http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/eit.2015.145
www. europeani ournaloftaxonomv. eu
2015 • Albrecht A.C.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Monograph
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F6A3EA6C-9080-4DC7-9EF9-4C4DBEB4086F
Identification guide to Nordic aphids associated with mosses, horsetails
and ferns (Bryophyta, Equisetophyta, Polypodiophyta)
(Insecta, Hemiptera, Aphidoidea)
Anders Christian ALBRECHT
Finnish Museum of Natural History - Zoology, University of Helsinki, P. Rautatiekatu 13, FI-00014
Helsinki, Finland. Email:
[email protected]
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:3835E475-B3F6-4965-A4E6-A3AE55659C86
Abstract. Keys and diagnoses of North European aphids (Hemiptera, Aphidoidea) associated with
mosses, horsetails and ferns are given, based on fresh and freeze-dried material. Numerous externally
visible and thus informative characters, that are absent in cleared, slide-mounted specimens, such as
body shape colours, wax coating and pattern etc., are utilized. Most of the species are illustrated by
photographs of live specimens and drawings. Root-feeding species living in the moss layer or otherwise
often present in moss samples are also included, even if their hosts were spermatophytes. The combination
of colour images and diagnoses, utilizing easily observed characters, allows the identification of a large
number of species already in the field, and many more at home with the aid of a stereo microscope. Host
plant relationships and association with ants are summarised, including new records. Brief accounts on
aphid life cycles, freeze-drying preparation techniques, etc. are also given to support the use of the keys.
Keywords. Aphids, Bryophyta, Pteridophyta, identification, photographs.
Albrecht A.C. 2015. Identification guide to Nordic aphids associated with mosses, horsetails and ferns (Bryophyta,
Equisetophyta, Polypodiophyta) (Insecta, Hemiptera, Aphidoidea). European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55.
http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5852/eit.2015.145
Introduction
Aphids are notorious for being difficult to identify and traditionally demanding clearing and mounting
procedures before they can be studied, procedures that many beginning students experience as tedious
and time-consuming. The preparations include preservation in ethanol, maceration by heating in alcohol
and potassium hydroxide (KOH), neutralizing in acetic acid (CH 3 COOH), rinsing in distilled water,
embedding in a suitable medium (e.g., Polyviol, Canada balsam or Euparal) on a microscopic slide,
covered by a cover slip and finally drying, preferably in a heated cabinet. Recipes and instructions for
the procedures are given in, e.g., Danielsson (1985), Heie (1980, 1986) and Blackman & Eastop (1994,
2014). The clearing and mounting procedures, however, destroy many obvious and useful diagnostic
characters, such as shape, colour, wax pattern and grades of sheen and lustre. Disabling these characters
forces the identification to rely on counts, measurements and indices based on them.
1
European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55 (2015)
This guide is, as far as possible, based on fresh and freeze-dried material, which maximizes the number
of characters that can be used, including colouration and wax pattern. The measurements and indices
available on slides are naturally also available on freeze-dried specimens, so slide-based keys can very
well be used. Just as for slide-mounted material, knowledge of the host plant is of great help for the
identification. Most aphids are monophagous or oligophagous, and closely related species usually feed
on different plants, which makes plant-based keys fast and easy to use. A clear majority of the species are
readily identifiable based on host plant data, diagnoses, colour images of live specimens, fresh or freeze-
dried material and the aid of a good stereo microscope. Often just a glance at a photograph will appear to
give the correct identification, but sibling species may be involved, so it should always be kept in mind
that host plant association alone is not enough. Descriptions and figures should always be consulted
before the decision is made. In some cases fine details need to be studied, and measurements may have
to be taken. In most cases the necessary measurements can be taken on fresh and freeze-dried material,
without any further processing. Sometimes, however, a water preparation on a slide, e.g., of a leg, is
helpful, and in critical cases cleared and mounted specimens are needed. It should be borne in mind that
all characters visible in slides are present also in freeze-dried material, and if not directly visible, always
can be made so by clearing and mounting the specimen.
The present article is focused on the aphids associated with cryptogams of Finland and Scandinavia,
including Iceland, Greenland, The Faroes and Svalbard. Included are also most of the species occurring
in adjacent parts of north-eastern Europe, the Baltic region and northern central Europe, including the
British Isles. Some species feeding on spermatophytes, but often occurring in moss samples, are also
included. Accounts on aphid life cycles, preservation and terminology are also given here, but they are
kept short, and more or less limited to subjects needed for using the keys and diagnoses. This article is
intended to be followed by papers dealing with aphids feeding on other plants, and the ultimate goal is
to cover all aphids occurring in North Europe.
The keys, instead of being dichotomous, consist of multi-character diagnoses and synopses grouping the
diagnoses into sections sharing one or a few easily observed characters. Accompanied by photographs and
drawings the data given in the diagnoses should in most cases be enough to allow correct identifications,
or when that is not the case, to give sufficient reason to doubt the results and seek additional information
elsewhere in the literature. As a contrast to keys based on slide material, this article also aims at enabling
the student to learn species in advance and to recognise them as they are encountered in the field.
Material and methods
The host records and distribution data are according to Blackman & Eastop (1994, 2006, 2014), Heie
(1980, 1986, 1992, 1994, 1995, 2004), Holman (2009) and the database of the Finnish Expert Group on
Hemiptera ( http: //biol coll .utu. ft /h e m i / tv o rv h m a/tv or v h m ae n g, htm f comprising most of the aphid data
recorded from Finland (predominantly by O. Heilcinheimo and myself), with additional records from
adjacent countries. The photographs and drawings are original, unless otherwise stated. My own records
of hosts are marked with asterisks (*) in the host lists of the diagnoses and in the host tables (Appendices
1 and 2), as are records by Osmo Heikinheimo and other Finnish collectors whenever I have been able
to confirm the relationships (e.g., from Heikinheimo’s field notes).
The identifications underlying the figures, keys and diagnoses have all been confirmed by checking
against keys and descriptions based on cleared specimens. The diagnoses are kept short, particularly
when photographs are available, and the emphasis is on the parthenogenetic morphs, particularly aptera.
In many cases, characteristics of juveniles are also included. More elaborate descriptions of all morphs
are given in, e.g., Heie (1980, 1986, 1992, 1994, 1995, 2004) and references therein. The diagnoses are,
whenever possible, based on my own observations on fresh and freeze-dried material supplemented by
data from Heie (1980, 1986, 1992, 1994, 1995, 2004), Blackman 2010 and Blackman & Eastop (1994,
2
ALBRECHT A.C., Identification guide to Nordic aphids
2006, 2014) (generally not cited separately) or other references, cited as used. In addition, valuable
information on aphid taxonomy and bibliography can be found in Favret (2015). The plant nomenclature
is based on Hill et al. (2006: mosses) and Karlsson & Agestam (2014: vascular plants). Data on attendant
ants are mostly my own (denoted by an asterisk), the nomenclature following Abenius et al. 2012.
Preservation and labelling
For students who wish to preserve aphid material or build a reference collection without spending
excessive time with the slide mounting process, here is an easy recipe for freeze-dried specimens:
1. Collect the aphids in small test tubes or other suitable vials, with or without part of the host plant. A
slip of tissue paper may be inserted to absorb excess moisture. Tabel the vial and close it, e.g., with
a cotton wool stopper. Keep the vial out of direct sunshine.
2. At home, put the vials into a container with a layer of desiccant (Silica gel, Rubin gel) on bottom
in the freezer (-18°C is suitable) and close the container (Fig. 1A). Petri Ahlroth (pers. comm.)
uses silica gel cat litter as desiccant, and his aphid specimens are excellent. More material can be
added when needed. Some specimens can be pinned on micro-pins and the wings set at this stage.
It may be useful to pin the specimens from below, in which case the blunt end of the micro pins
may be sharpened (Fig. IB). Pinned specimens should preferably be mounted on a piece of, e.g.,
foam polystyrene to support the legs during the drying process. The wings of alatae can also be set
(Fig. 1C).
3. After a few months the aphids are dry and ready for the collection, as such in tubes or other vials
(Fig. ID), pinned, or glued to cardboard. Galls usually take at least six months to dry properly. For
examples of dry, pinned specimens, see Fig. 1E-G.
To speed up the drying process, vacuum equipment can be used (e.g., Albrecht 1994), but that is by no
means necessary.
Please note that in addition to the basic information on the labels (place, date and collector) it is of utmost
importance to add information on the aphid’s position and occurrence on the plant. Just the name of the
host plant is not enough to ascertain a true aphid-host relationship. “Cirsium arvense. Dense colony
on upper part of stalk.” is a correct host plant statement, whereas “Cirsium arvense ” alone denotes a
substrate or (the worst scenario) a subsequently added inferred “host” name, and its role as host is not
determined. Sadly enough, museum collections consist too often of many inadequately labelled aphid
samples, and many temporary substrates may have entered published host lists. An addition of attendant
ants is also welcome: “Attended by Lasius niger ”, preferably accompanied by a couple of preserved
ants. If the attending ant species cannot be identified with certainty, as is often the case with, e.g., wood
ants {Formica), it is better to leave the species name out instead of implying a certain identification.
Aphid life cycles
This chapter is intentionally kept very brief. I will just try to give the information needed for using
my keys. Most of the information is embedded in the figures. The accounts of life cycles given here
are just examples of frequently occurring patterns, and are by no means intended to be complete. For
more thorough accounts, see, e.g., Blackman (2014) or Heie (2004). Characteristically, the life cycle
comprises one sexual generation consisting of oviparous females and males (sexuales), alternating with
one or more parthenogenetic generations. The parthenogenetic females are viviparous (Aphididae) or
oviparous (Adelgidae, Phylloxeridae). Except in the Adelgidae, hibernation takes place in the egg stage.
