ;
from the valley east of the railway, one mile up the line from
Coega station (4742); the cliff on Buck Kraal, Sunday’s River
(116h, 120h, 122h); and the cliffs on Zoet Geneugd, Sunday’s
River (99h).
LRemarks.—Trigonia herzogi is well known from the striking figure
given by Goldfuss, illustrating a fine specimen which was included
in a small collection of Uitenhage molluses obtained by Hertzog.
These had been previously noticed briefly by Hausmann in his
paper on the geology of South Africa.| The shell is conspicuous
for its large size and elongated outline, its straight and lengthened
cardinal margin and its straight, nodose ribs, backwardly inclined
in the posterior half of a fully grown valve. It was referred by
Pictet and by Lycett to the section Quadrate. An excellent figure
of the shell was given also by Steinmann, who included 7. herzogi
with T. transitoria Steinm. in the group Pseudo-quadrate, the
characters of which are briefly discussed below in the remarks
appended to the description of Trigonia holubi. Steinmann has set
forth in great detail the differences that distinguish 7. herzogi from
* Stow (1), pp. 498-505. + Hausmann (1), p. 1458.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 103
T. transitoria, which occurs in Neocomian strata in Bolivia, Chili,
and the Argentine Republic. 7’. transitoria shows a closer approxi-
mation of characters to the Clavellate; it is not so elongated in
outline, and its strongly nodose ribs have a curved form and a forward
sweep when traced downwards, throughout almost the whole extent
of the flank. In TZ. transitoria the rows of nodes representing
the marginal and median carinee become joined by transverse rounded
ridges at an earlier growth-stage than in 7’. herzogi, in which these
rows of nodes, and that representing the inner carina, remain
isolated and distinctly developed until traced farther back towards
the siphonal margin of a fully grown individual. The escutcheon
is smooth in its anterior part in 7. transitoria, while ornamented at
an early stage in the African shell; in 7’. transitoria the escutcheon,
generally speaking, is more sparsely sculptured.
I have elsewhere pointed out the features of distinction between
T. herzogt and 7’. mamillata, from the Oomia beds of Cutch.*
T. mamillata shares the principal characters of the Pseudo-quadrate,
but is a shorter shell than 7. herzogi, and is vertically truncated
in front. In 7. mamullata those ribs situated at the centre of the
flank, and posteriorly to this, are slightly curved, and are directed
anteriorly at their lower ends, while the corresponding ribs of
T. herzogi are backwardly directed and are not curved. On the
area of 7’. mamillata, the rows of more or less isolated nodes become
united to form smooth transverse ribs nearer to the umbo than in
the African form, in which, also, the lines of nodes and transverse
ridges of the area are rather more closely spaced. In 7. mamillata
the tubercles are more closely crowded together in the ribs of the
flank and are, generally speaking, more robust and conspicuous than in
T. herzogt, particularly in relation to the size of the valve. The blunt
transverse ridges of the area towards the posterior end of an adult
specimen are broader and more strongly developed than in 7’. herzogi.
A comparison with Trigonia holubi is given in the remarks which
follow the description of that form.
Two specimens depicted in the left-hand side of a text-figure
published by Drs. Hatch and Corstorphine + represent J. herzogi,
but very greatly reduced in size.
TRIGONIA HOLUBI sp. nov.
Plate IV., figs. 2, 2a.
Description.—The shell is large and massive, almost oblong in
outline, and usually vertically truncated in front, or with very steep
* Kitchin (1), p. 102. + Hatch and Corstorphine (1), p. 245, fig. 66.
104 Annals of the South African Museum.
forward obliquity ; the length is greater than the height. The nearly
terminal umbones are little conspicuous and weakly incurved. The
cardinal margin forms an almost straight line and slopes back very
gently from the umbo. It forms posteriorly a sub-angular junction
with the relatively long, slightly convex siphonal margin. The
frontal margin is very slightly convex, more seldom quite straight,
in outline, and passes below by a sharp curve or sub-angular junction
into the lower border; this is more convex in profile. The inflation
of the valves is relatively weak; the greatest height occurs at about
the middle of the valve. A flattened frontal face is well developed
in fully grown specimens. There is no definite carinal angle, but the
area is well demarcated by the limits of its particular sculpture, which
is contrasted with that of the flank.
The sculpture of the flank in the young shell consists of relatively
strong concentric nodular ribs, four of which are already developed
when the shell has attained a height of 10 mm. Subsequently formed
ribs increase rapidly in prominence and robustness and become
steeply inclined, so that after about ten ribs are developed all reach
the inferior margin. The ribs of the adult shell consist of rows of
large and prominent tubercles, some of which reach a diameter
of 5 mm. Most of the ribs have a forward sweep when traced
downwards ; an approximately vertical direction is attained only by
those ribs situated in the posterior half of a fully grown valve, and
these also are slightly curved in form, with the convex side directed
posteriorly. The interspaces are rather narrower than the tubercles
of the ribs. In the early and middle adult stages, the tubercles com-
posing the ribs are well separated from one another on a given rib.
In the late adult and senile stages the tubercles become closely
crowded together and are contiguous. Towards the lower border of
a fully grown individual the tubercles tend to become elongated in a
direction parallel to the shell margin, and they may appear to coalesce
with prominent ridges of growth. With senility the ribs become im-
perfectly developed, while crowded ridges and furrows of growth are
more marked near the pallial margin. In the lower half of the
anterior portion of the flank in an adult specimen some tubercles
are somewhat unevenly dispersed, giving rise to an appearance of
irregularity, with departure from the strictly linear arrangement.
In a fully grown specimen about sixteen ribs are developed on the
flank.
The area in the neanic stage is crossed by transverse ribs con-
tinuous with those of the flank. In the early and middle adult
stages no ribs are developed upon it; but a line of tubercles limits
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uttenhage Series. 105
the area above, a second row of less well-defined tubercles is situated
just below the longitudinal groove, while a third row of well-spaced
stronger tubercles limits the area below. Prominent transverse ridges
or irregular ribs cross the area in the posterior half of an adult
individual, terminating above and below in the marginal tubercles
and also between them. These ridges make their first appearance
somewhat abruptly, and become more strongly marked and also
more irregular in their form and spacing towards the posterior end
of the area, in a well-grown individual. A few may even pass over
to the flank and be there partly identified with ridges of growth.
The longitudinal groove of the area, which divides it into a
narrower, superior, and broader inferior portion, forms a constriction
in each transverse ridge.
The escutcheon is narrow and relatively very elongated. It is
ornamented by irregular rows of coarse tubercles or prominent ridges
which pass very obliquely across its surface and terminate anteriorly
at the cardinal margin. They are seen to be frequently continuous
with the ornaments of the area. The ligament pit is of narrow and
elongated lanceolate form, and in a large individual extends to half
the length of the escutcheon.
The central tooth of the left valve is very massive and prominent,
with relatively narrow apical angle. The anterior tooth of the right
valve is supported by a well-raised platform. At the posterior end
of the valves the raised ridge on the internal surface which separates
the siphonal channels is situated high up in the siphonal border
and is of relatively great strength and extent; in a fully grown
individual it can be traced for at least 25 mm. from the margin.
Dimensions.— (1) (2) (3) (4)
Length (about) ......... 98 Fo AO) 3) 20 2) l32inam:
Greatest height ...... 75 ; 78 : 87 ; eo)
Depth of asingle valve 18 ‘ 20 22 3 DiS sy,
Occurrence.—Specimens in the collection of the South African
Museum came from the Sunday’s River (285 to 288, 290 to 296, 299).
Mr. Rogers collected this form on the left side of Coega Valley, half
a mile down from the railway (458g). An immature specimen from
Brentford, Knysna Estuary (150h), is also probably referable to
LT. holwbt.
Remarks.—The characters of this shell appear to be on the whole
very well defined, while the valves are especially conspicuous both
by their large dimensions and their salient ornamentation. Most of
the specimens submitted to me, in all of which the shell is replaced
by coarsely crystalline calcite, have had the surface considerably
106 Annals of the South African Musewm.
corroded by weathering. In these specimens the etching has attacked
the shell along lines of weakness, and has brought the tubercles and
ornamenting ridges into undue relief, which results in an appearance
so deceptive that for some time I was in doubt whether these etched
specimens should not be regarded as a distinct form. A careful
comparison between these individuals and others which have not
suffered from weathering shows that they agree in all essential
characters and that a separation cannot on present evidence be
established. In addition to differences due to preservation, there is
some variation in the sculpture of the area and escutcheon which
may be noted here. The transverse ornaments of the area are in
some individuals more robustly developed than in others; on the
escutcheon the linear coalescence of tubercles to form parallel,
obliquely running ridges is more complete and regular in some
specimens than in others, and the ridges replace the isolated
tubercles at an earlier stage of growth. There is also some variation
in the arrangement of the tubercles in the lower half of the flank of
adult specimens near the frontal margin. The lower terminations
of the ribs here tend to turn forwards along the more prominent
ridges of growth; some of the tubercles may appear to blend with
these ridges, which turn up sharply at the frontal face. Another
point in which some variation is shown is in the form of the anterior
profile of the shell. In some specimens there is vertical truncation
in front, in others the outline of the anterior margin slopes forward
somewhat, when traced down from the umbones, so that the foremost
point of the shell is situated near to the junction of the inferior and
anterior margins.
This is the form referred to by Sharpe as a Trigonia allied to
T. herzogi; he gave the following description of specimens which
were presented by J. 8. Bowerbank to the Geological Society of
London: ‘‘ Trigonia sp.(?). This variety (or possibly distinct
species) is closely allied to Trigonia herzogi, but is more quadrate
in outline than the common variety, the anterior edge being
truncate; and the costal rows of knobs turn forward as they
approach the ventral border, instead of passing downwards and
backwards. These specimens came from Algoa Bay, and apparently
have been derived from the Sunday River district, from the aspect
of their matrix.” *
T. holwbi clearly cannot be united with either the Clavellatz or
the Quadratz, but its characters are those of the somewhat inter-
mediate kind which led Steinmann to establish the group Pseudo-
* Sharpe (1), p. 202.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 107
quadrate, to receive Trigonia herzogi (Goldf.), the well-known
Uitenhage form, and TJ. transitoria Steinmann, from Lower
Cretaceous strata in Chili, Bolivia, and the Argentine Republic.*
T. neuquensis Burckhardt,+ which is found associated with T. transi-
toria in the Neocomian Trigonia-beds of Las Lajas (Rio Agrio,
Argentine Republic), also falls within this division, and another
example of the same group is 7. mamillata, which occurs in the
Oomia Trigonia-beds near Goonaree in Cutch.} These five members
of the Pseudo-quadrate show similar deviation from the characters of
the two sections with which they may best be compared. Like the
Quadrate, they have the escutcheon well ornamented, and the
sculpture of the area is in some respects very similar, especially in
the manner in which transverse ridges, particularly in the late adult
stage, may pass over to the escutcheon on the one hand and the
flank on the other. These characters contribute largely to distin-
guish the group from the Clavellate, with which, both as regards
the youthful ornamentation and the adult form, it has much in
common. In the Quadratz the area is usually divided by its longi-
tudinal groove into a broader, superior, and narrower inferior
portion ; in the Pseudo-quadratz the upper division is the narrower.
A row of impressions or pits on the inner valve surface, near the
pallial margin towards the posterior end, is present in the Quadratze
but absent in the Pseudo-quadrate. In accordance with the position
of the longitudinal groove of the area, the lower siphonal channel on
the inner valve surface is relatively broad in the Pseudo-quadratie,
and may be almost twice as broad as the upper one.
T. holubt is most closely comparable with the Indian 7. mamillata,
to which it shows a striking similarity. In 7. holwbi, however, the
valve has a rather less convex form, the longitudinal groove of
the area is more strongly marked, and the tubercles of the ribs
in the early and middle adult stages are much less closely spaced.
The most important point of distinction lies in the development of
the sculpture of the area. In T. mamuillata the phase in which
irregular transverse costz crossing the area form a dominant feature
is reached at a much earlier stage of growth than in 7. holubv.
Thus, in 7. manullata, strongly developed costz appear on the area
soon after the neanic stage is passed and long before half the adult
dimensions are attained. In 7’. holwbi, save for the longitudinal
groove and its accompanying line of tubercles, the surface of the
area is smooth, and only marked by lines of growth, until at least
* Steinmann (2). + Burckhardt (2), p. 74, Taf. xiv., figs. 4-6.
{ Kitchin (1)}p) 100, pl. ix., figs. "8,95 pl. x. figs: 1-3:
108 Annals of the South African Museum.
half the adult dimensions are attained. The transverse ribs which
are subsequently developed on the area are not so well defined or so
robust as in 7. mamillata.
From Trigonia herzogi (Goldf.),* T. holubi is readily distinguished
by the considerably shorter form, the vertical anterior truncation,
the more crowded and much more prominent character of the flank
ornaments, and the later appearance of transverse sculpture on the
area. In the middle of the flank of an adult specimen, the ribs of
T. herzogi are straight, while those of 7. holubi are curved. The
backward slope of the posterior flank ribs in 7’. herzogi is another
point of distinction.
There is a marked general similarity to Tvrigonia transitorva
Steinmann,+ from South America, but the ornamentation differs
considerably. In TY. transitoria the tubercles of the costz on the
flank are placed closely against one another through all adult stages
instead of being openly spaced as in the ribs of T. holubi. In T. tran-
sitoria also, the development of transverse ridges on the area comes
in at a much earlier stage of growth, and, in fact, this ornamentation
is a marked character during a large part of the adult life. There
appear to be other points of difference which it 1s unnecessary to
enumerate.
T. neuquensis Burckhardt is at once readily distinguished from
T. holubt by its much shorter and higher outline. Here, also, the
transverse ridges of the area become a marked feature at an earlier
growth-stage than in 7. holubi. In T. newguensis, the manner in
which these ridges in the posterior part of the shell extend down-
ward on to the flank is much more marked than in the most advanced
stage in 7’. holubt.
Note on the Development of the Pseudo-quadrate Trigonie.
A strong contrast between the features of the neanic and adult
stages may be observed very frequently in species belonging to
various sections of this widely conceived genus, but it is seldom that
a transition in characters so marked and abrupt as that shown in
T. holubi is seen to occur during the adult period. The sudden
acquirement of strong transverse ridges on the area, a character
which is accompanied by a change in the manner of development
* Goldfuss (1), Band ii., p. 202, Tab. 137, fig. 5 (1837).
+ Steinmann (1), p. 260, Taf. ili., fig. 3; Steinmann (2), p. 221, Taf. vii.,
figs. 3, 4, Taf. viii., figs. 1-8; Burckhardt (1), p. 21, pl. xxv., figs. 1-8;
Burckhardt (2), p. 73, Taf. xiv., figs. 1, 2.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 109
of the tubercles of the flank coste—they become crowded closely
together on a given rib—is a very striking feature. In 7. mamullata
from Cutch, these characters are also coincident, but they are
acquired at a much earlier pevicd of growth. The members of the
Pseudo-quadratw, in the three continents where they are known
to occur, seem to have been destined to pass through a similar
sequence of developmental phases, but these phases were not
reached by all the species at the same time. Thus, 7. mamuillata
is in advance of T. holubt. In T. holubi, the stage where the area
is demarcated by an upper and lower marginal row of tubercles and
marked by a median longitudinal row, persists until half the adult
dimensions have been reached. In 7. mamillata, this trituberculate
stage is passed over rapidly and is superseded in very early adult
life. In 7. herzogz it is superseded by the transversely costate stage
(the area alone is still referred to) at a somewhat later period of
development, but still not so late as in 7. holwbi. A point of great
interest is that in 7. mamillata and T. herzogi, and also in
T. transitoria, the trituberculate stage may be seen to pass into
the transversely costate stage by the progressive transverse elonga-
tion of the tubercles in the three sets, and the gradual coalescence
of the transverse ridges thus formed. In TZ. holubi, this inter-
mediate phase of development is not so noticeable: it is very much
suppressed or is wholly omitted.
The facts here briefly set forth seem to suggest that the group
Pseudo-quadratze may be of an artificial character to some extent—
that the forms here included for convenience of classification are not
strictly homogenetic ; and many known parallel instances amongst
molluses and brachiopods give great probability to the truth of this
idea. We must suppose all these forms to have been descended from
true Clavellatz, just as in the case of the Quadratee of Europe, and
it is a very striking circumstance that the characters which mark
the Pseudo-quadrate should appear approximately at the same
geological moment of time in three widely remote continents.
Yet these forms are unknown in the European area. The Post-
jurassic development shown by the Quadrats# and Pseudo-quadrate,
each group representing offshoots from one or more clavellate stocks,
took place along parallel though independent lines in the European
area and in the southern development with which we are dealing.
Within each area, again, the development in the supposed several
genetic series (which were departing along the same general lines
from the ancestral clavellate characters) may be supposed to have
been in some degree independent.
110 Amnals of the South African Museum.
Confining our attention to the Pseudo-quadrate, it is difficult to
believe that the salient characters by which all the members are
distinguished could have been called forth by the ordinary process
of natural selection alone. The acquirement of costation on the
area coincident in direction with lines of accretion; the encroach-
ment of this simple ornament from the area to the transcrescently
sculptured flank in the late adult and senile stages; the prodigal
expenditure of shell substance in producing massive sculpture of an
increasingly irregular type in these same growth-stages; and the
evident variation in many characters which indicates a certain
instability of type; all these point to racial degeneracy. A com-
parison of the Pseudo-quadrate from India, South Africa, and South
America, shows that in all of them this degeneracy was expressed
as the culmination of a definite sequence of developmental phases.
The facts do not warrant the supposition that the members of
the group were wholly independent of one another. Their simi-
larity in leading characters was perhaps due, in varying degree, to
a number of causes: a certain community of ancestry; continued
intercourse until checked by divergence; and at the same time the
constant influence of natural selection; all these may have played
a part. But it seems difficult to escape from the belief that innate
racial tendencies of a very definite kind found their expression in
representatives of these Trigonia-stocks at the same geological
period. Had the members of these genetic series been more
passive, so to speak; had they been more plastic and more com-
pletely amenable to the call of natural selection, it is scarcely con-
ceivable that environmental conditions should not have occurred
at some earlier time which would be capable of producing closely
similar results. But the advent of the Quadrate in Europe, and of
the comparable though independent Pseudo-quadratee of the south,
took place, so far as we know, invariably in Neocomian times.
TRIGONIA VAU Sharpe.
Plate VI., figs. 1, ta, 2, 2a, 20, 3.
1856. Trigonia vaw D. Sharpe, Trans. Geol. Soc. Lond., ser. 2,
vol. wil, ps LO4 ple exis tices:
? 1867. Trigoma vau R. Tate, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxiil.,
pl vil, fe.6:
Occurrence.—The record of occurrence given by Sharpe was
“Sunday River, in greenish-grey grit, with fragments of wood
and shells; and in a shelly grit at the Zwartkop River.” Speci-
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. ia
mens preserved in the collection of the Geological Society of
London are labelled ‘Sunday River’? (Atherstone and Bain),
“Prince Alfred’s Rest’? (Rubidge), and “ Zwartkop River”
(Rubidge). Specimens sent to me from the South African
Museum are from the Sunday’s River. Messrs. Rogers and
Schwarz record 7. vaw from the following localities: in the neigh-
bourhood of Uitenhage, ascending the Grass Ridge road, in the
uppermost of three beds of sandstone exposed in the dry water-
courses, and in the railway cutting between milestones 244-24? on
the Graaff-Reinet line; on Sunday’s River, in the upper beds exposed
in a white krantz on Wolve Kraal, on the north bank of the river.
In 1905 Mr. Rogers collected specimens 300 yards below Addo
Drift (Tunbridge’s), left bank of Sunday’s River (40h, 41h, 42h).
An immature specimen (46h) from the same locality, may also
belong to Trigonia vau.
Remarks.—A large specimen of T. vaw sent to me from the South
African Museum attains a height of 50 mm., measured from the
umbo. The ribbing of the flank ceases to be developed at a distance
of nearly 10 mm. from the inferior margin, in the neighbourhood
of which the shell surface is marked only by ridges and furrows of
growth.
Sharpe gave a very accurate and characteristic figure of this
remarkable form, but the differences which distinguish J. vaw from
T’. stow? appear up to the present to have escaped observation, and
it is probable that the shells cited under the name J. vaw by Stow *
are in reality to be ascribed to.7. stowi sp. nov. I have had the
opportunity of examining and comparing a considerable number
of excellently preserved specimens of these two Trigonie, and find
that the characters which distinguish them from one another are
very constant. Several fully-grown shells of 7. vaw sent to me from
South Africa agree very perfectly with the original type and other
individuals in the collection of the Geological Society. The points
of distinction which may be readily observed in the adult shells of
T. vaw and T. stowi are set forth in the remarks which follow the
description of the latter. During the youthful growth-stage, how-
ever, these two forms cannot be separated, so that it is uncertain
to which must be ascribed a young specimen obtained by Messrs.
Rogers and Schwarz at Walton’s Farm, just below Dunbrodie on
the Sunday’s River (307), and another individual measuring 17 mm.
in length, collected between milestones 244-242 on the Graaff-Reinet
railway (309). There is the same doubt concerning an immature
* Stow (1), pp. 499-505.
(1), ¥
112 Annals of the South African Musewm.
specimen from Addo Drift (46h). For the same reason it is uncer-
tain whether the young individual figured by Tate really represents
the true 7. vau. Tate’s figure, which represents the specimen in
twice the natural size, unfortunately does not give a very satisfactory
picture of the youthful characters of either of these shells.
The close agreement in the characters of the neanic stage reveals
the near relationship of these two forms, and, indeed, such a rela-
tionship might reasonably be inferred from a comparison of adult
characters, which coincide in a remarkable manner as regards the
ribbing of the flank and the posterior elongation. Other shells,
however, which when adult exhibit similar peculiarities of form
and ornamentation, differ widely from TJ. vaw and its associate
when in the youthful stage. These are the members of the
Trigonia v-scripta group in the marine Oomia beds of Cutch,*
and a comparison of their youthful characters and those of 7. vaw
and 7’. stowt is given in the remarks which are appended to the
description of the latter. J. stowi when adult approaches closely
in many particulars to 7. v-scripta itself, but the adult 7. vaw agrees
much more closely with T. dubia Kitchin, so far as the unsatis-
factorily preserved Indian specimens allow of comparison. In
consequence of imperfect preservation, the nature of the sculpture
in the youthful stage of JT. dubia is not known, but it appears
reasonable to assume that it bears closer relationship to the other
members of the group of T. v-scripta than to T. vaw. In the adult
stages, too, points of distinction between T. dubia and T. vaw are
not wanting. These have been set forth in my account of the
characters of T. dubiat+ as follows: “In T. vau, the ribs of
the anterior series, though narrow and crowded as in ZT. dubia,
are seen to be upwardly inclined as they depart from their point
of meeting with the posterior series. and are crossed obliquely by
the lines of growth. In 7. dubia, on the other hand, these anterior
coste are placed in a direction quite, or almost, parallel to the
inferior border, and the angle of the lateral V is therefore not
so acute. Moreover, before individuals of JT. vaw have reached
half their full dimensions, the costz of the frontal series cease to
be formed close to the frontal border. There arises, therefore, a
space devoid of ornamenting ribs, marked only by ridges and
furrows of growth, and bounded posteriorly by the last-formed
obliquely directed costae of the frontal series. This peculiar
character is totally absent in 7. dubia, in no specimen of which
is a frontal unsculptured space seen, although in respect to size
* Kitchin (1), p. 65. { Ibid., p. 69.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 113
all the individuals examined considerably exceed the dimensions at
which this feature becomes noticeable in T. vau. . . . Sharpe’s type
is of larger dimensions than the known specimens of T. dubia.”
The extent to which an unsculptured space near the lower part of
the frontal margin may be present in J. vaw is really somewhat
variable, but a few of the lowest ribs of the anterior series seem
always to fail to extend at their upper terminations to the valve
margin. In some individuals, two or three of these lower ribs may
be slightly bent down at their anterior ends in manner reminiscent
of the strong, angular bending at the front end of these ribs in
T. stowi, as well as in the Indian 7. v-scripta. It may also be
noted that although the inclination of the frontal series of coste in
T. vau is always as steep as in the specimen depicted in Sharpe’s
figure, yet these ribs may in some instances attain a stronger
development and may be of a rather more robust character.
A shell possibly related to 7. vau is T. kiihni G. Miiller,* from
Neocomian strata at a locality 23 km. west-south-west of Mtshinga
in German East Africa. To judge from the description and figures,
this is distinguished by an angular rib arrangement very similar to
that exhibited by the members of the group of 7. v-scrzpta in India,
and J’. vaw and T. stowz in South Africa. TZ’. kiihna seems to differ,
however, by its less equilateral form and the persistent ornamenta-
tion of its area. The figure of an imperfect specimen of 7. kiihnz
(fig. 8) shows a curved frontal profile and the ribs of the frontal
series obliquely crossing the growth-lines in manner that recalls
the same characters in 7. vauw, though still. more reminiscent
of 7. recurva Kitchin, from the Oomia beds. It is as yet not
possible to say, however, whether 7’. kiihnz is more nearly related to
T. vau or to the group of T. v-scripta, though it may be anticipated
that a study of the youthful characters will ultimately throw light on
this point.
Trigonia heterosculpta Stanton,} from the Belgrano beds (Lower
Cretaceous) of Patagonia, is very probably closely related to 7’. vau,
but differs by the much shorter and more elevated triangular figure.
The first-formed ribs of the posterior series are vertical or backwardly
inclined, and not forwardly sloped as in JZ. vau, while several
successive anterior ribs terminate abruptly on the flank of a single
vertical posterior rib. In the neanic stage, however, the plan of
sculpture as well as the form of the valve appears to agree closely
with that of 7. vaw.
* G. Miller (1), p. 561, Taf. xxv., figs. 6-8.
+ Stanton (3), p. 20, pl. iv., figs. 16-18.
114 Annals of the South African Musewm.
R. A. Philippi* has figured some Chilian forms (for example,
T. arsinoe Philippi, 7’. foveata Philippi) which may be related to
T. vaw; they are characterised by great posterior elongation, very
convex anterior profile, and two series of ribs on the flank meeting
at an angle. The general aspect, indeed, at once suggests the
probability of relationship with the two South African types, but the
Chilian shells are so unsatisfactorily figured, and their preservation
appears to have been so imperfect that further and critical com-
parison is not possible.
Whiteaves has drawn attention to the features wherein Trigonia
diversicostata Whiteaves,+ from the Cretaceous of Queen Charlotte
Islands, bears resemblance to 7’. vaw. These are: the elongated and
posteriorly strongly produced figure of the shell, the convex anterior
profile and recurved umbonal region, and the general plan of
sculpture on the flank. In 7. diversicostata, however, the anterior
ribs are much coarser in character than in 7’. vaw, and are directed
almost parallel to the lower valve margin, thus forming a right angle
with the posterior ribs instead of an acute angle. A good distinctive
feature is seen in the area of the Canadian shell, which is coarsely
ornamented by strong longitudinal ribs, and this alone is sufficient
to indicate that the two forms are in no way nearly related, but that
the common characters of shape and broad plan of flank sculp-
ture have been quite independently attained. Whiteaves ascribes
T. diversicostata to the section Scaphoidesw, but all members of this
division bear evidence of a clavellate ancestry, and longitudinal
ornamenting ridges on the area are unknown amongst them. Such
ornaments are essentially characteristic of the Costatee, from which
T. diversicostata was quite probably derived, and rapid divergence
from the typical pattern of the section might well result in this
aberrant form, in manner analogous to that exhibited in some of the
modified Costatz of the marine Oomia beds in Cutch. TJ. vaw
shows no signs of a connection with the section Costatz at any
early growth-stage that can be studied, but the ornaments of the
area are transverse from the first.
The peculiarly ornamented Trigomia doroschint HKichwald,{ from
the Neocomian of Tukusitnu Bay (Alaska), may finally be brought
into comparison. This appears to me, however, to be well separated
from the group of 7’. vaw (as well as from the group of 7’. v-scripta
in India) by the more truncated and less convex anterior margin and
by the manner in which the frontal ribs are directed at right angles
* R. A. Philippi (1), pls. 34, 35. + Whiteaves (1), p. 68, pl. x., fig. 1.
+ Hichwald (2), p. 180, pl. xiii., figs 12-14; xiv., figs. 1-4.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Urtenhage Series. 115
to the frontal margin. It seems doubtful from Hichwald’s figures
whether a single form alone is represented, for it is difficult to
believe that the originals of pl. xiii., fig. 12, pl. xiv., fig. 1, and
pl. xiv., fig. 3 can belong to one species. Other points in which
these differ from 7’. vaw are the great extent of the frontal ribs, the
horizontal position of these, and the persistent transverse ornaments
on the area. Hichwald’s description and figures leave the affinities
of T. doroschini obscure, but I think it improbable that it is related
to the group of 7’. vau.
TRIGONIA STOWL sp. nov.
Plate VI., figs. 4, 4a, 40,5; VII., fig. 1.
Description.—The shell is of very elongated form, moderately
inflated, anteriorly pointed, posteriorly very much produced, and
slightly gaping at the siphonal margin. The umbones are situated
at some point lying between one-quarter and one-third of the
shell’s total length from the anterior extremity; they are well
incurved and slightly recurved. The umbonal region is fairly
prominent and inflated. Posteriorly to the umbo, the very long
cardinal margin forms a straight or very gently concave outline and
passes posteriorly by a curve into the short, convex siphonal margin.
Anteriorly to the umbo, the valve margin slopes downwards with
straight profile to the projecting anterior extremity, where it forms a
sub-angular or sharply curved junction with the lower margin; the
latter forms a gentle and evenly convex profile as it is traced between
the anterior and posterior extremities of the shell.
At no stage of growth is a marginal carina developed; in the
youthful stage its place is represented by a blunt carinal fold which
passes with advancing growth into a still broader and less well
defined rounded fold of the valve. At the siphonal end of an adult
individual this loses definition and the valve becomes evenly convex.
In the youthful shell, until the valve attains a height of about
8 mm. measured from the umbonal apex, the ornamentation
consists of numerous, crowded linear ribs which are parallel to the
iower margin and extend from the frontal border across the flank ;
they pass over the carinal angle and across the area. Up to a
distance of between 5 mm.and 10 mm. from the umbonal apex these
ribs extend across the escutcheon also, and terminate either at the
cardinal margin or just before reaching it. Subsequently they cross
the area though not the escutcheon, until a distance of about 10 or
12 mm. from the umbonal apex is reached, after which they occupy
the flank only, terminating at the carinal angle, while the area subse-
116 Annals of the South African Musewm.
quently remains smooth. In the space between 10 mm. and 20 mm.
from the umbonal apex, the very blunt ridge demarcating the area
from the escutcheon is ornamented by minute, transversely elongated
nodes or short raised lines, each measuring about one millimetre in
length. Ata distance of about 10 mm. below the umbo the ribs on
the flank become bent down in the middle in angular form and
become more widely spaced. The transition from the straight to
the angularly bent flank-ribs is somewhat sudden. Three or four
bent ribs are successively produced, having a more delicate anterior
and more robust posterior limb, and an increasing acuteness of the
angle. Subsequently, an anterior and a posterior series of inclined
ribs may be spoken of, not strictly coinciding with each other in
number. The anterior ribs, numbering about 14-16 in the adult,
often cease to extend to the frontal margin after the shell has attained
half its adult dimensions; their upper, anterior terminations are
situated on the flank at an increasing distance from the margin, and
forming acute angles with these, with upwardly directed apices, are
several short, steeply inclined, weak and rather broader ribs. Each
of these is only a few millimetres in length and might be considered
to represent the downwardly bent anterior termination of a rib of
the anterior series. The most forward portion of the flank is usually
devoid of sculpture and marked only by ridges and furrows of
accretion. The lowest ribs of the anterior series become in
varying degree irregularly nodose or broken into wavy lines of nodes
with loss of regularity near the lower valve margin. The ribs of the
posterior series have their upper termination at first close to the
carinal fold, and successively at a gradually increasing distance
from this, so that a narrow portion of the flank adjacent to the fold
is smooth. These ribs are not developed to the posterior end of the
flank in the adult, but there is here a smooth tract only marked by
lines of growth. The ribs of the posterior series, developed to the
number of about 14, are very steeply inclined, and all have a slight
forward slope. They are of rounded form, are about 3 mm. in
breadth, and have slightly narrower interspaces.
The area is relatively narrow, and is marked throughout the adult
period by a longitudinal linear depression. In the posterior half of
the area this marks off a narrow superior and broader inferior
portion. There is no defined inner carina, and the line of delicate
and imperfectly developed nodes which marks the inner limit of the
area at a distance of 10-20 mm. from the umbonal apex is a
transitory feature, and does not persist with subsequent growth.
The escutcheon is relatively very long and is of lanceolate form, and
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Urtenhage Serves. uy
though imperfectly demarcated from the area, it is marked by its
excavated form and smooth surface. Ridges of growth which cross
the area are replaced by very delicate and scarcely perceptible lines
of accretion on the escutcheon. At a distance of 15 mm. from the
umbones the escutcheon in each valve is fully as broad as the area.
The ligament pit is relatively short and broad.
Dimensions. — (1) (2) (3)
Greatest) lene pling. .sccoc...2-2-citcene 80 ; 95 0) ELOr mame
Height, measured from the umbo 42 : 44 ‘ i510) ee
Greatest depth of a single valve... 14 : 15 F DOs iss
Occurrence.—Marine Beds of Sunday’s and Zwartkop’s Rivers.
Specimens in the collection of the Geological Society of London are
labelled “ Zwartkop River’ (Rubidge) ; ‘‘ McLoughlin’s, bed No. 5”
(Stow) ; ‘‘ Above Modder Drift, No. 3 bed”’ (Stow).* In the British
Museum (Natural History) a fine specimen is labelled ‘‘ Sundays
River, Pont.’ A specimen sent to me from the South African
Museum is believed to come from the Sunday’s River cliffs. An
immature specimen, 15 mm. in length, and a portion of the flank of
an adult in the form of an external mould, resembling 7’. stow?z, were
collected by Messrs. Rogers and Schwarz at Walton’s Farm on the
Sunday’s River, just below Dunbrodie (307). These may probably
represent 7’. stow2, though they might equally well be ascribed to
T. vaw so far as their characters allow of determination. Another
immature specimen, from the railway cutting between milestones
241-243 on the Uitenhage—Graaff-Reinet railway (309) may also
perhaps belong to this form. Mr. Rogers collected JZ’. stowz in a
small kloof, three miles up the left bank of Sunday’s River (17h).
A hand-specimen containing one complete and two fragmentary
valves was also obtained by him from a cliff W. 20 8. from Comley’s
house, right bank of Sunday’s River (90h).
Remarks.—This form shows some variation in regard to the shape
of the frontal profile and the position of the umbones in relation to
the anterior extremity. In some examples, the anterior sculpture is
more robust and more regular than in others. The thickened and
downwardly directed terminations of the anterior ribs are some-
times a very prominent feature, in other cases they are less
noticeable. In some individuals the anterior ribs are very
closely spaced, and towards the lower part of the adult valve may
be much broken up into nodes (as exemplified by specimen 17h).
Sometimes a small portion of the flank, most anteriorly situated, is
* See Stow’s table of cliff-exposures at localities on ‘‘ Upper Sundays River” and
‘* Lower Sundays River”; Stow (1), fig. 3.
9
118 Annals of the South African Museum.
smooth, in other cases the ribbing extends to the frontal margin
at all parts. Near the pallial margin of large individuals senile
characters may be seen in the cessation of sculpture and the
appearance of several strong furrows of accretion.
Two right valves in the specimen numbered 90h have a more
rounded and less sharply pointed anterior profile than any of the
other specimens studied. They also have the umbones rather more
anteriorly placed. The other extreme, illustrating the less inequi-
lateral form of the valves and the more marked pointing of the
anterior profile, is shown by an individual from the collection of
the South African Museum. Characters quite intermediate between
these extremes are exhibited, for example, by a specimen numbered
12006 in the collection of the Geological Society of London. I
believe, therefore, that the material examined only suffices for the
establishment of a single species.
Stow appears to have believed this form, to represent T. vau
Sharpe. When dealing with the Trigone of the Oomia beds of
Cutch, I made reference to 7’. stow? as an undescribed form allied to
T. vau.* In addition to the specimens there referred to, I have
since had the opportunity of examining further material in the col-
lections of the Geological Society and the British Museum (Natural
History), and also the fine specimens sent to me from South Africa.
T. stowt is a very well characterised form, peculiar for its elongated
outline, its pointed anterior extremity and greatly produced posterior
region, its striking flank-sculpture and its siphonal gape. Although
in many points, and particularly in the sculpture of the adult, it very
strongly recalls the Oomia 7’. v-scripta WKitchin, yet its youthful
characters plainly reveal its close relationship to 7. vaw Sharpe (see
above). Until the young shell has attained a height of about 10 mm.,
these two African forms are so alike that I have been unable to find
any feature by which they may with certainty be distinguished. In
the adult stage, however, 7’. stowi has a more elongated outline and
is more strongly produced posteriorly ; its umbones are relatively
further removed from the anterior extremity; the upper and lower
valve-margins converge towards the front to join in more or less
pointed form, and produce a frontal profile which stands in contrast
to the sweeping convex outline of the frontal margin in T. vau. The
angularly bent and swollen anterior portions of the ribs in the frontal
series, which produce such a peculiar pattern in the sculpture of the
anterior quarter of the flank in 7’. stow7, are developed to a much
* Kitchin (1), pp. 66, 74.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 119
less noticeable extent in 7. vaw, and the bending is absent in some
individuals.
When studied in connection with the shells of the group of
Trigonia v-scripta from the Oomia beds of Cutch, 7. stow? can only
be closely compared with 7. v-scripta itself. Though, when adult,
it resembles this in most striking manner in the backward position
of the umbones, the posterior elongation and general form, and
especially in the character of the flank ornamentation, 7. stow? may
be readily distinguished by its relatively more elongated and poste-
riorly attenuated figure, and its anteriorly more acutely converging
upper and lower margins. TT. v-scripta is a shorter shell relatively
to height, particularly in the late adult and fully grown state, while
its valves are somewhat flatter and less inflated. In the youthful
stage the two are widely different in character; 7. v-scripta then has
a very few coarse concentric flank-ribs, which, continuing across
the well-marked carinal angle, pass obliquely forwards over the area
in the form of attenuated thread-like raised lines, and terminate at a
delicate linear ridge which represents an inner carina. Similar
characters distinguish the young 7. recwrva, another Oomia form.
This, like 7. stow7, has strong posterior elongation in the adult, and
a smooth tract on the posterior portion of the flank; but it is well
contrasted by its much smaller size, its rounded convex frontal
profile, its more crowded and much less steeply sloped anterior ribs,
and its imperfectly developed, short posterior ribs.
TL’. heterosculpta Stanton,* from the Belgrano beds (Lower Cre-
taceous) of Patagonia, is very probably a related form. Its youthful
characters are closely similar to those of 7’. stow, but the adult shell
is much shorter, more triangular in form, and much less elongated
posteriorly, while there are marked differences in the details of
sculpture.
TRIGONIA CONOCARDIIFORMIS (Krauss).
Plate VII., figs. 2, 2a, 20, 3, 4.
1843. Lyriodon conocardiiformis F. Krauss, Amtlicher Bericht iiber
die zwanzigste Versammlung der Gesellsch. deutsch.
Naturforscher und Aerzte zu Mainz im Sept., 1842,
p. 180.
1850. Lyrodon conocardiiformis F. Krauss, Nov. Act. Acad. Ces.
Leop.-Carol. Nat. Cur., vol. xxii., pt. 2, p. 454, Tab. 49,
figs. la—ld.
* Stanton (3), p. 20, pl. iv., figs. 16-18.
120 Annals of the South African Museum.
1879. Trigonia conocardiiformis J. Lycett, Mon. Brit. Foss. Trigonie,
pp. 210, 211, and woodcuts; p. 230. (Palseontographical
Society.)
1903. Trigonia conocardiiformis C. Burckhardt, Beitrage zur Kennt-
niss der Jura- und Kreideformation der Cordillere. Palex-
ontographica, Band 1., Taf. xii., figs. 3-5.
Supplementary Descriptive Note-——Krauss gave an admirable
detailed description of this very characteristic shell, but I am able to
supplement this by some additional observations, based on the
examination of material more favourably preserved than that which
appears to have been at his disposal. There are one or two points,
also, in which the figures accompanying Krauss’s description are
rather misleading.
With regard to the ribbing of the flank, it must be noted that this
does not always strictly conform with the simple plan illustrated in
the figures given by Krauss and Lycett. It may be remarked that
if the figures of the German author are imperfect, that given by
Lycett to illustrate the exterior of a left valve is still less character-
istic, although it was intended to supply the deficiencies of the
earlier illustrations.
Several specimens now examined are in such condition as to show
the form of the sculpture in early growth-stages, and two individuals,
in particular, have the ornaments of the nepionic and neanic stages
well preserved. One is an imperfect left valve which measures
9 mm. in length, and would be 7 mm. in height if uninjured at the
pallial border; it occurred in a hand-specimen, containing adult
T’. conocardiuformis, T. vau, and other typical forms, from the
Sunday’s River. The other specimen is an immature individual
haying both valves in place, imperfect posteriorly, but beautifully
preserved in the umbonal region. This was collected by Mr. Rogers
from a cliff on the right bank of Sunday’s River on Commando
Kraal (104h). Other specimens, also, show the ribbing of the neanic
stage, though less perfectly. It is seen that until the valve attained
a height of about 6 mm., measured from the umbonal apex, the
flank was ornamented by simple concentric ribs, running parallel to
the lower margin. Close to the apex the crests of the ribs are
situated at a distance of about 0° mm. apart; at about 5 mm.
below the apex the distance between the ribs has increased to 1 mm.
These concentric ribs extend to the frontal margin. Traced back-
wards, they pass over the flank to a definite carinal ridge, and
becoming more delicate in character, turn sharply forwards and
pass across the relatively narrow area. There is no inner carina
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Serves. 121
even at this early stage, but the ribs encroach slightly upon the
smooth eseutcheon. This is clearly seen in the neanic stage, where
the escutcheon begins to increase rapidly in breadth. Very close to
the umbonal apex, however, it is difficult to observe traces of an
escutcheon, and here the attenuated and delicate linear ribs of the
area pass obliquely forward until almost reaching the cardinal
margin, when they die out. Where they disappear, very close to
the cardinal border, the ribs are extremely attenuated and crowded,
while directed to form an acute angle with the valve-border. The
longitudinal linear groove of the area which becomes so marked a
feature in the adult, is only faintly indicated at the close of the
neanic stage.
As the succeeding growth-stage is entered upon—that is, when the
valve exceeds 8 mm. in height—the carinal angle rapidly becomes
rounded and blunt, and soon takes the form of a broad fold.. The
ribs of the flank are now prominent and robust, and are separated
by interspaces 3 mm. broad. They pass obliquely downwards when
traced forwards. There is some variation shown in the relation of
the anterior ribs to the sueceeding posterior ones in the adult stage.
Sometimes the first four or five strong ribs have their posterior
terminations on the flank at successively greater distances from the
carinal fold. Immediately behind these, and forming a separate
series having an almost vertical arrangement, are the numerous and
much more delicate ribs of the posterior series. They have their
superior terminations immediately below the carinal fold. The sixth
or seventh rib of the anterior series is in continuity with the second
or third rib of the posterior series, forming the lower and more
strongly developed portion of it, this lower portion being directed to
form a very obtuse angle with the upper portion. Posteriorly to
this, the ribs are not divisible into two series. In other specimens,
however, the successively formed ribs have their upper terminations
alike close under the carinal fold of the valve, and there is no
tendency to division of the ribs into two series. There is also con-
siderable variation in the strength and number of the ribs. In some
specimens the ribs are more strongly developed and are rather less
numerous than in other individuals of equal size; sometimes their
more strongly swollen character may be particularly noticeable on
the posterior half of the flank.
The area throughout the adult stage is devoid of ornamentation
except the well-marked longitudinal groove. The escutcheon is of
very elongated lanceolate form. It is not separated from the area
by any definite carinal ridge, but is well marked off for the most
122 Annals of the South African Museum.
part by being sunk in concave form. Towards the posterior end it
is scarcely demarcated.
Dinensions.—Trigoma conocardiufornus may attain very large
dimensions. A specimen presented by Atherstone to the Geological
Society of London has a maximum length of 164 mm. This
specimen, which is not quite complete at the lower margin under
the umbonal region, must originally have had a height (measured
at this part) of 95 mm. The ligament groove is 45 mm. long. A
specimen figured by Krauss is 84 mm. in length and 42 mm. in
height (at the umbonal region), while the depth of a single valve,
measured from the figure, is 24 mm. In several individuals
examined by me, the height is somewhat greater than this, in
relation to the length.
Occurrence.—This form is found in the Marine Beds at various
localities on the Sunday’s and Zwartkop’s Rivers. It was obtained
by Messrs. Rogers and Schwarz from the railway cutting between
milestones 244-242 on the line from Uitenhage to Graaff-Reinet
(297, 298) ; also at the white krantz on Wolve Kraal on the north
bank of Sunday’s River. The same authors have mentioned the
occurrence of this shell in a conglomeratic bed at Plettenberg’s
Bay.* Specimens in the collection of the South African Museum
are from the Sunday’s River. In 1905, Mr. Rogers obtained
examples in the cliff on Commando Kraal, right bank of Sunday’s
River (104h) ; in the highest beds on Zoet Geneugd, right bank of
Sunday’s River (67h); on a bare slope W. 30 S. from the middle
of Barkly Bridge, on the farm Olifant’s Kop, Sunday’s River (21h);
and from the Nek S. 33 HE. from Comley’s house, right bank of
Sunday’s River (86h).
Remarks.—A very striking feature exhibited by this Trigonia is
the sudden transition of sculptural characters at the close of the
neanic stage. The abrupt manner in which the crowded concentric
ribs give place to coarse, widely spaced, inclined ribs, recalls the
analogous transition in Trigonia vaw and T. stow; in these, the
youthful stage has similar though more delicate concentric orna-
ments, and these are replaced almost as abruptly by angularly bent,
coarse ribs. The youthful characters of 7. conocardiiformis seem
perhaps to suggest an ancestry similar to that from which 7. vau
and its ally were derived. In the young IT. conocarduformis,
however, the carinal ridge is more clearly defined, and in passing
across this the ribs are sharply bent to form an angle. The early
characters do not seem to indicate alliance with either the Scabrze
* Schwarz (1), pp. 53, 61; Rogers and Schwarz (1), p. 5; Rogers (1), p. 295.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 123
or the Costate; but in view of the remarkable manner in which
widely divergent types of Trigonia in the Oomia beds of Cutch
show, by their neanic characters, their relationship to the Costate,
it would not have been surprising to obtain evidence of a similar
descent in T. conocardiiformis. The young stages, however, exhibit
no trace of longitudinal ornamentation on the area, and it is difficult
to surmise its true derivation.
T. conocardiiformis, by reason of its peculiar characters of outline
and sculpture, has for long held a somewhat isolated position among
the representatives of the genus. lLycett at first expressed the
belief that it is an abnormal example of the Clavellatz, only
remotely related to other members of the section ;* but he after-
wards modified his opinion and associated this form with the
‘“crenulated examples of the Scabre.’ + Definite indications of
such a relationship, as we have seen, are not to be recognised.
It is a point of great interest that on the South American
continent, an apparently very close ally of 7’. conocardiiformis has
been found to occur, and in association with two members of the
Pseudo-quadrate. The shells described by Burckhardt} under
the name ‘ Zrigonia aff. conocarduformis’’ were collected from
strata ascribed to the Lower Neocomian at Las Lajas (Argentine),
and they certainly bear a very remarkable resemblance to this
South African form. In general figure and outline the similarity
is very striking, while differences in the hinge apparatus of the left
valve are of a minor character. The principal points of distinction
are in the nature of the sculpture of the flank in the adult stage ;
regarding the sculptural plan in the youthful stage of the South
American shell, no information is as yet forthcoming. The tendency
in some few individuals of 7’. conocardiiformis to show a develop-
ment of two distinct series of ribs on the flank during the early
adult stage is illustrated in more complete and emphasised manner
during the whole adult period in the South American shell. Most
of its anterior ribs, though in continuity with ribs of the posterior
or vertical series, form an obtuse angle with these, and pass across
the flank towards the frontal border in a direction more nearly
horizontal than the downwardly directed anterior portions of the
ribs in T. conocardiifornis. The contrasted aspect of the sculpture
in the two forms is well illustrated in plate xiii. of Dr. Burckhardt’s
monograph, where figures of African and South American individuals
are presented side by side.
* Lycett (3), p. 121 (1875). + Ibid., p. 210 (1879).
t Burckhardt (2), p. 72, pl: xiii., figs. 1, 2.
124 Annals of the South African Musewm.
Another South American form which is probably also nearly
related, is Trigonia eximia R. A. Philippi,* from the Tinguirica
valley in Chili, This represents a type of shell very closely com-
parable with 7. conocardiiformis, but the complete differentiation of
the ribs into a posterior and an anterior series is a marked feature
of the adult stage. With regard to this character of the ribbing,
the form described by Burckhardt under the name Tvrigonia aff.
conocardufornmis may be regarded as illustrating a somewhat inter-
mediate type of sculpture between the two extremes, 7’. conocardi-
formis and T. exumia. Another probably allied shell has been
recorded by Haupt} from the Neocomian of Loteno, on the Rio
Neuquen, on the east slope of the Argentine Cordillera, under the
name T'rigonia cf. exinva Philippi. This is said to differ from
Philippi’s type chiefly in having the dividing line between the
anterior and posterior ribbing more obliquely directed. 1’. exama
is referred by Haupt to the section Undulatie, but this is an obvious
error. These aberrant forms in South Africa and South America
have in common certain peculiar characters of shape and ornamenta-
tion by which they differ in marked manner from all divisions of
the genus known to occur in the Jurassic rocks. It is not improbable
that we are here dealing with representatives of several parallel
series developed from some common ancestral species or group of
species, showing rapid departure from the ancestral type along
similar lines of development, the successive phases being attained,
however, at an unequal rate. On the other hand, the possibility
that convergence is illustrated is not remote. In the above descrip-
tion of 7. conocardiiformis, differences observable in the plan of
sculpture after the close of the neanic stage are ascribed to individual
variation. I believe this to be sufficient to account for such
differences, but the possibility is not excluded that in the Uitenhage
beds, two very closely similar forms, undergoing parallel develop-
ment, are present. It may be that those individuals which show
some division of the ribbing into two distinct sets forming an angle
with one another, at the beginning of the adult stage, illustrate a
series which has passed through a stage similar to that represented
in the adult 7’. eximia, and that this stage, with angularly disposed
costate ornamentation, has become suppressed by tachygenesis and
reduction. The entire absence of characters of sculpture which
approach those of 7’. eximia, in the other individuals from Cape
Colony, might probably be due to the same cause.
* R. A. Philippi (1), p. 76, pl. xxxiv., fig. 3.
+ Haupt (1), p. 216.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 125
TRIGONIA TATEI Neumayr.
1867. Trigonia cassiope R, Tate, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxiii.,
p. 158.
1881. Trigonia tatei M. Neumayr, in E. Holub and M. Neumayr,
Denkschr. d. k. Akad. Wiss., Math.-Nat. Cl., Band xliv.,
p. 275, pl. ii., fig. 3.
Occurrence.—A very imperfect and ill-preserved fragment of a
costate Trigonia occurs in hard limestone with Plewromya baina
from Grass Ridge, three miles east-north-east of Uitenhage (330).
In all probability this represents 7. tatez.
Remarks.—Although no complete or satisfactorily determinable
specimens of this well-characterised form are included in the collec-
tion under examination, it may be useful to draw attention to one
or two points of interest in reference to the occurrence of this shell,
the only member of the section Costate hitherto found in the
Uitenhage beds. In 1877, Lycett* cast doubt upon the correctness
of Tate’s identification of this South African form with the European
Oolitic shells named 7. cassiope by d’Orbigny,t and Neumayr sub-
sequently saw the necessity of applying a new name. 1’. tated
certainly cannot be united with any other known costate form, and
although the general outline and nature of the ribbed flank has a
close parallel in several familiar European Costatx, yet the narrow
area and elongated escutcheon, the delicate and little-prominent
carine and inter-carinal ridges, and the relatively very delicate
beaded ornamentation of area and escutcheon, are very distinctive
features.
Two specimens preserved in the collection of the Geological
Society of London are labelled ‘‘ Zwartkop River” (H. Longlands)
and ‘“McLoughlin’s Rest’’ (Major Rocke) respectively, and the
former specimen appears to have been the one upon which Tate’s
identification was based. The length is relatively great compared
with the height ; the cardinal margin is elongated, while the siphonal
margin is short. The area is slightly convex in form, without a
marked median carina or groove; the escutcheon is large, and
ornamented by raised lines of granules running parallel to the
ridges of the area. There are about 18 ribs on the flank of
the larger specimen. The elongated form, the very delicate carine,
the fine intercarinal sculpture, the convex area, and the elongated
eranular escutcheon, are all characters which at once recall the
* Lycett (3), p. 172. + d’Orbigny (4), voli., p. 308.
126 Annals of the South African Museum.
same features in 7. tenuis, from the Oomia beds in Cutch.* This,
however, is strongly distinguished from 7’. tate? by the very crowded
and delicate costate ornamentation of the flank, and by the slight
convexity of the valve.
In view of the comparative rarity of the Costatz in the Cretaceous
rocks, the occurrence of so typical a member of the section in the
Uitenhage Series might appear at first sight to lend some support
to the view of those who have maintained that a part, at least, of
these beds must be ascribed to the Upper Jurassic. It is clear,
however, that in any attempt to uphold such a conclusion, less
weight can now be attached to the presence of Costate than when
our knowledge of the distribution of this division of the Trigoni@
was founded principally upon European occurrences. In Europe
itself, representatives of the section are sparsely present in the
Cretaceous, and these mostly show deviations which at once dis-
tinguish them from the typical Jurassic forms. Trigonia peninsularis
Coquand,+ from the Aptian of Spain, exhibits a marked degeneration
of characters in its later growth-stages, while 7. carinata Agassiz, {
from the Neocomian and Aptian, which may be brought into the
most intimate connection with the Costate, shows equally far-
reaching modifications, although an examination of Lycett’s figured
specimens and other well-preserved individuals fails to reveal any
characters which can be taken to justify Lycett’s separation of this
form under a separate sectional heading.§ The typical features of
the section Costate are exemplified, however, in a small Trigonia
described by E. Ascher from the Hauterivian of Silesia.||
Although these European forms may be looked upon as lingering
representatives of a section which had passed its maximum develop-
ment, we must look further afield in order to complete the history of
this strongly characterised and long-lived division of the genus. In
the marine Oomia beds of Cutch, which may now be regarded as
of Lower Cretaceous rather than of Upper Jurassic age, aberrant
derivatives of the Costate provide a striking feature in the molluscan
fauna; but here also have been found two representatives, 7’. tenwis
Kitchin and 7. parva Kitchin, which retain in perfect manner the
typical characters of the section. South America has also furnished
another unmodified Cretaceous costate form in T’. anguste-costata,
described by Behrendsen *' from strata which he regards as Upper
* Kitchin (1), p. 35, pl. iii., figs. 5, 6. + Coquand (1), p. 129, pl. xxiii., fig. 3.
t Agassiz (1), p. 43, Tab. vii., figs. 7-10; Lycett (3), p. 179, pl. xxxv., figs 3-6,
(1877). § See also Collot(1).
|| Ascher (1), p. 159 [25], pl. xiii. [ii], fig.10. [| Behrendsen (1), p. 6, pl. 3, fig. 7.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Urtenhage Series. 127
Cretaceous, at Caryilauhue (Argentine); this is accompanied by
a typical member of the Cretaceous section Scabree, 7’. transatlantica
Behr. TZ. anguste-costata is a small triangular shell, which in the
delicate character and close spacing of the flank-ribs recalls the
Indian JT. parva Kitchin, from which, however, it is widely
distinguished by the very different outline and the delicate ornamen-
tation of the area. In the perfect development of these longitudinal
ridges of the area, 7. anguste-costata retains in typical manner an
essential feature of the section, a differentiation of the valve-
sculpture which so strongly and constantly characterises all the
Costatz. With reference to the occurrence of the costate Trigonie
in Cretaceous rocks, Behrendsen cites, in addition to JT. peninsu-
laris Coquand and T. carinata Agass., the following shells: 7. longa
Ag., T’. pennata Sow., T. cardissa Ag., and T. indica Stoliczka. This
list, however, is misleading, as may be ascertained from a careful
examination of these forms. TJ. longa and T. pennata certainly
cannot be included in the section Costatze, while it is doubtful
whether 7’. indica stands in very close connection with this division.
T’. cardissa, on the other hand, is a typical representative of the
section, but it has been shown to be Jurassic,* and not Cretaceous,
as at first suggested on insufficient grounds by Agassiz.
Genus CARDITA J. G. Bruguiére.
CARDITA NUCULOIDES Tate.
Plate VII., figs. 5, 5a, 5d.
1867. Cardita nuculoides R. Tate, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol.
Xxiil., p. 162, pl. vii., figs. 7a—7d.
Occurrence.—Tate’s figured specimen, numbered 11028 in the
collection of the Geological Society, came from the Sunday’s River.
A specimen obtained by Mr. Rogers is from the left side of the
Coega Valley, half a mile down from the railway (466g).
ftemarks.—The specimen found by Mr. Rogers is a well-preserved
left valve which differs slightly in outline from Tate’s figured type:
it is a little more drawn out obliquely, and the convex fold of the
valve which runs obliquely from the umbonal region to the postero-
ventral corner is rather more pronounced than in the original
type. Tate’s specimen, however, although having both valves in
place, is not so perfectly preserved, and some allowance may also
be made for individual variation. The general form of the shell,
* Bigot (1), p. 292.
128 Annals of the South African Musewm.
and the complete agreement in the sculpture, leave no doubt
that the specimen from Coega Valley must be identified with
C. nuculoides.
The form of the shell is that of a four-sided figure with
rounded angles. The anterior margin is short, the posterior margin,
on the other hand, very extensive. The umbonal region is relatively
weakly developed. The surface is beautifully ornamented by
numerous, minute, radial striz which cannot be seen with the
naked eye. The intercrossing of the strie with concentric growth-
lines results in a delicate cancellation.
Genus ASTARTE J. Sowerby.
ASTARTE LONGLANDSIANA Tate.
1867. Astarte longlandsiana R. Tate, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc.,
vol. xxiii., p. 158, pl. viii., figs. 5a, 50.
Occurrence.—Specimens in the collection of the Geological Society
are from the Zwartkop’s River. Mr. Rogers obtained an immature
example of this form in the Coega Valley east of the railway,
one mile up the line from Coega station (477g).
Remarks.-The immature specimen from the Coega Valley
measures only 19 mm. in height. It has both valves in position,
and the umbonal region of the right valve is perfectly preserved.
The umbo is acutely pointed and is ornamented by closely spaced
concentric ribs up to the apex. Tate says that the valves are
ornamented with ‘slightly elevated ridges of growth,’ but it would
be more correct to say that the ornamentation consists of well-raised
concentric ribs. The ribs show some little irregularity of spacing.
The surface between the rib-summits frequently shows finer
concentric lines, which appear here and there to have the regularity
of definite sculpture, though in places they resemble ordinary ridges
of growth. The escutcheon is narrow, steep-sided, and deeply
excavated, and the ribs of the flank terminate abruptly at the acute
margin which bounds the escutcheon.
Susp-aENus ERIPHYLA F. Stoliczka (? W. M. Gabb).
ASTARTE (ERIPHYLA) HERZOGI (Goldfuss).
1840. Cytherea herzogii (Hausmann) A. Goldfuss, Petrefacta
Germanie, Band ii., Lief. 7, p. 239, Tab. exlix., fig. 10.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 129
1843. Astarte capensis F. Krauss, Amtlicher Bericht itber die
zwanzigste Versammlung der Gesellsch. deutsch.
Naturforscher und Aerzte zu Mainz im Sept., 1842,
p. 150.
1850. Astarte herzogw F. Krauss, Nov. Act. Acad. Ces. Leop.-Carol.
Nat. Cur., vol. xxii., pt. 2, p. 447, Tab. 47, figs. 2a—2e.
1905. Astarte herzogi A. W. Rogers, An Introduction to the
Geology of Cape Colony, p. 291, fig. 25 (1).
Occurrence.—Specimens before me are from the uppermost
red bed in a kloof east-north-east of Red House on Zwartkop’s
River (326, 327), and from a krantz near Picnic Bush, north-east
of Red House (328). Messrs. Rogers and Schwarz also found this
shell in the cutting on the road running from the farm Perseverance
on to the plateau, and leading to the Salt Pan. Stow obtained
specimens at McLoughlin’s Bluff and between the Addo and Modder
Drifts, on the Sunday’s River. Hertzog’s collection, including this
shell, was obtained in the Sunday’s River district about eighteen
miles from Hnon.* Krauss collected specimens on the left bank
of the Zwartkop’s River, below Uitenhage.
Riemarks.—Krauss furnished such an accurate description of this
shell that it will only be necessary to supplement this by a discussion
of its narrower relationships. Astarte herzogi cannot be looked upon
as a typical representative of its genus, and it is by no meansa
simple matter to assign it to its correct position among recognised
sub-generic groups. The principal characters to be borne in mind
in this connection are as follows. The shell has a lenticular form
and frequently an almost circular outline; it is ornamented by
crowded concentric ribs and sulcations forming a well-developed
sculpture. The lunule is short, but is sharply bounded and of very
deep and concave form; the escutcheon is very narrow and
elongated, almost entirely occupied by the long ligament space,
and very sharply marked off from the flank. In the right valve
there is a distinctly developed posterior lateral dental process,
situated behind the elongated external ligament, and an anterior
(sub-lunular) depression in the hinge-plate for the reception of an
anterior lateral process of the left valve. The pallial margin of the
valve is strongly notched on its inner side; the pallial line is
posteriorly rather weakly impressed.
We are therefore dealing with an Astarte in which lateral hinge
processes are definitely developed. The evidence for the presence or
* See Hausmann (1), p. 1459 (as Cytherea).
130 Annals of the South African Musewm.
absence of a shallow pallial indentation, it must be admitted, is incon-
clusive in the material I have examined, but this, after all, is a com-
paratively minor point, and one of less importance than the nature
of the hinge. A fact to be noted is that shells which exhibit a
similarly developed hinge are chiefly characteristic of Cretaceous
rocks in other regions.
Stoliezka* thought that Astarte herzogi belonged to Speyer’s
genus Grotriania,+ but in reality it is widely enough removed from
this, which has a very different form and is characterised by a very
large and profoundly excavated lunule and escutcheon, and by the
absence of lateral teeth. Much closer agreement is shown to the
shells known as Eriphyla lenticularis (Goldfuss) {| and other forms
to which the name Hriphyla hag been applied. Unfortunately, the
employment of this name has been attended with some confusion.
The shell upon which Gabb founded the name (HZ. wmbonata
Gabb)§ occurs in the Shasta-Chico Series of California,|| and it
was thought to be allied to Astarte. The characters of the shell
were unfortunately not diagnosed with satisfactory precision,
and Stoliczka‘! first stated in full detail the distinguishing
features of Cretaceous shells (H. lenticularis) which he believed
to be generically identical with Hriphyla wmbonata Gabb.
Stolicezka, however, brought the genus into relationship with
Dosinia, though be adduced no convincing reason for such a view,
except the presence of a pallial sinus. His description of the
hinge characters shows that they agree with those of Astarte herzog,
but he mentioned the pallial sinus as a leading feature of his shells,
and made no reference to any crenulation of the margin. He says:
“Tt appears probable that some of the Jurassic Astarte (A. excavata
and others) belong to this genus, but a careful examination of the
hinge and of the pallial line, which is broad though very faint, and
also of its sinus, will be necessary.’ Again, he remarks: ‘The
hinge-teeth of Hriphyla closely approach those of Astarte, but these
have no distinct lateral teeth, nor a deep lunule or sinus.”
Whether Stoliczka did right in ascribing the widely distributed
E. lenticularis to Gabb’s imperfectly characterised genus is a
question which still remains unanswered. He, at any rate, used the
name in connection with definite and precise diagnostic characters,
and his reading has been accepted by Holzapfel,** who maintains
* Stoliczka (2), p. 286 (1871). + Speyer (1), p. 496, Taf. xi., fig. 6.
t Goldfuss (1), Band ii., p. 228, Tab. exlvi., fig. 16 (1837).
§ Gabb (1), p. 180, pl. 24, fig. 162. || See Diller and Stanton (1).
{ Stoliczka (2), p. 156 (1870). ** Holzapfel (1), p. 196.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 131
that so long as it cannot be shown that Eriphyla Stoliczka differs in
essentials from Hriphyla Gabb, this name must be retained for shells
having the characters set forth by Stoliczka. Previously, however,
J. Bohm * had remarked upon the unsatisfactory nature of Stoliczka’s
use of Gabb’s name, in view of the great uncertainty respecting the
characters of the Californian shell, and he employs the name Dozyia
for Lucina lenticularis Goldf., a name applied by Bosquet in 1868 to
the same form. Meek t+ also doubted the correctness of Stoliczka’s
view in identifying the European and Indian shell with Gabb’s
genus, but his remarks on the subject only add further confusion and
help to show the futility of attempts to utilise Gabb’s imperfect
description and figure in a generic characterisation.
From the foregoing it appears clear to me that in the absence of
further information regarding the Californian type, the published
account of Gabb’s genus is totally insufficient to support the validity
of the name proposed by him; the repeated attempts to utilise
Gabb’s description and figure have proved so unavailing that the
name as based upon Californian material may be reasonably ignored.
In further support of this contention it is only necessary to mention
that Whitfield t has so conceived the meaning of Gabb’s description
as to apply the name Hriphyla to a Cretaceous shell from Syria
which is characterised by triangularly elliptical outline, strongly
prominent umbonal region, a short internal ligament, and surface
sculpture resembling that of Chione.
The question then arises, whether the name Hriphyla as defined
by Stoliczka may be applied to ZL. lenticularis, in view of the fact
that Bosquet had previously proposed to eall this Dozyia lenticularis.
It is true that this generic name was only published in a tabular
list,§ without description or discussion, but it was accompanied by a
reference to Goldfuss’s type. I should have no hesitation in
following Dr. J. Bohm and employing Bosquet’s name on the
strength of the definite reference to Goldfuss, but unfortunately the
description and figure given in the “ Petrefacta Germaniz ’’ deals
only with external characters, and no mention was made of those
features which are of generic or sub-generic value. These were first
elucidated by Stoliczka, and herein lies the justification for following
Prof. Holzapfel in accepting the name Hviphyla, as defined by
Stoliczka.
Hriphyla lenticularis has a shallow pallial sinus and its valve-
margins are not crenulated. It might therefore appear that, on the
* J. Bohm (1), p. 125. + Meek (2), p. 123.
+ Whitfield (1), p. 403, pl. vi., figs. 2-5. § Dewalque (1), p. 368.
132 Annals of the South African Museum.
strength of these points, Astarte herzogi should be excluded from
this division of the genus, though in reality these characters are of
very small value and appear to be sufficiently inconstant to be dis-
carded as guides to the sub-generic grouping. The hinge-characters
above described, on the other hand, are remarkably constant in
several Cretaceous forms which differ in regard to the marginal
crenulation, and it appears that the posterior indentation of the
pallial line is only of specific value at the most, appearing occasion-
ally, as in a few other “integripalliate’’ genera. A shallow pallial
sinus is shown to be present in the figures of Aptian shells ascribed
by Pictet and Renevier* to Astarte buchi F. Roem. and A. obovata
J. Sow., and in both of these the marginis crenulate. Astarte striata
J. de C. Sow., from the Blackdown Beds of England, shows very
close agreement with H. lenticularis, and, like it, has a shallow sinus
and a smooth margin. Then again, the same shell agrees closely in
the hinge and other features with Astarte herzogi, though the latter
has a crenulated margin. This last character, indeed, is clearly one
of very small significance. In dealing with Astarte and its divisions,
von Zittel +} has ignored the notching of the margin, while several
authorities on the living forms have abandoned this structure as even
of specific value.} Regarding the value of the distinctive characters
of Hriphyla, as here accepted, in establishing its claim to the rank of
a separate genus, opinions may be expected to differ; I am not
convinced that a definite separation from Astarte is expedient, or
warranted by the features which distinguish Hriphyla from typical
members of that genus, and I therefore prefer for the present to
follow Zittel in employing the name Astarte in the broad sense, and
including EHripyhla as a sub-genus.
In tracing the relationships of A. herzogi, it is somewhat surprising
to find that the closest agreement is exhibited with shells from the
Neocomian of Lincolnshire. These occur in the Claxby Ironstone
at Willingham and Benniworth Haven, and are most probably to be
assigned to a horizon comparable with a part of the zone of Belem-
nites lateralis or possibly the lowest part of the zone of Belemnites
jaculum at Speeton;§ specimens are preserved in the Museum of
Practical Geology in London, and in the Sedgwick Museum at
Cambridge, and have been identified by Mr. Woods as Astarte levis
(Phill.).|| The similarity to A. herzogi is striking, but the following
* Pictet and Renevier (1), pl. x., fig. 1; xi., fig. 1.
+ Zittel (5), p. 65. + See Jeffreys (1), p. 309.
§ Pavlow and Lamplugh (1), p. 29 (of authors’ copy); Pavlow (1), able,
p. 548. || Woods (3), vol. ii., p. 115 (1906).
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 133
points of distinction appear to be constant and to justify the definite
separation of these two forms. In the Lincolnshire specimens the
shell is as a rule less orbicular, and attains greater height in propor-
tion to length; at the same time, the valve is rather more flattened
towards the inferior margin in fully grown individuals. The lunule
has greater relative length and is less deeply excavated and less
concave in form than in A. herzogi. The noticeable fact that the
sculpture in the Lincolnshire examples is less well defined than in
the African shell may perhaps be in some measure due to the
mode of preservation. The form and size of the lunule certainly
affords a good separating character, and as regards the outline
of the shell, the difference above mentioned seems to hold good
if specimens of average proportions be compared, though it must
be admitted that Astarte herzogi exhibits considerable shape
variation, and specimens with shorter and higher outline occur
not infrequently.
As already remarked, Astarte striata Sow.,* from the Blackdown
Beds, agrees in many respects, but it is a much more compressed and
flattened shell, has greater length in relation to height, and shows no
marginal crenulation.
Astarte beawmonti Leym.,+ from the Neocomian of the Aube, is
likewise characterised by a sharply demarcated and deeply excavated
lunule, and is ornamented by ridges and suleations similar to those
of A. herzogi ; it may probably agree, too, in the internal characters,
but it differs by its inequilateral form and oblique elongation.
Astarte buchi F. Roemer{ (Lower Cretaceous, Perte du Rhone)
seems to agree well in internal characters, though it is not clear
whether a posterior lateral tooth of the right valve is plainly
developed. The sub-lunular groove in the hinge of the right valve,
shown in Roemer’s figure, seems to indicate the presence of an
anterior lateral tooth in the left valve. The sharply cut, elongated
escutcheon and the well-sunk short lunule are similar, but Roemer’s
shell differs from A. herzogi by being considerably more inequilateral
in shape and also less incurved at the umbones, besides having much
less perfectly developed concentric surface sculpture.
Astarte semanni de Loriol, from the Portlandian of the north of
France § and of England,|| is more similar again, and may be closely
* J. de C. Sowerby (1), vol. vi., Tab. 520, fig. 1 (1826).
+ Leymerie (2), p. 4, pl. 4, fig. 1.
t F. Roemer (1), p. 20, fig. 4.
§ De Loriol and Pellat (1), p. 68, pl. vi., fig. 9.
|| Blake (1), p. 232, pl. x., fig. 5.
10
134 Annals of the South African Musewm.
related. The ornamentation, though coarser, with broader and more
widely spaced ribs, is of essentially the same kind, and there is the
deeply cut lunule. It may be judged from de Loriol’s figure of a
left valve that a posterior lateral hinge process is present in the right
valve. The shell, while appearing to have very closely similar
hinge characters, differs from A. herzogi by its more elongated form
and relatively less height. English specimens from the Portland
Sands of Swindon, ascribed to A. semanniz, have a denser costate
ornamentation than the example figured by de Loriol, and in this
they more closely resemble A. herzogi. Miss E.G. Skeat has drawn
attention to the fact that these English specimens, which are well
represented in the Sedgwick (formerly Woodwardian) Museum at
Cambridge, exhibit a shallow pallial sinus.*
A shell described by G. Miiller under the name Hriphyla stuwhl-
mann, from the Neocomian at a locality 35 km. west of Mtshinga in
German East Africa,+ clearly belongs to the same sub-generic group.
In the characters of the hinge and in the presence of marginal
crenulation, it resembles A. herzogi, but differs by the absence of
the surface ridges and sulcations and by the more inequilateral form
and more prominent umbones. LHriphyla stwhlmanni is accompanied
by a Gervillia probably identical with G.dentata Krauss. Dr. Miller
refers his shell to Hriphyla without comment, and was no doubt
influenced by the presence of the lateral teeth.
In the orbicular outline, the surface ornamentation and the type
of hinge, Astarte jugosa (Forbes) } from the Upper Cretaceous of the
Trichinopoly district (Utatur stage) approaches somewhat closely to
A. herzogi. The Indian shell was referred by Stoliczka§ to Speyer’s
genus Grotriania, but this was an error of judgment. Its valves, it
is true, have a somewhat deepened lunule and escutcheon, but do not
compare in this respect with those of the true Grotriama, and, more-
over, have plainly developed lateral hinge-processes fitting into
opposing grooves. In this respect A. jugosa agrees with A. herzogt,
and may be classed in the same sub-division of Astarte. According
to the description and figures given by Stoliczka, it has a crenulated
valve-border and the pallial line is without a sinus. The shell
differs from A. herzogi by the greater compression of the valves, the
greater depth of the escutcheon and hinge-plate, and the more nearly
circular outline.
* Skeat and Madsen (1), p. 124.
+ G. Muller (1), p. 553, Taf. xxi., figs. 3,4; Taf. xxii., figs. 8-10.
+ Forbes (2), p. 142, pl. xvii., fig. 7.
§ Stoliczka (2), p. 289, pl. x., figs. 12-14.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 135
Eriphyla argentina Burekhardt,* from the Neocomian of Las
Lajas (Argentine), is also a similar shell, as regards the hinge, the
deep lunule and escutcheon, and the development of concentric orna-
ments. It differs, however, from A. herzogz by the considerably more
elongated figure and the coarseness and spacing of the ornamenting
ridges. H. argentina, it may be observed, has a weak pallial sinus,
and Dr. Burckhardt remarks that the margin is probably crenulated.
ASTARTE (HRIPHYLA) PINCHINIANA Tate.
Plate VIL., figs. 6, 6a.
1867. Astarte pinchiniana R. Tate, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc.,
VOlpxxite go. LO, plaix. fe 0.
Supplementary Descriptive Note-—The shell has a sub-orbicular
outline, with rather acutely pointed, anteriorly directed umbones.
The lunule is sharply demarcated from the flank, and is of deeply
excavated form, bounded outwardly by a sharp ridge which is con-
cave in profile. The lunule is of relatively great length. The
escutcheon is narrow, deep, and sharply bounded, and is occupied
very largely by the ligament space.
The valve-surface is ornamented during the neanic stage by
numerous and closely crowded, very regular and delicate concentric
ribs, terminating posteriorly at the margin of the ligament-space.
This ornamentation becomes obscure at a distance of 3-5 mm. below
the umbo, and subsequently gives place to numerous delicate, raised
growth-lines, too irregular to be confounded with definite sculpture.
Stronger ridges and furrows of accretion appear in the late adult
stage.
The shell-substance is very thick in relation to the size of the
specimens. The interior of the valve-border is strongly crenulate.
Dimensions.— (1) (2) (3)
Height, measured from the umbo 15 : 18 : 18 mm.
IGM Slag whens cia daseicecieSaa aor uelnsin viens 15 : aUS5) a IS) Ss
Depth of a single valve ............ SOLE 5 fo 59
Number (3) is the specimen figured by Tate.
