THE NAUTILUS
Volume 119, Number 1
March 28, 2005
ISSN 0028-1344
A quarterly devoted
to malacology.
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
Dr. José H. Leal
The Bailey-Matthews Shell Museum
3075 Sanibel-Captiva Road
Sanibel, FL 33957
MANAGING EDITOR
Christina Yorgey
The Bailey-Matthews Shell Museum
3075 Sanibel-Captiva Road
Sanibel, FL 33957
EDITOR EMERITUS
Dr. M. G. Harasewych
Department of Invertebrate Zoology
National Museum of
Natural History
Smithsonian Institution
Washington, DC 20560
CONSULTING EDITORS
Dr. Riidiger Bieler
Department of Invertebrates
Field Museum of
Natural History
Chicago, IL 60605
Dr. Arthur E. Bogan
North Carolina State Museum of
Natural Sciences
Raleigh, NC 27626
Dr. Philippe Bouchet
Laboratoire de Biologie des
Invertébrés Marins et Malacologie
Muséum National d’ Histoire Naturelle
55, rue Buffon
Paris, 75005 France
Dr. Robert H. Cowie
Center for Conservation Research
and Training
University of Hawaii
3050 Maile Way, Gilmore 409
Honolulu, HI 96822
Dr. Robert T. Dillon, Jr.
Department of Biology
College of Charleston
Charleston, SC 29424
Dr. Eileen H. Jokinen
8234 E. North Shore Road
Sault Ste. Marie, MI 49783
Dr. Douglas S. Jones
Florida Museum of Natural History
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32611-2035
Dr. Harry G. Lee
1801 Barrs Street, Suite 500
Jacksonville, FL 32204
Dr. Charles Lydeard
Biodiversity and Systematics
Department of Biological Sciences
University of Alabama
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
Dr. James H. McLean
Department of Malacology
Natural History Museum
of Los Angeles County
900 Exposition Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90007
Dr. Paula M. Mikkelsen
Department of Living Invertebrates
The American Museum of Natural
History
New York, NY 10024
Dr. Diarmaid O Foighil
Museum of Zoology and Department
of Biology
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079
Dr. Gustav Paulay
Florida Museum of Natural History
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32611-2035
Mr. Richard E. Petit
P.O. Box 30
North Myrtle Beach, SC 29582
Dr. Gary Rosenberg
Department of Mollusks
The Academy of Natural Sciences
1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Dr. Angel Valdés
Department of Malacology
Natural History Museum
of Los Angeles County
900 Exposition Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90007
Dr. Geerat J. Vermeij
Department of Geology
University of California at Davis
Davis, CA 95616
Dr. G. Thomas Watters
Aquatic Ecology Laboratory
1314 Kinnear Road
Columbus, OH 43212-1194
Dr. John B. Wise
Houston Museum of Natural Science
Houston, TX 77030-1799
SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION
The subscription rate per volume is
US $35.00 for individuals, US $72.00
for institutions. Postage outside the
United States is an additional US
$5.00 for surface and US $15.00 for
air mail. All orders should be
accompanied by payment and sent to:
THE NAUTILUS, P.O. Box 1580,
Sanibel, FL 33957, USA, (239) 395-
DIZ"
Change of address: Please inform
the publisher of your new address at
least 6 weeks in advance. All
communications should include both
old and new addresses (with zip
codes) and state the effective date.
THE NAUTILUS (ISSN 0028-1344)
is published quarterly by The Bailey-
Matthews Shell Museum, 3075
Sanibel-Captiva Road, Sanibel, FL
33975.
Periodicals postage paid at Sanibel,
FL, and additional mailing offices.
POSTMASTER: Send address
changes to: THE NAUTILUS
P.O. Box 1580
Sanibel, FL 33957
Sep Oe ee ae
CONTENTS
PIN ge bt haw
Volume 119, Number 1
March 28, 2005
ISSN 0028-1544
Kevin J. Roe
Paul D. Hartfield
Russell L. Minton
Steven P. Savarese, Jr.
Frank Kohler
Matthias Glaubrecht
John Slapcinsky
Angel Valdés
Kelvin Barwick
Claude Vilvens
Hamiota, a new genus of freshwater mussel (Bivalvia:
Unionidae) from the Gulf of Mexico drainages of the
southeastern United States
Consideration of genetic relationships in management
decisions for the endangered Anthony’s riversnail, Leptoxis
crassa anthonyi (Redfield, 1854) (Gastropoda:
Pleuroceridae)
Fallen into oblivion—the systematic affinities of the
enigmatic Sulcospira Troschel, 1858 (Cerithioidea:
Pachychilidae), a genus of viviparous freshwater gastropods
TVOMY, JAVA: 2 pidatsie syooae dh oH 4 48 4 Hamed gd Gea dalaed. aetnhignna. a2
Six new species of Paryphantopsis (Gastropoda: Pulmonata:
Charopidae) from the Papuan Peninsula of New Guinea...
First record of Akera Miiller, 1776, from the eastern
Pacific, with the description of a new species ............
Description of Calliotropis pulvinaris new species
(Gastropoda: Trochidae: Eucyclinae: Calliotropini) from
West Madagascar
7
Pe ee al
4 Batre de UW Gaal Been 50
Sponsored in part by the State of Florida, Department
of State, Division of Cultural Affairs, the Florida Arts
Council and the National Endowment for the Arts.
NATIONAL
ENDOWMENT
FOR THE ARTS
THE NAUTILUS L19(1):1-10, 2005
Page 1
Hamiota,
(Bivalvia:
Kevin J. Roe
Delaware Museum of Natural History U.S
4840 Kennett Pike
Wilmington, DE 19807 USA
Paul D. Hartfield
. Fish and Wildlife Service
6578 Dogwood View Parkway, Suite A
Jackson, MS 39213 ,
a new genus of freshwater mussel
Unionidae) from the Gulf of Mexico drainages
of the southeastern United States
USA
ABSTRACT
Hamiota, a new genus of freshwater mussel containing four
species formerly assigned to the genus Lampsilis Rafinesque,
1820, is described. In addition to the genus Lampsilis, mem-
bers of Hamiota had previously been placed in the genera Vil-
losa Frierson, 1927, and Ligumia Swainson, 1840. Several char-
acters including the packaging of their larvae in a superconglu-
tinate lure to attract host fishes, placement and shape of the
marsupia, and release of glochidia through the excurrent si-
phon, support the recognition of these species as a distinct
genus.
INTRODUCTION
Following the discovery in 1988 by Robert Butler of the
first superconglutinate lure ensnared on a snag in a trib-
utary of the Choctawhatchee River, a sumber of publi-
cations (e.g., Haag et al., 1995; Hartfield and Butler,
1997: O’Brien and Brim Box, 1999: Blalock-Herod et al.,
2002) have confirmed through direct observation the
supposition that these unique Tures are produced by four
species of freshwater mussels endemic to the Gulf of
Mexico drainages of the southeastern United States.
Herein, we confirm earlier published suggestions that
these four species represent a distinct genus of fresh-
water mussels (Fuller and Bereza, 1973; O’Brien and
Brim Box, 1999). The recognition of this genus is based
on several characters including the production of the su-
perconglutinate lure, and the unique shape and place-
ment of the marsupia (the region of the demibranchs
where female unionoid mussels brood developing lar-
vae), and is supporte od by mole cular evidence (Roe et al.,
2001). Use of marsupié al { eatures is consistent with pre-
vious designations of unionid “divisions” initiated by
Simpson (1900a) and continued by Heard and Guckert
1970). The designation of Hamiota increases the num-
ber of North American unionids genera to 50 (Turgeon
et al., 1998S).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A list of specimens examined is included in Appendix 1.
Acronyms used in the text are: Academy of Natural Sci-
ences of Philadelphia (ANSP), Delaware Museum of
Natural History (DMNH), Florida Museum of Natural
History (UF), Unite sd States National Museum (USNM),
University of Alabama Unionid Collection (UAUC), and
Mississippi Museum of Natural Science (MMNS). Ab-
breviated synonymies are presented for bas taxon and
include novel combinations and publications with illus-
tration. Measurements were taken to the nearest 0.05
mm using dial calipers.
SYSTEMATICS
Family Unionidae Rafinesque, 1520
Tribe ‘Lampsilini von Ihering, 1901
Hamiota new genus. Type species: Hamiota subangulata (Lea,
1840) by original designation
Diagnosis: A monophyletic group of freshwater bi-
valves (Roe et al., 2001) in which all of the glochidia are
released simultaneously encased in mucous packages
that are referred to as superconglutinates (Haag et al.,
1995, fig. 1). The supe rconglutinate lure exits the aaile
cavity via the excurrent opening and is encased within a
transparent mucous tube (Hartfield and Butler, 1997;
O’Brien and Brim Box, 1999). When acted upon by wa-
ter currents the superconglutinate mimics the move-
ments of a swimming fish, and has been shown to elicit
attacks from fishes (Haag and Warren, 1999). The mar-
supium is restricted to the ventral portion of the outer
demibranchs of female mussels (Figure 1). The precise
shape and pigmentation of the marsupia, as well as the
degree of posterior mantle margin development, varies
across species.
Description: Members of this genus are small- to me-
dium-sized freshwater bivalves, and adult valves gener-
ally are between 45-100 mm in length. Shells range
from ovate to elliptical in outline, and are somewhat
Page 2
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 1
Figures 1, 2.
Inner mantle and outer demibranchs of gravid superconglutinate-producing mussels in the genus Hamiota and
inner mantle and outer demibranchs typical of non-supe »rconglutinate- -producing mussels of the genera Lampsilis, Ligumia, and
Villosa. 1. Female Hamiota australis. 2. Female Villosa vibex.
compressed to moderate ly inflated. Shell thickness rang-
es from heavy to thin. Sexes display some degree of ae
morphism in ‘shell sh: ape. Shells of male musse cis are typ-
ically more acutely pointed posteriorly, whereas shells of
female mussels disy slay an ante posterior margin,
Periostracum is typically smooth, but can be very glossy
in some species. Background color ranges from. dark-
brown and black through chestnut-brown to straw-yel-
low. Black to bright green rays of variable width are of-
ten present and may be limited to the posterior slope,
or cover the entire disk. Nacre color is typically white
although other colors such as salmon or blue may be
seen as well, particularly in the beak cavities or the pos-
terior margins. The m: arsupia are often asymmetrical in
shape; the anterior portion is typically broadest, tapering
toward the posterior end. The ventr: dm: wein of the mar-
supium is darkly pigmented in gravid fe males, Pigmen-
tation of marsupia varies across species and populations
and colors may include purple, red, black, or white. In
females, the mantle margins anterior to the branchial
opening are elaborated to varying degrees. The mor-
phology of the glochidial valves of qwember of Hamiota
is similar to that of members of Lampsilis or Villosa
(O’Brien and Brim Box, 1999).
Etymology: Hamiota = angler. Derived from the
Greek word hans, meaning hook. This name refers to
the means by which members of this genus attract host
fishes by packaging their parasitic larvae in a lure that
mimics a small fish.
Remarks: Species of Hamiota generally have been
treated as Lampsilis ce to the similarity in shape and
coloration of their shells. Some authors also have in-
cluded these species in the genus Villosa or Ligumia,
due to shell shape, thickness, and/or ornamentation of
the mantle flap. The shells of Hamiota species are in-
K. J. Roe and P. D. Hartfield, 2005
» a |
Page 3
deed similar to the shells of these genera, and the man-
tle flap may exhibit characters of both Lampsilis and
Villosa. However, in Hamiota, the marsupia is restricted
to the ventral half of the posterior portion of the outer
demibranchs, while in Lampsilis, Ligumia, and Villosa
the marsupium fully occupies the water tubes of the pos-
terior portion of the outer demibranchs (Figure 1). Un-
like members of Lampsilis, which release larvae through
pores in the ventral edge of the demibranchs, members
of Hamiota release the superconglutinate lure through
the excurrent opening. The placement and shape of the
marsupium and the extraordinary method of glochidial
release and host fish attraction, the superconglutinate,
are uniquely derived characters in the Lampsilini that
warrant Petite recognition.
Hamiota altilis (Conrad, 1834) new combination
Unio altilis Conrad, 1834; Conrad, 1834: 43, pl. 2, fig. 1;
Chenu, 1845: 21, pl. 1, fig. 1; Reeve, 1865; pl. 23, fig. 109.
Margarita (Unio) altilis (Conrad, 1834); Lea, 1836; 24,
Margaron (Unio) altilis (Conrad, 1834); Lea, 1852a: 27.
Lampsilis altilis (Conrad, 1834); Simpson, 1900a: 529; Par-
malee and Bogan, 1998: 125, pl. 47.
Unio clarkianus Lea, 1852; Lea, 1852b: 251; Lea, 1852c: 273,
pl. 21, fig. 30; Lea, 1852d: 29, pl. 21, fig. 30.
ieee eon (Unio) clarkianus (Lea, 1852); Lea, 1852a: 27.
Lampsilis clarkianus (Lea, 1852); Simpson, 1900a: 532.
Unio gerhardtii Lea, 1862; Lea, 1862a: 168; Lea, 1862b: 208,
pl. 31, fig. 277; Lea, 1862c: 30, pl. 31, fig. 277.
Margaron (Unio) gerhardtii (Lea, 1862); Lea, 1870: 35.
Lampsilis (Lampsilis) gerhardtii (Lea, 1862); Simpson, 1900a:
532.
Unio doliaris Lea, 1865; Lea, 1865: 88; Lea, 168: 260, pl. 32,
fig. 75; Lea, 1869: 20, pl. 32, fig. 75.
Margaron (Unio) doliaris (Lea, 1865); Lea, 1870: 42.
Lampsilis (Lampsilis) doliaris (Lea, 1865); Simpson, 1900a:
533.
Description: Described by Conrad (1834) as sub-oval,
thin, and inflated. The periostracum was described as
“rugose” and “blackish” with rays and “numerous short
vermicular lines on the posterior slope,” and the nacre
as whitish and iridescent. The periostracum of speci-
mens of H. altilis is typically brown to chestnut-brown
in color with a variable number of dark green rays. The
left valve has two heavy, spatulate pseudoc -ardinal teeth,
the smaller above the larger. The right valve has two
nearly equally sized triangular teeth, the larger anterior
to the smaller. The later an teeth are short but blade-like,
two in the right valve, and one in the left
The posterior mantle margin of the Saale is expand-
ed into a well-developed flap with papillae along the bor-
der. Coloration, number, and size of papillae vary some-
what between populations. In general, however, the in-
terior mantle flap is colored red to dark red or brown
with darker spots, while the exterior of the flap is brown
to black, often with vertical lighter bars, and with a
small, but prominent dark “eye spot” on the posterior
end. Small papillae are present along the mantle flap,
usually becoming more robust anteriorly. In males, the
mantle flap is typically not expanded and is reddish in
color. Mar supia of H. altilis are finely tapered at each
end when immature, becoming bro: idly rounded on the
ends in most populations, tapering anteriorly in others.
Marsupia color is a dark reddish- Dione or black along
the margin and white above. The anus is usually pig-
mented red and the incurrent and excurrent siphons are
reddish-brown to black. The glochidia of H. altilis are
described by Haag et al. (1999).
Type Material: Unio altilis Conrad, 1834, Lectotype
ANSP 56419 (Figures 3, 4) here designated. Type lo-
cality: Alabama River, near Claiborne [Monroe Co., Al-
abama|.
hela clarkianus Lea, 1852, Type not found. Type local-
: Williamsport, [Maury Co.], Tennessee; Georgia or
en
Unio doliaris Lea, 1865, Lectotype USNM 84936, here
designated. Type locality: Etowah River, Georgia.
Unio gerhardtii. Lea, 1862, Holotype USNM 25711 by
monotypy. Type locality: Chattanooga, Georgia.
Remarks: The most variable species included in Ham-
iota, H. altilis, is endemic to the Mobile River Basin.
Some of the conchological variation is undoubtedly eco-
phenotypic in nature, although the extent and nature of
the variation in shell shape and pigmentation has not
been adequately expl ored.
Conrad (1834) in his original description did not iden-
tify a primary type. Johnson and Baker (1973) identified
ANSP 56419 as the figured holotype, although the spec-
imen label indicates the locality as “Ogeeche re R., Ga.”
Johnson and Baker (1973) state that the label is in error,
and “probably was mixed with ANSP 46415, which is
labeled ‘Claiborne, Alabama’, by error.” Conrad (1534)
clearly indicated that the specimen(s s) of U. altilis de-
scribed were collected from the “Alabama River, near
Claiborne.” Conrad (1834) did not specifically designate
a holotype and according to the ICZN recomme ndation
73F and Article 74.5 the holotype designation of John-
son and Baker (1973) is deemed inv alid. In order to
preserve stability of nomenclature, we herein designate
specimen ANSP 56419 as the le sctotype of U. altilis. In
accordance with ICZN Article 74.7, we herein designate
the specimen USNM $4936 as the lectotype of U. do-
liaris Lea in order to maintain taxonomic stability and
because this specimen appears to be that figured by Lea
(1868). Hamiota altilis is considered threate ned by the
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS, 1994).
Life History: Mature gravid females have been re-
ported from March through June. Hamiota altilis have
also been observed releasing glochidia in a superconglu-
tinate (Haag et al., 1999). Large centrarchid fishes, in-
cluding Micropterus coosae Hubbs and Bailey, ee M.
punctulatus (Rafinesque, 1S19), M. salmoides (Lace-
péde, 1802), and Lepomis cyanellus Rafinesque, 1a18,
have been confirmed as suitable hosts (Haag et al.,
1999).
Range: Hamiota altilis was historically reported
SS SESS ES SE
Page 4 THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 1
Figures 3-10. Type material of species of Hamiota Photographs are of the interior of left valve and exterior of right valve. 3,
1. Lectotype of H. altilis ANSP 56419. 5, 6. Holotype of H. australis USNM 150473. 7, 8. Lectotype of H. perovalis ANSP 56416
9, 10. Lectoty pe ol H. subangulata USNM 8580]
K. J. Roe and P. D. Hartfield, 2005
Page 5
throughout the Mobile River Basin, including the Tom-
bigbee, Black Warrior, Cahaba, Alabama, Tallapoosa, and
Coosa River drainages in Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi,
and Tennessee. The species is currently restricted to lo-
calized portions of the Cahaba, Coosa, and Tallapoosa
rivers and some of their tributaries (USFWS, 2003).
Hamiota perovalis (Conrad, 1834) new combination
Unio perovalis Conrad, 1834; Conrad, 1834; 43, pl. 2, fig. 2:
Chenu, 1845: 21, pl. 1, fig. 2; Kiister, 1861: 257, pl. 87,
fig. 2; Reeve, 1866: pl. 38, fig. 209.
Margarita (Unio) perovalis (Conrad, 1834); Lea, 1836: 24.
Margaron (Unio) perovalis (Conrad, 1834); Lea, 1852a: 27.
Lampsilis perovalis (Conrad, 1834); Simpson, 1900a; 531.
Unio spillmanii Lea, 1861; Lea, 1861: 39, Lea, 1862d: 98, pl.
15, fig. 246; Lea, 1862e: 102, pl. 15, fig. 246, Reeve, 1868:
pl. 82, fig. 435.
Margaron (Unio) spillmanii (Lea, 1861); Lea, 1870: 42.
Lampsilis (Lampsilis) spillmani (Lea, 1861); Frierson, 1927: 69
[misspelling].
Description: Conrad (1834) described this species as
oval and inflated with a moderately thick shell. He noted
two color varieties, one in which the periostracum was
olivaceous and obscurely rayed with white nacre and an-
other in which the periostracum was reddish-brown with
“rose colored” nacre. The periostracum of specimens of
H. perovalis is generally lighter in color than H. altilis
and range from straw -yellow to light brown. The number
of rays is variable and can cover fhe entire disk. The left
valve contains two robust equal sized pseudocardinal
teeth. The right valve has two pseudocardinals and the
anterior tooth is smaller than the posterior tooth. The
lateral teeth are elongate, two in the left, one in the
right.
The mantle margins of female H. perovalis are ex-
panded into well-developed flaps, pigmented red on the
interior and darker red to brown or black on the exterior.
No eyespot is present and short papillae are present
along the mantle edge. Males possess a rudimentary
mantle margin with w eak pigmentation and few papillae.
The marsupia of H. perovalis are pisciform in shape,
broader anteriorly and narrowly tapering posteriorly.
The marsupium is reddish or darker along the margin,
often with a darker spot of pigment on thie broader an-
terior end that resembles an eyespot in the supercon-
glutinate lure. The anus can be pigmented red and
black, and the incurrent and excurrent siphons are usu-
ally reddish or brown in color.
Type Material: Unio — Conrad, 1834, Lecto-
type ANSP 56416 (Figures 7, 8), here designated. Type
locality: Alabama River, at Clabore [Monroe Co., Al-
abama].
Unio spillmanii Lea, 1861, Lectotype USNM 84925
here designated. Type locality: Luxpalila Creek, near Co-
lumbus, Mississippi.
Remarks: There has been some question as to the dis-
tinctiveness of H. perovalis from H. altilis, perhaps be-
cause both were described from practically the same lo-
cality. An examination of mitochondrial DNA sequences
by Roe et al. (2001) recovered these two taxa as a clade,
but failed to resolve them into re ciprocally monophyletic
groups. Hurd (1974) considered perovalis a junior syn-
onym of altilis, as did Burch (1975). Frierson (1927)
considered U. doliaris (Lea, 1865) a synonym of perov-
alis, although Parmalee and Bogan (1998) include U. do-
liaris as a synonym of altilis. Based on the collection
locality and ‘the appearance of the type specimen, we
place U. spillmanii Lea, 1861 as a synonym of H. per-
ovalis. As with U. altilis, ron §34) did not specifi-
cally designate a holotype for U. perovalis, therefore,
accor ding to the ICZN Article a 5 and recommendation
73F the holotype designation of Johnson and Baker
(1973) is deemed to be in error. In an effort to maintain
nomenclatural stability we herein designate ANSP 56419
the lectotype for U. perovalis. Accor ding to ICZN Arti-
cle 74.7, the specimen USNM 84925 is here des ignated
as the lectotype of U. spilmanii in order to fix the name
and maintain nomenclatural stability. This species is list-
ed as threatened by the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS, 1994).
Life History: Discharge of superconglutinates was
first observed in H. perovalis (Haag et al., 1995). Glo-
chidia mature and are discharged between March and
June, with releases concentrate din early April (Hartfield
and Butler, 1997). Micropterus coosae, M. punctulatus,
and M. salmoides have been identified as suitable host
fishes for the orange-nacre mucket (Haag and Warren,
1999).
Range: Hamiota perovalis was historically known from
the Mobile Basin’s Alabama, Tombigbee, Black Warrior,
and Cahaba rivers and their tributaries in Alabama and
en eae The species has apparently become extir-
pated from the main channels of the larger rivers, but
continues to survive in some tributaries of “all four drain-
ages (USFWS, 2003).
Hamiota subangulata (Lea, 1840) new combination
Unio subangulatus Lea, 1840; Lea, 1840: 287; Lea, 1$42a: 209,
pl. 13, fig. 23; Lea, 1$42b: 47, pl. 5, fig. 23; Kiister, 1861:
278, pl. 94, fig. 2; Simpson, 1892: 415, pl 58, fig. 1; Reeve,
1868. pl. 65, fig. 327.
Margaron (Unio) subangulatus (Lea, 1840); Lea, 1$52a: 29.
Lampsilis subangulatus (Lea, 1840); Simpson, 1900a: 556;
Clench and Tumer, 1956: 196, pl. 2, fig. 2.
Ligumia subangulata (Lea, 1840); Haas, 1969: 443.
Villosa subangulata (Lea, 1840); Heard, 1979: 44.
Unio kirklandianus S$. H. Wright, 1897; S. H. Wright, 1S97:
136.
Lampsilis kirklandianus (S. H. Wright, 1897); Simpson, 1900a:
557; Simpson, 1900b: 76, pl. 1, fig. 7.
Description: A medium-sized mussel that reaches ap-
proximately $5 mm in length (Brim Box and Williams,
2000). Specimens are gene ae elongate; the posterior
ridge is rounded and the posterior slope is usué uly con-
Page 6
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 1
cave. Periostracum color is variable in this species. In-
dividuals range from straw-yellow to chestnut- brown in
color with a variable number of black to bright emerald
green rays of variable width. These rays emanate from
the umbo and radiate across the disk. Most shells are
shiny, although some populations exhibit an extremely
glossy periostracum, This species has been described as
one of the most beautiful of all North American fresh-
water mussels (S. H. Wright, 1897; Clench and Turner,
1956).
Wright (1897) described U. kirklandianus from the
Ochlockonee River in Leon County, Florida and re-
marked that his specimens were more polished and had
broader rays than typical of U. subangulatus, and that
the shells were “deeper and broader.” The right valve
has two somewhat spatulate pseudocardinal teeth, the
smaller nearly directly above the other. The left valve
has two pseudocardinal teeth, the anterior one much
larger than the other. Lateral teeth are thin, but not
dekeate. two in the left and one in the right valve. Ex-
amination of specimens from across the range of this
species reveals substantial variation in shell color and
size. The mantle margins in females are only slightly ex-
panded into a sncdlesk flap. The flaps are light brawn in
coloration on the interior and freckled- brown on the ex-
terior, and no eyespot is present. Short papillae are pres-
ent along the margin of the flap, becoming larger ante-
riorly, In males, the mantle is only slightly expande od,
without pigment, and with very short papillae. The mar-
supia are pisciform in shape, broader anteriorly and ta-
pered behind, and darkly pigmented along the mar gin
often with a darker spot of pigment adtenoaly The anus
is unpigmented and the siphons are brownish. Glochidia
were figured and described by O’Brien and Brim Box
(1999).
Type Material: Unio subangulatus Lea, 1840, Lecto-
type USNM 85801 (Figures 9, 10) designated by Clench
and Turner (1956). Type locality: @hatahooskes River,
Columbus, [Muscogee Co.,] Georgia.
Unio kirklandianus S. H. Wright, 1597, Paratype USNM
149648. Type locality: Oclocknee River, Leon Co., Flor-
ida.
Remarks: Hamiota swhangulata is listed as an endan-
gered species (USFWS, 1998). The analysis of Roe et al.
(2001) resolved this taxon as monophyle tic and in a clade
with H. australis.
Life History: Discharge of superconglutinate lures
has been documented by O’Brien and Brim Box (1999)
from late May through early June. Micropterus punc-
tulatus and M. salmoides appear to be primary hosts for
the species (O’Brien and Brim Box, 1999).
Range: Hamiota subangulata was found throughout
the Apalachicola River Basin and the Ochlockonee River
drainage (Brim Box and Williams, 2000). Currently the
species continues to survive in some small streams and
headwater rivers (USFWS, 1998).
Hamiota australis (Simpson, 1900) new combination
Lampsilis australis ou ou 1900; Simpson, 1900a: 544; Simp-
son, L900b: 75, pl. 2, fig. 2; Clench and Tumer, 1956: 199,
pl. 2, fig. 3
Ligumia australis (Simpson, 1900); Haas, 1969: 432.
Villosa australis (Simpson, 1900); Heard, 1979: 44.
Description: Simpson (1900b) described the shells of
a species as “long and elliptical . .. moderately inflat-
* The periostracum was described as “smooth, shin-
ng greenish yellow, rayed with green” and the nacre
“bright bluish white.” Specimens examined were el-
liptical to elongate oval and often terminate in a blunt
point. Specimens are almost always stained black, with
some green rays visible on the posterior slope. The per-
iostracum is often glossy. The right valve contains two
pseudocardinal teeth, the smaller above the larger. The
left valve has two compressed pseudocardinal teeth. Lat-
eral teeth are elongate and slightly curved, two in the
left valve and one in the right. Posterior mantle flaps are
poorly developed with a aieal OF ved.ctain along the
margins. There is no eyespot on the mantle flap, and
only: a few very small papillae. The marsupia are pisci-
form, broadly rounded anteriorly and tapering behind
(Figure 1). Color of the marsupium is white along the
margin and black above. The anus is unpigmented and
the incurrent and excurrent siphons are reddish in color.
Glochidia were described and figured by Blalock-Herod
et al. (2002).
Type Material: Lampsilis australis Simpson, 1900,
Holotype USNM 150473 by original designation (Fig-
ures 5, 6). Type locality: Little Patsiliga Creek, south-
eastern Alabama.
Remarks: Fuller and Bereza (1973) stated that this
species represented an “undescribed lampsiline genus”
and that its marsupium allied it closely with Ptychobran-
chus. This species was incorrectly synonymized with Pty-
chobranchus jonesi (van der Schalie, 1934) by Clench
and Turner (1956). The phylogenetic analysis of Roe et
al. (2001) clearly placed this species with ‘the other su-
perconglutinate } yroducers.
Life History: Superconglutinate releases have been
documented in this species by Blalock-Herod et. al.
(2002). Micropterus spp. are likely hosts (Blalock-Herod
et al., 2002).
Range: Hamiota australis was known historically from
the Escambia, Yellow, and Choctawhatchee River sys-
tems. It continues to survive in some river and stream
segments within these systems. This species is not cur-
re sntly protected under the End: angered Species Act.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We express thanks to the many individuals who have
worked with this unique group of mussels and directly
or indirectly assisted in the production of this work. Sev-
eral museum curators provide sd access to the spe cimens
K. J. Roe and P. D. Hartfield, 2005
Page 7
in their care including the National Museum of Natural
History (Dr. Robert Hershler), The Florida Museum of
Natural History (Dr. Fred Thompson), The Academy of
Natural Sciences of Philadelphia (Dr. Dan Graf), The
University of Alabama Malacology Collection (Dr.
Charles Lydeard), and the Mississippi Museum of Nat-
ural Science (Dr. Robert Jones and Leann Staton). The
comments of several individuals greatly improved this
manuscript: We are grateful to Art Bogan, Jettrey Gar-
ner, Dan Graf, Jeanne Serb, and Jim Williams. Gary
Bloomer (DMNH) assisted with figures.
LITERATURE CITED
Blalock-Herod, H. N., J. J. Herod and J. D. Williams. 2002.
Evaluation of conservation status, distribution, and repro-
ductive characteristics of an endemic Gulf Coast fresh-
water mussel, Lampsilis australis (Bivalvia: Unionidae).
Biodiversity and Conservation 11: 1S77—LSS7.
Brim Box, J. and J. D. Williams. 2000, Unionid mollusks of the
Apalachicola basin in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia. Bul-
letin of the Alabama Museum of Natural History 21: 1-
143.
Burch, J. B. 1975. Freshwater Unionacean clams (Mollusca:
Pelecypoda) of North America. Malacological Publica-
tions, Hamburg [Michigan], 204 pp.
Chenu, J. C. 1845. Bibliothéque Conchyliologique. 1 série,
vol. 3. A. Franck, Paris, 153 pp., 34 pls.
Clench, W. J. and R. D. Turner. 1956. Freshwater mollusks of
Alabama, Georgia, and Florida from the Escambia to the
Suwannee River. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum 1:
97-239.
Conrad, T. A. 1834. New fresh water shells of the United
States, with coloured illustrations; and a monograph of the
genus Anculotus of Say; also a synopsis of the American
naiads. Judah Dobson, Philadelphia, 76 pp. + S plates.
Frierson, L. S$. 1927.
the North American naiads. Baylor University Press,
Waco, 111 pp.
Fuller, S. L. H. and D. J. Bereza. 1973. Recent additions to
the naiad fauna of the eastern Gulf Drainage (Bivalvia:
Unionoida: Unionidae). Association of Southeastern Biol-
ogists Bulletin 20: 53
Haag, W. R., R. S. Butler and P. D. Hartfield. 1995. An ex-
traordinary reproductive strategy in freshwater bivalves:
prey mimicry to facilitate larval dispersal. Freshwater Bi-
ology 34: 471476.
Haag, W. R. and M. L. Warren. 1999. Mantle displays of fresh-
water mussels elicit attacks from fish. Freshwater Biology
42: 3540.
Haag, W. R.. M. L. Warren and M. Shillingsford. 1999. Host
fishes and host attracting behavior of Lampsilis altilis and
Villosa vibex (Bivalvia: Unionidae). American Midland
Naturalist 141: 149-157.
Haas, F. 1969. Superfamilia Unionacea. Das Tierreich (Berlin)
88: x + 663 pp.
Hartfield, P. and R. Butler. 1997. Observations on the release
of superconglutinates by Lampsilis perovalis (Conrad
1834). In: Cummings, kK. S., A. C. Buchanan, C. A. Mayer,
and T. J. Naimo (eds.) Conservation and management of
freshwater mussels II: Initiatives for the future. Proceed-
ings of a UMRCC symposium, 16-15 October 1995, St.
A classified and annotated check list of
Louis, Missouri. Upper Mississippi Conservation Com-
mittee, Rock Island, Hlinois, pp. 11-14.
Heard, W. H. 1979. Identification manual of the freshwater
clams of Florida. State of Florida Department of Envi-
ronmental Regulation, Technical Series, vol.4, no. 2, $3
pp:
Heard, W. H. and R. H. Guckert. 1970. A re-evaluation of the
recent Unionacea (Pelycepoda) of North America. Mala-
cologia 10: 333-355,
Hubbs, C. L. and R. M. Bailey, 1940. A revision of the black
basses (Micropterus and Huro) with descriptions of four
new forms. Miscellaneous Publications Museum of Zool-
ogy, University of Michigan 48: 1-51.
Hurd, J. C. 1974. Systematics and zoogeography of the Union-
acean mollusks of the Coosa River Drain: ige of Alabama,
Georgia and Tennessee. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation,
Auburn University.
Johnson, R. 1. and H. B. Baker. 1973. The types of Unionacea
(Mollusca: Bivalvia) in the Academy of Natural Sciences
of since lie Proceedings of the Acade smy of Natural
Sciences of Philadelphia 125: 145-186, pls. 1-10.
Kiister, H. C. 1861. In: Systematisches Conchylien Cabinet von
Martini und Chemnitz. 2" ed.
Lacepéde, B. G. E. 1802. Histoire naturelle des Poissons,
vol. 4.
Lea, 1. 1836. A Synopsis of the family of Naiades. Carey, Lea,
and Blanchard, Philadelphia, 59 pp., 1 pl.
Lea, 1. 1S40. Descriptions of new freshwater and land shells.
Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society of
Philadelphia 1: 254-289.
Lea, I. 1$42a, Description of new freshwater and land shells.
Transactions of the American Philosophical Society S{new
series]: 163-250, pls. 5-27.
Lea, 1. 1842b. Observations on the genus Unio, together with
descriptions of new species in the families Naiades, Col-
imacea, Lymnaeana, Melaniana and Peristomiana. 3: 1—
88, pls. 5-27.
Lea, I. 1852a. A synopsis of the family of Naiades. Philadelphia.
3rd edition, Blanchard and Lea, Philadelphia, SS pp
Lea, L. 1852b. Descriptions of new species of the family Union-
idae, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society
of Philadelphia 5: 251-252.
Lea, L. 1852c. Descriptions of new species of the family Union-
idae. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society
10[New Series]: 253-294, pls. 12-29.
Lea, I. 1852d. Observations on the genus Unio, together with
descriptions of new species in the families Unionidae, Col-
imacea and Melaniana 5; 9-61, pls. 30.
Lea, I. 1861. Descriptions of twenty-five new species of Union-
idae from Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee and
Florida. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences
of Philadelphia 13: 35-41.
Lea, I. 1S62a. Descriptions of ten new species of Unionidae
from the United States. Proceedings of the Academy of
Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 14: 165-169.
Lea, I. 1862b. New Unionidae of the United States and arctic
America. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sele neces of
Philadelphia 5|New Series}: 187-216, pls. 24—:
Lea, I. 1862c, Observations on the genus Unio, focthek with
descriptions of new species, their soft parts, and embry-
onic forms, in the family Unionidae, and descriptions of
new genera and species of the Melanidae. 9: 9-175, pls.
24-35,
Lea, I. 1862d. New Unionidae of the United States. Journal of
Page 8
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 1
the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 5 [New
Series]: 14-109, pls. 1-15.
Lea, I. 1862e, Observations on the genus Unio, together with
descriptions of new species, their soft parts, and embry-
onic forms, in the family Unionidae. 8: 9-114, 34 pls.
Lea, I. 1865. Descriptions of eight new species of Unio from
the United States. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural
Sciences of Philadelphia 17: SS—S9.
Lea, I. 1868. New Unionidae, Melanidae, etc., chiefly of the
United States. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences
of Philadelphia 6 [New Series]: 249-302, pls. 29-45,
Lea, I. 1869. Observations on the genus Unio, together with
descriptions of new species in the family Unionidae, and
descriptions of new species of the Melanidae and Palu-
dinae, 12; 9-105, 26 pls.
Lea, I. 1870. A synopsis of the family of Naiades. Philadelphia,
4th edition, H. C. Lea, Philade ‘Iphia, 154 pp.
O’Brien, C. and J. Brim Box. 1999. Reproductive biology and
juvenile recruitment of the Shinyrayed Pocketbook,
Lampsilis subangulata (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in the Gulf
Coastal Plain. American Midland Naturalist 142: 129-140.
Parmalee, P. W. and A. E. Bogan. 1998. The Freshwater Mus-
sels of Tennessee. The University of Tennessee Press,
Knoxville, 328 pp.
Rafinesque, C. S, 1819. Prodrome de 70 nouveaux generes
danimaux découverts dans lintérieur des Etats-Unis
d Amérique, Durant lannée 1818. Journal de Physique,
de Chimie, d'Histoire Naturelle, et des Arts, Paris 88:
417-429,
Rafinesque, C. S. 1820. Monographie des coquilles bivalves
fluviatiles de la Riviere Ohio, contenant douze generes et
soixante-huit e speces. Annales générales des sciences Phy-
siques, a Bruxelles 5: 257-322.
Reeve, L. 1865-1868. Monograph of the genus Unio. Con-
chologica Iconica. L. Reeve and Co., London.
Roe, K. J., P. D. Hartfield and C, Lydeard. 2001. Phylogeo-
graphic analysis of the threatened and endangered super-
conglutinate-producing mussels of the genus Lampsilis
(Bivalvia: Unionidae). Molecular Ecology 10; 2225-2234,
Simpson, C. T. 1892. Notes on the Unionidae of Florida and
the southeastern United States. Proceedings of the United
States National Museum 15: 405-436, pls. 49-74.
Simpson, C. T, 1900a. Synopsis of the naiads or pearly fresh-
water mussels, Proceedings of U.S. National Museum 22:
501-1044.
Simpson, ©. T. 1900b. New and unfigured Unionidae. Pro-
ceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadel-
phia 52: 74-86.
Swainson, W. 1840. A treatise on malacology or the natural
classification of shells and she “ fish. London, 419 pp.
Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F.
G — rg, W. G. Lyons, 7 M. Mikkelsen, C. F. E.
Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, M. J. Swee-
ney, F. G ade M. Vecchione and J. D. Williams.
1988. Common and scientific names of aquatic inverte-
brates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks, 2"
edition. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication
26, Bethesda, Maryland, 526 pp.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1994, Endangered and threat-
ened wildlife and plants, 50 CFR 17.11 and 17.12. Divi-
sion of Endangered Species, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Ser-
vice, Washington, D.C
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1998. Endangered and threat-
ened wildlife and plants, Determination of endangered
status for five freshwater mussels and threatened status
for two freshwater mussels from eastern Gulf slope drain-
ages of Alabama, Florida, and Georgia. Federal Register
63: 12664-12687.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Endangered and threat-
ened wildlife and plants; proposed designation of critical
seen for three threatened mussels and eight endangered
mussels in the Mobile pe Basin; proposed rule. Fe sdetal
Register 68: a 52-14832
van der Sehallie. . 1934. ae jonesi, a new naiad from
southeastern a ibama. The N: autilus 47: 125-127.
von Thering, H. 1901. The Unionidae of North America. The
Nautilus 15: 37-39, 50-53.
Wright, S. H. 1897. Contribution to the knowledge of the Unit-
ed States Unionidae. The Nautilus 10; 136-139.
APPENDIX 1
SPECIMENS EXAMINED
Hamiota altilis
ALABAMA
Alabama River: USNM 25948; Alabama River, near Clai-
borne: ANSP 56419 [Lectotype U. altilis Conrad, 1834],
ANSP 56415; Big Swamp Creek, Macon Co.: USNM
361723; Jackson Shoals, Choccolocco Creek: ANSP
103834, ANSP 103871; Beaver Creek: ANSP 103863;
ieee River: ANSP 41120, DMNH 130623; Coosa Riv-
, Coosa Valley: ANSP 103771; Higgin’s Ferry, Coosa
oe Chilton Co.. USNM 218118: McGowen’s Ferry,
near Wilsonville, Coosa River: USNM 521359: Weduska
Shoals, Coosa River: ANSP 48001, DMNH 075252,
DMNH_ 150037, DMNH 150038, USNM 348970,
USNM 452169; Coosa River, [incomprehensible hand-
writing] Shoals, Shelby Co.: ANSP 341399; Shoal Creek,
Pine Glen Recreational Area, Cleburne Co.: MMNS
7743, MMNS S0S4, MMNS 8085, UAUC 120, UAUC
121, VAUC 125; Yellowleaf Creek, Jumbo, Chilton Co.:
ANSP. 89031; Cane Creek, West of CR 65, 2 mi. West
CR 7S Jet., T15S, RIIE, sec 3: UAUC 3292, MMNS
SOS1; Little Cane Creek, at CR 78, East of Edwardsville:
UAUC 3293; Chewacla Creek at CR 22, ~4 mi. East of
Tuskeegee, Macon Co.: UAUC 246, UAUC 247, UAUC
248; Uphappee Creek, 0.5 mi. upstream of Hwy. 29,
Macon Co.: MMNS 8082: Cahaba River: USNM
152026: ue River: oe 126054; Little Cahaba
River, 0.5 mi. below Cahaba Beach Rd. bridge, Jefferson
Co.; UAUC 149: Coosa River, Weduska Shoals: Shelby
Co.; UF 3955: Coosa River at Fort William Shoals, Tal-
ladega Co.: UF 65420; Hurricane Creek, Cherokee Co.:
UF 175098; Chewacla Creek, 8 mi. ESE of Tuskeegee
Co. Rd. 22, Macon Co.: UF 202249; Shoal Creek, St.
Clair Co.: UF 245989; Tuskeegee National Forest, Ma-
con Co.: UF 266048; Cahaba River: UF 269576; Shoal
Creek, St. Clair Co.. MMNS 8083.
GEORGIA
Etowah River: USNM 84936 [Lectotype, U. doliaris
Lea, 1865]; Chattooga River: ANSP $9102; Chattooga
K. J. Roe and P. D. Hartfield, 2005
Page 9
River, Chattooga Co.: USNM 59527; Chattanooga:
USNM 25711 [I iolonpert ’. gerhardtii, ‘Lea, 1862]; Fish
Creek at Highway 278/ GA State Rt. 6, ~3.9 air mi.
West of Rockm: art, Polk Co.: UAUC 538, UAUC 539:
Conasauga River at Tibbs Bridge Murray CR 109 (Whit-
field CR1OO), Murray/Whitheld Co’s.: UAUC 515,
MMNS S092; Conasauga River, Muskrat Midden, Tri-
togonia Shoals (CRM 46.70), Whitfield/Murray Co’s.:
UAUC 376; Conasauga River, south of state line, Murray
Co.: MMNS S090; Conasauga River: DMNH_ 150124,
USNM $4937, USNM 348969: Etowah River: USNM
123202.
TENNESSEE
Conasauga River: DMNH 014683; Conasauga River,
Conasauga: ANSP 341305, ANSP 347949; Conasauga
River, Polk Co.;: MMNS SO91.
Hamiota perovalis
ALABAMA
Alabama River: ANSP 56416 [Lectotype U. perovalis
Conrad, 1834], ANSP 333496; Alabama River, Clai-
borne: USNM 84938: Coosa River: ANSP 56415; Coosa
River, Gadsen: ANSP 126051; Coosa River, Talladega
Co.: ANSP 126048; Black Warrior River: ANSP 88483:
Mulberry River [Fork, Black Warrior River]: ANSP
88485: Rush Creek [Black Warrior River Dr.], FS Rt.
245, Winston Co.: MMNS 7745, MMNS 8088, UAUC
426; Flannigan Creek at FS Rd. 229, Lawrence Co.:
MMNS 7744, UAUC 423, UAUC 424, UAUC 425;
Toadvine, Valley Creek, Black Warrior River Dr., Jeffer-
son Co.: UF 65302, UF 65304; Forks of the Warrior
River, Walker Co.: UF 65305; North River, near Hagler’s
Mill, Black Warrior Dr., Tuscaloosa Co.: UF 65306; Sip-
sey Fork at N.F. 234, Bankhead National Forest, Win-
ston Co.: UF 79069, UF 79072, UF 79082, UF 79085,
UF 79136, UF 79137; Brushy Creek above Brushy Lake
Recreational Area, Bankhead National Forest, Winston
Co.: UF 79094: Capsey Creek, 50 mi. from Jct. with
Brushy Creek, Bankhead N.F., Winston Co.: UF 79115;
Sipsey Fork at mouth of Hurricane Creek, Bankhead
National Forest, Winston Co.: UAUC 95; Brown Creek,
Bankhead National Forest, Winston Co.: UAUC 1774:
Alabama: ANSP 126049: North River, near Samantha
[Black Warrior River], Tuscaloosa Co.. UAUC 107; But-
tahatchee River, Hamilton: ANSP 100657, DMNH
075231: Tuscaloosa Co. Alabama: DMNH 146496; Black
Warrior River, Jefferson Co.: UF 269609; Squaw Shoals,
Black Warrior River, Jefferson Co.: UF 65298, UF
65299. UF 65300. UF 65303. UF 65307. UF 65429. UF
269515: Garden City, Mulberry Fork: UF 69207, UF
244558: Banks of Brushy Creek, at N.F. Rd. 255, Bank-
head N.F, Winston Co.: UF 69269, UF 79177, UF
79178, MMNS 7748, MMNS SOS9: Sipsey Fork, 1 mile
N. of AL Hwy. 33 crossing, Winston Co.: UF 69279;
Brushy Creek at N.F. Rd., Bankhead N.F., Winston Co.:
UF 79076; Sipsey River at Sipsey Recreational Area,
Bankhead N.F., Winston Co.: UF 79089: Borden’s
Creek, 1 mi., upstream of from Jct. Sipsey Fork, eo y
Wilderness, Bankhead National Forest, Winston: | os o.
UF 79092, UF 79151; Sipsey Fork at N.F. Rd.,
Bankhead National Forest, Winston Co.: UF ee
Limestone Creek, 6.3 mi WNW of Monroeville, Monroe
Co.: UF 197636; Blackwater Creek upstream from Har-
ris bridge, Walker Co.: UF 266369; Sipsey River, 1.6 mi
N. of Pleasant Ridge, Greene Co.; UF 197671; North
River at Co. Hwy. 30, Fayette Co.: UF 197686; Sipsey
River, 200 m. below Co. Hwy 23, Greene ho UF
197552; Sipsey River, 4-6 mi. below Co. Hwy. 2, Greene
Co.: UF 197566; Sipsey River at CR 2, Lanta of
boat ramp, Pickens Co.: UAUC 156; Tombigbee River:
ANSP 126053; Elrod, Sipsey River, Tombigbee R.:
DMNHEL 146493; Lubbub Creek, at CR 24, 3.25 mi.
Northeast of Aliceville, Pickens Co.: UAUC 67: Tombig-
bee River: USNM 159989: Lubbub Creek, 1.8 mi SSE
of Aliceville above Hwy 14: UF 197619, UF 197632
Sipsey River, 3.6 mi. W. of Jena downstream of CR 2,
Greene Co.: UF 197697: Sipsey River near confluence
with C varpe nter’s Creek, Greene Co.: UF 197801; Sipsey
River, 5.7 mi. NNE of Mantua, Greene Co.: UF 197857,
UF 197862; Sipsey River, near Elrod, Tuscaloosa Co.:
UF 269559, UF 65301; Trussels Creek at CR 19 bridge,
Greene Co.: MMNS SOS7.
MISSISSIPPI
Luxpalila Creek, near Columbus: USNM 84925 [Lec-
totype, U. spillmanii Lea, 1561], USNM 123279; Colum-
bus, Lowndes Co.: UF 269560.
Hamiota subangulata
ALABAMA
Uchee Creek, Russell Co.; UAUC 116.
FLORIDA
Chipola River, Look-Tremble Falls near Alpha, Calhoun
Co.: ANSP 175750; Chipola River, near Pole Bluff land-
ing, Calhoun Co.: ANSP 175751; Chipola River: ANSP
84324; Ochlockonee River: DMNH 150098; Ochlocko-
nee River, Leon Co.: USNM 149648 [Paratype, U. kirk-
landianus 8. H. Wright, 1897]; Ochlockonee River, Tal-
lahassee, Leon Co.: ANSP 156892, ANSP 341307; Och-
lockonee River, 7 mi. west of Tallahassee: ANSP 157553:
Ochlockonee River, 10 mi. west of Tallahassee, Leon
Co.: ANSP 159126; Ochlockonee River, 11 mi. north-
west of Tallahassee: DMNH 119506; Ochlockonee Riv-
er, 2 mi. west of Bloxham, Liberty Co.: ANSP 360553;
Spring Creek, Marianna: ANSP 160210; State Rt. 167,
1 mi. north of Marianna, Chipola River, Jackson Co.:
ANSP : seen Spring Creek, Reynoldsville, Seminole
Co.: UF 177: 1 mi. north Marianna, C Jhipola River: UF
390; 3.5 mi. ane of Quincy, Little River: UF 415: ca. 2
Page 10
mi. east of Clarksville, Chipola River, Calhoun Co.: UF
418; Chipola River, 9.2 km ENE Kinard, 12.5 km NW
Lewis, 16.4 km N. Ida, Calhoun Co.: MMNS 8099.
GEORGIA
Chattahoochie River: ANSP 56477; Chattahoochie Riv-
er, Columbus: USNM 85081 [Lectotype, U. subangula-
tus Lea, 1840]; ANSP 126272: Cooleewahee Creek, 0.9
mi. NE of Newton, Baker Co.: USNM 853746; Coolee-
wahee Creek at GA Rt. 91, Baker Co.: MMNS 8095;
Abram’s Inlet, Flint River: ANSP 190294; Mill Creek,
Flint River, several mi. north of Albany: ANSP 267572;
Kinchafoonee Creek at GA Rt. 41 crossing, just south of
Preston, Webster Co.: UAUC591:; Kinchafoonee Creek
at GA Rt. 49 bridge ~9 air mi. northeast of Dawson,
Terrell/Sumter Co’s.. UAUC 602, UAUC 603, UAUC
604; Kinchafoonee Creek at GA Rt. 32, Lee Co., GA:
MMNS._ 8096; Chickasawhatchee Creek at CR 130
bridge ~4 air mi. SW of Chickasawhatchee, Terrell Co.:
UAUC 1753; Muckalee Creek at GA Rt. 195 bridge
~3.5 air mi. Northeast of Leesburg, Lee Co.: UAUC
312; Whitewater Creek on Morgan Mill Rd., Fayette
Co.: UAUC 645; Ochlockonee River: DMNH 173390;
Ochlockonee River, 7 mi. S. of Cairo: ANSP 194640,
DMNH_ 048538, UF 412; Mimsville: ANSP 47892,
DMNH 075151; Georgia: ANSP 126273; Calvary: ANSP
47891; Ochlockonee River, Thomas/Grady Co's. Georgia:
MMNS S101; Spring Creek at GA Rt. 54, Decatur Co.:
MMNS 8094, MMNS S100; Line Creek at GA Rt. 85/
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 1
74 bridge, Coweta/Fayette Co.: MMNS 8097; Ichaway-
nochaway Creek at GA Rt. 216, Baker Co.: MMNS
SO9S.
Hamiota australis
ALABAMA
Andrews fish trap, Pea River, Barbour Co.: UF 65309;
7 mi. east of Brundidge, Pea River, Pike Co.: UF
123284; Bozemans landing, Conecuh River, near Cren-
shaw Co. line, Covington Co.: UF 65313; Lightwood
Knot Creek, 1.6 mi. west of Opp, Covington Co.:
ANSP#; Little Patsaliga Creek: USNM_ 150473 [Holo-
type, Lampsilis australis, Simpson, 1900]; West Fork
Choctawhatchee River at Blue Spring State Park, Bar-
bour Co.; UAUC 134, UAUC 511, UAUC 512, UAUC
513, UAUC 514: Little Choctawhatchie Creek, near
Drian bridge, Houston Co.: UF 229532; Conecuh River
on CR 28 ~1 mi. east of Goshen, Pike Co.: UAUC 510;
Flat Creek at AL Hwy 153, near Flat Creek Church,
Geneva Co.: UAUC 547: Five Runs Creek, Conecuh N.
F., Covington Co.: MMNS SOS6.
FLORIDA
Shoal River at Hwy 85, 1 mi. south of I-10 Jct. in Crest-
view, Okaloosa Co.: UVAUC 550, UAUC 551, VAUC 552.
UAUC 643, UAUC 644; Shoal Creek, ca. 1 mi. above
U.S. Highway 90, Okaloosa Co.: UF 261852; Limestone
Creek, Walton: MMNS 7746, MMNS 7747.
THE NAUTILUS 119(1):11-14, 2005
Page 11
Consideration of genetic relationships in management decisions
for the endangered Anthony’s riversnail, Leptoxis Crassa
anthonyi (Redfield, 1854) (Gastropoda: Pleuroceridae)
Russell L. Minton
Museum of Natural History
University of Louisiana at Monroe
Monroe, LA 71209-0504 USA
Box 870345
Steven P. Savarese, Jr.
University of Alabama
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
ABSTRACT
Anthony’ riversnail, Leptoxis crassa anthonyi, is a federally en-
dangered pleurocerid restricted to three natural populations in
the Tennessee River drainage. Recovery plans organized the
three populations into two management units, and called for
specific numbers of populations for downlisting or delisting.
Given that nothing was known about the genetic structure of
these populations and that individuals were being randomly
transplanted, we examined each population using COI mtDN A
sequences. All three populations possessed unique sequence
haplotypes, and the two units identified in the recovery plan
did not group the populations accurately in a phylogenetic con-
text. Potential management decisions in light of our findings
are discussed.
INTRODUCTION
Anthonys riversnail, Leptoxis crassa anthonyi (Redfield,
1854), is a pleurocerid gastropod currently listed as en-
dangered by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) under the End: mgered Species Act of 1973 as
amended (USFWS, 1994). Adult shells of L. crassa an-
thonyi are large compared to sympatric pleurocerids,
globose to ovate, greenish to greenish-brown in color,
often with purple bands. The body whorl may be sculp-
tured with low, indistinct tubercles, giving the she il a
bumpy appearance. The aperture is ovate with a thin
outer lip, and the columellar lip is fees d so that it
covers a prominent umbilicus (Tryon, LS7: 3). Historically,
L. crassa anthonyi had been documented aa the Ten-
nessee River drainage in Alabama, Georgia and Tennes-
see, including the lower reaches of some of the larger
tributaries (Burch and Tottenham, 1980; Bogan and Par-
malee, 1953). Most populations of the species were ex-
tirpated when much of the Tennessee River and its trib-
utaries were impounded by the Tennessee Valley Au-
thority. Natural populations of L. crassa anthonyi persist
at three localities: a small, scattered population in the
main channel of the Tennessee River near the Alabama
and Tennessee state line; a large population in Lime-
stone Creek, Limestone County, Alabama; and a small
population limited to a single stretch of the Sequatchie
River, Marion County, Tennessee (Garner, 1994; Jenkin-
son, 1994; USFWS, 1997; Figure 1).
Two morphologically similar snails have occurred
within the historic range of » Leptoxis crassa anthonyi.
The species often occurs sympatrically with L. praerosa
(Say, 1821), and adults of L. praerosa are easily confused
with juveniles of L. crassa anthonyi (Dillon and Ahls-
tedt, 1997). The other taxon, L. crassa crassa (Halde-
man, 1841), was described as being similar to L. crassa
anthonyi but with larger, more prominent tubercles on
the body whorl, is presumed extinct (Turgeon et al.,
1998). Leptoxis crassa anthonyi shells are most easily
recognized as juveniles, given their saucer shape and the
presence of a heavy carina that disappears with age (Dil-
lon and Ahlstedt, 1997). The distinctness of L. crassa
anthonyi has been supported by both allozyme (Dillon
and Ahlstedt, 1997) and mitochondrial sequence data
(Holznagel and Lydeard, 2000).
In 1997, USFWS published their recovery plan
(USFWS, 1997) for L. crassa anthonyi. The plan iden-
tified two “populations” of L. crassa anthonyi: individ-
uals from the Sequatchie and Tennessee Rivers as one
population; and individuals from Limestone Cre eek as the
other. Recovery criteria for L. crassa anthonyi were to
protect the extant populations and to successfully re-es-
tablish other populations. [f a total of four “poy sulations”
could be established, the species could be downlisted to
threatened status; if six “populations” could be estab-
lished, the species would be delisted entirely. Though
the plan treated the three localities as two populations,”
no effort had been made to determine if they were ge-
netically homogeneous (i.e., a single gene ee population )
or genetically variable ( two or three separate pop-
ulations). In order to oo the stated goals of the re-
covery plan, the number of genetically distinct Lt -
tions within the species needed to be determined.
working baseline of genetic information about each ae
ulation was even more important due to reports of snails
Page 12
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 1
Tennessee \ ~""G
a Alabama *&
Figure 1. Map showing the locations of the three extant nat-
ural populations of Leptoxis es anthonyi. L. = Limestone
Creek; S = Sequatchie River; T = Tennessee River.
being translocated into existing populations and moved
to new localities in the Tennessee River drainage (J. Gar-
ner and D. Hubbs, pers. comms.). In this study, we used
mitochondrial DNA sequence data to conduct a com-
parative genetic analysis of extant L. crassa anthonyi
populations to examine the degree of genetic differen-
tiation among the three populations. Knowledge of the
genetic structure would help direct management efforts
in determining which populations could and should
serve as sources for augmentations and reintroductions
if desired.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Adult specimens of L. crassa anthonyi from the three
natural populations were collected under an endan-
gered/threatened species subpermit (SA99-13). The
maximum allowed number of specimens were collected,
twenty from Limestone Creek, and five each from the
Sequatchie and Tennessee Rivers (see Appendix 1
). For
Figure 2.
Leptoxis crassa anthonyi specimens identified as in Figure
position of Leptoxis and Lithasia clades are given in Table
3remer support >]
Strict consensus of two most parsimonious trees (TL =
L. Jackknife values >
|; both clades were monophyletic with jackknife support >50% and
comparative purposes, a reduced data set from previous
analyses (Minton and Lydeard, 2003) was used to place
L. crassa anthonyi in the proper systematic context. Fif-
teen individuals of L. crassa anthonyi from Limestone
Creek and five each from the other two populations
were included in the genetic study, along with four L.
praerosa, each from different river drainages, and one
each of the other taxa used in the previous study (Ap-
pendix 1).
Mitochondrial DNA sequences for a 1 kb portion of
the cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene (COT) were gen-
erated using published methods (Minton and Ly deacak
2003) for genomic isolation, PCR amplification, and ge-
netic an: alys sis that followed. Sequences were aligned i
eye (Hall, 1999) and phylogenetic hypotheses ¢ generated
by PAUP® 4.0b10 (Swofford, 2002) under maximum par-
simony with the following options: 50 replicates of heu-
ristic search with random addition, uninformative char-
acters were ignored, branches with minimum zero
length colle ipsed, and minimal length trees kept. This
gene fragment showed significant phylogenetic signal
and no base composition bias or sequence saturation in
a more inclusive pleurocerid dataset (Minton and Ly-
deard, 2003). Internal branch stability was assessed by
jackknife (Farris et al., 1996) and Bremer support (Bre-
mer, 1994).
RESULTS
Aligned sequences resulted in a data matrix of 890 char-
acters, of which 222 were parsimony-informative. Each
population of Leptoxis crassa anthonyi possessed a
unique haplotype, and all individuals from a population
shared the same haplotype. Maximum parsimony anal-
ysis yielded two trees (Figure 2, strict consensus). All
specimens of L. crassa anthony constituted a monophy-
letic group. Uncorrected p-distances were 1.46% be-
tween the Limestone Creek and Sequatchie River spec-
Pleurocera canaliculatum
Pleurocera walkeri
Pleurocera prasinatum
Elimia sp. 2
Elimia sp. 1
Elimia hydei
Lithasia
lo fluvialis
Leptoxis praerosa
Leptoxis c. anthonyi T (n=5)
Leptoxis c. anthonyi L (n=15)
Leptoxis c. anthonyi S (n=5)
71S, CL = 0.54) based on mitochondrial COL sequences.
50% above branches, Bremer values below. Com-
R. L. Minton and S. P. Savarese, Jr., 2005
imens, 2.02% between the Limestone Creek and Ten-
nessee River specimens, and 3.03% between the Se-
quatchie and Tennessee River specimens. The L. crassa
anthonyi clade was sister to a clade of L. praerosa spec-
imens. Most clades were well supported by jackknite and
Bremer values, as were the relationships within each
clade.
DISCUSSION
Our results further support the validity of Leptoxis cras-
sa anthonyi and its distinctiveness from L. praerosa, and
show each of the three populations of L. crassa anthonyi
to be genetically unique based on COT haplotypes. Un-
corrected pairwise genetic differences between the three
populations of L. crassa anthonyi were consistent with
published intraspecific differences seen in other pleu-
rocerids using COI sequences (Minton and Lydeard,
2003). The USFWS recovery plan calls for the presence
of no fewer than four viable populations of L. crassa
anthonyi before any change in listing status can occur.
For establishment of new “populations, introductions of
each haplotype to new areas within their current river
system would be preferred in order to avoid mixing of
unique evolutionary entities and possible elinninetion of
the current genetic diversity.
The USFWS has designated Leptoxis crassa anthonyi
from the Sequatchie and Tennessee Rviers as a single
population. Based on that assumption, their manage-
ment efforts might target one of the populations as a
source for augmenting the other. If translocations are to
be used, our fetal sis suggests that the Limestone Creek
population would be a better option for augmenting the
Sequatchie River population due to lower genetic dif-
ference. Additionally, if a single population is to serve as
a source of new introductions and augmentations, recent
survey work (J. Garner, pers. comm.) indicates that
Limestone Creek would be preferred because of its
large population size. Regardless, controlled experimen-
tal ‘populations should be established, either in the field
or laboratory, that could be monitored genetically and
for population ¢ growth and be compared with non-aug-
mented populations to determine whether fitness ne
been enhanced or diminished from the introduction of
unique haplotypes from other populations. This measure
would be especially prudent given that haplotypes are
being randomly introduced through human activity. Any
recovery plan that involves iencioosion of L. crassa an-
thonyi should use juveniles, as they are more easily iden-
tified by their strong keel. This will help ensure the
movement of L. crassa anthonyi and potentially prevent
the introduction of adult. non-endemic L. praerosa.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This project was completed in the lab of C. Lydeard at
the University of Alabarna. We thank S. Ahlstedt and J.
Gamer for specimens. and two anonymous reviewers for
Page 13
their comments. Funding was provided by a USFWS
grant to C. Lydeard (1448-40181-97-G-033).
LITERATURE CITED
Bogan, A. E. and P. W. Parmalee, 1983, Tennessee’s Rare Wild-
life Volume II: The Mollusks. Tennessee Wildlife Re-
sources Agency, Nashville, 123 pp.
Bremer, K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics
10: 295-304.
Burch, J. B. and J. L. Tottenham. 1980. North American fresh-
water snails. Species list, ranges, and illustrations. Walk-
erana |: S]—215.
Dillon, R. T. and S. A. Ahlstedt. 1997. Verification of the spe-
cific status of the endangered Anthony’s riversnail, Athear-
nia anthonyi, using allozyme electrophoresis. Nautilus 10:
97-101.
Farris, J. S.. V. A. Albert, M. Kallersjo, D. Lipscomb and A.
G. Kluge. 1996. Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neigh-
bor-joining. Cladistics 12: 99-124.
Gamer, J. 1994. Survey of mollusks: Tennessee River mile
412.1. Aquatic Resources Center, Franklin, 2 pp:
Jenkinson, J. 1994. Freshwater mollusk survey at CSX railroad
bridge, near Bridgeport, Alabama, Tennessee River Mile
414.5. Tennessee Valley Authority, Chattanooga, 15 pp.
Haldeman, S. S. 1841. A monograph of the Limnaides and
other freshwater univalve snails of North America. No. 3,
[{Limnea]. J. Dobson, Philadelphia, 16 pp.
Hall, T. A. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence
alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/
9S/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95-98.
Holznagel, W. E. and C. Lydeard. 2000. A molecular phylogeny
of North American Pleuroceridae ( (Gastropoda: Cerithioi-
dea) based on mitochondrial 16S rDNA sequences. Jour-
nal of Molluscan Studies 66; 233-257.
Minton, R. L. and C. Lydeard. 2003. Phylogeny, taxonomy,
genetics, and global heritage ranks of an imperiled, fresh-
water snail genus Lithasia (Pleuroceridae). Molecular
Ecology 12: 75-87.
Redfield, J. H. 1854. Descriptions of new species of shells.
Annual Report of the Lyceum of Natural History of New
York 6: 130-132
Say, T. 1821. Descriptions of the univalve shells of the United
States. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of
Philadelphia 2: 149-179.
Swofford, D. 2002. PAUP®: Phylogenetics Analysis Using Par-
simony, version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland,
Massachusetts.
Tryon, G. W. 1873. Land and freshwater shells of North Amer-
ica, Part IV. Strepomatidae. Smithsonian Miscellaneous
Collections 253: i-iv, 1-435.
Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G.
Hochberg, is G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C.
F. E. Roper, }. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Schletema, F. G.
Thompson, “4 Vecchione and G. D. Williams. 1998.
Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates
from the United States and Canada: Mollusks (second edi-
tion). American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26,
Bethesda, 526 pp.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 1994. Endangered and
threatened wildlife and plants; determination of endan-
gered status for the royal snail and Anthony’ riversnail
Federal Register 59: 17 ‘994-17998.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 1997. Recovery plan
for Anthony’s riversnail. Atlanta, Georgia. 21 pp.
Page 14
Appendix 1. Systematic list of taxa and specimens used in this study. Complete locality information is available from the authors.
UAG = University of Alabama gastropod collection.
Taxon
Locality
Genus Elimia
E. hydei
Elimia sp. 1
Elimia sp. 2
Genus Io
Io fluvialis
Genus Leptoxis
L. crassa anthonyi
L. praerosa
Genus Lithasia
L. armigera
L. geniculata fuliginosa
L. lima
L. verrucosa
Genus Pleurocera
P. canaliculatum
P. prasinatum
P. walkeri
Black Warrior River, Tuscaloosa Co., AL
Green River, Hart Co., KY
Collins River, Warren Co., TN
Clinch River, Hancock Co., TN
Limestone Creek, Limestone Co., AL
Sequatchie River, Marion Co., TN
Tennessee River, Jackson Co., AL
Harpeth River, Davidson Co., TN
Shoal Creek, Lawrence Co., AL
Sequatchie River, Marion Co., TN
Tennessee River, Jackson Co., AL
Harpeth River, Cheatham Co., TN
Red River, Robertson Co., TN
Duck River, Maury Co., TN
Buffolo River, Humphreys Co., TN
Bear Creek, Colbert Co., AL
French Broad River, Knox Co., TN
White River, Woodruff Co., AR
Duck River, Maury Co., TN
Yellowleaf Creek, Shelby Co., AL
Shoal Creek, Lauderdale Co., AL
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
dCadaddddaada
UAG voucher
AG 584
AG 574
UAG 407
AG 585
UAG 581
AG 582
AG 583
AG 404
AG 560
UAG 588
AG 589
AG 555
AG 398
AG 403
AG 406
AG 570
AG 576
AG 577
AG 590
AG 591
AG 592
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 1
Genbank accession
AF435775
AF435759
AF435761
AF435776
AF435772
AF435773
AF435774
AF435779
AF435780
AF435781
AF435782
AF435739
AF 435754
AF435749
AF435747
AF435767
AF43577
THE NAUTILUS 119(1):15-26, 2005
Page 15
Fallen into oblivion—the systematic affinities of the enigmatic
Sulcospira Troschel, 1858 (Cerithioidea: Pachychilidae), a genus
of viviparous freshwater gastropods from Java
Frank Kohler!
Matthias Glaubrecht’
Museum of Natural History
Humboldt University
Institute of Systematic Zoology
Department of - o 1cozoology
InvalidenstraBe 43, D-10115 Berlin
GERMANY
ABSTRACT
Sulcospira Troschel, 1858, is not only the taxonomically oldest
but also one of the most poorly known genera of Southeast
Asian Pachychilidae. It serves as an instructive case study as to
how the puzzling systematics of freshwater Cerithioidea has
hampered a deeper understanding of their phylogeny and evo-
lution. The genus has been established for the Javan freshwater
gastropod Melania sulcospira Mousson, 1849, on the grounds
of its round, multispiral operculum and an elongated main cusp
in the central radula teeth. Although of great systematic sig-
nificance, this taxon has been widely ignored by subsequent
authors. We here recapitulate the taxonomic history of the ge-
nus and describe and evaluate the morphological properties of
the type species S. sulcospira on basis of the limited existing
material, in order to facilitate a better understanding of pachy-
chilid systematics. In addition, in an attempt to clarify its sys-
tematic affinity, we compare the properties of another allege sly
related species from Java, S. martini (Schepmann, 198). We
show that these two viviparous species exhibit different pro-
toconch morphologies, which are indicative of reproductive
strategies distinct from other pachychilids. Finally, we outline
preliminary suggestions as to the systematics of Sulcospira
within the family Pachychilidae.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
MATERIALS
This study is based on the examination of material from
various museum collections worldwide (see repositories).
All of these samples comprise dry shells only, which as
a rule were empty. Only few shells contained fragmen-
tary soft parts; some of them were re-hydrated for ex-
aminations. However, these bodies gene rally did not fa-
cilitate morphological examinations except for the ex-
traction of small radula fragments. We have not tried to
extract DNA from dried tissues because earlier attempts
with comparable material of Brotia failed. In order to
acquire fresh material, collecting trips have been under-
taken in 2000 and 2002. We have searched rivers and
creeks in different sectors of there course (i.e. upstream,
midstream, downstream) for a period of altogether 7
days in West Java (along the roads between Jakarta and
Serang, Bogor and Sulabtme Sukabumi and Pelabuhan
Ratu, Bogor and Cipanas, Bogor and Cianjur, in the Bo-
tanical Garden Bogor) and for 3 days in East Java (be-
tween Taksimalaya, Cipatujah, and Pangadaran). During
these trips we were not able to find any mate ial of Sul-
cospira, though.
Because freshwater biotopes on Java are facing dra-
matic devastation by a multitude of causes related to the
dense population on this island such as pollution, flow
regulation, drainage, impoundment and a general deg-
radation of collecting areas by agriculture, industry and
settlements (own observations; see also Dudgeon, 2000,
for SE Asia in general), we believe that S. sulcospira has
become extinct in vast areas on Java. It remains unclear
whether and at which localities populations of this spe-
cies still exist.
Reposirory INSTITUTIONS
Voucher material is housed with the following museums:
Natural History Museum, London (BMNH), Museum
of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Mass. (MCZ), Mu-
séum cl Histoire Naturelle, € Geneve (MHNG), Muséum
National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris (MNHN), Natural
History Museum Naturalis, Leiden (RMNH), Sencken-
bergmuseum, Frankfurt/Main (SMF), Zodlogisch Mu-
seum, Amsterdam (ZMA), Museum fiir Naturkunde,
Berlin (ZMB).
We were not able to locate material in the following
museum collections: Academy of Natural Sciences, Phil-
od
Page 16
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 1
adelphia (ANSP), United States National Museum,
Washington (UNSM), Zoologisches Institut und Muse-
um, Universitiit Hamburg (ZMH), Zoologische Staats-
sammlung, Miinchen (ZSM).
MORPHOLOGICAL EXAMINATIONS
Dimensions of all shells measured to 0.1 mm pre-
cision. The shell height (H) is the maximum dimension
parallel to the axis of ae breadth (B) the maximum
dimension perpendicular to H, including the aperture.
The length of the aperture (LA) is the greatest length
from fhe: junction of the outer lip with the penultimate
whorl to the anterior lip, the width (WA) the greatest
length perpendicular to LA. The height of the body
whorl (BW) is the distance from the ase of the shell to
the upper suture of the first whorl exactly above the
junction of the outer lip with the penultimate whorl.
Morphometrical parameters used in the analyses, beside
the shell dimensions, were: H/B, H/LA, H/BW, H/LA
and B/BW. These shell parameters were statistically an-
alyzed by performing t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and a
discriminate analysis.
Protoconchs removed from dried adults were cleaned
by soaking in 10% KOH solution, flushed in distilled
water, and sonicated to remove residual contaminations
prior to scanning electron microscopy. Radulae were tak-
en from dried shells or from historic preparations. Rad-
ulae from dried shells were enzymatically cleaned as de-
scribed by Holznagel (1998); an old radula embedded in
Canada balsam was cleaned with xylene followed by son-
ication. Radulae and juvenile shells were mounted on
aluminum specimen stubs using adhesive carbon tabs or
double-sided tape, respectiv ely. and coated with gold-
palladium for 120 s at 20 mA for examination under a
scanning electron microscope (LEO 1450 VP) at 10 keV.
NOMENCLATORIAL REMARKS
Some species-group names introduced by Troschel
(1857-1555) are open to discussion. Bouchet (pers.
comm,) argued that the usage of the names Bithyniae,
Lithoglyphi, Hydrobiae, Ancyloti, Thiarae, and Pachy-
chili by Troschel ( (op. cit.) contrasts with the rest of his
work (Troschel, 1856-1863), in which he stated the
ranks of the categories he used and formed names with
endings -idea, -ina, or -acea. Because Troschel stated
explicitly that he refrained from allocating these group-
ings at family rank given the somewhat ambiguous mor-
phological data he was faced with, it was suggested that
one should ignore these names (Bouchet, pers. comm.).
However, some of these names, such as Bithyniidae,
Thiaridae, or Hydrobiidae, have been usually published
with Troschel (1857-1858) as author.
stipulated, we prefer to refer to Troschel (1857-1858) as
Unless otherwise
author of these names not only because we regard them
as available and valid but also in order to maintain sta-
bility in their usage; for a statement to the contrary see
Bouchet and Rocroi (submitted).
Figure 1. Original drawing of the radula of “Sulcospira typ-
. (Melania sulcospira Mousson)” by Troschel (1858: pl. 9, fig.
. In the upper part of the figure a row of teeth is shown
ae a rachidian flanked on each side by a lateral tooth
and an inner and outer marginal tooth; a magnified represen-
tation of the rachidian is shown below. Characteristics that are
typical for Pachychilidae are, e.g., the enlarged main cusp of
the rachidian and lateral teeth, respectively, which is flanked
by three (or two) smaller cusps on each side that taper in size;
the presence and shape of the glabella (or ramp); and marginal
teeth possessing two cusps.
Nomenclatorial aspects raised in this paper refer to
the stipulations of the 4 edition of the International
Code of Zoological Nomenclature (“ICZN”) issued by
the Intern: eonal Commission of Zoological Nomencla-
ture (1999).
RESULTS
Sulcospira Troschel, 1858
Sulcospira Troschel, 1858: 117-118; Brot, 1874: 56; Thiele,
1929: 190; Morrison, 1954: 351.
Diagnosis: —Sulcospira ea a rather conical shell
et by spiral lirae; axial sculptural elements are
lacking. Protoconchs possess a smooth sculpture with a
fine granular texture or faint growth lines.
Type Species: 1849, by
mo ytypy.
Melania sulcospira Mousson,
Nomenclature and Systematics: The genus Sulcos-
pira was described by Troschel (1858) for the Javan spe-
cies M. sulcospira e xhibiting certain characteristics that
were held to be peculiar of his species, namely a round,
multispiral operculum with four regular whorls and the
radula with an enlarged main cusp of the rachidian (Fig-
ure 1, 17-18). Troschel (1858: 114) based his description
on material received from August Brot in Genéve, i.e.,
F. Kohler and M. Glaubrecht, 2005
BW
Figure 2. Shell dimensions. B: breadth; BW: weight of the
body whorl; H: height; LA: length of the aperture; WA: width
of the aperture.
on material that is likely housed at MHNG today (see
Material Examined).
Sulcospira represents the oldest available generic
name established for representatives of the Southeast
Asian Pachychilidae and is here considered valid. How-
ever, the diagnosis of Troschel (1858) is not sufficient to
characterize the taxon unambiguously. Neither a round
and multispiral operculum w ith four whorls nor the pos-
session of a pronounced main cusp of the rachidian are
considered as diagnostic features of Sulcospira alone
(see discussion). Nonetheless, these features character-
ize Sulcospira as a member of the Pachychilidae (Glau-
brecht, 1996, 1999: Kohler and Glaubrecht, 2001, 2002,
2003).
In more recent literature Sulcospira has been widely
ignored. Thiele (1929) suggested subdividing Sulcospira
into two subgenera, Sulcospira and Tylomelania F. and
P. Sarasin, 1S98. According to Thiele, Sulcospira would
include Paracrostoma, Acrostoma Brot, 1870, and Bro-
tella Rovereto, 1899, as ee synonyms, consequently
comprising two species: S. sulcospira from Java and S.
Page 17
huegeli (Philippi, 1843) from South India. Tylomelania,
however, was considered to encompass a small number
of species restricted to Sulawesi.
This concept of Thiele (1929) led Subba Rao (1989:
107) to wrongly assume that M. huegeli would be the
type species of Sulcospira, which it is not (see Troschel’s
original designation).
Later authors had different taxonomic views. Morri-
son (1954) followed Abbott (1948) but not Thiele (1929)
and treated Acrostoma, Brotella, and Paracrostoma as
synonyms of Brotia, while considering Tylomelania as a
genus on its own. He also claimed that our understand-
ing of Sulcospira is not satisfactory. Based on some su-
perficial similarities with Brotia, but also with Tylome-
a and Balanocochlis (a thiarid), Morrison (1954) pro-
posed the allocation of Sulcospira “tentatively to the Me-
lanoides complex”. Since Melanoides is a thiarid, this
allocation is rejected here.
All a classification schemes were suggested in ab-
sence of phylogenetic analyses of morphological char-
acters. In addition to the type species, other taxa have
been assigned to the genus by previous authors, al-
though this has not hee m done consistently (Table 1).
The various opinions led also to different a dp
on the species circumscription and div ersity of this tax-
on. For example, Brot (1874) subsumed a number of
taxa under Sulcospira, of which we currently only con-
sider two to be actually pachychilids: Mc lania spadicea
Reeve, 1860, and M. hainanensis Brot, 1872. Yen (1939)
added two more taxa, M. ebenina Brot, 1883, and M.
biconica Brot, 1886. Boettger (1890), Oostingh (1932)
and Adam and Leloup (1838) treated M. te eeudnaria
von dem Busch, 1842, as member of Sulcospira but did
not mention the former taxa. In contrast, other authors
assigned those taxa to Brotia instead (Rensch, 1934;
Benthem: -Jutting, 1956, 1959; Knipper, 1958; Dudgeon,
1982, 1989: Kéhler and Glaubrecht, 2001, 2002). Even-
tually, Benthem-Jutting (1956) assumed that S. sulcos-
pira is the only representative of the genus.
In order to clarify the puzzling taxonomy and system-
atics, a revision of Sulcospira with an evaluation of its
anatomical characters is needed. A sound classification
has to be based on autapomorphic features, which is
lacking to date. Unfortunately, a comprehensive descrip-
tion of the morphology of Sulcospira suffers from the
Table 1. Comparison of previous views on the systematics and circumscription of Sulcospira
Authors
Morrison (1954);
Benthem-Jutting Kohler and Glaubrecht
Brot (1874) Thiele (1929) (1956) (2002)
Taxonomy at generic Melania (Sulcospira)
Sulcospira (Sulcospira),
Sulcospira Sulcospira
level Sulcospira (Tylomelania)
Included taxa M. sulcospira, M. spadicea,
M. hainanensis, and other
non-pachychilid taxa
sulcospira, S. huegeli,
T. neritiformis, T. carbo,
T. porcellanica
S. sulcospira S. sulcospira, 8. spadicea
Page 18
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 1
Table 2. Shell parameters [mm] of S. sulcospira and S. martini. Abbreviations: B: breadth; BW: weight of the body whorl; H:
height: LA: length of the aperture; m: median; N: number of whorls; No: number of shells; sd: st: sitar deviation; WA: width of
the aperture.
Lot No
S. sulcospira (total) m 26
sd
Holotype M. sulcospira ]
S. sulcospira (ZMA) m 21
sd
S. sulcospira (MNHN) m 4
sd
S. martini (total) m 58
sd
Syntypes M. spadicea (BMNH 19990497) m 3
sd
Syntypes M. junghuhni (RMNH, ZMA) m 22
sd
Sym pes var. flammulata, var. fasciata m 16
RMNH) sd
5 eee (ZMB 4.074) m 17
sd
=
Oo) x
io)
aa ee bo
bo
Olde WO mNWowns
NUMA ONUW Ui &
bo
B LA WA BW N
10.1 9.5 4.9 14.3 4.7
1.3 1.0 0.6 1.9 0.5
12.0 9.7 5.0 15.2 4.0
10.2 9.5 4.9 14.4 4.6
1:2 0.9 0.5 0.6 0.6
9.9 9.3 4.9 14.1 4.8
1.8 L.5 0.9 2.9 0.4
12.0 11.0 5.9 17.7 6.0
1.5 1.3 0.8 2.1 1.0
11.6 10.2 5.2 16.1 6.0
0.2 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.5
12.4 11.6 6.0 18.4 6
1.8 1.4 0.9 2.4 0.7
12.3 11.7 6.1 17.9 6.6
1.2 11 0.7 1.7 0.6
11.2 11.0 5.7 16.9 4.9
1.3 1.0 0.5 hod 0.7
lack of well-preserved material of the type species. We
compile below the anatomical data based on the material
of S. sulcospira available.
Sulcospira sulcospira (Mousson, 1849)
Melania sulcospira Mousson, 1849a [1848]: 269; Mousson,
1S49b; 68, pl. 9, fig. 3; Martens, 1897; 245 (partim); Les-
chke, 1914: 251.
Sulcospira typica Troschel, 1858: 117, 118, pl. 9, fig. 6 [intro-
duced as replacement name for M. sulcospira Mousson,
1849].
Pachycheilus sulcospira |sic|—H. and A. Adams, 1858; 299.
Melania ( (Sulcospira) pee ae —Brot, 1870: 277: Brot, 1874:
56-57, pl. 6, fig. 11: Boettger, 1890; 245.
Sulcospira sulcospira ne 1954: 381; Kohler and Glau-
brecht, 2002: 149, fig. 3 L.
Diagnosis: Shell relatively small (Table 2), conical
with spiral lirae, and a subsutural depression; aperture
elongately ovate, abapically flared. Radula with squarish
rachidian exhibiting a straight upper and lower rim, the
cutting edge of all teeth with one very pronounced main
cusp of triangular shape.
Description: Shell (Figures 3-5): small, ovate to
conical, solid, spire with eroded apex and up to six flat-
tened whorls, separated by a narrow suture; sculpture
consisting of fine, reguli ar spiral lirae that are most prom-
inent at the base aad may almost lack on upper whorls,
and faint growth lines; whorls with a subsutural de spres-
sion; color from yellowish to olive or dark brown. Ap-
erture elongate ‘ly ovate, abapically flared, peristome
sharp; columella ‘slightly bent and thickened.
Protoconch (Figures 19-20): Relatively large, com-
pared to the adult: with he ight of about 1.2 mm com-
prising one and a half whorl: generally smooth. Apical
whorl inflated, dome-shaped, with a granular surface
sculpture, transition in sculpture visible on first whorl
from granular to faint growth lines. One sample of four
specimens housed at MNHN (ex coll. Staat) has a label
stating that * ‘about 140 embryos were obtained from the
large specimen”. However, the fate of these protoconchs
is unknown.
Operculum: With four whorls regularly increasing in
diameter and a sub-central nucleus.
Radula (Figures 16-17): Rachidian tooth squarish with
a straight upper and lower rim, cutting edge with one
he: avily enlarged main cusp of triangular shape, flanked
by two, simak smaller accessory cusps on each side; gla-
bella well developed, rather rectangular with a rounded
basal margin not exceeding the lower rim of the rachi-
dian tooth, lateral margins straight and not well defined.
Lateral teeth with one heavily enlarged main cusp, and
considerably smaller accessory cusps, one at the outer
side, two or three at the inner side. Inner and outer
marginal teeth with two cusps, the outer one being very
large, triangular in shape, and the inner one being point-
ed and small. Inner marginal teeth broader than outer
marginals. Outer lateral flange inconspicuous.