Life cycles including both sexual and parthenogenetic generations (complete life cycle) are called a
holocycle, whereas cycles lacking the sexual generations are called anholocyclic. Some life cycles
involve host alternation where the sexual reproduction and hibernation takes place on one host, the
primary host, usually a woody plant, with migration to secondary host(s) in spring, and back in autumn.
The secondary hosts are usually herbaceous plants, but migration to roots of trees and shrubs is common
3
European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55 (2015)
Fig. 1.A Freeze-drying container with samples and silica-gel on bottom. B. Equipment for sharpening
micro pins. C. Foam plate with pinned aphids ( Hyperomyzus lampsanae (Bdmer, 1932)). D. Foam
polyurethane storage vials (. Formicafiisca Linnaeus, 1758 and Aphisfarinosa Gmelin, 1790). E-I. Pinned
freezedried aphids. E. Eiicallipterus tiliae (Linnaeus, 1758). F. Cinara laricis (Hartig, 1839). G. Cinara
pruinosa (Hartig, 1841). H—I. Geoica utricularia ( Passerini, 1856).
4
ALBRECHT A.C., Identification guide to Nordic aphids
Fig. 2. Monoecious one-year life cycles. In the outer zone an ordinary monoecious holocycle in
Aphididae. The fertilized egg overwinters and in spring the first viviparous parhenogenetic generation,
the fundatrix (stem-mother) hatches. Upon the fundatrix follows a variable number of viviparous
females (viviparae), apterous and/or alate. In autumn (sometimes earlier) sexuparae are born and in turn
give birth to oviparous (sexual) females (ovipara) and males, which mate, and the oviparae lay eggs.
The inner zone shows an anholocycle, with only parthenogenetic females (viviparous in Aphididae,
oviparous in Adelgidae).
Fig. 3. Dioecious one-year holocycle ( Rhopalosiphumpadi). The inner zone represents the primary host
(bird cherry, Prunus padus and allies), the outer zone the secondary (usually graminoids). The fundatrix
gives birth to apterae, which in turn give birth to alatae, most of which migrate to the secondary hosts.
In autumn males and gynoparae (viviparae giving birth to oviparae) migrate to the primary host, where
mating and egg-laying take place. A small fraction of the viviparae may remain on the primary host
throughout the summer.
5
European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55 (2015)
Fig. 4. Dioecious one-year holocycle accompanied by a continuous anholocycle on the secondary
host, e.g., Pachypappella lactea (leaf galls on aspen, Populns tremula; roots of spruce, Picea abies) or
Tetraneura ulmi (leaf galls on elm, Ulmus ; subterraneous parts of grasses, Poaceae). Zones as in Fig. 3.
In some years the Finnish populations on the primary hosts (for P lactea in South Finland) may be more
or less absent, and their existence is dependent on the populations on the secondary hosts.
Fig. 5. Dioecious two-year holocycle in Adelgidae, e.g., Adelges laricis (shoot galls on spruce, Picea ;
needles of larch, Larix). All females oviparous. The fundatrix (hatched from a fertilized egg) overwinters
as a larva, and induces the formation of a pineapple-like gall on the primary host. All her offspring are alate
(gallicolae) and migrate to the secondary host, where they lay eggs on the needles. The aphids hatching
move to the twigs where they hibernate as young larvae (the ‘neosistens’ stage). In spring they move
back to the needles and become adults (sistentes). Their offspring are either alate sexuparae and migrate
to spruce, or apterous ‘progredientesf In autumn the sexuparae fly to spruce and lay eggs which become
sexual females and males, which mate. The females then lay eggs out of which new fimdatrices hatch.
6
ALBRECHT A.C., Identification guide to Nordic aphids
in Eriosomatinae. Species that complete their life cycle on one host are called monoecious (Fig. 2),
whereas species with host alternation are called dioecious (or heteroecious) (Fig. 3). In many species
holocycles are accompanied or supported by anholocyclic populations (Fig. 4). Most aphids have one-
year cycles, but also two-year cycles do occur, e.g., in Eriosomatinae (Fordini) and Adelgidae (Fig. 5).
Often used morphological terms are shown in Fig. 6.
median frontal tubercle
(poorly developed)
lateral frontal tubercle
circular, oval, slit-like or tubular
secondary rhinaria often present
on antennal segments III—V (-VI)
muscular sclerites
spinal,
pleural and
marginal area of dorsum
primary rhinaria (x) apically on
penultimate segment and base
of ultimate segment (see also
enlarged figure below)
hair-bearing scleroites
tubercles on the thoracal and
margin
abdominal segments are (if present)
situated here, one on each segment
presiphuncul
sclerite
segment 2 of hind
tarsus (HT2)
siphunculus
cauda
siphuncular aperture
processus terminalis (PT)
cauda
part of antenna with primary rhinaria (x)
anal plate
subgenital plate
RIV+V
postsiphuncular
sclerite
basal primary hairs
abdomen obliquely
from behind
accessory hairs
apical primary hairs
apical part of rostrum
Fig. 6. Often used morphological terms (Uroleucon cirsii (Linnaeus, 1758), freeze-dried specimen.)
7
European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55 (2015)
Abbreviations used in this paper
ad.
al.
ant.
apt.
HT2
juv.
ov., ovip.
PT
B
R
siph.
viv.
adult
alata, alate, winged
antenna
aptera, apterous
second segment of hind tarsus
juvenile, nymph
oviparous, ovipara (=oviparous female)
Processus Terminalis (apical part of ultimate antennal segment)
Basal part of ultimate antennal segment
Rostrum
siphunculus
viviparous
The presence of the species in the Nordic countries is based on Heie (1980, 1982, 1986, 1992, 1994,
1995, 2004) and my own databases. The countries are denoted by letters as follows:
D = Denmark
F = F inl and
Fa = Faroes
Gr = Greenland
I = Iceland
N = Norway
S = Sweden
Sv = Svalbard
Results
Phylum Arthropoda von Siebold, 1848
Class Insecta Linnaeus, 1758
Order Hemiptera Linnaeus, 1758
Superfamily Aphidoidea Latreille, 1802
Family Aphididae Latreille, 1802
Synoptic key and diagnoses for aphids on mosses, horsetails and ferns
For a summary of the host-plant relationships of aphids feeding on mosses, horsetails and ferns, see
Appendix 1 and 2. In the diagnoses my own host records and relevant others from the database are
denoted by an asterisk (*) after the host name. For geographical and phenological records from Finland,
see Albrecht (2010).
Aphids on mosses (Bryophyta). Key A. p. 8
Aphids on horsetails (Equisetophyta). Key B. p. 30
Aphids on ferns (Polypodiophyta). Key C. p. 39
Key A. Aphids on mosses (Bryophyta)
Synopsis
AA. Siphunculi elongate, more or less cylindrical. p. 9
AAA. Siphunculus with distinct apical flange. p. 9
AAB. Siphunculus without flange. p. 14
AABA. Siphuncular aperture terminal. p. 14
AABB. Siphuncular aperture subterminal. p. 16
8
ALBRECHT A.C., Identification guide to Nordic aphids
AB. Siphunculi absent or present as pores, at most raised on low cones. p. 19
ABA. Body extremely flattened, circular or broadly oval. p. 19
ABB. Colour pink to orange; siphuncular pores on low cones. p. 20
ABC. Colour cream to light brown; dorsum with brown spatulate hairs. p. 21
ABD. Colour whitish, cream pale green or pale yellow; dorsal hairs pointed. p. 22
ABDA. Body robustly built, global or ovoid, 0.5-1.5 mm. Tarsi with segments fused (prac¬
tically 1-segmented); antennae 4-5-segmented. Tegs, antennae and rostrum short
and stout. p. 22
ABDB. Body elongate, 1-2.5 mm. Tegs, antennae and rostrum more slender; tarsi 1-2-
segmented; antennae 5-6-segmented. p. 25
ABDBA. RIV+V with a broad, distinct, pale subapical zone. Head without wax gland plates
. p. 25
ABDBB. Pale subapical zone on RIV+V narrow, indistinct or absent. Wax glands may be
present on head. p. 27
AA. Siphunculi elongate, more or less cylindrical
AAA. Siphunculus with distinct apical flange
Subfamily Aphidinae Tatreille, 1802
Tribe Macrosiphini Wilson, 1910
Genus Decorosiphon Borner, 1939
Decorosiphon corynothrix Borner, 1939
Fig. 7
Diagnosis
Apterae 1.2-1.7 mm, s hin y olive, brownish yellow or reddish brown, juveniles green-olive brown, with
whitish wax dusting, the rupture lines (which break at moulting) exceptionally distinct, due to denser
wax coating. Antennae longer than body. Siphunculi strongly swollen distally, with well-developed
apical flange. Hairs on body and appendages very long, with spatulate distal part. Ad. and juv. can
be found all the year. Peat bogs, damp places in coniferous forests, also deciduous forests. Often on
Polytrichum interspersed in Sphagnum tussocks. Monoecious, seems to prefer Polytrichaceae. Not ant-
attended.
Recorded hosts
Hylocomiaceae: Rhytidiadelphus squarrosus\ Polytrichaceae: Atrichum undulatum*, Polytrichastrum
formosum, Polytrichum commune , juniperinum , strictum*.
Distribution
DFNS.