Occurrence.—Collected by Miss Wilman at Coega River. The
specimens in the collection of the Geological Society in London are
from the Sunday’s River.
Remarks.—Tate’s description and figure of this elegant form must
appear sufficiently inadequate when it is realised that a most dis-
* Burckhardt (2), p. 76, pl. xii., figs. 3-6.
136 Annals of the South African Museum.
tinctive feature is the very elongated, sharply demarcated and deeply
excavated lunule, well preserved and exhibited in the specimen un-
satisfactorily figured by Tate. The widely erroneous statements of
shell-measurements, so numerous in that author’s paper on the South
African fossils, are difficult to account for and may best be ignored.
Tate’s comparison of A. pinchiniana with two English Oolitic forms,
A. excentrica Morr. and Lyc. and A. pumila J. de C. Sow., is also
unfortunate, since a very much closer resemblance is shown to several
Cretaceous forms. A. excentrica* is much more triangular in outline
and has the lunule scarcely defined, while A. pumila + is a narrow,
convex, inequilateral shell widely different in type from the one we
are considering.
The question whether A. pinchiniana should be referred to the sub-
genus Hriphyla, as defined by Stoliczka, cannot be decided by an
examination of the material which has been at my disposal. In no
instance have I been able to ascertain the characters of the hinge, and
it is therefore uncertain whether lateral hinge-processes are present
in either valve. At the same time, the external characters of shape
and the presence of a deep and sharply defined lunule, suggest the
strong probability that the arrangement of hinge and lateral teeth is
the same as in Hriphyla, but it would, of course, be unwise to accept
close agreement in external features as justification for a definite
conclusion on this point. For the time being, a provisional reference
to Hriphyla may be permitted. This question might seem to be of
subsidiary interest were it not that the known characters of
A. pinchiniana give this shell so close a resemblance to members of a
principally Cretaceous group of forms, and as additional evidence for
the age of this fauna, such resemblance must be taken fully into
consideration. Remarks on the application of the name Hriphyla in
dealing with certain Cretaceous forms of Astarte will be found above
in the discussion concerning the relationships of Astarte (Eriphyla)
herzogt.
A. pinchiniana ditters from immature examples of A. herzogi by the
relatively more extended lunule and the disappearance of concentric
sculpture at the close of the neanic stage. It bears a great outward
resemblance to immature specimens of A. striata Sow.,} having a
similarly elongated lunule, with the marginal profile of concave form
in front of the umbo; but in A. pinchiniana the concentric surface
* Morris and Lycett (1), part iii., p. 83, pl. ix., fig. 8 (1855).
+ J. de C. Sowerby (1), vol. v., Tab. 444, fig. 2 (1824),
t Ibid., vol. vi., p. 35, Tab. 520, fig. 1 (1826).
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Serves. 137
ridges are absent in the adult, and the interior of the valve-margin is
strongly crenulated.
Astarte rhodani Pict. and Camp.,* from the ‘‘ Gault” of the Perte-
du-Rhone, is of similar general type, but is truncated posteriorly.
Shells from the Gault of Cosne (Niévre) figured by de Loriol{ under
the name 4d. rhodani have a much more closely similar, rounded
outline; they appear, however, to have a slightly shorter lunule, and
they are probably without marginal crenulation.
Astarte dupiiana d’Orb.,t from the Albian of France, closely
resembles A. rhodani Pict., and like this, is abruptly truncated
posteriorly ; in this it offers a contrast to the more rounded profile of
A. pinchiniana. A. dupiniana possesses the character of marginal
crenulation, but differs from the African shell in having a less
strongly developed lunule and escutcheon.
The presence of well-developed sculpture in the neanic stage of
A, pinchiniana and its disappearance in the succeeding growth-
stages, indicates degeneration, so far as this character is concerned,
from a wholly sculptured ancestry.
Genus ANTHONYA W. M. Gabb.
ANTHONYA LINEATA SP. noy.
Plate VII, figs. 7, 8.
Description.—The shell is of slender, elongated form, much pro-
duced posteriorly. The valves are flattened and compressed, having
very slight convexity. The umbonal region is not strongly pro-
minent; it is situated at a distance of about one-third of the shell’s
total length from the anterior extremity, where also the shell has its
greatest height. The upper valve-margin, posteriorly to the umbo,
slopes down gradually, giving a very slightly concave outline. It has
an angular junction with the siphonal margin. The siphonal margin
is very short and shows a straight outline, directed slightly pos-
teriorly when traced down to its inferior termination. In front of
the umbo, the valve-margin is at first forwardly produced with a
downward slope and straight outline, passing then by a curve into
the convex anterior margin. This in turn passes by regular curve
into the elongated, slightly convex inferior margin. The siphonal
* Pictet and Campiche (1), 8° Partie, p. 319 (1866); Pictet and Roux (1), p. 437,
pl. 32, fig. 5 (1852).
+ de Loriol (4), p. 94, pl. xii., figs. 1-7.
{ d@Orbigny (3), p. 70, pl. 264, figs. 4-6 (1844).
138 Annals of the South African Museum.
margin marks the posterior limit of a weakly defined postero-
superior area of the valve-surface. This is only demarcated from the
flank by a weak and flattened fold of the surface which passes
obliquely backwards from the umbo to the postero-inferior angle of
the valve.
The ornamentation consists of very delicate, closely spaced,
rounded, concentric ridges, separated by impressed linear interspaces.
The ridges traverse the flank, parallel to the pallial border, then turn
sharply upwards to cross the area in a direction parallel with the
siphonal border. On the area the ornaments are slightly coarser
and less regular, and less strongly developed than on the flank.
An internal cast of a left valve shows traces of very weak rounded
ribbing, running parallel to the inferior border, but these markings
are confined to the middle part of the valve and terminate posteriorly
at the oblique, weak carinal ridge. In addition to the two short,
diverging, cardinal teeth, there are indications of a narrow, lath-like
ridge (represented on the cast by a narrow hollow) running parallel
with the upper valve-margin for a short distance in front of the
umbo, and another similar narrow depression extends for a longer
distance close to the valve-margin behind the umbo. Just above the
posterior part of the broadly oval anterior adductor impression,
is a small, well-marked, oval pedal muscle-scar. The somewhat
elongated posterior adductor impression is situated close to the upper
valve-border, half-way between the umbo and the posterior margin,
and just below the narrow, lath-like process which is represented on
the cast by a groove close to the valve-margin. The pallial line on
reaching its posterior extremity turns sharply forward with an
angular bend.
Dimensions.— (1) (2)
Tenet ata uanceeage eee eerie 15 ‘ 22 mm.
Greatest height, (...5252sasegss tees 8 : Ife
Occurrence.—Specimen (1), preserved as a mould of the external
surface of a left valve, was found on the left side of the Coega
Valley, half a mile down from the railway (461g). Specimen (2),
which is the cast of the interior of a left valve, came from a bare
slope W. 30 8. from the middle of Barkly Bridge, on the farm
Olifant’s Kop, Sunday’s River (35h).
Remarks.—There can be no reasonable doubt that the two
specimens above described, showing the exterior and interior
characters respectively, belong to one species. They are of interest
as representing a genus of shells which is elsewhere only known to
occur in rocks of Cretaceous age. These valves have a very delicately
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 139
shaped, flattened form, and though their depth cannot be satisfac-
torily measured in either specimen, it could not have exceeded two
or three millimetres. In the example from Olifant’s Kop, the pallial
border does not lie in a median plane of symmetry, but is laterally
bowed, with a slight convexity towards the observer. This may
possibly have been an individual abnormally distorted in life, or the
distortion may perhaps have been brought about during the process
of fossilisation, but it was probably not a normal character.
Anthonya cultrifornis Gabb,* the type-species of the genus, from
the Cretaceous rocks of California, differs in being considerably
more elongated and attenuated posteriorly, and in having more
oblique posterior truncation. It also lacks the close linear orna-
ments which cover the whole surface of A. lineata, though it has a
similar type of sculpture in the umbonal region.
A. cantiana Woods,+ from the Folkestone Beds of Folkestone, is
more inequilateral, with the umbonal region more elevated and
nearer to the anterior extremity. A species described by Mr. Woods,
though unnamed, from the Lower Greensand of Atherfield, is
distinguished by the posterior elongation and attenuation of its
shell, and by its smooth surface.
Anthonya cornueliana (d’Orb.) | appears to approach more closely
in form, especially such a specimen as that figured by Miss Skeat ;
but A. lineata is less inequilateral and is not so obliquely truncated
posteriorly.
Genus TANCREDIA J. Lycett.
TANCREDIA SCHWARZI sp. NOv.
Plate VII., figs. 9, 9a, 10.
Description.—The shell has an elongated trigonal outline, well
produced anteriorly. The umbonal region is prominent, the margin
before and behind it falling away rapidly. The umbo is situated
within the posterior half of the valve, though not distant from the
middle; it is fairly strongly incurved. The upper margin in front of
the umbo forms a straight line in profile, and only curves on reaching
the anterior extremity, where it passes by a sudden and sharp bend
into the long, gently convex inferior margin. At the posterior
end of the short, straight hinge-line the shell-outline is obliquely
* Gabb (1), p. 182, pl. xxx., fig. 236.
+ Woods (3), vol. ii., part 3, p. 130, pl. xix., figs. 4, 5 (1906).
t @Orbigny (3), p. 74, pl. cclxiv., figs. 7-9 (1844), described as Crassatella ;
Skeat and Madsen (1), p. 178, pl. vi., fig. 13 (as Ptychomya).
140 Annals of the South African Musewm.
truncated. The oblique posterior border has a sub-angular junction
with the inferior border. The greatest height occurs at the umbo.
The valves are weakly inflated, most strongly so posteriorly to the
middle, and are anteriorly compressed and flattened.
On the posterior side of the valve, a well-marked carinal ridge
extends obliquely backwards from the umbo to the posterior angle of
the shell, cutting off a narrow, flattened area from the flank. Near
the umbo, the surface of the area is directed at right angles to that
of the flank, but the angle becomes more obtuse when traced
towards the posterior end of the valve. The surface of the area is
slightly concave in the neighbourhood of the umbo, but becomes
flat posteriorly. The surface of the flank close to the antero-superior
margin curves over with a convex surface towards the margin.
The surface of the valves is marked only by occasional faint growth-
lines.
Immature specimens have a rather more pointed anterior outline
than an individual of larger dimensions.
Dimensions.— (1) (2) (35)
HE ere lipas,. eetnckhdssme. at ese da eae 16 , 16 , 22 mm.
Height, measured from the umbo 10 : ia : 1 Roieee
Greatest depth of a single valve 4 : t ; Oss
Occurrence.—In the kloof east-north-east of Red House, on the left
side of the Zwartkop’s River (324); this form is also found in the
Marine Beds of the Sunday’s River, where it occurs associated in
the same hand-specimen with Trigonia vau, Trigonia conocardii-
fornuis, Acteonina atherstoni, and other characteristic shells. A
specimen of this kind is from the collection of the South African
Museum. Mr. Rogers collected a fine example of this form from a
cliff W. 20 S. from Comley’s house, right bank of Sunday’s River
(95h).
Itemarks.—The specimens examined are unfortunately so preserved
in hard matrix that it has been found impossible to investigate the
internal characters. The outward features of the shell, however, are
so well marked and so characteristic, that one can scarcely suggest
a doubt as to the generic position, unless, indeed, it should happen
that we are dealing with a striking instance of parallelism, of which
there is so far no evidence. It is with Jurassic forms that the most
striking similarities are shown.
This shell may be most aptly compared with familiar English
Oolitic forms. 1’. extensa Lycett,* from the Inferior Oolite, is very
* Lycett (1), pl. xi., fig. 9; Morris and Lycett (1), part iii., p. 93, pl. xiii., fig. 6
(1855).
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 141
similar in outline, but differs in having the umbones more centrally
placed, and the posterior carinal ridge less prominently developed
and less steeply inclined. The posterior area is narrower, and
this and the carinal ridge have greater relative length than in
T. schwarz. In the African shell the umbonal angle is sharper
and the umbonal region more prominently projecting.
Tancredia brevis Lycett,* from the Great Oolite, is also closely
similar in form, and may be distinguished principally by its slightly
greater convexity, its less prominently projecting umbonal region,
and its more pointed anterior outline.
Again, the resemblance shown by TZ. schwarz: to T. angulata
Lycett,{ from the Great Oolite, is very close, particularly in the
position of the umbones, the long antero-superior slope of the outline,
and the inclination of the carinal ridge; in T. angulata, however,
the outline is rather more obtuse at the posterior angle, and the
aspect of posterior truncation is more marked, while the anterior
outline has a rather more pointed form. The resemblance of 7.
schwarzi to these Jurassic types is indeed so striking as necessarily
to arrest attention, and it is clear that such a form, if known before,
would have been seized upon by those who believed the Uitenhage
fauna to be of Oolitic age. How little reliance should be placed on
the evidence of a single occurrence such as this is well shown by a
study of the associated types, which can only be taken to indicate the
Lower Cretaceous age of this fauna. Although the genus Tancredia
reached its greatest development during Jurassic times, 7’. americana
Meek and Hayden { is known from Cretaceous strata on the Upper
Missouri and on Cache La Poudre River, in Colorado. The generic
position of 7’. americana has not been disputed, so far as I am aware,
but itis a much larger shell, not closely comparable with the one
we are discussing.
A shell from the Upper Aptian of Spain, described by Coquand §
as Tellina gibba, bears considerable resemblance to some forms of
Tancredia, and may very well be a representative of this genus,
though Stoliczka suggested that it belongs to Gray’s Tellinella.
Coquand himself stated that it differs from other fossil Telline by
its elongated form and particularly by the strong carinal ridge.
Speaking generally, this shell shares the main outward characters of
* Morris and Lycett (1), part iii., p. 92, pl. xiii., fig. 8 (1855).
+ Lycett (2), 341, pl. xiv., fig. 5; Morris and Lycett (1), part iii., p. 94, pl. xiii.,
fig. 9 (1855).
t Meek (2), p. 142, pl. 38, fig. 1.
§ Coquand (1), p. 101, pl. viii., figs. 9, 10. m
142 Annals of the South African Musewm.
Tancredia schwarzi, from which it differs by its greater elongation
and relatively reduced height; it has a more obtuse umbonal angle,
and the umbonal region is consequently considerably less prominent.
Although there is also some resemblance to shells which have been
ascribed to the genus Paleomya Zittel and Goubert,* Paleomya
deshayest Zittel and Goub., from the Corallian, upon which the
genus was established, is a more elongated shell and is more
inequilateral and less definitely carinated posteriorly. Its umbonal
angle is also very much more obtuse. Palezomya autissiodorensis
(Cott.) de Loriol,t from the Portlandian of the Yonne, while more
equilateral and more sharply carinated than the last, is also
relatively much more elongated than the African shell, and has
much less sloping upper outlines, with inconspicuous umbonal
region and obtuse umbonal angle. It may be noted that Miss E. G.
Skeat | has referred this Portlandian shell to the genus Tancredia,
and expressed the belief that these supposed separate genera may
have to be united; she points out that they appear to agree very
closely both in external and internal characters.
Genus THETIRONIA F. Stoliczka.
THETIRONIA PAPYRACEA (Sharpe).
Plate VII., figs. 11, lla.
1856. Ceromya papyracea D. Sharpe, Trans. Geol. Soc. Lond., ser. 2,
Voli vil, p. 195, spl. xxi, fies 8:
Supplementary Description.—The shell is of rounded sub-quadrate
or oblong outline, with the length slightly greater than the height ;
it is strongly inflated in the umbonal half. The umbones are
strongly incurved and are anteriorly directed; they are situated at a
distance of less than one-third of the shell’s total length from the
anterior margin. The hinge-line is only very slightly curved and has
a scarcely perceptible downward slope when traced backwards from
the umbo, passing posteriorly by a somewhat abrupt curve into the
elongated posterior margin; this margin, also, is only very slightly
convex in profile and gives the shell an aspect of vertical posterior
truncation. The lower border forms a gently convex profile. There
is no keel on the posterior side of the valve.
The surface of the very thin shell is ornamented by numerous,
* Zittel and Goubert (1), pl. viii., figs. 6-8.
+ de Loriol and Cotteau (1), p. 510, pl. v., figs. 12-14.
t Skeat and Madsen (i), p. 129.
The Inwertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 143
delicate, radial, linear stria, which at the lower margin of an adult,
and especially in the posterior half of the valve, may be separated by
spaces exceeding a millimetre in breadth. The granular ornaments
which occur on the striz# are delicate though prominent, and widely
spaced (nearly 4 mm. apart on the same radial line) towards the
lower margin in the posterior half of the valve, but less conspicuous
and much more closely spaced in the anterior half.“ The radial
strize leave their impression on the cast when the thin shell becomes
removed.
The well-impressed line on the posterior side of a cast, passes far
up and has its angular apex situated close to the umbonal apex. Its
anterior limb becomes weakly impressed when traced downwards
from the angle for a distance of 7 mm. or 8 mm., and appears to
dwindle and disappear at its lower end instead of bending forwards
as a well-defined line. On the anterior side of the cast there is
a single radial linear impression, less clearly defined than those of
the posterior side; it appears most clearly marked at a distance
of about 6 mm. from the umbonal apex, and dies out on entering
the lower half of the valve.
Dimensions.— (1) (2) (3)
Memes... ncns-nseriseneemsoero nese ess 22 25 : 47 mm.
Height measured from the umbo 19 é 22. : 30° |,
Greatest depth of a single valve.. 8 : 10 1A a
Number (3) is the specimen figured by SHarte!
Occurrence.—Collected in the railway cutting between milestones
241-943 on the line from Uitenhage to Graaff-Reinet, about three
miles from Uitenhage (315); also found by Miss M. Wilman at
Coega. The locality given by Sharpe is ‘“‘ Zwartkop River.”
Remarks.—Sharpe referred this shell with some doubt to the
genus Ceromya, and he evidently had not the opportunity of
observing the characters of the cast, which would have set at rest
all doubts as to a generic determination. In addition to the well-
impressed angular line on the posterior side of the umbonal region
of the cast, the thin shell and the surface markings afford additional
indications of generic position. In the fine specimen collected by
Bain and figured by Sharpe, the shell is so preserved that the delicate
ornaments of the surface are obscure, and their presence only becomes
clearly evident when the specimen is very carefully examined in a
good light under slight magnification. The specimen from Coega,
* It may, perhaps, be more correct to speak of some of these markingsas puncta-
tions, each of which has a well-raised circular rim; they represent the bases of very
short spines.
144 Annals of the South African Museum.
figured here, is so well preserved that these surface characters are
plainly visible to the naked eye.
The occurrence of a representative of this exclusively Cretaceous
genus has considerable interest when regarded as additional evidence
for the age of this molluscan fauna. It is perhaps fortunate that the
shell before us, when well preserved, is sufficiently characterised by
its own distinctive form to preclude confusion with Kuropean mem-
bers of the genus, especially as the nomenclature of these has for so
long been in an unsatisfactory state. The European forms appear
to show considerable variation, and are often preserved merely as
casts, while the delicacy of the shell renders it lable to distortion,
and true characters of similarity or difference are, therefore, often
difficult to establish. In like manner, immature or ill-preserved
specimens of Th. papyracea may seem to differ somewhat widely
from the large individual figured by Sharpe, and may appear to
approach some of the European forms; hence, a brief comparison
with certain of these may perhaps be not without value.
The shells from the Blackdown Beds described under the name
Corbula levigata by Sowerby* seem to represent the same form as
that afterwards named Thetis major,t while some shells from the
Lower Greensand of Atherfield (Isle of Wight) cannot always be
satisfactorily distinguished from small specimens of the Blackdown
form. Others from the Lower Greensand in the Isle of Wight,
named Thetis nuinor by the same author,} are frequently preserved
as casts (the specimens from Shanklin), but appear to be usually
well distinguished from those above-mentioned by their greater con-
vexity, their more prominent umbones, and frequently straighter
and longer hinge-line. Some individuals, however, are very difficult
to separate, and Roemer§ united these two forms under the name
Thetis sowerbyt. Forbes, again, divided Roemer’s Th. sowerbyi into
varieties minor and major ;|| but these are both regarded by Mr.
Woods as synonymous with J. de C. Sowerby’s Thetis minor.
Mr. Woods also considers that d’Orbigny’s Thetis levigata is
identical with Sowerby’s Th. minor. Despite some difficulty in
the comparison of certain individuals, we may on the whole satis-
factorily distinguish between Thetironia levigata (J. Sow.)—which
includes Th. major (J. de C. Sow.)—and Th. minor (J. de C. Sow.),
which includes Th. levigata (d’ Orb.)
* J. Sowerby (1), vol. iii., Tab. 209, figs. 1, 2 (1818).
+ J. de C. Sowerby (1), vol. vi., Tab. 513, figs. 1-4 (1826).
+ Ibid., vol. vi., Tab. 513, figs. 5, 6 (1826).
§ F. A. Roemer (2), p. 72 (1841). || Forbes (1), 242.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 145
Thetiroma papyracea is distinguished from Th. levigata by its
greater inflation, its anteriorly situated umbones, its posterior trunca-
tion, and the absence of strong radial strie on the posterior side in
the neighbourhood of the cardinal margin. It is widely separated
from Th. minor by its inequilateral form and long, truncated posterior
margin, and apparently also by the obscure lower termination of the
anterior limb of the angular line impressed on the cast.
The Cenomanian shell ascribed by d’Orbigny to Thetis major,
which was renamed Thetis rotomagensis by Pictet and Campiche, is
much more equilateral, and appears to have the umbonal region less
prominent and less inflated than in Th. papyracea, and if d’Orbigny’s
figure be correct, the angular line on the cast does not extend so far
up towards the umbonal apex. The anterior limb of the line is also
bent forwards at its lower end and passes in well-defined manner
weross the flank.
Thetironia reneviert (de Loriol),* from the Hauterivian of Sainte-
Croix and Mont Saléve, has a general outline and degree of convexity
somewhat approaching that of Th. papyracea, but the Swiss shell
has the limbs of the angular line of the cast much more widely
diverging, and the anterior limb forwardly bent and passing relatively
closely to the anterior valve-margin when traced downwards ; it
is also more equilateral, with much greater height in relation to
length.
Thetironia genevensis (Pict. and Roux),+ which occurs in the
“Gault” of the Perte-du-Rhone, Cosne, Sainte-Croix, and other
places, is distinguished by its more equilateral and more circular
outline, and by the form of the angular line on the cast, though
it approaches Th. papyracea in its inflation and in the prominence
of the umbonal region. Thetironia prestensis (Pictet and Cam-
piche) | (Aptian) lacks the elongation and posterior truncation that
characterises Th. papyracea, and its linear markings on the cast
follow a widely different course.
Thetiroma sancte-crucis (Pict. and Camp.) is still further removed
from the African shell, not only by its outline, but especially by
the great relative breadth and shallowness of the posterior sinus on
the cast.
A shell which much more closely approaches 7’. papyracea in the
general form and outline and in the position of the umbones is
* de Loriol (1), p. 65, pl. ix., fig. 11.
+ Pictet and Roux (1), p. 420, pl. xxx., fig. 2 (1852).
t Pictet and Campiche (1), 3° Partie, p. 205, pl. exii., fig. 6 (1865).
146 Annals of the South African Museum.
Th. caucasica (Kichwald),* from ‘‘ Greensand” in Daghestan, said
to be of Gault horizon. When compared with other representatives
of the genus, this, like the African form, is of relatively elongated
outline; but in Zh. caucasica the shell is slightly more equilateral
and the posterior border is not so abruptly truncated as in Th.
papyracea, but is more convex in profile, while the course followed
by the anterior limb of the angular line on the cast is a different
one.
Although the true systematic position of the genus Thetirona
cannot yet be said to be established beyond doubt, it is clear that
the angular linear marking on the internal casts in no degree coincides
with the course of the pallial ine. The genus has therefore been
erroneously held to be related to members of the Veneride, but
although its suggested affinity to the Lucinide seems to accord
better with what is known of its characters,| yet the evidence for
such relationship is not of a satisfactory character. Mr. H. Woods,
who has examined some material which is very favourably preserved
for the purpose of comparative study, has found points of analogy
between Thetironia and Protocardia, both in the characters of the
hinge and the ornamentation ; but after drawing attention to some
features which distinguish these genera, and carefully weighing the
available evidence, Mr. Woods concludes that ‘‘ although T'hetironia
resembles the Cardiidz in several respects, yet thejpoints of difference
are too great to allow of its being included in that family.” }
THETIRONIA OBLONGA Sp. Nov.
Plate VII., figs. 12, 12a, 120.
Description.—The shell is of elongated form, with the length con-
siderably greater than the height. The umbones are situated a short
distance anteriorly to the middle of the shell and are fairly well
raised and prominent and are strongly incurved. The cardinal
margin is very long and is only slightly curved, falling very gently
when traced forwards from the umbo and still more gradually
posteriorly to the umbones. The greatest height of the shell is at
the umbonal part. The height near the posterior end of the shell is
greater than in the anterior quarter. In lateral aspect, the cardinal
margin is seen to pass by a curve into the posterior margin, which
* Hichwald (1), p. 709, pl. xxvi., fig. 7; Anthula (1), p. 90, Taf. iv., fig. 6.
+ See remarks on this point by Miss E. G. Skeat; Skeat and Madsen (1), p. 177.
{ Woods (3), vol. ii., part 4, p. 167 (1907).
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 147
at once falls very steeply with very gently convex outline. This
passes in turn by a curve (broader than that of the postero-dorsal
outline) into the inferior margin, which has an almost straight out-
line. The short frontal border has an evenly convex outline. The
shell is greatly inflated below the umbonal region, but the valves are
compressed in the neighbourhood of the posterior border.
The outer surface of the very thin shell-wall, so far as it has been
observed, appears to show only the faintest traces of radial strie,
but delicate radial linear markings are to be seen on the surface of a
cast of the interior. The punctate ornaments of the surface may be
separated from one another, on the same radial line, by a space of
at least 3 mm. in the posterior part of the shell, near the pallial
margin. They are less strongly developed and are more closely
spaced in the anterior part of the valves.
The well-marked angular linear impression on the posterior side
of the umbonal region of the internal cast, has its apex extending
almost to the umbonal apex, so that the apical part of the angular
line is hidden from view by the incurvation of the contiguous
umbones, in a specimen in which the valves are united. The line
forms a very acute angle. The posterior limb is relatively weakly
impressed, but the anterior limb is well incised and has a very slight
backward inclination when traced away from the umbonal apex. In
the specimen here described, it only extends for about 5 mm. and
then ceases abruptly, while the posterior limb extends for at least
8 mm. and dwindles away.
Dimensions .—
Wie ne bigs ceeetee aes eee oe see ce aroun este aia 25 mm.
Height, measured from the umbo......... dye
Greatest depth of a single valve ......... 9)
Occurrence.—Collected at a kloof, 8. 5 W. from Comley’s house,
on the right bank of Sunday’s River (83h).
Remarks.—Only one specimen of this form has been found, but it
is well characterised by its long cardinal and pallial margins and
the relatively small height in comparison with length, as well as by
the peculiar form of the angular linear impression on the cast in the
umbonal region. The specimen is preserved in the form of an
internal cast with portions of the shell adhering, and it is not in the
least distorted. So far as I am aware, there is no described species
of Thetironia with which this new form can be brought into close
comparison.
148 Annals of the South African Musewm.
Genus TRAPEZIUM Megerle von Mihlfeldt.
TRAPEZIUM ? TATEI Sp. Nov.
Plate VII., figs. 13, 13a.
Description.—The shell is well elevated in figure, with the umbonal
region rising prominently, and well removed from the anterior
extremity. The cardinal margin is almost straight posteriorly to the
umbo, and slopes back to form a rounded obtuse angle with the
straight, very steeply falling posterior border. In front of the umbo
the margin falls rapidly, with shghtly convex outline, to the sharply
convex anterior border. The inferior margin gives a broadly convex
outhne, and has a sharply angular junction with the posterior
border. The greatest height occurs at the umbo, the greatest con-
vexity at about the middle of the valve.
On the posterior side of the valve a sharp carinal ridge passes
in steeply inclined direction from just behind the umbonal apex to
the postero-inferior angle of the valve-margin. This carina marks
off a very well-defined, flattened posterior area, the surface of which
is inclined at a sharp angle to that of the remainder of the valve.
The valve-surface is devoid of sculpture, but is marked by numerous
delicate lines of growth.
Dimensions.— (1) (2)
Lionel paneer one osmseeneaeace 9°5 ‘ 14 mm.
Height :..seccacsogstennes.cssonsets 8 : WAY
Depth of a single valve ......... — ee
Occurrence.—Found on the left side of the rece Valley, half a
mile down from the railway (452g). An imperfect left valve,
apparently of the same species, occurring in the same hand-specimen
with Solecurtus sp. and Meretrix witenhagensis (310), was found at
Grass Ridge, three miles east-north-east of Uitenhage.
Remarks.—Unfortunately there is only a single perfect specimen,
a left valve, available for description, but this is very well preserved,
although the interior characters cannot be studied.
Another shell of still more doubtful generic position, with which
this form is comparable in some respects, is Corbula ? rockiana
Tate.“ The general habit is very similar, but a very careful com-
parison with Tate’s type-specimen (number 11023 in the collection of
the Geological Society) seems to preclude any idea of uniting these
two forms. Tate’s species is less elongated, more elevated in figure,
and considerably more inflated, particularly in the umbonal region,
* Tate (1), p. 159, pl. viii., fig. 8.
The Invertebrate Fawna of the Uitenhage Series. 149
and its carina falls more steeply and forms a line more nearly
straight. In Trapeziwm ? tatei, the carina follows a more oblique
direction and forms a more curved line when the valve is viewed
in lateral aspect. In Corbula? rockiana the umbonal region is
broader and more massive, and the incurvation more pronounced.
It may be remarked that Tate’s figure of Corbula ? rockiana is not
accurately drawn. ‘The figure gives the idea that there is a depres-
sion or concavity on the surface of the valve, whereas this is really
not the case in the specimen itself.
A shell of apparently very similar type, so far as external
characters go, has been described by G. Miiller* from the Lower
Cretaceous of German Hast Africa as Mactra stromert. Another
comparable form when large specimens are selected is Mactra ? angu-
lata J. de C. Sowerby, from the Blackdown Beds of England.+ This,
however, is less produced in front and the umbonal region is
not so prominently developed and is less incurved. The umbo in
Trapezium ? tatet is more anteriorly placed and more forwardly
directed.
Owing to the scanty material available for study, and the fact that
the nature of the interior is at present unknown, the generic position
of this shell cannot be satisfactorily settled, although the provisional
assignment to Trapeziwm may, perhaps, not prove incorrect. It
seems possible, however, that this may be a member of the group,
typified by Cypricardia bathonica d’Orb.,} of the Great Oolite, for
which Fischer has proposed the name Pseudotrapezium,§ although
there can be no certainty on this point.
Genus CYPRINA Lamarck.
CyYPRINA RUGULOSA Sharpe.
1856. Cyprina rugulosa D. Sharpe, Trans. Geol. Soc. Lond., ser. 2,
vOlenviie palo, pls xxi, tis, 9,
Occurrence.—This characteristic form was obtained from the green
sandy beds, crowded with the remains of oysters, in the cliff below
the old school-house at Dunbrodie, Sunday’s River (325). Sharpe
recorded it from ‘Sunday River, in greenish shelly grit,’ and Stow
mentions its occurrence above the Modder Drift on the Sunday’s
* G. Miiller (1), p. 563, pl. xxv., fig. 15.
+ J. de C. Sowerby (2), p. 341, pl. xvi., fig. 9.
t Morris and Lycett (1), part ii., p. 75, pl. vii., fig. 8 (1853).
§ Fischer (1), fase. xi., p. 1075 (1887).
11
150 Annals of the South African Museum.
River, in association with the characteristic Trigoni@ of the Marine
Beds. In 1905 Mr. Rogers found this species in the cliff on Buck
Kraal, Sunday’s River (128h).
Remarks.—Cyprina rugulosa, in its inflated character, the position
of the umbones, and the wrinkled surface, bears no slight resem-
blance to C. regularis d’Orb.,* from the lower Gault of Europe; it
differs chiefly in the manner in which the upper margin slopes away
posteriorly into the posterior margin. The European form has
greater relative height at its posterior end, with an accompanying
aspect of truncation.
Some individuals of C. rugulosa, in which the shell attains a rather
greater height in proportion to length than in the majority of
specimens I have examined, approach somewhat closely in form to
a Cyprina recorded by Dacqué from strata of supposed Aptian age
in Somaliland;{+ but C. rugulosa is less strongly inflated, and
most examples are further distinguished by their rough surface
markings.
CYPRINA BORCHERDSI Tate.
1867. Cyprina borcherdsi R. Tate, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soe., vol. xxiii.,
p. L61, plicvill.; fie. 2.
Occurrence.—Found in the railway cutting between milestones
941-943 on the line from Uitenhage to Graaff-Reinet, about three
miles from Uitenhage (313). The specimens described by Tate were
also from the Zwartkop’s River.
A specimen obtained by Mr. Rogers from the left side of the Coega
Valley, half a mile down from the railway (467g), must also be
referred to the same species.
Remarks.—Tate’s type-specimen is unfortunately inaccurately
figured, and is represented as considerably more elongated than it
really is. It measures 42 mm. in greatest length and 31 mm. in
height, while the corresponding measurements of the illustration in
Tate’s paper are 47 mm, and 27 mm. respectively. The greatest
depth (convexity) of this type-specimen (a single valve) is about
10 mm. A specimen obtained by Messrs. Rogers and Schwarz is an
immature individual measuring 17 mm. in height; it is imperfect
anteriorly, and consequently has the aspect of being more equilateral
than Tate’s shell, though a careful comparison leaves no doubt about
its identity.
* @Orbigny (3), p. 100, pl. 272, figs. 3-6 (1844); Pictet and Campiche (1),
3e Partie, p. 224, pl. exv., figs. 1, 2 (1865).
+ Dacqué (1), p. 16, Taf. ii., fig. 9.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 151
I have been unable to ascertain the nature of the hinge, and must
regard the generic determination of this form as provisional. A
shell having very similar outward form is Cyprina swindonensis,
described by the late Prof. Blake * from the Portlandian Swindon
Sands of England.
Genus MERETRIX Lamarck (sensw lato).
MERETRIX UITENHAGENSIS sp. nov.
Plate VIL., figs. 14, 14a; VIII., figs. 1, 1a.
Description.—The shell is of somewhat variable ovate outline,
with the umbones situated at about one-third (or slightly less) of the
shell’s total length from the anterior extremity. The shell-substance
is relatively thin and the aspect of the valves considerably com-
pressed and flattened, particularly in the lower half of the individual.
The cardinal margin slopes down only very gently when traced back
from the umbo, giving a slightly convex outline, and passes by a
curve into the posterior border which is evenly convex in outline,
or most sharply curved towards the lower part. This border
usually has considerably greater extent than the frontal border,
which is more sharply curved and limited in height by the some-
what rapid convergence of the upper and lower borders in front
of the umbo. The inferior border gives an evenly convex out-
line. The umbones are little-prominent and gently incurved;
they share in the relatively compressed character of the shell.
The greatest height of the valve occurs a little posteriorly to
the umbo.
The surface is covered with very minute and delicate, concentric,
raised linear ornaments, separated by narrow, thread-like striz ; in
the lower half of the valve there are about eight of these raised
lines within the space of a millimetre. The lines are not all of
equal strength, nor are the interspaces equal in breadth, yet
they have a much greater aspect of regularity than that shown
by mere stris and ridges of growth. Behind: the umbones, the
flank of each valve passes over into the well-sunk ligament space
without carination, but forming a rounded, blunt, pillow-like mar-
gin which, when observed in profile, conceals the ligament. The
ligament (preserved in some specimens) in an individual measur-
ing 14 mm. in length, extends back from the umbones for a distance
of 5 mm.
* Blake (1), p. 232, pl. x., fig. 2.
152 Annals of the South African Musewm.
Dimensions.— (1) (2) (3) (4)
Mengthy ace. ssdecaatase: 14 ; 16 : ky ; 20 mm.
Height, measured at the
middle of the valve 11 ; 12 : 13 : Gwaes
Greatest depth of a
single valve basse. 3 : 3 15 ae 3°Oune Anas
Occurrence.—Found in the kloof east-north-east of Red House, on
the left side of the Zwartkop’s River (324), and at Grass Ridge, three
miles east-north-east of Uitenhage (310) ; also in the railway cutting
between milestones 244-242 on the line from Uitenhage to Graaff-
Reinet, about three miles from Uitenhage (316). A specimen sent
from the South African Museum is from the Sunday’s River,
occurring with Holcostephanus cf. atherstoni (Sharpe). Mr. Rogers
obtained specimens of this form, in 1905, from the left side of
Coega Valley, half a mile down from the railway (453g, 454g) ;
from a bare slope, W. 30 S. from the middle of Barkly Bridge,
on the farm Olifant’s Kop, Sunday’s River (24h, 26h, 28h—80h) ;
and from the highest beds in the kloof behind Colchester, left bank
of Sunday’s River (493g, 498g).
Remarks.—Although this elegant shell shows some variation in
outline and in the degree of inflation, yet the individuals here brought
together agree on the whole very closely and are well characterised.
The chief features of the shell are the generally rounded and soft
outline, the inconspicuous, rounded umbonal region, and the very
compressed form of the valves.
In outline, the shell resembles some specimens of Venus
orbignyana Forbes,* from the Lower Greensand of the Isle of
Wight, which differs, however, by the considerably stronger inflation
and the more marked anterior excavation under the umbones.
Meretrix witenhagensis has a less steeply sloping upper margin
posteriorly to the umbones, and the umbones are less prominent.
The minute concentric linear striz are developed also in Venus
orbignyana, though more faintly marked than in the African shell.
Meretrix parva (Sow.),t also from the Lower Greensand of
England, is more circular in outline, more nearly equilateral, and
considerably more inflated in form.
Meretrix brongniarti (Leymerie)} is a larger and more massive
shell, and even if compared at the same dimensions is seen to be more
elongated and posteriorly attenuated in outline, and more equilateral.
* Forbes (1), p. 240, pl. ii., fig. 5.
+ J. de C. Sowerby (1), vol. vi., Tab. 518, figs. 4-6 (1826).
+ Leymerie (2), p. 5, pl.v., fig. 7; pl. vii., fig. 1.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 153
Meretrix labadyei (d’Archiac),* from the Tourtia of Tournay, has
an almost identical outline, but its valves are much more convex.
The same character distinguishes several other Cretaceous forms
ascribed to Cytherea or Venus, which, when compared with our shell,
are seen to have a very similar outline.
In the shape of the shell, the inconspicuous umbones, and the
compressed form, resemblance is shown to Tapes pictetc de Loriol,+
from the Gault of Cosne (Niévre), which, however, is not so elongated
relatively to height, and moreover, has a coarser concentric orna-
mentation. A similar resemblance is shown to Tapes patagontca
Stanton,{ from the Belgrano beds (Lower Cretaceous) of Patagonia,
but the points of distinction are plainly seen in the less elongated
figure, the greater inflation, and the coarser concentric ornamenta-
tion of the Patagonian shell.
A shell from supposed Lower Cretaceous strata in the Cameroons
(left bank of Mungo River), described by von Koenen§ as Cytherea
wohltmanm, differs from Meretrix witenhagensis in the greater
inflation, the more inequilateral form, and the prominence of the
umbonal region.
A word may be added regarding the generic position of this form.
In no specimen has the interior been seen, so that a precise generic
determination cannot really be made with certainty; but a com-
parison with other species in which the hinge-teeth are known,
justifies a provisional reference to Meretrix, if this name be applied
in the broad sense in which the name Cytherea has for long been
used, with reference to Cretaceous forms. The tendency of modern
work is to set closer and closer limits to the application of long-
established generic names amongst lamellibranchs, as in other
classes of Mollusca. It is highly probable, when evidence of
internal characters can be obtained, that an extension of this
principle to Cretaceous forms, on the lines carried out in the classifi-
cation of recent and Tertiary species, may eventually show the in-
applicability of the name Meretrix (equivalent to Cytherea as
commonly used) to such a form as the one here described. From
practical considerations, however, it will often be necessary, as in
the present case, to continue to utilise in a broad sense a name
which, though perhaps technically wrong, conveys as definite a
meaning as the available evidence for the time being allows.
* dArchiac (1), p. 303, pl. xiv., fig. 7. + de Loriol (4), p. 64, pl. vii., fig. 21.
t Stanton (3), p. 23, pl. iv., figs. 12, 13.
§ von Koenen (1), p. 36, Taf. iv., figs. 6, 8, 9; since shown to be of Upper
Cretaceous age, see Solger (1).
154 Annals of the South African Museum.
Genus PSAMMOBIA Lamarck.
PSAMMOBIA ATHERSTONI Sharpe.
1856. Psanumobia atherstoni D.. Sharpe, Trans. Geol. Soc. Lond.,
ser.2; vol. vile p. 196, piixxit.; fig: 11.
This was found in the cliff below the old school-house at Dun-
brodie, on the right bank of Sunday’s River (321, 325). A specimen
from this locality, submitted to me, agrees very closely with the
largest individual figured by Sharpe. The Dunbrodie specimen
measures 25 mm. in length and 15 mm. in height; it is a left valve,
having the characteristic compressed form and flattened flank and
very inconspicuous umbo. Sharpe records this shell from the
‘Sunday River near Enon, in a grit sometimes full of the casts of
the shell.” At Dunbrodie Psammobia atherstoni is associated with
Acteonina atherstoni, Turbo atherstoni, Pecten cottaldinus, and other
forms. Messrs. Rogers and Schwarz mentioned the occurrence of
Psammobia atherstoni in the Wood Bed series of the Bezuidenhout’s
River below Blue Cliff,* but this name was probably applied to
specimens which I have referred to the genus Unvo.
The generic determination of this species must be regarded as
provisional. No specimens showing satisfactorily the internal
characters have been available for study, and true relationship with
Psammobia (or Gari Schumacher, if this be regarded to have
synonymic value) still remains to be proved. The propriety of
considering the name Gari to possess the same significance as that
which has been ascribed to Psammobia (sensu lato) is perhaps still
open to question. The shells we are dealing with in the present
instance are smooth and without radial markings, and this fact,
together with the slight doubt concerning even the broader generic
relationships, seems to justify the retention, for the time being, of
Lamarck’s more familiar and more widely accepted name. It
appears reasonable, under the circumstances, to use as a provisional
measure a nomenclature which clearly indicates the supposed rela-
tionships, though it may perhaps be technically erroneous. To
hazard a “correction’’ of nomenclature on an insecure basis of
imperfect knowledge is a step for which it would probably be more
difficult to find justification.
* Rogers and Schwarz (1), p. 13.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 155
Genus SOLECURTUS H. D. de Blainville.
SOLECURTUS sp.
Text-figure 1.
Description of a Single Specimen.—The specimen is a right valve,
slightly imperfect at the siphonal margin. The umbo is very incon-
spicuous, and is situated slightly in front of the middle of the shell.
The upper margin slopes down very gently in front and behind the
umbo. The frontal margin is short and has a rounded convex
profile ; towards this margin the upper and lower valve-borders very
gently converge. Towards the siphonal margin the valve has a
slightly greater height than in the anterior half. The surface is
marked by lines of accretion, but no trace of ornamentation has
been observed. The inflation of the valve is very slight.
Fie, 1.—Solecurtus sp., nat. size. Survey Collection.
Dimensions.—
length) (if restored) .c20-..--es.-c.8e--s- 31 mm.
Height at the umbos:.2-25....20--...+63 1D nae
Depth of the valve, about ............ eae
Length of siphonal margin............ eas
Length of frontal margin ............ ay
Occurrence.—Found at Grass Ridge, 3 miles east-north-east of
Uitenhage (310).
femarks.—The single specimen examined is not quite complete
at the posterior end, and, unfortunately, the surface is so preserved
as to leave no traces of faint linear sculpture, if such markings were
ever present. By following the growth-lines it is possible to arrive
at the original form of the posterior border. In shape the shell
agrees very closely with Solecurtus warburtoni Forbes,* from the
Aptian of Atherfield (Isle of Wight); the umbo occupies a similar
position, and the valve is anteriorly rounded, with diminished height
towards the frontal border, while posteriorly the height is greater,
The only clearly observable difference is that, in specimens of similar
dimensions, the measurement from the umbo vertically to the
inferior margin is relatively rather smaller in the English shell.
*Horbes|(1) ps Zar, ple iis, fe. 1
156 Annals of the South African Musewm.
This also has very faint and delicate radial, linear ornamentation on
the anterior part of the flank, but the African shell may originally
have borne similar minute sculpture, and on this point nothing
further can at present be said.
Similar forms were described by d’Orbigny, under the name
Solen, from the Lower Cretaceous (S. robinaldinus) * and from the
Chalk (S. @qualis).| Guéranger has figured a shell from the Ceno-
manian of the Sarthe under the name Solecurtus equalis,} to which
our specimen appears to bear a close resemblance, so far as com-
parison is possible.
Genus MACTRA Linn.
Macrra? DUBIA sp. nov.
Plate VIIL., figs. 2, 2a, 3, 3a.
Description.—The shell has greater length than height, and the
umbones are situated at rather more than one-third of the shell’s
total length from the anterior extremity. The inflation is moderate,
and most strong just above the middle of the valves. The umbones
are somewhat weakly developed and are not very prominent. The
cardinal margin and the posterior margin form together a curved
outline which passes down, posteriorly very steeply, to a marked
angular junction with the lower border. From the umbo a well-
marked carina passes obliquely across the posterior part of the
valve, down to the postero-inferior angle of the valve-margin. The
carina marks off a flattened or very slightly concave postero-superior
area which occupies less than one-quarter of the total valve-surface.
In front of the umbo the valve-margin slopes down to form a some-
what sharply curved outline in front, the foremost point of the
anterior margin falling well within the lower half of the shell. The
long pallial margin shows a broadly convex outline, sometimes
slightly flattened towards the posterior end. The greatest height of
the valve occurs at the umbonal part. The surface is smooth, with
numerous delicate growth-lines, and shows closely spaced radial
rows of very minute puncte, only visible under a lens.
Dimensions.— (1) (2)
Ihengthy.. oscc.sassacseusemereeer sneer 15 ; 15 mm.
Height, measured from the umbo 12 : 1s
Greatest depth of a single valve 4 : 3°5,,
* d@Orbigny (3), p. 320, pl. 350, figs. 1, 2 (1845).
+ @Orbigny (3), p. 321, pl. 350, figs. 5-7 (1845).
+ Guéranger (1), pl. xv., fig. 3.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 157
Occurrence.—Found in the cliff on Buck Kraal, Sunday’s River
(141h).
Remarks.—The doubtful reference of this form to Mactra is, it
must be admitted, unsatisfactory. The generic position, in fact, is
very uncertain, for the characters of the hinge are unknown and the
ligament space is relatively extensive. The general aspect of the
shell does not accord well with either Cyprina or Meretrix, The
specimens share with Mactra angulata J. de C. Sow. (Blackdown
Beds),* the sub-angular junction of the posterior and inferior margins
and the presence of a defined ridge running obliquely from the
umbo down to the base of the posterior margin. In M. angulata,
however, the shell is more triangular and less ovate in outline, and
the umbonal region is more prominent and tumid, less anteriorly
placed, and less strongly directed forwards.
Mactra warrenana Meek and Hayden (Cretaceous of Dakota) + is
in some degree comparable, but differs by its more trigonal form,
more prominent umbonal region, and the presence of a defined
lunule of relatively large size.
Genus PLEUROMYA L. Agassiz.
PLEUROMYA BAINI (Sharpe).
Plate VIIL., figs. 4, 4a.
1856. Myacites ? bainit D. Sharpe, Trans. Geol. Soc. Lond., ser. 2,
VOl ovals LOO, pl exxil., fe 17.
Occurrence.—The locality given by Sharpe was merely ‘“ Sunday
River.’’ Specimens were collected by Messrs. Rogers and Schwarz
at Grass Ridge, 3 miles east-north-east of Uitenhage (317, 318,
334, 335), from an outcrop of nodular limestone, the highest fossil1-
ferous outcrop of this locality, where many characteristic fossils of
the Sunday’s River Beds were found.} P. baini was also found to
occur commonly in the railway cutting between milestones 243-243
on the line from Uitenhage to Graaff-Reinet. Mr. Rogers obtained
a very well-preserved specimen from the highest beds in the klootf
behind Colchester, Sunday’s River Valley (495g).
Remarks.—There is some variation in the form of the shell, and
the inferior margin, though never showing a strongly curved outline,
is not always so straight as depicted in Sharpe’s figure. When well
* J. de C. Sowerby (2), p. 341, pl. xvi., fig. 9.
+ Meek (2), p. 208, pl. xxx., fig. 7.
+ Rogers and Schwarz (1), p. 9.
158 Annals of the South African Museum.
preserved the surface is seen to be covered with closely spaced
radial lines of delicate granules.
Although possessing no highly distinctive external features, this
shell retains a certain characteristic aspect, while approaching some-
what closely to some European representatives of the genus. It
may usually be easily distinguished from the larger Plewromya
lutraria (Krauss),* another characteristic shell of the Sunday’s
River Beds, with which it is associated. If mature specimens be
compared, P. lutraria is distinguished by its much larger dimen-
sions. If small specimens of this be brought into comparison with
mature examples of P. baini of equal size, there is a considerable
general similarity between them; but P. lutraria, when young, has
a definite ornamentation of rounded concentric ribs, whereas P. bane
is a smooth shell, with the surface only marked by lines of growth
and minute granules. The umbones of P. lutraria are rather more
prominent, and are perhaps situated a little nearer to the anterior
extremity, while the margin in front of the umbo slopes down more
suddenly than in P. bainz.
Pleuwromya neocomiensis (d’Orb.) + is a similarly elongated form,
but is distinguished by marked anterior truncation. P. rostrata
(d’Orb.) | is more produced posteriorly and has a more curved
inferior outline. Some individuals of P. baini closely resemble a
Plewromya from the Lower Greensand of the Isle of Wight which
has been considered, apparently erroneously, to represent d’Orbigny’s
P. neocomiensis, and is much more likely to be identical with
P. schréderi (Wollemann),§ from the Neocomian of North Germany.
To judge from Dr. Wollemann’s description and figure, P. schréderi
approaches very closely indeed to P. bain.
Another shell which shows considerable resemblance to P. baina
occurs in the Neocomian sandstone of the Teutoburger Wald, and
was ascribed by Weerth,|| though perhaps erroneously, to d’Orbigny’s
Panopea neocomiensis ; the general similarity is great, but the shell
figured by Weerth has an inferior margin presenting a rather more
curved outline.
The shell from the Neocomian of North Germany, described by
F. A. Roemer { as Plewromya solenoides, is an elongated form with
* Krauss (2), p. 447, Tab. xlvii., fig. 1.
+ d’Orbigny (3), p. 329, pl. 353, figs. 3-8 (1845).
+ d’Orbigny (3), p. 333, pl. 355, figs. 3, 4 (1845).
§ Wollemann (1), p. 126, Taf. v., fig. 7 (as Panopea).
|| Weerth (1), p. 37, Taf. viii., fig. 7.
« F. A. Roemer (3), p. 330, pl. xli., figs. 20 21.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 159
straight upper margin and little-curved lower margin. P. baine
differs from this in being more equilateral and less produced and
truncated posteriorly.
As regards the generic position of this shell, although the hinge-
characters have not been described and I have been unable to inves-
tigate them, there is no reason to doubt that we are dealing with a
typical Plewromya, to which genus belong also, in all probability, the
majority of the Neocomian forms to which the name Panopea was
formerly applied. There is no reason to suppose that the hinge-
characters of P. baini differ essentially from those of P. lutraria,
with which it is associated; and although it was the nature of the
hinge that led Krauss to propose for the latter form the separate
generic name Anoplomya, it appears plain from Terquem’s * detailed
studies of the genus Plewromya that the name proposed by Krauss
must be regarded as a synonym—a view already adopted by Zittel.}
Genus GONIOMYA J. L. R. Agassiz.
GONIOMYA Sp.
This genus is represented by a single specimen of a small right
valve. It is unfortunately imperfect, with a large part of the shell
substance removed, and it is embedded in a very hard matrix which
cannot be removed without further injury to the delicate shell.
Description.—The valve has little convexity and is posteriorly well
produced. The umbo is rather pointed and prominent and shows
a weak fold of the valve-surface extending for a short distance on
its posterior side. The shell-substance is very thin and delicate.
The ribbed ornaments of the surface are developed already close
to the umbonal apex, where the anterior and posterior ribs are very
delicate and closely spaced and are steeply inclined to form the
V-pattern. The angle of the V is very acute, and the successive
angles formed by the junction of the ribs of the two series are
situated at first just below the umbonal apex, and then below one
another on the flank on a slightly oblique line posteriorly inclined,
so that the lowest angles of the sculpture are situated more back-
wardly than those above. The most backwardly situated ribs,
which do not contribute to the angular ornamentation, are pos-
teriorly inclined when traced down from their upper terminations.
Posteriorly to the umbo there is a broad smooth area devoid of
sculpture on the upper part of the valve, but this is not sharply
demarcated from the flank.
* Terquem (1); Terquem (2). + Zittel (5), p. 125.
160 Annals of the South African Musewm.
The anterior ribs are narrower and perhaps rather more pro-
minent than the posterior ribs. Delicate and fairly regular lines
of growth cross the surface of ribs and interspaces alike. The
surface of the shell, where well preserved, is seen to be covered
by very numerous and delicate, radially disposed lines of minute
granules.
Dimensions.—The anterior part of the specimen is hidden in the
matrix, but to judge from the course taken by the anterior growth-
lines, the length of the valve may be fairly accurately estimated as
22mm. The umbo is situated at about one-third of the total length
from the anterior extremity, assuming that the above length-measure-
ment is correct. The height of the valve at the umbonal region is
13 mm. The height of the siphonal border is 8 mm.
Occurrence.—Collected by Mr. Rogers from the highest beds in
the kloof behind Colchester, Sunday’s River Valley (489g).
Remarks.—This is the first specimen of Goniomya recorded from
the Uitenhage Series. The condition of the single valve available
for comparison scarcely justifies a specific determination, and the
question of relationships cannot be usefully discussed without better
material for study but the specimen probably represents a new
species.
It is interesting to find the genus Goniomya represented here, in
strata which yield the peculiar Trigonie of the group of T. vaw
which so strongly simulate the genus Goniomya both in the
arrangement of the costate ornaments and in the general habit.
Though the specimen above described at once recalls these
Trigome, it may be readily distinguished from them by the very
thin shell-wall and the presence of surface granulation, as well as
by the details of ornamentation. In Trigonia vaw Sharpe and its
allies, the neanic stage is ornamented by concentric ribs passing
across the flank and area, and the inclination of the ribs with
resulting angular pattern is not produced until the early adult
stage. In this Goniomya, the cost formed an anterior and a pos-
terior series, steeply inclined, already in the neanic stage, at a very
much shorter distance from the umbonal apex than in the Trigome
mentioned.
Genus THRACIA W. E. Leach.
THRACIA sp.
Plate VIIL,, fig. 5.
A single specimen, which must be ascribed to this genus, is
scarcely so well preserved or so strongly characterised as to allow
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Urtenhage Series. 161
of a thorough comparison with known forms, or to warrant the use
of a new specific name. The posterior end is slightly broken away
so that the exact outline of the shell here cannot be clearly seen.
The length is considerably greater than the height; the valves are
of a compressed form, most convex in the uppermost third, more
flattened below. The umbones are little conspicuous and are directed
very slightly backwardly ; they are situated just posteriorly to the
middle of the shell. The upper margin slopes down very gently in
front of the umbo, with an almost straight profile which passes into
the evenly convex outline of the frontal margin. The posterior com-
pressed area is well defined, especially in the neighbourhood of the
umbo.
Dimensions.—
WMenethvaresrsacesestesSec cas aradss seme seoseos 40 mm.
Height, measured from the umbo......... ZO,
Depihrotoneryaliyer-ncccscescetsn. odes tee oseee Sue
Occurrence.—In the railway cutting between milestones 244-242
on the line between Uitenhage and Graaff-Reinet, about three miles
from Uitenhage (331).
Remarks.—Comparison with English specimens of Thracia phil-
linsi Roem.,* from the Speeton Clay, shows that these differ widely
from the shell before us by their much more inflated and prominent
umbonal region and more steeply sloping antero-superior margin.
In general form and outline the African shell shows close simi-
larity to Thracia subtruncata Meek, from the Cretaceous strata
of Sucia Islands (British Columbia).{ The outline also some-
what nearly resembles that of Thracia gracilis Meek and
Hayden,} from Cretaceous sandstone at the mouth of the Judith
River (on the Missouri), but the latter is rather more elongated
posteriorly.
Another shell which may be brought into close comparison occurs
in the Aptian of Spain (Obon and Utrillas) and was described by
Coquand § as Periploma loriert. To judge by Coquand’s figure, this
differs from the Uitenhage form by the steeper inclination of the
carinal ridge and the more nearly parallel direction of the upper and
lower margins anteriorly to the umbo.
* Mya depressa Phillips, (1), Tab. 2, fig. 8 (non Sow.) ; Thracia phillipsi F. A.
Roemer, (2), p. 74, Taf. 10, fig. 1 (1841).
t+ Whiteaves (2), p. 140, pl. 17, fig. 7.
t Meek (2), p. 224, pl. 39, fig. 6.
§ Coquand (1), p. 100, pl. ix., figs. 5, 6.
162 Annals of the South African Museum.
Thracia robinaldina (d’Orbigny)* is distinguished by its more
oblong and less ovate outline, and its more conspicuous umbones.
The African shell compares again more closely with the figure of a
specimen from the Lower Cretaceous (Rolling Downs Formation)
of Queensland, ascribed by Etheridge with some doubt to Thracva
primula Hudleston, and figured under the generic name Corumya.}
Less similarity is shown to the specimen originally named Thracia
primula,{ preserved in the British Museum (Natural History) ; this
has greater relative height anteriorly to the umbo, a more curved
inferior margin, more strongly compressed valves, a less inflated
umbonal region, and less definitely developed posterior carination.
Genus GASTROCHANA L. Spengler.
GASTROCHEZNA DOMINICALIS Sharpe.
1856. Gastrochena donunicalis D. Sharpe, Trans. Geol. Soc. Lond.,
ser. 2, vol. vii., p. 198, pl. xxiii., fig. 4.
Sharpe described under this name a shell which had bored into
a fragment of wood,§ found on the Sunday’s River ‘near Enon.”
He also mentions the occurrence of Gastrochena boring into
fragments of wood and Trigonia-shell, also from the Sunday’s
River.
Fragments of fossil wood bored by Gastrochena were collected by
Messrs. Rogers and Schwarz from an oyster bed at the base of the
cliff below the old school-house at Dunbrodie, Sunday’s River (336).
The shells are concealed within the short calcareous tubes which
line their cavities, and some of these crypts measure about 6 mm.
in length. There is no reason to doubt that these specimens repre-
sent the same form as that described by Sharpe. This shell was
also found boring into lignite in strata of the ‘‘ Wood Bed” series
of the Bezuidenhout’s River below Blue Cliff station.
* VOrbigny (3), p. 380, pl. 372, figs. 1, 2 (1845).
+ Jack and Etheridge (1), p. 481, pl. 28, fig. 11.
+ Hudleston (1), p. 245, pl. ix., fig. 7.
§ Sharpe spoke of this fragment as ‘‘ bone,” but this was corrected on p. 228
of Sharpe's paper and by Prof. T. Rupert Jones in an editorial footnote to Tate’s
paper in 1867, Tate (1), p. 155.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 163
Crass GASTEROPODA.
Genus PATELLA Linnzus.
PATELLA CAPERATA Tate.
1867. Patella caperata R. Tate, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soce., vol. xxiii.,
p. 152, pl. vii., fig. 1.
Occurrence.—A single specimen, on Hxogyra imbricata Krauss,
from the collection of the South African Museum, was obtained at
Coega. Tate’s figured specimen, in the collection of the Geological
Society (No. 11,003), is labelled ‘* Prince Alfred’s Rest” (Sunday’s
River).
Remarks.—The specimen from Coega is more strongly elevated
in form than Tate’s original type. The apex in both is excentric
in position, and as a result of this, the outline from the apex to the
margin on the shorter side of the shell falls more steeply than that
on the opposite side. Annular markings and growth-lines are more
marked on Tate’s specimen, because its surface has suffered less from
weathering than that of the other individual.
The figured type of this species measures 28 mm. in longest
diameter at the base, and the measurement at right angles to
this, across the shortest diameter, is 22 mm. The height is 10 mm.
The true dimensions of the Coega specimen cannot be measured
satisfactorily because the shell has so suffered from weathering that
its original margins are not preserved. There are indications that
a firmly established station had been taken up, on the Hxogyra. In
one place, on the surface of the Hxogyra, in the position which the
serrated margin of the Patella formerly occupied, there are indenta-
tions which correspond with the terminations of the cost on the
Patella.
Genus PLEUROTOMARIA J. L. M. Defrance.
PLEUROTOMARIA Sp.
Description.—A large, ill-preserved and much-weathered specimen
consists of at least five whorls. The body-whorl is flattened on its
under side and its outer margin is obtusely angular; the surface of
the whorl above this margin is very slightly convex. The suture
falls at the bluntly angular margin of the whorls, so that the general
figure of the shell in profile is that of a cone with little excavation at
the sutural depressions and inconspicuous convexity of the outline
164 Annals of the South African Museum.
between these. The mouth aperture is of transversely oval form.
The surface is so far weathered that no sculpture can be seen except
on the base, where traces of numerous raised longitudinal (spiral)
ornamenting ridges, crossed by ridges of growth, may be detected.
The spiral angle is about 85°.
Dimensions .—
Heights. 2. 2.3tnososteusercneneenaecececeessce 90 mm
Greatest width of base............ eaten 1LOO® .;;
Height of aperture: (inc.nescescoscestaace ay
Approximate breadth of aperture ...... ON
Occurrence.—Collected by Miss Wilman at Coega.
Remarks.—This single specimen is the first representative of its
genus yielded by the Uitenhage beds, and it is a matter for regret
that the preservation is so indifferent that a more precise description
of characters is impossible. We must await the addition of further
material before the nature of the sculpture can be ascertained and
the nearer relationships made clearer ; in the meantime it would be
unjustifiable to propose a specific name. In general figure the shell
is not unlike Plewrotomaria (Leptomaria) tithonia Zittel,* but the
spiral angle is rather wider than in that form, and if viewed in
aperture-aspect it is seen that the whorl is deeper in section in the
Uitenhage shell, and the mouth much less transversely elongated.
The form of the whorls is not unlike that of Plewrotomaria
tardensis Stanton,{+ from the Belgrano beds (Lower Cretaceous) of
Patagonia, which is also similar by reason of its large dimen-
sions; but in the Coega specimen the outer margin of the body-
whorl is less broadly rounded and the spiral angle is rather
smaller.
Genus TURBO Linneus.
TURBO ATHERSTONI Sharpe.
Plate VIII., figs. 6, 6a, 7, 7a, 7b.
1856. Turbo atherstoni D. Sharpe, Trans. Geol. Soc. Lond., ser. 2,
vol. vii., p. 200, pl. xxviii., figs. 15, 16.
1856. Turbo baini D. Sharpe, Ibid., p. 200, pl. xxviii., figs. 17, 18.
Supplementary Descriptive Note.—The shell consists of about six
whorls, the first four of which have a smooth, flat, or very slightly
concave upper surface, sloping down very gently from the spiral
suture. The outer side of the whorl is truncated, with a sharp and
* Zittel (4), p. 337, Taf. 50, figs. 5, 6.
+ Stanton (3), p. 29, pl. vii., figs. 1, 2.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 165
prominently projecting longitudinal (spiral) keel limiting the trun-
cated band above, and also a similar one below. Under the lower
marginal keel the surface of the whorl is gently convex in profile and
slopes rapidly in. Just below the lower marginal keel there is a
narrow, deep spiral sulcus bounded below by a delicate thread-like
longitudinal keel. Below this there are four weaker raised spiral
lines which are already developed in the third whorl, if not before.
Until the fourth whorl is reached, the slightly concave outer band
between the prominent marginal keels is smooth, but before this
whorl is completed, in some individuals at its commencement, a
weaker central keel appears.
The spiral angle varies somewhat, and averages about 70°. The
last two whorls expand rapidly. The spiral suture is situated on the
lower marginal keel of the whorls. The mouth has an angular
outer lip, corresponding with the form of the whorls. The outer
margin of the aperture is thin and sharp; under the columella the
margin is slightly thickened.
Dimensions.—
Height of a specimen with four complete whorls 5 mm.
Diameter of the fourth whorl.................s00.00. 4...
{ Height of a specimen with five (or six ?) whorls 14 _,,
( Diameter of the body-whorl....................000800 oe
Occurrence.—Found in the cliff below the old school-house at
Dunbrodie on the Sunday’s River (351), where it is abundant.
Specimens in the collection of the Geological Society of London are
from ‘ the lowest strata of the Zwartkop crag,” and “greenish grit
with Ostree from Sunday River,” as recorded by Sharpe. This form
was obtained by Mr. Rogers in 1905 in a cliff W. 20S. from Comley’s
house, right bank of Sunday’s River (95h).
femarks.—It is clear from a careful examination of the specimens
in the collection of the Geological Society, together with the new
materials supplied to me, that Sharpe was in error when he separated
the shells described by him as Turbo atherstoni and T. baini. The
differences which caused him to make the separation are in reality
due to changes in the nature of the ornamentation during successive
stages of growth; but the specimens at his disposal were very small
and the materials so comparatively unsatisfactory that the mistake
is not surprising. All specimens having the two marginal keels
only, and consequently agreeing with the type of 7’. atherstont, are
very small individuals which have not reached the stage in which, by
the intercalation of a central marginal keel and the more prominent
development of the spiral ornaments on the lower part of the whorl,
12
166 Annals of the South African Museum.
the features of 7. bainti are exhibited. The change in characters is
found to be very constant, although some slight variation may be
shown as regards the exact period, in relation to the precise number
of whorls developed, when the additional keel makes its appearance.
In this connection also, differences of preservation prove very decep-
tive. As the adult stage becomes completed, it is noticeable how
relatively rapidly, by the greater expansion of the whorls, the shell
gains in length when compared with the proportional dimensions of
the young individual.
This well-characterised form seems to resemble very closely Turbo
reedt W. Keeping,” from the Lower Cretaceous of England, and may
be more aptly compared with this than with any other European
shell with which I am acquainted. The type of ornamentation is
essentially similar as regards major features, and while Keeping
gave no account of the variation of sculptural characters when
traced through successive stages, it seems probable that the central
marginal keel became added between the two prominent keels during
the course of individual growth, just as in TZ. atherstoni. The
principal points by which the English shell differs, are seen in the
greater number of spiral ribs on the lower part of the body-whorl
and in the very delicate spiral striation and resulting granulation of
the surface.
A somewhat analogous type of ornamentation is exhibited by a
shell from the Upper Neocomian of Utrillas (Teruel), described as a
Trochus, under the name T’. maestrei, by de Verneuil and Loriére. +
This, however, shows only two marginal spiral keels, while the base
of the body-whorl is ornamented by several strong, well-spaced
keels. Further points of distinction are the fine spiral lines which
ornament the whorls, and the wider spiral angle.
A form which perhaps merits mention by way of comparison
occurs in the Upper Jurassic Aucella-beds of Novaya Zemlya, and
was ascribed by Tullberg to Minster’s Turbo capitaneus.t This has
ornaments similar to those of 7. atherstoni, but there is less overlap
of the whorls, the upper and lower marginal keels are less
prominent and of similar strength to the central one, and the
outline of the whorl is more rounded and less angular. There are
apparently other differences, so far as it is possible to make com-
parison with the figure of the relatively large specimen figured by
Tullberg.
* Keeping (1), p. 97, pl. ili., fig. 13.
+ de Verneuil and Loriére (1), p. 23, pl. ii., fig. 9.
t Tullberg (1),:p. 9; pli ii., fic. 1.
The Invertebrate Fawna of the Uitenhage Series. 167
There is much closer resemblance, again, to Turbo bitropistus
Ascher, from the Grodischter Schichten (of Hauterivian age) in
Silesia.** This, however, has a relatively narrower band between the
two sharp marginal keels, and moreover, the surface of the shell is
ornamented with numerous and delicate spiral lines.
TURBO ROGERSI sp. noy.
Plate VIII., figs. 8, 8a, 8d.
Description.—The shell consists of six whorls, possibly more.
The whorls are flattened above, and the upper surface slopes very
gently away from the spiral suture, terminating abruptly at a
prominent marginal keel which marks the upper limit of the outer
truncated face of the whorl. This truncated portion is straight in
profile in the earlier whorls, but becomes gently but distinctly
convex in the fourth or fifth whorls; it is bounded below by a
prominent marginal spiral keel similar to the one above. Already in
the third whorl, a central spiral keel makes its appearance, and this
soon grows in strength, so that in the fourth whorl it is almost, if
not quite, as prominent as the two pre-existing marginal keels, and
subsequently it remains quite as conspicuous as these. At the com-
pletion of the fourth whorl, or perhaps a little before this, two
additional well-marked, thread-like, raised linear ornaments become
intercalated, one above and one below the central marginal keel.
The lower part of the body-whorl shows a rounded, convex surface
ornamented by about five delicate spiral keels, of which the upper-
most is the strongest and is separated by a narrow sulcus from the
lowest marginal keel.
The spiral angle is about 75°. The overlap of the whorls is such
that the suture coincides with the lowest keel of the marginal area.
In the earlier whorls the outwardly truncated form of the whorls
gives a step-like profile with vertical outer face ; in the later growth-
stages (about the fifth whorl) the upper surface of the whorls becomes
a little more convex and less abruptly demarcated from the marginal
face, while the latter becomes more convex and merges gradually
into the lower part of the whorl, so that the marginal truncation
becomes successively obscure and lost and the whorl attains an
aspect of even convexity. The mouth is then almost circular in
outline, with thin outer lip not showing angularity of form. In the
fifth whorl an indistinct and weakly developed sulcation appears on
the upper surface of the whorl, immediately above the upper marginal
keel and running parallel to it.
* Ascher (1), p. 139 [5], pl. xii. [i.], figs. la—le.
168 Annals of the South African Museum.
Dimensions.—
Height of specimen with five whorls .... 11 mm.
Diameter of the fifth whorl ............... tea
Occurrence.—In the cliff below the old school-house at Dunbrodie,
on the right bank of Sunday’s River (282).
Remarks.—This shell, represented in the collection by only two
specimens, appears to be so closely related to Turbo atherstont that
at first I felt some hesitation in definitely separating it. A careful
comparison with the specimens of 7’. atherstoni from Dunbrodie and
those in the museum of the Geological Society shows, however, that
it possesses distinctive characters which appear in no specimen of
T. atherstont that I have examined; the points of difference are as
follows. In IT. atherstoni the upper and lower marginal keels are
very prominent and the outer area of the whorl concave in profile ;
the marginal keels in 7’. rogerst are less pronounced and the outer
truncated area flat and vertical in profile in the earlier whorls. The
central keel of 7’. rogersi makes its appearance much earlier and
gains in strength so that it rapidly becomes as prominent as the two
original peripheral keels ; this equality is not attained in 7’. ather-
ston. In T. rogersi two additional raised ornamenting lines appear
on the peripheral area, while larger specimens of 7’. atherstont, illus-
trating a more advanced stage of growth, have shown no similar
development. Another feature of distinction is seen in the manner
in which the whorls of 7’. rogersi lose their angularity of form with
advancing growth and present an even convexity of surface not seen
in the largest specimens of 7. atherstont. It is impossible to speak
with certainty of any differences in the spiral angle, but the com-
parison of additional specimens, when these are forthcoming, may
possibly show that the angle of J. vogerst rather exceeds that of
T. atherstont.
A Turbo described by Zittel from the Stramberg beds under the name
Turbo eryx d’Orb., var. major is of similar type to ZT’. rogersz, but
differs in the more expanded form and wider spiral angle, and in the
details of the spiral linear ornaments.
TURBO MINUTULUS sp. nov.
Plate VIII., figs. 9, 9a, 9d.
Description.—The shell consists of at least four whorls, and these
are flattened above and sloping gently away from the suture, but
vertically truncated at the periphery. The truncated marginal band
* Zittel (4), p. 321, pl. xlviii., fig. 10.
EE
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 169
is bounded above and below by a prominent longitudinal (spiral)
keel ; these two principal keels are of equal strength, and while the
lower one is smooth (or nearly so), the upper one is bluntly nodular.
Each of the rounded nodes of this keel is prolonged in wedge shape
downwards into the marginal band, but the apices of the wedges die
out before they reach the lower keel. At the end of the fourth
whorl the wedge-like ornaments appear to be losing the well-defined
character they possessed at the beginning of this whorl and before,
while early in the fourth whorl an intermediate (central) peripheral
keel makes its appearance, though it is less strongly developed than
the two pre-existing marginal keels.
Below the marginal band the surface of the body-whorl has an
evenly rounded outline ; it is ornamented by three prominent spiral
keels, one situated near the lower marginal keel and almost as
strongly developed as this, the other two, rather weaker, below and
in close proximity to one another. The spiral angle is about 70°.
The spiral suture is immediately under the lower marginal keel.
The mouth aperture has equal breadth and height. The outer lip is
sharp and thin and slightly angular, in accordance with the form of
the whorl. The inner lip is slightly thickened.
Dimensions .—
Height of specimen with four complete whorls 8 mm.
Greatest diameter of the last whorl............... Oe o
EMeight of apertures. 2. 52.2552. .saces+ 0. -co-ea+ee ness Aes:
Occurrence.——Cliff below the old school-house at Dunbrodie, on the
right bank of Sunday’s River (305, 351).
Remarks.—This form, though apparently a near ally of Turbo
atherstoni and T’. rogersi, is readily separable from these by the
regular nodose ornaments on the upper marginal keel and peripheral
zone below this, as well as by the stronger development and smaller
number of the spiral keels on the under surface of the whorl, below
the lower marginal keel. It seems probable that this shell would
attain dimensions as large as those reached by 7’. atherstont, and the
appearance of a central marginal keel in the last whorl of the largest
individual examined very strongly recalls the increase of the spiral
ornaments in the associated forms mentioned.
TURBO sp.
An imperfect specimen, consisting of a body-whorl deprived of the
spire, may be provisionally referred to this genus. The greatest
breadth across the base is 8 mm., and the diameter of the mouth
aperture which is nearly circular, measures 4 mm. The surface is
170 Annals of the South African Museum.
ornamented by rounded, shallow spiral grooves, and blunt spiral
ridges having little prominence. These ornaments are so disposed
that above the peripheral area a weakly marked ridge forms the
outer limit of a narrow shoulder which is without spiral sculpture,
while on the lower part of the peripheral area is a spiral groove,
slightly broader than the three remaining grooves which lie below
it. The surface is crossed transversely by numerous and well-
marked ridges and furrows of growth, which are so regularly
developed as almost to appear to constitute part of the sculpture.
Occurrence.—This was found, in association with the three forms
previously described, in the cliff below the old school-house at
Dunbrodie, Sunday’s River (351).
Remarks.—This imperfectly preserved specimen is quite distinct
from the other forms assigned to the genus Twrbo, described above,
but it will be well to await the collection of further material before
applying a specific name. It can hardly even be said that the generic
position is established beyond doubt. Although the rounded form
of the whorl and the impressed spiral grooves might suggest at first
sight that we are dealing with a fragment of an immature Neritopsis ?
turbinata Sharpe,* a comparison with Sharpe’s specimens shows
that this is not the case. The spiral ornaments lack the regularity,
and the grooves are broader, less sharply incised and less regularly
spaced than those of Sharpe’s type. A complete comparison, it is
true, is difficult, since the examples of Neritopsis ? turbinata pre-
served in the Geological Society’s museum are all much larger than
the fragmentary specimen here described, and the involution of
Sharpe’s shell is such that it is not possible to make satisfactory
comparison at the same stage of growth; but the observable diffe-
rences in the ornamentation are in themselves sufficiently significant.