Unknown.
Type Material: Indonesia: Holotype ZMZ 522306, In-
donesia: Java, leg. Zollinger (Figure 3) {Mousson, 1849b
refers to “das einzige Exemplar dieser Art...” = the
only specimen of this species . . .].
Anatomy:
Type Locality: “Java”, Indonesia.
Other Material Examined: Indonesia: Java (MHNG;
MNHN: MNHN, ex coll. Staat; ZMA (2 lots); ZMB
200.101) (if not stated otherwise, a single lot from each
collection, mostly without reference number, was ex-
amined): museums without material: ANSP, BMNH,
MCZ, RMNH, SMF, USNM, ZMH, ZSM.
F. Kohler and M. Glaubrecht, 2005 Page 19
Figures 3-16. Shell morphology of Sulcospira sulcospira (3-5) and S. martini (6-16) (apertural and abapertural, respectively
3. S. sulcospira. Holotype (ZMZ 522306). 4-5. S. martini. Two shells from Java (ZMA). 6. Lectotype of M. spadicea (BMNH
19990497/A). 7-8. Two paralectotypes of M. spadicea (BMNH_ 19990497/B). 9. Lectotype of M. junghuhni (RMNH 71326). 10-
11. Two syntypes of M. junghuhni var. flammulata (RMNH 71327). 12-13. Two syntypes of M. junghuhni var. fusciata (RMINH
7132S). 14-16. Three shells from Java. Malangbong (ZMB 4.074). Scale bar = 10 mm
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 1
Figures 17-24. SEM images of the radula and juvenile shells removed from dry shells of S. sulcospira (17-20) and S. martini
(21-24). S. sulcospira: 17. Radula (ZMA). 18. Radula (ZMB 200.101). 19. Juvenile shell, apertural view (ZMA). S. martini: 20.
Juvenile shell, apical view (ZMA). 21. Juvenile shell, apertural view (ZMB 4.074). 22-23. Apical view. 24. Detail of the apical
portion. Scale bars = LOO zm.
F. Kohler and M. Glaubrecht, 2005
18 : —_— = a ]
}
167 o 50
° 2 |
4 |
14 oO
Co}
oo «Kod |
m 12 Ke 8
OR XK, & xPO |
oO ax x § e °
|
10 o ae oS |O'S. sulcospira |
aos |
| Oo a S. sulcospira holotype |
8 | 5 a =: |@ S. spadicea types —
| OS. martini types |
: XS martini (2B 4074) | |
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Figure 25. Comparison of the shells of $. sulcospira and _S.
martini based on shell parameters height (H) and breadth (B).
Distribution: Indonesia: Java. More precise localities
were given by Boettger (1890: Bogor Botanical Garden)
and Martens (1997: Jakarta, Malangbong, Cipanas).
However, the hase of Boettger sould not be traced
(SMF? ), and Martens misidentified material of Melan-
oides tuberculata (Cipanas) and S. martini (Malangbong;
ZMB 4.076); no voucher material was found from Ja-
karta.
Nomenclature and Systematics: Melania sulcospira
is the type species of the genus Sulcospira by original
designation. When describing the new genus, Troschel
(1858), mentioned M. sulcospira as the * ‘typical species”,
and introduced the name S. typica for the same taxon
as a new, unnecessary substitute name meant to replace
an older available name (nomen novum). Thus, S. typica
is a junior svnonym of S. sulcospira (ICZN Art. 72.7.).
Sulcospira ee is invalidated as potential type name
(ICZN Art. 68.4.) making M. sulcospira the type by ab-
solute autonomy. Martens (1897) ued that M. spad-
icea is a synonym of this species, which was rejected by
Leschke (1914) and Benthem-Jutting (1956: 373), stat-
ing that Martens (1897) had misidentified specimens of
Melanoides tuberculata for M. spadicea.
Remarks: Compared to Sulcospira martini, S. sulcos-
pira is more conical in shape; the former lacks a con-
spicuous subsutural depression. Most conspicuously,
both species differ in their protoconch morphology.
Shells of B. testudinaria are more elongated in shape,
attain a larger size (between 25 to 40 mm in shell
height), lack a subsutural depression, and exhibit a dif-
ferent radular morphology: e.g., rachidian with inflated
and rounded upper corners, a smaller main cusp, mar-
ginal teeth possess two equally shaped cusps.
Given the scarcity of material and imprecise earlier
locality data for this material, we tried to restrict the type
locality from historical accounts. The Swiss malacologist
Albert Mousson (1805-1890) based his de scriptions on
material collected by the Swiss botanist Heinrich Zollin-
ger (1818-1859), who traveled in Indonesia between
1842 and 1848. However, as Zollinger collected not only
Page 2]
2.8
2.6
2.4
2.2)
N= 25 59
S. sulcospira S. martini
Figure 26. Comparison of S. sulcospira and S. martini based
on shell parameters ratio H/B. Box plot diagram showing the
median, the 25%- and 75%-percentile and largest non-ex-
tremes (less than 1.5 times of box height).
in West Java, but later also in East Java, and on some
other islands (Wanner, 1984), it turned out that a re-
striction of the type locality is not possible and “Java”
remains as the only known reference.
Sulcospira(? ) martini (Schepmann, 1898)
Melania spadicea Reeve, 1860: pl. 19, species 132 (not Melania
spadicea Philippi, 1549); Brot, 1S70: 277.
Melania (Sulcospira) spadicea.—Brot, 1874: 57-58, pl. 6, fig.
12,
Brotia spadicea.—Benthem-futting, 1956: 372-373, fig. 75
Sulcospira spadicea.—kohler and Glaubrecht, 2002: 14s. fig.
3G.
Melania junghuhni Schepman, 1896; 135-136, pl. 2, fig. 1.
(“Java”; lectotype and 41 paralectotypes RMNH 71326; 24
paralectotypes ZMA; two paralectotypes SMF 292406; var.
flammulata: 16 syntypes RMNH 71327; 3 syntypes MCZ
96926, var. fasciata: 18 syntypes RMNH_ 71528; 24 syn-
types ZMA; § syntypes MCZ 96598) (not M. junghuhni
Martin, 1879); Leschke, 1914; 251; Benthem-Jutting,
1929: S4.
Melania martini Schepmann, 1898: S4.
Brotia testudinaria.—Kohler and Glaubrecht, 2001; 301-304
(partim); Kohler and Glaubrecht, 2002: 140, 141, 150
(pe artim).
Diagnosis: Conical shell with convex to flattened
whorls sculptured with fine spiral ridges. Protoconch
with about 2.5 regular whorls; apical whorl not inflated,
no transition in shell structure is visible in the first two
whorls. Axial ribs may be present in the juvenile shell
from the second whorl on. Most conspicuously distin-
guished from all other pachychilids by its oe
morphology ( (Figures 27-34): distinguishable f rom. §.
sulcospira by its more elongated and I. irger shell (Figure
26); though adult shell not distinguish: ible from B. tes-
ye
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 1
Figures 27-34. Comparison of protoconchs of different southeastern Asian Pachy chilidae (apertural and apical view, respectively).
27-28. Brotia costula. 29-30. Brotia hainanensis. 31-32. Tylomelania patriarchalis (with kind permission of Thomas von Rintelen).
33-34. Pseudopotamis semoni. Scale bars = 100 jum.
Desenptons Shell (Figures 6-16): Small to medium
sized (Table 2), ovate to conical, spire with eroded apex
and eight to ten flattened whorls; sculpture consisting of
fine, closely spaced regular spiral lirae, may lack ahniost
completely, and faint gr rrowth lines: color yellowish brown
to olive, brown spiral band or patches may be present.
Aperture elongated ovate, produced below, peristome
sharp.
Protoconch (Figures 21-24): Height of about 1.2 mm
comprising 2% whorls; apical wheel not inflated, corre-
sponding to the regular diameter of the subsequent
whorls; first two w honk smooth, only faint growth lines
visible, without transition in sculpture, our the second
whorl on smooth axial ribs may be present.
Operculum: Consisting of three whorls and a sub-basal
nucleus Brot (1874).
Anatomy and Radula: Unknown.
Type Material: Indonesia, Java: els and 41
paralectotypes of M. junghuhni, RMNH 71326, leg. Jun-
ghuhn (Figure 9), designated by Kohler and G laubrecht
(2002): 24 paralectotypes, ZMA; two paralectotypes,
SMF 292406; 16 syntypes of M. junghuhni var. flam-
mulata, RMNH 71327; three syntypes, MCZ 96926, 18
syntypes of M. junghuhni var. fasciata, RMNH 71328;
eight syntypes, MCZ 96898. Without locality: Lectotype
of M. spadicea, BMNH 19990497/A, Cuming collection,
anal by Kohler and Glaubrecht (2002): two para-
lectotypes, BMNH_ 19990497/2.
Type Locality: “Java”, Indonesia.
Other Material Examined: Without locality (ZMA;
MHNG): Indonesia: Java (MHNG), Malangbon (ZMB
4.074) (a single lot from each collection, mostly without
reference antaibee No material was found in the fol-
lowing museums: ANSP, MNHN, SMF. USNM, ZMH,
ZSM.
Nomenclature and Systematics: Melania spadicea
Reeve, 1860, is a primary homonym of M. spadicea Phi-
lippi, 1849 (ICZN Art. 53.3) and, as such, is permanently
invalid (ICZN Art. 57.2). The next available names are
M. junghuhni Schepmann, 1896, M. junghuhni var. flam-
F. Kohler and M. Glaubrecht, 2005
mulata Schepmann, 1896, and M. junghuhni var. fasciata
Schepmann, 1896. However, the first is a primary hom-
onym of Melania junghuhni Martin, 1879, a fossil spe-
cies from Java, as stated by Schepmann (1898). The oth-
er two are junior primary synonyms of Melania flam-
mulata von dem Busch in Philippi, 1843, and Melania
fasciata Menke, 1828, respectively.
Schepmann (1898) suggested Melania martini as a re-
placement name for M. junghuhni, which is the valid
name for this taxon. The two color morphs described by
Schepmann (1896), fasciata and flammulata, are not
considered here to represent extant evolutionary entities
and therefore are treated as junior synonyms of M. mar-
tini.
The classification of this species by former authors is
inconsistent. Benthem-Jutting (1956) considered it to be
a member of Brotia; but unaware of the fact that M.
spadicea Reeve, 1860, is not valid she assumed that this
name had priority over M. martini. Kohler and Glau-
brecht (2002) assumed that M. martini and M. spadicea
are distinct and treated the former as a synonym of B.
testudinaria and the latter as a species closely related to
S. sulcospira as was suggested earlier by Brot (1874).
Distribution: Java, as the only known locality. Ma-
langbon in Central Java, east of Bandung, is the only
known exact locality (ZMB 4.074, catalogued in 1859).
Analyses of Shell Morphometry: —Sulcospira martini
can be distinguished from S. sulcospira by its higher
shell and more slender shape (see analyses of she ll pa-
rameters below). However, to differentiate between
shells of “M. sulcospira” and “M. martini” is no easy task;
contradictory statements on their taxonomy abound in
earlier accounts (Brot, 1874; Benthem-Jutting, 1956;
kohler and Glaubrecht, 2002). In fact, shells exhibit a
very similar shape, sculpture, and coloration, However,
the two taxa can be distinguished by statistical analyses
of shell morphometry. We Taséd one-way ANOVA and t-
test for two independent groups of var iables to discrim-
inate specimens that were assigned beforehand either to
S. sulcospira or to S. martini according to their shell
oe The t-test showed that both taxa vary sig-
nificantly by the following parameters (P<5%): H, N,
H/B, H/LA, and H/BW: the one -way-ANOVA yielded
corresponding results.
The shells of the only lot from Java with precise lo-
cality data (ZMB 4.074) is identified here as S. martini
given its elongated shell (while the original label states
“M. sulcospira” instead). The statistical test has been
employed to explore whether these shells can signifi-
cantly be discriminated either from shells of S. sulcos-
pira or S. martini in regard to shell morphometry. Com-
parison of shells of the lot ZMB 4.074 with shells of S.
sulcospira (MNHN, ZMA, ZMB 200.101, ZMZ 522306)
by t-test reveals that both groups differ significantly in
the parameters H/LA, H/BW, and with a weak support
(P = 0.51) for H/B, whereas no significant differences
were found when comparing the lot ZMB 4.074 with
Page 23
Table 3. Results of the discriminate analysis of shell param-
eters.
Predicted group
membership S. sulcospira S. martini
S. sulcospira 95 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%)
S. martini 1 (1.7%) 59 (98.3%)
other shells of S. martini (BMNH 19990497, RMNH
71326-8).
A graphic comparison of the two taxa by means of
selected shell parameters is shown in Figures 95—26.
Shells assigned to each of the two taxa according to their
morphology were found to be correctly dlascified by a
diserantuate analysis of morphometric data with good
statistical support (Table 3). It is concluded that challe
of S. sulcospira are smaller and more conical in shape
than shells of S. martini (Table 1, Figure 26).
DISCUSSION
I. EVALUATION OF MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERS OF
SULCOSPIRA
The operculum and radula of S. sulcospira led Troschel
(1858) to describe a new genus for this species. How-
ever, among the Pachychilidae the operculum is known
to be relatively conservative in its general organization
(that is, to be. multispiral, rounded or ovate) bt quite
variable in relation to their number of whorls and in-
crease in diameter, even within a single genus (Kohler
and Glaubrecht, 2001, for Brotia; Kohler and Glau-
brecht, 2003, for Jagora; Glaubrecht and Rintelen, 2003,
for Pseudopotamis; Rintelen, 2003, for Tylomelania;
Kohler, 2003). Consequently, an operculum possessing
four regular whorls might be typical for S. sulcospira,
but only at the species les el. The possession of a round
to oval. multispiral operculum led Sarasin and Sarasin
(1898) to group several taxa within the so-called “pa-
laeomelanians”, as contrasted with the so-called “neo-
melanians”, which exhibit a paucispiral operculum. In
fact, this grouping coincides well with the modern con-
cept of the Pachychilidae and Thiaridae, respectively
(Glaubrecht, 1996, 1999: Kohler and Glaubrecht, 2001,
2002, 2003). Therefore, operculum morphology in S.
sulcospira corroborates the placement of the taxon with-
in the Pachychilidae. This, however, represents a ple-
siomorphic character state among the caer ae of
this family, and is not a suitable character to establish
generic distinction.
By and large, the same can be stated for the radula.
The onollascen radula is generally considered a conser-
vative character (Fretter ond Graham, 1994). The pat-
tern described and depicted by Troschel (1558) (Figure
1) is commonly found among ‘pachychilids (Kohler and
Glaubrecht, 2001, 2002. 2003: Glaubrecht and Rintelen,
ne Rintelen and Glaubrecht, 1999, 2003). This had
been already noticed by Troschel (1858), when allocating
taxa such as Pachychilus and Sulcospira (but also Me-
Iage 9
Page 24
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 1
lanopsis) under the “Pachychili”. However, we have
been unable to identify a single radular character pe-
culiar to Sulcospira, based on ine limited anatomical tea-
tures discussed here. An enlarged main cusp is also
found in other pachychilid species, such as B. pagodula
(Kohler and Glaubrecht, 2001). Moreover, it is evident
that radular characters may especially be prone to ad-
aptation, parallelism, and convergence and that intraspe-
cific variability and Sato d in general may be consid-
erable, as described, e.g., for littorinid gastropods (Pa-
dilla, 1998; Reid and Mak 1999; Reid, 2000). Thus, pos-
session of an elongated cusp alone is not considered a
characteristic suitable for the diagnosis of Sulcospira.
Gross anatomy of S. Seas and S. martini remains
unknown, due to the lack of ethanol-preserved speci-
mens. It has been shown for other pachychilids, though,
that particularly characters of the reproductive organs
(pallial oviduct, gonads, brooding structures) ) and the
protoconch may ‘bear essential systematic information
(Kohler and Glaubrecht, 2001, 2003).
Juvenile shells extracted from dried adults (Troschel,
1858: and own observations) deliver circumstantial evi-
dence that Sulcospira is viviparous. Furthermore, as
made evident from the following comparison, the pro-
toconchs of S. sulcospira are similar to those of some
species we hav e primarily assigned to the “Brotia-tes-
tudinaria-group” (Kéhler and Glaubrecht, 2001, e.g.,
Brotia testudinaria and B. hainanensis: Figures 29- 30).
In contrast, other taxa constituting the genus Brotia sen-
su stricto (denominated the “Brotia pagodula group” by
Kohler and Glaubrecht, 2001) have juveniles with an ir-
regularly wrinkled sculpture of the apical whorl of the
protoconch (Figures 25-26). Protoconchs of Tylomelania
and Pseudopotamis exhibit yet another fine morphology
(Figures 27-34). They attain a relative lar ve size and
exhibit a relatively small apical whorl with a Hier shell
as well as regularly increasing whorls (Rintelen and
Glaubrecht, 1999, 2003: Glaubrecht a Rintelen,
2003).
As discussed in some detail by Kohler and Glaubrecht
(2001), distinct protoconch morphologies of several pa-
chychilid genera are correlated with different reproduc-
tive strategies. For example, Brotia possesses a subhae-
mocoelic brood pouch while representatives of Tylome-
lania and Pseudopotamis are characterized by an eu-vi-
viparous mode of reproduction utilizing a modified
oviduct as brood pouch (= uterine brood pouch; Rin-
telen and Glaubrecht, 1999; Glaubrecht and Rintelen,
2003). Females of the latter two taxa retain a small num-
ber of embryos in the uterus that are nourished by se-
cretions produce ‘d by the albumen gland.
The protoconchs of Sule ospira corre spond to those of
the so-called “Brotia ae group” (Kéhler and
Glaubrecht, 2001), which indicates to us ra S. suleos-
pira possesses a subhaemocoelic brood pouch as well.
Il. COMPARISON OF S. SULCOSPIRA AND S. MARTINI
Sulcospira martini, which has tentatively been allocated
the genus by Kohler and Glaubrecht (2002), can be
distinguished by its shell, but much more conspicuously
by its “different ‘protoconch morphology, which is unique
among the Pachychilidae.
Because the protoconch morphology is related to the
mode of reproduction, it is assumed that S. martini ex-
hibits reproductive features (e.g. incubatory structure,
reproductive strategy) that may be distinct from those
known from any other pachychilid taxon.
IIL. SysTeMATIC CONCLUSIONS
Shell, operculum, and radula of S. sulcospira (and also
of S. martini) are typically pachychilid; a basally well
rounded and flared aperture, a round to oval, multispiral
operculum, and a rachidian tooth with an enlarged main
cusp flanked by up to three accessory cusps that taper
in size are diagnostic characters of this family. However,
these characters are symplesiomorphic and, thus, unin-
formative at the generic level. Soft body morphology,
which could bear eee information, is not known. Still,
some systematic conclusions can be drawn based on the
evaluation of protoconch morphology, which is consid-
ered to be more or less constant at the generic level:
First, species of Brotia (Figures 27-28), Tylomelania
(Figures 31-32), ), and Pse Lilacs (Figures 33-34) are
not congeneric with S. S. sulcospira ( see Figures 19-20)
since they exhibit each a distinct protoconch, which is
testimony to a different reproductive strategy as dis-
cussed above. The same holds true for Jagora (Kohler
and Glaubrecht, 2003). All these pachychilid genera
have been shown to represent independent monophy-
letic lineages characterized by morphological features,
such as See: reproductive morphologies. Second, the
protoconch of S. sulcospira is very similar to that known
from spe cies of the “Brotia-te studinaria- -group * denom-
inated by Kéhler and Glaubrecht (2001) (Figures 29, 30
for B. hainanensis). Hence, Sulcospira Troschel, 1858,
being available and valid, might be an appropriate ge-
neric name for this species group under the precondition
that it can be shown that a protoconch with a smooth
and dome-shaped apical whorl is a character possessed
by the members of this group and derived by shared
ancestry. However, the alternative explanation that a
similar protoconch re presents an ancestral state that is
present in two different lineages has to be ruled out.
Otherwise, inferring generic relationship in absence of a
phylogenetic evaluation could lead to the erection of
pe araphy letic taxa when the characters considered are
plesiomorphic. Before we cannot show by phylogenetic
analyses oF morphologic il or molecular data that S. sul-
cospira and species of the “Brotia testudinaria group”
indeed belong to the same taxon, we therefore refrain
from a respective taxonomic suggestion.
Third, we conclude that S. martini can be recognized
as a species and that it does not represent a synonym of
S. sulcospira. Furthermore, it is clear that the morphol-
ogy of the protoconch of S. martini does resemble
ther of the known pachychilid genera very closely (Fig-
ures 27-34) including that of S. sulcospira (Figures 19-
F. Kohler and M. Glaubrecht, 2005
20). Just based on this single feature, it could be de-
duced that S. martini might bea represents itive of a yet
undescribed genus. However, as has been stated for S.
sulcospira, a sound decision on its systematics should
rely on a more comprehensive data set.
For the time being, we suggest to maintain Sulcospira
as a monotypic genus endemic to Java. Furthermore, we
refrain from a taxonomic decision on the generic rela-
tionship of “Sulcospira™ martini. It likely is not a mem-
ber of one of the described pachychilid genera, but its
true relationships remain unknown.
Irrespective of our anticipation that both species dealt
with in this paper may have already become extinct in
large parts of their original distribution area, we still
hope t that suitable material will turn up, eventually al-
lowing to find an answer to the remaining questions and
to solve another of the many puzzling aspects of pachy-
chilid phylogeny and syste inatics that long hampered a
deeper understanding of the evolution of this intriguing
and instructive case study among the lymnic C erithioi-
dea.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are most grateful to the curators Philippe Bouchet
(MNHN), Yves Finet (MNHG), Edmund Gitte snberger
and Jeroen Goud (RMNH), Ronald Janssen (SMF), Tru-
di Meier (ZMZ), Robert Moolenbeek (ZMA) and Kathie
Way (BMNH) for making material of their collections
available to us. Thomas von Rintelen kindly provided
SEM images of a juvenile shell of Tylomelania patriar-
chalis. We thank Philippe Bouchet and an anonymous
reviewer for most helpful comments on the manuscript,
in particular as related to nomenclatorial aspects. Their
comments helped much to improve the quality of this
paper. The work of F. K. was funded through a post-
graduate scholarship of the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung,
Sankt Augustin (Germany). This paper is part of a pro-
ject on Southeast Asian pachy chilids supported through
grant GL 297/4 to M.G. by the Deutsche For schungs-
gemeinschaft.
LITERATURE CITED
Abbott, R. T. 1948. Handbook of medically important molluscs
of the Orient and the western Pacific. Bulletin of the Mu-
seum of C 2omparative Zoology 100: 285-299.
Adam, W. and E. Leloup. 1938. Prosobranchia et Ophisto-
branchia. In: Straelen, V. van (ed.). Resultats scientifiques
du voyage aux Indes Orientales Néerlandaises de LL. rw
RR. le Prince et la Princesse Léopold de Belgique. Mé-
moires du Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique
2(19): 1-209.
Adams, H. and A. Adams. 1858. Genera of recent molluscs
arranged according to their organization, 1. John v. Voorst,
London, 661 pp.
Benthem-Jutting, W. S. S. v. 1956. Systematic studies on the
non-marine Mollusca of the Indo-Australian archipelago.
5. Critical revision of the Javanese freshwater ae el.
Treubia 23(2): 259-477.
Benthem-Jutting, W. S. S. v, 1959. Catalogue of the non-marine
Mollusca of Sumatra and of its satellite islands. Beaufortia
41-191.
Boettger, O. 1890, Ad. Strubell’s Konchylien aus Java I. Bericht
de sr senckenbergischen né iturforschenden Gesellschaft. pp.
3-7 de 3.
Beuchat P. and J. P. Rocroi. Classification and nomenclator of
gastropod families. Malacologia (submitted).
Brandt, R. A. M. 1968. Description of new non-marine mol-
lusks from Asia. Archiv fiir Molluskenkunde 98(5/6); 213—
289.
Brandt, R. A. M. 1974. The non-marine aquatic Mollusca of
Thailand. Archiv fiir Molluskenkunde 105(1/4); 1-423.
Brot, A. 1870. Catalogue of the recent species of the family
Melanidae. American Journal of Conchology 6; 271-325.
Brot, A. 1874. Die Melaniaceen (Melanidae) in Abbildungen
nach der Natur mit Beschreibungen. In: Martini, F. H.
W. and C he smnitz, J. H. (ed.). Systematisches Conchylien-
Cabinet, 1(24). Bauer & Raspe, Niirnberg, 455 pp.
Dudgeon, D. 1982. The life history of Brotia hainanensis
(Brot, 1872) (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia: Thiaridae) in a
tropical forest stream. Zoological Journal of the Linnean
Society 76: 141-154.
Dudgeon, D. 1989. Ecological strategies of Hong Kong Thiar-
idae (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia). Malacological Review
22: 39-53.
Dudgeon, D. 2000. Conservation of freshwater biodiversity in
oriental Asia: constraints, conflicts, and challenges to sci-
ences and sustainability. Limnology 1(3): 937-243.
Fretter, V. and A. Graham. 1994. British Prosobranch Molluscs.
24 ed. The Ray Society, Andover, $19 pp.
Glaubrecht, M. 1996. Evolutionsdkologie und Systematik am
Beispiel von Siif- und Brackw asserschnecken (Mollusca:
Caenogastropoda: Cerithioidea): Ontogenese-Strategien,
paliiontologische Befunde und Historische Zoogeogra-
phie. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, 499 pp.
Glaubrecht, M. 1999. Systematics and the evolution of vivi-
parity in tropical freshwater gastropods (Cerithioidea:
Thiaridae sensu lato)—an overview. Courier Forschung-
sinstitut Senckenberg 125: 91-96.
Glaubrecht, M. and T. v. Rintelen. 2003. Systematics, molec-
ular genetics and historical zoogeography of the viviparous
freshwater gastropod Pseudopotamis (Cerithioidea, Pachy-
chilidae): a relic on the Torres Strait Islands, Australia.
Zoologica Scripta 32: 415-435.
Holznagel, W. E. 1998. A nondestructive method for cleaning
gastropod radulae from frozen, alcohol-fixed, or dried ma-
terial. American Malacological Bulletin 14: 181-153.
International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. 1999.
International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, Fourth
edition. The International Trust for Zoological Nomencla-
ture, London, 306 pp.
Knipper, H. 1958. Die Typen und Typoide des Uberseemu-
seums Bremen, 5: Mollusca (Gastrop. Prosobranch.): Ner-
itidae und Thiaridae. Veréffentlichungen des Ubersee-
museums Bremen, Reihe A 3(1): 39-74.
Kohler, F. 2003. Brotia in space and time. Phylogeny and evo-
lution of Southeast <r in freshwater gastropods of the
family Pachychilidae (Caenogastropoda, Cerithioidea).
Uny sublished Ph.D. Thesis, Humboldt University Berlin.
a pp-
Kohler, F. and M. Glaubrecht. 2001. Toward a systematic re-
vision of the Southeast Asian freshwater gastropod Brotia
H. Adams, 1866 (Cerithioidea: Pachychilidae )
an account
Page 26
of species from around the South China Sea. Journal of
Molluscan Studies 67: 281-318.
Kohler, F. and M. Glaubrecht. 2002. Annotated catalogue of
the nominal taxa of Southeast Asian freshwater gastro-
pods, family Pachychilidae Troschel, 1858 (Mollusca:
Caenogastropoda: Cerithioidea), with an ev: re of the
types. Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum, Ber-
lin, 78: 121-156.
Kohler, F. and M. Glaubrecht. 2003. Morphology, reproductive
biology and molecular genetics of ovoviviparous freshwa-
ter gastropods (Cerithioidea: Pachychilidae) from the Phil-
ippines, with ean of the new genus Jagora. Zool-
ogica Scripta 32(1): 35-59.
Leschke, M. 1914. oe Malluskenfaina von Java und Celebes,
Mitteilung des naturhistorischen Museums Hamburg 21:
205-284.
Lydeard, C., W. E. Holznagel, M. Glaubrecht and W. F. Pon-
der. 2002. Molecular phylogeny of a circum-global, diverse
gastropod superfamily ( (Canthioides: Mollusca: Caenogas-
tropoda): Pushing the deepest phylogenetic limits of mi-
tochondrial LSU rDNA Sequences. Molecular Phyloge-
netics and Evolution 22: 399-406.
Martens, E. v. 1897. Sii®- und Brackwasser-Mollusken des In-
dischen Archipels. In: Weber, M. (ed.). Zoologische Er-
gebnisse einer Reise in Niederlandisch Indien (4). Brill,
Leiden, 33 31 pp:
Morrison, J. P. E. 1954. The relationship of old and new world
melanians. byode -edings of the United States National Mu-
seum 103; 357-394. |
Mousson, A. 1849a [1848]. Uber die Land- und
SiiBwassermollusken von Java. ae ihimgen der Natur-
forschenden Gesellschaft, Ziirich 1; 264-273
Mousson, A. 1849b. Die Land- und Siisswasser-Mollusken von
Java. Schulthess, Ziirich, 126 pp.
Oostingh, C. H. 1935. Die Mollusken des Plioziins von Boe-
miajoe (Java). Wetenschappelijke Mededeelingen 26: 1-
Od,
Padilla, D. K. 1998. Inducible phenotypic plasticity of the rad-
ula in Lacuna (Gastropoda: Littorinidae). The Veliger 41;
201-204.
Ponder, W. F. and A. Warén. 1988. A systematic list of the
family-group names and higher taxa in the Caenogastro-
poda and Heterostropha. In: Ponder, W. F. (ed.) Proso-
branch Phylogeny. Proceedings of a Symposium held at
the 9th Intemational Mal: cological Congress, Edinburgh,
1986. Malacological Review, Supplement 4: 288-328.
Reid, D. G. 2000. The use of the radula in the taxonomy and
phylogeny of gastropods: cautionary cases of convergence,
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 1
intraspecific variation and plasticity. Phuket Marine Bio-
logical Center Special Publication 21(2): 329-345.
Reid, D. G. and Y.-M. Mak. 1999. Indirect evidence for eco-
phenotypic plasticity in radular dentition of Littoraria spe-
cies (Gastropoda: Littorinidae), Journal of Molluscan
Studies 65: 355-370.
Rensch, B. 1934. SiiBwassermollusken der deutschen limnol-
ogischen Sunda-Expedition. Archiv fiir Hydrobiologie
Supplement 8: 203-254.
Rintelen, T. v. 2003. Phylogenetic analysis and systematic re-
vision of a species flock of viviparous freshwater gastro-
pods in the ancient lakes on Sulawesi (Indonesia)—a mod-
el case of adaptive radiation?. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis,
Humboldt University Berlin. 259 pp.
Rintelen, T. v. and M. Glaubrecht. 1999. On the reproductive
anatomy of freshwater gastropods of the genera Brotia H.
Adams, 1866 and Tylomelania Sarasin and Sarasin, 1897
in the central lakes on Sulawesi, Indonesia (Cerithioidea:
Melanatriidae). Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg
125: 163-170.
Rintelen, T. v. and M. Glaubrecht. 2003. New discoveries in
old lakes: three new species of Tylomelania Sarasin and
Sarasin, 1S97 (Gastropoda: Cerithioidea: Pachychilidae)
from the Malili lake system on Sulawesi, Indonesia. Jour-
nal of Molluscan Studies 69: 3-18.
Robertson, R. 1957. Publication dates of Troschel’s “Das Ge-
biss der Schnecken”. The Nautilus 70; 136-138.
Schepmann, M. M. 1896. Descriptions of new Melaniidae.
Notes from the Leyden Museum 18: 135-139.
Schepmann, M. M. 1898. Conchological corrections and ad-
ditions. Notes from the Leyden Museum 20: 84-86.
Subba Rao, N. V. 1989. Handbook, Freshwater Mollusks of
India. Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta, 289 pp.
Thiele, J. 1929. Handbuch der Systematischen Weichtierkun-
de. Gustav Fischer, Jena, 376 pp:
Troschel, F. H. 1856-1563. Das Gebiss der Schnecken zur Be-
eriindung einer natiirlichen Classification. Nicolaische
Verlagsbuchhandlung, Berlin, 252 pp.
Vaught, kK. C. 1989. A classification of the living Mollusca.
American Malacologists Inc., Melbourne, Florida, 189 pp.
Wanner, H. 1984. Heinrich Zollinger, 1S1S—1859. Ein Ziiricher
Schulmann als Naturforscher und Pflanzen in Indonesien.
Sein Leben und seine Zeit. Vierteljahrsschrift der Natur-
forschenden Gesellschaft in Ziirich 128(5):; 1-32.
Yen, T.-C. 1939. Die chinesischen Land- und Siibwasser-Gas-
tropoden des Natur-Museums Senckenberg. Abhandlun-
gen der senckenbergisch-naturforsche nden Gesellschaft
444: 1-233.
THE NAUTILUS 119(1):27-42, 2005
Page 27
Six new species of Paryphantopsis (Gastropoda: Pulmonata:
Charopidae) from the Papuan Peninsula of New Guinea
John Slapcinsky
Florida Museum of Natural History
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
ABSTRACT
Six new species of Paryphantopsis, a genus of charopid snails
endemic to New Guinea, are described from the geologically
complex eastern terminus of the Papuan Peninsula. All descrip-
tions are based on material collected in 2002-2003 and sa
information on shell, genital, and radular anatomy. Of the
previously described species, genital anatomy was known i
three and radular morphology for only one species. Examina-
tion of these under-utilized character sets has uncovered tax-
onomically useful interspecific variation. The six new species
appear to have distributions limited to particular mountain
groups on the extreme eastern terminus of the Papuan Pen-
insula. Species in close proximity or sympatry share unique
shell, genital and radular characters suggesting local speciation
and poor dispersal ability. Diversity in Paryphantopsis has been
underestimated and it is likely that there are many species yet
to be discovered with narrow geographic and ecological ranges
in the under-explored mountains of New Guinea.
INTRODUCTION
Paryphantopsis, a genus of charopid snails endemic to
New Guinea, are found at moderate and high altitudes
(600-4000 m) and are distributed from Western Papua
(Irian Jaya) to the Louisiade Archipelago. The genus
contains fourteen previously described species: P. arcu-
ata Jutting, 1964, P. dualoensis Solem, 1970, P. elegans
(Fulton, 1902). P. filosa Jutting, 1964, P. fultoni (Coen,
1922), P. globosa (Hedley, 1890), P. lame lligera (Thiele,
1925), P. latior Jutting, 1964, P. lowisiadarum (Méllen-
dorff, 1899), P a eine Jutting, 1964, P. pygmaca
(Bavay, 1908), P. sculpturata Jutting, 1964, P. similis
(Thiele. 1928), ss P. striata (Fulton, 1902). Solem
1970) reviewed the genus, redescribing all species ex-
cept those then recently described or reviewed by Jut-
ting (1964). Most A a le species are known
from small samples of shells, often only from their type
localities, and data on genital morphology are limited to
three species, and on radular morphology to only one
species (Solem, 1970, Wiktor, 2003). Paryphantopsis has
not been reported previously east of longitude 148° E
on the relatively poorly sampled eastern part of New
Guinea, which is known as the Papuan Peninsula. The
eastern end of the eee includes the Cloudy Moun-
tains to the south, and the disjunct terminus of the
Owen Stanley Range to the north, separated from the
main Owen Stanley uplands by extensive lowlands west
of Mount Suckling. The geologically complex Papuan
Peninsula is formed largely by the East Papua Compos-
ite Terrane (EPCT), a tectonic province compose dof at
least 4 separate geological units with differing ages, or-
igins, and histone s. These units appear to have assem-
led northeast of modern New Guinea during the Pa-
leocene, 62-57 Myr ago, and fused to the main body of
the island in the Late “Oligocene to Early Miocene, 25—
22 Myr ago (Pigram and Davies, 1987). Because of its
likely initial offshore amalgamation, the EPCT may have
develope ed a distinct and large ly endemic biota. This is
the first in a series of papers de scribing the results of
ten weeks of field surveys that took place during April-
May, 2002 and January-March, 2003. These surveys ex-
plored the extreme eastern terminus of the Papuan Pen-
insula where two geological units lie in close proximity,
the Cloudy Mountains of the Port More ssby Terrane and
eastern terminus of the Owen Stanle ny Range of the Kutu
Terrane (Figure 1).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Specimens were hand-collected or sifted from samples
of leaf-litter. Live collected animals were drowned over-
night and then preserved in 75% ethanol. Gross anatom-
ical dissections were made under 75% ethanol using a
dissecting microscope. Radulae were isolated from dis-
sected buceal masses using a saturated KOH solution.
Scanning electron micrographs of radulae were made us-
ing a field emission SEM. Drawings of the genital anat-
omy were made with the assistance of a camera lucida,
and measurements were taken using an ocular microm-
eter. Shell measurements were made as follows. Whorl
count (W) was measured from the suture of the first
whorl to the body whorl and fractions of a whorl were
determined with the aid of a cardboard circle divided
into 10 equal parts of 36° (Figure 2, line 1-2.9). Spire
Page 28
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 1
= 9°
F Mount
Suckling
S 10° MKK «2550080
MM
Mount
Simpson
0-100m
100-1000m
1000-2000m
2000-3000m
Owen Stanley Range
a 11°
E 149°
E250"
E i5i?
Figure 1. Distribution of Paryphantopsis on the eastern terminus of the Papuan Peninsula, Papua New Guinea between 9° S,
149° E and 11° S, 151° E. A = P. abstrusa, K = P. koragae. L = P. lebasii, M = P. matawanensis, U = P. ubwamensis, Y = P.
yawii, O = other sites sampled.
diameter (SD) was the length of a straight line passing
from the apertural edge of the suture through the mid-
dle of the apex to the opposite suture (Figure 2, line A-
B). Diameter (D) was the greatest width of the shell
perpendicular to the shell axis (Figure 3, line C—D).
Height (H) was the greatest distance between the apex
and the base of the aperture measured parallel to the
shell axis (Figure 3, line D-E). Spire height (SH) was
measured from the top of the body whorl to the apex of
the shell (Figure 3, line F—G). Aperture width (AW) was
the greatest distance from the columellar edge to the
outer edge of the aperture (Figure 3, line E-H). Aper-
ture height (AH) was measured from the suture to the
base of the aperture, parallel to the shell axis (Figure 3,
line H-I). The lengths of radular teeth were measured
from the top of the mesocone to the posterior edge of
the basal plate. The widths of radular teeth were mea-
sured as the greatest width of the cusps, not the basal
plate. The following abbreviations are used in figures of
genital anatomy: AT = atrium, DI = diverticulum, EP
= epiphallus, OV = free oviduct, PE = penis, PG =
prostate gland, PP = penial pilasters, PR = penial re-
tractor muscle, SD = spermathecal duct, SP = sper-
matheca, VA = vagina, VD = vas deferens, VP = vergic
J. Slapcinsky, 2005
Dace. OC
Page 29
Periostracal
Extensions
Periostracal
Processes
H E
Figures 2-3. Diagram of shell measurements, 2. Whorl count (line 1-2.9), spire width (line A-B). 3. Diameter (line C—D),
height (line D-E), spire height (line F-G), aperture width (line E-H), aperture height (line HI).
papillae. Specimens are deposited in the following insti-
tutions: Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu (BPBM),
Florida Museum of Natural History, Gainesville (UF),
Papua New Guinea National Museum, Port Moresby
(PNGNM), Wroclaw University Museum of Natural
History (MNHW).
SYSTEMATICS
Family Charopidae Hutton, 1884
Genus Paryphantopsis Thiele, 1928 (Type species:
Flammulina (Paryphantopsis) lamelligera Thiele, 1928,
by original designation.)
Description: Moderate to large-sized charopid snails
with loosely coiled shells of approximately three whorls.
Shell shape varies among species from globose to de-
pressed with an elevated to flat spire and a rounded to
keeled margin. The umbilicus, usually covered by an ex-
pansion of the peristome, is sometimes perforate. Nu-
clear whorls (protoconch) are sculptured with spiral rows
of small pits that become weaker and less regular on
later whorls. Postnuclear whorls (teleoconch) are usually
sculptured with growth lines accentuated with short per-
iostracal extensions punctuated with occasional longer
extensions at regular intervals. These longer extensions
can bear additional processes at the shell margin (Figure
2). A few species do not have longer periostracal exten-
sions and some species do not bear any extensions. Body
color is usually yellow in life. The epiphallus is apically
inflated. often with an apical diverticulum. The penis is
textured with convoluted pilasters of varying complexity.
Central teeth of the radula are tricuspid and of similar
size to the tricuspid and slightly assymetrical lateral
teeth. The many lateral teeth become shorter and less
symmetrical, grading in shape with the marginal teeth.
Marginal teeth are usually assymetric, their endocones
longer than their ectocones. Endocones and ectocones
and less often mesocones can bear accessory cusps.
Paryphantopsis abstrusa new species
(Figures 4-10, Table 1)
Description: The adult shell is small for the genus,
4.4-4.8 mm (mean = 4.6) in diameter and 3.5-3.8 mm
(mean = 3.6) in height, with 2.9-3.0 (mean = 3.0) rap-
idly expanding whorls (Figures 4-6, Table 1). The spire
is elevated 0.3 mm. Postnuclear whorls descend regu-
larly and the shell height/diameter ratio is ().76—0.81
(mean = 0.79). The shell has 1.3 evenly rounded nuclear
whorls, sculptured with 12 spiral rows of small pits. The
postnuclear whorls bear weak and irregular malleations,
most readily visible at the base, and indistinct and irreg-
ular striae on the apical surface. The postnuclear whorls
are also sculptured with weak growth lines. Approxi-
mately every fourth growth line is accentuated by a per-
iostracal extension. The periostracal extensions bear
small (0.15 mm) trigonal processes at the periphery.
These processes occur on every periostracal extension
for the first two whorls, then become less regular and
finally absent from the final % whorl. The fragile pro-
cesses are often partially worn from the earlier whorls
of adult shells. The nuclear whorls are white, the post-
nuclear whorls brown. The umbilicus is closed by a re-
flection of the peristome. The aperture is large, ovate to
nearly circular, with an aperture-diameter to aperture-
height ratio of 0.54-0.67 (mean = 0.63).
The body color is uniform bright yellow-white in life,
fading to cream in specimens preserved in ethanol. The
vas deferens narrows rapidly from the prostate gland and
remains narrow to the swollen head of the epiphallus
(Figure 7). A long coiled diverticulum inserts laterally
on the epiphallus soon after the junction with the vas
deferens. The epiphallus narrows slightly after the di-
verticulum and widens towards the junction with the pe-
nis. The penis is half the length and three times the
width of the epiphallus, robust, widest centrally, and nar-
rowing slightly at each end. Apically there are several
small convoluted pilasters and one much larger convo-
luted pilaster that extends to near the base (Figure §).
The penial retractor muscle is robust, originating from
Page 30 THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 1
Figures 4-10. Paryphantopsis abstrusa. 4-6. Photographs of shell, Holotype UF 308235, diameter 4.6 mm. 7-8. Camera lucida
drawing of genitalia, UF 299677, maximum width 7.2 mm. 9-10. Scanning electron micrograph of radula, UF 299677, field width
of central and lateral teeth 41 xm, marginal teeth 42 xm
he is
J. Slapcinsky, 2005
Page 3]
Table 1. Measurements in mm of undamaged adult shells of six species of Paryphantopsis, N = count, H
= height, D = diameter,
SH = spire height, SD = spire diameter, AH = aperture height, AD = aperture diameter, W = number of whorls.
Species N H D SH sD AH AD W
P. abstrusa 3 mean+SD 36+02 46+02 32+ 0.0; QI=O0 26202 28=01 30+ 01
range 3.5-3.8 44-AS 0.3-0.3 2.0-2.] 2.4-2.7 2.7-2.9 2.9-3.0
P. koragae 3 mean+ SD 29+ 0.1 42+00 02+0.0 16+ 0.1 2.1 EO 2.6 =O] 2.8 + 0.1
range 2.8-3.0 4.14.2 0.1-0.2 1.5-1.7 2.0-2.1 2.5-2.7 2.7-2.8
P. lebasii 41 mean+ SD 36+ 0.2 6.8 + 0.5 0.1 + 0.1 25+ 0.2 2.8 + 0.2 43+ 0.4 28 + 0.1
range 3.34.0 6.1-7.5 0.0-0.2 2.3-2.8 2.4-3.0 3.9-4.9 2.7-2.9
P. matawanensis 5 mean+SD 45+05 70+04 O12+01 26+03 36+05 452+04 29+02
range $.0—-4.9 6.6-7.3 0.0-0.1 2.2-2.8 3.24.1 4.14.8 2.7-3.0
P. ubwamensis 3 mean+SD 50202 71+07 O38 01 30+03 38+03 43+05 30201
range 4,8-5.1 6.4-7.7 0.2-0.4 2.7-3.3 3.64.1 3.94.9 2.9-3.]
P. yawii 55 mean+SD 312+03 59+04 02+01 22+03 232403 37404 272011
range 2.6-3.6 5.0-6.5 0.1-0.3 1.9-2.6 2.0—2..7 3.24.1 2.6-2.8
the diaphragm and inserting at approximately mid-point
on the epiphallus. The spermathecal duct is robust, nar-
rowing abruptly at mid-point and remaining narrow until
joining the relatively small, ovate spe srmatheca. The free
oviduct joins the moderate length vagina above the atri-
um.
The central teeth of the radula (second row from left)
are tricuspid, S-9 wm wide and 11-12 wm long, roughly
the same shape as, but smaller than, the first lateral
teeth, which are 9-10 zm wide and 12-13 wm long (Fig-
ure 9). The mesocones of both the central and first lat-
eral teeth are tall, slender, and blade-shaped, joining the
rectangular basal plates close to, but not on, their pos-
terior edge. The mesocones of the ce sntral teeth barely
project beyond the anterior edge of the basal plates,
those of the lateral teeth project well beyond the edge.
The ectocones are trigonal and short only one third of
the height of the mesocones, joining the posterior edge
of the basal plates. The lateral teeth are asymme strical,
their endocones are slightly taller then their ectocones.
The marginal teeth are dorsoventrally compressed and
tricuspid to multicuspid, S-9 jzm wide and 11-12 ym
long (Figure 10). The endocones of the marginal teeth
the height of the mesocones and only slightly
taller than the ectocones. The mesocones of the margin-
al teeth often bear small cusps near the mid-point.
Type Material: Holotype: UF 308235, J. Slapcinsky,
16 April 2002; oe UF 299667 (2 specimens), UF
303558 (4 specimens), type locality, J. Slapcinsky, 16
April 2002.
are half
Type Locality: Papua New Guinea, Milne Bay Proy-
ince, Cloudy Mountains, Ubwam Mountain, headwaters
of the Watuti River, 10° 29.8’ S, 150° 14.02’ E, 670 m
altitude.
Habitat: Observed crawling near the base of trees
with smooth bark, in native forest, during wet weather
at 670 meters altitude.
Etymology: From the Latin abstrusa, a feminine ad-
jective meaning hidden, concealed and reserved, allud-
ing to the difficulty finding this species and to its subtle
alieniost concealed pe ieiosteacal processes.
Remarks: = Paryphantopsis abstrusa difters from most
other Paryphantopsis smaller than 5 mm in diameter by
having periostracé il extensions with processes at their
margins. Paryphantopsis similis is the only other small
species with periostracal extensions. It is more de-
pressed, with a height/diameter ratio of 0.70 compared
to a height/diameter ratio of 0.79 in P. abstrusa.
Paryphantopsis koragae new species
(Figures 11-17, Table 1)
Description: The adult shell is small for the genus,
4.14.2 mm (mean = 4.2) in diameter and 2.$—3.0 mm
(mean = 2.9) in height, with 2.7-2.8 (mean = 2.8) rap-
idly expanding eihoels (Figures 11-13, Table 1). The
spire is slightly elevated, 0.1-0.2 mm Rese = (0.2),
postnuclear whorls descend slowly and regularly. Shell
height/diameter ratio is 0.67—0.71 (mean = 0.69). There
are 1.1 evenly rounded nuclear whorls, sculptured with
12 spiral rows of small pits that are not continued on
the postnuclear whorls. The postnuclear whorls have
regular growth wrinkles with irregular, short, periostracal
extensions that are slightly we ae basally. None of the
periostracal extensions extend further than the others.
The nuclear whorls are white, the postnuclear whorls are
dark brown. The umbilicus is closed by a reflection of
the peristome. The aperture is large, flattened apically
and slightly angled at the periphery and base of the col-
umella. The aperture-diame to aperture-height ratio
is 0.78—0.80 (mean = 0.79).
The body color is uniform yellow in life, fading to
cream in ae preserved in ethanol. The vas def-
erens narrows rapidly after the prostate gland and re-
mains narrow until entering the swollen, ovate head of
the epiphallus (Figure 14). The interior of the head of
the epiphallus bears two strong pilasters that enter the
short broad diverticulum, which is roughly one quarter
of the length of the epiphallus. The e piphi illus is two to
three times longer than the penis and one third narrower
Page 32 THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 1
Figures 11-17. Paryphantopsis koragae. 11-13. Photographs of shell, Holotype UF 305237, diameter 4.2 mm, 14-15. Camera
lucida drawing of genitalia, UF 303586, maximum width 6.3 mm. 16-17. Scanning electron micrograph of radula, UF 303586,
field width of central and lateral teeth 55 2m, marginal teeth 41 jzm
J. Slapeinsky, 2005
at the junction with the penis. The very short penial
retractor muscle originates on the diaphragm and inserts
near the mid-point of the epiphallus. The interior of the
penis bears several smooth, low, regular Me and
one much larger convoluted pilaster (Figure 15). The
spermatheca is oblong-ovate, its duct is apicall y narrow
and widens abruptly at the mid- point. The free oviduct
is relatively robust, joining the long vagina well above
the atrium.
The central teeth of the radula (center row) are tri-
cuspid, 9-10 am wide and 12-13 jm long, slightly
smaller than the first lateral teeth, which are 10-11 xm
wide, 13-14 pm long (
both central and lateral teeth barely project beyond the
basal plate. The ectocones of the central and lateral
teeth are about one half the height of the mesocones.
The lateral teeth are tricuspid and very slightly assy-
metric with the endocone of each lateral sligl itly taller
than the ectocone. The marginal teeth are domox entrally
compressed and tricuspid or weakly and irregularly mul-
ticuspid, 5-13 zm wide and 8-10 jm long (Figure 17).
The endocones of the marginal teeth are nearly the
height of the mesocones aad can have very weak sec-
ondary cusps; the ectocones are shorter and unicuspid
to irregularly multicuspid.
Type — Holotype: UF 308237, J. Slapcinsky,
20 February 2003; Paratypes: Papua New Guinea, Milne
Bay Province, Mount Matawan (Mount Simpson): UF
303586 (2 specimens), UF 303587 (2 specimens), type
locality; UF 303584 (1 specimen), plateau ENE of sum-
mit, 10°2.1' S, 149°34.6’ E, 2567 m altitude, J. Slapcin-
sky, 17 February 2003; UF303585 (1 specimen), Bunisi
V: illage, 10°1.1' S, 149°36.2’ E, 1450 m altitude, J. Slap-
cinsky, 16 February 2003.
Type Locality: Papua New Guinea, Milne Bay Prov-
ince, Mount Matawan (Mount Simpson): NE of summit,
10°L.7’ S, 149°34.7' E, 2100 m altitude.
Habitat: Active on plants and leaf litter usually near
the ground. Observed aestivating in suspended leaf litter
within 1.5 m of the ground in tr opical hardwood forest
and cloud forest from 1450 m to 2600 m altitude.
Etymology: This matronym honors Ms. Helen Kor-
age, Councelor for the Village of Ikara, who facilitated
our access to the Mount Matawan area.
Remarks: = Paryphantopsis koragae differs from other
species of Paryphantopsis in being sculptured with
growth lines accentuated with very short periostracal ex-
tensions. All other small species (= 5 mm diameter),
including P. filosa, P. pygmaea, P. arcuata, P. sculpturata,
P. similis, P. “platycephala, and P. abstrusa have occasion-
al longer periostracal extensions. The anatomy of only
one Pega species of similar size has ‘been fig-
ured previously: P. filosa ee Karkar Island near Ma-
dang (Wiktor, 2003. fig. 9). This species differs from P.
koragae in not having a bistieraet Cas on the epiphallus.
Din orp 28
age 33
Figure 16). The mesocones of
Paryphantopsis lebasii va species
(Figures 18-24, Table 1
Description: The adult shell is slightly larger than av-
erage for the genus, 6.1-7.5 mm (mean = 6.5) in di-
ameter and 3.3-4.0 mm (mean = 3.6) in height, with
2.7-2.9 (mean = 2.8) 1 rapidly expanding whorls (F Figures
18-20, Table 1). The spire is flat to slightly elevated, 0.0—
0.2 mm (mean = 0.1). Postnuclear whorls descend slow-
ly and regularly and shell height/diameter ratio is 0.45—
0.61 (mean = 0.53). There are 1.3 nuclear whorls, with
weak, peripheral and supraperipheral angles, and sculp-
tured with about 12 spiral rows of small pits. These pits
become larger and less regular on the postnuclear
whorls, where they are visib sle through the periostracum
as weak malleations. The sculpture of spiral rows of ob-
long pits is clearer where the periostracum is removed.
The shell periphery is weakly keeled. Apical surface of
the whorls is broadly rounded or with a very weak su-
praperipheral angle. Regular growth w rinkles accentu-
ated with short periostracal extensions are present on
the postnuclear whorls. On the apical surface, these ex-
tensions are folded along their length towards the ap-
erture and are weakly appressed to the shell. Approxi-
mately every fifth periostracal extension protrudes about
0.5 mm beyond the shell margin forming large rectan-
gular processes. These processes ov erlap "each: other on
the penultimate whorl, but not on the body whorl. They
are approximately equally spaced, rectangular, distally
rounded, and of approximately equal length. Periostracal
extensions of the growth lines are shorter, erect, and less
prominent basally. Nuclear whorls are white; postnuclear
whorls pale yellow brown. The umbilicus is perforate or,
less often, closed, covered to varying degrees by a re-
flection of the peristome. The aperture is large, de-
pressed-ovate with an aperture-diameter to aperture-
height ratio of 0.51-0.75 (mean = 0.65).
The body color is uniform bright creamy-yellow in
life, fading to creamy-white in specimens preserved in
ethanol. The vas deferens narrows to the junction with
the ovate head of the epiphallus (Figure 21). The epi-
phallus is approximately one quarter the diameter of the
penis and does not bear a diverticulum. The penial re-
tractor muscle is a little less than half the length of the
epiphallus, originating from the diaphragm and inserting
at the base of the epiphallus. The robust penis is a little
shorter than the epiphallus, with three strong pilasters
that run its entire length (Figure 22). The atrium is
short, expanding slig] itly towerd the junction with the
penis and vagina. The spermathec cal aut is massive at
the base, tapering rapidly at mid point, the remainder is
relatively narrow until its junction with the spherical
spermatheca. The free oviduct is slightly coiled and nar-
row, joining the very short vagina just above the atrium.
The central teeth of the radula (fifth row from left)
are symmetrically tricuspid, 89 jzm wide and 13-14 jm
long, and are similar in shape and length to the slightly
wader (Q- " wm), and slightly asymme strical lateral teeth
(Figure 23). The bluntly Sonics ‘and erect mesocones of
Page 34 THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 1
Figures 18-24. Paryphantopsis Iebasii. 18-20. Photographs of shell, Holotype UF 308233, diameter 6.5 mm, 21-22. Camera
lucida drawing of genitalia, UF 299671, maximum width 6.7 mm. 23-24. Scanning electron micrograph of radula, UF 299671,
field width of central and lateral teeth 67 zm, marginal teeth 38 jum
J. Slapcinsky, 2005
the central and lateral rows join their basal plates cen-
trally and barely project beyond the anterior of their bas-
al plates. The ectocones of both the central and lateral
rows are trigonal and short, about half the height of the
mesocones; they join the posterior edge of their basal
plates at a low buttress. The e ndocones of the lateral
teeth are slightly larger but otherwise of similar shape
to their ectocones. The marginal teeth are dorsoventrally
compressed, multicuspid, about 9-LO jum wide and 10—
11 wm long (Figure 24). The endocones are nearly the
same height as the mesocones while the ectocones are
much shorter, about one half to one third the height of
the mesocones and divided into three cusps.
Type Material: Holotype: UF 308233, J. Slapeinsky,
9 April 2002; Paratypes: Papua New Guinea, Milne Bay
Province: UF 299676 (1 specimen); UF 299699 (5 spec-
imens), Cloudy Mountains, Ubwam Mountain, heacwa-
ter of the Watuti River, 10°29.8’ S$, 150°14.0' E, 675
meters altitude, J. Slapcinsky, 16 April 2002; UF 299674
(S specimens); UF 303593 (4 specimens), Pini Range,
Duabo Mission Station, 10°25’ 05” S, 150°1S’ 24 EB, 325
meters altitude, J. Slapcinsky, 9 April 2002; BPBM (2
specimens); MNHW 97S (2 specimens); PNGNM 004-
105 (2 specimens); UF 299671 (19 specimens) UF
303591 (1 specimen), 30 April 2002; UF 303590 (7 spec-
imens), 2 March ae Pini Range, E of “a tbo Mission
Station, 10°25.0’ S$, 150°18.6" E, 325 meters altitude, J.
Slapcinsky; UF prea 1 specimen), 30 April 2002: UF
303592 (1 specimen), | May 2002, Pini Range, aban-
doned logging road W of f Duabo Mission Station, 10°
24.9’ S, 150° 18.3" E, 325 meters altitude, J. Slapcinsky.
Type Locality: Papua New Guinea, Milne Bay Prov-
ince, Pini Range, Duabo Mission Station, 10°25’ 04.7"
S. 150°18’ 24.4” E, 325 meters altitude.
Habitat: Found on logs, mossy rocks and wet ground,
usually near streams in disturbed and undisturbed
broadleaf forest in hilly terrain from 325 to 700 meters
altitude. Observed active during the day.
Etymology: This patronym honors Mr. Biga Lebasi,
our host ad guide at Duabo Mission Station, the type
locality.
Remarks: Only four other Paryphantopsis species, P.
elegans, P. fultoni, P. yawii, and P. lamelligera have weak
to strong peripheral keels. Paryphantopsis lebasii is un-
like all species except P. yawii and P. fultoni, in having
large, rectangular periostracal extensions oriented par-
allel to the keeled shell mar gin. These peripheral exten-
sions are all of equal length, unlike in P. fultoni, and do
not overlap on the body whorl, unlike in P. yawii.
Paryphantopsis matawanensis new species
(Figures 25-31, Table 1)
Description: The adult shell is larger than average
size for the genus, 6.6-7.3 mm (mean = 7.0) in diameter
and 4.0-4.9 mm (mean = 4.5) in height, with 2.7-3.0
(mean = 2.9) rapidly expanding whorls (Figures 25-27
Table 1). The spire is flat or very slightly elevated, 0. 0.
0.1 mm (mean = 0.1). Postnuclear eos descend reg-
ularly and shell height/diameter ratio is 0.61—0.69 (mean
= (0.64). There are 1.3 rounded nuclear whorls, sculp-
tured with 6 spiral rows of small pits that grade into
weak, spiral striae on the penultimate whorl; shell sculp-
ture is obscured by periostracum on the body whorl. The
shell is wider and slightly angular below the mid- point.
The postnuclear whorls have regul: ir growth wrinkles ac-
centuated with low periostracal extensions that alternate
with several much longer extensions approximately every
10 growth-lines. The grouping of several longer exten-
sions appears like a single very thick pe sriostracal exten-
sion to the naked eye. The nuclear whorls are white, the
postnuclear whorls are dark brown to red-brown. A re-
flection of the peristome closes the umbilicus. The ap-
erture is large, depressed-ovate, with an aperture-di-
ameter to aperture-height ratio of 0.54-0.67 (mean =
0.63).
In life the body color is bright-yellow with lateral
patches of dark purple- brown, the yellow fades to cream
in specimens preserved in ethanol. The vas deferens nar-
rows toward the junction with the inflated spherical head
of the epiphallus. Immediately after, and perpendicular
to the head of the epiphallus, there is a finger-shaped
diverticulum that is roughly one quarter the length, and
slightly narrower than the diameter of the epiphallus
(Figure 28). The remainder of the epiphallus is some-
what twisted and approximate ly the same length as the
penis. The penial retractor muscle is short, originating
from the diaphragm and inserting on the basal ee of
the epiphallus. The epiphallus is roughly half the di-
ameter of the penis. The penis expands for its apical
third and then tapers basally to its junction with the sim-
ilarly sized atrium. The penis apex bears seve ral regular
pilasters oriented perpendicular to the length of fhe pe-
nis (Figure 29). At the pe nis mid- -point there i is one very
large and convoluted pilaster that extends basally. The
Ww: all of the base of the pe nis is thin, bearing regular small
pustules. The atrium is short and narrow ‘expanding
slightly towards the junction with the penis and the long
vagina. The base of the spermathecal duct is relatively
narrow, about the same diameter as the base of the penis
and free oviduct; it triples in size to its mid-point then
narrows abruptly for the remaining third before joining
the spherical spermatheca. The free oviduct is narrow,
joining the long vagina well above the atrium.
The central teeth of the radula (center row) are tri-
cuspid, 11-12 zm wide and 18-19 jum long, roughly the
same size and shape as the first lateral tee sth ( Figure 30).
The mesocones of both the central and first late al teeth
are tall and sharp, tapering apically and narrowing ba-
sally. Mesocones are atti ie d to their basal plates along
their entire le ngth, except for their apical quarter that
extend beyond the anterior margin of the basal plates.
The ectocones of the central teeth and the symmetric
ectocones and endocones of the lateral teeth are trigo-
nal, about half the height of the mesocones. The mar-
Page 36 THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 1
Figures 25-31. 9 Paryphantopsis matawanensis. 25-27. Photographs of shell, Holotype UF 308236, diameter 7.3 mm. 28-29.
Camera lucida drawing of genitalia, UF 303581, maximum width 11.7 mm, 30-31. Scanning electron micrograph of radula, UF
303581, field width of central and lateral teeth 63 zm, marginal teeth 59 jm
J. Slapceinsky, 2005
ginal teeth are dorsoventrally compressed and irregularly
multicuspid, 11-12 pm wide and 10-12 pm long (Figure
31). The ectocones of the marginal teeth are slightly
shorter than their endocones, which are slightly shorter
than their mesocones. Both the ectocones and endo-
cones are irregularly multicuspid, the mesocones are
broadly trigonal to bro: idly rounded,
Type Material: UF 308236, J. Slapcinsky, 19 Febru-
ary 2003; Paratypes: Papua New Guinea, Milne Bay
Province, Mount Matawan (Mount Simpson): UF
303581 (9 tag UF 303582 (3 specimens), type
locality; UF 306529 (1 specimen), NE of summit,
10°2.1' S, 149° 34.4" r ae m altitude, J. Slapcinsky, 18
February 2003; UF 303583 (1 specimen), NE of sum-
mit, LO°L.7' S, aga 7 E, 2100 m altitude, ]. Slapcin-
sky, 20 February 2003.
Type Locality: Papua New Guinea, Milne Bay Prov-
ince, Mount Matawan ( Mount Simpson), ), ridge top E of
summit, 10°2.5’ S, 149°34.6’ E, 2700 m altitude.
Habitat: All specimens were collected in cloud forest
from 2100 io 700 m altitude. Individuals were observed
from 1-2 m above ground, crawling on a variety of cloud
forest vegetation in wet or foggy w eather In drier weath-
er specimens were observ ed in leaf litter that was sus-
pended in trees, especially in the crowns of Pandanus
sp.
Etymology: Named for the type locality and known
range of dhis species: Mount Matawan ( (Mount Simpson).
Remarks: Of the other larger (>6 mm diameter) spe-
cies of Paryphantopsis, P. P. globosa, and P. louisiadarum
do not have periostracal extensions on the growth lines,
unlike P. matawanensis. Of the species with periostracal
extensions, P. latior, P. lamelligera, P. fultoni, and P. stri-
ata do not have a repeating pattern of approximately LO
short periostracal extensions followed by several longer
extensions. P. matawanensis further differs from P. To
melligera and P. fultoni in not having peripheral pro-
cesses on the periostracal extensions. The genital anat-
omy of P. matawanensis differs from P. lamelligera in
having a diverticulum.
Paryphantopsis ubwame - new species
(Figures 32-38, Table 1
Description: The adult shell is large for the genus.
6.47.7 mm (mean = 7.1) in diameter and 4.8-5.1 mm
mean = 3.0) in height, with 2.9-3.1 (mean = 3.0), rap-
idly expanding whorls (Figures 32-34, Table 1). The
spire is elevated, 0.2-0.4 mm (mean = 0.3), the post-
nuclear whorls descend relatively ails espe cially near
the aperture. The shell height/diame ter ratio is 0.66—
0.75 (mean = 0.70). The 1.2 nuclear whorls are evenly
rounded and sculptured with 12 spiral rows of small pits.
These pits do not continue on the postnuclear whorls,
which are sculptured only with weak srowth lines that
do not bear periostracal extensions. The whorls are in-
Page 37
flated, the sutures deeply impressed, and the periphery
evenly rounded. The nuclear whorls are white, the post-
nuclear whorls brown, with irregular lighter patches.
The umbilicus is perforate, narrowed by a reflection of
the peristome. The aperture is large, ovate, with an ap-
erture-diameter to aperture- height ratio of 0.79-0.93
(mean = 0.85).
The body color is uniform yellow in life, fading to
cream in specimens preserved in ethanol. The vas def-
erens is wide at the prostate gland, narrowing slags!
and remaining narrow until the junction with the inflated
ovate tip of the epiphallus (Figure 35). The epiphallus
bears a long (approximately a quarter of the length of
the epiphallus), ), finger-she ped diverticulum just after the
junction with the vas deferens. The epiphallus is about
one third the diameter of the apex of the penis. The
penis is broad apically, narrowing abruptly to half its api-
cal diameter slightly before mid-point and remaining the
same diameter to the junction with the atrium, The pe-
nis is sculptured with several slightly convoluted pilasters
that extend in air are from near basally to near apically,
and one much larger and more convoluted pilaster near
the penis mid-point (Figure 36). The penial retractor
muscle originates from the diaphragm and inserts at the
mid-point of the epiphallus. The spermathecal duct is
basally robust and narrows at mid-point, remaining nar-
row until the junction with the spherical spermatheca.
The free oviduct is narrow joining the moderate length
vagina above the atrium.
The central teeth of the radula (center row) are tri-
cuspid, 10-11 pm wide and 15-16 jum long, roughly the
same width and shape as, but a little shorter than, the
first lateral teeth, which are 15-19 wm long (Figure 37).
The mesocones of both the central and lateral teeth are
long, slender and blade shaped, projecting slightly be-
yond the basal plate. The ectocones and endocones of
the lateral teeth are symmetrical and half the height of
the mesocones. The marginal teeth are dorsoventrally
compressed and irregularly tricuspid-multicuspid, 12-15
um wide and 13-15 pm long (Figure 38). The endo-
cones are tall, large to very large and sometimes irreg-
ularly multicuspid. The ectocones are unicuspid.
type Material: Holotype: UF 303589, J. Slapcinsky,
22 April 2002; Paratypes: Papua New Guinea, Milne Bz ly
Price: Cloudy Mountains, Ubwam Mountain: UF
299666 (1 specimen), type locality; UF 299668 (2 spec-
imens), headwaters of the Watuti River, 10°29.8' S,
150°14.02' E, 670 m altitude, J. Slapcinsky, 16 April
2002.
Type Locality: Papua New Guinea, Milne Bz wy Proy-
ince, Cloudy Mountains, Ubwam Mountain, suuminit,
10°30.4' S, 150°13.5' E, 1000 im altitude.
Habitat: This species was found crawling on a moss-
covered rotting log in cloud forest at 1000 meters. Dead
shells were also found at 670 meters in leaf litter at the
base of a tree with smooth bark.
Page 38 THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 1
OT alae i emma Mle es iM ae.
7.7 mm. 35-36.
Camera lucida drawing of genitalia, UF 299666, maximum width LO. mm. 37-38. Scanning electron micrograph of radula, UF
Figures 32-38. Paryphantopsis ubwamensis. 32-34. Photographs of shell, Holotype UF 303559, diameter
299666, field width of central and lateral teeth 66 jm, marginal teeth 45 pom.
J. Slapeinsky, 2005
Etymology: This species is named for the type local-
ity, Ubwam Mountain, and indirectly for one of our
guides who is named after the mountain.
Type Material: Holotype: Papua New Guinea, Milne
Bay Province, Cloudy Mountains, Ubwam Mountain,
summit, 10°30.4" S, 150°13.5' E, 1000 m altitude, J.
Slapcinsky, 22 April 2002 (UF 303589); Paratypes: Papua
New Guinea, Milne Bay Province, Cloudy Mountains,
Ubwam Mountain: type locality (UF 299666, 1 speci-
men); headwaters of the Watuti River, 10°29.8’ S,
150°14.02’ E, 670 m altitude, J. Slapcinsky, 16 April
2002 (UF 299668, 2 2 specimens).
Paryphantopsis yawii new species
(Figures 39-45, Table 1)
Description: The adult shell is average in size for the
genus, 5.0-6.5 mm (mean = 5.9) diameter, and 2.6-3.6
mm (mean = 3.1) height with 2.6-2.5 (mean = 2.7)
rapidly expanding whorls ( Figures 39-41, Table 1). The
spire is elevated, 0.1-0.3 mm (mean = 0.2). Postnuclear
whorls descend slowly and regularly. Shell height/diam-
eter ratio is 0.47-0.55 (mean = 0.53). The 1.2 2 nuclear
whorls bear rounded peripheral | supraperipheral
ridges: sculptured with about 15 spiral rows of small pits.
These pits become larger and less regular on postnuclear
whorls but usually are obscured by the periostracum.
However, pits are visible in areas where the periostra-
cum is removed, and within the aperture. The shell has
a peripheral keel and blunt supraperipheral ridge; the
surface between is flattened. Postnuclear whorls are
sculptured with regular growth wrinkles that are accen-
tuated with periostrac ‘al extensions. On the apical surface
of the shell, periostracal extensions are folded along their
length toward the aperture and appressed to the shell
except at the keeled margin where they form rectangular
processes that extend about 0.5 mm beyond the shell
margin. The large, distally rounded processes over rlap,
forming a continuous periostracal fringe of uniform
length at the shell periphery. Pariostracal extensions on
the crowth lines extend basally but are short and erect.
Nuclear whorls are white, postnuclear whorls yellow
brown. The umbilicus is closed by a reflection of the
peristome. The aperture is large, de »pressed-ovate, with
an aperture-diameter/aperture-height ratio 0.53-0.66
(mean = 0.63).
The body color is uniform bright creamy-yellow in
life. fading to creamy-white in specimens preserved in
ethanol. The vas deferens narrows toward the junction
with the slightly inflated head of the epiphallus (Figure
42). The epiphall us is approximately three times longer
and one quarter of the diameter of the penis and ioe:
not bear a diverticulum. The penial retractor muscle is
long, about two thirds the length of the epiphallus, orig-
inating from the diaphragm and inserting on the cal
third of the epiphallus. The penis is shit and robust
with poorly defined pilasters in the apex (Figure 43).
The atrium is short and narrow, expanding slightly to-
Page 39
wards the junction with the penis and the short vagina.
The base of the spermathecal duct is massive, tapering
slowly but remaining broad for more than one third of
its length; the remainder is relatively narrow until the
junction with the spherical spermatheca. The free ovi-
duct is slightly coiled and narrow, joining the short va-
gina just above the atrium.
The central teeth of the radula (fifth row from left)
are tricuspid, 9-10 «zm wide and 14-15 wm long, rough-
ly the same size and shape as the first lateral teeth (Fig-
ure 44). The mesocones of both the central and first
lateral teeth are short, conical and erect, joining the rect-
angular basal plates nearly centrally and barely project-
ing beyond the plates’ anterior margin. The ectocones
are triagonal and short, only one third of the height of
the mesocones, joining the posterior edge of the basal
plates. The lateral teeth are asy mmeticak their endo-
cones are slightly taller then their ectocones. The mar-
ginal teeth are dorsoventrally compressed, tricuspid to
multicuspid, 8-10 wm wide and 10-12 wm long (Figure
45). The endocones of the marginal teeth are near ly the
same height as the mesocones while the ectocones are
much shorten only one half to one third of their height
and often divided into three cusps.
Type Material: Holotype: UF 308235, J. Slapcinsky.
6 April 2002; Paratypes: Papua New Guinea, Milne Bay
Province: UF 299675 (2 specimens), UF 303594 (2 spec-
imens), Wowow Mountain, W of Naura, 10°16.9’ S,
150°9.9' E, 635 m altitude, J. Slapcinsky, 8 May 2002;
UF 299673 (1 specime n), UF 303595 (1 specimen), 4
April 2002, UF 303598 (1 ‘specimen), 27 February 2003,
waterfall on Upalai Creek, 3 km WNW of Watunoa,
10°19.6' S, 150°34.6' E, 60 m altitude, J. Slapcinsky; UF
299670 (3 specimens), UF 299672 (6 (6 specimens), 6 April
2002, UF 303596 (13 specimens), 7 March 2003, head-
water of Goilayoli River at road crossing, 30 km ENE
of Alotau, 10°18.7' S$, 150°37.3' E, 275 m altitude, J.
Slapcinsky; BPBM (4 specimens), MNHW 977 ( (4 spec-
imens), PNGNM 004-104 (4 specimens), UF 303597 (45
specimens), small waterfall on Kinahidamadamana River
near Budo Village, 10°17.1' S, 150°26.7' E, 125 m alti-
tude, J. Slapcinsky, 4 March 2003.
Type Locality: Papua New Guinea, Milne Bay Proy-
ince, headwater of Goilayoli River at road crossing, 30
km ENE of Alotau, 10°1S.7’ S, 150°37.3’ E, 275 m al-
titude.
Habitat: This species was active during the day in na-
tive forest on rocks and logs with moss and algae, and
on moist soil near streams. It was encountered in hilly
terrain at relatively low altitudes for the genus, ranging
from 60 to 635 meters.
Etymology: This patronym honors Mr. Benjamin Yawi
of Budo Village, Milne Bay Province, Papua New
Guinea. He and his family located, arranged permission
to visit. and helped to collect at m: iny of the sites where
this species was found.
Page 40 THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 1
Figures 39-45. Paryphantopsis yawii. 39-41. Photographs of shell, Holotype UF 308238, diameter 6.5 mm. 42-43. Camera
lucida drawing of genitalia, UF 299672, maximum width 6.4 mm. 44-45. Scanning electron micrograph of radula, UF 299672,
field width of central and lateral teeth 63 2m, marginal teeth 48 jum.
J. Slapeinsky, 2005
Page 4]
Remarks: Peripheral keels are unusual among known
Paryphantopsis species and are found only in P. elegans,
P. fultoni, and to a lesser extent in P. le basii and P. la-
melligera. Paryphantopsis yawii is unlike all other spe-
cies, except for P. lebasii and P. fultoni, in having large,
rectangular periostracal extensions oriented parallel to
the keeled shell margin. These peripheral extensions are
all of equal length, unlike in P fultoni and they overlap,
forming a continuous periostracal fringe, unlike in P. le-
basii.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
The family Charopidae was previously considered to be
a minor component of the terrestrial molluscan fauna of
New Guinea, with relatively few species and genera, and
to lack the spectacular radiations exhibited by this and
the related Endodontidae in the oceanic islands of the
Pacific (Solem, 1983: 305). Ongoing surveys indicate that
this is not the case; inadequate * sampling, rather than low
diversity, is the cause of the perceived low number of
charopid species in New Guinea. Likewise, reports of
low generic diversity of charopids in New Guinea are
more likely the result of insufficient sampling and may
reflect the paucity of anatomic material available to de-
fine generic units (Solem, 1970: 241). Despite the short
duration and limited geographic scope of the current
survey, six new species of Paryphantopsis are reported
here. increasing the known diversity of the genus by al-
most 50%. In addition to Paryphantopsis, species be-
longing to several other charopid genera were also col-
lected: these will be treated in later publications.
On the eastern terminus of the Papuan Peninsula,
Paryphantopsis species that occur in close proximity or
sympatry share unique shell, genital, and radular char-
acters. For example, both species from the Mount Ma-
tawan area, P- matawanensis and P. koragae, have un-
usually short penial retractor muscles, long vaginas and
angled apertural margins. Species in the uplands of the
Cloudy Mountains, P ubwamensis and P. abstrusa, are
unusually tightly coiled and globose. The two lowland
species, P. lebasii and P 1 yawii, share distally rounded
rectangular periostracal processes and the unusual origin
of fer mesocones from the center of their basal plates.
These unusual characters shared by different species in
close proximity or sympatry suggest that Paryphantopsis
species have speciated locally on a fine geographic scale;
speciation in these cases is presumably Peilitited by
their poor dispersal ability. Because much of New
Guinea remains under-explored, the true diversity of the
islands’ Paryphantopsis, other charopids, and land snails
in general is almost certainly greatly underestimated.
The geographic distibacon: of the six Paryphantopsis
species appears to be limited to particular mountain
ranges on different terrains, despite the proximity of
these mountains to each other (Figure 1). Three species,
P. matawanensis, P. koragae, and P yawwii are restricted
to the Owen Stanley Range, part of the Kutu Terrane,
while three others, P. abstrusa, P. lebasii, and P. ubwa-
mensis, are restricted to the Cloudy Mountains of the
Port Moresby Terrane. These distinct suites of endemic
species are consistent with the terrane-accretion hypoth-
esis (Davis et al. 1997) proposed for the formation of
the East Papua Composite Terrane and suggest that the
low vagility and high diversity of charopids and other
land cial may viralee them ideal to test hypotheses of
terrain acc1 retional | ustory.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I thank the landowners of Alotau, Budo, Bunisi, Gadow-
alai, Ikara, and Naura for permission to work on -
land and for field assistance; J. Anamiato, I. Bigilale,
Kraus, F. Malesa, B. Uruwa, and B. Yawi for cia
field assistance; B. Lebasi for hosting my stay at Duabo
Mission Station; B. Yawi for help accessing land through-
out the Alotau area; G. Kula and D. Mitchell of Conser-
vation International for pr oviding logistical support and
advice; PNG National Museum a Art Gallery for pro-
viding in-country collaborative assistance; PN es Depart-
ment of Environment and Conservation, PNG National
Research Institute, and Milne Bay Provincial Govern-
ment for permission to work in Milne Bay Province: and
]. Worsfold for sharing bibliographic information. Field
work for this pesenecly Was supported by National Sci-
ence Foundation grant DEB 0103794 and the University
of Florida Foundation, McGinty Endowment. kK. Em-
berton, F. Kraus, G. Paulay, F. G. Thompson, and two
anonymous reviewers suggested i improvements to earlier
drafts of this manuscript.
LITERATURE CITED
Bavay, A. 1908. Mollusques terrestres et fluviatiles. Nova
nar Zoology 5: 269-292, pl. 14.
Coen, G. 1922. Descrizione di nuovo specie di molluschi
del Tate Civico di Genova. Annali del Museo Civico di
Storia Naturale, Genova 9(3): 359-363.
Fulton, H. C. 1902. Descriptions of new species of land Mol-
lusca from New Guinea. Annals and Magazine of Natural
apes) 7(9): 182-184.
Hedley, C. 1890. Description of a new Rhytida from New
Cuned, Annual Report of British New Guinea, 1555—
1889: 94.
Jutting, W. S. S. v. B. 1964. Non-marine Mollusca of West New
Guinea. Part 3, Pulmonata, I. Nova Guinea, Zoology 26:
1-74, pls. 1-2.
Mollendorff, O. 1899. Neue arten aus der Strubell’schen sa-
mmlung. Nachrichtsblatt der Deutschen Malakozoolo-
gischen Gesellschaft 31(5): S9-92.
Pigram, C. J. and H. L. Davies. 1987. Terranes and the accre-
tion history of the New Guinea orogen. BMR Journal of
Australian Geology and Geophysics LO: 193-211.
Solem, A. G. 1970. The Endodontid land snail genera Pilsbry-
charopa and Paryphantopsis (Mollusca: Pulmonata). The
Veliger 12: 239-264.
Solem, A. G. 1983. Endodontoid land snails from Pacific Is-
lands (Mollusca: Pulmonata: Sigmurethra). Part Il. Fam-
ilies Punctidae and Charopidae, Zoogeography. Field Mu-
seum of Natural History, Chicago ix + 336 p
Page 42
Thiele, J. 1928. Mollusken vom Bismark-Archipel, von Neu-
Guinea und Nachbar-Inseln. Zoologische Jahrbiicher 55:
119-146.
Wiktor, A. 2003. Terrestrial gastropods (Mollusca) of province
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 1
Madang in Papua-New Guinea. Part III. Pulmonata:
Rathousiidae, Ellobiidae, Succineidae, Agriolimacidae,
Endodontidae (partim), Ariophantidae, Euconulidae, Sub-
ulinidae, Streptaxidae. Folia Malacologica 11(1/2); 1-21.
THE NAUTILUS 119(1):48-49, 2005 Page 43
First record of Akera Miiller, 1776, from the eastern Pacific,
with the description of a new species
Angel Valdés
Natural History Museum of Los
Angeles County
900 Exposition Boulevard
Kelvin Barwick
City of San Diego
EMTS Laboratory
2392 Kincaid Road
Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
San Diego, CA 92101 USA
ABSTRACT
The description of the new species Akera julicae is based on a
complete specimen collected from southern California and
three empty shells from Costa Rica. These specimens consti-
tute the first record of Akera in the eastern Pacific. Akera ju-
lieae is distinguishable from the widespread Indo-Pacific spe-
cies Akera soluta by its radular and jaw morphology; the rach-
idian teeth of A. soluta are more solid sr larger cusps and
flanking denticles, the mid-lateral teeth of A. soluta are den-
ticulated, whereas in A. julieae they are ace and the out-
ermost lateral teeth of A. julieae are proportionally more elon-
gate and straighter than those of A. soluta; the jaws of A. soluta
are well developed and composed of a number of rows of
strong rodlets, whereas in A. julieae the jaws are more rudi-
mentary with only five rows of { fragile-looking rodlets. There
are no consistent differences between these two species in giz-
zard plate and adult shell morphology, but the protoconch of
A. soluta is slightly larger and more elongate. The western At-
lantic species Akera bayeri is distinguishable from A. julicae by
having a more elevated shell spire and stronger radular teeth
with denticles on all lateral teeth.
INTRODUCTION
The opisthobranch family Akeridae Mazzarelli, 1891,
includes opisthobranchs with an external, cylindrical
shell into which the animal cannot retract completely. It
contains the single genus Akera Miiller, 1776, and only
a few Recent valid species distributed throughout trop-
ical and temperate regions. The type species, Akera bul-
lata Miiller, 1776, has been reported from the northeast
Atlantic, from the Baltic shores of Denmark and Norway
to the British Isles, continuing on to the Atlantic and
Mediterranean costs of continental France and Spain
(Thompson, 1976), Italy (Rinaldi, 1988), and the Canary
Islands (Ortea et al., 2001).
In the Indo-Pacific, the widespread species Akera so-
luta (Gmelin, 1791) has been reported from South Af-
rica and Mozambique to Australia, Marshall Islands, and
the Philippines (Gosliner, 1987). Both Akera bicincta
(Quoy and Gaimard, 1833), from Australia, and Akera
constricta Kuroda 1947, from Japan, have been regarded
as junior synonyms of A. soluta, see Wells and Bryce
(1993) and Hamatani (2000) respectively. This expands
the known range. for A. soluta. Other nominal Indo-Pa-
cific species, Akera tumida (A. Adams in Sowerby, 1850),
Akera tasmanica Beddome, 1852, and Akera aperta
Hedley, 1899, were all described from the southwestern
Pacific, and are poorly known. They are likely synonyms
of A. soluta, but because they were described based sole-
ly on shell morphology, their identities are unclear and
in need of revision. In the western Atlantic, Olsson and
McGinty (1951) reported for the first time a species of
Akera from Florida under the name “Akera thompsoni.”
Because the animal was figured but not described, this
species name is a nomen nudum in accordance with Ar-
ticle 13.1 of the International Code of Zoological No-
menclature (ICZN, 1999). The first available name for
the western Atlantic Akera is Akera bayeri Ev. Marcus
and Er. Marcus, 1967, which has been reported from
the southwestern Caribbean Sea and Brazil (Ev. Marcus,
1970).
