www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu
2015 • Leduc D.
ISSN 2118-9773
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:16E64AF8-518C-47F0-B3CF-6BA707C222FA
New species of Thelonema , Metasphaerolaimus, and Monhystrella
(Nematoda, Monhysterida) from Kermadec Trench, Southwest Pacific
Daniel LEDUC
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Private Bag 14-901,
Wellington, New Zealand; +64 4 386 0379.
Email: [email protected]
um:lsid:zoobank.org: author: 9393949F-3426-4EE2-8BDE-DEFFACE3D9BC
Abstract. Three new species of the order Monhysterida are described based on specimens obtained at
depths of 8081 and 9177 m in the Kermadec Trench. Thelonema clarki sp. nov. is characterised by a
large body size (3230M461 pm), short cylindrical buccal cavity, gubernaculum without apophyses, and
long conico-cylindrical tail. This is the first record of the genus since its original description over two
decades ago from the Peru Basin. Metasphaerolaimus constrictus sp. nov. is characterised by a relatively
long body (1232-1623 pm), slightly arcuate spicules without gubernaculum, and conico-cylindrical tail
with inner cuticle conspicuously thickened immediately anterior to cylindrical portion. Monhystrella
kermadecensis sp. nov. is characterised by a circle of papillose outer labial sensillae slightly anterior to
the four short cephalic setae, gubernaculum with caudal apophyses, the presence of distinct cuticularised
piece along anterior vaginal wall, and a relatively short conical (males) or conico-cylindrical tail
(females) with conical, ventrally-curved spinneret. M. kermadecensis sp. nov. can be differentiated from
all other species of the genus, and, indeed, the entire family, based on the variable position of the anterior
gonad relative to the intestine. The new species is classified within the Monhysteridae, and not the
closely-related Xyalidae, based on the small body size, a smooth cuticle, and the presence of six outer
labial papillae and only one testis. Further work is required to clarify the placement of M. kermadecensis
sp. nov. relative to other monhysterid genera. A tabular key to all ten valid Metasphaerolaimus species
is presented.
Keywords. Linhomoeidae, Sphaerolaimidae, Monhysteridae, hadal. New Zealand.
Leduc D. 2015. New species of Thelonema , Metasphaerolaimus , and Monhystrella (Nematoda, Monhysterida)
from Kermadec Trench, Southwest Pacific. European Journal of Taxonomy 158: 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/
eit.2015,158
Introduction
The Order Monhysterida is well represented in hadal trench samples (> 6000 m depth), with the family
Monhysteridae often dominant (Gambi et al. 2003; Vanhove et al. 2004). The families Sphaerolaimidae
and Linhomoeidae are also common in hadal trench samples, but are typically much less abundant (e.g.,
Tietjen 1989). Whilst species of the families Sphaerolaimidae and Linhomoeidae are relatively large (> 1
mm in length) and easy to identify, species of the family Monhysteridae are typically small (<0.8 mm in
1
European Journal of Taxonomy 158: 1-19 (2015)
length) and often represented by many morphologically similar species in deep-sea samples (D. Leduc
unpublished data). As a result, data on the distribution of Monhysteridae species in the deep sea are
scarce despite their high abundance (Tietjen 1989; Miljutin et al. 2010). In addition, there has been some
confusion related to the identification of the small and morphologically similar genera Monhystrella
Cobb, 1918 and Thalassomonhystera Jacobs, 1987. Vanhove et al. (2004) and Gambi et al. (2003)
recorded high densities of the genus Monhystera Bastian, 1865 in hadal trenches, despite a taxonomic
revision by Jacobs (1987) almost two decades earlier resulting in all marine Monhystera species being
transferred to either Thalassomonhystera or Monhystrella (Fonseca & Decraemer 2008). More work
is clearly needed on the taxonomy of this family, as well as other Monhysterida, in order to identify
patterns in species distribution within and among trenches.
Of the fifteen nematode species so far described / recorded from hadal trench environments worldwide
(Miljutin et al. 2010; Leduc 2015), three are known from Kermadec Trench: Synonchoides galathea
Wieser, 1956 (4570 m depth), Manganonema rowdeni Leduc, 2015 (8081 m) and Manganonema
majusculum Leduc, 2015 (8081 m). Here, three new species of the Order Monhysterida, one species each
of the families Linhomoeidae, Sphaerolaimidae and Monhysteridae, are described based on specimens
obtained at depths of 8081 and 9177 m.
Materials and methods
Kermadec Trench is situated in the Southwest Pacific Ocean and is formed by the subduction of the Pacific
Plate under the Indo-Australian Plate. It extends from approximately 26° to 36° S near the northeastern
tip of New Zealand’s North Island. Samples were collected from the axis of Kermadec Trench at
depths of 8081 and 9177 m during the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute (WHOI) cruise TN309 (RV
Thomas G. Thompson) in May 2014. The sediment cores were obtained using the submersible ROV
Nereus (core internal diameter = 6.35 cm). Cores were sliced into 0-1, 1-2, 2-3, 3—4, 4-5 and 5-10 cm
layers and fixed in 10% buffered formalin. Samples were rinsed on a 20 pm sieve to retain nematodes.
Nematodes were extracted from the remaining sediments by Ludox flotation, stained with Rose Bengal,
and transferred to pure glycerol (Somerfield & Warwick 1996). Species descriptions were made from
glycerol mounts using differential interference contrast microscopy and drawings were made with the
aid of a camera lucida.