Considerable resemblance is shown to a shell from the Neocomian
of German East Africa described by G. Miller as Delphinula afri-
cana,+ such similarity, in fact, as to suggest that we are dealing
with a closely allied form. The shape and proportions of the body-
whorl appear alike, and in each case there is the strong spiral groove
on the lower part of the peripheral area. In the figure of Delphinula
africana a spiral keel is seen, situated between this groove and the
keel which defines the shoulder above. In the Dunbrodie specimen,
which is of smaller dimensions than Miiller’s type, the beginnings of
a similar keel, though weakly developed, are becoming apparent in
the most advanced portion of the whorl. As regards other charac-
* Sharpe (1), p. 198, pl. xxiii., fig. 5.
+ G. Miller (1), p.557, Taf. xix., fig. 11.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. iL
ters, it is not easy to make a detailed comparison, and it must suffice
to have drawn attention to the apparently close resemblance between
these shells. In his employment of the generic name Delphinula
for forms such as these, Miller follows the usage of Stoliczka.
Fischer has restricted the use of the name to living types, but it has
been applied to certain Twrbo-like shells of Jurassic and Cretaceous
age by several leading authorities.* In the case of the single speci-
men here dealt with, while it may be considered most expedient in
the meantime to use the name Zurbo as one of convenience, it
appears not improbable that better preserved material may even-
tually show that a separation is necessary.
In the form of the whorl and the ornamentation great similarity
is also shown to the figure of a specimen from the Aptian of Sainte-
Croix, identified by Pictet and.Campiche, perhaps wrongly, with
Turbo munitus Forbes. The African specimen is much smaller
than this Swiss individual, but so far as a comparison with the figure
is possible, the general agreement is very close. The specimen
depicted by Pictet and Campiche in fig. 1 of the same plate has a
taller spire and less expanded whorls than the original of fig. 3, and
agrees much more closely with the typical 7. munitws from the
English Lower Greensand, and correspondingly less closely with
this specimen from South Africa, apart from the differences in the
ornamentation.
Genus NATICA Lamarck.
NATICA UITENHAGENSIS Sp. nov.
Plate VIII., figs. 11, lla; ? figs. 10, 10a.
Description.—The shell consists of at least five whorls. The spire
is very short, the body-whorl overlapping rather more than one-half
of the preceding whorl and expanding relatively rapidly ; the body-
whorl occupies rather more than two-thirds of the whole height of
the shell. The spiral suture is somewhat deeply impressed though
not definitely channelled; the upper part of each whorl, adjacent to
the suture, is slightly flattened to form a narrow rounded ledge, as
seen in profile, the outer limit of which is not sharply defined, but
forms a curved outline passing down into the rather flattened upper
half of the whorl. This flattening of the whorl above the middle
zone is most marked in the body-whorl of a well-grown individual,
and even a slight depression of the surface here may be developed
* See remarks by Hudleston and Wilson (1), p. 20; also Stoliczka (1), p. 368
(1868).
+ Pictet and Campiche (1), 2¢ Partie, p. 480, pl. Ixxxiv., figs. 3a—3c (1863).
172 Annals of the South African Museum.
during the fifth whorl. At the middle zone, and below, the whorl is
evenly convex in outline.
The shell-wall is thick. The surface of the whorls is marked by
numerous distinct, transverse growth-lines, which, however, do not
form an obtrusive feature. The spiral angle is about 90°. The
inner lip of the aperture is considerably thickened and forms a raised
callus which bounds a well-impressed though closed umbilical slit.
Just below this, and adjacent to the inner lip, the surface of the
whorl presents a narrow, slightly flattened space. The height of the
aperture is much greater than the breadth.
Dimensions.— (1) (2)
Pidightrofehelll 45 22eceticsaeek tesoee 15 : 30 mm.
Height of body-whorl at the aperture 11 : 24 ,,
Greatest width at aperture ............ 8 ; are
Occurrence.—Two well-preserved specimens in the collection of
the Geological Society of London are labelled ‘‘ Zwartkop, Dr.
Atherstone, 1876.’’ A specimen from the railway cutting between
milestones 244-243 on the railway from Uitenhage to Graaff-Reinet,
about three miles from Uitenhage (350), is referred with some doubt
to the same species.
Remarks.—The specimen from the railway cutting (850) may per-
haps be identical with Atherstone’s two individuals, upon which this
species is founded. It differs from them by its rather lower spire
and slightly wider spiral angle, and by the more complete overlapping
of the whorls. These differences may, however, be due to individual
variation.
Natica atherstont Sharpe,* another Uitenhage shell, is distin-
guished by its much more slender and elongated figure and narrow
apical angle (75°).
Compared at similar dimensions, Natica levigata (Desh.) Leym..,t
a Lower Cretaceous form, has much less overlap of the whorls, and
consequently a higher spire and narrower spiral angle. N. dupini
(Desh.) Leym.,} on the other hand, has a shorter spire and wider
spiral angle, with wider and more inflated whorls and less elongated
mouth aperture. The shell figured by d’Orbigny as N. dupini §
shows much greater similarity to N. wtenhagensis, but this too has
a wider spiral angle and a broader aperture as well as a distinct
umbilical opening.
* Sharpe (1), p. 200, pl. xxviii., fig. 22.
+ Leymerie (2), p. 13, pl. 16, fig. 10.
+ Leymerie (2), p. 13, pl. 16, fig. 7.
§ d’Orbigny (2), p. 158, pl. 173, figs. 5, 6 (1843).
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 173
In form and outline and in the shape of the aperture great resem-
blance is shown to the shell from the Stramberg beds figured by
Zittel * as Natica (Ampullina) elegans Sow.; this differs, however,
by the slightly less overlap of the whorls and by the thinner shell ;
the inner lip is considerably less thickened than in the African form.
It seems doubtful whether the Stramberg shell is identical with the
English Portland Natica to which Sowerby gave the name N. elegans,
and although Sowerby’s figure | much resembles fig. 23a in plate 45
of Zittel’s work, yet typical specimens of the Portland shell show a
higher spire. Natica witenhagensis is well distinguished from the
English N. elegans by the much thicker shell and the lower spire.
The shells from the ‘“‘ Portlandien supérieur ”’ of Boulogne, ascribed
to Natica elegans Sow. by de Loriol and Pellat,! whose determina-
tion was accepted by Hudleston and Wilson,§ are also slightly
higher in the spire, and the aperture is broader and more rounded
below.
The form described by Stanton as Lunatea constricta, from the
Belgrano beds of Patagonia,|| shows great similarity to N. witen-
hagensis, but differs apparently by the more strongly impressed
sutures, the slightly less overlap of the whorls, and by the marked
transverse furrows.
NATICA ROGERSI sp. nov.
Plate VIII., figs. 12, 12a, 13, 13a.
Description.—The shell is small, and consists of four whorls in
the specimens examined. The body-whorl overlaps a little less than
one-half of the preceding whorl, and occupies about two-thirds of
the whole height of the shell. The spiral suture is well impressed
or slightly channelled. The whorl-surface traced downwards from
the suture presents an evenly convex surface.
The shell-wall is rather thick. The surface is marked by numerous
transverse lines of growth and there is also a tendency to produce
coarser, rounded, transverse ridges and furrows. The spiral angle
is about 90°. The mouth aperture is broadly rounded below and
narrowed and somewhat pointed above. The height of the aper-
ture does not greatly exceed the breadth. The outer lip is sharp.
Below, the margin of the aperture is thickened. On the inner side
* Zittel (4), p. 289, Taf. 45, fig. 23.
+ J. de C. Sowerby (2), p. 347, pl. xxili., fig. 3.
t de Loriol and Pellat (1), p. 27, pl. iii., figs. 13-15.
§ Hudleston and Wilson (1), p. 81.
|| Stanton (3), p. 31, pl. vi., figs. 10, 11.
174 Annals of the South African Musewm.
of the aperture is a well-developed callus. There is a slightly
developed, short, closed umbilical slit.
Dimensions.— (1) (2) (3)
Hieightiof the shell v3. se.: cere ceere etree He. ol ee alsa
Height of the body-whorl at the aperture 8 . SiGe, wiOkes
Greatest width of aperture .................. Gee 5:50 %, Gees:
Occurrence.—Found by Mr. Rogers in the cliff on Buck Kraal,
Sunday’s River (136h).
Remarks.—This form is distinguished from small specimens of
Natica witenhagensis sp. nov. by the rather more expanded and less
elevated figure of the shell, and the broader and more rounded form
of the aperture. A specimen from the neighbourhood of Uitenhage
(350), ascribed above with some doubt to N. wtenhagensis, is com-
parable in point of size with individuals of N. rogers. It differs
from these by its broader apical angle, shorter spire, narrower and
more elevated figure, and relatively higher body-whorl and aperture.
NATICA? MIRIFICA Sp. Nov.
Plate VIII., figs. 14, 14a.
Description.—The shell consists of at least six whorls, and has a
somewhat elongated turbinate outline with the body-whorl well pro-
duced and narrowed below. The body-whorl overlaps about half
the preceding whorl, and occupies rather less than two-thirds of the
total height of the shell. The spiral suture is well impressed, and
below it the whorl-surface bulges out in the form of a convex spiral
fold. Immediately below this rounded swelling of the whorl-surface
is a depression of the surface forming a concave spiral band. This
impressed zone is less well developed in the earlier whorls, more
pronounced in character in the later ones. At the middle zone of
the whorl the surface is again convex, and below this the whorl-
surface slopes inwards with less marked convexity. The concave
and convex zones in the upper half of the whorl merge into one
another without the production of any angularities of the surface
or of the outer lip of the aperture.
The shell-wall is moderately thick. The surface is smooth and
only marked by transverse growth-lines. The spiral angle is about
70°. The aperture is elongated, its height being about twice as
great as its maximum breadth. It is angular at its upper extremity
and has a narrowed, rounded outline below. The inner lip is
thickened and a callus is developed. There is a short, narrow,
but closed umbilical slit.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Urtenhage Series. 175
Dimensions.—
ete ton shelley ey eks. 396i siocssawceawece ects 27 mm.
leiohtrOl Aperture <....ccc<s.secessasctesedes n(n
Greatest width of aperture .................. LOD
Occurrence.—Collected from the cliff on Buck Kraal, Sunday’s
River (137h). A fragment of a specimen, probably belonging to the
same form, was obtained from the cliff W. 20 S. from Comley’s
house, right bank of Sunday’s River.
Remarks.—This is a rather peculiar shell, and I am unable to
state with certainty its true generic position. In spite of the
elongated form, the relatively narrow spiral angle, the narrowed
aperture, and the body-whorl produced and narrowed below, the
characters of the shell appear on the whole to conform with those
of naticoid type, while the close and smooth texture and lustrous
appearance of the surface, when well preserved, seem to favour
alliance with some division of the Natice. A striking feature of
the shell is the longitudinal (spiral) depression of the surface of the
whorls in their upper part. This character in less emphasised form
is not unknown in Natica, though I am not aware that any described
species exhibits it in such a marked degree as in the shells under
discussion. The well-known Natica bulbiformis from the Gosau
beds, figured by J. de C. Sowerby,* has a distinct depression of the
surface corresponding in position with the stronger sulcation in this
African form. N. bulbiformis also has a relatively tall spire, but it
is otherwise well distinguished by its more cylindrical whorls, the
deep channelling at the suture and the more oblique direction of the
mouth in relation to the long axis of the shell. Natica angulata
from the same beds,t+- first figured by Sowerby, also shows in some
degree a corresponding depression in the surface of the whorls.
There is a very close resemblance between Natica ? muirifica and
a Cretaceous gasteropod from the steppes of Astrakhan, described
and figured by B. Rehbinder under the generic name Odostomopsis. ;
The general form of the shell and the undulating outline of the
whorl-surface is strikingly similar, but generic identity seems
excluded by the absence of any fold on the columella in the
African form. It may be questioned whether the specimens
depicted in Rehbinder’s figures 12 and 13 are identical with the
originals of any of the other figures given by him under the same
* In Sedgwick and Murchison (1), pl. xxxviii., fig. 13; see also Zekeli (1), p. 45,
Taf. viii., fig. 2.
+ Zekeli (1), p. 46, Taf. viii., fig. 4.
t Rehbinder (1), p. 139, pl. ii., figs. 12, 13.
176 Annals of the South African Musewni.
specific name, and it is very doubtful whether they are correctly
referred to Odostomopsis abethensis (Blanck.), but it is certain that
the Uitenhage form here ascribed with doubt to Natica cannot be
brought into close comparison with Whitfield’s genus.*
Genus ACTZHZONINA A. d’Orbigny.
ACTHONINA ATHERSTONI (Sharpe).
Plate VIII., figs. 15, 15a, 16, 16a, 16d,
1856. Act@on atherstoni D. Sharpe, Trans. Geol. Soc. Lond., ser. 2,
vol. vii., p. 200, pl. xxviii., fig. 19.
Supplementary Descriptive Note-——The shell consists of about six
whorls, in the last of which there is a tendency to develop a steeply
sloping and slightly convex shoulder below the suture, demarcated
from the flattened central portion of the whorl by an ill-defined,
blunt spiral ridge. The previous whorl also shows these characters,
though in less marked degree, but the earlier-formed whorls have
a more evenly rounded outline, most convex near the suture, more
flattened below. The whorls are ornamented over their whole
surface by numerous delicate, impressed, linear, spiral striae which
are crossed by more conspicuous furrows and rounded ridges of
accretion, most noticeable in the last whorl. The spiral angle
is about 45°.
Dimensions.—
Height of a specimen with six whorls......... 19 mm.
Greatest diameter of the last whorl............ OF
Heightof the aperture »......<...sc02.weesdedescss LOM 3,
Greatest width of the aperture.................. 4°35. ;,
Occurrence.—Collected at Grass Ridge, three miles east-north-east
of Uitenhage (333), and from a clay-pit in the lower part of the
Marine Beds on the left bank of the Zwartkop’s River near Rawson
Bridge (343) ; also at Dunbrodie, Sunday’s River (2838, 284). Speci-
mens from the South African Museum are from the Sunday’s River.
The record of occurrence given by Sharpe was “ the lowest strata of
the Zwartkop crag.” Mr. Rogers collected specimens of this form
in 1905 at the bare slope W. 30 8S. from the middle of Barkly Bridge,
on the farm Olifant’s Kop, Sunday’s River (24h); from the highest
beds in a kloof behind Colchester, Sunday’s River (499g) ; and from
a cliff W. 20 S. from Comley’s house, right bank of Sunday’s River
(92h). From this last locality was also obtained a specimen (95h)
* Whitfield (1), p. 425.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 177
which may possibly belong to this species, though it possesses certain
distinguishing characters which are noted below.
Remarks.—Sharpe’s figured type, in the collection of the Geological
Society of London, is an unsatisfactorily preserved immature speci-
men with the shell partially removed. The smallest example sent
to me from South Africa measures 6°5 mm. in length, and is con-
siderably larger than the figured type, but a careful comparison
convinces me that these and the larger shells, one of which attains
a length of 19 mm., represent the same form. All the specimens
submitted to me have their whorls covered throughout with the
delicate spiral striae, and it was probably the imperfect preservation
of his material which led Sharpe to believe that these markings are
confined to the lower part. Relatively to the size of the whorls, the
spiral ornamentation is strongest in youthful and early adult stages,
weakest in the last whorl. A single specimen collected by Mr.
Rogers (95h) differs from the majority of the individuals examined
by its taller spire, narrower spiral angle and less inflated body-
whorl: the degree of overlap in the whorls is also rather less,
and the body-whorl occupies less of the total height of the shell
(see plate viii, fig. 17). This may possibly represent a distinct
species, but it bears so close a general resemblance to A. atherstoni
that it is difficult to arrive at a decision on this point, especially as
some variation is observable in the other individuals.
The examination of well-preserved adult specimens shows that
this species possesses a mouth of oval form, rounded below, with
sharp outer lip and a columella quite devoid of folds. It therefore
falls within d’Orbigny’s genus Act@onina as restricted by Meek,*
under which name it was correctly quoted by Messrs. Rogers and
Schwarz in their report on the survey of 1900.
There is some resemblance between Act@onina atherstoni and the
Belgian shells ascribed by Briart and Cornett to the Blackdown
species named Phasianella striata by J. de C. Sowerby, and
described under d’Orbigny’s name Phasianella sowerbyt.{ This
has a shorter spire than the African form, but to judge from the
figures given by the Belgian authors, the slender outline of the shell
and the shape of the mouth are very similar, although the two forms
are perhaps not even generically identical, and the stria are coarser
in the Belgian shell. In another Blackdown species, described by
Sowerby under the name Phasianella formosa,§ the shape of the
* Meek (1), p. 91. + Briart and Cornet (1), p. 35, pl. iii., figs. 20, 21.
+ @Orbigny (4), vol. ii., p. 152.
§ J. de C. Sowerby (2), p. 343, pl. xviii., fig. 14.
178 Annals of the South African Musewn.
whorls and the mouth closely approaches that of Act@onina ather-
stom, but the spire of the English shell is relatively shorter, and the
spiral striz are confined to the lower part of the whorls.
A specimen from the Upper Cretaceous beds of Umkwelane Hill,
Natal, has been described as a variety of Acteonina atherstoni by
R. Etheridge, jun. (var. wmkwelanensis).* To judge from the figure
of this supposed variety, there is a general resemblance to Act@onina
atherstont, although the spiral strie are depicted as of a coarser
character than in the Uitenhage form. Mr. Ktheridge’s remarks
on his new variety do not suffice to enable a satisfactory com-
parison to be made, but I am inclined to doubt the likelihood of
near relationship between these forms.
Acteonina haugi Ascher, from the Grodischter Schichten,+ the
equivalent of the Hauterivian in Silesia, is of similar general type
to A. atherstoni, and is ornamented over the whole surface of the
whorls by minute spiral striz. It is more slender and elongated,
however, and more cylindrical in form, and has a narrower spiral
angle and less convex whorls than A. atherstoni. The specimen
numbered 95h, mentioned above, approaches closely to A. haugi in
the form of the spire, but has a more convex and less cylindrical
body-whorl.
Genus LIMNA#A Lamarck.
LIMNH#A REMOTA sp. nov.
Plate VIILI., figs. 18, 18a.
Description of a Single Specimen.—The specimen, which is im-
perfect at the apical end, consists of nearly four whorls, and is
wound in the form of a tall spire, having a somewhat pupoid figure.
The outline of each whorl slopes down very steeply from the spiral
suture, giving the whorl a gently and evenly convex profile. The
volutions are relatively high between the sutures. The body-whorl
overlaps about one-third of the previous whorl, and occupies nearly
one-half of the total height of the shell. The rather steeply inclined
spiral suture is not deeply impressed.
The spiral angle is about 30°. The shell-wall is thin, and its outer
surface is marked by numerous wrinkles and furrows of accretion.
The mouth aperture is in the form of an acute angle above, and is
of rounded oval outline below. Its height is about twice as great as
* Etheridge (1), p. 87, pl. ii., fig. 38.
t Ascher (1), p. 152 [18], Taf. xii. [i.], fig. 12a-c.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 179
its breadth. The outer lip is thin and the inner lip only furnished
with a very thin callus-coating.
Dimensions.—
vetchitr Or SOM eae. dccssceesdesseaaseasacauens 33 mm.
Height of body-whorl at the aperture ... 17 __,,
Greatest width of the aperture ............ S:oi5
Occurrence.—The specimen was collected by Mr. Rogers from the
cliff on Buck Kraal, Sunday’s River (138h).
Remarks.—This is the only fresh-water form included among the
fossils found in the cliff-section on Buck Kraal, and it seems most
probable that it represents a merely stray occurrence in marine
strata, and does not indicate the presence of a fresh-water bed. The
specimen may have become washed down into marine surroundings
by flood-waters, but its fresh appearance suggests that it could not
have been subjected for long to the action of currents before becoming
embedded.
The resemblance shown by this specimen to Limnea longiscata
Brongn.,* which occurs so abundantly in the Headon Beds of the
Hampshire basin and in the Paris basin, is really very striking.
Although selected specimens of L. longiscata may approach very
closely in all characters to the form with which we are dealing, yet
this may be well distinguished from most specimens of the Tertiary
shell by its more slender and elongated figure. The spiral angle of
L. longiscata is frequently wider, and the body-whorl is almost always
more tumid than in Limnea remota.
Crass CEPHALOPODA.
Genus PHYLLOCERAS E. Suess.
PHYLLOCERAS ROGERSI sp. Nov.
Plate VIIL., figs. 19, 19a—c.
Description of a Single Specimen.—The shell is very involute, with
minute umbilicus. The umbilical wall is not abruptly marked off
from the flank. The whorls have a laterally compressed form, and
the flanks show a slightly convex surface. The height of the whorl,
measured from the umbilical rim, is greater than the breadth seen in
cross-section. The greatest breadth of the whorl-section occurs at
* Edwards (1), p. 85, pl. xii., figs. 3a-h; Deshayes (1), p. 92, pl. xi., figs. 3, 4
(1825).
180 Annals of the South African Museum.
about the middle of the flank, and from here the whorl narrows very
gradually towards the periphery, which forms a relatively broad,
flattened arch.
The surface is ornamented with closely set, delicate, linear trans-
verse ribs, which have a very slight forward inclination when traced
from the umbilicus towards the periphery. Ona portion of the last
whorl which measures 9 mm. from the umbilical centre to the
periphery, there are 12 ribs crowded into a space of 2 mm. at the
middle of the flank. There are no constrictions.
The specimen is imperfect, and is wholly septate. The course of
the lobe-line is relatively complex in its details. The siphonal
(external) lobe is narrow and very deep, and the small siphonal
saddle at its termination narrows somewhat abruptly to a sharply
pointed summit. The siphonal lobe is as deep as the first lateral
lobe.
Dimensions.—:
Greatest diameter, if completed, about............... 30 mm.
Greatest breadth of the last whorl in cross-section 16 ,,
Height of the last whorl at the centre, in section... 13 ,,
Occurrence.—Found in the kloof behind Colchester, Sunday’s
River Valley, in the middle beds (3h).
Remarks.—This specimen, so far as I am aware, is the only repre-
sentative of the genus Phylloceras which has been found in the
Uitenhage Series. It is, unfortunately, not a complete individual ;
the body-chamber is absent, and a portion of the last whorl pre-
served is also broken away. The surface ornaments are only pre-
served in a few small patches on the early part of the last whorl,
where the outer surface has escaped destruction. In the remaining
portions of the surface which are exposed, sufficient of the shell
substance is present to prevent the septal suture-line from being
seen. It has, therefore, been necessary to etch away part of the
shell with acid in order to obtain a view of the suture-line, but owing
to the mode of preservation of the cast, the picture obtained is not
so satisfactory or complete as might be desired.
It has been possible, however, to trace the course of the lobe-line
so far as concerns the siphonal lobe, the first lateral saddle and the
first lateral lobe. The most striking feature is the depth of the
siphonal lobe, which touches a radius which is reached by the first
lateral lobe. In other respects the lobe-line, so far as observed, very
much resembles that given by d’Orbigny in the case of his Ammonites
picturatus,* from the Lower Neocomian of France; although both
* d’Orbigny (1), p. 178, pl. liv., figs. 4-6 (1841).
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 181
suture-lines are so complex, the agreement, in fact, is remarkably
close. Phylloceras picturatum has somewhat less inflated whorls
than the African form, and its surface is said to be entirely smooth.
In the depth of the siphonal and first lateral lobes of the septal
suture, there is agreement with Phylloceras semisulcatum (d’Orb.)*
but the suture of that form is much less complex in its details.
There is considerable similarity of form to a specimen from the
Wernsdorfer Schichten (Barrémian of Silesia) described by Uhlig
under the name Phylloceras cf. guettardi Rasp.t The whorl-section
of this shows that the flanks converge slightly towards the periphery,
which is narrowly arched. In the African specimen the flanks are
not so markedly convergent, but are more nearly parallel, and they
are perhaps a little less convex. The peripheral area is broader, and
in the cross-section of the whorl a greater breadth is maintained up
to the peripheral part. There are no noteworthy points of agree-
ment in the course of the septal suture of these two forms. In the
shell described by Uhlig, which is said to have a suture identical
with that figured by d’Orbigny for Phylloceras guettardi,: the
siphonal and first lateral lobes are of unequal length, and the suture
is considerably less complex in its details.
The specimen here described appears to represent a new species,
but it will be necessary at some future time to supplement the
present imperfect account by additional notes, and by the illustra-
tion of the septal suture of a more favourably preserved individual.
Genus BOCHIANITES P. Lory.
BocHIANITES GLABER sp. noy.
Plate VIII., figs. 20, 21.
Description. — The shell has a delicately attenuated form, and
increases very slowly in diameter. Near the delicately pointed
posterior end the shell is cylindrical, but becomes slightly com-
pressed laterally, with corresponding elliptical section, when traced
towards the anterior end. The surface is devoid of ornamentation,
and is marked by numerous minute lines of growth which show
a slight anterior arching on the siphonal side, and when traced
across the flank of the shell are directed somewhat posteriorly ; they
follow a straight course (or have an exceedingly gentle and broad
* VOrbigny (1), pl. liii., fig. 6 (1841).
+ Uhlig (1), p. 182, Taf. iv., fig. 9.
t d@Orbigny (1), pl. liii., fig. 3 (1841).
13
182 Annals of the South African Museum.
anterior arching) when passing across the anti-siphonal side. In
addition to these lines there are very faint and indistinct shallow
depressions of the surface, of varying breadth, which follow a course
similar to that of the growth-lines.
It has only been possible to follow completely the course of the
septal line at an early stage of growth, where the shell has a
diameter no greater than 2 mm., and, as might be anticipated, the
suture is here of a comparatively simple character. While the main
lobes and saddles have come to full development as regards their
general course, the minor indentations of the suture have only in
small degree made their appearance. The siphonal, anti-siphonal,
and lateral lobes are narrow and deep, and have almost equal
elongation. At this comparatively early stage the trifid character
of the lateral lobe is already making its appearance. Both the
siphonal and lateral saddles are divided into two limbs by a narrow
and shallow subsidiary lobe. Hach limb of the saddle is in turn
divided by a shallow, pointed indentation. The lateral saddle is
slightly broader than the siphonal saddle. The small secondary
saddle at the base of the siphonal lobe is at this stage weakly
developed and has a blunt summit.
Dimensions. —
Length of a specimen with body-chamber, but incomplete
ab unitialiand:- amuSrior CWUS | esses sscescccne ete omcce sete e ee 50 mm.
Diameter at the posterior’ end) (22.).2...2.82 scknwecss ces snlenese- Dee,
Greater diameter at the anterior End ..............cscceesoseses Se
Occurrence.—Found on the road below the railway cutting, one
mile from Rawson Bridge on the main line, up side (277, 338).
Crushed specimens obtained from the clay-pit on the left bank of
Zwartkop’s River near Rawson Bridge (278, 339, 344), referred by
Messrs. Rogers and Schwarz with some doubt to Baculites, may
probably represent the same form.
Remarks.—The adoption of the name Bochianites, proposed by
P. Lory* for Baculites neoconiensis d’Orb. and its allies, seems to be
well justified when a comparison is made between the septal sutures
of the forms to which the name is applied and those of the true
Baculites as exemplified, for instance, by B. baculoides (Mant.) or
B. bohemicus Fritsch and Schloenbach. Whether we are to regard
* Lory (1), p. 133, footnote ; Lory (2), p. 129, footnote. [I have not been able to
consult the latter work quoted, but give the citation on the authority of von
Koenen (2), p. 397, and G. Boehm (3), p. 26. The papers Lory (1) and Lory (2)
have identical title and date of year, but I have not ascertained which was issued
first ; one is presumably a reprint of the other, except in pagination.]
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 183
Bochianttes as a separate genus or as a sub-genus of Baculites might,
perhaps, be considered doubtful, and on this point G. Boehm, who
adopts the name,* has refrained from expressing an opinion. Sarasin
and Schéndelmayer ascribe a generic value to the name, and con-
sider that a comparison of the septal sutures indicates that
Bochianites and Baculites have originated separately ;+ the dif-
ferences revealed by such a comparison are, in fact, so striking and
so constant that with present knowledge it appears to be a reasonable
and expedient course to regard these forms as generically distinct.
In Bochianites there is a siphonal lobe, an anti-siphonal lobe, and
on either side one main lateral lobe. These are relatively narrow
and of almost equal depth. An important distinctive feature is the
trifid termination of the lateral lobe. On either side there are two
relatively broad saddles, each divided fairly symmetrically by a
narrow subsidiary lobe. There are thus typically only four main
lobes and four saddles, though in some forms (for example B. wndu-
latus von Koenen) the lateral saddle is so deeply divided that it
might be almost regarded as forming two saddles separated by a
lobe less deep than the lateral lobe. To obtain the septal suture
of Baculites, we must imagine the subsidiary lobe of the lateral
saddle to be so deepened as to constitute an additional lateral lobe ;
at the same time the anti-siphonal lobe becomes very much less
deepened, while the first lateral lobe should have a paired instead
of a trifid termination. These relations are very well revealed by
a comparison of the suture-line in Bochiamtes neoconiensis t and
Bochiamtes wateringi § with that in Baculites baculoides || and
Baculites bohenucus.%
There can be no doubt that the Uitenhage specimens must be
referred to Bochianttes, as clearly indicated by the course of the
lobe-line. One of the chief distinctive characters of the form here
dealt with appears to be the absence of surface ornaments, and even
allowing for imperfect preservation, it may be regarded as certain
that the available material would have shown definite traces of
ribbing if such had existed. Specimens from the clay-pit near
Rawson Bridge, which I think may represent the same species, are
much crushed, but the shell-substance is in great part preserved and
retains its nacreous lustre. In these there is no trace of ribbing,
and the shell appears to have been a smooth one.
* G. Boehm (3), p. 26. + Sarasin and Schéndelmayer (1), p. 177.
t d’Orbigny (1), p. 560, pl. 138, fig. 4 (1842).
§ G. Boehm (3), p. 26, fig. 3. || @Orbigny (1), p. 562, pl. 138, fig. 11 (1842).
§] Jahn (1), pl. viii., fig. 7; Woods (1), p. 76, pl. ii., fig. 10.
184 Annals of the South African Museum.
A form with which it might seem possible to bring Bochianites
glaber into close comparison is B. oosterit Sarasin and Schondel-
mayer,* from the Swiss Neocomian. This is also devoid of
ornamentation so far as has been ascertained; but it appears to be
well distinguished by the great breadth of the lateral saddle in
relation to the siphonal saddle, and by the deeply divided form of
the lateral saddle. This division is carried so far, indeed, that it
may be said that two lateral saddles are developed. If B. glaber
possessed in maturity a septal suture having the relations of lobes
and saddles similar to those exhibited in B. oosteri, it would be right
to expect that some signs of it would be evident even at an early
stage. Traces of the suture of B. glaber where the shell has attained
a diameter of 4 mm. are still of a very simple character, and show
no promise of such sub-division at a later stage of growth as that
which characterises the mature B. costeri?. Moreover, the septa of
B. glaber are much more closely approximated than those of the
Swiss shell, in which the length of the chambers is a special
feature.
Bochianites wndulatus von Koenen,+ from the lower Aptian of
North Germany, is well distinguished from B. glaber by the well-
developed ornamentation and the deeply divided lateral saddle, as
well as by other features.
Baculites rotundus Reuss,} from the Plinermergel of Bohemia, is
also a smooth, slowly tapering form, but without particulars of the
septal line it is impossible to make a close comparison. B. rotundus
may be a true baculite, and Pictet has even suggested that its real
position may be in the genus Hamites.
Genus HOLCOSTEPHANUS M. Neumayr (sensw stricto).
The great majority of the ammonites included in the collections
under examination belong to that section of the original genus
Holcostephanus exemplified by d’Orbigny’s Ammonites astierianus,
the form which was regarded by Neumayr to be the best known
typical species of his genus.§ To this species and some allied forms
Pavlow gave the name Astierza, when recognising that the wide
application of the name Holcostephanus was not in accordance with
* Sarasin and Schéndelmayer (1), part 2, p. 179, pl. xxiy., figs. 3, 4, and text-
figure 6.
+ von Koenen (2), p. 398, pl. liii., figs. 11, 13, 14.
+ Reuss (1), part i., p. 24, pl. vii., fig. 4 (1845).
§ Neumayr (1), p. 922.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 185
the results and requirements of modern work, and that a division
into a number of genera or sub-genera had become necessary.* If
we were to ascribe to the name Holcostephanus the broad signification
allowed by Neumayr, Zittel, and others, it would certainly be con-
venient to use the name Astieria to denote one of several sub-genera,
were this procedure not contrary to the recommendations of the
International Zoological Congress.+| It will be more correct, as
Lemoine has pointed out, to restrict the name Holcostephanus to
that portion of the genus, as originally conceived, which is typified
by H. astierianus, and apply it in place of Astzeria.t
The separation of Spitzceras from Pavlow’s Astieria, as proposed
by V. Uhlig and F. Suess, appears to be a well-founded step in the
recognition of further divisions within the broadly conceived genus
Holcostephanus. Holcostephanus, sensu stricto (= Astieria Pavlow,
emend. V. Uhlig and F’. Suess) thus becomes a group having very
narrow limits, and some division of opinion is likely to exist con-
cerning the question of its generic or sub-generic value. This at
present must remain a matter for individual judgment, and in view
of our rapidly growing knowledge and the other causes which con-
tribute to the present instability of ammonite-classification, it is a
question of comparatively subordinate importance. For the purposes
of the present work the name will be employed in a generic sense,
as the equivalent of the restricted Astverva of Uhlig and F. Suess.
It is unfortunate that the specimens of Holcostephanus obtained
from the rocks of the Uitenhage Series are usually in a state of
preservation unfavourable for exhaustive study. Thus, in no case
has it been possible to ascertain the true course of the lobe-line, while
evidence regarding the form of the body-chamber and mouth aperture
is likewise still scanty. We must also look to further collecting to
furnish materials for a study of individual development in the various
forms represented, and it is clear that there is much to be added in
order to supplement the following imperfect account of this interesting
assemblage. There can be no doubt, however, that the characters of
shape and ornament displayed by the available specimens suflice to
enable us to read aright the relationships of these forms, though
perhaps not always with the precision that might be desired.
It may be pointed out that in the diagnosis of Astverva given in
Uhlig’s monograph on the Fauna of the Spiti Shales § a sentence
* Pavlow and Lamplugh (1), pp. 471, 491 (113, 133 of authors’ copy).
+ Régles Internationales de la Nomenclature Zoologique adoptées par les Congrés
Internationaux de Zoologie; articles 9, 25, 29. Paris, 1905.
{ Lemoine (1), p. 181. § Uhlig (4), p. 86.
186 Annals of the South African Museum.
occurs which does not seem to express quite accurately the relations
most frequently exhibited in the secondary ribbing. It is stated that,
starting from the tubercles at the margin of the umbilical wall, there
are groups of secondary ribs “ which bifurcate higher up and admit
of intercalary ribs.’’ It would perhaps have been more correct to
say that bifurcation of the secondary ribs on the flank (away from
the tubercles) occurs rather as an exception than as a rule, since it
is certainly either absent or very rare in the majority of known
“Asteri@.”’ In typical specimens of H. astierianus (d’Orb.), as
figured by d’Orbigny himself,“ no bifurcation in the costs of the
rib-bundles after they leave the tubercles is apparent, but the finely
ribbed forms (d’Orbigny’s plate 28, fig. 4), which have been named
H. saym by Kilian and Astieria scissa by Baumberger, show the
division of the ribs here and there on the flank. In all the South
African representatives of Holcostephanus the groups of secondary
ribs proceed from the compressed umbilical tubercles and pass over
the periphery to the tubercles of the other side without undergoing
any division. It may be noted, however, that the ribs forming a
group on one flank may become so disposed when traced to the
opposite flank that they do not all reunite at one tubercle; thus, of
three ribs departing from a tubercle on one side, two may unite
again at a tubercle on the opposite side of the whorl, while one may
either pass to an adjacent tubercle or may terminate in the space
between two tubercles at the umbilical rim.
There is one other point in Uhlig’s diagnosis of Astierta which
seems to call for emendation. It is stated that the ornamentation
‘consists of a varying number of primary cost which start from the
suture, and at the passage from the umbilical wall into the sides
swell up into tubercles.”’ A specimen obtained by Messrs. Rogers
and Schwarz near Uitenhage, and described below (H. witenhagensis
sp. noy.), is so characterised that it can only be ranged among the
“ Asteerie”’; but in this example the ornamentation commences with
the marginal tubercles, and no primary umbilical cost are developed
in the last whorl. It seems therefore necessary to say that although
primary umbilical ribs are present in the majority of the Holcostephani,
yet they do not form an essential part of the sculpture in all growth-
stages. It may be that in the specimen referred to, umbilical ribs
were developed in the earlier growth-stages represented by the inner
whorls, but these, owing to unfavourable preservation, unfortunately
cannot be studied. In this specimen, which is of considerable size,
the ultimate whorl probably represents a stage approaching, or in,
* d’Orbigny (1), p. 115, pl. 28, fig. 1 (1840).
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 187
the final phase of individual growth, and it is only in this whorl
that the umbilical wall has been satisfactorily exposed and freed
from the matrix.
The predominance of Holcostephani in the cephalopod-fauna of
the Uitenhage beds is no less striking than the manner in which
certain of these lend themselves to close comparison with European
forms. There is apparently near relationship to types well distributed
in the Valanginian and Hauterivian of the European continent and
more sparingly represented in England, and in this fact we may
recognise the most reliable evidence for a correlation of the
Uitenhage Marine Beds with European standards. It will be
well, for the present, to regard with the greatest caution the ap-
parently peculiar geographical distribution of Holcostephanus, since
so little is yet known of any cephalopod-faunas, in tropical or sub-
tropical latitudes, which may be brought into correlation with that
of the Uitenhage Series. Some remarks on this subject have already
been made in the previous section of this memoir.
I have to acknowledge my indebtedness to Mr. G. C. Crick for
kindly assisting me to compare some of the specimens described
below with representatives of Holcostephanus preserved in the British
Museum (Natural History).
HoLcosTEPHANUS ATHERSTONI (Sharpe).
1856. Ammonites atherstoni D. Sharpe, Trans. Geol. Soc. Lond.,
ser. 2, vol. vii., p. 196, pl. xxiii., fig. 1.
1882. Olcostephanus atherstoni M. Neumayr, in E, Holub and
M. Neumayr, Denkschr. d. k. Akad. Wiss., Math.-Nat.
Cl., Band xliv., p. 272.
1892. Olcostephanus (Astieria) atherstoni A. P. Pavlow ( partim), in
A. P. Pavlow and G. W. Lamplugh, Bull. Soc. Imp. Nat.
Mosc., année 1891, Nouv. Sér., tome v., p. 495 (p. 137 of
authors’ copy). (Probably not pl. xvii., fig. 14.)
Occurrence.—Collected by Miss M. Wilman at Coega. A specimen
from the South African Museum is probably from the Sunday’s
River. The type-specimen in the Geological Society’s collection in
London is from the Sunday’s River (registered 10975). Messrs.
Rogers and Schwarz have recorded this form from the Zwartkop’s
River valley in the neighbourhood of Uitenhage.* Mr. Rogers has
also noted its occurrence at several localities in the valleys of the
Coega and Sunday’s Rivers. t
* Rogers and Schwarz (1), p. 9. + Rogers (2).
188 Annals of the South African Musewm.
Remarks.—Some characteristic points in H. atherstoni are the
strong, backwardly directed umbilical ribs, the steep umbilical wall,
the relatively narrow and profound umbilical cavity, and the con-
siderable breadth and inflation of the whorls. The involution until
the shell has attained large dimensions is such that the umbilical
wall of a given whorl falls upon the umbilical tubercles of the
previous whorl, wholly concealing the secondary ribbing. In the
large type-specimen of H. atherstoni, measuring 140 mm. in greatest
diameter, the last-formed whorl is beginning to show a little less
involution, and its most advanced part leaves the tubercles of the
previous whorl wholly exposed, and also the commencement of the
rib-bundles of the flank.
It has been stated by several authors that H. atherstont oceurs in
the Valanginian and Hauterivian of Europe, and since such an
occurrence would be of high interest, both from a stratigraphical
and paleontological point of view, I have taken some pains to test
the value of these identifications. The result has been to convince
me that none of the determinations can be upheld with certainty.
Pavlow considered Holcostephanus psilostomus Neum. and Uhlig,*
from the Neocomian of North Germany, to be identical with
H. atherstoni, or at least that the two forms represent no more than
varieties of a single species. Uhlig, on the other hand, believes this
view to be erroneous,} and points out that H. atherstoni has an
almost semicircular cross-section and greater breadth. There can
be no doubt that, though closely comparable, these types are not
identical. Another allied North German form, from the zone of
Hoplites radiatus (Lower Hauterivian) has been described and
figured by von Koenen } under the name Astierva aff. psilostoma.
In this, the rate of increase in the breadth of the whorls is not so
rapid as in H. atherstoni, and the ribbing is a little coarser. The
pronounced development of constrictions is another distinguishing
feature.
Another European form which bears considerable resemblance to
H. atherstoni has been described by von Koenen as Astieria convoluta §
from the Lower Hauterivian of North Germany. This appears to
have similarly inflated whorls and a narrow umbilicus, but the
number of umbilical tubercles is fewer than in H. atherstoni at a
comparable stage of growth, and the ribs are coarser and less
numerous.
* Neumayr and Uhlig (1), p. 149, Taf. xxxii., fig. 2.
+ Uhlig (4), p. 132. t von Koenen (2), p. 151, Taf. liv., fig. 2.
§ von Koenen (2), p. 146, Taf. xxxix., figs. 4a, 4b.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 189
Holcostephanus multiplicatus Neum. and Uhlig (non Roemer) *
from the Upper Valanginian of North Germany, which has been
renamed Astieria ventricosa by von Koenen, + approaches H. ather-
stoni in the fine character of the ribbing, but is well separated by the
much higher whorl-section and the conspicuous development of con-
strictions, as well as by other characters.
Certain forms occurring in the south-east of France and in the
Maritime Alps, ascribed by Kilian to H. atherstont,{ seem to have
been so named in the belief that H. multiplicatus Neum. and Uhlig
(= Astieria ventricosa von Koenen) is identical with H. atherstont.
Baumberger has also spoken of the ‘“‘ Zone of Holcostephanus multi-
plicatus Neum. and Uhlig, non Romer = H. atherstont Sharpe ” in
the Lower Hauterivian of the Swiss Jura.§ Early in the present
year, however, he has taken pains to show that the earlier identifi-
cation of H. multiplicatus with H. atherstoni was erroneous. ||
When we come to discuss the correctness of Baumberger’s view
that a group of forms represented richly at the base of the Haute-
rivian (the so-called Astieria Zone) in the Swiss Jura is really
inseparable from Holcostephanus atherstont, the difficulty of forming
a final judgment becomes very great. Baumberger discusses the
question in great detail, {and his conclusion is put forward judicially
and not with any claim to be the final word in the matter. Some,
at least, of the specimens figured by Baumberger bear a strikingly
close resemblance to H. atherstont, and it appears safe to conclude
that the relationship is a very close one. It appears possible that
more than a single species is represented in the Swiss material
brought together by Baumberger under Sharpe’s specific name, but
I am not in the position to form a definite judgment on this point.
Of the larger specimens figured by Baumberger, which from their
size are most fitly comparable with the large type-specimen from
South Africa, that depicted in plate xxiv., fig. 2, seems to agree
most closely in the fineness of the ribbing. The specimen
shown in plate xxiii, fig. la, exhibits more clearly the
characters of the umbilical part of the shell, and allowing that
this is an internal cast, the figure might well have been drawn
from a South African specimen. The apertural view (fig. 1b), how-
ever, unless the peripheral part is much crushed down, shows that
* Neumayr and Uhlig (1), p. 150, Taf. xxxiil., fig. 2.
+ von Koenen (2), p. 144.
t Kilian (1), pp. 716, 726, 735; Kilian (4), p. 865; Kilian and Leenhardt (1),
pp. 973, 979, 981; Matte (1), p. 151.
§ Baumberger (1), 2°" Theil, p. 3. || Baumberger (1), 4e* Theil, p. 40.
“| Baumberger (1), 4e* Theil, pp. 39-47 (Astieria atherstoni).
190 Annals of the South African Museum.
the whorl is not nearly so highly arched in section as in H. atherstoni.
In this character, the specimen shown by Baumberger in his text-
figure 115 agrees more closely. The whorl-section shown in fig. 114,
on the other hand, is not quite so highly arched in proportion, and
seems to agree better with that shown by the South African
specimens described below as H. cf. atherstont. As regards the
development of constrictions, these, if truly developed, are so in-
conspicuous in South African specimens that they can scarcely
be detected, and they never form a feature like that shown in
Baumberger’s text-figure 116.
It must be admitted that much remains to be known about the
true H. atherstont. As yet, we are without information regarding
the limits of individual variation, the characters of shape and
sculpture in successive growth-stages from early youth onwards,
and the course of the septal suture throughout the individual de-
velopment. This information can only be obtained by the exami-
nation of an extensive suite of specimens, and in the meantime it is
not possible to form a decided opinion on the question of identity
with the Swiss specimens dealt with by Baumberger. It seems
necessary, with the present imperfect data for comparison, to regard
that question as still awaiting settlement. At the same time, we
may presume the relationship between these Swiss and South
African forms to have been so intimate as to furnish further highly
suggestive evidence for a correlation between the Uitenhage beds
and the strata situated about the base of the Hauterivian in
Europe.
It may be noted that Baumberger gives reasons for considering
that the form from the Hauterivian of the Maritime Alps ascribed
by Kilian* to H. atherstoni, is not identical with the supposed
H. atherstont from the Swiss Jura, above discussed.
It has been stated by Sayn and Roman that Holcostephanus
atherstont occurs in the Hauterivian inférieur at localities in
Languedoc.+ In answer to an inquiry concerning this French form,
M. Roman very courteously sent me three specimens from the Lower
Hauterivian of Saturargues (Herault) which had been determined by
M. Kilian. Two of the specimens were named H. atherstoni, and
the third, a very finely ribbed example, somewhat flattened laterally
by crushing, bore the name H. sayni Kilian. After a careful exami-
nation of these three specimens I was unable to satisfy myself that
they represented two separate species. All three are very finely
* Kilian (4), p. 865, pl. lvii., fig. 1.
+ Sayn and Roman (1), pp. 623, 625, 629, 632, 638, 639.
The Invertebrate Fawna of the Uitenhage Serves. 191
ribbed, and though the ribs seemed most crowded in the specimen
referred by M. Kilian to H. sayni, yet the differences in this respect
did not appear to me to be at all considerable, and other points of
distinction, such as the more discoidal form, were probably to be
accounted for by distortion through crushing. A comparison of
these specimens with Sharpe’s type, and other examples of
H. atherstoni, shows that in H. atherstonz the shell is much more
inflated and less discoidal: the whorl is broader in section and less
highly arched. The umbilicus is relatively much narrower and
more profound. The umbilical wall falls more abruptly and steeply
into the umbilical cavity. The involution is greater. In the French
specimens the umbilicus is of a broader and shallower type, and the
involution is such that the tubercles, together with part of the ribbing
of the flank, are visible in the penultimate whorl. The involution,
in fact, is less than in the last whorl of the considerably larger type-
specimen of H. atherstoni. The primary (umbilical) ribs are also
much more weakly developed than in H. atherstont. The ribbing of
the flank and periphery of H. atherstont is of a somewhat coarser
type, and the ribs are rather more prominent and are less closely
crowded together than those of the French specimens. At a selected
stage of growth comparable in the two forms, a space of 20 mm.
along the periphery includes 9 ribs in H. atherstont and 13 in the
French shells. In H. saynt an occasional bifurcation of a rib, or
the intercalation of a shorter rib between two longer ones, may be
observed to occur on the flank at a varying but usually considerable
distance away from the tubercles. In H. atherstoni, the ribs of the
flank all have their commencement either at, or in the near vicinity
of, the tubercles, and bifurcation of the ribs has not been observed
on any part of the flank.
It is clear, therefore, that these French specimens are not very
closely comparable with H. atherstoni, and I think it highly probable
that all three represent H. sayni Kilian,* a finely ribbed species very
nearly allied to H. astiertanus (d’Orb.).
A specimen from the Neocomian of Speeton (zone of Belemnites
jaculum), preserved in the Scarborough Museum, was figured by
Pavlow (Bull. Soc. Imp. Nat. Mosc., 1892, pl. xvii., fig. 14) and con-
sidered by him to be identical with H. atherstont. Through the
kindness of Mr. H. Ascough Chapman and Mr. J. A. Hargreaves, of
Scarborough, I have been able to compare this Yorkshire individual
with Sharpe’s type and other examples of H. atherstonz from South
* Kilian and Leenhardt (1), p. 976; Sarasin and Schéndelmayer (1), part 1, p. 38,
pl. iv., figs. 2, 3; d’Orbigny (1), pl. 28, fig. 4.
192 Annals of the South African Musewm.
Africa. The specimen is preserved unfavourably for an exhaustive
comparison, but certainly bears a very close resemblance to H.
atherstoni, particularly in the inflation of the whorls and the general
character of the ribbing. Some readily apparent differences may at
the same time be noticed. At a comparable stage of growth the
Speeton form is distinctly more closely and more delicately ribbed ;
umbilical ribs are hardly defined, and certainly have not attained the
development to be observed at a similar stage in H. atherstont. A
further point is that in all specimens of H. atherstoni the flattened
umbilical marginal tubercles have either a slight backward direction
when traced towards the flank, or their disposition is strictly radial ;
in the Yorkshire example, on the other hand, the tubercles have a
strong forward inclination. These differences cannot be overlooked,
and they strongly suggest that the Speeton form may not be
identical with that from South Africa; but it must be admitted that
the two approximate very closely to one another. It may suffice to
have drawn attention to these points of difference while refraining
from any final expression of opinion concerning the intimate relation-
ship of these forms—a question which can only be ultimately settled
by the comparison of further material. At the same time, I am
inclined to think that the Speeton form will not be found to be
identical with H. atherstont.
Other finely ribbed specimens from the lower part of the zone of
Belemnites gaculum at Speeton, which have been referred by Prof.
Pavlow and Mr. C. G. Danford to Holcostephanus astierianus (d’Orb.),
are also in some respects comparable with H. atherstoni ; but they
are usually of small size, and a satisfactory comparison with the
much larger available examples of H. atherstoni is difficult. One
such individual, in which the development of constrictions does not
form a feature, has been figured by Mr. Danford under the name
Olcostephanus (Astierra) astiert.* It is laterally compressed and
relatively highly arched, and the umbilical ribs are very weakly
developed and are not backwardly inclined. The secondary ribbing,
which is of a very crowded and delicate character, has a stronger
forward inclination than that of H. atherston. The tubercles also
have a forward inclination, which is not the case in the African
species.
Karakasch has described a Holcostephanus from the Lower
Cretaceous of Biassala (Crimea) under the name Holcostephanus
(Astieria) cf. atherstont Sharpe.t It appears, from the figure given
* Danford (1), pl. xi., figs. 7, 7a.
+ Karakasch (1), p. 103, pl. i., fig. 3.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 193
by Karakasch, to differ from the African species by the relatively
wider umbilicus and less degree of involution, but to resemble it in
possessing backwardly inclined umbilical ribs. Kilian has described
an ammonite from the Hauterivian of the neighbourhood of Escrag-
nolles (Maritime Alps) as Holcostephanus quebhardi,* and states that
this corresponds to H. atherstont Karakasch, but not to the type of
Sharpe. In the specimen figured by Kilian the ribs of the flank are
strictly radial in direction, so that there is no close agreement with
H. atherston,
Another form which may be somewhat nearly related to H.
atherstoni is I. schenki (Oppel), from the Spiti Shales in Tibet,+ but
this is less densely ribbed and is further distinguished by the
more flattened arch of the whorl-section, and by the presence of
strongly marked constrictions.
An inflated form from the so-called ‘‘ Gault’’ on the Island of
Chasik and from Tukusitnu Bay (Alaska), figured by Hichwald as
“Ammonites astierianus d’Orb. aff.” and compared by him with
Roemer’s Ammonites multiplicatus, may perhaps be related to H.
atherston ; but according to Hichwald’s insufficient figure the
primary ribs are almost exactly direct (radial) in their course. A
complete comparison with this unsatisfactory figure is impossible,
since a side view only is given.}{
HoLcostEePHANUS cf. ATHERSTONI (Sharpe).
A single specimen from the Sunday’s River, in the collection of the
South African Museum, agrees very closely with Sharpe’s type in all
points except one—the inflation of the shell. The whorl-section has
rather greater breadth in relation to its height, and the peripheral
area presents a more broadly rounded surface and is less highly
arched in sectional view than that of H. atherstont. The shell
accordingly retains a rather more globose aspect, the flank of the
whorl is less extensive and less flattened and becomes more insensibly
merged in the broad peripheral area, while the umbilical cavity is
correspondingly rather more profound. The dimensions of the
specimen, which comprises a considerable part of the body-
chamber, are as follows :—
ETE OUUDE SURG CLOTH weer ants oe, aces om ccak stews onee es dace cee as 130 mm.
Greatest breadth of the last whorl in cross-section
SSS MIMMALE)A cctiars aes as cele sess coteien ee seeerae4 vase satis soniseiee Jo
* Kilian (4), p. 866, pl. lvii., figs. 2a, 2b.
t+ Oppel (2), p. 286, Tab. 81, figs. 4a-4ce; Uhlig (4), p. 130, pl. xviii., figs. 2a—2c.
+ Hichwald (2), pl. viii., fig. 13.
194 Annals of the South African Museum.
Greatest height of the last whorl at the centre, in section 35 mm.
Greatest diameter of the umbilicus, measured from the
umbilical rim between the tubercles .................- 480
In the type-specimen of H. atherstoni the maximum diameter is
140 mm., the greatest breadth of the last whorl 90 mm., and the
height of the last whorl in section at its anterior part 42 mm. It is
thus seen that the height of the whorl-section in relation to its
breadth is somewhat different. In the more inflated specimen, when
the breadth of the whorl is 86 mm. its height at the centre is 32 mm. ;
in H. atherstoni (type-specimen) I have estimated that with a
breadth of 86 mm. the height is 40 mm. The two left-hand
specimens, depicted in greatly reduced size, in a text-figure pub-
lished by Drs. Hatch and Corstorphine,* may perhaps represent this
inflated form.
Mr. G. C. Crick has shown me a specimen in the British Museum
(registered 46534) which closely agrees with the one here discussed.
lt is from the Sunday’s River (from A. G. Bain’s collection), and has
at some time been determined as Olcostephanus atherstom. It has
an inflated form and breadth of whorl-section which seem to dis-
tinguish it from H. atherstoni, as exemplified by Sharpe’s figured
type, in the manner described above in the case of the other
specimen. The greatest diameter of this individual in the British
Museum is 145 mm. The greatest breadth of the ultimate whorl
would, when complete, have been almost 100 mm., while the height
of this whorl at the centre at its anterior end would have slightly ex-
ceeded 835 mm. In the breadth of the umbilicus and in all other
characters there is the closest agreement with the specimen from the
South African Museum. This would seem to indicate that fixed and
reliable characters are exhibited which may suffice to separate this
more globose shell from the true H. atherstoni, and it might perhaps
be possible to establish the constancy of these distinctive features
were a suite of specimens of undoubted H. atherstont, at a suitable
stage of growth, available for comparison. Unfortunately this is not
the case, and the only specimen of H. atherstona that I have seen
which illustrates a comparable stage is Sharpe’s figured type. Com-
parison with this has revealed the slight shape differences above
noted, but beyond this there is entire agreement; the characteristic
ornamentation, the degree of involution and the width of the
umbilicus are the same. There is as yet no material for a
comparison of the septal sutures. I therefore do not yet feel
justified in proposing a new specific name for the specimens here
* Hatch and Corstorphine (1), p. 243, fig. 65 (as Olcostephanus bainii).
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 195
dealt with, and whatever may ultimately become known regarding
their exact relationship to H. atherstoni, which they so closely
resemble, it is certain that so far as present evidence goes, this
relationship must be presumed to be very intimate.
HOLCOSTEPHANUS WILMANZ Sp. nov.
Plate IX., figs. 1, la.
Description of a Single Specimen.—tThe shell is laterally much com-
pressed and is discoidal in form; the flattened flanks of the ultimate
whorl are relatively extensive, while the peripheral area is narrow and
presents a somewhat flatly convex surface. The whorl is narrow and
highly arched in section, and the height of the whorl-section,
measured at the middle, is almost equal to the breadth, which is
greatest at the umbilical margin. The whorl, however, is almost
parallel-sided, so that the breadth of its section taken at the middle
of the flank is little less than at the umbilical tubercles. The in-
volution is such that about two-thirds of the preceding whorl are
embraced.
The umbilicus is relatively shallow, and occupies one-third of the
total diameter. The umbilical rim is not abruptly defined, but the
surface of the flank curves down somewhat gradually to the umbilical
wall, which falls very steeply to the spiral suture. Primary umbilical
ribs commencing at the suture slope back very obliquely, and, quickly
gathering strength, swell up at the umbilical rim to form strong,
elongated, much-compressed tubercles, present to the number of
eighteen in the ultimate whorl. The secondary ribs proceed from the
tubercles chiefly in groups of three, but there are occasionally four ribs
in a group in the ultimate whorl, and frequently a rib is inserted so
as to terminate between two tubercles. The ribs at first swing
forwards from the tubercle, and bend back at the middle of the flank
to take an almost direct course across the periphery. The ribs are
prominent in character, and on the peripheral area in the anterior
part of the last whorl their crests are 4 mm. apart.
Immediately behind the oral margin is a strong constriction, anda
portion of a lateral auricular extension is preserved.
Dimensions .—
PC MUGHEROUIAMICLGE) cased cailadocoss acon dodedbiccebeeeccestcaeaeecdee tows 90 mm.
Greatest breadth of the last whorl in cross-section............ 30) 5;
Height of the last whorl at the centre, in section.............. 23
Greatest diameter of the umbilicus, measured from the
umbilical rim between the tubercles .............0...eeeeeee 0? 3,3
196 Annals of the South African Musewm.
Occurrence.—The specimen is in the collection of the Geological
Society of London (registered 10975), and the label affixed to it
bears the following record of locality and collector: ‘ Aasvogel
Krantz above Modder Drift, Sunday’s River, §. Africa. Dr.
Atherstone, F.G.8., 1876.”
Remarks.—The individual above described is almost complete,
comprising the body-chamber, but the exact length of this cannot be
ascertained, nor is the shell so preserved that the lobe-line is any-
where visible. The specimen has undergone some distortion from
crushing, but making every allowance for this, it is clear that we are
dealing with a form well distinguished by its high whorl-section and
extensive flattened flanks. In the discoidal form, the relatively
shallow umbilicus, and the degree of involution, we are reminded of
H. astierianus (d’Orb.),* but H. wilmane@ is readily separated from
this by its very strong, oblique umbilical ribs and tubercles, and by
the inclination and the coarseness of the secondary cost.
This appears to be the specimen mentioned by Pavlow} as a
compressed variety of H. atherstoni, but it was recognised that
the distinctive characters are sufficient to warrant a new specific
name (op. cit. p. 492). As pointed out by Pavlow, the specimen
is distinguished from the typical H. atherstona by the presence
of rather fewer umbilical ribs and by the more strongly developed
secondary coste. In addition, H. atherstona is a considerably
more strongly inflated shell, and has a relatively narrower and
much more profound umbilicus. The points of distinction are in
fact so great that the only course open is to definitely separate
the two forms.
There is much stronger resemblance to H. psilostomus Neum. and
Uhlig, from the Neocomian of North Germany. The ribbing is of
very similar character, but in H. psilostomus the umbilical ribs are
rather more numerous, the breadth of the umbilicus is somewhat
greater relatively to that of the flank, and the shell, although much
more laterally compressed than H. atherstoni, is still considerably
more inflated and less discoidal than in H. wilmane. I believe that
the presence of the above characters of distinction must be con-
sidered sufficient to warrant the provisional separation of these two
forms, but there can be little doubt that the relationship is intimate,
and there is no other known Holcostephanus with which H. wilmane
can be brought into such close comparison.
* d’Orbigny (1), p. 115, pl. 28, fig. 1 (1840).
+ Pavlow and Lamplugh (1), p. 496 (p. 138 of authors’ copy).
+ Neumayr and Uhlig (1), p. 149, Taf. xxxii., fig. 2.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 197
A shell from the Lower Hauterivian of North Germany described
by von Koenen * under the name Astieria aff. psilostoma also shows
great similarity to H. wilmane, but may be readily distinguished by
the wider umbilicus, the strongly developed constrictions, and the
more inflated and less discoidal form of the whorls.
Pavlow thought that small specimens from the Neocomian of
Spain, figured by Nicklés + as Holcostephanus hispanicus, might
possibly belong to this form; but though a thorough comparison
with these figures is difficult, and the character of the ribbing
appears to be very similar, it seems to me most probable that the
much greater inflation of the Spanish shell would be found sufficient
to separate it. If the specimen figured by Nicklés in fig. 11
represents the same form as that depicted in fig. 3, then it is clear
that H. wilmane is a much more discoidal shell. The small
specimen represented by Nicklés in fig. 10 is only drawn in side
view, but it appears to possess a prominence of the umbilical rim
and a depth of the umbilical cavity which may be taken to indicate
the somewhat strongly inflated character of the shell. Pavlow draws
attention to the existence of two specimens which he identifies with
the South African form above described; the one is from Aigles
(Basses-Alpes), preserved in the Pictet collection in the museum at
Geneva, and the other, from the Shasta group of California, is in the
geological collection of the University of Moscow.
Holcostephanus tinsbergensis (Weerth),{ from the Neocomian of
the Teutoburger Wald, may possibly also be related, so far as can be
judged from a comparison with Weerth’s figure 4.
HOoLcostEPHANUS BAINI (Sharpe).
1856. Ammonites bain D. Sharpe, Trans. Geol. Soc. Lond., ser. 2,
vol. vii., p. 197, pl. xxiii., fig. 2.
1882. Olcostephanus baini M. Neumayr, in E. Holub and M.
Neumayr, Denkschr. d. k. Akad. Wiss., Math-Nat. Cl.,
Band xliv., p. 272.
Although no specimen undoubtedly referable to this form is
included in the collection under examination, a few remarks under
this heading may be useful as a preface to the account of an
individual, to be described below, which I believe to be very closely
related to H. bainv.
* von Koenen (2), p. 151, Taf. liv., fig. 2.
+ Nicklés (1), pl. ix., figs. 3 and 10.
t Weerth (1), p. 16, Taf. iv., fig. 4.
14
198 Annals of the South African Museum.
Occurrence.—H. baini has been found at localities on the Zwart-
kop’s and Sunday’s Rivers, and its occurrence in the Zwartkop’s
River Valley below Uitenhage has been noted by Messrs. Rogers and
Schwarz.* Specimens in the collection of the Geological Society
(Sharpe’s type, registered 109764) and in the British Museum
(registered 52052) are from the Sunday’s River.
Remarks.—Neumayr thought H. baini to be most closely related
to H. schenki (Oppel),t from the Spiti Shales of Tibet, and there is
indeed a great resemblance between the two in all the more impor-
tant features; but H. baini is more closely ribbed, and as mentioned
by Uhlig,} in regard to the fineness of the ribbing, H. schenki
occupies a position just midway between H. baini and H. atherstonz.
Neumayr and Uhlig § also thought close relationship to exist between
HI, baini and H. keyserlingi Neum. and Uhl. from the Neocomian of
North Germany, but the manner of division of the ribs is really a
strong distinguishing feature. In H. baini none of the ribs bifurcate
after leaving the nodes. The relationship of H. baini to H. diptychus
(Keys.) and H. polyptychus (Keys.) || from Petschora-Land is also no
doubt much more remote than Neumayr supposed, and these forms,
as well as H. keyserlingi, clearly do not belong to the same division
of the Holcostephani (sensu lato) as H. baint and H. schenki.
Nikitin,’ in fact, has strongly criticised Neumayr’s suggestion of
relationship between H. schenki and these two ammonites from
Remarks on the points of resemblance between H. bain and
H, rogersi sp. nov. will be found appended to the description of the
latter given in these pages.
Neumayr ++ dealt fully with the question of a suggested resem-
blance between H. baini and a Jurassic ammonite from Madagascar
ascribed to J. Sowerby’s Ammonites herveyi,{ {| and showed that these
really have no significant characters in common. The points of
resemblance are in fact so slender as not to merit further discussion
here ; but it may be remarked that Neumayr probably misrepre-
sented the case when he wrote as follows: ‘‘ Newton thinks to have
found close relationship between Macrocephalites herveyi from
Madagascar and Olcostephanus baini Sharpe from the Uitenhage
* Rogers and Schwarz (1), p. 7.
+ Oppel (2), p. 286, Tab. 81, figs. 4a-c; Uhlig (4), p. 130, pl. xviii., figs. 2a—c.
t Uhlig (4), p. 132. § Neumayr and Uhlig (1), p. 156.
|| Keyserling (1), p. 327, pls. xx., figs. 4, 5; xxi. figs. 1-3; xxii., figs. 9, 10.
“{ Nikitin (1), p. 122.
** Pavlow and Lamplugh (1), p. 488 (p. 130 of authors’ copy),
tt Neumayr (5), p. 6. tt Newton (1), p. 334.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 199
Formation.” In the description of the Madagascar fossils, the
opinion that these two forms are truly related was not expressed,
and it is not necessary to infer that such a view was actually
entertained.
Kilian * has suggested that H. baint may represent an immature
stage of H. atherstont (Sharpe), but this is certainly not the case.
H. atherstoni at a comparable growth-stage is much more finely
ribbed, to mention only one point of distinction.
With regard to the type-specimen of Anumonites bain Sharpe,
preserved in the collection of the Geological Society, it is perhaps
well to note that in the late Prof. J. F. Blake’s published list of the
types and figured specimens in the Society’s museum, reference is
accidentally made to a wrong specimen.| The individual figured by
Sharpe was unfortunately overlooked by Mr. C. D. Sherborn when
preparing a manuscript catalogue of the collection some years ago.
The specimen erroneously noted as the type (registered 10976) was
presented by Atherstone and bears the date 1876; {| I consider it to
represent a hitherto undescribed form, and it is dealt with in these
pages under the name Holcostephanus modderensis.
HoLcostEPHANUS cf. BAINI (Sharpe).
Piatewlixe figs 25 XS, fel
A single specimen, from the collection in the South African
Museum, agrees so closely with Sharpe’s Ammonites baini that
it has seemed questionable whether it should not be considered
identical.
Description.—The specimen, which is considerably larger than
known examples of H. bain, consists of at least four whorls, and
the form of these as well as the degree of overlap in the earlier
whorls is the same as in H. bain. Some of the shell substance is
retained and the specimen is partly preserved as a cast, but it
exhibits in very imperfect manner the course of the septal sutures,
so that these cannot be satisfactorily copied for illustration. The
body-chamber is not preserved. In the interior whorls the umbilical
wall of each whorl falls upon the umbilical tubercles of the pre-
ceding whorl, but in the latter half of the last whorl the degree of
involution becomes slightly reduced, so that the nodes of the
preceding whorl are completely exposed and the beginnings of the
flank ribs proceeding from them can be just discerned. At the same
* Kilian (4), p. 865. + Blake (2), p. 59.
t Sharpe’s figure of H. baini was published in 1856.
200 Annals of the South African Museum.
time, the slope of the umbilical wall of the last whorl becomes
slightly less steep.
There are sixteen strong umbilical marginal tubercles in the last
whorl preserved, and from these the ribs of the flank and periphery
proceed most frequently in groups of three, though occasionally only
two ribs are given off from the nodes. Sometimes a rib may be
situated between two nodes at one of its extremities, while springing
from a node at its opposite end. These relations of the ribs, how-
ever, are the same in H. baini. The ribs as they depart from the
tubercles to cross over the periphery are not forwardly inclined, but
pass almost straight across the whorl. In the most advanced
portion of the specimen the crests of the ribs upon the peripheral
area are situated at a distance of 6 mm. apart. Well-marked
constrictions are present as in H. baini.
Dimensions.—
Greatest) diameter of Specimen .....5.4..0-.:neessanaseoeemsaneeaes 92 mm.
Greatest breadth of last whorl in cross-section ............+6+ DS
Greatest height of last whorl at the centre (section) ...... DN
Greatest diameter of the umbilicus, measured from the
umbilical rim between the tubercles ...................+. AS
Occurrence.—-This specimen is believed to come from the Sunday’s
River.
Remarks.—There can be no douht that the form here represented
is very closely related to H. bain, and I was for some time
undecided whether definitely to identify the two. Allowing for the
difference in dimensions between this specimen and the examples of
H. baini that I have seen, which are smaller, the only apparently
valid character of distinction is in the disposition of the ribs. In
H. bain the ribs proceeding over the whorl from the nodes have a
well-marked forward throw, but such an inclination is not seen in
the specimen above described. Mr. G. C. Crick, who has kindly
examined the specimen, considers that this is a significant point of
distinction, but admits that in other respects the two forms are very
closely similar. With regard to the inclination of the ribs as a
constant and reliable character, it may be remarked that in the
British Museum collection a specimen of H. baini (registered 52052)
which strikingly resembles Sharpe’s type in all other points, agrees
with it also in showing the same inclination of the ribs. It therefore
appears evident that in this character of the ribbing we have a
distinctive feature for separation, whatever this alone may be worth.
There is unfortunately as yet only a single specimen available for
comparison, and since in other respects it shows such close agree-
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 201
ment with H. baini, I am unable to arrive at a definite opinion as to
the nearness of its relationship to that form, and feel hardly justified
in proposing a new specific name. It is to be hoped that the acquisi-
tion of additional material may enable a more thorough comparison to
be made and lead toa clearer knowledge of the actual relationships.
The specimen has much general resemblance to H. rogersz sp.
nov., but is more coarsely ribbed. In H. rogersi, too, the ribbing
shows a still greater departure from that of H. bai, in that the
secondary cost as they proceed from the tubercles are not truly
direct in their course across the periphery, but have a very sli ht
backward throw.
HoLcostEPHANUS ROGERSI sp. nov.
Plate IX., fig. 3; X., fig. 2.
Description of a Single Specimen.—The shell is involute to the
umbilical tubercules, and the ultimate whorl is broad in section
and broadly rounded on the peripheral area. The umbilical wall
falls very steeply and the umbilical rim is bluntly rounded. The
primary ribs, commencing above the spiral suture, are narrow,
and rather weakly developed. They have a slight backward slope
as they are traced up to the marginal nodes. There are about
sixteen of these laterally compressed, not very prominently
developed tuberzles in the ultimate whorl. From these the ribs
of the flank proceed mostly in groups of three, though there
are occasionally only two ribs terminating at a node, or a rib-ending
may now and then fall between two nodes. These ribs as they pass
from the tubercles over the peripheral area are very slightly reclined,
that is, have a backward slope in relation to a radius. In the
anterior portion of the ultimate whorl the crests of the ribs on the
peripheral area are separated from one another by a space of 3 mm.
Two strongly developed constrictions are visible on the ultimate
whorl, and they are situated opposite to one another. The specimen
is entirely septate, but so preserved that the figure of the lobe-line
cannot be traced.
Dimensions .—
PEALE SURUNATMe bermu ce ete tates je cacese er snc cet wcrc: sscuisien se naees 63 mm.
Greatest breadth of the last whorl in cross-section ......... AO) =
Height of the last whorl at the centre, in section ............ Ii)
Greatest diameter of the umbilicus, measured from the
umbilical rim between the tubercles................00.20005 Do)
Occurrence.—The specimen, in the collection of the South African
Museum, is from the Sunday’s River.
202 Annals of the South African Musewm.
Remarks.—Although I have only seen a single specimen, and
the state of preservation of this is not so good as might be desired,
I have no hesitation in pronouncing it to represent a hitherto
undescribed form. It is apparent that though distinctively charac-
terised, particularly by the feature of reclined costation, this
ammonite may be brought into closest relationship with H. baina
(Sharpe) and H. schenki (Oppel), and particularly with the latter.
H. baini has the whorl relatively narrower and more highly arched
in section, while its ribbing is noticeably coarser. On the peri-
pheral part of the whorl at a comparable stage there are seven ribs
in H. rogersi within a space which includes only six ribs in
H. baim. Moreover, the ribs in HM. baint have a marked forward
inclination as they depart from the nodes.
Reference to the published descriptions and figures of H. schenki,*
from Shangra, east of Puling (Tibet), seemed to show a very close
resemblance between tbe two forms, but I have been able to
supplement this by an actual comparison with Oppel’s type-
specimen in the State Palwontological Collection at Munich, and
when making this comparison I was fortunate in having the kind
assistance of Prof. J. F. Pompeckj. HH. schenki has rather more
numerous umbilical tubercles and is slightly more densely ribbed
than H. rogersi. In H. schenki the umbilicus is relatively a little
wider and in cross-section the whorl is rather wider between the
umbilical rims, in relation to the height. The most notable point
of distinction, however, is in the course taken by the secondary
ribs as they pass from the tubercles over the periphery. In
H. schenki they have a forward inclination, while in H. rogersz they
are slightly reclined.
There is considerable resemblance between H. rogersi and H.
guebhardi Kilian,} from the Hauterivian of the neighbourhood of
Escragnolles in the Maritime Alps, but in H. guebhard: the ribbing
of the flank is strictly radial in direction.
HoLcosTEPHANUS MODDERENSIS sp. noy
Plate X., figs 3, 3a.
1892. Astierra schenki A. P. Pavlow (partim), Bull. Soc. Imp. Nat.
Mosce., année 1891, Nouv. Sér., tome v., p. 493 (p. 135
of authors’ copy).
Description of a Single Specimen.—The shell has rapidly expanding
whorls, and is involute to the umbilical marginal tubercles in the
* Oppel (2), p. 286, Tab. 81, figs. 4a-c; Uhlig (4), p. 130, pl. xviii., figs. 2a-c.
+ Kilian (4), p. 866, pl. lvii., figs. 2a, 2b.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 203
most advanced stage represented in this individual, in which the
ultimate whorl is not complete anteriorly. The greatest breadth
falls at the umbilical rim, and in section the ultimate whorl is very
broad in relation to its height; the peripheral area forms a broadly
flattened arch. The umbilical wall falls very steeply and abruptly
from the rounded rim, and the relatively narrow umbilicus has the
form of a profound and acutely pointed funnel.
The umbilical ribs, commencing above the spiral suture, are
narrow, and they are slightly backwardly directed as they pass up
into the compressed and fairly prominent marginal tubercles. There
are sixteen of these flattened tubercles in the ultimate whorl, and
from them the secondary cost proceed mostly in regular groups of
three, though from two of the nodes four ribs are given off. The
secondary ribs follow a direct course from the nodes across the
periphery except near the anterior part of the whorl, where a few
of them appear to have a very slight forward inclination. This,
however, may possibly be due to an accident of preservation,
and may stand in relation to a slight distortion exhibited by the
specimen in its anterior part. The ribs crossing the periphery
are fairly prominent, and at the anterior part of the peripheral
area the crests of adjacent ribs are situated at 4 mm. apart from
one another. On the last whorl there is a single deeply impressed
constriction.
In this specimen the shell is in great part preserved, and the
course of the septal sutures remains unknown. The ultimate whorl
seems to comprise a part at least of the body-chamber.
Dimensions.—
RE OATES tUGIAIN CUCL mace crnteseniese ssh sem eaicmane shai catiocetens cies sore ates 80 mm
Greatest breadth of the last whorl in cross-section ......... GS: a;
Height of the last whorl at the centre, in section ............ 2" 4,5
Greatest diameter of the umbilicus, measured from the
umbilical rim between the tubercles. .................0065 28
Occurrence.—The specimen is from the Modder Drift, Sunday's
River, and is preserved in the collection of the Geological Society of
London (registered 10976).