There are no Recent species of Akera known from
the eastern Pacific. Akera maga Vokes, 1939, the only
known species from this area, was described from the
lower to middle Eocene, Domengine Formation, Fresno
County, California (Vokes, 1939). ). Squires (2001) report-
ed this species from the Llajas Formation (also lower to
middle Eocene), Ventura County, California. In the
present paper we describe the first occurrence of Recent
Akera in the eastern Pacific based on a complete spec-
imen collected in the Channel Islands, California and
three shells from Guanacaste, Costa Rica.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The specimen from California was collected as part of
the Southern California Bight 1998 Regional Marine
Monitoring Survey (Bight, 1998) conducted in the sum-
mer of 1998. Infaunal samples were taken with a 0.1 m°
Van Veen grab sampler and screened through a 1 mm
mesh. The sample was then placed in a relaxant solution
of Epsom salts (magnesium sulfate heptahydrate—
Page 44
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. |
Table 1. Comparative material examined in this study. The specimen marked with an asterisk (*) was collected alive and included
soft parts.
Species Locality
Date Depth Number
Akera soluta Kii, Japan
Uala Reef, Quezon, Philippines
New Zealand
Hardwick Bay, South Australia
Hardwick Bay, South Australia
Hardwick Bay, South Australia
Phuket, Thailand
Akera bullata Finmark, Norway
May 1959
— LACM 153414
3-15 m LACM 073035
LACM 153415
LACM 157942
LACM 153416
LACM 153417
LACM 046386
LACM 153415
MegSO,-7H,.O) and freshwater for a minimum of 30 min-
utes. The sample was then fixed in 10% buffered for-
malin and preserved in 70% ethanol. The preserved
whole animal was photographed using a digital camera
mounted on a dissecting scope (Wild Epimarkroskop®
M450).
The Costa Rican shells were collected during the
Searcher 401 Expedition of the Natural History Muse-
um of Los Angeles C ounty.
Several additional specimens and shells belonging to
other species of Akera were examined for comparison
purposes. These specimens are listed in Table 1
The shell is very fragile and could not be dissected
intact from the specimens examined, which rendered
the description below incomplete. Once the shell was
removed, the internal organs were dissected and drawn
using a Nikon SMZ LOOO microscope equipped with a
drawing tube. The radula, jaws, and gizzard plates were
didceoted and photographed using a Hitachi S-3000N
Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). The apical region
of the shell was separated from the rest of the shell vie
mounted for SEM photography.
SYSTEMATICS
Akeridae Mazzarelli, 1891
Akera Miiller, 1776
Type Species:
typy.
Akera bullata Miiller, 1776, by mono-
Diagnosis: Shell external, fragile, translucent, cylin-
drical to slightly bulloid. Spire flattened to elevated with
a pi artially e »mbedde d protoconch. Ape rture equé al to the
length of the spire or Slightly shorter. Thin periostracum
forming a raised flange at the keel. Animal unable to
retract fully into the shell, but can stretch over twice its
length; with a
tending laterally, meeting mid-dorsally over the shell.
yosterior pallial tentacle. Parapodia ex-
Radula with rachidian tooth having a median cusp and
smaller denticles on either side. Rachidian tooth flanked
by 21-52 lateral teeth. Gizzard with a number of irreg-
ular plates arranged in three tiers.
Akera julicae new species
(Figures 1-4)
Akera sp.—Behrens, 2004: 1S, pl. LD.
Holotype: LACM 3033, from type locality.
Paratypes: 3 shells, southeastern corner of Bahia
Jobo, off sand beach west of Bahia de Salinas, Guana-
caste Province, Costa Rica (11°02'22” N, 85°45'16" W),
14 Feb. 1972, 1.5-10.7 m depth (LACM 3034).
Type Locality: Southwestern corner of Santa Catalina
Island, California, USA (33°18'24" N, 118°22’05” W), 24
Jul. 1998, m depth, in gray colored silt and clay
(LACM 303:
External sarees The body is oval, 10 mm long
in the preserved holotype. The cephi alic shield is trian-
gular, comprising about 4 of the body length in the pre-
served specimen (Figures 1A, 2A). The parapodia are
narrow and . not reach the midline of the body (Fig-
ures LA-C, ). The gill is unipinnate, with 11] simple
lamellae ae 2B). The color of the living animals is
unknown; the preserved holotype is grayish hike:
Shell Morphology: The shell is bullomorph, fragile,
well-calcified (Figure 1). The protoconch is smooth, aad
only the outer whorl is visible externally (Figure 3C). Its
maximum diameter is 200 jm. The whorls are se parated
by a deep, channelled suture, which is shallower on the
apical whorls. The periphery of the whorls, near the
apex, is angulated and forms a conspicuous keel, which
divides the whorls into two parts (Figure 1D, 3C). The
inner part has a characteristic pattern of strong, Gue
wrinkles. The whorls are attached to the preceding
whorl just below the periphery of this whorl. The apical
region is flattened and the external whorls overlap the
most internal. The whorl sides are clearly curved, con-
vex. The aperture is broad below and narrow above,
where it extends into a deep sinus along the suture of
the upper lip. There is a thin callus in the columella.
The sculpture consists of numerous, low and thin spiral
ribs and axial growth lines. The shells are covered with
a thin brownish periostracum.
Anatomy: The buccal bulb is oval; it connects poste-
riorly to the long esophagus and the salivary glands (Fig-
A. Valdés and K. Banwick, 2005
Figure 1.
B. Ventral view. Scale bar as in A. C. Lateral view. Scale bar
I
ure 2C). Two strong retractor muscles attach laterally to
the buccal bulb. The radular formula is 19*23.1.23 in
the holotype. The rachidian teeth are broad, with a tri-
y
4
o}
angular based. basally concave, and a pointed central
Akera julieae new species, photographs of the preserved holotype (LACM 3033). A. Dorsal view. Scale bar = 5 mm
5 mm. D. Api al view of the shell. Scale bar 5 mm
cusp (Figure 4A). There are 3-5 denticles on each sid
of the cusp varying in shape and size. The two innermost
teeth on each row have a long and narrow ba
ni ]
conspicuously wider cusp bearing de noacires O
Page 46
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 1
Figure 2.
Scale bar = 1 mm. B. Detail of the gill. Scale bar =
of the reproductive system. Scale bar = 0.5 mm. E. Penis and prosate. Scale bar =
Akera julieae new species, drawings of the preserved holotype (LACM 3033)
_ A. Dorsal view of the complete body.
1 mm. C. General view of the anatomy. Scale bar = 1 mm. D. General view
0.5 mm. Abbreviations: ag, albumen gland;
am, ampulla; bb, buccal bulb: be, sais copulatrix; cs, cephalic shield; dg, digestive gland; es, esophagus; esg, external seminal
groove; fco, female copulatory organ;
ga, genital atrium; gl, gill: @z, gizzi ard:
i, intestine; mg, mucous gland; pn, penis; pr, prostate;
ps, penial sheath; rm, retractor nants sh, shell; sg, salivary gland: sr, seminal receptacle.
and outer sides. The rest of the lateral teeth are hook-
shaped, with a long and narrow cusp and lack denticles
(Figure 4B). In the outermost teeth the base is shorter
and the cusp proportionally longer than in the mid-lat-
erals (Figure 4C)
simple, elongate rodlets | (Figure 3B), The esophagus
opens into a large muscular gizzard, which contains sev-
eral gizzard plates. The gizz ard plates vary in shape and
size; they are irregular with angular edges ( (Figure 3A).
The reproductive system is monoaulic (Figure 2D).
The ampulla is long and convoluted; it opens into the
genital atrium at the same point where the albumen and
mucous glands open. The bursa copulatrix is oval; it con-
nects with the genital atrium through a wide and curved
duct. The genital atrium is long and is connected to a
complex female copulatory organ near the opening.
From the gonopore an open seminal groove runs in an-
terior direction to the protrusible cephalic penis and the
prostate. The penis is long and externally enclosed in a
). The jaws are compose d of 6 rows of
sheath (Figure 2E). The prostate is short and simple,
and connects proximally to the penis.
Etymology: Dedicated to Julie Barwick, the daughter
of the junior author.
DISCUSSION
Akera julicae has been included in Akera because of the
presence of a fragile, cylindrical external shell, a flat-
tened spire, and a parti lly embedded protoconch. The
radula of this species has a single broad, triangular rach-
idian tooth, with a median cusp and smaller denticles on
either side, as well as several hamate lateral teeth. The
gizzard contains a number of irregular gizzard plates ar-
ranged in three tiers. All these characteristics are diag-
nostic of the genus Akera (see above).
This is the first record of Akera in the eastern Pacific.
Behrens (2004) cited this species as Akera sp., based on
A. Valdés and K. Barwick, 2005
Page 47
Figure 3. Akera juliae new species and A. soluta (Gmelin, 1791). A-C. Akera julieae, scanning electron micrographs of the
22)
preserved holotype (LACM 3033). A. Gizzard plate. Scale bar =
300 pm. B. Jaw. Scale bar =
50 wm. C. Protoconch. Scale bar
= 200 am. D-E. Akera soluta (Gmelin, 1791), scanning electron micrographs of a specimen from Japan (LACM 153414). D.
Gizzard plate. Scale bar = 300 jm. E. Jaw. Scale bar = 50 wm. F. Protoconch. Scale bar = 200 jxm.
the material here examined and information, photo-
graphs. and descriptions provided by the junior author.
The description of the new species is mainly based on
the holotype, collected from California, but the three
empty shells collected from Costa Rica seem to belong
to the same species. However, this needs to be verified
when complete specimens from Costa Rica become
available.
Akera julieae differs from other described species of
the genus. Several shells and one specimen of the Indo-
Pacific Akera soluta were examined for comparison (see
Table 1) confirming the presence of several external and
internal differences between these two species. For in-
stance, the rachidian radular teeth of A. soluta are more
solid with larger cusps and flanking denticles (Figure
4D). The three innermost lateral teeth have wide cusps
Page 48
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 1
Figure 4.
of the holotype (LACM 303:
\. soluta, whereas only the two inner-
most teeth of A. fall ae have similar characteristics. The
mid-lateral teeth in A. soluta also have denticles (Figure
4), whereas they are smooth in A. julieae. The outer-
with denticles in A.
most lateral teeth of A. julicae are proportionally more
elongate and straighter than those ie \. soluta (Figure
4F). More importantly, the jaws of A. soluta are well
developed and composed of a number ae rows of strong
rodlets (Figure 3E), whereas in A. julicae the jaws are
Akera juliae new - cies and A. soluta (Gmelin, 1791).
A-C, Akera julicac, scanning electron micrographs of the radula
A. Rachidian and innermost lateral teeth. Scale bar = 50 pum, B. Mid-lateral teeth. Scale bar = 50
p.m. C. Outermost lateral realy Scale bar = 50 pm. D-F, Akera soluta, scanning electron micrographs of the radula of a specimen
from Japan (LACM 153414). D. Rachidian and innermost lateral teeth. Scale bar = 50 ym. E. Mid-lateral teeth. Scale bar = 50
pm. F, Outermost lateral teeth. Scale bar = 50 jm.
more rudimentary with only 5 rows of fragile-looking
rodlets. There are no consistent differences between the
gizzard plates of A. julicae and A. soluta (Figures 3A,
3D). Externally, A. soluta has a slightly larger and more
elongate seen The adult she lls of the “se two spe-
cies are indistinguish: able due to the morphological Var-
iability in A. soluta.
Akera oe ri is the only other species of Akera known
from the Americas. The external morphology and anat-
A. Valdés and K. Barwick, 2005
nae 40
Page 49
omy of this species was described in detail by Marcus
and Marcus (1967) and Marcus (1970). Akera bayeri dif-
fers from A. julieae in two important regards. The shell
of A. bayeri has a more elevated spire and the radular
teeth are stronger with denticles on all lateral teeth,
whereas in A. julieae the lateral teeth are smooth.
LITERATURE CITED
Behrens, D. W. 2004. Pacific coast nudibranchs, Supplement
I1—New species to the Pacific coast and new information
on the oldies. Proceedings of the California Academy of
Sciences 55: 11-54.
Gosliner, T. 1987. Nudibranchs of Southern Africa. Sea Chal-
lengers, Monterey, 136 pp.
Hamatani, I. 2000. Family Akeridae. In: Okutani, T. (ed.), Ma-
rine Mollusks in Japan. Toaki University Press, Tokyo, xlvii
+ 1173 pp.
ICZN (International Commission of Zoological Nomenclature).
1999. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, 4"
Edition. International Trust on Zoological Nomenclature,
London, 306 pp.
Marcus, Er. and Ev. Marcus. 1967. Opistobranchs from the
southwestern Caribbean Sea. Bulletin of Marine Science
17: 597-628.
Marcus, Ey. 1970, Opisthobranchs from northern Brazil. Bul-
letin of Marine Science 20: 922-995.
Olsson, T. and L. McGinty. 1951. “Akera thompsoni.” The
Nautilus 65: pl. 3, figs. 7-7b.
Ortea, J. A.. L. Moro, J. J. Bacallado and R. Herrera. 2001.
Catalogo actualizado de los Moluscos Opisthobranquios
de las Islas Canarias. Revista de la Academia Canaria de
Ciencias 12: 105-134, pls. 1-4.
Rinaldi, E. 1988. Primi rinvenimenti di Akera bullata O. F.
Mueller, 1776 sulla costa Romagnola. Bollettino Malacol-
ogico 24: 25-26.
Squires, R. L. 2001. Additions to the Eocene megafossil fauna
of the Las Llajas Formation, Simi Valley, Southern Cali-
fornia. Contributions in Science 489: 1-40.
Thompson, T. E, 1976. Biology of Opisthobranch Molluscs,
Volume 1. The Ray Society, London, 207 pp.
Vokes, H. E. 1939. Molluscan faunas of the Domengine and
Arroyo Hondo formations of the California Eocene. An-
nals of the New York Academy of Sciences 35: 1-246, pls
]-22.
Wells, F. E. and C. W. Bryce. 1993. Sea Slugs of Western
Australia. Western Australian Museum, 184 pp.
THE NAUTILUS 119(1):50-54, 2005
Page 50
Description of Calliotropis pulvinaris new species (Gastropoda:
Trochidae: Eucyclinae: Calliotropini) from West Madagascar
Claude Vilvens
Rue de Hermalle, 113
B-4680 Oupeye
BELGIUM
ABSTRACT
Calliotropis pulvinaris new species is described from West
Madagascar and compared with similar iy cies in the trochid
subfamily Eucyclinae, particularly with C. patula (Martens,
1904), C. concavospira (Schepman, 1908), C. blacki. Marshall,
1979, and C. vaillanti (Fischer, 1582). The new species can be
separated from these by a rather depressed spire, a rounded
periphery, tumid whorls be saving four spiral cords of which nod-
ules decrease in size and increase in number from adapical
cord to abapical cord, and five spiral cords on the base.
INTRODUCTION
The malacofauna of this area remains poorly known, de-
spite earlier surveys (1971-1973) by ORSTOM (Office
de la Recherche Scientifique et Technique Outre-Mer,
now IRD: Institut de Recherche pour le Développe-
ment) on the continental slope of Madagascar (Crosnier
and Jouannic, 1973). Independently of the inherent eco-
nomic interest, this endeavor yielded abundant zZ00logi-
cal material, more particularly mollusks now de sposited
at the MNHN (Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle,
Paris).
Commercial fishing boats have trawled for deep-water
shrimp off Madagascar. The commercial dredging off
West Madagascar from these last years brought various
specimens of trochid species, some of them described
in the past (Watson, 1886; Martens and Thiele, 1904;
Thiele, 1925; Barnard, 1963), others recently named as
new — (Vilvens, 2001 and 2002).
Guido T. Poppe entrusted me with trochid shells cal:
lected in deep water. These shells, originally labeled as
C calliotropis patula (Martens, 1904), are conspecific with
material trawled by French expeditions and deposited at
MNHN in the 1970s. Closer examination and compari-
son with the type of the supposed species leads me to
Two years ago,
conclude that all these shells belong to an unnamed spe-
cies that is described here as new.
Text abbreviations used are: IRSNB: Institut royal des
Sciences naturelles de Belgique, Bruxelles, Belgium:
MNIIN: Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris,
France; NMNZ: Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Ton-
garewa, Wellington, New Zealand; ZMA: Zodlogisch
Museum, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; ZMB: Zoolo-
gisches Museum of Berlin, Germany; Pl, P2, P3, P4:
primary cords (P1 is the most adapical); stn: station; dd:
no live specimens present in sample.
I follow below the classification of Hickman and Mc-
Lean (Hickman and McLean, 1990) at the suprageneric
level.
SYSTEMATICS
Family Trochidae Rafinesque, 1$15
Subfamily Eucyclinae Koken, 1897
Tribe Calliotropini Hickman and McLean, 1990
Genus Calliotropis Seguenza, 1903
Type Species: Trochus ottoi Philippi, 1544, Pliocene—
Pleistocene, Italy; by original designation.
Calliotropis pulvinaris new species
(Figures 1-6)
Description: Shell rather long for genus (height up to
18.3 mm, width up to 29.0 mm), rather depressed, rath-
er thin, cyrtoconoidal; spire Yr ather low, he ight 0.6—
0.7Xwidth, he ight 2.3-4.5Xaperture height; smb?
deep and large. Protoconch about 300 jm wide, with
about 1 whorl, partially damaged on available specimens,
remaining part smooth. Teleoconch of up to seven con-
vex whorls, bearing four spiral granular cords and pro-
socline threads; nodule .s from cords produced by inter-
sections with axial folds on four first whorls; additional
axial threads not connecting nodules on last whorls. Su-
ture visible, impressed, not canaliculated. First teleo-
conch whorl convex, sculptured by about LS—20 proso-
cline smooth riblets, interspace be ‘tween riblets twice as
wide as riblets; primary spiral cords P2 and P3 appearing
almost immediately, evenly spaced, similar in size me |
shape, bearing rounded nodules produced by intersec-
tion with axial "ible ts. On second whorl, P2 and P3 stron-
ger, P1 appearing at end of whorl, close to P2. On third
whorl, nodules of Pl and P2 becoming sharp, with weak-
C. Vilvens, 2005 Page 5
Figures 1-8. Calliotropis species. 1-6. Calliotropis pulvinaris new species. 1-3. Holotype MNHN, northwestern Madagascai
18.129.0 mm. 4. Paratype IRSNB, West Madagascar, 1$.1*26.6 mm. 5-6. Paratype, collection C. Vilvens, West Madagascar,
18.3%25.4 mm. 7-8. C. concavospira Schepman 1908), syntype ZMA Indonesia, 6.0%8.7 mm
Page 52 THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 1
Figures 9-16. Calliotropis species. 9-12. Calliotropis patula (Martens, 1904). 9-10. Syntype ZMB 55919, between Zanzibar and
Brawa, 16.2%25.1 mm. 11-12. Syntype ZMB 109933, Somaly, 19.0% 27.2 mm. 13-14. C. blacki Marshall, 1979, holotype NMNZ
M226932, Raoul Island, Kermadec group, 11.3% 13.0 mm. 15-16. C. vaillanti (Fischer, 1582), MNHN, Azores Islands, 10.6% 12.2
C. Vilvens, 2005
Table 1. Calliotropis pulvinaris. Shells measurements in min for all types cited and type material (n=8
aperature height; TW: number of teleoconch whorls.
. H: height; W: width; HA:
Measurement
TW H W HA L/W H/HA
Range 5.75-7.00 15.4-18.3 21.8-29.0 4.00-6.90 0.60—-0.70 2,304.50
Mean 6.69 17.11 94.7 5.71 0.69 3.10
Standard deviation 0.41 0.97 9.13 0.93 0.03 0.70
ly adapically oriented tip; P4 partially covered by suc-
ceeding whorl, with nodules smaller and more numerous
than ones on other cords. From fourth whorl on nodules
on cords decrease in size and sharpness, and increase in
number from Pl to P4; cords evenly distributed on
whorl: axial threads in area between cords remain thin,
distance between threads similar to threads width. On
last whorl, P4 ae aia no secondary spiral cords; pe-
riphery rounded.
Aperture almost circular, forming angle at junction of
inner and outer lips; this angle almost aaade d and outer
lip slightly flared in fully mature specimens; inner lip
flanged i in a curved are projecting weakly over umbilicus:
parietal lip forming thin, transparent | glaze. Columella
slightly curved, ata tooth, abapical part prosocline.
Base moderately convex, with 5 granular spiral cords,
innermost one stronger than others and bordering um-
bilicus; interspace between cords twice as wide as cords,
smaller for two innermost cords on young adult speci-
mens: very fine axial lamellate threads between cords,
poorly visible. Umbilicus wide, funnel shaped, diameter
about 35% of shell diameter, with very fine crowded axial
lamellae and no spiral cord within. Color of protoconch
and teleoconch pinkish white, with no maculations; first
two whorls somewhat brownish.
Type Locality: West Madagascar, 22°17.0' S,
43°02.2" E, 640-660 m, Indian Ocean.
Type Material: Holotype MNHN unnumbered (dd),
Chalutages Vauwban, stn. CH 112, coll. A. Crosnier, from
type locality, 18.1X29.0 mm; Paratype 1 MNHN un-
numbered (dd), 12°50'S, 48°09'E, 580-585 m, north-
western Madagascar, coll. A. Crosnier; Paratypes 2
MNHWN (dd), 1 IRSNB (IGnr 30 185) (dd), 1 ZMB
(Moll. 108.519) (dd), 1 G. T
. Poppe collection (dd), 1
C.Vilvens collection (dd), all from West Madagascar, off
Mahajanga (formerly Majunga), commercial trawlers
said to be from 800 m.
Etymology: Of a cushion (Latin); with reference to
the soft and oval form of the shell, without angulations.
Remarks: Calliotropis pulvinaris new species is simi-
lar to C. patula (Martens, 1904) (Figures 9-12) from
East Africa (off Somalia and Zanzibar, 977-1019 m), but
this species differs from the new species by having a
subangulated periphery, less tumid whorls, four spiral
cords on base (instead of 5) and also by the nodules of
Pl and P2 that become bigger than those of P3 much
later (4° whorl).
The new species weakly resembles C. concavospira
(Sche pman, 1908) (Figures 7—S) from Indonesia (also
deep water from $35 to $83 m), but this smaller species
has only three cords on the whorls and these whorls are
more angulate dd.
C alliotropis pulvinaris new species may ne pe com-
pared to C. blacki Marshall, 1979 (Figures 13 ), from
Kermadec Islands, but this Indo-Pacific species is ein
er for a similar number of whorls, has a more elevated
spire and only four spiral cords on the base.
The new — is also superficially similar to C. vail-
lanti (Fischer, 1882) (Figures 15-16) and C. ambigua
(Dautzenberg and pie »r, 1896), both from eastern At-
lantic, and to C. actinophora (Dall, 1890) from western
Atlantic, but these three spe cies have a more elevated
spire, only 3 spiral cords on the whorls and only four
spiral cords on the base.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to express my warm thanks to P. Bouchet
(Muséum national d'Histoire n: ture lle, Paris) for access
to the malacological resources of the MNHN, and V.
Héros (MNHN) f or her help in my search for scientific
papers. Also, I am especially grateful to J. L. Van Goe-
them (Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique)
for his constant he Ip, particularly with loan of er I
also would like to thank F. Koehler (Museum fiir Na-
turkiinde, formerly Zoologisches Museum, Berlin), B. A.
Marshall (Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa,
Wellington) and R. Moolenbeek (ZoGlogisch Museum,
Amsterdam) for the loan of types from their institution.
Finally, 1 highly appreciate the judicious advice of R.
Houart.
LITERATURE CITED
Barnard, K. H. 1963. Contributions of South African marine
mollusca. Part IV. Gastropoda: Prosobranchiata: Rhipidog-
lossa, Docoglossa. Tectibranchiata. Polyplacophora. Solen-
ogastres. Scaphopoda. Annals of the South African Mu-
seum 47 (2): 201-360.
Crosnier, A. and C. Jouannic. 1973. Note dinformations sur
les prospections de la pente continentale malgache effec-
tuées par le N.O. Vauban (Bathymétrie—Sédimentolo-
gie—Péche au chalut). Documents scientifiques du Cen-
tre — YM de Nosy Bé 42.
Hickman, S. and J. H. McLean. 1990. Systematic revision
and ane neric classification of trochacean gasteropods
Page 54 THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 1
Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Science Vilvens, C. 2001. Description of a new species of Calliostoma
Series vit 169 pp. (Gastropoda: Trochidae: Calliostomatinae) from Madagas-
Martens, E. von and J. Thiele. 1904. Die beschalten Gastro- car. Novapex 2: 175-178.
poden der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition, 1895-1899. A. Vilvens, C. 2002. Description of Lischkeia mahajangaensis n.
Systematisch-geographischer Teil. Wissenschaftliche Fr- sp. (Gastropoda: Trochidae: Eucyclinae: Calliotropini)
gebnisse der deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition auf dem from East Madagascar. Novapex 3: 127-131.
Dampfer “Valdivia” 1595-1899, 7 (A): 1-146. Watson, R. B. 1886. Report on the Scaphopoda and Gas-
Thiele, J. 1925. Gastropoda der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition tropoda collected by HMS Challenger during the
IL Teil. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der deutschen Tief- years 1873-1876. Report on es Heiae results ef the
see-Expedition auf dem Dampfer “Valdivia” 1898-1899, voyage of HMS Challenger, 1876. Zoology 15: 1-
17(2): 35-282. 680.
Notice
THE 2005 R. T. ABBOTT VISITING CURATORSHIP
The Bailey-Matthews Shell Museum is pleased to invite applications for the 2005 R. T. Abbott Visiting Curatorship.
The Curatorship, established originally in accordance with the wishes of the late Dr. R. Tucker Abbott, Founding Director of
the Shell Museum, is awarded annually to enable malacologists to visit the museum for a period of one week. Abbott Fellows
will be expected, by performing collection-based research, to assist with the curation of portions of the Museums collection
and to provide one evening talk for the general public. The Museum collection consists of marine, freshwater, and terrestrial
specimens. A large percentage of our holdings have been catalogued through a computerized database management system.
A substantial portion of the time will be available for research in the collection, but field work in southwest Florida can be
arranged. The R. T. Abbott Visiting Curatorship is accompanied by a stipend of $1,500,
Interested malacologists are invited to send a copy of their curriculum vitae together with a letter detailing their areas of
taxonomic expertise and research objectives, and to provide a tentative subject for their talk. Send materials to:
Dr. José H. Leal, Director
The Bailey-Matthews Shell Museum
P.O. Box 1580
Sanibel, FL 33957
Applications for the 2005 Visiting Curatorship should be sent no later than May 30, 2005. The award will be announced by
late June. Questions about the Visiting Curatorship should be sent to the e-mail address above, or by phone at:
(239) 395-2233; fax (239) 395-6706
gy
INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS
THE NAUTILUS publishes papers on all aspects of the
biology and systematics of mollusks. Manuscripts describing
original, unpublished research as well as review articles will
be considered. Brief articles, not exceeding 1000 words, will
be published as notes and do not require an abstract. No-
tices of meetings and other items of interest to malacolo-
gists will appear in a news and notices section.
Manuscripts: Each original manuscript and accompanying
illustrations should be submitted in triplicate. Text must be
typed on one side of 8% X 11 inch white paper, double
spaced throughout (including literature cited, tables and
figure captions), with at least 1 inch of margin on all sides.
All pages must be numbered consecutively. If printed on a
word processor, the right margin should be ragged rather
than justified. Authors should follow the recommendsnons
of the Scientific Style and Format—The CBE Manual for
Authors, Editors, and Publishers, which is available from
the Council of Science Editors, Inc., 11250 Roger Bacon
Drive, Suite 8, Reston, VA 20190, USA (http:/Avww.cbe.org/
cbe). The first mention of a scientific name in the feet
should be accompanied by the taxonomic authority, includ-
ing year. Latin names and words to be printed in italics
must be underlined: leave other indications to the editor.
Metric and Celsius units are to be used.
The sequence of sections should be: title page, abstract
page, introduction, materials and methods, results, discus-
sion, acknowledgments, literature cited, tables, figure cap-
tions, figures. The title page should include the title, au-
thor’s name(s) and address(es). The abstract page should
contain the title and abstract, which should summarize in
250 words or less the scope, main results and conclusions
of the paper. All references cited in the text must appear in
the literature cited section and vice versa. In the literature
cited section, all authors must be fully identified and listed
alphabetically. Follow a recent issue of THE NAUTILUS
for bibliographic style, noting that journal titles must be un-
abbreviated. Information on plates and figures should be
cited only if not included in the pagination. Tables must be
numbered and each placed on a separate sheet. A brief leg-
end must accompany each table. Captions for each group of
illustrations should be typed on a separate sheet and include
a key to all lettered labeling appearing in that group of illus-
trations.
Allline drawings must be in black, high quality ink, clear-
ly detailed and completely labeled. Photographs must be
on glossy, high contrast paper. All figures are to be consec-
utiv vely numbered (Hoses a NOT figs. la, 1b, lc,
_NOR plate 1, fig. 1. . .). Illustrations must be arranged
in 1 proportions that sail Conorai with the width of a page
(634 inches or 171 mm) or a column (3% inches or 82 mm).
The maximum size of a printed figure is 6% by 9 inches or
171 by 228 mm. All illustrations must be fully cropped,
mounted on a firm, white backing, numbered, labeled and
camera ready. The author's name, paper title and figure
number(s) should appear on the back. Original ilies
must be between one and two times the Bestted final size.
It is the author's responsibility that the line weight and let-
tering are appropriate for the desired reduction. Original
illustrations will bé returned to the author if requested. Col-
or illustrations can be included at extra cost to the author.
Voucher Material: Deposition of type material in a rec-
ognized public museum is a requirement for publication of
papers in which new species are described. Deposition of
representative voucher specimens in such institutions is
strongly encouraged for all other types of research papers.
Processing of Manuscripts: Upon receipt, every manu-
script is acknowledged and sent for critical review by at
least two referees. These reviews serve as the basis for ac-
ceptance or rejection. Accepted manuscripts are returned
to the author for consideration of the reviewers’ comments.
Final Manuscript Submission: Authors of accepted
manuscripts will be required to submit an electronic version
of the manuscript correctly formatted for THE NAUTI-
LUS. The formatted manuscript may be sent as an e-mail
attachment to nautilus@shellmuseum. org or in a diskette,
preferably prepared using an IBM PC- -compatible text pro-
cessor. Original illustrations may be submitted separately by
regular ral or as digital files (zip disks or CDs), preferably
in "TIFF or BMP formats. The original resolution of digital
images at final (printing) size should be at least 600 dpi for
halfrones and 1200 dpi for line drawings.
Proofs: After typesetting, two sets of proofs are sent to the
author for corrections. Changes other than typesetting er-
rors will be charged to the AML at cost. One set of cor-
rected proofs shoule be sent to the editor as soon as pos-
sible.
Reprints and Page Charges: An order form for reprints
will accompany the proofs. Reprints may be ordered
through the editor. Authors with institutional, grant, or oth-
er research support will be billed for page charges at the
rate of $60 per printed page.
Manuscripts, corrected proofs and correspondence re-
garding editorial matters should be sent to: Dr. José =
Leal, Editor, The Nautilus, P.O. Box 1580, Sanibel,
33957, USA,
[email protected], (239) 395-2233.
© This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper).
i
mea
Ate
ett desl
THE NAUTILUS
Volume 119, Number 2
July 20, 2005
ISSN 0028-1344
A quarterly devoted
to malacology.
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
Dr. José H. Leal
The Bailey-Matthews Shell Museum
3075 Sanibel-Captiva Road
Sanibel, FL 33957
MANAGING EDITOR
Christina Yorgey
The Bailey-Matthews Shell Museum
3075 Sanibel-Captiva Road
Sanibel, FL 33957
EDITOR EMERITUS
Dr. M. G. Harasewych
Department of Invertebrate Zoology
National Museum of
Natural History
Smithsonian Institution
Washington, DC 20560
CONSULTING EDITORS
Dr. Riidiger Bieler
Department of Invertebrates
Field Museum of
Natural History
Chicago, IL 60605
Dr. Arthur E. Bogan
North Carolina State Museum of
Natural Sciences
Raleigh, NC 27626
Dr. Philippe Bouchet
Laboratoire de Biologie des
Invertébrés Marins et Malacologie
Muséum National d’ Histoire Naturelle
55, rue Buffon
Paris, 75005 France
Dr. Robert H. Cowie
Center for Conservation Research
and Training
University of Hawaii
3050 Maile Way, Gilmore 409
Honolulu, HI 96822
Dr. Robert T. Dillon, Jr.
Department of Biology
College of Charleston
Charleston, SC 29424
Dr. Eileen H. Jokinen
8234 E. North Shore Road
Sault Ste. Marie, MI 49783
Dr. Douglas S. Jones
Florida Museum of Natural History
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32611-2035
Dr. Harry G. Lee
1801 Barrs Street, Suite 500
Jacksonville, FL 32204
Dr. Charles Lydeard
Biodiversity and Systematics
Department of Biological Sciences
University of Alabama
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
Bruce A. Marshall
Museum of New Zealand
Te Papa Tongarewa
P.O. Box 467
Wellington, NEW ZEALAND
Dr. James H. McLean
Department of Malacology
Natural History Museum
of Los Angeles County
900 Exposition Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90007
Dr. Paula M. Mikkelsen
Department of Living Invertebrates
The American Museum of Natural
History
New York, NY 10024
Dr. Diarmaid O F oighil
Museum of Zoology and Department
of Biology
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079
Dr. Gustav Paulay
Florida Museum of Natural History
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32611-2035
Mr. Richard E. Petit
P.O. Box 30
North Myrtle Beach, SC 29582
Dr. Gary Rosenberg
Department of Mollusks
The Academy of Natural Sciences
1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway
Philadelphia, PA 19103
ID Se. Angel Valdés
Department of Malacology
Natural History Museum
of Los Angeles County
900 Exposition Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90007
Dr. Geerat J. Vermeij
Department of Geology
University of California at Davis
Davis, CA 95616
Dr. G. Thomas Watters
Aquatic Ecology Laboratory
1314 Kinnear Road
Columbus, OH 43212-1194
SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION
The subscription rate per volume is
US $35.00 for individuals, US $72.00
for institutions. Postage outside the
United States is an additional US
$5.00 for surface and US $15.00 for
air mail. All orders should be
accompanied by payment and sent to:
THE NAUTILUS, P.O. Box 1580,
Sanibel, FL 33957, USA, (239) 395-
9933.
Change of address: Please inform
the publisher of your new address at
least 6 weeks in advance. All
communications should include both
old and new addresses (with zip
codes) and state the effective date.
THE NAUTILUS (ISSN 0028-1344)
is published quarterly by The Bailey-
Matthews Shell Museum, 3075
Sanibel-Captiva Road, Sanibel, FL
33975:
Periodicals postage paid at Sanibel,
FL, and additional mailing offices.
POSTMASTER: Send address
changes to: THE NAUTILUS
P.O. Box 1580
Sanibel, FL 33957
ee 7 IN el a
CONTENTS
Volume 119, Number 2
July 20, 2005
ISSN 0028-1344
Guido Pastorino
Alvar Carranza
Walter Norbis
A revision of the genus Trophon Montfort, 1810
(Gastropoda: Muricidae) from southern South America................... 55
Latitudinal trends in shell characters of the neogastropod
Olivancillaria urceus (Gastropoda: Olividae) in the
temperate southwestern Atlantic Ocean... 0... cc eee 83
Errata .............0...
-
S
mn
a!
iw
“ ,
‘ i
nad
9
:
ste
ane
‘
‘
'
'
THE NAUTILUS 119(2):55-82, 2005
Page 55
A revision of the genus Trophon Montfort, 1810 (Gastropoda:
Muricidae) from southern South America
Guido Pastorino
Museo Argentino de Ciencias
Naturales
Angel Gallardo 470, 3° piso lab. 57
. 1 405D]R Buenos Aires
ARGENTINA
ABSTRACT
The genus Trophon from southern South America is revised
and restricted to ten valid species from among the 36 nominal
species still currently used. In addition, a new species, Trophon
parodizi from Patagonian waters, is described. Adult specimens
of the new taxon are illustrated, described and compared with
other living species of the same genus and similar geographic
distribution. Redescription and re-illustration of types, based
on material from several institutions around - world are pro-
vided for Trophon geversianus (Pallas, 1774), T. plicatus (Light-
foot, 1786), T. patagonicus (dOrbigny, 18: a T. acanthodes
Watson, 1882, T. pelseneeri Smith, 1915, T. amettei Carcelles,
1946, T. clenchi (Carcelles, 1953), T. wilhelmensis Ramirez-
Bohme, 1981, and T. bahamondei McLean and Andrade, 1982.
In addition, “Trophon” malvinarum Strebel, 1908, assigned to
genera incerta, is also redescribed and illustrated.
INTRODUCTION
Among many groups of marine gastropods from South
American waters in need of a modem comprehensive
revision, the high diversity and abundance exhibited by
the muricid genus Tro} hon Montfort, 1810, renders it
particularly interesting. Ear ly collections include a large
and varied array of specimens obtained by 19" century
expeditions from shallow waters of a vast area including
more than 5,000 km of coast in Argentina. A taxonomic
revision of these gastropods sevesled that a large num-
ber of names should be placed in synonymy. The tax-
onomy and nomenclature thus cle wified is sure to im-
aes ‘the usefulness of this genus and its species as tools
for biogeographic and evolutionary interpretations, with-
out forgetting that clear specific delimitation is crucial
to other uses such as the commercial exploitation of the
type species (Trophon geversianus) in southern Chile.
The subfamily Trophoninae is one of the most con-
spicuous groups of marine gastropods living presently
around the southern tip of South America. The southern
origin of the group seems to be beyond doubt, as dis-
cussed by Griffin and Pastorino (2005), when. revising
the numerous extinct species appearing in the fossil re-
cord since the late Oligocene.
This article Constitutes a review of all living species of
Trophon from both coasts of southern South America.
The study involves only those taxa living in environments
associated with the continental shelf. Accordingly, T. mu-
crone Houart, 1991, from 1500-1575 m off Brazil and
the subantarctic T. veronicae Pastorino, 1999, are not
considered herein. These two deep-water species seem
to belong in a different group according to data available
on the radula, protoconch, and penis of T veronicae.
Such anatomical data remain unknown for T) mucrone.
In addition, T. ohlini Strebel, 1904, with a distinct pro-
toconch and radula, different from those of other Pata-
gonian species and resembling the boreal Boreotrophon
truncatus, will be the subject “of a future paper. Finally,
T. triacanthus Castellanos et al., 1987, recently described
under Trophon, is also considered as belonging to a dif-
ferent genus—possibly Apyxistus—according to several
differences in protoconch and shell morphology.
Houart (2003) recently described three new species
under the genus Trophon sensu lato from enten
more than 1000 m in de »pth. No radular, anatomical, o
protoconch information is included in the diescristions.
However, enough differences can be observed in the
shells that, as mentioned by Houart himself, a new genus
may be granted for these species. A similar situation is
true for * ‘Trophon” malvinarum:; however, as there are
no accurate illustrations or recent descriptions of this
species I decided to include it in this work as belonging
to an indeterminate genus.
For each of the species considered herein, adult spec-
imens, operculum, gross anatomy, radula, protoconch,
and ultrastructure of the shell are described whenever
enough material was available. This work is part of a
complete revision of the genus including all species from
South America and Antarctica.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All the material examined is housed in the collections of
the Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino
Page 56
Rivadavia”, Buenos Aires (MACN-In); Museo de La Pla-
ta, La Plata (MLP); National Museum of Natural His-
tory, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
(USNM) and American Museum of Natural History,
New York (AMNH). Part of the type material is housed
in the following museums: The Natural History Muse-
um, London, (BMNH). Zoologisches Institut und Zool-
ogisches Museum der Universitit Hamburg, (ZMH);
Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm,
(NHRM): Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris
(MNHN): Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Santia-
go, Chile (MNHNS): Museo Nacional de Historia Nat-
ural, Montevideo, Uruguay (MNHNM); Academy of
Natural Sciences of Philadelphia (ANSP) and Los An-
geles County Museum of Natural History (LACM). Fi-
nally, several historical specimens from the Auckland In-
stitute and Museum, New Zealand (AK) were examined
for comparative purposes. Material from the USNM
originates from the United States Antarctic Program
(USAP) and was mostly collected by two ships: R/V
Hero and R/V ELTANIN. Material collected by the Uru-
guayan ship R/V ALDEBARAN is also included.
Dissections were performed on ethanol-preserved
specimens for study of gross anatomy, with emphasis on
the morphology of the anterior alimentary system, and
the pallial portions of the male and female reproductiv e
systems. Radulae were prepared according to the meth-
od described by Solem (1972) and observed using a
LEO 440 scanning electron microscope (SEM) at the
USNM and a Philips XL 30 at MACN. Radular termi-
nology follows Kool (1993, fig. 6B). Shell ultrastructure
data were procured oat freshly fractured colabral sec-
tions taken from the central portion of the lip on the
last whorl of two individuals per taxon, whenever suffi-
cient material was available.
Photographs were taken using a digital scanning cam-
era. Several images were scanned from black and white
35 mm negatives using a slide scanner. All images were
digitally processed.
For the convenience of the reader in the Additional
Material Examined sections, “D” means that the speci-
mens were collected dead and “A” means alive.
SYSTEMATICS
Class Gastropoda Cuvier, 1791
Subclass Ortogastropoda Ponder and Lindberg, 1996
Superorder Caenogastropoda Cox, 1959
Order Sorbeoconcha Ponder and Lindberg, 1996
Infraorder Neogastropoda Wenz, 1938
Family Muricidae da Costa, 1776
Subfamily T [rophoninae Cossmann, 1903
Genus Trophon Montfort, 1S10
Murex magellanicus Gmelin, 1791
=Buccinum geversianus P all is, 1774) by original des-
ignation. Poly) plex Pe srry, LS11 (type species Polyple x bul-
bosa Perry, 1811] as ica geversianum Pallas, 1774)
and Muricidea Swainson, 1840 (type species Murex ma-
gzellanicus Chemnitz, 1780 (nomen nudum) =Murex ma-
el Species:
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 2
gellanicus Gmelin, 1791 =Buccinum geversianum Pallas,
1774) are synonyms.
Description: Shells variable in size, ranging from
about 1 to more than 10 centimeters high, fusiform, su-
bquadrate to elongate. Protoconch paucispiral, with 2 to
24) asymmetrical, ‘smooth, slightly globose, and regularly
convex whorls. Spire of about 4 whorls, equal or slightly
shorter than aperture height, never higher. Subsutural
ramp generally present, variously developed and slightly
‘nclined posteriorly, defining a conspicuous keel. Axial
sculpture variable, from weak growth lines to strong la-
mellae—in some instances even growing over the sub-
sutural ramp; axial sculpture generally betes developed
than spiral sculpture. eerie along keel sometimes
growing into fairly strong, always open, spines, which
may even curve backwar asi Spiral ornamentation. vari-
ably developed; sometimes missing, but generally con-
sisting of slightly rounded and equally dev eloped cords,
der than interspaces and sometimes accompanied by
weaker secondary intercalated ones. Spiral ornamenta-
tion usually restricted to surface abapical to keel, while
missing along subsutural ramp and in some cases only
present in the earliest whorls. Aperture subovoid; outer
lip sharp, sometimes slightly reflected, but always
smooth throughout. Siphonal canal always present and
open, although variably developed in length, sometimes
curved. Umbilicus variable, usually open, wide, although
in some species totally absent or represented bya hare
Shell ultrastructure arranged invariably in 2 layers: in-
nermost layer of crossed lanellar aragonite, outer layer
of amorphous calcite. Relative thickness of both layers
variable according to species or—within a given spe-
cies—latitude at which the population lives.
Radulae rachiglossate, rachidian teeth with 3 median
cusps, the central one the larger and the lateral ones
with a denticle, sometimes obsolete but always present,
attached to the interior margin (never free). Rachidian
base always sinuous and with the base offset under the
proximal tooth. Marginal cusps always single, never bifid.
Lateral teeth atonive: thin, with the attachment area also
thin. Operculum circular or suboval tear- shaped, attach-
ment area with horseshoe shaped scars.
Accessory salivary glands always developed, tubular,
single or coiled and miflled. Esophagus with a loop run-
ning along the left side of the gland of Leiblein; esoph-
ageal glands externally invisible.
~Egg-capsules always erect, never lenticular, usually
with nurse eggs.
Trophon geversianus (Pallas, 1774)
(Figures 1-21)
“Purpurschnecken” Knorr, 1769: 47, Pl . 30, fig. 2
“Buccin feuilleté” Knorr, 1770: 53, pl. 30, fig. 2.
Buccinum geversianum Pallas, 1774: 33, pl. 3, figs. 1, 2.
Buccinum foliaceum multifariam frondosum Chemnitz, 1780:
130, pl. 139, fig. 1297 {non-binominal, rejected by Opin-
ion 184 (ICZN, 1944) ) [Lectotype of Murex mage lanicus
Gmelin, 1791 (Beu, 1978)].
G. Pastorino, 2005 Page 57
Figures 1-16. Trophon geversianus (Pallas, 1774). 1-3. MACN-In 36036, Punta Cavendish, Puerto Deseado, Santa Cruz province
in 5 m. 4-5. MACN-In 36042, Cueva del Indio, Puerto Deseado. 6-9. MACN-In 36041, Sierra Grande, Rio Negro province, in
tide pools. 10-11. MACN-In 36037, Punta Penas, San Julian, Santa Cruz Province in 2 m. 12. MACN-In 36043, Bahia Almanza
Puerto Harberton, Tierra del Fuego, in 3 m. 13-14. MACN-In 36038, both specimens from Playa La Mina, San Julian, Santa Cruz
Province intertidal. Scale bar for all shells = 1 cm. 15-16. Two views of protoconch, arrow head the transition to teleoconch. Scale
bar = 500 wm
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 2
Figures 17-21.
Buccinum fimbriatum Martyn, 1754: fig. 6
Murex magellanicus Gmelin, 1791: 3548 partim (var. B excl.):
dOrbigny a 451: Ais 1828: 127, pl. 26, fig. 90;
Hanley, 1556 oe ig. 9O
Neptunea . foliacea eas 758. 116
?Murex ventricosus ve 1S10: 178
Polyplex bulbosa Perry, 1811: pl. 9, fig. 5
Murex foliatus Schumacher, 1$17: 215, sensu Vokes 1971
Fusus magellanicus Lamarck. Gray, 1839: 115
?Murex varians dOrbigny, 1839: pl. 42, figs. 4-7; d’Orbigny,
$41:452
T. geversianus Pallas—Montfort, 1810: 483, fig.; H. and A
Adams, 1853: 77, pl. 8, fig. 3 c.; Tapparone-Canefri, 1874
5; Kobelt, 1878: 205, pl. 72, fig. 1-3; pl. 73, fig. 1; Sow-
erby I, 1880: pl. 404, figs. 7,8; Tryon, 1880: 144, pl. 32,
7-340, 343-347; pl. 70, figs. 433; Watson, 1886:
64: Rochebrune and Mabille, 1889: H.53; Strebel, 1904:
73, pl 4, figs. 11-23; pl. 5, figs. 24-42: pl. 6, figs. 43-52
Lamy, 1906: 3: Ihering, 1907: 404; Melvill and Standen,
907: 106; Strebel, 1908: 37, pl. 6, figs. 94 a, b.; Carcelles
946: 60, figs. 1-5; 1946: 69, figs. 6Ga,b; TZa,b,c,d; 8; Powell,
951: 151, fig. L, 81; N, 107; Castellanos, 1970: 76, pl. 5
ig. 2: Dell, 1971: 210; Harasewych, 1984: 13, figs. 1-3
25: Vokes, 1991: 7, fig.; 1992: 3, figs le, d: 3c, d; Kool
993: 47, figs. 9-14, 30-31: Castellanos and Landoni
1993: 3, pl. 1 figs. 1-15, 1S—2]
figs. 33
Trophon geversianus (Pallas, 1774). 17. Radula, frontal view. Scale bar = 100 jm. 18. Lateral view of the same
radula. Scale bar = 30 jzm. 19. Ultrastructure of the shell. Scale bar = 100 wm. 20. Penis, critical-point dried. Scale bar = 800
pm. 21. two views of the operculum. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Fusus intermedius Hupé in Gay, 1854: 166, pl. 4, fig. 6, non
Cristofori and Jan, 1832 nomen nudum: nec A. J. Mich-
elotti, 1846 nomen nudum: nec G. Michelotti, 1547:
Rochebrune and Mabille. 1SS9: 11.53
F. geversianus Pallas —Hupé in Gay, 1$54: 167; Gould, 161:
pl. 16, fig. 277 a, b
Trophon geversianus var. calva Kobelt, 1S78: 305, pl. 75; fig. 1
T. geversianus var. lirata Kobelt, 1878: 305, pl. 76, fig. 1, 2.
philippianus Dunker in Kobelt, 1878: 277, pl. 72, figs. 4, 5;
Melvill and Standen, 1907: eo Powell, 1951. 152.
philippinarum Dunker. Sowerby Il, LSS0: pl. 405, fig. 21.
°T. varians (VOrb,)—Carcelles, oe 131, figs. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7;
Castellanos, 1970: 75, pl. 5, fig. 3, 4; Vokes, 1992: 3 fig. 4c.
plicatus (Lightfoot)—Calvo, 1987: 135, fig. 99
Trophon sp Vokes 1991: 9, figs. 1-13
Description: Shell large (up to 100 mm) and extreme-
ly variable, fusiform, subqui idrate profile, chalky, whitish;
protoconch of 2 whorls, smooth, cylindrical, slightly olo-
bose, slightly asymmetrical; te leoconch of 4 shouldered
whorls, spire less than % of total shell he ight. S Spire angle
about 50°; suture impressed; subsutural shelf straight,
aperture ovoid, interior glossy pinkish; anterior siphonal
canal moderately long (half the height of aperture); um-
bilicus closed or deep. some specimens with a pseu-
G. Pastorino, 2005
Page 59
doumbilical chink; outer lip rounded, with reflected edg-
es; inner lip curved, adpressed.
Axial ornamentation of irregular, low lamellose varices
on first whorls, becoming S—10 well-defined lamellae on
last ones. Lamellae growing across entire whorl, attached
to the shell, sometimes curving adavxially, Lamellae end-
ing in shallow peripheral spine, in some specimens grow-
ing adapically.
Spiral ornamentation of about 15 cords beginning at
periphery of whorls. Smooth specimens common in in-
tertidal pools : and ‘ayelia } yanks. Coloration varying from
creamy white to dark brown. Growth lines regularly
space od, present throughout shell. Geographic variation
conspicuous from north to south and from intertidal to
infralittoral specimens, expressed as a series of smooth
to profusely ornamented specimens according to area of
collection.
Shell ultrastructure composed of two layers; inner-
most layer (50% shell thickness) of * colabrally aligned
crossed lamellar aragonite, outer layer (50% shell thick.
ness) with amorphous calcite.
Operculum oval, brownish, with terminal nucleus. Ex-
ternal surface covered by concentric, irregular, growth
lines. Inner surface attachment area with 3 horseshoe-
shaped scars, thick glazed rim present in all specimens.
Anatomical and radial: ar characters as described by
Harasewych (1984) and Kool (1993).
Type Material: The type material upon which Pallas
(1774) based Buccinum geversianum could not be lo-
cated. It could not be found at the Zoological Institute
of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ZIL) St. Peters-
burg, where most of the material studied by that author
is housed (B. Sirenko, pers. comm.).
Additional Material Examined: 53°39’ S, 70°55.5' W,
5 A, R/V Hero Cruise 702, Sta. 466, 25 April 1970, 20
m (USNM 901605); 53°39’ S, 70°55.5' W, 6 A, R/V
Hero Cruise 702, Sta. 473, 26 ue 1970, 15-18 m
(USNM 901609); 53°30'48” S, 70°50'33" W, 4 A, R/V
Hero Cruise 692, Sta. 69-11, 24 ner 1969, intertidal,
(USNM 901604); 53°24.8' S, 69°39.2' W, 1 D, R/V
Hero Cruise 702, Sta. 481, 27 April 1970, 1S m, (USNM
901605): 53°17’ S, 68°13’ W, 1 A, R/V Hero Cruise 712,
he 71-2-6, 21 April 1971, 1 m, (USNM 886739);
3°51'32” S, 70°25'52"” W, 1 A, R/V Hero Cruise 692,
ae 69-22, 13 May 1969, 2-3 m (USNM_ 886187);
53°37.9' S, 70°14’ W, 1 D, R/V Hero Cruise 702, Sta.
486, 28 April 1970, 292-296 m (USNM 901602); 54°59"
S, 64°53’ W, 1 D, R/V ELTanin Cruise 11, Sta. 970, =
February 1964, 586-641 m (USNM 870515); 53°48.7'
70°24.1’ W, 1 D, R/V Hero Cruise702, Sta. 489, 29 heal
1970, 13-18 m (USNM 901601); 54°27’ S, 66°12' W, 2
D, R/V ELTaNIN Cruise 6, Sta. 453, 21 January 1963, 31
m (USNM 901600); 53°26’ S, 68°35’ W, 6 A, R/V EL-
TANIN Cruise 21, Sta. 297, 12 January 1966, 0 m (USNM
901607): 53°35’ S, 70°50’ W, 1 D, 1 A, R/V ELTANIN
Cruise 21, Sta. 292, § January 1966, 0 m (USNM
901606); 53°17’ S, 68°13’ W, 3 D, B/V ELTANIN Cruise
712, Sta. 71-2-6, 21 April 1971. 0-1 m (USNM 901608):
Puerto Basil Hall, Isla de los Estados, 10 A, 21 May
1971, 0-1 m (MLP 4243): Buen Suceso Bay, Tierra del
Fuego, 4 A, 23 October 1941 (MLP 27218): San Julian,
Punta Penas, 6 A, 1 March 1924 (MLP 526 partim):
Puerto Lobos, Chubut, 12 A, 2 February 1938 (MLP
2021); Puerto Golondrina, Ushuaia, 9 A, January 1962
(MLP 27201); Puerto Piramides, Chubut, 1 A (MLP
4715); San Julian, 8 A (MLP 1583); Puerto Hoppner,
Isla de los Estados, 7 A (MACN-In 22547); Punta Cav-
endish, Puerto Deseado, 7 A, 6 February 1961 (MACN-
In 26171): Punta Cavendish, Puerto Deseado. Santa
Cruz province, 5 m (MACN-In 36036); Chubut, 6 A
(MACN-In 4097); Tierra del Fuego, 4 A (MACN-In
5777-1); Cueva del Indio, Puerto Deseado (MACN-In
36042); Sierra Grande, Rio Negro province, in tide pools
(MACN-In 36041); Punta — es Julian, Santa Cruz
province, 2 m (MACN-In 36037 » Playa La Mina, San
Julian, Santa Cruz province eee (MACN-In
36038); Bahia Almanza, Puerto Harberton, Tierra del
Fuego, 3 m (MACN-In 36043); San Antonio Oeste, Rio
Negro, intertidal, 3 A (MACN 35387); 54°47'36" S,
64°22'35"” W, 1 A, R/V ELTANIN Cruise 712, Sta. 71-2-
44, 24 May 1971, intertidal (USNM 881127); 54°46'12”
S, 64°24'42” W, 1 A, R/V ELTANIN Cruise 712, Sta. 71-
2-46, 21 May 1971, intertidal (USNM 881131); 54°4536"
S, 64°02'36" W, 1 A, R/V ELTANIN Cruise 7151, Sta. S69,
23 October 1971, intertidal (USNM 881132); 54°45'45”
S, 64°09'55" W, 1 A, R/V Hero Cruise 712, Sta. 71-2-
40, 21 May 1971, intertidal (USNM 881130); 54°47'48"
S, 65°16’ W, 1 A, R/V Hero Cruise 712, Sta. 71-2-8, 23
April 1971, intertidal (USNM 881126); 54°48’, 65°14" W,
1 A, R/V Hero Cruise 712, Sta. 71-2-14, 25 April 1971,
intertidal (USNM_ 881129); Punta Arenas, Cabeza de
Mar, Chile (ANSP 101444); Ushuaia ee peas
Malvinas Is. (ANSP 277535 and 277538): Cape Fair-
weather, Santa Cruz province, Argentina (ANSP 78080);
Straits of Magellan (ANSP 36241 and ANSP 366497);
Puerto San Julian ( (ANSP 312324); Santa Cruz River
(ANSP 101445); Puerto Gallegos (ANSP 312319); Golfo
San Jorge (ANSP 178645): Puerto Madryn, Chubut
(ANSP 170471); Puerto Parry, Isla de los Estados, 54°46’
S, 64°23’ W (ANSP 402810); mouth of Santa Cruz River
(ANSP. 88536); Punta Arenas (ANSP $8549); Puerto
Madryn (ANSP 170474); Punta Arenas, Chile (ANSP
199711).
Distribution: Trophon geversianus has the widest
geographic range of all species of Trophon, i.e., from
Buenos Aires province to Burdwood Bank in the south-
western Atlantic, Tierra del Fuego and Malvinas Is., and
the Magellan Strait in Chile. Literature records from
around Antarctica are almost certainly wrong assign-
ments, probably mistaking it for Trophon nucelliformis
Oliver and Picken, 1984, T. mac quariensis Powell, 1957,
or T. albolabratus Smith, 1875.
Remarks: = Troplion geversianus is the best-known spe-
cies of the entire genus. The great morphological vari-
ation can be appreciated from the large number of
names proposed for the different morphological variants
Page 60
in this species. Zaixso (1973) and Penchaszadeh (1976)
both studied the egg capsules of this species but only
the latter confirmed the existence of short-lived nurse
eggs in the capsules.
Trophon varians is a dubious species described by
dOrbigny from material he collected in northern Pata-
gonia (“au sud du Rio Negro”). This species has no la-
mellae, weak spiral cords, ad its shell is unusually thick.
Houart (1998) illustrated a paralectotype (as syntype)
housed in Paris and Aguirre (1993) designated and fig-
ured the lectotype (BMNH 1854.12.4. 539) from 13 syn-
types from the BMNH collection. According to
dOrbigny’s illustration (Plate 42, figs. 4, 5) and the lec-
totype and the paralectotype housed in Paris, it appears
that its distinctive characters are the thickness of the
shell and absence of lamellae. However, despite this dif-
ference between T. geversianus and these primary types
of T. varians, the rest of the paralectotypes are very sim-
ilar to other thin-shelled specimens of Trophon gever-
sianus usually found exposed during low tides in noite
em Patagonia, Golfo San Matias and around the Valdés
Peririsula: The anatomy and radula of the latter are
identical to those of T. geversianus. The specimens with
heavy shells are characteristic of the mouth of Rio Ne-
gro. Nothing is known about the anatomy and radula of
Hess heavy specimens. Perhaps these characters may
prove that it is only a local variation of Trophon gever-
sianus, as it was suggested originally by d’ Orbigny him-
self (1841: 452). D’Orbigny (1841: 452; 1839, plate 42
figs. 6-7) also described and illustrated the egg- -capsules
Fone what he supposed were z. varians. The illustration
agrees better with capsules of Urosalpinx haneti (Petit,
1856).
Trophon plicatus (Lightfoot, 1786)
(Figures 22-42)
Le Sabot Magellanique Favanne, 1780: 3
men nudum.
Buccinum laciniatum Martyn, 1784: fig. 42, nomen nudum.
Murex plicatus Lightfoot, 1786: 104.
M. lamellosus Mz oa Gmelin, 1791: 3536; Wood and Han-
ley, 1856: 133, pl. 27, fig. 100
Polyplex gracilis Pe srry, ISL1: pl. 9, fig. 4
Fusus laciniaius Martyn.—Reeve, 1847: spec. 14, figs. a, b, c.;
Hupé in Gay, 1854: 168; Gould, 1861: pl. 16, fig. 278.
Trophon laciniatus Martini—H. and A. oe 1853: 77, pl.
8, figs. 3 a, b.; Kobelt, 1878: 280, pl. 72, figs. 6, 7; Tryon,
1880: 143, pl. 31, figs. 330-332. Rochen and Mabille.
1889: H.53:; Stre shel, 1904: 199, pl. 3, figs. 1-8; Lamy,
1906: 3; Strebel, 1908: 37; Caste distes 1970: 74, pl. 5,
fic. |
?Trophon antarcticus Philippi, 1868: 225 (sensu Tryon 1880),
T. lacineatus Martyn. Sowerby IL, 1880: pl. 404, fig. 13.
T. (Stramonitrophon) laciniatus (Martyn).—Powell, 1951: 156,
fig. L, 86.
T. (Stramonitrophon) lamellosa (Ginelin)—Dell; 1971: 212.
T. plicatus (Lightfoot, 1786).—Rehder, 1967; 20; Cernohorsky,
1977: 117, fig. 1s Vokes, 1991: 7, fig.; 1991b: 9, figs. 14—
16; 1992: 3 bec 2. b, e, d.; Castellanos and Landoni, 1993:
5, figs. 16, 15, 22
42, pl. 79, fig. LT. no-
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 2
Description: Shell of medium to large size (to 50
mm), smooth, fusiform, thin, somewhat "challey: proto-
conch smooth of 2% whorls; teleoconch of 6 shouldered
whorls, spire less than % of total shell height. Spire angle
about 50°; suture impressed; subsutural ramp straight,
aperture small, ovoidal, interior pale brownish; anterior
siphonal canal long (more than half height of the aper-
ture), narrow, curved, open; umbilicus absent; outer lip
rounded with reflected edges; inner lip curved, adpres-
sed. Axial ornamentation of irregular, low lamellose var-
ices in the first whorls, that become 8-10 real lamellae
in the last ones. Lamellae growing over the entire whorl,
but attached to the shell, sometimes curving adaxially.
Lamellae ending in a peripheral spine, in some speci-
mens growing adapically. Spiral ornamentation poorly
developed to almost smooth, sometimes consisting of 6
weak cords on the base of the last whorl and the back
of the siphonal channel. Regular, very weak growth lines
present throughout shell.
Shell sitvastractune composed of two layers; inner-
most layer (25% of shell thickness), composed of cola-
brally aligned crossed lamellar aragonite, outer layer
thick (75% of shell thickness) with amorphous calcite
(Figure 42).
Operculum oval, with terminal nucleus. External sur-
face covered by concentric, irregular, growth lines. Inner
surface attachment area with two or three horseshoe-
shaped scars, glazed rim present in all specimens (Figure
36).
Animal of medium size relative to shell. Mantle large,
mantle roof thin, Cephalic tentacles broad in basal fae
flat, blunt, with rounded large black eyes in the middle;
mantle edge thickened, smooth; pallial organs arranged
as in other rachiglossans; brown osphradium less than
half of ctenidium length, slightly asymmetrical, with 50—
55 leaflets per side; ctenidium as wide as osphradium,
containing triangular leaflets. Hypobranchial gland
brownish and inconspicuous, rectum to the right of hy-
pobranquial gland.
Proboscis pleuroembolic, long, broad. Radular ribbon
extending beyond rear of buccal mass, long (0.69 * ap-
erture height vs. 0.78 * aperture height in Trophon gev-
ersianus). Esophagus loops beneath buccal mass, where
esphagus receives embedded ducts of salivary glands an-
terior to a small Leiblein valve. Esophagus curving dis-
tinctly and running along entire side of gland of Lei-
blein. Esophageal ¢ olands ( “Glandule framboise’ *) whitish
in color, posterior to nerve ring slightly marked on the
external side of the esophagus. Large s saliv ary glands en-
veloping Leiblein valve and accessory salivary glands. Ac-
cessory salivary glands distinctly large, sometimes dark-
colored, tubular, compact, coiled, embedded in saliv. ary
glands. Gland of Leiblein conspicuous, brown, ending in
a medium size blind duct and very small ampulla.
Radula rachiglossi in with rachidian teeth wide (~ 150
um), central cusp thin, large; lateral cusps wider and
slightly shorter than central cusp, with inner edge
straight; with sharp straight denticle in upper third of
inte al edge of lateral cusp, external edge with 6 very
G. Pastorino, 2005 ase 6]
Figures 22-36. Trophon plic atus (Lightfoot, 1786). 22-24. MACN-In 36033, Bahia Ensenada, Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego, Ar-
gentina. 25-26. MACN-In 9032-16, Comodoro Rivadavia, Chubut province, Argentina. 27. BMNH 19990354, 45°55.219' S
73°39.522' W, intertidal. Islet NE shore of Isla Huemules, Golfo Elefantes, Chile. 28-29. AK 133035, Station WS7S8 Discovery
15°07" S, 65°W. 30-31. MACN-In 36034, Punta Pefias, San Julian, Santa Cruz province, Argentina. 32. Same lot as Figure 6. 33.
MLP 27202. Bahia Golondrina, Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego. 34-35. Two protoconchs, scale bars 100 jum. 34. USNM $70535
52°30’ S, 67°14’ W, in $2 m. 35. USNM 901620, 53°35’ S, 69°45’ W, 1 D, R/V Hero Cruise 692, Sta. 404, 37-46 m. 36. MLP
979
27232. operculum. external (left) and internal (right) views, scale bar = 1 cm. Scale bar for all shells = 1 cm
eee)
Page 62 THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No.
9
Figures 37-42. Trophon plicatus (Lightfoot, 1786). 37. MLP 27232, Dorsal view of radular ribbon. Scale bar = 50 jm. 38.
MLP 526, San Julian, Punta Penas, | March 1924, rachidian teeth. Scale bar = 30 jzm. 39. Variations of rachidian teeth, Rocamora,
Ushuaia, 1 A, 8-10 m (MACN-In 36053). Scale bar = 30 wm. 40. MLP 272
27202, Bahia Golondrina, Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego,
Argentina, detail of the rachidian teeth, Scale bar = 20 wm. 41. Same specimen as 40, lateral view of rachidian teeth, scale bar =
30 pm. 42. USNM 870535, 52°30’ S, 67°14’ W, in 82 m, shell ultrastructure, fracture surface commarginal. Scale bar = 30 wm.
G. Pastorino, 2005
well defined denticles, always present. Base of rachidian
tooth sinuous, sliding bene rath base of next tooth. Mar-
ginal area with single conspicuous cusp. Lateral teeth
with single, long and narrow cusp, slightly attached basal
plate. Cusps of rachidian teeth pyramid-like in lateral
view (Figures 38-40)
Male and female organs as in Trophon geversianus
(see Harasewych, 1984).
Type Locality: Islas Malvinas.
Type Material: Probably lost. According to Dance
(1966) part of the materi: il from the Portland ¢ Jatalogue
is in London (BMNH), however this is not the case of
T. plicatus.
Additional Material Examined: 52°30’ S, 67°14’ W,
2 D, RV ELranin Cruise 11, Sta. 980, 14 February
1964, $2 m (USNM 870535); 53°35’ S, 69°45’ W, 1D,
R/V Hero Cruise 692, Sta. 404, 37-46 m (USNM
901620); 52°56’ S, 75°00’ W, 1 D, R/V ELTANIN Cruise
Ll, Sta. 958, 5 February 1964, 92-101 m (USNM
$70423):; 53°06' S, 67°04’ W. 3D, B/V Hero Cruise 702,
Sta. 450, 5 March 1970, 86 m (USNM_ 901622):
53°39'24" S$. 70°55'30" W, 1 D, R/V Hero Cruise 702,
Sta. 467, 25 April 1970, 24 m (USNM 901623); 52°35’
S, 65°0S’ W, 1 D, R/V ELTanin Cruise 11, Sta. 976, 13
February 1974, 128 m (USNM 870525): 46°04’ S, 83°55’
W, 1 A, R/V ELTANIN Cruise 25, Sta. 326 9 October
1966, 298 m (USNM 901621): 53°48.7' S, 70°24.1' W,
1 D, R/V Hero Cruise 702, Sta. 489, 29 April 1970, 13—
IS m (USNM 901624); 53°32’ S, 64°57’ W, 2 A, R/V
ELTANIN Cruise 11, Sta. 974, 12 February 1964, 119-
124 m (USNM 881960): 53°39’ S, 70°55.5' W. 1 A. R/V
Hero Cruise 702, Sta. 466, 20 m (USNM 901754): Ba-
hia Golondrina, Ushuaia, 1 A, (MLP 2 ae Rocamora,
Ushuaia, 1 A, S-10 m (MACN-In 36053); Bahia Ensen-
ada, Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego, en 36033):
45°07’ S, 65°W, 1 A, py eee WS7SS, 13 De-
cember 1931, $2-88 m (AK 133035) illustrated o figs,
28-29: Comodoro Rivadavia, 17 D ie N-In 9032-16):
54°34’ S, 64°00'18” W, 1 D, 1 A, B/V Hero Cruise 715,
Sta. 870, 24 October 1971, 84 m (USNM 881128): Bahia
Buen Suceso, | A, 23 October 1941, (MLP27230): Cabo
Colnett, Isla de los Estados, 1 A, R/V Hero Cruise 712,
Sta. 853, 20 October 1971, 91 m (USNM 869720): 2 D,
7S m (USNM 96176); Orange Harbor (USNM 5676);
Paso Richmond, Tierra del Fuego 55 m, (MACN-In
24940): 55°7’ S, 66°33’ W, 82 m (MACN-In 23938): Ti-
erra del Fuego (MACN-In 5240-2); Punta Penas, San
h ilidn, Santa Cruz eet Argentina, 4 A (MLP
27232); Punta Penas, San Julian, Santa Cruz, Argentina,
| A (MLP 27212); Puerto San Julian, Santa Cruz prov-
ince, Argentina (49°15’ S, 67°39’ W), 4 A, 2-3 m
(MACN-In 36034): 45°55. 219' S, 73°39. 599! W intertid-
al, Islet NE shore of Isla Huemules, Golfo Elefantes,
Chile (BMNH 19990384).
Distribution: This is a typical species from the Ma-
gellanic province. It has been recorded from Peninsula
Page 63
g
Valdés to Tierra del Fuego in Argentina and Chile to
49°S in the north (Reid and Osorio, 2000).
Remarks: The authorship of the name according to
Dance (1962) and Rehder (1967) should be oF to
J. Lightfoot, the anonymous compiler of the “Catalogue”
where the name was used for the first time, not to So-
lander.
There is an interesting range of conchological varia-
tion in Trophon plicatus, from almost smooth specimens
to highly lamellate. However, the profile is always slen-
der. Trophon bahamondei McLean and Andrade, 1982,
is a morphologically similar species, with peripheral
spines and shallow lamellae. On the other hand, F ba-
hamondei has no spiral ornamentation and Trophon pli-
catus has 6 weak cords on the base of the last as and
the back of the siphonal canal.
The gross anatomy is that customary for most Pata-
gonian Trophoninae. However, a distinctive anatomical
feature is the morphology of the accessory salivary
glands, which are compact, tubular, somewhat coiled and
large, and completely embedded in the salivary glands.
Most Pat: wonian Tega? (e.g. T. bahomanda as
well as T. geversianus), have small, kidney-shaped, ac-
cessory saliv ary glands.
Radular features of 7. plicatus are clearly different
from T. bahamondei (see Figures 26-27). The latter has
a distinctive small cusp on the outer margin of the lateral
cusp on the rachidian teeth. In addition, the rachidian
base is thinner and wider.
Trophon antarcticus Philippi, 1868, is probably a syn-
onym according to Tryon (1880); however, the type ma-
terial is missing and the description is rather obscure.
Powell (1951) described the subgenus Stramonitro-
phon to include only T. plicatus {(as T. laciniatus Martyn,
nomen nudum rejected by Opinion 456 (ICZN, 1957)]
a species with Stramonita-like radula, i.e., rachidian
teeth with three cusps, where the marginal side of the
lateral cusps bears several en This radula illus-
trated by Powell (1951: 194, fig. L, 86) was dissected
from the spe cime n illustrated in 98 29. The radular
morphology of T. plicatus is different from that of T.
geversianus. However, Coronium coronatum (Penna-
Neme and Leme, 1978) and T. acanthodes Watson,
1882, bear the same denticles on the lateral cusps of the
rachidian teeth. This appears to be a common feature in
several Trophoninae from the southwestern Atlantic.
The shell of Trophon iarae Houart, 1998, shows some
similarity with some specimens of T. plicatus. It was
based on only two specimens collected . fishing boats
apparently from Brazil and off U Jruguay. The anatomy
and soft parts of T. iarae remain unknown. The radula
apparently has been illustrated by Calvo, 1987 (although
according to Houart, 1998: 127, there is no certainty
about the ide tity of the specimen from where this r: ad-
ula was taken). In any event, this illustration does not
allow for a detailed comparison with other species. Fur-
ther comments about the validity of this species or its
Page 64
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 2
affinity with other species of Trophon mostly depends
on anatomical data which are not available.
Houart (1998: 127) mentioned the specimen of T. pli-
catus illustrated by Cernohorsky (1977) from Lively Is.
(Malvinas Is.) as belonging to his new species, T. iarae.
However, Cernohorsky’s specimen could be easily in-
cluded in the range of geographic distribution and mor-
phological variation of T. plicatus. He also illustrated two
specimens of T. patagonicus as T. plic atus (Figures 5-10
in Houart, 1998).
Trophon patagonicus (VOrbigny, 1839)
(Figures 43-65)
Murex patagonicus dOrbigny, 1839: pl. 62, figs. 2-3; 1941: 452
non Fusus patagonicus Sowerby, 1846 (=Trophon).
Trophon necocheanus thering, 1907: 404, pl. 16, fig. 106.
lie laciniatus ( Martyn). Carcelles, 1946: 70-72, figs. 6
a, b, 7 a-d, 8.
Trophon plicatus (Lightfoot, 1786),—Rios, 1985: 88, : 31, fig.
386; 1994: 114, pl. 37, fig. 453; Houart, 1998: 130, figs.
8-10 non Lightfoot, 1786.
Description: Shell large (up to 72 mm), biconic,
heavy, chalky or glossy we sometimes brownish grey,
opaque; protoconch smooth of 2% (~2.0 X 1.5 mm)
asymmetrical whorls; transition to teleoconch well de-
fined; teleoconch of 7 shouldered whorls, spire less than
¥% of total shell height. Spire angle about 70°; suture
impressed: aperture oval, interior ‘glossy white; anterior
Siphonal Canal rather long tor ve genus (ha reigh of
iphonal | rather long for tl (half height of
aperture), narrow, open; pse sidouenbiens deep and
widely open; outer lip reflexed. Axial ornamentation of
irregular strong, sharp lamellae covering entire whorl
surface, numbering 9-12 in the last whorl Continuum
of morphologies present from completeh sly smooth shells
with no axial ornamentation (Figures 53-56), to some
incipient lamellae along periphe ral keel (Figures 45—50),
to strongly developed lamellae (Figures 43-45). Spiral
ornamentation missing, except on first teleoconch whorl
which bears 3—4 invariably present spiral cords (Figures
62-63). Irregular growth lines present throughout “shell
surface. Some uncommon specimens have about three
weak greenish or dark spiral lines on the last three or
four whorls.
Shell ultrastructure arranged nieen’y of two layers;
innermost layer (25% shell thickness)
crossed lamellar aragonite, outer layer very thick (75%
shell thickness) of amorphous calcite (Figure 61).
Operculum oval, with terminal ep sus. External sur-
face covered by concentric, irregular, growth lines. Inner
surface attachment area with two or three horseshoe-
shape scars.
Rachiglossan radula with rachidian teeth distinct, cen-
tral cusp thin, large; lateral cusps slightly shorter than
central cusp, sharp straight denticle in the upper third
of the internal edge of the lateral cusp, external edge of
lateral cusps smooth. Base of rachidian tooth sinuous,
sliding beneath base of next tooth. Marginal area with
single conspicuous cusp. Lateral teeth with single, long
compose dof
and narrow cusp, attached to basal plate (Figures 64—
65).
Penchaszadeh (1976) described the egg capsules of T.
patagonicus {identified as T. laciniatus (Martyn) and T.
varians (dOrbigny)].
Type Material: Four syntypes are housed in the Nat-
ural History Museum, London under the number
1854.12.4.538, from “Baie de San Blas, Patagonie”. One
of them is herein illustrated (Figures 43, 44),
Additional Material Examined: Puerto Quequén,
Buenos Aires province, 3 A (MLP 26309); Miramar,
Buenos Aires province, | A, 1 D (MLP 417); Necochea,
Buenos Aires province, 3 A, 30 m (AMNH 173640); Ne-
cochea, | A, 30 m (AMNH 181220); Puerto Quequén
(ANSP 236034 and 236032): 18 miles off Puerto Que-
quen, 4 D (MACN-In 20441); 37°20’ S, 56°50’ W, 4 D,
55 m (MACN-In 15104); Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires
province, Argentina (MACN-In 10289; 12902; 2 D, 45
m, 9361-51: 7 D, 11374; 11587; 115S87-1; 4 D, 10249:
10320: 2 D, 10749: 11118; 3 D, 12066; 3 A, 25775; 9361-
53: 5 D, 10290; 10190; 10248; 12216): 36°25’ S, 54°38"
W, 54 m, 1 D wet 93426): 34°40’ S, 52°18’ W, 1
A, 100 m (MACN-In 23491); Fondos de Querandf,
Buenos Aires province, 5 A (MACN-In 14334); 25 miles
off Puerto Quequén, 22 D (MACN-In 21138); Fondos
de Querandf, | D (MACN-In 25774); Necochea, 2 D,
40-50 m (USNM 710024); Mar del Plata, 4 D, 1 D
(USNM 568240: USNM 346826): off Necochea, 1 A, 30
m (USNM 876123, Bledsoe collection); Mar del Plata,
1 D (USNM 363768); Uruguay, 1 D (USNM 346786);
1 D, 36°30" S, 54°44" W, 26 m (MACN-In 24259).
Distribution: This species is common on the mussel
banks off southern Uruguay and Buenos Aires province
in depths of 25-40 m.
Remarks: = Trophon patagonicus is a variable species,
endemic to the littoral of Buenos Aires province and the
Uruguayan coast. The species has had quite a confusing
taxonomic history. Those specimens with well-dev eloped
lamellae have been usually identified as T. plicatus, and
those with smooth shells and no omamentation as T.
geversianus or T. varians. Specimens collected on the
same location were identified as two different species
according to the presence or absence of lamellae. How-
ever, some specimens (Figures 50-52) are clearly inter-
mediate forms, and no another anatomical feature seems
to separate them. There is no reason to consider them
as two different species. The whole lot of specimens
a d by Carcelles (1946) shows clearly that he con-
fused dOrbigny’ s species with T. plicatus. Such a mis-
take was alos made by Rios (1985, 1994) and several
other authors. Trophon plicatus is a typical magellanic
species with a thinner and more cylindrical profile, me-
dium size (never reaching more than 50 mm. high).
Specimens of T. plicatus here identified were never col-
lected at latitudes north of 45°S. Its protoconch is always
smooth and with fewer whorls, and the lamellae along
the keel usually develop into strong triangular projec-
G. Pastorino, 2005 Page 65
Figures 43-59. Trophon patagonicus (d¢ Irbigny, 1539). 43-44. Syntype BMNH 1554.12.4.538, Bahia San Blas, Argentina. 45-
46. MACN-In 36040, Puerto Quequén, Buenos Aires. 47-49. MLP 417, Miramar, Buenos Aires, in 54 m. 50-52. MACN-In 12066
Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires. 53-56. MACN-In 36031, Puerto Quequén. 57-59. MACN-In 21047, “Carmen de Patagones?”
Buenos Aires. Scale bar for all figures = 1 cm
SEE
Page 66
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No.
bo
Figures 60-65. Trophon patagonicus (WOrbigny, 1839). 60. Penis, critical-point dried. Lateral and frontal view. Scale bar = L000
wm. 61. Shell ultrastructure, fracture surface commarginal. Scale bar = 300 zm. 62-63. MACN-In 11374, protoconch, three views,
Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires province. Scale bar for all figures = 600 pm. 64. Dorsal view of radular ribbon. Scale bar = 50 jm.
65. Lateral view of rachidian teeth. Scale bar = 50 jm
tions approximately parallel to the coiling axis. The ap-
erture is larger and subcircular in T. patagonicus, very
different from the smaller and almost circular one on T.
plicatus. Trophon geversianus usually has strong spiral
ornamentation on the entire shell surface, a feature also
observed in T. varians
Ihering (1907) described TL necocheanus based on
(Quaternary?) specimens collected at Necochea, Buenos
\ires province, Carmen de Patagones, Buenos Aires
province, and Sierra Laziar, Santa Cruz province (“For-
mation araucanienne’). Most of the type material is lost,
but the remaining types fall within the range of variation
of T. patagonicus. One of the specimens, from a lot of
three, with uncertain locality (MACN-In 21047, rela-
beled “Carmen de Patagones?”) is here illustrated (Fig-
ures 57, 59). This specimen was acquired through an
exchange with Museu Paulista, S40 Paulo, Brazil (where
Ihering worked for most of his professional life) and is
G. Pastorino, 2005
Page 67
part of the original type series. All of the specimens fit
well in the original description of T. patagonicus and
there is no doubt that is the same species described by
d Orbigny.
Sowerby I (2! of name) described in 1846 Fusus pa-
tagonicus from the Tertiary of San Julian (Santa Cruz
province, Argentina), a species that clearly belongs in
Trophon. Therefore, as the two species are quite distinct,
dOrbigny’s name has priority over Sowerbys (Griffin
and Pastorino, 2005).
Trophon acanthodes Watson, 1882
(Figures 66-78)
Trophon acanthodes Watson, 1882: 386; 1886: 166, pl. 10, fig.
6; Cemohorsky, 1977: 112, fig. 9 (holotype); Pain, 1980:
S, fig.; Rios, L985: SS, pl. 31, fig. 358; Castellanos, 1986:
22, fig: C Castellanos and Landen 1993: 8, pl. 2, fig. 28
Fusus haenhones (Watson).—Carcelles, 1947: 12, pl. 2 figs. 1,
2; pl. oi figs. 3, 4 (not figs. 5, 6 which is Corontin coron-
atum).
Pagodula acanthodes (Watson).—Kaicher, 1980: fig. 2599.
“Fusinus” acanthodes (Watson) —Calvo, 1987: 153, fig. 127.
“Trophon™ acanthodes Watson.—Rios, 1994: 37, pl. 37, fig. 486.
Description: Shell large, about 125 mm high, thick,
slender in profile, ch alky white: protoconch worn in all
specimens; teleoconch of 7 shouldered whorls: spire less
than % of total shell height. Spire angle about 45°; suture
impressed, subsutural shelf oblique, somewhat convex,
aperture small, subcircular, interior glossy white; ante-
rior siphonal canal very long (longer than aperture
height) deep, straight or gueved always open; outer lip
rather reflected, rounded: inner lip adpressed. Axial or-
namentation of 12-15 regularly spaced, axial lamellae,
slightly raised, almost attached along the entire whorl,
producing open, conspicuous, regularly spaced spines at
periphery; spines becoming more closely packed on last
whorl. Spiral ornamentation of 4-5 weak rounded
threads on the lower part of the first whorls, becoming
more than 20 in last one. Growth lines present through-
out shell, producing wrinkly surface by intersection with
spirals.
Operculum elliptical, nucleus terminal, older speci-
mens tear-shaped. External surface covered by concen-
tric, irregular, growth lines. Inner surface with a con-
spicuous margins al rim; attachment area cov ering almost
the whole operculum but the rim; oreeshGe- shaped
scars present.
Rachidian teeth wide (~130 ym), central cusp large:
lateral cusps wider and shorter than central cusp, inner
edge with an almost obsolete denticle (particularly in
adult specimens), external edge with 5-6 denticles de-
creasing in size towards the edge. Base of rachidian
tooth curved, somewhat sinuous, sliding beneath base of
next tooth. Marginal area with single oe Lateral teeth
with single, long cusp, slightly atached | yasal plate.
Shell ultrastructure composed of two layers: inner-
most layer (55% of total thickness of shell) composed of
crossed lamellar aragonite, outer layer (45%) of amor-
phous calcite.
Animal as in other Trophon species but with some size
differences. Tentacles long and well defined, joined at
base; eyes deeply marked. Salivary and accessory salivary
glands as in T. plicatus. Osphradium a bit more than one
third of penile length, asymmetrical, with about 112
leaflets, ctenidium w ith about 250 leaflets twice as large
as osphradium. Typical pleuroembolic proboscis, shorter
than in T. geversianus, valve of Leiblein also smaller:
gland of Leiblein large with a long blind duct. Radula
long; digestive tract with the usual loop on the left side
of the gland of Leiblein, before the duct to the gland.
Male and female organs similar to T. geversianus.
Type Material: BMNH_ 1887.2.9.568, holotype
50°8'30" S, 74°41’ W, 229 m (illustrated by Cernohorsky,
1977, fig. 9).