Genus Myzodium Borner, 1949
Myzodium modestum (Hottes, 1926)
Fig. 8
Diagnosis
Apterae 1.3-1.7 mm, shape Myzus-like, bronze to bronzy black; dorsal cuticle heavily sclerotized, rugose;
thinly wax-covered below. Juveniles paler, with shorter body, smoother dorsum and more extensive
wax dusting, also dorsally. Frontal tubercles well developed, rounded, nodulose. Siphunculi slightly
s-curved, with distinct apical constriction and flange. Aduts and juveniles can be found all year. Peat
9
European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55 (2015)
bogs, damp depressions in spruce and pine forests, overhanging moss on rock margins. Monoecious.
Not ant-attended.
Recorded hosts
Bryaceae: Pohlia; Grimmiaceae: Racomitrium ; Polytrichaceae: Atrichum undulatum , Polytrichum
commune *; Sphagnaceae: Sphagnum (perhaps only interspersed on other mosses).
Distribution
FGrS.
Fig. 7. Decorosiphon corynothrix Borner, 1939. A. Apt. and juv. in Polytrichum commune sample.
B. Apt. on Sphagnum magellanicum (with interpersed Polytrichum strictum). C. Apt. juv. on Polytrichum
commune. D. Apt. juv. on S. magellanicum , showing rupture line.
10
ALBRECHT A.C., Identification guide to Nordic aphids
Fig. 8. Myzodium modestum (Hottes, 1926). A-B. Apt. and juv. from Polytrichum commune sample.
11
European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55 (2015)
Genus Pseu dacau della Borner, 1950
Pseu dacau della rubida (Borner, 1939)
Fig. 9
Diagnosis
Apterae 0.7-1.2 mm, shiny green, grey-green, olive or brown, sometimes with rusty patches. Half-
grown juveniles often brownish yellow. Adult apterae with transverse, partly fused, segmental sclerites
on thorax and abdomen. Wax-dusted between sclerites and ventrally. Hibernating juveniles dark olive
or purple, covered in a thick, easily cracking wax coating. Frontal tubercles undeveloped. Siphunculi
with distinct apical constriction and flange. Can be found all year, during the cold season as hibernating
nymphs. A ubiquitous species, occurring on a wide range of mosses on dry rock and stones, on the
Fig. 9. Pseudacaudella rubida (Borner, 1939). A. Apt. and juv. from Hylocomium splendens sample (grid
1 mm). B. Apt. and C. hibernating juv. on Pleurozium schreberi. D-E. Hibernating juv on Calliergon
cordifolium.
12
ALBRECHT A.C., Identification guide to Nordic aphids
forest floor and in damp depressions of spruce and pine forests, fallow fields, deciduous forests, even
submerged in forests swamps. Monoecious. Not ant-attended.
Recorded hosts
Amb\ystegmceae:Sanioniauncinata*\Bmchyt\iGcmceeLe.Brachytheciumalbicans*,Pseudoscleropodium
purum; Sciuro-hypnum oedipodium*', Calliergonaceae: Calliergon cordifolium*\ Climaciaceae:
Climacium dendroides: Dicranaceae: Dicranum ; Grimmiaceae: Racomitrium lanuginosum*;
Hylocomiaceae: Hylocomium splendens*, Pleurozium schreberi*, Rhytidiadelphus squarrosus *;
Hypnaceae: Calliergonella cuspidata ; Mniaceae: s.lat.; Polytrichaceae: Polytrichum commune *;
Sphagnaceae: Sphagnum magellanicum *, recurvum; Thuidiaceae: Thuidium tamariscinum.
Distribution
DFS.
Genus Cryptaphis Hille Ris Lambers, 1947
Cryptaphis poae { Hardy, 1850)
Fig. 10
Diagnosis
Apterae 1.3-2.0 mm, shiny, greyish, olive, green or yellowish with brownish markings, to brownish
black. Body hairs long, stiff, capitate. Siphunculi straight, with apical flange. Monoecious. Feeds on
grasses at or below soil level or in moss tufts, and is sometimes found in moss samples.
Distribution
DFNS.
Fig. 10. Cryptaphis poae
(Hardy, 1850). Apt. from
Rhytidiadelphus squarrosus
sample. Grid 1 mm.
13
European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55 (2015)
AAB. Siphunculus without flange
AABA. Siphuncular aperture terminal
Genus Jacksonia Theobald, 1923
Jacksonia papillata Theobald, 1923
Fig. 11
Diagnosis
Diagnosis based on Heie (1994, 2004). Apterae 1.3-1.9 mm, green-olive-brown-reddish. Cuticle rough,
squamous or nodulose, particularly on head and antennae. Antennal tubercles well developed, their
inner sides converging. Siphunculi squamose, from a thick base narrowing to a slender apical half;
aperture small, terminal. Monoecious. Lives on basal parts of grasses and may, in addition to grasses,
also feed on mosses.
Recorded hosts
Holman (2009) reports Hyocomium armoricum and Hypnum cupressiforme (Hypnaceae) as hosts and
Heie (2004) Bryum pallens (Bryaceae).
Distribution
D Fa I NS.
Fig. 11. Jacksonia papillata Theobald, 1923. Aptera (photo Roger Blackman, from Blackman 2010,
with license from The Royal Entomological Society).
14
ALBRECHT A.C., Identification guide to Nordic aphids
Genus Muscaphis Borner, 1933
Subgenus Muscaphis Borner, 1933
Muscaphis musci Borner, 1933
Fig. 12
Diagnosis
Diagnosis based on Blackman & Eastop (2014) and Heie (2004). Apterae 0.5-1.0 mm, shiny, greyish
yellow, pale brown or dark olive. Siphunculi reddish brown, cylindrical; apex truncate without
constriction or flange; aperture terminal. Monoecious?
Recorded hosts
Amblystegiaceae: Amblystegium', Hypnaceae: Calliergonella; Brachytheciaceae: Brachythecium
rutabuluny Brachytheciastrum velutinum , Eurhynchium, Pseudoscleropodium purum ; Bryaceae: Bryum;
Hylocomiaceae: Hylocomium ; Plagiomniaceae: Plagiomnium undulatum ; Polytrichaceae: Atrichum
undulatum , Polytrichum commune ; Pottiaceae: Barbula , Tortula muralis\ Calliergonaceae: Calliergon.
Distribution
D.
Fig. 12. Muscaphis musci Borner, 1933. Aptera with siphunculus. (photo Roger Blackman, from
Blackman 2010, with license from The Royal Entomological Society).
15
European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55 (2015)
AABB. Siphuncular aperture subterminal
Subgenus Aspidaphium Borner, 1933
Muscaphis escherichi (Borner, 1939)
Fig. 13
Diagnosis
Apterae 0.7-1 mm, shiny red-brown, ochreous or olive brown. Legs and antennae slightly paler. Dorsum
reticulate, abdominal mid-dorsum fairly smooth, siphunculi squamose. Siphunculi narrowly conical,
slightly dorsoventrally flattened, tapering towards a rounded apex; aperture small, subapical. PT/B
= 0.6-1.16; RIV+V/HT2 = 1.2-1.5. Shady broad-leaved, mixed and coniferous forests, mesotrophic
meadows. Can be found all year. Monoecious. Not ant-attended.
Recorded hosts
Brachytheciaceae: Sciuro-hypnum oedipodium*, Cirriphyllum piliferum*, Kindbergia praelonga (syn.
Eurhynchium praelongum ), Pseudoscleropodium purum; Bryaceae: Pohlia , Rhodobryum roseiim *;
Dicranaceae: Dicranum; Hylocomiaceae: Pleuroziumschreberi*, Rhytidiadelphus loreus, R. sqiiarrosus:
Hypnaceae: Calliergonella cuspidata , Hypnum cupressiforme , Ptilium crista-castrensis\ Mniaceae:
Mnium hornum; Plagiomniaceae: Plagiomnium affine*, P. rostratum, P. undulatum; Plagiotheciaceae:
Plagiothecium laeturn (see below).
Distribution
DFNS.
Note
The question of whether the moss-feeding M. escherichi represents the secondary host generations of
the So r bus-feeding M. drepanosiphoides (Borner, 1939), which would make the two taxa synonymous
(Blackman & Eastop 2014), has not yet been definitely resolved, and is awaiting results from molecular
analyses. Until then, I prefer to continue regarding the two taxa as separate species, because they are
morphologically distinctive. Among other characteristics are the siphunculi, which are generally quite
constant throughout the parthenogenetic morphs. In the So r bus-feeding fimdatrix and alatae they are
long, black and truncate, with a large terminal aperture. The transfer experiments ofM drepanosiphoides
from Sorbus to Plagiothecium laetum performed by Stekolshchikov & Shaposhnikov (1993) would,
however, give support for the synonymy.
Muscaphis cuspidata (Stroyan, 1955)
Fig. 14
Diagnosis
Apterae 0.7-1 mm, dark greenish brown to black, abdominal dorsum and siphunculi black, legs brown.
Dorsum reticulate, siphunculi conical, distinctly dorsoventrally flattened, squamose-papillose, aperture
small, subapical. PT/B = 1.2-1.5, RIV+V/HT2 = 0.9-1.15. Can be found all the year round. Pond and
stream margins, often submerged. Monoecious. Not ant-attended.
Recorded hosts
Amblystegiaceae: Drepanocladus aduncus', Brachytheciaceae: Brachythecium rivulare*', Hypnaceae:
Calliergonella cuspidata.
16
ALBRECHT A.C., Identification guide to Nordic aphids
Distribution
F.
Fig. 13. Muscaphis escherichi (Borner, 1939). A. Apt. on Cirriphyllum piliferum. B. Apt. on Sciuro-
hypnum oedipodium.