Remarks.—The specimen here described was thought by Pavlow
to represent H. schenki (Oppel). It bears a label ‘ Ammonites
baint Sharpe, Jurassic, Modder Drift, S. Africa. Dr. Atherstone,
¥.G.8., 1876,” and the descriptive details given by Pavlow (op. cit.,
p. 493) apply to it accurately. I am convinced that this African
form is so characterised that it cannot rightly be united with
H. schenki, and though it appears highly probable that the two are
204 Annals of the South African Mausewm.
very closely related, I believe that the following points fully justify
the separation. In H. modderensis the whorl increases more rapidly
in breadth and the involution is stronger than in H. schenki. The
umbilicus is relatively narrower and the umbilical wall falls more
steeply in H. modderensis, in which also the umbilical ribs, at least
in the ultimate whorl, have a definite posterior inclination when
traced up towards the tubercles. In cross-section, the whorl is
considerably broader in proportion to height than in H. schenk.
Further, not only is the ribbing of H. modderensis at a com-
parable stage somewhat coarser, but the coste as they pass
from the tubercules across the periphery mostly follow a straight
course, while in H. schenki they have a well-marked forward
inclination.
It is scarcely necessary to make a detailed comparison between
H. modderensis and H. rogersi, described above. H. modderensis
is a much more inflated and globose shell, and the rate at which the
whorls increase in breadth is considerably more rapid ; the umbilicus
is also relatively narrower, and the breadth of the whorl-section
proportionately greater than in H. rogerst.
H. baini (Sharpe) * is no doubt a related shell, but H. modder-
ensis is well distinguished from this by its inflated form, the great
breadth and diminished height of the whorl-section, the rapid
increase in breadth of the whorl, the narrower umbilicus, and the
direct course of the secondary ribs as they cross the periphery.
H, modderensis is also considerably more densely ribbed than
A. baint.
One of the forms figured by Pictet as Ammonites bidicho-
tomus Leym.,+ which Pavlow considered identical with Oppel’s
H. schenki, appears to be well distinguished from H. schenki by
the coarser ribbing, the direct course of the secondary ribs, and
the absence of noticeable constrictions. As far as it is possible
to make comparison by means of Pictet’s figures, the Swiss shell
seems to approach more closely to H. modderensis, though at
the stage represented it is less strongly involute. A satisfactory
comparison between this figure of a small specimen and _ the
relatively large specimen of H. modderensis is, however, not
possible.
A specimen from Neuchatel figured by Pictet as Ammonites astve-
rianus @’Orb.* was united with Ammonites spitiensis Blanford by
* Sharpe (1), p. 197, pl. xxiii., fig 2.
+ Pictet and Campiche (1), pl. xli., fig. 3 (1860).
+ Pictet and Campiche (1), pl. xliii., fig. 2 (1860).
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 205
Pavlow,* but a reference to Uhlig’s + description and figures of
Holcostephanus spitiensis shows this to have been an error. Pictet’s
figure represents an inflated form which has some resemblance to
H. modderensis, but it differs from this by its relatively higher
whorl-section, less strong involution, and greater number of umbilical
ribs. Here again, the comparison cannot be quite satisfactorily
made, because Pictet’s figure is drawn in half the natural size,
and the original specimen would have attained a stage when its
dimensions were almost twice those of the individual of #.
modderensis compared.
It is also difficult to make comparison with the small inflated
specimens from Berrias (Ardéche) figured by Pictet under the name
Ammonites astierianus.{ These might conceivably represent an
earlier stage in the growth of such a form as H. modderensis, but
if this be the case some changes in the degree of involution and in
the form of the whorl-section would have to follow. While of
apparently very similar type to H. modderensis, at the stage repre-
sented in Pictet’s figure the involution is less strong and the whorl
more highly arched in section, and relatively narrower. Pictet’s
‘“Varieté No. 3,’’ from the same place,$ while possessing a broad
and depressed whorl-section, is still more strongly distinguished
from HH. modderensis by the much wider umbilicus and_ the
diminished involution. The specimens represented in Pictet’s
plate 17, figs. 3 and 4, were considered by Pavlow to be Holco-
stephanus spitiensis (Blanf.), but I believe this view to be erroneous.
They seem to me to illustrate a form probably more aptly com-
parable with H. modderensis than with either H. spitiensis or the
true H. astierianus with which they were at first identified.
An ammonite from the Tithonian cf Stramberg, figured by Zittel|)
under the name Ammonites grotianus Opp., and thought by Pavlow
to represent Holcostephanus spitiensis(Blanf.), is believed by Uhlig *
to be distinct from both of these and to stand nearer to the true
“Astieri@.” It has a whorl-section and inflated form somewhat
resembling that of H. modderensis, but it is a more widely umbilicate
shell, and at the stage of growth represented in Zittel’s figure there
is a marked difference in the relation of the secondary ribs to the
umbilical tubercles.
* Paylow and Lamplugh (1), p. 497 (p. 139 of authors’ copy).
+ Uhlig (4), p. 89, pl viii., figs. 1-3.
t Pictet (1), p. 86, pl. 17, figs. 3, 4.
§ Pictet (1), p. 86, pl. 18, fig. 3.
|| Zittel (3), p. 90, pl. 16, figs. 3, 4.
“| Uhlig (4), p. 94.
206 Annals of the South African Musewm.
HOoLCOSTEPHANUS UITENHAGENSIS Sp. Noy.
Plate XI.
1905. Olcostephanus bainii F. H. Hatch and G. 8. Corstorphine
(partim). The Geology of South Africa, p. 243, fig. 65
(right-hand specimen only).
Description of a Single Specimen.—The specimen is preserved
chiefly in the form of a cast which in the greatest portion of the
ultimate whorl has retained, though somewhat imperfectly, the
impress of the external costate ornaments. The specimen is also
slightly distorted by pressure.
The shell has a laterally compressed aspect, and the whorls are
relatively narrow and highly arched in section. The flanks are broad
and flattened in form, while the peripheral area presents a somewhat
narrowly convex surface. The involution is such that about two-
thirds of the flank of the preceding whorl are embraced, thus leaving
a considerable space free between the spiral suture and the umbilical
margin of the preceding whorl. The greatest breadth of the whorl
is at the umbilical margin, though the breadth at the middle of the
flank is little less than this until the anterior portion of the ultimate
whorl is reached, when the whorl is relatively rather more inflated.
The umbilical margin is abrupt, and the umbilical wall falls
almost vertically until traced to the last half of the ultimate whorl,
where the wall slopes with slightly decreasing steepness. Umbilical
ribs are not developed in the last whorl. The umbilical marginal
tubercles, present to the number of fifteen in the last whorl, are not
strongly compressed in form, and they are well spaced. The ribbing
of the shell is relatively fine, and in the ultimate whorl three or four
coste proceed from each tubercle, in addition to which there are
some costs which terminate between the tubercles and occasionally
a rib may become intercalated on the flank. There is no evidence
that any bifurcation of the costw# occurs on the flank. The ribs
as they pass towards the periphery are forwardly inclined, more
noticeably so in the anterior half of the ultimate whorl, where, on
the peripheral area, adjacent ribs have their crests 6 mm. apart.
The development of constrictions is very weak and inconspicuous.
Dimensions.—
Greatest diameters. cant enh stn cease oe eae eee eno ace Oo) eme
Greatest breadth of the last whorl in cross-section ......... 9 e
Height of the last whorl at the centre, in section............ 6 ss
Greatest diameter of the umbilicus, measured from the
umbilical rim between the tubercles ............c+000- (coun
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 207
Occurrence.—In clay between two hard calcareous bands in the
railway cutting between milestones 244-242 on the Graaff-Reinet
railway, about three miles from Uitenhage (276).
Remarks.—The specimen here described was referred to by
Messrs. Rogers and Schwarz* as “an Olcostephanus .. . allied
to O. atherstom,”’ and it was rightly stated to be distinguished from
this by ‘‘ being more compressed laterally, in having no umbilical
ribs, and in the less overlapping of the whorls.” H. witenhagensis
is considerably more discoidal in form, and the rate of increase in
the breadth of the whorl-section is much less than in H. atherstoni ;
the umbilicus is also very much wider and relatively shallower than
in Sharpe’s type. The ribbing of these two forms is of closely
similar character, and both agree also in the very inconspicuous
development of constrictions. :
In the lateral compression of the shell and the fine character of
the ribbing, the wide umbilicus and the degree of involution, H.
witenhagensis is more reminiscent of the typical H. astierianus
(d’Orb.) + than of some of the more coarsely ribbed and inflated
Holcostephani that occur in the Uitenhage Series ; but the points of
distinction are so marked that a detailed comparison with H. astier?-
anus is unnecessary. The same remarks apply when we attempt a
comparison between H. witenhagensis and H. sayni Kilian, | the finely
ribbed form which was originally thought to be identical with H.
astierianus. In general habit there is similarity to the finely ribbed
H., filosa (Baumberger)§ from the Hauterivian of the Swiss Jura, but
the two forms are far from being identical.
Genus ACANTHODISCUS V. Uhlig.
ACANTHODISCUS sp.
Description of a Single Specimen.—The specimen consists of a
fragment of the chambered part of a large whorl. It measures
about 70 mm. from end to end along the periphery, and the cross-
section at the anterior end is 35 mm. in height and about the same
in breadth. The specimen is considerably weathered, and has had
the shell partially removed, showing here and there a portion of the
lobe-line and displaying the siphuncle near the posterior end. The
whorl is slightly flattened on the sides and evenly and broadly
* Rogers and Schwarz (1), p. 10. + d’Orbigny (1), pl. 28, fig. 1 (1840).
{ Kilian and Leenhardt (1), p. 976; Sarasin and Schéndelmayer (1), part 1,
Poo mpl. fies. 2, 3.
§ Baumberger (1), 4e Theil, p. 31, pl. xxiii., figs. 2a, 2b.
208 Annals of the South African Musewm.
arched in the peripheral area. To judge by the channelling of the
inner surface, the involution was relatively slight. Since the height
of the cross-section at the posterior end is slightly over 80 mm., the
rate of increase of the whorl was not rapid.
The umbilicus must have been shallow. The umbilical rim is
not abruptly defined, though the surface of the flank slopes down
steeply to the spiral suture. Primary ribs starting from the suture
are radial in direction and are not of equal strength. At the
rounded umbilical margin, some of the ribs (main ribs) swell into
a rounded node, and a bifurcation of the rib may here take place,
giving rise to ribs of unequal strength. Some ribs, however (inter-
mediate ribs), do not bear umbilical nodes, and bifurcation at the
nodes on the main ribs does not always take place. Some of the
ribs arising from the umbilical nodes have a forward inclination as
they pass towards the periphery. On the peripheral side of the
middle of the flank, but near the middle, a second set of nodes
is developed on the main ribs, stronger than the inner series.
At these nodes a division of a rib into two or three peripheral ribs
takes place, and these have a well-marked forward inclination. The
intermediate ribs have a corresponding forward swing as they pass
on to the periphery. The peripheral ribs are of approximately equal
strength and pass across the periphery, though their development is
less pronounced in the central area. This area is flat, and in better
preservation might be weakly sulcate. On either side of it the ribs
show traces of a swelling.
The inner surface of the fragment (that is, the concave surface) is
deeply channelled, in such manner as to show that the previous
whorl had a distinctly suleate periphery, and that the central con-
cave area was bounded on either side by a line of nodular swellings
in the peripheral ribs.
Occurrence.—Collected at Brentford, Knysna Estuary (151h).
femarks.—It is unfortunate that only a single fragment of this
well-characterised form is available for study. The specimen is so
imperfect that its intimate relationships cannot be precisely ascer-
tained, and the important evidence of young and early adult growth-
stages is wanting. There can scarcely be a doubt, however, that we
are dealing with a representative of that group within Hoplites (sensu
lato) to which Uhlig has given the generic name dAcanthodiscus.*
Whether this group of trituberculate forms constitutes a generic unit
may be open to question, in view of the differences in the characters
of the youthful stages shown by some of its members, though
* Uhlig (5), p. 607.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 209
Professor Uhlig has suggested that the occurrence of ccenogenetic
phenomena may account for these. So far as the characters of
sculpture of this fragment are concerned, a very similar type is seen
in the adult stage of Acanthodiscus hystricoides (Uhlig),* from the
upper Teschener Schichten of Silesia (correlated by Uhlig with the
Valanginian). To judge from a comparison of such scanty material
with the figures of A. hystricoides, the African specimen differs in
the more nearly circular section of the whorl, in the occurrence
of groups of three peripheral ribs arising from the outer tubercles of
the flank, and perhaps also in the greater number of ribs inter-
mediate between the main ribs. It also shows a more strong
forward inclination of the ribs as they pass from the flank to the
periphery.
It is impossible to say with certainty whether this form bears any
close relationship to Tate’s Ammonites swbanceps, which also came
from the Uitenhage beds. Tate’s figured specimen } is the only one
of its kind known from these beds, and it is a small individual,
representing in all probability an immature stage of growth. This
probability, and the great disparity in size between Tate’s type and
the fragment of an adult Acanthodiscus above described, makes a
comparison difficult and unsatisfactory. The fragment here dealt
with formed part of an individual exceeding 110 mm. in diameter,
with an umbilical diameter, measured from the inner tubercles, of
probably 45 mm. Tate’s specimen measures less than 20 mm. in
greatest diameter. Allowing for this, however, there is some simi-
larity in the type of sculpture in the two forms. If they are closely
related the points of distinction that exist may well be due to the
fact that different stages of growth are brought into comparison. In
the specimen from Knysna the sulcation of the peripheral area is
very weakly marked, but it is seen from a comparison of the outer
and inner sides of the whorl that this is a modification accompanying
advancing growth, and that the previous whorl was much more
suleate. It is also probable that the reduction of this character
is to some extent only apparent, owing to the removal of the
shell-substance on the outer side by weathering. Other points in
which the specimen differs from Tate’s type are the presence of
well-marked nodes at the umbilical margin, the situation of the
second series of nodes a little nearer to the periphery, the stronger
forward inclination of the peripheral ribs, and the rather broader
periphery and more nearly circular, outline of the whorl in cross-
* Uhlig
(2), p. 39, Taf, i., fig. 8.
+ Tate (1),
p. 150, pl. vii., fig. 3.
210 Annals of the South African Musewm.
section. It should be noted with regard to the first of these points
that although Tate made no mention of any trace of umbilical
marginal tubercles in his specimen, such traces exist in several of
the ribs, which are swollen at that part which corresponds with the
row of umbilical nodes in the Knysna specimen.
While bearing in mind that these forms are so far comparable, it
is at the same time not improbable that Tate’s Anumonites subanceps
should be placed with those species of Hoplites (sensu lato) which
Uhligh as united to form the narrower generic group Solgeria.*
Great similarity is shown to figures of forms ascribed by Sayn + to
Hoplites arnold (Pict. and Camp.) and by Toucas to Hoplites botelle
Kilian.} These have been considered by Pavlow to be wrongly
determined, and to represent one species to which he has given the
name Hoplites heteroptychus.§ It was even suggested by Neumayr
that Ammonites subanceps might represent the young of Crioceras
spinosissimum, and this does not seem excluded as a possibility.
While Tate’s specimen, which was very imperfectly figured, is cer-
tainly to be brought into the closest comparison with Neocomian
forms of Hoplites, and not with the Jurassic Reineckia anceps as
thought by Tate, only the collection of additional material will show
with certainty its true narrow relationships, though I am inclined to
think that its nearest allies are to be sought in representatives of
Uhlig’s genus Solgeria, of which Hoplites heteroptychus Pavlow is an
example, rather than in members of the genus Acanthodiscus.
Genus BELEMNITES Lamarck.
BELEMNITES sp.
Two specimens of belemnites are unfortunately only of a frag-
mentary character. One was collected by Mr. Rogers at Brentford,
Knysna Estuary (1538h), and the other was obtained by Miss M.
Wilman at Coega.
1. The specimen from Brentford is a fragment of a rostrum, and
neither the alveolar nor apical end is preserved. It is compressed
in the dorso-ventral direction in such manner as to give a broadly
ovate outline in cross-section. The greatest transverse diameter is
situated at some distance—at least a third of the length of the frag-
ment—away from the alveolar end of the specimen. From this
* Uhlig (5), p. 624.
+ Sayn (1), p. 682, pl. xii., fig. 6.
t Toueas (1), p. 606, pl, xviii., fig. 10.
§ Pavlow and Lamplugh (1), p. 467 (109 of authors’ copy).
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 211
point the outline tapers very gently, almost imperceptibly, in the
alveolar direction, more markedly (though still gradually) in the
apical direction. The length of the fragment is 45mm. At the end
towards the alveolus the transverse diameter is 11 mm., the dorso-
ventral diameter 9°5 mm. At the other end the transverse diameter
is 9 mm., the dorso-ventral measurement 8 mm. Situated on the
side are two parallel, shallow longitudinal grooves, placed closely to
one another. Towards the anterior end of the specimen the surface
is becoming split off in the form of thin lamine.
This specimen is evidently the representative of some subfusiform
species. The shape of the rostrum, though this is represented by an
imperfect fragment, is sufficiently suggestive, and in addition there
is the presence of the shallow parallel grooves on the side and the
foliaceous character of the surface towards the alveolus. These two
latter points, apart from the shape of the guard, at once recall certain
Hastati of the European Neocomian, and there can be no doubt con-
cerning the broad relationships of the specimen. The greatest
thickness of the guard is, however, nearer to the alveolus than in
Belemnites yaculum Phill. (=B. subfustformis Rasp.), B. pistilliformis
Blainv. (=B. pistillirostris Pav.), or B. obtusirostris.* The outline
in section is more oval and compressed than in B. jaculwm, and
although in that species there is some variation with regard to the
form of the section, Mr. G. W. Lamplugh informs me that he has
never observed quite such a degree of compression as is shown by
the Brentford specimen.
2. The specimen from Coega is still less favourably preserved for
a satisfactory comparison with known forms, but it also belongs to
some subfusiform species, and one which has a rostrum of relatively
slender figure. It is a fragment of a guard from which the alveolar
and apical ends are missing, and is compressed in manner similar to
that shown by the other specimen. It measures 46 mm. in length.
The transverse diameter at the thicker end is 8 mm., the dorso-
ventral diameter 7mm. The specimen tapers gradually from here
towards the thin end, where the greatest diameter is 4mm. This
end is most probably approaching the alveolus, though it shows no
sign of a ventral groove. Here also the surface shows no foliaceous
character, but the specimen is so unfavourably preserved and so
much weathered that these negative characters are not of much
significance. It is possible, however, that this thin end of the
specimen lies towards the apex, but if this be the case we are dealing
with a hastate form remarkable for the slow tapering towards the
* Pavlow and Lamplugh (1), pp. 77-82.
212 Annals of the South African Musewm.
apex. Iam inclined to regard the other orientation as the correct
one.
These two specimens, although so fragmentary, are of special
interest. They furnish one more piece of evidence which serves to
dispel the idea that the fauna of the Uitenhage beds lived under
geographical conditions which prohibited free intercourse in a
northerly direction. It will be remembered that a representative of
the Hastati has been recorded from the Neocomian beds of north-
west Madagascar.* An extension of our knowledge of the belemnite-
fauna in the Uitenhage deposits becomes very desirable.
Crass CRUSTACEA.
Genus MEYERIA F. M’Coy.
MEYERIA SCHWARZI sp. nov.
Plate VIII., fig. 22; IX., 4, 4a, 5; X., 4, 4a, 40.
Description.—The elongated body shows, in its form, considerable
lateral compression, and the carapace, in particular, has strong
lateral flattening. The carapace, in lateral aspect, has relatively
great height, and the branchiostegites occupy a large area. The
cephalic portion of the carapace is best known in its posterior part,
since the best-preserved specimens examined have the anterior part
broken off. Commencing at the cervical suture and passing for-
wards there is a sharp and narrow, weakly serrated, median dorsal
keel which is prolonged anteriorly into a short, sharply pointed,
laterally flattened rostrum, exhibiting a median carination, weakly
and finely serrated. Running almost parallel with this median keel
and at a very short distance below it there is on either side a more
strongly tuberculated or serrated lateral keel; at a rather greater
distance below this on either side there is situated a second similar
lateral keel, and, with a still greater separating space, below this
there is a third lateral keel. The two lowest keels on each side have
a more marked upward slope than the first lateral keel when traced
forwards from the cervical groove. The surface between the keels
is flat or slightly concave, and bears very little or no granular orna-
mentation. The appendages of the head are unknown.
The cervical suture slopes backward rather obliquely in its general
course when traced upwards. In relation to the slenderly formed
* Newton (1), p. 333.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 213
carapace it is deeply impressed. Traced from its anterior termina-
tion, for the first few millimetres of its course, immediately under
the lowest cephalic keel, it has a very slight upward inclination ; it
then bends more sharply upwards, and during the rest of its course,
towards the median dorsal line of the carapace, it is not markedly
sinuous.
Immediately behind the cervical suture there is on either side a
short raised keel in backward continuation of the lowest lateral
cephalic keel; this is only a few millimetres in extent (about 5 mm.
in specimens examined), and immediately below it is situated a small
oval area, nearly smooth, bearing only one or two isolated granules,
and surrounded above and below and behind by a well-impressed
linear groove. In the specimens examined this is only about 2 mm.
or 3 mm. in length, but is not well defined anteriorly. From this
little area the weakly developed branchial furrow passes obliquely
backwards, rising gradually, and dies out before reaching the
indented portion of the posterior margin of the carapace. This
furrow is bounded dorsally by a slightly raised fold of the surface,
which arises anteriorly at the short keel which forms the backward
continuation of the lowest cephalic keel.
The median dorsal carination is a very marked feature, posteriorly
to the cervical groove. Commencing at the median carina at a dis-
tance from the cervical suture of about one-third of the space between
that suture and the posterior margin of the carapace, there is a very
faintly marked, shallow linear groove of attenuated sigmoidal form.
Meeting the corresponding groove of the opposite side in the median
dorsal line so that no appreciable angle is formed by the junction,
the groove on each side of the carapace forms a shorter shallow
upper curve and a more extensive lower curve. Before terminating
below it is for some distance directed anteriorly, and runs obliquely
downwards just above the fold of the surface which accompanies the
branchial furrow.
The lower margin of the thoracic part of the carapace is divisible
into a shorter antero-ventral portion, which slopes gently downwards
with straight outline when traced backwards, and a longer posterior
portion with almost straight outline, which slopes gently upwards
and then passes by a broad curve into the posterior border. The
posterior border forms in its lower part a broad lobe with convex
outline, and is then indented (between the branchial and cardiac
regions) in the shape of a narrowly curved bay with broad
Opening.
The margins of the thoracic portion of the carapace are furnished
15
214 Annals of the South African Museum.
with a smooth, narrow, raised lip, which becomes somewhat broader
on the posterior lobed margin of the branchiostegite, where, also, it
is accompanied by a smooth, hollowed, shallow runnel of the surface.
The branchiostegites are ornamented by numerous granules or
minute tubercles distributed evenly over their surface. The raised
folds of the surface which are situated just dorsally to the oblique
branchial furrows are furnished with a row of somewhat stronger
granules, besides a few granules irregularly disposed. The region of
the carapace situated between the weak sigmoidal grooves (above
described) and the cervical suture is ornamented by numerous
granules or minute tubercles similar to those on the branchiostegite.
The cardiac region, posteriorly to this, is more nearly smooth,
showing only a few isolated, weakly developed granules.
The ambulatory appendages of the thoracic region are known only
by a few fragments, and those actually associated with carapaces
are too imperfect for accurate description. Portions of a long,
slender limb occurring isolated in a nodule from the Sunday’s River
(the specimen is from the South African Museum collection, and
bears the number 663 on a white label) may probably belong to this
species. It consists of a portion of a segment of the limb, keeled,
with some scattered granular ornaments and bearing a short,
distally directed, lateral pointed spur, near the articulation with
the succeeding (more terminal) segment. The latter is very
slender and elongated and bears several longitudinal tuberculated
keels. .
The terga of the first five abdominal segments have a smooth
surface and are narrowly and highly arched. The pleura of seg-
ments ii.—v. have a flattened or slightly convex form; they are rela-
tively extensive and bear ornaments. The tergum of the first
segment is divided across the middle by a well-marked transverse
(right and left) groove. The posterior part only of this tergum is
prolonged downwards to form a very small pleuron with rounded
margin anteriorly, and broadly pointed below. This bears pitted
ornamentation and has a transverse carination, the carinal ridge
extending forwards from the point of articulation with the tuber-
cular facet of the second segment. The surface of the pleuron below
the short carina is set at a slight angle to the part above, and is
flattened for movement against the posterior lobe of the branchio-
stegite.
The second abdominal segment is relatively broad (antero-posterior
measurement), and has very large pleura which bulge forward just
below the tubercular articulating facets, and have very extensive
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Urtenhage Series. 215
antero-ventral margins which form a broadly convex outline. Their
truncated posterior borders are slightly sinuous—being projected
backwardly just below the articular socket, and having a slightly
excavated outline below this. The posterior borders bear minute
marginal denticles, and they form a roughly rectangular junction,
below, with the antero-ventral border. There is a shallow vertical
groove on the surface near the posterior border, and the pleuron also
bears granular and pitted ornaments on its upper and posterior parts.
Posteriorly situated, on its lower half, are two short, parallel, raised
ridges bearing several minute tubercles: these have a transverse
(horizontal) direction, and the lower is the shorter of the two. On
the pleura of the succeeding three segments (ii1.-v.) the ornaments
are similar, but the horizontal tubercular ridges become reduced in
size, particularly in the fifth segment. The pleura of these segments
are much less extensive than those of the second segment. Those
of the third and fourth segments are pointed below, with sloping,
slightly convex, antero-ventral borders, with narrow smooth raised
marginal lip and straight posterior borders furnished with a row of
minute denticles. The pleura of the fifth segment are more broadly
rounded below. Those of the sixth segment are very reduced in
extent and have the posterior half of their inferior margin broadly
excavated to allow of the free movement of the expanded swimming
appendages of this segment. The pleura and tergum of this segment
are alike ornamented with minute tubercles,
The tergum of the first abdominal segment has a shallow groove
rising from the articular sockets and curving slightly forwards as it
crosses the back. Similar grooves occur on the succeeding four
segments, two on either side of each tergum. They arise at the
(anterior) articular facet and the (posterior) articular socket and
slightly converge as they pass up towards the dorsal arch of the
tergum. The anterior groove on the second segment may be traced
across the back, but the remaining grooves become very faintly
marked or disappear on the dorsal parts. On the sixth segment,
the corresponding anterior groove is very strongly marked, and
passing right across the back, defines an anterior, convex, lenticular
shaped tergal facet which fits under the posterior part of the fifth
tergum. There is also on either side, in the posterior half of the
segment, a horizontal groove, separating the pleuron from the
tergum, and these pass posteriorly into a very weak shallow groove
which runs across the tergal arch close to the posterior border of the
segment.
The telson is relatively narrow and elongated. Its sides form
216 Annals of the South African Museum.
approximately straight outlines in the anterior half and converge
very gradually at first, but more rapidly in the vicinity of the
narrowed, rounded, posterior margin. The anterior margin is almost
straightly transverse, and forms roughly rectangular junctions with
the sides. The dorsal surface of the telson is of flattened form,
curving down abruptly at the lateral margins. There is a weak
median longitudinal ridge which dwindles away posteriorly before
reaching the hinder border. At a distance of about one-quarter of
the total length of the telson from its anterior border there arises
from the median ridge on either side a curved, narrow ridge, bearing
granules or minute tubercles. These first pass backwards, and,
diverging from the median ridge, they curve outwards and pass
obliquely forwards to the antero-lateral angles of the telson. Hach
encloses a roughly ovate area of the dorsal surface which is almost
smooth, or has very sparse granular ornaments. The remainder of
the surface of the telson has evenly spaced granules or minutely
tubercular ornamentation.
The appendages of the abdominal segments are unknown, except
portions of the expanded swimming organs of the sixth segment; but
these are too imperfectly preserved for precise description.
Dinensions.—The largest specimen examined measures 38 mm.
along the median dorsal line from the tip of the rostrum to the
posterior end of the carapace. The greatest height of the carapace
in this specimen, if it were perfect, would be about 16 mm. Other in-
dividuals, in which the rostral region is absent, have a similar height-
measurement, and the total breadth of their carapaces measured
in cross-section does not appear to exceed 8 mm., although the
specimens have not suffered appreciably from lateral crushing. The
length of the abdomen in extension cannot be accurately measured
owing to the flexion assumed at death, but it may be estimated to
have been approximately the same as that of the carapace.
Occurrence. —Several specimens were obtained by Mr. Rogers
from a bare slope W. 30 8. from the middle of Barkly Bridge, on
the farm Olifant’s Kop (35h, 37h, 38h).
A specimen consisting of portions of a thoracic limb which
may belong to this species is from the collection of the South
African Museum and is labelled “Sunday River” (663, on white
label).
Remarks.—Since the term ‘‘epimeron”’ has been used in two
distinct senses by different authors, the term “ pleuron”’ has been
retained in the above description to denote the downward lateral
prolongation of the tergum of each abdominal segment on either
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 217
side. The usual condition of the abdomen is one of flexion, with the
pleura overlapping one another in a marked degree; but one of the
specimens examined (38h) shows segments iii—vi. so extended
that the form of the pleura is well exhibited. It will be noted that
the conventional terminology here used in reference to the main
divisions of the body is that which is most widely known and
employed.
The transverse grooves on the terga of the abdominal segments
mark the degree of overlap of the segments when these are in the
position of extension. The grooves probably correspond with
strengthening ridges on the interior surface of the terga which
pass upwards from the ball (anterior) and socket (posterior), respec-
tively, of the lateral articulations in each segment. The depth and
the dorsal continuity of the anterior groove in the sixth segment, and
the smooth, convex, well-developed rolling facet anteriorly to it,
which fits closely under the hinder part of the fifth tergum, appear
to be contrivances for securing the rigidity and strength called for
in the exercise of rapid and vigorous movements of the tail in swim-
ming or springing. The tergal facets of the preceding segments are
much less well developed and defined.
Meyeria schwarzi differs widely from M. ornata (Phill.),* from the
Speeton Clay, in the absence of the characteristic ornaments on the
abdominal terga and in the form of the pleura, as well as in other
features. From M. magna M’Coy [= M. vectensis Bell],+ of the
Aptian of the Isle of Wight, it is readily separable by the absence of
ornamenting granular ridges on the abdominal terga, by the weaker
development and different position of the oblique branchial fold or
carina, and by the form of the pleura. M. magna also appears to
be a much larger and more robustly formed species. It may
be remarked that the fragment of an elongated ambulatory leg
(South African Museum collection, No. 663), mentioned above, bears
much resemblance, in its relative proportions and in its tuberculated
ornamenting keels, to the long and slender anterior thoracic legs of
M. magna.t
There appears to be very considerable resemblance between
M. schwarzt and M. rapax Harbort,s from the Lower Valanginian
of North Germany. Both have a smooth surface in the abdominal
terga i—v., and the form and ornamentation of the pleura are very
* Bell (1), p. 33, pl. ix., figs. 9-11.
t+ M’Coy (1), p. 334; Bell (1), p. 33, pl. x.
{ Belli(l); pls x., figs. 1, 4.
Spiarbort (1) ps ll; Gat. i. fie: 12's i. figs, 1-45 iu., figs, 1, 2); xi., figs, 1, 2.
218 Annals of the South African Museum.
similar. M. rapax, however, attained much larger dimensions and
more robust form than any of the specimens of M. schwarzt
examined, and it appears also from Dr. Harbort’s figures that the
cephalothorax of his species has less relative lateral compression.
Other differences that may be noticed are as follows. In M. rapax
the development of the obliquely running blunt branchial keel is
much more pronounced; the anterior margins of the abdominal
pleura are denticulated ; the sixth abdominal segment has greater
lateral depth and is not so depressed dorsally as the corresponding
segment in M. schwarzi. Further, Dr. Harbort makes no mention
of distinctive ornaments on the telson such as those which charac-
terise the African form. The little smooth oval area at the anterior
end of the branchial groove, which is well marked in M. schwarzi,
does not appear to be an evident feature in M. rapaz, if developed
at all, and the same may be said of the grooves of attenuated
sigmoidal form in front of the cardiac region of the carapace.
With reference to the above-mentioned small, smooth, oval area,
which is situated on either side of the carapace on the anterior part
of the branchiostegite, this structure is well represented also in
Meyeria magna M’Coy, but does not seem to have attracted special
attention. Its significance is not obvious, but it appears to be
homologous with the similar areas on the carapace of Pseudo-
glyphea. These were considered by Oppel to be a _ constant
characteristic of that genus,* and he referred to them as ‘reni-
form eminences,” but did not enter into the question of their
meaning. Corresponding structures of modified form may also be
seen in some species of Glyphea.
(A). LISTS OF THE FOSSILS CRITICALLY EXAMINED.
The lists of fossils collected by Messrs. Rogers and Schwarz in
1900 and by Mr. Rogers in 1905 should be read in connection with
the published official reports by these authors, which contain the
records of additional forms seen by the Surveyors to occur at some
of the localities. Thus, for instance, in the first report, among the
fossils stated to have been found in the Marine Beds at Grass Ridge,
near Uitenhage, there are the names of ten Mollusca, specimens of
which were not brought away.} In the later report by Mr. Rogers,
many fossils are in like manner recorded, which are not represented
in the collections submitted for examination. |
* Oppel (1), p. 51. + Rogers and Schwarz (1), p. 9. t Rogers (2).
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 219
(1) Zwarrkop’s River.
(Specimens collected by Messrs. Rogers and Schwarz, 1900.)
a. Railway cutting between milestones 244-243 on the railway from
Uitenhage to Graaff-Reinet, about 3 miles from Uitenhage.
OURO MOS ERM SD, «lsu pniaessceaicemencriess (345, 346, 347, 348, 349)
Serpula cf. concava (J. Sow.) .....---- (332)
Pecten (Camptonectes) projectus Tate (297, 350)
Lima (Acesta) obliquissima Tate ...... (346)
Exogyra wmbricata Krauss ..........-. (312)
Trigonia conocarditformis (Krauss)... (297, 298)
> DOES SSAAEPC) cay cscesgseas sera (309)
Cyprina borcherdst Tate.......++-+++++++ (313)
Thetirona papyracea (Sharpe) ....-.... (515)
Meretrix witenhagensis sp. NOV. ...-+- (316)
IR AUGIGS, SJ D2) Sonboe coh obo ten buco sEoseaneL ec (331)
Natica witenhagensis ? sp. NOV.......... (314, 350)
Holcostephanus uitenhagensis sp. nov. (276)
b. Grass Ridge, 3 miles east-north-east of Uitenhage.
Trigonia tatei Neumayr......+-+-.++++ (335)
Trapeziwm ? tatet sp. NOV. .......--++- (310)
Meretrix witenhagensis sp. Nov. ....-- (310)
SWIAGIVAWISISDs deem hasocbcuabocoasbeooseconne (310)
Pleuromya bain (Sharpe) ..........-++-- (317, 318, 334, 335)
Acteonina atherstoni (Sharpe) ......... (333)
c. Krantz near Picnic Bush, north-east of Red House.
Astarte (Hriphyla) herzogi (Goldf.) .....+.-.-.:ssseeeee (328)
d. Kloof on the left side of Zwartkop’s River, east-north-east of
Red House.
Trigonia ventricosa (Krauss) ..--...-+++ seers ee eeee (308)
Astarte (Hriphyla) herzogt (Goldf.) ......-.:++++++ (326, 327)
Tancredia SChwar2t Sp. DOV. ...+-s.ceeeeereeee seers: (324)
Meretrix witenhagensis Sp. DOV...-...+-+eeeeee rere es (524)
220 Annals of the South African Musewm.
é. Road below railway cutting, 1 mile from Rawson Bridge on the
main line, up side.
Bochvanttes Glaber, Sp. MOV. <eeewseseccse0ss2<occees (277, 338)
jf. Clay-pit on the left bank of Zwartkop’s River near Rawson
Bridge.
Acteonina atherstoni (Sharpe) ............++. (343)
BOChtanites 2 Toveng swac ses tovctes onaescensee soon (278, 339, 344)
g. One mile north-east of Rawson Bridge.
Modtola dainty Sharpe 6....<:<ccsescce cscs secccw sen seu cast (281)
(2) BezumpenHout’s RIver.
(Collected by Messrs. Rogers and Schwarz, 1900.)
Onno Wtenhagensis: SP. MOV. s-.e.cesecsecs ase caaanel (322, 323)
(3) SunDAy’s RIVER.
(Collected by Messrs. Rogers and Schwarz, 1900.)
a, Cliff below the old school-house on the right bank of Sunday’s
River, Dunbrodie (Geelhoutboom).
Pecten (Camptonectes) cottaldinus d’Orb. —_ (808, 306)
Perna atherstont Sharpe .............+sssee0 (305)
OSU EU SI ie, aaeaty. Nous oa Soa'ashc resem on on oes (305, 306, 336)
Mytilus witenhagensis sp. NOV. ......+++..000s (319)
Cyprina rugulosa Sharpe ............ss0s0+ (325)
Psammobia atherstont Sharpe ........+...0+ (321)
Gastrochena dominicalis Sharpe ..........+ (336)
Turbo atherstont SOAaLpe) Vesscpes-<cce-sssivee (351)
fy, MOGETSE SP OV wedsta cscs oecaece ass (282)
59. MUUNULULUS SP MOV. scerenecesesnees se. +s (305, 351)
jp (SDs bie eh eens meee ucan aawenenesecamce soe (351)
Acteonina atherstont (Sharpe) ...........0++ (283, 284)
b. Walton’s Farm, below Dunbrodie.
Perna atherstony SWAaLpe: ..2.ss.2sse: sues oncew sees eaece es (311)
Erigonia stows ? Sp. MOV. /sodosswase ces sarmeneeceeeseeeiace (307)
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Urtenhage Series. 221
(Collected by Mr, A. W. Rogers, 1905.)
c. Cliff on Buck Kraal.
Serpula pinchimana Tate ..........000. (122h)
Trigonia herzogt (Goldf.)..............+.se00 (116h, 120h, 122h)
Cyprina rugulosa Sharpe ...........000 (128h)
Mactra ? dubta sp. NOV. ......0..csreeeeee (141h)
Naiica ? mirifica sp- NOV,, ...-0.0..000050. (137h)
INGULCH MOGETSt GD, TIOVs << -werteezesssscase os (136h)
LAMNAA TEMOLA SP. DOV. .......000eeeeeeee (138h)
d. Cliff on the right bank of Sunday’s River on Commando Kraal.
Trigonia conocardiiformis. (Krauss).......02.ceceeeeeeee (104h)
e. 300 yards below Addo Drift (Tunbridge’s), left bank of Sunday’s
River.
Trigonta Vaud SHarpe .......6200s.0.0-0000 (40h, 41h, 42h, 46h)
f. Cliff on Zoet Geneugd.
Trigonia conocardiiformis (Krauss) (67h), from higher beds.
A herzogt (Goldt.)) se..2..2.-s (99h).
Mytilus witenhagensis sp. nov. ....-. (64h), from lowest beds.
g. Kloof S. 5 W. from Comley’s House, right bank of Sunday’s
River.
UCUETONUG OOLONGA SPA DOV. | cesceceersess tors comes saseenie (83h)
h. Nek 8S. 32 HE. from Comley’s House, right bank of Sunday’s
River.
Trigonta conocarditformis (Krauss) .............sseeeees (86h)
a. Cliff W. 20 8. from Comley’s House.
UG OMG ESLOWO SP) TOV 1 $ico oe de cose io sietee eiclonts onda cies (90h)
MORCNCAVASCHWATZU SPs MOVs, soqc ct oss ceacieas esd seeait os (95h)
MUROO ALRETSLON? SDAXPO.....scpebencceseelswescasascaeace sss (95h)
INGUUCOE MAT ULCH SPs DOV. <4. c-esccseeeedereecerbanere ses (95h)
Acigonina atherstont (Sharpe) .........scecssecseseeeeeee (92h)
56 CEvatnerstond (Sharpe) .c-cesccs.sseessesceore (95h)
222 Annals of the South African Museum.
j. Bare slope W. 30 8. from the middle of Barkly Bridge, on the
farm Olifant’s Kop.
Trigonia conocardiiformis (Krauss) (21h)
9 TOGETSU: SPs MOV. + sass 4002 (20h)
FAISCOUC SID. todos toate etre emench ert (24h)
Anthonya lineata sp. nov. .....++-. (35h)
Meretrix witenhagensis sp. nov. ... (24h, 26h, 28h, 29h, 30h)
Acteonina atherstont (Sharpe) ... (24h)
Meyeria schwarzi sp. Nov. ......... (35h, 37h, 38h)
k. Kloof behind Colchester.
Meretrix witenhagensis sp.nov. (493g, 498g) from highest beds.
Pleuromya bai (Sharpe) ... (495g) 3 5
GOMOMYD: SP xi 2sj.<ccede cesses =F (489g) ‘5 "5
Acteonina atherstoni (Sharpe) (499g) a1
Phylloceras rogerst sp. noy. ... (3h) from middle beds.
1. Small kloof 3 miles up the left bank of Sunday’s River.
LTAQOnNia SLOW? (SP. DON -so2ee oe cocaceee morn ee atts (17h)
5 VenuricOsa(IKTAUSS) i ates. cs ess<scee sess ees (14h, 15h)
The following list is based upon specimens, in the collection of the
South African Museum, from Sunday’s River :—
Serpula pinchiniana Tate ........0.....cc.00- (303)
Pecten (Syncyclonema) orbicularis J. Sow. (279, 280)
» (Chlamys) ef. subacutus Lam. ...... (304)
Lima (Acesta) obliquissima Tate
EHxogyra imbricata Krauss .........+.+00.5 (300, 301, 302, 303)
Prigonta herzoga (Goldi)\s.-s--¢--2s..-20s06 (289)
os Wovwbr SP. WOW. oi nsactessns.caosact (285, 286, 287, 288,
290, 291, 292, 293,
294, 295, 296, 299)
=m vau Sharpe
5, conocardiiformis (Krauss)
Tancredia schwarzi sp. nov.
Meretrix uitenhagensis sp. nov.
Acteonina atherstoni (Sharpe)
Holcostephanus ef. atherstoni (Sharpe)
3 rogerst sp. Nov.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 223
Specimens of the following, in the South African Museum, are
also believed to have come from the Sunday’s River :—
Trigonia kraussi sp. nov.
- stow? sp. nov.
Holcostephanus atherstoni (Sharpe)
i cf. bain (Sharpe)
Specimens from Sunday’s River, in the collection of the Geo-
logical Society of London :—
Holcostephanus baini (Sharpe)
a modderensis sp. nov. (Modder Drift)
AS wilman@ sp. noy.... (Aasvogel Krantz, above
Modder Drift. Specimen
numbered 10975A.)
(4) Conca RIver.
(Collected by Mr. A. W. Rogers, 1905.)
a. Wash-out 100 feet above Coega station at a point one mile north
of Coega Hotel.
Nucula witenlhagensts Sp. NOV. .....:.--2s2+20.seeeesene (441g)
UIGOMUAS Dt «todas hadsae ae ceuotesn te Ona dees Sushi wenajstenics (438g)
b. From valley east of railway, 1 mile up the line from Coega
station.
Mytilus witenhagensis sp. NOV.........2020.2-.sceceeesee- (479g)
igrgonia Nerzogis (GOldt:)) . ssecuceo0se0ee <0 sclsssacies 8003 02 (474g)
. TOGCUSU SI): WOW se oro.) meine ss seieisinies eho dane snge (472¢)
ASUOTLC LONQLAMASTANG, LALO .22.c<c-sccoessceceseess-csase (477g)
c. Left side of Coega Valley, half a mile down from the railway.
Serpula pinchiniana Tate .........0...000 (458g)
Pecien orbicularis J. Sow. .........s0.0-eee+ (453g)
Lima (Acesta) obliquissima Tate ......... (455g)
»» (Mantellwm) neglecta Tate ......... (448g, 449¢, 453g)
DLGONTG ROULDI SP. MOVs +... ..210- 00050008 (458¢)
7) ventricosa (Krauss) ...-:.-+2-.. (463g)
Cardita nuculoides Tate.............ceecse0s (466g)
224 Annals of the South African Museum.
Anthonya lineata sp. NOV. ......seeeeeeseee (461g)
Cyprina borcherdst Tate........0r+s0recsn-- (467g)
Prapeznim 2 tater sp. MOVs .-ce--+0-2+0 eee (452¢)
Meretria witenhagensis sp. NOY.......+..++ (453g, 454¢)
d. Left side of Coega Valley, 2 miles down from the railway.
Prigoniaherzogu (Goldis\wacss ssa ctee nee eect eee (468g)
(Collected by Miss M. Wilman.)
e. Coega River.
Astarte (Eriphyla) pinchiniana Tate
Pecten (Camptonectes) projectus Tate
f. Coega.
Hxogyra imbricata Krauss
Grammatodon jonesi (Tate)
Thetironia papyracea (Sharpe)
Plewrotomaria sp.
Holcostephanus atherstoni (Sharpe)
Belennites sp.
The following are in the collection of the South African Museum,
from Coega :—
Exogyra imbricata Krauss
Patella caperata Tate
(5) Knysna.
(Collected by Mr. A. W. Rogers, 1905.)
Brentford, Knysna Estuary.
Trigonia holuwbi ? sp. nov. [young individual] ...... (150h)
ACGNLNOGISCUS ISD sie panne eseateca chats sr eos teasers (151h)
Belenintbes Spi. scccmnenaes sce s saspeiiac Searsesvecees ecceacees (1d53h)
The names of all the fossils mentioned above are brought together
in a synoptic list at the end of the following Section (VI.) of this
memoir.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 225
(B). LIST OF INVERTEBRATE FOSSILS
FROM THE UITENHAGE
SERIES, NOT REPRESENTED IN THE COLLECTIONS EXAMINED.
Tsastrea antipodum Tate
Cidaris pustulifera Tate
*Serpula sp. (two species)
*Bereniwcea antipodum Tate
Pteria baint (Sharpe)
*Pecten rubidgeanus Tate
*Gervillia dentata Krauss
*Pinna sharpei Tate
*Placunopsis imbricata Tate
* a“ subjurensis Tate
+ undulata Tate
*Haxogyra jonesiana Tate
Mytilus jonest Tate
Modiola atherstoni Sharpe
a rubidget Tate
Lithodomus stowianus Tate
Cucullea kraussi Tate
Grammatodon atherstont (Sharpe)
Seebachia bronni (Krauss)
*“Ptychomya complicata (Tate)
Cyrena ? baint Sharpe
Trapezium nivencanum (Tate)
Pleuromya lutraria (Krauss)
*Pholadomya domuucalis Sharpe
Corbula ? rockiana Tate
Trochus baint Sharpe
Monodonta hausmanni Neum.
Neritopsis ? turbinata Sharpe
Natica atherstont Sharpe
Turritella rubidgeana Tate
Alaria coronata Tate
Nautilus sp.
Hamites africanus Tate
*Hoplites subanceps (Tate)
Crioceras spinosissemunr (Hausm.)
Neum.
Belemnites africanus Tate
The above list is given as far as possible with corrected nomen-
clature, but some of the names are still subject to revision, though
in nearly all instances I have been able to see either the original
types or other satisfactory specimens. In the case of Pinna
sharpei no specimen was seen by Tate, and the species was founded
upon a drawing made by Stow from a specimen collected by another
geologist. The names marked with an asterisk have received some
brief mention in the second section of this paper.
In addition to the above, the following forms have also been
recorded from the Uitenhage beds :—
Sanguinolaria ? africana Sharpe
Turbo stowianus Tate
Phasianella ? sharper Tate
Chemnitzia africana Tate
Ampullaria ? ignobilis Tate
Act@onina jenkinsiana Tate
5 morrisiana Tate
9) sharpeana Tate
226 Annals of the South African Museum.
The materials upon which these names are based are for the
most part unsatisfactory, and in several cases consist of small
shells which were figured by Sharpe, though considered by him
to be unfitted for specific determination. Sangwinolaria ? africana
is a small shell of doubtful generic position, and the species may
perhaps be founded upon an immature individual. Turbo stowranws
has never been figured, and I have not been able to find the
specimens described by Tate. Phasianella? sharper is a minute
shell, and its generic position cannot be determined. Chemmitzia
africana, founded upon a single individual, has not been figured,
and I have not found the type-specimen. <Ampullaria ? ignobilis
is the name given by Tate to a very small shell figured by
Sharpe, but the specimen cannot be found and its generic position
is quite uncertain. The three forms ascribed by Tate to Acteonina
are represented by specimens of minute dimensions figured by
Sharpe. These determinations, like those above mentioned, are
quite unsatisfactory ; the specimens are probably immature, and
in any case it is evident that more than a single genus is
represented.
A comparison of the names of the Mollusca in all the above
lists with those in the list given by Mr. R. B. Newton in 1896*
shows an apparent want of agreement in some few items, and
for convenience of reference these may be briefly noted here.
Reineckia subanceps of Mr. Newton’s list is the shell I have
referred to Hoplites. In place of Acteon (for A. atherstonc) I
have been led to use Actgonina, since the shells in question show
no trace of plication on the columella; it has also been possible
to show that Turbo baw must now be considered as a synonym
of Turbo atherstoni. To substitute the name Turbonilla in place
of Tate’s Chemnitzia must be regarded as hazardous in view of
the fact that the original determination was unsatisfactorily estab-
lished. In place of Cyprina, Mr. Newton used Arctica, a name
which is unfortunately preoccupied, even were there any valid
objection to the employment of the familiar and long-established
name Cyprina. Ceromya papyracea is now shown to be referable
to Thetironia. Tate’s Crassatella complicata, as pointed out by
previous writers, belongs to the genus Ptychomya, and the
emendation to Crassatellites is therefore incorrect. Cuculle@a can-
cellata in Mr. Newton’s list is a synonym of Cucullea krausse
Tate, and was no doubt retained through oversight. In the case
of Cucullea? jonesi and Parallelodon atherstoni, which may be
* Newton (2), pp. 150, 151.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 227
referred to a single genus, I have employed the name Gram-
matodon. The selection of a correct name for these and similar
Mesozoic forms might possibly be regarded as still debatable,
but in this matter I have deferred to the opinion of Mr. H. Woods—
a view with which Dr. Wheelton Hind is now also in agreement.
In the choice between the generic names Gari and Psammobia
opinions are divided, but I have given reasons for preferring to
retain Psammobia (for Ps. atherstoni), although this course cannot
perhaps be strictly justified, except as a measure of expediency
to meet the circumstances of this particular instance. In the
case of Avicula baint, the generic name Pteria, which has the prior
claim, is used in one of the above lists. Gryphea imbricata we
have seen to be more correctly referable to Hxogyra, to which
it was originally assigned by Krauss, and I have pointed out that
there is no foundation whatever for the inclusion of the name
Trigonia goldfusst in any list of molluscs from the Uitenhage
Series.
It should be remarked that the errors to which some of the
discrepancies above noted are due, are such as must almost inevi-
tably occur in a list of fossils which is compiled from previous
works, with attempt at revision, without the examination of actual
specimens, even though the task of compilation be carried out as
carefully as in Mr. Newton’s paper.
VI.—SU MMARY.*
General Results.—The great majority of the invertebrate fossils
collected from the Uitenhage Beds consist of marine Mollusca, and
have been obtained from localities in the valleys of the Sunday’s,
Zwartkop’s, and Coega Rivers. The present study has shown that
these marine fossils in reality furnish evidence which enables us to
estimate their geological age with considerable precision. A more
detailed examination of the fauna than that undertaken by Neumayr
fully corroborates that author’s conclusion that a large number of
the Mollusca show affinity to Cretaceous rather than to Jurassic
forms. The broad question of age which has given rise to such widely
different expressions of opinion is, in fact, decisively answered
by the occurrence of representatives of the following genera:
Holcostephanus (sensu stricto) ; Hamuvtes ; Crioceras ; Bochianites ;
Acanthodiscus ; Trigonia (divisions Scabree and Pseudo-quadrate) ;
* See also Kitchin (2),
228 Annals of the South African Museum.
Ptychomya; Thetironia; Anthonya; Solecurtus, and Meyeria.
Further, there is found to be no support whatever for the suggestion
occasionally put forth, that the Uitenhage Marine Beds may cor-
respond to a part of both the Upper Jurassic and the Lower
Cretaceous series of Europe. So far as the paleontological evidence
goes, there appears to be every probability that the strata yielding
the marine fossils were deposited with comparatively great rapidity,
and there is no indication of such diversity in the character of the
fauna as would be consistent with the supposition that more than
the equivalent of one paleontological stage is represented. Some of
the typical marine forms are now known to have a much more
extensive vertical range in the series than was formerly suspected,
and the sameness of character in the fauna observed at different
levels in the series seems to preclude any attempt to establish zonal
divisions. It may be inferred that the Marine Beds were rapidly
accumulated, and that they represent a very restricted period of
time.
Amongst the Uitenhage Mollusca, the Gasteropoda constitute the
least important element in a comparative study, while the Cephalo-
poda furnish the most significant evidence by reason of their close
alliance with forms having well-restricted vertical range in Europe.
The Lamellibranchiata largely preponderate in the fauna, and
prominent amongst these are Tvigonie which represent divisions of
the genus as yet unknown to occur in EKurope. While many of the
lamellibranchs afford data which are valuable in supporting the
evidence yielded by the Cephalopoda, in a correlation with European
standards, some of the best-characterised bivalves are of very great
interest from the fact that they and their close allies have an
extensive geographical distribution, and enable us to bring the
Uitenhage Series into broad correlation with deposits situated in
widely separated regions outside the European area.
Correlation of the Fauna.—A detailed comparison with the
Secondary faunas of Europe has shown that, despite the presence of
some few bivalve forms which not remotely resemble familiar Jurassic
types, there is abundant evidence in support of the opinion of those
German writers who have ascribed to the Uitenhage Series a Lower
Cretaceous age. Only a very small proportion of the Mollusca can
be definitely identified with European forms, but a considerable
number are closely comparable with Neocomian and Aptian shells.
This is true of many of the lamellibranchs, which nevertheless, as
might be expected, would alone afford comparatively scanty data for
a precise correlation of the Uitenhage beds with members of the
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 229
Lower Cretaceous series in Europe. A surer guide may be
recognised in some of the Cephalopoda, more especially in the
representatives of Holcostephanus (sensu stricto) which so pre-
ponderate in the Uitenhage cephalopod-fauna. It is obvious that
these have very near allies in Europe which are confined to the
Upper Valanginian and Lower Hauterivian, and this fact may suffice
to justify the provisional approximate correlation of the Marine Beds
with this part of the Neocomian.
In the attempt to trace relationships between the Uitenhage
molluses and those of Lower Cretaceous deposits in extra-Huropean
regions, the desirable evidence to be derived from a comparison of
cephalopod-types is as yet not forthcoming, if we except the single
case of Holcostephanus schenki (Oppel), from the Spiti Shales, which
is closely allied to some of the South African Holcostepham. Certain
well-characterised lamellibranchs, on the other hand, some of which
are of a very specialised nature, point to the bonds by which this
development of the Neocomian in Cape Colony is connected with
the Oomia Trigonia-beds of Cutch, the strata yielding Trigonia
ventricosa in the Godavari district and in Hazara (Himalayas), the
Neocomian deposits of German East Africa, and the Lower Cretaceous
strata of presumably like age in Chili, Bolivia, and the Argentine
Republic. In comparing the faunas, importance must be attached
to the evidence of some of the Trigome@, notably of the divisions
Scabree and Pseudo-quadrate. In particular, the points of contact
revealed by a comparison of the lamellibranch-fauna of the Uitenhage
Series with that of the Oomia Trigonia-beds are found to be very
remarkable, and of such a kind that we must infer the approximate
contemporaneity of these two faunas, and the existence of facilities
for intercourse between the two areas. It becomes, therefore, a
matter for some surprise that the Uitenhage ammonitoids or forms
closely allied to them are as yet unknown in Cutch, and the real
or apparent absence of such forms from the Neocomian deposits of
German East Africa and of South America is also a striking circum-
stance.
The Relation of the Fauna to some Questions of Distribution.—
A careful comparative study of the Uitenhage Mollusca dispels the
idea, emphasised by Neumayr, that this fauna proclaims its isolated
position by the sharp contrast it affords to the comparable faunas of
other regions, and that it may therefore be considered to support the
theory of an Indo-African land barrier in early Cretaceous times.
Neumayr laid principal stress upon the contrast between the fauna
of the Neocomian Belemnite-beds in the north-west of Madagascar
16
230 Annals of the South African Museum.
and that of the Uitenhage Series. It is probable, however, that this
contrast may be due to a difference of facies, and in any case the
argument derivable from it is greatly weakened, if not rendered
valueless, by the relation seen to exist between the Uitenhage
molluscan assemblage and that of the more truly comparable faunas
in East Africa and Cutch. There are other facts also which are
known to cast doubt upon the existence of an effective barrier to
migration between the equatorial and southern waters to the east of
the African continent, in Cretaceous times.
Neumayr laid great stress upon the occurrence of Belemmutes
africanus in the Uitenhage Series in support of his theory of the
distribution of cephalopods according to climatic zones. He found
this form to belong to a group which, though occurring in the colder
waters of the northern hemisphere, appeared to have no represen-
tatives in the warmer equatorial regions. While the known distribu-
tion of Holcostephanus (sensu stricto) might at first thought be
considered to support in a similar manner the broad principle laid
down by Neumayyr, it would certainly not be justifiable to attach any
such significance to the facts. Our knowledge is as yet very
incomplete, but a body of evidence relating to the distribution of
fossil Cephalopoda has now been accumulated, which casts the
strongest possible doubts upon the soundness of Neumayr’s theory.
Hence it will be well to exercise the greatest caution in the attempt
to estimate the significance of the Uitenhage Cephalopoda in any
general question of distribution. The apparent absence of identical
or closely related forms from the Neocomian rocks of German Hast
Africa and of Cutch is in all probability owing either to our imperfect
acquaintance with the fossil faunas in these districts, or to conditions
of a local nature which may really have determined the absence of
such forms, in manner not unknown among the Cephalopoda of
various geological horizons within restricted areas in Europe.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 231
LIST OF THE FOSSILS COMPRISED IN THE COLLECTIONS
SPECIALLY DEALT WITH IN THE FOREGOING PAGES.
The genera and species are arranged alphabetically under their
respective classes. Their arrangement under localities is set forth in
the lists at the end of the previous section of this memoir.
ANTHOZOA.
PAGE
MERIC UISUNUE OS 1) Biman OR Gs ata wie 282s cia sialde Scr Sale bab as Meee: 62
ANNELIDA.
Precis CONCHUG (Jc. SOWs)! , ciascekon-Sa' stn eicisleuae seatipacteee as etes 63
PEER CRUUCO NA: DAtel «i: namie aseiwti olsen eteneun sekiaiiedem cece: 64
LAMELLIBRANCHIATA.
Per COON eNCALA Se WOVE senscc tone see cane Oo etseees teats wav aree cindees 137
Astarte (Eiriphyla) herzogt (Goldf.) .................00055 ane Mee oees 128
PE LONGUANASTONG WAtO Yiacs. 2 Sacscte see -)od0e1geskioigekiaobeccctens jose 128
Pe Hirvohyla) ponchiniana Tate 6.20.10. 2.2. one eden esen snes oes 135
ROM TICCULOLACS AL ALO rics ames cost vn sicee's stems sue'ston ie uesee oes eead< 127
mre RUONCRENGSY WAGC: Seek cence sd ages ees sodeco eRe ssalntane ee avbaieg se 150
< BUGUUOSES SWAT Os fistinsceia- soe seria state. Sek er Sacieae Ac ven dutee SS 149
REPO MORMON ICH IKYRUSS) aes cleee scenes oteeses eee dees 4s5-dedesees 77
ECUSENOCIENG AOMIUNICALIS: SHALPE \..-.02-- cece ccniedeeeesseeescceBceae es 162
FOTO DIIOL SS ORES SEPARATE PG ROE PP eee AER ner Ree ee ere er 159
erammatodon jonest (Tate) ...:...c.s.seseeensesseeneseet a eee wk 88
ama (Mantellum) neglecta Tate ........0..:ccssecscesececeneneceecses 74
Pm tcesta\robleqniissima "Tate 2.2.20 catesspen scones des secscenss se (al
RECA ME NC WOUE SI AION. an oa /<s «@elenc 6 Sc ciwss <eecioe seleeven em ads oa sea eee 156
MRCRCUI DE MOLEMILAGENSTS SP. NOV. asses. 4-esiscnceeecus ss cesencesanenees 151
MATION O ROC TILA IRE DOr cher: ceca cust tee se avssoUeveredetto vase sewssece 85
MU ORUSUULLCTURAGEMSIS BID. DOV: ......cecsseesaveecsescoseecsssancceteess 52
I UCUIO WILEMNAGENSIS SP. NOV. ..-c..0s00esescevedcweresseccrereesennse 87
SURGE, Sills, 20 gb8 CSORSBAOUOME EM Ce eR OOE RE Ce Seen ao A nee ee ea CHE
Pecten (Camptonectes) cottaldinus Q’Orb. .......2-...ececceceeceeees 65
syncyctonema) orbicularts J. SOW .....0.0-2-0-.1eecseeeeseess 65
mecanupconectes) profeCtuUs Vat, corn ect ace.cshess eccincpu es sete 66
PM COLULCIRUS ICL. SUOGCUEUS Wai, <.ccc20<2 +s. foeemctencsacrataes: 69
Ree MOMGUNCHSLOMIMOUAT DO .1.c0 5 vec.estnateose¥adeeoeav os vedescnssSeees (i)
Pinna atherstoni bey Me Ia (ORE eecaiiet-ina steed grote nae Aaraictets seeing cee ee 76
232 Annals of the South African
Pleuromya Oaini (SWALPeC)).c-ceuses-- ccs =e rameter aes eee ener ree ee
Psammobia atherstoni Sharpe
Trigonta conocardaiform7s (Krags) ie. .cece sess: cece <<a ween
3 [ree 7o 0m (Eo) GUID) ha eacea eh eoncdasnansdeacdodaeannoasedosson S3c
a POUCH aD, (3) Orea\OS Renee eocecdc eet eeeng odous 2dr conacadconcupacnicashc
EPAUSSUS MOVs ees. senses seen tlten Perec mee tenance
2 TOGOTSU IS: WOW a) eos sieeneidce nates metenm omar eters eee ease
ns SEOWS "SP! MOVs oosc secaaae ve sae caiseces seme seuee tees eee eee meter
e tater Neumayr
- POU SMALPE. tasecccuacee- ous smstees secede s saeRtiea eee eee
4 Mentrecosa, (KTAUSS) x sosbos see sacs test ve ascceuseees ererh ey:
Unto artenhagensts Spy GOV. <c-c2.ce-eeane sent seer erence ane se cetera e
GASTEROPODA.
AGLBONING Giherstont (SHAPE) -eaessch soso -etsscseitciestes ce -eee ee
a Ci ry Pee ens ean eee sank Seen eee
TGOULEO, TOMO SP. WOW: eine aesies. sxia sta sie crnaiaieayeele ciao se reeee ies sees
INGURCON? NUIT LTLCG SD MWOV Ace oteoneisciclss goeitis «mice a ele te 2 aie ease eee ee
INGEICH TOGETStISPs MOV. 1c sevassseckqte senses acuer (2 sose eee eee
5) | SUULENNAGENSUS SP. WOVs Sis -.naceeaseine: oe aenseen seer
PGbella COMET GLA Mater. wstle ve\aicsisesreicm etead ote erie eat ee eee
PCUTOCOMOTIG SPr Senmec vee scsmee aoe bio rarer anteater ee ere
Turbo GtRerstOny SATS scp .2-cee-s-e aca ene aer eee eee rere
yi ) UUTUUTALUIS “SD. OW Wan oe cos = sae sls ons rae ee eee eee
sf) TOGOTSDSD. MOVs Jose ceeetiass 3. Ses neue site taco aero eee eee
si 0 BID ee Sos wcilea sk vee cipe ete oe na ele as neck eee Cee ee
CEPHALOPODA.
Acantmodiscus Stix =: t2n-c2: scence core tee cote nee eee seca eaenne
Bolemmates Si, 1. io snnces 20 de= contest siolec nse aera oe eee Sa eat eee
a SDs ole cede singe ss ve cheats Mobetnaiaciet Me ids et ee tee eae eee ceare
Bochianutes glaber Sp. m0v.. 22 --e-ss-2. see ay eee eee
Holcostephanus atherstona (Sharpe) ..........2--+:seecee sees ec neee ees
‘a Ch. athersiont (SOWA Pe)) ecu. .eeeuseae tee eee
ES bani Sharpe)ioossc ese saddacaee eae oacee
Musewn.
ee ee ee Cr
SOVCCUPTUS*SI8 Sse o Minot or ee mses e aa ovis woo ails Sree eee eee
Nameredvar SCnwarzy Spy WOVagemaaa<ceet one te seen senna eee ree
Thevironua OOLONGA ASP. OVa ten s-eepesacsekis/2. sciee ee -ie eee eee
PAPYTACed( SWALpe)) ease 2 -)-- ees adem es see ere eee eee ee
PR PGCU SD. vale sodas po ea toon wa oes Seaton ieee Se a setae ols Societe ve eee
Pramezvuin:? tated Sp. WOVe ce .ceece cee eke seat anaes oa nce eo aaserre
re ee i i iy
PAGE
157
154
155
139
146
142
160
148
119
101
103
115
125
110
The Invertebrate Fawna of the Uitenhage Series. 233
PAGE
Holcostephanus ci. baint (Sharpe).............0.200ecscseseeerscsesesees Og
s TRODACTENSTS SPHMOV. sso+c eee. ce ececsersmcerse seein 202
i TOGOTSUSPa MOV. (eulak chooses cwsnne sae eee eae 201
Rs WILETILAGENSIS SP; WOV..5:.sesscstsencene enn esee a= 206
5 WU UINAILIE S.A TOW Jacan ss'osis.ssioneee seis ia“ aemeereeseeas 195
EYUOCEVGS TOGETSL SP. NOV. ....20-+0c02secccesceerectesescse roses onewes 179
CRUSTACEA.
Ber eOMSGIO ATL: Ss MOVs v0 vac osessssecseorancsn seiesseee+secwasemace ors 212
VII.—LIST OF WORKS CITED.
Apams, H. and A.
(1) The Genera of Recent Mollusca, vol. ii., London, 1858.
Acassiz, J. L. R.
(1) Htudes Critiques sur les Mollusques Fossiles. Mémoire sur les Trigonies.
Neuchatel, dated 1840, issued 1841.
(2) Etudes Critiques sur les Moll. Foss. Monographie des Myes. Neuchatel,
1842-1845.
AntHutna, D. J.
(1) Ueber die Kreidefossilien des Kaukasus. Beitriige zur Pal. und Geol.
Oesterr.-Ungarns u. d. Orients. Band xii., p. 53. 1899.
Arcutac, A. D’.
(1) Rapport sur les Fossiles du Tourtia. Mém. Soc. Géol. France, 2° Sér.,
Tome ii., p. 291. 1847.
AscHer, E.
(1) Die Gastropoden, Bivalven und Brachiopoden der Grodischter Schichten.
Beitriige zur Pal. und Geol. Oesterr.-Ungarns wu d. Orients. Band xix.,
p. 135. 1906.
ATHERSTONE, W. G.
(1) Geology of Uitenhage. The Eastern Province Monthly Magazine. Vol. i.,
No. 11, pp. 580-595. Grahamstown, 1857.
Barn, A. G.
(1) On the Geology of Southern Africa. Trans. Geol. Soc. Lond., ser. 2,
vol. vii., p. 175. 1856.
BAuMBERGER, E.
(1) Fauna der unteren Kreide im westschweizerischen Jura. 2° Theil, Die
Ammonitiden der unteren Kreide im westschweiz. Jura. <Abhandl.
Schweiz. Pal@ont. Gesellsch., vol. xxxii., 1906; 4e Theil, Ibid.,
vol. xxiv. (1907). 1908.
Bayis, E.
(1) Fossiles principaux des terrains. Explication de la Carte géologique de la
France, Tome iv., part 1, Atlas. Paris, 1878.
234 Annals of the South African Museum,
Baye, E., and Coquanp, H.
(1) Mémoire sur les Fossiles Secondaires recueillis dans le Chili par M. Ignace
Domeyko. Mém. Soc. Géol, France, 2° Sér., Tome iy., p. 1. 1851.
BEHRENDSEN, O.
(1) Zur Geologie des Ostabhanges der argentinischen Cordillere, 2°" Theil.
Zeitschr. der deutsch. geol. Gesellsch., Band xliv., p. 1. 1892.
Brn, 2.
(1) A Monograph of the Fossil Malacostracous Crustacea of Great Britain.
Part 2: Crustacea of the Gault and Greensand. 1863 [dated 1862].
Paleontographical Society.
Biaeor, A,
(1) Contributions a l’étude dela Faune Jurassique de Normandie. 1* Mémoire.
Sur les Trigonies. Mém. Soc. Linn. Norm., vol. xvii., p. 259. 1893.
Brake, J. F,
(1) On the Portland Rocks of England. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. Xxxvi.,
p. 189. 1880.
(2) List of the types and figured specimens recognised by C. D. Sherborn,
F.G.S., in the collection of the Geological Society of London.
London, 1902.
BuanForpD, H. F.
(1) On the Age and Correlations of the Plant-bearing Series of India. Quart.
Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxxi., p.519. 1875.
Buanrorp, W. T.
(1) The Paleontological Relations of the Gondwana System. Records Geol.
Surv. Ind., vol. xi., part 1, p. 104. 1878.
(2) Homotaxis as illustrated from Indian Formations. Presid. Address Geol.
Sect. Brit. Assoc., Montreal meeting, 1884 ; reprinted in Records Geol.
Surv. Ind., vol. xviii., part 1, p. 32. 1885.
(3) Anniversary Address of the President, Geological Society. Quart. Journ.
Geol. Soc., vol. xlvi., Proceedings, p. 43. 1890.
(4) On the papers of Dr. Kossmat and Dr. Kurtz, and on the ancient geo-
graphy of ‘‘ Gondwana-Land.” Records Geol. Surv. Ind., vol. xxix.,
part 2, p. 52. 1896.
See also Mepuicorr and Buanrorp.
Boreum, G.
(1) Die Bivalven der Stramberger Schichten. Paleontographica, Suppl. ii.,
Abth. 4, 1883.
(2) Geologische Ergebnisse einer Reise in den Molukken. Compte Rendw de
la IX Session, Congrés Géologique Internat., Vienne, 1903, 2° Fasc.,
p. 657. Wien, 1904.
(3) Beitriige zur Geologie von Niederlindisch-Indien. 1° Abth., Die Siidkiisten
der Sula-Inseln Taliabu und Mangoli. Abschnitt I. Grenzschichten
zwischen Jura und Kreide. Paleontographica, Suppl. iv., 1904.
Boum, J.
(1) Der Griinsand yon Aachen und seine Mollusken-fauna. Verhandl. des
naturhist. Vereines der preuss. Rheinlande, Westfalens, und des Reg.-
Bezirks Osnabriick. Jahrgang 42 (5° Folge, Jahrg. 2). Bonn, 1885.
(2) Ueber cretaceische Gastropoden vom Libanon und von Karmel. Zeitschr.
der deutsch. geol. Gesellsch., Band lii., Heft 2, p. 189. 1900.
The Invertebrate Fawna of the Uitenhage Serres. 235
Bogostowsky, N.
(1) Der Rjasan-Horizont, seine Fauna, seine stratigraphischen Beziehungen
und sein wahrscheinliches Alter. MJaterialien zur Geologie Russlands,
Band xvili., p. 1. St. Petersburg, 1897.
Bourse, M.
(1) Note sur les Fossiles rapportés de Madagascar par M. E. Gautier. Bull.
du Museum d?Hist. Nat., Tome i., No. 5, p. 181. Paris, 1895.
(2) Note sur de nouveaux Fossiles Secondaires de Madagascar. Bull. du
Museum d@ Hist. Nat., Tome v., p. 130. Paris, 1899.
(3) Sur la Géologie des terrains sédimentaires de Madagascar. Bull. Soc.
Géol. France, 3¢ Sér., Tome xxvii., p. 124. 1899.
(4) La Géologie et la Paléontologie de Madagascar, dans l’état actuel de nos
connaissances. Comptes Rendus, VIIIe Session, Congrés Géol. Internat.
(1900), p. 673. Paris, 1901.
(5) Sur de nouveaux fossiles de la céte orientale de Madagascar. Bull. Soc.
Géol, France, 4° Sér., Tome iv., p. 172. 1904.
Bourg, M., and THrvEnNIN, A.
(1) Paléontologie de Madagascar. I. Fossiles de la Céte Orientale. Annales
de Paléontologie, Tome i., p. 43. Paris, 1906.
Briart, A., and Cornet, F. L.
(1) Description minéral., géol., et paléontologique de la Meule de Bracquegnies.
Mém. Cour. et Mém. des Savants Etrang. Acad. Roy.'Belge, vol. xxxiv.,
1868.
Buca, L. von.
(1) Betrachtung iiber die Verbreitung und die Grenzen der Kreide-Bildungen.
Bonn, 1849.
Buckman, 8. 8., and Barner, F.A.
(1) The terms of Auxology. Zoolog. Anzeiger, Nos. 405 (p. 420), 406 (p. 429).
1892.
BurckHarpt, C.
(1) Coupe Géologique de la Cordillére entre Las Lajas et Curacautin [Descrip-
tion of Neocomian fossils by Ch. Mayer-Eymar, pp. 17-23]. Anales
del Museo de La Plata, Seccion Geol. y Mineral., iii. La Plata, 1900.
(2) Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Jura- und Kreideformation der Cordillere.
Paléontographica, Band 1., p. 1. 1903.
(3) La Faune Jurassique de Mazapil, avec un Appendice sur les Fossiles du
Crétacique Inférieur. Boletin del Instituto Geoldgico de Mexico, Num.
23, 1906.
Buvienrer, A.
(1) Statistique géol., minéral., et paléontologique du département de la Meuse
Atlas. Paris, 1852.
Cuorrat, P.
(1) Sur le Crétacique supérieur 4 Mogambique. Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci.
Paris, 24 Decemb., 1900.
(2) Sur le Crétacique de Conducia en Mogambique. Bull. Soc. Géol. France,
4e Ser., Tome ii., p. 400. 1902.
(3) Contributions 4 la connaissance géologique des Colonies Portugaises
d’Afrique. I. Le Crétacique de Conducia. Comm. Serv. Géol. Portugal.
Lisbonne, 1903.
236 Annals of the South African Museum.
Cotuort, L.
(1) Sur les Trigonies byssiféres. Bull. Soc. Géol, France, 3° Sér., vol. xxvii.,
p. 224. 1899.
Coquanp, H.
(1) Monographie de l’étage aptien de !Espagne. Marseilles, 1865.
(2) Monographie du genre Ostrea, Terr. Crét. Marseilles, 1869.
CoRSTORPHINE, G. 8.
(1) The History of Stratigraphical Investigation in South Africa. Report
South Afr. Assoc. Adv. of Science, 1904. President’s Address,
Section B. 1905.
Dacqut, E.
(1) Beitrage zur Geologie des Somalilandes. I. Theil: Untere Kreide.
Beitriige zur Pal. und Geol. Oesterr.-Ungarns u. d. Orients, Band xvii,
p.7. 1904.
Dat, W. H.
(1) Contributions to the Tertiary Fauna of Florida. Part III. A New Classi-
fication of the Pelecypoda. Trans. Wagner Free Institute of Science,
vol. iii., part 3, p. 479. Philadelphia, 1895.
Dames, W.
(1) Ueber Ptychomya. Zeitschr, der deutsch, geol. Gesellsch,, Band xxv.,
p. 379. 1873.
Damon, R.
(1) A Supplement to the Geology of Weymouth and the Isle of Portland.
2nd Edition, London, 1880.
(2) Geology of Weymouth, Portland, and Coast of Dorsetshire. 2nd Edition.
Weymouth and London, 1884.
Danrorp, C. G.
(1) Notes on Speeton Ammonites. Proc. Yorks. Geol. Soc., vol. xvi., part 1,
p- 101. 1906. (Issued Feb., 1907.)
DE Lorton, see Lorron, P. pr.
D’ORBIGNY, see ORBIGNY, A. D’.
DesHayeEs, G. P.
(1) Description des Coquilles Fossiles des Environs de Paris. Tome ii.