Additional Material Examined: 52°53’ S, 74°05’ W,
3 D, B/V ELTANIN Cruise 23, Sta. 1605, 1 April 1966,
522-544 m (USNM 901756): off Mar del Plata, 5 A,
January 1962 (MLP 26283); 52°41’ S, 74°35’ W, 1 D,
R/V ELTANIN Cruise 21, Sta. a 6 January 1966, 188—
247 m (USNM 870115); 51°56’ S, 56°39’ W, 1 D, R/V
ELTANIN Cruise 7, Sta. 557, . March 1963, 855-866 m
(USNM 870345): 52°52’ S, 75°18’ W, 1 D, R/V ELTANIN
Cruise 21, Sta. 288, 119-329 m (USNM 901758): 52°51’
S, 74°13’ W, L D, B/V Etrantin Cruise 21, Sta. 291, 523-
539 m (USNM 901757); 52°53’ S, 74°05’ W, 2 D, R/V
ELTANIN Cruise 23, Sta. 1605, 1 April 1966, 522-544 m
(USNM 897615): 40°15" S, 57°40' W, 1 A (MACN
18425): 40°03’ S, 57°00’ W. 1 D, 50 fathoms (91.5 m)
(MACN 15699): 30 miles off Mar del Plata (ANSP
262989 and 236028); off Mar del Plata, 1 A, 2 D (MACN
17671 and 16449): 39°26’ S, 56°40’ W, 1 A, 1 D, 90 m
(MACN 17040); 39°02’ S, hai W, 1 A, 1 D; East of
Punta Médanos (39°—39°30' S), 4 D, 50 fathoms (91.5
m) (MACN 14386); 39°55’ _ 57°50’ W, 1 D,51 fathoms
(93 m): 38°25' S$, 56°30’ W,3 D (MACN 16798); 39°35’
S, 57°10’ W, 1 A, 1 D (MACN 18342); 39°50’ S, 57°18’
W, 4 A, 52 fathoms (95 m) (MACN 21741); 39°00’ S,
57°10’ W, 2 D, 45 fathoms (S2 m) (MACN 15216);
37°15’ S, 54°50’ W, 1 A, B/V ALDEBARAN, March 2000,
commercial otter trawl, 111 m (MACN-In 36032):
36°37' S, 54°14’ W, 1 A, B/V AcpeBaran, March 2000,
otter trawl, 104 m (MACN-In 36031): 39°02’, 57°02’ W,
2 D, 46 fathoms (S4.1 m) (MACN-In 25118); 37°35’ S,
54°55’ W. 1 D, 105 fathoms (192 m) (MACN-In 25165-
2).
Distribution: Off Rio Grande do Sul state in Brazil
(Rios, 1994), Uruguay, to Tierra del Fuego, Argentina.
Remarks: The shell of Trophon acanthodes is some-
what similar to that of Coronium coronatum, which in fact
could be granted that generic position. The operculum
and the radula are different in both species. The oper-
culum is somewhat triangular in Coroniwm with a weak
rim instead of the characteristic thicker one of the Tro-
phon species. The radula of Trophon acanthodes presents
the intermediate cusp between the central and the lateral
Page 68 THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 2
Figures 66-76. a ee Watson, 1582. 66-68. MACN-In 25118, 39°02", 57°02" W, 46 fathoms (84.1 m). 69-71.
MACN-In 36031, 37°15’ S 50’ Win 111 m. 72-73. MLP 26283, Mar del Plata. Scale bar for all shells = 1 cm.74. Two views
of the operculum of the specimen in Figures 69-71. Scale bar = 1 cm. 75. Ultrastructure of the shell. Scale bar = 200 jzm; detail,
large quadrangle. Scale bar = 50 zm. 76. Penis, critical-point dried (scale bar = 600 wm) with detail of the efferent conduct (scale
bar 150 jum
one of the rachidian teeth almost obsolete, while in Co- The protoconch in Coronium is multispiral and ex-
ronwm coronatum it is very conspicuous Castellanos tremely pointed, distinctive of the genus. All the studied
1986) drew a stereotyped radula of 7 acanthodes where specimens of T. acanthodes are worn; however, some of
denticles are wrongly placed on the margin of the rachi- them show the sinuated line of a typical Trophon pro-
dian tooth instead of the inne edge of the lateral cusp toconch
G. Pastorino, 2005
Page 69
Figures 77-78.
Trophon pelseneeri Smith, 1915
(Figures 79-93)
Trophon pelseneeri Smith, 1915: 92, pl. 2, figs. 6, 7; Rios, 1994:
115, pl. 38, fig. 484; Houart, 1991: 33.
Trophon sp.—Carcelles, 1944: 253.
Trophon orbignyi Carcelles, 1946: $1, pl. 12; Castellanos, 1970:
73, pl. 5, fig. 6.
Description: Shell small to medium in size (up to 35-
40 mm), fusiform, slender, chalky, pinkish with 2 weak,
diffuse reddish bands along the edge of last whorl la-
mellae; protoconcl symmetrical, cylindrical, smooth, of
2% whorls: teleoconch of 7 rectangular whorls, spire %
of total shell height. Spire angle about 45°, suture im-
pressed, subsutural shelf straight, aperture small, circu-
lar, interior glossy white; anterior siphonal canal long,
open, straight. with the tip adaxiz il curved, equal to
aperture height: umbilicus slightly pe n, sometimes only
a narrow slit; outer lip reflexed to form lamellae; inner
lip curved. with white adpressed callus. Axial ornamen-
tation of 9-11 regular, low lamellae, covering entire
whorl surface; lamellae forming a back-turned spine at
periphery. Spiral ornamentation of 2 to 3 very weak
threads in first whorls be coming more than 7 in last one,
sometimes only visible along edge of last whorl] lamellae.
Siphonal fasciolae slightly oblique, always present.
Operculum triangular (tear- oh ape -d), with terminal nu-
cleus. External surface covered by irregular growth lines.
Inner surface attachment area with horseshoe-shaped
scars: glazed rim weak but present (Figure 85).
Radula rachiglossate with rachidian teeth wider than
high, central cusp thin, in a different plane than laterals;
lateral cusps wider and shorter than central cusp, with
inner edge oblique; sharp straight denticle in the upper
third of the internal edge of the lateral cusp, external
edge with almost obsolete denticles numbering 3-4.
Base of rachidian tooth slightly sinuous, sliding beneath
base of next tooth. Marginal area with single conspicuous
Trophon acanthodes Watson, 1882. 77. MLP 26283, off Mar del Plata Radula of a large specimen, frontal view.
Scale bar = 50 pm. 78. Lateral view. Scale bar = 50 pm.
cusp. Lateral teeth with single, long and narrow cusp,
slightly attached basal plate (Figures 92-93).
Type Material: = [T. pelseneeri] BMNH 1915.4.18.276-7,
two syntypes from west of Malvinas Is. in 229 m (Figures
79-82) and [T. orbignyi] MACN-In 24421, Puerto Que-
quén, Buenos Aires, holotype (Figures $3-S5) and 10
paratypes.
Additional Material Examined: Macaé, Rio de Ja-
neiro, Brazil, August 1969, 2 A, 55 m (USNM 846550):
Macaé, Rio de Janeiro,. Brazil, : e 30 m (AMNH
187586); Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, (AMNH 241045):
off Rio de bare iro, Brazil Ae a ); 34°48'7" S,
54°21'9" W, 1 A, R/V ALpDEBARAN, Cruise 9901, Sta. 25,
27 January idea, 25 m, with Piccard trawl (MNHNM
15400).
Distribution: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, to Uruguay and
Buenos Aires province, Mé ilvinas Is. Rios (1994) cited it
from dredgings from 55 to 225 m off the Brazilian coast.
Remarks: This is a rare species occasionally collected
by fishermen on the mussel banks off Buenos Aires
province. It was originally described from Sta. 3S of the
British Antarctic (“Terra Nova”) Expedition, west of
Malvinas (Falkland) Islands in 125 fathoms depth. How-
ever, together with this species, the author mentioned
several others not reported before or since from. this
latitude, but sae occur at Station 42 of the same ex-
pedition, off Rio de Janeiro. This leads to the supposi-
tion that the material from these stations could have
been mixed up (Searabino, 2003; 199).
Trophon amettei Carcelles, 1946
(Figures 94-100)
Trophon amettei Carcelles, 1946: $4, fig. 13; Carcelles and Wil-
liamson, 1951: 287
Description: Shell small in size (up to 30 mm), fusi-
Page 70 THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 2
Figures 79-93. Trophon pelsenceri I. A. Smith, 1915, 79-80. BMNIT 1915.4.18.276-7 syntype. 81-82. BMNH 1915.4.18.276-7
other syntype. 83-85. T. orbignyi Carcelles, MACN-In 24421 holotype. 86-87. MNHNM 15400, B/T ALDrBaran, 34°d48'7" S
9
54°21'9" W, in 25 m. Seale bar lL cm. 88. Two views of the operculum of the specimen in Figures S6—-S7 Seale baa 2mm
$9-90. USNM 846550 apical and lateral view of the protoconch Seale bars 100 and 300 pom respectively 91. Detail of the
ultrastructure of the shell. Scale bar 100 jum. 92-93. Dorsal and lateral view of the radula of the specimen in Figures S6—S7
‘ le har (0)
Da ) Jem
G. Pastorino, 2005
Figures 94-100.
form, biconic, chalky whitish; protoconch elongate,
smooth, of
dered whorls, spire less than % of the total shell height.
2% whorls; teleoconch of 6 strongly shoul-
Spire angle about 45°, suture impressed; subsutural shelf
short but straight, aperture small, ovoid. interior glossy
white: anterior siphonal canal comparatively long, almost
same height as aperture, open and straight: umbilicus
closed, inner lip adpressed. Axial ornamentation of §
regular concave ee per whorl. Lamellae growing
attached to entire whorl surface and producing concave
spine along periphery. Spiral ornamentation of 2 cords
in first teleoconch whorls that soon become obsolete on
subse oe nt whorls. Last whorl with 6—10 cords on lower
part. Shell ultrastructure composed of two layers, similar
to T. geversianus. Operculum and soft parts unknown
Type Material: Holotype and 15 _ paratypes MACN-
In 23510) all from 45°09’ S, 66°27’ W anchorage Res-
tinga Aristizdbal, Chubut province, in 8 fathoms (11.28
m). rocky bottom associated with the
; calyptraeids Cre-
pidula cachimilla and Calyptraea pileolus
Remarks:
type locality
This is a rare species known only from the
concave lamellae, are 1 fact. unusuc il f tor the genus. The
has not been found again. The regular
Trophon amettei Carcelles, 1946, 94-96. MACN-In 23810, holotype, 45°09' S_ 66°27’ W in 11.28 m. 97-98.
MACN-In 23810, paratype. Scale bar = 1 cm. 99. MACN-In 23510, ultrastructure of the shell. Scale bar = 30 pm. 100. MACN-
In 23810, protoconch, uncoated SEM picture. Scale bar = 300 jzm
protoconch resembles those usually found in the genus
Fuegotrophon, however the typical fimbriate spiral or-
namentation is absent. Trophon pelseneeri has a com-
parable profile, however it is easily segregated: where
the latter has lamellae forming a back-turned spine at
periphery, T. amettei presents a characteristic and
unique concave lamellae. In addition T. pelseneeri has a
slightly open umbilicus while in T. amettei it is invariably
closed. Examination of the radula may beget a new ge-
neric allocation for this species
Trophon clenchi (Carcelles, 1953)
(Figures 101-114)
Murex clenchi Carcelles, 1953: 7, figs. 23-28: Castellanos
1970; SO, pl. 5, fig. 7; Fair, 1976: 31, fig. 15; Vokes, 1992b
24: Rios, 1994: 115
Poirieria (Poirieria) clenchi (Carcelles Vokes, 1970: 18
Sarina a Shell medium in size, delicate, thin,
che lly, tré isluce nt white prot toconch known onl from
the holot type, asyinine tric al. clobose, of 2 A 2 whorls: t te-
leoconch of 5 shouldered whorls; spire short, less than
% of total shell height. Spire angle about 45° (without
subsutural shelf shor
spines); suture impressed
a a SEE
Page 72
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 2
Figures 101-110. Trophon clenchi (Carcelles, 1953). 101-104. MACN-In 25146, holotype, 38°24! $, 55°36’ W in 89.61 m. 105-
107. MACN-In 36269, aproximately 45°10’ S$, 57°20’. Scale bar = 1 cm, 108. Holotype, protoconch. Scale bar = 1000 jzm. 109.
External and internal views of operculum of specimen in Figures 105-107, Scale bar = 0.5 cm 110. MACN-In 25146, paratype.
straight; aperture suboval, interior glossy white; anterior
siphonal canal very long (longer than the aperture
height deep and slightly curved in the beginning and
then straight open but narrow: outer lip sharp, inner lip
somewhat protruding adpressed. \xial ornamentation of
7-9 regular axial lamellae growing across entire whorl
surface, but attached to shell producing open, long and
regularly spaced spines along periphery Spiral Ormamen-
tation of 4—5 rounded cords on lower half of first whorls
becoming more than 20 in the last. Delicate growth lines
present on entire shell surface.
Shell ultrastructure composed of two layers following
the common pattern of the genus: innermost layer (40%
of total thickness of shell) composed of crossed lamellar
aragonite, outer layer (50%) of amorphous calcite.
Sometimes, depending on the fracture mode, a basal
aragonitic layer can be observed.
Radulae rachiglossate, rachidian teeth with three me-
lant
Pp.
. Pastorino, 2005
Figures 111-114. Trophon clenchi (Carcelles, 1953). 111. USNM 901774, 51°58" S, 56°38" W, R/V ELTaNIN Cruise 7, Sta. 558,
646-S45 m, ultrastructure of the shell. Scale bar = 100 pm. 112. Poirieria zelandica, ultrastructure, commarginal fracture surface.
Scale bar = 100 wm. 113. Trophon clenchi MACN-In 36269. Lateral view of radula ribbon. Scale bar = 100 jm. 114. Dorsal
view of radular ribbon. Scale bar = 50 juin.
dian cusps, the central one the larger and the lateral
ones with a denticle, attached to the upper third of the
interior margin of the lateral cusp; external margin with
2-3 obsolete denticles. Rachidian base sinuous, with the
base offset under the proximal tooth. Marginal cusps sin-
ale, never bifid. Lateral teeth curved, thin, with attach-
ment area also thin (Figures 113-114).
Operculum triangular or suboval tear-shaped, attach-
ment area elliptical, with horseshoe shape scars.
Type Material: 38°24’ S, 55°36’ W, off Mar del Plata,
in $9.6 m, holotype and paratype (MACN-In 25146).
Additional Material Examined: 51°58’ S$, 56°38’ W,
3 D, R/V ELTANIN Cruise 7, Sta. 558, 646-845 m
USNM 901774), 41°51’ S, 57°34" W, collected by Uru-
cuayan fishermen, June 2002, 1062 m, 1A, MACN-In
36270; approximately 45°10’ S, 57°20’ Uruguayan fish-
ermen, | A, MACN-In 36269: 54°50’ S, 63°50.5' W. 2.5
miles south Punta Fallows, Isla de los Estados, Tierra
del Fuego, 1 A, R/V Hero Cruise 715, Sta. 715/879, 28
October 1971, in 342-353 m (LACM 71-331).
Distribution: Known from off Buenos Aires province,
Patagonia and Isla de los Estados, in 90-1050 m depth.
Remarks: Carcelles (1953) described Murex clenchi
from two shells he received from the crew of the ARA
Banfa BLANCA, an Argentine Navy ship that occasionally
collected material for the collection of the Museo Ar-
gentino de Ciencias Naturales (MACN). Both holotype
and paratype were collected from the continental shelf
off Buenos Aires province. This material remained
housed at the MACN until it was sent on loan and it
appears to have been lost for almost 30 years (see Cas-
tellanos, 1986). The return of the material to MACN
made the type material again available for studies. Per-
haps because of these facts, the ordinary quality of the
illustration and the absence of soft parts, the species was
always reluctantly considered as the southernmost rep-
resentative of the genus Murex
E. H. Vokes, in a fundamental paper published in
1970, stated that Murex clenchi belongs in the genus
Poirieria sensu stricto. Rios (1994) considered M. clenchi
Page 74
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 2
as an anomalous specimen of Trophon acanthodes Wat-
son, a species that slightly resembles some specimens of
M. clenchi (e.g., the paratype).
The morphology of the shell as well as the radula and
penis of Murex clenchi allow the allocation in the genus
Trophon. In fact, this was already suggested by E. H.
Vokes (1992b). After studying the material of T) acan-
thodes housed at the MACN she proposed that M. clen-
chi belongs to Trophon sensu lato and not to Poirieria.
It bears no relationship with Poirieria despite some ap-
parent shell similarity. As it is shown in Figure 112, Poir-
ieria zelandica, type species of Poirieria, Tae no calcitic
layer on the shell but a thick aragonitic one instead (Fig-
ure 112a). In contrast, the entire group of Patagonian
Trophon (T. clenchi in particular), shows different de-
grees of development of the typical calcitic layer on the
distinct species.
The range of the very few lots studied falls within the
geographic distribution of other species of Trophon. Tro-
phon clenchi was known from two quite different geo-
graphic and bathymetric areas: off Buenos Aires prov-
ince (in about 90 m) and the slope off Patagonia. A new
lot is recorded here from Isla de los Estados, which sig-
nificantly increases the range of distribution of the spe-
cies. It is possible that hike other Patagonian species of
the genus, T. clenchi would be associ ‘ated to hard bot-
toms, thus hampering the collection of material. Its fra-
gility, size, and inadequate sampling of the area adds
other reasons for the scarcity of records. It is suggested
that these variables accounts for the disjunt recorded
distribution of this species. In fact, this species started
to be repeatedly collected recently, when the fishery of
the Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) on
the Argentinean slope provided the opportunity to catch
accidentally entangled specimens (F. Scarabino, pers.
comm. ).
Trophon wilhelmensis Ramirez-Bohme, 1981
(Figures 115-119)
Trophon (Enixotrophon) wilhelmensis Ramirez-Bohme, 1981:
6, fig. la, b.
Description: Shell of medium size, about 52 mm
high, slender in profile, chalky white; Sa un-
iow teleoconch of 6 shouldered whorls: spire less
than % of total shell height. Spire angle less than 45°;
suture impressed, subsutural shelf straight, aperture
small, subcircular, interior glossy white; anterior siphonal
canal very long (longer a aperture height) deep,
straight or curved, always open; outer lip ri ather reflexed,
rounded, inner lip adpresse sd. Axial ornamentation of
12-15 regularly spaced, axial lamellae, slightly raised, al-
most attache d along the entire whorl, producing open,
conspicuous, regul: urly spaced spines at periphery; spines
becoming more close ly packed on last whorl. Spirs al or-
namentation of 4—5 weak rounded threads on the lower
part of the first whorls, becoming more than 20 in last
one. Growth lines present throughout shell, producing
wrinkly surface by intersection with spirals.
Operculum elliptical, nucleus terminal. External sur-
face covered by growth lines. Inner surface with mar-
ginal rim; Adachinent area, horseshoe-shaped scars pres-
ent.
Rachidian teeth of about 90 zm wide, central cusp
large; lateral cusps shorter than central cusp, inner edge
with conspicuous de nticle, external edge with 5 denticles
of equal size. Base of rachidian tooth straight, somewhat
sinuous, sliding beneath base of next tooth. Marginal
area with single cusp. Lateral teeth thin with single, Tong
cusp, slightly attached basal plate.
Type Material: Holotype in MNHN (unnumbered),
41°51' S, 74°30'5” W West of Chiloé Island in 250 m.
Additional Material Examined: Boca del Guafo,
43°39'36" S. 73°51'11" W, southern Chile, 6 July 2002,
1 A, 200 m (MNHWN unnumbered).
Distribution: Known only from the holotype and an-
other lot, both from the same area and depth, around
the Chiloe Is., Chile.
Remarks: Trophon wilhelmensis was recently de-
scribed from Chile with no mention of the similarity
with T. acanthodes. Both species are actually quite sim-
ilar. The species, known only from the holotype and an-
other specimen, may be distinguished from T. acantho-
des mainly by the upturne cd spines (compare Figures 66—
73 with Figures 115-117). In addition, slight diferentes
in the morphology of the rachidian reat: allow for fur-
ther differentiation of the two species. Notwithstanding,
future studies of specimens from intermediate localities
could demonstrate that these represent but a single spe-
cies.
Trophon bahamondei McLean and Andrade, 1982
(Figures 120-125)
Tropnon bahamondei McLean and Andrade, 1982: 10, figs. 24—
25.
Description: Shell of medium size, up to 50 mm,
slender, with narrow profile, chalky or creamy white;
protoconch unknown (worn in all specimens); teleo-
conch of 6 shouldered whorls; spire less than % of total
shell height. Spire angle about 45°; suture impressed,
subsutural shelf well defined, straight; aperture subcir-
cular, interior chalky white; anterior siphonal canal very
long (equal to aperture height), narrow, and curved,
open; outer lip sharp, mound. inner lip adpressed. Axial
ornamentation of 11-13 regular axial lamellae growing
on entire whorl surface, but attached to the shell and
producing open, short and regularly spaced spines along
periphery. Spiral ornamentation lac king. Growth lines
present throughout shell.
Ope srculum “elliptical, nucleus terminal. External sur-
face CC wvered by concentric, irregular crowth lines. Inner
surface attachment area reaching upper side or center,
with horseshoe-shaped scars (Figure 123).
Radula with rachidian teeth very wide (~114 jzm),
with narrow base, central cusp thin, large; lateral cusps
G. Pastorino, 2005
Figures 115-119. Trophon wilhelmensis Ramirez-Bohme, 1981. 115-117. MNHNS unnumbered, Boca del Guafo, 43°39'36" S,
73°51 11" W, southern Chile, 6 July 2002, 200 m. Seale bar = 1 em. 118-119. Radula of the specimen on Figures 115-117, 118.
Frontal view. Scale bar = 50 xm. 119. Lateral view. Scale
wider and shorter than central cusp, inner edge wi
sharp. curved denticle, external edge with denticles de-
creasing in size toward lateral edge where they disa
pear. Base of rachidian tooth sinuous, inserted in part
under base of subsequent tooth. Marginal area with si
o
yar = 40 jem
h
=
le conspicuous cusp. Lateral teeth with single, long and
very narrow cusp, $ ightly attached basal plate. Centr
al
cusps of rachidian teeth curved back in lateral view (Fig-
ures 124-125
Animal very similar to T. plicatus. Osphradium le
Ss
than half ctenidium length, asymmetrical, with 60—70
leaflets. Ctenidium with 140 leaflets less than two times
larger than those of osphradium. Tentacles well defined;
eyes deeply marked. Same type of accessory salivary
glands, twisted and non-compact
Male unknown, all specimens studied were females
Female similar to T. geversianus
Type Material: Holotype from off Pichilemu, Chile
34°27' S, 340 m (LACM 1982, but apparently on loan)
and two paratypes, 34°27’ S, 71°54’ W, 25 May 1976,
200-450 m (USNM 754739).
Additional Material Examined: 31°56’ S, 71°54’ W,
off Los Vilos, Chile, 2 A, 8 March 1977, 240-350 m
(LACM 72491): off Playa Blanca, Coquimbo, Chile, 400
m (ANSP 291065): off Coquimbo, Chile (LACM 75-88
Distribution: This is a deep water Trophon known
from latitudes 30° to 34° S off the coast of Chile
Remarks: Trophon bahamondei 1S apparently a Very
Page 76
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 2
Figures 120-125. Trophon bahamondei McLean and Andrade, 1952. 120-122. Paratype USNM 754739, 34°27’ S, 71°54" W,
Pichilemu, Chile, in 200-450 m. Scale bar = 1 em, 123. Operculum, external (right) and internal (left) views. Scale bar = 1 cm.
124. Dorsal view of radular ribbon. Scale bar = 30 xm. 125. Lateral view of rachidian teeth. Scale bar = 30 frm.
consistent species from the morphological standpoint. It
was only recently described despite its apparently wide-
spread presence in shrimp trawls. The deeper water
habitat of species (more than 200 m) probably rendered
the species less accessible in the past.
General morphology of shell and gross anatomy shows
at first glance some similarities with those of T. plicatus;
however close examination of shell and radula confirms
the presence of a different species.
Trophon parodizi new species
Figures 126-137, Table 1)
Description: Shell medium in size (up to 2
Q
oO mm),
very thin, chalky: protoconch smooth, of 1% (1.
4]
1.39) very asymmetrical whorls: transition to teleoconch
well defined; teleoconch of 4 convex whorls spire less
than ¥% total shell height Spire angle about 40°; suture
ImMpre ssed aperture subovoid. interior lossy white; all-
terior siphonal canal medium in size (less than half
height of aperture), narrow, open; umbilicus absent; out-
er lip rounded. Axial ornamentation of irregular, low,
rounded ridges occupying entire whorl surface, num-
bering up to 9 in early whorls, but vanishing and un-
dulate on last whorl. Spiral ornamentation poorly devel-
oped or almost smooth, when present consisting of ob-
solete, weak cords mostly developed on last whorl. T-
regular growth lines present throughout shell.
Shell ultrastructure composed of two layers; inner-
most layer thin (35% of shell thickness), composed of
colabrally aligned crossed lamellar aragonite, outer layer
thick (65% of shell thickness) with amorphous calcite.
Operculum oval, with terminal nucleus. External sur-
face covered by concentric, irregular, growth lines. Inner
surface attachment area with two or three horseshoe-
shape scars. Animal unknown.
Radula rachiglossan with rachidian teeth distinctive,
central cusp thin, large; lateral cusps almost same size
as central cusp, sharp denticle on upper third, irregular
external denticles present. Base of rachidian tooth sin-
G. Pastorino, 2005 Page 77
Figures 126-137. Trophon parodizi new species. 126-128. USNM 896397, holotype, 54°56" S, 65°03" W, in 229-265 m. 129-
130. USNM 896397, paratype. coated with ammonium chloride. Scale bar = 1 cm. 131. Ultrastructure, fracture surface commar-
ginal. Scale bar = 20 pm. 132. USNM 896397, operculum, external view. Scale bar = 0.5 cm. 133-135. Protoconch of the
paratype. three views. Scale bar for all figures = 400 pm. 136. Dorsal view of radular ribbon. Scale bar = 40 jum. 137. Lateral
view of rachidian teeth. Scale bar = 40 wm
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 2
Figures 138-144.
uous, sliding beneath base of next tooth. Marginal area
with a conspicuous cusp. Lateral teeth with single, long
cusps and narrow, slightly attached basal plate.
Type Material: Holotype and one paratype from
54°56° S, 65°03° W, Le Maire Strait, R/V ELTANIN Cruise
11, Sta. 969, 10 F ebruary 1964, 229-265 m, Blake trawl
(USNM 896397) (Map 1).
Material Examined: Only holotype and paratype.
Distribution: Known only from the type locality.
Etymology: This species is named after Juan José Par-
odiz, one of the pioneers of malacology Argentina,
Curator Emeritus at the Carnegie Museum, Pittsburgh,
and a good friend.
Remarks:
within Trophon. The small, very thin shell, almost com-
Trophon parodizi is an unusual species
pletely smooth and devoid of lamellae, is an exception
for the Patagonian Trophon. However, the radula and
protoconch match those typical of the genus. The rad-
ular morphology resembles that of T. plicatus where the
denticles of the lateral cusp of the rachidian teeth are
plac ed along the entire external e dge of the lateral c usp.
In 7 parodizi the lateral cusp is thinner and the denti-
cles are more clearly separated from it and placed mainly
along the marginal area as in T. bahamondei. In addi-
tion—a character also present in T. bahamondei—most
internal denticle lies against the lateral cusp and is clear-
ly differentiated from the rest
“Trophon” malvinarum Strebel 1908, 138-139. NHRM 1041, holotype
In 23944-2, 55°07’ S, 66°33’ W. 143-144. Protoconch. Scale bar = 400 xm
»592°29' S, 60°36! W. 140-142. MACN-
“Trophon™ malvinarum Strebel, 1908
(Figures 135-144)
Trophon malvinarum Strebel, 1908: 44, figs. 16 a-c; Carcelles
and Williamson, 1951: 289: Castellanos and Landoni,
1993: 10, pl. 2, fig. 29.
Description: Shell small, up to 30 mm, thick, fusi-
form, profile slender, chalky, whitish; protoconch glo-
bose, somewhat cylindrical, with two whorls: teleoconch
of 4% shouldered whorls, spire less than % of total shell
height. Spire angle about 45°; suture impressed; subsu-
tural shelf abaxially oblique, aperture subquadrate, an-
terior siphonal canal moderately long (same height as
aperture): umbilicus closed, outer lip polygonal to
rounded; inner lip slightly curved, cas sd. Axial or-
hnamentation of S—9 re soular, distinct low varices, which
never develop into full-fledged lamellae. Spiral orna-
mentation of about 3 cords, filling interspaces between
consecutive varices, and beginning at periphery of
whorls.
Radula and anatomy unknown.
Table 1. Measurements of the type specimens of Trophon
parodizi new species in mm
Species Leneth Width Whorls
[. parodizxi
Holotype 23 L] {
2
Paratype Ll 10.6 {
G. Pastorino, 2005
a. > TC
| age iv
=
T eee aeny ~
Buenos Aires a ,
Y
y A
*
Golfo
San Matias
~ -Malvinas Is.
Se
te rt eS
Se
v A
e
sar Staten Is
nce — eh
Figure 145. Map showing the type locality of T. parodizi
new species ( @ ).
Type Material: 52°29’ S, 60°36’ W, West Falkland
(Malvinas) Is., Svenska Sudpolar Expedition, 11 Septem-
ber 1902. Sta. 58, 197 m (NHRM 1041).
Additional Material Examined: 55°07’ S, 66°33’ W,
1 D. $3 m (MACN-In 23944-2).
Distribution: Around Malvinas Is. and the Magellanic
region.
Remarks: “Trophon” malvinarum is a rare species
known from only one specimen other than the holotype.
It was originally described in the genus Trophon; how-
ever, the protoconch is somewhat shorter a symmet-
rical and the shell never develops true lamellae but low
varices. It probably could be better assigned in the genus
Urosalpinx. Assessment of its real attaites must wait
until estes with soft parts preserved can be studied.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
The geographic distribution of the species of the genus
Trophon sensu stricto is restricted to the southwestern
Atlantic and the southeastern Pacific Oceans. This dis-
tribution is certainly a consequence of their larval biol-
ogy. Planktonic larval development is unknown to occur
in the genus. Moreover, the larvae do not need to move
any significant distance either for feeding or reproduc
tive purposes—those from shallow water habitats live on
mussel banks on which they feed and mate. Such a con-
dition is reflected in the enormous morphological vari
ation shown by the shells of the different species, par-
ticularly in T. geversianus. While most of the species are
well known, some others were only collected in a single
location (e.g., T. amettei) and therefore their range “of
variation remains to be known.
Radular and anatomical features suggest that the en-
tire Tro} hon group from Patagonia is very homoge-
neous. An the species included in this genus have several
common radular features. The most femaieble are: the
intermediate denticle attached to the upper third of the
internal edge of the lateral cusp of the rachidian teeth;
a single marginal denticle in the external edge of the
base of the eaidian teeth; the attachment area of the
marginal teeth are always (no exceptions known) narrow,
thin, with the free part of same thickness, and the cen-
tral cusp of the rachidian is always thin and larger than
the laterals (see also Pastorino, 2002).
The Antarctic species so far assigned to Trophon and
the boreal ones recently included in the genus Boreo-
trophon (see Egorov, 1993) have the immer denticle be-
ie central and lateral cusp of the rachidian teeth al-
ways free, attached to the base of the teeth. In addition,
most of the radulae of these northeastern Atlantic spe-
cies—according to Bouchet and Warén’s revision
(1985)—have a lite: id attachment of the marginal teeth.
Conchological features are so variable that I consid-
ered them as secondary. However, the protoconchs are
actually very different and allow for the division in at
least two clearly defined oe There is no ornamen-
tation on the protoconchs of Patagonian representé itives
of Trophon, whereas most of the Loreal species of Bor-
eotrophon have a delicate pattern of irregular threads.
The anes species have also no ornamentation in the
protoconch with only one exception: T. scotianus Powell,
1951 which has apparently the same pattern observed in
North Atlantic Boreotroj yhon species.
There are several ae features that character-
ize the group of species living along the South American
coast. The accessory salivary glands, when known, are
usually tubular; the esophagus produces a typical esoph-
ageal loop after the cake of Leiblein and posteriorly
runs appressed to the left side of the gland of Leiblein;
Page SO
the esophageal glands in the mid-esophagus are incon-
spicuous, not exomally visible; and finally, the penises
are always dorso-ventrally flattened, with a large papilla
and a simple vas deferens either closed by the ov erlap-
ping sides of the penis or open.
The features mentioned above and the geological sto-
ry of the two areas, Antartica and Patagonia, allow for
the clear differentiation of these two groups.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I thank the following people for making available spec-
imens and type material for study or advice when re-
quested: P. Greenhall and T. Nickens (USNM); K. Way
(BMNH), D. Reid (BMNH); A. Warén (NHRM); P.
Bouchet and V. Heros (MNHN); J. H. McLean and L.
Groves (LACM); P. Mikkelsen (AMNH); G. Rosenberg
and P. Callomon (ANSP); B. Sirenko (ZIL); O. Galvez
Herrera (MNHNS); C. Osorio (Santiago, Chile); F. Scar-
abino (DINARA) and C. Ituarte (MLP). P. Lozouet
(MNHN) took the photographs of specimens from Paris.
S. Horta (DINARA) and H. Racz-Lorenz (Montevideo)
kindly provided some of the specimens of Trophon clen-
chi that allowed part of the present work. Emily Vokes
(Tulane University) and Bruce Marshall (Museum of
New Zealand Te ‘Papa Tongarewa, Wellington) helped
with excellent reviews that Gonsiderabls improved on the
original manuscript. Finally special thanks to M. G. Har
asewych (USNM), who guided this work from the be-
ginning, and to M. Griffin for good advice.
Part of this study was conduc ted during a Postdoctoral
Fellowship granted by the Consejo Nacional de Inves-
tigaciones Centos y Técnicas (CONICET), Argenti-
na, to support my tenure at the National Museum of
Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington,
DC. The study was also supported in part by a Research
Award from the NSF-USAP United States Antarctic
Program [Contract No. OPP-9509761], a Grant Award
from Conchologists of America and the Walter E. Sage
Memorial Aw ard, in addition to the projects PICTs 02-
01795 and 03-14419 from the National Agency for Sci-
entific and Technical Promotion, Argentina.
LITERATURE CITED
Adams, H., and A. Adams. 1853-1854. The Genera of Recent
Mollusca, arranged according to their organization. Vol-
ume 1. John van Voorst, Paternoster Row, London, 484
pp. [pp 1-156, 1853; pp. 257-44, 1854].
Aguirre, M. L. 1993. Type specimens of Quaternary marine
gastropods from Argentina. Ameghiniana 30: 23-38.
Bouchet, P.. and A. Warén. 1985. Revision of the northeast
Atlantic bathyal and abyssal Neogastropoda excluding Tur-
ridae (Mollusca, Gastropoda). Bolletino Malacologico,
supplemento 2: 123-296.
Calvo, I. S. 1987. Radulas de Gastré6podes Marinhos Brasilei-
ros. Editora da Fundagao Universidade do Rio Grande,
Rio Grande, 201 pp
Carcelles, A. 1943. Observaciones sobre Trophon varians
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 2
dOrbigny. Notas del Museo de La Plata, Zoologia 8(72):
431-437.
Carcelles, A. 1946. Observaciones sobre algunas especies ac-
tuales y fésiles de Trophon de la Republica Argentina. No-
tas del Museo de La Plata, Zoologia 11(93): 59-89.
Carcelles, A. 1947. Notas sobre algunos gastropodos marinos
del Uruguay y la Argentina. I-VI. Comunicaciones Zool-
Ogicas del Museo de Historia Natural de Montevideo
2(40): 1-27
Carcelles, A. 1953. Nuevas especies de gastropodos marinos de
las Reptiblicas Oriental del Uruguay y Argentina. Comun-
icaciones Zoolégicas del Museo de Historia Natural de
Montevideo 4(70): 1-18.
Carcelles, A. and S. Williamson. 1951. Catalogo de los molus-
cos marinos de la provincia magallanica. Revista del In-
stituto Nacional de Investigacién de las Ciencias Naturales
2, Ciencias Zooldégicas: 225-383.
Castellanos, Z. J. A. de. 1970. Catalogo de los moluscos mari-
nos bonaerenses, Anales de la Comision de Investiga-
ciones Cientificas de la provincia de Buenos Aires 8: 9-
365.
Castellanos, Z. A. de. 1986. Aclaracién sobre Trophon acan-
ae Watsons 1883 (Mollusca Gastropoda). Neotrépica
(87): 2
ee ae A. de, and N, Landoni. 1993. Catélogo des-
criptivo de la malacofauna marina magallanica 9. Neogas-
tropoda: Muricidae y Thaisidae. Comision de Investiga-
ciones Cientificas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, 26 pp.
Castellanos, Z. J. A. de., E. Rolain and S. Bartolotta. 1987.
Nuevos nuicrouiohisens de la platatorma inferior Argentina
y talud superior (Moll. Gastropoda). Revista del Museo de
La Plata, ig Zoologia 14(156): 93-102.
Cemohorsky, W. O. 1977. The taxonomy of some southern
ocean ee (Gastropoda) mainly antarctic and subant-
arctic. Records of the Auckland Institute and Museum 14:
105-119.
Chemnitz, J. H. 1780. Neues systematisches Conchylien-Cab-
inet / Geordnet und beschrieben von Friedrich Heinrich
Wilhelm Martini und unter dessen Aufsicht nach der Na-
tur gezeichnet und mit lebendigen Farben erleuchtet.
Raspe, Niiremberg. Vol. 4, 344 pp. pls. 122-159.
Cossmann, M. 1903. Essais de Paléoconchologie comparée. F.
R. de Rudeval, Paris, 151 pp.
Cristofori, J. D., and G. Jan. 1832. Catalogus in IV sectiones
divisus rerum naturalium in Musaeo exstantium / J. de
Cristofori et G. Jan ... complectens adumbrationem or-
yctognosiae et geognosiae atque prodromum faunae et flo-
rae italiae superioris. Mediolani, Parmae, Sectio 1, 1-8 pp.
Dance, P. 1962. The authorship of the Portland Catalogue
(1786). Journal of the Society of Bibliography of Natural
History 4(1): 30-34.
Dance, P. 1966, Shell Collecting: An Illustrated History. Berke-
ley, University of California Press, Berkeley, 305 pp.
Dell, R. K. 1971. The marine mollusca of the Royal Society
Expedition to southern Chile, 1958-1959. Records of the
Dominion Museum 7(17): 155-233.
Dell, R. K. 1990. Antarctic Mollusca with special reference to
the fauna of the Ross Sea. Bulletin of the Royal Society
of New le aland 27: 1-311.
dOrbigny, A. D. 1834-1547. Mollusques. In: Bertrand, C.P.,
led, a age dans /Amerique Meridionale (Le Bresil, La
Repub lique Orientale de LUruguay, La Republique Ar-
gentine, La Patagonie, La Re publique du Chili, La Re-
publique de Bolivia, La Republique du Perou), execute
G. Pastorino, 2005
Page 8]
pendant les annees 1826, 1827, 1828, 1829, 1830, 1831,
1832 et 1833. Chez Ve. Levrault, pas 5(3) 758 pp.
Egorov, R. 1993. Trophonine ie (Muricidae) of Russian and ad-
jacent waters. Ruthenica Supplement: 11-49.
Fair, R. H. 1976. The Murex Book: an illustrated catalogue of
Recent Muricidae (Muricinae, Muricopsinae, Ocenebri-
nae). Ruth H. Fair, Honolulu, Hawaii, 138 pp.
Favanne Montcervelle, J. D. 1780. La conchyliologie, ou his-
toire naturelle des coquilles de mer, d’eau douce, terres-
tres et fossiles; avec un traite de la Zoomorphose, ou rep-
resentation des animaux qui les habitent: ee dans
lequel on trouve une nouvelle Methode de les diviser. De
Bure, G. Paris, 2, S48 pp.
Gmelin, J. F. 1791. Caroli a Linné Systema Naturae per Regna
Tria Naturae, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Spe-
cies, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Ed-
itio decima tertia, aucta, reformata, cura J. F. Gmelin.
Georg. Emanuel. Beer, Leipzig, 1, part 6 Vermes, pp.
3021-3910.
Gould, A. A. 1852-1861. Atlas. Mollusca and Shells, p. 512,
United States Exploring Expedition, During the years
1838, 1839, 1840, L041, 1842. Under the command of
Charles Wilkes, U.S. N. Volume 12. C. Sherman and Son,
Philadelphia.
Gray, J. E. 1839. Molluscous Animals. In: The Zoology of Cap-
tain Beecheys Voyage; compiled from the collections and
notes made by C aptain Beechey, the officers and naturalist
of the expe dition, During a voyage to the pacific and Beh-
ring’s Straits performed in his Majesty’s ship Blossom, un-
der the command of Captain F. W. Beechey, in the years
1825, 26, 27 and 28. H. G. Bohn, London 1: 103-142.
Griffin, M. and G. Pastorino. 2005. The genus Trophon Mont-
fort, 1S10 (Ge astropoda: Muricidae) in the Tertiary of Pat-
agonia. Journal of Paleontology 79: 296-311.
Hanley, S. 1856. Index Teste wceologicus, an illustrated catalogue
of British and fore ign shells... by W. Wood. A new and
eens revised edition. Willis and Sotheran, London. xx
234 pp.
econ M. G. 1954. Comparative anatomy of four prim-
itive muricacean gastropods. Implications for Hoghantn: ie
phylogeny. American Malacological Bulletin 3: 11-26.
Houart. R. 1991. The southeastern brazilian maineidae col-
lected by RV Marion-Dufresne in 1987, with the descrip-
tion of three new species. The Nautilus 105; 26-37
Houart, R. 1998. Description of Trophon tarde i. sp., a new
muricid from southern West Atlantic (Gastropoda: Muri-
cidae) with illustration of related species. Apex 13: 127—
130.
Houart, R. 2003. Description of three new species of Trophon
s. |. Montfort, 1S10 (Gstropoda: Muricidae) from Chile.
meee 4: 101-110.
Hupé, L. H. 1854. Mollusca, p. 499. In: C. Gay (ed.), Historia
Fisics i y Politica de Chile. Zoologia 8. Maulde y Renou,
Paris and Santiago.
International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature
(ICZN). 1944. Opinion 184. On the status of names first
published in volumes 1 to 11 of Martini (F. H. W.) and
Chemnitz (J. H.), Neues systematisches Conchylien-Cab-
inet, Niirmmberg, 1769-17 95. Opinions and Declarations
rendered by the ICZN 3(3): 25-36
International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature
ICZN). 1957. Opinion 456 ear of the work by
Thomas Martyn published in 1784 with the title “The Uni-
versal Conchologist” as a ie which does not comply
with the requirements of Article 25 of the “regles” and
which therefore possesses no status in zoological nomen-
clature and rejection also of a proposal that the forgoing
work should be validated under the plenary powers. Opin-
ions and Declarations of the ICZN 15(22): 395-410.
Ihering, H. von 1907. Les Mollusques fossiles du Tertiaire et
du Cretace superieur de PArgentine. Anales del Museo
Nacional de Buenos Aires (3)7: 1-611.
Knorr, G. W. 1757-1773. Verniigen der Augen und des Ge-
miiths, in Vorstellung einer allgemeinen Sammlung von
Muscheln und andern Geshépfen, welche im Meer ge-
funden werden. Niirnberg. 1, 40 pp., 30 pls. (1757); 2, 56
pp.. 30 pls. (1764); 3, 52 pp., 30 pls. (1 oy : 4, 48 pp., 30
pls. (1769); 5, 46 pp., 30 pls. (1771); 6, 18 pp.. 40 pls
(1773).
Knorr, G. W. 1760-1773. Les délices des yeux et de lespirit,
ou collection géné ie des différentes especes de coquil-
lages que la mer renferme. Nuremberg. 1, 52 pp., 30 pls.
(1760); 2, 65 pp., 30 pls. (1765); 3, 55 pp., 30 pls. ( nos:
4, 54 pp., 30 pls. (1770); 5, 48 pp., 30 pls. (1771); 6, 76
pp.. 40 pls. (1773).
Kobelt, W. 1878. Die geschwénzten und bewehrten Purpur-
schnecken (Murex, Ranella, Tritonium, Trophon, Hindsia).
In: Abbildungen nach der Natur mit Beschreibungen. Be-
gonnen von HH. C. Kiister, fortgesetzt und beendet von W.
Kobelt, Systematisches Conchylien-Cabinet von Martini
und Chemnitz. Neu herausgegeben und vervollstandigt
von H. C. Kuster (nach dessen Tode fortgesetzt von W.
Kobelt und H. C. Winkauff). Verlag von Bauer and Raspe,
Nurnberg 3 (2), 336 pp.
Kool, S. P. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of the Rapaninae (Neo-
gastropoda: Muricidae). Mal: icologia 35: 55-260.
Lamy, E. 1906. Gastropodes Prosobranches et Pé ‘Jécypodes:
‘Expédition Antarctique Francaise (1903-1905) Comman-
deé par le Dr. Jean Charcot. Masson et Cie. Paris, Sci-
ences Naturelles, 20 pp.
Lightfoot, J. 1786. A catalogue of the Portland Museum, lately
the property of the Duchess Dowages of Portland, de-
ceased: which will be sold by auction by Mr. Skinner and
Co. on Monday the 24th of April, 1756, and the thirty
seven following days, at twelve o'clock London, 194 pp.
Martyn, T. 1784. The Universal Conchologist, exhibiting the
figure of every known shell, accurately drawn, and Se
after nature: with a new systematic arr mgement by the
author Thomas Martyn. Volume 1. T. Martyn, London,
pls. 1-80.
McLean, J. H. and H. Andrade. 1982. Large archibenthal Gas-
tropods of Central Chile Collection from expe dition of the
R/V Anton Bruun and the Chilean Shrimp Fishery. Con-
tributions in Science 342: 1-20.
Melvill, J. C., and R. Standen. 1907. The marine mollusca of
the Scottish National Antarctic Expedition. Transactions
of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 46: 119-157,
Michelotti, A. J. 1546. Mitteilungen an Professor Bronn geri-
chtet. Neues Jahrbuch fiir Mineralogie, Geognosie, Geo-
logie und Petrefakten-Kunde, 1546; 52-56.
Michelotti, G. 1847. Description des fossiles des terrains mio-
cenes de I'Italie septentrionale. Natuurkundige verhan-
delingen van de Bataafsche Hollandsche Maatschappye
der Wetenschappen te Haarlem 3(2): 1408
Molina, G. I. 1810. Saggio sulla storia naturale del Chile. Bo-
logna, 306 pp.
Montfort, P. D, D. 1810. Conchyliologie systématique, et clas-
sification méthodique des coquille s: offrant leurs figures,
Page 82
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 2
leur arrangement generique, leurs descriptions caracter-
istiques, leurs noms; ainsi que leur synonymie en plusieurs
langues. F. Schoell, Paris, 2, 676 pp.
Pain, T. 1980. A gallery of eacids from around the world.
Hawaiian Shell News 28: 8-9.
Pallas, P. S. 1774. Spicilegia Zoologica quibus novae imprimis
et obscurae animalium species iconibus, descriptionibus
atque commentariis illustrantur. Berolini, 1 part 10, 41
pp.. 44 ps
Pastorino, G, 2002. Systematics and phylogeny of the genus
Trophon Montfort, 1810 ( (Gastropoda: Muricidae) from
Patagonia and Antarctica: morphological patterns. Bollet-
tino Malacologico 38 (supplemento 4): 127-134.
Pastorino, G. and M. G. Harasewych. 2000. A Revision of the
Patagonian genus Xymenopsis Powell, 1951 (Gastropoda:
Muricidae). The Nautilus 114: 38-58.
Penchaszadeh, P. 1976. Reproduccién de gastropodos proso-
branquios del Atlantico suroccidental. El género Trophon.
Physis, Seccion A, 35 (90): 69-76.
Penna-Neme, L., and J. L. Moreira Leme. 1978. Novas espé-
cies e novas ocorréncias de Gastrépodos marinhos da Cos-
ta Brasileira (Prosobranchia, Neogastropoda). Papéis Avul-
sos de Zoologia 31: 283-297.
Perry, G. 1811. Conchology, or the natural history of shells:
containing a new arrangement of the genera and species,
illustrated by coloured engravings excouted from the nat-
ural specimens, and including dhe latest discoveries. Bul-
mer and Co, London, 4 pp.. 61 pls.
Petit de la Saussaye, M.S. 1856. Description de Coquilles nou-
velles. Journal de Conchyliologie 5: 87-92.
Philippi, R. A. 1868. Conchylia nova potissimum magellanica.
Malakozoologische Blatter 15: 223-226.
Powell, A. W. B. 1951. Antarctic and subantarctic Mollusca:
Pelecypoda and Gastropoda. Discovery Reports 26: 47—
196.
Ramirez-Bohme, J. 1981. Trophon (Enixotrophon) wilhelmen-
sis n. sp. (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Muricidae). Museo Na-
cional de Historia Natural, Noticiario Mensual 24 (301—
302): 5-7.
Reeve, L. 1847. Monograph of the genus Fusus. Conchologia
Iconica. Vol. 4, pls. 1-14.
Rehder, H. A. 1967. Valid zoological names of the Portland
Catalogue. Proceedings of the United States National Mu-
seum 121 (3579): 2-21.
Rios, E. 1985. Seashells of Brazil. Editora da Fundacao Univ-
ersidade do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, 328 pp.
Rios, E, 1994. Seashells of Brazil. 2°" ed. Editora da Fundagao
Universidade do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, 368 pp.
Rochebrune, A. T. D. and J. Mabille. 1889. Mollusques. Mis-
sion Scientifique du Cap Horn. 1882-1883. Volume 6,
Zoologie, 2. Gauthier-Villars et fils, Paris, pp. H1-129.
Réding, P. F. 1798. Museum Boltenianum sive catalogus ci-
meliorum e tribus regnis naturae quae olim collegerat.
Joa. Fried Bolten, M. D. pd Pars Secunda continens con-
chylia sive testacea univalvia, bivalvia and multivalvia,
Hamburgo, 199 pp.
Scarabino, F. 2003. Lista sistematica de los Cephalopoda vi-
vientes de Uruguay. Comunicaciones de la Sociedad Ma-
lacolégica del Uruguay 8; 197-202.
Schumacher, C. F. 1817. Essais d'un nouveau systéme des hab-
itations des vers testacés. Schultz, Copenhagen, 287 pp.
Smith, E. A. 1915. Mollusca Part I Gastropoda Prosobranchia,
Scaphopoda and Pelecypoda. British Antarctic (“Terra
Now! Expedition, 1910. Natural History Report, Zoology
: 61-112.
Gian A. 1972. Malacological application of Scanning Electron
Microscopy, I. Radular structure and functioning. The
Veliger 14: 327-336.
Sowerby, G. B. I. 1846. Descriptions of Tertiary fossil shells
from South America. In: Darwin, C. Geological Obser-
vations on South America. Smith Elder Co, london: Pp.
249— oe
Sowerby, B. IL. 1847-1887. Thesaurus Conchyliorum of
tee of Genera of Shells, London.
Strebel, H. 1904. Beitriige zur Kenntnis der Molluskenfauna
der Magalhaen- Provinz. Zoologischen Jahrbiichern. Ab-
teilung fiir Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Ti-
ere, 21 (2 ): 171-248.
Strebel, H. 1908. Die Gastropoden. Wissenschaftliche Ergeb-
nisse der Schwedischen Sudpolar-expedition 1901-1903
Unter Mitwirkung Zahlreicher Fachgenossen Herausge-
geben von Otto Nordenskjold Leiter der Expedition. 6,
Zoologie (2), 111 pp.
Tapparone-Canefri, C. 1874. Zoologia del viaggio intorno al
globo della Regia Fregata Magenta durante gli anni 1865—
68. Malacologia ( (Gasteropodi, Acefali e Brachiopodi). Me-
morie della Reale Accademia delle Scienze di Torino (2)
28: 161.
Tryon, G. W. 1880. Muricinae, Purpurinae. Manual of Con-
chology (1) 2, 289 pp.
Vokes, E. H. 1970. Cenozoic Muricidae of the western Atlantic
region. Part 5. Pterynotus and Poirieria. Tulane Studies in
Geology and Paleontology § (1): 1-50.
Vokes, E. H. 1971. Cat: alogue ‘of the genus Murex Linné (Mol-
lusca: Gastropoda); Muricinae, ‘Ocenebrie. Bulletins of
American Paleontology 61: 5-141.
Vokes, E. H. 1991. Collecting trophons in Argentina. Part I,
Tierra del Fuego. American Conchologist 19: 7-10.
Vokes, E. H. 1991b. Collecting trophons in Argentina. Part II,
The Valdes Peninsula.. American Conchologist 19: 8-11,
Vokes, E. H. 1992. Argentine trophons revisited—or Dr. Pow-
ell, I owe you an apology. American Conchologist 20:
3-4.
Vokes, E. H. 1992b. Cenozoic Muricidae of the Western At-
lantic Region, Part IX. Pterynotus, Poirieria, Aspella, Der-
momurex, Calotrophon, Acantholabia and Attiliosa, addi-
tions and corrections. Tulane Studies in Geology and Pa-
leontology 25: 1-108.
Watson, R. B. 1882. Mollusca of H. M. S. “Challenger” Ex-
pedition. Part 13. The Journal of The Linnean “Society,
Zoology 16: 358-392.
Watson, R. B. 1886. Report on the Scaphopoda and Gastero-
poda collected by H. M. S. Challenger during the Years
1873-76, London, 15 Zoology (42), 756 pp.
Wood, W. 1828. Index teamed an illustrated catalogue
of shells, British and foreign, arranged according to the
Linnean System. Second Edition. W. Wood, andon: 212
yp.
Zaixes H. 1973. Observaciones sobre el desove y embriologia
de Trophon geversianus (Pallas, 1774). Neotropica 19
(60): 152-155.
THE NAUTILUS 119(2):83-89, 2005
Page 83
Latitudinal trends in shell characters of the neogastropod
Olivancillaria urceus (Gastropoda: Olividae) in the temperate
southwestern Atlantic Ocean
Alvar Carranza!
Walter Norbis
Seccién Oceanologia
Facultad de Ciencias
Igua 4225
11400 Montevideo
URUGUAY
ABSTRACT
Variation in shell characters of the neogastropod Olivancillaria
urceus (Réding, 1798) was analyzed at the central part of its
geographical range. Nine shell dimensions were measured
from specimens from seven localities between 32°10’ S and
40°33' S along the Atlantic coast of South America. er ae
effects of collection site were detected on all measured vari-
ables. The first three components in principal component anal-
ysis together explained nearly 0% of the observed variance in
morphome tric measures. Variables also differ in their allome-
tric trajectories among localities: all measured shell dimensions
displayed both positive and negative allometric coefficients
along the latitudinal axis. Allometric effects were then removed
to allow for determination of size-free variation in shape. High-
spired, elongated forms occurred more frequently in higher
latitudes. Spire width, maximum width, maximum width/height
and shell thickness decreased as latitude increased. Spire
length measured on the apertural side showed an opposite
trend. No relationship with latitude was found for fasciolar-
band length and spire length (measured along the abapertural
shell side). The existence of extreme forms within the analyzed
sample showed high phenotypic and ecological plasticity in the
populations assigned to O. urceus.
INTRODUCTION
Gastropod shell shape reflects a trade-off among func-
tional requirements, energetics of construction and
maintenance, rules governing growth, and the imprint of
evolutionary ancestry. The result of the interactions be-
tween these factors on the realized shell is also affected
by environmental features and tied to architectural con-
straints (Vermeij, 1993). Phenotypic plasticity in shell
characters appears to exert a strong influence on small
and large-scale morphological variation in marine snails
Trussel and Etter, 2001).
Different patterns in shell variation are found as dif-
ferent spatial scales and taxonomical or ecological hier-
archies are considered: well-disseminated eco-geograph-
ical rules, suitable for many taxa, predict that animals at
high latitudes should have larger body sizes and life
spans than at low latitudes (Mayr, 1956: Atkinson and
Sibly, 1997). In most mollusks growth is faster at high
temperatures and in the presence of food than in eel.
nutrient-poor conditions (Vi ermeij, 1993).
Latitudinal variation in shell characters was detected
in northem hemisphere gastropods assemblages. This
variability was related to efficiency of calcium carbonate
utilization. It was shown that more heavily calcified and
ornamented shells occur with decrease in latitude
(Grauss, 1974).
When considering variation in shell features at the in-
traspecific level, it could be interpreted as a response to
environmental conditions, which may include biotic and
abiotic factors. Biotic interactions have been proposed
as driving forces for morphological changes. Certain
shell characters interpreted as anti-predatory features
such as low spire and elongate aperture were found to
be significantly different between comparable gastropod
assemblages from both sides of the tropical Atlantic and
Indo-West Pacific (Ver meij, 1978).
Within-location variation in shell shape and shore-lev-
el size gradients have been found for several species of
intertidal mollusks (Vermeij, 1972). This intra-popula-
tional variability is often coupled with shifts in shell
growth and has been related experimentally with food
supply and density-dependant processes: specimens of
Littorina littorea (Linnaeus, 1758) with plentiful supph
of seaweed grow faster and develop low-spired shells
oe
than other group maintained under crowded conditions;
in the latter growth was slower and higher spired shells
were developed (Kemp and Bertness, 1984). De Wolf et
al. (1998) documented large-scale patterns of shell var-
iation in Littorina striata, a planktonic-developing peri
winkle from Macaronesia, confirming expectations based
Page 84
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 2
BRAZIL
Cassino
La Coronilla
La Paloma
Punta del Este
ARGENTINA
(Ax Mar del Plata
A Puerto Militar
ATLANTIC OCEAN
San Antonio
Figure 1. Map showing parts of the Atlantic coast of Brazil,
Uruguay, and Argentina that include the collection sites of Oli-
vancillaria urceus
on morphological patterns observed among other pros-
obranchs for increasing shell size and weight in southern
sites,
There is also ontogenetic related variation due to al-
lometric increase of spire length relative to other shell
dimensions (Vermeij, 1993). In this context, remotion of
allometric effects is needed in order to detect changes
in shell shape.
However, most of the studies dealing with morpho-
logical variability in gastropods are restricted to intertidal
rocky-shore snails, in particular those belonging to Lit-
torinidae. We know of no attempt made to analyze or
even describe patterns of intraspecific variation in neo-
gastropod shell features along a latitudinal axis in the
Southern Hemisphere.
The genus Olivancillaria d’Orbigny, 1839, is widely
distributed along the Atlantic coast of South America. It
comprises seven species occurring from tropical areas
(Espirito Santo, Brazil) to temperate regions (Golfo San
Matias, Argentina) (Burch and Burch, 1964; Klappen-
bach, 1964; 1965; 1966; Rios, 1994). Olivancillaria ur-
ceus (R6ding, 1798) is distributed along the entire lati-
tudinal range of the genus in subtidal soft bottoms, rang-
ing from the surf zone to at least 35 m depth (Juanicé
and Rodriguez-Moyano, 1976; Milstein et al., 1976; Es-
cofet et al., 1979; Scarabino, 1984) and exhibiting con-
spicuous differences in shell shape as noticed by Bara-
tinni and Ureta (1961). For these reasons, this species
is suitable for the examination of patterns of morpho-
logical variation in the region
In this paper we document large-scale variability in
hell features of Olivancillaria urceus in the temperate
Figure 2.
Dorsal, ventral, and apical view of Olivancillaria
urceus showing measurements taken for statistical analysis.
Seale bar = 1 cm. Abbreviations: LWL: last whorl length from
suture to anterior end; AL: aperture length, distance along out-
er lip from suture to anterior end: FB: distance between an-
terior and posterior ends of fasciolar band along internal side
of the aperture; MW: maximum linear distance from outer lip
to opposite side; MWH: maximum linear distance perpendic-
ular to MW to anterior end; ST: shell thickness; SW: diameter
of spire base from tip of callus above aperture to opposite point
on suture; SL2: lateral spire length from tip of callus above
aperture to protoconch tip on outer lip side in ventral view,
parallel to growth axis; and SLI; same length measured on the
opposite side
sector of it distribution range and analyze this species
variability along the latitudinal axis. We also discuss pos-
sible ecological implications of the observed pattern.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
\ total of 193 specimens collected in seven sites be-
tween 32° and 40° S along the Atlantic coast of South
America were analyzed. Collection sites were Cassino
Beach, Brazil (32°10' S, 52°20’ W, Site 1), La Coronilla
(33° 57’ §, 53°30’, Site 2), La Paloma (34°38" S, 54°08’
W, Site 3) and Punta del Este (34°36' S, W 58° 1S’ W,
Site 4), Uruguay, and Mar del Plata (38°02' S, 57° 32’
W, Sites 5), Puerto Militar (3S°44' S, 62°10’ W, Site 6)
and San Antonio Oeste (40°33' S, 64°50! W, Site 7), Ar-
gentina (Figure 1). Examined material is deposited at
Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Ri-
vadavia” (Buenos Aires, Argentina) and Museo Nacional
de Historia Natural (Montevideo, Uruguay),
Nine shell dimensions were measured with vernier
A. Carranza and W. Norbis, 2005
Page 85
Table 1. Sample size, % of variation accounted by PCI and allometric coefficients for morphometric variables in each collection
site. Abbreviations: LWL: last whorl length from suture to anterior end; AL: aperture length, distance along outer lip from suture
to anterior end; FB: distance between anterior and posterior ends of fasciolar band along internal side of the aperture; MW:
maximum linear distance from outer lip to opposite side; MWH: maximum linear distance perpendicular to MW to anterior end;
ST: shell thickness; SW: diameter of spire base from tip of callus above aperture to opposite point on suture; SL2: lateral spire
length from tip of callus above aperture to protoconch tip on outer lip side in ventral view, parallel to growth axis; and SL1: same
length measured on the opposite side.
Locality
Variable l 2 3 4 bt 6 7
Sample size 27 17 39 18 43 2] 28
% of variation accounted
for by PCL 65.33 67.54 $4.36 71.81 94.23 87.82 75.44
Allometric coefficients
LWL 1.258 0.492 1.098 1.144 1.063 0.985 0.890
AL 1.451 0.37 1.166 0.965 1.072 1.028 L125
FB 1,544 0.617 1.207 1.086 1.142 1.05 0.948
MW L101 0.382 1.12 1.089 1.102 1.134 1.123
MWH 1.386 0.459 1.163 1.041 1.134 1.026 1.062
ST 1.214 0.485 1.143 1,159 1.118 1.043 1.151
SW 1.294 0.760 1.338 1.101 1.136 1.165 1.285
SLI 0.025 2.573 0.426 0.619 0.623 0.750 0.765
SL2 —0.274 2.858 0.340 0.796 0.610 0.819 0.650
calliper, within an accuracy of 0.05 mm. Abbreviations
for the variables are as follows: LWL: last whorl length
from suture to anterior end; AL: aperture length, dis-
tance along outer lip from suture to anterior end; FB:
distance between anterior and posterior ends of fasciolar
band along internal side of the aperture; MW: maximum
linear distance from outer lip to opposite side; MWH:
maximum linear distance perpendicular to MW to an-
terior end; ST: shell thickness; SW: diameter of spire
base from tip of callus above aperture to opposite point
on suture; SL2: lateral spire length from tip of callus
above aperture to protoconch tip on outer lip side in
ventral view, parallel to growth axis; and SLI: same
length measured on the opposite side (Figure 2). Col-
lection sites were grouped a priori for discretion of
differences among samples from different geographic
regions. For this we used the non-parametric Kruskall-
Wallis ANOVA median test. Allometric coefficients for
the seven collection sites were calculated for all vari-
ables. The method used was based on Jolicoeur (1963)
with additions from Kowalewski et al. (1997). Data were
log-transformed and subjected to principal component
analy sis (PCA). The first principal component (PC1) was
regarded as a size axis. Correlation between sampling
size and explained variance was examined by means of
regression analysis. The allometric coefficient for each
original variable was estimated by dividing the PC] load-
ing for that variable by the mean PC1 loading over all
variables. Estimation of 95% confidence intervals for the
cane coefficients was made by bootstrapping spec-
imens (2000 bootstrap replicates were made, not
jae
Size effects were then removed, following Lleonart et
al. (2000), by scaling all individual to the same size
(mean LWL) ) adjusting their shape to the one they would
have in the new size according to allometric change.
PCA was run on transformed dass and loads of the eight
remaining variables (i.e., all but total length) were cake
culated. This removal method is one of the most pow-
erful tools available, since it is in turn a theoretical gen-
eralization of the technique used by Thorpe (1975,
1976), which was recorded as one of the most efficient
methods in the empirical evaluation done by Reist
(1985).
A cluster analysis (single linkage, Euclidean distances)
was then performed to discriminate among possible
morphological groups using site mean value for each var-
iable. The cophenetic eourelanion coefficient (CCC) was
calculated to measure the internal distortion of the clus-
ter analysis following Sokal and Rolf (1962). Finally, pos-
sible relationships heteen latitude and shell characters
were examined by regression analysis.
RESULTS
All variables showed significant differences between sites
(non-parametric ANOVA: p < 0.01). PCA performed
with log-transformed data showed that variance ex-
plained by PC1 (Factor 1, regarded as size axis) differed
among sampling sites and varied between 65.33% (site
1) and 94.23% (site 5). Explained variance was not cor-
related with sample size (regression analysis, F = :0.010,
p-level = 0.922). Allometric coefficients calculated for
the nine variables also varied among collection sites. All
variables displayed both positive (b > 1) and negative
(b < 1) allometric trajectories (Table 1).
The first three factors in size-free PCA explained to-
gether 79.38% of the total variance. Variables MW,
MHW, ST, and SW grouped together with positive loads
on Factor 1. SLI and SL2 formed another highly cor-
Page 86
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 2
Table 2. Results of size-free PCA Analysis. % of variance ac-
counted by each factor and loading of each variable are shown
Abbreviations: LWL: last whorl length from suture to anterior
end; AL: aperture length, distance along outer lip from suture
to anterior end; FB: distance between anterior and posterior
ends of fasciolar band along internal side of the aperture; MW:
maximum linear distance from outer lip to opposite side;
MWH: maximum linear distance perpendicular to MW to an-
terior end; ST: shell thickness; SW: diameter of spire base from
tip of callus above aperture to opposite point on suture; SL2:
lateral spire length from tip of callus above aperture to pro-
toconch tip on outer lip side in ventral view, parallel to growth
axis; and SLI: sane length measured on the opposite side.
Factor loadings
Variable PC] PC2 PC3
% of variation 41.54 22.9 14.95
AL 0.422 —(0.474 0.550
FB 0.173 —(.487 0.716
M\W 0.874 0.2125 —0.063
MHW 0.888 0.083 0.034
ST 0.S58 0.226 —O.11]
SW O.S1] 0.246 —(0.044
SLI —(0.094 O.S15 0.446
SL2 —0.396 0.735 0.399
related group loading positively on Factor 2, and AL and
FB did the same on Factor 3 (Table 2)
Two different groups were discriminated when the
collection-site mean value for each variable were plotted
onto a hierarchical cluster, one of these groups com-
posed by individuals belonging to sites 6 and 7 (Figure
The calculated value for CCC was 0.93.
Latitudinal-related patterns of variation were found in
variables MW, MHW, ST, AL, and SW. This group of
variables showed a decreasing trend with increasing lat-
itude. On the other hand, SL2 tend to increase with
latitude, whereas SLI and F . ran wved no relationships.
The coefficient of determination (r?) explained less than
30% for all variables (Figure 4).
DISCUSSION
The present work documents shell shape variation in O.
urceus along a latitudinal gradient. The results show that
shell features vary between sites. The analyses presented
above show that northern forms are stunt, low- -spired,
and conical, whereas southern specimens (mostly those
from sites 6 and 7) are high-spired, narrower and elon-
gated.
a location variation may be due to local differ-
ences in habitat conditions, for example, contrasting
re morphodynamics, which are in turn associated
with different sediment features. However, the poor
geographical definition of collection sites did not allow
us to assign in all cases a particular individual to a par-
ticular habitat. Notwithstanding, intraspecific phenotypic
plasticity in a small spatial scale is known to occur in
mollusks. For example, observations made on the mur-
icid Nucella la villus (Linnaeus, 1758) showed that spec-
imens from very exposed shores are short-spired when
compared with those from sheltered localities (Cooke,
1895; 1915).
When considering variation at a geographic scale, two
possible scenarios are suggested to explain the among-
collection sites differences. These are either: (1) a grad-
ual response to shifts in environmental conditions along
the latitudinal gradient that generate a shape gradient
(in this scenario, macro-scale variation in physical pa-
rameters such as sea water temperature and calcium car-
bonate availability could be correlated with the observed
variation); or (2) different morphs associated with par-
Figure 3. Extreme forms of Olivancillaria urceus in the study area
Dorsal and apertural views of specimens from site 7. Scale bat
A. dorsal and apertural view of specimens from site 3. B.
Lom
A. Carranza and W. Norbis, 2005
Page
40,
MW = 45.70 - 0.60 * Lat“
= 0.286 ;
4
Maximum Width (mm)
DP p> Pp Pp
a SW = 38,74 - 0,64 * Lat
r= 0.281
Spire Width (mm)
—
fe)
> DPE P D> p>
DA AADIRE b DD
PERE | >
DAN >> pb>
AL = 36.68 -0.14" Lat
r= 0.050
Aperture Length (mm)
28 A
31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42
Shell Thickness (mm) Max. Width Height (mm)
Spire Length 2 (mm)
MWH = 42.97- 0.47 * Lat “
r’=0.284 ,
4
> DEE! >
DDE DE I D>
ST =39.92-0.55*Lat 4
’=0.244 “4
28 4 A
DOSRBR >
>>
DE D>
>
>
B>pe> PP
SL2 = -1.39 + 0.22 * Lat A
r= 0.153
(oe)
PEP DP > >
DPD > b>
Se DE>
MP DPB >
D> PRPPP> DP DP
>>
>
6
4, 4 z
y)
3
1 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42
Latitude
Figure 4.
and linear model fitted are shown.
ticular habitats, such as exposed sandy beaches or shel-
tered bays: broader specimens with short spire in high-
energy habitats and high-spired, elongated forms in pro-
tected habitats. In this case, likelihood of occurrence of
one particular morph depends on environmental char-
acteristics of geographic locations and may be consid-
ered local populational phenomena.
A related species, Olivancillaria vesica (Gmelin, 1791)
also shows two geographical forms, recognized as sub-
species. which are easily separable along its distribution
range (Klappenbach, 1966). This species shows an op-
posite latitudinal pattern: northern forms are narrower
and longer compared with the broader, “auriculated”
ear-shaped) southern forms. In accordance with (2), the
latter form extends along the southerm coast of Brazil
Olivancillaria urceus, relationship between standardized shell characters and latitude. Coefficients of determination (1°)
(Santa Catarina), Uruguay, and Argentina as far as
Puerto Quequén, Province of Buenos Aires, the same
geographical area in which O. urceus displays broader
and low spired shells. These broader shell forms could
be interpreted as associated with a large foot that en-
hances its ability of “anchoring” to the substratum in
higher energy environments, thus improving individual
fitness. However, more study is necessary on the taxo-
nomic status on O. vesica forms before any analysis of
its morphological variation.
It can be argued that differences in spire length and
width reflect shifts in growth patterns associated with
the adaptive process. It should be noticed that there is
a coincidence between occurrences of high-spired forms
(associated with slower growth mode) in higher lati-
Page 88
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 2
LINKAGE DISTANCE
Pto. Militar
San Antonio
Punta del Este
La Paloma
La Coronilla Cassino
Mar del Plata
COLLECTION SITES
Figure 5.
each morphometric variable.
tudes. This could be supporting the hypothesis that both
latitudinal and env ironmental effects may be coupled to-
gether in a combined effect that masks the isolated ef-
fects of each factor.
As demonstrated by PCA analysis, nearly half of the
variance is explained by PC] (42% of total variance),
which in turn is mainly affected by MW, MWH, ST. and
SW. This fact implies that changes in shell shape de-
tected within the analyzed sample are due mostly to dif-
ferences in its variables. Variation observed in SL2 and
SLI are of much less importance as form determinants
when considering total variance components. However,
height and shape of the spire and protoconch characters
have been regarded as important specific (L6pez et al.,
1988) and supraespecific (Tursch, 1988) features, for
which these characters deserves further analysis. Nev-
ertheless, it seems that macrogeographic variation in
shell morphology strongly depend on local conditions,
which make adequate sampling and data treatment very
difficult.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors wish to thank Mr. Fabrizio Scarabino (Di-
reccion Nacional de Recursos Acuaticos, Montevideo),
Dr. Sergio Martinez and Dr. Alejandro Brazeiro (Facul-
tad de Ciencias, Montevideo), who provided useful bib-
Olivancillaria urceus, cluster analysis. Collection sites were grouped on the basis of similarities in the mean value for
liography and suggestions that helped us to improve this
manuscript. J. L ie sonart made his own designed software
available for statistical analysis on remotion of allometric
effects. Authors would also like to e xpress their gratitude
to the two anonymous referees for their great help in
reviewing and correcting the original version of the man-
uscript. A.C. thanks Msc. Estela Delgado for encourage-
ment and support and J. de los Santos for assistance with
the figures.
LITERATURE CITED
Atkinson, D. and R. M. Sibly. 1997. Why are organisms usually
bigger in colder environments? Making sense of a life his-
tory puzzle. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12: 235-239,
Barattini, L. P and FE. H. Ureta. 1961. La fauna de las costas
del este (invertebrados). Publicaciones de Divulgaci6én
Cientifica “Museo Damaso Antonio Larranaga,” Monte-
video, 108 pp.
Burch, J. Q A R. L. Burch. 1964. The genus Agaronia J. E.
Gray, 1839. The Nautilus 77: 110-114, pls. 6-7
Cooke, A oe 1895. The Cambridge Natural History, 3 Mol-
luses and Brachiopods. I ,ondon, Macmillan, London, 535
pp:
Cooke, A. H. 1915, The geographical variation of Purpura la-
pillus. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London
40: 319-327.
De Wolf, H., T. Backeljau, S. Van Dongen and R. Verhagen.
A. Carranza and W. Norbis, 2005
1998. Large-scale patterns of shell variation in Littorina
striata, a planktonic developing periwinkle from .
nesia (Mollusca: Prosobranchia). Marine Biology 131(2
309-317.
Escofet, A., N. Giannuca, S. Maytia and V. Scarabino. 1979.
Playas arenosas del Atlantico Sudoccidental entre los 29°
y 43°S.: consideraciones generales y esquema biocenol6-
gico. Memorias del Seminario sobre Ecologia Benténicas
y Sedimentacion de la Plataforma Continental del Atlan-
tico Sur, 1: 245-258. UNESCO, Montevideo.
Graus, R. 1974. Latitudinal trends in the shell characteristics
of marine gastropods. Lethaia 7: 303-314.
Jolicoeur, P. 1963. The multivariate generalization of the allo-
metric equation. Biometrics 19: 97-499.
Juanicé, M. and M. Rodriguez-Moyano, 1976. Composicion
faunistica de la comunidad de Mytilus edulis platensis
dOrbigny, 1846, ubicada a unas 55 millas al SE de La
Paloma. Comunicaciones de la Sociedad Malacologica del
Uruguay 4 (29): 113-116.
Kemp, P and M. D. Bertness. 1984. Snail shape and growth
rates: evidence of plastic shell allometry in Littorina lit-
torea. Proceedings of the National Acade smy of Sciences
Sl: S11-S13.
Klappenbach, M. A. 1964. A new species of Olivancillaria from
Uruguay and Brazil. The Nautilus 77: 132-134.
Klappenbach, M. A. 1965. Consideraciones sobre el género
Olivancillaria @Orbigny, 1840 (Mollusca, Gastropoda) y
descripcién de dos nuevas especies de aguas argentinas y
uruguayas. Comunicaciones Zoolégicas del Museo de His-
toria Natural de Montevideo § (104): 1-10, 2 pls.
Klappenbach, M. A. 1966. Olivancillaria vesica (Gmelin, 1791)
has priority over Olivancillaria auricularia (Lamarck,
1810) (Mollusca, Gastropoda). Archiv fiir Molluskenkunde
95 (1/2): 75-77.
Kowalewski, M., E. Dyreson, J. Marcot, J. Vargas, kK. Flessa
and D. Hallman. 1997. Phenetic discrimination of bio-
metric singletons: paleobiological implications of morpho-
species in the lingulide brachiopod Glottidia. Paleobiology
23: 444469.
Lopez, A., M. Montoya and J. Lopez .1985. Two new species
of the genus Agaronia (Olividae) in the Panamic province
Page 89
and the description of two new species from Nicaragua.
The Veliger 30; 295-304.
Lleonart, J., J. Salat and G. J. Torres. 2000. Removing allo-
metric effects of body size in morphological studies. Jour-
nal of Theoretical Biology 205: 85-93.
Mayr, E. 1956. Geogr aphical ‘character gradients and climatic
adaptation. Evolution 10: 105-108.
Milstein, A., M. Juanicé and J. Olazarri. 1976. Algunas asocia-
ciones bentonicas frente a las costas de Rocha, Uruguay.
Resultados de la campana del R/V “Hero”, viaje 79-3A.
paring eee de la Sociedad Malacolégica del Uruguay
4 (30): 143-164. _—
Reist, J. D. 1985. An empirical evaluation of several univariate
methods that adjust for size variation in morphometric
data. Canadian Journal of Zoology 64; 1363-1368.
Rios, E. C. 1994. Seashells of Brazil. Museu Oceanografico
Eliézer de Carvalho Rios da Fundacao Universidade do
Rio Grande, Rio Grande, 328 pp.
Scarabino, V. 1984. Clave para el reconocimiento de moluscos
litorales del Uruguay, I. Gastropoda. Contribuciones del
Depto. de Oceanogratia de la Facultad de Humanidades
y Ciencias ] (2): 12-22.
Sokal, R. R. and F. J. Rohlf. 1962. The comparisons of den-
drograms by objective methods. Taxon 11: 33-40.
Thorpe, R. §. 1975. Quantitative handlings of characters useful
in snake systematyes with particular references to intra-
specific variation in the ringed snake Natrix natrix (L.).
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 7; 27-43.
Thorpe, R. S. 1976. Biometric analysis of geographic variation
and racial affinities. Biological Review 51: 407-452.
Trussell, G. C. and R. J. Etter. 2001. Integrating genetic and
environmental forces that shape the evolution of geo-
graphic variation in a marine snail. Genetica 112— 113:
321-337.
Tursch, B. 1988. Protoconch measurements as supraespecific
characters in the family Olividae. The Veliger 31: 244-251.
Vermeij, G. J. 1972. Intraspecific shore level size gradients in
intertidal mollusks. Ecology 53: 693-700.
Vermeij, G. J. 1978. Biogeography and adaptation. Patterns of
marine life. Harvard University. Press, Cambridge, 332
pp.
Vermeij, G. J. 1993. A natural history of shells. Princeton Uni-
versity Press (Eds.) 207 pp.
THE NAUTILUS 119(2):90-91, 2005 Page 90
Errata
Due to an editorial lapse, the Introduction section was omitted from K6hler and Glaubrecht’s (2005) article in the
most recent issue of The Nautilus. The missing Introduction is printed below (literature references are in the main
article), with apologies to the authors and readers.
Fallen into oblivion—the systematic affinities of the enigmatic Sulcospira Troschel, 1858 (Cerithioidea:
Pachychilidae), a genus of viviparous freshwater gastropods f rom Java
Frank Koéhler
Matthias Glaubrecht
INTRODUCTION
The first volume of the well-known work “Das Gebiss der Schnecken zur Begriindung einer natiirlichen Klassifikation”
[Establishing a natural classification of snails from their dentition] by Franz Hermann Troschel (1810-1882) was
published in parts between 1856 and 1863. The work is an important historic landmark in the enduring challenge of
zoologists to create a natural classification of the living Sapel rds. In his work, Troschel (p. 117) described the genus
Sulcospira within the tribus “Pachychili) mainly based on features of the operculum and the radula (Figure Ly Ac-
cording to Robertson (1957), that description was wc bished in L858. Within the non-marine C ‘ereiioided, Sulcospira
represents one of the least known genera of Southeast Asian Pachychilidae, a group of viviparous freshwater gastropods
we have been focusing on in the last few years.
Recent research aiming to propose a phylogene tic systematics hypothesis and to establish a natural classification of
this limnic gastropod banaly will also allow a better understanding of their evolution, morphology, and ecology (Glau-
brecht, 1996: 1999: Kohler and Glaubrecht, 2001; 2002; 2003: Glaubrecht and Rintelen, 2003). Only recently, the
Pachychilidae Troschel, 1857, have been shown to represent a monophyletic group clearly distinct from the Thiaridae
Troschel, 1857, and from the other limnic Cerithioidea. This new conce pt has been suggested by analyses of mor-
phological data (e.g. Glaubrecht, 1996; 1999) and is corroborated by molecular data suggesting that Thiaridae (e.g.
Melanoides, Thiara, Tarebia) and Pachychilidae (e.g. Paracrostoma Cossmann, 1900, Pac shyc hils Lea, 1850) are not
very closely related to each other (see phylogenetic reconstruction in Lydeard et al., 2002: figs. 1, 2). This classification
conflicts with the traditional view of most earlier authors who treated pachychilid taxa as tae = Thiaridae
(among others, Thiele, 1929; Rensch, 1934; Benthem-Jutting, 1956; Brandt, 1968; 1974) or Pleuroceridae (e.g. Ponder
and Warén, 1988; Vaught, 1989).
However, our current knowledge of the phylogeny and systematics of freshwater Cerithioidea in general and the
Pachychilidae in particular is still limited, since many taxa remain poorly known. Only recently, systematic studies
using morphological as well as molecular genetic data have shed some light on the rele tionships of several other genera
withen the Pachychilidae. For instance, Kohler and Glaubrecht (2001) presented comparative morphological de ita on
taxa tre ditionally assigned to Brotia H. Adams, 1866, by various authors, revealing that this genus as previously per-
ceived actually comprises four lineages, each characte rized most conspicuously by distinet re productiv e morphologies.
Subseque nt studies including molecular phylogenetics data put special e mphasis on two of these lineages, Jagora
Kohler and Glaubrecht, 2003, endemic to the Philippines (KGhler and Glaubrecht, 2003) and Tylom dania F. and P.
Sarasin, 1595, endemic to Sulawesi (Rintelen and Glaubrecht, 1999; 2003), suggesting an independent generic status
for each. In addition, the properties of another Australasian pachychilid genus, Pse doy yotamis Martens, 1894, have
been extensively described by Glaubrecht and Rintelen (2003). Hence, a “nideable alin of crucial biological infor-
mation on pachychilids has been amassed, he Iping to facilitate a better understanding of pachychilid systematics,
phylogeny, and evolution.
Nevertheless, there remain a number of systematic and taxonomic problems and difficulties related to this group
of freshwater snails. One of them will be dealt with in this study: The t: wonomy and systematic position of Sulcospira.
Among the various generic names that have been introduced for Southe ast Asian pe achychilid taxa, Sulcospira is
clearly the oldest one. Its description predates that of other names, such as Brotia, Antime lania Fischer and Crosse,
1892, or Pse udopotamis; a complete annotated list of the introduced supraspecific names within the Southeast Asian
Pachychilidae is given in Kohler and Glaubrecht (2002). Consequently, every other supraspecific pachychilid taxon is
valid only with the reserve that it is not a junior synonym of Sulcospira. In spite of this significant taxonomic role of
Sulcospira, this taxon has been widely ignored, e spec ‘ially by modern systematists. Thus, another aim of this article is
to compile all available information on Sulcospira and to provide new data from our own examinations of the limited
Errata, 2005 Page 9]
material from museum collections. In addition, implications for pachychilid taxonomy and systematics are discussed
in relation to Sulcospira.
LITERATURE CITED
Kohler, F. and M. Glaubrecht. 2005. Fallen into oblivion—the systematic affinities of the enigmatic Sulcospira Troschel, 1858
(Cerithioidea: Pachychilidae), a genus of viviparous freshwater gastropod from Java. The Nautilus 119: 15-26.
In the recently published article by Ardila and Valdés (2004), please note the following corrections:
On page 134, caption of Figure 3, replace “Armina muelleri Thompson, Cattaneo and Wong, 1990”, for “Armina
muelleri (Ihering, 1886)”;
On the same page, the adjacent subsections “Type Material” and “Type Locality” should be replaced by:
Material Examined: MHNMC INV MOL3901, 32 mm length, alive, from off Salamanca Island, Colombia (11°5'46”"
N, 74°40'35” W), 20 m depth, hard bottom with pennatulaceans (Renilla reniformis and Renilla muelleri).
LITERATURE CITED
Ardila, N. E. and A. Valdés. 2004. The genus Armina (Gastropoda: Nudibranchia: Arminidae) in the southern Caribbean, with the
description of a new species. The Nautilus 11S: 131-138,
Sponsored in part by the State of Florida, Department
of State, Division of Cultural Affairs, the Florida Arts
Council and the National Endowment for the Arts.