17
European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55 (2015)
Fig. 14. Muscaphis cuspidata (Stroyan, 1955). A-B. Apt. on Brachythecium rivulare. C. Ovip on
Brachythecium rivulare.
18
ALBRECHT A.C., Identification guide to Nordic aphids
AB. Siphuncui absent or present as pores, at most raised on low cones
ABA. Body extremely flattened, circular or broadly oval
Subfamily Hormaphidinae
Tribe Hormaphidini
Genus Hormaphis Osten-Sacken, 1861
Hormaphis betulae (Mordvilko, 1901)
Fig. 15
Diagnosis
Apterae 1-2 mm, pale yellow, circular, flat; older juveniles and adults on secondary host with marginal
wax rim. Dioecious. Alternates between witch-hazel Hamamelis (Hamamelidaceae) and birch Betula
Fig. 15. Hormaphis hetulae (Mordvilko, 1901). Apt. (ad. and juv.) on Betulapubescens.
19
European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55 (2015)
(Betulaceae). Anholocyclic in Northern Europe, living on birch. Overwintering in the moss layer of
mixed coniferous forests and bogs, and during the cold season seen in moss samples.
Distribution
F.
ABB. Colour pink to orange; siphuncular pores on low cones
Subfamily Eriosomatinae
Tribe Eriosomatini
Genus Tetraneura H artig, 1841
Tetraneura ulmi (Linnaeus, 1758)
Fig. 16
Diagnosis
Apterae 1.5-3 mm, pink, orange or purple, with a thin iridescent wax layer that is easily worn off.
Siphuncular pores elevated on low cones. Dioecious. Alternating between elm Ulmus (Ulmaceae) and
Fi. 16. Tetraneura ulmi (Linnaeus, 1758). Apt. and juv. on grass root.
20
ALBRECHT A.C., Identification guide to Nordic aphids
grass roots (Poaceae). Anholocyclic populations on secondary hosts common all year, and particularly
juveniles are often seen in moss samples. Often in association with ants.
Distribution
DFNS.
ABC. Colour cream to light brown; dorsum with brown spatulate hairs
Tribe Fordini
Genus Geoica Hart, 1894
Geoica utricularia (Passerini, 1856)
Fig. 17
Diagnosis
Apterae 1.2-2.2 mm, cream to light brown, dusted with white wax. Tegs and antennae short and stout,
tarsi two-segmented. Body with numerous brown spatulate hairs. Dioecious, alternating between leaf
Fig. 17. Geoica utricularia (Passerini, 1856). Apt. on grass root.
21
European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55 (2015)
galls on pistachio Pistacia (Anacardiaceae) and grasses (Poaceae). In Northern Europe anholocyclic
on grass roots (Poaceae). I have observed a few individuals feeding on Polytrichum commune*
(Polytrichaceae) in a Lasius flavus nest mound during extreme drought when the grasses had dried out.
Always accompanied by Lasius ants.
Distribution
DFS.
Recorded moss host
Polytrichaceae Poly trichum commune (occasionally).
ABD. Colour whitish, cream, pale green or pale yellow; dorsal hairs pointed
ABDA. Body robustly built, global or ovoid, 0.5-1.5 mm. Tarsi with segments fused (in practice
1-segmented); antennae 4-5-segmented. Legs, antennae and rostrum short and stout
Genus Melaphis Walsh, 1867
Melaphis rhois (Fitch, 1866)
Diagnosis
Diagnosis based on Pike et al. (2012). Resembling Pachypappella lactea but marginal wax gland plates
on segments 1-6 in six longitudinal rows (in P. lactea in four rows on segments 3-6). Pegs, antennae and
rostrum short and stout; tarsi 1-segmented, ant. normally 4-segmented. RIV+V without pale subapical
zone. Dioecious, alternating between leaf galls on Rhus glabra and R. hirta (syn. typhina , Anacardiaceae)
and mosses (Bryophyta). In northern Europe anholocyclic on mosses. For detailed descriptions, see Pike
et al. (2012).
Recorded secondary hosts
Brachytheciaceae: Eurhynchium striatum ; H y p n aceae: Hyocomium armoricum , Hypnum; Polytrichaceae:
Polytrichum commune ; Sphagnaceae: Sphagnum.
Distribution
S (if correctly identified: Heie’s (1980) fig. 243 based on material from Sweden is probably Pachypap¬
pella lactea).
Tribe Pemphigini
Genus Pachypappella Baker, 1920
Pachypappella lactea (Tullgren, 1909)
Fig. 18, 19D
Diagnosis
Apterae ovoid, robustly built, 0.6-1 mm, whitish, with a thin wax-dusting and exuding wax tufts from
spinal and pleural wax gland plates on abdominal segments 3-6 (4 longitudinal rows of plates); marginal
wax gland plates absent. Fegs, antennae and rostrum short and stout. Antennae 4-5-segmented. Hind
femur not distinctly thickened. RIV+V with a rather narrow and indistinct pale subapical zone. Tarsal
segments fused (the segment border depicted in fig. 66b by Blackman & Eastop (1994, 2014) looks
anomalous, and may be an artefact).
Dioecious, alternating between leaf galls on aspen Populus tremula (Salicaceae) and Norway spruce
Picea abies (Pinaceae), where the aphids live on thin roots within and above the mor layer (a compacted
22
ALBRECHT A.C., Identification guide to Nordic aphids
Fig. 18. Pachypappella lactea (Tullgren, 1909). A-E. Apt. and wax cells on terminal Picea abies roots.
F-G. Apt. from Hylocomium splendens sample. Two wax gland plates in F indicated by arrows.
23
European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55 (2015)
humus layer beneath the moss layer), among moss or litter. The apterae reside in nests of dense wax
wool, 1.5-2 mm across, usually one aphid in each. The nests often occur in small groups, often within
the looser, wider and less distinctly delimited wax exudate of Prociphilus xylostei (deGeer, 1773) and
Pachypappa species. P. lactea has a continuous anholocyclic population on spruce roots. Not associated
with ants. Danielsson (1990a, 1990b) gives keys and descriptions of the root-feeding generations of
Pachypappella , Gootiella and Pachypappa. See also Carter & Danielsson (1991).
Distribution
FNS.
Genus Gootiella Tullgren, 1925
Gootiella tremulae Tullgren, 1925
Fig. 19C
Diagnosis
Diagnosis based on Danielsson (1990b). Apterae globular to ovoid, 0.9-1.5 mm, grey, covered in white
wax. In many respects resembling Pachypappella lactea , but readily distinguished by the remarkably
thickened hind femora. Antennae 5-segmented. Dioecious, alternating between Populus tremula
(Salicaceae) and juniper Juniperus communis (Cupressaceae), where the aphids live in wax nests similar
to those of P. lactea , and commonly overwinter there (Danielsson 1990b).
Distribution
DFNS.
Fig. 19. Gootiella, Pachypappa and Pachypappella. Apt. alienicolae (born on secondary host).
A-B. Spinal wax gland on abd. terg. 6 of Pachypappapopuli (Linnaeus, 1758) ( A) and P. vesicalis Koch,
1856 (B). C. Hind leg of Gootiella tremulae Tullgren, 1925. D-G. Hind tibia and tarsus of Pachypapella
lactea (Tullgren, 1909) (D), Pachypappa tremulae Tullgren, 1925 (E), P. populi (Linnaeus, 1758) (F)
and P. vesicalis Koch, 1856 (G). A-B and D-G after Carter & Danielsson 1991, C after Danielsson
1990b. All modified.
24
ALBRECHT A.C., Identification guide to Nordic aphids
ABDB. Body elongate, 1-2.5 mm. Legs, antennae and rostrum more slender; tarsi 1-2-segmented;
antennae 5-6-segmented
ABDBA. RIV+V with a broad, distinct, pale subapical zone. Head without wax gland plates
Genus Pachypappa Koch, 1856
Pachypappa populi (Linnaeus, 1758)
Fig. 19 A, F; 20
Diagnosis
Apterae 1-2 mm, pale yellowish with wax tufts posteriorly. Cells in abdominal wax gland plates with
a small central spot (Fig. 19A). Segments 1 and 2 of tarsi less distinctly separated than in P. tremulae
(Linnaeus, 1761) and P. vesicalis Koch, 1856. Legs longer, hind femur more than 4 x its maximum width.
Antennae usually 6-segmented, PT finger-like. Spines at apices of tibiae weak, not much stronger than
the hairs on first tarsal segment. Hind tibia on dorsal side bearing 2-5 spine-like hairs with short, blunt
apices. Dioecious. Alternating between Populus tremula (Salicaceae) and Picea abies roots (Pinaceae),
where wax-covered colonies are formed. Anholocyclic hibernation occurs.
Distribution
F N S. See also Carter & Danielsson (1991).
Fig. 20. Pachypappa populi (Linnaeus, 1758). Apt. from mycorrhizal Picea abies root in the moor layer
of a shady spruce forest.
25
European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55 (2015)
Fig. 21. Prociphilus xylostei (deGeer, 1773). A-B. Apt. on mycorrhizal Picea abies roots under
Pleurozium schreberi.
26
ALBRECHT A.C., Identification guide to Nordic aphids
Pcichypappa tremulae (Linnaeus, 1761)
Fig. 19E
Diagnosis
Apterae 1-2 mm. Resembling P. populi. Cells in abdominal wax gland plates with a larger central spot
(as in Fig. 19B). Segments 1 and 2 of all tarsi distinctly separated from each other. Spines at apices of
tibiae very robust, much stronger than hairs on first tarsal segment. Dorsal hairs on hind tibia with fairly
short and blunt apices. Life cycle as in the previous species. Anholocyclic hibernation on roots of spruce
Picea is co mm on
Distribution
D F N S. See also Carter & Danielsson (1991).
Pcichypappa vesicalis Koch, 1856
Fig. 19B, G
Diagnosis
Diagnosis based on Carter & Danielsson (1991). Resembling P. populi. Antenna usually 5-segmented,
PT extremely short. Cells in abdominal wax gland plates with a larger central spot (Fig. 19B). Spines
at apices of tibiae very robust, much stronger than the hairs on first tarsal segment. Dorsal hairs on hind
tibia with long, pointed apices. Dioecious. Alternates between white poplar Populus alba (Salicaceae)
and Picea roots (Pinaceae) where the aphids live in wax nests similar to those of Pachypapella lactea
(Carter & Danielsson 1991).
Distribution
FS.
ABDBB. Pale subapical zone on RIV+V narrow, indistinct or absent. Wax glands may be present
on head
Genus Prociphilus Tullgren, 1925
Prociphilus xylostei (deGeer, 1773)
Fig. 21
Diagnosis
Apterae 1.2-2 mm, pale green with large wax gland plates (and wax tufts unless worn off) on head and
abdomen. RIV+V = 0.2 x HT2, without pale subapical zone. Legs and antennae slender. Dioecious.
Alternating between honeysuckle Lonicera (Caprifoliaceae) and thin, mycorrhizal Picea abies roots
(Pinaceae), where the colonies are coated with wax wool and where the aphids may hibernate. P. xylostei
apparently has a continuous anholocyclic population on spruce roots. Common in moss samples from
spruce forests.
Distribution
DFNS.
27
European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55 (2015)
Prociphiluspini (Burmeister, 1835)
Fig. 22
Diagnosis
Apterae 1.2-2 mm As P. xylostei but cream or pale pinkish rather than greenish or yellowish. RIV+V
as long as HT2, with narrow and indistinct subapical zone. Dioecious. Alternating between Crataegus
Fig. 22. Prociphilus pini (Burmeister, 1835). A. Colony on thin Pinus sylvestris root in the moor layer
of a pine forest on rock. B-C. Apt. from Polytrichum commune sample.
28
ALBRECHT A.C., Identification guide to Nordic aphids
(Rosaceae) and thin roots of Pinus (Pinaceae). May be found all the year in moss samples in pine forests,
especially on rock.
Distribution
DFNS.
Prociphilus bumeliae (Schrank, 1801)
Diagnosis
Diagnosis based on Heie (2004). Apterae about 2.9 mm, wax-covered. Two pairs of wax gland plates
on head. Posterior plates on head better developed than anterior ones. A narrow pale subapical zone on
RIV+V distinct. Dioecious, alternating between ash Fraxinus excelsior (sometimes other Oleaceae) and
fir Abies (Pinaceae), where it feeds in wax-covered colonies on the roots.
Distribution
DFS.
Prociphilus fraxini (Fabricius, 1777)
Diagnosis
Diagnosis based on Heie (2004). Apterae 1.8-2.7 mm, pale, wax-covered. Very similar to P. bumeliae ,
but the posterior wax gland plates on head weakly developed, sometimes absent. Dioecious, alternating
between Fraxinus excelsior (Oleaceae) and roots of Abies (Pinaceae), where wax-covered colonies are
formed.
Fig. 23. Aphis equiseticola Ossiannilsson, 1964. Aptera (redrawn after Heie 1986).
29
European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55 (2015)
Distribution
DNS.
Key B. Aphids on horsetails (Equisetophyta)
Synopsis
BA. Siphunculi present, half as long as cauda or longer. p. 30
BAA. Lateral frontal tubercles hardly developed; antennae shorter than body. p. 30
BAB. Lateral frontal tubercles well developed; antennae usually longer than body
. p. 33
BABA. Lateral frontal tubercles with diverging inner margins. p. 33
BABB. Lateral frontal tubercles with parallel or converging inner margins. p. 35
BB. Siphunculi absent. p. 37
BA. SiphuncuM present, half as long as cauda or longer
BAA. Lateral frontal tubercles hardly developed; antennae shorter than body
Subfamily Aphidinae Latreille, 1802
Tribe Aphidini Latreille, 1802
Genus Aphis Linnaeus, 1758
Aphis equiseticola Ossiannilsson, 1964
Fig. 23
Diagnosis
Diagnosis based on Heie (1986). Aptera 1.4-2.0 mm, light or dark green without markings.
Head, antennae, tarsi and tips of tibiae rather dark. Antennae about half as long as body.
Siphunculi shorter than cauda, dusky or pale, with dark apices. Monoecious.
Recorded hosts
Equisetum prate ns e, E. sylvaticum.
Distribution
S.
Aphis gossypii Glover, 1877
Diagnosis
Aptera 0.8-1.7 mm. Pale green to blackish green; siphunculi black. Small, pale yellow specimens occur
in in crowded colonies or hot conditions. In cold temperate regions mostly in glasshouses. Dioecious
with several unrelated plants as primary hosts, in Europe, however, mostly anholocyclic. Very similar
to A. beccabungae Koch, 1855 (Fig. 24) and other species of the A. frangulae group. See Blackman
& Eastop (2014) and Heie (1986) for differences and a more complete account. Dioecious but usually
anholocyclic, polyphagous.
Recorded Equisetum host
E. sylvaticum.
30
ALBRECHT A.C., Identification guide to Nordic aphids
Distribution
DFNS.
Genus Rhopalosiphum Koch, 1854
Rhopalosiplium padi (Linnaeus, 1758)
Fig. 25
Diagnosis
Aptera 1-2.4 mm, olive mottled with darker green. Siphuncular area and often also tip of abdomen
rust-red. Juveniles paler, matt, with thin wax dusting. Siphunculus almost straight, longer than cauda,
with subapical constriction and apical flange. Dioecious, alternating between Primus and graminoids
(Poaceae, Cyperaceae, Juncaceae), rarely on other hosts, exceptionally on Equisetum. Recorded from
E. sylvaticum.
Distribution
DNFFalS.
Fig. 24. Aphis beccabungae Koch, 1855. Apt. and juv. on Galeopsis speciosa. A. beccabungae is very
similar to A. gossypii Glover, 1877.
31
European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55 (2015)
Fig. 25. Rhopalosiphum padi (Linnaeus, 1758), apt. and juv. on Poa pratensis.
32
ALBRECHT A.C., Identification guide to Nordic aphids
BAB. Lateral frontal tubercles well developed; antennae usually longer than body
BABA. Lateral frontal tubercles with diverging inner margins
Tribe Macrosiphini Wilson, 1910
Genus Macrosiphum Passerini, 1860
Macrosiphum equiseti (Holman, 1961)
Fig. 26
Diagnosis
Aptera 1.6-3 mm, bright green without markings, body with thin whitish wax dusting on venter (adults)
or all over (juveniles). Siphunculi length rarely over 1.35 x cauda length. Holocyclic, monoecious.
Damp, shady broad-leaved and spruce forests.
Recorded hosts
Equisetum arvense , E. pratense, E. sylvaticum*, E. telmateia.
Distribution
FS.
Genus Sitobion Mordvilko, 1914
Sitobion avenue (Fabricius, 1775)
Fig. 27
Diagnosis
Aptera 1.2-3.5 mm, green with black muscle sclerites. Legs and antennae partly black. Siphunculi
black. Cauda pale. Abdominal dorsum sclerotised, shiny, all green, all black, or green with grey or
black transverse bars. Juveniles matt, apt. juv. green, al. juv. brown. Holocyclic, monoecious on grasses
(Poaceae), exceptionally on Equisetum sylvaticum. Not ant-attended.
Distribution
DFNS.
Sitobion fragariae (Walker, 1848)
Diagnosis
Similar to S. avenue , but generally paler, usually without blackened patches on dorsum. Siphunculi
longer, more than 1.7 x cauda. Holocyclic, dioecious, alternating between Rubus subgenus Rubus and
grasses (Poaceae). Exceptionally on Equisetum , recorded from E. sylvaticum.
Distribution
DFFaNS.
33
European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55 (2015)
Fig. 26. Macrosiphum equiseti (Holman, 1961) on Equisetum sylvaticum. A-C. Apterae. D-E. Juveniles.
34
ALBRECHT A.C., Identification guide to Nordic aphids
BABB. Lateral frontal tubercles with parallel or converging inner margins
Genus Aulacorthum Mordvilko, 1914
Aulacorthum solani (Kaltenbach, 1843)
Fig. 28
Diagnosis
Aptera 1.2-2.6 mm, green with dark green spots in front of siphunculi. At most with very slight wax
dusting ventrally. Occupying a wide range of habitats, also a common indoor pest. Holocyclic or
anholocyclic, monoecious, polyphagous. Not ant-attended.
Recorded Pteridophyta hosts
Equisetaceae: Equisetum fluviatile* ; Asp 1 eniaceae: Asplenium trichomanes; Athyriaceae: Athyriumfilix-
femina*\ Polypodiaceae: Polypodium vulgare; Pteridaceae: Adiantum capillus-veneris.
Distribution
DFINS.
Fig. 27. Sitobion avenae (Fabricius, 1775). Apterae and juveniles on A. Dactylis glomerata and
B. Elytrigia repens.
35
European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55 (2015)
Fig. 28 . Aulacorthum solani (Kaltenbach, 1843). Apterae and juveniles on Abutilon sp.
Fig. 29. Neomyzus circumflexus
(Buckton, 1876). Aptera. (from
Dransfield & Brightwell 2015, licensed
under Creative Commons Attribution
3.0, downloaded 30 Jun. 2015).
36
ALBRECHT A.C., Identification guide to Nordic aphids
Genus Neomyzus van der Goot, 1915
Neomyzus circumflexus (Buckton, 1876)
Fig. 29
Diagnosis
Diagnosis based on Heie (2004). Rather similar to Aulacorthum solani. Whitish, yellow or green;
abdomen with brown or black markings, usually including a horseshoe-shaped patch. Monoecious,
polyphagous, apparently anholocyclic (sexuales not recorded).
Recorded Pteridophyta hosts
Equisetaceae: Equisetum arvense*', Aspleniaceae: Asplenium sp.; Dryopteridaceae: Cyrtomiumfalcatum ,
Polystichum lonchitis ; Nephrolepidaceae: Nephrolepis sp.; Onocleaceae: Matteuccia struthiopteris\
Polypodiaceae: Polypodium vulgare ; Pteridaceae: Adiantum sp.*; Salviniaceae: Salvinia auriculatia.
Distribution
D F N S, in Northern Europe ma inl y indoors.
Genus Myzus Passerini, 1860
Myzus cerasi (Fabricius, 1775)
Fig. 30
Diagnosis
Aptera 1-1.5 mm, shining black, almond-shaped. Legs and antennae partly pale. Juveniles brown.
Holocyclic, dioecious, alternating between Prunus and herbs of several families, rarely on Equisetum.
Recorded Pteridophyta host
Equisetum sp.
Distribution
DFNS.
BB. Siphunculi absent
Subfamily Eriosomatinae
Tribe Fordini
Genus Paracletus von Hey den, 1837
Paracletus cimiciformis von Hey den, 1837
Fig. 31
Diagnosis
Aptera 2.2-3.4 mm, broadly oval, flattened, rather shining cream with brown legs and antennae.
Dioecious, alternating between leaf galls on Pistacia and roots of grasses and herbs. In N. Europe
anholocyclic, normally feeding on grass (Poaceae). In xerothermic habitats. Lives in association with
ants, usually Tetramorium caespitum (Linnaeus, 1758).
Distribution
FS.
37
European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55 (2015)
Fig. 30. Myzus cerasi (Fabricius, 1775). Apt. and juv. on Prunus cerasus.
Fig. 31 . Paracletus cimiciformis von Hey den, 1837. Aptera in nest of Tetramorium caespitum (Linnaeus,
1758).
38
Recorded Pteridophyta host
Equisetaceae: Equisetum arvense.
ALBRECHT A.C., Identification guide to Nordic aphids
Key C. Aphids on ferns (Polypodiophyta)
Synopsis
CA. Black with pale legs and siphunculi, and pale-ringed antennae. p. 39
CB. Green, brown, yellowish or reddish aphids. p. 40
CBA. Lateral frontal tubercles hardly developed; mainly on aquatic plants. p. 40
CBB. Lateral frontal tubercles with diverging inner margins. p. 41
CBBA. Siphunculi distinctly swollen distally. p. 41
CBBB. Siphunculi at most slightly swollen. p. 41
CBC. Lateral frontal tubercles with parallel or converging inner margins.p. 43
CA. Black with pale legs and siphunculi, and pale-ringed antennae
Subfamily Aphidinae Latreille, 1802
Tribe Macrosiphini Wilson, 1910
Genus Idiopterus Davis, 1909
Idiopterus nephrelepidis Davis, 1909
(Fig. 32)
Diagnosis
Diagnosis based on Heie (1994). Aptera 1.2-1.6 mm. Apparently anholocyclic, monoecious, in N Europe
in greenhouses.
Fig. 32. Idiopterus nephrelepidis Davis, 1909. Aptera (photo Roger Blackman, from Blackman 2010,
with license from The Royal Entomological Society).
39
European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55 (2015)
Recorded hosts
Aspleniaceae: Asplenium adiantum-nigrum,A. ruta-muraria,A. scolopendrium ; Blechnaceae: Blechnum
sp.; Dennstaedtiaceae: Dennstaedtia sp.; Dryopteridaceae: Cyrtomium falcatum; Nephrolepidaceae:
Nephrolepis exaltata ; Pteridaceae: Adiantum sp., Pteris sp.
Distribution
DS.
CB. Green, brown, yellowish or reddish aphids
CBA. Lateral frontal tubercles hardly developed; mainly on aquatic plants
Tribe Aphidini Latreille, 1802
Genus Rhopalosiphum Koch, 1854
Rhopalosiphum nymphaeae (Linnaeus, 1761)
Fig. 33
Diagnosis
Aptera 1.5-2.5 mm, brown to olive, dusted with greyish wax, particularly on venter and margins,
including legs and antennae. Siph. swollen, with a distinct constriction before the apical flange.
Holocyclic, dioecious, alternating between Prunus and many unrelated, mostly aquatic or semiaquatic
plants. Not ant-attended.
Fig. 33. Rhopalosiphum nymphaeae (Linnaeus, 1761). Aptera on Myripohyllum spicatum.
40
ALBRECHT A.C., Identification guide to Nordic aphids
Recorded Pteridophyta hosts
Marsileaceae: Marsilea quadrifolia , M. strigosa; Salviniaceae: Azolla caroliniana , A. filiculoides,
Salvinia auriculatia , S. natans.
Distribution
DFNS.
CBB. Lateral frontal tubercles with diverging inner margins
CBBA. Siphunculi strongly swollen distally
Tribe Macrosiphini Wilson, 1910
Genus Amphorophora Buckton, 1876
Amphorophora ampullata Buckton, 1876
Fig. 34
Diagnosis
Aptera 3-5 mm, bright green without markings. Eyes red. Holocyclic, monoecious. Shady places, parks,
gardens, mixed and deciduous forests. Not ant-attended.
Recorded hosts
Aspleniaceae: Asplenium sp.; Athyriaceae: Athyrium filix-femina *; Cystopteridaceae: Cystopteris
montana\ Gymnocarpium dryopteris; Dennstaedtiaceae: Dennstaedtia sp., Pteridium aquilinum;
Dryopteridaceae: Dryopteris carthusiana*, D. dilatata , D. filix-mas , Polystichum sp.; Onocleaceae:
Matteuccia struthiopteris*', Thelypteridaceae: Phegopteris connectilis , Thelypteris palustris.
Distribution
DFNS.
CBBB. Siphunculi at most slightly swollen
Genus Macrosiphum Passerini, 1860
Macrosiphum lapponicum Shaposhnikov, 1964
Diagnosis
Diagnosis based on Heie (1994). Abdominal dorsum membranous, segmental borders distinct. Apt.
about 4 mm, green, yellowish or reddish. Ant. segment 3 with more than 30 rhinaria. Monoecious.
Recorded host
Athyriaceae: Athyrium distentifolium.
Distribution
Known from NW Russia only.
41
European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55 (2015)
Fig. 34. Amphorophora ampullata Buckton, 1876. A. Aptera on Dryopteris carthusiana. B-C. Apterae
and juveniles on Athyrium filix-femina (B) and Matteuccia struthiopteris (C), aptera in C parasitized.
42
ALBRECHT A.C., Identification guide to Nordic aphids
Macrosiphum dryopteridis (Holman, 1959)
Fig. 35
Diagnosis
Aptera 2.5^1.2 mm, yellowish green (rarely bright green). Eyes black. Abd. dorsum sclerotised (but
neither darkened nor distinctly glossy), segmental borders obliterated. Siphunculi slightly swollen
distally. Ant. segment 3 with 0-10 rhinaria. RIV+V less than 0.14 mm Holocyclic, monoecious. Shady
places, parks, gardens, mixed and deciduous forests. Not ant-attended.
Recorded hosts
Athyriaceae: Athyrium distentifolium , A. filix-femina *; Cystopteridaceae: Gymnocarpium dryopteris,
G. robertianum\ Dennstaedtiaceae: Pteridium aquilinum', Dryopteridaceae: Dryopterix carthusiana*,
D. cristata*, D. dilatata, D. filix-mas ; Polypodiaceae: Polypodium vulgare ; Thelypteridaceae:
Phegopteris connectilis, Thelypteris palustris.
Distribution
FNS.
Macrosiphum ptericolens Patch, 1919
Diagnosis
Diagnosis based on Blackman & Eastop (2006). Rostrum IV+V more than 0.14 mm long. Aptera 2.3-
3.3 mm, yellowish green to dark green. Siphunculi slender, tapering distally. Holocyclic, monoecious.
Recorded host
Dennstaedtiaceae: Pteridium aquilinum.
CBC. Lateral frontal tubercles with parallel or converging inner margins
Genus Aulacorthum Mordvilko, 1914
Aulacorthum solani (Kaltenbach, 1843)
Fig. 28
Diagnosis
Green with dark green patches in front of siphunculi. See p. 35, under BABB.
Genus Neomyzus van der Goot, 1915
Neomyzus circumflexus (Buckton, 1876)
Fig. 29
Diagnosis
Whitish, yellow or green with brown or black horse-shoe shaped marking. See p. 37, under BABB.
43
European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55 (2015)
Fig. 35. Macrosiphum dryopteridis (Holman, 1959). Apterae on Athyrium filix-femina.
44
ALBRECHT A.C., Identification guide to Nordic aphids
Genus Myzus Passerini, 1860
Myzus persicae (Sulzer, 1776)
Fig. 36
Diagnosis
Aptera 1.2-2.2 mm, almond-shaped, pale yellow to dirty yellow, olive, green, brownish, purple
or reddish. Siphunculi twice as long as cauda or more, slightly swollen beyond middle. Dioecious,
Fig. 36. Myzus persicae (Sulzer, 1776). Apterae and juveniles on Capsella bursa-pastoris.