Paris, 1824-1837.
DE VERNEUIL, seé VERNEUIL, E.. DE.
DEWALQUE, G.
(1) Prodrome d’une description géologique de la Belgique. Bruxelles and
Liége, 1868.
Ditter, J. §., and Stanton, T. W.
(1) The Shasta-Chico Series. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., vol. v., p. 435. 1894.
Douuruss, A.
(1) Sur une nouvelle Trigonia de étage kimmeridgien du Hayre. Bull. Soc.
Géol. France, 2° Sér., vol. xix., p. 614. 1862.
D’Onnieny, see ORBIGNY, A. D’.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 237
Dovvi114, H.
(1) Examen des fossiles rapportés du Choa par M. Aubry. Bull. Soc. Géol,
France, 3° Sér., Tome xiv., p. 223. 1886.
(2) Sur une coupe de Madagascar dressée par M. Villiaume. Bull Soc. Géol.
France, 3° Sér., Tome xxvii., p. 385. 1899.
(3) Sur le Terrain Jurassique de Madagascar. Comptes Rendus, VIII* Session,
Congrés Géologique Internationale (1900), p. 429. Paris, 1901.
(4) Sur quelques fossiles de Madagascar. Bull, Soc, Géol. France, 4° Sér.,
Tome iv., p. 207. 1904.
Dounxer, W. B. R. H., and Meyer, H. von.
(1) Monographie der norddeutschen Wealdenbildung. Braunschweig, 1846.
Epwarps, F. E.
(1) A Monograph of the Eocene Mollusca. Part II., Pulmonata (pp. 57-122),
1852. Palwontographical Society.
EcHwa.p, C. E. von.
(1) Lethzea Rossica ou Paléontologie de la Russie, vol. ii., sect. 2 (and Atlas).
Stuttgart, 1868.
(2) Geognostisch-paleontologische Bermerkungen iiber die Halbinsel Mangi-
schlak und die Aleutischen Inseln. St. Petersburg, 1871.
ETHERIDGE, R. [JUN. ]
(1) Cretaceous Fossils of Natal. Part I. The Umkwelane Hill Deposit.
Second Report of the Geol. Survey of Natal and Zululand, p. 69.
London, 1904.
FEISTMANTEL, O.
(1) Notes on the age of some Fossil Floras in India. Records Geol. Surv, Ind.,
vol. ix., part4, p 115. 1876.
(2) Fossil Flora of the Gondwana System, vol. i., part 3. 1877. Paleontologia
Indica,
(3) Fossil Flora of the Gondwana System, vol. ii., Preface. 1880. Pal@onto-
logia Indica.
(4) Ueber die pflanzen- und kohlenfiithrenden Schichten in Indien, Afrika und
| Australien. Sitzungsber. d. k. béhm. Gesellsch. d. Wiss., Math.-Nat.
Classe, Jahrgang 1887, p.1. Prag, 1888.
Fiscuer, P.
(1) Manuel de Conchyliologie et de Paléontologie Conchyliologique. Paris,
1880-1887.
Forsss, E.
(1) Catalogue of Lower Greensand Fossils. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. i.,
pp. 237-250 ; 345-355. 1845.
(2) Report on the Fossil Invertebrata from Southern India, collected by
Mr. Kaye and Mr. Cunliffe. Trans. Geol. Soc. Lond., Ser. 2, vol. vii.
part 3, p.97. 1846.
Frecu, F.
(1) Ueber Gervilleia. Centralblatt fiir Mineral., Geol., und Paleont.,
Jahrgang 1902, p. 609. 1902.
Furrerer, K.
(1) Beitrige zur Kenntniss des Jura in Ost-Afrika. Zeitschr. der deutsch.
geol. Gesellsch., Band xlix., p. 568. 1897.
238 Annals of the South African Museum.
Gass, W. M.
(1) Geological Survey of California, Paleontology, vol. i. sect. iv., p. 55.
Description of the Cretaceous Fossils. 1864.
(2) Geological Survey of California, Paleontology, vol. ii., sect. ii., p. 125.
Cretaceous Fossils. 1869.
GerniTz, H. B.
(1) Die Versteinerungen von Kieslingswalda und Nachtrag zur Charakteristik
des siichs.-béhmischen Kreidegebirges. Dresden und Leipzig, 1843.
(2) Das Elbthalgebirge in Sachsen. Paleontographica, Band xx., Theili, 1871-
1875; Theil ii., 1872-1875.
Goupruss, G. A.
(1) Petrefacta Germanie. Band i., 1826-1833; Band ii., 1833-1840. Diissel-
dorf.
Grecory, J. W.
(1) Catalogue of the Fossil Bryozoa in the Department of Geology, British
Museum (Nat. Hist.). The Cretaceous Bryozoa, vol. i., London,
1899.
(2) The Jurassic Fauna of Cutch, vol. ii., part 2. The Corals. 1900.
Paleontologia Indica, Ser. ix.
GriesBacH, C. L.
(1) Geological Notes. Records Geol. Surv. Ind., vol. xiii., part 2, p. 83.
1880.
GUERANGER, E.
(1) Album Paléontologique du Departement de la Sarthe. Le Mans, 1867.
Guricy, G.
(1) Ueberblick iiber den geologischen Bau des Africanischen Kontinents.
Petermann’s Mitteil., Band xxxiii., p. 257. 1887.
Harsort, E.
(1) Die Fauna der Schaumburg-Lippe’schen Kreidemulde. Abhandl. der k.
preuss. geol. Landesanst., Neue Folge, Heft 45. 1905.
Hatcu, F. H., and Corsrorpuine, G. 8.
(1) The Geology of South Africa. London, 1905.
HatcHer, J. B.
(1) Sedimentary Rocks of Southern Patagonia. Amer. Journ. Sci., 4th Ser.,
vol. ix., p. 85. 1900.
Have, E.
(1) Sur le Cénomanien de Diego-Suarez (Madagascar). Bull. Soc. Géol. France,
3e Sér., Tome xxvii., p. 396. 1899.
Haupt, O.
(1) Beitriige zur Fauna des oberen Malm und der unteren Kreide in der
argentinischen Cordillere. Neues Jahrb. fiir Min., Beilage Band xxiii.,
2es Heft, p. 187. 1907.
Hausmann, J. F. L.
(1) Beitrige zur Kunde der geognostischen Constitution von Siid-Afrika.
Géttingische gelehrte Anzeigen, 1837, p. 1449. [An abstract of this
paper appeared in the Neues Jahrb. fiir Min., 1838, p. 181.]
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 239
Hennie, A.
(1) Revision af Lamellibranchiaterna i Nilsson’s ‘‘ Petrificata Suecana Forma-
tionis Cretace.’”’ Kon. Fysiogr. Sillsk. Lund. Handl., N.F., vol. viii.,
1897.
Hit, R. T., and Vaucuan, T. W.
(1) The Lower Cretaceous Grypheas of the Texas Region. Bull. U.S. Geol.
Surv., No. 151. 1898.
Houvs, E., and Neumayr, M.
(1) Ueber einige Fossilien aus der Uitenhage-Formation in Siid-Afrika.
Denkschr. d. k. Akad. Wiss., Math.-Nat. Classe, Band xliv., p. 267.
Wien, 1882.
Houzapret, EH.
(1) Die Mollusken der Aachener Kreide. Lamellibranchiata. Palcontographica,
Band xxxv., p. 139. 1889.
Houpteston, W. H.
(1) Further notes on some Mollusca from South Australia. Geol. Mag.,
Dec. 3, vol vii., p. 241. 1890.
Hupteston, W. H., and Wiison, E.
(1) A Catalogue of British Jurassic Gasteropoda. London, 1892.
Hyart, A.
(1) Values in Classification of the stages of Growth and Decline, with proposi-
tions for a new nomenclature. Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., vol. xxiii.,
p. 396. 1888.
(2) Bioplastology and the related branches of Biologic Research. Proc. Bost.
Soc. Nat. Hist., vol. xxvi. p. 59. 1895.
Jack, R. L., and Erueripas, R. (s0n.).
(1) The Geology and Paleontology of Queensland and New Guinea. Brisbane
and London, 1892.
Jackson, R. T.
(1) Phylogeny of the Pelecypoda; the Aviculide and their allies. Mem. Bost
Soc. Nat. Hist., vol. iv., No. 8, p. 277. 1890.
JAHN, J. J.
(1) Hinige Beitrige zur Kenntniss der béhmischen Kreideformation. Jahrb.
der k. k. geol. Reichsanst., Band xly., p. 125. 1895. (Wien, 1896.)
JEFFREYS, J. Gwyn
(1) British Conchology, vol ii. London, 1863.
Jones, T. R.
(1) On the Geology of South Africa. Nature, vol. xxx., p. 553. 1884.
(2) On the Geology of South Africa. Rep. Brit. Assoc. [Montreal meeting,
1884]. Trans. Sect. C, p. 736. 1885.
Karakascu, J.
(1) Note sur le Crétacé Inférieur de Biassala (Crimée). Travaux du Labora-
toire de Géologie de la Faculté des Sciences de V Université de Grenoble.
Tome vi., Fase. 1, p. 93. 1902.
240 Annals of the South African Museum.
Kayser, E.
(1) Formationskunde. 2¢ Aufl. Stuttgart, 1902.
Keepine, W.
(1) The Fossils and Paleontological Affinities of the Neocomian deposits of
Upware and Brickhill. Cambridge, 1883.
KeysERLING, A.
(1) Wissenschaftliche Beobachtungen auf einer Reise in das Petschora-Land.
St. Petersburg, 1846.
Kinin, W.
(1) Notice Stratigraphique sur les Environs de Sisteron et contributions a la
connaissance des Terrains Secondaires du sud-est de la France. Bull.
Soc. Géol. France, 3° Sér., Tome xxiii., p. 659. 1895.
(2) Ueber Aptien in Stidafrika. Centralblatt fiir Mineral., Geol., und Paleont.,
Jahrgang 1902, p. 465. 1902.
(3) Sur la présence de l’étage Aptien dans le sud-est de Afrique. Travaua du
Laboratoire de Géologie dela Faculté des Sciences de UV Université de
Grenoble. Tome vi., Fasc. 2, p. 212. 1902.
(4) Sur quelques Fossiles Remarquables de l)Hauterivien de la Region
d’Escragnolles. Bull. Soc. Géol. France, 4° Sér., Tome ii., p. 864.
1905.
Kinran, W., and LEennarpt, F.
(1) Sur le Néocomien des Environs de Moustiers Ste. Marie (Basses-Alpes).
Bull. Soc. Géol. France, 3° Sér., Tome xxiii., p. 970. 1895.
Kine, W.
(1) The Upper Gondwanas and other Formations of the Coastal Region of the
Godavari District. Mem. Geol. Surv. Ind., vol. xvi., p. 195. 1880.
Kitcutn, F. L.
(1) The Jurassic Fauna of Cutch, vol. iii., part 2. Lamellibranchiata ;
No. 1, Genus Trigonia. 1903. Paleontologia Indica, Ser. ix.
(2) Notes on the Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series in Cape Colony.
Geol. Maq., Dec. 5, vol. iv., p. 289. 1907.
Kocu, F. C. L., and DunkEr, W.
(1) Beitrage zur Kenntniss des norddeutschen Oolithgebildes und dessen
Versteinerungen. Braunschweig, 1837.
KorEneEn, A. VON.
(1) Ueber Fossilien der Unteren Kreide am Ufer des Mungo in Kamerun.
Abhandl. der k. Gesellsch. der Wiss. zu Gottingen, Math.-Phys. Klasse.
Neue Folge, Bandi., No.1. Berlin, 1897.
(2) Die Ammonitiden des norddeutschen Neocom. <Abhandl. der k. preuss.
geol. Landesanst., Neue Folge, Heft 24. 1902.
(3) Ueber das Auftreten der Gattungen und Gruppen yon Ammonitiden in den
einzelnen Zonen der unteren Kreide Norddeutschlands. Nachricht.
der k. Gessellsch. der Wiss. zu Gittingen, Math.-Phys. Klasse. 1907.
[Author’s copy, pp. 1-10.]
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 241
Kossmat, F.
(1) Die Bedeutung der siidindischen Kreideformation fiir die Beurtheilung
der geographischen Verhiltnisse wihrend der spiiteren Kreidezeit.
Jahrb. der k. k. geol. Reichsanst., Band xliv., Heft 3, p. 459. Wien.
1894.
(2) On the importance of the Cretaceous Rocks of Southern India. . . . [trans-
lation of the above paper]. Records Geol. Surv. Ind., vol. xxviii.,
part 2, p. 39. 1895.
(3) The Cretaceous Deposits of Pondicherri. Records Geol. Surv. Ind.,
Vol. xxx, part) 2, p, ol. 1897.
Krauss, F.
(1) Ueber die geologischen Verhiiltnisse der dstlichen Kiiste des Kaplandes.
Amtlicher Bericht iiber die 20° Versamml. d. Gesellsch. deutscher Natur-
forscher und Aerzte zu Mainz im Sept., 1842, p. 126. Mainz, 1843.
(2) Ueber einige Petrefacten aus der untern Kreide des Kaplandes. Nova Acta
Acad. Ces. Leop.-Carol. Nat. Cur., vol. xxii., part 2, p. 439. Bonn,
1850.
Lamarck, J. B. DE.
(1) Histoire Naturelle des Animaux sans Vertébres, vol. vi. Paris, 1819.
LAPPARENT, A. DE.
(1) Traité de Géologie, 4° Edition. Paris, 1900.
Lemoine, P.
(1) Etudes Géologiques dans le Nord de Madagascar. Contributions a
Vhistoire géologique de Ocean Indien. Paris, 1906.
LEYMERIE, A.
(1) Synonymie de lExogyra sinuata. Bull. Soc. Géol. France, Tome 3 log
p. 121. 1840.
(1a) Thése sur les caractéres distinctifs des Huitres, des Gryphées et des
Exogyres. Paris, 1840.
(2) Suite du Mémoire sur le Terrain Crétacé du Département de V Aube.
Mem. Soc. Géol. France, Tome v., p. 1. 1842.
(3) Statistique géologique et mineralogique du Département de l’Aube.
Troyes, Paris and London, 1846.
Lorton, P. DE.
(1) Description des Animaux Invertébrés Fossiles contenus dans l’étage
Néocomien moyen du Mont Saléve. Geneve and Bale. Part L.,
1861.
(2) Description des Fossiles de l’Oolite Corallienne, de Pétage Valangien et de
Vétage Urgonien du Mont Saleve: in A. Favre’s Recherches Géo-
logiques dans les parties de la Savoie. Tome i., p. 310. Paris and
Geneva, 1867.
(3) Monographie des Couches de l’étage Valangien des Carriéres d’Arzier
(Vaud). Matér. pour la Paléont. Suisse, Ser. 4. 1868.
(4) Etudes sur la Faune des Couches du Gault de Cosne (Niévre). Iém. Soc.
Paléont. Swisse, vol. ix., 1882.
242 Annals of the South African Museum.
Lorton, P. pr, and Corrrau, G.
(1) Monographie paléont. et géol. de l’étage Portlandien du Département de
PYonne. Bull. Soc. Sci. Hist. et Nat. de VYonne, 2° Sér., Tome i.,
p. 437. 1868.
Lorton, P. pz, and Pexuat, E.
(1) Monographie paléont. et géol. de I’étage Portlandien des Environs de
Boulogne-sur-Mer. Mém. Soc. Phys. et d’Hist. Nat. de Geneve,
Tome xix., 1¢ Partie, 1866.
(2) Monographie paléont. et géol. des étages supérieurs de la Formation
Jurassique des Environs de Boulogne-sur-Mer { part 2], Mém Soc. Phys.
et d’Hist. Nat. de Genéve, Tome xxiv., 1¢ Partie, 1875.
Lorton, P. pr, Royer, E., and Tomsecr, H.
(1) Description géologique et paléontologique des étages Jurassiques
Supérieurs de la Haute-Marne. Mém. Soc. Linn. Norm., Tome xvi.,
1872.
Lory, P.
(1) Sur le Crétacé Inférieur du Dévoluy et des régions voisines. Bull. Soc.
Géol. France, 3& Sér., Tome xxvi., p. 132. 1898.
(2) Sur le Crétacé Inférieur du Dévoluy et des régions voisines. Travaux du
Laboratoire de Géologie de la Faculté des Sciences de V Université de
Grenoble. Tome iv., 1898.
Lycett, J.
(1) Tabular view of Fossil Shells from the middle division of the Inferior
Oolite in Gloucestershire. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 2, vol. vi.,
p. 401. 1850.
(2) Description of some New Species of Mollusca from the Lincolnshire Oolites.
Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. ix., p. 339. 1853.
(3) A Monograph of the British Fossil Trigonie. Paleontographical Society,
1872-1883.
M’Coy, F.
(1) On the Classification of some British Fossil Crustacea, with notices of New
Forms in the University Collection at Cambridge. Ann. Mag. Nat.
Hist., Ser. 2, vol. iv., p. 330. 1849.
Marueron, P. ;
(1) Catalogue Méthodique des corps organisés fossiles du Département des
Bouches-du-Rhone. Répertoire des travaux de la Soc. statist. de Mar-
seille, vol. vi. Marseille, 1842.
Marre, H.
(1) Documents pour servir 4 la Description Géologique des Alpes Delphino-
Savoisiennes. Travaux du Laboratoire de Géologie de la Faculté des
Sciences de VU Université de Grenoble. Tome vi., Fasc. 1,p.109. 1902.
Maver-Eymar, Cu., see BurckHarpt (1).
Mepuicorr, H. B., and Buanrorp, W. T.
(1) A Manual of the Geology of India; Part I. Calcutta, 1875.
(2) Id., second edition, revised and largely rewritten by R. D. Oldham.
Caleutta, 1898.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Serves. 243
Mregx, F. B.
(1) Remarks on the family Actzeonide, with description of some new genera
and sub-genera. Amer. Journ. Sci., 2nd Ser., vol. xxxv., p. 84.
1863.
(2) A Report on the Invertebrate Cretaceous and Tertiary Fossils of the Upper
Missouri Country. Rep. U.S. Geol. Surv. Territ., vol ix., 1876.
Moescu, C.
(1) Monographie der Pholadomyen, Theil ii., pp. 79-135. Abhandl. Schweiz,
Pal, Gesellsch., vol. ii., 1875.
Moueneraar, G. A. F.
(1) Schets van de Bodemgesteldheid van de Zuid Africaansche Republiek.
Tijdschr. konink. Nederlandsch. Aardrijksk. Genoots. Jaargang 1890.
(2) Die Reihenfolge und Correlation der geologischen Formationen in
Siidafrika. Neues Jahrb. fiir Min., 1900, Band i., p. 113.
Morris, J., and Lycert, J.
(1) A Monograph of the Mollusca of the Great Oolite. Part 2, Bivalves, 1853 ;
Part 3, Bivalves, 1855. Palwontographical Society.
Movtteg, A.
(1) Mémoire sur la Géologie générale et sur les mines de diamants de |’ Afrique
du Sud. Annales des Mines, Tome vii., p. 193. 1885.
Muuer, G.
(1) Versteinerungen des Jura und der Kreide, pp. 514-571, in Deutsch-Ost-
Afrika, Band vii. Zur Oberfliichengestaltung und Geologie Deutsch-
Ostafrikas. Zweiter Theil, Paleont. Ergebnisse. Berlin, 1900.
Mier, J.
(1) Monographie der Petrefacten der Aachener Kreideformation. 1¢* Abth.
Bonn, 1847.
Nevmayr, M.
(1) Die Ammoniten der Kreide und die Systematik der Ammonitiden, Zeitschr.
der deutsch. geol. Gesellsch., Band xxvii., p. 854. 1875.
(2) Ueber Klimatische Zonen wiahrend der Jura- und Kreidezeit. Denkschr.
d. k. Akad. Wiss., Math.-Nat. Classe, Band xlvii., p. 277. Wien, 1883.
(3) Die geographische Verbreitung der Juraformation. Denkschr. d. k, Akad.
Wiss., Math.-Nat. Classe, Band 1., p. 57. Wien, 1885.
(4) Ueber einige Belemniten aus Central Asien und Siidafrika und tiber den
Canal der Belemniten. Verhandl. d. k.k. geol. Reichsanst., No. 2,
1889, p. 52.
(5) Ueber neuere Versteinerungsfunde auf Madagascar. Neues Jahrb. fiir
Min., 1890, Band i., p. 1.
(6) Erdgeschichte, Band ii., 2e Auflage. Leipsic and Vienna, 1895.
See also Hotus and Neumayr,
Neumayer, M., and Untte, V.
(1) Ueber Ammonitiden aus den Hilsbildungen Norddeutschlands. Palconto-
graphica, Band xxyii., p. 129. 1881.
244 Annals of the South African Museum.
Newton, R. B.
(1) Notes on Fossils from Madagascar. Appendix to R. Baron’s Notes on the
Geology of Madagascar. Quart. Jowrn. Geol. Soc, vol. xlv., p. 331.
1889.
(2) On the occurrence of Alectryonia ungulata in 8.E. Africa, with a notice of
previous researches on the Cretaceous Conchology of Southern Africa.
Journal of Conchology, vol. viii., p. 136. 1896.
Nicxuus, R.
(1) Contributions 4 la paléontologie du Sud-HEst de l’Espagne. Mém. Soc.
Géol. France, Paléontologie, Mém. No. 4, 1890.
Nixiriyn, S.
(1) Einige Bemerkungen iiber die Jura-Ablagerungen des Himalaya und
Mittelasiens. Newes Jahrb. fiir Min., 1889, Band ii., p. 116.
(2) Hiniges iiber d. Jura in Mexico und Centralasien. Neues Jahrb. fiir Min.,
1890, Band ii., p. 273.
Nixsson, S.
(1) Petrificata Suecana Formationis Cretacew, descripta et iconibus illustrata.
Lund, 1827.
NoEtiine, F.
(1) Die Fauna der Baltischen Cenoman-Geschiebe. Pal@ontologische Abhandl-
ungen, Band iii., Heft 4, p. 199. Berlin, 1885.
Oxpuam, R. D., see Mepuicorr and Buanrorp (2).
Oppe., A.
(1) Ueber Jurassische Crustaceen. Palgontologische Mittheilungen aus dem
Museum des koenigl. bayer. Staates. Bandi., p.i. Stuttgart, 1862.
(2) Ueber ostindische Fossilreste aus den secundiiren Ablagerungen von Spiti
und Gnari-Khorsum in Tibet. Jbid., Bandi., p. 267. 1863.
Orpieny, A. D’.
(1) Paléontologie Francaise. Terr. Crét., Tome i. [Cephalopoda]. Paris,
1840-42.
(2) Id., Tome ii. [Gasteropoda], 1842-1843.
(3) Id., Tome iii. [Lamellibranchiata |, 1844-1848.
(4) Prodrome de Paléontologie, vols. i. and ii. Paris, 1850.
Ortmann, A. E.
(1) An examination of the arguments given by Neumayr for the existence of
climatic zones in Jurassic times. Amer. Journ. Sci., 4th Ser., vol. i.,
p. 257. 1896.
PARKINSON, J.
(1) Organic Remains of a Former World, vol. iii. London, 1811.
PASSARGE, 8.
(1) Die Kalahari. Berlin, 1904.
PauLcKe, W.
(1) Ueber die Kreideformation in Siidamerika und ihre Beziehungen zu anderen
Gebieten. Neues Jahrb. fiir Min., Beilage Band xvii., 2°5 Heft, p. 252.
1903.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 245
Paviow, A. P.
(1) On the Classification of the Strata between the Kimeridgian and Aptian.
Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. lii. p. 542. 1896.
Pavnow, A. £., aad Lampiucu, G. W.
(1) Argiles de Speeton et leurs équivalents. Bull. Soc. Imp. Nat. Mosc.,
Année 1891, Nouv. Sér., Tome y., pp. 181-276, 455-570. Moscou, 1892.
PERON, A.
(1) Description des Mollusques Fossiles des Terrains Crétacés de la Region
Sud des Hauts-Plateaux de la Tunisie. 2¢ Partie. Exploration
Scientifique de la Tunisie. Paris, 1900-1901.
Puinierr, EH.
(1) Beitriige zur Morphologie und Phylogenie der Lamellibranchier: Lima
und ihre Untergattungen. Zeitschr. der deutsch. geol. Gesellsch.,
Band lii., p. 619. 1900.
Puaiuirrr, R. A.
(1) Los Fosiles Secundarios de Chile. Santiago de Chile, 1899.
Puruies, J.
(1) Illustrations of the Geology of Yorkshire. Second Edition, Part I.
London, 1835.
Prcrer, F. J. ;
(1) tudes Paléontologiques sur la Faune a Terebratula diphyoides de Berries
(Ardéche). Mélanges Paléontologiques, vol. i., Livr. 2 (pp. 41-131,
pls. vili.—-xxviii.). Geneva, 1867.
Pictet, F. J., and Campicue, G.
(1) Description des Fossiles du Terrain Crétacé des environs de Sainte-Croix.
le Partie, 1858-1860 (Matér. pour la Paléont. Suisse, Ser. 2).
2e ,, , 1861-1864 (Ibid., Ser. 3).
Be, =~, 1864-1867 (Lbid., Ser. 4).
de ,, , 1868-1871 (Lbid., Ser. 5).
Pictet, F. J., and Renevier, E.
(1) Description des Fossiles du Terrain Aptien de la Perte du Rhone et des
Environs de Ste, Croix. Matér. pour la Paléont, Suisse, Ser. 1,
1854-1858.
Picret, F. J., and Roux, W.
(1) Description des Mollusques Fossiles qui se trouvent dans les Grés Verts des
Environs de Genéye. Geneva, 1847-1853.
Portiock, Lirvt.-Con.
(1) [Note on Fossils collected by R. Rubidge at Sunday River, exhibited by
Lieut.-Col. Portlock at the Ipswich meeting of the British Association,
1851}. Rep. Brit. Assoc., Trans. of Sect., p. 68. 1852,
QueEnstEpT, F. A.
(1) Der Jura. Tiibingen, 1856-57. (Pp. 1-576, pls. i.-lxxii., 1856: pp. 577-
823, pls. Ixxiii.-e., 1857.)
17
246 Annals of the South African Museum. -
REHBINDER, B.
(1) Fauna und Alter der Cretaceischen Sandsteine in der Umgebung des
Salzsees Baskuntschak. Mém. Com. Géol., vol. xvii., No. 1. St.
Petersburg, 1902.
Remes, M. :
(1) Nachtriige zur Fauna von Stramberg. IV. Ueber Bivalven der Stram-
berger Schichten. Beitriige zur Pal. und Geol. Oesterr.-Ungarns w. d.
Orients. Band xy., p. 185. 1903.
Reuss, A. E.
(1) Die Versteinerungen der béhmischen Kreideformation. Stuttgart, Part 1,
1845 ; Part 2, 1846.
Roemer, Frrp.
(1) De Astartarum Genere et Speciebus, que e Saxis Jurassicis atque Cretaceis
proveniunt. Berlin, 1842.
Roemer, F, A.
(1) Die Versteinerungen des norddeutsch. Oolithen-Gebirges. Hannover,
1835-36. Nachtrag, 1839.
(2) Die Versteinerungen des norddeutsch. Kreidegebirges. Hannover, 1840-41.
(3) Hinige neue Versteinerungen aus dem Korallenkalk und Hilsthon.
Paleontographica, Band i., p. 329. 1851.
Rogers, A. W.
(1) An Introduction to the Geology of Cape Colony. London, New York, and
Bombay, 1905.
(2) Geological Survey of parts of the Divisions of Uitenhage and Alexandria.
Ann. Rep. Geol. Commission, 1905, p. 9. Cape Town, 1906.
Rogers, A. W., and Scuwarz, E. H. L.
(1) Report on the Survey of parts of the Uitenhage and Port Elizabeth
Divisions. Ann. Rep. Geol. Commission, 1900, p. 3. Cape Town,
1901.
SARASIN, C., and ScHONDELMAYER, C.
(1) Etude monographique des Ammonites du Crétacique Inférieur de Chatel-
Saint-Denis. le Partie, MWém. Soc. Pal. Suisse, vol. xxvill., 1901;
2¢ Partie, Ibid., vol. xxix., 1902.
Sayn, G.
(1) Note sur quelques Ammonites nouvelles ou peu connues du Néocomien
Inférieur. Bull. Soc. Géol. France, 3° Sér., Tome xvii., p. 679. 1889.
Sayn, G., and Roman, F.
(1) L’Hauterivien et le Barrémien de la rive droite du Rhone et du Bas-
Languedoc, Bull. Soc. Géol. France, 4° Sér., Tome iv., p. 607. 1905.
ScHENCK, A.
(1) Die geologische Entwickelung Siidafrikas. Petermann’s Mitteilungen,
vol. xxxiv., p. 225. 1888.
Scuwarz, EK. H. L.
(1) Knysna, between the Gouwkamma (Homtini) and the Blue Krantz Rivers.
Ann. Rep. Geol. Commission, 1899, p. 51. Cape Town, 1900.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 247
(2) Geological Survey of the Coastal Plateau in the Divisions of George,
Knysna, Uniondale, and Humansdorp. Ann. Rep. Geol. Comm., 1909,
p- 47. Cape Town, 1906.
See also Rocrers and ScHwarz.
Sepewicr, A., and Murcutsoy, R. I.
(1) A Sketch of the Structure of the Eastern Alps. Trans. Geol. Soc. Lond.,
Ser. 2, vol. iii., part 2, p. 301. 1832.
Sewarp, A. C.
(1) Fossil Floras in Cape Colony. Annals of the South African Museum,
VOls ive parti del 903:
SHARPE, D.
(1) Description of Fossils from the Secondary Rocks of Sunday River and
Zwartkop River. Trans. Geol. Soc. Lond., Ser. 2, vol. vii., p. 193.
1856.
SuHartruck, G. B.
(1) The Mollusca of the Buda Limestone. Bull. U.S. Geol. Surv., No. 205,
1903.
SxeEat, EH. G., and Mapsen, Vicronr.
(1) On Jurassic, Neocomian, and Gault boulders found in Denmark.
Danmarks Geologiska Undersggelse, 2 Reekke, No. 8, 1898.
Soucer, F,
(1) Die Fossilien der Mungokreide in Kamerun und ihre geologische Bedeutung.
In E. Esch, F. Solger, M. Oppenheim, and O. Jaekel; Beitrage zur
Geologie von Kamerun, pp. 83-242. Stuttgart, 1904.
SowErsy, J.
(1) The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain. Nos. 1-65, pls. 1-875.
London, 1812-1822.
SowrrBy J. pEC,
(1) The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain. Nos. 66-113, pls. 376-648.
London, 1822-46.
(2) [Appendix A in] W. H. Fitton’s Observations on some of the Strata
between the Chalk and the Oxford Oolite. Zvrans. Geol. Soc. Lond.,
Ser. 2, vol. iv., p. 335.° 1836.
(3) [Descriptions and figures of fossils in] Col. W. H. Sykes. A Notice
respecting some Fossils collected in Cutch by Capt. W. Smee. Trans.
Geol. Soc. Lond., Ser. 2, vol. v., part 3, p. 715. 1840.
SPEYER, O.
(1) Ueber Tertiiir-Conchylien :von Sdéllingen bei Jerxheim. Zeitschr. der
deutsch. geol. Gesellsch., Band xii., p. 471. 1860.
Stanton, T. W.
(1) On the genus Remondia, Gabb, a group of Cretaceous bivalve molluscs.
Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. xix., p. 299. 1897.
(2) A comparative study of the Lower Cretaceous Formations and Faunas of
the United States. Journal of Geology, vol. v., p. 579. Chicago, 1897.
(3) Rep. Princeton Univ. Exped. to Patagonia, 1896-99, vol. iv., part i.
Marine Cretaceous Invertebrates. 1901.
248 Annals of the South African Museum.
STEINMANN, G.
(1) Zur Kenntniss der Jura- und Kreideformation von Caracoles. Neues Jahrb.
fiir Min., Beilage Band i., Heft 2, p. 239. 1881.
(2) Die Gruppe der Trigonie Pseudo-quadrate. Neues Jahrb. fiir Min., 1882,
Band i., p. 219.
(3) Reisenotizen aus Chile. Neues Jahrb. fiir Min., 1884, Heft i., p. 198.
SroniczKa, F.
(1) The Cretaceous Fauna of Southern India, vol. ii.; The Gasteropoda,
1867-68. Paleontologia Indica.
(2) Id., vol. iii.; The Pelecypoda, 1870-71. Ibid.
Srow, G. W.
(1) On some points in South African Geology. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol.
XKVil Dyes elie
Sugss, E.
(1) Das Antlitz der Erde, I. Prague and Leipsic, 1885.
Tate, R.
(1) On some Secondary Fossils from South Africa. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc.,
vol. xxili., p. 139. 1867.
Trrquem, O.
(1) Observations sur les Pleuromya et les Myopsis de M. Agassiz. Bull. Soc.
Géol. France, 2° Sér., Tome x., p. 534. 1853.
(2) Observations sur les Etudes Critiques des Mollusques Fossiles comprenant
la monographie des Myaires de M. Agassiz. Mém. de V’ Acad. Imp. de
Metz, année 1854-55: pp. 253-357, pls. i.-v. Metz, 1855.
THURMANN, J., and Eratnon, A.
(1) Lethea Bruntrutana. Allgemeine Schweizerische Gesellsch., Neue Denk-
schriften, Tome xviii., pp. 1-145, pls. i—xxiii., 1861; Tome xix., pp. 147-
353, pls. xiv.—xlix., 1862; Tome xx., pp. 357-500, pls. 1.-Ixii., A-C, 1864.
(Neuchatel ; Zurich.)
Tornoguist, A.
(1) Fragmente einer Oxfordfauna von Mtaru in Deutsch-Ostafrika. Jahrb.
der Hamburg. Wissenschaftl. Anstalten, Jahrgang x., 1892, 2° Hilfte,
p. 265. Hamburg, 1893.
Tovcas, A.
(1) Etude de la Faune des Couches Tithoniques de l’Ardéche. Bull. Soc.
Géol. France, 3° Sér., Tome xviii., p. 560. 1890.
TuLupere, 8. A.
(1) Ueber Versteinerungen aus den Aucellenschichten Novaja Semljas. Bihang
till svenska Vet. Acad. Handl., Band vi., No. 3. Stockholm, 1881.
Unuie, V.
(1) Die Cephalopodenfauna der Wernsdorfer Schichten. Denkschr. d.k. Akad.
Wiss., Math-Nat. Classe, Band xlvi., 2° Abtheil., p. 127. | Wien, 1883.
(2) Ueber die Cephalopodenfauna der Teschener und Grodischter Schichten.
Ibid., Band lxxii. Wien, 1901.
(3) [Review of G. Miiller’s ‘‘ Versteinerungen des Jura und der Kreide,”
Deutsch-Ostafrika, Band vii., 1900.] Neues Jahrb. fiir Min., 1901.
Band ii., p. 294.
The Invertebrate Fauna of the Uitenhage Series. 249
‘4) The Fauna of the Spiti Shales. Himalayan Fossils, vol. iv., part 1, 1903.
Paleontologia Indica, Ser. xv.
(5) Kinige Bemerkungen iiber die Ammonitengattung Hoplites Neumayr.
Sitzungsber, d. k. Akad. Wiss., Math-Nat. Classe, Band exiv., p. 591.
Wien, July, 1905.
Verneuin, E. pr, and Loribre, G. pe.
(1) Description des Fossiles du Néocomien Supérieur de Utrillas et ses Environs.
Le Mans, 1868.
VERRILL, A. E.
(1) A Study of the Family Pectinide, with a revision of the Genera and Sub-
genera. Trans. Connecticut Acad., vol. x., p. 41. 1897.
Von Bucu, see Bucu, L. von.
Waacen, W,
(1) The Jurassic Fauna of Cutch, vol. i. The Cephalopoda, 1873-76.
Paleontologia Indica, Ser. ix.
Watuace, A. R.
(1) Island Life. Second Edition, London, 1892.
WEeeErtTH, O.
(1) Die Fauna des Neocomsandsteins im Teutoburger Walde. Palcontologische
Abhandlungen, Band ii., Heft 1, Berlin, 1884.
Wuireaves, J. F.
(1) On some Invertebrates from the Coal-bearing Rocks of the Queen Charlotte
Islands. Geol. and Nat. Hist. Surv. Canada, Mesozoic Fossils, vol. i.,
part 1, 1876.
(2) On the Fossils of the Cretaceous Rocks of Vancouver and adjacent islands
in the Strait of Georgia. Tbid., part 2, 1879.
(3) On the Fossils of the Coal-bearing Deposits of the Queen Charlotte Islands.
Ibid., part 3, 1884.
WHITFIELD, R. P.
(1) Observations on some Cretaceous Fossils from the Beyrtt District of Syzia.
Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. iii., No. 2, p. 381. 1891.
Wo.LieMAnn, A.
(1) Die Bivalven und Gastropoden des deutschen und hollindischen Neocoms.
Abhandl. der k. preuss. geol. Landesanst., Neue Folge, Heft 31. 1900.
Woops, H.
(1) The Mollusea of the Chalk Rock ; Part I. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. lii.,
p. 68. 1896.
(2) Note on the genus Grammatodon, Meek and Hayden. dAnn. Mag. Nat.
Hist., Ser. vii., vol. ili, p. 47. 1899.
(3) A Monograph of the Cretaceous Lamellibranchia of England. Vol. i.,
1899-1903 ; vol. ii., 1904—J[in progress]. Palaontographical Society.
(4) The Cretaceous Fauna of Pondoland. Annals of the South African
Museum, vol. iv., part 7. 1906.
250 Annals of the South African Museum.
Wwtiey, A.
(1) Notes of a Journey in two directions across the Colony made in the years
1857-8, with a view to determine the character and order of the various
Geological Formations. [Appendix to Parliamentary Report, G, 54.]
Cape Town, 1859.
Wynne, A. B.
(1) The Geology of Cutch. Mem. Geol. Surv. Ind., vol. ix. 1872.
(2) Further notes on the Geology of the Upper Punjab. Records Geol. Surv.
Ind., vol. xii., part 2. 1879.
ZEKELI, F.
(1) Die Gasteropoden der Gosaugebilde. Abhandl. d. k. k. geol. Reichsanst.,
Band i. Wien, 1852.
ZiETEN, C. H. von.
(1) Die Versteinerungen Wiirttembergs. Stuttgart, 1830-33,
ZitTEL, K. A.
(1) Die Bivalven der Gosaugebilde in den nordéstlichen Alpen. Theil i.
(Dimyaria). Denkschr.d.k. Akad. Wiss., Math,-Nat. Classe, Band xxiv.,
p. 105. Wien, 1865.
(2) Id., Theil i., 2° Halfte (Monomyaria). Jbid., Band xxy., p. 77. 1866.
(3) Die Cephalopoden der Stramberger Schichten. Palcontologische Mit-
theilungen aus dem Musewm des koenigl. bayer. Staates. Band ii.
Stuttgart, 1868.
(4) Die Gastropoden der Stramberger Schichten. Palgontographica, Suppl. ii.,
Abth. 3. 1873.
(5) Handbuch der Palzeontologie, Band ii., 1881-85.
Zrrten, K. A., and Gousert, E.
(1) Description des fossiles du Coral-Rag du Glos. Journ. de Conchyliologie,
Avril, 1861.
EXPLANATION OF PLATES.
The figures are of natural size except when the amount of enlargement is
specially stated in the explanations. The numbers in parentheses refer to the
register numbers on the specimens. ‘The specimens are in the South African
Museum except when otherwise stated.
Puate II.
FIGS. PAGE
1 eae ef. concava (J. Sow.) aoe one 503 “eet Be iOo
la, x 2. Railway cutting between mileworee 244-243 on the line
freee Uitenhage to Graatf-Reinet, about three miles from Uiten-
hage (332).
2, 8. Pecten (Syneyclonema) orbicularis J. Sow. wa ; 65
2. Left valve. Sunday’s River (279); 3, right valve, nection of
surface above the middle of the valve on the posterior side, x 4.
Sunday’s River (280).
4, Pecten (Camptonectes) cottaldinus d’ Orb. eee 65
Right valve. Cliff below old school-house on the right ‘bank of
Sunday’s River, Dunbrodie (306).
5. Pecten (Camptonectes) projectus Tate... D0 66
5. Right valve; 5a, portion of surface in the onistar ‘half of
valve about half-way up, x 6. Coega River.
6. Pecten (Chlamys) ef. subacutus Lam. ... ee sac ~ 5 (68)
6. Right valve; 6a, left valve. Sunday’s River (304).
7. Lima (Acesta) obliquissima Tate ... sie sae aoe Sie iil
Right valve. Sunday’s River.
8. Lima (Mantellwm) neglecta Tate ... 508 74
8. Left valve; 8a, portion of surface on fhe: posterolateral
part, x 8. Left side of Coega Valley, half a mile down from
the railway (453g).
9. Perna atherstont Sharpe... 5)
Left valve. Walton’s Farm on Saniane s eee jee elon Dare
brodie (311).
Ann.S. Afr. Mus. Vol. VII.
1
al
4
:
sh
TA.Brock del. West, Newman collo.
Fossils from the Uitenhage Series.
Puate IT. (continued).
FIGS. PAGE
10,11. Mytilus witenhagensis sp.nov. ... el Sa
10. Right valve. Cliff on Zoet Gerenedt ‘Saino Bee (64h) ;
Lily left valve. Cliff below the old school- house, right bank of
Sunday’s River, Dunbrodie (319); lla, flat antero-ventral sur-
face of both valves (319).
12. Modiola baini Sharpe 500 85
12. Left valve; 12a, portion of Hes in ane ioner part of the
valve, X 2. One mile north-east of Rawson Bridge, Zwartkop’s
River (281).
13. Nucula witenhagensis sp.nov... 87
Right valve. Wash-out 100 ft. above Goer Goce At a ain!
one mile north of Coega Hotel (441g).
14. Grammatodon jonest (Tate)... eee se oe aes SS
14. Left valve; 14a, the same, x 2. Coega.
15. Unio witenhagensis sp. nov. des aaa aro tek’)
15. Right valve; 15a, frontal aspect. Bereidentca? s River (323).
Pruate III.
FIGS.
1. Trigonia ventricosa (Krauss) tee
1. Right valve; la, frontal aspect. Small kloof, three miles up
the left bank of Sunday’ s River (14h).
2. Trigonia kraussi sp. nov. 508 ane ane eae
2. Left valve; 2a, frontal Renee Most probably Sunday’s
River.
3. Trigonia rogerst sp. nov.
3. Right valve; 3a, frontal napents Bare slope W. 30 8S. from
the middle of Barkly Bridge, on the farm Olifant’s Kop (20h).
PAGE
99
Ann.S.Afr Mus. Vol.VIL.
T.A.Brock del.
Fossils from the
Tey
3}
e 7
i}
ei Lge!
Wy Y
a\ 3 2 Yi
Dee
West, Newman collo.
Uitenhage Series.
Puate LV.
FIGS.
1. Trigonia rogerst sp. nov. Be 56 on 600 Ss Ae
Dorsal view. Bare slope W. 30 8S. from the middle of Barkly
Bridge, on the farm Olifant’s Kop (20h).
2. Trigonia holubi sp. nov. SoD 56
2. Left valve; 2a, frontal aspect of same specimen, showing both
valves. Left side of Coega Valley, half a mile down from the
railway (4582). In fig. 2, a portion of the shell is missing from
the lower part of the valve; in the drawing, the ribs have been
restored in this part and the ornaments supplied by copying the
corresponding part of the right valve.
PAGE
99
103
‘Ann.S. Afr Mus.Vol.VII. IL
TA.Brock del. West, Newman collo.
mescile irom the Uitenhage Series.
PuatTe VY.
FIGS. PAGE
1. Trigonia herzogi (Goldf.) —... oe i ae coe lOl
Left valve of a large individual, posterior part not shown.
Sunday’s River (289), South African Museum collection. In
the figure, the umbonal region is restored from another speci-
men (99h).
The ornaments of the area are well preserved, and show the
gradual acquirement of the transversely costate character at a
comparatively early stage. In 7. holubi sp. nov., the change
takes place more suddenly and at a later growth-stage.
2. Trigonia rogerst sp. nov. see ‘
Left valve. Coega Valley, east of the railway, one mile up the line
from Coega station (472g).
99
Mn.o. Atr Mus. Vol. VIL. PLY.
T.A.Brock del. West, Newman collo.
Fossils from the Uitenhage Series.
a) er rr ee ee Se =
Prate VI.
FIGS. PAGE
1-3. Trigonia vau Sharpe... 586 ee 505 son Bt aoe LO
1. Left valve, dorsal aspect; la, umbonal region of the same
valve, x 2. Three hundred yards below Addo Drift (Tunbridge’s),
left bank of Sunday’s River (41h).
2. Right valve; 2a, dorsal aspect; 2b, frontal aspect. Same
locality (40h).
3. Interior of a right valve. Same locality (42h).
4,5. Trigonia stow? sp. nov. 606 406 Blais}
4. Right valve; 4a, frontal view ; 4h, doen Bees of the vaaouial
region of right valve and fragment ‘of left valve, showing details
of “sculpture. Above Modder Drift, Sunday’s River. In the col-
lection of the Geological Society of London (No. 12006).
5. Left valve. From the South African Museum collection ;
probably Sunday’s River.
Ann.S. Afr Mus. Vol. VIL. PL.VI
T.A.Brock del. West, Newman collo.
Fossils from the Uitenhage Series.
18
Puate VII.
FIGS.
1. Trigonia stowv sp. nov.
Right valve. Cliff W. 20 S. irom Gomlee HIGHEE. Sunday’s
River (90h).
2-4. Trigonia conocardifornmis (Krauss)
2. Left valve; 2a, dorsal aspect; 2b, the same, x 2h Cliff on ihe
right bank of Sunday’ s River, on Commando Kraal (104h).
3. Left valve. Sunday’s River.
4, Left valve, incomplete posteriorly. Railway cutting between
milestones 244~-24% on the line from Uitenhage to Graaff-Reinet,
about three miles from Uitenhage (297). To compare with fig. 3,
for rib-development. <A fragment of Serpula pinchiniana Tate is
adhering to the valve.
5. Cardita nuculoides Tate ... atic ae oes ies sare
5. Left valve; 5a, frontal aspect; 5b, portion of surface orna-
mentation from the middle of the lower half of the valve, x 10.
Left side of Coega Valley, half a mile down from the railway
(466g).
6. Astarte (Hruphyla) pinchiniana Tate ae ies 050
6. Right valve; 6a, umbonal part x 2, showing concentric
sculpture. Coega River.
, 8. Anthonya lineata sp. nov.
7. Cast of interior of a left valve. Bare slope W. 30 S. from the
middle of Barkly Bridge, on the farm Olifant’s Kop, Sunday's
River (35h).
8. Drawn from a wax impression of the mould of the external
surface of a left valve. Left side of Coega Valley, half a mile
down from the railway (461g).
9,10. Tancredia schwarz sp. nov. tbe 500 sels 000 590
9. Left valve; 9a, frontal view. Cliff W. 20 S. from Comley’s
House, Sunday’s River (95h).
10. Right valve. Kloof on the left side of Zwartkop’s River,
east-north-east of Red House (324).
11 Thetironia papyracea (Sharpe)
11. Right valve; 11a, portion of Sf in mae Salita ‘half of
the valve, x 2. Coega.
12. Thetironia oblonga sp. nov.
12. Right valve; 12a, frontal Papen 120, Rates Gea, Kloof
8.5 W. from Comley’ s House, right bank of Sunday’s River (83h).
13. Trapezium ? tatet sp. nov.
13. Left valve ; 13a, frontal spect Left ‘sub a Goss Valley,
half a mile down from the railway (452g).
14. Meretrix wtenhagensis sp. nov.
14. Left valve ; 14a, dorsal aspect. Bare) slope W. 30 8. from
the middle of Bar kly Bridge, on the farm Olifant’s Kop, Sunday’s
River (30h).
PAGE
115
119
127
135
137
139
142
146
148
151
legless
Ann.S. Afr Mus. Vol. VII.
West, Newman collo.
TA Brock del.
Fossils from the Uitenhage Series.
Puate VIII.
FIGS. PAGE
1. Meretrix uitenhagensis sp.nov. ... ane poe poo LL
1. Right valve; la, part of surface x 4 Grass Ridge, three
miles east-north-east of Uitenhage, Zwartkop’s River valley (310).
2,3. Mactra? dubia sp.nov. ... te oe one ob ao Sie:
2. Right valve; 2a, dorsal view. Cliff on Buck Kraal, Sunday’s
Liver (141h).
3. Left valve; 3a, dorsal view. Same locality (141h).
4, Plewromya baini Sharpe ... ee ae ae eglom
4. Right valve; 4a, portion of eueince x we Kloof behind Col-
chester, Sunday’ s River (495¢).
5. Thracta sp. ... 160
Right valve. Fela ay rane hareeea lastones 244-249 on the
line from Uitenhage to Graatt- Reinet, about three miles from
Uitenhage (331).
6, 7. Turbo atherstoni Sharpe ... ee on 506 os ssaloe
6a. Apertural aspect. Cliff below the old school-house on the
right bank of Sunday’s River, Dunbrodie (851).
7. An immature specimen; 7a, x 2; 7), apertural aspect, x 2.
Same locality and number.
8. Turbo rogersi sp. nov. * ... ee 500 Sec oe sre GT
8a. Apertural aspect; 8), the same view as fig. 8, x 2. Cliff
below the old school-house on the right bank of Sunday’s River,
Dunbrodie (282).
9. Turbo minutulus sp. nov. ... Eee ons bi BAC Boo Altaf}
9a. Apertural aspect; 9b, the same, x 2. Cliff below the old
school-house on the right bank of Sunday’s River, Dunbrodie
(305).
10. Natica witenhagensis ? sp.nov. ... cao ee LLP
10a. Apertural aspect. Railway eating peuveen mulestanes
243-243 on the line from Uitenhage to Graaff-Reinet, about three
miles from Uitenhage (350).
11. Natica witenhagensis sp.nov. ... : aoe Bee cacee Liga
lla. Apertural aspect. Zwartkop’s River. arecmen in the col-
lection of the Geological Society of London.
Ann.S.Afr. Mus. Vol. VII. Pl.VIIL.
NERO ViOK
preter rane
prererrys
vine
= Te
. a
-
~
ETI AN
he
5 ia
re
t
20
TARE SATA CNTR
7A
TA.Brock del. West, Newman collo.
Fossils from the Uitenhage Series.
Puate VIII. (continued).
FIGS. PAGE
12,13. Natica rogerst sp.nov. ... ie ae ass ase og. AT
12a. Apertural aspect. Cliff on Buck Kraal, Sunday’s River
(136h). 13, 13a, same locality and number.
14. Natica? mirifica sp. nov. ... ate oat sb ane .. 174
14a. Apertural aspect. Cliff on Buck Kraal, Sunday’s River
(137h).
15, 16. Acteonina atherstoni (Sharpe) ... 176
15a. Apertural aspect. Cliff below the ald sehool: Rouee) on the
right bank of Sunday’s River, Dunbrodie (283).
16a, x 2; 16b, apertural aspect, x 2. Grass Ridge, three miles
east-north-east of Uitenhage (333).
17. Acteonina cf. atherstoni (Sharpe) a 177
17a. Apertural aspect. Cliff W. 20 8. from Gomley's Tous.
Sunday’s River (95h).
18. Limnea remota sp. nov. ... 550 ae ae S00 soo a dlrs)
18a. Apertural aspect. Cliff on Buck Kraal, Sunday’s River
(138h).
19. Phylloceras rogersi sp. nov. Shp ae Lo
19a. Apertural aspect; 19b, part of pepe Pere x OF Ges
portion of surface ornamentation, x 6. Kloof behind Colchester,
Sunday’s River (3h); from the middle beds.
20, 21. Bochianites glaber sp. nov. 5 181
20. Anti-siphonal view. From the oral below the inag cutting!
one mile from Rawson Bridge on the main line, up side (277) ;
21, septal suture of another specimen at an immature stage, x 10.
Same locality in Zwartkop’s River valley (338).
22. Meyeria schwarzi sp. nov. : 212
Specimen with the rostral region ior the: carapace heoken off,
viewed from the left side. Bare slope W. 30S. from the middle
of Barkly Bridge, on the farm Olifant’s Kop, Sunday’s River
(37h).
Puate IX.
FIGS,
1. Holcostephanus wilmane sp. nov. Sod site
la. Apertural view. Aasvogel Krantz, above Modder Drift,
Sunday’s River. In the collection of the Geological Society of
London (No. 10975a).
2. Holcostephanus cf. baini (Sharpe) ... 2 aoe 5a ‘te
Probably from Sunday’s River. From the South African Museum
collection.
3. Holcostephanus rogerst sp. nov. ate 5ac 58 AG
Apertural aspect. Sunday’s River. South African Museum
collection.
4,5. Meyeria schwarzi sp. nov. ... 505 ges cae fa 8
4. Dorsal view of the carapace ; 4a, transverse section across the
carapace, as viewed from the front, where the rostral region is
missing. Bare slope W. 30 8S. from the middle of Barkly Bridge,
on the farm Olifant’s Kop, Sunday’s River.
5. Segments iiivi. of the abdomen in extended position, dis-
playing the pleura. Same locality (38h).
PAGE
195
199
201
212
Ann.S. Afr Mus.Vol. VII. Phabe
T.A.Brock del. West, Newman collo.
Fossils from the Uitenhage Series.
PLATE X.
FIGS. PAGE
1. Holcostephanus ef. baini (Sharpe) ... : ae sao | (IE)
Apertural view of the specimen shown in dite previous plate, fig. 2.
2. Holcostephanus rogerst sp.nov. ... on Oil
Another view of the specimen shown in ihe previous nlete, fig. 3.
3. Holcostephanus modderensis sp. nov. : ig spo PAU
3a. Apertural view. Modder Drift, sunday: s Haver! In the col-
lection of the Geological Society of London (No. 10976).
4, Meyeria schwarzi sp. nov. ... soo PAIL?
4. Fifth and sixth apeonaaE ean sae akan. viewed dor-
sally ; 4a, telson x 2; 4b, lateral view of abdominal segments
il.—vii., with a trace of the swimming appendage of segment
vi., x 2. The same specimen has already been shown in plate
viii., fig. 22
Ann. S. Afr. Mus. Vol. VII. PIX.
TA.Brock del. West, Newman collo.
Fossils from the Uitenhage Series.
Prate XI.
FIG. PAGE
1. Holcostephanus witenhagensis sp. NOV. es 540 --- 206
Railway cutting between milestones 243— “248 o on ihe line from
Uitenhage to Graaff-Reinet, about three miles from Uitenhage
(276).
la. Outline diagram of apertural aspect.
eho,
‘SoTdag sbeyusiiy 9} Wood} s[issog
O][OO WeUuLMma hy “482,
tf NSO leP 9°rg Vi
(251)
4. (7)*.—The Fossil Fishes of the Upper Karroo Beds of South
Africa.—By R. Broom, M.D., D.Sc.
(With Plates XII., XIII.)
Curiously enough almost nothing is known of the fishes of our
marine formations. From the Bokkeveld beds (Devonian) a badly
preserved fish spine is the only fish fossil as yet obtained, and so far
no fish remains have been discovered in the Upper and Lower
Cretaceous beds of Sunday’s River and Pondoland. The fresh-water
deposits of the Karroo have, however, a considerable number of
interesting forms. One or two well-preserved fish have been
obtained from the Dwyka shales, a few scales from the Ecca beds,
and a number of badly preserved fishes from the Pareiasaurus beds.
From the Middle Karroo beds a considerable number of specimens
have been obtained. In a later paper I hope to deal with the fishes
of these lower beds, reviewing the state of our knowledge, and
describing one or two new forms. In the present paper I wish to
deal with the fishes of the Upper Karroo beds, including the Upper
Beaufort and Stormberg series.
All the fishes at present known from the Upper Karroo come from
two horizons, by far the largest number having been obtained from
the Rouxville district of the Orange River Colony. They occur in
sandstone beds, which, with a high degree of probability, may be
referred to the Upper Beaufort series, and may thus be of Upper
Triassic Age. All the specimens of Semionotus, on the other hand,
come from the Ficksburg and Ladybrand districts, from beds
which are apparently Cave sandstone. If this is so then they
most probably are of Lower Jurassic Age.
The collections which I have examined have been (1) a very fine
collection obtained by Mr. Alfred Brown, of Aliwal North, from
some locality near the Caledon River, O.R.C. ; (2) a fine collection
obtained by Dr. Kannemeyer, of Smithfield, from Bekker’s Kraal,
* This series of contributions is numbered paper 4 of vol. vii. The figures in
brackets are the Nos. of Dr. Broom’s contributions, the last of which, No. 6,
appeared in Part VIII. of Vol. IV.
18
252 Annals of the South African Museum.
Rouxville district, O.R.C.; (3) a few specimens obtained by Mr.
R. A. Albertyn from near Rouxville, and now in the Victoria College
Museum, Stellenbosch; and (4) the very fine specimens of Semi-
notus capensis in the South African Museum obtained from Ficksburg
by Chief Justice de Villiers.
HYBODUS AFRICANUS, 0. sp.
In Mr. Brown’s collection there are numerous fish spines, and
one specimen shows much of the shagreen of the little shark with
many teeth, but as in Dr. Kannemeyer’s collection there is an
almost complete specimen, though of a smaller animal than Mr.
Brown’s, I shall take as the type this specimen which Dr. Kanne-
meyer has presented to the South African Museum.
The specimen measures 230 mm. in length. The head is not
well preserved, but the jaws are fairly distinct. One of the cephalic
spines is preserved very similar in general shape to those figured by
Smith Woodward in H. medius (1). The quadrate portion of the
upper jaw is deep; the whole lower jaw apparently rather slender.
If the most anterior part where shagreen can be detected is really
the rostrum, then the mouth is situated well forward. The upper
jaw is about 20 mm. in length. At about 43 mm. behind the sup-
posed rostrum is a large shoulder girdle which, as preserved, is
nearly 30 mm, in length and 8 mm. wide in its broadest part.
Immediately above it is situated the base of the anterior spine.
Unfortunately in the type specimen neither of the spines is well
preserved. Behind the lower part of the girdle is a small flat area,
which probably represents part of the pectoral fin. The anterior
spine is situated about 46 mm. from the rostrum, and the second
spine is 110 mm. behind the first. At a point 124 mm. behind the
rostrum on the ventral side is a structure which probably represents
the pelvic fin with a large clasper. It is, however, too indefinite to
say anything of the detailed structure. Comparatively little of the
axial skeleton can be made out. In the caudal region a number of
hemal spines are very clearly shown, and a large number of neural
spines are indistinctly seen in the middle region of the body. In
the abdominal region a little behind the shoulder girdle are indica-
tions of some curved slender structures suggestive of ribs. Perhaps
they may be due to intermuscular septa.
One specimen obtained by Dr. Kannemeyer shows a dorsal spine
and fin in splendid preservation. The specimen is too imperfect to
show whether it is an anterior or posterior fin. The spine shows
the posterior denticles and the ridging characteristic of Hybodus.
Fossil Fishes of the Upper Karroo Beds of South Africa. 2538
Behind the lower part is evidence of a large triangular place of
cartilage, and behind it are seen very clearly 8 radials and perhaps
a 9th, the last three resting on a longitudinal small additional
cartilage. Some neural spines are also shown but less clearly. The
arrangement of the radials is very similar to that in the specimen of
Hybodus basanus figured by Smith Woodward (2), but this specimen
is more complete.
The teeth are very small.
Ca@LACANTHUS AFRICANUS, Broom.
This species was described in Rec. Alb. Mus., vol. 1, pt. v.,
1905 (3), from two imperfect specimens in Mr. Brown’s collection.
No further specimens have been obtained, so that nothing more can
be added to the description there given. I, however, here give a
figure of the specimen.
CERATODUS CAPENSIS, S.- Woodward.
This species was described in Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., September,
1889, by Smith-Woodward (4) from a tooth obtained by Dr. Exton
at Smithfield, O.R.C. Most probably the beds from which the type
was obtained are the same as those in which most of the species
described in this paper were found. In fact, the exact spot from
which most of the fossils were procured is probably nearer to the
town of Smithfield than to Rouxville.
CERATODUS KANNEMEYERI, Seeley.
This species was described by Seeley in the Geol. Mag., April,
1897 (5), from a specimen obtained by Dr. Kannemeyer. It is a
large form with strong blunt denticles quite unlike either C. capensis
or the following species.
CERATODUS ORNATUS, 0. sp.
This new species is founded on a single mandibular tooth found
by me at Vaalbank, near Burghersdorp. It is characterised by
having four ridges, of which the anterior three have sharp angles
of about 60°. There may be a small fifth. The front ridge is almost
exactly equal in size to the 2nd and 3rd together. The second and
third ridges have along the edge a row of small tubercles. All the
ridges radiate from a single point.
The length of the Ist ridge is 12 mm. and the 2nd 11 mm,
A second small imperfect tooth, also from Vaalbank, is only about
254 Annals of the South African Musewm.
half the size of the type specimen. It is probably an upper tooth.
It has apparently had five ridges, and may belong to a different
species. It is most probably an immature tooth.
Of described forms this Vaalbank specimen seems to come
nearest to C. serratus and C. Phillips: of Agassiz.
HELICHTHYS BROWNI, g. et sp. n.
This interesting little Paleoniscid is represented by a considerable
number of specimens in Mr. Brown’s collection, by one or two in
the collection sent to the South African Museum by Dr. Kannemeyeri,
and by one or two specimens in the collection of the Victoria College.
Many of the specimens are very well preserved, and almost every
detail of the external anatomy is revealed in one or other. For the
type I have taken one of Mr. Brown’s specimens, which, though
without the tail, is the most perfect otherwise.
General Form.—Most of the specimens measure about 90 mm. in
length, and the body is about 18 mm. deep behind the pectoral fins.
The length of the head with the opercular apparatus is about 21 mm.
The dorsal and anal fins are well developed and triangular, the
dorsal being very slightly in advance of the anal. The tail is
typically Palaeoniscid.
Head and Opercular Apparatus.—The skull differs from that of
the majority of Palxoniscid genera in having the suspensorium,
as in Amblypterus, nearly vertical. The frontal bone is long and
narrow, and each is traversed by a sensory canal which opens on
the surface by a series of foramina. On the outer side of each
frontal are, as in Nematoptychius as figured by Traquair (6), a
posterior frontal and an anterior frontal, to use Traquair’s names ;
and in front of the frontals doubtless a median ethmoid. It is not
well preserved in any of the specimens, but in one the place for it is
well shown between the anterior frontals. Immediately behind the
frontals are a pair of small parietals. These are relatively smaller
than in Paleoniscus and considerably smaller than in Nematoptychius.
The supratemporal region has hitherto been only known in a
very few Palxoniscids. In Palgoniscus Traquair says (6, p. 21):
“The presence of a narrow swpratemporal chain of ossicles behind
the posterior margin of the cranial buckler is probable, though not
satisfactorily exhibited in any specimen I have had the opportunity
of examining. I have, however, observed what seems to me to be
decided traces of their presence in Palgoniscus, and... I have
indicated them in dotted lines [in the figure].’’ In Hlomchthys
pectinatus, however, he discovered a series of well-developed
Fossil Fishes of the Upper Karroo Beds of South Africa. 255
supratemporal ossicles, which he describes as follows (7, p. 83):
‘Between the posterior margin of the cranial shield and the
post-temporal element of the shoulder girdle we obtain a good
view of the supratemporal chain of ossicles so seldom seen in a
Paleoniscid head. Of these three are shown, namely, two belonging
to the left, and one . . . belonging to the right side of the head ;
while traversing all these three we observe an elevated line showing
the course of the supratemporal slime canal, which here, as in the
salmon and many other fishes, forms a transverse commissure
between the right and left main canals.’’ These observations in two
different Paleeoniscids are extremely interesting in connection with
the somewhat similar but different condition in Helichthys.
In Helichthys, behind the parietals are a pair of large supra-
temporals which have a long median suture, and behind these a
second pair of supratemporals, small and narrow, and wedged in
between the large supratemporals in front and the post-temporals
behind. The commissural sensory canal lies entirely in these
second small supratemporals. Along the outer side of the parietal
and the large supratemporal and in front of the anterior end of the
small supratemporal lies the large squamosal, along the middle of
which is continued the sensory canal from the small supratemporal.
In front of the squamosal are apparently a number of orbital ossicles
not satisfactorily preserved, and the sensory canal a little in front of
the squamosal bends abruptly down and passes through the ossicles
behind the eye. Further it cannot be traced.
Below the squamosal is a moderately large triangular bone pre-
sumably corresponding to the bone marked 2 in Traquair’s figure of
the head of Hlonichthys and calied an accessory piece. Below this
triangular bone is a large preopercular, and adjoining this latter in
front and below is the maxilla, which is fairly long and slender in
front and bears a large number of small teeth. The dentary is long
and bears many small teeth, which are arranged irregularly on the
upper and inner margin of the bone.
The operculum is an oblong bone situated below the squamosal
and the smaller supratemporal. Below it is the large interopercular,
followed by the branchials. These latter are not well preserved in
any of the specimens examined. The first three or four are well
seen in the type, but the others appear always to he inside of the
mandible, and are thus hidden.
Most of the surface bones of the head are ornamented, but the
details of the sculpturing differ in different specimens. The mandible
has on the front part of the lower two-thirds of the outer side a large
256 Annals of the South African Musewn.
number of short irregular longitudinal ridges. In the posterior part
of the bone the ridges are mostly vertical. A similar ornamentation
is present on the maxilla, preopercular, and opercular, and to a less
extent on most of the other surface bones. The frontals, parietals,
and supratemporals are, however, nearly smooth.
Appendicular Skeleton.—The shoulder girdle is not unlike that of
Paleoniscus, though the proportions of the different elements differ
considerably. The post-temporal is a small bone which lies behind
the second supratemporal. It is only very slightly ornamented. The
supraclavicle is a large oblong bone which is divided into two very
unequal parts by the lateral line which crosses it obliquely, separating
the upper and posterior corner from the lower part. The anterior
and inferior large part is beautifully ornamented by a series of 5 or 6
wavy ridges running down it, while the small upper part is unorna-
mented. The lateral line has in its course through the bone 7 or 8
foramina. Both the clavicle and the interclavicle seem stouter than
in Pale@oniscus, but otherwise they are similar in structure so far as
can be seen. Both are beautifully ornamented by ridges of ganoine.
The postclavicle is considerably longer than in Palg@oniscus and is
smooth. The infraclavicle is well developed and ornamented.
The pectoral fin is not fully preserved in any of the specimens. It
consists of at least 10 rays—probably considerably more—of which
the second is the longest. All are unarticulated, and they appear to
be unbranched even at their tips, but the specimens are not sufficiently
well preserved to admit of certainty on this latter point. In the front
of the fin are powerful fulcra, which occupy a space rather larger than
that occupied by the first three rays.
The pelvic fin is about half the size of the pectoral and is formed
of about 12 rays, which are articulated at their bases but appa-
rently not distally. There is no evidence of branching in either
of the two specimens showing the fin. Small fulera lie on the
front of the fin and occupy a space a little greater than that
occupied by one ray.
Unpaired Fins.—The dorsal fin is situated far back, and nearly
opposite the anal. It consists of 21 rays, of which the 7th and 8th
are the longest. All the rays are articulated, but though distally
they are much flattened, they are not manifestly branched. A
number of small fulcra are present on the front of the upper part of
the fin. A couple of enlarged scales are present on the dorsum in
front of the fin.
The anal fin is slightly longer than the dorsal. It consists of
34 rays, of which the 8th is longest. All the rays are articulated
Fossil Fishes of the Upper Karroo Beds of South Africa. 25T
and unbranched. Fulcral bones are ‘present on the front of the
distal half of the fin.
The caudal fin is lost in the type specimen, but from other
specimens it is seen to agree closely with the caudal of the
following species.
Squamation.—The scales on the sides are rhomboidal, with the
inferior borders somewhat convex and the posterior borders nearly
straight and smooth. The posterior angle is slightly produced. The
scales on the abdominal region are narrower and closely imbricated.
All the scales are practically smooth.
While most of the specimens are of the same size as the type,
one which I cannot distinguish specifically is considerably larger,
measuring 140 mm. in length. It is not well preserved and may
prove to be distinct, but so far as can be seen there is no distinct
difference except in size from the typical H. browni.
The genus Helichthys seems well differentiated from any other
previously described. The other genera of Paleoniscids with the
suspensorium nearly vertical are Canobius, Gonatodus, Drydenius,
Amblypterus, and Hurylepis, and of these only Amblypterus seems
to have any close affinity. Further, all are Carboniferous genera
except Amblypterus, which is also found in the Permian Age. From
Amblypterus, Helichthys differs in having a feebler taii, and in having
the fin rays not or only slightly branched.
HELICHTHYS DRAPERI, Smith-Woodward.
In 1893 Smith-Woodward (8) described under the name
Dictyopyge (2?) Drapert a fossil fish from Rouxville, O.R.C. The
type specimen has lost the tail, and Smith-Woodward was in doubt
whether to regard the species as a Palieoniscid or a Catopterid, but
provisionally placed it in the genus Dictyopyge. In Mr. Brown’s
collection is a fairly well-preserved specimen which shows that the
fish is undoubtedly a Paleeoniscid and enables me to add to the
original description.
Mr. Brown’s specimen measures 133 mm. in length and 28 mm,
in depth, while the head measures 27 mm. in length. The head is
not very well preserved, but the specimen shows that the suspen-
sorium is, as in Helichthys brownt, nearly verticle. The mandible is
long and slender, as is also the anterior part of the maxilla. The
opercular bones are large and smooth, but the anterior frontal region
has a considerable amount of rugose ornament. The shoulder girdle
is not well preserved, but has apparently little or no ornamentation.
The pectoral fin has 16 rays articulated in the distal half and
258 Annals of the South African Museum.
branched distally. Small fulera are present in front. The pelvic
fin is badly preserved. The dorsal fin is almost wholly in front of
the anal. It has about 25 rays. I cannot detect any fulcra in front
of it, but the condition of the fin is somewhat unsatisfactory.
The caudal fin is deeply bifurcated, the upper lobe being the
longer. Along the top of the upper lobe is a row of specialised ridge
scales, but they are not much larger than the other scales of the tail.
All the rays of the caudal fin are articulated and branched.
The scales of the side of the body are about as deep as broad.
The lower and posterior margins are both straight, but the posterior
one is distinctly serrated in the scales of the anterior half of the
body. From the serrations on some of the scales there run forwards
for a short distance a few feeble ridges.
While there may still be some doubt as to the genus of this species
it can confidently be stated that it cannot be referred to Dictyopyge.
Nor do I think it can be placed in the genus Rhadinichthys, which is
characterised by having the suspensorium very oblique. Though
the fin rays differ a little from those of Helichthys browni, the
general structure of the skull so far as known is so similar that it
seems advisable to place this species in the same genus as the other.
HELICHTHYS TENUIS, N. sp.
This very well-marked species is represented by only one
specimen, and that a badly preserved. The fish is fairly com-
plete, but it is so much weathered that little remains beyond the
impression.
The complete fish probably measures 90 mm., and the greatest
depth is 16mm. The head measures 16 mm. Though in general
structure it agrees with H. brown, and most probably belongs to the
same genus, it differs from that species in being more slender, in
having the dorsal and anal fins much smaller, and in having the
peduncle of the tail much longer.
The head agrees fairly well with that of H. brownt, but is longer
in proportion to the height. The pectoral fin is smaller than in the
type species and has apparently 18 rays. The dorsal fin is also
smaller, but has a larger number of very delicate rays—apparently
30. No distinct fulera can be detected. The fin is situated only
very slightly in front of the anal. Like the dorsal the anal fin has
many delicate rays—probably 36. The caudal fin is not preserved,
but the distance from the posterior part of the anal to the front of
the caudal fin is at least 13 mm. In the type of H. browni the
corresponding distance is only 5 mm.
Fossil Fishes of the Upper Karroo Beds of South Africa. 259
In the collection obtained by Dr. Kannemeyer there is a tail with
the dorsal and anal fins, which almost certainly belong to this
species.
OxyGNATHUS Brownl, sp. nov.
Of this large Paleoniscid fish there is only one good specimen in
the collection which will be taken as the type. There is, however, a
second smaller specimen of which much of the head is preserved
and the anterior half of the body. It is difficult to compare the two
specimens, and it is thus not quite certain that the two belong to the
same species. As, however, the two are at least closely allied, and
probably represent the same animal, the second specimen will be
used for the description of the cranial characters.
General Form.—The type specimen when complete probably
measured 310 mm. in length, and the greatest depth of the trunk
is 75mm. The dorsal, anal, and caudal fins at least are large and
powerful, while the scales are relatively small and thin.
Head and Opercular Apparatus.—In the type specimen only the
upper and back part of the head is preserved. The opercular is large
and rhomboidal, and about a half longer than broad. In front of it
lies a narrow preopercular, about half the width of the opercular.
Above these two bones is a large squamosal imperfectly preserved.
Between the upper part of the opercular and the preopercular is
apparently a small triangular bone agreeing in position with the bone
figured as “ hyomandibular”’ by Traquair in his figure of the head
of Oxygnathus ornatus, but I do not think it can be regarded as
hyomandibular in the present specimen as it is finely tuberculated
like the opercular bones, and thus presumably a membrane bone.
Most probably it corresponds to the element marked z, and called a
“supplementary plate ’’ by Traquair in his restoration of the head of
Elonichthys pectinatus. Only a small part of the subopercular is
preserved.
In the second specimen the ocular and preocular regions are
missing, but the posterior half is fairly well preserved. The surface
of the bones is weathered off, but well-marked impressions of many
of the bones remain. The opercular at its widest part measures
8 mm., and its greatest length over the long diagonal is about
18 mm. The subopercular is about a half broader than deep.
Immediately below it are the series of branchials. There are
19 preserved, and it is unlikely that more than one or two are
missing. Immediately in front of the opercular and subopercular is
a long narrow hyomandibular exposed by the removal of the “ sup-
260 Annals of the South African Museum.
plementary ossicle,” and part of the preopercular. The hyomandi-
bular measures 20 mm. in length, and is constricted in the middle.
It supports a very small quadrate, and there appears to be a distinct
symplectic. The preopercular lies along the upper side of the
maxilla. The squamosal lies above the opercular, the hyomandi-
bular, and the preopercular. Behind it is a narrow supratemporal
dividing it from the post-temporal. The sensory canal is continued
from the lateral line over the supraclavicle and can be seen crossing
the squamosal. The maxilla and the dentary are well developed
and have two series of teeth, an outer row of small irregularly
arranged teeth, and an inner row of large well-spaced laniaries.
Axial Skeleton of Trunk.—The axial skeleton of the posterior half
of the larger specimen is well preserved. There is clear evidence of
the persistence of the notochord. In the middle region of the body
a series of short neural arches are well displayed. The height of the
arches is about equal to the diameter of the notochord. In the
posterior region the arches are much obscured by the scales. Above
each arch isa slender spine about twice the length of the arch. The
head of each arch is dilated and the lower end of each spine
similarly expanded to articulate with it. The middle part of each
spine is slender, but the ends seem to be expanded, but they are not
well preserved. The spines can be traced back into the tail. In the
region of the dorsal fin a row of short interspinous bones are dis-
played, of which eight are clearly seen. Above these and articulating
with them is a second row of interspinous bones arranged along the
base of the dorsal fin. Of these there are probably 20, and they are
all somewhat hour-glass shaped, about three or four times as long
as broad.
In the region below the anterior part of the dorsal fin are seen a
few hemal arches. Like the neural arches they are short, and like
them articulate with long hemal spines. The hemal arches cannot
be traced beyond the plane of the back part of the dorsal fin, but the
spines can easily be traced into the tail. In the region of the
posterior part of the anal fin they are rather feeble, but become
much more strongly developed where they are required to give
support to the lower lobe of the caudal fin. The anal fin is
supported by a single series of long interspinous bones, many of
which are curved to fit the ends of the hemal spines.