NATIONAL
ENDOWMENT
FOR THE ARTS
2
i
INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS
THE NAUTILUS publishes papers on all aspects of the
biology and systematics of mollusks. Manuscripts describing
original, unpublished research as well as review articles will
be considered. Brief articles, not exceeding 1000 words, will
be published as notes and do not require an abstract. No-
tices of meetings and other items of interest to malacolo-
gists will appear in a news and notices section.
Manuscripts: Each original manuscript and accompanying
illustrations should be submitted in triplicate. Text must be
typed on one side of 8% X 11 inch white paper, double
spaced throughout (including literature cited, tables and
figure captions), with at least 1 inch of margin on all sides.
All pages must be numbered consecutively. If printed on a
word processor, the right margin should be ragged rather
than justified. Authors Sone follow the Peconic ine
of the Scientific Style and Format—The CBE Manual for
Authors, Editors, and Publishers, which is available from
the Council of Science Editors, Inc., 11250 Roger Bacon
Drive, Suite 8, Reston, VA 20190, USA (http://www.cbe.org/
cbe). The first mention of a scientific name in the text
should be accompanied by the taxonomic authority, includ-
ing year. Latin names and words to be printed in italics
must be underlined: leave other indications to the editor.
Metric and Celsius units are to be used.
The sequence of sections should be: title page, abstract
page, introduction, materials and methods, results, discus-
sion, acknowledgments, literature cited, tables, figure cap-
tions, figures. The title page should include the title, au-
thor’s name(s) and address(es). The abstract page should
contain the title and abstract, which should summarize in
250 words or less the scope, main results and conclusions
of the paper. All references cited in the text must appear in
the literature cited section and vice versa. In the literature
cited section, all authors must be fully identified and listed
alphabetically. Follow a recent issue of THE NAUTILUS
for bibliographic style, noting that journal titles must be un-
abbreviated. Information on plates and figures should be
cited only if not included in the pagination. Tables must be
numbered and each placed on a separate sheet. A brief leg-
end must accompany each table. Captions for each group of
illustrations should be typed on a separate sheet and include
a key to all lettered labeling appearing in that group of illus-
trations.
All line drawings must be in black, high quality ink,
clearly detailed ad completely labeled. Photographs
must be on glossy, high contrast paper. All figures are to
be consecutively ‘numbered gs a See, NOT figs.
la, 1b, le, ... NOR plate 1, fig. 1...). Illustrations ee
be arranged in proportions that will conform with the
ig
width of a page (6% inches or 171 mm) or a column (3%
inches or 82 mm). The maximum size of a printed figure is
6% by 9 inches or 171 by 228 mm. Allillustrations must be
fully cropped, mounted on a firm, white backing, num-
bered, labeled and camera ready. The authors: name,
paper title and figure number(s) should appear on the
back. Original illustrations must be between one and two
times the desired final size. It is the author’s responsibility
that the line weight and lettering are appropriate for the
desired reduction. Original illustrations will be returned
to the author if requested. Color illustrations can be in-
cluded at extra cost to the author.
Voucher Material: Deposition of type material in a rec-
ognized public museum is a requirement for publication of
papers in which new species are described. Deposition of
representative voucher specimens in such institutions is
strongly encouraged for all other types of research papers.
Processing of Manuscripts: Upon receipt, every manu-
script is acknowledged and sent for critical review by at
least two referees. These reviews serve as the basis for ac-
ceptance or rejection. Accepted manuscripts are returned
to the author for consideration of the reviewers’ comments.
Final Manuscript Submission: Authors of accepted
manuscripts will be required to submit an electronic version
of the manuscript correctly formatted for THE NAUTI-
LUS. The formatted manuscript may be sent as an e-mail
attachment to
[email protected] or in a diskette,
preferably prepared using an IBM PC-compatible text pro-
cessor, Original illustr pone may be submitted separately by
regular el or as digital files (zip disks or CDs), preferably
in "TIFF or BMP formats. The original resolution of digital
images at final (printing) size should be at least 600 dpi for
halftones and 1200 dpi for line drawings.
Proofs: After typesetting, two sets of proofs are sent to the
author for corrections. Changes other than typesetting er-
rors will be charged to the author at cost. One set of cor-
rected proofs should be sent to the editor as soon as pos-
sible.
Reprints and Page Charges: An order form for reprints
will accompany the proofs. Reprints may be ordered
through the editor. Authors with institutional, grant, or oth-
er Rea support will be billed for page charges at the
rate of $60 per printed page.
Manuscripts, corrected proofs and correspondence re-
garding editorial matters should be sent to: Dr. José H.
Tear Editor The Nautilus, P.O. Box 1580, Sanibel, FL
33957, USA,
[email protected], (239) 395-2233.
This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper).
THE NAUTILUS
Volume 119, Number 3
October 6, 2005
ISSN 0028-1344
A quarterly devoted
to malacology.
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
Dr. José H. Leal
The Bailey-Matthews Shell Museum
3075 Sanibel-Captiva Road
Sanibel, FL 33957
MANAGING EDITOR
Christina Yorgey
The Bailey-Matthews Shell Museum
3075 Sanibel-Captiva Road
Sanibel, FL 33957
EDITOR EMERITUS
Dr. M. G. Harasewych
Department of Invertebrate Zoology
National Museum of
Natural History
Smithsonian Institution
Washington, DC 20560
CONSULTING EDITORS
Dr. Riidiger Bieler
Department of Invertebrates
Field Museum of
Natural History
Chicago, IL 60605
Dr. Arthur E. Bogan
North Carolina State Museum of
Natural Sciences
Raleigh, NC 27626
Dr. Philippe Bouchet
Laboratoire de Biologie des
Invertébrés Marins et Malacologie
Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle
55, rue Buffon
Paris, 75005 France
Dr. Robert H. Cowie
Center for Conservation Research
and Training
University of Hawaii
3050 Maile Way, Gilmore 409
Honolulu, HI 96822
Dr. Robert T. Dillon, Jr.
Department of Biology
College of Charleston
Charleston, SC 29424
Dr. Eileen H. Jokinen
8234 E. North Shore Road
Sault Ste. Marie, MI 49783
Dr. Douglas S. Jones
Florida Museum of Natural History
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32611-2035
Dr. Harry G. Lee
1801 Barrs Street, Suite 500
Jacksonville, FL 32204
Dr. Charles Lydeard
Biodiversity and Systematics
Department of Biological Sciences
University of Alabama
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
Bruce A. Marshall
Museum of New Zealand
Te Papa Tongarewa
P.O. Box 467
Wellington, NEW ZEALAND
Dr. James H. McLean
Department of Malacology
Natural History Museum
of Los Angeles County
900 Exposition Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90007
Dr. Paula M. Mikkelsen
Department of Living Invertebrates
The American Museum of Natural
History
New York, NY 10024
Dr. Diarmaid O Foighil
Museum of Zoology and Department
of Biology
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079
Dr. Gustav Paulay
Florida Museum of Natural History
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32611-2035
Mr. Richard E. Petit
P.O. Box 30
North Myrtle Beach, SC 29582
Dr. Gary Rosenberg
Department of Mollusks
The Academy of Natural Sciences
1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Dr. Angel Valdés
Department of Malacology
Natural History Museum
of Los Angeles County
900 Exposition Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90007
Dr. Geerat J. Vermeij
Department of Geology
University of California at Davis
Davis, CA 95616
Dr. G. Thomas Watters
Aquatic Ecology Laboratory
1314 Kinnear Road
Columbus, OH 43212-1194
Dr. John B. Wise
Department of Biology
~ College of Charleston
Charleston, SC 29424
SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION
The subscription rate per volume is
US $35.00 for individuals, US $72.00
for institutions. Postage outside the
United States is an additional US
$5.00 for surface and US $15.00 for
air mail. All orders should be
accompanied by payment and sent to:
THE NAUTILUS, P.O. Box 1580,
Sanibel, FL 33957, USA, (239) 395-
2233.
Change of address: Please inform
the publisher of your new address at
least 6 weeks in advance. All
communications should include both
old and new addresses (with zip
codes) and state the effective date.
THE NAUTILUS (ISSN 0028-1344)
is published quarterly by The Bailey-
Matthews Shell Museum, 3075
Sanibel-Captiva Road, Sanibel, FL
33975.
Periodicals postage paid at Sanibel,
FL, and additional mailing offices.
POSTMASTER: Send address
changes to: THE NAUTILUS
P.O. Box 1580
Sanibel, FL 33957
ae
CONTENTS
mr
one
an
MNAUTILUS
Volume 119, Number 3
October 6, 2005
ISSN 0028-1344
Cristian Ituarte
Shannon M. Carpenter
Paolo Mariottini
The Sphaeriidae (Bivalvia) from northwestern Argentina including three
EW Species Of PIStdiH ge socos oun Oo ee te MEA a Ha4 we ED EER Ee ER 93
Mysella pedroana, a commensal bivalve (Lasaeidae) on two decapod
Crustacean NOSstS. cs 448% an oe bathe Pe taaneahwag faced edemedan 105
Coralliophila trigoi (Gastropoda: Muricidae), a new species from the
Carlo Smriglio northeastern Atlantic Ocean . i. s406cacee cd Gk ded aaa ee ee vba eee 109
Emilio Rolan
Book REVIEW. 6 6.465.556 4645 babar coe bem oabbte habeas dhoudn cn tavesedananeacucapebhabaa 116
OC) 18 2005
THE NAUTILUS 119(3):93-104, 2005
Page 93
The Sphaeriidae (Bivalvia) from northwestern Argentina including
three new species of Pisidium
Cristian Ituarte
Division Zoologia Invertebrados
Museo de La Plata
1900 La Plata
Buenos Aires
ARGENTINA
|, n,n
ABSTRACT
Knowledge on the Sphaeriidae fauna in southern South
America is significantly improved with the description of three
new species of the genus Pisidium from Salta and Jujuy
provinces (northwestern Argentina). This paper provides the
first record of sphaeriids in restrictive high-altitude South
American environments, particul uly from very small water
courses found in “vegas”,
“cushion vegetation” or “cushion peat bogs” developing
between 2000-4000 m altitude in the Argentine pre-Andean
ranges. Furthermore, the geographic distribution range of
Pisidium chiquitanum Ituarte, 2001, only reported to date from
the type locality in sub-Andean regions of central Bolivia, is
considerably e nlarged.
INTRODUCTION
The Sphaeriidae fauna from Argentina is poorly known;
the first reports were those by Strobel (1874) on
Musculium argentinum (dOrbigny, 1835) and Pilsbry
(1911) describing several new gee of Pisidium C.
Pfeiffer, 1821, and Musculiwm Link, 1807, from
Patagonia. Later on, Doello-Jurado (1921) described
the first species of Eupera Bourguignat, 1854, from
Argentina, and Ituarte (1989, 1994) and Ituarte and
Dreher-Mansur (1993) described three new species of
Eupera from Iguazi, Uruguay and Parana River basins
in northeastern Argentina. Regarding the species di-
versity of Pisidium C. Pfeiffer, 1$21, twelve species are
known from Patagonia and Northeastern provinces
Ituarte, 1996, 1999, 2000).
Only two species of Sphaeriidae have been reported
from northwestern Argentina: Sphaerium lauricochae
Philippi, 1869), from Jujuy Province (Ituarte, 1995)
and Musculium argentinum from Mendoza Province
(Strobel, 1874). The species diversity of Pisidiwm
has essentially not been documented. In _ the
present paper, three new species of Pisidium
from lowland and high-altitude habitats in the pre-
Andean mountain ridges are described. Based on new
exce ptionally localized areas of
findings the knowledge on the geographic distribu-
tion of Pisidium chiquitanum Ituarte, 2001, is
updated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials for the present study were obtained during
three field trips to Northwestern Argentina (Tucuman
and Salta provinces in March 1999, Salta and Jujuy
provinces in December 2001 and March 2004, and
Catamarca Province in March 2004). Figure | shows the
location of collecting sites; more detailed information on
the source of specimens is given in the Systematics
section. The collected specimens were fixed immediately
after collecting in 70° alcohol after being relaxed through
a short rinse (around 20 seconds) in warm water (about
50°C). Specimens for scanning electron microscopy
(SEM) were cleaned by repeated rinsing in distilled
water followed by a short treatment (about 5 seconds) in
10% sodium hypochlorite solution. Soft anatomy was
studied after decalcification of valves through a 12-hour
rinsing in a 5% formaldehyde and 2% acetic acid
solution. Linear measurements (shell length [SL], shell
height [SH], shell width [SW] and presiphonal suture
length [PSS]), shape indices and coun ratios
(height index [HI= SH/SL]. convexity index
SH], ratio of hinge length [HiL] to shell length [HiL/
SL]), were calculated according to the criteria followed
by Ituarte (1996). For each calculation (n= 10, unless
otherwise stated), mean and standard deviation values
are given.
Type specimens are deposited at Museo de La Plata,
La Plata (MLP), Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales
“Bernardino Rivadavia”, Buenos Aires (MACN), Funda-
cin Miguel Lillo, Tucuman (FML) and Muséum
National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris (MNHWN). Types of
Pisidium chiquitanum, housed at Museo de Historia
Natural “Noel Kempff Mercado”, Santa Cruz de La
Sierra, Bolivia (MHNB) and MLP were also used for
con iparatiy e pl 1 rpc SES.
Page 94
(
BOLIVIA
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 3
Balasto®/
\/@Hualfin®
Snel t \ 3 \
Lf
68° Ww
Figure 1.
SYSTEMATICS
Pisidium omaguaca new species
(Figures 2-15)
Diagnosis: Shell markedly oval, high and anteriorly
produced, beaks depressed, displaced backward, not
projecting from shell surface and only barely visible
above dorsal margin; ligament internal; anal and
branchial mantle openings present; two demibranchs
present, nephridia of closed type, with lateral lobe not
visible in lateral or dorsal views.
Description: Shell thin, translucent, small to medium
size (mean SL = 2.73 + 0.17, maximum observed size:
3.7 mm), rather high (mean HI = 85 + 1) (Figure 2),
not inflated (mean Ci = 58 + 3) (Figures 2, 3). Shell
| | \ \ \
Tt | Catamarca’
ca.
Location map. Stars in black indicate type localities of Pisidium omaguaca new species, Pisidium ocloya new species, and
Pisidium chicha new species.
outline markedly oval, anteriorly elongated. Anterior end
produced in a sharp curve, posterior end short, widely
rounded, sometimes slightly truncated and _ straight
(Figures 2, 4, 5, 8). Dorsal margin short, weakly
connected with anterior margin, which slopes markedly
towards anterior end; sometimes, a gentle angle marks
joining point of dorsal and posterior margins (Figure 8).
Beaks very low, depressed and wide, not raised from
shell surface, only slightly projected above dorsal
margin, displaced backward, located at about 59% of
SL (Figures 2, 4,5). Shell surface finely and somewhat
irregularly striated, glossy, amber.
Hinge plate strong, hinge line short (HiL/SL = 53 +
3), strongly curved. Hinge: Left valve (Figures 4, 6):
cardinal teeth well-developed, the inner one (Cs) thin,
short at base, bent upward, slightly oblique with respect
C. Ituarte, 2005 age 95
Figures 2-7. Pisidium omaguaca from Termas de Reyes, Jujuy. 2. Holotype (MLP 5496-1-1): outer view of right valve. 3-7.
he
Paratypes (MLP 5496-1-2). 3. Posterior view. 4. Left valve, inner view. 5. Right valve, inner view. 6. Left valve, detail of hinge
Right valve, detail of hinge. Scale bars = 500 um
to antero-posterior axis rounded at the tip, outer displaced forward posterior lateral tooth (PIL) minute
cardinal tooth (C4) a narrow, slightly wider at posterior straight and strong, cusp high, distally displaced. Right
end, uniformly curved blade, quite oblique, overlapping valve (Figures 5, 7): cardinal tooth (C3) not strong
C3 at posterior half: anterior lateral tooth (AIT) ver somewhat displaced forward, curved in the middle quite
strong. short, nearly straight, cusp high, pointed, narrow at anterior half, slightly enlarged in a posterior
Page 96 THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 3
Figures 8-13. Pisidiwm omaguaca. 8. Paratype (MLP 5485). Right valve, outer view. 9. Paratype (MLP 5496-1-2). Dorsal view,
detail of the escutcheon, 10-11. Inner view of left and right valves of a specimen from Tiraxi, Jujuy (MLP 6535). 12, 13. Outer and
inner views of right and left valves of a specimen from a “peat bog” between Yavi (Salta) and Santa Victoria (Jujuy) (MLP6559). Scale
bars (8, 10-13) LOO00 Um; (9) = 200 Lm
elongated cup. Lateral teeth short and robust, inner never visible from outside (Figure 9). Escutcheon
anterior lateral (AI) curved cusp subcentral or slightly inconspicuous (Figure 9).
displaced anteriorly; outer anterior lateral tooth (AIII)
quite short, cusp distal; inner posterior lateral (PI) nearly Anatomy: Anal siphon and branchial inhalant mantle
straight, short cusp subcentral; outer posterior lateral opening present. Presiphonal suture about 9% of shell
PIII) minute, with distal cusp leneth (Figure 15). Eight or nine well-marked muscle
Ligament-pit enclosed, deep, inner margin straight o1 scars located away from pallial line correspond to inner
slightly concave (Figures 6, 7). Ligament relatively short radial mantle muscles. Muscle scars corresponding to
representing 20 + 1% of shell length, strong, internal, anal siphon retractors are coalescent with that of
C. Ituarte, 2005
Page 97
as
Via
15
Figures 14-15. Pisidium omaguaca new species. 14. Gross
anatomy. 15. Mantle muscles. (as: anal siphon; asr: anal
siphon retractor; ia: inhalant aperture; id: inner demibranch;
isr: inhalant siphon retractor; irm: inner radial mantle muscles;
n: nephridium: od: outer demibranch; pss: presiphonal suture).
posterior adductor muscle (Figures 4, 5). Bundles of
fibers of inner radial mantle njnaales strong, converging
anteriorly, except for two posterior bundles { (Figures 4,
5. £4).
Inner and outer demibranchs present. Outer demi-
branch much smaller, formed by 10-12 very short
descending filaments, reaching back to the 14"” filament
of inner demibranch ( (Figure 14). Up to three large
embryos (1.3 mm length) were found within each becod
pouch of a specimen 3.7 mm L. Nephridia of closed
type. dorsal lobe, usually subquadrate, completely
covering pericardial part of nephridium (Figure 14).
Type Locality: A small watercourse opening into Reyes
River at Termas de Reyes, 24°10'19" S, 65°29'27" W,
1754 m altitude, Jujuy Province, Argentina (Figure 1).
Type Material: Holotype (MLP 5496-1-1) and 42
paratypes from the type locality (16 paratypes MLP
5496-1]-2: 6 paratypes MLP 5485: 4 paratypes MACN-In
36361; 12 paratypes FML 14506; and 4 paratypes
MNHN.
Other Material Examined: Jujuy Province: numer-
ous specimens from the type local ity (MLP 5496-1-3)
Tumbaya, small pool with vegetations at the side of
national road No. 9 (23°47'28” §, 65°28'37” W), 2070 m
(MLP 6548); small stream flooding from springs in
highland areas covered with “cushion vegetation”,
between Yavi (Jujuy) and Santa Victoria (Salta)
(22°07'11" S 65°13'05” W), 4150 m (MLP 6559): small
pool at the side of Rio Grande River (22°58'14" S
65°27'01" W), 3950 m (MLP 6530); small springs at side
of Manzanito Rivulet, near Huertas (22°14'20" S
65°00'31" W), 2740 m (MLP6551): small stream at the
side of the road to Yala (24°07'20" S 65°24'16” W),
1430 m (MLP 6531). Salta Province: unnamed brook on
provincial road No. 57, near Cachi (25°05'24" S
66°07'33" W), 2340 m (MLP 6540).
Distribution: Highlands of Jujuy and Salta provinces,
Argentina, between 1400 and 4100 m altitude.
Etymology: The name refers to the Omaguacas,
ancient aboriginal inhabitants of the Quebrada de
Humahuaca, the spectacular 150 km long valley of the
Rio Grande River (Figure 1), which underwent a major
cultural change during the past 10,000 years.
Remarks: Pisidium omaguaca new species differs
from Pisidium meierbrooki Kuiper and Hinz, 1984, in
being higher and less obese, having lower and_ not
inflated be: iks, and a more broadly founded posterior
end. Pisidium omaguaca new species is similar to
Pisidium chiquitanum Ituarte, 2001, in soft anatomy,
but differs in having a more solid and higher shell, with
posterior end shorter and anterior half of dorsal margin
sloping markedly towards the anterior end.
Pisidium ocloya new species
(Figures 16-33)
Diagnosis: Shell rather trapezoidal and high, small size,
presence of only one (anal) mantle aperture and one
demibranch.
Description: Shell thin, translucent, of small to
medium size (maximum observed SL = 3.2 mm), high
(mean HI = 85 + 2), quite convex (mean Ci = 77 + 4),
shell outline rather trapezoidal. Anterior end somewhat
produced in a sharp curve, posterior end short,
truncate, somewhat oblique (Figures 16, 17). Beaks
full, wide at base, markedly raised from shell surface
and projected above dorsal margin, subcentral or
slightly displaced backward, located at about 58% of
SL (Figures 16, 19, 20). Shell surface fine ly and
irregularly striated (Figures 16, 18), glossy, whitish or
yellowish. ;
Hinge plate not strong, narrow in middle, hinge line
rather long (HiL/SL = 56 + 2), arcuate. Hinge on right
valve (Figures 20, 22): cardinal tooth (C3) delicate,
Page 98 THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 3
Figures 16-22. Pisidium ocloya new species from Burrumayo River, Jujuy. 16. Holotype (MLP 5499-1): outer view of right valve
17-22. Paratypes (MLP 5499-2). 17. Posterior view. 18. Posterior view, detail of ligament. 19. Left valve, inner view. 20. Right
t
valve, inner view. 21. Left valve, detail of hinge. 22. Right valve, detail of hinge. Scale bars (16, 17, 19-22) = 500 um; (18)
200 Lm
rather weak, slightly curved, narrow on anterior half, posterio1 lateral (PI) gently curved, not long, cusp
nlarged into a well-marked, blunt posterior cup distally displaced; outer posterior lateral (PIIT) reduced
Lateral teeth robust, inner anterior lateral (AI) well- in size, with distal cusp. Hinge on left valve (Figures 19,
developed, cusp displac ed distally: outer anterior lateral 21)
cardinal teeth minute, inner one (C2) short and
tooth (AIII) shorter and weaker, cusp distal; inner high, horizontal with respect to antero-posterior axis,
SSS SSS SSS
C. Ituarte, 2005
Page 99
outer one (C4) short, oblique, slightly overlapping Co at
posterior end; anterior lateral tooth (AIT) very strong,
cusp high, distal; posterior lateral tooth (PII) shorter and
weaker, cusp high, distal.
Ligament-pit enclosed, deep, inner margin slightly
and evenly curved (Figures 21, 22), Ligament narrow,
relatively long, representing 24 + 1% of shell length,
visible from outside and somewhat protruded at anterior
half of ligament length. Escutcheon slightly marked by
a delicate lanceolate line (Figures 17, 1S).
anatomy: Only one demibranch (inner) present
(Figure 23). Only anal mantle opening present. Inner
radial mantle muscles weak, 6-7 bundles of few weak
fibers converging anteriorly, attached just above pallial
line (Figure 23): sometimes scars corresponding to inner
radial muscles coalescent with pallial line (Figures 19,
20). Anal siphon retractors attached immediately ven-
trally to posterior adductor muscle. Nephridium with
lateral loop visible dorsally (Figure 24).
Type Locality: Small flooded areas on the banks of
Burrumayo River (24°10'18” S, 65°22'43” W), 1201 m
altitude, in the neighborhood of Jujuy City, Jujuy
Province, Argentina; and unnamed brook opening into
Zapla River (24°16'03" S, 65°07'09”" W), 946 m altitude,
Zapla, Jujuy Province, Argentina.
Type Material: Holotype (MLP 5499-1) and 15
paratypes from the outskirts of Jujuy City (6 paratypes
MLP 5499-2; 10 paratypes FML 14505; 56 paratypes
from Zapla (36 paratypes MLP 6899-2; 10 paratypes
MACN-In 36362; 10 paratypes MNHN),.
Other Material Examined: Catamarca Province:
unnamed brook at national road No. 40 at La Ciénaga
de Abajo, between La Ciénaga and Belén (27°31'05" S,
66°59’08" W), 1520 m (MLP 7201); Jujuy Province:
numerous specimens from the type locality (MLP 7369):
unnamed brook on side of provincial road No. 4 at
Guerrero (24°11'13" S, 65°26'51"” W), 1650 m (MLP
7379); small spring on side of provincial road No. 4, near
Termas de Reyes (24°10'36"” S 65°28'18" W), 1730 m
(MLP 5497-1, MLP 7370-1); small water course on side
of national road No.9 at Tumbaya (23°51'26" S,
65 27'57" W), 2020 m; Los Cedros Rivulet, south to
“El Carmen” (24°28'0" S 65°17'08" W), 1190 m (MLP
6545-1); small spring near Tiraxi (23°59'57" S,
65°19'39" W), 1576 m (MLP 6553): on the road
between Termas de Reyes and Laguna Yala, flooded
areas at the bottom of hills (24°07'47" S, 65°28'58” W),
1920 m (MLP 7371). Salta Province: unnamed brook at
national road No. 40 at Molinos (25°18’'53” S,
66 -14'5S8” W), 2155 m (MLP 6526); small spring at road
No. 33. to Cachi at Los Laureles (25°06'27" S,
65° 36/10" W), 1360 m (MLP 6529): Tucuman Province:
flooded areas at side of the Nio River, near Rio del Nio
City 26 25.60’ S 64°55.60' W), SS6 m (MLP 7403): on
side of Medina River, on provincial road No. 305,
between El Tipal and Aserradero (MLP 7404-1); small
24 CS
Figures 23-24. Pisidium ocloya new species. 23. Gross
anatomy. 24, Detail of nephridium. (id: inner demibranch;
irm: inner radial mantle muscles; n: nephridium; p: pericar-
dium; pa: posterior adductor; r: rectum.
pond on side of Potrero de Las Tablas River, Raco,
880 m (MLP6992), La Angostura dam, on Los Sosa
River (26°55'21” S, 65°41'02” W), 2000 m (MLP 6897-
2,
Distribution: Catamarca, Jujuy, Salta, and Tucuman
provinces, Argentina, between 880 and 2155 m altitude.
Etymology: The name of the new species refers to the
Ocloyas, ancient aboriginal inhabitants of the lands in
the surroundings of the type locality.
Remarks: Pisidium ocloya new species _ strikingly
differs from other northwestern Argentine Pisidium
species by its relatively small size and trapezoidal shell
outline. Compared with Pisidium vile Pilsbry, 1987,
a small species from the eastern drainage system of the
Rio de La Plata Basin, P. ocloya new species differs in
being larger and comparatively lower. Ituarte (1999)
described Pisidium huillichum from southern Chile,
another small-sized Pisidium species with one mantle
opening and one demibranch, which differs from P.
ocloya in having a non trapezoidal shell outline, lower
beaks, very strong lateral teeth, and strongly marked
commarginal ribs of the shell surface.
The height/length ratio, the convexity index and the
degree at which part of the ligament is protruded
showed a relatively wide variability in samples of
Pisidium ocloya from different localities (Figures 25-
33); larger specimens were in general more convex with
much inflated and pronounced beaks, and more sharply
defined trapezoidal outline.
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 3
Figures 25-33. Pisidiwm ocloya new species. 25-27. Specimens from Termas de Reyes, Jujuy (MLP 5497-1). 28-30. Specimens
from Zapla, Jujuy (MLP 6899-2). 31-33. Specimens from Cachi, Salta (MLP 6529). Scale bars = 500 um
Pisidium chicha new species
(Figures 34-43)
Diagnosis: Rather elliptic shell outline sub-centrally
located beaks, somewhat inflated and markedly raised
from shell surface, are diagnostic features. The presence
of only one mantle aperture and one demibranch is also
distinctive
Description: Shell small, maximum observed. shell
length 2.7, moderately high (mean HI 79 + 1), not
convex (mean Ci = 68 + 5): shell outline strikingly oval.
Dorsal and ventral margins broad, dorsal margin, slightly
ircuate, ventral margin uniformly curved; anterior end
evenly curve and only. slightly projected forward,
posterior end slightly truncated (Figures 34-37). Beaks
wide, widely rounded at tip, somewhat inflated, raised
above dorsal margin but low, sub-central, slightly
displaced backward, located at about 57-58% of SL.
Shell surface glossy, amber, sculptured with well marked
fine and rather regularly spaced striae (Figure 34).
Hinge plate narrow, hinge line somewhat short, HiL/
SL = 53 + 3% of SL (n = 8), widely curved. Hinge on
left valve (Figures 36, 38): cardinal teeth well-developed,
the inner one (Cy) thin, long, straight at base, bent
upward distally parallel] with respect to antero-posterior
axis, rounded at tip, outer one (Cy) a slender, slightly
C. Ituarte, 2005
Figures 34-41. Pisidium chicha new species. 34. Holotype (MLP 6S99-1-1): outer view of right valve, 35-41. Paratypes (MLP
6899-1-2). 35. Posterior view. 36. Left valve, inner view. 37. Right valve, inner view. 38. Left valve, detail of hinge. 39. Right valve
letail of hinge. 40. Right valve, detail of cardinal tooth and ligament. 41. Posterior view, detail of ligament. Scale bars (34-37
500 um; (38, 39) = 200 um: (40) = 250 um; (41) = 100 um
Page 102
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 3
curved blade, quite oblique, overlapping Cz on posterior
half; anterior lateral tooth (AII) very strong, straight,
cusp high, somewhat acute, displaced distally; posterior
lateral tooth (PII) short, strong, cusp high, distal. Hinge
on right valve (Figures 37, 39, 40): cardinal tooth (C3)
well-developed, narrow, and evenly curved on anterior
half, quite enlarged into triangular, slightly grooved cup
at posterior end; slightly hanging from inner margin of
hinge plate. Lateral teeth short and robust, inner
anterior lateral (AI) somewhat curved, cusp displaced
forward; outer anterior lateral tooth (AIIL) very short,
straight, with distal cusp; inner posterior lateral one (PI)
short, straight, slender and low, cusp sub-central; outer
posterior lateral one (PHI) minute, with distal cusp.
Escutcheon lanceolate, long, outline demarcated by
a very delicate line. Ligament-pit enclosed, inner margin
gently sinuous (Figures 40, 41). Ligament moderately
strong, internal, slightly visible from exterior, but not
protruded, representing about 23% of shell length.
Anatomy: Only one (anal) mantle opening present.
Only inner demibranch present (Figure 42). Inner radial
mantle muscles weak, inserted just above or coalescent
with pallial line. Nephridium with dorsally visible lateral
loop (Figure 4:3).
Type Locality: Unnamed brook flooding into Zapla
River in the neighborhood of Zapla City (24°16’01" S,
65°07'09" W), 946 m altitude, Jujuy Province, Argen-
tina, and small springs on bank of Manzanito Rivulet, on
the road from Santa Victoria East to Yavi near Huertas
(22°14'20" S, 35°00'31" W), 2740 m, Jujuy Province,
Argentina.
Type Material: Holotype (MLP6S99-1-1), 9 para-
types (7 paratypes MLP 6899-1-2; 2 paratypes MACN-
In 36363) from 24°16’ S, 65°12’ W; 62 paratypes from
22°14'20" S, 35°00'31" W (52 paratypes MLP 6550; 5
paratypes FML 14775; 5 paratypes MNHN).
Other Material Examined: Catamarca Province:
flooded areas at side of an unnamed river on the road
to Singuil, (27°38'25" S$, 65°57'23" W), 2000 m
(MLP7203). Jujuy Province: Los Cedros Rivulet, close
to Las Maderas Dam (24°28'40" S 65°17'08" W),
1190 m (MLP 6545-2). Tucuman Province: small pools
at the side of Medina River, on provincial road 305
between El Tipal and Aserradero (MLP 7404-2).
Distribution: Catamarca, Jujuy and Tucuman_ pro-
vinces, Argentina, between 940 and 2740 m altitude.
Etymology: The name of the new species alludes to
the Chichas, a small ethnic group that was a part of the
Omaguaca people, who inhabited the lands in the
neighborhood of the type locality.
Remarks: The shell shape, quite ovate and nearly
equilateral, and the marked sculpture of Pisidium chicha
new species are distinctive features that allow for easy
identification of the new species among other Pisidium
species from northwestern Argentina. A moderate shell
43. A —s
Figures 42-43. Pisidium chicha new species. 42. Gross
anatomy. 43. Detail of nephridium. (be: brooding embryos; id:
inner demibranch; n: nephridium; pa: posterior adductor; sr:
siphon retractor).
variation was observed: the specimens from Manzanito
Rivulet (MLP 6550) show shells slightly more convex
and higher than those of the specimens from Zapla
(MLP 6899-1); the striae were slightly coarser and more
marked in the former group. Specimens from Catamarca
Province (MLP 7203) show slightly inequilateral shells,
with posterior end slightly shorter. Pisidium chicha
shares with P. ocloya the same number of mantle
openings and demibranchs and the nephridium with
lateral lobe dorsally visible; but the former species
strikingly differs in having a smaller shell with quite an
oval shell outline. The presences of only one demibranch
and one mantle opening in P. chicha clearly separate this
species from P. chiquitanum. In addition, this latter is
a larger species of relatively similar shell outline but that
also differs from P. chicha in having an almost smooth
shell surface, lower, more backward displaced beaks,
and somewhat truncated posterior end.
Pisidium chiquitanum Ituarte, 2001
(Figures 44-47)
Pisidium chiquitanum Ituarte, 2001: 50; figs. 2-14 (La Siberia,
West of Comarapa, Santa Cruz de La Sierra, Bolivia,
holotype MHNB 34734),
Diagnosis: Rather elongate shell outline, — slightly
truncated at posterior end, low and posteriorly located
beaks, ligament position, internal but externally visible,
presence of branchial and anal openings, two demi-
branchs on each side and nephridia of closed type.
C. Ituarte, 2005
Description: Shell thin, small to medium size (mean
SL = 3.9 + 0.25; maximum observed size: 4.2 mm),
not verv high (mean HI = SO + 1), not convex (mean
Ci 61 = shell outline markedly oval elongate,
anteriorly produced, posterior end short, widely
rounded, or slightly truncated and nearly straight
Figures 44, 46, 47). Beaks low, depressed, slightly
projected above dorsal margin, located at about 62% of
SL (Figures 4446).
vellowish, with fine and low commarginal — striae,
Shell surface dull glossy, straw-
moderately more accentuated towards the shell margin
Figures 44, 46)
Hinge plate solid, hinge line rather long (HiL/SL
56 + 2). Hinge on right valve: Right cardinal tooth (Cs
strongly curved in middle, quite narrow on anterior hi i
enlarged into gently sulcated, rounded, or somewhat
elongate cup. Right lateral teeth robust, inner anterior
lateral (AD), widely curved, long, cusp sub-central or
slighth displaced forward: outer anterior lateral tooth
AIIL) quite short, cusp distal; inner posterior lateral (PI)
nearly straight, short, cusp sub-central; outer posterior
lateral tooth (PII) reduced in size with distal cusp. Left
valve (Figure 47): cardinal teeth short, inner one (Cs)
short, oblique with respect to antero-posterior axis, outer
one (C4) a narrow curved lame, quite oblique, over-
lapping C2 on posterior half; anterior lateral tooth (ATI)
strong, straight, cusp sub-central: posterior lateral tooth
PII) narrow and weak, cusp distal.
Ligament-pit enclosed, deep, inner margin slightly
sinuous, concave at posterior end. Escutcheon well
marked by a delicate line; ligament long, internal, but
visible from outside in anterior half through a very
narrow and sometimes rather long gap between valves,
never protruded. Ligament length is 23 + 1% of shell
ength.
Anatomy: Anal siphon and branchial mantle opening
oresent. Presiphonz . suture rather long, representing 11
+ 2% of St
yowertul siphonal serene present. Inner radial mantle
nuscles. S bundles as rule. inse srted aWe Ly from pe alli il
ine, scars of those corresponding to anal siphon
retractors coalescent with posterior adductor muscle
scars. Inner and outer demibranchs present. Outer
demibranch reduced in size, composed of 11-15 very
short descending filaments, reaching back to the 14— 16”
filament of inner demibranch. Ne phridia of closed type.
dorsal lobe variable in shape, aed subquadrate,
with lateral loop not visible in dorsal view
Material Examined: Holotype (MHNB 34734) La
Siberia, West of Comarapa, Santa Cruz de La Sierra
Bolivia; Tucuman, Argentina: 27°01'24” S, 65°39'29" W
MLP 6554): Cerro Munoz, Santa Cruz, 26°54’ S,
65°46'42” W, 2400 m (MLP 6991): La Angostura dam,
26°56' S, 65°41'03" W, 1800 m (MLP 6527): Jujuy,
Argentina: Los Laureles, 25°06'27" S, 65°36'10" W,
1360 m (MLP 6528): Los Toldos. Santa Victoria De-
parisien 1770 m (MLP 6993): small brook near Tiraxi
23°59'57” S, 65°19'39” W), 1576 m (MLP 6552): small
Anal siphon well-developed, pair of
Figures 44-47.
Paratype
Pisidium chiquitanum Ituarte, 2001. 44, 45.
(MLP 5362). 44. Outer view of right valve. 45.
Posterior view. 46, 47. Specimen from Tiraxi, Jujuy (MLP
6552). 46. Outer view of right valve. 47. Inner view of left
500 um
valve. Scale bars =
spring at the side of provincial road No. 4, near Termas
de Reyes (24°10'36" S$, 65°28'18" W) (MLP 5497-
Distribution: Ranging from sub-Andean regions in
Siberia (west of Comarapa) in central Bolivia (1SO0 m
altitude) southward to northwestern Argentina (between
1360 and 2400 m altitude)
Remarks: Pisidium chiquitanum can be easily identi-
fied among South American Pisidium species by its oval
shell outline with low beaks and internal (however
visible from the outside) ligament. It is also character-
ized by two, inner and outer, demibranchs on each sid
two siphonal openings, and nephridia of closed type
SS SS
Page 104
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 3
Pisidium chiquitanum resembles Pisidium meierbrooki
ee and Hinz, 1984, from Peru and Bolivia, which is
the only known species from tropical South America
with both, branchial and anal, siphonal openings
(Ituarte, 1995). Pisidium meierbrooki differs from. P.
chiquitanum in having a more convex shell (according to
data in Kuiper and Hinz, 1984, the Ci varies between 77
and 80), fuller and more backward displaced beaks. As
pointed out by Ituarte (2001)Pisidium chiquitanum is
similar to specimens from Ecuador and Peru reported
by Kuiper and Hinz (1984), as Pisidium casertanum
(Poli, 1791), an Eurasian species extremely variable in
shell shape, currently reported as cosmopolitan (Burch,
1975; Kuiper, 1953; Kuiper and Hinz, 1984: Holopainen
and Kuiper, 1982), However, these specimens are larger
than P. chiquitanum, having more central beaks and ae
produced anterior end. P. chiquitanum also differs from
P. casertanum in having less convex shell, lower and
narrower beaks, decidedly displaced backward. The
specimens from northwestern Argentina slightly differ
from the ones from Bolivia in being generally higher,
with beaks slightly less displaced in posterior Grection
(Figure 46).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author is grateful for the warm friendship and kind
support received from colleagues Gabriela Cuezzo,
Fatima Romero, and Carlos Molineri during the three
field trips to northwestern Argentina. This study was
funded by grant: PIP 554/98 ae the Consejo Nacional
de Investigaciones Cientificas y Técnicas (CONICET),
Argentina. The author is rese ucher of the CONICET.
LITERATURE CITED
Burch, J. B. 1975. Freshwater Sphaeriacean clams (Mollusca:
Pelecypoda). Malacological Publications, Hamburg, Mi-
chigan, 96 pp.
Doello-Jurado, M. 1921. Una nueva especie de Eupera del Rio
de Ja Plata. Physis 5: 72-75.
Holopainen, I. J. and G. J. Kuiper. 1982. Notes on the
morphometry and anatomy of some Pisidium and
Sphaerium species (Bivalvia, Sphaeriidae). Annales Zool-
ogici Fennici 19: 93-107.
pn J. G. J. 1983. The Sphaeriidae of Australia. Basteria 47:
—52,
Gee J. G. J. and W. Hinz. 1984. Zur Fauna der
Kleinmuscheln in den Anden. Archiv fiir Molluskenkunde
114[1983]: 137-156.
Ituarte, C. F. 1989. Los géneros Byssanodonta dOrbigny,
1846 y Eupera Bourguignat, 1854 (Bivalvia: Sphaeriidae)
en el area parano-platense. Descripcion de Eupera
iguazuensis n. sp. del rio Iguazu, Misiones, Argentina.
Neotropica 35: 53-63. ;
Ttuarte, C. F. 1994. fpel guaraniana n. sp. (Pelecypoda:
Sphaeriidae) del rio Uruguay, Argentina. Gayana, ser.
zool. 58: 1-7.
Ituarte, C. F. 1995. Nuevos registros de Pisidium Pfeiffer,
1821 y Sphacrium Scopoli, 1777 (Bivalvia: Sphaeriidae) en
Chile, Bolivia y Noroeste argentino. Neotropica 41: 31-41.
Ituarte, C. F. 1996. Argentine species of Pisidium Pfeiffer,
1821, and Musculium Link, 1807 (Bivalvia: Sphaeriidae).
The Veliger 39: 189-203.
Ituarte, C. F. 1999. Pisidium chilense (VOrbigny, 1846) and
new species of Pisidium C. Pfeiffer, 1821 from southern
Chile (Bivalvia, Sphaeriidae). Zoosystema 21: 249-257.
Ituarte, C. F. 2000. Pisidium taraguyense and Pisidium
pipoense, new species from Northeastern Argentina
(Bivalvia: Sphaeriidae). The Veliger 43: 51-57.
Ituarte, C. F. 2001. Pisidium chiquitanum new species from
Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia (Bivalvia: Sphaeriidae).
The Nautilus 115; 50-54.
Ituarte, C. F. and M. ©. Dreher-Mansur. 1993. Enupera
elliptica n. Sp., una nueva especie en el rio Iguazu,
Misiones, Argentina. Neotropica 39: 11-16,
Pilsbry, H. A. 1911, ‘Non-marine Mollusca of Patagonia.
Reports of the Princeton University Expedition to
Patagonia 1S96—1S99, 3(Part 5): 513-633.
Strobel, P. 1874. Materiali per una malacostatica de terra e di
acqua dolce dell’ Argentina. Pisa.
THE NAUTILUS 119(3):105—LOS, 2005
Page 105
Mysella pedroana, a commensal bivalve (Lasaeidae) on two
decapod crustacean hosts
Shannon M. Carpenter
Santa Barbara Museum of Natural
History
Department of Invertebrate Zoology
2559 Puesta del Sol Road
Santa Barbara, CA 93105-2998 USA
ABSTRACT
Mysella pedroana (Dall. 1898), lives commensally on Isocheles
/ }
pilosus | Holmes, 1900), and Blepharipoda occide ntalis Randall,
1839. Because of their small size at reproductive maturity,
I
specimens attached to Isocheles pilosus were prev iously
referred to in the literature as an undescribed species.
However, preliminary comparisons between the variability of
hinge dentition and internal structure of those specimens and
small individuals of Mysella pedroana indicate that they
represent instead a single species. Variability of characters
including size at reproductive maturity and shell morphology
suggests that Mysella pedroana is a highly variable species.
INTRODUCTION
A small bivalve living attached to hermit crabs has
perplexed biologists for over a decade. It was referred to
as Mysella sp. H by Valentich-Scott and Barwick (2001),
as an undescribed species. It was shown to be
reproductively mature at 1.0 mm in length.
Bivalves in the family Lasaeidae have been taxonom-
ically problematic (Dall, 1898; Gage, 1966a; 1966b;
O Foighil and Eernisse 1988: Morton and Scott,
1989). These bivalves combine features of immaturity
induced by changes in environmental factors, perhaps
due to their commensal nature. Mysella pedroana
Dall, 1895), is no exception. It is found both as
a commensal and free-living (Scott, 1987); however,
due to its prevalence on hosts, it may prefer a eomniensal
habitat.
Mysella pedroana was previously thought to be host-
specific and found only on ee sand crab Blepharipoda
occidentalis Randall, 1839, (Burch and Burch, 1944;
Boss, 1965a; Lafferty, (on Boyko and Mikkelsen,
2002). Originally described by Dall in 1898 from a single
valve, M. pe -droana was then redescribed (Boyko and
Mikkelsen, 2002) and associated with B. occidentalis as
host. The discovery of its occurrence on another host,
the hermit crab Isocheles pilosus (Holmes, 1900),
previously undocumented variation in shell morphology,
and small size at reproductive maturity has led to this
present study,
Blepharipoda occidentalis (Decapoda: Albuneidae) is
found in the northeastern Pacific from Stinson Beach,
Marin County, California, USA, to Bahia Santa Rosalia,
Baja ee Mexico (Morris et al., 1980) both
intertidally and subtidally, burrowing in sand. Isocheles
pilosus (Decapoda: Diogenidae) ranges from Bodega
Bay Harbor, Sonoma County, California, USA, to Estero
de Punta Banda, Baja California, Mexico (Rickets et al.
1985). Like B. occidentalis, it is intertidal, but also occurs
in mud flats, bays and estuaries including depths
offshore up to 55 meters. Isocheles pilosus most
commonly inhabits shells of Polinices or Kelletia (pers.
comm. Scott, 2004) and crawls on the sand or buries
with only its eyes and mouth visible (Fager, 1965).
Mysella pedroana is either attached to the crab’s setae or
in its branchial chambers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Preserved specimens identified by Valentich-Scott and
Barwick (2001) as Mysella sp. H from the collections in the
Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History (SBMNH)
were studied. Additional material included SBMNH
specimens associated with preserved specimens of Iso-
cheles pilosus and B. occidentalis, along with specimens
from two living I. pilosus and one B. occidentalis collected
7 Sands Be ch, S Santa Barbara. Specimens removed from
pilosus are deposited as SBMNH 351472-351480 and
means Material of M. pedroana examined includes
SBMNH 348251, 345553, 348252, and 348253.
Of the 145 av a. specimens, 35 were opened and
Riche or gross anatomy. Characters examined were
internal structure, shell dentition, and shape. Measure-
ments were made with vernier calipers and anatomical
observations were performed under a dissecting micro-
scope. Scanning electron micrography was performed at
SBMNH with a Zeiss EVO 40 XVP with a variable-
pressure secondary electron detector.
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 3
Figure I.
Living Mysella perdroana were placed in Petri dishes
with sea water and coarse sediment for comparison of
movement in different media. Specimen with brood
was stained with crystal violet in distilled water prior to
examination.
RESULTS
Mysella pedroana (Dall, 1898)
Description: SHELL (Figures 1—3): Shell morphology
variable from ovate to subtrigonal, thin, more elongate
anteriorly; umbones opisthogyrate; beaks range from
central to posterior; shell surface white with poorly
defined commarginal striae; periostracum thick and
yellow, variable in texture, rough and dehiscent to
smooth and adherent; prodissoconch line present;
maximum shell length 11.0 mm, mean height to length
ratio 77% (herein) (SD +4.8; range 11.0-1.0 mm) to
80% (Boyko and Mikkelsen, 2002).
Muscle scars apparent in larger specimens with
anterior adductor scar elongate and posterior ovate;
pallial line entire; hinge with prominent subumbonal
resilium; two lateral cardinal teeth on right valve with
longer anterior tooth and slight groove, posterior shorter;
teeth diverging into an inverted V; left valve with thin
Figures 2-3. Mysella pedroana, hinge dentition. 2. From host Isocheles pilosus, SBMNH 351473, SEM. Scale bar =
3. From host Blepharipoda occidentalis, SBMNH 351478, SEM
\ crowth series of commensal Mysella pedroana, SEMNH 351473. Scale bar = | mm.
grooves (lamellae) that interlock with the right valve.
Extensive variation shown in smaller specimens (length
1-3.4 mm), which may exhibit a posterior tubercular
tooth on the right valve with a similar posterior
tubercular tooth on the left valve.
Gross Anatomy: Mantle papillate, more so anteriorly;
ctenidium encompasses large area of internal space and
serves as a brood chamber: presence of eggs observed in
specimens from 1-11 mm in length; labial palps small.
OBSERVATIONS ON Live SPECIMENS: Activity was enhanced
following regular replacing of cold sea water. Clams
were observed crawling on surface of Petri dish with
shell positioned vertically, in the manner of a gastropod;
dug in sand with anterior end, process took 15-20 sec.
Detached M. pedroana took 3 min. to reattach to
setae on the ventral surface of I. pilosus. However,
when I. pilosus setae were easily accessible and M.
pedroana was placed next to them, attachment took 30-
45 sec.
Host INFORMATION AND PREVALENCE: Blepharipoda occi-
dentalis had a carapace length of 4.06-4.55 cm (n = 3)
and all three had Mysella pedroana present. Isocheles
pilosus had a carapace length of 1.9-2.57 cm (n = 6)
with three of the six crabs having bivalves present.
200 Lm.
Scale bar = 1 mm
S. M. Carpenter, 2005
Page 107
Figures 4-5.
Three B. occidentalis were examined with 100%
prevalence. Of the six preserved museum specimens of
I. pilosus, only one was infested. However, two live
I. pilosus were examined and fifty-nine M. pedroana
specimens were retrieved.
The live B. occidentalis examined had two M.
pedroana that were found on the external surface near
the antennae and on the second pereopod.
Host Isocheles pilosus: Mysella specimens on I. pilosus
were found in the branchial chambers, attached to the
chelae, the junction between the chela and carapace, the
ventral setae and branchial chambers (Figure 4). The
largest specimens were on the chelae (1 mm) with
smaller individuals on the ventral surface (0.7—1 mm)
and juveniles (<0.7 mm) anteriorly in the right and left
branchial chambers. Those on the ventral surtaee and in
the branchial chambers were attached with byssus
(Figure 5). The few on the chelae were observed
crawling or attached by byssal threads to the surface
spines of the chelae. Upon preservation in 70% ETOH
M. pedroana retained its byssal threads.
DISCUSSION
This study suggests that shell shape of Mysella pedroana
is more variable than previously appreciated. These
variable characteristics include texture of the periostra-
cum (rough and dehiscent to smooth and adherent),
dentition, “shape of the shell. These differences have
been attributed to environmental conditions in other
molluscan shells (Wellington and Kuris, 1983; De Wolf
et al., 1998).
Shell variation probably led to the redescription of
Mysella pedroana as Rochefortia golischi by Dall in 1916
(Burch and Burch, 1944); these were later synonymized
by Scott (1957). However, this variation is also common
to many commensal species and makes it difficult to
Myse o pe droana. 4. Host Isocheles pilosus showing attachment between the chela and carapace (arrows), SBMNH
345553, Scale bar = 2.2 mm. 5. On host Isocheles pilosus with byssus (arrow), SBMNH 351472
. Seale bar = 0.8 mm.
identify them based on shell morphology (O Foighil and
Eernisse, 1988: Morton and Scott, 1989).
Due to shell variation and the small size at re-
productive maturity of M. pedroana, these smaller
bivalves on I. pilosus were thought to be a new species,
referred to as Mysella sp. H (Valentich-Scott and
Barwick, 2001). However, minimum size of brooding
adults of M. pedroana had been previously reported at
1 mm (Valentich-Scott and Barwick, 2001) and sper-
matogenesis has been confirmed in specimens of
1.2mm. Previous observations for individuals of M.
pedroana undergoing spermatogenesis were 4.7 mm in
length (pers. comm. Kevin Lafferty, 2004). Reproductive
maturity at small sizes has been reported also for
Pseudopythina macrophthalmensis at 2.0 mm (Jespersen
et al., 2001) and Mysella bidentata with egg production
at 1.7 mm (O Foighil et al., 1954).
The prevalence of Mysella pedroana was higher on B.
occidentalis than on I. pilosus. Those on B. beotdentalis
were also larger in the gill chambers compared to only
juveniles found in the gills of I. pilosus. Further
examination of both hosts would be required to see if
there is a host preference.
Reattachment to a host is possible for the species.
Both Lafferty (pers. comm. 2004) and Valentich-Scott
(pers. comm. 2004) noted that individuals could drop
their byssus and disassociate from the host if perturbed.
Individuals of M. pedroana could use this procedure to
move from host to host or to become free-living.
The above observations on morphology and symbiont-
host relationships permit the identification of this
bivalve as Mysella pedroana. Previously reported host
specificity for commensal bivalves may be due to the
scarcity of studies or experimental observations (Boss,
1965b; Morton and Scott, 1989). This species was
previously thought to be host-specific (Boyko and
Mikkelsen, 2002), an assumption here shown not to be
valid.
Page 108
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 3
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to thank to Paul Valentich-Scott for his
guidance, knowledge and for introducing me to the
world of bivalves "The Hearst Fonndaton Internship
through the Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History
made this research possible. Scanning electron micro-
scope facilities funded by NSF grant number
MRI0420726, Daniel Geiger assisted with SEM images.
Michael Caterino, Henry Chaney and Armand Kuris for
reviewing preliminary drafts. Shane Anderson provided
living eae: Patricia Sadeghian contributed her knowl-
edge of crustaceans. Paula Mikkelsen and Kevin Lafferty
whom offered additional data. Kelvin Barwick contrib-
uted many specimens. Two anonymous reviewers
offered critical observations which greatly improved
the manuscript.
LITERATURE CITED
Boss, kK. J. 1965a. Symbiotic erycinacean bivalves. Malacologia
3: 183-195,
Boss, K. J. 1965b. A new mollusk (Bivalvia, Erycinidae)
commensal on the stomapod crustacean Lysioquilla.
American Museum Novitates 2215; 1-11.
Boyko, C. B. and P. M. Mikkelsen. 2002. Anatomy and biology
of Mysella pedroana (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Galeommatoi-
dea), and its sateen: relationship with Blepharipoda
occidentalis (Crustacea: Anomura: Albuneidae). Zoolo-
ieee: Sipe 241: 149-160.
Buich, IG and T. Burch. 1944. [Family Montacutidae].
STE Nae list of the west American marine Mollusca
from San Diego, California, to the Polar Sea, Part I.
Pelecypoda. Conchological Club of Southern California,
Minutes 40: 14-16.
Dall, W. H. 1898. Synopsis of the Recent and Tertiary
Leptonacea of North America and the West Indies.
Proceedings of the United States National Museum 21:
873-897.
De Wolf H., T. Backeljau, V. S. Dogen and R. Verhagen.
1998. Large-scale patterns of shell variation in Littorina
striata, a planktonic developing periwinkle from Macro-
nesia (Mollusca: Prosobranchia). Marine Biology 131;
309-317.
Fager, E. W. 1968. A sand-bottom epifaunal community of
invertebrates in shallow water. Limnology and Oceanog-
raphy 13(3): 448-464.
Gage, J. 1966a. Observations on the bivalves Montacuta
substriata and M. ferrunginosa, ‘commensals’ with spa-
tangoids. Journal of Marine Biology Association of the
United Kingdom 46: 49-70.
Gage, J. 1966b. The life-histories of the bivalves Montacuta
substriata and M. ferruginosa, ‘commensals’ with spatan-
goids. Journal of Marine Biology Association of the United
Kingdom 46: 499-511.
Jespersen, A. T. Kosuge and J. Lutzen. 2001. Sperm
dimorphism and spermatozeugmata in the commensal
bivalve Pseudopythina macrophthalmensis (Galeommatoi-
dea, kelliidae). Zoomorphology 120: 177-189.
Lafferty, K. D. 1993. Ecology and parasites of the spiny sand
crab, Blepharipoda occidentalis, American Zoologist 33: 19A,
Morris, R. H., D. P. Abbott and E. C. Haderlie. 1980.
Intertidal Invertebrates of California. Stanford University
Press, Stanford, 584 pp.
Morton, B. and P. H. Scott. 1989. The Hong Kong
Galeommatacea (Mollusca: Bivalvia) and their hosts, with
descriptions of new species. Asian Marine Biology 6:
129-160.
O Foighil, D., D. McGrath, M. E. Connely, B. F. Keegan and
M. Costelloe. 1984. Population dynamics and reproduc-
tion of Mysella bidentata (Bivalvia: Galeommatacea) in
Galway Bay, Irish west coast. Marine Biology $1: 283-291.
O Foighil, D. and D. J. Eernisse. 1958S. Geepiephiedly
wide sspread, non-hybridizing sympatric strains of the
hermaphroditic, brooding clam Lasaea in the northeastern
Pacific Ocean. Biological Bulletin 175: 218-229.
Ricketts, E. F., J. Calvin and J. W. Hedgpeth. 1985. Between
Pacific Tides. 5'" ed. Stanford Unive rsity Press, Stanford,
336 pp:
Scott, P. H. 1987. A preliminary review of Mysella (Bilvalvia,
Montacutidae) from the northwestern Pacific. Western
Society of Malacologists 19: 13-14.
Valentich-Scott, P. and Kk. Barwick. 2001. Mysella sp. H
(Bivalvia, Lasaeidae). Southern California Association of
Marine lavecteh ibe Taxonomists Newsletter 20(2):
13-14.
Wellington, G. M. and A. M. Kuris. 1953. Growth and shell
variation in the tropical eastern Pacific intertidal gastro-
pod genus Purpura: ecological and evolutionary implica-
tions. Biological Bulletin 164: 518-535.
THE NAUTILUS 119(3): 109-115, 2005
Page LO9
Coralliophila trigoi (Gastropoda:
Muricidae), a new species
from the none ers Atlantic Ocean
Paolo Mariottini'
Dipartimento di Biologia
Universita di “Roma Tre”
Viale Marconi 446
00146 Roma
ITALY
Carlo Smriglio
Via di Valle
00167 Roma
ITALY
Aurelia 134
Emilio Rolan
Museo de Historia Natural,
Campus Universitario Sur, 15752
Santiago de Compostela
SPAIN
ABSTRACT
Based on shell characters and with further support from mo-
lecular data, Coralliophila trigoi, a new species of gastropod of
the family Muricidea, is here described from the northeastern
Atlantic Ocean. The new taxon, consisting of several specimens
mainly collected along the Atlantic Spz inish coast, has previ-
ously been misidentified in the literature as Coralliophila bas-
ilea (Dautzenberg and H. Fisher, 1896). Coralliophila trigoi
new species is conchologically similar to Coralliophila meyen-
dorffii (Caleara, 1845), and Coralliophila panormitana (Mon-
terosato, 1869), but it can be easily separated from them mainly
because it is differently sculptured. The new species is com-
pared with other members of the genus Coralliophila from the
same geographical area and Me .diterranean Sea. Molecular se-
quencing of the intemal transcribed spacer 2 region (ITS2) of
the nuclear rDNA and part of the ditochondeal gene for 12S
rDNA confirm the validity of the new species.
INTRODUCTION
The coralliophilines form a monophyletic group of neo-
gastropods that includes approximately 200-250 de-
scribed species he based on their shell morphol-
ogy, in at least 7-LO “genera”, distributed worldwide in
temperate and tropical oceans. The subfamily Corallio-
philinae Chenu, 1859 (for the phylogenetic relationship
of this muricoidean groups, see Oliverio and Mariottini,
2001a) includes species invariably associated with cni-
darians, which are generally used as food by the gastro-
pods. Shell variability, absence of radula, absenes of a
preserved protoconch (often eroded in adults and even
in young specimens), together with a limited knowledge
of the anatomy, represent constrains to the understand-
ing of the taxonomic status of this group of neogastro-
pods. Their classical systematics above the species level
is at present far from. being stable (Clover, 1982; Bou-
chet and Warén, 1985: Kosuge and Suzuki, 1985: Oliv-
erio, 1989: Vaught; 1989; Olivers. in press). Data from
‘ Author for correspondence
mitochondrial and nuclear genes (12S rDNA and ITS2
rDNA, respectively) have been recently utilized in the
proposal of a molecular framework for the phylogeny of
these muricids (Oliverio and Mariottini, 2001a; Oliverio,
Cervelli and Mariottini, 2002). Data from both sequence
= secondary structure show that Rapaninae Gray, 1853
=Thaidinae Jousseaume, 1585) are their sister group
iat asewych et al., 1997; Oliverio and Mariottini, 200 1a;
Oliverio, Cervelli and Mariottini, 2002), indicating a
monophyletic radiation of the Coralliophilinae. The
state-of-the-art knowledge about feeding, anatomy, sex-
ual strategies, parental care, and protoconch of corallio-
philines was recently reviewed by Richter and Luque
(2002). The authors ‘reported the available data on pro-
toconch and larval development of many coralliophilines
belonging to ten different genera, including Corallio-
phila H. and A. Adams, 1853. We had the opportunity
to examine several shells of a coralliophiline that we
could allocate to any of the Atlantic and Mediterranean
species of this subfamily. These shells, mostly collected
along the coast of Galicia, Spain, were prev iously mis-
identifie d in the literature as Coralliophila basilea
(Dautzenberg and H. Fisher, 1896) (Rolan, 1953; Rolan,
Lopez and Gutiérrez-Garcia, 1995). After comparisons
with other species, we realized that they represent an
undescribed species, possibly related to Coralliophila
meyendorffti (Caleara, 1845) and Coralliophila panor-
mitana (Monterosato, 1569).
In order to verify the taxonomic validity of Corallio-
phila trigoi, we carried out ee sequencing of the
ater transcribed spacer 2 region (ITS2) of f the nucle-
ar rDNA and of part of the mitochondrial gene for 12S
rDNA. Genomic DNA was extracted from the
foot of two freshly collected individuals with standard
methods (SDS-proteinase K digestion, phenol/chloro-
form extraction, ethanol precipitation (Oliverio and Mar-
iottini, 2001b)). Mitochondrial rDNA was amplified
through the ieee rase chain reaction (PCR) with prim-
ers 12S-I and 12S-IIT (Oliverio and Mariottini, 2001a)
Nuclear ribosomal ITS2 was amplified using the primers
dissected
Page 110
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 3
Table 1. Collecting data and DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank accession number for specimens assayed in molecular systematics.
Species/individuals
Accession number
Coralliophila neritoidea
Coralliophila brevis
Coralliophila mejendorffii
Coralliophila panormitana
Coralliophila trigoi new species,
speci. #1]
Coralliophila trigoi new species,
specim. #2
La Maddalena Is. (
Cape Circeo (Latium, Italy
Taiwan, 23°10’ N, 120°05’ E, 5 m depth
Collecting locality and depth 128 ITS2
AJ293679 AJ420258
La Maddalena Is. (Sardinia, Italy), 41°15’ N, 009°26' E, 30 m depth — AJ293676 — AJ420256
Sardinia, Italy), 41°15’ N, 009°26' E, 3-7 m depth AJ297517 — AJ293661
), 41°11" N, 013°04" E, 70 m depth AJ293681 — AJ420259
Camarifias, Galicia, Spain, northeastern Atlantic Ocean, 15-50 m depth — AJ937305 — AJ937307
Camarifias, Galicia, Spain, northeastern Atlantic Ocean, 15-50 m depth —AJ937306 — AJ937308
its-3d and its-4r complementary to conserved regions of
the ribosomal coding portions on the 5.8S and 28S
tRNAs (Oliverio and Mariottini, 2001b). PCR-amplified
products were directly sequenced by an automated se-
quencer. Nucleotide sequences were first aligned by
hand and the alignment progressively optimized : accord-
ing to secondary structure homology. Phylogenetic anal-
yses_ were performed using PAUP? 4b10 ( (Swofford,
2002). GenBank accession auimber 12S and ITS2) of
the Coralliophila trigoi sequences are reported in Ta-
ble 1.
Institutional abbreviations used: MNCM, Museo
Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid, Spain; MZB,
Laboratorio di Malacologia, Museo di Zoologia
dell Universita di Bologna, fialy.
Abbreviations used for collections: CS-PM, Carlo
Smriglio and Paolo Mariottini (Rome, Italy); ER, Emilio
Rolén (Vigo, Spain); FS, Frank Swinnen (Lommel, Bel-
gium); Ir J uan Trigo (Brion, A Coruna, Spain); MO,
Marco Oliverio (Rome, Italy).
SYSTEMATICS
Superfamily Muricoidea Rafinesque, 1S15
Family Muricidae Rafinesque, 1815
Subfamily Coralliophilinae Chenu, 1859
Genus Coralliophila H. and A. Adams, 1853
Type Species: Fusus neritoideus Lamarck, 1816,
Ency. Meth., pl. 435, figs. 2a—b. (=Purpura violacea Kie-
ner, 1836), by subsequent designation (Iredale, 1912).
Recent, Indo-Pacific.
Coralliophila trigoi new species
(Figures 1-8, 13-14, 17-21)
Description: Shell of large size, up to 35 mm length.
Protoconch usually erode d in adult specimens (proto-
conch observed in only one juvenile Daas n, albeit
worn and lacking the embryonic sti we), Protoconch in-
dicative of plz inktotrophic larval development, multispi-
ral, composed of protoconch I and If. Protoconch IL of
about 2% whorls, with a diameter of about SOO jm,
showing two strong spiral keels, only one visible above
the suture of the first whorl, crossed by axial ribs forming
nodules at intersections. The protoconch- teleoconch de-
marcation is well-defined, marked by a varix. Teleoconch
shape biconical, elongate ovoid-fusiform, solid, rather in-
flated. Spire relatively high, conical, 4-5 rather convex
whorls, shoulder rounde a Suture not very evident, par-
tially covered by the sculpture, which is formed of 15—
20 spiral cords, regularly ordered, rarely alternating with
smaller spiral ponds: Spiral sculpture consisting of ribs
rounded in cross-section, all of similar width, densely
covered with imbricating, fine, and long lamellae. Axial
ribs 7—11, large, generally weak, crossing the spiral
cords. Siphonal ae short, narrow, open, moderately
curved. Aperture large, oval, representing about half of
the shell height, w /hite or cream-white inside. Umbilicus
absent. Outer lip thin and crenulate. Shell color uni-
formly reddish- or pale-brown. Operculum oval, oblong,
horny, concentric, with lateral-terminal nucleus, weddishe
brown.
Type Material (Figures 1-8): Holotype (Figures 1-2),
30.6 * 20.4 mm, MNCN 15,05/46458; paratype A (Fig-
ures 3-4), 31. ° x 19.4 mm, MZB 31023; paratype B
(Figures 5-8), 27.3 x 16.7 mm, CS-PM; paratype C,
27.4 X 18.2 mm, CS-PM: paratype D, 24.2 * 16.5 mm,
ER; paratype E, 26.5 * 16.6 mm, ER; paratypes A-E,
from type locality; paratype F, 30.9 * 18.5 mm, ER,
Malpica, Spain; paratype G, 23.5 * 16.3 mm, ER, Ca-
melle, Spain; paratype H, 24.8 < 17.3 mm, JT; paratype
I, 21.2 x 12.3 mm, JT; pe aratype L, 26.9 * 17.1 mm, ”
paratype M, 21.4 * 12.3 mm, JT; paratype N, 31.2
18.0 mm, JT; paratype O, 18.5 * 12.5 mm, JT; ears
P. 7.4 * 5.1 mm, CS-PM; paratypes H—P from Porto da
es Sagres, Portugal; paratype Q, 30.2 * 18.1 mm,
ER, Lira A Coruna, Spain; paratype R, 26.4 * 17.2 mm,
ER, Malpica, Spain; paratype S, 27.3 * 16.2 mm, CS-
PM; paratype T, 25.1 * 16.2 mm, CS-PM; paratypes
Q-T from Lira A Coruna, Spain; paratype U, 39.2 x
23.2 mm, CS-PM, A Guarda, Spain; paratype V, 30.1 x
18.6 mm, CS-PM, type locality; paratype W, 29.8 x 17.4
mm, CS-PM: paratype Z, 25.5 < 16.2 mm, CS-PM;
paratypes W-Z from Malpica, Spain.
Type Locality: Camarifias, Galicia, Spain, northeast-
ern Atlantic Ocean, 15-50 m depth.
Distribution: Known from Galicia, Spain, to Algarve,
Portugal, in the Atlantic Ocean, and from Malaga and
Almeria (Alboran Sea, Spain) in the Mediterranean.
P. Mariottini et al., 2005
Figures 1-8. Coralliophila trigoi new species. 1-2. Holotype, 30.6
19.4 mm, MZB 31023. 5-8. Paratype B, 27.3
Habitat: Several live collected specimens were found
attached at the base of host cnidarians Calliactis paras-
itica (Couch) (a sea anemone).
Etymology: This species name is dedicated to our
friend Juan Trigo, who supplied some of the specimens
of the new species
Molecular Sequencing: Given the often misleading
information conveyed by characters of shell morphology
in this group Oliverio and Mariottini, 2001b), we veri-
20.4 mm, MNCN 15.05/46455. 3-4. Paratype A, 31.6
16.7 mm, CS-PM. From type locality, depth 15-50 m. Scale bars = 1 em
fied the validity of the new species using a molecular
appre vach. We sequenced the internal transcribed spacer
2 region (ITS2) of the nuclear rDNA and part of the
mitochondrial gene for 12S rDNA from individuals of
the new taxon and compared them with available se-
quences of C, meyendorffii, C. panormitana, and Cor-
alliophila brevis (Blainville, 1832), plus Coralliophila
neritoidea (Lamarck, 1816) as outgroup. Parsimony anal-
ysis of the aligned sequences ol nuclear and mitochon-
Sed
drial DNA resulted in the tree reported in Figure 2%
a
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. ¢
1s)
Figures 9-16. Shells of Coralliophila species. 9-10. Coralliophila squamosa (Bivona, 1838), 35.9
Galicia, Spain, 15-50 in depth. 11-12. Coralliophila panormitana (Monterosato, 1869), 19.2
20.9 mm, CS-PM,. Camarinas
12.1 mm, CS-PM, Malaga, Spain, 40 m
depth. 13-14. Coralliophila trigoi new species, 27.2 * 18.1 mm, MO, Marbella, Spain, 30-50 m depth. 15-16. Coralliophila meyendorffii
Calcara, 1845), 26.8
The two related species C. meyendorffii and C. panor-
mitana, were more closely related to each other than to
the two specimens of the new species
Other Material Examined: Coralliophila trigoi: 5
spec. from the tvpe locality: 3 spec., Laxe: | spec, A
Guarda 3 spec. amelle 3 spec Malpica, Galicia, Spain
ER: 2 spec. Sagres \loarve, Portugal, CS-PM; 2 spec
\lmeria; 3 spec. Marbella, Spain, MO; Coralliophila
meyendorffii: 10 spec. La Maddalena Isl., Sardinia Is-
land: 1 spec. San Pietro Isl., Sardinia Island; 6 spec. San-
ta Marinella; 3 spec. Ponza Isl.; 1 spec. Capo Palinuro
» SPE Le Castella: 5 spec Elba Isl.. Italy, CS-PM: 6
14.7 mm, FS, Punta del Carmen, Lanzarote Isl., Canary Islands, 20 m depth Seale bars = 1 cm
spec. Punta del Carmen, Lanzarote Isl., Canary Islands,
FS Coralliophila panormitana: 5 spec. Marina di Ca-
merota, Italy; 1 spec. Malaga, Spain; 1 spec. Portimao,
Portugal, CS-PM: Coralliophila squamosa: 23 spec. from
the type locality: 6 spec Laxe; § spec. Camelle; 7 spec.
Malpica, Galicia, Spain, ER; 10 spec. Ria de Vigo, Ga-
licia, Spain, JT; 1 spec. Malaga, Spain; 1 spec. San Pietro
Isl., Sardinia Island: 1 spec. Ventotene Ish: ] spec. Ma-
rina di Camerata; 2 spec. Le ( rastella: 2 spec. Civitanova
Marche, Italy, CS-PM
Remarks: Based on shell characters of the teleoconch
we take the conservative approach of conserving this
P. Mariottini et al., 2005
Figures 17-26.
species in the genus Coralliophila s. |., as traditionally
ormulated (see also Oliverio, in press). The new species
was collected in Galicia together with the Atlantic-Med-
terranean Coralliophila squamosa (Bivona, 1838). This
atter species is generally collected in the Mediterranean
Sea at depths ranging from 100 to 600 m (Figures 9-
10). The new taxon is clearly conchologically distinguish-
able from all other eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean
species of Coralliophilinae. Coralliophila trigoi shows a
certain resemblance with the Mediterranean Corallio-
phila panormitana (Monterosato, 1869), but the latter is
smaller, having a different sculpture that includes a larg-
er number of spiral cords (22-24), with smaller scales
Figures 11-12
Coralliophila trigoi is similar to Coralliophila meyen-
dorffii (Calcara, 1845) (Figures 15-16, 22-26), but it dif-
fers by its more rounded shape, by having the length/
width and length/aperture lensth ratios smaller (1.60
and 1.68 vs. 1.72 and 1.86), by possessing a larger num-
ber of primary spiral cords (15-20 vs. 13-15), which are
narrower in width and differently sculptured and by a
reddish- or pale-br« yWwTh color Coralliophila meyendorffii
1S generally milky-white Furthermore, the protoconch
Shells of Coralliophila species. 17-20. Coralliophila trigoi new species, 23.6
14.0 mmm, CS-PM, Algarve
Portugal. 18, 19. Details of shell sculpture. 21. Coralliophila trigoi new species, detail of the larval whorls, paratype P, 7.4 * 5.1
mm, CS-PM, Porto da Baleeira, Sagres, Portugal, 15-25 m depth. 22-25. Coralliophila meyendorffti (Calcara, 1545), 25.6 16.0
mm, CS-PM, La Maddalena Isl., Sardinia, Italy, 1 m depth. 23, 24. Details of shell sculpture. 26. Coralliophila meyendorffi, detail
of the larval whorls, specimen size 2.2 * 1.3 mm, CS-PM, La Maddalena Isl., Sardinia, Italy, 1 m depth. Scale bars =
or Figures 21, 26, scale bars = 200 xm
I cm, except
[1 of Coralliophila trigoi shows a number of whorls (2%
and a diameter (SOO xm) different from the values on
Coralliophila meyendorffii (3% and 650-750 jum, re-
spectively; see Figures 21, 26). The main shell morpho-
logical differences between these two species are sum-
marized in Table 2. Coralliophila meyendorffii is a lit-
toral, widely distributed species, occurring in the Med-
iterranean Sea (Figures 22-26), along the Atlantic
African coast and Canary Islands (Figures 15-16). It is
worth mentioning that Coralliophila meyendorffii preys
on a variety of anthozoans, including the cnidarian Cal-
liactis parasitica (personal observations). Interestingly,
Coralliophila trigoi seems to be distributed along the
\tlantic coast of Spain and Portugal, but restricted to
the Alboran Sea (Malaga, Almeria) within the Mediter-
ranean basin. The collecting depth is slightly deeper (50
m) than the bathymetric range (littoral) of ¢ oralliophila
meyendorffti Although the
velopment (as indicated by t
phila trigoi could bring abou
bution than that currently
planktotrophic mode. of de-
he protoconch) of Corallio-
it a wider geographic distri
Known for the species the
taxon has not yet been found in the Macaronesian Is
lands and the West African coast
Page 114
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 3
C. neritoidea
C. brevis
C. panormitana
100/97 C. meyendorffii
C. trigoi #1
100/100
C. trigoi #2
Figure 27. Cladogram of parsimony analysis for the studied
coralliophiline taxa. This topology was recovered under maxi-
mum parsimony analysis of the 12S + ITS2 dataset (either
including or excluding gap positions). Numbers at the branch
represent ee support in MP analyses (gap included and
gaps as missing). Locality data and GenBank accession num-
bers (128 and ITS2) are reported in Table 1.
Coralliophila trigoi has been previously misidentified
as Coralliophita pasilee (Rolan, 1983: 236, fig. 210; Ro-
lan, Lopez and Gutiérrez-Garcia, 1995: 30, fig.2 2), but it
is easily distinguishable from this taxon. palo:
basilea has a more turreted shell and a coarser spiral
sculpture. Among the fossil coralliophiline records, the
only species that slightly resembles the new taxon is Cor-
alliophila burdigalensis (Tournouér, 1874), a species
from the Upper Oligocene and Lower Miocene of Aq-
uitaine (France); but the fossil species is smaller and has
a different shell outline ane sculpture (Lozouet and
Renard, 1998: 173, figs. 2. 1-10).
Parsimony aay sis of the oe d sequences of nuclear
and mitochondrial DNA resulted in the tree re ported in
Figure 27. Accordingly, the two related species C. mey-
endorffii and C. panormitana were more closely related
to each other than to the two specimens of f the new
species. The same results (not shown here) were ob-
tained including additional (yet shorter) sequences of C.
meyendorffii from other Mediterranean localities (Sar-
dinia, Sicily, and Southern Spain). This is a clear indi-
cation that the spe cimens of the new form constitute a
distinct, isolated gene-pool and strongly support our de-
cision to describe it as new.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We would like express our deep gratitude to Mr. Juan
Trigo, Brion, A Coruna, Spain, for kindly sending us
Table 2. Comparison of shell characters between Corallio-
phila trigoi and C. meyendorffi.
Shell characters C. trigoi C. meyendorffii
Protoconch diameter 800 jzm 650-750 jum
Protoconch number of
whorls 2.5 3.5
Teleoconch primary spiral
cords 15-20 13-15
Teleoconch axial ribs 7-11 8-10
LengthAvidth ratio 1.60 + 0.09 1.72 + 0.09
Length/aperture length
ratio 1.68 + 0.10 1.86 + 0.10
Size range 17.6-35.4 mm = 19.5-34.3 mm
ees of Coralliophila trigoi. Dr. Andrea Di Giulio
(Department of Biology, University of “Roma Tre”,
Rome, Italy) is acknowlec Iged for SEM photographs,
which were carried out at the LIME (Inter-Department
Laboratory of Electron Microscopy, University of “Roma
Tre”). Sincere thanks are due to Dr. Antonio Bonfitto
(Zoological Museum, University of Bologna, Italy) for
generously providing bibliography. We are crateful to
Drs. Marco Oliverio and Maria Vittoria Modiea (De-
partment of Animal and Human Biology, University of
“La Sapienza”, Rome, Italy) for help with molecular
work. M. Oliverio also proy ided valuable advices and dis-
cussion.
LITERATURE CITED
Bouchet, P. and A. Warén. 1985. Revision of the Northeast
Atlantic bathyal and abyssal Neogastropoda excluding Tur-
ridae_ (Mollusca, Gastropoda). Bollettino Malacologico,
Suppl. 1: 1-296.
Clover, P. 1982, Latiaxis catalog and illustrated check list of
the Coralliophilidae family. Privately printed, i-ii, 18 pls.
+ 18 unnumbered text pages.
Harasewych, M. G., S. L. Adamkewicz, J. A. Blake, D. Saudek,
T. Spriggs and C. J. Bult. 1997. Neogastropod phylogeny:
a molecular perspective. Journal of Molluscan Studies 63:
eee
Iredale, 1912. New generic names and new species of ma-
rine ols Proceedings of the Malacological Society
of London 10: 217-228.
Lamarck, J. B. P. A. de, M. 1516. Liste des objets représentés
dans les planches de cette livraison. “Vingt-troisiéme par-
tie: mollusques et polypes divers, par M. Lamarck. In:
Bruguiére, J. G., M. J B. P. A. de Lamarck and B. de St.
Vincent. (1782-1832) Tableaux enc yclopé dique et méth-
odique ‘de »s trois regnes de la nature”. 1-16, pls 391-488,
431 bis, 432 bis®.
Lozouet, P. and P. Renard. 1998. Les Coralliophilidae, Gastro-
poda de Oligocéne et du Miocéne inférieur d’Aquitaine
(sud-ouest de la France); systématique et coraux hdtes.
Geobios 31 2: 171-184
Kosuge, S. and M. Suzuki. 1985. Ilustrated catalogue of La-
tiaxis and its related groups. Family ¢ ‘oralliophilid: ie. In-
stitute of Malacology of Tokyo, Speci: il Publications 1: 1—
83.
P. Mariottini et al., 2005
Page 115
Oliverio, M. 1989. Famiglia Coralliophilidae Chenu, 1896 in
Mediterraneo. La Conchiglia 246-249: 45-54.
Oliverio, M. In press. Coralliophilinae (Neogastropoda: Muri-
cidae) from the South West Pacific. In: P. Bouchet and V.
Heros (eds.) Tropical Deep-Sea Benthos. Memoires du
Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris.
Oliverio, M. and P. Mariottini. 200la. A molecular framework
for the phylogeny of Coralliophila and related muricoids.
Journal of Molluscan Studies 67: 215-224.
Oliverio, M. and P. Mariottini. 2001b. Contrasting morpholog-
ical and molecular variation in Coralliophila meyendorffii
(Muricidae, Coralliophilinae). Journal of Molluscan Stud-
ies 67: 243-246.
Oliverio, M., M. Cervelli and P. Mariottini. 2002. ITS2 rRNA
evolution and its use in the phylogeny of muricid neogas-
tropods (Caenogastropoda, Muricoidea). Molecular Phy-
logenetics and Evolution 25: 63-69.
Richter, A. and A. A. Luque. 2002. Current knowledge on Cor-
alliophilidae (Gastropoda) and phylogenetic implication of
anatomical and reproductive characters. Bollettino Mala-
cologico, Suppl. 4: 5-15.
Rolan, E. 1983. Moluscos de la Ria de Vigo I. Gasterépodos.
Thalassas, Anexo 1: 1-383.
Rolan, E., D. Lopez and G. Gutiérrez Garcia. 1995. Nuevas
citas de moluscos de Galicia. Noticiario SEM 25; 20-21.
Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP®. Phylogenetic Analysis Using
Parsimony (°and Other Methods). Version 4 [1998], beta
4.0b10 [2002]. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachu-
setts.
Vaught, K. C. 1989. A classification of the living Mollusca.
“American Malacologists Inc., Melbourne, 143 pp.
THE NAUTILUS 119(3):116-117, 2005
Page 116
Book Review
Land Snails of British Columbia
Forsyth, Robert G. 2004. Land Snails of British
Columbia. Royal BC Museum Handbook. Royal BC
Museum, Victoria, 192 pp. ISBN 0-7726- 5218- X. Black
and white illustrations, plus a section of color photo-
graphs.
Even as “cutting edge” systematics shifts its focus
from morp hological to molecular data sets, the need for
identification mianaals.] yased on real-world field marks
and accessible characters has never been greater. When
zoologists with landcare agencies or environmental
consultants ask for references on land snails, it hardly
helps to refer them to ponderous, outdated, and hard to
find tomes such as Pilsbry (1939-1945). So, manuals like
Land Snails of British Columbia are a welcome resource.
Land Snails of British Columbia is the latest in a Royal
BC Museum series of natural history books that began in
1942. It is the first work to describe and illustrate the 92
species of terrestrial mollusks known to occur in British
Columbia, Canada. Because all of the species treated
occur outside that province as well, its utility extends
beyond those borders. Identification aids include
a paragraph of physical description, usually brief, to
the point, and adequate; a sentence or two of
comparison with other, potentially confusing species;
clear illustrations (the line-and- stipple drawings of many
of the smaller kinds are noteworthy); and keys to, first,
the genera of snails and slugs, and then to the species in
each multi- species genus. For slugs, where the di-
agnostic characters are often internal, excellent, pre-
dominantly original, drawings of the distal genitalia are
provided. (The simple dissection needed to access these
features should be within the range of all to whom this
book is directed.) The language of the descriptions is
simple and intelligible, and a gloss: ury of technical terms
is included. The de -scriptive material is followed by
a summary of each species’ distribution, concise com-
ments on natural history, etymology of the generic and
spe cific name, remarks the it, among other things, upd ite
the species’ taxonomic history (e.g., since Pilsbry, 1939—
1948) or point out special conservation status, and selected
references pointing to the extensive and well researched
bibliography. All of this adds up to a highly functional
volume that will serve its intended audience well.
A six-page section of color photographs of living snails
and slugs, mainly by Kristina Ovaska, is not only
attractive but also helpful, particularly in showing the
habitus of livin
¢ slugs, something not always well
conveyed. by drawings.
The information is amalgamated (the author's word)
from published literature, his own observations, scien-
tific collections, and personal communications with
other workers. The distributions are based in part on
unpublished records from the Royal BC Museum and
other collections. Specific localities are not cited: three
online resources by the same author (Forsyth, 1999,
2005a, 2005b) ) provide more detail for specific regions.
A significant innovation is the introduction of Euconu-
lus (Euconulus) praticola (Reinhardt, 1883) to the North
American fauna. Its distinctness from E. (E.) fulvus
(Miiller, 1774) is well documented by characters of shell
and external anatomy. The former catchall “Zonitidae” is
correctly parsed into Pristilomatidae, Gastrodontidae, and
Daudebardiidae for regional genera, in keeping with
recent work by Hausdorf and others. Monadenia, iconic
of northwest American forests, is correctly assigned to
Bradybaenidae rather than the redundant and poorly
argued Monadeniidae of Nordsieck (1987) and Schileyko
(1996). In these and other ways, the author shows himself
to be well “booked up” on the current and evolving
literature of land snail systematics.