All measurements are in pm, and all curved structures are measured along the arc. Type specimens are
held in the NIWA Invertebrate Collection, Wellington, New Zealand. Abbreviations in the text are as
follows:
a = body length / maximum body diameter
abd = anal body diameter
b = body length / oesophagus length
c = body length / tail length
cbd = corresponding body diameter
%V = vulva distance from anterior end of body x 100 / total body length
2
LEDUC D., Kermadec Trench Monhysterida
Results
Class Chromadorea Inglis, 1983
Order Monhysterida Filipjev, 1929
Superfamily Siphonolaimoidea Filipjev, 1918
Family Linhomoeidae Filipjev, 1922
Diagnosis (From Fonseca & Bezerra 2014)
Cuticle often striated, sometimes smooth. Inner labial sensillae papillose or not observable. Amphideal
fovea usually circular, rarely unispiral. Inner side of labial region formed by an annular, soft-skinned pad
that narrows the buccal opening. Cardia long and conspicuous. Usually two outstretched and opposed
gonads, rarely single gonad present. Anterior gonad to the left or right of intestine, posterior gonad to
the opposite side.
Subfamily Thelonematinae Bussau, 1993
Type and only genus
Thelonema Bussau, 1993.
Diagnosis
See diagnosis of type and only genus Thelonema.
Thelonema Bussau, 1993
Diagnosis (modified from Bussau 1993)
Inner labial sensillae not observable with light microscopy. Six outer labial setae situated in separate
circle from the four sensillae of the third circle; the latter consists of papillae located in depressions.
Four sub-cephalic setae located immediately posterior to the cephalic papillae. Farge circular amphideal
fovea located far posteriorly, and with nerve process usually visible. Buccal cavity cylindrical or funnel-
shaped, cuticularised, without teeth. Pharynx with weak posterior bulb; cardia long and gradually
widening posteriorly. Female with two outstretched and opposed ovaries and male with two outstretched
and opposed testes. Tail conico-cylindrical.
Type species
Thelonema majum Bussau, 1993.
Thelonema clarki sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:F4ED998A-656F-48Dl-8FBC-B0031BA943D9
Figs 1-3, Table 1
Diagnosis
Thelonema clarki sp. nov. is characterised by large adult body size (3230M461 pm), short cylindrical
buccal cavity with cuticularised walls, sub-cephalic setae of similar length or shorter than outer labial
setae, secretory-excretory system with two or three renette cells, gubernaculum without apophyses, and
conico-cylindrical tail 6.4-10.4 abd long.
3
European Journal of Taxonomy 158: 1-19 (2015)
Etymology
This species is named after Malcolm R. Clark, principal investigator of the HADES project (HADal
Ecosystem Studies) who has made an outstanding contribution to the field of deep-sea ecology and who
kindly supported the involvement of the author on the Kermadec Trench voyage.
Material examined
Holotype
KERMADEC TRENCH: $ (NIWA 99760), collected 6 May 2014 (WHOI cruise TN309, Nereus dive
N074).
Fig. 1 . Thelonema clarki sp. nov. Holotype, S- A. Anterior body region. B. Head, showing buccal
cavity and cephalic sensillae. C. Posterior body region. D. Gonads, right-hand side view. E. Spicule and
gubernaculum. Scale bar: A, C = 40 pm; B = 12 pm; D = 45 pm; E = 20 pm.
4
LEDUC D., Kermadec Trench Monhysterida
Paratypes
KERMADEC TRENCH: 2 $$ (NIWA 99761) and 1 juvenile (NIWA 99762), collected 7 May 2014
(WHOI cruise TN309, Nereus dive N075).
Type habitat
KERMADEC TRENCH: water depth: 8081 m (178.17571° W, 34.34030° S), sediment depth: 2-3 cm
(holotype); water depth: 9177 m (177.65414° W, 32.85037° S), sediment depth: 0-2 cm (paratype).
Fig. 2. Thelonema clarki sp. nov. Paratypes, $ and juvenile. A. Female head. B. Female anterior body
region. C. Juvenile head. D. Juvenile anterior body region. E. Female posterior body region. F. Juvenile
posterior body region. G. Female reproductive system. Arrow shows position of vulva. Scale bar: A-C
= 40 pm; B-D = 100 pm; E-F = 90 pm; G = 210 pm.
5
European Journal of Taxonomy 158: 1-19 (2015)
Description
Male
Body cylindrical, tapering slightly towards both extremities. Cuticle striated from level of buccal cavity
to near tail tip. Somatic setae absent except for a few 1 pm long setae in pharyngeal region. Lip region
slightly concave; head region otherwise rounded. Internal labial sensillae not observed. Six outer labial
setae, 5 pm long, situated in separate circle from the four sensillae of third circle; the latter consists
of papillae located in depressions (Fig. 3B). Small, granular glands sometimes observed, apparently
connected to base of outer labial setae (Fig. IB); larger unicellular glands also sometimes observed
and apparently connected to cephalic sensillae (Fig. 2C). Four sub-cephalic setae located immediately
posterior to the cephalic papillae, 3M pm long, similar in length or slightly shorter than outer labial setae.
Large circular amphideal fovea with cuticularised outline situated 1.7 cbd from anterior body extremity.
Mouth opening narrow, surrounded by bulge of inner portion of lip region; buccal cavity cylindrical,
7 pm deep, 9 pm wide, with cuticularised walls, not surrounded by pharyngeal tissue. Pharynx narrow,
muscular, with oval posterior bulb; pharyngeal glands and their orifices indistinct. Nerve ring slightly
posterior to middle of pharynx length. Secretory-excretory system with two or three renette cells (third
cell may sometimes be obscured) all situated just posterior to pharyngeal bulb; ampulla and pore between
nerve ring and posterior pharyngeal bulb. Cardia conspicuous, 90 pm long, widening posteriorly, not
surrounded by intestine walls.
Reproductive system diorchic with two opposed and outstretched testes, anterior testis to the
left of intestine and posterior testis to the right of intestine. Mature sperm globular, nucleated, 4-5 x
6-7 pm. Spicules paired, 1.2 abd long, strongly arcuate, with well-developed capitulum and pointed
distal end. Gubernaculum thin, pointed at both ends, without apophyses but with rounded glandular
tissue extending dorsally. Rectal glands not observed; one ejaculatory gland situated between spicules.
Pre-cloacal supplements absent. Tail long, conico-cylindrical, with rounded tip. Caudal glands not
observed; short and sparse caudal setae present, no terminal setae. Intestine with numerous transparent
crystalline structures, square to rhomboid-shaped, up to 14 x 14 pm (Fig. 3C-D).