The condition of the neural and hzemal arches, spinous and inter-
spinous bones will be seen to be essentially similar to those described
by Traquair in Pygopterus and Nematoptychius. He says: “I can
find no clear evidence of the presence of two sets of interspinous
Fossil Fishes of the Upper Karroo Beds of South Africa. 261
bones in the anal.’”’ In the Paleeoniscid fish I am describing there
is pretty conclusive evidence that there is only one set, unless the
other be extremely rudimentary.
Appendicular Skeleton.—In the type specimen the shoulder girdle
is only represented by the upper part of the supraclavicle and the
post-temporal, and these are very badly preserved. In the second
specimen much of the shoulder girdle is seen in good condition.
The supraclavicle is of large size, and the lateral line passes over the
upper part of it. The postclavicle is small, but distinct. The
clavicle is well developed. The rays of the pectoral fin are dis-
tinctly articulated distally, but it is not clear whether the proximal
halves are also articulated.
The pelvic fin is seen in the type specimen, but it is very im-
perfectly preserved.
Unpaired Fins—The dorsal fin begins a little in front of and ends
opposite the middle of the anal fin. It is large and triangular, and
is formed by about 40 rays, of which the 8th is the longest and the
first 3 very short. They are articulated throughout their whole
length. Most of the rays divide near their middle and again at the
beginning of their distal fourth. A series of small fulera support the
front of the fin, and one or two enlarged scales lie in front of
the anterior end.
The anal fin has a longer attachment than the dorsal, and the
rays are rather longer. They are about 52 in number, and the 8th
and 9th are the longest. Like those of the dorsal fin, they are
articulated and branch dichotomously.
The caudal fin is somewhat imperfectly preserved. It is probably
fairly deeply bilobate, but neither the upper nor the lower lobe is
complete, and the two portions are artificially separated from
each other. The lower lobe is well developed, the rays being
supported by large hemal spines. The upper caudal lobe is well
developed.
Squamation.—The scales of the body are small and rather thin.
Those of the anterior part, which are better developed, are rhom-
bohedral, and ornamented with 8 or 9 little irregular ridges which
pass backwards and slightly downwards. The scales of the ab-
dominal region are very narrow and closely imbricated. Those of
the posterior part of the body are thinner and smaller. On the
upper lobe of the tail the scales are again thicker and form long,
narrow rhomboids ornamented by a few oblong ridges passing
backwards.
A few enlarged scales lie in front of the dorsal fin, but apparently
262 Annals of the South African Museum.
there are none before the anal or caudal. Above the tail are, how-
ever, a row of very large fulcral scales.
While this large Paleeoniscid seems different from any previously
described form, it is a little difficult to be sure in what genus it
ought to be placed. It resembles to some extent the New South
Wales genus Apateolepis and to a less extent the genus Myriolepis,
but it seems to agree so much more closely with the English Liassic
genus Oxygnathus, that I think it better to place it, at least pro-
visionally, in that genus. The only points in which the South
African fish does not agree with Smith-Woodward’s definition of
the genus Oxygnathus are in having the ridge scales of the upper
caudal lobe large and in the body scales being rather thin.
DiIcTYOPYGE FORMOSA, Nl. Sp.
This new species is represented by a single specimen in the
collection obtained by Dr. Kannemeyer. It is a small species,
measuring only about 70 mm. in length, and the head 14 mm.
The body has a greatest depth of 13 mm.
The head is not sufficiently well preserved to enable one to say
much about its structure. The orbit is placed well forward, and
both the maxilla and the dentary are long, and each has a row of
small uniform teeth.
The pectoral fin is composed of about 11 rays, of which the 4th
is longest and the first 3 short. There are well-developed fulcra in
front. The fin rays are not manifestly branched, and it is doubtful
if they are articulated. The pelvic fin is not well preserved. The
dorsal fin is only very slightly in front of the anal. It is composed
of 24 rays, of which the 8th is longest. There are no fulera. The
anal fin is composed of about 36 rays, of which the 8th is the
longest. A few fulcral rays are present in front of the distal part
of the fin. The caudal fin is slightly imperfect, but enough is
preserved to show that it is a variety of the abbreviate hetero-
cercal. The axial portion of the upper lobe is longer than in typical
Dictyopyge, but distinctly not Paleoniscid.
The scales are well developed and rhomboidal. They are charac-
terised by the presence of two prominent ridges, which are directed
backwards. The dorsal scales are perhaps slightly enlarged, and
two large scales lie in front of the dorsal and at least one in front of
the anal.
SEMIONOTUS CAPENSIS, Smith-Woodward.
In 1888 Smith-Woodward (9) described, under the above name,
some fossil fishes from the Stormberg beds of the Drakensberg Range.
Fossil Fishes of the Upper Karroo Beds of South Africa. 263
Though the specimens were in fair preservation, so many very much
finer specimens have since then been discovered that it is now
possible to add a good deal to Smith-Woodward’s description, and
also to modify one or two details.
The finest specimens are believed to have come from near Ficks-
burg in the Orange River Colony, and good examples are to be
found in most of the South African museums. The finest I have
seen are those in the Cape Town collection.
The majority of specimens measure from 160 to 210 mm. in
length. In the example which is 210 mm. long, the body is 42 mm.
in depth at the deepest part, and the head measures 48 mm. to the
back of the operculum.
Hi. Schellwien (10) has recently described a number of specimens
from the Orange River Colony, and has shown the more important
features of the skull structure. The specimens I have examined
confirm most of his observations, but in one or two points I am
inclined to differ from him. Schellwien’s specimens show one or
two features not seen by me in those I have examined, while I am
able to add a number of characters not observed by him.
Almost every detail of the skull is now known except the basi-
cranial region. The frontals are large, and extend from the nasal
region to behind the plane passing through the back of the orbit.
The back part of the bone is about twice as wide as the middle
portion. Behind it is a large oblong parietal. Below the parietal
is a slightly narrower squamosal. My specimens do not satis-
factorily show the supratemporal region, but Schellwien finds a
narrow supratemporal and a post-temporal.
The opercular bones are very like those of Lepidotus. The oper-
culum differs in being relatively considerably wider in its lower half.
Inferiorly it joms the subopercular in a manner very similar to that
in the better known genus. The subopercular in Semonotus is only
about one-third the size of the operculum instead of half as large as
in Lepidotus, while the interopercular is less than half the size of
that in Lepidotus. In front of these three opercular bones is a
narrow curved preopercular, along which there runs a mucous
canal.
In Schellwien’s diagrammatic restoration the postorbital seems to
me to be rather too small, while the interopercular is much too large.
Above the anterior end of the long preopercular is an elongated sub-
orbital smaller in size than the postorbital. The portion of the figure
dealing with this region is, in my opinion, erroneous.
I should be inclined to restore the anterior portion of the skull
264 Annals of the South African Musewm.
somewhat differently from Schellwien, but my material is too
unsatisfactory to decide the matter.
The lower jaw has an elongated triangular dentary and a powerful
angular.
The palato-pterygo-quadrate arch is fully ossified, but the exact
limits of the different element cannot be made out with certainty.
There is a long narrow bone below the quadrate stretching from the
articular region to the lower end of the hyomandibular. This would
seem to be the symplectic. The hyomandibular is a powerful bone
and fairly similar to that of the ordinary Teleosteans. In addition
to supporting the opercular bones and the quadrate arch, it supports
the hyoid arch. There is a large quadrangular epihyal and an
elongated triangular ceratohyal. The interhyal has probably been
cartilaginous, as has also probably been the hypohyal and the
urohyal. Under the subopercular are six branchiostegals.
The clavicular arch consists of the clavicle, supraclavicle, post-
clavicle and post-temporal, but there seems to be no trace of an
infraclavicle. A mucous canal crosses the supraclavicle obliquely
as in the Paloniscids. There is a small ossification which possibly
may he the coracoid as is thought by Schellwien.
The pectoral fin consists of 14 rays with 5 or 6 fulera in front.
The rays are much flattened distally, but apparently not branched.
The pelvic fin consists of 7 rays which are branched distally.
The fulcra are powerful.
The dorsal fin begins exactly in the middle of the back of the fish
and consists of 13 rays, of which the last 3 are very small. All
the rays are branched distally and articulated. In front are a row of
very powerful fulera, 9 in number. The anal fin consists of 9 rays
with 9 powerful fulcra in front.
The caudal fin consists of 16 rays, all of which are branched and
articulated. Below and in front of the first ray are 14 fulcra, and
14 fulera also lie above the tail, gradually passing into dorsal
scales in front. The rays of the dorsal, anal, and caudal fins are
double. Though the tail is in a sense brevi-heterocercal the upper por-
tion is really continued as along, slender process bearing small rhombic
scales about 20 mm. beyond the end of the middle of the tail.
All the specimens of Semionotus capensis are believed to come from
Stormberg beds, and to be thus of lower Jurassic Age.
CLEITHROLEPIS EXTONI, Smith-Woodward.
This remarkable deep-bodied Ganoid was described in 1888 by
Smith-Woodward from specimens found at Rouxville. Though the
—— ne
——————— ee
Fossil Fishes of the Upper Karroo Beds of South Africa. 265
type is a fairly well-preserved specimen there were a number of
points left in doubt which can now be settled. I have only seen
three specimens of this species and only one approaching perfection.
Though the head is fairly well preserved it is very difficult to make
out the sutures owing to the large numbers of ganoine tubercles
scattered over the bones. In the numerous specimens of the following
allied species the cranial details are somewhat better seen.
The operculum and subopercular are well preserved in a number
of specimens, the latter being nearly twice the size of the former.
Tn front of these lies a large curved bone about half the width of the
operculum and extending from the level of the upper border of the
operculum to the middle of the subopercular. Smith-Woodward in
characterising the genus Cleithrolepis (B. M. Cat., vol. iii., p. 155)
states, ‘‘the preoperculum narrow and almost covered by the sub-
orbitals.” I feel satisfied this is not the case in Cleithrolepis minor
at least, for in it down the relatively broad preopercular runs the
sensory canal in almost exactly the same way as is seen in the
preopercular of Semionotus. The circumoculars are small bones
which form a ring round the orbit, the one at the upper and
posterior corner of the orbit being the largest. A canal seems to
run up over the head in the supratemporal region and another
branch down the frontal and round the front of the orbit. Above
the operculum there seems to be a fairly large squamosal traversed
by the anterior continuation of the lateral line. And there is some
evidence of a second canal running parallel to the other above it.
In one of the specimens of Cleithrolepis extoni the parasphenoid
is well seen. The maxilla and mandible are very short. If there is a
distinct interoperculum it is very small. Three or four branchiostegal
rays can be detected in one of the specimens of C. manor.
The pectorals are not preserved in any of the specimens of
C. extont I have seen though the place of attachment is manifest,
and only a trace of the pelvic fin is preserved. In all three speci-
mens the dorsal fin is nearly perfectly preserved. It consists of
20 rays with a series of small fulcra in front. The anal fin is
shorter than the dorsal and consists only of 15 rays. Both fins
extend to near the base of the tail. The caudal fin is large and
symmetrical, but not very deeply cleft, and the longest rays are only
a little longer than the longest of the dorsal and anal fins. There
are altogether 30 rays in the caudal fin and a series of small fulcra
both above and below, and all the rays are articulated and bifurcated
distally.
The greatest length of the complete fish from the snout to the line
266 Annals of the South African Museum.
joining the tips of the tail is 100 mm., and the greatest depth from
the highest point of the back to the base of the pelvic fin is 72 mm.
CLEITHROLEPIS MINOR, N. Sp.
The large majority of the specimens of Cleithrolepis are only
about two-thirds the size of the type specimen of C. extoni. For
some time I was inclined to consider all these as merely young
specimens, but on careful examination they reveal sufficient points
of difference to justify them being placed in a distinct species. In
C. extoni the depth of the head is less than one-third the depth
of the body; in C. minor it is almost half. In C. extoni the line of
the back forms an obtuse angle a little nearer the front of the dorsal
fin than the occiput; in C. minor the line of the back forms a gentle
curve. In the former species the cranial bones and the scales are
covered with tubercles; in the latter the tubercles are very slightly
developed on the opercular and other cranial bones, and even of the
scales they are relatively much smaller than in C. extont. The tail
in C. minor is much more deeply bifurcated, and the dorsal and anal
fins are much smaller and do not extend so near to the base of
the tail.
The largest specimen of C. minor measures 72 mm. in greatest
length and 43 mm. across the body to the base of the pelvic fin.
The dorsal fin has about 18 rays, the anal 12 or 13. The caudal
fin has about 30 rays.
HypDROPESSUM KANNEMEYERI, g. et sp. nov.
In Kannemeyer’s collection there are two specimens of this
beautiful little deep-bodied ganoid, and unfortunately both are
imperfect. One specimen exhibits the upper two-thirds of the body
including most of the head and the tail; the other shows the greater
part of the body, but has very little of the head.
Though allied to Cleithrolepis, this genus differs in that it is
extended up so that the edge of the dorsum makes nearly a right
angle, and the ventral region is probably similarly produced, so that
excluding the tail the body is apparently deeper than long. There
is the further marked difference in that the dorsal fin begins at the
upper angle of the back, and is a short fin with a very long base.
In general appearance Hydropesswm is thus strikingly like Cheirodus,
but there is not the slightest doubt that it does not belong to the
Platysomidee, but is a near ally of Cleithrolepis.
The larger of the two specimens measures from the snout to a
Fossil Fishes of the Upper Karroo Beds of South Africa. 267
line joining the tips of the tail 62 mm., and the greatest depth of the
body is probably about 52 mm.
The cranial sutures are not distinctly seen for the most part, but
there seems to be a fairly close resemblance between the general
structure of the head in this genus and Cleithrolepis. The operculum
and suboperculum appear to differ only in the operculum being
perhaps rather smaller relatively. The preoperculum is even rather
larger than in Cleithrolepis, and as in that genus a sensory canal
runs down its posterior side. The circumorbitals are small. The
frontal is large, and the maxilla short.
The dorsal fin is composed of at least 21 short rays, and extends
from the dorsal angle about two-thirds down the posterior dorsal slope.
A few small fulcra lie in front, but the rays are not sufficiently well
preserved to show whether they are bifurcated and articulated. The
caudal fin is deeply bifurcated, the rays of the upper and lower lobes
being powerful, those of the middle region feeble. The tail is brevi-
heterocercal.
The scales are rather larger than in Clezthrolepis, and differ in
being ornamented not with tubercles, but with numerous small short
ridges of ganoine which run vertically and are very irregularly
arranged. The cranial bones are scarcely at all ornamented.
Of previously described ganoids Cleithrolepis seems to be the
nearest ally of Hydropessum. Dapedius has a somewhat similarly
extended dorsal fin, but the cranial structure is very different in the
two. <A’theolopis differs in the remarkable developments of the
fins and tail.
PHOLIDOPHORUS BROWNI, Ni. Sp.
In Mr. Brown’s collection there are two specimens of a small
species of Pholidophorus and in Dr. Kannemeyer’s two imperfect
specimens of a second species, also apparently of the same genus.
The smaller of the two species, which I am naming after Mr.
Brown, measures 74 mm. in length and 15 mm. deep at the pelvic
fin. The front of the dorsal fin is situated exactly midway between
the snout and end of the tail, and is only a short distance behind the
front of the pelvic fin. The head with opercular apparatus measures
about 14-15 mm.
The head is not well preserved in either specimen. The maxilla
is slender in front and fairly deep behind. It bears about 14 elon-
gated conical teeth, which cannot be described as in the typical
Pholidophorus as ‘‘ minute.”” Behind and above the posterior end
of the maxilla is a large flat bone, or possibly two bones, which must
18)
268 Annals of the South African Musewm.
be suborbitals. The preopercular is narrow and overlapped by the
suborbitals. The opercular is broad, but the division between it
and the subopercular cannot be made out. A number of branchio-
stegal rays can be seen.
The dorsal fin is composed of apparently 16 rays with a few very
small fulcra in front. The anal fin has at least 11 rays. The
pectoral fin is badly preserved in both specimens, but the pelvic is
well seen in the type. It has at least 6 rays, and there is a series
of well-developed fulera in front. The caudal fin is bifurecate but not
deeply, and is nearly homocereal. It is formed of about 21 rays, and
there are a number of small fulera at least in front of the lower lobe.
The scales are in about 37 series and about 10 rows. The middle
3 rows in the front two-thirds of the body are roughly about
twice as deep as the others, and these scales are distinctly serrated
behind with about 10 teeth. From these teeth feeble ridges run
forward on the scales a short distance, but otherwise the scales are
smooth. There is practically no ornamentation on the bones of
the head.
CONCLUSION.
With the exception of Seminotus capensis, which is believed to be
of Stormberg Age, all the fishes here described belong to Upper
Beaufort beds. The fishes collected by Dr. Kannemeyer and Mr.
Brown are pretty certainly all of one horizon, and form one of the
most interesting collections of fossil fish ever obtained. The Upper
Beaufort beds with little doubt correspond to the Keuper of Europe.
A species of Cyclotosawrus occurs at Rouxville, and a species of
Capitosaurus at Burghersdorp, and there are many other facts which
seem to confirm this determination of the age.
A comparison of this Karroo collection of fishes with those of the
Hawkesbury of Australia is very interesting. In both faunas we
have the genera Dictyopyge, Cleithrolepis, and Pholidophorus, and
possibly when the Australian and African beds are more fully
explored other common genera may be found. The Australian
Palzoniscid genus Myriolepis may be regarded as the representative
of the South African Oxygnathus. Still, in spite of the resemblances,
the differences between the two faunas is more striking. In the
Hawkesbury beds Belonorhynchus and Pristisomus are very pro-
minent genera, yet quite unknown in the Karroo beds. On the
other hand, the two most prominent genera in the South African
beds—Hybodus and Helichthys—are unknown in the Australian
beds.
‘TroaAowWeUuUuey umnssedorpAy ‘¢ BIg ‘“snyeudo snporeres sbi
‘snueolayy snuqueoeiayg ‘¢ Big ‘snueolayy snpogéy 22 T big
‘UML Weurmen “ASaA, ‘Jep uwlooarg Wy
TumMoig snzoydopifoyg ‘QT 61g “dour, stdetoayyteyo gry “Ttumoarg snyeuBAxg °9 BIg
‘TumModg sAUIUoIpTey 7 bt ‘Tdoderqg sAUyWopey 9 Bry |
‘O][OD WeulMayyysa
wibidescoalec IIA TOA'snylagy's uuy
Fossil Fishes of the Upper Karroo Beds of South Africa. 269
Besides the forms I have described, there are evidences of a
considerable number of others, but the remains are too unsatis-
factory
for description.
I must express my indebtedness to Mr. EH. 8. C. Dyke for taking
excellent photographs of the more important specimens.
REFERENCES TO LITERATURE.
. SmirH-Woopwarp. Brit. Mus. Cat. Foss. Fishes, vol. i., pl. ix.
. Surru-WoopwarpD.
. Brown. ‘‘On a species of Celacanthus from the Upper Beaufort Beds of
Aliwal North,” Rec. Albany Mus., vol. i., pt. 5, 1905.
. SurrH-Woopwarp. ‘On Atherstonia, &c., and on a tooth of Ceratodus
from the Stormberg beds of the Orange Free State,’? Ann. and Mag,
Nat. Hist., 4. 1889.
. G. Seetrey. ‘‘On Ceratodus Kannemeyeri (Seeley),’? Geol. Mag.,
December, 1897.
.H. Traguatr. ‘ The Ganoid Fishes of the British Carboniferous Formae
tions,’’ Paleeont. Soc., No. 1, 1877.
.H. Traguarr. Tbid., No. 2, 1901.
. SmitH-Woopwarp. ‘ Further ‘Notes on Fossil Fishes from the Karroo
Formation of South Africa,’ Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 12. 1893.
. SuirH-Woopwarp. ‘‘On two new Lepidotoid Ganoids from the Early
Mesozoic Deposits of Orange Free State, South Africa,” Q.J.G.S.,
44, 1888.
ScHELLWIEN. ‘Ueber Semionotus Ag,’’ Konigsberg, 1901.
REFERENCES TO PLATES XII., XIII.
Hybodus africanus. Slightly reduced.
Hybodus africanus. Anterior dorsal fin and spine. xX 4.
Celacanibus africanus. Tail. x 4.
Ceratodus ornatus. Tooth (? mandibular.) x 4.
Hydropessum kannemeyeri. x +.
Helichthys draperi. x almost nat. size.
Helichthys browni. x about %.
Oxygnathus brownt. xX 3.
Cleithrolepis minor. x about 3.
Pholidophorus browni. x about 3.
SS ie]
eA ea
(270)
(8).—Notice of some New South African Fossil Amphibians and
Reptiles—By R. Broom, M.D., B.Sc.
(With one text figure.)
TREMATOSAURUS KANNEMEYERI, 0. sp.
The type of this new species is the centre part of a skull received
from Dr, Kannemeyer and obtained by him in the Orange River
Colony. Posteriorly it is broken obliquely across a little behind the
orbits, and in front is broken through about 65 mm. in front of the
orbits.
The skull is evidently that of an animal about twice the size of
Trematosaurus braunt, and it has probably differed from the type
species in having the snout relatively considerably longer.
- The orbit measures 31 mm. by 20 mm., and the interorbital
measurement is 49 mm. At the back of the orbit the width of
the skull is 94 mm., and at transverse plane 60 mm., in front of the
orbit 64 mm.
‘The surface of few of the bones is preserved, but where it is found
it is seen to be pitted as in T. brawni, and a groove runs up the
snout and passes along nearer to the middle line than to the orbit.
The frontal does not enter the orbital margin, and passes much
further forward than in 7’. brawni, the anterior end being in advance
of the portion preserved.
The prefrontal is large, and ends about 55 mm. in front of the
orbit.
The postfrontal is long and narrow, and, so far as preserved, fairly
similar to that figured by Burmeister in 7. braunt.
The postorbital is peculiar. It forms 9 mm. of the orbital margin,
but behind the orbit it becomes rapidly constricted till it measures
only 4 mm. across, and then slowly widens out till it measures
13 mm. The preserved portion measures 43 mm. in length, and
probably at least 10 mm. are missing.
The maxillary teeth are not well preserved. Where preserved they
are small and uniform, and 8 occupy 11 mm.
The para-sphenoid (vomer) is very narrow.
New South African Fossil Amphibians and Reptiles. 271
The resemblances of this South African animal to Trematosaurus
brauni are sufficiently great to leave little doubt that both should
be placed in the same genus. The Spitzbergen Labyrinthodont
recently described by Smith-Woodward as Aphaneramma rostratum
has an elongated snout, but is not allied to the South African form.
CAPITOSAURUS AFRICANUS, 0. Sp.
In the highest division of the Beaufort series—the Burghersdorp *
or Cynognathus beds—remains of a moderate-sized broad-headed
Labyrinthodont are rather common. Many fragments of jaws and
teeth occur in Mr. Brown’s collection, but I had not thought it wise
to name the teeth, as there was little doubt that more perfect
specimens would be obtained. Last year I was fortunate in dis-
covering the greater part of the skull of this broad-headed form on
the farm Vaalbank, near Burghersdorp, and though the specimen is
incomplete, enough is preserved to enable one to refer it to the genus
Capitosaurus with great probability. A few years ago I described
another large flat-headed form from the same beds under the name
Cyclotosaurus albertyni, considering with Fraas that it was at least
convenient to keep this genus distinct from Capitosaurus. Cycloto-
saurus albertyni is the giant Labyrinthodont of the Upper Karroo
beds. It occurs at Smithfield, Aliwal North, and Burghersdorp. A
large tooth, which does not seem distinguishable from that of
C. albertyni, Seeley has recently made the type of a new genus
and species.
The form to which I give the name Capitosaurus africanus is only
about half the size of Cyclotosaurus albertyni, and differs in having
the auditory notch open behind, as in Capitosaurus nasutus and
most other Labyrinthodonts. In general it resembles Capitosaurus
nasutus, but differs in having the exoccipital condyles nearly hidden
by the superficial cranial bones, and in the prosquamosal (supra-
temporal) being relatively much larger.
As in C. nasutus, the jugal only forms a very small part of the
orbit. The prosquamosal is so large that its outer and anterior
angle is almost on the plane of the back of the orbit. The distance
from the posterior border of the postparietal (“‘ supraoccipital’’) in the
middle line to the posterior border of the parietal is greater than the
distance from the posterior border of the parietal to the pineal
* Mr. du Toit is inclined to regard the Burghersdorp beds as including both
the Cynognathus beds and the Procolophon beds. Lithologically it is doubtful if a
distinction can be drawn, but the faunas are very different.
272 Annals of the South African Museum.
foramen—a character in which it differs from C. nasutus. The
vomer (“ parasphenoid”’) is narrow and flat, and markedly concave
in its posterior part. In the posterior part of the mandible 6 teeth
occupy 11 mm.
The following are some of the principal measurements :—
Length of mandible (estimated) ............... 330 mm.
Widtla ofskllt (265 ee eeeessereccess me seenee-eete ISO}
Width across occipital condyles ........-..-.-. BBs;
Width between Orbits) See. pcta-6--sesseeeeeenenee doles
Distance from orbit to tympanic notch ...... DA 55
Width across the “‘epiotic”’ cornua ......... lgtaan es
BAvRIA CYNOPS, g. et sp. nov.
BAURIA CYNOPS. X 3.
Some months ago I discovered on Mr. Lategan’s farm, Vaalbank,
near Burghersdorp, the almost perfect skull of a new type of
Cynodont. The specimen was picked up at the foot of a little slope
of debris, and no trace of the rest of the skeleton could be found.
The specimen consists of the skull and first three cervical vertebre,
and is practically perfect with the exception of the back portions of
each lower jaw, which have been weathered away, leaving only the
impression in the matrix.
The skull, which is extremely mammal-like in general appearance,
measures 134 mm. in length and 82 mm. in breadth. It differs from
that of all previously discovered Cynodonts in haying the orbits open
behind, as in most mammals, and simple conical molars, as in most
Therocephalians. On further examination it is seen that Bauwria,
New South African Fossil Amphibians and Reptiles. 278
though a Cynodont, belongs to a more primitive family than any
hitherto known.
The snout is, like that of typical Cynodonts, slightly narrowed
behind the canines. The nasals are long and broaden out behind,
as in Gomphognathus. In front they pass further forward, so that
the nostrils look forwards and slightly outwards, so that, except for
their being divided by an internasal septum, they are very mammal-
like in appearance.
The orbits are relatively large, measuring 30 mm. by 24 mm., and
the interorbital measurement is 26 mm. Each frontal bone is
concave, so that there is a low median ridge and a ridge above each
orbit. The frontal only forms a very small part of the orbit, the
greater part of the upper margin being formed by the prefrontal.
There is no postfrontal, but the postorbital is well developed. It
forms the whole of the back of the orbit, but does not extend as far
as the jugal. Posteriorly it only passes back on the parietal for a
short distance. There is no trace of a pineal foramen. The parietals
are anchylosed, and form a thick triangular roof to the brain cavity.
On passing backwards they spread out and form the inner half of the
posterior wall of the temporal fossa.
The squamosal is much smaller than in the typical Cynodonts.
It is developed in four directions. The inner limb articulates with
the parietal, and a second large flat process les in front of the
exoccipital. The third process descends to support the small
quadrate, and the anterior process, which is short and slender,
articulates with the jugal. The quadrate is probably similar to that
in the other Cynodonts. It lies to the inside of the lower process of
the squamosal, and apparently forms the whole of the articulation
for the articular. To the inner side of the quadrate les the
tympanic bone, as in the Anomodonts and Cynodonts. It is an
elongated rod, constricted in the middle and considerably dilated at
both ends.
The jugal is slender, but extends far back. It nas no ascending
process. The lachrymal appears to be much smaller than the
prefrontal.
The maxillaries are approximated, so that the distance between
the alveolar margins is considerably less than between the outer
margins of the nasals. There is a moderate-size round canine with
no trace of serrations so far as preserved. Behind it are 10 some-
what conical teeth. They are somewhat flattened antero-posteriorly,
so that they have oval sections, but there appear to be no trace of
cusps or serrations. The space occupied by the 10 teeth is 31 mm.
274 Annals of the South African Museum.
The premaxilla is well developed, and is not overlapped by the
maxilla, as in Therocephalians. It meets the nasal behind the
nostril, and it forms a very short internasal process. There are
four rounded incisors which, like the canines and molars, are, so far
as preserved, without any trace of serrations or cusps. The space
occupied by the incisors is 15 mm. The snout has been split in the
middle line to show the relations of the vomer, prevomer, and
palatine process, but it is impossible to be quite sure of all the
details. The vomer is a large median bone, as in all Cynodonts, and
it has the same relations behind the palatines and pterygoids. In
front it lies above the secondary palatine plate of the maxilla, and
passes forward to within 4mm. of the root of the 1st incisor, where
it lies above an elongated triangular bony process. Whether this
bony process is palatine process of the premaxilla or not is doubtful.
It seems to be continuous with the premaxilla, and may provisionally
be regarded as the palatine process. It is remarkable for having a
very large, apparently cavernous, space in it. I do not think the
space has been for the accommodation of Jacobson’s organ, as its
walls are very irregular, and it is very near the roots of the incisors.
It is too far back, on the other hand, to be a cavity for the development
of a second tooth. Above it, and roofing it for the most part entirely,
is a thin bone, which is most probably the septo-maxillary. The
septo-maxillary is well seen in the floor of the nostril externally, and
this flat plate of bone is apparently the inner continuation of the
same bone. It is thus very doubtful whether there is any trace of
the prevomer left, and there is no evidence of an organ of Jacobson.
If this conclusion be correct, Bawria would agree in this with the
Anomodonts and a number of mammals.
The palate is, so far as can be seen, exactly like that of the typical
Cynodonts, and the structure of the posterior nares also similar.
The basis crani is peculiar in that there are two prominent
processes passing downwards and outwards from the basisphenoid,
and probably giving support to the inner end of the tympanic. This
is an arrangement differing somewhat from that of the typical
Cynodonts but very similar to that seen in the Anomodonts.
The exoccipital forms a large transverse process, passing outwards
towards the articular region, as in other Cynodonts. Doubtless
above it lies the opisthotic. Near the inner end of the exoccipital is
a large round foramen, situated exactly as in better-known Cynodonts.
Tt seems to correspond to the large foramen behind the condyle in
Ornithorhynchus, and probably served for the transmission of the
9th, 10th, 11th, and 12th nerves. The 12th nerve has in part a
New South African Fossil Amphibians and Reptiles. 275
distinct canal for itself, only joining the larger foramen at its
exit,
The occipital condyle is in an extremely interesting condition,
being intermediate in type between that of the Anomodonts and that
of the typical Cynodonts. In Dicynodon and allied forms the
condyle is single and made up of a median basioccipital portion and
two lateral exoccipital parts. Here the basioccipital part has become
very much reduced, and the exoccipital parts are approximated.
Though there is thus produced a double condyle by the reduction
and retreat of the basioccipital, the two condyles are so near that
they probably act as a single condyle. In the Cynodonts proper the
exoccipital portions become enlarged and separated by a very deep
cleft.
The lower jaw is in a very interesting condition. Hitherto one of
the most striking distinguishing features of the Cynodonts has been
that the dentary extended backwards nearly to the articulation,
whereas in the Therocephalians the posterior third of the jaw was
formed entirely by the articular, the angular, and the surangular.
In Bauria we have a condition exactly intermediate between the two
types. The dentary is long and not very powerful, and has most
probably, like the maxilla, 10 molars. Those which are displayed are
like the upper teeth simple and unserrated. The canine is fairly
large and perfectly round, and there are four incisors slightly
flattened transversely. The complete dental formula of Bawria
would thus be: 2#c1m1° x 2=60. The coronoid process is
thicker and shorter than in most Therocephalians, and less expanded
than in typical Cynodonts. The Cynodonts hitherto known have all
differed from the Therocephalians in having the dentary nearly
reaching to the articulation. In Bawria the dentary only forms the
anterior three-quarters of the jaw. The posterior part of the jaw is
much more Therocephalian in type than Cynodont. The surangular
forms a rounded convex upper border to the hind part, and the
angular is of fair size. The articular is also Therocephalian in type.
The atlas vertebra, so far as can be seen, is fairly similar to that
in the ordinary Cynodonts and has a large inferior piece. It is
apparently the arch mainly that gives articulation to the occipital
condyles. The broad inferior piece, though not anchylosed with the
arch, must be firmly attached to it by ligaments. There is a proatlas.
The axis has a flat broad odontoid process which lies above the
inferior piece of the atlas, and owing to its shape it must have been
almost impossible for any rotatory movement to have been made
round the odontoid. In this feature Bawria is distinctly more
276 Annals of the South African Musewn.
primitive than Cynognathus or Gomphognathus. Most probably the
rotation of the skull was effected round the occipital condyles, and
as the condyles became divided and rotation impossible there the
odontoid process took up the function.
There is a distinct intercentrum between the axis and the third
cervical, and the body of the third cervical is very deeply concave—
very possibly notochordal.
I have named this most important genus after the distinguished
paleeontologist, the late Dr. George Baur, of Chicago University. I
had not the good fortune to be acquainted with him, and even now
know nothing of him but his work. But it has long seemed to me
that the character of that work was such as entitled him to a higher
rank among paleontologists than has been generally assigned him.
By treating paleontology as a branch of zoology rather than of
geology, he has done much to assure that for all future time every
paleontologist must be in the first place a zoologist.
ECCASAURUS PRISCUS, g. et sp. nov.
The type of this new genus and species is a large humerus, found
by Mr. J. L. Cairneross in the Eeca beds about twelve miles N.W. of
Prince Albert, and probably near the same horizon as Arch@osuchus
cairncrosst. In giving a name to a humerus I have departed from
my almost invariable rule of only making types of skulls or teeth.
But as fossils are extremely rare in the Ecca beds, and the gigantic
lizard-like form represented by this humerus is not likely to be
confused with any other animal, as it is of quite a different type from
any previously discovered, I think it well to name it.
It measured 344 mm. in greatest length. The upper end is
179 mm. broad and the lower end 207 mm., and the plane of the
upper end makes with the lower an angle of about 25°. In the
middle the shaft is constricted, so that its broad diameter measures
only 72 mm. About 122 mm. above the lower end is a well-de-
veloped entepicondylar foramen. From the outer side there passes
forward a fairly well-developed delto-pectoral ridge, whose plane is
for the greater part at right angles to the plane of the lower end of
the bone. The point of the ridge is situated about 216 mm. from the
distal end. Unlike the ridge in the Anomodonts, it is not continued
on to the upper end of the bone, ending about 80 mm. short of the
head.
Of previously discovered humeri only one, so far as I am aware,
agrees with the present type in all essentials, viz., the humerus of
New South African Fossil Amphibians and Reptiles. 277
Procolophon. In both, the head is similar in being continued up to a
point externally. In Procolophon the deltoid ridge is separated from
the head and has a very similar structure. The lower end of the
bone differs only that in Procolophon the outer condyle is pointed and
the inner rounded, whereas in the large Eeca type the inner is
pointed and the outer rounded. In the Pelycosauria the humerus is
somewhat similar but less like than in Procolophon.
While it is impossible to say with certainty to which order the
new humerus belongs, we may safely affirm that it does not belong to
any of the Therapsidan groups, the humerus being well known in
the Anomodontia, Therocephalia, Dinocephalia, and Cynodontia, and
being of quite a different type. Nor is there any resemblance to the
humerus of Pareiasaurus. On the other hand, the close resemblance
to that of Procolophon, and the less-marked affinity with that of other
early Diaptosaurian types, seems to indicate that the new genus,
which I propose to call Hccasaurus, is a primative Diaptosaurian
which probably belongs to a distinct and new sub-order.
HELEOPHILUS ACUTUS, g. et sp. nov.
The type of new form is a very fragmentary skeleton found by
myself at Victoria West. It consists of a crushed skull with both
mandibles, a few very imperfect cervical vertebra, and a fragmentary
foot.
The skull, which measures 28 mm. in length and about 14 mm. in
breadth, resembles in general characters, so far as preserved, that of
Heleosaurus scholtzi. The mandibles are fairly well preserved,
portions of the premaxillaries and maxillaries, and crushed fragments
of the palate.
The premaxillary appears to have had about 3 teeth, and the
maxillary about 15. These are long rounded pointed teeth, which
when fully grown become anchylosed to the bone, as in Procolophon.
When immature they are in sockets. There are no indications of
serrations.
The neck is probably a little shorter than the head, but is so badly
preserved that it is impossible to clearly define the vertebra and to
say where it ends. The remains of a foot are seen lying a little
behind the supposed posterior end of the neck. There are four fairly
well preserved metatarsals (supposing the foot to be a posterior one),
the Ist measuring 2°7, the 2nd 5:5 apparently, the 3rd 6-7, and the
4th about 7:5. The 5th is only represented by faint indications.
The 4th supports 5 slender phalanges. The phalanges of the other
278 Annals of the South African Museum.
digits are mostly lost. There is a well-developed 1st tarsal, a small
2nd tarsal, and a large 3rd tarsal, while a fair-sized element articu-
lates behind with all three. It will be seen that the general
structure of the foot is typically Diaptosaurian and more adapted for
land progression than that of Mesosaurus.
While it is impossible to be certain of the affinities of Heleophilus,
we may, I think, safely place it near Heleosawrus, from which it
differs in having long rounded teeth, and provisionally we may put
both in the Mesosauria.
When I described Galechirus and Heleosaurus from Victoria West,
I thought it not improbable that we had here evidences of the land
forms of the Lystrosaurus fauna. Both are distinctly primitive
types, the one an ancestral Therocephalian and the other apparently
allied to Mesosaurus, and it is satisfactory to have the opinion of
Mr. A. L. du Toit, who has since visited the locality, that the
Victoria West beds are probably very low in the Beaufort series.
We are therefore safe in concluding that Heleophilus and the others
are Permian and probably Lower or Middle Permian.
(279)
(9).—On a Large Extinct Species of Bubalis—By R. Broom, D.Se.
The specimen consists of the postorbital portion of the skull with
the proximal part of the left horn core. The right side of the most
of the upper surface is missing, but the occiput is nearly complete
and much of the base of the cranium is preserved.
The large bony elevation from which the horns spring rises to a
height of 75 mm. above the roof of the brain case, and contains two
BUBALIS PRISCUS. X 4.
enormous air sinuses. Taking direction from the basi-cranial axis,
the horn core passes backwards and outwards, so that when the
skull is viewed from behind the proximal portions of the horns lie
in a horizontal line. There is some little evidence that more distally
the horn curves slightly upwards. The greatest width of the horn
core at its base is 110 mm., and the greatest thickness 63 mm. The
frontal region immediately in front of the base of the horn core
280 Annals of the South African Museum.
measures 146 mm. across. From the upper margin of the foramen
magnum to the highest point of the skull is 150 mm. The foramen
magnum itself measures at its narrowest part in the neighbourhood
of the hypoglossal foramen 32 mm. by 42 mm., while the width
across the occipital condyles is 116 mm.
The specimen was discovered by Mr. C.J. de Villiers in the banks
of the Modder River, half-way between Kimberley and Bloemfontein.
As it differs from any of the recent species and also apparently
from any of the previously known extinct forms, I propose to name
it B. priscus.
In the outward spread of the horns it resembles more the northern
forms, such as B. coket or B. swaynet, but differs markedly from both,
especially in the greater size and in having much more massive
horns. Pomel has recently described two new extinct species from
North Africa under the names Boselaphus probabalis and B. ambiguus.
Both of these resemble this South African form more closely than
any of the recent species, but both differ in the curve of the horns.
(281)
(10).— On Evidence of a Large Horse recently extinct in South Africa.
—By R. Broom, D.Sc.
About five years ago one of my students brought me a couple of
upper molars of a large horse from a superficial deposit in the
Karroo, but as they appeared to me to be those of a recent horse, no
further notice was taken of them. A couple of years later there was
found at Bloembosch, near Darling, a number of remains of a large
horse associated with the remains of Bubalus baini, and apparently
contemporaneous with the Bushmen. The front of the snout was
very appreciably larger (about 3) than that of any recent horse of
which I could obtain the skull. As, however, the horse remains
were manifestly not old geologically, and there seemed just a
possibility that they might have belonged to horses of the earlier
European settlers, I sent the specimens to Professor H. F. Osborn,
who passed them on to Professor W. B. Scott. But as neither of
these paleontologists has done anything with the specimens, I
assume that, like myself, they felt there was some doubt in the
matter.
About 18 months ago a new specimen was discovered, which
makes it pretty certain that a very large horse was a native of South
Africa before European occupation. Along the western coasts of
the Cape Colony the sand hills frequently become converted into
limestone by the infiltration of lime. In some places the limestone
forms thick beds, but in others it is present as thin layers not more
than a few inches thick. In Table Bay and along the coast to the
north there is a similar formation of limestone in the sea, as after
storms slabs of it are cast up on the shore by the waves. It is
doubtful whether this limestone has been formed in the sea, but as
in structure it appears identical with that found on the flats, it seems
more probable that it has been formed on the land and afterwards
submerged. In one of the slabs cast ashore at Yzerplaatz is the
ereater part of the left lower jaw of a large horse. The 3rd and 4th
premolars and the lst and 2nd molars are fairly well preserved, and
the 2nd premolar less satisfactorily. The 2nd premolar probably
measures about 30 mm. in length. The 3rd premolar is 33-5 mm.
282 Annals of the South African Museum.
in length, and the total height of the crown and root, even with the
surface considerably worn, is 92mm. In general pattern it agrees
closely with that of modern horses, but differs in its larger size and
in showing no trace of the rudimentary protostylid. The fold of
enamel which forms the inner wall of the hypolophid measures
18°56 mm. in length. The 4th premolar has its crown fairly well
preserved. The hypolophid is very large, and there is no trace of
a fold corresponding to the protostylid. The entostylid is small, and
the parastylid scarcely extending in front of the metaconid. The
total length of the hypolophid and the small entostylid is 20 mm.,
and the enamel fold on its inner wall is 16 mm. The whole length
of the crown is 34 mm., and the height of the crown and root is
105 mm. The Ist and 2nd molars are of equal size, measuring
30 mm. in length and 97 mm. in height.
The length from the front of the grinding surface of pm.? to the
lower side of the jaw is 110 mm. The whole length of the first five
grinding teeth is 158 mm. The six teeth probably measured 198 mm.
The average length of the molar series in Hquus caballus is 170 to
175mm. In Hquus hemionus the series measures about 158 mm.
Even in the large Hquus siwvalensis the series measures from 180 to
195. We thus seem justified in concluding that South Africa was
until recently the home of a species of horse considerably larger
than Hquus caballus, and though much more would require to be
known before it would be possible to say in how far it differed from
Equus caballus, it seems advisable to give it a distinctive name, and
I therefore propose to call it Hquus capensis.
A year ago Fraas, in a paper, ‘‘Pleistocine Fauna aus den
Diamantseifen von Siidafrika,” described some remains of pleisto-
cene South African mammals, and among them some teeth of a
species of Hcuwus. Whether this may belong to the same species
as the Yzerplaats specimen cannot at present be decided, but it
shows that a large horse was contemporaneous with a species of
Mastodon, and it seems not unlikely that it is the same horse that
is contemporaneous with Bubalus bau further south.
( 283 )
(11).—On the Shoulder Girdle of Cynognathus.—By R. Broom, D.Sc.
In 1895 Seeley described under the name Cynognathus cratero-
notus the magnificent skeleton which now adorns the British
Museum. Though the limbs are missing the skull and vertebral
column are well preserved, and the resemblance of the skeleton to
that of a large carnivorous mammal is so striking as to constantly
force on the attention the question as to whether it may not belong
to the group from which the mammals sprang. To those of us who
believe that the resemblance is not merely superficial, but denotes
a close relationship, it seems important that every detail in the
organisation of the group should be known as thoroughly as
possible.
Though the limbs are unknown in Cynognathus, Seeley has thrown
considerable light on them from specimens of other Cynodonts,
especially Microgomphodon, and I have been able to add a few more
facts in connection with Diademedon and A’lurosuchus. Still, there
are some points on which nothing is known, and others where our
knowledge is very imperfect.
Some months ago I obtained near Burghersdorp on the farm Vaal-
bank some imperfect remains of a skeleton of a species of Cynog-
nathus. The remains consist of a large part of the vertebral column
with most of the shoulder girdle and pelvis and parts of both upper
and lower limbs. The only fragments of the skull are very imper-
fect, but it is probable that they belong to Cynognathus crateronotus
or an allied species, and the scapula agrees very closely with that
of the London type. The specimen, though imperfect, is of the
greatest value, in that for the first time we obtain precise knowledge
of the structure of the shoulder girdle in a Cynodont reptile.
The scapula is already well known from Seeley’s specimen ; the
only point about which there remained any doubt being the lower
end. In both the scapule of the type there is a distinct acromion
process. In that of the right side the bone is seen to be a little
narrowed below the process and before expanding to meet the precora-
coid. In the case of the left scapula, the anterior margin of the bone
has been restored and made considerably too large and thick. In
20
284 Annals of the South African Museum.
the present specimen the margin of the bone below the acromion
is exactly as in the unrestored type scapula. About 30 mm. below
the acromion the scapula is, of course, again greatly expanded to
meet the precoracoid.
The coracoid is singularly short, and not more than about 10 mm.
is missing from the lower border of the right coracoid in the type
specimen.
The precoracoid is also comparatively small. The anterior margin
is 22 mm. in front of the foramen, and the lower margin 26 mm.
below it.
The clavicle is a short, rather stout bone, which stretches from the
acromion process down to middle line, probably meeting its neighbour
in front of the interclavicle. The upper end appears to have a broad
articulation with the acromion and the 20 mm. or so of the anterior
margin of the scapula below it. While the upper end is flattened to
fit the border of the scapula the lower end is flattened in the opposite
direction to fit the front of the interclavicle.
The interclavicle is not very well preserved, and the posterior
portion is missing, but all the important features can be made
out. It differs from that of the Monotremes in being in no way
T-shaped. It is at least 130 mm. in length, and the broadest part
in front measures 63 mm. It is a little narrower in the middle,
measuring only 45 mm. wide, but posteriorly it widens out to 60 mm.
The lower half is somewhat concave in front.
(285 )
(12).—An Attempt to Deternine the Horizons of the Fossil Vertebrates
of the Karroo.—By R. Broom, D.Sc.
Recently I made a list of the genera of the fossil vertebrates of the
Karroo, and endeavoured to place them in the various horizons.
The following is an attempt to review and determine the horizons
of the more important species.
In South Africa we have been singularly fortunate in having had
most of our types founded on skulls or teeth, so that there is no
great burden of synonymy. In the following lists, I have almost
entirely ignored types founded on vertebre or fragments of
skeletons, as most of these are probably portions of animals
already known from the skulls. In many cases it will be long
before it will be possible to identify every limb bone, but in the
large majority of cases, where new types have been founded on
limb bones or other portions of the skeleton than skulls, I have
satisfied myself that a mistake has been made in conferring a
new name.
286
Annals of the South African Museum.
Selachii.
Orpver PLAGIOSTOMI.
Hy bodusairicantis BroOme.seseeeeeeceseeceeeeee
Dipnoi.
Orper SIRENOIDEI.
Ceratodus capensis, S.-Woodward .............2.+++
Ceratodus kannemeyeri, Seeley ................0+..+
Ceratodusvormatusy brOOUl me. ee seeeceecerscetestene
Ganoidei.
Orper CROSSOPTERYGILI.
Celacanthus africanus, Broom .............0.se00-.
Orpver HETEROCERCI.
Helichthys) brown, Broomie.-ses:.ccanceseesesee eter
Helichthys draperi (S.-Woodward) ...............
Helichthys tenuis, Broom ...............s.scs+se0eee |
HMiloniehtihy sy 'Spsswcencacensemceeaeseehe stersere acetone x
Mlonichthiys, spy. -ceecessesmsnoe-eseececesseteeec ees | ?|x
Atherstonia scutata, S.-Woodward..............0s.-
Atherstonia minor, 8.-Woodward
Atherstonia seeleyi, S.-Woodward.................
Acrolepis molyneuxi, 8.-Woodward ............... lhe
Acrolepis (?) digitata, S.-Woodward ............... ?
Oxygnathus browni, Broom...............s.sseessse0+
Dictyopyge formosa, Broom .............s.ecess-ses
Orper LEPIDOSTEI.
Semionotus capensis, 8.-Woodward ..............- |
Cleithrolepis extoni, 8.-Woodward..................
Cleithrolepis minor, Broom.....:..........-.-s0c+e.s-
Hydropessum kannemeyeri, Broom ...............
Pholidophorus africanus, Broom ................+-
Ornver STEGOCEPHALIA.
Rhinesuchus whaitsi, BroOM 5.......scesss.0.se0e- | x
Rhinesuchus africanus (Lydekker)................+ ?
Cyclotosaurus albertyni, Broom.................000+
Capitosaurus africanus, Broom .................0+++
Trematosaurus kannemeyeri, Broom..............-
Batrachosuchus browni, Broom...............6+ See
Rhytidosteus capensis, Owen .............s.sseeeeees
Bothriceps major (Owen)...........ss.sssecssscs..050s
Bothriceps huxleyi, Lydekker.....................06+
Micropholisistowi,, Huxley s-.-<s-s<ssesece eee rere
Micropholis granulata (Owen)...............0+-cesere
PERMIAN.
Dwyka.
Eeea
Endothiodon Beds.
Pareiasaurus Beds.
PISCES.
AMPHIBIA.
Cistecephalus Beds.
TRIASSIC,
Lystrosaurus Beds.
=
Cynognathus Beds.
_ Procolophon Beds,
mon x K XK XK
~
|
|
x
Molteno Beds.
Red Beds.
Cave Sandstone.
Horizons of the Fossil Vertebrates of the Karroo. 987
PERMIAN. | TRIASSIC. Ces
| SRE Ele «|
S1o|S|S|o/S] . o
g)2 2/8 2/8 4), §
d| .| 2] o|-4| 2! gl 2lals| 2
4] a] 2] Oo] a) 2] 0] 5} ONS
|| S| Ba] ola] 8] 3/4] of] a
(2) S| a]212) e| es] Silk
|Q A) & | 5) 2 S| s|/s] 2| .
| & 5] 2 Sno eal To|m| 2
2/3/23) a] S| ale| | s
S| 4) .2) ml al ie)
ALE O]A) A oO
| — =
| | |
REPTILIA. | | | |
SupER-orDER COTYLOSAURIA. |
OrpeR PAREIASAURIA. |
Rareiasaunus| send cuss Owenessecssssnsssactesss ss x |
Pareiasaurus baini, Seeley ...............00-.seeee0 x
Propappus omocratus, Lydekker...................+. x
Tapinocephalus atherstonei, Owen ............... x
Suprr-orpeER THERAPSIDA.
OrpeER DROMASAURIA.
Galechinusischolizis Broombeccessssesscceee sees ?
Orper DINOCEPHALIA. |
Delphinognathus conocephalus, Seeley............ | x |
MitaAnosuchusnherox. Owen sesseesecsos aces ceceeces x |
Titanosuchus clastei, Broom ........0....0++.0-+e-- x |
Archseosuchus cairnerossi, Broom .............5+... x |
Scapanodon duplessisi, Broom .............002-000- <i
Orper THEROCEPHALIA. |
Mlopecodonypriscuss BrOom=.cers-casseecssecssseenees | x |
Alopecodon rugosus, Broom ...............scsseeee- | x |
Scylacosaurus sclateri, Broom .............2.+2+-++ ?
Pristerognathus polyodon, Seeley .............:06+ Z |
Pristerognathus baini, Broom................+++++++- |?
Pardosuchus whaitsi, Broom: ....c..c..+<--scsess-ene | x |
Scymnosaurus ferox, Broom .............-.2+0...008 x
Scymnosaurus warreni, Broom ...............2+8+++ ?
Glanosuchus macrops, Broom..........-...s...000+0+ x |
Ictidosaurus augusticeps, Broom ..............+++- zy |
AMlunosaurus telanus.) Owenk-....jcsc-.seseceseeseccee u
Gorgonops' torvas; Owen ............c00-++----06-s200- ze
Scaloposaurus constrictus, Owen ...........0.0.00 2 |
Arnognathus parvidens, Broom ...............++++ xX} |
Mrochosaurus acutusy Broom sesscseseeseeccescerc ere x
Hyznasuchus whaitsi, Broom..............0...0+-++ x
hycosuchus mackayi, Broom .............--+..+-+--- 2]
Lycosuchus vanderrieti, Broom ................++ 2|
Ictidosuchus primevus, Broom ..............06000 x |
Cynosuchus suppostus, Owen ............eeeeeesee eee |? eel
Cynodraco serridens, OWen............02s0.0+-+-+--s | x | |
Hierisuchus simuss Owen cs...peccccs-ceses-s-ce ees le |
Lycosaurus pardalis, Owen ............sseoseesseee+° lie |
Lycosaurus tigrinus, Owen ............2.essseseeseees 2 |
Lycosaurus curvimola, Owen ............ssssseseeee 2] |
Cynochampsa laniaria, Owen ........0....e0see0eeee 2] | |
Orper ANOMODONTIA. | aaa
Endothiodon bathystoma, Owen ............4606+ |x | |
|
Annals of the South African Museum.
Dwyka.
Ecca. :
Pareiasaurus Beds.
Endothiodon Beds.
Cistecephalus Beds.
PERMIAN.
TRIASSIC.
Lystrosaurus Beds.
Procolophon Beds.
Cynognathus Beds.
Molteno Beds.
JUR-
Red Beds
Cave Sandstone.
Esoterodon uniseries (OWeN) .........seeeee eee een ees
Cryptocynodon simus, Seeley .................scseeee
Prodicynodon pearstonensis, Broom ...............
Opisthoctenodon agilis, Broom .............:2068..-
Opisthoctenodon brachyops, Broom ............++
Pristerodon mackayi, Huxley ...................00.+.
Chelyoposaurus williamsi, Broom ...............6+
Dicynodon lacerticeps, Owen ............2c000+...06s
Dicynodon leoniceps, Owen ..............0..s0...eeees
Dicynodon) feliceps,tOwenl ve-aeecteacestesceiee cia ter
Dicynodon pardiceps, Owen ..........s..sesesereees
Dicynodon simocephalus, Weithofer ...............
Dicynodon latifrons, Broom.............0+...000+..+0
Dicynodontin Pens, SxLOOM a mere cssel che secretes
Dicynodon testudiceps, Owen .............s0..-s+eees
Dicynodon tiericeps, Owenlss.rccteseacsouncerelrcst
Dicynodon jouberti; BLOOM n..c-.e- cose ecco:
Oudeniodon*baimi, Owen! weesce.ccceeseels-telescatesceee
Oudenodon strigiceps, OWen .........2.2...seceeeees
Oudenodon megalops, Owen ............0sesseseeees
Oudenodon prognathus, Owen...........0......eeee
Oudenodoniereyin Owente-s -sccscsss-ocesense tener
Oudenodon' cracilis Brooms... --j-cseccneeseese ses |
Oudenodon trigoniceps, Broom ................66.++
Oudenodon megalorhinus, Broom ...............++
Oudenodon Ws.) seaess seiccccseoaeecee sce ceoas semen:
Lystrosaurus declivis (Owen) ............sseeeeeeeeee
Lystrosaurus latirostris (Owen) .............0.eee e+
Lystrosaurus microtrema (Seeley) ............-00.+
Lystrosaurus murrayi (Huxley) .............eeeee eee
Lystrosaurus boops (Owen) .............ssseeecerseees
Lystrosaurus frontalis, Cope ...........s.seeeeeeee
Lystrosaurus m’caigi (Seeley)............ssc.ssceeees
Lystrosaurus platyceps (Seeley) ...........++0e..e0+
Lystrosaurus andersoni, Broom ............++++e10+
Cistecephalus microrhinus, Owen ............+0+00
Cistecephalus leptorhinus, Owen ...........,.0+.++
Cistecephalus planiceps, Owen ..........+0...002ee
Orper CYNODONTIA.
Bauria Cynops, Broom .........2:.000...02-+00eeeeerene
Galesaurus planiceps, OWeNn ............seeeeeeeeeee
Cynognathus crateronotus, Seeley .............0.-+-
Cynognathus platyceps, Seeley ..........-.sseeeeee
Cynognathus berryi, Seeley..............0......s0000
AL lurosuchus browni, Broom ..............+-seeseree
Gomphognathus kannemeyeri, Seeley ............
Gomphognathus polyphagus, Seeley............++
|
mw xk K wx
“~
~
x
xXx xX XK
x XX
xX KX wx KX wxK
SAPS APG OS CMP Ses
ASSIC.
ae
—— ——
Horizons of the Fossil Vertebrates of the Karroo,
289
PERMIAN.
TRIASSIC.
JUR-
ASSIC.
Ecca.
Pareiasaurus Beds.
Endothiodon Beds.
Cistecephalus Beds.
Lystrosaurus Beds.
Procolophon Beds.
Cynognathus Beds.
Molteno Beds.
Red Beds
Cave Sandstone.
Diademodon mastacus, Seeley...........csceseeeeeees
Diademodon tetragonus, Seeley ........-...-:seseeee
Trirachodon kannemeyri, Seeley ..........s.+0+..-
Trirachodon berryi, Seeley «............02-..-ee+ee00
Trina chodoneminore bro lM ececrses secrete eters
Microgomphodon oligocynus, Seeley ............+++
Sesamodon browni, Broom ..............+ssesseersees
Mehmodonisiniss Broomissssescrceccmceeeeceie st cese=
Tribolodon frerensis, Seeley ............-:.seeeeeees
SupEer-orpErR DIAPSIDA.
OrpverR PROCOLOPHONTIA.
Procolophon trigoniceps, OWen .......eeseeeee steers
Procolophon baini, Broom ..........c.c0+...000eee00
Thelegnathus browni, Broom ...............seesseee.
Thelegnathus parvus, Broom ........ ...seeeeeeee ee
Saurosternon baini, Huxley ........0...+0.sseseeees
Ornper MESOSAURIA.
Mesosaurus tenuidens, GervaiS ............+...0.+0-
Mesosaurus pleurogaster, Seeley..........:.eeeeee ee
Mesosaurus capensis (Giirich)............:0e see eee ees
Heleosaurus scholtzi, Broom ............00e ese eee
Heleophilus acutus, Broom ..........eeees sees eee ees
Eunotosaurus africanus, Seeley ............-++...++
OrpeR PROTEROSUCHIA.
Proterosuchus fergusi, Broom............s.eeeeee sees
Orpen GNATHODONTIA.
IBLE) LOK MAN, IBIRCYOFAN cospopuccoooooaGoooRnaoDedcG0NC
Orper RHYNCHOCEPHALIA.
Palacrodoni brown, BrOOM) secceceeseeeceicceisneieertccte
Orper PHYTOSAURIA.
Erythrosuchus africanus, Broom ............+++++
Orpver LACERTILIA.
Paliguana whitei, Broom............sseseeeeseeeeeeees
Orper CROCODILIA.
Notochampsa longipes, Broom ...........01e..eee
Notochampsa istedana, Broom ............0:s+0s+
Orpver DIOSAURINA.
Massospondylus carinatus, Owen .............++-+.
Thecodontosaurus skiropodus (Seeley) ...... ....-
Thecodontosaurus browni (Seeley) .........-++0e+ ++
Euskelesaurus browni, Huxley .........0.......20+
Onpver unknown
Pelosuchus priscus, Broom ......-..sseeeeseeeeeee eens
Eecasaurus priscus, BroOm........ceeeseeseeeee neers
MAMMALIA.
Orper MULTITUBERCOLATA.
Tritylodon longawous, OWEN «1.0.62... eeeeeee eee ee eens
Karoomys browni, Broom ......eseeseeeree ree eee ees
KK KK KKK KX
xxxx
x
expat he Na cesar Meat
“ul Apes i. “¥ Weed ate TES i.
fe
> gly? tae
i | : ie aa x
ud
Corse
ets, ATT 4
T ton :
; 15 fy i
omit ola! Nora alone
;
he! 2 Se ore
; TP a
4 ple Gabsc to Dae Seva 7
Digit Pod Ae
4
.
Te
6
™ |e
i=
’ -
(291 )
13.—On the Dinosaurs of the Stormberg, South Africa.—By R.
Broom, M.D., D.Sc., C.M.Z.S.
(Plates XIV.-XVIL.)
THouGH the first South African Dinosaurs were discovered nearly
sixty years ago, only a very few forms have hitherto been described,
and these from very fragmentary remains.
MASSOSPONDYLUS CARINATUS, Owen.
In 1853 Mr. J. M. Orpen, Government Surveyor, discovered on
the farm Beaucherf, Harrismith, a series of fairly large bones, and
on the Harrismith commonage some smaller bones. These he
forwarded to his father, the Rev. C. E. H. Orpen, of Colesberg, who
transmitted them to Professor Owen. Owen apparently believed
that all the bones came from one spot, and regarded them as
belonging to these different genera and species which he named
Massospondylus carinatus, Pachyspondylus Orpenit, and Leptospon-
dylus capensis. No figures were given by Owen, but in 1895 Seeley
redescribed and figured the principal remains, and regarded ali as
probably belonging to one species. Huene has recently very fully
described and figured all the specimens, and agrees with Seeley that
all belong to one species, but recognises a larger and a smaller
individual. Mr. J. M. Orpen has recently given me particulars of
the finds, and it is quite evident that there are two individuals
represented, and probably only two. Unfortunately the remains of
the smaller individual are very unsatisfactory, and Owen’s genera
Pachyspondylus and Leptospondylus are founded on vertebre so
imperfect that it is doubtful if either can be regarded as satisfactory
types even if distinct from Massospondylus, and it is pretty certain
one at least is founded on remains of Massospondylus carinatus.
The small individual possibly belongs to the species I am describing
as M. harriesi.
21
292 Annals of the South African Museum.
EUSKELESAURUS BROWNI, Huxley.
ORINOSAURUS CAPENSIS, Lydekker.
Never was there a man with a greater genius for collecting than
Mr. Alfred Brown, of Aliwal North, and though Aliwal is by no
means a rich district, his perseverance during over fifty years has
been rewarded by the discovery of a large number of most interesting
remains. But valuable as his work has been, we who know the
man have some idea of what he would have done had he received
more encouragement.
When he discovered the large bones of Huskelesaurus he spent
a very considerable sum in excavating and having them sent to
England. The first consignment was sent to Sir R. Murchison,
who handed them over to Huxley for description. Huxley recognised
the remains as those of huge Dinosaurs, and named the principal
form Huskelesaurus browni. A large crushed tibia he described as
Orosaurus. A second consignment was sent to Murchison, and
the receipt of it duly acknowledged, but this lot of bones was
apparently lost. Brown sent his next consignment to Paris,
where it was described and figured by Fischer. A still later
collection was sent to Vienna. Mr. Brown informs me that all
these collections were got at the same spot, so that while it
is manifest that they are the remains of two individuals, it
is probable that the Vienna remains are parts of the type of
Euskelesaurus brownt. He further informs me that the collection
which has been lost ‘‘contained chiefly the remains of large limbs
and other massive bones.”’
Seeley, in 1894, redescribed and figured all the principal remains
of Huskelesaurus, including a further number of bones that had been
obtained by Mr. Brown. In addition, he deseribes a lower jaw and
cervical vertebra obtained at Kraai River which are doubtfully
referred to Huskelesaurus brownt. In 1905 Mr. Brown sent to the
South African Museum some further remains from Kraai River, also
believed to be Huskelesaurus, but when the remains were developed
it was found that they belonged to a new animal which was not
even a Dinosaur. This new type I named Hrythrosuchus africanus.
When the collection of fossils given by Dr. Kannemeyer to Professor
Seeley was worked up, it was found to contain much of the skeleton
of another specimen of Erythrosuchus, including the greater part of
the skull, and when the mandible was compared with that supposed
to be of Huskelesaurus, the two were seen to be practically similar.
There is thus no doubt that the mandible figured by Seeley is really
On the Dinosaurs of the Stormberg, South Africa. 293
the mandible of Hrythrosuchus and not that of Huskelesaurus. And
there is reason to suppose that the short cervical vertebra is also
that of Hrythrosuchus.
Orosaurus of Huxley was changed to Orinosaurus by Lydekker,
and the specific name capensis added. Huene has fully re-examined
all the Huskelesaurus remains, and gives a restoration of the
animal. He regards Orinosaurus capensis as but another species.
of Huskelesaurus.
HORTALOTARSUS SKIRTOPODUS, Seeley.
MASssOSPONDYLUS BROWNI, Seeley.
Hortalotarsus skirtopodus is founded on a fragment of the hind
limb of a small Dinosaur from Barkly East. Originally most of the
skeleton was in the rock, and it was regarded by the farmers as the
skeleton of a Bushman, but it is said to have been destroyed through
fear that a Bushman skeleton in the rock might tend to weaken the
religious belief of the rising generation. Huene is of opinion that
H. skirtopodus really belongs to the European genus Thecodonto-
Saurus.
In 1905 I described the hind limb, with pelvis and some vertebree
of a specimen which I thought might be referred to Hortalotarsus
skirtopodus, thinking the differences in size might be due to this
specimen being immature. If, however, Huene is right in regarding
H. skirtopodus as really a species of Thecodontosaurus, and there is
little doubt that Hortalotarsus is at least allied to Thecodontosaurus,
then the South African Museum specimen which I referred to
Hortalotarsus must be placed in a new genus.
Massospondylus browni is, like Hortalotarsus skirtopodus, only
known from a few remains. The femur, however, is well preserved,
and seems to show that the species belongs to T'hecodontosaurus, as
is maintained by von Huene.
GYPOSAURUS CAPENSIS, g. et sp. nov.
This new genus and species is founded on the South African
Museum specimen which I had referred to Hortalotarsus skirtopodus.
The two animals are of practically the same size, but the pelvis and
femur of the South African Museum specimen are very different
from those of Thecodontosaurus, and must belong to a new genus.
Among the chief characteristics of this new genus the most note-
worthy is the remarkable shape of the ilium. The iliac crest has
a greater anterior extension than in any other known carnivorous
294 Annals of the South African Museum.
Dinosaur, and the preacetubular process relatively small. The
femur is relatively stout, and has the trochanter quartus small and
high up, and the trochanter major almost rudimentary.
All the remains of any importance are figured in a paper in the
Trans. South African Phil. Soc., vol. xvi., pt. 3, 1906.
GRYPONYX AFRICANUS, g. et sp. nov.
Recently there was discovered on the farm of Mr. J. L. Harries,
Foutani, near Fouriesburg, in the Orange Free State, a considerable
number of remains of Dinosaurs, and the more accessible have been
excavated by Mr. A. R. Walker, of the South African Museum,
with Mr. Harries’ assistance. All the remains are from the Red
beds.
The most important is a large carnivorous Dinosaur allied to
Plateosaurus of Europe, but apparently belonging to a new genus
and species which I have named as above. The anterior half of the
animal has been lost, but Mr. Walker and Mr. Harries were suc-
cessful in obtaining both the right and left manus, most of the dorsal
vertebra, the whole pelvis, both hind limbs, and the right pes. The
greater part of the tail had to be left in the rock, as, owing to its
passing straight into the cliff, it could not have been all removed
except at very great expense.
The vertebre have not yet been completely developed, but so far
as can be seen they appear to agree fairly closely with those of
Plateosaurus.
The radius and ulna are both well preserved in their distal halves,
but imperfect proximally. The shapes of the distal ends are seen
in the figures.
In the carpus there are seven elements, and though there is some
doubt concerning the determination of one or two, most can be
determined with certainty and the others with much probability.
The Ist, 2nd, and 3rd distal carpalia are in undisturbed relations
with the metacarpals, and there can be practically no doubt about
them. All the proximal carpals are small, and in the specimen
three lie below the end of the radius. These I believe to have been
displaced and to be the radiale, the intermedium, and the ulnare.
While this seems to be the natural determination of the three
proximal elements, it is confirmed by the fact that they can be
fitted in their natural position on the proximal side of the distal
carpalia. The 7th element is small, and from its situation by the
side of the 3rd carpale it is evidently the 4th carpale.
On the Dinosaurs of the Stormberg, South Africa. 295
Assuming these determinations to be correct the elements may be
described as follows :—
Radiale-—A very small lenticular bone measuring 10 mm. in
length and about 4 mm. in greatest thickness. It has probably
been imbedded in cartilage, and lay in a concavity on the upper
side of the inner half of the large 1st distal carpale.
Intermedium.—A moderate-sized bone, which appears to have
lain on the proximal side of the outer fourth of the Ist carpale.
Ulnare.—This is roughly about the same size as the intermedium,
The outer and under side is concave as if to fit a part of the
cartilage of the 4th carpale. It appears to have articulated with
the 2nd and 38rd carpalia.
1st carpale.——This is a very large bone which distally articulates:
with most of the end of the large 1st metacarpal and with half of the
proximal end of the 2nd carpale. Proximally it articulates with the
largely cartilaginous radiale and the intermedium. It seems, how-
ever, pretty certain that the lower half of the proximal end articu-
lated with the radius when the hand was flexed. The greatest
length of the bone is 56 mm., and the greatest thickness between
the dorsal and ventral sides about 35 mm. Between the proximal
and distal surfaces the greatest measurement is 20 mm.
2nd carpale.—This is a little less than half the size of the Ist
carpale. On the dorsal side it is narrow, and fits in between the
lst carpale and the end of the 2nd metacarpal, but on the palmar
surface it is broad and underlies a part of the metacarpal.
3rd carpale.—This appears on the dorsal surface larger than the
2nd, but on the palmar surface rather smaller. On the ulnar and
proximal side there is a small concavity which probably articulated
with the large and mainly cartilaginous 4th carpale.
4th carpale is a small flattened spheroidal bone about 12 mm. in
length and 7 mm. thick. It was probably imbedded in a large
amount of cartilage.
The 1st metacarpal is a large bone, measuring in greatest length
64 mm. and about 54 mm. in width. The distal articular end is
divided into a large portion on the ulnar side and a small portion
on the radial. The Ist phalanx of the Ist digit has a very broad
proximal end measuring about 47 mm. Distally there is a bilobed
articulation for the large claw, which is so arranged that the claw
must have pointed downwards and towards the radial side. The
length of the bone is 63 mm. The 2nd phalanx is the huge claw of
the pollex. The proximal end measures 52 mm. in depth and about
28 mm. in greatest width. There is a very large bony process for
296 Annals of the South African Museum.
the insertion of the flexor tendon. The curve on the upper side of
the claw is part of a circle with a radius of about 60 mm. On the
radial side is a marked vascular groove, which runs nearly to the
point. The claw appears to have been able to move on the phalanx
through about 60°. The greatest length is about 105 mm.
The 2nd metacarpal measures 80 mm. in length, and 39 mm. in
breadth at its proximal end and 35 mm. at its distal. It articulates
proximally with the small 2nd carpale. The upper side of the distal
end has the articular surface extending back for 20 mm., so that the
1st phalanx could have been bent back to about 75°.
The 1st phalanx is a short powerful bone measuring 42 mm. in
length. At the proximal end it measures 30 mm. in width and
28 mm. in depth. The distal end measures 28 mm. in width and
20 min. deep.
The 2nd phalanx measures 35 mm. in length. The proximal end
is 25 mm. by 25 mm., and the distal 23 mm. by 20 mm.
The terminal phalanx probably measured 65 mm. in length and
the proximal end 20 mm. by 32 mm.
The 38rd digit is rather more slender than the 2nd. The meta-
carpal is 75 mm. long. The proximal end is 38 mm. wide, and the
distal end 30 mm. The articular surface on the distal end does not
extend down the upper surface as in the 2nd metacarpal, and the
1st phalanx could probably not bend back more than 25°, nor could
it have been flexed more than 30°.
The following are the measurements of the phalanges of the 3rd
digit :—
Proximal Proximal Distal Distal
Length. Width. Depth. Width. Depth.
Ist phalanx ...... 32 mm. 24 mm. 18 mm. 22 mm.13 mm.
2nd phalanx ...... 95. *2- QO. lO seine Soe ae eee
3rd phalanx ...... Dae ngs AT cee 9 IS eo ee eller eal oe
Claw phalanx ... 43 ,, 14 ,, 20 — —
In the 3rd digit very littie extension beyond the straight was
possible, and the amount of flexion was limited to about 45°
in the case of the claw, and about 30° in the case of the
phalanges.
In the best-preserved foot the 4th and 5th digits seem to have
been affected with arthritis, and the phalanges are deformed. In
this left foot the 4th digit has only one phalanx and the 5th two.
In the right foot the 8rd digit has evidently had the toe cut off
beyond the Ist phalanx, as it alone remains, and the distal articular
On the Dinosaurs of the Stormberg, South Africa. 297
surface has been completely destroyed. The 4th digit is apparently
complete and uninjured, but has only three phalanges, and the last
is rudimentary and had no claw. The 5th digit in both feet has
only two phalanges.
The digital formula for the manus would thus be 2, 3, 4, 3, 2.
The following are the measurements of the bones of the 4th and
5th digits—the former taken from the left and the latter from the
right foot :—
Proximal Proximal Distal Distal
Length. Wioath. Depth. Width. Depth.
4th metacarpal... 50mm. 35mm. —mm. 26mm, —mm.
Ist‘phalanx ...... 25.457 20ers Jo ee ed bee
2nd phalanx ...... [9 3. 15) Ales S ies ie bees
3rd phalanx ...... rudimentary.
5th metacarpal... 38 mm. 34 ,, — ,, AG, a ==
Ist phalanx ...... DO ee oan. Se ie OE
2nd phalanx ...... rudimentary.
The pelvis is fairly well preserved, but a little distorted. The
pubes and ischia of both sides are complete, and the greater part of
both ilia are present. In fact, the only part that requires to be
restored is the tip of the anterior process of the iliac crest. The
right ilium has the base of the anterior process preserved, and
the left ilium the greater part of the iliac crest; so that the small
missing part can be restored with much probability.
The iliac crest is much straighter than in Plateosaurus or
Teratosaurus, and the anterior iliac spine is unusually small. The
acetabulum is large, and the portions of the ilium which form both
its anterior and posterior walls are well developed.
The pubes and the ischia form a complete symphysis, with no
opening of any sort in it from the front of the pubis to the posterior
end of the ischium. The upper end of the pubis is large and fairly
flat and forms a wide angle with its neighbour. It has a large
nearly round pubic foramen. The anterior portion of the pubis
is broad and flat, the two together at their narrowest part
measuring 122 mm. across. The greatest length of the pubis
435 mm.
The ischium is rather shorter than the pubis. In general shape
it fairly resembles that of Sel/osawrus and Plateosaurus. Its anterior
part has a long articulation with the pubis extending from the
acetabulum to the symphysis. The greatest length of the ischium
is 405 mm. The greatest measurement across the two ischia where
298 Annals of the South African Museum.
they meet the ilia is 185 mm., and the narrowest measurement
across the two bones near the middle of the posterior portion is
50 mm.
Both femora are nearly completely preserved, but both are much
crushed and in opposite ways. The femur resembles pretty closely
that of Plateosaurus, differing so far as can be seen only in the
trochanter minor being smaller and in the third trochanter being
more to the inner side of the bone. The one femur measures
535 mm. in length and the other 550 mm.
The tibia has a larger head than appears to be the case in Plateo-
saurus, but otherwise presents no specially interesting features.
The total length of the bone is 447 mm., and the proximal end
measures 163 mm. by 71 mm.
The fibula is a long slender bone, which is slightly expanded at
its distal end and much flattened out at its proximal end. It
measures 413 mm. in length.
The tarsus is not well preserved. The tibiale is of the usual
shape and has been pretty closely united to the tibia.
The pes is complete, but some of the bones are slightly
crushed.
The 1st metatarsal is a rather flat oblong bone. The upper end
fits into a hollow on the inner side of the 2nd metatarsal. The
greatest breadth of the proximal end is 59 mm. and the greatest
thickness 21 mm. The total length of the bone is 112mm. The
distal end is somewhat oblique. It measures in greatest breadth
60 mm. and in greatest thickness 26 mm.
The 2nd metatarsal has an irregular quadrangular proximal end.
The breadth across the plantar surface is 50 mm. and across the
dorsal probably 30 mm. The depth of the proximal end is across
the most remote angles about 74mm. The greatest length of the
bone is 187 mm. The distal end measures in greatest breadth
64 mm.
The 8rd metatarsal has a narrow irregularly triangular proximal
end measuring about 40 mm. by 62 mm. The total length measures
203 mm. The distal end measures 50 mm. across.