Overall, the taxonomy is simplified, appropriately for
a general interest manual. Synonyms are merely listed,
not referenced, as few pote mtial users will need that
entry into the primary literature. Subspecies are treated
in the remarks, not in the major taxon headings or in the
taxonomic checklist (pp. 23-28). If experience in Cali-
fornia is any guide, upon further study some—perhaps
most—nominal subspecies will be shown to be species:
and examination of data not available to prior mono-
graphers may uncover local endemics, possibly in former
glacial refugia such as the Queen Charlotte Islands. For
the present, however, this handbook provides a reliable
source of biodiversity information. Author Forsyth is
fully aware of the dynamic character of taxonomic
ani ilysis and astutely states (p. 2), “this book is a work in
progress.” By clear ly showing the state of our know ledge
at this time, he has contributed greatly to that process.
LITERATURE CITED
Forsyth, R. G. 1999. Terrestrial Gastropods of the Columbia
Basin, British Columbia. Royal BC Museum, Victoria. http://
www.livinglandscapes.be.cé Vcbasin/molluses/contents. html
[html ve rsion] or http:/Avww.livinglandscapes.be.ca/cbasin/
molluses/pdf/molluse3.pdf {pdf version ]. ania August
20, 2005.)
Forsyth, R. G. 2005a. Terrestrial Gastropods of the Peace
River Region — Northern Rockies of British Columbia.
Royal BC Museum, Victoria. http://livinglandscapes.be.
ca/prnr/prnr_snails/index.html [html version] or http://
livinglandscapes.be.ca/prnr/snails/prnr_snails.pdf [pdf ver-
sion|. (Accessed August 20, 2005.)
Forsyth, R. G. 2005b. Terrestrial Gastropods of the Upper
Fraser Basin of British Columbia. Living Landscapes,
Royal BC Museum, Victoria. http://livinglandscapes.be.ca/
Book Review, 2005
Page 117
uppertraserbasin/ufb_snails/index.html [html version| or
http://livinglandscapes.be.ca/uppertraserbasin/snails/
ufb_snails.pdf [pdf version]. (Accessed August 20, 2005.)
Nordsieck, H. 1987. Revision des Systems der Helicoidea
(Gastropoda: Stylommatophora) Archiv fiir Mollusken-
kunde 118: 9-50
Pilsbry, H. A. 1939-1948. Land Mollusca of North America
north of Mexico). Academy of Natural Sciences of
Philadelphia, Monograph 3, 1 (1): i-xvii + 1-573 + i-ix
(1939); 1 (2): iwi + 574-994 + i+ix (1940); 2 (1): i-viii + 1-
520 + i-ix (1946); 2 (2): i-xlviii + 521-1113 (1948),
Schileyko, A. A. 1996 Guamampa n.g. (Gastropoda
Pulmonata), a bradybaenid land snail with monadeniid
characters. Bulletin du’) Muséum National d’Histoire
Naturelle, Section A, Zoologie, Biologie et Ecologie
Animales 1S: 401-408
Barry Roth
745 Cole Street
San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
Sponsored in part by the State of Florida, Department
of State, Division of Cultural Affairs, the Florida Arts
Council and the National Endowment for the Arts.
NATIONAL
ENDOWMENT
FOR THE ARTS
42
MBL
| Seca
INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS
THE NAUTILUS publishes papers on all aspects of the
biology and systematics of mollusks. Manuscripts describing
original, unpublished research as well as review articles will
be considered. Brief articles, not exceeding 1000 words, will
be published as notes and do not require an-abstract. No-
tices of meetings and other items of interest to malacolo-
gists will appear in a news and notices section.
Manuscripts: Each original manuscript and accompanying
illustrations should be submitted in triplicate. Text must be
typed on one side of 8% X 11 inch white paper, double
spaced throughout (including literature cited, tables and
figure captions), with at least 1 inch of margin on all sides.
All pages must be numbered consecutively. If printed on a
word processor, the right margin should be ragged rather
than justified. Authors should follow the recommendations
of the Scientific Style and Format—The CBE Manual for
Authors, Editors, and Publishers, which is available from
the Council of Science Editors, Inc., 11250 Roger Bacon
Drive, Suite 8, Reston, VA 20190, USA (http:/Avww.cbe.org/
cbe). The first mention of a scientific name in the text
should be accompanied by the taxonomic authority, includ-
ing year. Latin names and words to be printed in italics
must be underlined: leave other indications to the editor.
Metric and Celsius units are to be used.
The sequence of sections should be: title page, abstract
page, introduction, materials and methods, results, discus-
sion, acknow ledgments, literature cited, tables, figure cap-
tions, figures. The title page should include the ieee: au-
thor’s name(s) and address(es). The abstract page should
contain the title and abstract, which should summarize in
250 words or less the scope, main results and conclusions
of the paper. All references cited in the text must appear in
the literature cited section and vice versa. In the literature
cited section, all authors must be fully identified and listed
alphabetically. Follow a recent issue of THE NAUTILUS
for bibliographic style, noting that journal titles must be un-
abbreviated. Information on plates and figures should be
cited only if not included in the pagination. Tables must be
numbered and each placed on a separate sheet. A brief leg-
end must accompany each table. Captions for each group OF
illustrations should be typed on a separate sheet and include
a key to all lettered labeling appearing in that group of illus-
trations.
All line drawings must be in black, high quality ink,
clearly detailed and completely labeled. Photographs
must be on glossy, high contrast paper. All figures are to
be consecutively numbered (figs. 1, 2,3,.... NOT figs.
la, lb, lc, ... NOR plate 1, fig. ilies s); Illustrations must
be arranged in proportions that all conform with the
width of a page (6% inches or 171 mm) or a column (3%
inches or 82 mm). The maximum size of a printed figure is
6% by 9 inches or 171 by 228 mm. All illustrations must be
fully cropped, mounted on a firm, white backing, num-
bered, labeled and camera ready. The author’s name,
paper title and figure number(s) should appear on the
back. Original illustrations must be between one and two
times the desired final size. It is the author’s responsibility
that the line weight and lettering are appropriate for the
desired peducnont Original illustrations will be returned
to the author if requested. Color illustrations can be in-
cluded at extra cost to the author.
Voucher Material: Deposition of type material in a rec-
ognized public museum is a requirement for publication of
papers in which new species are described. Deposition of
representative voucher specimens in such institutions is
strongly encouraged for all other types of research papers.
Processing of Manuscripts: Upon receipt, every manu-
script is acknowledged and sent for critical review by at
least two referees. These reviews serve as the basis for ac-
ceptance or rejection. Accepted manuscripts are returned
to the author for consideration of the reviewers’ comments.
Final Manuscript Submission: Authors of accepted
manuscripts.will be required to submit an electronic version
of the manuscript correctly formatted for THE NAUTI-
LUS. The formatted manuscript may be sent as an e-mail
attachment to
[email protected] or in a diskette,
preferably prepared using an IBM PC- -compatible text pro-
cessor. Original illustrations may be submitted separately by
regular mail or as digital files s (zip disks or CDs), preferably
in TIFF or BMP formats. The original resolution of digital .
images at final (printing) size should be at least 600 dpi for
halftones and 1200 dpi for line drawings.
Proofs: After typesetting, two sets of proofs are sent to the
author for corrections. Changes other than typesetting er-
rors will be charged to the author at cost. One set of cor-
rected proofs should be sent to the editor as soon as pos-
sible.
Reprints and Page Charges: An order form for reprints
will accompany the proofs. Reprints may be ordered
through the editor. Authors with institutional, grant, or oth-
er research support will be billed for page charges at the
rate of $60 per printed page.
Manuscripts, corrected proofs and correspondence re-
garding editorial matters should be sent to: Dr. José H.
Leal, Editor, The Nautilus, BO. Box 1580, Sanibel, FL
33957, USA,
[email protected], (239) 395-2233.
© This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper).
THE NAUTILUS
Volume 119, Number 4
December 30, 2005
ISSN 0028-1344
A quarterly devoted
to malacology.
wl ieee his Vs
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
Dr. José H. Leal
The Bailey-Matthews Shell Museum
3075 Sanibel-Captiva Road
Sanibel, FL 33957
MANAGING EDITOR
Christina Yorgey
The Bailey-Matthews Shell Museum
3075 Sanibel-Captiva Road
Sanibel, FL 33957
EDITOR EMERITUS
Dr. M. G. Harasewych
Department of Invertebrate Zoology
National Museum of
Natural History
Smithsonian Institution
Washington, DC 20560
CONSULTING EDITORS
Dr. Riidiger Bieler
Department of Invertebrates
Field Museum of
Natural History
Chicago, IL 60605
Dr. Arthur E. Bogan
North Carolina State Museum of
Natural Sciences
Raleigh, NC 27626
Dr. Philippe Bouchet
Laboratoire de Biologie des
Invertébrés Marins et Malacologie
Muséum National d’ Histoire Naturelle
55, rue Buffon
Paris, 75005 France
Dr. Robert H. Cowie
Center for Conservation Research
and Training
University of Hawaii
3050 Maile Way, Gilmore 409
Honolulu, HI 96822
Dr. Robert T. Dillon, Jr.
Department of Biology
College of Charleston
Charleston, SC 29424
Dr. Eileen H. Jokinen
§234 E. North Shore Road
Sault Ste. Marie, MI 49783
Dr. Douglas S. Jones
Florida Museum of Natural History
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32611-2035
Dr. Harry G. Lee
1801 Barrs Street, Suite 500
Jacksonville, FL 32204
Dr. Charles Lydeard
Biodiversity and Systematics
Department of Biological Sciences
University of Alabama
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
Bruce A. Marshall
Museum of New Zealand
Te Papa Tongarewa
P.O. Box 467
Wellington, NEW ZEALAND
Dr. James H. McLean
Department of Malacology
Natural History Museum
of Los Angeles County
900 Exposition Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90007
Dr. Paula M. Mikkelsen
Department of Living I nvertebrates
The American Museum of Natural
History
New York, NY 10024
Dr. Diarmaid O F oighil
Museum of Zoology and Department
of Biology
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1079
Dr. Gustav Paulay
Florida Museum of Natural History
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32611-2035
Mr. Richard E. Petit
P.O. Box 30
North Myrtle Beach, SC 29582
Dr. Gary Rosenberg
Department of Mollusks
The Academy of Natural Sciences
1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Dr. Angel Valdés
Department of Malacology
Natural History Museum
of Los Angeles County
900 Exposition Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90007
Dr. Geerat J. Vermeij
Department of Geology
University of California at Davis
Davis, CA 95616
Dr. G. Thomas Watters
Aquatic Ecology Laboratory
1314 Kinnear Road
Columbus, OH 43212-1194
Dr. John B. Wise
Department of Biology
College of Charleston
Charleston, SC 29424
SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION
The subscription rate per volume is
US $43.00 for individuals, US $72.00
for institutions. Postage outside the
United States is an additional US
$5.00 for surface and US $15.00 for
air mail. All orders should be
accompanied by payment and sent to:
THE NAUTILUS, P.O. Box 1580,
Sanibel, FL 33957, USA, (239) 395-
D230
Change of address: Please inform
the publisher of your new address at
least 6 weeks in advance. All
communications should include both
old and new addresses (with zip
codes) and state the effective date.
THE NAUTILUS (ISSN 0028-1344)
is published quarterly by The Bailey-
Matthews Shell Museum, 3075
Sanibel-Captiva Road, Sanibel, FL
33975.
Periodicals postage paid at Sanibel,
FL, and additional mailing offices.
POSTMASTER: Send address
changes to: THE NAUTILUS
P.O. Box 1580
Sanibel, FL 33957
Ii FNS TS
Volume 119, Number 4
December 30, 2005
ONT KN)DR_13
CONTENTS ISSN 0028-1344
Ellen E. Strong A morphological reanalysis of Pleurocera acuta Rafinesque, 1831,
and Elimia livescens (Menke, 1830) (Gastropoda: Cerithioidea: Pleuroceridae) 119
Richard L. Squires New Late Cretaceous (Santonian and Campanian) gastropods from
LouElla R. Saul California and Baja California, Mexico... 0.0... ee 133
M. G. Harasewych Daffymitra lindae, a new genus and species of Volutomitridae
Yuri I. Kantor (Neogastropoda) from the Bellingshausen Abyssal Plain ............... 149
Sven N. Nielsen Exilia alanbeui, a new species from the Neogene of central Chile:
the first record of Exilia (Gastropoda: Ptychatractidae) from South America 153
Patricia Miloslavich Spawn of Amphissa sp. and Cosmioconcha sp. (Caenogastropoda:
Ana Karinna Carbonini Columbellidae) from the Colombian Caribbean ........0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.000. 157
Juan Manuel Diaz
Néstor E. Ardila
Thomas J. DeVries Pterorytis pacanana new species (Gastropoda: Muricidae): circumstantial
evidence for late Pliocene El Nino events in southern Peru ............ 164
Eliézer de Carvalho Rios A new species of Falsimargarita (Gastropoda: Vetigastropoda: Trochidae)
Luiz Ricardo L. Simone from the South Atlantic Ocean... 0. 169
PACU Iy ois. os. oh aye ae ns eee iad ela G Gd oR ob HG ew hd @ ache Sadak bY Did oa des wathe Da hassle io wae 163
STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP, MANAGEMENT AND CIRCULATION
Publication Title, THE NAUTILUS.
Publication No., 0028-1344.
Filing Date, November 21, 2005,
Issue Frequency, Quarterly
No. of Issues Published Annually, Four.
Annual Subscription Price, US $72.00.
Complete Mailing Address of Known Office of Publication, 3075 Sanibel-Captiva Road, Sanibel, FL 33957.
Complete Mailing Address of Headquarters, same as 7.
Full Names and Complete Mailing Addresses of Publisher, The Bailey-Matthews Shell Museum, 3075 Sanibel-Captiva Road,
Sanibel, FL 33957.
Editor, Dr. José H. Leal, address as above.
Managing Editor, Christina Yorgey, address as above.
Owner, Shell Museum and Educational Foundation, Inc., address as above.
Known Bondholders, Mortgagees, and Other Security Holders Owning or Holding 1 Percent or More of Total Amount of
Bonds, Mortgages, or Other Securities, None.
The purpose, function, and nonprofit status of this organization and the tax exempt status for federal income tax purposes has
not changed during the preceding 12 months.
Publication Name, THE NAUTILUS.
Issue Date for Circulation Data Below, October 5, 2005.
Average Single
_ Extent and Nature of Circulation 12 months Issue
A. Total Number of Copies 505 500
B. Paid Circulation
1. Paid/Requested Outside-County Mail Subscriptions 346 348
2. Paid In-County Subscriptions (0) 0
3. Sales Through Dealers and Carriers, Street Vendors,
Counter Sales, and Other Non-USPS Paid Distribution 0 0
4. Other Classes Mailed Through the USPS 2] 21
C. Total Paid and/or Requested Circulation 367 369
D. Free Distribution by Mail
1. Outside-County 28 28
2. In-County 0 0
3. Other Classes Mailed Through the USPS 0 0
E. Free Distribution Outside the Mail 0 0
F. Total Free Distribution 28 28
G. Total Distribution 395 397
H. Copies not Distributed L1O 103
I. Total 505 500
J. Percent Paid and/or Requested Circulation 93% 93%
Sponsored in part by the State of Florida, Department
of State, Division of Cultural Affairs, the Florida Arts
Council and the National Endowment for the Arts.
NATIONAL
ENDOWMENT
FOR THE ARTS
THE NAUTILUS 119(4):119-132, 2005
A morphological reanalysis of Pleuwrocera acuta Rafinesque,
1831, and Elimia livescens (Menke, 1830)
(Gastropoda: Cerithioidea: Pleuroceridae)
Ellen E. Strong
Department of lave rtebrate Zoology
National Museum of Natural History
Smithsonian Institution
P.O. Box 37012-MRC 163
Washington, DC 20013-7012 USA
ABSTRACT
Pleurocera acuta and Elimia livescens have been the subject of
several anatomical and ecological studies and are two of the
most thoroughly documented species of North American
Pleuroceridae. Yet significant gaps still remain in our un-
derstanding of their structure. Consequently, the anatomy of
these two species is re-described, allowing a re-interpretation
of pallial oviduct homologies; features not previously portrayed
in the literature (midgut and Kidney) are newly described.
These taxa are characterized by the presence of an ovipositor,
a kidney with a subdivided internal lumen that invades the
pallial roof, a prostate with a highly folded anterior spermato-
phore-forming region, and a pallial oviduct with spermato-
phore bursa but lacking a seminal receptacle. This analysis
verifies the degree of similarity between the two species, but
a number of differences were identified including features of
the ovipositor, pallial oviduct, prostate, anterior esophagus,
midgut, kidney, pericardium and nervous system. Comparison
to other pleurocerids confirms that species distributed
Western North America (Juga) and Asia (Hua, Semisulcospira)
share the presence of a seminal receptacle—a feature that is
lacking in all described Eastern North American species.
INTRODUCTION
The freshwater Pleuroceridae Fischer, 1855, comprises
one of the most species-rich assemblages of limnic
mollusks occurring in North America and Eastern Asia.
In North America, they are represented by eight genera
(Athearnia Morrison, 1971, Elimia H. and A. Adams,
1854, Jo Lea, 1831, Juga H. and A. Adams, 1854,
Leptoxis Rafinesque, 1819, Lithasia Haldeman, 1540,
Pleurocera Rafinesque, 1$18, and the extinct Gyrotoma
Shuttleworth, 1845) and estimates of 159. species
currently considered valid; of these, 34 are extinct and
59 are listed as critically imperiled (G1) or imperiled
G2) (Johnson et al., 2005).
The current concept of the family Pleuroceridae (e.g.
Bouchet and Rocroi, 2005) can be traced to the works of
Thiele (1928, 1929) who recognized 6 subfamilies within
the heterogeneous “Melaniidae” (an invalid name for
Thiaridae Gill, 1871), including the Pleurocerinae. An
alternative, highly polyphyletic view promoted by
Morrison (1954) caused great confusion for more than
four decades concerning the extension and indepen-
dence of the Pleuroceridae and Pachychilidae P. Fischer
and Crosse, 1892 (e.g. Ponder and Warén, 1988). Recent
work on the systematics of limnic lineages within the
Cerithioidea Fleming, 1822 (e.g. Glaubrecht, 1996,
1999: Kohler et al., 2004) has resolved some of this
confusion and supports the distinctiveness of these
families on both morphological and molecular grounds.
However, molecular data ( (Lydeard et al., 2002) do not
support monophyly of the Pleuroceridae as currently
defined, but suggest that a clade of eastern North
American species are more closely related to Melanopsis
ge ie H. Adams and A. Adams, 1854) than to
a clade of western North American (Juga) and eastern
Asian pleurocerids (Semisulcospira Boettger, 1586, Hua
Chen, 1943).
As noted by Woodard (1934), anatomical data are
critical in refining the phylogenetic relationships and
classification of these species. However, all taxonomic
treatments of the family have been based primarily on
conchological characters in the absence of a broad
comparative understanding of morphology. Although the
subject of numerous ecological studies (e.g. Dillon,
2000) and comparably many descriptions exist for the
radula, operculum and life history of North American
pleurocerids, surprisingly little is known about their
basic biology and anatomy. Scant information on the
anatomy (besides radula and operculum) has been
provide sd for Elimia Shai (Say, 1829) (Woodard,
1934), E. potosiensis (Lea, 1841) (Jones and Branson,
1964) and Pleurocera canaliculata (Say, 1821) (Magru-
der, 1935b):; among western North American forms, only
reproductive anatomy is known for several species
(Prozorova and Rascheph bkina, 2004). In addition, the
Page 120
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 4
classically cited work of Dazo (1965) on the natural
history, ecology, distribution and anatomy of Pleurocera
acuta Rafinesque, 1831 and Elimia livescens (Menke,
1830) has long stood as the most comprehensive
morphological snaey of any pleurocerid gastropod. As
such, that study has formed the basis for hypotheses of
homology in recent higher-order phylogenetic studies
based on morphology (e.g. Houbrick, 1988; Glaubrecht,
1996). Yet, Dazo’s study ¥ was completed long before our
present understanding of the structure, function and
homologies of canbhioidean reproductive anatomy was
in place, particularly through the work of R. S. Houbrick
on marine species. We alee have a much more thorough
understanding of midgut structure and its utility oy
revealing phylogenetic affinities of cerithioideans (Glau-
brecht and Strong, 1999: Strong and Glaubrecht, 1999,
unpublished data).
Given the persistent paucity of anatomical data
available for the family, the goal of this contribution is
to reevaluate the morphology ‘and putative homologies of
the two species described by Dazo, and to place them
within the emerging fr amework now available for limnic
cerithioideans. This j is critical for ongoing morphological
and phylogenetic studies of coithioide: in gastropods,
and in particular for clarifying the monophyly and
systematic affinity of the family Pleuroceridae.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study is based on collections of individuals of
Pleurocera acuta and Elimia livescens living sympatri-
cally in the Mukwonago River at the outflow from Lower
Phantom Lake, Mukwonago, Waukesha County, Wis-
consin (42°51.402 N: 88°19.767 W). Populations were
sampled in May and June; only reproductively mature
individuals were used for observations of reproductive
anatomy. Individual specimens were cracked, preserved
in 95% ethanol and were not relaxed. Voucher material
is deposited in the National Museum of Natural History
in Washington (USNM).
As stated above, Dazo (1965) provided a rather
detailed account of external features (operculum, shell,
ovipositor, color patterns of the head-foot) as well as of
the radula and all internal organ systems (alimentary,
nervous, excretory, respiratory, \ vascular, and reproduc-
tive systems). Baker (1928) also provided information on
the ope erculum, jaw, 1 radulae, and external anatomy of the
two species: additional scattered accounts relating to the
radula, external anatomy and life history are also
available (e.g. Jewell, 1931; Howe, 1938; Goodrich,
1945). As such, the following reanalysis emphasizes
anatomy of the soft parts. As the two species are
overwhe Imingly similar, a thorough account is provided
for Pleurocera acuta — the type species of the type genus
for the family; only details that differ are noted for
Elimia livescens. However, the internal kidney structure
of P. acuta, while displaying the same configuration as E.
livescens, is too occluded with excretory tissue to allow
a clear representation. As such, only the internal
structure for the latter species is illustrated.
Specimens were examined using a Leica MZ 12,5
binocular microscope with camera lucida; visualization
of structures was enhanced through the use of aqueous
toluidine blue. Typically four to five specimens were
aaa for each organ system investigated, especially
for those systems showing high 1 evels of individual and/
or seasonal variation (i.e. reproductive system); a mini-
mum of two individuals were examined for particularly
complex structures (i.e. midgut, nerves). Descriptions of
midgut morphology are given with the stomach opened
dorsally and the style sac uppermost. Unless otherwise
indicated, an incision is made along the extreme right,
upper and lower margins, and the ior deflected laterally
to the left. Terminology follows Strong and Glaubrecht
(2002, 2003).
RESULTS
Pleurocera acuta Rafinesque, 1831
Material Examined: Wisconsin: Mukwonago River:
USNM 1081522, 1081524.
External Anatomy: Operculum sub-ovate, corneous,
dark reddish-brown in color, with 3.5 whorls; paucispiral
with | large, eccentric nucleus of approximately 2.75 to 3
whorls (Figure 1). Final whorl moderately inflated.
Nucleus occupying slightly under 1/2 (~43%) of total
length.
Foot ovate with narrow propodium; anterior pedal
gland oe along anterior margin (Figure 2, ap).
Ovipositor (ovp) located on side of neck below right
cephalic tentacle. Ciliated egg groove extending Shore
distance up side of neck from ovipositor, sh: allowing past
mantle margin; groove fading near anal aperture. Two,
partially juxtaposed, parallel folds, extending into
ovipositor pore from aperture (*); one fold at upper
posterior edge, second at lower anterior edge of
ovipositor (when viewed laterally), forming obliquely
flattened H-shaped lumen. Folds unequal in size;
anterior fold along floor significantly larger than
posterior fold along roof. Ovipositor pore expanding
medially into head-foot, then curving and narrowing
slightly posteriorly. Two vertical lane of “H” unequal
Sich that posterior limb forming rather narrow channel
along posterior wall. Anterior limb inflated and expand-
ing medially into foot, forming large flattened, sub-
triangular chamber. Folds diminishing toward blind tip
of pore. Short grooved tract extending ventrally from
ovipositor aperture toward foot sole, but not reaching
edge of foot.
Most individuals with straight sr ieee but some
with curved anterior tip (Figure 3, os). Hypobranchial
gland highly developed with pendulous, transverse folds
(Figure 4, hg).
Alimentary System: = Forecurt. Buccal mass short and
stout, extending to base of cephalic tentacles (Figure 3,
E. E. Strong, 2005 Page 12]
Zp ", int
op
555
*) indicate folds extending into ovipositor. 3. Mantle cavity and anatomy of cephalic hemocoel. Dorsal view, anterior is below
Hypobranchial gland removed for clarity. 4. External view of organs in visceral mass. Dotted line indicates extent of pericardium
under main kidney chamber. Abbreviations: ap, anterior pedal gland: b, bladder; bm, buccal mass; em, coc ineel muscle; et,
ctenidium: e, esophagus: hg, hypobranchial gland; int, intestine; kd, main kidney chamber; me, mantle edge; nr, circum-esophageal
nerve ring; op, operculum; sea uapintaes Ov, Ovary; Ovp, Ovipositor; per, pericardium; po, pallial oviduct: ae ane intestinal sinus;
r, rectum; rt, buccal mass retractor muscle; sg, salivary gland: sn, snout; sp, supra-esophageal ganglion: ss, style sac; sto, stomach
Scale bars = 1 mm.
Figures 1-4. Anatomy of Plewrocera acuta. 1. Operculum. 2. Ovipositor and egg groove. Right lateral view of side of foot. Asterisks
Page 122
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 4
bm). Odontophore occupying majority of buccal cavity
with small, glandular subradular organ protruding before
radula. Small jaws present at anterior ends of dorsal
folds: epithelium of buccal cavity overlying dorsal folds
glandular (stippled region). Shallow, non-glandular
buccal pouches extending underneath dorsal folds
adjacent to buccal ganglia at rear of buccal cavity.
Radular sac short, curving upward behind base of buccal
mass. Robust buccal retractors (rt) inserting onto lateral
walls of cephalic hemocoel adjacent to cerebral ganglia
(nr). Short, glandular mid-ventral fold forming smi all flap
just behind ‘odontophore in anterior esophagus, flanked
laterally by two ventro-lateral folds. Ventro-lateral folds
converging short distance behind mid-ventral fold and
continuing through mid-esophagus (e). Mid-esophagus
long, hearing paired longitudinal ventral and dorsal
folds. Epithelium between dorsal and ventral folds
weakly glandular and irregularly striated; septate esoph-
ageal ele and lacking. Dorsal and ventral folds converging
and fusing at distal end of mid- esophagus before
continuing into posterior esophagus and subdividing
into numerous folds equal in height. Long, tubular
salivary glands (sg) opening dorso-laterally to buccal
cavity ‘alongside odontophore, passing through circum-
esophageal nerve ring (nr), almost reaching posterior
esophagus.
MIpcuT.
midgut floor (Figure 5, e). Marginal fold (mf) extending
anteriorly from esophageal aperture alongside major
typhlosole (t1), then turning posteriorly bordering right
margin of sorting area (sa). Groove present along
midline of marginal fold (mf) for much of its length:
groove fading ‘proximally and distally. Sorting area
elongate- triangular, tapering posteriorly; posterior tip
curving slightly to the left around wedge-shaped sorting
area pad ( sap). Accessory marginal fold (amf) ) emerging
from esophageal aperture, paralleling marginal fold wae
curving around posterior tip of sorting area; fold
bifurcating at posterior end of gastric Charer to form
two folds. Fine parallel striations extending anteriorly
from esophagus up face of major typhlosole. Midgut roof
to the left of sorting area coarsely folded and einsieulane
ized (eu). Gastric Shiela (gs) ) small and delicate, strongly
concave, with narrow, tubular posterior end and more
flaring, flattened anterior end; shield continuous with
cuticle of stomach roof and crystalline style ea (p).
Glandular pad (gp) large and broadly rounded. Cres-
centic ridge (er), bounding deep crescentic groove,
extending from esophageal aperture and fusing to right
side of elandular pad. Paired digestive gland ducts (dd)
opening to deep pocket near proximal tip of crescentic
ridge. Shallow caecum (ec) extending ventrally under
glandular pad behind gastric shield. Single longitudinal
fold (ef) extending from caecum (ce) ne posterior
end of gastric chamber. Prominent fold (wu) extending
from right side of style sac lip, along floor ne crystalline
style pocket, to base of major ty phlosole: fold bounding
u-shaped depression below lip . style sac (ss). Style sac
Esophagus opening under ledge on left side of
and intestinal groove communicating along entire length.
Crystalline style present.
Hinpcur. Proximal intestine (Figure 4, int) passing
below distal tip of style sac (ss), then extending
posteriorly alongside style sac to main gastric ch siber
(sto). Intestine curving anteriorly, with broad loop
overlying proximal style sac. Intestine extending under
posterior end of main kidney chamber (kd), entering
pallial roof alongside bladder (b) and pallial gonoduct
(Figure 3, po), continuing forward to papillate anus near
mantle margin (1).
Reno-pericardial System: Kidney oe three
interconnected chambers (Figure 4, 17, kd, b). Main
chamber (kd) ) lying along dorsal os ‘of body whorl,
anteriorly surrounding pericardium (Figure 4, per),
crossing axis of body from right to left and extending
short ditadce into pallial roof at base of mantle cavity.
Chamber occluded anteriorly (within pallial roof) with
excretory tubules. Posterior ly, main chamber with small,
narrow lumen, dorsally enclosing intestine. Second
chamber (see exposed chamber in Figure 17) extending
between pericardial chamber to right body wall below
intestine, forming small bladder (Figure 4, b). Chamber
mostly occluded by vertical sheets of excretory tissue
radiating from afferent renal vessel (see Figure 17, arv),
and communicating to mantle cavity via large nephro-
pore (np). Sheets of excretory tissue branching and
anastomosing, and fusing to right lateral floor, roof and
walls: vertical sheets highly branched anteriorly and
forming comparatively dense honeycomb of excretory
tissue. Bladder penetrating connective tissue along right
side of body, short distance into mantle roof. Excretory
tissue separating small ventral chamber below, within
pallial portion ( (dottec | line). Size of ventral chamber, as
well as branching pattern and number of excretory
sheets of tissue variable between individuals. Small
aperture just behind afferent renal vessel connecting
main chamber and bladder (arrow). Nephridial gland
absent.
Pericardium voluminous (Figure 4, per), extending to
right side of body (dotted line).
Nervous iia Circum-esophageal nerve — ring
(Figure 3, nr) lying immediately behind buccal mass,
at base of hs alic tentacles. Cerebral ganglia (Figure 6,
ce) connected by short, stout commissure, each pro-
ducing seven nerves (optic, statocyst, tentacular, and
four labial nerves). Buccal connectives short, innervating
buceal ganglia lying ventro-laterally at base of buccal
cavity immediately behind buccal retractor muscles.
Pleural ganglia (pl) lying behind and below cerebral
ganglia connected to cerebral ganglia by short, thick
connectives. Pedal ganglia (pe) with two prominent
anterior nerves and five smaller accessory nerves. Small
statocysts (st) with approximate ‘ly 10-15) statoconia
present dorsally alongside pedal ganglia behind pedal
connectives. Sub- esophage val ganglion (sb) joined to left
pleural ganglion by thickened connective (co); connec-
E. E. Strong, 2005
Figures 5-6.
Anatomy of Plewrocera acuta. 5. Midgut anatomy. Dorsal view, anterior is uppermost. 6, Circum-esophageal nerve
ring. Frontal view on the left, right lateral view on the right. Abbreviations: amf, accessory marginal fold: ¢, caecum: ef, caecal fold:
ce, cerebral ganglion: co, thickened connective between left pleural and sub-esophageal ganglia: er, crescentic ridge: cu,
cuticularized region of stomach roof; dd, duct of digestive gland; e, esophageal aperture; gp, ¢ nd ates pad; gs, gastric shield; int,
intestine; mf, marginal fold; p, crystalline style pocket; pe, pedal ganglion; pl, pleural ganglion; pn, pallial nerve from left pleural
ganglion; sa, sorting area; sap, sorting area pad; sb, sub- esophageal ganglion; sp, connective to supra-esophageal ganglion; ss, lip of
style sac; st, statocyst; tl, major typhlosole: u, u-shaped fold; z, zygoneury. Scale bars = 1 mm.
tive producing 1-3 small nerves (n=2). Zygoneury (z)
formed between sub-esophageal and right pleural
ganglia. In addition to zygoneury (z), sab: esophageal
ganglion (sb) producing one other prominent nerve and
connectives to the left pleural (pl) and visceral ganglia.
Long connective uniting right Sosa and supra-
esophageal ganglia (Figures 3, 6, sp), the latter lying
on left side mantle floor near midline of osphradium.
Dialyneury formed between pallial nerve of left pleural
ganglion ‘and osphradial nerve of supra-esophageal
ganglion at junction of mantle roof and floor. Single
visceral ganglion present between pericardium and
kidney at base of mantle cavity, above posterior
esophagus on the right. Ganglion producing two
prominent nerves.
Reproductive System: Mate. Narrow vas deferens
(Fisure 8. vd) emerging ventrally from testes, continuing
forward along ventral midline of whorl. Short, distal
portion of vas deferens thickened and forming straight
seminal vesicle. Vas deferens narrowing and curving
dorsally to enter posterior end of prostate (Figure 7, pr)
at base of mantle cavity. Prostate glandular, forming
flattened tube, opening to mantle cavity through broad
slit along entire length except for a short fused segment
at base of mantle cavity (arrows). Lateral lamina
epithelium thin along aperture; short distance into
lumen, glandular tissue forming flattened longitudinal
shelf. Glandular tissue diminishing in thickness at
anterior and posterior ends of gonoduct. Shelf undercut
along much of its length by flattened sinus (Figure §,
dotted line). Glandular tissue forming central rounded
mass flanked by shallow trough along sonoductal groove.
Medial lamina unevenly glandular, oath irregular troughs
and ridges; glandular tissue diminishing in thickness
anterior @ and posteriorly (Figure 9). Epithelium of
medial lamina posterior 1/5 smooth and concave, partially
separated from anterior region by prominent curving
ridge; ridge embracing corresponding rounded elandular
mass in lateral lamina. Ridge continuous anteriorly with
curving trough formed oe opposing ridges of tissue.
Trough fading anteriorly, and becoming fl: inked by short,
shallow flap running along gonoductal groove.
Femare. Gonad (Figure 4, ov) dorsally pease cues
digestive gland (except for a narrow ventral strip) from
tip of visceral mass to posterior end of midgut (sto).
Oviduct emerging ventrally from ovary. Renal oviduct
(Figures 10, 11, ovi) ) deflected dorsally behind mantle
cavity before entering base of glandular les il oviduct.
Pallial oviduct, with proximal albumen (ag) and distal
capsule glands (eg). Albumen and capsule glands
forming narrow bands with opposing flattened surfaces
bounding gonoductal groove (Figure 11, gg); non-
glandular portions of medial and lateral laminae formed
by thickened connective tissue (et), Proximal segment of
albumen gland at base of ahs cavity under pallial
kidney extension rather short and straight ( (Fieures 10,
Page 124
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 4
Figures 7-11.
Reproductive anatomy of Pleurocera acuta. 7. External, left lateral view of prostate. Anterior is to the left. Arrows
indicate extent of opening to gonoductal groove. 8. Internal aspect of prostate lateral lamina. Dotted line designates extent of sinus
under glandular shelf. 9. Internal aspect of prostate medial lamina. Anterior is to the right. Note parallel folds and groove at anterior
end, representing presumptive spermatophore forming region. 10. External, left lateral view of ee oviduct. Anterior is to the left.
Arrows indicate extent of opening to gonoductal groove. 11. External, right lateral view of pallial oviduct. Anterior is to the right.
Abbreviations: ag, albumen gland; eg, capsule g gland; et, connective tissue; gg, gonoductal groove; ovi, renal oviduct; pr, prostate;
sg, sperm gutter; spb, spermatophore bursa; vd, vas deferens. Scale bars = 1 mm.
11, ag). Anterior to pallial kidney chamber, albumen
gland curving under distal tip of bursa to the right, then
arcing dorsally. Capsule gland comprising approximately
anterior 1/4 of pallial oviduct; externally capsule gland
not inflated (Figure 10, eg). Broad aperture along entire
length of pallial oviduct except for a short fused segment
at base of mantle cavity (Figure 10, arrows). Above
aperture, sperm gutter (sg) opening in medial lamina at
anterior tip of pallial oviduct and deepening posteriorly;
gutter leading to short, blind spermatophore bursa
(spb). Seminal receptacle absent.
Elimia livescens (Menke, 1830)
Material Examined: Wisconsin: Mukwonago River:
USNM 1081521, 1081523.
External Anatomy:
, Operculum ovate, corneous, dark
reddish-brown in color, with three whorls; paucispiral
with small, basal nucleus of approximately 2.5 whorls
(Figure 12). Last whorl expanding rapidly. Nucleus
comprising approximately 1/5 of total length.
Foot broad and rounded, with wide propodium and
long anterior pedal gland along anterior margin
(Figure 13, ap). C iliated egg groove extending short
distance up side of neck from ovipositor; groove fading
near base of tentacle. Parallel folds extending into
ovipositor pore from aperture (*) roughly equal in size.
Grooved tract extending ventrally from ovipositor to sole
of foot at junction of propodium and mesopodium, just
behind termination of anterior pedal gland.
Osphradium with curved anterior tip; some individu-
als with mostly straight osphradium (Figure 14, os).
ela ae gland well developed with deep, trans-
verse folds ( Figures 14, 15, hg).
Alimentary System: FrorEGUT. Epithelium between
dorsal and ventral folds glandular and irregularly to
transverse ly striated. Dors: l and ventral folds diminish-
E. E. Strong, 2005
Page 125
12
Figures 12-15. Anatomy of Elimia livescens. 12. Operculum. 13. Ovipositor and egg groove. Right lateral view of side of foot.
Asterisks (*) indicate folds extending into ovipositor. 14. Mantle cavity and anatomy of cephalic hemocoel. Dorsal view, anterior is
below. 15. Extemal view of organs in visceral mass. Dotted line indicates extent of pericardium under main kidney chamber.
Abbreviations: ap, anterior pedal gland: b, bladder; bg, buccal ganglion; et, ctenidium; e, esophagus; hg, hypobranchial gland; int,
intestine; kd, main kidney chamber; me, mantle edge; nr, circum-esophageal nerve ring; op, operculum; os, osphradium; ev, ovary;
Ovp, ovipositor: per, pericardium: po, pallial oviduct; r, rectum; rt, buccal mass retractor muscle; sg, salivary gland; sp, supra-
esophageal ganglion: ss, style sac; sto, stomach; t, cephalic tentacle. Scale bars = 1 mm
Page 126
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 4
er
Figures 16-17.
Anatomy of Elimia livescens. 16. Midgut anz tomy, Dorsal view, anterior is uppermost. 17. Kidney anatomy.
Internal view of bladder. Lateral view, anterior is to the right. Right we all of bladder and adhering sheets of excretory tissue remov ed
to reveal interior; cross-hatching indicates cross-section through sheets of tissue. Arrow indicates opening in septum allowing
communication between bladder and main kidney chamber.
Dotted line anteriorly indicates extent of ventral chamber.
Abbreviations: amf, accessory marginal fold; arv, afferent renal vessel; e, caecum: ef, caecal fold; er, crescentic ridge; cu,
cuticularized region of stomach roof; dd, duct of digestive gland; e, esophageal aperture; gp, glandular pad; gs, gastric shield; int,
intestine; kd, main kidney chamber; mf, marginal fold; np, nephropore; p, crystalline style poc ‘ket; sa, sorting area: sap, sorting area
pad: ss, lip of style sac; t1, major typhlosole; u, u-shaped fold. Scale bars = 1 mm.
ing at distal end of mid-esophagus (Figure 14, e) but
continuous into posterior esophagus. Posterior esopha-
gus narrow, bearing numerous folds of equal height.
Long, tubular salivary glands (sg) just reaching transition
to posterior esophagus.
Mipcut. Groove along midline of marginal fold lacking
(Figure 16, mf). Single, weak, caecal fold (ef) along right
side of midgut behind gastric shield, opposite caecum.
Hinpcur. Proximal intestine (Figure 15, int) passing
below distal tip of style sac (ss), then extending
posteriorly alongside style sac almost reaching main
gastric chamber (sto). Intestine curving anterior rly with
loop partially overlying proximal style sac. Intestine
ue nding under posterior end of main kidney chamber
(kd), entering pallial roof alongside blad der (b) and
pallial gonoduct (po), continuing forward to papillate
anus near mantle margin (Figure 14, r).
Reno-pericardial System: — Bladder (Figure 15, b) largely
occluded by vertical sheets of excretory tissue radiating
from afferent renal vessel (Figure 17, arv) and fusing to
right lateral floor, roof and walls. Sheets of excretory tissue
loosely and regularly branching and anastomosing;
posterior sheets less branched than those anteriorly.
Pericardium rather narrow and short (F igure 15, per).
extending to intestinal loop (dotted line)
Nervous System: Buccal ganglia (Figure 14, bg) lying
dor so-laterally at base of buccal mass between buccal
retractor muscles (rt) and salivary glands (sg). Thick-
ened connective (Figure 18, co) between left pleural and
sub-esophageal ganglia producing 1-2 nerves (n=2). In
addition to zygoneury (z) and connectives to left pleural
and visceral gangli ia, sub- ae ae ganglion producing
2-3 prominent nerves (n=2 _ Small statocysts (st) with
approximately 20-30 ee
Reproductive System: Mace. Flattened longitudinal
shelf of glandular tissue within lateral lamina diminish-
ing in thickness at anterior and posterior ends of
prostate (Figures 19, 20, Deep longitudinal cleft
opening in glandular shelf along gonoductal groove at
midpoint of gonoduct and extending anteriorly; cleft
closing a short distance back from anterior tip of
gonoduct (Figure 20, cl). Medial lamina thinly and
rather evenly glandular along its length; glandular
tissue slightly diminishing anteriorly ( Figure 21). Epi-
thelium of medial lamina posterior ‘third smooth
and strongly concave, separated from anterior 2/3 by
prominent curving ridge; ridge embracing correspond-
ing groove in glands of lateral lamina at proximal end of
cleft. Epithelium of medial lamina anterior 2/3 irregu-
larly and variably crossed by oblique and longitudinal
ridges,
E. E. Strong, 2005
Page 127
18
Figure 18. Circum-esophageal nerve ring of Elimia lives-
cens. Frontal view on the left, right lateral view on the right.
Abbreviations: ee, cerebral ganglion; co, thickened connective
between left pleural and sub- esophageal ganglia; pe, pedal
ganglion; pl, pleural ganglion; sb, a esophageal g ganglion; sp,
connective to supra- esophi eal ganglion; st, statocyst; Z,
zygoneury. Scale bar = 1 mm.
Femate. Renal oviduct (Figures 22, 23, ovi) deflected
dorsally behind mantle cavity before entering base of
glandular pallial oviduct. Proximal albumen ole nd rather
long and initially curved, then forming straight segment
along base of mantle cavity under pallial kidney
extension. Capsule gland comprising approximately
anterior 1/3 of pallial “avidick externally capsule gland
markedly saflated: Above aperture, short distance bak
from anterior tip of oviduct (~1/5 of length), sperm
gutter (sg) sama: in medial lamina and: deepening
posteriorly : gutter leading to short, blind spermatophore
bursa (spb).
DISCUSSION
Whatever may be discovered in the future regarding the
structure and relationships of species currently placed
within the Pleuroceridae, given that Plewrocera acuta is
the type species of the type genus for the family, this
description will necessarily remain as the standard for
the application of the name.
COMPARISON OF PLEUROCERA ACUTA AND ELIMIA LIVESCENS
Baker (1925) commented on the considerable uniformity
of structure in the genitalia of these two species and that
the soft parts do not seem to show the same degree of
differentiation as the shells. Although this statement was
based on external observations, Dazo (1965) similarly
noted that, except for differences in size, the internal
anatomy of the two species is quite similar or often
identical in all organ systems; the most. significant
differences were those relating to size and shape of the
operculum, snout, tentacles, foot, and radula.
Yet, notions of similarity and how similar two entities
must be to be characterized as “identical” are subjective
concepts. The thorough documentation of these two
species has been provided to allow a more objective
means of assessing the degree of similarity between the
two. Of course, any aimatounical re ndering will maintain
some element of subjectivity.
With this in mind, the present analysis confirms that
Pleurocera acuta and Elimia livescens are remarkably
similar, both in overall organization and in many details.
This level of similarity is perhaps not une xpecte od given
the sister group relationship between the two genera
supported in one molecular analysis (Holznagel and
Lydeard, se However, it should be noted. that
monophy ly of these genera has not been demonstrated
unambiguously ( (e.g. ‘Sides, 2005), but awaits confirma-
tion within a more comprehensive phylogenetic frame-
work. Thus, the present results may indicate a closer
systematic affinity than currently appreciated.
Yet, a number of differences between the two species
are apparent. Externally, the two differ in development
of the hypobranchial gland, but this is difficult to
quantify. They also differ in the position of the ovipositor
and its relationship to the foot sole. This is consistent
with described differences in the mode of egg capsule
transfer to the substrate; in Plewrocera acuta, only the
everted walls of the ovipositor function in oviposition
(van Cleave, 1932), but in Elimia laqueata—a species
with an ovipositor configuration identical to E. livescens
(see below)—both the everted lips of the ovipositor and
the margins of the finely noued tract guide the ova to
the sibetrane (Woodard, 1934).
The most significant differences in midgut structure
are length of caecal fold, and the presence of a groove
along the marginal fold; however, these variations may
be attributable to preservation artifacts. The significance
of other minor differences (size and/or shape of caecum,
glandular pad, major typhlosole, gastric shield, crescen-
tic ridge, field of parallel striations above esophageal
aperture) can only be ascertained once a broader
sampling of species from both genera have been
examined, But these may also be attributable to
preservation artifacts and/or intra- specific variation.
Internal structure of the kidney differs only in that the
vertical sheets of excretory tissue are more highly and
densely branched within the bladder in Ple UurOCera
acuta. It was observed that the amount of such excretory
tissue varied between individuals in a species and with
maturity. Although a highly qualitative character, the
degree of difference between the two species surpasses
that of intra- specific variation.
Page 128
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 4
Figures 19-23. Reproductive anatomy of Elimia livescens. 19. External, left lateral view of prostate. Anterior is to the left. Arrows
indicate extent of opening to gonoductal groove. 20. Internal aspect of prostate lateral lamina. Note deep cleft at anterior end (el),
representing presumptive spermatophore forming region. 21. Internal aspect of prostate medial lamina. Anterior is to the right. 22.
External, left lateral view of pallial oviduct. Anterior is to the left. Arrows indicate extent of opening to gonoductal groove. 23.
External, right lateral view of pallial oviduct. Anterior is to the right. Abbreviations: ag, albumen gland; eg, capsule | gland; cl, deep
cleft; et, connective tissue; gg, gonoductal groove; ovi, renal oviduct; sg, sperm gutter; spb, spermatophore bursa; vd, vas deferens.
Seale bars = 1 mm.
The configuration of the nerve ring and visceral loop is
largely idence between the two. One difference is the
dumber of nerves issuing from the sub-esophageal/left
pleural connective and from the sub- esophageal gangli-
on. However, given the observed intra-specific variation,
these difiesences likely fall within the range of individual
variation.
In contrast to the results presented here, Dazo (1965)
reported 9 cerebral nerves, only a single nerve from the
visceral ganglion, and an inconstant number of accessory
pedal nerves: however, Dazo did confirm the unique
thickened left pleural/sub-esophageal connective. Dazo
also commente a on the unlikely generality of Rose-
water's (1961) findings that pleurocerids differ primarily
in the lengths of the cerebral commissure and left
pleural/sub-esophageal connective (n=6 for 9 species).
Indeed, these lengths were found to be sometimes
conspicuously different between individuals examined in
the present study.
Males of the two species differed in the pattern of
folds within the anterior region of the prostate. Regard-
less, the anterior region is inferred to be the site of
spermatophore formation rather than the comparatively
smoother posterior region. This conclusion seems
justified given the similarity in the configuration of the
folds as compared to overall form and shape of the
spermatophore (Jewell, 1931; Dazo, 1965). Limnic
cerithioideans in the family Paludomidae Stoliezka,
1868, have separated the glands in this anterior region
to form a hollow tube that has been implicated in
spermatophore formation (Glaubrecht and shone.
2004). That discovery further supports the notion
that sperm packets are produced anteriorly and suggests
that this function may be homologous in different
lineages.
For a summary of these and other morphological
differences, see Table 1
COMPARISON TO OTHER PLEUROCERIDS
With minor rer eee published accounts agree on the
main patterns of pleurocerid anatomy. Thus, pleurocer-
ids have long been known to be dioecious and oviparous
(except Se misulcospira) ) with an ovipositor involved in
the ee of the egg capsules (Stimpson, 1564).
Members of the family are also aphallate, with open
gonoducts, a gonad thi it dorsally surrounds the digestive
eland, and produce see nt-shaped spe rmatophores
(e.g. Stimpson, 1564; Jewell, 1931; Woodard, 1934, 1935;
Maprude r, 1935b; Jones and Branson, 1964; Dazo,
1965). Like other cerithioideans, pleurocerids possess
E. E. Strong, 2005
Table 1. Summary of morphological differences between Plewrocera acuta and Elimia livescens.
Pleurocera acuta
Elimia livescens
External Anatomy:
Propodium
Ovipositor ventral groove
Curved anterior tip of osphradium
Alimentary System:
Ventral folds at posterior end of mid-
esophagus
Groove along marginal fold
Length of caecal fold
Hindgut loop
Reno-Pericardial System:
Bladder excretory tubules
Pericardium
Nervous System:
Buccal ganglia
Statoconia
Nerves from sub-esophageal/left pleural
connective
Nerves from sub-esophageal ganglion
Reproductive System:
Spermatophore-forming region
Sperm gutter
Junction of renal and pallial oviduct
Proximal albumen gland
Narrow
Does not extend to foot margin
Sometimes present
Fused
Present
Long
Extends to main gastric chamber
Densely and highly branched
Extends to right body wall
Ventro-lateral
~ 10-15
1-3
2 connectives and 2 nerves (including
zygoneury)
Parallel folds and trough in medial lamina
Extends to anterior tip of oviduct
Renal oviduct curves dorsally to straight
segment of albumen gland
Short, straight segment between renal
oviduct and posterior end of bursa
Broad
Extends to foot margin
Often present
Untused
Absent
Short
Does not reach main gastric chamber
Loosely and regularly branched
Extends to inte cael loop
Dorsal
~20-30
1-2
2 connectives and 3—4 nerves
(including zygoneury)
Deep cleft in lateral lamina
Does not extend to anterior tip of
pallial oviduct
Renal oviduct ventrally joins curved
portion of albumen gland
Initially curved, with long, straight
segment to posterior end of
spermatophore bursa
two types of glands within the pallial oviduct — a feature
not previously documented among eastern North
American species.
The gut is characterized by the presence of tubular
salivary glands, a crystalline style and a style sac in
restricted communication with the cen intestine
(Magruder, 1935a, b; Itagaki, 1960; Dazo, 1965). The bi-
lobed nature of the kidney has been noted before
(Magruder, 1935b; Itagaki, 1960), but the internal sub-
division of the organ had not been previously documented.
The nervous system is consistent with many other
cerithioideans (left dialyneurous, long connective between
the right pleural and supra-esoph nBdeal ganglia, single
visceral ganglion) (e.g. Strong, 2003; Strong and Glau-
brecht, 2002, 2003), uk is distinguished by the presence
of an enlarged connective between the left pleural and
sub- -esophageal g ganglia and a zygoneurous connection on
the right—the ites a highly homopk istic character in the
Cerithioidea (see review in Houbrick, 1988). However, the
presence/absence of zygoneury among pleurocerids re-
quires confirmation as it has been de spicted as dialyneury
in several other species (Magruder, 1935b; Itagaki, 1960).
Only the former study confirmed the presence of the
enlarged left pleural and sub- sh ae connective.
Additionally, published descriptions (Magruder, 1935b;
Itagaki, 1960; Dazo, 1965; present study) disagree on the
“umber of nerves produced by various ganglia, but as
noted above, this can be highly vageule even within
species. However, the eumber of statoconia reported by
Magruder (30-40; 1935b) is significantly more than the
auimaber shee herein, possibly exceeding the level of
intra-specific variation and, thus may be an informative
phylogenetic character.
Several significant discrepancies among previous
descriptions of pleurocerid anatomy are now resolved.
Wood. ard ( 1934, 1935) observed a so-called “cytophore
organ” at the base of the mantle cavity, apparently
content with the sperm duct. Similarly, Dazo (1965)
reported the presence of a cytophore organ in males of
both Plewrocera acuta and Elimia livescens. Based on the
present analysis and Woodard’s description of the
internal structure and position of this organ, it is clear
that Woodard misidentified the kidney bladder as a part
of the reproductive tract. However, it is not clear why
the cytophore organ was described as lacking in females.
The intimate connection between the bladder and
proximal pallial gonoduct was correctly depicted in
Hua by Prozorova (1990).
Dazo (1965), as well as
(Woodard, 1934: Jones and Branson,
other workers
1964), have
several
Page 130
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 4
Table 2.
Summary of morphological differences between Pleurocera acuta and Elimia livescens compared to other limnic
gastropods cli issified in the Pleuroceridae and Me lanopsidae. Details from Itagaki, 1960; Bilgin, 1973; Houbrick, 1988; Nakano and
Nishiwaki, 1989; Glaubrecht, 1996; Strong and Glaubrecht, unpubl. data.
Pleuraceura acuta
Elimia livescens
juga
Semisulcospira Melanopsidae
External Anatomy:
Ovipositor pore Simple, weakly glandular
Simple, weakly
Not applicable Complex, highly glandular
glandular
Alimentary System:
Salivary glands Tubular > Tubular Tubular/branched
Salivary gland position Pass through nerve ring ? Pass through nerve Pass through/anterior to
ring nerve ring
Esophageal gland Absent ? Absent? Present
Digestive gland ducts 2 ? 2 |
Caecum Small ? Small Deep and spiral
Reno-Pericardial System:
Bladder Small, pallial e i Small, pallial
Nervous System:
Dialyneury, Zygoneury Zygoneury if Dialyneury? Zygoneury
Reproductive System:
Seminal vesicle Straight ? Straight Coiled
Pallial oviduct Open Open Closed Open
Seminal receptacle Absent Present Present Present
Reproductive strategy Oviparous Oviparous Viviparous Oviparous
reported the presence of a seminal receptacle, but no
mention of a spermatophore bursa was made. The
present ee has confirmed that the sperm storage
structure in Pleurocera acuta and Elimia livescens is
a bursa paced on the presence of unorientated sperm.
Examination of specimens of E. laqueata (USNM
1081558) confirmed that the structure reported as
a seminal receptacle is indeed a bursa—no_ seminal
receptacle is present; judging from the description of
Jones and Branson (1964), the same holds true for E.
potosiensis. The pallial position of the bladder was also
confirmed in E. laqueata (pers. obs.). It is interesting to
note that the sperm gutter extends farther anteriorly in
E. laqueata than in E. livescens. Additionally, the straight
segment of the albumen gland between the tip of the
bursa and the junction of the renal oviduct is lacking in
E. laqueata. Instead, the albumen gland arcs dors: illy to
join the renal oviduct just behind the tip of the bursa. In
all other respects, the overall structure of the pallial
oviduct in’ E. laqueata is consistent with features
described here, as well as in the close association
between the ovipositor and the junction of the
propodium and mesopodium.
A final discrepancy is the presumed site of spermato-
(1934, 1935)
distal prostate as smooth and the highly folded proximal
phore formation. Woodard described the
portion as the site of spermatophore formation. Jones
and Branson (1964) did not distinguish a spermatophore-
forming region in Elimia potosiensis. In the present
study, it is the highly folded distal region that is inferred
to be the site of sperm itophore formation,
SYSTEMATICS OF PLEUROCERIDAE
As mentioned above, although confusion has long
existed, the distinctiveness of Fie Pachychilidae from
other limnic lineages including the Pleuroceridae has
now been clarified based on morphol ygical and molec-
ular data (e.g. Glaubrecht, 1996, 1999; Lydeard et al.,
2002: Kéhler et al., 2004). However, the paraphyly of
eastern and western North American and Asian pleur-
ads with respect to the Melanopsidae based on
molecular data (Lydeard et al., 2002) remains at issue.
The analysis of Houbrick (1988) did not include
sufficient taxon sampling to adequately assess mono-
phyly of the two fi cas 's, but a sister-group relationship
between the two was supported.
Although an in depth analysis of monophyly and
affinity of the two families is beyond the scope of this
study, several morphological features may be informa-
tive in clarifying these relationships. ‘As noted by
Prozorova (1990) the reproductive anatomy of eastern
North American pleurocerids differs from species in
western North America (fuga) and Asia (Semisulcospira)
in that both Juga and Semisulcospira possess a seminal
receptacle in addition to a spermatophore bursa. The
latter genus has modified the pallial oviduct into a closed
brood pouch (Itagaki, 1960; Nakano and Nishiwaki,
1989: Prozorova, 1990: Rashchepkina, 2000; Prozorova
and Raschepkina, 2001, 2004).
In sddiece to the synapomorphies recovered in the
analysis of Houbrick (weakly developed hypobranchial
ole ind, zygoneury, long left ple ural/sub-esophageal con-
E. E. Strong, 2005
Page 13]
nective), midgut anatomy is broadly congruent in the
two families, dif ffering in several significant respects from
that of the other limmic lineages (e.g. Paludomidae,
Pachychilidae, Thiaridae) (Bilgin, 1973; Kohler and
Glaubrecht, 2001; Strong and Glaubrecht, 2002, 2003,
unpubl. data). They also share similarities in reno-
pericardial (presence of a bladder) and reproductive
anatomy (open pallial gonoducts, presence of a seminal
rece eptacle) the latter, in particular, are undoubtedly
symplesiomorphic. But other aspects of the anatomy are
consistent within each family and clearly differentiate
the two when sufficient information is available. Thus, in
addition to features of the radula and shell, melanopsids
may be distinguished by the presence of an esophageal
gland, salivary glands that lie anterior to the nerve ring
(although variable in the family), a single digestive gland
duct and spiral caecum in the midgut, md a oiled
seminal vesicle. Of course, the extent to which these
features represent shared derived or homoplastic
features remains to be discovered in the context of
a phylogenetic analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
The present study has provided the first detailed
description of the midgut and kidney for any pleurocerid
snail, and_ has elaahed the internal structure and
homologies of the pallial gonoducts of eastern North
American forms. This comparative analysis has confirmed
the high degree of morphological similarity between
Picipocet acuta and Elimia livescens, but has also
revealed a number of differences in detail; the extent to
which these features support monophyly of the genera
remains to be established. The fact that the presence/
absence of a seminal receptacle distinguishes eastern and
western North American/Asian pleurocerids is confirmed.
Pleurocerids and melanopsids are broadly similar in
features of the midgut and share a similar configuration of
the pallial oviduct, but can be distinguished by saatowical
characters of the alimentary (salivary glands, esophageal
gland. digestive gland ducts, caecum) and reproductive
(seminal vesicle) systems. However, comprehensive
anatomical treatments of western North American and
Asian pleurocerids are needed to fully assess the
morphological distinctiveness of the two ‘families. The
clarification of the distribution of these features, within
the context of a phylogenetic analysis, should aid in
refining the monophyly of the Pleuroceridae and their
affinity, to other freshwater lineages.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I thank Charles Lydeard for organizing a gastropod
morphology w vorkshop at University of Alabama, Tusca-
loosa, in September 2003 that inspired this study. I also
thank Rex Hanger (University of Wisconsin-W hitewater)
for assistance with collecting the samples of Pleurocera
acuta and Elimia livescens, Paul Johnson (Alabama
Department of Conservation and Natural Resources) for
supplying comparative material of Elimia laqueata, and
Jonathan Slaght (University of Minnesota) for providing
translations of several Russian texts. I am indebted to
Marilyn Schotte (USNM) for inking the anatomical
drawings. Arthur Bogan (North Carolina State Museum
of Natural Sciences), Philippe Bouchet (Muséum
national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris) and John Wise
(College of Charleston) provided valuable comments
that improved the quality of the manuscript.
LITERATURE CITED
Baker, F. C. 1928. The fresh water Mollusca of Wisconsin. Part
I. Gastropoda. Bulletin of the Wisconsin Geological and
Natural History Survey, Wisconsin, 70: 1-507, i-xx, 28 pls.
Bilgin, F. H. 1973. Studies on the functional anatomy of
Melanopsis praemorsa (L.) and Zemelanopsis trifasciata
(Gray). Proceedings of the Malacological Society, London,
40: 379-393. :
Bouchet, P., and J.-P. Rocroi (eds.) (2005). Classification and
nomenclator of gastropod families. With classification "4
J. Fryda, B. Hausdorf, W. Ponder, A. Valdés and ,
Warén. Malacologia 47: 1-397.
Dazo, B. C. 1965. The morphology and natural history of
Pleurocera acuta and Goniobasis livescens (Gastropoda:
Cerithiacea: Pleuroceridae), Malacologia 3: 1-80.
Dillon, R. T. 2000. The ecology of freshwater mollusks
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Glaubrecht, M. 1996. Evolutionsdkologie und Systematik
am Beispiel von SiiB- und Brackwasserschnecken
(Mollusca: Caenogastropoda: Cerithioidea): Ontogenese-
Strategien, palaontologische Befunde und Historische
Zoogeographie. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, 499 pp..
25 pls. :
Glaubrecht, M. 1999. Systematics and the evolution of
viviparity in tropical freshwater gastropods (Cerithioidea:
Thiaridae sensu lato) - an overview. Courier Forschungs-
Institut Senckenberg 215: 91-96.
Glaubrecht, M. and T. vy. Rintelen. 2003. Systematics,
molecular genetics and historical zoogeography of the
viviparous freshwater gastropod Pseudopotamis (Cer-
ithioidea, Pachychilidae): a relic on the Torres Strait
Islands, Australia. Zoologica Scripta 32: 415-435.
Glaubrecht, M. and E. E. Strong. 1999. Midgut Morphology
and Implications for Cerithioidean Phylogeny (Mollusea:
Gastropoda). Abstracts. XVIII Meeting of the Willi
Hennig Society, Géttingen, 1999, p. 24.
Glaubrecht, M. and E. E. Strong, 2004. Spermatophores of
thalassoid gastropods (P Paludomidae) in Lake Tanganyika,
East. Africa, with a survey of their occurrence in
Cerithioidea: functional and phylogenetic implications.
Invertebrate Biology 123: 218-236.
Goodrich, C. 1945. Goniobasis livescens of Michigan. Mis-
cellaneous Publications, Museum of Zoology, University
of Michigan 64: 5-36.
Holznagel, W. E. and C. Lydeard. 2000. A molecular
phylogeny of North American Pleuroceridae (Gastropoda:
Cerithioidea) based on mitochondrial 16S rDNA se-
quences. Journal of Molluscan Studies 66: 233-257.
Houbrick, R. S$. 1988. Cerithioidean phylogeny. In: W. F.
Ponder (ed.) Prosobranch Piles ny. Malacological
Review, Supplement 4: 58-128.
Page 132
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 4
Howe, S. W. 1938. A study of the radulae of snails of the
family Pleuroceridae. American Midland Naturalist 20:
549-561.
Itagaki, H. 1960. Anatomy of Semisulcospira bensoni, a fresh-
water gastropod. Venus 21: 41-51.
Jewell, D. D. 1931. Observations on reproduction in the snail
Goniobasis. The Nautilus 44: 115-119.
Johnson, P. D., A. E. Bogan, C. E. Lydeard, K. M. Brown and
}. E. Cordeiro, 2005, Development of an initial conser-
vation assessment for North American freshwater gastro-
pods. Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society, 4th
Biennial Symposium. Meeting Program and Abstracts,
p. 35.
Jones, W. C. and B. Branson. 1964, The radula, genital
system, and externé a morphology in Mudalia potosiensis
(Lea) 1841 (Gastropoda: Prosobranchiata: Pleuroceridae)
with life history notes. Transactions of the American
Microscopic Society 83: 41-62.
Kohler, F. and M. Glaubrecht. 2001. Toward a systematic
revision of the Southeast Asian freshwater gastropod
Brotia H. Adams, 1866 (Cerithioidea: Pachychilidae): an
account of species from around the South China Sea.
Journal of Molluscan Studies 67: 253-321,
Kohler, F., T. v. Rintelen, A. Meyer and M. Glaubrecht. 2004.
ce origin of viviparity in Southeast Asian gastropods
(Cerithioidea: Pachychilidae) and its evolution: ry implica-
tions. Evolution 5S: ae ee
Lydeard, C., W. E. Holznagel, Glaubrecht and W. F.
“Ponder. 2002. Molecular Sosy and evidence for
multiple origins of freshwater gastropods of the circum-
clobal, diverse superfamily Cerithioidea (Mollusca: Cae-
nogastropoda). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
22: 399-406.
Magruder, S. R. 1935a. Record of a crystalline style in two
fresh water gastropods. The Nautilus 48: 101-102.
Magruder, S. R. 1935b. The anatomy of the fresh water
prosobranchiate gastropod, Pleurocera canaliculatum
undulatum (Say). American Midland Naturalist 16:
883-912. ,
Mihalcik, E. L. and F. G. Thompson. 2002. A taxonomic
revision of the freshwater snails referred to as Elimia
curvicostata, and related species. Walkerana 13: 1-108.
Minton, R. L. and C. Lydeard. 2003. Phylogeny, taxonomy,
genetics and global heritage ranks of an imperiled,
freshwater snail genus Lithasia (Pleuroceridae). Molecu-
lar Ecology 12: 75-87,
Morrison, J. P. E. 1954. The relationships of Old and New
World Melanians. Proceedings of the United States
National Museum 103; 357-394,
Nakano, D. and S. Nishiwaki. 1989. Anatomical and histolog-
ical studies on the reproductive system of Semisulcospira
libertina (Prosobranchia: Pleuroceridae). Venus 48:
263-273.
Ponder, W. F. and A. Warén. 1988. Classification of the
Caenogastropoda and Heterostropha — a list of the family
group names and higher taxa, In: W. F. Ponder (ed.)
Prosobranch Phylogeny. Malacological Review, Supple-
ment 4 a 326
Prozorova, L. A, 1990. On the biology reproduction of molluscs
Pachyc lil 1e (Gastropoda, Cerithiiformes). Zoologiches-
kii Zhurnal 69: 24-37.
Prozorova, L. A. and A. V. Raschepkina. 2001. Comparative
anatomy of reproductive system of the Juga-like gastro-
pods (Gastropoda, Cerithioidea) from South Korea and
Primorye Territory. The Bulletin of the Russian Far East
Malacological Society 5: 62-70. [In Russian. |
Prozorova, L. A. and A. V. Raschepkina. 2004. Reproductive
anatomy of some genera of North American Pleuroceridae
(Gastropoda: Cerithiiformes: Cerithioidea). The Bulletin
of the Russian Far East Malacological Society 8: 87-94.
[In Russian. |
Rashchepkina, A. V. oy Anatomy of the pallial oviduct of the
genus Hua Chen (Pachychilidae, Cerithioidea). The
Bulletin of the ae Far East Malacological Society 4:
99-100. [In Russian. |
Rosewater, J. 1961. Preliminary observations on the nervous
systems of some Pleuroceridae. Program and Abstracts.
American Malacological Union, 28th Annual Meeting,
June 19-23
Sides, J. D. 2005. The systematics of freshwater snails of the
genus Pleurocera (Gastropoda: Pleuroceridae) from the
Mobile River basin. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, University
of Alabama — Tuscaloosa, 222 pp.
Stimpson, W. 1864. On the structural characters of the so-
called Melanians of North America. The American Journal
of Science and Arts, Second Series 38: 41-53.
Strong, E. E. 2003. Refining molluscan characters: morphol-
ogy, character coding and the phylogeny of the Caenogas-
tropoda ( Gastropoda). ). Zoological Journal of the Linnean
Society 137; 447-554.
Strong, E. E. and M. Glaubrecht. 1999. Tapping the un-
expk red: midgut ga of cerithioidean gastropods
(Caenoga: liminary results and implications
for Pe and phylogeny. Program and Abstracts.
American Mal: iological Society, 65th Annual Meeting,
Pittsburgh, PA, July 4-9, 1999, pp 53-54.
Strong, E. E. and M. Glaubrecht. 2002. Evidence for
convergent evolution of brooding in a unique gastropod
from Lake Tanganyika: anatomy and affinity of Tanganyi-
cia rufofilosa (Smith, 1880) (Caenogastropoda, Cerithioi-
dea, Paludomidae). Zoologica Scripta 31: 167-184.
Strong, E. E. and M. G laubrecht. 2003. Anatomy and
systematic attinity of Stanleya neritinoides (Smith, 1880),
an enigmatic member of the thalassoid gastropod fauna
from Lake 1 Tanganyika, East Africa (C ecuhiwidea, Paludo-
midae). Acta Zoologic: i 84: 249-265.
Strong, E. E., M. G laubrecht, C. Lydeard and W. F. Ponder.
2002. A total evidence phylogeny of the Cerithioidea. In:
R. T. Dillon (ed.) Program and Abstracts, 68th American
Malacological Society. American Malacological Society,
Inc., Charleston, p. 102.
van Cleave, H. J. 1932. Studies on snails of the genus
Pleurocera, 1. The eggs and egg laying habits. The
Nautilus 46; 29-34.
Woodard, T. M. 1934. Anatomy of the reproductive system of
Goniobasis laqueata (Say). Jeune of the Tennessee
ne of Science 9; 243-2.
Woodard, T. M. 1935. Spermic dimorphism in. Goniobasis
ee (Say). Journal of Morphology 57: 1-23.
Woodard, T. M. 1940. The function of the apyrene spermatozoa
of Goniobasis laqueata. 1. The behavior of the apyrene and
eupyrene spermatozoa under natural and artificial condi-
tions. The Journal of Experimental Zoology $5: 103-123.
THE NAUTILUS 119(4):133-148, 2005
Page 133
New Late Cretaceous (Santonian and Campanian) gastropods
from California and Baja California, Mexico
Richard L. Squires
Department of Geological Sciences
California State University
Northridge, CA 91330-5266 USA
County
LouElla R. Saul
Invertebrate Paleontology Section
Natural History Museum of Los Angeles
900 Exposition Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
lousaul@earthlink. net
ABSTRACT
Three new genera and six new species of shallow-marine Late
Cretaceous gastropods are reported from various formations in
California and from one formation in Baja California, Mexico.
7 jeanae new species, of early Campanian age, is the
earliest known species of this trochid genus. Nerita (sub-
genus?) orovillensis new species is the second known Early
Campanian neritid from California. The cerithioid Bullamir-
ifica new genus is represented by three species: Bullamirifica
verruca new Lae of Coniacian age; Bullamirifica elegans
new species of early Campanian age; and Bullamirifica ainiktos
(Dailey and Popenoe, 1966) of middle to late ( Campanian age.
The latter species has the most widespread distribution, with
occurrences in southern California and northern Baja Cali-
fornia. Minytropis melilota new genus and species of Santonian
age, and Paxitropis dicriota new genus and species of Late
Santonian to early Campanian age are high-spired trichotro-
pids. As presently known, Bullamirific. a, Minytropis, and
Paxitropis were endemic to the study area.
INTRODUCTION
This study is based largely on specimens collected by
Eric Géhre of Oroville, California. Over the years, he
has amassed a sizeable collection of shallow-marine
mollusks from the lower Campanian Pentz Road
member of the Chico Formation near Pentz, Butte
County, northern California (Figure 1). His collection
has yielded several new species of gastropods, and some
of these were described by Groves (2004) and Squires
and Saul (2004). In part, this present study concerns
three additional new species and a new genus of
gastropods found in his collection. They are the trochid
Tegula jeanae new species, the neritid Nerita (sub-
genus?) orovillensis new species, and the cerithioid
Bullamirifica elegans new genus and species.
Inspection of the literature, as well as examination of
the collections at the Natural History Museum of Los
Angeles County, allowed us to incorporate two additional
species into Bullamirifica. These are Bullamirifica
verruca new genus and species from the Coniacian
Member IV of the Redding Formation in the Oak Run
area, northern California, and Bullamirifica anikitos
Dailey and Popenoe (1966) new combination from the
middle ¢ Campanian Pigeon Point Formation southwest of
San Francisco, northern California: the middle upper
Campanian Punta Baja Formation, Baja California,
Mexico; and the upper Campanian n Jak uma Formation,
southern California (Figure 1). “Cimolithium miya-
koense” (Nagao, 1934) and “Vicarya (Shoshiroia) yabei”
Kamada, 1960, reported by Perrilliat-Montoya (1968)
from Baja California, Mexico (see Figure 1, formation 6),
are judged by us to be synonyms of Bullamé ‘ifica ainiktos.
Also included in this present study are new tricho-
tropid gastropods found in the collections at the Natural
History Museum of Los Angeles County. They are
Minytropis melilota new genus and species from the
Santonian part of the Redding and Chico formations of
northern California, and Paxitropis dicriota, new genus
and species from the of upper Santonian part of the
Redding Formation, northern California; the lower
Campanian part of the Chico Formation; and the lower
Campanian part of the upper Holz Member of the Ladd
Formation, southern California (Figure 1).
The geologic age of each new species described in this
paper is shown in Figure 2. The entire interval of time
that encompasses all these species is Coniacian to late
Campanian, or about 19 million years. The new species
are locally common, except for Tegula jeanae, Nerita
(subge mus?) orovillensis, and B. verruca.
The classification system used here generally follows
that of Hickman and McLean (1990) for the tegulines,
Ponder (1988) for the trichotropids, and Ponder and
Warén (1988) for the other taxa.
Study localities are listed in Appendix 1. Abbreviations
used in the text are: CAS: California Academy of Sciences,
Page 134
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 4
1-Redding Formation
2-Chico Formation
3-Pigeon Point
Formation
4-Jalama Formation
5-Ladd Formation
6-Punta Baja
Formation
Figure 1. Location of formations bearing the new taxa.
San Francisco; IGM: México Museo del Paleontologia del
Instituto de Geologa; LACMIP: Natural History Museum
of Los Angeles County, Invertebrate Paleontology
Section; UCLA: University of California, Los Angeles
(collections now housed at LACMIP); UCMP: University
of California Museum of Paleontology (Berkeley); USGS:
United States Geological Survey.
STRATIGRAPHY
Except for the Punta Baja Formation, which is discussed
below, the ages and depositional environments of all the
formations and members containing the new taxa
discussed in this paper can be found in the following
papers: Member IV of the Redding Formation, Squires
and Saul (2003a); Musty Buck Member of the Chico
Formation, Saul and Squires (2003); Pentz Road
member (informal) of the Chico Formation, Squires
AGE (m.y.) 80 75
|
UPPER CRETACEOUS
Sant-
onian
Coniacian Campanian
T
lower; middie j; upper
polarity
chrons 3 +— C33 ——+——4# (32
!
T
eanae
Tegula f
ao
orovillensis
[227777]
Nerita
1
T
1
!
!
1
i}
i
1
1
—— SSS
verruca !
see elegans |
f !
'
Bullamirifica :
eins
1
—————_| > = 1. > oh
Minytropis melilota 1
1
1
'
Paxitropis dicriota
l
Figure 2. Chronostratigraphic positions of the new taxa.
Ages of stage boundaries and magnetostratigraphy from
Gradstein et al. (2004, fig. 19.1).
and Saul (1997); Ten Mile Member of the Chico
Formation, Squires and Saul (2003b); upper Holz Shale
of the Ladd Formation, Squires and Saul (2001); Pigeon
Point Formation, Elder and Saul (1993) and Squires and
Saul (2003b); and Jalama Formation, Squires and Saul
(2003b). The locales of these formations are shown in
Figure 1. Stratigraphic information mentioned below
concerns additional pertinent biostratigraphic details.
The age of the Jalama Formation used here is slightly
younger than used in our previous papers because we
had to adjust its chronostratigraphic position based on
the latest published ( Gradstein et al., 2004) absolute-
time and global-paleomagnetic data correlations.
Punta Baja FORMATION
Perrilliat- Montoya (1968) reported specimens of gastro-
pods, herein assigned to Bullamirifica ainiktos, from the
“Rosario Formation” at Punta Baja, near El Rosario,
northern Baja California, Mexico. The 5-140 m_ thick
Punta Baja Formation (Figure 1) overlies fluvial deposits
of the La Bocana Roja Formation, and the angular
unconformity between these two formations is canyon-
shaped (Boe shIke and Abbott, 1986). This canyon is filled
with conglomerate, sandstone, and siltstone reported by
Kilmer (1963) to have been deposited in shallow-marine
depths not exceeding 60 me is rs. Boehlke and Abbott
(1986) have a differing viewpoint and reported that the
ie posits represent buaebicite »s that accumulated in bathyal
depths. They reported, furthermore, that shallow-marine
mollusks are common, but Kilmer’s collection at UCMP
does not contain very many specimens. The Punta Baja
Formation is unconform: ably overlain by terrestrial
deposits of the La Escarpa Member of the El Gallo
R. L. Squires and L. R. Saul, 2005
Formation, which, in turn, is overlain by the Rosario
Formation.
Based on molluscan fossils collected by F. H. Kilmer,
Saul (1983: 21-22. fig. 9) reported the ammonite
Metaplacenticeras cf. pacificum (Smith, 1900) and the
gastropod Turritella chicoensis pescaderoensis Arnold,
1908, from the siltstone in the Punta Baja Formation.
Although these two mollusks were reported by Saul
(1983: 65-66) to be of late Campanian age, more recent
biostratigraphic studies (Elder and Saul, 1996: fig. 1)
depicted both of these taxa as ranging in age from late
middle Campanian to earliest late Campanian. Adjust-
ments for the most recently published (Gradstein et al.,
2004) absolute-time and global-paleomagnetic data
correlations place these ammonite and turritellid zones
in the middle late Campanian. Recent examination by
the junior author of additional Punta Baja Formation
mollusks revealed three specimens of the bivalve Calva.
The best preserved specimen is from LACMIP loc.
12582 and is Calva (Egelicalva) crassa Saul and
Popenoe, 1992, whose geologic range is early late
Campanian to early Maastrichtian elsewhere on the
Pacific slope of North America (Saul and Popenoe,
1992). The other two Calva je aie are worn and
broken, from UCMP loc. B-3388. These two specimens
are similar to Calva (Calva) peninsularis (Anderson and
Hanna, 1935), whose geologic range is latest Campanian
to early Maastrichtian elsewhere on the Pacific slope of
North America (Saul and Popenoe, 1992).
Boehlke and Abbott (1986: fig.
the Punta Baja Formation to the early Campanian based
entirely on calcareous nannofossils. They also reported
that the benthic foraminifera in this formation corre-
spond to the F2-lower E foraminifera zones of Goudkoff
(1945), but they did not rely on the foraminifera for their
age call. Almgren (1986: table 2) reported that the F2-
lower E foraminifera zones are essentially correlative to
the early Campanian to late Campanian. It is important
to mention that the Alcalde Shale in the Co: ilinga area
along the west side of the San Joaquin Valley, central
California, is correlative to the E zone (Almgren, 1986:
ee 3). As depicted in Saul (1983: fig. 10), the Alcalde
Shale contains Metaplacenticeras ct. M. pacificum, and
Almgren (1986) assigned the Alcalde Shale to the early
late Campanian.
In summary, the Metaplacenticeras, Turritella, Calva,
and benthic foraminifera data strongly support a middle
late Campanian age for the Punta Baja Formation. The
calcareous nannofossils, however, support an early
Campanian age. It seems probable that the older
calcareous nannofossils are reworked, and this would
be consistent with the depositional environment of the
formation.
SYSTEMATIC PALEONTOLOGY
Superfamily Trochoidea Rafinesque, 1815
Family Trochidae Rafinesque, 1515
4) assigned the age of
Subfamily Tegulinae Kuroda, Habe and Oyama, 197]
Genus Tegula Lesson, 1835
Type Species: Tegula elegans Lesson, 1835, by
monotypy; Recent, west coast of Central America to
the Gulf of California, Mexico.
Although Wenz (1938), Keen (1960), and
Davies (1971) reported the geologic range of Tegula to
be Miocene to Recent, Bandel and Stinnesbeck (2000)
reported a species of Tegula of Late Cretaceous
(Maastrichtian) age from central Chile. Kiel and Bandel
(2001) reported a tentatively identified Tegula from
upper Campanian strata in northern Spain. The early
Campanian new species described below represents the
confirmed earliest record we know of for Tegula. For the
Pacific slope of North America, the previous earliest
record of Tegula was given by Addicott (1973: 17, pl. 8,
figs. 2, 4), who reported it from the Wygal Sandstone
Member of the Temblor Formation, southwestern
margin of the San Joaquin Valley, Kern County, central
California. Squires (2003: table 2.1, fig. 2.1) placed this
member in the lower Oligocene Matlockian Stage.
Discussion:
Tegula jeanae new species
(Figures 3-5)
Diagnosis: A Tegula with low to moderate spire.
Whorls convex, smooth, and bearing one spiral groove
on posterior third of last whorl. Anomphalous. Last
whorl with raised lip along basal edge, base sunken
between this lip and columellar lip, which bears at least
one denticle and one much smaller denticle adapically.
Description: Shell medium (up to 16.6 mm height
and 21.7 mm diameter, same specimen). Turbiniform
with spire low to moderately elevated. Protoconch
unknown. Teleoconch consisting of three whorls. Suture
impressed, slightly channeled. Whorls convex, some-
times slightly concave short distance anterior of suture;
blunt angulation anterior of medial part of last whorl.
Whorls smooth: spiral groove eee of medial part
of last whorl. Aperture oblique, peristome discontinu-
ous. Anomphalous, umbilical area covered by broad
callus. Base wide and smooth, peripheral (abaxial)
margin coincident with raised lip along edge of last
whorl; area depressed between this lip and columella.
Outer lip strongly prosocline. Columellar lip with at least
one oblique denticle; much weaker second denticle
sometimes present immediately posterior of main
denticle. Growth lines strongly prosocline, forming wide
bands.
Holotype: LACMIP 13322,
22 mm in diameter.
LACMIP 13323.
18.7 mm in height,
Paratype:
Type Locality: LACMIP loc. 24337
Geologic Age: Early Campanian.
Page 136
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 4
Figures 3-8.
11.6 mm, diameter 16.8 mm, 7-8. Paratype LACMIP 13325, total shell height 10 mm, diameter 13.7 mm.
Apical view.
Distribution: Chico Formation, Pentz Road member
(informal), near Pentz, Butte County, northern Califor-
nia.
Etymology: Named for Jean Géhre, mother of Eric
Gohre, who collected and donated the type material to
LACMIP.
Discussion: This new species is known from two
specimens, both showing good preservation. The new
species is remarkably aay to Tegula (Chlorostoma)
funebralis (Adams, 1855), from Pliocene and Pleistocene
strata of southern California (Grant and Gale, 1931) and
from the Recent of Vancouver Island, British Columbia,
to central Baja California, es (McLean, 1978). The
new species differs from T. ) funebralis by having
a smooth shell rather than oe ornamented by weak
nee ribs. The similarity between the new species and
T. (C.) funebralis is even stronger if the specimens of the
a are worn.
Tegula ovallei (Philippi, 1887: - fig. 4; Bandel
and Stinnesbeck, 2000: 761, pl. 1, the only other
positively identified Cretaceous Te mule chi it we know of,
is from Maastrichtian strata in central Chile. The new
species differs from T. ovallei by having a smooth shell
rather than being ornamented by granulated spiral
ridges
Kiel and Bandel (2001; 139, pl. 1, fig.
a tentatively identified Tegula? simplex (Quintero and
Revilla, 1966: 49 pl. §, fig
1) reported
from upper Campanian
New tegulid and neritid gastropods. Specimens coated with ammonium chloride. 3
LACMIP loc. 24337. 3. Paratype LACMIP 13323, apertural view, height 13.9 mm, diameter 17.9 mm, 4-5. Holotype 13322, height
18.7 mm, diameter 22 mm. 6-7. Nerita (subgenus?) orovillensis new species. 6. Holotype LACMIP 13324, a view, height
-5. Tegula jeanae new species,
7. Abapertural view. 8.
strata in northern Spain. The new species differs greatly
from T.? simplex by having a less elevated spire, smooth
shell, blunt Aiea than a sharp angulation anterior of the
medial part of the last whorl, hioad callus covering the
umbilical region, wider aperture, very much stronger
denticles on the columella, raised lip along the basal
edge of the last whorl, and sunken base between this
raised lip and the columellar lip.