Female
Similar to males but with lower values of a, b, and c, slightly smaller amphids (0.42-0.44 vs 0.65 cbd)
and longer tail (9.0-10.4 vs 6.4 abd). Buccal cavity 5 pm wide and 4-5 pm deep. Reproductive system
didelphic; anterior branch outstretched, to the right of intestine, posteror branch poorly developed, to the
left of intestine. Spermatheca present in anterior branch only, simple, not cuticularised. Vulva transverse,
situated slightly posterior to mid-body; small vaginal glands present on either side of vagina; muscular
pars proximalis vaginae.
Juvenile
Similar to females, but with shorter body and lower values of a and b.
Remarks
Thelonema clarki sp. nov. can be differentiated from the only other species of the genus, T. majum , by
the larger body size (323CM1461 vs 1000-1460 pm), short cylindrical buccal cavity (vs long and funnel-
shaped in T. majum), sub-cephalic setae of similar length or shorter than outer labial setae (sub-cephalic
setae longer than outer labial setae in T. majum), secretory-excretory system with two or three renette
cells (secretory-excretory system not observed in T. majum), absence of gubernacular apophyses (vs
dorso-caudal apophyses present in T. majum), and longer tail (6.4-10.4 vs 2.7 abd).
This is the first time that Thelonema is recorded outside the type locality in the Peru Basin (~ 4150 m
depth) since the original description of the genus by Bussau (1993). The genus was not included in
6
LEDUC D, Kermadec Trench Monhysterida
Fig. 3. Thelonema clarki sp. nov. Light micrographs. A. Holotype, entire biody. B. Cross-section
view of sunken papilla, second circle of cephalic sensillae. C. Female gut content, showing crystalline
structures and other unidentified contents. D. Juvenile gut showing crystalline structures. Arrow shows
position of sunken papilla of third circle of cephalic sensillae. Scale bar: A = 520 pm; B = 5 pm; C-D =
20 pm.
7
Table 1. Morphometries (pm) of Thelonema clarki sp. nov., Metasphaerolaimus constrictus sp. nov., and Monhystrella kermadecensis sp. nov. (n,
number of specimens; L, body length; V, vulva distance from anterior end of body).
European Journal of Taxonomy 158: 1-19 (2015)
>
o
ss
d
.6*5
>3
<J
’R
R
I
*
«3
"5:
R
R
13
fen
5B
<U
a
S3
--
S3
o
oo in
tj- x
in | I m
Os <N
r) x
tJ-
o 7
x
o
I
vo
7
5 B
4}
13
5 B
4>
a
S3
S3
Ph
<N
Ov i
Tt Tt
cn ^ ^ in
x vo
o x
Tt
o
- Tt
vo
o
vo"
7
a>
a
■W
©
©
3 !
o
ov
Tt
vo
x
in
o Tt
m
i
m
Tf
i
^f-
1
oo
in
i
1
in
Os
1 i
1>
1
CN
i
^1"
l |
Ov
l i
oo
r-"
i
o
oo
o
cn
i
-f
X
i
m
i
i
CN
cn
CN
i
o
1
I>
vo
1
1 1
CN
vo
X
T
oo
o’
i
CN
1
CN
i
cn
' 1
in
oo
X
O
CN
X
o
cn
o
cn
cn
O
o
X
cn
cn
nf
55
10
Os
1
OO
oo
o'
of
cn"
CN
Os
CN 00
’" H o'
X
oo"
Tt
oo
o
>n
x x
x
Tt
x
in
in
X.^CNTtO.^CNTtf'i
— — ci n — o 0
>3
s
>«*
VJ
£
>3
R
R
>3
R
s
R
53
*R
Si,
I
.R
>
©
S3
d
5B
!/3
"3
©
13
§
VI
cn
a>
CN
a
X
cn
Tf
X
O
—H
cn
—H
CN
cn
OV
cn
5_ .
cn 1
1 x
1
1
1
1
Tf
o
CN
X
Tt
CN
S3
Ph
o
X
cn
CN
cn
in
x |
Tt
Tt
Os
X
cn
O
cn
oo
O
Os
Tt
X
CN
cn
X
CN
(—^
Tt
Tt
T
T
T
1 7
cn
1
7
X
1 1
1 7
7
cn
1
V—D
1
X
1
X
1
oo
X
X
CN
r-*
Os
oo
OV
in
ov
ov
CN
OV
cn
CN
Tt
o
CN
cn
Tt
'
CN
X
Tt
©
a
©
©
3
cl
x x
cl x
in
x o
-H <N
_ o x
^ I I
“ x <N
in in oo <n ^ o
'—I '—i Tt Tt x
Tt
cn
CN
in
<N
vo o o
x x Tt
O
x os fr)
>
o
S3
a
5B
t
R
R
I
R
R
g
o
i—i oo
cn cn
ci
OS
Os
Cl OS
-H Cl
cn
■'3" Tt oo
’—i ’—i Tt
OS
cn
o oo
vo cn
T (M
cn
cl
OS 00
Tt in
OV
cn
in
oo
CN
cn
o
!/3
3
a>
©
a
tn
S3
S3
Oh
in
in vo »—i o o Tt cn
Cl
Cl
X
X
Tt
X
X
OV
OV
OV
X
o
X
i—H
CN
/—N
oo
o
X
cn
<N
X
Os
X
H X
i x x
X
1—1
Tt
X
X
X
X
H 1
1 ^
Tt
X
X
O
ov" 1
oo"
cn"
Tt
~ ~ cf
Tt
Cl
o"
oo"
ov"
x"
x"
X
o
»— 1
(— T
x"
x"
x"
cn
Tf
r-H
X
Tt
X
X
Tt
oo
oo
CN
X
X
X
'sj
oo
X
X
Cl
4— H
1—H
CN
X
Os
o
cn
13
s
©
a
©
©
3
»c -h 't cn h o ^
m- oo -h -h <n ^i- ^
Tt
Os vo m vo oo
CN CN VO VO Xh ^
^ cn
CN CN
cn cn
oo
CN
*-h x <n x x 95?
in in vo h in £> vo
!Z3
a>
©
©
a
©
C3
4->
<D
C/3
0, rt
<u
o
<D
C3
+-*
<U
C/3
o
T3 ^
KS
C3 C3
C3 C3
CC 3
-Eh
a,
n>
o
i
C/3
<4-1
O
CD
C3
4->
<D
C/3
CD
13
Si
cx
CD
O
< 4 -H
o
J5 -P3
op
a>
X3
o
n3 'O
. . TO T3 TO
T3 T3 X X -=J
Ch hJ C3 -O O
n3 T3
cO cO
CD CD
3 3
bfl 00
03 S3
CD CD
^3 Si
cx cx
S S
< <
si
cx
s
<
T3
S3
CD
CD
+->
S3
co
s
H-H
T3
s
CX
S
<
T3
S3
CD
CD
"S
C3
s
<2
M-H
OO
_E3
"C
CD
CD
z
T3
S3
CD
CD
S3
cO
^ 2 ■$
o 3»0
a, S3
E ~
o g
g 2 &
S-H O CO
u X si
Z W Ph
X3
o
oo
S3
CD
C/3
CCS
X3
13
i—<
CD
4—>
CD
£
cd
<D
CZ!
c3
^ s
ecs .cO ,03
-a
X3
o
T3 00
o CD
b b
cO
-S3
Oh
33
o
00
S3
CD
£
J3
3
o
CCS
S3
S-H
CD
X)
33
cO
TO
X
CCS
^ S
3 n cS cH
ecs C} .is J-) ccs —j —h
X l*H Dh r S £ CCS CCS H
'O
o
X
13
S3
00 00
S3 S3
CD CD
2
x
_Z‘
o
X
13
> 3
8
LEDUC D., Kermadec Trench Monhysterida
the recent overview of all Monhysterida by Fonseca & Bezerra (2014), but the discovery of a new
Thelonema species in the Southwest Pacific confirms the validity of the genus.
The presence of crystalline structures in the intestine is intriguing, as many appear too large to have
been ingested (the structures are up to 14 pm wide, and the width of the cuticularised buccal cavity is
4-9 pm). It seems unlikely that the buccal cavity can stretch to accommodate such large particles given
the presence of cuticularised walls. The crystalline structures may have grown through accretion whilst
in the intestine, but this process would presumably require a relatively long period of time.
Superfamily Sphaerolaimoidea Filipj ev, 1918
Family Sphaerolaimidae Filipjev, 1918
Diagnosis (from Fonseca & Bezerra 2014)
Cuticle striated or annulated. Six outer labial setae and four cephalic setae in one circle, with cephalic setae
longer than outer labial setae. Eight groups of sub-cephalic setae present (four groups in Megalamphis).
Buccal cavity wide, barrel-shaped (except for Subsphaerolaimus Forenzen, 1978, which is conical),
with longitudinal ribs, surrounded only at the base by pharyngeal tissue. Pharyngeal lumen with thick
cuticle. Renette cell usually present, opening behind nerve ring. Females with one outstretched anterior
ovary at left or right of intestine. Males usually with two testes; anterior one either to the left or right of
intestine, posterior one at opposite side.
Subfamily Metasphaerolaiminae Gourbault & Boucher, 1981
Type genus
Metasphaerolaimus Gourbault & Boucher, 1981.
Diagnosis
See diagnosis of type and only genus Metasphaerolaimus.
Genus Metasphaerolaimus Gourbault & Boucher, 1981
Ceratosphaerolaimus Fadeeva, 1983: 1329, fig. 5. (see Jensen 1992: 8)
Diagnosis (modified from Fonseca & Bezerra 2014)
Cuticle finely striated. Six inner labial papillae; six outer labial setae at same level as four longer cephalic
setae; eight groups of sub-cephalic setae. Amphideal fovea circular, situated posteriorly to buccal
cavity. Buccal cavity strongly cuticularised with six H- or X-shaped mandibles, hooked anteriorly and
articulating on cuticularised rim posteriorly. Pharynx cylindrical with strongly cuticularised lumen.
Type species
M. cancellatus Gourbault & Boucher, 1981.
Metasphaerolaimus constrictus sp. nov.
um:lsid:zoobank.org:act:C2DDlCB2-2B9B-4C31-BF13-C0ElA143A275
Figs 4-5, Table 1
Diagnosis
Metasphaerolaimus constrictus sp. nov. is characterised by a relatively long body (1232-1623 pm),
amphids located 1.0-1.4 cbd from anterior extremity, slightly arcuate spicules 1.3 abd long without
9
European Journal of Taxonomy 158: 1-19 (2015)
Fig. 4. Metasphaerolaimus constrictus sp. nov. A. Holotype, S, anterior body region. B. Holotype,
head. C. Female head. D. Female anterior body region. Scale bar: A = 50 pm; B-C = 25 pm; D = 55 pm.
10
LEDUC D., Kermadec Trench Monhysterida
gubernaculum, tail conico-cylindrical with inner cuticle conspicuously thickened immediately anterior
to cylindrical portion and with three short terminal setae.
Etymology
The species name is derived from the latin constrictus (= drawn together or contracted), and refers to the
distinctive shape of the tail with thickening of the inner cuticle.
Material examined
Holotype
KERMADEC TRENCH: $ (NIWA 99763), collected 6 May 2014 (WHOI cruise TN309, Nereus dive
N074).
Paratypes
KERMADEC TRENCH: 3 ? ? (NIWA 99764-6), collected 7 May 2014 (WHOI cruise TN309, Nereus
dive N075).
Type habitat
KERMADEC TRENCH: water depth: 8081 m (178.17571° W, 34.34030° S), sediment depth: 2-3 cm
(holotype); water depth: 9177 m (177.65414° W, 32.85037° S), sediment depth: 0-2 cm (paratype).