The 4th metatarsal is much flattened. The proximal end measures
78 mm. across by about 36 mm. deep. The length of the bone is
166 mm. and the distal end measures 52 mm. in breadth.
The 5th metatarsal is a short irregular triangular bone. The
proximal end measures 66 mm. in breadth, and total length of the
bone is 113 mm.
The following are the measurements of the phalanges :---
On the Dinosaurs of the Stormberg, South Africa. 299
Proximal Distal
Length, Width. Width.
Ist digit 1st phalanx......... 7imm. 43mm. 38 mm.
2nd phalanx......... about 110 -,, Sys, _-
2nd digit Ist phalanx......... Via 49" 40 ,,
2nd phalanx......... oot ay ae as 38 tn
ard phalanx.....5.05 about 99 ,, DAO aur —
3rd digit. 1st phalanx......... ieee 08 4; SO 45
2nd phalanx......... on. 40: 5; Pa bac
ord phalanx......... Ca en BOL ie 28 ,,
4th phalanx......... about 7%. = aAO lie st —
4th digit lst phalanx......... (we eee een.
2nd plelanx.s.2.7-2. Ages. 315 ean 2S,
ord phalanx ....... oO! | 3) Ore DAD Maken
4th phalanx......... of a: 29, BB) ep
oth phalanx......... about 68 ,, DA —
Oth digit lst phalanx......... rudimentary.
Perhaps the most interesting point in connection with the
phalanges is the fact that the claw of the 2nd digit has got a sharp
outer side and a rounded inner side. This same condition is found
in Massospondylus harriesi and A’tonyx palustris. There seems to
be little doubt that the digit had a claw with a combing or scraping
edge such as is seen in many birds, and the question arises, What
had the Dinosaur to comb? We seem justified in concluding that
the dermal covering was probably of a different nature from the
scales seen in lizards and crocodiles. As the combing claw is only
on the 2nd digit it had clearly nothing to do with scraping the ground
or digging, and from analogy with the bird and marsupials almost
certainly was used for cleaning the skin and scales. Probably the
skin had elongated scales with soft skin between. This would admit
of greater freedom of movement and, like the feathers of birds, would
require to be cleaned after the animals had been hunting their prey
on the muddy banks of the lakes.
MAsSOSPONDYLUS HARRIESI, Sp. Nov.
This Dinosaur, which was also discovered on the farm of Mr.
Harries, resembles Massospondylus carinatus sufficiently closely to
suggest the advisability of placing it at least provisionally in the
same genus. The remains consist of an imperfect humerus, a nearly
perfect radius and ulna, and a perfect manus, as well as portions of
the femur and tibia, and a number of toe bones all of one individual,
and the perfect pes of another individual.
300 Annals of the South African Musewm.
The humerus has lost the upper third, but the lower two-thirds,
including delto-pectoral ridge, is perfect. In general shape it
resembles considerably the humerus of Plateosauwrus reinigert, but is
only about half the size. The narrow part of the shaft is relatively
a little thickerin the present species, the lower end of the bone is
broader and the delto-pectoral ridge is narrower, and is more directly
continuous with the head of the bone. The following are some of
the principal measurements :—
Probable greatest length .................:cceeeeeeeees 220 mm.
Breadth vatidistalsend! (feet secsseecereenenestner le as
Width at narrowest part of shaft .................. 32°5 ,,
Width at top of pectoral ridge.....................++- oe
From lower end of pectoral ridge to furthest part
OL distalvend< 25.22. 2cce¢ coco nostiaene en ear 125
The left ulna is almost perfect, only a small portion of the proximal
end being lost, and the left radius is even better preserved. This is
the more satisfactory in that in Massospondylus carinatus neither the
radius nor ulna is known, and in the other Triassic Dinosaurs the
bones of the forearm are rarely well preserved. In Pachysaurus
ajax both radius and ulna are known, but they are considerably
distorted. In Plateosawrus quenstedti they are better preserved.
In Massospondylus harriest the radius is nearly straight, slightly
broadening at the upper and lower ends. The upper end has a
deep concavity for the condyle of the humerus. On the posterior
and inner side of the upper third is an oblique groove, probably for
the attachment of the biceps or humero-antibrachialis. The lower
end of the bone is curved outwards a little, and the large articular
surface looks somewhat forwards.
The ulna is in its upper half nearly twice as broad as the radius.
The lower end has the same peculiar twist already seen in Gryponyz,
but here it is more marked. The distal fourth of the bone is rotated
about 40° to the right.
The following are the principal measurements of the bones :—
Greatest length of radius .................. probably 128 mm.
Width atsproxtmaliemd sos 252 estes sas alana eer BO 5
Width atidistalvend)) o22.255ce<tasctscss sonst tenes see dl
Width imlanid dle iof'sinait: 2.52) ssa eee 9
Greatest length of uloa .2..2.. 120.0053. .e: probably 134 ,,
Width: at,proximalvemdl: tcc 7oss-a. toate ence ee OT
Width at distal emd) 20222022. svantee ae eee oes 41
Width in narrowest part of shaft..................... 25
On the Dinosaurs of the Stormberg, South Africa. 301
The carpus is imperfect and the rudimentary phalanx of the 5th
digit lost, but otherwise the whole of the left manus is perfect, and
the bones are so well preserved that it is possible to fit all the bones
in true position so that a better idea of the shape of the hand can be
obtained than in any other known specimen.
The 1st carpale is concavo-convex in front, like the saddle-shaped
end of the centrum of the vertebra of a bird, and convex behind. It
measures 36 mm. by 24 mm.
The 2nd carpale is a curved bone with a sharp upper end and
a broad square lower end. It fits in between the 1st metacarpal,
the Ist carpale, and the 3rd carpale. Its greatest depth is 24 mm.,
and the lower end measures 13 mm. by 13 mm.
The 1st metacarpal is short and broad, and is remarkable for the
very small size of the inner distal condyle. The greatest length is
39 mm. and the proximal breadth 36 mm.
The Ist phalanx of the 1st digit measures, greatest length 42 mm.,
proximal breadth 31 mm., distal breadth 27 mm. It is much less
twisted than in Gryponyx, so that when the digit is flexed the claw
passes nearly directly downwards. When extended, however, the
claw is directed about 45° inwards. The claw measures 72 mm. in
length, and the proximal end measures 38 mm. by 21 mm.
The measurements of the other metacarpals and phalanges are as
follows :—
Greatest Proximal Distal
Leovgth. > Width. Width.
PMOemMehACAT pal see. csse. «ce: 49 mm. 32 mm. 27 mm.
Ist phalanx ...... son KS) on 2 See IS)
Amd. plialeiax, 2y.2.0.4- 2 ills fee IBY a
Ungual phalanx ... 465 ,, proximal end 22 x 13
ord metacarpal ......:...:.... 45 ,. 28 mm. 19mm.
listepnalamxees..cesa: iis}. iGaeee 3 es
And phalanx .......-: Ome la lig
ord phalanx eye... Hey Fa es il
Ungual phalanx ... 27 ,, proximal end 13 x 10
4th metacarpal ........22.-:- Sil ay 21 mm. 13 mm.
liste oliallaiaxg esse ey fille ) se
2nd phalanx 22......: 1@ 5, Sie. 6 |;
ord phalanx <..:.20.. Ome (aj ae =
SJtametacarpall:t:.......02--2 7S eee DDE NES ANG ae
list phalanx .....:... 1UGy. Sp 14 ,, ial
and phalanx <....-..% rudimentary, lost.
302 Annals of the South African Museun.
From the structure of the manus it is quite manifest that it could
rest on the ground and support the weight of the body. In my
opinion the foot did not rest, as believed by von Huene, on the palm,
but was quite as digitigrade as the hind foot. My reasons for this
conclusion are that it is impossible to fit the metacarpals together
satisfactorily so that they could lie on a flat surface, whereas if they
are arranged in digitigrade fashion they fit accurately, the ends
resting on one plane.
When the foot is placed on the ground the Ist large digit probably
bears none of the weight, though possibly the side of the toe may
touch the ground. The large claw curves inwards, and may also
touch the ground, though it bears none of the weight. The balls of
the 2nd, 8rd, 4th, and 5th toes, with probably a palmar pad and the
short 4th and 5th digits carry all the weight. The 2nd digit is
doubtless considerably extended, so that it makes an angle of about
80° with the metacarpal, and the claw is flexed so that it may just
touch the ground. The 3rd digit is less extended, and probably to a
considerable extent rests on the ground. The penultimate phalanx
is more extended and the short claw flexed. The 4th digit has no
claw and rests flat on the ground. The short 5th digit, which has a
stout proximal phalanx and probably a single rudimentary distal one,
also rests on the ground.
When the animal is standing on its hind feet the digits are
probably more flexed, and when catching its prey all three claws
can be brought to work together by flexion, but for satisfactory
prehension it is necessary for the two hands to work together.
Probably the animal caught its prey with its hands and killed and
tore it up by blows from one or other of the hind feet.
The femur is imperfect, all the portion above the lower trochanter
being lost. The lower half is considerably stouter in relation to its
length than in either Gryponyx, Massospondylus carinatus, or Plateo-
saurus. It is, as preserved, somewhat distorted, but the measure-
ments are as follows :—
Distal end to lower end of trochanter............... 155 mm.
Width of distaltend as crushed! ......ss2--e- eae 4,
Probable widthiol umcerushed: \......ss.e.6-sc20-" sees SO
Greatest width of narrowest part of shaft......... AD: ie 95
The proximal end of the left tibia is preserved in good condition
It measures 102 mm. by 52 mm.
On the Dinosaurs of the Stormberg, South Africa. 303
The whole of the pes except the tarsal elements is known in
perfect condition, though probably the metatarsals are slightly
crushed proximally.
The Ist metatarsal is 87 mm. in length, the proximal end is
40 mm., and the distal end 36 mm. wide. The upper end fits into
a deep concavity on the inner side of the 2nd metatarsal.
The 2nd metatarsal has the proximal end irregularly quadrangular,
with the one diagonal considerably longer than the other. The
greatest width is 63 mm. The greatest length is 138 mm., and the
distal end measures 39 mm. across.
The 3rd metatarsal has the proximal end irregularly triangular.
The greatest measurement across the upper end is 45 mm. The
total length of the bone is 154 mm., and the distal end measures
38 mm. in width.
_ The 4th metatarsal has the head greatly flattened—partly, per-
haps, increased by crushing. The greatest length of this end is
55mm. ‘The total length of the bone is 135 mm., and the width of
the distal end is 31 mm.
The 5th metatarsal measures 75 mm. in length. The proximal
end is 44 mm. and the distal end 185 mm. across.
On the whole there is much resemblance between the metatarsals
of Massospondylus harriesi and those of Teratosaurus trossingensis,
though the latter is about twice as large.
The following are the principal measurements of the phalanges :—
Proximal Distal
Length. Breadth. Breadth.
Ist digit lst phalanx......... 45mm. 32mm. 25mm.
Claws osteeeits.e oe about 68 __,, Dien =
2nd digit 1st phalanx...... .. 48 ,, Omer BY) pe
2nd phalanx......... oOu ote ae Diary
Clawiee evo 62F 3 DAM —
3rd digit lst phalanx......... AS ae ath) A aon
2nd phalanx 2.2..c0- 315) ap 310) ap Oe
ord plalanmxe.cses Que «53 2S mae Dah OF
Clawasaensesne scenes oillte. Dy) ee =
4th digit lst phalanx......... 49, Sle Tila
2nd phalanx......... 30) ae. 2 24s
3rd phalanx......... YS) INBY ne Dil ae
4th phalanx......... PAST IQ a LORE a
@laweeresosnteeeete 48, AEN ies as
5th digit 1st phalanx......... NP a ee =
304 Annals of the South African Museum.
ANTONYX PALUSTRIS, g. et sp. nov.
In the collection made by Mr. Walker are the remains of a third
species of carnivorous Dinosaur much smaller than either of the
other two species, and differing from both considerably in the pro-
portions of the limbs. There are preserved the following bones :
A few imperfect dorsal vertebrae, a good scapula and coracoid, a.
good humerus, a good radius and imperfect ulna, the greater part.
of each manus, the upper end of one tibia, and the almost complete
right pes.
The dorsal vertebra agrees in most respects with those of other
carnivorous Dinosaurs. The centrum is much flattened and agrees
closely with that of Celophysis, and apparently with Anchisaurus.
It measures in length 45 mm., and in its narrowest middle part
11 mm. across. The greatest depth of the articular end is 30 mm.
The length from the one zygapophysis to the other is about 57 mm.,
and the measurement from the one transverse process to the other
about 37 mm.
The scapula is well preserved, only a very little being lost from:
its upper end. In general shape the bone resembles that of Masso-
spondylus more than that of any other known type. The lower end
is very broad, being nearly three times as broad as the middle of the
bone is narrow. As preserved the scapula measures 185 mm. in
length, and possibly originally measured 210 mm. The width of the
narrowest part of the bone is 30 mm. and the width of the lower end
87 mm.
The coracoid is almost perfect. It measures antero-pos-
teriorly 102 mm. and in depth at the region of the foramen
58 mm.
The humerus is perfect except for a small fragment missing from:
both ends. It agrees pretty closely with the Plateosaurian type,
but has the part below the delto-pectoral crest relatively rather
shorter. The greatest length of the humerus is 174mm. From the
lower end of the delto-pectoral ridge to the upper end of the bone:
is 101 mm. The width of the lower end is 57 mm.
The radius and ulna are relatively very short. The radius.
measures only 96 mm. in greatest length.
The first distal carpal measures 28 mm. by 19 mm. and is
9 mm. thick. What are probably the 2nd and 3rd carpals are
preserved, but as they are not in position the identification is.
doubtful.
The manus is fully preserved with the exception of the 3rd meta--
On the Dinosaurs of the Stormberg, South Africa. 305
carpal, most of the 4th metacarpal, and the phalanges of the 4th
and 5th digits.
The 1st metacarpal is in general shape much like that of Masso-
spondylus, but differs in that its proximal outer corner ends in a
point. In this it also differs from Gryponyx. The 1st phalanx
differs from that of Massospondylus harriesi in being relatively
longer and more slender.
The 2nd digit is relatively more slender than in Massospondylus
harriesi, and the claw is unlike that of either Massospondylus or
Gryponyx, about the same length as the penultimate phalanx. The
claw is further remarkable from the fact that the vascular grooves
meet each other on the upper side near the union of the middle and
distal third, leaving the upper part of the claw separated from the
lower, something like the horn of a hornbill.
The 8rd digit is a little shorter than the 2nd, and the phalanges
are narrow and slender.
The 5th metacarpal is not unlike that of Massospondylus harriest,
but considerably smaller.
The following are the principal measurements of the bones of the
manus :—
Greatest Proximal Distal
Length. Width. Width.
dUSin VamVenieN ceo Of2h Claas amen aE eee 34 mm. 33 mm. 15mm.
Ist phalanx ......... 35,5 28. 4; 21 ,,
Ungual phalanx ... 61 (approx.) 19 _,, —
2nd metacarpal......:.:22.-..- 42 mm. 2655, Dae
listpphalansx <2. 2... Dy an 20, LS: ae
2nd phalanx ......... DAS) 17 (approx.). 15 _,;
Ungual phalanx ... 32 (approx.) 11 mm. —-
3rd metacarpal missing.
list phalanx ¢20 cc... 19 mm. ae 13mm,
Ind phalanx «....:.:. dS ere IQ TE ee
ard phalanx. 22. 2.-5... 1op pes 10 vee et
Ungual phalanx ... 25 (approx.) 8 ,, —
4th metacarpal and phalanges fragmentary or missing.
Sth metacarpal ............... 26 mm. 20 mm. 15. 55
Phalanges missing.
The right hind foot is nearly complete, but the metatarsals have
been broken across the middle, and the 4th is very badly
crushed.
306 Annals of the South African Musewm.
The following are the principal measurements of the bones :—
Greatest Proximal Distal
Length. Width. Width.
Ist metatarsal ......... 80 mm. ? crushed 30 mm.
1st phalanx ...... AAS 27 mm. 2 aes
Ungual phalanx 58 (approx.) 20 _,, —
Indsmetabarsallt..cse... 123 mm. Diss gh. 29) 5;
Ist phalanx ...... 44 ,, a0) 4 280 =
Qnd phalanx ... 34 ,, D5 Dar
Ungual phalanx 55 (approx.) 20 _,, —
3rd metatarsal .....:... 130 mm. 2a 35 (crushed)
Ist phalanx...... 45 ,, 20 ,, 27 mm.
2nd phalanx ...° 35° ,, Ses Oar
3rd phalanx...... 5 ae 21 206
Ungual phalanx 48 (approx.) 18 _,, “=
4th metatarsal ......... 117 (crushed) 44 (much crushed) 23. ,,
1st phalanx...... 35 mm. Imperfect 24s.
2nd phalanx ... 28 ,, 24 (approx.) mm. 23 ,,
3rd phalanx...... Diss 21 mm. Dales
4th phalanx...... 23 ,, Loss 1St ts;
Ungual phalanx 37 (approx.) 15 _,, —
Oth metatarsal ......... 65 mm. (crushed, imperfect)
Rudimentary phalanx missing.
GERANOSAURUS ATAVUS, g. et sp. nov.
The remains of this small Dinosaur were got by Mr. G. 8. T.
Mandy in the road-cutting near the summit of the Barkly Pass in
Elliot. The collection of bones consists of badly crushed fragments
of a skull with the anterior part of the lower jaw fairly well pre-
served, some slender birdlike hind-limb bones, and a number of very
imperfect vertebre. The vertebree seem too large to have belonged
to the skull, and there being thus some doubt about the bones being
those of one animal I think it better to describe the jaw-bones alone
and to make them the type.
As preserved, the lower jaw has the left dentary fairly complete
with a considerable portion of the right and the predentary nearly
perfect.
The predentary has its upper surface displayed, which is concave.
It is 12 mm. long and the same in width. The outer and anterior
edges are sharp and doubtless formed a horny beak.
The dentary as preserved measures 73 mm. in length, and there
On the Dinosaurs of the Stormberg, South Africa. 307
is probably but little missing from the posterior end. The anterior
half bears 9 teeth which have rounded roots in sockets. The teeth
in the fragment of the maxilla have flat chisel-shaped crowns with
the outer face feebly ridged. Probably those of the mandible were
similar in this respect. The most remarkable thing about the denti-
tion is that the most anterior of the teeth is larger than the others,
and may be looked on as a canine. The total length of the dental
series is 35 mm. Most of the teeth have a diameter of between
3 and 4 mm., but the anterior tooth has a diameter of 5 mm.
The specimen is from the Cave sandstone of the Stormberg Series,
which, in my opinion, is of Lower Jurassic Age. Formerly the
bed was believed to be Triassic, but the discovery in it of a
true Crocodile (Notochampsa) seems to show that we should regard
it as Lower Jurassic. And this discovery of a Predentate Dino-
saur seems to confirm the conclusion. Even considering the sand-
stone as Lower Jurassic, Geranosaurus would still be the earliest
known member of the Predentata.
All the specimens are in the paleontological series of the South
African Museum, except those represented in figures 2, 3, 5, 18 and
23, which are in the Government Museum, Bloemfontein.
LITERATURE.
In Baron von Huene’s recent magnificent work, ‘‘ Die Dinosauriex
der Europiiischen Triasformation”’ a full list is given of the litera-
ture of the South African Stormberg Dinosaurs and of the allied
forms of Europe and America.
io.)
18.
9:
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
(308 )
REFERENCES TO PLATES.
Puate XIV.
. Left side of pelvis of Gryponyx africanus. x °16.
. Outer view of left femur of Gryponyx africanus. x ‘15.
. Posterior view of left femur of Gryponyz africanus. x °15.
. Outer view of left tibia of Gryponyx africanus. x °15.
. fibula of Gryponyx africanus. x :15.
. Right pes of Gryponyx africanus. x *29.
PratE XV.
. Left manus of Gryponyx africanus. x ‘39. The hand is represented with
the bones of the forearm and digits lying in one plane. The carpal
elements are placed in what appears to be the natural position.
. Portion of manus of Gryponyx africanus, with the carpals represented in the
position in which they were found.
. Left Ist metacarpal of Gryponyx africanus. Nat. size.
. Left lst metacarpal of Massospondylus carinatus. Nat. size.
. Left lst metacarpal of Wassospondylus harriest. Nat. size.
. Left lst metacarpal of #tonyx palustris. Nat. size.
Prate XVI.
. Left humerus of Massospondylus harriesi. x *54.
. Distal end of humerus of MW. harriesi. x *65
. Left ulna of MW. harriesi. x °71.
. Left radius of M. harriesit. x ‘71.
. Left manus of MW. harriesi. x ‘66. The hand is represented with what
appears to be the natural position of the bones when the limb rested on the
eround. The metacarpals and the penultimate phalanges of the 2nd and
3rd digits are considerably foreshortened.
Puate XVII.
Right pes of Massospondylus harriest. x °35.
Right scapula and coracoid of Mtonyx palustris. x °38.
Right humerus of tonyx palustris. x ‘41.
Right radius of Mtonyx palustris. x ‘41.
Distal portion of right ulna of Htonyx palustris. x ‘41.
Left manus of tony palustris. x °42.
Imperfect lower jaw of Geranosaurus atavus, About nat. size. The predentary
is seen in front.
Pix
Ann.S. Afr. Mus.Vol.VIL.
West, Newman lith.
R.Broom del.
Fig. 1-6 Gryponyx africanus.
Ann.S. Afr. Mus. Vol. VII.
‘stdisnjted xAuoyw 2, 61g
Tselddey snjApuodsossep, JT big
‘snyeutzeo snjApuodsossep, op bt snueolaje xAUOdAdy 6-/
8
cheap
West, Newman lith.
R.Broom del.
R.Broom del.
a
ei TT a
PLGA:
iesi.
Fig.13-17 Massospondylus harr
West, Newman lith.
Ann. S. Afr Mus.Vol. VII. pa AVAIL,
R. Broom del. West, Newman lith.
Fig.18 Massospondylus harriesi. Fig.19-23 Aitonyx palustris.
Fig.24 Geranosaurus atavus.
( 309 )
14.—Description of a New Plesiosaur (Plesiosaurus capensis,
sp. nov.) from the Uitenhage Beds of Cape Colony.—By C. W.
AnpREws, D.Sc., F.R.S., of the British Museum (Natural
History).
(Plate XVIII., text-Figs. 1-4.)
In the Annual Report of the Geological Commission of the Cape
of Good Hope for 1900 (1901) Messrs. Rogers and Schwarz*
announced the discovery of the remains of a Plesiosaurian reptile,
which were found by Mr. Schwarz in a cliff at Picnic Bush, in
the valley of the Zwartzkops River, between Uitenhage and the
sea. The deposit in which the fossil was. found is described as a
nodular clay-limestone, and belongs to the Sunday River beds of the
Uitenhage Series. The age of this series seems now to have been
fairly definitely settled by Dr. Kitchin | as the Upper Velangian and
Lower Hauterivian horizons of the Neocomian ; that is to say, corre-
sponding in age to some part, probably the upper, of the Wealden
beds of England.
So far as Iam aware, this is the first mention of the occurrence
of a Plesiosaurian in South Africa. The discovery is afterwards
again referred to in Rogers’ and du Toit’s ‘‘ Introduction to the
Geology of Cape Colony,” p. 331 (2nd ed., 1909).
The specimens were entrusted to the late Professor H. G. Seeley
for description, but unfortunately he died before any account of
them had appeared. Afterwards, through the kindness of Dr. A. W.
Rogers, the material passed into my hands, and the present paper
contains the resuits of my examination of the remains.
Originally the bones seem to have been embedded in hard matrix
at least to a large extent, but much of this has been successfully
removed, and a considerable part of the skeleton is now visible.
The parts preserved are—skull, part of the mandible, some teeth,
* Appendix I., Report on the Survey of Parts of the Uitenhage and Port Eliza-
beth Divisions, p. 8.
+ Kitchin, Ann. 8. African Museum, vol. vii. (1908), ‘‘ The Invertebrate Fauna
and Paleontological Relations of the Uitenhage Series,” p. 21.
310 Annals of the South African Museum.
limb bones, including portions of the femora, tibia, fibule, and a
number of phalanges. These show that the animal was a typical
Plesiosaur, and, in the absence of the pectoral girdle, 1 see no
sufficient reason to regard it as other than a species of the genus
Plesiosaurus. It will be shown below that it differs in several
respects from other known species from approximately contem-
porary deposits, and it is therefore regarded as a new species, for
which the name Plesiosaurus capensis is suggested.
The skull (Pl. XVIIL., Fig. 1, text-Fig. 1) is in a fair state of preserva-
tion: nearly the whole of the palatal surface can be seen, but of the
dorsal surface the greater part of the left side is concealed by the
neural spines of six dorsal vertebree which have been crushed down
upon it. Part of the sub-orbital region of the right side and the
right zygomatic arch are missing, and the zygoma of the left side is
in part concealed by matrix. Between the temporal fosse the
parietals probably formed a well-marked sharp crest, but for the
most part this has been broken away. The snout is narrow, and at
the point where the maxillo-premaxillary suture crosses the alveolar
border there is a slight.constriction. The greatest width of the
skull is between the outer ends of the quadrates, and this measure-
ment is to the length of the skull from the occipital condyle to the
tip of the snout, about as 2 to 3.
The basi-occipital (b.oc.) appears to bear the whole of the occipital
condyle, which is sessile and considerably wider than high. Beneath
the condyle there is a narrow vertical surface, running out laterally
on to the posterior face of the postero-lateral (pterygoid) processes.
The lower ends of these, and indeed the whole ventral face of the
basi-occipital, are covered by the pterygoids, which meet in the
middle line. It is not possible to make out the sutures between the
basi-occipital and the exoccipital-opisthotics. The latter are, so far
as can be seen, similar to the same elements in the other Plesio-
saurs; that is to say, they consist of a columnar portion forming the
sides of the foramen magnum and uniting above with the supra-
occipital, and a long paroccipital process which runs outwards,
downwards and backwards to the quadrate (q.), with which its outer
end was probably in contact, though possibly it joined the outer end
ot the quadrate process of the pterygoid, the sutures in this region
being very indistinct.
The supra-occipital forming the upper part of the foramen
magnum is crushed over to the left, and the shape of the opening
thereby distorted. At its upper end the supra-occipital united with
parietals, but its precise relations with those bones cannot be made
Description of a New Plesvosaur. “S11
out. As usual the posterior part of the parietals, probably together
with the parietal processes of the squamosal, project some distance
behind the occipital surface.
The basi-sphenoid is concealed by the overlapping pterygoids and
by the posterior end of the parasphenoid. This latter (pas.) is a
narrow vertical plate, not a horizontal one, as in Mwrenosaurus and
Cryptoclerdus. As in the other Plesiosaurs, it divides the posterior
inter-pterygoid vacuity into two openings (p.t.v.) (elsewhere called
the posterior palatine vacuities). Its anterior end is thrust between
diel, al,
1. Diagrammatic view of the palate of Plesiosaurus capensis. 4 nat. size.
a.i.v., anterior interpterygoid vacuity; b.oc., basi-occipital ; i.n., internal
narial openings; ma., maxilla; pal., palatine; pas., parasphenoid ; p.i.v.,
posterior inter-pterygoid vacuity ; pmx., premaxilla; pt., pterygoid ;
q., quadrate ; s.o.v., sub-orbital vacuity ; t., transpalatine bone; v., vomer.
the palatine plates of the pterygoids, but its exact limits are obscure.
The pterygoids (pt.) are of the usual triradiate form: posteriorly
they unite with one another in the middle line beneath the basi-
occipital and basi-sphenoid, and are produced backwards and out-
wards into thin vertically compressed processes to the quadrates.
In front of their union beneath the basis cranii the median borders
of these bones diverge from one another and enclose a large oval
inter-pterygoid vacuity (p.i.v.) which, as just mentioned, is divided
into two in the middle line by the parasphenoid. In front of this
vacuity the anterior end of this bone is wedged in between the
312 Annals of the South African Museum.
about twenty cervical and fifteen dorsal vertebrae, some imperfect
pterygoids for a short distance; in front of this again the pterygoids
meet in the middle line for a short distance, and then are separated
by a narrow anterior inter-pterygoid vacuity (a.7.v.). Possibly they
may be in contact with one another again at their anterior ends.
The outer border of the posterior ramus in front of the union
beneath the basis cranii runs forwards and at first slightly outwards,
then turning outwards almost at right angles to form the posterior
border of the lateral ramus. The outer end of this joins the trans-
palatine bone (¢.) which connects the pterygoid with the maxilla. The
flat anterior ramus of the pterygoid is broad posteriorly but narrows
towards its anterior end, where it joins the vomers (prevomers). On
its outer side it joins the palatine in a long oblique suture.
The palatine (pal) is an elongated bone, the inner border of which,
as just described, unites in suture with the pterygoid. Anteriorly
the palatines converge, but do not seem to meet owing to the union
of the anterior ends of the pterygoids with the vomers; at the same
time it should be noted that in this specimen the sutures are not
very distinct. The rounded anterior ends of the palatines unite
with the vomers, externally to these they join the palatine plates of
the maxilla, for a short distance behind which they are separated
from that bone by a narrow sub-orbital vacuity (s.o.v.), which is
closed posteriorly by the transpalatine bone (¢.), with which the hinder
end of the palatine unites. The transpalatine bone (¢.) is a triradiate
element, its outer side unites with the maxilla, its inner branch
underlies the outer end of the lateral ramus of the pterygoid, and its
anterior concave border is,in contact with the palatine, its anterior
angle closing the sub-orbital vacuity (s.o.v.) posteriorly.
The vomers (v.) (prevomers of Broom) are closely united with one
another in the middle line, the original suture between them being
only visible in their expanded posterior portion. The united bones
extend far forwards between the premaxille, almost to the pits
occupied by the tips of the replacing teeth. Followed back to the
nares (?.2.), they widen gradually and are convex from side to side ;
at the nares they are again narrowed and the palatal surface becomes
flat. Behind the nares they widen out into a fan-like expansion, and,
as already mentioned, the suture between them is visible, and is
situated at the bottom of a median depression. In front of the
nares the vomers lie between the palatine plates of the premaxille,
which extend back just to the anterior angle of the narial opening
(i.n.). Behind the nares they unite with the palatine plates of the
maxilla externally, internal to this with the palatines, and in the
Description of a New Plesiosaur. 313
middle line probably with the anterior ends of the pterygoids, though
this is not quite clear.
The premaxille (pmx.) which form the narrow muzzle, each
bear alveoli for five teeth. Of these the anterior one is small and
close to the middle line; the second is rather larger; both these
teeth seem to have been directed forward. The third and fourth
teeth are large, the fifth again smaller. Immediately behind the
last there is a short diastema crossed by the maxillo-premaxillary
suture. Within the row of alveoli and separated from them by a
flattened area there is a row of pits which mark the points at
Jets ee
wanlaaina taath annaar Internal to the two posterior
| Owing to a regrettable printer's error a line has been misplaced
in Dr. C. W. Andrews’ paper, Annals 8. Afr. Museum, Vol. VII. Part 4,
The top line of p. 312 should be the top line of p. 310,
and the sentence to which it belongs should read :—
The parts preserved are—skull, part of the mandible, some teeth
about twenty cervical and fifteen dorsal vertebre, some imperfect
limb 1 i i ti ibi
bones, including portions of the femora, tibie, fibule, &e.
be seen, however, that the first tooth was small, while tne suc-
ceeding three were greatly enlarged, the third being the largest.
The palatine portion of the bone is in contact with the premaxilla
in front; behind this it forms the outer border of the internal nares ;
behind this again it joins the palatine for some distance, but pos-
teriorly is separated from it by the narrow sub-orbital vacuity (s.0.v.).
Behind this it unites with the transverse bone and posteriorly prob-
ably with the jugal. The facial surface is imperfectly preserved :
the maxillo-premaxillary suture runs from the alveolar border
upwards and backwards, then backwards nearly parallel with the
middle line as far as the external nares which form deep notches
in the border of the bones, their inner edge being formed by the facial
processes of the premaxille. The relations of the facial region of
312 Annals of the South African Museum.
about twenty cervical and fifteen dorsal vertebrae, some imperfect
pterygoids for a short distance; in front of this again the pterygoids
meet in the middle line for a short distance, and then are separated
by a narrow anterior inter-pterygoid vacuity (a.i.v.). Possibly they
may be in contact with one another again at their anterior ends.
The outer border of the posterior ramus in front of the union
beneath the basis cranii runs forwards and at first slightly outwards,
then turning outwards almost at right angles to form the posterior
border of the lateral ramus. The outer end of this joins the trans-
palatine bone (¢.) which connects the pterygoid with the maxilla. The
flat anterior ramus of the pterygoid is broad nasteriavly hut sse-—-
wuvuuci m1 vue mdaale line, the original suture between them being
only visible in their expanded posterior portion. The united bones
extend far forwards between the premaxillex, almost to the pits
occupied by the tips of the replacing teeth. Followed back to the
nares (¢.7.), they widen gradually and are convex from side to side ;
at the nares they are again narrowed and the palatal surface becomes
flat. Behind the nares they widen out into a fan-like expansion, and,
as already mentioned, the suture between them is visible, and is
situated at the bottom of a median depression. In front of the
nares the vomers lie between the palatine plates of the premaxille,
which extend back just to the anterior angle of the narial opening
(i.n.). Behind the nares they unite with the palatine plates of the
maxilla externally, internal to this with the palatines, and in the
Description of a New Plesiosaur. 313
middle line probably with the anterior ends of the pterygoids, though
this is not quite clear.
The premaxille (pmx.) which form the narrow muzzle, each
bear alveoli for five teeth. Of these the anterior one is small and
close to the middle line; the second is rather larger; both these
teeth seem to have been directed forward. The third and fourth
teeth are large, the fifth again smaller. Immediately behind the
last there is a short diastema crossed by the maxillo-premaxillary
suture. Within the row of alveoli and separated from them by a
flattened area there is a row of pits which mark the points at
which the replacing teeth appear. Internal to the two posterior
pits the surface of the premaxilla is raised into a ridge on a level
with the vomer against which it abuts. The facial surface of the
premaxille consists of a broad anterior region, convex from side to
side with a median groove marking the line of union of the two
bones, and a backwardly prolonged narrow facial process, the two
bones uniting in this region to form a prominent ridge with concave
sides which extends back between the orbits; how far back the
facial processes of the premaxille extend cannot be determined from
this specimen, but probably, judging from what occurs in some of
the Oxford Clay genera, they joined the frontals a little in front
of the level of the posterior border of the orbits. It is possible that
these backward prolongations of the premaxille may, as suggested
by Williston, include some other element, possibly the nasal, though
I have never seen any evidence of this. The upper surface of the
anterior part of the premaxille is much roughened and bears a
number of vascular foramina.
The maxilla (mx.) is not completely preserved on either side of the
skull, and it is not possible to say how many teeth it bore; it can
be seen, however, that the first tooth was small, while the suc-
ceeding three were greatly enlarged, the third being the largest.
The palatine portion of the bone is in contact with the premaxilla
in front; behind this it forms the outer border of the internal nares ;
behind this again it joins the palatine for some distance, but pos-
teriorly is separated from it by the narrow sub-orbital vacuity (s.0.v.).
Behind this it unites with the transverse bone and posteriorly prob-
ably with the jugal. The facial surface is imperfectly preserved :
the maxillo-premaxillary suture runs from the alveolar border
upwards and backwards, then backwards nearly parallel with the
middle line as far as the external nares which form deep notches
in the border of the bones, their inner edge being formed by the facial
processes of the premaxille. The relations of the facial region of
314 Annals of the South African Musewm.
the maxille to the bones behind cannot be made out, and it is
uncertain whether there is a lachrymal, a pre-frontal, or a nasal.
Probably the bone forming the anterior part of the raised rim of the
roof of the orbit was the pre-frontal, while that forming the pos-
terior part was the post-frontal, but no sutures are visible. Neither
can sutures be seen between the frontals and the surrounding bones.
The pineal foramen seems to have been just opposite the anterior
border of the temporal fossz and probably marks the anterior limit
of the parietal bones. These formed a high, narrow, sagittal crest
between the temporal fosse, but in this specimen its summit is
broken away. Posteriorly these bones widen out and project back-
wards behind the level of the foramen magnum ; how far the lateral
expansions of the parietals are overlapped by the upper limbs of the
squamosals cannot be determined. The ventral process of the
squamosal (sq.) can be seen to be closely adherent to the posterior
and outer face of the large quadrate (q¢.) extending far down its side.
The zygomatic process seems to have been wide, but the relations
of its anterior end to other bones cannot be seen. The quadrate (q.)
is relatively very large: its anterior face is concave from side to side,
while its posterior face is convex in the same direction. The
articular surface for the mandible is imperfect, but must have
been very wide, as is shown also by the width of the articular
surface of the mandible. The outer face of the quadrate, as already
mentioned, was overlapped by the ventral process of the squamosal,
while the inner side unites with the quadrate ramus of the pterygoid
and probably also with the outer end of the paroccipital process
of the opisthotic, though possibly this only supports the quadrate
through the medium of the pterygoid.
The mandible (Pl. XVIII., Figs. 2, 3) is only imperfectly preserved,
the symphysial region being completely wanting. It seems to
have been very strongly built for the size of the skull. The
articulation for the quadrate is very broad; it consists of two con-
cave surfaces, the inner being the larger, separated by a slight
convexity: both in front and behind it is bordered by a strongly
raised rim, so that the articulation must have been a very strong
one. On the outer side of the jaw, just beneath the articular sur-
face, there is a deep and roughened pit or groove, apparently for the
attachment of ligament. The post-articular process is short and
broad ; its inner border is rounded, while the outer forms a sharp edge.
Its upper portion is formed by the hinder part of the united sur-
angular and articular bones (Pl. XVIII, Figs. 2 and 3, s. ang. and art.),
the lower portion is constituted by the angular (Fig. 3, ang.). In
Description of a New Plesrosaur. 315
front of the articular surface the upper border, formed by the united
surangular and articular, rises to a blunt coronoid angle where it
meets the dentary on its outer side and the coronoid (cor.) on the
inner; the anterior limits of the coronoid are not known, but it
seems to have extended as a thin plate, closely adherent to the
inner face of the dentary, forwards to about the level of the middle
of the dental series. The greater part of the dentigerous part of
the mandible is formed, as usual, by the dentary, which is the only
element visible on the outer side of this part of the jaw. On its
inner face the upper part of the posterior end is covered by the closely
adherent coronoid, while beneath this is the thin plate-like splenial
(spl.) which closes Meckel’s groove, and probably extended forward
to the symphysis into the formation of which it perhaps entered :
posteriorly it is prolonged back some distance behind the level
of the coronoid angle, forming the lower (inner) edge of the
opening of the dental (Meckel’s) canal. Beneath the splenial and
on the inner side of the dentary the angular sends forward a
long tapering process, the anterior end of which is concealed
by the overlap of the splenial upon the dentary. In the neigh-
bourhood of the symphysis the dentary widens out and _ bears
at least three greatly enlarged teeth: behind these the teeth are
smaller and continue about equal in size for the first six or seven:
behind these again there is a gradual reduction in size to the end
of the series. The outer face of the dentary is marked by numerous
vascular grooves and foramina.
Several teeth (Pl. XVIIIL., Fig. 4) are preserved, differing much in
size and to some extent in shape. ‘The larger ones have long
conical, slightly curved crowns, circular in section and probably
terminating in a sharp point. On the inner (concave) side of the
crown the enamel is raised into numerous fine longitudinal ridges
which tend to unite with one another in pairs as they are followed
towards the tip of the crown; similar ridges occur to a less extent on
the anterior and posterior faces of the crown, but on the outer (convex)
face the enamel is almost smooth, only a very faint ridging being
visible. The roots of the teeth are very large, smooth and circular in
section. In the smaller teeth (Pl. XVIII., Fig. 4) the crown is more
strongly curved. The enamel ridges are relatively larger and fewer
in number, but their arrangement is the same as in the large teeth.
Of the vertebral column (Pl. XVIII., Figs. 5,6; text-Figs. 2, 3) a
considerable portion is preserved, Twenty-one or twenty-two
cervicals are present, of which eleven are anterior, the remainder
posterior and forming a continuous series with the fifteen pectorals
316 Annals of the South African Museum.
and dorsals that are preserved. In the anterior cervicals (Pl. XVIII.,
Figs. 5, 6) the centra are considerably wider than long; their
articular faces are wider than high and are deeply concave, the
centre being occupied by a large sharply defined fossa (Fig. 6).
This depression seems to be more deeply excavated on the posterior
than on the anterior face, and is particularly sharply defined in the
more anterior vertebre. In these also the centra bear a sharp hypa-
2. Posterior cervical vertebre of Plesiosaurus capensis; from left side. About
2 nat. size.
a.z., anterior zygapophysis; c¢.r., bases of cervical ribs; n. sp., neural
spine; p.z., posterior zygapophysis.
pophysial ridge (Fig. 5a), which is as it were pinched up and has
on either side of it a concave surface ; near its anterior end there are
in some cases small sharp lateral projections which probably served
for the insertion of tendons. On either side of the ridge and close
to it are the nutritive foramina. The cervical ribs are fused with
the ventro-lateral borders of the centra, and above them the sides of
the centra are concave both from side to side and from above down-
wards. The neural arch is high and is fused with the centrum ; the
Description of a New Plesiosaur. 317
zygapophyses are relatively large; the neural spines are incomplete
in all the anterior cervicals. In the posterior cervicals (text-Fig. 2)
the hypapophysial ridge is broadly rounded, and is best marked in
the anterior part of the centrum; the ventral nutritive foramina are
here separated by an interval of about 15cm. It is possible that
some of the posterior cervical ribs were still free. In this region
the zygapophyses are large and the anterior ones project strongly
forwards. The neural spines, which are not very high, slope back-
wards; their anterior border is convex, the posterior concave. In
the hindermost cervicals the rib-facet passes up on to the arch, but
the condition of the specimen makes it difficult to determine in
which the passage actually takes place; probably the tenth and
eleventh of the series as preserved may be regarded as the
transitional (pectoral) vertebre.
The dorsals (text-Figs. 3a, 3B) have the centra relatively shorter
than the cervicals and at the same time rounder, the transverse
diameter being little greater than the vertical. The ventral surface
of the centrum is almost evenly rounded from side to side, there
being only a slight trace of a hypapophysial ridge, on either side of
which are the nutritive foramina (7.f’.). The upper part of the sides
of the vertebree is concave in all directions; the lower border of the
concavity approximately marks the line of the suture between the
centrum and the arch; at its lower angle there is a vascular foramen
(n.f.). The articular ends of the centrum are nearly circular except
for the presence of a slight depression beneath the neural canal ;
they are fairly deeply concave but without the sharp central depres-
sion seen in the cervicals; their outer edges are sharp and well
defined. The neural arches are lower than in the cervical region
and the zygapophyses are proportionately smaller; the anterior
zygapophyses (a.z.) project considerably forwards, the whole of
their articular surface lying in front of the centrum. A strong ridge
runs from the anterior zygapophysis to the anterior border of the
transverse process, which in the anterior dorsals is situated low
down on the arch but passes upwards as the series is followed back ;
it is compressed from above downwards. The height of the neural
spines (7.sp.) in the dorsal region is not known, all having been
‘broken off short.
Of the limbs (text-Fig. 4) there remain portions of two paddles,
which I regard as posterior. One consists of the much-shattered
and imperfect distal portion of the femur with the tibia and fibula
attached. The other is the upper part of the shaft of the other
femur and the detached tibia and fibula, in excellent preservation,
318 Annals of the South African Museum.
there is also a carpal, probably a fibulare, and a number of phalanges,
which cannot be placed. The femur seems to have possessed a well-
developed trochanter, and on the ventral face of the shaft there was
a rugose surface for the attachment of muscles; distally it expanded
considerably (text-Fig. 4, fem.) ; indeed, its expansion seems to have
Sf.
3. Dorsal vertebre of Plesiosaurus capensis; A. from left side, B. from below.
% nat. size.
a.z., anterior zygapophyses; n.f. and n.f.’; nutritive foramina; n. sp.,.
neural spine; p.z., posterior zygapophysis; t.p., transverse processes.
been too great for articulation with the tibia and fibula only, and
probably it also supported a posterior accessory ossicle. The tibia
and fibula (text-Fig. 4, tb. fib.) are more elongated than one would
expect to find them in a Wealden form, and in this respect the paddle
much resembles that of some of the Lower Lias Plesiosaurs, e.g.,
P, hawkinsi, The tibia (tvb.) articulates with the femur by a long
Description of a New Plesiosaur. 319
and slightly convex facet; its anterior border is sharp and almost
straight, while the post-axial border is concave in its proximal half
but distally is occupied by a large facet for union with the fibula,
with which there seems to have been no contact at the proximal
end. Distally there is a long, flat facet for the tibiale; in front of
this there is a small, oblique facet and behind it a longer, also oblique
facet for the intermedium. The fibula (fib.) is a kidney-shaped
bone; proximally it bears a large, nearly straight surface for union
with the femur; anteriorly it has in its proximal portion a concave,
Fia. 4.
4. Portion of hind paddle of Plesiosaurus capensis. About 4 nat. size.
fem., femur; jib., fibula; tib., tibia.
sharp-edged border and distally a facet for union with the tibia.
The remainder of the border is occupied by four facets—one for
the intermedium, behind this a surface for the fibulare, next a post-
axial surface looking nearly directly backwards, and lastly a small
surface looking upwards and backwards, which probably supported
an accessory ossicle which also articulated with the femur. The
chief peculiarity of this tibia and fibula, apart from their length, is
that, although they unite distally, proximally there is a considerable
interval between them which is only closed above by the humerus.
I am not acquainted with any Plesiosaur in which exactly the same
thing is seen; usually in the post-Liassic Plesiosaurs the tibizw and
320 Annals of the South African Museum.
fibule are much shortened, and if there is any interval between them,
it is a small foramen or slit which is enclosed above and below by
the meeting of these bones.
For comparison of this species with previously described species.
from the same or approximately the same horizon the cervical
vertebre are of the greatest importance, since the skull is quite
unknown in the other species and only a few odd limb bones have
hitherto been found. The cervical vertebre are very similar to those
of some of the nearly contemporaneous forms, particularly in the
presence of a sharply defined and deep central depression in the
middle of the more gently concave articular surfaces of the centra,
but in all cases differences are apparent which forbid the inclusion of
this form in any of the species hitherto described.
The forms which seem to resemble the present species most:
nearly are Plesiosaurus degenhardtt Koken, P. limnophilus Koken,
and P. valdensis Lydekker, sp.; there is also a certain amount of
similarity to P. bernardi Owen and some other species.
In Plesiosaurus degenhardti* of Koken the form of the centra of
the cervicals differs considerably, the height of their centra being
greater than either their width or length; in the present species
the width is the greater, and at the same time in P. degenhardti the
edges of the articular surfaces are more rounded and thickened and
the zygapophyses are smaller. The difference in the proportions of
the centra is shown if we compare centra of approximately the
same size of the two species: thus, in the present species, if the
length of the centrum be taken as 100, the width will be about 156,
the height 138; while in P. degenhardti, the length being 100, the
width will be 127, the height 152.
From Plesiosaurus limnophilus + of Koken the difference is also
well marked, the length of the centrum being about equal to the
width, while in P. capensis it is much less. In a vertebra from the
Wealden of Cuckfield, Sussex, ascribed by Lydekker | to P. limno-
philus, but regarded by Koken as probably distinct, the length and
height of the centrum are about equal, but the width is greater,
Comparison with Pleszosaurus valdensis§ shows a much more
marked similarity; in this case, the length of the centrum being
taken as 100, the width is 151, the height 129—proportions which
* Koken, Paleont. Abhandl., vol. iii. (1887), p. 414; see also vol. vii. (1896),.
p. 122, pl. iii.
+ Koken, op. cit., vol. iii. (1887), p. 417.
+ Lydekker, Catal. Foss. Rept. Brit. Mus., pt. ii. (1889), p. 224.
§ Lydekker, tom, cit., p. 188.
Description of a New Plesiosaur. 321
approach very nearly to those of some of the vertebre here described.
In both eases also there is a sharp hemapophysial ridge with a con-
cavity on each side, and the articular surface is strongly concave
with a sudden depression in tbe middle; this last character is more
strongly marked in the present species. The neural spines in
Plesiosaurus valdensis also resemble those of the present species,
being rather low and curved backwards (see Lydekker, Catal. Foss.
Rept. Brit. Mus., pt. ii., p. 188, fig. 61). There are, however, a
number of differences in detail which seem to render it impossible
that our specimen is specifically identical with this species.
Comparison of the proportions of the cervical vertebree of different
species of Plesiosaurs is only of value in a very general way since
the vertebree have been, for the most part, found isolated or in small
groups, so that their position in the neck is usually uncertain, and
they may have belonged to animals of different sizes. Nevertheless,
on the whole it may be taken as fairly certain that Plesiosawrus
capensis is » member of the group of small Plesiosaurs which in
Europe is represented by P. degenhardtt and P. valdensis from
the Wealden, and perhaps by P. bernhardi from the Cambridge
Greensand,
The occurrence of a Plesiosaur in South Africa is of peculiar
interest since it is not improbable that the group may have been
derived from some form related to the Therocephalia remains of
which are found on the Permian of that region.
The approximate dimensions (in centimetres) of the type specimen
of Plesiosaurus capensis are :—
SKULL.
Length from tip of snout to occipital condyle .. .. .. .. .. «.. .. Q27°7
Length from tip of snout to hinder point of agente doe oo eno) woo pa eed
Length from tip of snout to vertex Hohe 2 acl oe ba oo Jao 6g tke
Length from tip of snout to external narial opening... .. .. .. .. .. 10°4
Width between outer angles of quadrates .. .. 18°3
Width of snout where the maxillo-premaxillary eae crosses the atveolie
BORGER Sty ese peepee tte = nhs AOe Mise Pr cet eit’ meets . SOs
VERTEBRAE.
Cervicals. Dorsals.
Length of centrum in mid-ventral line 1°9 2:1 2°5* 3°2 2:8
Width of posterior articular face... .. 30 3:3 (app.) 3°6 5°0 (app.) 4°6
Height of articular face.. .. 2°65 2°7 (app.) 3:1 4-1 4:1
United length of the two feared (exe Fig. 2) posterior cervical vertebre .. 7:0
Height to top of neural spine of posterior cervical vertebre .. .. .. .. IL‘
* Vertebra figured Pl]. XVIIL., fig. 6.
322 Annals of the South African Museum.
Distance from anterior angle of pre-zygapophysis to the ie angle of
the post-zygapophysis of one of above .
United length of the centra of the three funred one Mio oa 35) iderea
vertebrae ave Pero hoGt Sok Winte mio, “ool! ac
Length of middle Domini of the (ieee! :
ene of anterior angle of pre-zygapophysis ‘B norence “Hele of rast
ygapophysis
wiath of the middle of the ponte
FrEmuvUn.
Approximate width of distal end
TIBIA.
Length
Width ..
FIBuLa.
Length
Width (approx. )
EXPLANATION OF PEATE Sey EE:
1. Plesiosaurus capensis, n.sp.; palatal view of skull. 4 nat. size.
2. Ditto; hinder portion of left ramus of mandible. 4 nat. size.
3. Ditto; hinder portion of right ramus of mandible. 4 nat. size.
4. Ditto; sides and outer view of a tooth. 4 nat. size.
5. 5a. Ditto; anterior cervical vertebre from side (5) and from below (5a).
6. Ditto; anterior cervical vertebra, from behind. 4 nat. size.
a.i.v., anterior interpterygoid vacuity.
ang., angular.
b.oc., basi-occipital.
cor., coronoid.
c.r., cervical rib.
d., dentary.
i.n., internal nares.
ma., maxilla.
n.sp., neural spine.
pal., palatine.
pas., parasphenoid.
p.i.v., posterior interpterygoid vacuity.
pmx., premaxilla.
pt., pterygoid.
q., quadrate.
s. ang. art., surangular and articular.
s.0.v., suborbital vacuity.
spl., splenial.
v., vomer.
10°5
Ann S. Afr. Mus. Vol. VII. IPL VAIL
‘~~
4S
&
3
x
>
~N
3
ay
G.M Woodward del.et lith. West, Newman imp
15.—On a New Species of Propappus, and on the Pose of the
Pareiasaurian Limbs.—By R. Broom, M.A., D.Sc.
(Plates XITX.—XXL.)
Apout a year ago Dr. A. W. Rogers, of the Cape Geological Com-
mission, discovered on the farm Hoedemakers Kraal, Beaufort West
district, much of the skeleton of a small species of Propappus.* The
skull and most of the anterior part of the vertebral column are
missing, and some of the limb bones are badly weathered, but a few
of the presacral vertebrze are beautifully preserved, while most of
the bones of the right fore and hind limbs are present in perfect
condition. There are also preserved large numbers of dermal
ossicles, and there can be little doubt that as in Propappus omocratus
the whole of the back and probably much of the sides of the animal
were protected. There seems some reason to believe that even the
limbs were protected by small dermal bones. The present specimen,
though manifestly belonging to the genus Propappus, differs from
P. omocratus, not only in being considerably smaller, but in a
number of important characters, and for it I propose the name
Propappus rogerst.
Vertebre.
The best-preserved vertebree are a lower dorsal, possibly the 19th,
and two somewhat more anterior, possibly 13th and 15th.
The vertebra, which is evidently from the mid-dorsal region, and
may be the 13th, is the most perfectly preserved Pareiasaurian
vertebra that I have had an opportunity of examining. It agrees
pretty closely with the dorsal vertebrae of Parevasaurus serridens,
and also with those of Propappus omocratus, but differs in its
proportions. The greatest height of the vertebra is 135 mm.; the
maximum width across the transverse processes 147 mm.; and the
length of the centrum 50 mm. The spine is short, rising only
28 mm. above the curve formed by the posterior zygapophyses.
* See Annual Report of the Geological Commission for 1910, p. 18.
23
324 Annals of the South African Museum.
These posterior processes are well differentiated from the transverse
processes, and pass outwards and slightly backwards. From the
posterior edge of each articular surface there passes inwards and
slightly downwards a bony ridge, which, with the upper edge of the
zygapophyses demarcates a bony lozenge-shaped slightly concave
surface on the back of the vertebra. The lower angle of the bony
ridge forms the roof of part of the spinal canal, but there is no
hyposphene. ‘The transverse process is well developed and has a
moderately large articulation for the single-headed rib. On the
front of the process is the anterior zygapophysis, from which there
runs inwards and slightly downwards a bony ridge as on the posterior
side of the vertebra, but here the ridges do not meet. The vertebra
of Propappus rogersi differs from that of P. omocratus in that the
ereater part of the centrum hes below a line joining the two costal
articulations.
The lower dorsal vertebra, which I think may be the 19th,
measures in height 162 mm., and in width across the transverse
processes 156 mm. The spine is 35 mm. in height. The posterior
aspect of this vertebra much resembles that of the other, but the
large lozenge-shaped surface is flatter and is divided by a median
low ridge. The transverse process is very massive, and the articular
surface for the rib much broader and shorter than in the more
anterior dorsals. The articular surface of the body is nearly normal,
measuring 63 mm. in both diameters. The length of the body is
about 50 mm.
Shoulder Girdle.
The upper half of the scapula is missing, but the lower part of the
girdle is well preserved. It resembles closely the shoulder girdle of
Pareiasaurus serridens, differing only a little in the proportion of
certain parts and in the shape of the acromion. The sutures are
almost completely obliterated, but there seems little doubt that the
usual elements—scapula, coracoid, and precoracoid—are present.
The scapula has a broad lower end, which articulates with or
rather is anchylosed to the coracoid and precoracoid. It probably
forms about half of the glenoid cavity, and the articular surface is
divided into a large posterior part and a small anterior, which looks
more directly outwards and downwards. Below the anterior edge of
the glenoid cavity lies the large precoracoid foramen, which passes
almost directly upwards, forming a deep groove on the inner side of
the scapula. The preglenoid portion of the base of the scapula
is about the same size as the glenoid, in this differing from the
New Species of Propappus, and Pose of Pareiasaurian Limbs. 325
condition in Pareiasaurus, where the former is much smaller. The
acromion process is large and differs from that of Pareiasawrus in
being directed more upwards than forwards. Above the acromion
‘the scapula is comparatively narrow, but stout.
The coracoid is perfectly preserved. The subglenoid portion is
roughly about the size of the glenoid cavity. The lower and
posterior corner is truncated, and doubtless articulated with a
cartilaginous sternum, The whole lower border of the coracoid and
precoracoid has a flattened and thickened edge, probably for a short
articular cartilage which met the similar cartilage of the other side.
The inner side of the lower part of the precoracoid and of part of the
coracoid is very markedly concave.
The following are some of the principal measurements :—
Posterior end of coracoid to top of acromion ...... 275 mm.
Greatest width of glenoid ..........scscesssecereereeees 30) 3s
Width of scapula immediately above acromion ... 60 ,,
Thickness of scapula immediately above acromion 40 ,,
Humerus.
The right humerus is in perfect condition, and while re-
sembling that of Pareiasaurus serridens it differs rather strikingly in
one or two points. As I pointed out some years ago, the British
Museum specimen of Pareiasaurus baini gives a most misleading
idea of the animal from the fact that in restoring the humerus the
upper half was fixed on to the lower at a wrong angle. The articular
head of the bone is placed nearly in the same plane as the lower
portion of the bone. In Pareiasaurus serridens the head makes
with the distal portion an angle of about 70°. In Propappus rogers:
the head makes with the distal end of the bone an angle of only
about 30°. But to make up for the very small rotation of the shaft,
the delto-pectoral crest is twisted very abruptly forwards and
developed into a prominent knob, which stands out at right angles
to the plane of the distal part of the humerus. The head of the
bone is very similar to that of Parezasaurus, being similarly arranged
to fit the peculiarly shaped glenoid cavity. Most probably it had a
thick pad of cartilage. The greatest width of the head of the bone is
178 mm. The middle of the shaft is very narrow, measuring only
48 mm. in diameter. The lower half of the bone agrees closely with
that of Pareiasawrus. There is a well-developed entepicondylar
foramen, but no ectepicondylar. The articular surface for the radius
and ulna is large with a rounded part for the head of the radius and
326 Annals of the South African Museum.
a saddle-shaped part for the ulna. The ulnar part passes round on
to the back of the bone to a much greater degree than in Pareia-
saurus, from which we may infer that Propappus could straighten its
limb more than Pareiasaurus. The width of the lower end of the
humerus is 175 mm.
The total length of the humerus is 267 mm., as compared with
318 mm. in Propappus omocratus.
Radius and Ulna.
The radius is preserved in perfect condition, and the ulna
only lacks the distal end.
The radius is a columnar bone with a moderately straight shaft
and dilated ends. The proximal end presents an oval surface
86 mm. xX 60 mm. It is moderately deeply concave. The
narrowest part of the shaft measures 37 mm. x 26 mm. The
distal end is more massive than the proximal. The articular
surface measures 78 mm. by about 60 mm., and is somewhat
kidney-shaped.
The ulna has a remarkably well-developed olecranon process,
which passes back for about 38 mm. behind the articular surface.
The articular surface is concavo-convex, measuring 70 mm. in length
and about the same in width. The large olecranon process when
viewed from behind is club-shaped, with a large number of shallow
longitudinal markings on the surface.
Pelvis.
The pelvis is well preserved, the innominate of the right side
being nearly perfect, and much of the left side also present, though
badly weathered. Though in general type the pelvis is distinctly
Pareiasaurian, the differences from the pelvis of Parezasaurus itself
are much more marked than in the case of the shoulder girdle.
The ilium has its axis passmg upwards and forwards from the
acetabulum. The crest is of considerable length and fairly straight.
Anteriorly it turns abruptly outwards for a distance about equal to
half of the antero-posterior portion. Owing to this outward turning
of the crest the anterior part of the ilium is triangular in section,
and there is a large flat surface looking forwards. Internally the
ilium is irregularly concave for the reception of the large first sacral
rib. The greatest length of the iliac crest is probably about 190 mm.
The transverse portion measures 100 mm. From the top of the
New Species of Propappus, and Pose of Pareiasaurian Limbs, 327
acetabulum to the most anterior part of the iliac crest is 190 mm.
The narrowest part of the ilium is 65 mm.
The acetabulum is large, and but for a marked development of the
upper iliac border and of the ischial border would be rather shallow.
Its greatest width is 115 mm., and its vertical measurement 95 mm.
The three bones forming it are so completely anchylosed that their
limits cannot be with certainty determined.
The pubis and ischium are so completely anchylosed that no trace
of the dividing suture can be detected, and the bones of the two
sides are likewise completely anchylosed along the symphysis. The
bones are massive, and represent a somewhat specialised modification
of the plate-like type. .
The pubis is considerably longer vertically than antero-posteriorly.
From the anterior part of the symphysis to the point where it
probably unites with the ilium is about 170 mm. The greatest
antero-posterior measurement is probably not more than 100 mm.
There is a large pubic foramen situated as shown in the figure. As
the bone lies in the body the pubic canal passes almost directly
upwards. The outer half of the front edge of the pubis is much
thickened and bent downwards and forwards, and I think there
is little doubt that it supported a prepubic cartilage. This surface
for the cartilage measures about 90 mm. in length, and varies from
20 to 30 mm. in width. The lower end of the surface rises abruptly
from the inner part of the anterior border of the pubis.
The ischium measures about 180 mm. by about 135 mm., and but
for the great vertical depth would be practically of the plate-like
type. The symphysis is very thick. In the pubic region it reaches
a thickness of 68 mm., but becoming thinner in the ischial region
it averages about 55 mm., and at the posterior part of the ischium it
is only about 35 mm.
Femur.
The right is preserved in perfect condition. It resembles pretty
closely the femur of Propappus omocratus, but differs from that of
Parevasaurus serridens in a number of important features. It agrees
with the femur of Propappus omocratus in having the axis of the
upper third of the bone making an angle with the lower part of
the shaft of about 45°. It also agrees with it, and differs from that
of Pareiasaurus in having the middle of the shaft constricted and
nearly round. And lastly, it agrees with the femur of Propappus
omocratus in that the trochanter minor is directed backwards and
outwards, so that a deep concavity is formed between it and the
328 Annals of the South African Museum.
trochanter major. The femur of Propappus rogers: differs from that
of P. omocratus in being shorter and stouter; in having the head
more largely cartilaginous; in having the great trochanter more
directly continuous with the articular surface; and in haying the
outer condyle relatively larger.
The following is a comparison of the measurements of the femur
in the two species :—
Propappus Propappus
onvocratus. rogersv.
Thength¥of femur ........62.c0-.sececneernoene 335 290
Wad Gh Ot nea Gh masscstceteenesc tanec clearest 75 75
Length of head...... a Mia sie PE POTATO WIAs 112
Width of shaft at narrowest part ......... 60 60
Width of distal end of the bone............ lay 147
Tibia and Fibula.
The right tibia and fibula are both in beautiful preservation. The
tibia resembles considerably that of Propappus omocratus, but differs
in a few points. The proximal articular end had probably a con-
siderable pad of cartilage. As preserved it is a large flattened
surface rising up to a prominent boss in the middle. It measures
112 mm. by 77 mm. as against 110 mm. by 85 mm. in Propappus
omocratus. The distal articular surface is kidney-shaped and
measures 94 mm. by 55 mm., as against 90 mm. by 60 mm. in
Propappus omocratus. The total length of the bone is 177 mm.:
in P. omocratus it measures 200 mm.
The fibula is the most perfect Pareiasaurian fibula known. It is a
slightly curved bone, with a slender shaft and dilated at each end.
The proximal end is expanded and flattened antero-posteriorly and
articulates on a distinct facet on the outer condyle of the femur.
The distal end is flattened in the opposite direction to the upper and
has a large convex articulation for the outer side of the proximal
tarsal bone. The total length of the bone is 206 mm. The proximal
end measures 63 mm. by 36 mm., and the distal end 68 mm. by
42 mm. The shaft is 27 mm. in diameter.
Proximal Tarsal Bone.
The proximal tarsal bone, which certainly represents the conjoined
tibiale and fibulare with possibly the intermedium, is of the well-
known Parelasaurian type.
New Species of Propappus, and Pose of Pareiasawrian Limbs. 329
The Pose of the Limbs.
Though most of the bones of Pareiasaurus have been known for
twenty years, and though four skeletons are now known from South
Africa, and at least as many from Russia, there are still a good
many points in dispute in regard to the pose of the animal. Seeley
had the British Museum specimen mounted with the limbs so bent
that the abdomen must have been almost touching the ground, with
the interclavicle in advance of the plane of the occiput, and with
the scapula pointing almost directly backwards. Amalitzky has
set up his skeletons with the limbs straighter, with the scapula
directed as much upwards as backwards and with the shoulder
girdle situated some little distance behind the head. In giving a
restoration of Pareiasaurus in 1903 from the South African Museum
specimen, I also placed the shoulder girdle a little distance behind
the head, and made the animal stand well off the ground. Boulenger,
in discussing Telerpeton in 1905, criticised my restoration, pointing
out that in his opinion Pareiasawrus had no more neck than a
Salamander.
The very perfect bones of Propappus, though they may leave a
little doubt on a few points, enable us to have a much clearer idea
of the pose of the animal and of its movements than was previously
possible. As all the limb bones have their articular surfaces perfectly
preserved, we can fit the limbs together with certainty.
The peculiarly shaped glenoid cavity, with its large posterior
concavity and the small anterior flattened surface, so exactly
corresponds to the head of the humerus if we allow for a car-
tilaginous pad that we can articulate the humerus on the shoulder
girdle with confidence, and the position of the bones when the
animal is standing must be as shown in the figures given. The
movement of the humerus must have been practically limited to
an up and down direction, and when the animal lay down on its
front the anterior limbs would lie outwards and forwards by its
sides. In the standing position the humerus, radius, and ulna
would be in the positions shown in the drawings. One interesting
thing about the anterior limb is that it becomes quite manifest that
the scapula must have been directed much more upwards than
backwards, and as the shoulder girdle is about twice as long as
the head is deep it cannot have been situated close up to the
head, and therefore Parevasaurus and Propappus must be regarded
as having had distinct necks.
The hind limb was probably more freely movable than the
330 Annals of the South African Musewm.
anterior, but the movement was mainly between the femur and
the innominate. The head of the femur must have had a large
rounded pad of cartilage which fitted into the acetabulum, and
allowed of considerable freedom of movement. In the knee-joint
the amount of movement must have been very limited. Both femur
and tibia doubtless had articular cartilages, but the evidence is that
these were comparatively thin, and the articular surfaces of the
femur are not larger than those of the tibia. It seems probable that
the amount of movement of the tibia on the femur was limited to
about 45°. The relative positions of the femur, tibia, fibula, and the
proximal tarsal bone when the animal is standing are shown in the
figures given. The degree of movement between the tarsal bone
and the tibia and fibula was probably very limited, and the ankle
movement must have been mainly between the distal tarsals and
the proximal tarsal bone.
Pareiasaurus and Propappus were heavily built animals which
probably walked with slow, deliberate movements such as we see in
the large tortoises. They were land animals, and it seems more
likely that they lived even on the dry land than that they frequented
the marshes. The structure of the claws and the humerus would
seem to indicate that they were digging animals, and probably, like
Echidna, they defended themselves from their carnivorous enemies
by digging into the ground. The occurrence of bony plates along
the dorsal region of Pareiasawrus would serve to protect the most
vulnerable part of the body when the animal had dug its way into
the ground for safety. In Propappus, a smaller and feebler animal,
bony plates were situated all over the back and sides and apparently
even on the outer sides of the limbs, but the plates on the back
are very much larger and strengthened by a powerful median
boss in each.
Ann.S. Afr Mus. Vol. VII. Pilate Sue.
R. Broom del.
West, Newman lith.
Propappus rogersi, Broom.
Plate XX.
Ann.S.Afr Mus.Vol. VII.
West, Newman lith.
R.Broom del.
Propappus rogersi, Aroom.
Plate OGe
Ann.S. Afr. Mus. Vol. VII.
West, Newman lith.
R. Broom del.
Propappus rogersi, Zroom.
( 331 )
REFERENCE TO PLATES XIX., XX., XXI.
IG.
1. Dorsal vertebra of Propappus rogersi. x4. Posterior view.
2; e a x #. Side view.
3. Lower dorsal vertebra of Propappus rogersi. x4. Posterior view.
4 5 x f. Side view.
5
L ”?
. Right shoulder girdle of Propappus rogersi. x‘.
6, 7, 8, 9. Right humerus of Propappus rogersi. x 4.
. Right ulna of Propappus rogersi. x 4.
. Right radius of Propappus rogersi. x t.
. Right pelvic bones of Propappus rogersi. x 4.
. Right pubis and ischium of Propappus rogersi. x 4.
. Right femur of Propappus rogersi. x 4.
. Right tibia of Propappus rogersi. x 4.
. Right fibula of Propappus rogersi. x .
. Right tarsal bone of Propappus rogersi. x 4.
. Right fore limb of Propappus rogersi viewed from the front with the
bones arranged as they were when the animal stood. x about +.
. Side view of fore limb of Propappus rogersi in the standing position.
. Front view of hind limb of Propappus rogersi. x about +.
/. Side view of hind limb of Propappus rogersi. x about 1.
[o)
Co
bo
<
16.—On a Species of Tylosaurus from the Upper Cretaceous Beds of
Pondoland.—By R. Broom, M.D., D.Sc.
(Plate XXII., Figs. 28-29.)
Apnout ten years ago a collection of bones was made from the
Cretaceous beds of Pondoland by Dr. Rogers and Professor Schwarz.
The bones were for the most part fragmentary and water-worn, and,
except in one or two instances, detached. As was recognised at the
time, all the bones found represent portions of the skeletons of
Chelonians and Pythonomorphs. In the Annual Report of the
Geological Commission for 1901, p. 41, the bones are referred to as
jaw-bones of a reptile related to Mosasawrus and Chelonian bones.
Recently the collection was placed in my hands to see if I could
make anything further of the remains. Most of the bones are frag-
ments of the carapace of Chelonians with other bones of the
skeleton. The fragments, however, are too imperfect to justify one
in deciding on the species. There are pretty certainly two species
and probably three represented. One is of large size—possibly with
a carapace 6 ft. in length: one isa quite small turtle less than a foot
in length.
The Pythonomorph remains are more satisfactory, as not only
are there some jaw fragments with teeth, but a satisfactory portion
of the frontal region of the skull.
The skull fragment consists of the nearly perfect frontal bone
with about the anterior half of the parietal and portions of both
postorbitals.
The frontal is a large triangular bone, measuring 304 mm. in
greatest length and 234 mm. in greatest width. The upper surface is
moderately flat and smooth. Near the parietal suture in the middle
line the bone is slightly depressed, and also in front where it meets
the prefontals. The anterior end of the bone is more rounded than
in any frontal I have seen figured, as if the nostrils were wider apart.
than usual, and as if there might have been distinct nasal bones
Species of Tylosaurus from Upper Cretaceous Beds of Pondoland. 333
present. From the anterior end to the outer corner of the bone the
margin of the bone is almost in a straight line. The line of the
suture with the postorbital is not unlike that of Tylosawrus
proriger. The fronto-parietal suture is more like that of Mosasaurus
horridus. The under surface of the bone has the sides for the
articulation of the postorbitals behind, of the prefrontals in
front. Down the middle of the bone in the centre region is a
well-marked groove.
The postorbital only has its frontal portion preserved. As
preserved it agrees pretty closely with that of Tylosawrus proriger,
but is more slender.
The parietal has a broad upper surface exactly as in Tylosaurus
proriger, and in this differing markedly from Mosasaurus. The
present species differs from 7’. proriyer in that the pineal foramen
is well behind the plane which passes through the front of the
temporal fossa.
The illustrations given show the contour of the bones, and that it
is pretty safe in concluding that the South African form belongs to
the genus Tylosaurus. It is manifestly not Tylosawrus proriger,
Cope. If v. Huene has rightly referred the species recently
described by him to Tylosaurus dyspelor, Cope, then the South
African species is a very near ally. But as it differs in that the
frontal is relatively shorter, and in a number of other points, I
propose to call the Pondoland form Tylosaurus capensis.
PLATE XXII.
FIG. ; :
28. Upper view of frontal and parietal regions of skull of Tylosaurus capensis.
29. Under view of ditto.
Both + nat. size.
( 334 )
17.—On a New Type of Cynodont from the Stormberg.—By R.
Broom, M.A., D.Sc.
(Plate XXII., Figs. 30-36.)
Amona the specimens recently placed in my hands for deter-
mination, by the Director of the South African Museum, is a most
insignificant-looking fragment of a small skull bearing a number
of teeth most of which are broken; but small and imperfect as it is,
it is one of the most interesting finds made within recent years.
The fragment was picked up by Dr. M. Ricono at Paballon,
Mt. Fletcher District, Griqualand East, and given to Mr. Schwarz,
of the Geological Survey, in 1902, by whom it was placed in the
collection of the South African Museum.
The fragment consists of a large portion of the left maxilla with
the roots of 7 teeth and two immature but perfect teeth, portion
of the left jugal, and a fragment of the left palatine, of a small
Cynodont reptile.
The maxillary bone as preserved measures 25 mm. in length, but
there is probably at least 10 mm. missing from the front. The tooth-
bearing portion is narrow and deep and extends behind the origin
of the jugal arch. The jugal arch is extremely massive and the
maxilla sends a process outwards to strengthen the front of it. At
the front of the base of this process is a well-marked maxillary fora-
men towards which the sides slope in. The depth of the maxilla
in the plane of the foramen is 15 mm. There is clear evidence
of a well-developed secondary palate.
The jugal is unusually robust. It passes well inwards behind the
outward process of the maxilla, and forms the margin of the orbit.
In the suture between the jugal and the lachrymal there is a fora-
men probably for a branch of the maxillary nerve. No part of the
lachrymal is preserved.
The teeth are apparently all similar, to judge from the roots.
It is unfortunate that almost all the teeth are broken off below
On a New Type of Cynodont from the Stormberg. 330
the crown, except in the case of two teeth which are evidently
immature. The eight teeth in front measure 17 mm., and each
tooth has a section measuring 4 mm. by 1-7 or 1:8 mm. It will
thus be seen that the molar series consists of a series of antero-pos-
teriorly compressed teeth closely set together. Behind the 8 teeth
more or less satisfactorily preserved is a fragment of the root of a
ninth. The fifth tooth as preserved has the crown in perfect condi-
tion owing to its being immature, and the crown of the eighth is
also preserved except for the loss of the tip of the main cusp.
In structure the crown is unlike that of any tooth ever previously
described, so far as I am aware. There is one large sharp-pointed
cusp near the middle of the crown, and on its inner side a second
small cusp and a third still smaller. A very small fourth cusp lies
in front of the third. If the crown of the tooth were found detached,
and one did not know that it was compressed antero-posteriorly, one
would readily believe it to be the premolar of some primitive mammal
or of some Cynodont such as Galesaurus.
The present specimen is so entirely unlike any form previously
discovered that it is very difficult to discuss its affinities. The first
question that arises is whether the animal is a mammal or a Cyno-
dont reptile. There is, I think, little doubt that it is one or other.
The teeth are single-rooted, though of course this character is of
little importance. But the crowns have nothing the least like them
in any of the known mammalian orders. Antero-posteriorly com-
pressed teeth are not at all rare, as in Chysochloris, Notoryctes,
Kurtodon, Dryolestes, and other genera, but these teeth are entirely
different in structure from those of the present fossil, and are merely
modifications of the ordinary early mammalian type. The branching
of the maxillarv nerve before opening on the face is also a character
unknown in mammals, but met with in Cynodonts. In Cynodonts
we get antero-posteriorly compressed teeth in Bawria, Trirachodon,
and dilwrosuchus, but none of these genera can be at all nearly
related to the present one. In Bawria the crowns of the teeth are
apparently smooth and rounded, and the relations of the teeth to the
jugal arch and the general structure of the maxilla and jugal are
quite unlike. Trirachodon has molars of a highly specialised type.
Each may be described as having a crown with three cusps arranged
in a transverse row and connected by a low ridge, while the inner
and outer large cusps are connected by a series of very small cusps
arranged round the anterior and posterior borders of the tooth. It
is possible that the three cusps in the present fossil are homologous
with the three transverse cusps in the molar of Trirachodon, and
336 Annals of the South African Museum.
that the Trivachodon molar is related to that of the Stormberg fossil
in much the same way that the molar of the pig is related to that
of the opossum, but it seems impossible that the two animals can
be more nearly related than an ungulate and a marsupial.
If this new form is a mammal it must be regarded as the repre-
sentative of a new order, and if, as I believe, it ought to be regarded
as a Cynodont, it will have to be the representative of at least a new
family.
The exact horizon of the fossil is unknown. Professor Schwarz
writes me that Paballon might mean any horizon from Molteno
Bed to the Cave Sandstone, but from the matrix of the fossil it
seems highly probable that it comes from the Red Beds. In any
case it may be regarded as certain that the fossil is of Lower
Jurassic age. This is interesting from the fact that no Cynodont
has hitherto been got from beds younger than the Burghersdorp
or Upper Triassic.
I suggest for this interesting fossil the name T’ritheledon riconoi,
g. et sp. nov., and the new family of which it is the type may be
ealled the Tritheledontide.
PHATE Xi.
FIG.
30. Side view of fragment of the skull of Tritheledon riconoi. x 2.
31. Palatal view of fragment of skull of Tvritheledon riconoi. x 2.
32. Front view of ditto. x 2.
33. Restoration of front of skull of Tritheledon riconoi. Nat. size.
34. Anterior view of molar tooth of Tritheledon riconoi. x 6.
35. Palatal view of molar tooth of Tritheledon riconoi. x 6.
36. Posterior view of posterior molar of Tritheledon riconoi. x 6,
inn. 5. Afr Mus. Vol. VII. Plate XXII.
R.Broom del. West, Newman lith.
Fig. 28-29 Tylosaurus capensis, Broom.
Fig. 30-36. Tritheledon riconoi, Broom.
( 337 )
18. — On Some Points in the Structure of the Dieynodont Skull.—
By R. Broom, M.A., D.Sc.
(Five Text Figs.)
Tue skull on which most of the following observations are based
was found on Rhenoster Fontein, a farm at the top of the Molteno
Pass north of Beaufort West, and brought to the South African
Museum by Dr. Kolbe. It was sent in 1902 to Prof. Seeley, and
the matrix was most carefully removed under his direction by the
British Museum preparators. He had most carefully examined the
skull and traced out the sutures, and intended to give a full descrip-
tion, and had prepared for his paper a series of process blocks of
drawings of the skull; but apparently he had not gone further.
Doubtless other work which he thought more important, such as
the study of the skull of Hiythrosuchus, came to hand, and death
overtook him with his work unfinished. The skull bas been
returned to the South African Museum, and as the illustrations
have been prepared I have been asked to write a description of the
skull to accompany the blocks. Though Prof. Seeley has left no
manuscript, so far as I am aware, it is possible to get a good idea of
his views from his determinations on the figures. In a number of
points my views differ from those of Seeley, and where this is the
case I shall give his views as well as my own.
Though imperfect as regards the right zygomatic arch and
slightly crushed and distorted, it is the finest Dicynodont skull
that has ever been obtained. Others have been got more complete
but owing to the condition of the bone or matrix it has been
impossible to display the bones in such perfection, and no skull
has ever shown so many sutures satisfactorily.
As regards the species there is here, as with all Dicynodonts,
an element of doubt. In the first place, we do not yet know whether
Oudenodon is not really the female of Dicynodon. Owen, Lydekker,
and the writer have all considered the question, and all come to the
conclusion that probably the genera are distinct, but as time goes
on doubts became greater, and at present the evidence on the two
sides is about evenly balanced, Lystrosawrus is apparently tusked
in both males and females, while Cistecephalus is tuskless in both
338 Annals of the South African Museum.
Fie. 1.—Oudenodon kolbei. Upper View of Skull. x 4.
On Some Points in the Structure of the Dicynodont Skull. 339
sexes; but I know of no characters other than the presence or
absence of tusks to distinguish Dicynodon and Oudenodon. The
arrangement of bones and sutures, even to minute details, appears to
be identical. Then the difficulty of determining the species is
enhanced by the fact that many of Owen’s types are indeterminable,
since the points which appear to be most variable and on which
species might be distinguished are often lost from the types.
The present specimen I have compared with all the known
determinable species of Dicynodon and Oudenodon, and conclude
that it is distinct from all previously described species. It
approaches a number in various ways, but only with three species
might it be confused. Oudenodon baint, Owen, agrees with it fairiy
closely, but differs in having the tusk-lke maxillary process passing
more downwards, and in having the parietal region considerably
wider than the frontal, besides in a number of minor characters.
Oudenodon prognathus, Owen, differs in the peculiar manner in which
the prominent ridge of the maxilla is directed forwards and in the
smaller size of the nasal bosses. Owudenodon brevirostris, Owen,
differs in the contour of the frontal and parietal regions.
As the species is evidently new, I should have been delighted to
have named it after Prof. Seeley, who has done so much valuable
work on the South African fossil reptiles, but unfortunately Broili
has recently associated Seeley’s name with Dicynodon, and a species
which is certainly synonymous with one of Owen’s types. Some
years ago a number of fossil bones were got near Middelburg and
sent to the South African Museum. Dr. Corstorphine, who, as
director of the Geological Survey, had charge of the specimens,
thought evidently there would be no harm in sending a few of the
bones to Europe, but fortunately he kept the skull. The bones sent
to Europe included a beautiful pelvis, but why any European
paleontologist should think of making a pelvis of an Anomodont
the type of a new species passes my comprehension. At the best
it could only cause confusion. In this case, fortunately, we know
the skull, and it is identical with Owen’s Ptychognathus boops.
Whether Ptychognathus boops is itself a synonym of Dicynodon
murrayt, Huxley, it is at present impossible to say, but quite
certainly Dicynodon seeleyi, Broil, is not a new species. As the
present skull cannot be called after Prof. Seeley, I propose to name
it after Father F. C. Kolbe, D.D., who has taken such a prominent
part in educational and scientific work at the Cape and to whom we
owe the skull, and to call it Oudenodon kolbet.
The general shape of the skull is shown in the figures when
24
Annals of the South African Museum.
340
xb.
Palatal Aspect of Skull.
Fic. 2.—Oudenodon kolbei.
On Some Points in the Structure of the Dicynodont Skull. 341
allowance is made for some degree of depression of the frontal and
parietal regions. But though the outlines are moderately correct,
the shading is very unsatisfactory. In Fig. 2 the deep vaulting of
the front of the palate is not shown, nor is the deep depression
between the anterior parts of the pterygoids brought out, nor
the deep furrow between the basioccipital processes. In Fig. 1
there is very little attempt to indicate the heights and depths of the
specimen. Figs. 3 and 4 are both fairly well drawn, but the shading
bad in both, especially in Fig. 3.
The premaxillary (IM, intermaxillary in the figures) is a large
powerful median bone. In all the Dicynodonts the bones of
the two sides are anchylosed at a very early period. In front the
bone forms a rounded sharp beak. Above a broad powerful
internasal process passes up between the nasals and ends in a
point as shown in Fig. 1. Underneath the premaxillary forms
about two-thirds of the hard palate. Though the suture is not
shown in the figures, it begins in the dark mark shown in Fig. 3
behind the letter ‘‘ b” of ‘‘ broken,” and passes almost straight back
along the outside of the irregularities believed by Seeley to be
teeth. It then passes inwards in front of the irregularity marked
‘“‘nalatine tooth,” and ends in the middle line in front of the
irregularity marked “tooth,” and behind the region marked “ teeth
lost.’ I have carefully examined the structures regarded by Seeley
as teeth, and am quite satisfied they are merely bony irregularities
with no tooth structure. The whole of the hard palate was probably
covered by thick epithelium, which was horny in front, and probably
most of the snout above was also covered with a horny beak and
horny scales. Underneath the great epithelial development the
bone in most places is irregular. The nasals, the premaxilla, and
much of the external surface of the maxille have a very rough
appearance. In the palate there are patches of what appear to me
to be exactly the same style of roughened bone, This rough
appearance is seen on the median ridge formed by the premaxilla
and on the small part of the ridge formed by the vomer on the pair
of ridges in the front part of the premaxillary, on the ridges formed
by the lateral margins of the premaxillary, and on the anterior part
of the palatines. Though it is customary to speak of the horny
beak of the Anomodonts, it is probable that the beak was less horny
than in the tortoise or bird, except perhaps just on the margins.
Both maxille are in almost perfect preservation ; that of the left
side being quite perfect except for the loss of a minute fragment
from the caniniform process. The bone forms the greater part of
342 Annals of the South African Museum.
the side of the snout behind the large nostril. A stout suborbital
process articulates with the jugal and meets the anterior end of
the huge squamosal. On the palate the maxilla is overlapped by
the premaxilla, and only forms a small part of the roof of the
laoth
tooth
. Oroken edge
| of the jaw.
Fic. 3.—View of Front of Palate. Nat. size.
Showing appearances regarded by Seeley as
teeth. By the writer these are believed to
be merely irregularities on the surface of
the bones.
mouth, though each max-
illa forms about one-third
of the margin of the palate.
Posteriorly the maxilla
meets the palatine, and
much of it is covered by
the jugal.
The nasal is compara-
tively short. It forms
an overhanging roof to.
the nostril, and a _ con-
siderable part of the pos-
terior wall. It meets its ,
neighbour only for a very
short distance near the:
frontal bone, the two
nasals being nearly com-
pletely separated by the
internasal process of the
premaxilla. Above and a
little behind the nostril
there is a well-marked
bony thickening slightly
exaggerated in Fig. 1.
On the posterior wall
of the nostril there is a
small bone which appears
to be quite distinct from
both the maxilla and the
nasal, and which is evi-
dently a small septomax-
illary. Hitherto a septo-
maxillary has not been
detected in any Anomo-
dont, though it is known in all the other groups of mammal-like
reptiles—Cynodontia, Therocephalia, Dinocephalia, Dromasauria,
and Pelycosauria—as well as in the Cotylosaurian suborders.
Pareiasauria and Procolophonia and in the Monotremes.
On Some Points in the Structure of the Dicynodont Skull. 343
The lachrymal has a comparatively small facial portion, though it
forms a considerably larger part of the orbital wall. The foramen is
rather large and lies inside the orbit.
The prefrontal is a little larger than the lachrymal, and forms the
anterior part of the supraorbital ridge. It also forms a considerable
portion of inner wall of the orbit.
The frontals are paired elongated bones which form most of the
interorbital region, and pass back as far as the pineal foramen.
Though the suture between the frontals and the nasals is not very
clearly defined, owing to the thickening of the bones, it is probably
very nearly as determined by Seeley. Posteriorly the frontals
become very narrow as they pass back between the preparietal and
the postfrontal and postorbital. The suture between the frontals and
the parietals is on the plane of the front of the pineal foramen. The
line indicating a supposed suture in front of this in Fig. 1 is an error.
Where the frontals meet each other there is a slight median ridge,
and the orbital margins are considerably elevated, leaving a pair of
fairly deep furrows along the frontal bones. On the upper side of
each bone opposite the middle of the orbit are a pair of short grooves
which end in foramina, most probably for branches of the supra-
orbital branch of the Vth nerve.
The postfrontal bones can be very clearly defined for the first
time in a Dicynodon or Oudenodon skull. They were known to occur
in Lystrosaurus, in a number of Therocephalians and in Dino-
cephalians and Pelycosaurs, but they are lost in all Cynodonts,
and were hitherto believed to have been also lost in Dicynodon and
Oudenodon. The part that now proves to be a distinct postfrontal bone
was hitherto regarded as a part of the frontal, the suture being
usually indistinct or lost. In Fig. 1 the two postfrontals are well
shown as small triangular bones situated at the posterior and upper
corner of the orbit. On the posterior side of each is the postorbital
and on the inner side the frontal. In my opinion the postfrontals
extend further back than indicated in Fig. 1, as delicate processes
by the side of the frontals.
The postorbitals are large bones which form almost the whole of
the inner wall of the temporal fossa and the greater part of the post-
orbital arch. This large bone used to be regarded as the postfrontal
(Seeley 1889, Broom 1901, 1903), but the discovery of a small but
distinct bone in front of it in Scylacosaurus in 1903 showed that
the large bone must be called the postorbital, the small more
anterior one being manifestly the postfrontal. Exactly what
Seeley’s position in the matter was latterly I cannot say. In
EEE EEE EEO
‘azIs ‘yVwu ¢ NOgY ‘[[WYG JO AIA VpIg *2aq704Y Uopouapno—'F ‘PIA
ican Musewn.
fi
d
v
Annals of the South A
344
On Some Points in the Structure of the Dicynodont Skull. 346
Fig. 1 he has the postfrontal carefully marked PtF, and the post-
orbital is left unlettered, but in Fig. 4 he has both the postfrontal
and the postorbital marked PtF. Probably the lettering of the latter
bone is a lapsus calami. The postorbital arch is formed by three
bones—the postfrontal forming a small part of the upper end, and
the jugal forms the whole of the inner side of the lower half. At the
upper end of the postorbital arch the postorbital passes backwards
on the outside of the parietal and at the posterior end overlapping
the squamosal.
The jugal is a large bone which is developed in three different
directions. The anterior part forms the lower wall of the orbit and
the greater part of the suborbital arch. It is overlapped by the
maxilla and articulates with the lachrymal and with the palatine.
It sends up a strong flat process behind the orbit and articulating
with the under side of the postorbital portion of the postorbital
bone. The posterior process of the jugal extends back nearly as
far as the temporal fossa, and lies along the inner side of the
zygomatic process of the squamosal.
The large pineal foramen is situated a little behind the plane of
the postorbital arches. It is in the middle of a median bone which
has been called the preparietal. This bone is present in most
Anomodonts, but is absent in Cistecephalus. It is unknown in any
other order of reptiles. By Newton it is believed to be the inter-
parietal, but this is pretty certainly wrong. One might consider
whether this is not the true parietal, and the supposed parietals
modified post-temporals, but from the condition in Therocephalians
and in Cistecephalus we may safely conclude that the pavietals are
rightly identified. The preparietal is a narrow bone only a little
wider than the foramen, and there is about two-thirds of the bone
in front of the foramen and only one-third behind.
The parietals are a pair of greatly elongated narrow bones. In
front they articulate with the frontals, and, passing backwards
between the preparietal and the postorbitals, form the median
portion of the post-temporal ridge, and articulate with the squa-
mosals. Though when viewed from above the parietals are very
narrow, this is owing in part to their being covered by the post-
orbitals.
Behind the parietals is a large median bone which is greatly
developed laterally, and forms the back of the temporal ridges.
This is the bone which has usually been called the interparietal, and
whether or not it may be the homologue of one or other of the mem-
brane bones of the lower forms, it seems highiy probable that it is
346 Annals of the South African Museum.
homologous with the mammalian interparietal, and therefore rightly
named. It articulates with the whole of the posterior end of the
parietals, and even extending beyond them supports part of the
squamosal.
The squamosal is by far the largest bone in the skull. The pos-
terior part articulates with the exoccipital and supraoccipital, and is
also supported by the interparietal. The downward portion which
is supported by the exoccipital has attached to its lower end the
quadrate, and to the front of the plate the large quadratc-jugal.
The upper and inner portion of the squamosal passes inwards and
forwards as a narrow plate which rests on the interparietal and
on the parietal, and its most anterior part is covered by the post-
orbital. The zygomatic portion passes directly outwards from near
the top of the main portion of the bone, and then curves forwards
Fic. 5.—Occiput of Oudenodon kolbei. About 4 nat. size.
and ends in a point below the orbit. The greater part of the zygo-
matic process rests on the jugal, and the extreme anterior end is
in contact with the posterior part of the maxilla.
The question of whether the Anomodonts have or have not a
quadrato-jugal is one which has occupied my attention for the last
ten years, and every skull with the articular region at all well pre-
served has been most carefully examined for further light on the
matter. The large flat plate which rests on the front of the lower
part of the squamosal has the appearance of a membrane bone,
and had any suture been found between it and the articular head it
would at once have been determined as a quadrato-jugal; but in the
most perfect specimens hitherto examined it was quite clearly made
out that the articular end was the same bone as the flat ascending
plate, and the whole was thus believed to be quadrate. Further,
there quite certainly was no quadrato-jugal bone in the Cynodonts,
and none seemed to be present in the Therocephalians ; it was thus
On Some Points in the Structure of the Dicynodont Skull. 347
unlikely that one should be found in Anomodonts. The study of the
Pelycosaurs showed that the American mammal-like reptiles are allied
to the South African, though in general structure rather more primi-
tive, but there is certainly a quadrato-jugal in the Pelycosaurs. We
now know that in the South African Dinocephalians Delphinognathus,
Tapinocephalus, and Moschops there is also a well-developed quad-
rato-jugal. Recently I have discovered that a quadrato-jugal is
present in Hndothiodon, and as Endothiodon is a near ally of
Dicynodon, though rather more primitive, the discovery has com-
pelled me to still more carefully examine the condition in Dicynodon
and Oudenodon, and the skull of Oudenodon kolbei gives the oppor-
tunity desired.
In Endothiodon the large plate which rests on the squamosal is
evidently all quadrato-jugal, and the present skull proves that in the
Dicynodonts this large plate is also quadrato-jugal. The difficulties
have arisen from the fact that about the outer third of the articular
end, and which has always been regarded as quadrate, now proves
to be quadrato-jugal. The articular surface is of irregular quad-
rangular shape, of which the outer two-thirds are slightly convex
and the inner third has an antero-posterior ridge. Though all this
surface looks as if it were one bone, the quadrate, it is found that a
delicate suture runs across the outer convex portion in an antero-
posterior direction, dividing the surface into two. The outer portion,
which is little less than half, is quadrato-jugal, the inner is quadrate.
The quadrato-jugal bone thus consists of an articular end and a
large flat plate affixed to the anterior side of the squamosal. There
is probably a passage between the quadrate and the quadrato-jugal,
as in most reptiles.
In connection with this discovery it is interesting to note that
Dr. Goodrich came to the correct conclusion a good many years
ago, as appears from a letter he sent me in 1903, in which he says:
“‘T was much interested to hear that you had succeeded in working
out the jaw articulation in Theriodonts, but I am still uneasy about
the identification of the bones of this region in the Dicynodonts.
Some time ago I made some notes in the British Museum, and
concluded that on the outer and anterior face of the squamosal
there is a bone with an upper squamous blade spreading over the
squamosal and a lower portion sharing to a small extent in the
formation of the articulation for the lower jaw. This bone is, I
believe, the one you call quadrate. But since it has more the
appearance of a membrane bone—is apparently on the outer surface
alone and does not come into relation with the bones of the auditory
348 Annals of the South African Museum.
capsule—it seems to me more like a quadrato-jugal,” and further,
“T should like to suggest that the quadrate must be sought some-
where proximally to my quadrato-jugal.”’ Though Goodrich failed
to identify the quadrate, and to clearly understand the articulation,
he deserves full credit for having been the first to correctly identify
the quadrato-jugal. From the determinations on Fig. 4 it is
manifest that Seeley regarded the quadrato-jugal as part of the
quadrate, as has been my own opinion till now.
The quadrate forms the inner portion of the articular surface.
It is a moderate-sized bone, which is supported by the squamosal
but also partly by the exoccipital, and largely by the quadrato-jugal.
On its inner side it gives support to the dumb-bell shaped bone
which I hitherto believed to be the tympanic, but which now proves
to be the stapes.
The yomer is not perfectly displayed in the specimen, but its
structure is well known in other specimens. It articulates with the
premaxilla in front and forms a short backward continuation of the
premaxillary median ridge. It divides the posterior nares, and,
passing backwards, spreads out, and, with the palatine, forms a roof
to the posterior nares after their union.
The palatine is a well-developed bone which forms a small
secondary palate, and on passing backwards forms much of the
lateral wall of the posterior nares. The palatal surface of the
anterior part is roughed, as are the palatal margins and the median
ridge of the premaxilla, and this rough area is regarded by Seeley as
a tooth. Its situation is shown in Figs. 2and 4. As with the other
roughened patches, I feel perfectly satisfied that there is no tooth
structure present and that the structure is merely a bony irregularity
due to the bone having been covered by a thickened epidermal
development. The parts marked M in Fig. 2 by the side of the
palate, and evidently regarded by Seeley as maxille, are, in my
opinion, also palatine, the suture shown in the figure being the
boundary between the palatine and the maxilla. In Fig. 4 the
notch between the two letters M is the suture, and the posterior
M ought, in my opinion, to be PI.
I can find no trace of a transpalatine.
The pterygoid is a long narrow bone which in front articulates
with the palatine, being clasped by the inner and outer portions of
this latter. It forms much of the walls of the posterior narial fossa.
Behind the fossa the bones of the two sides firmly unite with one
another below the basisphenoid, with which they form a strong
suture. The carotid foramen pierces this back part of the bone
On Some Points in the Structure of the Dicynodont Skull. 349
near the middle line. From the sides of this sphenoidal portion of
the pterygoids there passes outwards and backwards a flattened
process which extends to and articulates with the quadrate.
There is still a little uncertainty as to the structure of the
epipterygoid, and the skull of Oudenodon kolbei does not reveal the
structure satisfactorily on either side. What appears to be the
condition from other specimens is as follows: There is a long
slender rod-like epipterygoid or columella cranii which passes from
the parietal above to the pterygoid below. At its lower end it has
an antero-posterior development which is closely articulated with
the side of the basisphenoid and rests on the side of the pterygoid.
In front it passes forwards nearly to the palatine, and behind a
considerable distance towards the quadrate.
The basisphenoid is a well-developed median bone situated
between the pterygoid in front and below, and the periotic and the
basioccipital behind. The anterior portion passes forwards above
the pterygoids and articulates with the vomer. The posterior and
middle part forms a considerable part of the strong bony framework
which supports the brain. In this bony mass sutures are not usually
distinct, but some can be made out with certainty and others with
much probability. Laterally and posteriorly the basisphenoid
articulates with the large bone which holds the ear capsule and
which may be called the periotic. Between the two is a foramen
for the VIIth nerve. On the undersurface the basisphenoid has
two flattened processes which form anterior supports to the
basioccipital processes.
The periotic is a large massive bone, and it may possibly be made
up of an anterior prootic and a posterior opisthotic as in Ophthalmo-
saurus, but at present this is uncertain. It has a descending pro-
cess which forms part of the basioccipital process and in it is
the fenestra ovalis.
The basioccipital is relatively small. It forms the lower third of
the occipital condyle and the greater part of the basioccipital pro-
cesses. By the side of the condyle is a large foramen for the IXth,
Xth, XIth, and XIIth nerves.
The exoccipital forms the outer third of the condyle and the
large lateral process of the occiput.
The supraoccipital forms most of the upper flat portion of the
occiput. In the Oudenodon kolber skull the structure of the oeciput
is not very clearly shown, but the whole structure is known from
other specimens.
In front in the middle line there is another bone which has not,
350 Annals of the South African Museum.
yet been mentioned. Thisis the ethmoid. It lies under the frontal,
and is badly shown in the present skull.
There remains only one other bone to be discussed, namely, the
dumb-bell shaped bone lying between the quadrate and the basi-
occipital process. In the present skull it is beautifully shown, as
can be seen in Fig. 2. Seeley has left it unnamed in the illustra-
tion, and hitherto there has been doubt as to its determination. I
have long been of opinion that it was the tympanic, but I have just
discovered that this is not so. There is now no doubt that the ear
capsule extends down the basioccipital process and that the fenestra
ovalis is situated at the side of the lower end of the process and that
it is covered by the end of the bone in question. There can there-
fore be no longer any doubt that the bone isa true stapes. Else-
where I shall give a detailed account of the structure of the
Anomodont ear. In Oudenodon kolbei the stapes is, when viewed
from below, a somewhat dumb-bell shaped bone, but being irregu-
larly rhomboidal in shape it measures across the one pair of opposite
angles 30 mm., and across the other pair 23 mm. Across the
narrowest part of the middle it measures 12mm. When the bone
is viewed from behind it is seen to be much flattened, the middle
part being only 4 mm. in thickness.
The following are the principal measurements of the skull, allow-
ance being made for the slight distortion.
Greatest length from occipital condyle to front
Of toa le ween saecitae vane nuzawe <moaree consis vas tiencires 228 mm.
Greatest length from beak to back of squamosal 274
Widthtof frontal Tegiom 22. -cc csc see eee telaee eer 36
Width of skull behind postorbital bar ............ 170
Greatest width across squamosals, about......... 230
Greatest width of palate ...............-.cseeseer eee 56
Length from orbit to front of beak ............... 65
Bengt Of Orbitz s.ctane= ees eo es nat a ses semnee 55
Width at narrowest part of parietal region ...... 39
Addendum.—Since the above was written there has appeared
Prof. Jaekel’s book entitled ‘‘ Die Wirbeltiere,’”’ in which he gives
three figures of the skull of Oudenodon kolbei. His interpretations of
the bones agree in the main with those here given. He recognises
the distinctness of the quadrato-jugal. The bone which has been
called preparietal by Seeley and myself Jaekel regards as the
unpaired parietal. The bones which we regard as the parietals he
On Some Points in the Structure of the Dicynodont Skull. 351
does not name. He identifies what he believes to be a distinct
transpalatine, and the median ridge of the premaxillary he believes
to be part of the vomer. I have carefully re-examined the skull
since seeing Jaekel’s book, and am satisfied that this determination
of the vomer is wrong, and I still think we must regard the paired
bones as the parietals and the bone round the pineal foramen a
neomorph. The condition of the parietals in Cistecephalus makes
this conclusion pretty certain. Whether there are distinct trans-
palatines is less clear. The condition in this skull would appear to
lend support to their existence, but I think the apparent sutures are
due to crushing.
Later Addendum.—On one or two points which were left in doubt
in the above paper definite information is now forthcoming. There
is no longer any question that Oudenodon is the female of Dicynodon.
The large series of specimens of Diaclurodon whartsi collected by the
Rev. J. H. Whaits, at Beaufort West, show that a tusk may be either
present or absent, and that it is pretty certainly a sexual character.
Another small Endothiodont obtained by Mr. Whaits at Lemoen-
fontein also shows tusked and tuskless specimens of certainly the
same species. Further, at Kuilspoort, Mr. D. M. 8. Watson and
myself have obtained specimens of Oudenodon bolorhinus tusked and
tuskless. The above-described specimen will thus have to be called
Dicynodon kolber,
There is unquestionably a septo-maxillary in Dicynodon, and quite
a large one has been found by Mr. Watson in Lystrosaurus.
In Endothiodon there has been discovered a distinct transpalatine,
and careful examination shows that in at least some specimens of
Dicynodon it is also distinct. It is thus probable that Jaekel is right.
in his identification of the transpalatine.
19.—On the Manus and Pes of Pareiasaurus.—By R. Broom,
M.D, 1D S6%, BB suo: Ar.
THE South African Museum recently obtained a fair skeleton of a
large Pareiasaurus—probably P. baini, Seeley, from Hottentot’s
Rivier, through the kindness of Mr. Gordon. The specimen was
carefully removed by Mr. A. R. Walker, who succeeded in securing
one hind foot with the toes in nearly perfect condition, and one front
foot, which, though most of the toes are lost, has most of the carpus
preserved with the bones in undisturbed position. These most
welcome additions make our knowledge of the osteology of Pareia-
saurus almost complete.
Though the carpus is not quite complete, sufficient of the elements
are found in contact to enable us to restore the whole carpus with
much probability.
The radiale is by far the largest element of the carpus. It
measures lll mm. in width, 72 mm. between the distal and
proximal surfaces, and 75 mm. between the palmar and dorsal
surfaces. It fits into and occupies nearly the whole of the distal end
of the radius. On the palmar surface there is developed a large
irregular boss which probably functioned as a heel to the manus and
bore the greater part of the weight. The outer side of the radiale
articulates with the intermedium and the 2nd centrale.
The intermedium is a narrow little bone which lies partly between
the radiale and ulnare and partly between the radius and ulna. It
measures 80 mm. in length, about 40 mm. in thickness, and 48 mm.
between the palmar and dorsal surfaces.
The ulnare is a small bone which when viewed from above
appears nearly circular. The upper surface is moderately flat and
the palmar irregularly rounded. The upper surface measures 67 mm.
in length and 58 mm. in width. The greatest thickness of the bone
is about 35 mm.
The 2nd centrale is a small rounded bone which fits in between
the radiale, intermedium, ulnare, 4th carpale, 3rd carpale, and prob-
ably the lst centrale. It measures on the upper surface 45 mm.
by 32 mm.
25
304 Annals of the South African Musewn.
Of the other elements of the carpus the radial centrale is lost, the
4th carpale is in position, the 3rd only slightly displaced, and the 1st
is in apposition with the lst metacarpal, but displaced from the
radiale. What is believed to be the 2nd carpale, but may possibly
but much less probably be the radial centrale, is present but dis-
placed. There is evidence of a lost 5th carpale. The metacarpal
and 1st phalanx of the pollex is present, and a metacarpal which is
probably that of the 2nd digit.
The 4th carpale is a moderate size element; but the upper surface
is smaller than that of the 2nd centrale, measuring 38 mm. by 26 mm.
Lerr CARPUS AND ADJOINING Bones oF Pareiasaurus.
The distance between the palmar and dorsal surface is about
37 mm.
The 3rd carpale is very narrow and deep. Its greatest width is
30 mm. and its depth 40 mm. The greatest measurement between
the proximal and distal surfaces is 24 mm.
The element which is almost certainly the 2nd carpale is 42 mm.
in width, 51 mm. in depth, and 30 mm. between the proximal and
distal surfaces. The upper surface is reduced to a minimum while
the under surface is flattened and doubtless bore part of the
weight.
The 1st carpale has a fairly large upper surface and a small
flattened lower surface. The greatest width of the bone is 47 mm.
and the depth 40 mm. The distance between the proximal and
distal surfaces is 32 mm,
On the Manus and Pes of Pareiasaurus. 355
By fitting the distal elements in position the complete structure of
the carpus can be seen, only the 1st centrale being lost, and its size
and position being apparent.
The 2nd metacarpal is a large quadrangular bone, measuring about
42 mm. in length and 58 mm. in width.
The 1st metacarpal is an irregularly shaped bone as shown in the
diagram. It measures 75 mm. in width and 46 mm. in greatest
length.
The 1st phalanx of the 1st digit is a small bone measuring 56 mm.
in width and 26 mm. in length.
The structure of the carpus will be seen to be of the primitive
generalised reptilian type. In the highly developed amphibian
Ricut Pres oF Pareiasaurus.
Eryops, the number of the elements is the same as in Pareia-
saurus, and the arrangement fairly similar. In Sphenodon the same
primitive structure is retained with little modification, and in the
mammal-like reptiles the agreement is even more striking. In
Dicynodon we find the same 11 elements, and except for the smaller
size of the radiale the carpus might be called Pareiasaurian in type.
In the Dromasauria and the Pelycosauria the same type is met with,
and even in the mammals of to-day the only difference is that the
5th carpale and one of the centralia are lost, and often both
centralia.
The pes, though lacking the proximal part of the tarsus, for-
tunately has the digits nearly complete, besides three distal
tarsal elements.
The tarsals preserved are the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. The 5th appears
to have been unossified.
356 Annals of the South African Museum.
The 2nd tarsale measures 38 mm. by 23 mm., and has a well-
marked dorsal surface. The 3rd tarsale is rather smaller, measuring
34 mm. by 22 mm., and the dorsal surface is reduced to a narrow
ridge. The 4th tarsale is 34 mm. by 18 mm., and has a small but
distinct dorsal surface.
The following are the approximate measurements of the meta-
tarsals and phalanges.
Length. Prox. Width.
list metatarsal ssnjasc. Jf <saze. —— 60 mm.
Ist) phalanx <2.325..- 22 mm. AD af:
Glaw adssnd: -ctios:.c about 70 _,, 48,
Ondrmetatarsal sf. oar bely ick. 43a st ADoes
ist phalanx 2-.-2.: 20 F; £0
2nd phalanx......... 13o 40);
GIaIW aucookcesh hosts about 60 _,, 416)
ard metatarsal cect... Se 45s,
Ist.phalanx ...:... DRS ee 40> ..
2nd phalanx......... about 13. ,, AO.
Glawesni Ns floss Do aia
Ath metatarsal...csa.ssoh 60. ,, 40 ,,
Ist phalanx ......... a0) 3p AO
2nd phalanx...... .. 20" S Soe
3rd phalanx ......... Lee) amr
Gil ai teen tenses: ao" 5 B00
JimeamMevaiarsale sssece cee ANS) HS) a
Ist phalanx ......... OO es DH es
2nd phalanx......... iL eieaioe 20%
Gilat s assets tits. ces IB; 53 2) ae
It is unfortunate that one cannot give with certainty the structure
of the tarsus. All we know for certain is that the proximal elements
are fused into a single bone and that there are a series of small
distal tarsals. The proximal bone certainly represents at least
the tibiale and fibulare, but whether there is or not an intermedium
must remain at present uncertain. From a comparison with the
condition in Procolophon I am inclined to think that the bone
represents the fused tibiale, fibulare, and intermedium. There are
pretty certainly 4 distal tarsals and probably a small centrale.
This foot removes any doubt there might have been as to the
digital formula of Parevasawrus. In the British Museum specimen
the phalanges were so mixed that Seeley was unable to fix the
digital formula. Amalitsky has, in a photograph of one of the
On the Manus and Pes of Pareiasaurus. 307
Russian specimens, shown that the formula is probably 2, 3, 3, 4, 3.
In Propappus two adjacent toes have more than 3 phalanges, and
I regarded the formula in it as probably 2, 3, 4,5, 3. It is now
pretty certain that in Pareiasaurus the formula is 2, 3, 3, 4, 3.
It might be thought unlikely that two animals so nearly allied
could have a different formula, but in the Therocephalia we almost
see the change taking place from the 2, 3, 4, 5, 3 formula to the
2, 3, 3, 3, 3. In Mlurosaurus, though the formula at first sight
appears to be 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, in reality it is 2, 3, 4, 5, 3, as there
is a small plate-like phalanx beyond the 1st phalanx of the 3rd
toe and two minute phalanges in the 4th toe. In Galepus and
Galechirus, and in Dicynodon the formula is certainly 2, 3, 3, 3, 3.
In Pareiasaurus I cannot detect any rudimentary phalanges. On
the present evidence I think one may conclude that Parevasaurus
with its massive body and short toes represents a stage in the
reduction of the digital formula, while the lighter Propappus, though
so closely allied to Pareiasaurus, retains the more primitive formula
of 2, 3,4, 5, 3. Williston has recently shown that the American
Cotylosaur Limmnoscelis has a foot which is very Pareiasaurian
in type but which has the formula 2, 3, 4, 5, 3-4, and this is
also the formula of Procolophon.
( 358 )
20.—On a New Mesosaurian Reptile (Noteosaurus africanus).—By
R. Broom, M.D., D.Sc., F.R.S.S.Af.
HirHerto three species of Mesosawrus have been recognised in
South Africa—M. tenwidens, Gervais, M. pleurogaster, Seeley, and
M. capensis (Girich). A fourth species is known from Brazil,
M. brasiliensis, McGregor, and from Brazil is also known an allied
\
Right pes of Notessaurus africanus. About nat. size.
Mesosaurian, Stereosternum tumidum, Cope. Though Stereosternum
and Mesosaurus agree in most essential characters, they differ in the
former having a pubic foramen and the latter a pubic notch. In both
genera the digital foramen is in the hind foot 2, 3, 4, 5,4. The new
specimen which I am about to describe is also closely allied to
Mesosaurus, but differs in having the digital formula of the hind foot
2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
On a New Mesosaurian Reptile (Noteosaurus africanus). 359
For the new type I propose the name Noteosaurus africanus,
g. et sp. nov.
The specimen was discovered in the district of Victoria West by
Mr. Blake. There is no doubt it is from the same horizon as the
South African species of Mesosaurus. Unfortunately only the pelvic
region with the anterior part of the tail and the greater part of the
two hind limbs are known; and further, though the feet are satisfac-
torily preserved the pelvis is almost hopelessly weathered away. A
part of the ischium is preserved, a fragment of the pubis, and a fair
portion of the ilium. There is no evidence as to whether the pubis
was perforated or notched.
The femur measures 33 mm. in length. The ends resemble those
of the South African Mesosaurs rather than the Brazilian in being
less completely ossified. The tibia and fibula agree rather with
those of M. brasiliensis. The fibula has, as in that species, the
typical Cotylosaurian shape. It measures 21 mm. in length, and
the head is 5:3 mm. wide. The tibia is rather slender.
The tarsus is well preserved. The two large proximal elements
are very similar to those in M. brasiliensis and M. capensis, the
resemblance to those of the former being the more marked.
Distally there appear to be only four tarsalia. The shape of the
elements will be best understood from the figure.
The following are the lengths of the metatarsals and digits in
this new species, and, for comparison, the lengths in the foot of the
Nieuwoudtville Mesosawrus which is believed to be M. capensis.
Noteosaurus Mesosaurus
africanus. capensis.
igh metatarsal saan seca meee as 9. mm: 8-7 mm.
Civdi, nek.) ge cent ire meee 12 12-4 ,,
3rd st ope © Saeeetasepese nae ctetars 12:85 15 9
Atkin, 0 oc: - Sy, Sena Ente ss 13:5 ,, 165,
5th wie, Uy bteamsremaasteeeeemmate [425405 18 -
1st digit, incl. metatarsal ...... ieee 16 a
Ond ,, Pp Ged Ss: O47, 24-6 ,,
ardia ae gt! 28:6 ,, Eh Werte
4th 3 ye tees oo) U5) 37 3
oth i ie eee 39 55 39
In comparing the feet of the two forms the most striking
differences are the relatively greater lengths of the 3rd, 4th, and
5th metatarsals in Mesosaurus, the greater length of the 4th toe
in Mesosaurus, and the relatively greater length of the 5th toe in
360 Annals of the South African Museum.
Noteosaurus. The possession of 6 phalanges in the 5th toe of Noteo-
saurus is a striking difference from Mesosawrus, when certainly
there are only 4 in the known specimens.
The phalanges of the 6th toe are slender, and the last one is
pretty certainly not clawed, whereas those of the other toes are
short and probably had some sort of nail or claw.
Noteosaurus africanus is a very near ally of Mesosaurus, and is
an interesting modification. The increase in number of the
phalanges of the 5th toe is exactly comparable to the increase in
the number of phalanges in the manus of the Cetacea. It is remark-
able to find this modification in one of the oldest known reptiles.
The zone in which it occurs is certainly not later than Lower
Permian, It may even possibly be Upper Carboniferous. It is
further remarkable that only one toe should be thus specialised.
( 361 )
21.—A Revision of the Reptiles of the Karroo.—By R. Broom, M.D.,
D.Sce., F.B.S.S.At.
PROBABLY no fossiliferos deposit in the world will ever compare in
importance with the extensive Permian, Triassic, and Jurassic beds
forming the Karroo system of South Africa. We have here the
continuous record of perhaps 3,000,000 years, and as they were the
years which saw the birth of all the various reptilian orders, of
the birds and of the mammals, the most important years in the
world’s history.
Though a large number of species are known, and though we have
a very good idea of the general character of the fauna at different
periods, the known species must be few in number in comparison to
those which remain to be discovered.
In the last ten years the number of known types has been more
than doubled, and one feels compelled from time to time to stop and
take stock lest one gets overwhelmed with the multitude of forms.
In the following lists I have endeavoured to classify all the known
reptiles of the Karroo. For many years it will be impossible to be
certain of the validity of a few species founded on very imperfect
remains. Fortunately most South African workers have been careful
only to found species on skulls or good skeletal remains, and hence
the confusion caused so frequently in America and Europe by having
names given to vertebre or limb bones scarcely exists with us, and
the few such types as there are will be treated as they deserve to be.
As an Order can rarely, if ever, be as carefully defined when first
proposed as a species or genus, it is impossible to apply the rules of
nomenclature to the large groups. Doubtless it is right to com-
memorate the work of the pioneers by using the names proposed by
them wherever possible, but it is quite impossible always to do so
without causing hopeless confusion. For example, the name Cotylo-
sauria was proposed by Cope in 1880 as a suborder of which
Diadectes was the type. It was founded on an error and was given
up. In 1889 it was re-established as an order to include the reptiles
with roofed temporal regions. In 1888, however, Seeley had proposed
the order Pareiasauria, and there has been much discussion and
362 Annals of the South African Museum.
difference of opinion as to which name has the priority and ought to
be used. If the question is to be decided by strict priority then
neither name must be used, but Owen’s term Serratidentia, proposed
in 1876 for the group to which Pareiasaurus belongs. As, however
Owen believed Pareiasaurus to be a Dinosaur, and as no one has
ever adopted Owen’s term for the reptiles with a roofed temporal
region it seems necessary to use one of the other two terms. As
Seeley in 1888 manifestly did not mean his Pareiasauria to include
any but Pareiasaurus-like animals and in his classification puts the
Procolophonia and the Cotylosauria as other orders of equal value we
can hardly use his term as a super-order. On the other hand, Cope
in 1889 clearly made Cotylosauria an embracing order including all
the primitive reptiles with roofed temporal regions. And as most
later writers have continued to use Cope’s term in this sense it
seems best to use the term Cotylosauria as a super-order and to use
the term Pareiasauria as a suborder of the Cotylosauria.
In the following list I have used the terms which seem to me those
that have most claim. Very doubtful species I have omitted.
Species that are a little doubtful but possibly good I have re-
tained :—
P. indicates that the form is Permian; T. Triassic; and J. Jurassic.
SuperR-OrDER COTYLO- SuPER-OrRDER THERAPSIDA,
SAURIA, Cope. Broom.
| OrpER DINOCEPHALIA,
Orpmr ee Seclen
e 5 é on
Care: Tapinocephalus atherstonti, Owen.. P.
Pareiasaurus serridens, Owen .... P. | Delphinognathus conocephalus,Seeley P.
Pareiasaurus bombidens, Owen .... BP. | Pelosuchus priscus, Broom ........ Pp.
Pareiasaurus baini, Seeley ........ P. | EHccasaurus priscus, Broom........ Bs
Pareiasaurus russouwi, Seeley .... P. | Moschops capensis, Broom ........ P.
Propappus omocratus, Seeley ...... P. | Tamboeria maraisi, Seeley........ P.
Propappus rogersi, Broom ........ P. | Tauwrops macrodon, Broom ........ Pe
Anthodon serrarias, Owen ........ 12s
OrpeER DROMASAUBIA,
Broom.
1
OrpER PROCOLOPHONIA, Galechirus scholtzi, Broom........ 12
Seeley. Galepus jouberti, Broom.......... Re
be) Galeops whaitsi, Broom .......... Ee
Procolophon trigoniceps, Owen .... TT.
Procolophon minor, Owen ........ ai
Procolophon baini, Broom ........ Tr. Orper THEROCEPHALIA,
Thelegnathus browni, Broom ...... ay Broom.
Thelegnathus parvus, Broom...... ‘TT. | Arch@osuchus cairncrossi, Broom... P.
Saurosternon baini, Huxley ...... 2?T. | Titanosuchus ferox, Owen ........ 12%
A Revision of the Reptiles of the Karroo. 363
Titanosuchus cloetei, Broom
Scapanodon duplessisi, Broom
Scymnognathus whaitsi, Broom ....
Gorgonops torvus, Owen
Alopecodon priscus, Broom
Alopecodon rugosus, Broom
Lycosaurus pardalis, Owen
Ictidosuchus angusticeps, Broom
Eriphostoma microdon, Broom
Lycosuchus vanderrieti, Broom... .
Lycosuchus mackayi, Broom
Pardosuchus whaitsi, Broom
Scymnosaurus ferox, Broom
Scymnosaurus warrent, Broom ....
Glanosuchus macrops, Broom......
T'rochosaurus acutus, Broom
Hyenasuchus whaitsi, Broom
Scylacosaurus sclateri, Broom
Pristerognathus polyodon, Seeley ..
Pristerognathus baini, Broom
Pristerognathus platyrhinus, Broom
Lycorhinus parvidens, Broom
Ictidognathus parvidens, Broom
Ictidognathus hemburyi, Broom....
Scaloposaurus constrictus, Owen
Aloposaurus gracilis, Broom ......
Alurosaurus felinus, Owen
Alurosaurus angusticeps, Broom ..
Alurosaurus whaitsi, Broom......
Hlurosaurus striatidens, Broom
Cynodraco serridens, Owen........
Cynosuchus suppostus, Owen
Tigrisuchus simus, Owen....... 5100
Cynochampsa laniaria, Owen......
Arctosuchus tigrinus, (Owen)
Arctognathus curvimola, (Owen)
Ictidosuchus primevus, Broom ....
Arnognathus parvidens, Broom....
OrpER ANOMODONTIA,
Owen.
Endothiodon bathystoma, Owen
Endothiodon uniseries, Owen......
Endothiodon whaitsi, Broom......
Endothiodon platyceps, Broom
Cryptocynodon simus, Seeley
Pristerodon mackayi, Huxley......
Pristerodon agilis, (Broom)
Pristerodon brachyops, (Broom)
Taognathus megalodon, Broom ...
Diélurodon whaitsi, Broom
BO eae eae ea
ig ty
Prodicynodon pearstonensis, Broom P.
Prodicynodon beaufortensis, Broom P.
Chelyoposaurus williamsi, Broom.. ? P.
Dicynodon lacerticeps, Owen...... TAN
Dicynodon feliceps, Owen .......- RB.
Dicynodon testudiceps, Owen ...... P:
Dicynodon tigriceps, Owen.......- Ie
Dicynodon leoniceps, Owen ....-- le
Dicynodon pardiceps, Owen ...... P.
Dicynodon recurvilens, Owen P.
Dicynodon magnus, (Owen) .....- Be
Dicynodon curvatus, Owen .......- Peat
Dicynodon brevirostris, (Qwen).... P.
Dicynodon prognathus, (OQwen).... P.
Dicynodon grayi, (Owen) ........ 12.
Dicynodon megulops, (Owen) ...... Pp.
Dicynodon strigiceps, (Owen)..... sp ky
Dicynodon raniceps, (Owen) ..... Br Wee
Dicynodon simocephalus, Weithofer TT.
Dicynodon latifrons, Broom ...... die
Dicynodon truncatus, (Broom) Parad ea
Dicynodon gracilis, (Broom) ...... P.
Dic-ynodon trigoniceps, (Broom).... P.
Dicynodon megalorhinus, (Broom).. P.
Dicynodon jouberti, Broom........ 126
Dicynodon ingens, Broom ........ Ae
Dicynodon bolorhinus, (Broom).... P.
Dicynodon kolbei, (Broom)........ P.
Dicynodon laticeps, Broom........ PR:
Dicynodon psittacops, Broom ...... P.
Dicynodon lutriceps, Broom ...... 12
Dicynodon pachyrhynchus, Jaekel ? T.
Eimydops arctatus, (Owen) ........ lee
Emydops minor, Broom .......... P.
Lystrosaurus frontosus, Cope...... T.
Lystrosaurus declivis, (Owen) .... TT.
Lystrosaurus latirostris, (Owen) AW
Lystrosaurus murrayi, (Huxley) Ie
Lystrosaurus boopis, (Owen) ...... ae
Lystrosaurus maccaigi, (Seeley) .. T.
Lystrosaurus platyceps, (Seeley) .. T.
Lystrosaurus andersoni, Broom .. ? T.
Cistecephalus microrhinus, Owen .. P.
ORDER CYNODONTIA, Owen.
Galesaurus planiceps, Owen
Nythosaurus larvatus, Owen
Nythosaurus browni, Broom
Ictidopsis elegans, Broom :
Cynognathus crateronotus, Seeley. .
364 Annals of the South African Museum.
Cynognathus berryi, Seeley ...... AM
Cynognathus platyceps, Seeley .... TT.
Cynognathus seeleyi, Broom ...... 4.
MHlurosuchus browni, Broom ...... T's
Microgomphodon oligocynus, Seeley TT.
Trirachodon kannemeyeri, Seeley... T.
Trirvachodon berryi, Seeley........ ey
Trirachodon minor, Broom ...... Ty
Diademodon mastacus, Seeley .... T.
Diademodon tetragonus, Seeley .... TT.
Diademodon browni, Seeley ...... Ws
Gomphognathus kannemeyeri, Seeley 'T.
Gomphognathus polyphagus, Seeley 'T.
Sesamodon browni, Broom........ any
Melinodon simus, Broom ...... ans
Tritheledon riconoi, Broom ...... J.
Bauria cynops, Broom .......... ms
Tribolodon frerensis, Seeley ...... 7m)
Karoomys browni, Broom ........ as
SuPER-ORDER DIAPTO-
SAURIA, Osborn.
OrDER PROGANOSAURIA,
Baur.
Mesosaurus tenuidens, Gervais .... P.
Mesosaurus pleurogaster, Seeley .. P.
Mesosaurus capensis (Gtirich) .... P.
Noteosaurus africanus, Broom .... P.
OrpEr THECODONTIA,
Owen.
Heleosuchus griesbachi, (Qwen).... ? P.
Heleosaurus scholtzi, Broom ...... Pe
Heleophilus acutus, Broom........ 15
Eosuchus colletti, Watson ........ We
Proterosuchus fergusi, Broom .... T.
Mesosuchus browni, Watson ...... IDS
Erythrosuchus africanus, Broom .. T.
OrpeR CROCODILIA.
Notochampsa istedana, Broom .. . J.
Notochampsa longipes, Broom
OrpeR DINOSAURIA, Owen.
Sus-OrprErR THEROPODA,
Marsh.
Massospondylus carinatus, Owen .. J
Massospondylus harriesi, Broom .. J.
Huskelesaurus brownt, Huxley .... J.
Huskelesaurus capensis, (Lydekker) J.
Gryponyx africanus, Broom ...... J.
Gryponyx transvaalensis, Broom .. J.
Aftonyx palustris, Broom ........ J.
Thecodontosaurus skirtopodus, (See-
LOW) ay seecvare sate lena ehoae er Nocheeoner J.
Thecodontosaurus brownt, (Seeley) J.
Gyposaurus capensis, Broom ...... J.
Sus-OrpER PREDENTATA,
Marsh.
Geranosaurus atavus, Broom .... J.
OrpDER RHYNCHOCEPHA-
LIA, Giinther.
Palacrodon browni, Broom........ 1
Orper GNATHODONTIA,
Owen.
Howesia browni, Broom .......... al
OrpeR LACERTILIA.
Paliguana whiteit, Broom ........ IN,
SupER-ORDER CHELONIA.
Eunotosaurus africanus, Seeley .. P.
Of the above recognised 168 types all are known by skull remains except 16, and
of these 9 are Dinosaurs.
A Revision of the Reptiles of the Karroo. 365
In the above classification it must not be considered that finality
has been reached. In dealing with extinct forms which are often very
imperfectly known it is impossible to do more than place many of
them in the system provisionally. Attention may be called to the
following points :—
Gorgonops, Titanosuchus, and the allied forms are provisionally
placed in the Therocephalia, of which they form a distinct family.
The genera Oudenodon and Opisthoctenodon have been abandoned
as these supposed genera are now pretty certainly known to be the
females of Dicynodon and Pristerodon respectively, the presence or
absence of a tusk being evidently only a sexual character in these
types.
Karoomys, which I have hitherto regarded as probably a mammal,
is perhaps rather more likely to be a Cynodont.
Under Owen's order Thecodontia are grouped a series of primitive
reptiles which seem to be connected with the ancestral crocodiles.
The forms known probably belong to at least four sub-orders, but it
seems unwise to attempt any further classification at present. Heleo-
suchus griesbacht is Owen’s Saurosternon griesbachi which is, in my
opinion, not at all allied to Sawrosternon baini. Erythrosuchus,
when first described by me, was regarded as a Phytosaur. At that
time only a few bones of the skeleton had been discovered ; now the
skull and most of the skeleton are known, Huene has recently dis-
cussed the affinities at length, and forms for the type a new Order,
the Pelycosimia, believing it has affinities with the Pelycosaurs as
well as the Phytosaurs. In this I differ from him. Hrythrosuchus
is, In my opinion, an ancestral Phytosaur not yet specialised for an
aquatic life, and related to the Belodon types in much the same way
as the Theropodous Dinosaurs are to the Sauropodous or the Creo-
donts to the Archzoceti. Mesorhinus of Jaekel to some extent
forms a connecting link.
Hunotosaurus of Seeley I have placed in the Chelonia. The skull
and limbs are still unknown, but the eight pairs of broad ribs and the
structure of the vertebre seem to suggest that we have here an
ancestral Chelonian. Three specimens are known, all from the
Pareiasaurus zone or Middle Permian beds.
ADDENDvUM [see next page].
366 Annals of the South African Museum.
ADDENDUM.
Since the above list was drawn up the following new Reptiles
have been described :—
OrpEeR PAREIASAURIA.
Pareiasaurus acutirostris, Broom.
Scylacognathus parvus, Broom.
Scymnorhinus planiceps, Broom.
Pareiasuchus peringueyi, Broom and | OrprerR ANOMODONTIA
Haughton. a ; ;
Propappus parvus, Haughton. we nodon alticeps, Broom and Haugh-
on.
Dicynedon testudirostris, Broom and
Orpers THEROCEPHALIA ads eae
and GORGONOPSIA. Dicynodon strigops, Broom.
Scylacops capensis, Broom. |
Scymnognathus tigriceps, Broom and Orper THECODONTIA.
Haughton. Euparkeria capensis, Broom.
It has been thought well to re-establish Seeley’s Order or Sub-
Order Gorgonopsia, as Gorgonops and its allies are now known to
differ from the Therocephalians in many important points.
ANNALS
OF THE
SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM.
VOLUME VII. containing :—
DESCRIPTIONS or tae PALAONTOLOGICAL MATERIAL
COLLECTED sy razr MEMBERS or tots GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
or CAPE COLONY.
PART I. containing :—
1.—Polyzoa and Anthozoa from the Upper Cretaceous Limestone of
Need’s Camp, Buffalo River. By W. D. Lane, M.A., F.G.S.,
British Museum (Nat. Hist.). With One Plate.*
2.—LHchinoidea, Brachiopoda, and Lamellibranchia from the Upper
Cretaceous Limestone of Need’s Camp, Buffalo River. By
Henry Woops, M.A., University Lecturer in Paleontology,
Cambridge. With One Plate* and Three Text-figures.
* The one Plate illustrates both papers.
ISSUED JULY 2nd, 1908. PRICE 2s. 6d.
PRINTED FOR THE
TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
AND :
THE GEOLOGICAL COMMISSION OF THE COLONY OF THE
CAPE OF GOOD HOPE.
By West, Newman & Co., Lonpon.
PARTS OF THE ANNALS PREVIOUSLY ISSUED :— Ba ae
- Vol. I.—Part 1, 7/6; Part 2,10/-; Part 8, 5/-; complete £1 os ot.
Vol. I1.—Part 1, 2/6; Part 2, 5/-; Part 8, 1/-;
Part 4, 2/6; Part 5,1/-; Part 6, 2/6;
Part 7, 1/-; Part 8, 2/6; Part 9, 1-/;
Part 10, 6/-; Part 11, 2/6; Index,&c.,1/-; complete £1 8s. 6d.
Vol. IlI.—Part 1, 2/-; Part 2,1/-; Part 3, 5/-;
Part 4, 2/6; Part 5,5/-; Part 6, 6/-;
Part 7, 1/-; Part 8, 2/6; Part 9, 1/-;
Index, Title, &., 1/- . : : . complete £1 7s. Od. — |
Vol. IV. (containing Paleontological papers published
‘in conjunction with the Geological Survey).—
Part 1,10/-; Part 2, 6/-; Part 3, 4/-;
Part 4, 4/-; Part 5, 2/-; Part 6, 4/-;
Part 7, 12/6; Part 8, 7/- E q . complete £2 9s. 6d.
Vol. V.—Part 1, 4/-; Part 2, 7/6; Part 3, 2/-;
Part 4, 1/-; Part 5, 1/6. (Not yet soubiieest
Vol. VI.—Part 1, 12/-.
The Annals of the South African Museum will be issued at —
irregular intervals, as matter for publication. is available.
Copies may be obtained from—
Messrs. WEST, NEWMAN & Co.,
54, Harron GarpEn, Lonpon.
Messrs. WILLIAM WESLEY & SON,
28, Essex Street, Stranp, Lonpon.
Mzssrs. FRIEDLANDER & Co., Cart Strasse, BERLIN.
Or, Spi
THE LIBRARIAN, SoutnH AFRICAN Museum, Care Town.
ANNALS
SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM.
_- DESCRIPYIONS or tax PALA ONTOLOGICAL MATERIAL
Be COLLECTED sy tax MEMBERS or maz GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
ues! or CAPE COLONY | ann OTHERS.
PART II. containing :—
3—The Invertebrate Fauna and Paleontological Relations of the
‘Unttenhage Serves. By F. L. Kiron, M.A., Ph.D., F.GS.
With Ten Plates and One Text-figure.
ISSUED SHPT. 24th, 1908. PRICE 12s. 6d.
PRINTED FOR THE
ee TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
AND
: a THE GEOLOGICAL COMMISSION OF THE COLONY OF THE
| CAPE OF GOOD HOPE AND OTHERS.
By West, NEWMAN & Co., Lonpon.
ern aay
yt a ah
ew
hha)
;
Oy
Vy
:
PARTS OF THE ANNALS PREVIOUSLY ISSUED :—
Vol. 1—Part 1, 7/6; Part 2,10/-; Part 8, 5/-; complete £1 2s. 6d.
Vol. II.— Part 1, 2/6; Part 2, 5/-; Part 8, 1/-;
Part 4, 2/6; Part 5,1/-; Part 6, 2/6;
Part 7, 1/-; Part 8, 2/6; Part 9, 1-/;
Part 10, 6/-; Part 11, 2/6; Index,&c.,1/-; complete £1 8s. 6d.
Vol. III.—Part 1, 2/-; Part 2,1/-; Part 8, 5/-;
Part 4, 2/6; Part 5, 5/-; Part 6, 6/-;
Part 7, 1/-; Part 8, 2/6; Part 9, 1/-;
Index, Title, &e., 1/- . - + + complete £1 7s. Od.
Vol. IY. (containing Paleontological papers published
in conjunction with the Geological Survey).—
Part 1, 10/-; Part 2, 6/-; Part 8, 4/-; | f
Part 4, 4/-; Part 5, 2/-; Part 6, 4/-;
Part 7, 12/6; Part 8,7/- . complete £2 9s. 6d. —
Vol. V.—Part 1, 4/-; Part 2, 7/6; Part 8, 2/-;
Part 4, 1/-; Part 5, 1/6. (Not yet completed.) —
Vol. VI.—Part 1, 12/-.
Vol. VII. (containing Paleontological papers published
in conjunction with the Geological Survey).—
Part 1, 2/6.
The Annals of the South African Museum will be issued at
irregular intervals, as matter for publication is available.
Copies may be obtained from—
Messrs. WEST, NEWMAN & Co., 3
54, Hatron Garpen, Lonpon.
Mussrs. WILLIAM WESLEY & SON,
28, Essex Srreetr, Srranp, Lonpon..
Mussrs. FRIEDLANDER & Co., Cart Srrasse, BERuin. —
: Or,
THE LIBRARIAN, Sourn Arrican Museum, Carr Town.
ee
slo eee
Rept F
ANNALS
SOUTH 7 MUSEUM.
4._CONTRIBUTIONS “TO ‘SOUTH AFRICAN
PALAONTOLOGY.
~ . PART III. containing :—
7.—The Fossil Fishes of the Upper Karroo Beds of South Africa.
8.—Notice of some new South African fossil Amphibians and Reptiles.
9.—On a large extinct species of Bubalis. .
10.—On evidence of a large Horse recently extinct in South Africa.
11.—On the shoulder girdle of Gynognathus.
12. —An attempt to determine the horizons of the fossil vertebrates of the
- Karroo.
BY
R. Broom, M.D., D.Sc., O.M.Z.S.
ISSUED APRIL 28, 1909. PRICE 4s. 6d:
- PRINTED, FOR THE
TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTH “AFRICAN MUSEUM
By West, Newman & Co., Lonpon.
PARTS OF THE ANNALS PREVIOUSLY ISSUED: NE
Vol. 1.—Part 1, 7/6; Part 2, 10/-; ; Part 3, 5/-; complete £1 2 6d.
Vol. I1.—Part 1, 2/6. Part 2, 5/-; Part 8, “Aj-3
Part 4, 2/6; Part 5,1/-; Part 6, 2/6;
Part -7; 1/25 Part8, 2/63 Parts8, 1a anes
Part 10, 6/-5 Part 11, 2/6; Index, &c., 1/-; complet “1 8s. 6d.
Vol. IlI].—Part 1, 2/-; Part 2, 1/-; Part 8, bs
Part 4, 2/6; Part 5, 5/-; Part 6, 6/-;
Part 7, 1/-; Part 8, ue Part 9, Alot aie Sb ieee
Index, Title, &c., 1/- gets complet £1 7s. 08 ue ‘i
(ita
ae
Bry:
ae
Nee
wee
aN
a
Siar
eee ”
Vol. IY. (containing Paleontological papers published _
in conjunction with the Geological Survey)— Pera
Part 1, 10/-; Part 2, 6/-; “Part 8, Ajeve: ; ete ;
Part'4, 4/-} Pact 5; O/-; Part 6, 4/-40 0 ee Rae
Part 7,12/6; Part 8,7/- . . - complete & £2 Qs. 6a. ae
Vol. V.—Part 1, 4/-; Part 2, 7/6; Part 8, 2/-; ie
Part 4, 1/-; Part 5, 1/6; et 6, ae (not yet competed.)
Vol. VI.—Part 1, 12/-; Part 2, 4/-. 5 , (not yet completed.)
Vol. VII. (containing Paleontological papers fabliched:
in conjunction with the Geological Survey).— —
Part 1, 2/6; 2, 12/6; 3, 4/6. (not yet completed.)
The Annals of the South African Museum will be isewed at
irregular intervals, as matter for pibleeation: is available.
Copies may be obtained from—
Mzssrs. WEST, NEWMAN & Co, -
| 54, Harron eae LONDON.
" Mussrs. WILLIAM WESLEY & SON, |
28, Essex Srreet, STRAND, Loxpox. |
Messns. FRIEDLANDER & Co., Cann Smnasen, Benn. -
THE LIBRARIAN, Sourn Arrican Muszum, Care Town. 9
ay tees
teens -9 a epee 4
pe Sn i ee ee
ANNALS
SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM.
VOLUME VII.
\
CONTRIBUTIONS TO SOUTH AFRICAN
oF PALMONTOLOGY.
PART. IV. containing :—
: 13.—On the Dinosaurs of the Stormberg, South Africa. By R.
; _ Broom, M.D., D.Se., C.M.Z.S. (Plates XIV.-XVIL.)
14.— Description of a New Plesiosaur (Plesiosaurus capensis, sp.
nov.) from the Uitenhage Beds of Cape Colony. By C. W.
Anprews, D.Se., F.R.S., of the British Museum (Natural
History). (Plate XVIII. and four text-figures.)
ISSUED JULY 5th, 1911. PRICE 7s.
_PRINTED FOR THE
TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
By Wsst, Newman & Co., Lonpon.
siden a
4
ae
Ke
Sate
ie
PARTS OF THE ANNALS PREVIOUSLY ISSUED:— i
Vol. I—Part 1, 7/6; Part 2,10/-; Part 3, 5/-; complete £1 2s. 6d.
Vol. II.—Part 1, 2/6; Part 2, 5/-; Part 8, 1/-; is
Part 4, 2/6; Part 5,1/-; Part 6, 2/6;
Part 7, 1/-; Part 8, 2/6; Part 9, 1-/;
Part 10, 6/-; Part 11, 2/6; Thdex, &e., 1/-; complete £1 8s. 6a.
Vol. I1].—Part 1, 2/-; Part 2, ie Part 3, 5/-;
Part 4, 2/6; Part 5, 5/-; Part 6, 6/-;
Part 7,1/-; Part 8, 2/6; Part 9, 1/-;
Index, Title, &.,1/- . , ; . complete £1 7s. Od.
Vol. IV. (containing Paleontological papers published
in conjunction with the Geological Survey).—
Part 1,10/-; Part 2, 6/-; Part 3, sha
Part 4, 4/-; Part 5, 2/-; Part 6, 4/-; mT ot
Part 7, 12/6; Part 8,7/- 3 - complete £2 9s, i
Vol. V.—Part 1, 4/-; Part 2, 7/6; Part 8, 2/-;
Part 4, 1/-; Part 5, 1/6; Part 6, 4/6;
Part. 7, 2/6; Part 8, 4/-; Part 9, 4/-.
Vol. VI.—Part 1, 12/-; Part 2, 4/-; Part 3, 3/-;
Part 4, 27/-. '
\
Vol. VIL. (containing Paleontological papers published
in conjunction with the Geological Survey).—
Part 1, 2/6: 2, 12/6; Part 3, 4/6.;
Part 4, 7/-.
Vol. VIII.—Part 1, 40/-.
Vol. IX.—Part 1, 4/-.
Vol. X.—Part 1, 2/6.
Vol. XI.—Part 1, 3/-.
_ The Annals of the South African Museum will be issued Ghee
irregular intervals, as matter for publication is available.
Copies may be obtained from—
Messrs. WEST, NEWMAN & Co.,
54, Harron GARDEN, Tek ates.
Messrs. WILLIAM WESLEY & SON, |
28, Essex Srreet, Srranp, Lonpon.
Messrs. FRIEDLANDER & Co., Cart Strasse, BERLIN.
Or, tes
THE LIBRARIAN, Sours Arrioan Museum, Care Town.
ANNALS
AFRICAN, MUSEUM
£
15 On a Nene) Specie
Rares surian Lambs.
- One Species,‘ of /
Weise! Pondoland. By R . Broom, M.A., D.Sc. (Plate XXTL)-
on -On a Noto Tipe: of Cymodont from. the Stormberg.
R. Broom, M.A, DiSe. (Plate XXIL) +
) Some ‘Points vin ‘the Structure of the Dieynodont Sul
Nie dele tie DS Sc. (Five text- figures.)
ISSUED JULY, 12th, 1912.
“of Propappus, and on. the ae of oe ok
By R. Broom, M.A. as ee
Tylosaurus from the Unpei Cretaceous Beds : ake!
c
PARTS OF THE ANNALS PREVIOUSLY ISSUED: sor
Vol. L—Part 1, 7/6; Par 2 ,10/-;
Vol. 11.—Pari 1, 2/6 Pa
fe);
Part 4, 2/6; Space Bea):
Part 7, 1/-; Part 8, 2/6;
Part 10, 6/-; Part 11, 2/6;
Vol. IlI.—Part 1, 2/-; Part 2, 1/-;
Part 4, 2/6; Part 5, 5/-;
Part 7, 1/-; Part 8, 2/6;
Index, Title, &., 1/-
Vol. LY. (containing Paleontological
Part 3, 5/-; complete £1 Qs. 6d.
Part 3, eas Bee
Part 6
Part 9, 1-/;~ aE
‘Index, &e., 1/-; complete él 8s. 6d.
Part 3, 5/-;
Part 6, 6/-;
Part 9, A;
6,
- complete. £1 Ts. Od. |
papers published
in conjunction with the Geological Survey).— _
Part 1,10/-; Part 2, 6/-;
Part 4, 4/-; Part 5, 2/-;
Part 7, 12/6; Part 8, 7/-
Vol. V.—Part 1, 4/-; Part 2, 7/6;
Part 4, 1/-; Part 5, 1/6;
Part 7, 2/6; Part 8, 4/-;
. Index, Title, &c., 1/-
Part 3, 4/-;
Part 6, 4/-; 2
complete £2 9s. Gd
Part 8, 2/-; hee
Part 6, 4/6;
Part 9, 4/-; is
heats £1 12s. Ou.
Vol. VI.—Part 1, 12/-;
Part 2, 4/-;
Part 8, 8/-;
. complete £2 qs. Od.
Part 4, 27/—; Index, Title, &.; 1/- .
Vol. VIL. (containing Paleontological papers published
in conjunction with the Geological Survey).—
Part 1, 2/6; 2, 12/6; Part 3, 4/6.;
Part 4, 7/—; Part 5, 5/-.
Vol. VIII.—Part 1, 40/-.
Vol. [X.—Part 1, 4/~; Part 2, 5/-.
Vol. X.—Part 1, 2/6; Part 2, 2/-; Part 3, 1/6.
Vol. XI.—Part 1, 8/-; Part 2, 1/6.
The Annals of the South African Musewn will be issued at
irregular intervals, as matter for publication is available.
Copies may be obtained from=s
Mzssns. WEST, NEWMAN & Co.,- ; BS
54, Harron GarpeEn, itonpon We
Mrssrs. WILLIAM WESLEY & SON, |
28, Essex Srreer, Sees, Lonpon.
Mussrs. FRIEDLANDER & ‘Co., Carn Srrassx, BERLIN.
Or,
THE LIBRARIAN, Sovursn Arrican Musrum, Carr Town.
Fo ANNALS”
OF THE |
i sour AFRICAN. ae
. - oe ‘cons tio TO oe AFRICAN |
OGY.
PART Vv “containing : a, *
19.—On the Manus and Pes. of Pareiasaurus. By R. Broom, —
‘| MD. D.Sc. : | :
20. —On a New Mesosaurian Lepitia (Noteosaurus africanus). By
R. Broom, M.D., D.Se. 4
- 21—A Ravan of the Rennes of the Karroo. By R. Broom,
MD., D860. PRS.S.AL !
Sek.
=> of
A ID ase
ISSUED MARCH 20th, 1913. PRICE Is.
% ; us PRINTED FOR THE
_ TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
By WEST: Newman & Co., Lonbon.
PARTS OF THE ANNALS. PREVIOUSLY ISSUED:
Vol. 1—Part 1, 7/6; Part 2, 10/-; Part 38, 5/~; complete
Vol. JI.—Part 1, 2/6; Part 2, 5/-; Part 8, 1/-;
Part 4, 2/6; Part 5, 1/-; Part 6, 2/6; Bi
Part 7, 1/-; Part 8, 2/6; ‘Part 9, Ap s a 3
Part 10, 6/-; Part 11, 2/6; Index,kc., Ynys complete £18 8s. 6a.
Nol. 1II.—Part 1,'2/—; Part 2,1/-; Part 3, 5/3 SIMAL AS Niche ye eae
Part 4, 2/6; Part 5, 5/-; Part 6, 6/-; ee
Part 7, 1/-; Part 8, BBs ‘Part 9, ees ig SOE a
Index, Title, &.,1/-.. 9°.
Vol. IV. (containing Paliasesaleatoal papers Aone
in conjunction with the Geological Survey).- Hage ee he roots
Part 1,10/-; Part 2, 6/-; Part 8, 4/-;
Part 4, 4/-; Part 5, 2/-; Part 6, Ales Gt REN NEG cos Nee ie
Part 7, 12/6}: ParksOea/ 2-5 aa! complete £2.95, a
Vol. V.—Part 1, 4/-; Part 2, 7/6; Part 8, 2/-; ae hear ie
Part 4, 1/-; Part 5, 1/6; Part 6, 4/6; TROL ae
Part 7, 2/6; Part 8, 4/-; Part 9, 4/-; rate Ate
Index, Title, &e.,1/- 2 ef ‘complete £1 12. od. oe
Vol. VI.—Part 1, 12/-; Part 2,4/-; Part 8,8/-;) ae
) Part 4, 27/-; Index, Title, &e., 1/- . eae “27 1s, Od.
Vol. VIL. (containing Paleontological papers published — v
in conjunction with the Geological Survey).— | oe es eae
Part’1, 2/6; Part 2,12/6; Part8,4/6; ==
Part 4, 7/-; Part 5,6/-; Part 6, 1/-; Se OM She:
Vol. VIII.—Part 1, 40/-.
Vol. IX.—Part 1, 4/-; Part 2, 5/-. . ce aes eet ee
Vol. X.—Part 1, 2/6; Part 2, 2/-; Part 8, 1/6; 0%) 9
Part 4, 2/6; Part 5,.18/-. AES a So BMS ME
“Vol. XI.—Part 1, 3/-; Part 2, 1/6; Part 3, (12/-; ‘Part aj
The Annals of the South African ‘Museum will be issued at . i
irregular intervals, as matter for publication us available.
| ee may be obtained okie : 2 cee:
Messrs. WEST, NEWMAN & Co, =
+54, HARON annex, Loxpos. 2
Mussns. WILLIAM WESLEY & SON, ee
28, Essex Sac Srrap, Lowpox. ye aa
MEssRs. FRIEDLANDER & Co., CaRL ‘Srmassr, Berwin. oe e -
Or,
THE LIBRARIAN, Sout ABRICAN Musnom, Carn Town.
ANNALS = 37019.
OF THE
SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
“VOLUME VIL—TITLE, INDEX, ée.
-. ISSUED MAY 30th, 1913. PRICE. 1s.
PRINTED FOR THE
TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM
By West, Newman & Co., Lonpon.
Kei
Se hk Seas
ote
PARTS OF THE ANNALS PREVIOUSLY ISSUED:—
Vol. 1.—Part 1, 7/6; Part 2,10/-; Part 3, 5/-3 complete £1 Qs. 6a.
Vol. I1.—Part 1, 2/6; Part 2, 5/-; Part 8, Ue;
Part 4, 2/6; Part 5, 1/-; Part 6, 2/6;
Part 7, 1/-; Part 8, 2/6; Part 9, 1-/;
Part 10, 6/-; Part 11, 2/6; Index,&c.,1/-; ngiapicle £1 83. 6d.
Vol. I1].—Part 1, 2/-; Part 2,1/-; Part 8, 5/-;—
Part 4, 2/6; Part 5, 5/-; Part 6, 6/-; MaASS
Part 7, 1/-; Part 8, 2/6; Part .9, 1/-; is
Index, Title, &e., 1/- . ; -eouelats £1 7s. Od.
Vol. IV. (containing Paleontological papers published
in conjunction with the Geological he A a _
Part 1, 10/~; Part 2, 6/-; Part 8, 4/-;
Part 4, 4/-; Part 5, 2/-; Part 6, 4/-;
Part 7, 12/6; Part 8, 7/= a £2 98. 64.
Vol. V.—Part 1, 4/-; Part 2, 7/6; Part 3, 2/-;
Part 4, 1/-; Part 5; 1/6; Part 6, 4/6; -
Part 7, 2/6; Part 8, 4/—; Part 9, 4/-;
Index, Title, &., 1/- . ee “complete £1 128. 0d.
Vol. VI.—Part 1, 12/-; Part 2, 4/-; Part 8, 8/-;
Part 4, 27/-; Index, Title, &e., 1/- ; complete £2 Te Od.
Vol. VII. (containing Paleontological papers published ~
in conjunction with the Geological Survey).—
Part 1, 2/6; Part 2, 12/6; Part 3, 4/6;
Part 4, 7/-; Part 5, Bie id Part 6, 1/-;
Index, Title, &c., 1/—-. i . complete £1 13s. 6d.
Vol. VIII.—Part 1, 40/-.
Vol. 1X.—Part 1, 4/-; Part 2, 5/-.
Vol. X.—Part 1,°2/6; Part 2, 2/-; Part 8, 1/6; ©
Part 4, 2/6; Part 5,18/—; Part 6, 2/6.
Vol. XI,—Part 1, 3/-; Part 2,-1/6; Part 3, 12/-;
Part 4,1/-; Part 5, 15/-.
Vol. XIL.—Part 1, 14/-.
The Annals of the South African Musewm will be ened at
uregular inter vals, as matter for publication is available.
Copies may be obtained from— soit,
Mzssrs. WEST, NEWMAN & Co., 54, Harton Garpen, Loxpox.
Mzssrs. WILLIAM WESLEY & SON, ;
28, Essx- Srreet, STRAND, Lonpox.
Messrs? FRIEDLANDER & Cae, Cari Strasse, BERLIN.
Or, cS
THE LIBRARIAN, SoutH AFRICAN ‘Mosuum, ( Care Town.
Me
Mt
s
he
rapa
5
ees
J MBL/WHOI LIBRARY
AMON
| WH LB&Y H