Family Neritidae Rafinesque, 1S15
Genus Nerita Linnaeus, 1755
Type Species: Nerita peloronta Linnaeus, 1758, by
subsequent designation (Montfort, 1810); Recent, south
Florida, West facies: and Bermuda.
Discussion: Nerita sensu lato ranges from een
Cretaceous (Hauterivian), and the earliest record i
from the Ono Member of the Budden Canyon
Formation, Trinity County, northern California (Saul
and Squires, 1997). The new species described below
represents the first record of an early Campanian Nerita
from the study area.
Subgenus?
Nerita (subgenus?) orovillensis new species
(Figures 6—S)
Diagnosis: A Nerita with approximate ‘ly 18 to 19
beaded spiral ribs. Columellar lip with four or five
obscure teeth.
R. L. Squires and L. R. Saul, 2005
Page 137
Description: Shell medium small (up to 11.6 mm in
height and 16.3 mm in diameter, same specimen),
broader than high, globose. Last whorl rapidly exp: roe
ing. Protoconch unknown. Teleoconch consisting of 2
to 2.75 whorls. Uppermost spire very low. ee
obscure. Earliest 1.5 teleoconch whorls apparently
smooth, rest of teleoconch covered with approximate ly
1S narrow spiral ribs bearing small beads; interspaces
between ribs approximately as wide as interspaces.
Beads on ribs becoming smaller and slightly elongate
on base of last whorl, especially in pariet ‘all region. Spiral
rib adjacent to suture can be slightly stronger say other
ribs. Aperture large, nearly circular. Outer lip flared,
interior smooth. Columellar lip with five somewhat
obscure teeth, most posterior tooth widest and longest.
Deck area broad, sloping, and sharply demarcated from
base of last whorl. Growth lines prosocline.
Holotype: LACMIP 13324,
16.8 mm in diameter.
Paratype: LACMIP 13325.
LACMIP loc. 24337
11.6 mm_ in height,
Type Locality:
Geologic Age: Early Campanian.
Distribution: Chico Formation, Pentz Road member
(informal), near Pentz, Butte County, northern Califor-
nia.
Etymology: Named for Oroville, California.
Discussion: The new species is based on two speci-
mens. The external surfaces are moderately well pre-
served, but the columellar lip and especially the deck
area are poorly preserved.
The new species is remarkably similar to Nerita
(Theliostyla) crooki Clark (1938: 700, pl. 4, figs. 1, 2)
from the Markley Formation east of San Francisco,
Solano County, northern California. Squires (2003: table
2.1. fig. 2.1) assigned this formation to the middle
Eocene ( ee Stage”). The new species differs from N.
(T.) crooki by having fewer and wider teeth on the
columellar lip, fewer ribs on the last whorl with relativ ely
wider interspaces, and ribs near the middle of the last
whorl not noticeably broader than adjacent ribs.
The new species is also very similar to Nerita
umzambiensis Woods (1906: 311, pl. 37, figs. 14-15;
Bandel and Kiel, 2003: 51-52, pl. 1, figs. 4-5) from
the Santonian/Campanian Umzamba Formation in
southeastern South Africa. The new species differs
from N. umzambiensis by having fewer teeth on the
columella lip. ribs on the base of the last whorl, and
a deck area sharply demarcated from the base of the last
whorl.
The new species somewhat resembles Nerita (The-
liostyla?) kennedyi Squires and Saul (2002: 185-187,
figs. 31-34) from the upper lower to lower middle
Eocene (“Domengine Stage”) Santiago Formation,
northern San Diego County, southern California. The
new species differs from N. (7.2) kennedyi by having
beads that are not elongate, wider interspaces between
the ribs, and fewer, stronger, and wider teeth on the
columellar lip.
The only other early Campanian neritid known from
the Pacific slope of North America is Neritina (Dostia)
cuneata (Gabb, 1864: 137, pl. 21, fig. 97) from lower
Campanian strata at Tuscan Springs on Little Salt Creek,
Tehama County, northern California. Gabb’s species
might also be present in 1) upper Campanian and/or
lower Maastrichtian strata in the Pozo area, San Luis
Obispo County (Vedder, 1977) and 2) Maastrichtian
strata along the western edge of the San Joaquin Valley,
California ‘Chloods and Saul, 1986). The new species is
vastly different from Neritina (Dostia) and does not have
its patelliform shape nor its distinctive collabral sculp-
ture.
Superfamily Cerithioidea Férussac, 1819
Family Indeterminate
Discussion: The new genus described below is most
likely a cerithioid, on the basis of its sigmoidal growth
lines, high spire, sculpture, short siphonal canal (slightly
twisted), smooth columella, and smooth interior of the
outer lip. Some specimens of the new genus have
a narrow spire, like that found in cerithioids, but other
specimens of the new genus have a buccinid-like shell.
The strongly sigmoidal “growth lines of the new genus,
however, are ankike that found on buccinid shells. It is
possible that the new genus belongs to a new cerithioid
family.
Genus Bullamirifica new genus
Type Species: Bullamirifica elegans, new species;
Early Campanian, Pentz area, Butte County, northern
California.
Description: Shell medium (up to 83 mm height and
37 mm diameter, same sprcmnen)s ), fusiform to turreted.
Height to diameter ratio 2 to 2.7. Spire high, comprising
41 to 595% of total shell height. Pleural angle 33 to 42°.
Protoconch unknown. Teleacsadh whorls six to eight.
Spire whorls with shoulder angulate; last whorl with
periphery angulate. Ramp short to moderately long,
concave to rarely straight-sloped. Suture slightly un-
dulatory, weakly impressed. Collabral sculpture consist-
ing of many narrow ribs, closely to moderately widely
spaced; interspaces smooth. Collabral ribs slightly
opisthocline to opisthocyrt, usually extending fom
suture to suture. Collabral ribs present on base or
obsolete; if present, swollen and elongate. Spiral
sculpture consisting of several spiral ribs with variable
width and spacing, especially on last whorl. Spire whorls
with strongest spiral rib on whorl shoulder, several weak
or moderately strong spiral ribs occ: asionally near
anterior suture, and suture coincident with weak spiral
rib either bearing weak nodes or without nodes. Last
whorl sculpture with three to four widely spaced, strong
spiral ribs on periphery and one or two weaker spiral ribs
Page 138
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 4
or several spiral riblets on base. Intersections of collabral
and spiral ribs producing many nodes or strongly
projecting tubercles, either rounded (knob-like) to
spinose or narrowly elongate. Nodes and knobs most
pronounced on whorl shoulder, especially on last whorl.
Intersections also strong on anterior portion of last whorl
periphery. Aperture short but moderately wide, comma-
shaped; small, narrow arch (canal-like) present where
outer lip meets most posterior part of aperture.
Columellar lip smooth. Siphonal canal short and spout-
like or well developed, moderately short, and can be
twisted to left. Outer lip thin, markedly sinuous, interior
smooth. Growth lines sigmoidal between suture and
shoulder; antispiral sinus coincident with tuberculate
spiral rib.
Geologic Age: Coniacian to early late Campanian.
Etymology: Combination of the Latin bulla, mean-
ing knob, and the Latin mirifus, meaning to cause
wonder.
Discussion: Three species can be herein assigned to
this new genus. Two of these species, Bullamirifica
verruca and Bullamirifica elegans, are based on entirely
new material. The third species was originally tentativ ely
assigned by Dailey and Popenoe (1966) to Pse udoglau-
conia Douvillé, 1921. Dailey and Pope noe (1966) stated
that this particular species belongs in a new genus, but
they withheld their description mati better specimens
were obtained. Although representatives of the new
genus have sigmoidal growth lines (see Wenz, 1940: 764,
fig. 2214) similar to that of Psewdoglauconia, Bullamir-
ifica differs considerably from Pseudoglauconia by
having bucciniform rather than a_tapered/conical
shape, angulate rather than flat-sided whorls, and
tubercles on the sides of the whorls instead of only near
the suture, and the suture between the pe ultimate and
last whorl is not extremely deep and widely sunken.
Unfortunately, the aperture of Pseudoglauconia is not
known and none of the apertures on the available
specimens of Bullamirifica is complete. In spite of the
absence of knowledge about the aperture of Pseudo-
glauconia, Wenz ( (1940) believed this gastropod genus to
belong in the Cerithiidae.
The shape of the growth lines in Bullamirifica is
similar to that of Batillaria echinoides clavatulata
(Lamarck, 1804) from the middle Eocene (Lutetian) of
the Paris Basin, France. The siphonal canal of this
Eocene species is longer than normally found in
Batillaria Benson, 1842. Ponder and Warén (1988) and
Houbrick (1988) placed Batillaria in superfamily Cer-
ithioidea, family Batillariidae Thiele, 1929. The similarity
in growth-line shape between Bullamirifica and Batil-
laria suggests to us that the new genus might be
a cerithioid. The high turreted spire of Batillaria,
however, is quite unlike the lower, more paucispiral
spire of Bullamirifica.
Bullamirifica has the growth-line shape, shell shape,
sculpture, and twisted siphonal canal similar to that of
Pseudorapa Holzapfel, 1888, a monotypic genus from
the Vaals Greensand in the Netherlands and Germany.
The age of these strata was determined to be early
Campanian by Albers (1976). Wenz (1941: 1083,
fig. 3079) illustrated Pseudorapa. Bullamirifica differs
from it by having a less twisted siphonal canal and
more variable sculpture, including the possibilities of
having spiral ribs and < relatively narrow shell. In
addition, Pseudorapa bee an outer lip that is very
crenulate and a spiral band near the base of the last
whorl that produces a tooth-like projection on the outer
lip.
Bullamirifica verruca new species
(Figures 9-12)
Diagnosis: Small Bullamirifica with prominent round-
ed knobs, nine on shoulder of last whorl. Suture
coincident with noded spiral rib. Base of last whorl
without elongate collabral ridges. Siphonal canal short
and straight.
Description: Small (up to 34 mm estimated height
and 16.5mm_ diameter, same specimen), fusiform,
moderately slender. Height to diameter ratio approxi-
mately 2. Spire high, approximately 44% of shell height.
Pleural angle approximately 35 to 37°. Protoconch and
upper spire unknown. Teleoconch whorls approximately
six (estimated). Spire whorls with shoulder angulate, last
whorl with periphery angulate. Ramp short, concave
Suture slightly impressed, ‘possibly undulatory. Collabral
sculpture consisting of many ribs, widely spaced;
interspaces smooth. Collabral ribs slightly opisthocline
and extending from suture to suture. Collabral ribs
mainly prey valent on ramp. Spiral sculpture consisting of
several ribs with variable strength and spacing, especially
on last whorl. Intersections of collabral and spiral ribs
producing many strongly projecting rounded tuberculate
knobs or, less commonly, nodes: knobs and nodes most
prominent on shoulder and usually extending posteriorly
across ramp and become narrow ridges. Spire whorls
with strongest spiral rib on whorl shoulder, very faint
spiral riblets present between whorl shoulder and
anterior suture. Suture coincident with moderately weak
spiral rib bearing small nodes. Penultimate whorl with
spiral rib on shoulder bearing nine, moderately closely
spaced knobs. Last whorl with three spiral ribs on
periphery, strength of ribs progressively decreasing
anteriorly: strong rib on shoulder and bearing nine very
prominent tuberculate knobs: middle rib miodenately
strong and bearing more numerous nodes (about half
sized of those on shoulde sr) that tend to become smaller
and even obsolete adaxially; and most anterior periphery
rib weakest and weak nodes tending to be obsolete
adaxially. Base of last whorl usually with one or two
spiral ribs, both bearing nodes (best developed near
outer lip) and with strength of
spiral ribs decreasing anterior in direction: occasionally,
anterior region of base with only very weak spiral riblets.
or bearing no nodes,
R. L. Squires and L. R. Saul, 2005 Page 139
18
Figures 9-21. New cerithioid? gastropods. Specimens coated with ammonium chloride, 9-12. Bullamirifica verruca new genus and
species, LACMIP loc. 8133. 9. Paratype LACMIP 13327, apertural view, height 27 mm, diameter 19.2 mm, 10-11. Holotype LACMIP
13326, height 29.7 mm, diameter 17.5 mm. 10. Apertural view. 11. Abapertural view. 12. Paratype LACMIP 13327, basal view,
diameter 18.9 mm. 13-17. Bullamirifica elegans new genus and species. LACMIP loc. 24337. 13-14. Holotype LACMIP 13328,
height 66.9 mm, diameter 34.9 mm. 13. Apertural view. 14. Abapertural view. 15-16. Paratype LACMIP 13329, height 60.1mm
diameter 25.7 mm. 15. Apertural view. 16. Abapertural view. 17. Holotype LACMIP 13328, basal view, diameter 35.7 mm. 18-21.
Bullamirifica ainiktos (Dailey and Popenoe, 1966) new genus. 18-19. Hypotype LACMIP 13330, LACMIP loc. 10691, height 60 mm,
diameter 24.1 mm. 18. Apertural view. 19. Abapertural view. 20. Plasto-holotype LACMIP 40435, LACMIP loc. 24125, right-lateral
view, height 58.2 mm, diameter 29.1 mm. 21. Hyptotype LACMIP 13331, LACMIP loc. 24124, basal view, diameter 16.7 mm
Page 140
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 4
Aperture round with very small posterior “arch.”
Aperture elliptical, columellar lip smooth, outer lip thin;
siphonal canal short and spout-like.
Holotype: LACMIP 13326, incomplete specimen
with two whorls (upper spire missing), 29.7 mm height,
17.8 mm diameter.
Paratype: LACMIP 13327
Type Locality: LACMIP loc. $133.
Geologic Age: Coniacian.
Distribution: Redding Formation, Member IV, Oak
Run area, northern California.
Latin verrucus, wart.
Etymology:
Discussion: This new species is based on three
specimens. It differs from Bullamirifica elegans new
species below by smaller size and presence of rounded
rather than elongate knobs, fewer knobs on shoulder of
last whorl, no elongate collabral ridges on base of last
whorl, a noded spiral rib coincident with the suture, and
a straight siphonal canal. Bullamirifica verruca differs
from Bullamirifica ainiktos by being smaller with
a shorter spire and having rounded and much more
projecting nodes, many fewer nodes on shoulder of last
whorl, much less tendency for elongate collabral ridges
on ramp, and much weaker spiral in between shoulder
and anterior suture.
Bullamirifica verruca is very similar to the cerithioid
Tympanotonus aaa robustus | Dockery
(1993: 47, pl. 7, fig. 1) in the shape of the spire, strong
nodes on the spire, shape of the growth lines next to
the outer lip. Tympanotonus (T.)
Campanian age and from Mississippi, however, has no
siphonal canal.
Bullamirifica elegans new species
(Figures 13-17)
[2] Pseudoglauconia? aft. P. ainiktos Dailey and Pope-
noe. 1, 1993: pl. 2, fig. 11.
Diagnosis: Large Bullamirifica with prominent
opisthocline eollabval ridges on upper spire and base
of whorl. Shoulder of lect: whorl with 11 nodes. Suture
coincident with unnoded weak spiral rib. Siphonal canal
short but well developed and twisted to left.
Description: Medium large (up to 83 mm estimated
height and 37 mm diameter, same specimen), fusiform,
moderately wide, rarely slender. Height to diameter
ratio approximately 29. Spire high, approximate ly 40%
of shell height. Pleural angle approximately 33 to 42°,
rarely approximately 30°. Protoconch and uppermost
spire unknown. Te leoconch whorls approximately eight
(estimated). Whorls with angulate shoulder. Ramp short
and slightly concave. Coll: bral sculpture consisting of
narrow ribs:
many mode rately strong, inte rspaces
smooth. Collabral ribs exte nding from suture to suture.
\ oninehas. which is of
Collabral ribs sigmoidal between posterior suture and
shoulder, opisthocline between shoulder and anterior
suture. Collabral ribs somewhat swollen on base of last
whorl. Spiral sculpture consisting of several ribs with
variable strength and spacing. Intersections of collabral
and spiral aie. producing many swollen, axially elongate
nodes or, in some cases, rounded tuberculate inohie?
nodes and knobs most prominent on shoulder. Spire
whorls with strongest spiral rib on whorl shoulder and
occasionally two Tabderately strong, noded spiral ribs
between whorl shoulder and anterior suture. Suture
coincident with weak spiral riblet. Penultimate whorl
with spiral rib on shoulder bearing 11 widely spaced
nodes. Last whorl with three or fear spiral ribs on
periphery, strongest rib on shoulder and bearing 11
nodes. Spiral lie on periphery of last whorl usually show
strength progressively decreasing anteriorly, occasionally
rib eamediately anterior of shoulder weaker than other
ribs on periphery. Growth lines sigmoidal, with antispiral
sinus coincident with shoulder, Aperture _ elliptical,
columellar lip smooth, outer lip thin; siphonal canal
short but well developed and slightly twisted to left.
Holotype: LACMIP 13325; nearly complete specimen
of five whorls (upper spire missing), 66.9 mm height,
34.9 mm diameter.
Paratype: LACMIP 13329.
Type Locality: LACMIP loc. 24337.
Geologic Age: Early Campanian to possibly middle
Campanian.
Distribution: Early Campanian: Chico Formation,
Pentz Road member (informal), near Pentz, Butte
County, northern California; Possibly middle Campa-
nian: ‘Pigeon Point Formation, San Mateo County,
northern Cali fornia.
Etymology: Latin elegans,
choice.
meaning very fine or
Discussion: The new species is based on six speci-
mens from the Pentz area, and preservation is moder-
ately good on all of them. Nearly all the specimens are
moderately wide, but a few are somewhat slender, as the
specimen illustrated in Figures 15-16.
There might be one specimen of the new species from
the Pigeon Point Formation. This museum specimen,
which cannot be located, was figured by Elder and Saul
aie pl. 2, fig. 11). It was identif ied by them as
Pse sudoglauconia? sp. aff. P. ainiktos Dailey and Pope-
noe, aa it has a profile somewhat more like Bullamir-
ifica elegans and basal nodes like B. elegans. As will be
discussed later, there are specimens of B. ainiktos from
the Pigeon Point Formation. It seems likely that some of
the Bullamirifica specimens from the Pigeon Point
Formation represent transitional forms between B.
elegans and B. ainiktos.
Bullamirifica elegans differs from Bullamirifica ver-
ruca in having larger size, prominent collabral ribs
R. L. Squires and L. R. Saul, 2005
extending from suture to suture on the spire whorls,
swollen collabral ribs on the neck, more nodes on
shoulder of the penultimate and last whorls, and
siphonal canal longer and slightly twisted to the left. In
addition, B. elegans aac has strong unnoded
spiral ribs between suture and shoulder.
Bullamirifica elegans difters from Bullamirifica ainik-
tos by usually having a wider pleural angle, usually a less
elevated spire, wider and stronger nodes on shoulder,
fewer nodes on shoulder of last whorl, and base with
swollen collabral ribs instead of fine spiral ribs.
Bullamirifica elegans also has variability in morphology,
whereas B. ainiktos does not.
Bullamirifica elegans is very similar to the cerithioid
Fide cegia hagas (Tympanotonus) binodosus Dockery
(1993: 47, pl. 7, fig. 2) in the shape of the spire, strong
a »s on the spire, and shape the growth ae next to
the outer lip. Tympanotonus (T.) binodosus of Campa-
nian age and from Mississippi, lie has no siphonal
canal.
Bullamirifica ainiktos (Dailey and Popenoe, 1966) new
combination
(Figures 1S—25)
Pseudoglauconia? ainiktos Dailey and Popenoe, 1966:
21-22, pl. 6, figs. 3, 5, 6.
Pseudoglauconia? aff. P. ainiktos Dailey and Popenoe.—
Elder and Saul, 1993: pl. 2, fig. 1G:
Cimolithium miyakoense (Nagao, 1934). — Perrilliat-
Montoya, 1968: 20, pl. 4, fig. 2.
Vicarya (Shoshiroia) yabei Kamada, 1960.—
Montoya, 1968: 21, pl. 6, fig. 1
Perrilliat-
Diagnosis: Medium-size Bullamirifica with usually
device turreted whorls. Ramp on upper spire short,
with narrow collabral ribs crossed by weaker spiral ribs;
ramp on later whorls much longer and smooth and
concave. Spire whorls concave on posterior half but
angulate medially, with moderately strong tubercles.
Shoulder of last whorl with 14 nodes. Base of last whorl
with many, closely spaced spiral riblets. Siphonal canal
short and possibly sly straight.
Description: Medium, up to 67.5 mm height estimat-
ed and 25.4 mm diameter, same specimen. Shell usually
slender, turreted, occasionally wide, fusiform. Height to
diameter ratio approximately 2 2.7. Spire high, approxi-
mately 55% of total shell height. Pleural angle approx-
imately 33. to 37°. Protoconch unknown. Teleocouch
whorls approximately eight (estimated). Spire whorls
with shoulder angulate. Ramp usually short and concave,
occasionally long and straight-slope od. Suture obscured.
Collabral sculpture consisting of many spiral ribs closely
spaced and narrow. Coll bral ribs opisthocyrt, most
prominent on ramp. Spiral sculpture consisting of
several ribs, moderately weak and_ closely spaced.
Intersections of collabral and spiral ribs producing many
nodes, most prominent and somewhat spinose on
shoulder. Spire whorls with strongest spiral rib on whorl
shoulder and five moderately strong, non-noded spiral
ribs between shoulder and anterior suture; most anterior
one of these ribs coincident with suture. Penultimate
and last whorls with approximately 14 nodes on
shoulder. Last whorl with three spiral ribs on periphery,
progressively weaker anteriorly, and bearing con »5, Base
of last whorl be caring fine spiral riblets. Siphonal canal
short and twisted to left. Columellar lip smooth. Outer
lip sinuous; interior smooth.
Holotype: LACMIP 40435, incomplete specimen (tip
of spire and siphonal canal missing), 39 mm_ height,
29 mm diameter.
Type Locality: —LACMIP loc. 4125
Geologic Age: Middle Campanian to Late Campa-
nian.
Distribution: Middle Campanian: Pigeon Point For-
mation, near Pigeon Point, San Mateo County, northern
California. Middle late Campanian: Punta Baja Forma-
tion, ee sst of El Rosario, Baja California, Mexico.
Late Campanian: Jalama Formation, Santa Barbara
County, southern California.
Discussion: Mae fa of the new species is based
on 25 specimens: 1S from the Jalama Formation, five
from the Pigeon Point Formation, and two from the
Punta Baja Formation. The Jalama specimens have poor
to moderately good preservation, although the apices are
broken off and the siphonal canal missing. The Pigeon
Point specimens also have poor to uadley rately good
preservation, but the matrix is very hard to remove. “The
Punta Baja specimens have poor preservation.
The Pigeon Point Formation specimen illustrated by
Elder and Saul (1993: pl. 2, fig. 10) has a whorl profile
like that found on B. anita: but it has wider pleural
angle, similar to that found on B. elegans. Unfortunately
ihe specimen is missing. As mentioned earlier, it seems
likely that some of the Bullamirifica specimens from the
Pigeon Point Formation represent transitional forms
between B. elegans and B. ainiktos.
Bullamirifica ainiktos differs from Bullamirifica ver-
ruca by larger size and having less rounded and much
lower nodes more nodes on shoulder of last whorl,
much more tendency for elongate collabral ridges on
ramp, and much stronger spiral ribs between shoulder
and anterior suture.
Bullamirifica ainiktos differs from Bullamirifica ele-
gans by smaller size, having a narrower spire, usually
a more elevated spire, narrower and weaker nodes on
shoulder, more nodes on shoulder of last whorl, and base
with fine ribs instead of swollen collabral ribs.
Perrilliat-Montoya (1968) identified one of the Punta
Baja Formation specimens (Figures 23-25 herein) of B.
ainiktos as Vicarya (Shoshiroa) yabei and identified the
other specimen as Cimolithium miyakoense. With Wenz
(1940: 740-741, fig. 2145) as a basis for comparison, we
consider that Bullamirifica ainiktos differs considerably
from the former gastropod by having a non-conical she ll,
Page 142 THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 4
Figures 22-34. New cerithioid? and trichotropid gastropods. Specimens coated with ammonium chloride, unless otherwise noted.
22-25. Bullamirifica ainiktos (Dailey and Popenoe, 1966) new genus. 22. Hypotype LACMIP 13332, USGS loc. M-SG601, height
35.5 mm, diameter 20 mm, 23-25. Plasto-hypotype IGM 1325, height S80 mm, diameter 36.9 mm. 23. Apertural view. 24.
Abapertural view. 25. Basal view. 26-29. Minytropis melilota new genus and species. 26. Paratype LACMIP 13334, LACMIP loc.
1077, apertural view, height 7 mm, diameter 2 mm, 27-29. Holotype LACMIP 13333, LACMIP loc. 10786, abapertural view,
height 62 mm, diameter 2.2 mm. 27. Abapertural view. 28. Oblique apertural view of tip; arrow indicates where protoconch ends
and teleoconch starts. 29. Protoconch, height 0.5 mm, diameter 0.8 mm; arrow indicates where protoconch ends and teleoconch
3336
starts; SEM photomicrograph (uncoated). 30-34. Paxitropis dicriota new genus and species. 30-31. Paratype LACMIP 13336,
LACMIP loc. 23643, height 12.7 mm, diameter 6.8 mm. 30. Apertural view. 31. Abapertural view. 32. Holotype LACMIP 13335,
LACMIP loc. 23639, apertural view, height 14.7 mm, diameter 6.6 mm. 33. Paratype LACMIP 13337, LACMIP loc, 23642,
apertural view, height 10.1 mm, diameter 4.4 mm. 34. Paratype LACMIP 13338, LACMIP loc, 24217, abapertural view, height
11 mm, diameter 4.3 mm
R. L. Squires and L. R. Saul, 2005
Page 143
more rows of nodes, and absence of a notch on the outer
lip near the suture and not having a thick, extensive
callus that covers part of the noded sculpture near the
suture on the last whorl. Using Kase (1954: 135-136, pl.
21, figs. 1-9; fig. 20) as a basis for comparison, we
consider that Bullamirific a ainiktos differs considerably
from the latter gastropod by having a much nae spire,
more strongly sinuous growth lines, and a well de-
veloped, twisted siphon: iT canal.
Superfamily Capuloidea Fleming, 1522
Family C apulidi ie Fleming, 1822
?Subtamily Trichotropinae Gray, 1850
Discussion: We include a subfamily name because
high-spired capulids, like those described below, are so
distinctive from cap-shaped capulids. The subfamily
allocation is tentative, pending much-needed taxonomic
work on capulids.
Genus Minytropis new genus
Type Species: = Minytropis melilota new species; Late
Cretaceous, Santonian, northern California.
Description: Shell very small, estimated maximum
height just over 10 mm. Shell thin, narrowly fusiform-
elongate. Protoconch flat-topped and smooth, approxi-
mately two whorls. Teleoconch whorls rounded. Sculp-
ture consisting of several strong spiral ribs with wide
interspaces both ribs and interspaces crossed by well
delineated prosocline | growth lines. Aperture ov al, pro-
duced anteriorly to short, with narrow siphonal canal.
Outer lip thin with no varix or inner denticulations.
Inner lip callused, narrow.
Geologic Age: Early and Late Santonian.
Etymology: Combination of the Greek minys, mean-
ing little, small, or short; and the Latin tropis, meaning
keel.
Discussion: The placement of Minytropis among the
trichotropids is suggested by the strongly prosocline and
well marked growth lines, strong spiral sculpture, and
the short, open siphonal canal. Minytropis resembles
Opposirius Iredale, 1931, which is known only from the
Recent of Australia (Wenz, 1940). Minytropis differs
from Opposirius by having a narrower aperture, a longer
siphonal canal, and a rounded rather than a bladelike
inner lip.
Finlay and Marwick (1937) reported that Opposirius is
more similar to Certhioderma Conrad, 1860, than to any
other trichotropid genus. In comparison to Certhioderma,
Minytropis is similar in having a flat-topped, smooth
protoconch and in having a short siphonal canal, but
Minytropis differs by having a much narrower shell,
longer and much narrower aperture, stronger spiral
sculpture. sculpture not recticulate on adult whorls, and
no hint of an umbilicus. Wenz (1940) reported Cerithio-
derma to have a geologic range of Late Cretaceous to
Oligocene, but Marwick (1965) reported that this genus is
also extant. Dockery (1993) reported Cerithioderma from
Campanian strata in Mississippi. High-spired trichotro-
pids very similar to Cerithioderma are best represented in
New Zealand Tertiary strata (Maxwell, 1992). According
to Maxwell (1992), Trichosirius Finlay, 1926, might be
a junior synonym of Cerithioderma. —
Minytropis melilota new species
(Figures 26-29)
Description: Small, up to 10.2 mm estimated height
and 3.5 mm diameter, same specimen, Shell narrowly
fusiform-elongate. Spire high, 60% (estimated) of shell
height. Pleural angle approximately 22°. Protoconch flat-
topped, with two hors , and smooth (0.5 mm height,
0.8 mm diameter). Teleoconch of approximately seven
to eight subangulate whorls, last whorl nearly one-third
total height. Suture deeply impressed, near ly coincident
with very weak rib. Sculpture nearly cancellate on
earliest teleoconch whorl, but four spiral riblets slightly
stronger than numerous collabral threads. Sculpture on
subsequent whorls progressing into five strong, flat-
topped ribs on middle spire, six ribs on lower spire, and
approximately eight to nine ribs on last whorl; most
posterior spiral rib weak to very weak on all these whorls.
Interspaces of nearly equal width on spire whorls but
becoming twice as wide as ribs on last whorl. On last
whorl, ribs on whorl face equally strong but on base, ribs
become much less prominent and more closely spaced.
Growth lines strongly prosocline, marked by fine
collabral threads strongest on early whorls where they
produce slight beading of spiral ribs. Growth lines less
prominent and closer- spaced on later whorls; growth
lines can be somewhat prominent on base of last whorl.
Aperture oval, produced anteriorly to short, narrow
siphonal canal. Outer lip thin, arcuate, crenulated by
ribs. Columellar lip narrow, weakly callused, and barely
forming a pseudo-umbilical chink between base of whorl
and indistinct fasciole.
Dimensions of Holotype: Nearly complete species
(siphonal canal mostly missing), 6.2 mm height, 2.2 mm
diameter.
Holotype: LACMIP 13333.
Type Locality: LACMIP loc. 10756.
Paratype: LACMIP 13334.
Geologic Age: Early and Late Santonian.
Distribution: Lower Santonian: Redding Formation,
Member V, Clover Creek, Shasta County, northern
California. Upper Santonian: Chico Formation, Musty
Buck Member, Chico Creek, Butte County, northern
California.
Etymology: Latin melitota, meaning sweet clover (in
reference to the occurrence of the new species near
Clover Creek).
Page 144
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 4
Discussion: De scription of this new species is based
on 29 specimens, most of which represented by small
fragments. The better preserved specimens are all from
the Redding Formation, however, none of these speci-
mens is as large as the larger ones from the Chico
Formation localities. Only two specimens, both from
LACMIP loc. 10786, have retained the protoconch. The
protoconch of one of these specimens is illustrated in
Figures 27-29. The other specimen’s protoconch is
mostly embedded in hard matrix. The flat- wlan
protoconch of M. meliota supports the position of this
gastropod among the Trichotropidae.
The new species can be distinguished from the suinlee
looking Opposirius idoneus ined le (1931: 210, pl. 2 29,
fig. 7: Wenz, 1940: fig. 2631), an extant species in
southwestern Australia, by having a narrower shell, one
more rib on the spire, two to four more ribs on the base
of the last whorl, a much longer siphonal canal, an
a rounded columella. Opposirius idoneus is the type
species of Opposirius Iredale, 1931.
Genus Paxitropis new genus
o
Type Species: Paxitropis dicriota; Late Cretaceous,
late Santonian to early Campanian, northern Califor-
nia.
Description: Shell medium small, narrowly pagodi-
form. Spire whorls with prominent keel medially, Suture
bordered posteriorly by relatively weak spiral rib
becoming keel-like on last whorl and, in concert with
aforementioned keel, producing bicarinate last whorl.
Shell base with several weak spiral riblets. Growth lines
prosocline. Columellar lip callused, abaxial margin well-
delineated. Siphonal canal short but distinct. Anompha-
lous.
Geologic Age: Late Santonian to early Campanian.
Etymology: Combination of the Latin pax, meaning
peace (in reference to the peaceful Pacific coast); and
the Latin tropis, meaning keel.
Discussion: Paxitropis is similar to Trichotropis Bro-
derip and Sowerby, 1829, a genus known (Sohl, 1960)
from the Late Cretaceous to Recent. The modern
distribution of Trichotropis is restricted to cireum-boreal
waters, in both the northern and southern oceans and, as
Sohl (1960) noted, this modern distribution is in sharp
contrast to its Cretaceous distribution in temperate
shallow-water deposits. Paxitropis differs from Tricho-
tropis by having a smaller size, much narrower shell
(including a narrower aperture), a siphonal canal, much
lower vz ariability in sculpture, and being anomphalous.
Paxitropis resembles the trichotropid Icuncula Ire-
2 , 1924, which is known from the Recent of the Indo-
-acific (Wenz, 1940). Paxitropis differs from Icuncula by
‘ wing no hint of an umbilicus, less prominent keels that
are unwavy, one less keel on the last whorl, and no axial
riblets on the ramp. The aperture of Paxitropis is not
entirely known.
The new genus has a whorl profile very similar to the
turrid Austrocarina Laseron, 1954, known only from the
Recent of New South Wales and Victoria, southeastern
Australia and Tasmania. Paxitropis, however, is not
a turrid because it does not have the turrid growth lines,
which tend to be opisthocline anterior to the notch and
across the whorl periphery curving toward prosocline
very near the siphonal area.
Paxitropis dicriota new species
(Figures 30-34)
Description: Shell small, up to height estimated
14.5 mm and 6.6 mm diameter. Shell pagodiform. Spire
high, approximately 60% of shell height. Pleural angle
approximately 30°. Protoconch iulcown, Teleseonth
approximately six strongly angulated whorls, with wide
ramp on middle spire w hors and on last whorl. Sculpture
dominated by prominent spiral rib, medially located on
shoulder and_ keel- -forming on later whorls. Early
teleoconch whorls with two spiral ribs anterior to carina.
On mature whorls, these additional ribs become mere
threads and equivalent in strength to growth lines, thus
producing microscopic caneellate surface, especially on
ramp. Suture impressed, nearly coincident with weakly
noded subsutural spiral rib located immediately posterior
to suture. Subsutural spiral rib relatively weak on spire
whorls but becoming keel-like on last whorl. Last whorl
with two sharp kee Is, one just above middle whorl height
and second one weaker and occasionally minutely noded,
emergent at anterior suture. Shell base ‘with several weak
spiral ribs. Growth lines prosocline, most prominent on
shell base, near outer lip. Aperture lanceolate and
produced anteriorly to short, but distinct siphonal canal.
Outer lip thin, angulate, crenulated by ribs. Columellar
lip callused, abasial margin well-de lineated. Columellar
lip narrow, barely forming pseudo-umbilical chink
between base of whorl and sadistinet fasciole.
Holotype: LACMIP 13335, 14.7 mm height, 6.6 mm
diameter.
Paratypes: LACMIP 13336, 13337, and 13338.
Type Locality: LACMIP loc. 23643.
Geologic Age:
Late Santonian to Early Campanian.
Distribution: Upper Santonian: Redding Formation,
Member area east of Redding, Shasta County,
northern California. Lower C vampanian: Chico Forma-
tion, Ten Mile Member, Chico Creek, Butte County,
northern California; Ladd Formation, upper Holz Shale
Member, Santa Ana Mountains, Orange County, south-
ern California.
Etymology: Combination of the Greek di, meaning
two, and the Greek criota, meaning ringed.
Discussion: Twenty incom ple ste specimens were avi ail-
able, and the six most ae te of these are the basis for
the above description. The only specimen from the
R. L. Squires and L. R. Saul, 2005
Page 145
Redding Formation is geologically the oldest specimen
(LAC MIP loc. 24217). The only specimen from the
upper Holz Shale is from LAC MIP loc. 21536.
The new species is very similar to the Pliocene to
Recent Tric yi bicarinata (Sowerby, 1825; Pitt and
Pitt, 1989: pl. 1, figs. 83-4; Egorov and Alexeyev, 199%:
25, figs. 22-23), which is a Pacific upper boreal Arctic
species, occurring in the waters off northern Japan,
Kamchatka, southern Chukchi Sea, and Queen Char-
lotte Islands in British Columbia (Egorov and Alexeyey,
1998). The new species di fers from T. bicarinata
by having a much narrower last whorl and a much
narrower aperture. These same differences distinguish
the new species from Trichotropis vokesae Pitt and Pitt,
1989, which is extremely similar to T. bicarinata.
Trichotropis vokesae is of Pliocene age and from
northwestern Ecuador, and the new species differs from
T. vokesae in the same ways that it differs from T.
bicarinata.
The new species can be distinguished from the similar
looking Icuncula torcularis (Tenison-Woods — 1879;
Wenz, 1940: fig. 2630), an extant species living off the
coasts of southeastern Australia and eee is having
less projecting and non-wavy keels, one less keel on the
last whorl, and an absence of axial riblets on the ramp.
Icuncula torcularis is the type species of Icuncula
Iredale, 1924.
The new species is remarkably similar to the extant
Austrocarina recta (Hedley, 1903; 1922: 223, fig. 3;
Powell, 1966: 34, pl. 3, fig. 2. 1969: 364, pl. 276; W ‘soa.
1994: 187) but dfers foun A. recta by having a shell
approximately 14 mm in height instead of 6 mm, a more
projecting and usually wider keel on the shoulder of the
adult whorls, several weak spiral ribs on base of last
whorl, several spiral ribs on earliest teleoconch whorls,
straight rather than a curved profile of the base,
columellar lip callused with abaxial margin well-de-
lineated, and no tendency to develop eélishral ribs on
earliest teleoconch whorls.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors are especially grateful for the careful and
tireless collecting of Eric Goéhre of Oroville, California.
Without his help’ and willingness to donate the material,
the paper would have been “greatly reduced in its scope.
James H. McLean, Natural History Museum of Los
Angeles County, Malacology Division, provided valuable
comments about the id ienteatioh of the new trochid.
Carmen Perrilliat (IGM) graciously sent us excellent
casts of the Punta Baja Formation material. David Haasl
(UCMP) spent considerable effort unsuccessfully trying
to locate the hypotypes of Bullamirifica ainiktos from ea
Pigeon Point Formation. Jorge Vazquez, California State
University, Northridge, kindly took SEM photomicro-
graphs of the protoconch of Minytropis melilota. Steffen
Kiel (Smithsonian Institution) and an anonymous re-
viewer critiqued the manuscript.
LITERATURE CITED
Adams, A. 1855. Further contributions toward the natural
history of the Trochidae: with the description of a new
genus and of several new species, from the Cumingian
collection. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of
London for 1854: 33-41. ;
Addicott, W. O. 1973. Oligocene molluscan biostratigraphy and
paleontology of the lower part of the type Temblor
Formation, California. U. S$. Geological Survey Profes-
sional Paper 791: 1-48. ;
Albers, H. J. 1976. dese rs Faziesanalyse und Zyklen
des Untercampans (Vaalser Griinsands = Hervien) von
Aachen und dem eee Limburg.
Geologisches Jahrbuch, A, 34, 3-68. :
Almeren, A. A. 1986. Benthic foraminiferal zonation and
correlations of Upper Cretaceous strata of the Great
Valley of California—a modification. In P. L. Abbott (ed.),
Cretaceous Stratigraphy Western North America. Pacific
Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Miner-
alogists 46: 137-152.
Anderson, F. M. and G. D. Hanna. 1935. Cretaceous geology
of Lower California. eee: of the California
Academy of Sciences, Series 4, : 1-34.
Arnold, R. 1908. De scriptions of new oc ee and Tertiary
fossils from the Santa Cruz Mountains, California.
Proceedings of the United States National Museum 34:
345-390.
Bandel, L. K. and S. Kiel. 2003. Relationships of Cretaceous
Neritimorpha (Gastropoda, Mollusca), with the descrip-
tion of seven new species. Bulletin of the Czech
Geological Survey 78: 49-62.
Bandel, K. and W. Stinnesbeck. 2000. Gastropods of the
Quiriquina Formation (Maastrichtian) in central Chile:
paleobiogeographic relationships and the description of
a few new taxa. Zentralbatt fiir Geologie und Palaontolo-
gie Teil 1(Heft 7/8): 757-788.
Benson, W. H. 1842. Mollusca. In: T. Cantor (ed.) General
Features of Chusan, with Remarks on the Flora and
Fauna of that Island. Annals and Magazine of Natural
History, Series 1, 9: 456-490. :
Boehlke, J. E. and P. L. Abbott. 1986. Punta Banda Formation,
a Campanian submarine canyon fill, Baja California,
Mexico. In: P. L. Abbott (ed.) Cretaceous Stratigraphy
Western North America. Pacific Section, Society of
Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists 46: 91-101.
Broderip, W. J. and G. B. Sowerby, I. 1829. Observations on
new or interesting Mollusca contained, for the most part,
in the Museum of the Zoological Society. Zoological
Journal 4(15): 359-376,
Clark, B. L. 1938. Fauna from the Markley Formation (upper
Eocene) on Pleasant Creek, California. Bulletin of the
Geological Society of America 49: 683-730.
Conrad, T. A. 1860. Descriptions of new species of Cretaceous
and Eocene fossils of Mississippi. Journal of the Academy
of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Series 2, 4(3):
275-298.
Dailey, D. H. and W. P. Popenoe. 1966. Mollusca from the
Upper Cretaceous Jalama Formation, Santa Barbara
County, California. University of California Publications
in Geological Sciences 65: 1-27.
Davies, A. M. 1971. Tertiary Faunas, a text-book for oilfield
palaeontologists and students of geology, Volume 1, The
Composition of Tertiary Faunas, feed by F. E. Eames.
George Allen and Unwin, London, 571 pp.
Page 146
Dockery, D. TIII. 1993. The streptoneuran gastropods
exclusive of the Stenoglossa, of the Coffee Sand (Campa-
nian) of northeastern Mississippi. Mississippi Department
of Environmental Quality, Office of Geology, Bulletin 129:
1-191.
Douvillé, H. 1921. Mélanges paleontologiques: genre Eova-
sum, Glaunconiidae, Pleuroceratidae, Pinenidae: genre
Ttruvia. Journal de Conchyliologie 66: 1-18.
Egorov, R. and D. Alexeyev. 1998. Treasure of Russian Shells.
~ Volume 2, Trichotropidae Moscow, 36 pp.
Elder, W. P. and L. R. Saul. 1993. Paleogeographic implica-
tions of molluscan assemblages in the Upper Cretaceous
(Campanian) Pigeon Point Formation, California. In: G.
Dunne and K. McDougall (eds.) Mesozoic Paleogeogra-
phy of the Western United States-IT. Pacific Section,
Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists 71:
PP ne 1S6.
Elder, P. and L. R. Saul. 1996. Taxonomy and_ bio-
eae of Coniacian through Maastrichtian Anchura
(Gastropoda: Aporrhaidae) of the North American Pacific
slope. Journal of Paleontology 70: 381-397.
Férussac, D. 1819. Histoire naturelle générale e pariticuliére
des mollusques terrestres et fluviatiles. Volume 1, Paris,
128 pp.
Finlay, H. J. 1926. A further commentary on New Zealand
molluscan systematics. Transactions of the New Zealand
Institute 37; 320-485.
Finlay, H. J. and J. Marwick. 1937. The Wangaloan and
associated molluscan faunas of Kalisonaise Green Island
subdivision. New Zealand Department of Scientific and
Industrial Research, Geological Survey Branch, Palaeon-
tological Bulletin 15: 1-140.
Fleming, J. 1822. Philosophy of Zoology. Volume 2. Edin-
ban 615 pp.
Gabb, M. 1864. Description of the Cretaceous fossils.
Dee Survey of California, Palaeontology 1: 57-2433.
Goudkoff, P. P. 1945. Stratigraphic relations of Upper
Cretaceous in the Great Valley, California. American
Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 29:
956—LOOT. :
Gradstein, F. M., J. G. Ogg and A. G. Smith. 2004. A geologic
time scale 2004. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
589 pp.
Grant, U. S., IV and H. R. Gale. 1931. Catalogue of the marine
Pliocene and Pleistocene Mollusca of California and
relate regions. Memoirs of the San Diego Society of
Natural History 1: 1-1036.
Cray, M. E. 1850. Figures of molluscous animals, selected
from various authors. Volume 2, London, pls. 79-199.
Groves, L. T. 2004. New species of Late Cretaceous
Cypraeidae (Gastropoda) from California and_ British
Columbia and new records from the Pacific slope. The
ce 118: 43-51.
Hedley, C. 1903. Scie nitific results of the trawling expedition of
H a S. “Thetis” off the coast of New South Wales in
February and March, 1896. Mollusca. Part IH. Scaphopoda
and Gastropoda. Memoirs of the Australian Museum 4:
327402.
Hedley. C. 1922. A revision of the Australian Turridae.
Records of the Australian Museum 13(6); 213-259,
Hickman, C. S. and J. H. McLean. 1990. Systematic revision
and suprageneric classification of trochacean gastropods.
Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. Science
Series 35: 1-169.
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 4
Holzapfel, E. 1888. Die Mollusken der Aachener Kreide.
Paleontographica 34: 29-180.
Houbrick, R. S. 1988. Cerithioidean phylogeny. In: W. F.
Ponder, D. J. Eernisse and J. H. Waterhouse (eds),
Prosobranch Phylogeny. Malacological Review, Supple-
ment 4; SS—128.
Iredale, T. 1924. Results from Roy Bell's molluscan collections.
Proceedings of the Linnaean Society of New South Wales
49: 179-278.
Iredale, T. 1931. Australian molluscan notes. I. Records of the
Australian Museum 18: 201-235.
Kamada, Y. 1960. On the associated occurrence of Vicarya and
Vicaryella in the Japanese Tertiary, with the first de-
scription of a Paleogene species of Vicarya from Japan.
Science Reports of Tonok University, Series 2, Special
Volume 4: 281-295.
Kase, T. 1984. Early Cretaceous marine and brackish-water
Gastropoda from Japan. National Science Museum,
Tokyo, 263 pp.
Keen, A. M. 1960. piel d Trochacea Rafinesque, 1815.
In: R. C. Moore (ed.) Treatise on Invertebrate Paleon-
tology. Pt. I. Mollusca 1. Geological Society of America
and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, pp. 1246-
1275.
Kiel, S. and K. Bandel. 2001. Trochidae (Archaeogastropoda)
from the Campanian of Torallola in northern Spain. Acta
Geologica Polonica 51(2):; 137-154.
Kilmer, F. H. 1963. Cretaceous and Cenozoic stratigraphy and
paleontology, El Rosario area. University of California,
Berkeley, unpublished Ph. D _ dissertation, 149 pp.
Kuroda, A. T., T. Habe and K. Oyama. 1971. The Sea Shells of
Sagami Bay. Maruzen Co., Ltd. Tokyo, 1281 pp.
Lamarck, J. B. 1804. Mémoires sur les fossiles des environs de
Paris. Annales de Muséum National d'Histoire Paris.
Tome 5, variously paged. Reprinted 1978, Paleontological
Research Institution, Ithaca, New York.
Laseron, C. F. 1954. Revision of the New South Wales
TurridaeAustralian Zoological Handbook. Royal Zoologi-
cal Society of New South Wales, Sy dney, 56 pp.
Lesson, R. P. 1835. Illustrations de zoologie ou recueil de
figures d’animaux peintes d’apres. Paris, 17 pls.
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae.
Regnum animale. Editio decima reformata. Volume 1.
Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm, $24 pp.
McLean, J. H. 1978S. Marine shells of southern California,
revised edition. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles
County, Science Series 24: |— 104.
Manwick, J. 1965. Upper Cenozoic Mollusca of Wairoa district,
Hawke's Bay. New Zealand Geological Survey Paleonto-
logical Bulletin 39: 1-83,
Maxwell, P. A. 1992. Eocene Mollusca from the vicinity of
McCulloch’s Bridge, Waiho River, South Canterbury,
New Zealand: pi aleoecology and systematics. New Zealand
Geological Survey P Paleontological Bulletin 65: 1-280.
Monttort, P. D. 1810. Conchyliologie sae et classifi-
cation meéthodique des coquilles. Volume 2. F. Schoell,
Paris, 176 pp.
Nagao, T. 1934. Cretaceous Mollusca from the Miyako
District, Honsha, Japan. Journal of the ony of Science.
The Hokkaido Imperial University, Series 4, 2: 177-277.
Perrilliat-Montoya, M, ©. 1968, Fauna del Ce Ais y del
Terciario del norte de Baja California, Universidad
Nacional Aut6noma de Mexico, Instituto de Geologa,
Paleontologa Mexicana 25: 1-26.
R. L. Squires and L. R. Saul, 2005
Page 147
Philippi, R. A. 1SS7. Die Tertiiren und Quartiiren versteiner-
ungen Chiles. F. A. Brockhaus, Leipzig, 266 pp.
Pitt, W. D. and L. J. Pitt. 1989. A new species of Trichotropis
(Gastropoda: Mesogastropoda) from the Esmeralda beds,
Onzole Formation, northwestern Ecuador. Tulane Studies
in Geology and Paleontology 22: 131-136.
Ponder, W. F. 1998. Supert umily Capuloidea. In: P. L. Beesley,
G. J. B. Ross and A. Wells (eds), Mollusca: the Southern
Synthesis. Fauna of Australia. V Game 5. CSIRO Publish-
ing, Melbourne, Part B, pp. 774-775.
Ponder, W.
the Caenogastropoda and deg list of the
family-group names te higher taxa. In: W. F. Ponder, D. J.
Eernisse and J. Waterhouse (eds.) Prosobranch
Phylogeny. Mal ane il Review, Supplement 4: 258-326.
Powell, A. W. B. 1966. The molluscan families Speightiidae and
Turridae: An evaluation of the valid taxa, both Recent and
fossil, with lists of characteristic species. Bulletin of the
Auckland Institute and Museum 5: 1-184.
Powell, A. W. B. 1969. The family Turridae in the Indo-Pacific.
niet 2. The subfamily Turriculinae. Indo-Pacific Mollusca
2(10): 207-416.
ree Land J. Revilla. 1966. Algumas especies nuevas y
otra poco conocidas. Notas y Comunicaciones del
Instituto Geologico y Minero de Espana $2: 27-86.
Rafinesque, C. S. 1815. Analyse de la Nature ou Tableau de
Univers et des Corps Organisé es. Barracvecchia, Palermo,
224 pp.
Saul, L. R. 1983. Turritella zonation across the Cretaceous-
Tertiary boundary, California. University of
Publications Geological Sciences 125: 1-165.
Saul, L. R. and W. P. Popenoe. 1992. Pacific slope Cretaceous
California
bivalves of the genus Calva. Natural History Museum of
Los Angeles County, Contributions in Science 433: 1-68,
Saul, L. R. and R. L. Squires. 1997. New species of neritid
ge istropods from Cretaceous and Lower Cenozoic strata of
the Pacific slope of North America. The Veliger 40:
131-147.
Saul, L. R. and R. L. Squires. 2003. New Cretaceous
cerithiform gastropods from the Pacific slope of North
America. Journal of Paleontology 77; 442453
Smith, J. P. 1900. The development and phy! ogeny of
Placenticeras. Proceedings of the California Acade my of
Sciences, Series 3, 1(7): 180-240.
Sohl, N. F. 1960. Arche eee Mesogastropoda and
stratigraphy of the Ripley, Owl Creek, and Prairie Bluff
formations. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper
31-A: 1-151.
Seid G. B., I. 1825. A catalogue of the shells contained in
the collection of the late Earl of Tankerville. London, 92
pp.
Squires, R. L, 2003. Turnovers in marine gastropod faunas
during the Eocene-Oligocene transition, west coast of the
United States. In: D. R. Prothero, L. C. Ivany and E. A.
Nesbitt (eds.) From Greenhouse to Icehouse: the Marine
Eocene-Oligocene Transition. New York: Columbia Uni-
versity Press, pp. 14-35.
Squires. R. L. and L. R. Saul. 1997. Late Cretaceous
occurrences on the Pacific slope of North America of
the melanopsid gastropod genus Boggsia Olssen, 1929.
The Veliger 40: 193-202.
Squires, R. L. and L. R. Saul. 2001. New Late Cretaceous
gastropods from the Pacific slope of North America.
Journal of Paleontology 75: 46-65.
F. and A. Waren. 1988. Appendix. Classification of
Saul. 2002. New information on Late
Cretaceous, Paleocene,
from the North American Pacific slope. The Veliger 45
177-192.
Squires, R. L. and L. R. Saul. 2003a. Additions to Late
Cretaceous shallow-marine
The Veliger 46; 145-161.
Squires, R. L. and L. R. Saul. 2003b. New Late Cretaceous
(Campanian and Maastrichtian) marine gastropods from
California. Journal of Paleontology 77: 50-63.
Squires, R. L. and L. R. Saul, 2004. The pseudomelaniid
gastropod Paosia from the marie Cretaceous of the
Pacific slope of North America and a review of the age and
paleobiogeography of the genus. Journal of Paleontology
78: 484-500.
Tenison-Woods, J. E. 1879. On some new species of
Tasmanian marine shells. Proceedings of the Royal
Society of Tasmania for 1S78: 32-40.
Thiele, J. 1929-1935. Handbuch a systematischen Weich-
tierkunde. Gustav Fischer, Jena, pp. 1-1154.
Vedder, J. G. 1977. Preliminary list of Late Cretaceous
mollusks from the Pozo district, San Luis Obispo County,
California. Ins D. G. Howell, J. G. Vedder and Kk.
esa (eds.), Cretaceous Geology of the California
Coast Ranges, West of the San Andreas Fault. Pacific
Section Society of Economic Paleontologists and Miner-
alogists, Pacific Coast Paleogeography Field Guide 2: pp.
107-109.
Wenz, W. 1938-1944. Gastropoda. Teil 1: Allgemeiner
Teil und Prosobranchia. In: O. H. Schindewolf (ed.),
Handbuch der Paliozoologie, Band 6. Gebriider Born-
traeger, Berlin, pp. 1-1639. [Reprinted 1960-1961].
Wilson, B. 1994. Australian marine shells. Prosobranch
gastropods, Part 2 (Neogastropoda). Odyssey Publishing,
Kallaroo, Western Australia, 370 pp.
Woods, A. J. C. and L. R. Saul. 1986. New Neritidae from
southwestern North America. Journal of Paleontology 60:
636-655.
Woods, H. 1906. The Cretaceous fauna of Pondoland. Annals
of the South African Museum 4: 275-350.
Squires, R. L. and L. R
and Eocene neritid gastropods
gastropods from California.
APPENDIX 1
LOCALITIES CITED
Localities are LACMIP, unless otherwise noted. All
quadrangle maps listed below are U. S. Geological
Survey maps.
10786. Near crest of south slope of divide between Basin
Hollow and Clover creeks, at approximately southeast
corner of the northwest 1/4 of section 33, T. 32 N, R. 2
W. Lower Santonian. Redding Formation, Member \
(lower part). Coll: W. P. Popenoe and D. W. Scharf,
August 8, 1931.
10787. Near crest of north slope of divide between Basin
Hollow and Clover creeks, near northeast corner of
northwest 1/4 of section 33 and not more than 122 m
south of section line, T. 32 N, R. 2 W, Millville
Quadrang] e (15 minute, 1953), Shasta County, northern
California. Lower Santonian. Redding Formation, Mem-
Page 148
ber V (lower part). Coll: W. P. Popenoe and D. W.
Scharf, August 8, 1931.
12582. Turritellas and oysters along beach just south of
La Bocana Roja Formation outcrop, approximately 2 km
north of south tip on west side of Punta Baja, Mexico.
Middle upper Campanian. Punta Baja Formation. Coll:
L. R. Saul, October 12, 1990.
21536. Corona Quadrangle, Santa Ana Mountains,
Orange County, southern California. Lower Campanian.
Ladd Formation, upper Holz Shale Member. Coll.: T
Bear, 1940.
93639. East bank of Chico Creek in concretions in
massive, greenish-gray sandstone, 373 m south and
ane m west of northeast corner of section 23, T. 23 N,
R. 2 E, Paradise Quadrangle (15 minute, 1953), Butte
County, northern California. Lower eee Chico
Formation, Ten Mile Member. Coll.: _ and R. B.
Saul, August 20, 1952.
23642. On W bank of Chico Creek, west of big westward
projection of east lava cap and approximately N 27°W of
BM 1770, 122 m south and 632 m west of northeast
corner of section 26, T. 23 N, R. 2 E, Paradise
Quadrangle (15 minute, 1953), Butte County, northern
California. Lower Campanian. Chico Formation, Ten
Mile Member. Coll: L. R. and R. B. Saul, August 20,
1952.
23643. Concretionary sandstone on west side of Big
Chico Creek, 670 m south and 762 m west of merheaet
corner of section 26, T. 23 N, R. 2 E, Paradise
Quadrangle (7.5 minute, 1953), Butte County, northern
California. Lower Campanian. Chico Formation, Ten
Mile Member. Coll.: L. R. Saul and R. B. Saul, August,
1952.
24124. Hard, medium-grained, gray, arkosic sandstone,
158 m north of Jalama Creek, 3.3 km west and 0.6 km
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 4
north of southeast corner of the topographic sheet,
Lompoc Hills Quadrangle (7.5 minute, 1947). Upper
Campanian. Jalama Formation. Coll.: D. Dailey and J. R.
Dorrance, October, 1929.
24125. Hard, fine to medium-grained arkosic sandstone,
2.8 km west and 0.53 km aortli of southeast corner of
the topographic sheet, Lompoc Hills Quadrangle
(7.5 minute, 1947). Upper Campanian. Jalama Forma-
tion. Coll.: D. Dailey and J. R. Dorrance, October 29,
1929.
24917. Hard sandstone slabs in bed of Clover
Creek, 213 m north and 366 m west of southeast
corner of section 22, T. 32 N, R. 2 W, Millville
Quadrangle (15 minute, 1953), Shasta County, northern
California. Upper Santonian. Redding Formation,
Member VI. Coll: W. P. Popenoe and D. Dailey,
August 27, 1959.
24337. Along east side of Highway 70, 792 m north and
305 m west of southeast corner of section 36, T. 21 N, R.
3 E, Cherokee Quadrangle (7.5 mintue, 1949), Butte
County, northern California. Lower Campanian. Chico
Formation, Pentz Road member (informal). Coll.: E
Gohre.
UCMP B-3388. In south-trending arroyo which reaches
coast aoiit 2.8 km north of the tip of Punta Baja.
Marine invertebrates from massive, chert conglomerate
at confluence of this arroyo and northwest- trending
tributary about 122 m upstream from confluence. This
locality is about 488 m northwest of the Punta Baja road.
Middle upper Campanian. Punta Baja Formation. Coll:
F. H. Kilmer, date unknown.
USGS M-S8601. In lens in sandstone on beach 0.5 km
southeast of Bolsa Point, Pigeon Point Quadrangle, San
Mateo County, northern California. Middle Campanian.
Pigeon Point Formation. Coll.: W. P. Elder, 1989?
THE NAUTILUS 119(4):149-152, 2005
Page 149
Daffymitra lindae, a new genus and species of Volutomitridae
(Neogastropoda) from he Bellingshausen Abyssal Plain
M. G. Harasewy ch Yuri I. Kantor
Department of Invertebrate Zoology
National Museum of Natural History
Smithsonian Institution
Washington DC 20013-
7012 USA Moscow 117071
RUSSIA
Severtzov Institute
Russian Academy of Sciences
Leninski Prospect, 33
ABSTRACT
Daffymitra lindae, new genus, new species, is described from
the Bellingshausen Abyssal Plain off Ellsworthland, Antarctica.
Known only from its shell, this new taxon is included in the
family Volutomitridae, but differentiated from all known living
genera and species on the basis of its inflated shell shape, with
an attenuated anterior and distinctive siphonal canal, as well as
by the shape and disposition of its three recessed, obliquely
oriented columellar plaits. This new taxon represents the first
record of Volutomitridae from abyssal depths. The concholo-
gical similarity of Daffymitra to the Upper Cretaceous genus
Volutomorpha raises the possibility that Daffymitra may be
a surviving descendent of a lineage presumed extinct since the
end of the Cretaceous, and suggests that a reassessment of the
relationships between the various Cretaceous genera assigned
to Volutoderminae and the earliest Volutomitridae.
INTRODUCTION
The Volutomitridae is a small family of rachiglossan
oe a characterized by: a fusiform shell (reach-
ing 50 mm) with 2-5 columellar plaits, and a paucispiral,
mammilate protoconch; a radula with distinctive, wish-
bone-shaped rachidian teeth and small, needle-like
lateral teeth that are present in most species; a mid-
oesophagus that is long, convoluted, with a muscular
posterior end: a gland of Leiblein that is only partially
separated from the mid-oesophagus; and a_ single
accessory salivary gland (Ponder, 1972, 1998; Kantor
and Harasewych, 1992: Bouchet and Kantor, 2004). The
family ranges into the North Pacific, North Atlantic and
the Caribbean, but centers of diversity are concentrated
in the southern hemisphere, particularly in the waters
surrounding Antarctica, Australia, New Zealand, and
especially New Caledonia (Bouchet and Kantor, 2004),
Six genera and 50 species are currently recognized in the
Recent fauna (Bouchet and Kantor, 2004), with a single
genus (Paradmete) containing six species represented in
the Antarctic and Magellanic fauna (Numanami, 1996;
Bouchet and Kantor, 2004). Volutomitrids are known
from the sublittoral zone to depths of 1980 m (based on
dead specimens), but the majority of species are
confined to outer continental shelf and upper continen-
tal slope depths (Bouchet and Kantor, 2004: Appendix;
see Figure 7 herein),
In the course of our studies of Antarctic and sub-
Antarctic neogastropods sampled by the United States
Antarctic Program (USAP) and housed in the collections
of the National Museum of Natural History (USNM), we
encountered a single specimen of a volutomitrid that was
collected on fhe: Bellinghausen Abyssal Plain. This
specimen represents a new genus and species within
the family Volutomitridae, as well as the first record of
the family from abyssal depths. This new genus and new
species is described herein, and comparisons made with
other volutomitrid taxa.
SYSTEMATICS
Class Gastropoda Cuvier, 1797
Order Neogastropoda Wenz, 1935
Family Volutomitridae Gray, 1854
Genus Daffymitra new genus
Type Species: Daffymitra lindae new species, by
original designation.
Description: Shell medium-sized for the family (to
28 mm), with low, conical spire, broadly inflated body
whorl. Protoconch conical, large, 2.6 mm in diameter, of
2 5/8 smooth whorls. Teleocouch thin, of about 3
smoothly rounded whorls, with well demarcated, broad
siphonal canal. Axial sculpture of distinct, very narrow,
broadly spaced ribs that extend from suture to siphonal
canal. Spiral sculpture of narrow, cords, alternating in
prominence. Aperture high (74% of shell length) broadly
ovate. Outer lip thin, smooth. Columella with three
columellar folds (central strongest) and siphonal fold.
Shell white. Periostracum thin, olive brown. Operculum,
anatomy, radula, unknown.
Etymology: This genus is named after Daffy, a tor-
toiseshell longhair cat that belongs to the senior author's
wife Linda.
Page 150
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 4
Figures 1-6. Daffymitra lindae new species, holotype. 1. Apertural view of the shell. 2. Oblique view, shell is rotated slightly to
expose the columellar plaits. 3. Lateral view of the shell. 4. Dorsal view of the shell. 5. Apical and 6. lateral views of the protoconch.
Transition to teleoconch is marked by arrow.
Daffymitra lindae new species
(Figures 1-7)
Description: Shell (Figures 1—t) of moderate size (to
27.9 min), thin, fragile, with matte surface, inflated,
fusiform, tapering anteriorly, with conical spire. Proto-
oOo
o 7
conch (Figures 5-6) large, mammilate, 1970 um in
height, diameter increasing from 676 Um to 2570 Lm in
2.5/8 convex whorls. Protoconch-teleoconch transition
distinct (Figures 5, 6, arrow), marked by onset of weak
closely spaced prosocline ribs. Teleoconch of 3.1/8
strongly convex, ovate whorls with rounded shoulder.
Suture impressed Axial sculpture of thin, sharply
12
demarcated, weakly prosocline raised ribs on last
whorl, 34 on penultimate whorl. Ribs closely spaced on
first teleoconch whorl, becoming more widely spaced on
later whorls, but again closely spaced along final vs
whorl. Spiral sculpture of very low, narrow cords,
subequal in width, alternating in prominence, covering
entire shell surface, about 50 on final whorl, 10 on
penultimate whorl. Aperture large (0.74 shell length),
broadly oval, smooth, deflected from shell axis by 15°.
Outer lip very thin, weakly reflected, edge forming final
axial rib, with shallow anal sinus at suture. Columella
weakly sinuate, convex posteriorly, distinctly concave
medially, and again anterior to 3 obliquely oriented,
recessed folds (Figure 2). Central fold most pronounced,
anteriormost fold even more obliquely oriented than
central and posterior fold. Parietal callus, broad, very
thin. Siphonal canal broad, long, well delimited from
M. G. Harasewych and Y. I. Kantor, 2005
Page 15]
Number of Species
0 5 10 15 20 25
1000
1200
1400
1600
Depth (m)
1800
2000
2500 ae :
O Volutomitridae, all species
3000
det Paradmete only
4000
4500 ae Dattymitra lindae
5000
6000
Figure 7.
Volutomitridae, of the Antarctic genus Paradmete (data from
Bouchet and Kantor, 2004: Appendix), and of Daffymitra
lindae. A: continental shelf; B: upper continental slope; C:
lower continental slope; D: continental rise; E: abyssal plain, F:
hadal depths.
aperture. Shell color white. Periostracum thin, olive
brown, covering entire shell. Operculum, radula and
anatomy unknown.
Type Locality: —Bellingshausen Abyssal Plain, 61°27’ S,
94°5S'-95°22’ W. in 4419-4804 m [R/V ELTANIN
cruise 23, sta. 1621, 10 Apr. 1966].
Type Material: Holotype, USNM 1050443, shell
length 27.9 mm, final whorl length 23.4 mm, aperture
length 21.5 mm, shell width, 13.5 mm.
Distribution: Known from the type locality only.
Etymology: This species is named for the senior
author's wife, Linda Lee Harasewych.
Remarks: Despite the absence of anatomical and
radular data, this new species can be unambiguously
assigned to the family Volutomitridae on the basis of its
distinctive shell shape, sculpture, presence of the
diagnostic paucispiral mammilate protoconch, and weak
columellar folds.
Bathymetric distribution of the Recent species of
Seven genera are currently recognized within i
family Volutomitride ae (C ernohorsky, 1970; Bouchet and
Kantor, 2004), The large size, long, broad aperture, and
thin shell of this new species, as well as the presence of
three obliquely oriented and deeply recessed columellar
folds and a siphonal fold preclude its rae to
either the fossil genus Proximitra Finlay, 1927, or the
Recent genera Conomitra Conrad, 1865: hie
Angas, 1877; Peculator Iredale, 1924; or Magdalemitra
Kilburn, 1974.
Conchologically, the new species is closer to the
genera Volutomitra H. and A. Adams, 1853 and
Paradmete Strebel, 1908, which are considered to be
closely related (Powell, 1951: 165; Cernohorsky, 1970:
91). The 13 known species of Voliutomitra are widely
distributed in the World Ocean, ranging from South
Africa, Southern Australia, New Talend and to the
Bering Sea in the Pacific, and from Colombia to the
northern part of the Atlantic Ocean. Daffymitra lindae
differs from all known species of Volutomitra in having
a proportionally shorter spire and inflated rather than
fusiform shell, coarse spiral sculpture and sharp, narrow,
broadly spaced axial ribs, as well as columellar folds that
are weak, recessed within the aperture and obliquely
oriented rather than being strong, prominent, and nearly
perpendicular to the édhunvellar axis. The only species of
Volutomitra with pronounced axial sculpture, V. erebus
Bayer, 1971, from Colombia, has axial ribs that are
thicker, more rounded, orthocline, and more densely
spaced.
The genus Paradmete, contains six species, all
confined to Antarctic and sub-Antarctic waters. Daffy-
mitra lindae may easily be distinguished from Paradmete
fragillima (Watson, 1882), the type species, as well as
from P. briedensis Numanami, 1996, and P. arnaudi
Numanami, 1996, by its larger size, shorter spire,
inflated rather than narrowly fusiform shell, and
distinctive narrow, prosocline axial ribs, as well as by
its well demarcated siphonal canal. The Magellanic
Paradmete crymochara (Rochebrune and Mabille, 1885)
approaches Daffymitra lindae in size, but differs in its
elongate, fusiform shape, absence of a distinct siphonal
canal, and presence of four columellar folds. The
distinctive Paradmete percarinata Powell, 1951, can Hs
recognized by its prominent peripheral carina, sharply
shouldered shell and pronounced columellar folds that
are nearly perpendicular to the columellar axis. Most
similar to Daffymitra lindae is Paradmete curta (Strebel,
1908), which reaches a similar size, has a low spire, and
has axial ribs, which, however, are opisthocline rather
than prosocline. Daffymitra differs in lacking a strong
shoulder and in having an inflated shell shape with an
attenuated anterior and distinctive Si} shonal canal.
The shell of Daffymitra lindae aes a surprising
resemblance to some members of the Mesozoic genus
Volutomorpha, particularly V. mutabilis Wade, 1926 (see
Wade, ao pl. 37, fig. 10, pls. 40, figs. 6, 9; Sohl, 1964:
pl. 39, figs. 1, 2, 6). Volutomorpha was restricted to the
Upper Cretaceous faunas of the Gulf and Atlantic
Page 152
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 4
coastal plains (for a review, see Sohl, 1964: 252-254),
and was “the giant of Cretaceous gastropods” (Wade,
1926: 20) with shell lengths extrapolated to exceed
45 em. Pilsbry and Olson (1954: 19) included Voluto-
morpha in the Cretaceous subfamily Volutodermatinae,
which they placed in the family Volutidae together with
Volutomitrinae. More recently, Dzhalilov (1977: 93)
proposed a new subfamily Volutomorphinae, also within
Volutidae, while Bouchet et al. (2005: 255) considered
Volutomorphinae a synonym of Volutodermatinae,
which they transferred from Volutidae to the extinct
family Pholidotomidae.
While Daffymitra is easily distinguished from Voluto-
morpha by its far smaller size, thinner shell, absence of
thick axial ribs, and lack of a pronounced shoulder, this
conchological similarity raises the intriguing possibility
that Daffymitra is a “living fossil,” a surviving de-
scendent from a group presumed to have become extinct
at the end of the Cretaceous. Further research is clearly
required to reevaluate the relationships between the
various Cretaceous genera assigned to Volutoderminae
and the earliest Volutamitridae.,
DISCUSSION
The family Volutomitridae has a broad geographic range,
but has previously been known only from continental
shelf and continental slope faunas, while the genus
Paradmete has been reported only from shelf and upper
slope depths (Figure 7). The greatest diversities for both
the family and the genus occur at upper continental
slope depths.
Although Daffymitra lindae is represented by a single
empty shell. the fragility of the shell, the presence “of
periostracum, and the fact that it was collected below the
aragonite compensation depth indicate that the speci-
men could not have been dead for long, and that the
species inhabits the area in which this specimen was
collected. Thus, this taxon represents the first record of
Volutomitridae from abyssal depths. In a survey of
Antarctic oe Magellanic Buccinoidea, Harasewych and
Kantor (2004) 4) found that the abyssal buecinoidean fauna
of the aes has no genera in common with the
sublittoral or bathyal faunas, but that credible sister taxa
and likely origins for at least some of the abyssal genera
occur on the ‘adjacent continental slope. Based on shell
morphologies, the genera Volutomitra, Paradmete, and
Daffymitra appear to represent a lineage within
Volutomitridae distinct from the predominantly austral
genera Proximitra, Conomitra, Microvoluta, Peculator,
and Magdalemitra. The genus Paradmete, a member of
the upper slope fauna of Antarctica, is likely the sister
taxon of the abyssal genus Daffymitra.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported by a grant from the NSF —
USAP United States Antarctic Program {Contract
Number OPP-9509761]. We are grateful to Bruce
Marshall for bringing to our attention the similarity of
Daffymitra and Volutomorpha.
LITERATURE CITED
Bouchet, P., J. Fryda, B. Hausdorf, W. F. Ponder, A. Valdés and
A. Warén. 2005, Part 2. Working Classification of the
Gastropoda [in] Bouchet, P. and J. P. Rocroi. Classification
and Nomenclator of Gastropod Families. Malacologia 47:
1-397.
Bouchet, P. and Y. I. Kantor. 2004. New Caledonia: the major
centre of biodiversity for volutomitrid mollusks (Mollusca:
Neogastropoda: Volutomitridae). Systematics and Bio-
diversity 1(4): 467-502.
Cernohorsky, W. O. 1970. Systematics of the families Mitridae
and Volutomitridae (Mollusca: Gastropoda). Bulletin of
the Auckland Institute and Museum 8: 1-190.
Dzhalilov, M. R. 1977. Cretaceous gastropods of Southeastern
Central Asia. Danek: Dushanbe, 1-202 pp.
Harasewych, M. G. and Y. I. Kantor. 2004. The Deep-Sea
Buccinoidea ( (Gastropoda: Neogastropoda) of the Scotia
Sea and Adjacent Abyssal Plains and Trenches. The
Nautilus 118: 1-42.
Kantor, Y. I. and M. G. Harasewych. 1992. Morphology of the
digestive system of Volutomitra alaskana Dall, 1902
(Gastropoda, Pectinibranchia, Volutomitridae), with notes
on the possible mechanism of feeding. Ruthenica 2:
45-53.
Numanami, H. 1996. Taxonomic study on Antarctic Gastro-
pods collected by Japanese Antarctic Research Expedi-
tions. Memoirs of National Institute of Polar Research
Series E (Biology and Medical Science) 39: 1-244.
Pilsbry, H. A. and A. A. Olsson. 1954. Systems of the Volutidae.
Bulletin of American Paleontology 35(152): 275-306, 4 pls.
Ponder, W. F. 1972. The morphology of some mitriform
gastropods with special reference to their alimentary and
reproductive systems (Neogastropoda). Malacologia 11:
295-342.
Ponder, W. F. 1998. Family Volutomitridae. pp. 842-843. In:
P. L. Beesley, G. J. Ross and A. Wells (eds) Mollusca: The
Southern Synthesis. Fauna of Australia. Vol. 5. CSIRO
Publishing: Melbourne, Part B viii, 565-1234 pp.
Powell, A. W. B. 1951. Antarctic and SubAntarctic Mollusca:
Pelecypoda and Gastropoda. Discovery Reports 26:
47-196, pls. 5-10.
Sohl, N. F. 1964. Neogastropoda, Opisthobranchia and Basom-
matophora from the Ripley, Owl Creek, and Prairie Bluff
Formations. United States Geological Survey cee
Paper 331-B: i-iv, 153-344, pls. 19-52, tables 1-2
Wade, B. 1926. The fauna of the Ripley Fonnation on Coon
Creek, Tennessee. United States Geological Survey Pro-
fessional Paper 137: 1-272, 72 pls., 2 figs. ,
THE NAUTILUS 119(4):153-156, 2005
Exilia alanbeui, a new species from the Neogene of central Chile:
the first record of Exilia (Gastropoda: Ptychatractidae) from
South America
Sven N. Nielsen
Freie Universitit Berlin
Institut fiir geologische Wissenschaften
Fachrichtung Paliontologie
Malteserstrasse 74-100
Haus D, 12249 Berlin
GERMANY
ABSTRACT
A new species of the ptychatractid genus Exilia, E. alanbeui
new species, is described from late Neogene sediments of the
Navidad Formation, central Chile. This new species represents
the first record, fossil or Recent, of the genus Exilia from the
South American continent. Given that Recent species of Exilia
are restricted to bathyal depths, the presence of representa-
tives of the genus in fine siltstones of the Navidad and Ranquil
formations lend support to a previous interpretation of bathyal
depths for these deposits.
INTRODUCTION
The genus Exilia Conrad, 1860, has been placed in the
family Turbinellidae by Maxwell (1988) and in the
subfamily Ptychatractinae within the Turbinellidae by
Kantor et al. (2001). The subfamily Ptychatractinae was
removed from the Turbinellidae and raised to family
level by Riedel (2000), as was suggested previously by
Kantor and Bouchet (1997). Riedel (2000) placed the
Turbinellidae together with other columellar plaits-
bearing groups in his suborder Volutina while the
Ptychatractidae were placed in the suborder Muricina
based mainly on radula type and absence of columellar
plaits. The most recent classification is that presented by
Bouchet and Rocroi (2005), placing Ptychatractidae
within Pseudolivoidea. The genus Evxilia has been
revised by Bentson (1940) and more recently by Kantor
et al. (2001). The latter authors Heyes nine
nominal genera, i.e., Mitraefusus Bellardi, Mesor-
hytis Meek, 1876, Surculina Dall, 1908, eh ee
Dall, 1918, Palaeorhaphis Stewart, 1927, Zexilia Finlay,
1926. Graphidula Stephenson, 1941, Benthovoluta
Kuroda and Habe, 1950, and Chathamidia Dell, 1956,
containing fossil and Recent species with Evxilia and
recognized a total of nine living species. Fossil species
were not formally treated by them but a number of
species were figured for comparison. Previously, the
Recent species of the synonymized genus Be mthovoluta
had been reviewed by Cernohorsky (1973) and Har-
asewych (1987). Species of Exilia are ee from the
Late Cretaceous (Coniacian) onward and fossil species
are known from all continents except Africa and South
America, “probably a reflection of insufficient studies of
Cretaceous and Tertiary mollusks in these regions”
(Kantor et al., 2001, p. 92). Some Cretaceous through
Miocene species come from shallow-water deposits
while deep-water occurrences are known since the late
Eocene (Kantor et al., 2001). Recent species of Exilia are
restricted to bathyal depths at tropical latitudes and in
the New Zealand region (Kantor et al., 2001).
GEOLOGY OF THE FOSSIL-BEARING LOCALITIES
The Navidad Formation (Darwin, 1846) and its equiva-
lents have recently been re-interpreted as late Miocene
bathyal basin deposits containing displaced intertidal to
outer shelf sediments (Finger et al., 2003; Nielsen et al.,
2003). Several fossiliferous sites have been sampled for
micro- and macrofossils. Of these, two localities from the
Navidad Formation (Figure 1B) and two from the
Ranquil Formation (Figure 1C) yielded specimens of
Exilia described here.
Locality PPP (Figure 1B) is a grey dee p-water
siltstone that today Reais the intertidal platform at
Punta Perro. Based on planktonic foraminifera this
locality has been dated as late Miocene (Tortonian) by
Tsuchi et al. (1990) and Ibaraki (1992), while new dating
by Finger et al. (2003) suggests an even younger age.
The fauna is of an unusual composition for the Navidad
Formation, containing otherwise unknown species of
Struthiochenopus (Zinsmeister and Griffin, 1995) and
Xenophora (Nielsen and DeVries, 2002). The specimens
coming from Pupuya (Figure 1B) were collected by
Page 154
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 4
j 70°
ex.
Santiago
(_— 4
«Matanzas
a
\N
-
/
-\--
As
27~7""Navidad ‘8
Isla Coronel
Sta. Maria
. Lavapié
Pta. Perro
> ;
: -@®Curanilahue
I
I
!
Los Alamos
\
|
'
i
1
|
'
!
I
@ Caiiete
\
\
Te
0 sf io 15820 25km
Figure 1. Fossil localities for Exilia alanbeui new species. in central Chile. A. Location of working areas. B. Localities of the
Navidad Formation, Platform Punta Perro (PPP), Pupuya. C. Localities of the Ranquil Formation, Punta El Fraile (FRM), northern
end of Caleta Ranquil (RQT), southwestern end of Caleta Ranquil.
V. Covacevich and D. Frassinetti a little south of the
village Pupuya and come from a grey siltstone for which
no ages are available. However, the faunal content (e.¢.,
Nielsen et al., 2004) justifies correlation with PPP. The
sediment at the type locality Punta El Fraile (FRM,
Figure 1C) consists of grey siltstone and underlies
a yellowish sandstone typical for the Ranquil Formation.
The limit between these two lithological units has been
observed to be a sharp, concordant one including some
pebbles at the boundary. The sediments at Caleta
Ranquil (ROT and MIB, Figure 1C) consist of a grey
siltstone similar to that present at Punta El Fraile. The
geological relation with other lithologies present at this
locality, like reddish sandstone with beds of glauconitic
sandstone and coarse light-grey sandstone, are not yet
clear. However, both localities of the Ranquil Formation
are similar to those of the Navidad Formation in
lithology, and faunal content and were also dated as late
Miocene by Finger et al. (2003).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Specimens described in this study are deposited in the
collections of the Departamento de Paleontologia de
Invertebrados Museo Nacional de Historia Natural,
Santiago de Chile (SGO.PI) and Senckenberg Museum,
Frankfurt, Germany (SMF). Photographs were taken
using a Leicaflex SL2 or Olympus Camedia c730
camera. Images taken with the former camera were
scanned from [ford FP4 125 black and white 35 mm
negatives using an Acer ScanWit 2720S film scanner. All
images were processed with Adobe Photoshop 7.0.
SYSTEMATIC PALEONTOLOGY
Family Ptychatractidae Stimpson, 1865
Genus Exilia Conrad, 1860
Type Species: — Exilia pergracilis Conrad, 1860, by
monotypy: Midway Group, lower Eocene, Alabama, USA.
Exilia alanbeui new species
(Figures 2-14)
Description: Shell narrow-fusiform, with spire occu-
pying only little more than half of total height.
Protoconch unknown. Teleoconch of about seven
straight to slightly convex whorls, lacking pronounced
shoulder. Axial sculpture consists of rounded, slightly
S. N. Nielsen, 2005
Figures 2-14. Exilia alanbeui new species. 2-4. Holotype FRM 019 (height 28.35 mm). 5-6. Paratype FRM 012-3 (height
30.2 mm). 7-8. Paratype FRM 012-2
(height 18.03 mm). 12.
height 23.9 mm).
backwards bent, collabral ribs. Penultimate whorl bears
about 16 ribs, which become obsolete on base of whorl.
Spiral sculpture well and equally defined, consisting of
narrow, low, rounded, subequal cords, crossing axial
elements unchanged, separated by interspaces of about
equal width. Fine secondary spiral threads present in
some interspaces. On penultimate whorl 10-14 spiral
cords present, S—9 further cords present on base of last
whorl and about 30 weaker, closely spaced cords on
siphonal canal. Aperture narrow-elongate. Outer lip
thin. Siphonal canal narrow, long, straight. Inner lip
smooth. Columella smooth and almost straight, with
weak swelling at entrance of siphonal canal. -
Etymology: This species is named in honour of Alan
G. Beu (Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences,
New Zealand), who always helps when needed.
Type Material: Holotype SGO.PI.6371 (FRM, height
28.35 mm), paratypes SGO.PL.6372 (FRM, one speci-
men, height 10.5 mm), SGO.PI.6373 (FRM, 21 speci-
mens), SMF 327749 (FRM, 19 specimens).
Other Material Examined: SGO.PI.6374 (PPP,
height 23.9 mm), SGO.PI.6375 (PPP, one specimen),
SGO.PI.5303 ( (Pupuya, four specimens), SGO.PI.6376
(ROT, one specimen, height 9.25 mm), SGO.PI.6377
(MIB, one specimen, height 29.91 mm).
Type Locality: The grey siltstone at Punta El Fraile
(FRM). Arauco, Souther central Chile.
(height 15.46 mm). 9-10. Paratype FRM 012-1 (height 9.3 mm). 11. Paratype FRM 012-4
Paratype FRM 012-5 (height 17.62 mm). 13. Paratype FRM 012-6 (height 15.2 mm). 14. PPP 017 (PPP,
Occurrence: PPP, Pupuya, FRM, MIB, ROT; Navi-
dad and Ranquil formations, Late Miocene or Early
Pliocene, central Chile.
Discussion: Exilia alanbeui resembles the type
species, EF. pergracilis (see Bentson, 1940, pl 2,
fig. 25; Kantor et al, 2001, figs. 1 A-D), and
E. lincolnensis Weaver, 1916, but differs from those
North American Eocene species in having a_ less
convex whorl profile, almost straight instead of sinusoi-
dal axial sculpture and a more angulated whorl base.