Description
Male
Body cylindrical, tapering slightly towards both extremities. Cuticle faintly striated along entire body.
Eight rows of somatic setae, relatively long (4-7 pm) and numerous in pharyngeal region, short and
sparse elsewhere. Head rounded, with well-developed lip region. Inner labial sensillae not observed; six
outer labial setae, 1-2 pm long, and four cephalic setae, 2-3 pm long, in one circle. Eight groups of three
to four sub-cephalic setae, 3-8 pm long. Large circular amphideal fovea with strongly cuticularised
outline, 1.4 cbd from anterior body extremity. Buccal cavity large, 24 pm deep and 13 pm wide; six
H-shaped mandibles hooked anteriorly and with wide base articulating onto cuticularised rim posteriorly.
Posterior portion of buccal cavity surrounded by pharyngeal tissue. Pharynx muscular, cylindrical,
widening very slightly towards posterior extremity, with strongly cuticularised lumen. Cardia extend
into intestine lumen. Nerve ring situated at middle of pharynx length. Secretory-excretory system not
observed.
Reproductive system diorchic with two outstretched testes; anterior testis to the left and posterior testis
to the right of intestine. Mature sperm cells nucleated, spherical to globular, 9 x 9-13 pm. Spicules
1.3 abd long, slightly arcuate, with swollen proximal ends and pointed distal ends. Gubernaculum and
pre-cloacal supplements absent. Tail conico-cylindrical with conspicuous thickening of inner cuticle
(maximum thickness ~7 pm) immediately anterior to cylindrical portion (Fig. 5D); cylindrical portion
shorter than conical portion. A few short, sparse caudal setae present sub-ventrally and sub-dorsally;
three short terminal setae, 2 pm long. Caudal glands not observed.
Female
Similar to male, but with longer body and substantially smaller amphids (0.11-0.14 vs 0.48 cbd)
situated 1.0-1.4 cbd from anterior body extremity. Reproductive system monodelphic with outstretched
anterior branch to the left or right of intestine. Spermatheca present, simple and not cuticularised. Vulva
transverse, situated at almost two thirds of body length from anterior. Vaginal glands not observed.
Three caudal glands observed in one specimen. Cuticle immediately anterior to cylindrical portion of
tail up to 9 pm thick.
11
European Journal of Taxonomy 158: 1-19 (2015)
Fig. 5. Metasphaerolaimus constrictus sp. nov. A. Entire J. B-C. Female posterior body region. D. Male
posterior body region. E. Male gonads. Scale bar: A = 300 pm; B-C = 55 pm; D = 45 mm; E = 80 pm.
12
LEDUC D., Kermadec Trench Monhysterida
Remarks
Metasphaerolaimus constrictus sp. nov. can be differentiated from all other species of the genus by
the distinctive tail shape with conspicuous thickening of cuticle (up to 7-9 pm thick) immediately
anterior to the cylindrical portion. M. constrictus sp. nov. is most similar to M. gerlachi Jensen, 1992,
M. hadalis (Freudenhammer, 1975), and M. inglisi Gourbault & Boucher, 1981. The new species can be
differentiated from M. gerlachi based on larger body size (1232-1623 vs 893-971 pm), larger amphids
in males (0.48 vs 0.30-0.40 cbd), and presence of short terminal setae (vs long terminal setae in M.
gerlachi ); from M. hadalis by higher values of a (30-38 vs 26-27), larger amphids in males (0.48 vs
0.35 cbd) and shorter tail (2.9-3.1 vs 3.4-3.8 abd); from M. inglisi by the absence of setae immediately
anterior to amphids in females (vs three long setae in M. inglisi ), and presence of terminal setae (absent
in M. inglisi).
Metasphaerolaimus was initially described by Gourbault & Boucher (1981) to accommodate
species similar to Sphaerolaimus Bastian, 1865, but with a buccal cavity with six mandibles instead
of a solid, heavily cuticularised capsule. Gourbault & Boucher (1981) described three new species
(.Metasphaerolaimus cancellatus Gourbault & Boucher, 1981, M. hamatus Gourbault & Boucher, 1981
and M. inglisi Gourbault & Boucher, 1981), and transferred the species Sphaerolaimus campbelli Allgen,
1927, Sphaerolaimus hadalis Freudenhammer, 1975, and Sphaerolaimus crassicauda Freudenhammer,
1975 to Metasphaerolaimus. Fadeeva (1983) later described the identical genus Ceratosphaerolaimus
Fadeeva, 1893, including one new species ( Ceratosphaerolaimus japonicus Fadeeva, 1983); the
latter author also transferred Sphaerolaimus horrendus Sergeeva, 1981 to Ceratosphaerolaimus.
Ceratosphaerolaimus was synonymised with Metasphaerolaimus by Jensen (1992), who also described
Metasphaerolaimus gerlachi Jensen, 1992. There are currently ten valid Metasphaerolaimus species
including Metasphaerolaimus constrictus sp. nov. (Table 2). Species ofthis genus are mainly differentiated
based on amphideal fovea size, spicule length, and length and shape of the tail. The majority of species
occur in the deep sea below 1000 m depth, except for Metasphaerolaimus campbelli , M. horrendus , and
M. japonicus , which were described from coastal waters. These three shallow water species are also the
only species of the genus that possess a gubemaculum with dorso-caudal apophyses.
Superfamily MonhysteroideaFilipjev, 1929
Family Monhysteridae de Man, 1876
Diagnosis (modified from Fonseca & Decraemer 2008)
Small, slender nematodes usually less than 2.5 mm long. Cuticle smooth or striated. Anterior sensillae
in two circles: anterior circle with six inner labial sensillae (usually papilliform) and posterior circle
with six outer labial sensillae and four cephalic sensillae (both usually setiform). Amphideal fovea
circular or cryptocircular. Buccal cavity small to medium-sized, bipartite or single, with or without
denticles. Pharynx with or without posterior bulb. Secretory-excretory system present or absent. Female
reproductive system monodelphic with outstretched gonad to the right of intestine; male monorchic
with anterior testis to the right of intestine (except Monhystrella kermadecensis sp. nov. where position
of anterior gonad relative to intestine is variable). Spicules usually simple and arcuate. Tail conical to
conico-cylindrical; terminal setae absent.
Genus Monhystrella Cobb, 1918
Diagnosis (modified from Fonseca & Decraemer 2008)
Short body length (< 0.8 mm). Small somatic setae often present. Six outer labial and four cephalic
sensillae usually setiform. Buccal cavity tubiform, funnel-shaped or conoid, often with cuticularised
walls; denticles usually present, but difficult to observe in small species. Circular amphideal fovea
13
Table 2. Key morphological characteristics of all valid Metasphaerolaimus species, and their bathymetric distribution. A: dorso-caudal apophyses
present; Co = conical; CoC = conico-cylindrical; G = gurbernaculum present; nd = no data; - = absent. Depth range data based on type locality and
additional distribution data summarised by Jensen (1992).
European Journal of Taxonomy 158: 1-19 (2015)
o
in
<N
n
d -
VO
cn
d-
d-
d= B
CL ZJ
o
Cl
oo
o
IN
On
|
CN
d-
7
cn
VO
|
d-
Os
7
o
1
d-
On
7
CN
cn
1
Zj CX
Q g
V
cn
d-
oo
o
r-~
On
in
d-
O
CN
VO
oo
o
VO
cn
VO
VO
O
CN
On
CN
O
oo
1
CN
o
o
oo
CN
VO
O
3
H g «s
4.6
in
1
VO
cn
1
On
cn
1
cn
3.3
cn
1
d;
cn
1
On
cn
1
VO
cn
1
d;
in
1
o
cn
ri
CN
cn
CN
CN
cn
d-
0/
•■= CP
U
U
U
©
U
U
o
o
U
U
r d a
H P3
1/3
o
U
o
U
o
U
U
o
U
o
U
U
U
o
U
o
U
d"
On
On
cn
d-
i>
T3
VO
1
VO
i
in
in
1
VO
1
i
o
1
£
d
VO
CN
cn
d
VO
00
o\
o
o
'sO
VO
IT)
r-
ID
S
st
"B
u
C5
S
0/
A
■a *•
“ 1/3
5 <U
* £
Y &
©
1/3
s-
* Q
O
&
o
a
s ■+*
« 6 X
•S =
C.
CZ2 —
C5
<
o
o
*
*
<
o
T3
d
o
cn
o
d"
o>
7
o
cn
o
cn
d-
o
cn
On
7
cn
cn
T3
d
r-
oo
On
CD
-d
o
=3
O
PQ
in
On
<D
d
CN
-d
o^
•—H
d
CN
T—H
ID
On
>
o
d
CP
C/3
On
d
"ID
-e
d
o
O
d
ID
td
C5
d
<D
c n
d
§
■Ki
s
s
CD
•-1
-C3
a
tj
Q
d
* ^
■"S
"R
<o
cp
^3
Co
R
■c
<<
R
«C3
«
d
C3
Q
O
C
Cj
Cj
Cj
d
bo
in
in
On
<D
d
-d
d
<D
d
CD
S-H
P-H
Q
-R
oo
On
<D
-d
o
d
o
pq
N
d
d
X>
1—
d
o
O
§
a
S
Q
-R
oo
On
d
>
CD
CD
d
CD
|
vS
R
E
o
-R
oo
On
CD
X
o
d
o
PQ
0^
d
03
X>
d
o
a
*
<
o
oo
IN
I
cn
VO
JS
2
"E
E
T3
CN
CN
d-
i
in
7
CN
T3
d
d-
7
in
7
CN
O
7
in
d w
cbd
£
d
oo"
i
1
o"
o
1
•V
r-'
in
i
1—1
o"
7
CN
in"
CN
in"
in"
2
QJ
cn
o
oo"
in
i
cn
o"
CN
1
T3"
cn
Cl
E
CZ
E
in
d-
d-
cn
in
1
CN
d
r"
O
1
d-
7
VO
7
On
1
7
7
1
On
On
1
g
£
00
CN
o
oo
O
o
oo
VO
V-i —1
• hH
,—
~o
in
VO
in
in
in
VO
in
<u
d-
1
d -
1
in
1
d -
d-
1
d -
1
d -
1
d -
d-
1
cn
a
in
oo
d-
CN
IN
t''
d-
VO
24
cn
1
VO
cn
1
o
cn
1
in
cn
1
oo
7
VO
cn
1
in
7
VO
7
cn
7
VO
-o
CN
cn
CN
CN
CN
CN
CN
r - H
cd
c —\
cn
O
O
O
UD
( -N
CN
o
r-H
d -
r-H
oo
in
O
VO
r—H
r-
d-
in
o^
cn
r-H
o
'w'
r-H
OO
On
r-H
Oi
Os
r-H
CN
t'
cn
oo
7
c-S
1
CN
[
o
1
cn
1
o
1
in
1
cn
1
o
1
O
v-_ ■)
cn
cn
in
On
cn
oo
VO
o
CN
<u
CN
VO
oo
CN
oo
VO
>
cn
oo
On
03
>
CD
CD
OS
Ld
§
Cj
■ No
R
O
Cp
bf
S; Hj
S; Hj
o
£
a>
n
X>
O
O
d d
a> a/
C/3 C/3
p d
S £
C/3 - LJ
^ d
-S °
Oh ' rt
O Oh
CL •
&
"O -o
| A
Y ^
A a
£ a
o £
Q *
* *
14
LEDUC D., Kermadec Trench Monhysterida
usually 1.5-2.0 or more head diameters from anterior end. Posterior part of pharynx enlarged forming a
single or double bulb without valves. Secretory-excretory system usually absent. Female reproductive
system short to medium sized; vulva near mid-body. Spicules mostly arcuate and short (< 2 abd). Tail
usually with ventrally curved conical anterior portion and dorsally curved cylindrical filiform posterior
portion. Spinneret a long and slender cone or cylinder.
Remarks
The taxonomy of all marine Monhystrella species was revised by Fonseca & Decraemer (2008), who
provided a detailed diagnosis of the genus and a key to all thirteen valid marine species; no new marine
species have been described since.
Monhystrella kermadecensis sp. nov.
um:lsid:zoobank.org:act:AA638C6A-E7A8-4636-A03D-8CF851B70498
Fig. 6, Table 1
Diagnosis
Monhystrella kermadecensis sp. nov. is characterised by circle of papillose outer labial sensillae slightly
anterior to circle of four short cephalic setae, amphideal fovea 1.9 cbd from anterior extremity and 0.33-
0.43 cbd (females) or 0.43-0.50 cbd (males), gubernaculum with caudal apophyses, presence of distinct
cuticularised piece along anterior vaginal wall, relatively short conical (males) or conico-cylindrical tail
(females) with conical, ventrally-curved spinneret.
Etymology
This species is named after the type locality.
Material examined
Holotype
KERMADEC TRENCH: $ (NIWA 99767), collected 6 May 2014 (WHOI cruise TN309, Nereus dive
N074).
Paratypes
KERMADEC TRENCH: 2 $$ (NIWA 99768) and 5 ? ? (NIWA 99769) same data as holotype.
Type habitat
KERMADEC TRENCH: water depth: 8081 m (178.17571° W, 34.34030° S), sediment depth: 0-1 cm.
Description
Male
Body cylindrical, tapering slightly towards both extremities. Cuticle smooth. Anterior end rounded or
slightly truncated. Six minute inner labial papillae, difficult to observe; circle of six small outer labial
papillae slightly anterior to circle of four short cephalic setae, 0.23 cbd long. Amphideal fovea medium¬
sized, circular, situated 1.9 cbd from anterior end, outline not cuticularised. Two short setae situated
in sublateral row posterior to amphideal fovea. Buccal cavity small, funnel-shaped, surrounded by
pharyngeal tissue. Pharynx gradually widening posteriorly, apparently forming a weak posterior bulb in
some cases. Nerve ring situated slightly posterior to middle of pharynx. Secretory-excretory system not
observed. Cardia small, partly surrounded by intestinal tissue. Progaster not observed. Distinct layer of
glycocalyx present in intestinal lumen.
15
European Journal of Taxonomy 158: 1-19 (2015)
Fig. 6. Monhystrella kermadecensis sp. nov. A. Male anterior body region. B. Male head region.
C. Female anterior body region. D. Male posterior body region. E. Female reproductive system. F. Entire
§. G. Entire S, holotype. H. Male copulatory apparatus. I. Female posterior body region. Arrow shows
position of cuticularised piece anterior to vulva. Scale bar: A, C-E, I = 25 pm; B = 7 pm; F-G = 70 pm;
H = 12 pm.
16
LEDUC D., Kermadec Trench Monhysterida
Reproductive system monorchic with anterior outstretched testis situated to left or right of intestine.
Mature sperm nucleated, globular, 1.3-2.0 x 1.5-2.4 pm. Spicules paired, arcuate, without capitulum,
widest at proximal end and with pointed distal tip. Gubernaculum with caudal apophyses and wide
lateral crurae. Pre-cloacal supplements or setae not observed. Tail conical, with two pairs of sub-ventral
setae and one pair of sub-dorsal setae. Well-developed, ventrally curved, conical spinneret; caudal
glands not observed.
Female
Similar to males but body widest immediately anterior to vulva, then markedly smaller immediately
posterior to vulva; body width decreases gradually towards both extremities. Amphideal fovea slightly
smaller than in males (0.33-0.43 vs 0.43-0.50 cbd), only one seta present posterior to amphideal fovea;
tail longer than in males (7.8-11.0 vs 6.2-6.7 abd), conico-cylindrical, without setae. Reproductive
system monodelphic with outstretched anterior branch to the left (two specimens) or right of intestine
(three specimens). Mature egg dimensions up to 12 x 39 pm. Vulva located at almost two thirds of
body length from anterior. Vagina transverse or oblique, with distinct cuticularised piece situated along
anterior wall (Fig. 6D). No vaginal glands visible. Post-vulvar sac not observed.
Remarks
Monhystrella kermadecensis sp. nov. differs from most other Monhystrella species (except M. marina
T imm , 1964) by the relatively short tail lacking a cylindrical filiform posterior portion. This trait may
suggest affinities with Thalassomonhystera Jacobs, 1987, but species of this genus always possess a
well-developed secretory-excretory system and lack a posterior pharyngeal bulb (Fonseca & Decraemer
2008). M. kermadecensis sp. nov. is also unusual in the position of the vulva at almost two thirds of
body length from the anterior extremity instead of near mid-body, a trait which suggests affinities with
Halomonhystera Andrassy, 2006. The vulva in M. kermadecensis sp. nov. is, however, situated more
anteriorly than in Halomonhystera (62-64 vs 76-92% of body length from anterior extremity); the
new species also differs from Halomonhystera in the absence of secretory-excretory system and shape
of the buccal cavity (Fonseca & Decraemer 2008). Elucidating the taxonomic relationships between
M. kermadecensis sp. nov. and other Monhysteridae will require detailed molecular analyses which are
not possible at present based on available specimens.
The holophyly of the Monhysteridae was established based on the anterior gonad always positioned to
the right of the intestine (Forenzen 1981). Monhystrella kermadecensis sp. nov. can be differentiated
from all other species of the genus, and indeed the entire family, based on the variable position of the
anterior gonad relative to the intestine (to the right or left of intestine in both sexes). The holophyly of
the closely related family Xyalidae was established based on the anterior gonad always positioned to the
left of the intestine and the posterior gonad (when present) always to the right of it (Forenzen 1981). The
new species therefore shows affinities with both the Mohysteridae and Xyalidae; within the Xyalidae
it resembles the genus Theristus Bastian, 1965 most due to the conical shape of the tail and lack of
terminal setae. The following traits, however, suggest closer affinities with the Monhysteridae: small
body size (< 500 pm in length), smooth cuticle (always striated in Xyalidae; Forenzen 1981), presence
of only four setae in second circle (always ten setae in Theristus ), and presence of only one testis (two
testes often present in Xyalidae).
Discussion
Monhystrella kermadecensis sp. nov. was among the most common species at the 8081 m site in
Kermadec Trench and represented 8% of total nematode abundance (D. Feduc unpublished data). This
species, however, was not present at the 9177 m site. Thelonema clarki sp. nov. and Metasphaerolaimus
constrictus sp. nov. were relatively common at the 9177 m site, representing 3 and 5%, respectively, of
17
European Journal of Taxonomy 158: 1-19 (2015)
total nematode abundance. These two species were also present at the 8081 m site but in lower numbers
(< 1% of total nematode abundance). The present study increases the number of nematode species known
from hadal trench enviro nm ents from fifteen to eighteen. Many more species are yet to be discovered
and described, and future sampling in trench environments should ensure that preservation and fixation
methods allow for both morphological and molecular analyses to be conducted (Yoder et al. 2006).
Acknowledgments
Funding was provided by NIWA’s Coasts and Oceans Centre Research Programme 2 (2013/14 SCI)
and the programme "Impact of resource use on vulnerable deep-sea communities” (CO 1X0906). I am
grateful to Tim Shank, principal investigator of the HADES project (HADal Ecosystem Studies, funded
by the National Science Foundation (NSF-OCE1130712, 1130494 and 1131620), and to expedition
leader Casey Machado, the officers, crew and scientific staff of RV Thomas G. Thompson (voyage
TN309), and ROVNereus engineers and technicians. I thank three anonymous reviewers for providing
constructive criticisms on the manuscript.
References
Bussau C. 1993. Taxonomische und okologische Untersuchungen an Nematoden des Peru-Beckens.
PhD thesis, University of Kiel, Germany.
Fadeeva N.P 1983. A contribution to the family Sphaerolaimidae Filipjev, 1918 (Nematoda,
Monhysterida) from the Sea of Japan. Zoologichesky Zhurnal 9: 1321-1333.
Fonseca G. & Decraemer W. 2008. State of the art of the free-living marine Monhysteridae. Journal of
the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 88: 1371-1390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/
S0025315408001719
Fonseca G. & Bezerra T.N. 2014. Order Monhysterida. In: Schmidt-Rhaesa A. (ed.) Handbook of Zoo¬
logy Gastrotricha, Cyclioneura and Gnathifera Volume 2, Nematoda: 435-465. De Gruyter, Hamburg.
Gambi C., Vanreusel A. & Danovaro R. 2003. Biodiversity of nematode assemblages from deep-sea
sediments of the Atacama Slope and Trench (South Pacific Ocean). Deep-Sea Research 1 50: 103-117.
Gourbault N. & Boucher G. 1981. Nematodes abyssaux (Campagne Walda du N/O “Jean Charcot”) III.
Une sous-famille et six especes nouvelles de Sphaerolaimidae. Bulletin du Museum national d'Histoire
naturelle de Paris 4: 1035-1052.
Jacobs L.J. 1987. A redefinition of the genus Monhystrella Cobb (Nematoda, Monhysteridae) with keys
to the species. Zoologica Scripta 16: 191-197. http://dx.doi.org/10. Ill 1/i. 1463-6409.1987.tb00066.x
Jensen P. 1992. Predatory nematodes from the deep sea: description of species from the Norwegian Sea,
diversity of feeding types and geographical distribution. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 33: 1-23.
Leduc D. 2015. One new genus and five new nematode species (Monhysterida, Xyalidae) from Tonga
and Kermadec Trenches, Southwest Pacific. Zootaxa 3964: 501-525. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/
zootaxa.3964.5.1
Lorenzen S. 1981. Entwurf eines phylogenetischen Systems der freilebenden Nematoden. Veroffent-
lichungen des Instituts far Meeresforschung in Bremerhaven 7, Suppl., Institut far Meeresforschung,
Bremerhaven.
Miljutin D.M., Gad G., Miljutina M.M., Mokievsky V.O., Fonseca-Genevois V. & Esteves A.M. 2010.
The state of knowledge on deep-sea nematode taxonomy: how many valid species are known down
there? Marine Biodiversity 40: 143-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s 12526-010-0041 -4
18
LEDUC D., Kermadec Trench Monhysterida
Somerfield P.J. & Warwick R.M. 1996. Meiofauna in Marine Pollution Monitoring Programmes: a
Laboratory Manual. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Fowestoft.
Tietjen J.H. 1989. Ecology of deep-sea nematodes from the Puerto Rico Trench area and hatteras Abyssal
Plain. Deep-Sea Research 36: 1579-1594. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(89)90059-9
Vanhove S., Vermeeren H. & Vanreusel A. 2004. Meiofauna towards the South Sandwich Trench (750-
6300 m), focus on nematodes. Deep-Sea Research II 51: 1665-1687.
Yoder M., Tandingan De Fey I., King I.W., Mundo-Campo M., Mann J., Blaxter M., Poiras F. & De
Fey P. 2006. DESS: a versatile solution for preserving morphology and extractable DNA for nematodes.
Nematology 8: 367-376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156854106778493448
Manuscript received. 9 September 2015
Manuscript accepted. 14 October 2015
Published on: 3 December 2015
Topic editor: Rudy Jocque
Desk editor: Kristiaan Hoedemakers
Printed versions of all papers are also deposited in the libraries of the institutes that are members of the
EJT consortium: Museum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France; Botanic Garden Meise, Belgium;
Royal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium; Natural History Museum, Fondon, United
Kingdom; Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium; Natural History Museum of
Denmark, Copenhagen, De nm ark.
19