45
European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55 (2015)
alternating between peach (. Prunus persica) and plants of more than 40 families. Anholocyclic in the
north and in the tropics. Usually in urban environments, also a co mm on indoor pest.
Recorded Pteridophyta host
Pteridaceae: Adiantum sp.
Distribution
DFNS.
Discussion
Up to now, identification keys for aphids have been based on macerated specimens on microscopic
slides, much of the emphasis being laid on measurements and indices based on them; in most cases only
the ranges are given, without statistical parameters. Attempting to identify fresh or freeze-dried aphids
using these keys may at first thought feel troublesome, but for the present that is the way we have to go.
And it works, provided you have a good stereo microscope. Almost all of the characters described in
the keys are well visible in unmacerated material, so slides need only exceptionally be made. And often
a leg or antenna immersed in water on a slide is enough. One goal of this guide is to enhance the use of
characters lost in the maceration process, many of which participate in the distinctiveness of the species
and make it possible to identify as many of them as possible even in the field, although it is always
advisable to look up the species in the literature and check the identification.
Most aphids are easily found by simply inspecting the plants, keeping the eyes open for abnormal
growth, the presence of ants and other phenomena that may indicate the presence of aphids. Aphids
associated with mosses are, however, generally considered rare and difficult to find. Aphids feeding
on mycorrhizal conifer roots are readily revealed by the white wax wool they produce, but the genuine
moss-feeders are almost impossible to spot in the field. Besides being small, they live hidden in the
moss tussocks and are often cryptically coloured. In funnel samples they usually die before reaching the
collection jar, which perhaps explains the seeming rarity of moss aphids. The best way of finding them is
to dry all excess water from the moss, sieve it through a 1-2 mm mesh and study the sample alive under
a stereo loupe. It seems quite safe to anticipate that, with the right methodology applied, moss aphids
will prove to be surprisingly common throughout Northern Europe.
Acknowledgements
Among the numerous persons and institutions that have contributed to this guide, I wish to thank the
Min istry of the Environment and the Finnish Museum of Natural History for allowing me to participate
in the Putte Programme, which enabled me to study aphids full-time for five years, getting me started
on the project, and for further support. Special thanks are due to my friend Jouni Issakainen for fruitful
discussions and excursions leading to the discovery of numerous new interesting records of aphids.
Above all, I want to thank my wife Margareta for fully accepting my work with these minute animals,
for letting me set up a laboratory at home, and for time after time offering me a helping hand. My
colleague Lauri Kaila kindly commented on the manuscript and suggested many valuable improvements.
Thanks are also due to Dr Bill Blakemore of The Royal Entomological Society for allowing me to use
copyrighted photographs.
References
Abenius J., Douwes P. & Wahlstedt U. 2012. Steklar. Myror — getingar. Hymenoptera : Formicidae-
Vespidae. Nationalnyckeln, Uppsala.
46
ALBRECHT A.C., Identification guide to Nordic aphids
Albrecht A. 1994. Freeze-drying techniques for preserving aphids (Homoptera, Aphidodea).
Entomologica Fennica 5: 105-113.
Albrecht A. 2010. Atlas of the Aphids of Finland. Available from http://koivu.luomus.fi/elaintiede/
hv onteiset/tutkimus/kirvat/atlas .htm .
Blackman R.L. 2010. Aphids - Aphidinae (Macrosiphini). Handbooks for the Identification of British
Insects 2 (7), The Royal Entomological Society, St Albans.
Blackman R.L. & Eastop V.F. 1994. Aphids on the World’s Trees. CAB International, Wallingford.
Blackman R.L. & Eastop, V.F. 2000. Aphids on the World’s Crops (2nd ed.). Wiley, Chichester.
Blackman R.L. & Eastop V.F. 2006. Aphids on the World’s Herbaceous Plants and Shrubs. (2 vols).
Wiley, Chichester.
Blackman R.L. & Eastop V.F. 2014. Aphids on the World's plants. Available from http://www.
aphidsonworldsplants.info/ [accessed on 13 Feb. 2015].
Carter C. & Danielsson R. 1991: Two spruce root aphids, Pachypappa vesicalis and Pachypappella
lactea new to Britain with illustrated keys to the morphs from Picea roots. The Entomologist 112: 66-74.
Danielsson R. 1985. Polyviol as mounting medium for aphids (Homoptera: Aphidoidea) and other
insects. Entomologica Scandinavica 15: 383-385.
Danielsson R. 1990a. The root-feeding generations of gall-making aphids of the genera Pachypappa
Koch, Pachypappella Baker and Gootiella Tullgren. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica
25: 77-88.
Danielsson R. 1990b. The life cycle of Gootiella tremulae Tullgren, with descriptions of all viviparous
morphs and a redescription of Gootiella alba Shaposhnikov. Entomologica Scandinavica 20: 413—428.
Dransfield B. & Brightwell B. 2015. Aphid genera. Available from http://influentialpoints.com/Gallery/
Aphid genera.htm [accessed on 30 Jun. 2015].
Favret C. 2015. Aphid Species File. Available from http://aphid.speciesfile.org/ .
Heie O.E. 1980. The Aphidoidea of Fennoscandia and Denmark I. Mindaridae, Hormaphidae,
Thelaxidae, Anoecidae and Pemphigidae. Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica 9. Scandinavian Science
Press, Klampenborg.
Heie O.E. 1986. The Aphidoidea of Fennoscandia and Denmark III. Pterocommatinae and Aphidinae,
Aphidini. Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica 17. E.J. Brill/Scandinavian Science Press, Leiden-
Copenhagen.
Heie O.E. 1992. The Aphidoidea of Fennoscandia and Denmark IV. Aphidinae. Part 1 of Macrosiphini.
Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica.25. E.J. Brill/Scandinavian Science Press, Leiden-New York-
Copenhagen-Koln.
Heie O.E. 1994. The Aphidoidea of Fennoscandia and Denmark V. Aphidinae. Part 2 of Macrosiphini.
Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica 28. E.J. Brill, Leiden-New York-Koln.
Heie O.E. 1995. The Aphidoidea of Fe nn oscandia and Denmark VI. Aphidinae. Part 3 of Macrosiphini
and Lachnidae. Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica 31. E.J. Brill, Leiden-New York-Koln.
Heie O.E. 2004. Bladlus 1-2. Pa nm arks Fauna 87. DanskNaturhistoriskForening, Kobenhavn.
Hill M.O., Bell N., Bruggeman-NannengaM.A., Brugues M., Cano M.J., Enroth J., Flatberg K.I., Frahm
J.-P, Gallego M.T., Garilleti R., Guerra J., Hedenas L., Holy oak D.T., Hyvonen J., Ignatov M.S., Lara
F., Mazimpaka V., Munoz J. & Soderstrom L. 2006. An annotated checklist of the mosses of Europe and
Macaronesia. Journal of Bryology 28: 198-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/174328206X119998
47
European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55 (2015)
Holman J. 2009. Host Plant Catalog of Aphids. Palaearctic Region. Springer Science + Business Media
B.V., Heidelberg.
Karlsson T. & Agestam M. 2014. Checklista over Nordens karlvaxter. [Checklist of vascular plants of
Scandinavia]. Available from http://www.euphrasia.nu/checklista/ [accessed on 30 Sep. 2014]
Pike K.S., Graf G., Foottit R.G., MawH.E.L., vonDohlen C., Harpel J., Pantoja A., Emmert S. & Hagerty
A.M. 2012. Eriosomatine aphids (Hemiptera, Aphididae, Eriosomatinae) associated with moss and roots
of conifer and willow in forests of the Pacific Northwest of North America. Canadian Entomologist 144:
555-576. http://dx.doi.org/10.4039/tce.2012.49
Stekolshchikov A.V. & Shaposhnikov G.Kh. 1993. [Revision of the genus Muscaphis....]
Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 72: 333-344. [English translation (1994) Entomological Review 73:
42-54]
Manuscript received: 17 April 2015
Manuscript accepted: 11 August 2015
Published on: 21 October 2015
Topic editor: Koen Martens
Desk editor: Kristiaan Hoedemakers
Printed versions of all papers are also deposited in the libraries of the institutes that are members of
the EJT consortium: Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France; Botanic Garden Meise,
Belgium; Royal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium; Natural History Museum, London,
United Kingdom; Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium; Natural History
Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
48
ALBRECHT A.C., Identification guide to Nordic aphids
Appendix 1
Summary of the host relationships of moss-feeding aphids of northern Europe. (Colours: Green =
monoecious. Blue = dioecious, on primary host (none in this table). Red = dioecious, on secondary host.
* = my own records).
BRYOPHYTA
Sphagnaceae Dumort.
Sphagnum L.
Melaphis rhois
Myzodium modestum
magellanicum Brid.
Pseudacaudella rubida*
recurvum H.H.Blom
Pseudacaudella rubida
Polytrichaceae Schwagr.
Atrichum P.Beauv.
undulatum (Hedw.) P.Beauv.
Decorosiphon corynothrix*
Muscaphis musci
Myzodium modestum
Polytrichastrum G.L.Sm.
formosum (Hedw.) G.L.Sm.
Decorosiphon corynothrix
Polytrichum Hedw.
commune Hedw.
Decorosiphon corynothrix*
Geoica utricularia* (occasionally on mosses)
Melaphis rhois
Muscaphis musci
Myzodium modestum*
Pseudacaudella rubida *
juniperinum Hedw.
Decorosiphon corynothrix
strictum Sull.
Decorosiphon corynothrix*
Grimmiaceae Arn.
Racomitrium Brid.
Myzodium modestum
lanuginosum (Hedw.) Brid.
Pseudacaudella rubida*
Dicranaceae Schimp.
Dicranum Hedw.
Muscaphis escherichi
Pseudacaudella rubida
Pottiaceae Schimp.
Barbula Hedw.
Muscaphis musci
Tortula Hedw.
muralis Hedw.
49
European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55 (2015)
Muscaphis musci
Bryaceae Schwagr.
Bryum Hedw.
Muscaphis musci
pallens Sw. ex anon.
Jacksonia papillata (see text)
Pohlia Hedw.
Muscaphis escherichi
Mycodium modestum
Rhodobryum (Schimp.) Limpr.
roseum (Hedw.) Limpr.
Muscaphis escherichi*
Mniaceae Schwagr.
Mniaceae s.lat.
Pseudacaudella rubida
Mnium Hedw.
hornum Hedw.
Muscaphis escherichi
Plagiomniaceae T.J.Kop.
Plagiomnium T.J.Kop.
affine (Blandow ex Funclc) T.J.Kop.
Muscaphis escherichi*
rostratum (Schrad.) T.J.Kop.
Muscaphis escherichi
undulatum (Hedw.) P.Beauv.
Muscaphis escherichi
Muscaphis musci
Climaciaceae Kindb.
Climacium F.Weber & D.Mohr
dendroides (Hedw.) F.Weber & D.Mohr
Pseudacaudella rubida
Amblystegiaceae Kindb.
Amblystegium Schimp.
Muscaphis musci
Drepanocladus (Mull.Hal.) G.Roth
aduncus (Hedw.) Wamst.
Muscaphis cuspidata
Sanionia Loeske
uncinata (Schwagr.) Brid.
Pseudacaudella rubida*
Calliergonaceae (Kanda) Vanderp., Hedenas, C.J.Cox & A.J.Shaw
Calliergon (Sull.) Kindb.
Muscaphis musci
cordifolium (Hedw.) Kindb.
Pseudacaudella rubida*
Thuidiaceae Schimp.
Thuidium Schimp.
tamariscinum (Hedw.) Schimp.
Pseudacaudella rubida
Brachytheciaceae Schimp.
50
ALBRECHT A.C., Identification guide to Nordic aphids
Pseudoscleropodium (Limpr.) M.Fleisch.
purum (Hedw.) M.Fleisch.
Muscaphis escherichi
Muscaphis musci
Eurhynchium S chimp.
Eurhynchium s.lat.
Muscaphis musci
striatum (Hedw.) Schimp.
Melaphis rhois
Cirriphyllum Grout
piliferum (Hedw.) Grout
Muscaphis escherichi*
Kindbergia Ochyra
praelonga (Hedw.) Ochyra
Muscaphis escherichi
Sciuro-hypnum Hampe
oedipodium (Mitt.) Ignatov & Huttunen
(syn . Br achy the cium curtum)
Pseudacaudella rubida*
Muscaphis escherichi*
Br achy the cium S chimp.
albicans (Hedw.) Schimp.
Pseudacaudella rubida*
rivulare Schimp.
Muscaphis cuspidata*
rutabulum (Hedw.) Schimp.
Muscaphis musci
Brachytheciastrum Ignatov & Huttunen
velutinum (Hedw.) Ignatov & Huttunen
Muscaphis musci
Pseudacaudella rubida
Hypnaceae Schimp.
Calliergonella Loeske
cuspidata (Hedw.) Loeske
Muscaphis cuspidata
Muscaphis escherichi
Muscaphis musci
Pseudacaudella rubida
Hyocomium Bruch & Schimp.
armoricum (Brid.) Wijk & Margad.
Jacksonia papillata (see text)
Melaphis rhois
Hypnum Hedw.
Melaphis rhois
cupressiforme Hedw.
Muscaphis escherichi
Jacksonia papillata (see text)
Ptilium De Not.
crista-castrensis (Hedw.) De Not.
Muscaphis escherichi
51
European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55 (2015)
Hylocomiaceae (Broth.) M.Fleisch.
Hylocomium Schimp.
splendens (Hedw.) Schimp.
Muscaphis musci
Pseudacaudella rubida*
Pleurozium Mitt
schreberi (Willd. ex Brid.) Mitt.
Muscaphis escherichi *
Pseudacaudella rubida*
Rhytidiadelphus (Limpr.) Warnst.
loreus (Hedw.) Warnst.
Muscaphis escherichi
squarrosus (Hedw.) Warnst.
Muscaphis escherichi
Decorosiphon corynothrix
Pseudacaudella rubida*
Plagiotheciaceae
Plagiothecium Schimp.
laetum Schimp.
Muscaphis escherichi
52
ALBRECHT A.C., Identification guide to Nordic aphids
Appendix 2
Summary of the host relationships of the Northern European aphids feeding on horsetails and ferns.
(Colours: Green = monoecious. Blue = dioecious, on primary host (none in this table). Red = dioecious,
on secondary host. * = my own records)
PTERIDOPHYTA
EQUISETALES DC. exBercht. & J. Presl
Equisetaceae Michx. ex DC.
Equisetum L.
Myzus cerasi
arvense L.
Aulacorthum circumflexum*
Macrosiphum equiseti
Paracletus cimiciformis (exceptionally?)
fluviatile L.
Aulacorthum solani*
pratense Ehrh.
Aphis equiseticola
Macrosiphum equiseti
sylvaticum L.
Aphis equiseticola
Aphis gossypii
Macrosiphum equiseti*
Rhopalosiphum padi (exceptionally)
Sitobion avenae (exceptionally)
Sitobionfragariae (exceptionally)
telmateia Ehrh.
Macrosiphum equiseti
SALVINIALES Bartl
Marsileaceae Mirb.
Mars ilea L.
quadrifolia L.
Rhopalosiphum nymphaeae
strigosa Willd.
Rhopalosiphum nymphaeae
Salviniaceae Martinov
Azolla Lam.
caroliniana Willd.
Rhopalosiphum nymphaeae
filiculoides Lam.
Rhopalosiphum nymphaeae
Salvinia Seg.
auriculata Aubl.
Neomyzus circumflexus
Rhopalosiphum nymphaeae
natans (L.) All.
Rhopalosiphum nymphaeae
POLYPODIALES Link
Dennstaedtiaceae Lotsy
53
European Journal of Taxonomy 145: 1-55 (2015)
Dennstaedtia Bernh.
Amphorophora ampullata
Idiopterus nephrelepidis
Pteridium Gled. ex Scop.
aquilinum (L.) Kuhn
Amphorophora ampullata
Macrosiphum dryopteridis
Macrosiphum ptericolens
Pteridaceae E. D. M. Kirchn.
Adiantum L.
Neomyzus circumflexus*
Idiopterus nephrelepidis
Myzus persicae
capillus-veneris L.
Aulacorthum solani
Pteris L.
Idiopterus nephrelepidis
Cystopteridaceae Shmakov
Cystopteris Bernh.
montana (Lam.) Desv.
Amphorophora ampullata
Gymnocarpium Newman
dryopteris (L.) Newman
Amphorophora ampullata
Macrosiphum dryopteridis
robertianum (Hoffm.) Newman
Macrosiphum dryopteridis
Aspleniaceae Newman
Asplenium L.
Amphorophora ampullata
Neomyzus circumflexus
adiantum-nigrum L.
Idiopterus nephrelepidis
ruta-muraria L.
Idiopterus nephrelepidis
scolopendrium L.
Idiopterus nephrelepidis
trichomanes L.
Aulacorthum solani
Thelypteridaceae Pic.Serm.
Phegopteris (C. Presl) Fee
connectilis (Michx.) Watt
Amphorophora ampullata
Macrosiphum dryopteridis
Thelypteris Schmidel
palustris Schott
Amphorophora ampullata
Macrosiphum dryopteridis
Onocleaceae Pic. Serm.
Matteuccia Tod.
54
ALBRECHT A.C., Identification guide to Nordic aphids
struthiopteris (L.) Tod.
Amphorophora ampullata*
Neomyzus circumflexus
Onoclea T.
Amphorophora ampullata
Blechnaceae Newman
Blechnum T.
Idiopterus nephrelepidis
Athyriaceae Aston
Athyrium Roth
distentifolium Tausch ex Opiz
Macrosiphum dryopteridis
Macrosiphum lapponicum
filix-femina (L.) Roth
Amphorophora ampullata *
Aulacorthum solani*
Macrosiphum dryopteridis*
Dryopteridaceae Herter
Cyrtomium C. Presl
falcatum (L.f.) C. Presl
Neomyzus circumflexus
Idiopterus nephrelepidis
Dryopteris Adans.
carthusiana (Vill.) H. P Fuchs
Amphorophora ampullata *
Macrosiphum dryopteridis*
cristata (L.) A. Gray
Macrosiphum dryopteridis *
dilatata (Hoffin.) A. Gray
Amphorophora ampullata
Macrosiphum dryopteridis
filix-mas (L.) Schott
Amphorophora ampullata
Macrosiphum dryopteridis
Polystichum Roth
Amphorophora ampullata
lonchitis (L.) Roth
Neomyzus circumflexus
Nephrolepidaceae Pic.Serm.
Nephrolepis Schott
Neomyzus circumflexus
exaltata (L.) Schott
Idiopterus nephrelepidis
Polypodiaceae J. Presl & C. Presl
Polypodium L.
vulgare L.
Neomyzus circumflexus
Aulacorthum solani
Macrosiphum dryopteridis
55