It differs from the New Fede Miocene species
E. nodulifera (Marwick, 1931), E. leachi (Marwick,
1931) and E. wellmanni Maxwell, 1988 (see Maxwell
1988) in having stronger axial sculpture. Most species
of Exilia have more convex whorls and_ especially
the Recent species have weaker axial sculpture
(see Harasewych, 1987 and Kantor et al., 2001).
The geographically closest species, E. cortezi, has
wider whorls and different axial sculpture and _ is
therefore not considered to be closely related to
E. alanbeui. Exilia alanbeui is known only from
localities consisting of deep water siltstones which
have been dated as probably Messinian in age based
on foraminifera (Finger et al. 2003). Therefore,
this species is younger than the above mentioned
Miocene — species from New Zealand. Regarding
the similarity of the two species, E. alanbeui may prove
to be closely related to the New Zealand species
E. wellmanni.
Page 156
CONCLUSIONS
The occurrence of Exilia alanbeui in central Chile is the
first record of the genus from the South American
continent (except the Recent E. cortezi (Dall, 1908) from
the Galapagos Islands) and therefore closes a consider-
able biogeographic gap. Although shallow water species
of Exilia are known from Miocene deposits of Europe,
the occurrence of Exilia in siltstones of the Navidad and
Ranquil formations is here interpreted to support
microfossil data placing these deposits in a bathyal
environment (Finger et al., 2003).
Exilia alanbeui is another Chilean Miocene gastropod
species that shows many similarities to New Zealand
taxa. Trans-Pacific biogec ygraphic connections between
Chile and New Zealand during the Miocene have
already been shown for some vetigastropods ( (Nielsen
et al., 2004) and xenophorids (Nielsen and DeVries,
2002).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I thank Klaus Bandel (Universitat Hamburg, Germany),
who helped in numerous ways and provide rd the
infrastructure to continue this work while I was in
Hamburg. Paulina Vasquez (TU Berlin, Germany) found
the figurec | specimen from PPP and was a cheerful help
during { field work. Daniel Frassinetti (SGO.PI, Chile)
provided access to collections under his care. Tom
DeVries (Burton, USA) improved the language of an
earlier draft. Constructive reviews by Philippe “Botichet
(Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle Paris, France)
and an anonymous reviewer are gratefully acknowl-
edged. The material has been eéllecte d during field work
Aarne by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
grant Ba 675/25 during the years 2000 to 2002.
LITERATURE CITED
Bentson, H. 1940. A systematic study of the fossil gastropod
Exilia. U niversity of California Publications 25: 199-238.
Bouchet, P. and J. P. Rocroi, 2005. Classification and nomen-
clator of ia rd families. Malacologia 47, in press.
Cernohorsky, W. O. 1973. The taxonomy of Benthovoluta
hilge moerh | von Martens) and allied turbinellid genera
(Mollusca: Volutacea). Records of the Auckland Institute
and Museum 10: 123-131.
Tsuchi, R., T
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 4
Darwin, C. 1846, Geological observations on South America.
Smith, Elder & Co., London, 279 pp.
Finger, k., A. Encinas, S. Nielsen and D. Peterson. 2003.
Microfaunal indications of Late Miocene deep-water
basins off the central coast of Chile. 10° Congreso
Geolégico Chileno, Concepcion, Chile. Abstract Volume
CD-ROM. 8 pp.
Harasewych, M. G. 1987. A revision of the genus Benthovoluta
with notes on the evolution of the subfamily Ptychatracti-
nae (Prosobranchia: Turbinellidae). The Nautilus 101:
166-181.
Ibaraki, M. 1992. Planktonic foraminifera from the Navidad
Formation, Chile: their geologic age and paleoceano-
graphic implications, pp. 91-95. In K. Ishizaki and
T. Saito (eds.), Centenary of Japanese Micropaleontology.
Terra Scientific Publishing Company, Tokyo.
Kantor, Y. I. and P. Bouchet. 1997. The Ptychatractinae: an
endemic deep-sea clade of the Turbinellidae? American
Malacological Union, 63"! Annual Meeting (Santa Bar-
bara, California), Abstracts: 37-38.
Kantor, Y. I., P. Bouchet and A. Oleinik. 2001. A revision of the
Recent species of Exilia, formerly Benthovoluta (Gastrop-
oda: Turbinellidae). Ruthenica 11: 81-136.
Maxwell, P. A. 1988. Late Miocene deep-water Mollusca from
the Stillwater Mudstone at Greymouth, Westland, New
Zealand: paleoecology and systematics. NZ Geological
Survey Paleontological Bulletin 55: 120 pp.
Nielsen, S. N. and T. J. DeVries. 2002. Tertiary Xenophoridae
(Gastropoda) of western South America. The Nautilus
116: ee
Nielsen, S. N., T. J. DeVries, A. Encinas, K. L. Finger and D.
Peterson, sie Towards an understanding of the age of
the Navidad Formation. 10° Congreso Ge ol6gico Chileno,
Concepcion, Chile. Abstract Volume CD-ROM. 7 pp.
Nielsen, S. N., D. Frassinetti and K. Bandel. 2004. Miocene
Vetigastropoda and Neritimorpha (Mollusca, Gastropoda)
of Central Chile. Journal of South American Earth
Sciences 17: 73-88.
Riedel, F. 2000. Ursprung und Evolution der “héheren”
Caenogastr ypoda. Berliner Geowissenschaftliche Abhand-
lungen E32. 240 Pp
. Shuto, T. Takayama, I. Koizumi, A. Fujiyoshi, R.
Nomura, M. Ibaraki, H. Duque-C, R. Tirado-S, M.
Aldana-A, E. Villavicencio-R and R. Martinez-P. 1990.
Trans-Pacific correlation of Neogene geologic events.
Reports of Andean Studies, Shizuhoka University, Special
vol. 3: 1-7.
Zinsmeister, W, J. and M. Griffin, 1995, Late Cretaceous and
Tertiary aporrhaid etl es from the southern rim of
the Pacific Ocean. Journal of Paleontology 69: 692-702.
THE NAUTILUS 119(4):157-163, 2005
Page 157
Spawn of Amphissa sp. and Cosmioconcha sp. (Caenogastropoda:
Columbellidae) from the Colombian Caribbean
Patricia Miloslavich
Ana Karinna Carbonini
Departamento de Estudios Ambientales
Universidad Sim6n Bolivar
P.O. Box S9000
Caracas LOSO
VENEZUELA
Bogota D.C.
COLOMBIA
Juan Manuel Diaz
Instituto Alexander von Humboldt
Néstor E. Ardila
Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas
INVEMAR
Santa Marta, A.A. 1016
COLOMBIA
ABSTRACT
We describe the egg capsules and embryos of Amphissa sp. and
Cosmioconcha sp. collected in the Caribbean Sea off Colombia
between 20-160 m depth. Amphissa sp. had one layer of 24
egg capsules attached to the shell.
completely covered by several layers of egg capsules; only the
outer layer capsules contained embryos, the rest had the
escape aperture open. Egg capsules of both species were
translucent, dome-shaped, with an oval escape aperture at the
center of the dome top. The surface was smooth, with no ridges
nor sutures, and attached to the shell by an oval basal
membrane that was surrounded by a thin, irregular flange. Egg
capsules of Amphissa sp. measured 2 mm in diameter and
Cosmioconcha sp. was
contained 6 embryos/capsule at the gastrula stage; egg capsules
of Cosmioconcha sp. measured 1 mm in diameter and
contained 25 embryos/capsule at all stages of development
(eggs, trochophores, and veliger larvae). Gastrulae of Amphissa
sp. measured 750-900 {tm in length and development in this
species is probably direct. Uncleaved eggs of Cosmioconcha sp.
measured 150 tm in diameter, the ve liger had an operculum,
a transparent shell measuring 188-219 um in length, and
a small velum; hatching occurs as planktonic larvae. No nurse
eggs were observed in the two species but late cannibalism
among sibling embryos may occur in Cosmioconcha sp.
INTRODUCTION
The family Columbellidae is very diverse in number of
species in the Southern Caribbean. In this region, a total
of 13 genera (Columbella Lamarck, 1799; Rhombinella
Radwin, 1968; Amphissa H. and A. Adams, 1853;
Zafrona Tredale, 1916; Anachis H. and A. Adams,
1853: Nassarina Dall, 1889: Mitrella Risso, 1826:
Cosmioconcha Dall, 1913; Aesopus Gould, 1860; Deci-
pifus Olsson and McGinty, 1958: Mazatlania Dall, 1900;
Strombina Morch, 1852: Nitidella Swainson, 1840, and
Pyrene Réding, 1798) and more than 30 species have
been recorded (cf. Radwin, 1877 a, b; 1978; Costa,
2005): however, columbellid classification, as well as the
identity and interpretation of the characters that support
this classification, is not well resolved (DeMaintenon,
1999). The shells of these specie s are usually small and
fusiform, within a size range of 5 to 24 mm and the outer
lip usually bears denticles. The egg capsules and
reproduction of several species have been described
worldwide: Thorson (1940) summarized the different
forms of egg capsules found in species from the Iranian
Gulf, Knudsen (1950, 1995) described the egg capsules
and development of species of tropical West Africa and
the Azores, Amio (1957, 1963) described the eggs, larvae
and embryology of Japanese species, DAsaro (1970)
described the egg capsules of Panamanian Pacific
species, Marcus and Marcus (1962) described the
reproductive biology of several species from Brazil and
Fortunato et al. (1998) characterized the reproduction of
Bifurcium bicanaliferum (Sowerby, 1832) from the
Pacific coast of Panama. In the Caribbean region,
Bandel (1974) described the egg capsules of 10 species
of Columbellidae from Santa Marta, Colombia; Pench-
aszadeh et al. (1983) characterized the reproduction of
Mazatlania consentini Philippi, 1836 (as M. aciculata)
(Lamarck, 1822) and Cipriani and Penchaszadeh (1993)
that of Strombina francesae |. Gibson—Smith, 1974, and
Strombina pumilio (Reeve, 1859), all three from
Venezuela. Despite these studies, egg capsule morphol-
ogy and developmental mode is still inknow for most of
the recognized species.
Bandel (1974) distinguished 6 morphological groups
of columbellid egg capsules according to the material he
observed in Colombia and the literature. These are: (1)
shallow domes on a broad, irregularly rounded disk of
adhesion only extending on a narrow rim beyond the
capsule walls as in Mitrella ocellata (Gmelin, 1791)
reported as Mitrella argus (d@Orbigny, 1542), (2) cone
shaped capsule, i walls rise from the round adhesion
disk and end in a projecting edge forming a collar
around the pane aperture, which is concave as in
Costoanachis sparsa (Reeve, 1859), (3) cupola shaped
with a suture dividing the capsule in 2 halves, oval base
and the basal membrane extends in an irregular rim
beyond the capsule walls, the escape aperture is
asymmetrically located as in Columbella mercatoria
(Linnaeus, 1758), (4) flask shaped and oval or round at
the base, radial symmetry, the round adhesion disk is
smooth and transparent, the capsule is sculptured with
ridges as in Nitidella nitida (Lamarck, 1822), (5) brick
Page 158
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 4
76°0'00"W 74°0'00"W 72°0'00"W
N
Punta Gallinasg="85
Zz Ke Zz
8 = S}
f=) = (=)
w *_/N
~A
2 2
° i)
S S|
2 =
=
E-159..~
Puerto®
Escondido
Z COLOMBIA 5025 0 50 1002
EE
S km Ss
S 76°0'00"W 74°0'00"W 72°0'00"W
Figure 1.
Colombian Caribbean.
Map of the collecting localities in the
shaped egg capsules, escape aperture is absent as in
Anachis sp. and (6) oval shaped standing on a peduncle
as in Columbella tryngas Pils. A common spawning
feature among these species was that they attached the
egg capsules io hard substrates such as rocks, stems and
algae (Sargassum), aquarium walls and hydroid stalks.
deter spawning strategy found in the family involves
attaching the egg capsules to the shells of * conspecific
living adults, such is the case of Mazatlania consentini,
Strombina pumilio, S. francesae and Bifurcium bicana-
liferum (Penchaszadeh et al., 1983; Cipriani and
Penchaszadeh, 1993; Fortunato et al., 1998). There is
no report in the literature for the Columbellid family of
females using the shells of other living species as
a substrate for egg laying.
In this paper, we describe the egg capsules and
embryos of Amphissa sp. (Amphissa H. and Adams,
1853) and Cosmioconcha sp. (Cosmioconcha Dall, 1913)
two apparently yet undescribed species from the Colom-
bian Caribbean continental shelf. We also report on the
number of egg capsules spawned by individual females
and some reproductive parameters such as number and
size of embryos contained in the egg capsules.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
One specimen of Amphissa sp. and three specimens of
Cosmioconcha sp. were collected during 2001 by the
Colombian ship B/I ANcon during an expedition to the
Colombian Caribbean shelf (Figure 1). The specimen of
Amphissa sp. was collected at Puerto Escondido, station
E-159 at 158 m in muddy bottom (9°17' N, 76°26’ W),.
The three specimens of Cosmioconcha sp. were
collected at Punta Gallinas, station E-85 at 22 m depth
in muddy-sand bottom (12°27' N, 71°41’ W). Samples
were obtained by trawling for 10 minutes with a trawling
net type V measuring 12.7 m in total length and with
a mesh size of 10 mm (Marinovich Trawl Co, Inc, USA).
Samples were washed and separated in a 2 mm mesh
seine, observed alive and preserved in ethanol 70%. The
material of both species is deposited at the Museo de
Historia Natural Marina de Colombia (MHNMC),
INVEMAR, catalog numbers INV MOL3746 for Am-
phissa sp. and INV MOL5396 for Cosmioconcha sp.
The following reproductive aspects were studied: (1)
number and size of egg capsules attached to each specimen,
(2) number and size of embryos within each capsule and
(3) observation of the different stages of development.
RESULTS
The specimen of Amphissa sp. (Figure 2) measured
12.5 mm and5 mm in shell length and width respectively;
the protoconch of this species measured 480 um in length
and had two whorls. A seemingly related species is
A. acuminata (Smith, 1915) ont the southern West
Atlantic. Specimens of Cosmioconcha sp. (Figure 3)
measured between 11 and 12 mm in shell length and
between 4.5 and 5 mm in shell width: the protoconch
measured 570 um in length and had 3—3'% whorls. The
taxonomic status of this species has to be confirmed.
A total of 24 egg capsules were attached to the shell of
Amphissa sp. (Figure 4); these were arranged in one
layer and covered most of the shell. The three specimens
of Cosmioconcha sp. were completely covered by egg
capsules in several layers that added 3 mm to the size ‘of
the shell (from 5 to 8 mm) (Figure 5). The egg capsules
of the internal layers had no embryos aie ‘had their
escape apertures open; the closed ae containing
embryos were limited to the external layer (Table 1).
The egg capsules of Amphissa sp. (Figure 6) were
translucent, dome-shaped, with an oval escape aperture
located on the center of the dome top. The capsule
surface was smooth with no ridges nor sutures. They
were attached to the shell by an oval basal membrane
that was surrounded by a thin, irregular flange. Egg
capsules measured around 2mm in diameter and
contained around 6 gastrulae embryos in each capsule.
The egg capsules of ‘Cosioroicha sp. (Figure 7) were
very similar to those of Amphissa sp. but smaller,
measuring around 1mm in diameter and containing
around 25 embryos in each capsule at the three
developmental stages examined: eggs, trochophore, and
veliger larvae (T Table 2). No nurse eggs were observed.
The open egg capsules were filled with debris composed
of organic matter and muddy sediment. Between the egg
capsules, within the empty spaces, several specimens of
the genus Turbonilla were found.
All egg capsules of Amphissa sp. contained embryos in
the gastrulae stage in a number of six per capsule. The
gastrulae were yellow, elongated, measuring 750-
90 0 um in length and 600-660 tm in width (T. Table 3).
Each ege capsule of Cosmioconcha sp. contained
embryos in the same stage of development; however,
three different stages were identified in the spawn:
uncleaved eggs, trochophore and veliger larvae (Table 3)
P. Miloslavich et al., 2005 Page 159
Figures 2-5. Shells and attached egg capsules. 2. Adult shell of Amphissa sp. and detail of protoconch. Scale bar = 2 mm, detail =
200 um. 3. Adult shell of Cosmioconcha sp and detail of protoconch Scale bar = 2 mm, detail = 100 tm. 4. Adult shell of Amphissa
sp. covered by attached egg capsules. Scale bar = 2 mm. 5. Adult shell of Cosmioconcha sp. covered by attached egg capsules. Scale
bar = 2 mm. All photos taken from preserved material.
Empty embryonic shells were observed in a few capsules
Table 1. Cosmioconcha sp. Number of layers and summary of with embryos at the veliger stage. The uncleaved eggs
the attached egg capsules for each of the three specimens ;
measured 150 um in diameter and the trochophore
collected (ND = not determined HM |
measured 165-212 um in leneth. The veliger had an
operculum and was characterized by a transparent,
bo
s)
Specimen . ; ; oO nad xen
fragile shell measuring 188-219 um in length and 156
i 5] ; ; 194 um in width. The velum was small, measuring 144-
Teal ie i meee ee ee tee 494 219 um across from one lobe to the other and 31-94 um
otal number of attached capsules 537 775 A é : a ; ;
Total number of capsules in external laver ND 217 157 in height; the cilia of this velum were very small
Number of open empty capsules , 447 623 355 measuring 6-13 pm
Number of closed empty capsules 3 0) |
Number of closed capsules containing S6 152 108 WATT
ated : DISCUSSION
Sumber ope ‘ 5 0 é o ( .
Number of open c ipsules containing | 0 ) Amphissa sp aetna heen previously reported in the
mat
mbDryvos i 7
Colombian Caribbean; the sediment at the locality
Page 160
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 4
Figures 6-7.
500° ttm,
6. Egg capsule of
7. Ege capsule of
500 um. All photos taken from preserved material.
Amphissa sp. Scale bar =
Cosmioconcha sp. Scale bar
where the spe cimen was collected is muddy, suggesting
a broader habitat distribution for the s The shell
of this — resembles somewhat that of A. acuminata
spe cies.
(Smith, 1915), a southwestern Atlantic pe (Costa,
2005), but is not as slender and the whorls are
more rounded: the teleoconch consists of six rounded
whorls and the sculpture of uniform spiral lirae and
fine axial ribs, forming small rounded nodules at the
intersections; aperture narrow, suboval; outer lip a lit-
tle thickened exteriorly, with about five slender, short
lirae within. For a detailed description of A. acuminata,
see Simone and Leme (2001) and Costa (2005). The
living species apparently most closely related to Cosmio-
eonieha sp. is Costoanachis helenae Costa, 1983, whose
distribution range is apparently restricted to the
tropical sector of the Brazilian coast, from Amapa to
Rio de Janeiro, in depths ranging from 8 to 100 m (Rios,
1994; Costa, 2005). We compared the egg capsules of
Cosmioconcha sp. to those of C. helenae collected off
Boipeba, an island on coast of the Brazilian state of
Bahia (deposited at the Museu Nacional do Rio Janeiro,
MNRJ 1029). The specimen measured 11.9 mm_ in
length and 5.2 mm in width. Several spawning events
had occurred on this shell since there were two layers of
egg capsules, the external with about 30 and the internal
with about 15 capsules, a number considerably low-
er than the number of capsules found in our species
Table 2). The capsules were
very similar in shape to those of Cosmioconcha sp. but
their size was large rr; the “y me sasured 1.4 mm in length
and 1.3mm in width, and the aperture measur red
0.6 mm in length and 0.5 mm in width (n= 10 capsules
measured),
of Cosmioconcha (see
Cosmioconcha sp. was previously reported from the
Colombian Caribbean as Anachis cf. fraudans Jung,
1969, a very closely related form from the Miocene-
Pliocene of Trinidad (Diaz and Puyana, 1994). It also
resembles C. helenae (Costa, 1983) in shell size and
form, as well as in the number and form of embryonic
whorls. However, the latter has a more slender spire, the
upper half of its last whorl is sculptured with 11-18 axial
ribs and its shell color is pale brown with white spiral
bands (Costa, 2005). The last whorl of Cosmioconcha sp.
lacks axial ribs and the shell is pale yellow under the dark
brown periostracum. Costoanachis helenae has so far
been only recorded from the central Brazilian coast,
from Amapa to Rio de Janeiro (Rios, 1994; Costa, 2005).
The re productive strategy of spi awning or atte aching the
egg capsules to the adult shell of conspecifics is
comparable to the spawning of other Caribbean species
1983; Cipriani
However, it was not reported
found in Venezuela, (Penchaszadeh et al.,
and Penchaszadeh, 1993).
Table 2. Summary of the egg c apsule characteristics of Amphissa sp. and Cosmioconcha sp. Values represent mean + SD, numbers
in parenthesis indicate range (n = number of egg capsules measured)
Species Capsule Capsule Capsule Aperture Aperture Embryos
Shell length (mm length (mm) width (mm) height (mm) length (mm) width (mm) per capsule
\mphissa sp 22+0.1 2.0+0.01 0.8+0.2 0.90+0.04 O0.74£0.07 5.9+1.2 (4-8)
2.5 (2.0-2.4) (1.9-2.1) (0.6-1.0) (0.7S—0.93) (0.60—0.90) n=l)
n=18 n=18 n=18 n=1] n=11 (Gastrulae)
Cosmioconcha sp LI5*+0.15 LOL+#0.12 0.56£0.06 ).35+0.05 0.27+0.03 25.0+2.9 (19-31)
1-12 (O.75-1.5) (0.75-1.47) (O.24—0.50) (0.27-0.54) (0.02—0.02) n=23
n=63 n=63 n=62 n=62 n=62 (All stages)
P. Miloslavich et al., 2005
Page 16]
—
Table 3. Size of embryos of Amphissa sp. and Cosmioconcha sp. during intracapsular development. Values represent mean + SD
and are reported in Um, numbers in parenthesis indicate range (n
Species Egg Gastrula
Trochophore
= number of embryos measured).
Veliger Protoconch (in adult)
S40 474 (750-900)
n=6
Cosmioconcha sp. 150+0 —
n=16
Amphissa sp. —_—
189+19 (165-213)
n=4 n=7
500-600
200+ 14 (188-219) 570
for any of the 10 columbellid species studied by Bandel
(1974) in the Santa Marta region, which atti wched the egg
capsules to other hard substrates such as rocks, Sar assum
plants, stalks of hydroids and, when in captivity, to the
glass walls of the aquarium. There are no records in the
literature of columbellids spawning on the shells of other
species, a strategy that has been ‘observed in the sandy
beach gastropod Olivancillaria deshayesiana Ducros,
1857, from Argentina, which spawns the egg capsules on
the adult shells of Buccinanops monilifer Kiener, 1834,
and Buccinanops duartei Klappenbach, 1961, either
directly on the adult shell or on top of the egg capsules
of these species, which are also attached to the shell of
conspecific individuals (Borzone, 1985). The fact that
several lavers of egg capsules are found, as well as different
stages of embrvonic dev elopment and empty egg capsules,
on Cosmioconcha sp. suggests that several different events
of oviposition have occurred using this specimen as
substrate. Penchaszadeh et al. (1983) reported that
females of Mazatlania consentini (as M. aciculata) attach
their egg capsules to the shells of other individuals of the
population with shells larger than 9 mm, apparently
exclusively males, as shoven by histological sections of
the gonads of bearing individuals ( (Penchaszadeh, 1981).
Fortunato et al. (1998) stated that the egg masses of
Bifurcium bicanaliferum usually have several layers as
well, whereas those of the Venezuelan Caribbean
Strombina pumilio, S. francesae, and M. consentini have
only one layer of egg capsules attached to the shell as we
observed in Amphissa sp. Regarding this remarkable
difference in the number of egg capsules that a single
animal is bearing, we hypothesize that the egg capsules of
species that bear few of them on the shell arranged on
a single layer are easily detachable since they are usually
individually attached, as is the case in M. aciculata. In this
species, up to 20 egg capsules can be observed at the same
time on one single adult shell; these have embryos at
different stages of development. which means that not all
egg capst ules are spawned simultaneously. Once the
veliger larvae hatch, the empty capsule usually falls off
the shell, sometimes leaving only the basal membrane
attached to the shell, and new capsules are spawned
(Penchaszadeh, 1981). On the other hand, egg capsules of
species with several layers are more resistant since they are
attached not only to the adult shell by the basal membrane,
but also form a very compact structure of egg capsules
attached between them by lateral membranes (B.
bicanaliferum, Cosmioconcha sp.). As pointed out by
Pechenik (1986), gastropod egg capsules are structurally
and chemically complex, the different layers are composed
in general among and other components by protein and
carbohy drates (Bayne, 1968; Miloslavich, 1996: Rawlings,
1999). Hunt (1966) also reported that since the c -apsule
walls are extremely resistant to chemical treatment, the
protein and carbohy drate components should be strongly
linked in a glycoprotein complex and thus stabilized by
sclerotization. In this way, the bond between two egg
capsules is much stronger than the bond between an eg
capsule and a shell.
The description of the egg capsule of Amphissa sp. is
similar to the description i -d by Bandel (1974) for
Zafrona pulchella (cited as Anac his pulchella) in its
dome shape. However, ne. oe of Amphissa sp. lacks
the division into lower and upper parts separated from
each other by one or a few concentric rings, it does not
have a suture that continues the axis of the escape
aperture and the membrane is not striped nor wrinkled.
On the contrary, the surface is very smooth and only very
thin imperceptible lines are visible. A comparable
feature among both species is that the number of
embryos per ae was very similar and that no nurse
eggs nor cannibalism seem to occur.
The egg capsules of Cosmioconcha sp. also fit in the
first category of egg capsule morphology described by
Bandel (1974), a simple dome attached by a rounded
base. It is very similar to the capsule of Amphissa sp. but
half its size in length, width and height. This capsule
shape and general morphology are also comparable to
the two species of the Strombina group from the
Caribbean described by Cipriani and Penchaszadeh
(1993), which have about the same size than the capsules
of Amphissa sp., and to B. canaliferum trom the Pacific
coast of Panama described by Fortunato et al. (1998),
which has about the same size than the capsule of
Cosmioconcha sp.
No nurse eggs seem to be present in the two species
studied. In comparison to other columbellid gastropods,
the reproductive strategy of Amphissa sp. is similar to
that of S. francesae and S. ounaliss large egg capsules
(more than 2 mm in length), large eggs (more than
500 um) and few embryos (about 4 to 8) that hatch as
large crawling juveniles (larger than 0.9 mm). We did
not observe the hatching stage of Amphissa sp., but the
large size of the gastrula (about $40 um) indicates that it
Page 162
comes from a large egg which would most probably lead
to direct dev elopment as in the two species of Strombina
studied by Cipriani and Penchaszadeh (1993). On the
other hand, the reproductive strategy of Cosmioconcha
sp. is similar to that of Bifurcium bic -analife rum, Anachis
sparsa, and Cosmioconcha sertulariarum (d’Orbigny,
1839): small egg capsules (about 1 mm in length), small
eggs (about 140-200 ttm) and many embryos (more than
20) that hatch as small veliger larvae (about 300 Um)
(Fortunato et al., 1998: Marcus and Marcus, 1962). Late
cannibalism among sibling embryos inferred from the
presence of empty shells "inside a few egg capsules of
Cosmioconcha sp. has also been reported in B.
bicanaliferum by Fortunato et al. (1998). Although late
cannibalism might take place in the egg capsules of
Cosmioconcha sp., it is very unlikely that this limited
extraembryonic food source ‘will allow the larva to grow
from 200 ttm to 600 f1m, which is the protoconch size
found in the adult shell. It is most likely that
Cosmioconcha sp. will hatch as a veliger larva spending
some time in the plankton as is also the case of B.
bicanaliferum, which grows from 1.5 whorls to 2.5
whorls in the planktonic period (Fortunato et al., 1998).
In the case of Amphissa sp., we can conclude from the
size of its protoconch that this species must hatch as
a crawling juvenile since the gastrula stage is already as
large as the protoconch, a_ situation similar to what
happens with the two Strombina species from the
Venezuelan Caribbean studied by Cipriani and Pench-
aszadeh (1993).
We hope that in a near future, and thanks to the
collection efforts carried out by INVEMAR in the
southern Caribbean, more specimens will be collected.
This will not only allow for the proper description of
these species th rough use of traditional characters such
as those from aaule shell, anatomy, and radular
morphology, but may also help increase the number of
observations on egg capsules and the development of
other embryonic stages.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was partially supported by a Decanato de
Investigacion y Des sarrollo, Universidad Simon Bolivar
grant to the Grupo de Ciencias Marinas, by a FONACIT
(S1-2001-000764) grant to the first author. Material
collecting was possible through the “Macrofauna I and
I” projects funded by COLCIENCIAS and INVEMAR.
We are especially indebted to Paulo Marcio Costa,
Departamento de Invertebrados, Malacologia, Museu
Nacional, Rio de Janeiro, and Marta DeMaintenon,
University of Hawaii at Hilo for helping with the
problematic taxonomic status of our material. Paulo
Marcio Costa also provided us with one reproductive
specimen of Costoananchis helenae from Brazil for
comparative purposes. We also wish to thank Pablo
Penchaszadeh, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Natur-
ales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, for our fruitful
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 4
discussions in the subject and José L. Garcia Rondon,
Artis Publishers, for his invaluable help with the
photographs.
LITERATURE CITED
Amio, M. 1957. Studies on the eggs and larvae of marine
gastropods I. Journal of the Shimonoseki College of
Fisheries 7; 107-127.
Amio, M. 1963. A comparative embryology of marine
gastropods, with ecological considerations. Journal of the
Shimonoseki College of Fisheries 12: 231-357.
Bandel, K. 1974. Spawning and development of some
Columbellidae from the Caribbean Sea of Colombia.
The Veliger 16; 271-282.
Bayne, C. J. 1968. Histochemical studies of the egg capsules of
eight gastropod molluscs. Proceedings of the Malacologi-
eal Society of London 38: 199-212.
Borzone, C. A. 1995. Ovicapsulas de Prosobranquios (Mol-
lusca: Gastropoda) de una playa arenosa expuesta del sur
del Brasil. Iheringia, Série Zoologia 79: 47-58.
Cipriani, R. and P. Penchaszadeh. 1993. How does Strombina
reproduce? Evidence from two Venezuela species (Proso-
branchia: Columbellidae). The Veliger 36: 178-184.
Costa, F. H. A. 1983. Anachis helenae, nova espécie de
Columbellidae do litoral brasileiro (Mollusca: Gastro-
poda). Anais da Sociedade Nordestina de Zoologia 1:
95-99.
Costa, P. M. S. 2005. Estudo taxondmico dos representantes da
familia Columbellidae Swainson, 1840 (Mollusca, Caeno-
gastropoda) da costa brasileira. Doctoral Dissertation
(CD-ROM), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro,
Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro, 291 pp.
DeMaintenon, M. 1999. Phylogenetic analysis of the Colum-
bellidae (Mollusca: Neogastropoda) ) and the evolution of
herbivory from carnivory. Invertebrate Biology 115:
258-288.
Diaz, J. M. and M. Puyana. 1994. Moluscos del Caribe
Colombiano. Un Catalogo Hustrado. Colciencias-Funda-
cion Natura-INVEMAR, 291 pp.
Fortunato, H., P. E. Penchaszadeh and P. Miloslavich. 1998.
Observations on the reproduction of Bifurcium bicanali-
ferum (Sowerby, 1832) (Gastropoda: Columbellidae:
Strombina group) from the Pacific Coast of Panama.
The Veliger 41: 208-211.
Hunt, S. 1966. Carbohydrate and amino-acid composition of
the egg capsule of the whelk Buccinum undatum L.
Nature 210: 436-437.
Knudsen, J. 1950. Egg capsules and development of some
marine prosobranchs from Tropical West Africa. Atlantide
Report 1: 85-130.
Knudsen, J. 1995. Observations on reproductive strategy and
zoogeography of some marine prosobranch gastropods
(Mollusca) from the Azores. Agoreana, Supplement:
135-158.
Marcus, E. and E. Marcus. 1962. Studies on Columbellidae.
Boletim da Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciéncias e Letras, S40
Paulo, 24; 335-354.
Miloslavich, P 1996 Biochemical composition of prosobranch
ege capsules. Journal of Molluscan Studies 62; 133-135,
Pechenik, J. A. 1956. The encapsulation of eggs and embryos
by molluscs: an overview. American Malacological Bulle-
tin 4: 165-172.
P. Miloslavich et al., 2005
Page 163
Penchaszadeh, P. E. 1981. Estudios sobre modalidades
reproductivas de gasteropodos prosobranquios del Caribe
Sur. Trabajo de Ascenso a Profesor Titular de la
Universidad Simon Bolivar, Caracas, 101 pp. (Unpub-
lished work.)
Penchaszadeh, P. E., G. De Mahieu, V. Farache and M. E.
Lera. . Ecology of the sandy beach gastropod Mazatlania
aciculata in Quizandal (Carabobo, Venezuela). In: McLa-
chlan, A. and) = T. Erasmus (eds.). Sandy beaches as
ecosystems. Proceedings of the First International Sym-
posium on Sandy Beaches, South Africa, Junk Publishers,
pp. 655-660.
Radwin, G. E. 1977a. The family Columbellidae in the Western
Atlantic. The Veliger 19: 403-417.
Radwin, G. E. 1977b. The family Columbellidae in’ the
Western Atlantic. Part Ha. The Pyreninae. The Veliger
20; 119-133.
Erratum
Radwin, G. E. 1978. The family Columbellidae in the Western
Atlantic. Part Ib. The Pyreninae (continued). The Velige:
20; 328-344,
Rawlings, T. A. 1999, Adaptations to physical stresses in the
intertidal zone: The egg capsules of neogastropod
molluses. American Zoologist 39: 230-243.
Rios, E. C. 1994. Seashells of Brazil. 2" edition. Universidade
do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, 368 pp. 113 pls.
Simone, L. R. L. and J. Lo M. Leme. 2001. Anatomia
comparativa e sistematica de Amphissa acuminata e
Amphissa cancellata (Gastropoda, Caenogastropoda, Co-
lumbellidae) da costa sudeste do Brasil. Cadernos do
Centro Universitario Sao Camilo, Sao Paulo, 7(2):
105-114.
Thorson, G. 1940. Studies on the egg masses and_ larval
development of gastropods from the Iranian Gulf. Danish
Scientific Investigations in Iran. Copenhagen, 2: 159-235.
Due to an editorial lapse in the latest article by Cristian Ituarte (2005), please substitute the last sentence in the
Etymology section (page 97, right-hand column, lines 24, 25) as follows:
Replace *..., which underwent a major cultural change during the past 10,000 years.”
For: *..., which has been a major pathway for cultural exchange during the past 10,000 years.”
LITERATURE CITED
Ituarte, C. 2005. The Sphaeriidae (Bivalvia) from northwestern Argentina including three new species of Pisidium. The Nautilus 119:
93-104.
THE NAUTILUS 119(4):164—168, 2005
Page 164
Pterorytis pacanana new species (Gastropoda: Muricidae):
circumstantial evidence for late Pliocene El Nifio events in
southern Peru
Thomas J. DeVries!
Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture
University of Washington
Seattle, WA 98195 USA
ABSTRACT
Pterorytis pacanana new species was discovered in upper
Pliocene bioclastic sandstone near Chala, southern Peru.
Although it was found farther south than other Pterorytis
species from the eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean, P. pacanana
most resembles P. roxaneae Petuch, 1994, from the Pliocene
Pinecrest beds of Florida. Its presence among endemic
late Pliocene cool-water mollusks from high-energy shoreface
paleoenvironments is thermally anomalous in the same sense
as the rare occurrence of other species from northern Peru
and Ecuador in upper Pliocene and Pleistocene strata
from southern Peru. By analogy with modern thermally
anomalous mollusks that appear episodic lly off the coast of
southern Peru and Chile, the Pliocene and Pleistocene
examples are circumstantial evidence for the occasional south-
ward incursion of warm equatorial waters during former E]
Nino events.
INTRODUCTION
Pliocene ee in southern Peru are noted for a variety
of muricid gastropods, most belonging to genera still
represented ‘by extant species (e.g., Ac anthina Fischer
von Waldheim, 1807; Chorus Gray, 1847; Concholepas
Lamarck, 1801; Crassilabrum Jousseaume, 1880; Mur-
egina Vermeij, 1998; Stramonita Schumacher, 1517;
Xanthochorus Fischer, 1854), but some from genera
entirely or locally extinct (e.g., Herminespina DeVries
and Vermeij, 1997; Trophon, Montfort, IS10) (DeVries,
1995, 1997, 2000, 2003, in press a, in press b: DeVries
and Vermeij, 1997).
muricids are not exceedingly difficult to find.
Specimens of most Pliocene
A well-preserved muricid from Pliocene bioclastic
sandstone south of Chala is, literally, the rare exception.
None have been found other than a single shell plucked
from a roadeut of the Panamerican Highway that
overlooks Playa Huacllaco. The lamellar fimbriate
varices of the Huacllaco specimen invite comparison
with ocenebrines from Ecuador, the southeastern
Mailing address: P.O. Box 13061, Burton, WA 98013 USA
United States, and the northwestern Pacific Ocean. Its
lone appearance in a collection of endemic cool-water
muricids is another example of a thermally anomalous
molluscan species encountered in upper Pliocene and
Pleistocene beds of southern Peru (Muizon and
DeVries, 1985; DeVries, 1986; Ortlieb et al., 1990). A
reasonable hypothesis is that these equatorial species
were introduced to higher austral latitudes by warm-
water incursions during the Pliocene and Pleistocene
comparable to modern incursions that carry Panamic
molluscan larvae poleward during El Nifio events
(DeVries, 1988; Arntz and Tarazona, 1990; Paredes et
al., 1998).
GEOLOGY
Bioclastic sandstone and gravel and balanid coquina
overlie igneous basement in roadcuts along a series of
sweeping curves in the Panamerican Highw ay where it
descends towards the beach at Play a Huacllaco
(Figure 1). The sediments represent high- energy fore-
shore and _ intertidal paleoenvironments that once
flanked steep cliffs. The section, previously published
\
fe)
Playa
Huacllaco
Figure I.
(DV 1628).
Type locality of Plerorytis pacanana new species
T. J. DeVries, 2005
Page 165
Figures 2-8. Pterorytis species. 2, 3, 5. salve pacanana new species. Upper Pliocene. Holotype, UWBM 97772, length =
30. 9 mm, width = 19.6 mm. 2. Apertural view.
3. Abapertural view. 5. Oblique view of spire. 4, 6-8. Prer rorytis roxaneae Petuch,
1994. Upper Pliocene. Holotype, Florida Museum of Natural History, Gainesville, UF 66254, length = =
3.3 mm, width = 21.5 min.
4. Lateral view. 6. Apertural view. 7. Abapertural view. 8. Oblique view of spire.
by DeVries (2003), consists of four stratigraphic units.
The ocenebrine specimen was found at the base of Unit
IH, just below strata where rounded clasts of blackened
andesite first appear in great numbers and below beds
where specimens of Concholepas and Acanthina acquire
their modern form (DeVries, 2000, 2003).
The age of the Huacllaco beds is bracketed by basal
beds with specimens of Concholepas nodosa Hupé,
1854, Acanthina triangularis DeVries, 2003, and Her-
minespina mirabilis (Mericke. 1896), which collectively
indicate an early late Pliocene age (DeVries and
Frassinetti, 2003), and the uppermost and oldest of
several marine terraces, whose elevation and largely
extant taxa suggest a latest Pliocene age (Muizon and
DeVries, 1985).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The specimen from Peru described in this study was
found by the author. Dimensions affected by breakage
are enclosed by parentheses. The holotype is deposited
at the University of Washington’s Burke Museum of
Natural History and Culture in Seattle, Washington
(UWBM).
SYSTEMATICS
Family Muricidae Rafinesque, 1S15
Subfamily Ocenebrinae Cossmann, 1903
Genus Pterorytis Conrad, 1862
Subgenus Pterorytis sensu stricto
Type Species: © Murex umbrifer Conrad, 1832, by
monotypy.
Pterort ae yaeaane new species
(Figures 2, 3, 5)
Diagnosis: Shell small; texture waxy, shell thin. Five
lamellar, fimbriate varices; intervarical nodes absent.
Three spiral cords; shoulder spiral cord strong. Sutural
platform horizontal. Labral tooth absent.
Description: Shell 30.9 mm long (first teleoconch
whorls missing), quadrate in profile, very thin, with
waxy texture. Spire estimated to be about 40 percent of
shell length. Siphonal canal about 20-25 percent of shell
length. Protoconch and earliest teleoconch whorls
missing. Upper sides of whorls planar, vertical; base of
body whorl sharply constricted. Shoulder orthogonally
Page 166
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 4
angulate, sutures deeply impressed; sutural platform
hareonte! to slightly concave. Three last whorls with five
lamellar varices "extending from fasciolar ridge to suture,
each varix joining across suture with varix of previous
whorl. Lamellae broader basally, narrower adapically,
extended adapically at shoulder but not spinose;
fimbriate on adapertural face; erect or recurved
adaperturally except apertural lamellae, which is weakly
recurved ae rturally. Intervarical nodes absent. Spiral
sculpture of prominent but ill-defined rounded primary
cord at shoulder angulation and two additional broad low
spiral cords anteriorly, almost obsolete. Additional broad
low secondary cords barely visible adjacent to adaper-
tural face of varices. Lamellar fimbria slightly extended
at intersection with primary spiral cords. Aperture with
inverted tear-drop shape. Parietal rib, anal sulcus absent;
parietal area unexcavated. Columella smooth, inner lip
very weakly concave, adherent anteriorly. Outer lip
without dentition on inner edge. Labral tooth absent.
Siphonal canal open, slightly recurved to right. Siphonal
fasciole strongly arched, without rostrae. Peewde: umbi-
licus narrow, extending adapically beyond siphonal
canal.
Holotype: UWBM 97772, DV 1628-5, lower Upper
Pliocene, length (30.9) mm, width 19.6 mm.
Type Locality: —Roadcut along the Panamerican High-
way, 10 km south of Chala, on a winding descent from
a 200 m elevation terrace towards Playa Huacllaco,
locality DV 1628, north side of first sweeping outside
curve from base of outcrop, south side of road, near
outcrop of igneous basement rock (Figure 1), 15°52" S,
74°10’ W (Chala 1:100,000 quadrangle).
Occurrence: Upper Pliocene, southern Peru.
Etymology: ‘Paca, Quechua for ‘high, and ‘nan,
Quechua for ‘path, referring to the horizontal to
concave sutural platform bordered above and below by
vertical walls of the whorls.
Remarks: Pterorytis or Ocinebrellus Jousseaume,
1880, is the most appropriate genus in which to place
the Huacllaco specimen, which has five varices on at
least the last three whorls, consistent with the three to
nine varices observed on fossil Atlantic species of
Pterorytis (Emerson, 1959; Vermeij, 2001), the four to
five varices on the modern eastern Pacific Pterorytis
hamatus (Hinds, 1844) (Emerson, 1985), and three to
twelve varices on specimens of Ocinebrellus (Amano and
Vermeij, 199Sa). The ocenebrine genera Ceratostoma
Herrmannsen, 1846, Pteropurpura Jousseaume, 1580,
and Mic rorhytis Emerson, 1959, in contrast, have three
prominent lamellar varices on all or at least the last two
whorls (Vermeij and Vokes, 1997; Amano and Vermeij,
1998a, 199Sb). Specimens of Ceratostoma, Pteropur-
pura, Microrhytis, and some Ocenebra Gray, 1547, also
have intervarical nodes, which are absent on the
Huacllaco specimen and specimens of Pterorytis and
Ocinebrellus.
The absence of a closed siphonal canal does not argue
against assignment of the single Huacllaco specimen to
Pterorytis or Ocinebrellus, since juvenile and some adult
specimens of the two genera may have an open siphonal
canal. The Peruvian specimen, itself partly abraded,
might be a juvenile specimen or have a broken siphonal
canal.
Distinguishing Pterorytis from Ocinebrellus for place-
ment of the "Huacllace specimen is problematic.
Ocinebrellus has four primary spiral cords on the swollen
portion of the body whorl, posterior to the labral tooth, if
present (Vermeij and Vokes, 1997; Amano and Vermeij,
1998a). Pterorytis and the Huacllaco specimen have
three primary spiral cords, with an additional weak
primary spiral between the shoulder and suture. On
smoother specimens of both genera the number of
primary spiral cords can be diff sulk to enumerate, and
on strongly sculptured specimens the distinction be-
tween primary and secondary spiral cords is unclear if
the ontogeny is unknown.
Other features are equally unsatisfactory for distin-
guishing the two genera. The reflection of lamellar
varices is not reliable, since the lamellae may be
adaperturally reflected, or not, in Ocinebrellus (Amano
and Vermeij, 1998a), abaperturally reflected or erect in
Pterorytis (Vermeij and Vokes, 1997), and erect or
reflected in either direction on the Huacllaco specimen.
The angularity of the shoulder also fails as a distinguish-
ing character. Most specimens of Ocinebrellus have an
angulate shoulder and a horizontal sutural platform (as is
ee case for the Huacllaco specimen), but some have
rounded shoulders. Most specimens of Pterorytis have
broad, planar, steeply sloping sutural platforms, but
some have narrower, less inclined sutural platforms
more like those of typical Ocinebrellus and the
Huacllaco specimen.
The presence or absence of a labral tooth is not
diagnostic. Some ocenebrines acquire a labral tooth only
in adulthood; the Huacllaco specimen might be a juve-
nile. Species of Pterorytis that normally have a tooth (P.
umbrifer Conrad, 1832; P. fluviana Dall, 1890) have
specimens lacking a tooth. Specimens of P. roxaneae
Petuch, 1994, never have a labral tooth (Vermeij and
Vokes, 1997). Species of Ocinebrellus (sensu Amano and
Vermeij, 199Sa) that normally lack a labral tooth have
specimens with a tooth. (In the more restrictive
classification of Houart and Sirenko (2003), species of
Ocinebrellus do not have a labral tooth.)
Taking into account this taxonomic ambiguity, the
Huacllaco specimen is assigned to Pterorytis. a cies of
Pterorytis (P. umbrifer, P. fluv iana, P. roxaneae) typically
have smooth-shelled variants such as the spe cimen from
Huacllaco. Most specimens of Pterorytis, like the
Huacllaco specimen, feature a prominent primary spiral
cord at the shoulder, but nonetheless usually lac k spines
or angulations typically seen in specimens of Ocineb-
rellus.
Pliocene Ecuadorian specimens assigned to Ocineb-
rellus by Vokes (1988) are smooth, have a prominent
T. J. DeVries, 2005
Page 167
shoulder spiral bordering an inclined sutural platform,
and have varices that are only weakly angulate; they may
be referred to Pterorytis ecuadoria (Olsson, 1964). They
have a more fusiform profile and greater number of
varices than the Huacllaco specimen.
The specimen of Pterorytis pacanana most closely
resembles specimens of the Pliocene Pterorytis (Pteror-
ytis) roxaneae Petuch, 1994, (Figures 4, 6-S) from
the Pliocene Pinecrest beds of Florida (Vermeij and
Vokes, 1997). Specimens of both species are thin with
a waxy texture, have reduced spiral sculpture, and lack
a labral tooth. Pinecrest specimens differ from the
Huacllaco specimen in having four varices, not five,
varical lamellae that are buenas adapically, not abapi-
cally, and a weak peripheral spiral cord bordering
a sloping sutural platform, rather than the strongly
defined horizontal sutural seeee of P. pacanana.
Contrary to Vermeij and Vokes (1997), the holotype of P.
roxaneae is neither excessively worn nor lacking the
labral varix.
DISCUSSION
Pterorytis pacanana is the third or fourth species of
Pterorytis recognized in the eastern Pacific Ocean, after
P. ecuadoria (Pliocene, Ecuador), P. hamatus (Recent,
northern Peru [Alamo and Valdivieso, 1997], a species
with a protoconch unlike that of Ocinebrellus or any
other ocenebrine [R. Houart, personal communication,
2005]), and an unnamed Recent ocenebrine from
northern Peru (Radwin and D’Attilio, 1976). These taxa
define an eastern tropical Pacific complement to a clade
of Pterorytis species from the southeastern United States
whose oldest members date to the late Miocene.
Ocinebrellus, which may be endemic to the northwest-
em Pacific (Amano and Vermeij, 1998a; Houart and
Sirenko, 2003), extends back to the Early or Middle
Miocene. Ocinebrellus seems morphologically more
similar to Pterorytis than other ocenebrine clades, but
the trail of fossil species that might lead from Japanese
Ocinebrellus to Panama and the Caribbean and beyond
to Peruvian and Floridian Pterorytis has yet to be
discovered (Amano and Vermeij, 1998a).
The specimen of Pterorytis pacanana from 16°S is
remarkable for its singular occurrence and equatorial
affinity. Associated taxa “(Table 1) are entirely endemic or
cool-water species that became prevalent after a pro-
vincial mid-Pliocene extinction that coincided with
a global cooling event (Dowsett et al., 1996; DeVries,
2001). The rare appearance of Pterorytis in southern
Peru resembles that of a mangrove bivalve, Anadara cf.
A. grandis (Broderip and Sow erby, 1829), whose speci-
mens are found in small numbers in uppermost Pliocene
beds at 15°30’ S with cool-water species (Muizon and
DeVries, 1985: DeVries, 1986). In a more recent
example, specimens of Chione broggi (Pilsbry and
Olsson. 1943) and Cerithium stercusmuscarum Valenci-
ennes, 1833, both living today only as far south as the
Table 1. Molluscan species associated with Pterorytis paca-
nana, new species, which was found at the base of Unit II of
the Upper Pliocene beds above Playa Huacllaco, Peru
= Extinct).
Unit ILIV (younger)
Acanthina unicornis (Bruguiére, 1789)
Cancellaria buccinoides Sowerby, 1832
Choromytilus chorus (Molina, 1782)
Chorus grandis (Philippi, 1887) / C. giganteus (Lesson,
1546)
Concholepas camerata DeVries, 2000
Concholepas concholepas (Bruguiére, 1789)
Crassilabrum crassilabrum (Sowerby, 1834)
Crepidula dilatata (Lamarck, 1822)
Eurhomalea lenticularis (Sowerby, 1835)
Glycymeris ovata (Broderip, 1843)
Mesodesma donacium (Lamarck, 1818)
Mulinia edulis (King, 1831)
Oliva peruviana Lamarck, 1811
Piscoacritia new species
Prisogaster niger (Wood, 1828)
Sinum cymba (Menke, 1828)
Xanthochorus cassidiformis (Blainville, 1832)
Unit I+II (older)
Acanthina triangularis DeVries, 2003
Acmaeids
* Chlamys cf. C. vidali (Philippi, 1887)
Choromytilus chorus (Molina, 1782)
Chorus grandis (Philippi, 1887)
Concholepas camerata DeVries, 2000
Concholepas nodosa (Méricke, 1896)
Fissurella spp.
Herminespina mirabilis (Moricke, 1896)
Lithophaga sp.
Piscoacritia collapsa DeVries and Hess, 2004
Stramonita new species
Tegula (Chlorostoma) new species
Xanthochorus buxeus (Broderip, 1833)
Xanthochorus new species
Sechura coastline of northern Peru (5°S) (Alamo and
Valdivieso, 1997), are occasionally found in upper
Pleistocene terrace deposits near San Juan de Marcona
(15°20'S), Saeaco (15 ae and Ilo (17°40'S) (DeVries,
1986, 1988: Ortlieb et al., 1990). Ortlieb et al. (1990)
proposed that the late Pleistocene thermally anomalous
species were introduced southward from equatorial
latitudes during El Niho events. Several such immigra-
tions of equatorial mollusks have been documented
during modern El Ninos events (Arntz and Tarazona,
1990: Paredes et al., 1998). The rare Pliocene equatorial
species in southern Peru were probably introduced in
the same manner.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to thank Brandur Karlsson of Reykjavik,
Iceland, for his assistance in the field and Greg Herbert
(University of South Florida) for helpful discussions on
Page 168
ocenebrine taxonomy. J. Vermeij and R. Houart
provided helpful tee in their reviews of the
manuscript.
LITERATURE CITED
Alamo, V. and V. Valdivieso. 1997. Lista sistematica de
moluscos marinos del Pert. Instituto del Mar del Peru,
Callao, 183 pp.
Amano, K. and G. J. Vermeij. 1998a. Taxonomy and evolution
of the genus Ocinebrellus Sea Re Muricidae) in
Japan. Paleontological Research 2: 199-212.
Amano, K. and G. J. Vermeij. 1998b. Origin and biogeographic
history of Ceratostoma (Gastropoda: Muricidae). Venus
57: » 209— 993.
Arntz, W. A. Fr J. Tarazona. 1990. Effects of El Nifio 1982-
1983 on benthos, fish, and fisheries off the South
American Pacific coast. In: P. W. Cat (ed.) Global
ecological consequences of the 1982-1983 El Nino-
Southern Oscillation. Elsevier: Amsterdam, pp. 323-360.
DeVries, T. J. 1986. The geology si paleontology of tablazos
in northwest Peru. Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State
University: Columbus, 964 pp.
DeVries, T. J. 1988. A review of geological evidence for ancient
El Nino activity in Peru. Journal of Geophysical Research
(Oceans) 92(C13): 14471-14479.
DeVries, T. J. 1995. Cone tholepas Lamarck, 1801 (Neogastro-
poda: Muricoidea): A Neogene genus native to South
America. The Veliger 38: 254-297.
DeVries, T. J. 1997. A review of the genus Chorus Gray, 1847
(Gastropode i: Muricidae) from western South America.
Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology 30; 125-147.
DeVries, T. J. 2000. Two new Neogene species and the
evolution of labral teeth in — oe Lamarck, 1801
(Neogastropoda: Muricoidea). The Veliger 43: 43-50,
DeVries, T. J. 2001. Contr isting patterns of Pliocene and
Pleistocene extinctions of marine mollusks in western
North and South America. Geological Society of America,
Abstracts with Programs 33(3): A-35,
DeVries, T. J. 2003. Ac cantina Fischer von Waldheim, 1807
(Gastropoda: Muricidae), an ocenebrine genus endemic to
South America. The see 46; 332-350.
DeVries, T. J. a. (In press). The Late Cenozoic history of
Xanthochorus Fischer, 1884 (Gastropoda: Muricidae) in
western South America. The Veliger.
DeVries, T. J. b. (In press). Late Cenozoic Muricidae from
Peru: Seven new species and a biogeographic summary.
The Veliger.
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 4
DeVries, T. J. and C. D. Frassinetti. 2003. Range extensions
and biogeographic implications of Chilean Neogene
mollusks Peay in Peru. Boletin del Museo de Historia
Natural, Chile 52; 141-157.
DeVries, T. J. and G. J. Vermeij. 1997. Herminespina: New
genus of Neogene muricid gastropod from Peru and
Chile. Journal of Paleontology 71: 610-615.
Dowsett, H., J. Barron and R. Poore. 1996. Middle Pliocene
sea surface temperatures: a global reconstruction. Marine
Micropaleontology 27: 13-2
Emerson, W. k. 1959. The gastropod genus Pterorytis.
American Museum Novitates 1974: 1-8.
Emerson, W. K. 1985. Murex hamatus Hinds, 1844, a living
West American species assigned to the Neogene paciphile
genus, Pterorytis Conrad (Gastropoda: Muricidae). The
Nautilus 99: 14— —
Houart, R. and B. I. Sirenko, 2003. Review of the Recent
species of Soinebra Gray, 1847 and Ocinebrellus
Jousseaume, 1880 in the northwest Pacific. Ruthenica
13: 53-74.
Muizon, C. de and T. J. DeVries. 1985. Geology and
paleontology of the Pisco Formation in the area of Sacaco,
Peru. Geologische Rundschau 74(3): 547-563.
Ortlieb, L., T. DeVries and A. Diaz. 1990. Ocurrencia de
Chione broggi (Pilsbry and Olsson, 1943) (Pelecypoda) en
depositos litorales Cuaternarios del sur del Peri: Im-
plicaciones paleoceanograficas. Boletin de la Sociedad
Geologica del Perti $1; 127-134.
Paredes, C., J. Tarazona, E. Canahuire, L. Romero, O. Cornejo
and F, Cardozo. 1998. Presencia de moluscos tropicales
de Ja provincia panamena en la costa central del Pert y su
relacion con los eventos “El Nino”. Revista Peruana De
Biologia (Universidad Nacional Mayor De San Marcos)
5(2): 123-128.
Petuch, E. J. 1994. Atlas of Florida Fossil Shells. Chicago
Spectrum Press, Evanston, 394 pp. :
Radwin, G. E. and A. D’Attilio. 1976. Murex Shells of the
World. Stantord University Press, Stanford, 254 pp.
Vermeij, G. J. 2001. Innovation and evolution at the edge:
origins and fates of gastropods with a labral tooth:
Biologic: ul Journal of the Linnean Society 72: 461-508.
Vermeij, G. J. and E. H. Vokes. 1997. Cenozoic Muricidae of
the western Atlantic region. Part XIE - the subfamily
Ocenebrinae (in part). Tulane Studies in Geology and
Paleontology 29: 69-115.
Vokes, E. H. 1988. Muricidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda) of the
Esmeraldas beds, northwestern Ecuador, Tulane Studies
in Geology and Paleontology 21: 1-50.
THE NAUTILUS 119(4):169-173, 2005
Page 169
A new species of Falsimargarita (Gastropoda: Vetigastropoda:
Trochidae) from the South Atlantic Ocean
Eliézer de Carvalho Rios
Museu Oceanografico
Fundagao Universidade de Rio Grande
Cx. Postal 379
96200-970 Rio Grande
BRAZIL
Sao Paulo
Cx. Postal 42494
BRAZIL
04299-970 Sao Paulo
F F e l
Luiz Ricardo L. Simone
Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de
ABSTRACT
A new trochid species, Falsimargarita stephaniae, is described
from about 1200 m depth off the Malvinas (Falkland) Islands,
South Atlantic Ocean. The new species is distinguished from
the most similar congeneric ones by its excee -dingly large spiral
cords located only along the periphery of its chouldeved whorls.
A re-hydrated specimen allowed for the description of some
details of the anatomy of the new species, including head-foot,
buccal mass, and radula.
INTRODUCTION
Representatives of the trochid genus Falsimargarita
Powell, 1951, can be distinguished by shell diarapters
such as external iridescence, well-defined spiral whorls,
strong spiral sculpture, opened umbilicus, and thin shell
wall. The genus encompasses five species occurring in
the cold or freezing deep waters off Antarctica and “the
Magellanic region of South America. The taxon was
more recently revised by Dell (1990), who outlined the
diagnostic characters of the genus and described two
species. :
The analysis of a specimens collected by a boat deep-
fishing for king crab and tuna rev ealed the presence of
the new species. This paper is part of a larger project of
revision of western Atlantic molluscan species, which at
the moment is focused on the study of deep-sea trochids.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A single specimen with dry soft parts was available for
study. Dry soft parts were carefully removed and re-
hy drated in physiological solution and 3—4 drops of KOH
20% for 3 h, then transferred to 70% ETOH. Only the
* Author for correspondence
head-foot was adequately extracted. The dissection was
performed with the specimen immersed under the
fixative, in a stereomicroscope. All drawings were done
under camera lucida. The radula was removed and
cleaned in a boiling solution of KOH for 1 h, then
cleaned by sonication in water. The examination was
done under a Zeiss electron microscope at the
Laboratorio de Microscopia Eletrénica of Museu de
Zoologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo.
Institutional abbreviations used in this article are:
MORG, Museu Oceanografico da Fundagao Universi-
dade de Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brazil; MZSP, Museu
de Zoologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo,
Brazil.
SYSTEMATICS
Genus Falsimargarita Powell, 1951
Type species: Margarites gemma Smith, 1915; by
original designation, Antarctica.
Falsimargarita stephaniae new species
(Figures 1-12)
Diagnosis: Shell with broad spire, 5 prominent large
and tall spiral cords restrict to periphery; umbilicus
protected by strong plate.
Description: SHELL of medium size (16.6 mm), tro-
choid to turbiform, whitish, iridescent-gray to pale-
reddish; wall relatively thin, light. Protoconch of one
smooth, glossy whorl. Separation protoconch-teleoconch
poorly detned! Spire with 3.5 teleoconch whorls; each
whorl highly convex, relatively high and shouldered;
superior half weakly descendent, sculj stured by 6-7 low
and narrow spiral and numerous axial lee »5, both e qually
predominating; inferior half abruptly descendent, sculp-
SE SSE
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 4
Figures 1-5.
larger diameter 16.6 mm). 5. Operculum, outer view
tured by five strong and promiment spiral cords, two
adapical ancl one abapical cords clearly larger latter cord
coinciding with suture; smooth area bearing only growth
lines present between cords of abapical halt ol whorl
Body whorl about twice spire width, sculptured with five
strong spiral cords that continue unchanged from spire;
five spiral cords restricted to periphery area of body
vhorl: base s« ulptured with 15 spiral lines successively
and gradually broader and more spaced toward umbi-
licus. Body whorl well separated from umbilicus by
viral cord almost ral low Carlilla i mbilicus open
Falsimargarita stephaniae new species. 1-4. Shell of holotype, apertural, abapertural, apical
deep, surface with s
like
from
expansion of t
umbilicus \p
slightly deflected o
adapical half marke
body whorl ho cal
thin, with
sculpture
Heap-roor: Total
whorl. Head protru
head-foot volume
small pr
Snout with about “4 of
and umbilical views
imple srowth lines: a strong plate-
he inner lip separates this latter
erture rounded, ample. Inner lip
1 abapical half, somewhat thick;
cd only by thin glazed area on
lus present Outer lip rounded,
ojections corresponding to spiral
ength about “> length of last shell
ded, occupying about 3 of total
foot size,
E. C. Rios and L. R. L. Simone, 2005
age 17]
Figures 6-11. Falsimargarita stephaniae new species. 6. Buccal mass, ventral view, ventral wall opened longitudinally along
median line and deflected to expose jaws. Scale bar = 1 mm. 7-8. Left jaw plate, outer and inner views. Scale bar = 0.5 mm. 9-11.
Radula. 9. General view; 10. Detail of central and lateral teeth. Scale bars = 100 ttm. 11. Detail of lateral teeth, arrow indicating
fifth lateral tooth. Scale bar = 50 um. Abbreviations: jw, jaw; mo, mouth; od, odontophore; ra, radula; rs, radular sac
cylindrical, broad; distal surface flattened, fully covered
with small papillae: each papilla cylindrical, tip rounded:
mouth central. Tentacles long (about twice snout
length), narrow, tip rounded. Ommatophore with about
¥ of tentacle length and approximately with same width;
located just posterior to tentacles: eyes dark, on
ommatophore tips. Foot occupying about 74 of head-
foot volume. Mesopodium constituting most of foot,
outline somewhat triangular; sole flat, simple; anterior
furrow of pedal glands bordered by thick margins,
restricted anteriorly, not protruding beyond lateral
edges. Epipodium divided into two apparently symmet-
rical lateral flaps. covering entire dorsal surface of
mesopodium, from snout base to opercular pad; bearing
eight pairs of long epipodial tentacles projecting about
twice longer than epipodial width, each tentacle pro-
truding on ventral but not on dorsal epipodial surface;
each epipodial tentacle bearing papillae at ventral
surface of basal region; papillae increasing in number
and size toward middle tentacles; some epipodial
tentacular papillae bifid at tip. Opercular pad with
edges as continuation of epipodium. Columellar muscle
thick, encompassing a half whorl
OpercuLuM: Circular, horny, multispiral: nucleus
central; occupying entire shell aperture
Dicestive System: Buccal mass somewhat larger than
snout internal space. Buccal cavity having a pair of very
large, dark-brown jaw plates, outline somewhat ellipt
are. 179
Page 172
THE NAUTILUS, Vol. 119, No. 4
Falsimargarita stephaniae new species. Head-
foot, ventral to slightly lateral right view, epipodium deflected
upward. Scale bar = 1 mm. Abbreviations: ep, epipodium; et,
epipodial tentacle; fs, foot (mesopodium) sole; he, head; mo,
mouth; om, ommatophore; pg, anterior furrow of pedal glands;
sn, snout; te, cephalic tentacle.
Figure 12.
both jaws occupying most of dorsal and lateral surfaces
of buccal cavity; posterior and lateral regions of jaws low,
medial and anterior regions taller, with “projected edges;
series of small cusps present along anterior and medial
edges, each cusp pointed and well separated from each
other. Odontophore about half projected into buccal
cavity. Radular ribbon about three times odontophore
length; about half of radular ribbon projected beyond
posterior end of odontophore.
RADULA:
radular ribbon width, triangular, narrowing somewhat
abruptly, strongly curved over its own base; cutting edge
sharply pointed, margins with very slender, elongated
cusps. First to fourth lateral teeth long, slender,
narrowing gradually, curved inward; distal half bearing
edges with slender, elongated cusps; tip sharply pointed.
Rachidian and four more central lateral teeth thin,
flexible. Fiftieth lateral tooth thick, hook-like, curved
inward; base broad, thick; distal region arched, re-
sembling a thick scythe. Marginal teeth slender, tall,
about 20 pairs per row, slightly broader toward medial
region; base ruler-like, weakly curved inward; distal half
sharpening gradually, with several slender, elongated
cusps along edges about 25 pairs per tooth; tip sharply
pointed.
Holotype: MORG 49650 (shell and operculum),
MZSP 46559, diameter: 16.6 mm; height: 14.6 mm;
includes re-hydrated soft parts and radula.
Type Locality: Argentina, off Islas Malvinas (45°S
58°W), 1200 m depth (fishing boat col., x/2004, Helen
Racz leg.).
Distribution: Known only from type locality.
Etymology: The
collector's mother, Ms.
Latinized specific epithet honors the
Teodora Stefania.
Rachidian tooth encompassing about 4 of
DISCUSSION
Although it has been recognized that definitions of
generic boundaries in the Trochidae merits further
revision, we are reasonably certain of its generic
allocation of the new species, because the species
possesses the conchological attributes reported in the
Introduction for Falsimargarita.
There are two other genera also occurring in the
South Atlantic Ocean that also exhibit iridescent shells,
a character associated with the presence of thin outer
shell layers. One of these genera is Margarella Thiele,
1893 (see Zelaya, 2004): tie new species cannot be
allocated into. this genus because of its larger size,
presence of thin shell wall, and absence of a : parietal
callus. The other genus is Gaza Watson, 1879; Falsi-
margarita stephaniae can not be included in Gaza given
its ‘aller shell, more rounded spiral whorls, and absence
of a flap covering the umbilicus.
Additional comparisons and discussion about Falsi-
margarita is provided by Dell (1990: 93). At first glance,
the new species could also be assigned to the Indo-
Pacific genus Otukaia Ikebe, 1942; however the new
species has lower profile, more elaborate sculpture, and
a more widely open umbilicus.
Falsimargarita stephaniae differs from the remaining
congeneric species F. iris (Smith, 1915), F. gemma
(Smith, 1915), F. thielei (Hedley, 1916), F. georgiana
Dell, 1990 and F. benticola Dell, 1990) by having
shouldered whorls, and by the strength of the spiral
folds. The other species have a rounded whorl profile
and a uniformity of spiral sculpture. Only F. thielei
possesses differentiable spiral cords resembling those of
F. stephaniae; however, F. stephaniae additionally differs
from F. thielei by having a larger number of those
outstandingly large spiral “eons at the shell periphery
and a taller spire.
The bathymetry is also a distinctive among Falsi-
margarita species. Falsimargarita gemma, F. iris, and
F. thielei occur in depths to 400 m. Falsimargarita
benthicola and F. georgiana are found in deeper waters
around 3000 m, ‘while "F. stephaniae occurs at interme-
diary depths, around 1200 m.
Until the discovery of the new species, the only
Falsimargarita known to occur in latitudes north of 50°S
was F. iris, which reaches 35°S (Rosenberg, 2004).
Falsimargarita stephaniae is the second species recorded
for these latitudes.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Helen Racz for the donation of the studied
specimen; José H. Leal, The Bailey-Matthews Shell
Museum, Sanibel, Florida, for literature; Lara Guimar-
aes, MZSP, for help with SEM; Diego Zelaya and one
anonymous referee for comments on the matsp
This study is We artially developed with financial help from
the State of Sao Paulo through grants from Pape sp
E. C. Rios and L. R. L. Simone, 2005 Page 173
(Fundagao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Powell, A. W. B. 1951. Antarctic and Subantarctic Mollusca: Pelecy-
Paulo). processes 04/00309-2, 04/02333-S. poda and Gastropoda. Discovery Reports 26: 47-196 + pls. 5-10
Rosenberg, G, 2004. Malacolog version 3.3.3, Western Atlantic
Gastropod Database. http://data.acnatsci.org/wasp/
LITERATURE CITED index.php (accessed on 07/11/2005).
; Smith, E. A. 1915. Mollusca. Part I. Gastropoda Prosobranchia,
Dell, R. K. 1990. Antarctic Mollusca, with special reference to Scaphopoda, and Pelecypoda. British Antarctic (“Terra
the fauna of the Ross Sea. Royal Society of New Zealand Nova”) Expedition, 1910. Natural History Report. Zoology
Bulletin 27: i-iv, + 1-311. 2: 61-112, pls. 1-2.
Hedley, C. 1916. Australia—Antarctic expedition 1911-1914. Zelaya, D. G. 2004. The genus Margarella Thiele, 1893
C — Zoology and Botany. Government Printer. Adelaide (Gastropoda: Trochidae) in the southwestern Atlantic
4(1): 1-80 + pls. 1-9 Ocean. The Nautilus 118; 112-120.
Notice
BIVALVIA 2006 - INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON BIVALVIA, BELLATERRA (BARCELONA), SPAIN, 22—27 JULY 2006
The congress, to be held at the Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, calls together neontologists and palaeontologists with research
interests in bivalve mollusks. Plenary talks include population genetics, evolution of ontogeny, evolutionary paleontology,
biomineralization, and freshwater conservation biology, but contributions need not be restricted to these topics. In addition, there
will be a planning session for a new bivalve treatise
Two one-day excursions—one each on recent and fossil bivalves—will be organized.
Interested parties are asked to register and submit abstracts via the congress webpage http://bivalvia2006.uab.es.
Further inquiries may be directed to Niko Malchus (
[email protected]). Please include in the subject line “Bivalvia 2006”.
THE NAUTILUS 119(4):174, 2005 Page 174
Notice
2006 MEETINGS OF THE AMERICAN MALACOLOGICAL SOCIETY AND THE WESTERN SOCIETY OF MALACOL-
OGISTS, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, 29 JULY—35 AUGUST 2006
The 72" amual meeting of the American Malacological Society and the 39th annual meeting of the Western Society of Malacologists
will be held jointly in Seattle from 29 July—3 August 2006 under the coordination of AMS and WSM co-president Dr. Roland C.
Anderson. The meeting's main venue will be the University of Washington. Reasonably priced housing will be available at the
University dormitories and the University Inn Motel. The opening night reception will be held at the Burke Museum, located on
campus, and the closing banquet will be at UW's University Club, also on campus. Thursday, 3 August, will be devoted to field trips.
The meeting will include three symposia: one on cephalopod behavior organized by Jennifer Mather of the University of Lethbridge,
one on chitons organized by Douglas Eernisse of the California State University at Fullerton, and one on opisthobranchs organized
by Sandra Millen of the University of British Columbia, Canada.
There will be a sale of malacological reprints to benefit the student fund of WSM and the traditional spirited auction of books and
molluscan memorabilia (no shells) that will benefit the student funds of both organizations. Several notable items of cephalopod art
have already been donated as well as a copy of R. T. Abbott's 24 edition of American Seashells. Bring some of your reprints, books,
and molluscan art to benefit this very worthy cause! Reprints and auction items can be sent to Roland Anderson at the address below.
For further information please contact AMS and WSM president:
Dr. Roland C. Anderson
1483 Alaskan Way
Seattle, WA 98101 USA
THE@MNAUTILUS
Volume 119
2005
AUTHOR INDEX
ARDDIUAS NUE svcidvetare ns aseeaaneeeheepie saat Ooteins eRonanaee es 157 INTEDSEN: 'S. (No aswriewe tecnica saat sna akalaa eas ennaeieaneue ge yee 153
BARWICK RG orig oc gaqiGes ace einenaeeascencsts eneensaastdasete 45 INQRBIS. Ws cos Moen sec cua cme Gneruieushaeusicndecotan odeniges 83
CARBONINIg Al IK: geeieiedjacsoassdane vores aes tams ot arteadene 157 RIOSS Es. (Crass cep badges oerohee ebehee ban metas decks dade duce vs 169
CARPENTERS D3. icinntasdncentst aun adawas acduaoede weananinlseaes 105 PASTORING OG. s..sicisideshinin avaesatertana ated eeadnareedartaiagdeor 55
GARRANZA, (As, 61gscne tacticant cebcee Stas ca ditbenoeang Ted ide ond SS ROE, Kea Jie sates cedh ca des ntse att ecwcaetedt one wees deaeeleuesasa ]
DEV RIES) Ts Pv deasecccedeageiae dace sonmegemeethesdeara 164 ROEAN,, Bis seis vier crasscasbaledeawsaies sadselstials obeaualiedes ee L109
GESUBREGBT, Mi. ois.ccaceannnes a acuuielichinns gedeaainadeasmovasints 15 ROTH, Disseshesat saute dele eeneatance tantane se chad Kone bes ened tests 116
IDIAZS! Iles Mic sta%ememnesicdoe seme arouse nwcsiag tee twacceh tees 157 SAUD Mie Ri sor avinsdcteics Swe do ONE ee ea ewe e spake een sedate 133
FIARASEWYGH, (Mi (Gide. vice cccscadineamugnonieesaetasasc 149 DAVARESE: 05 Po wesash ganansecaaeeaians camsieniia panda viedajeutemad ete 1]
FIARTRIBEDY Pe IO) osiseccsat ctahunt chide aber betta tite aoerien teed ] SIMONE: ia. i, Us, Jace ctcatevehtdeesd neh ecadesgiame se oacseres 169
ITUARTEMC 5, cco ictcagioteemannenontenieae oem eaatunyiaeees teeta 93 SLAPCINSRYS. [sd veeciros cei terete dealers ln Ga-as Mahasls sta ginctsteraueislet 27
KANTOR, Xo We saw rtevatanesd fesitinaa waa ndsaiaatetee badass 149 SMBIGLION Ce caciats aissaied'e ba /anacigle’d aitiniederuiila aintde gtuene Pees edce 109
INOMEER:, ij-c tsa cecensne cusiined etakeerien rede tuniaatenenas 15, 90 SOWIE SAI Uae A statate cscs wna egeardetomn kev neki nad vctase ear ohe soa tees 133
MARIOTIING 4Pas gaiacines ater staceaa ceovandices weananbanne sane 109 STRONG (E.G aiden uate Meranctqianihea enneagad sop waned weiss 119
NITLOSEAVIOH:. PS 2c 2.60.8 oActcacat ect etepeuecaniutaemeeaaees 157 MATES? Aso fc Roscch ictus Seta ea ctee eo netenereyetesane seas 45, 91
MINTON:, Re s.o2o2cce ccna sdensieedecunteieoudatevertereaeeyet exe ll VILVENS Os.s eeancuPeae eteiar + teaendeawed adareracyneras des 50
NEW TAXA PROPOSED IN VOLUME 119 (2005)
GASTROPODA
Akera julieae Valdés and Barwick, 2005, new species (Akeridae) .. 2.2... eee 44
Bullamirifica Squires and Saul, 2005, new genus (Indeterminate family)... ..........0...005 baa aedeeite aad pei oe Se Bs 37
Bullamirifica elegans Squires and Saul, 2005, new species (Indeterminate HAT Y i. asco cavis Bane inns che dceye aore id deh, Sk Saji ettee as 140
Bullamirifica verruca Squires and Saul, 2005, new species (Indeterminate family) Rod barhak Bedaes Seaga os 4 bee ene eS 138
Calliotropis pulvinaris Vilvens, 2005, new em (Trochidaé).. icc shoe ave seeded aon FoR be ee dea eh Pa Eee eee bee 50
Coralliophila trigoi Mariottini, Smriglio and Rolan, 2005, new species (Muricidae)... 2... 0 110
Daffymitra Harasewych, 2005, new genus (Volutomitridae).. 2... eee eee 149
Daffymitra lindae Harasewych, 2005, new species (Volutomitridae) .. 0... ee 150
Exilia alanbeui Nielsen, 2005. new species (Ptychatractidae)s 3 sc05 cee ev aks ee Oa dee ba PAR a PRT oe wees OE 154
Falsimargarita stephaniae Rios and Simone, mae new species (Trochidae). 20h. sate ganda Vane tak wa de dae ee san end 169
Minytropis Squires and Saul, 2005, new genus (Capulidae). 2... ee 143
Minytropis melilota Squires and Saul, 2005, new species (Capulidae). . 0... ee 143
Nerita orovillensis Squires and Saul, 2005, new species (Neritidae) ... 0... eee 136
Paryphantopsis abstrusa Slapcinsky, 2005, new species (Charopidae)... 2... 0. eee 29
Paryphantopsis koragae Slapcinsky, 2005, new species (Charopidae) .. 2... 0. ee 3
Paryphantopsis lebasii Slapcinsky, 2005, new species (Charopidae) ... 2... eee 33
Paryphantopsis matawanensis Slapcinsky, 2005, (Charopidae) ... 0... 0. ee ee 35
Paryphantopsis ubwamensis Slapcinsky, 2005, new species (Charopidae) . 2... ee 37
Paryphantopsis yawii Slapcinsky, 2005, new eee 610170120) 0) (6 1c) APA eR ee rc 39
Paxitropis Squires and Saul, 2005, new genus (Capulidae). 2.2... ee 144
Paxitropis dicriota Squires and Saul, 2005, new species (Capulidae).. inci ic0e aiwadaad si ade nee edas Ge ow ea ... 144
Pterorytis pacanana DeVries, 2005, new species (Muricidae). 2... ee 165
Tegula jeanae Squires and Saul, 2005, new species (Trochidae)... 2.2.0. eee 135
Trophon parodizi Pastorino, 2005, new species (Muricidae)... 1.0.2... eee ee 76
BIVALVIA
Hamiota Roe and Hartfield, 2005, new genus (Unionidae) .. 2.2... ee mceine ene
Pisidium chicha Ituarte, 2005, new species (Sphaeriidae) . 2.2... ee ‘8 : .. 100
Pisidium ocloya Ituarte, 2005, new species (Sphaeriidae).... 2.0.2 ee Pe, ope earaeoet .. 97
Pisidium omaguaca Ituarte, 2005, new species (Sphaeriidae). 2... 0.0.0 pd oe eeces ous . 94
REVIEWERS FOR VOLUME 119
Philippe Bouchet Steffen Kiel Luiz Ricardo L. Simone
Arthur E. Bogan Sadao Kosuge Geerat J. Vermeij
Robert H. Cowie Bruce A. Marshall Emily H. Vokes
Kevin S. Cummings Paula M. Mikkelsen Richard C. Willan
Marta J. deMaintenon Russ Minton James D. Williams
Emilio F. Garcia Guido Pastorino Andrzej Wiktor
Daniel L. Graf Maria del Carmen Perrilliat John B. Wise
M. G. Harasewych Richard E. Petit
Diego Zelaya
Roland Houart Timothy Rawlings © :
THE NAUTILUS reprints available in PDF format
We offer two types of PDF files; cost depends on the type of file you wish to order.
1. Ebook PDF—$40.00. Ebook PDF files are produced at 600 dpi.
2. Laser PDF—$95.00. Laser PDF files are produced at 1200 dpi.
PDF File Delivery Information:
< E-mail or FTP Site posting at no additional charge.
. CD-ROM add $12.00; for DVD add $25.00; free delivery by first class mail.
Terms of Sale:
. PDF files are not available until after printing of the issue in which the article appears.
. Prepayment is required. Make check payable to THE NAUTILUS.
. E-mail delivery is the standard method. If file size is too large for e-mail delivery (this pertains mainly to the larger
Laser files) they will be downloaded to a FTP site. The purchaser will then be notified by e-mail of the web site
address and instructions on how to download it.
4. Please allow 7-10 working days after the journal is printed for delivery of the PDF file
wpe
New Subscription Information
New subscription rate for institutions is US $72.00; subscriptions for individuals remain at US $35.00.
WALI
5 WHSE 05819
INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS
THE NAUTILUS publishes papers on all aspects of the
biology and systematics of mollusks. Manuscripts describing
original, unpublished research as well as review articles will
be considered. Brief articles, not exceeding 1000 words, will
be published as notes and do not require an abstract. No-
tices of meetings and other items of interest to malacolo-
gists will appear in a news and notices section.
Manuscripts: Each original manuscript and accompanying
illustrations should be submitted in triplicate. Text must be
typed on one side of 8% X 11 inch white paper, double
spaced throughout (including literature cited, tables and
figure captions), with at least 1 inch of margin on all sides.
All pages must be numbered consecutively. If printed on a
word processor, the right margin should be ragged rather
than justified. Authors “should follow the recommendations
of the Scientific Style and Format—The CBE Manual for
Authors, Editors, and Publishers, which is available from
the Council of Science Editors, Inc., 11250 Roger Bacon
Drive, Suite 8, Reston, VA 20190, USA (http:/Avww.cbe.org/
cbe). The first mention of a scientific name in the text
should be accompanied by the taxonomic authority, includ-
ing year. Latin names and words to be printed in italics
must be underlined: leave other indications to the editor.
Metric and Celsius units are to be used.
The sequence of sections should be: title page, abstract
page, introduction, materials and methods, results, discus-
sion, acknowledgments, literature cited, tables, figure cap-
tions, figures. The title page should include the title, au-
thor’s name(s) and address(es). The abstract page should
contain the title and abstract, which should summarize in
250 words or less the scope, main results and conclusions
of the paper. All references cited in the text must appear in
the literature cited section and vice versa. In the literature
cited section, all authors must be fully identified and listed
alphabetically. Follow a recent issue ‘of THE NAUTILUS
for bibliographic style, noting that journal titles must be un-
abbreviated. Information on plates and figures should be
cited only if not included in the pagination. Tables must be
numbered and each placed on a separate sheet. A brief leg-
end must accompany each table. Captions for each group of
illustrations should be typed on a separate sheet and include
a key to all lettered labeling appearing in that group of illus-
trations.
All line drawings must be in black, high quality ink,
clearly detailed and completely labeled. Photographs
must be on glossy, high contrast paper. All figures are to
be consecutively ‘numbered ( figses 2. 3o at NOMigs.
la, lb, 1c, ... NOR plate 1, fig. iv’ iy Illustrations must
be arranged in proportions that ‘will conform with the
width of a page (6% inches or 171 mm) or a column (3%
inches or 82 mm). The maximum size of a printed figure is
6% by 9 inches or 171 by 228 mm. All illustrations must be
fully cropped, mounted on a firm, white backing, num-
bered, labeled and camera ready. The author’s name,
paper title and figure number(s) should appear on the
back. Original illustrations must be between one and two
times the desired final size. It is the author’s responsibility
that the line weight and lettering are appropriate for the
desired reduction. Original illustrations will be returned
to the author if requested. Color illustrations can be in-
cluded at extra cost to the author.
Voucher Material: Deposition of type material in a rec-
ognized public museum is a requirement for publication of
papers in which new species are described. Deposition of
representative voucher specimens in such institutions is
strongly encouraged for all other types of research papers.
Processing of Manuscripts: Upon receipt, every manu-
script is acknowledged and sent for critical review by at
least two referees. These reviews serve as the basis for ac-
ceptance or rejection. Accepted manuscripts are returned
to the author for consideration of the reviewers’ comments.
Final Manuscript Submission: Authors of accepted
manuscripts will be required to submit an electronic version
of the manuscript correctly formatted for THE NAUTI-
LUS. The formatted manuscript may be sent as an e-mail
attachment to
[email protected] or in a diskette,
preferably prepared using an IBM PC-compatible text pro-
cessor. Original illustrations may be submitted separately by
regular al or as digital files (zip disks or CDs), preferably
in TIFF or BMP fens The original resolution of digital
images at final (printing) size should be at least 600 dpi for
halftones and 1200 dpi for line drawings.
Proofs: After typesetting, two sets of proofs are sent to the
author for corrections. Changes other than typesetting er-
rors will be charged to the aor at cost. One set of cor-
rected proofs should be sent to the editor as soon as pos-
sible.
Reprints and Page Charges: An order form for reprints
will accompany the proofs. Reprints may be ordered
through the editor. Authors with institutional, grant, or oth-
er seen support will be billed for page char ges at the
rate of $60 per printed page.
Manuscripts, corrected proofs and correspondence re-
garding editorial matters should be sent to: Dr. ee a
Leal, Editor, The Nautilus, P.O. Box 1580, Sanibel,
33957, USA,
[email protected], (239) 395-2233.
© This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper).